►
Description
This is a recording of the Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Subcommittee Hearing held on March 17, 2022. The Zoning Board will hold a vote on whether to approve or reject the subcommittee recommendations at its next full-Board hearing.
C
Good
evening
the
city
of
boston,
zoning
board
of
appeals
subcommittee
for
march
17th
is
now
2020
is
not
is
now
in
session
happy
st
patrick's
day,
this
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature
last
year.
C
This
hearing
of
the
board
is
being
held
remotely
via
the
webex
zoo,
sorry
by
via
the
zoom
webinar
event
platform.
This
hearing
is
also
being
live
streamed
in
order
to
ensure
this
hearing
of
the
board
is
open
to
the
public.
Members
of
the
public
may
access
this
hearing
through
telephone
and
video
conferencing.
C
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment
board
members,
applicants
and
their
attorneys
or
representatives
will
participate
in
the
hearing.
C
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
click,
the
raise
hand
icon
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform,
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
When
the
host
sees
your
hand,
you
will
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes,
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk.
C
C
Those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comments
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
The
address
into
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
irrelevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
hosts
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
D
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
The
first
order
of
business
is
the
deferrals
of
withdrawals
for
the
five
o'clock
cases.
We
have
the
address.
First,
please.
D
E
E
D
H
D
Hearing
none
I'll
call
the
first
case
calling
one
voa
124,
nine,
six,
fifteen
east
third
street.
This
is
an
existing
two
family
building
with
new
egress
stairs
and
a
rear
of
the
building.
The
violations,
article
68
section,
eight
side
yard-
is
insufficient
and
article
68
section,
eight,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
H
B
B
B
All
right
something
happened,
somebody
promoted
funeralist
and
then
I
got
me
a
ready
game.
Okay,
all
right,
so
my
client
has
purchased
and
beautifully
renovated.
This
two
family
home
the
building,
is
an
existing
non-conforming
building
on
the
site.
It's
too
close
to
the
side
plot
lines
existing
okay.
C
C
B
B
B
Okay,
could
you
go
back?
I
don't
have
control
of
the
screen
here.
Yes,
just
tell
us
all
right
stop
right
there.
Okay,
the
the
landing
is
12x8
of
that
four
by
eight
is
required
to
make
the
staircase
work.
So
there
is
probably
an
additional
four
by
four
square
feet.
I
mean
sorry,
four
by
eight
square
feet.
There
then
above
what
is
required
by
code.
C
Okay,
okay
and
tell
us
about.
I
know
this
is
not
before
us,
but
we
do
see
occupancy
in
the
basement.
Is
that
a
basement
or
is
it
a
walkout?
That's.
C
You
know
I
get
it,
but
you
know
in
some
cases
it
may
have
been
done
illegally
and
if
we
see
something
we
cannot
kind
of
look
the
other
way.
Oh
correct.
Yes,
yes,
so
please
tell
us
about
the
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
and
the
floor
to
still
heighten
those
in
those
bedrooms.
B
Yeah
the
floor
to
ceiling
is
currently
at
eight
feet.
The
window
sills
in
two
of
the
bedrooms
are
to
code.
The
front
bedroom
will
have
a
egress
well
cut
into
the
side
of
the
lot
and
the
window
sill
lowered
to
make
that
meet
the
code,
which
is
a
window
sill
at
43
inches
above
the
finished
floor.
Okay
window
well,
is
nine
square
feet.
Okay,.
I
Are
good
no
question,
I
agree
the
the
lower
level
it
is
a
full
walkout
and
the
one
bedroom
will.
I
think
it's
fine,
it's
right
at
the
grade
point,
so
I
don't
have
any
issue
with
that
per
se.
One
question
I
did
have
was
it:
you
know
it's
a
fairly
tight
rear
yard
condition
it
there's
no
site
plan.
Can
you
just
tell
me
the
dimension
between
the
rear
of
the
house
and
the
adjacent
house?
That
kind
of
comes
back
behind
by
my
calculations?
I
I
Okay,
it's
not
in
the
package
that
I
have
so
I
didn't.
I
couldn't
tell
those
dimensions.
B
Okay,
do
you
want
me
to
bring
it
up
on
the
screen.
G
C
C
Okay,
so
we
did
ask
about
the
the
the
deck
and
I
think,
you've
gotten,
that
in
on
the
record,
so
the
landing
is
eight
by
four
and
it's
four
by
eight
for
the
stairs.
K
C
So
we
we
have
made
a
motion.
It's
scary,
to
approve,
because
the
the
proposed
a
little
deck
is
doesn't
give
much
room
for
much
quote.
Hangout
you
know
so
so
it
has
been,
has
been
approved.
Okay,
so
may
I
have
mr
fortune
the
next
case.
D
Yep.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
127-7696
41
cornwall
street.
This
is
to
construct
a
new
roof
dormer
to
extend
living
space
to
the
attic
and
exist
in
two-family
dwelling.
The
violations,
article
55
section
9,
the
4-day
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
side
yacht
is
insufficient
and
article
55,
section
9
in
the
rail
yard,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
L
Well,
last
year,
on
july,
6,
my
house
was
hit
by
lighting
and
the
roof
was
damaged,
so
the
roof
and
the
house
have
to
be
repaired.
I
just
want
to
extend
the
dormers
of
the
house
in
the
attic,
so
I
have
more
living
space
in
the
two
bedrooms.
I
am
not
raising
the
elevation.
C
Yesterday,
sir,
so
hold
on
so
in
in
that
dormer
you
will
have
two
bedrooms
right.
C
Okay
hold
on
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
some?
Oh,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson,
those.
I
Are
good,
no
questions
very
straightforward
and
I
think
it's
consistent
with
the
the
neighborhood
in
terms
of
what
he's
proposing
no
questions.
Okay,.
O
Hi
yes,
good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
tiffany
gabriel.
From
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
there
was
no
butters
meeting
facilitated
for
this
applicant.
They
received
community
support
from
the
sony
brook
neighborhood
station,
I'm
sorry
the
stony
brook
neighborhood
association,
as
well
as
the
jamaica,
plain
zoning
subcommittee,
and
at
this
time
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
defer
the
board's
judgment.
Thank
you
very
much.
O
H
P
P
He
grew
up
across
the
street
from
me
in
his
family
home
at
12
haverford
street.
E
C
I
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
I
think
he
can
approve
with
just
straight
up
approval.
There's
it's
very
straightforward.
So
no
questions,
okay,.
D
Good
luck
calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
128
14996
port
fortnight
port
norfolk
street.
This
is
a
gut
interior
of
a
home
and
reinforce
existing
structure,
raise
the
second
floor
to
meet
code
and
add
dormers
for
violations,
article
65,
section,
9,
insufficient
side.
You
had
setback
and
article
65
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
alexander.
A
So
the
footprint
of
the
house
is
going
to
stay
the
same.
It's
going
to
be
pretty
much
a
gut
down
to
the
studs
new
layout
on
the
first
floor.
Second
floor
remains
pretty
much
the
same
other
than
the
staircase
moving
to
come
up
to
code
and
raising
the
ceiling
to
come
up
to
code,
and
then
the
issue
came
in
with
adding
dormers
to
the
roof,
to
actually
be
able
to
use
that.
C
Single-Family
owner
occupied
you're,
going
to
be
the
the
occupant
yes
okay
and
tell
us
about
the
the
height
with
the
proposed
domer.
A
So
the
the
the
peak
of
the
roof
is
only
going
to
come
up
three
feet,
which
is
still
within
code.
A
I'm
sorry
it's
currently
a
two
and
a
half
story,
so
it's
going
to
be
just
adding
dormers
to
that
half
of
story.
I.
I
Plans
are
fine.
I
think
that
I
I
understand
the
proposal.
I
think
that
in
general,
I'm
okay
with
it,
I
think
the
the
long
dormers
and
the
addition
of
the
height
it's
proportionately
a
little
bit
sort
of
different.
I
think
so
I
think
maybe
bpda
review
on
this
if
it's
approved
just
to
make
sure
that
the
proportions
work
for
the
house,
but
no
questions
on
the
actual
scope
of
the
expansion.
F
It's
good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
george
wind,
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
our
office
hosted
in
the
butter's
meeting
on
january
26
of
this
year,
where
neighbors
voiced
support
for
the
project.
The
port,
norfolk,
civic
association
also
wrote
a
letter
of
support.
H
C
Okay:
okay,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please
I'll.
I
Design
review
related
to
the
dormer
and
the
additional
height
of
the
roof.
C
I
two
am
in
support,
so
you're
all
set
with
that
proviso.
Good
luck.
D
Thank
you
very
much
calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
127-7213-43
pears
street.
This
is
a
change
of
arc
from
a
one
family
to
a
two
family
with
the
new
addition.
The
violations
article
69
section
9,
the
flooding
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69
section
9
the
bill.
It
has
accessibility
stories,
article
69,
section,
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
D
E
E
Our
proposal
is
to
build
a
second
unit
onto
the
rear
of
the
single
family
house.
This
second
unit
is
going
to
be
59
by
19
square
feet,
with
a
24
by
20
20
foot
attached
garage
that
will
be
attached
to
the
unit.
C
C
Proposal,
okay,
and
so
I
think
we
have
a
few
questions
with
what
we're
interested
in
is:
what
is
the
real
yard?
That's
asked
by
the
zoning
and
what
is
the
rear
yard
that
is
proposed.
E
So
it
looks
like,
and
if
you
reference
a
0
on
the
contractor
plans,
it
shows
that
the
rear
setback
is
going
to.
Excuse
me,
the
rear
yard
minimum
depth
should
be
40
feet,
but
we
currently
have
19.6
feet
in
the
rear.
I
will
make
mention
that
in
the
rear
of
the
building,
there
is
a
commercial
space,
so
there's
no
actual
residential
area
behind
the
building.
C
Okay
and
then
talk
about
the
side
yard,
what's
required
and
what's
being
proposed
so.
E
C
It
does
look
rather
big
and
solid,
and
we
are
not
used
to
seeing
designs
like
this,
because
you
know
one
of
our
goals
as
a
board
is
to
make
sure
that
light
and
air
and
other
kinds
of
impacts
are
not
felt
by
the
neighbors,
because
we
do
understand
that
there
might
be
a
commercial
structure
on
the
rear
today,
but
the
possibility
is-
or
there
is
the
possibility
in
the
future
that
it
may
go
to
a
residential
use.
E
Understood
I
will
say
that
the
owners
of
this
property-
bishop
glenn
prosper
as
well
as
pastor
pauline
prosper,
have
been
in
the
neighborhood
and
living
in
that
saint,
that
specific
house
for
the
last
30
years.
They
now
are
grandparents
or
their
parents
and
now
grandparents
and
are
looking
to
stay
and
continue
in
this
space
and
and
and
and
and
a
sit
and
have
that
land
in
the
back
to
be
accessible
for
their
family
and
their
growing
family.
They
did
speak
with
the
albertas
as.
C
Everybody
you
know
we,
we
appreciate
what
about
us
have
to
say,
and
everybody
has
to
say,
but
it
is,
as
it
is.
Advisory
to
the
board
so
has
have
the
homeowners
looked
at
other
options
to
accommodate
that
second
unit.
E
So
the
dona
zoning
district
yeah
on
the
street
there's
single
families,
but
there
are
also
many
multi-family
units.
D
C
A
2f5,
000,
okay
and-
and
the
thing
is
that
that
the
the
bpda
who
also
advises
us
as
the
board
of
appeal
as
the
planning
agency
for
the
city,
they're
they're,
recommending
denial
without
prejudice
so
and
and
that
and
and
and
their
recommendation
is
based
on
the
proposal
covering
a
lot
of
the
lot
and
setback
insufficient
open
space.
C
And
so
you
know
so
so
there
is,
you
know
a
planning
perspective.
That's
brought
into
this
through
their
recommendation.
E
So
I
would
say
that
we
can
do
a
deferral
at
this
point
and
come
up
with
a
revised
plan,
if
that
is
something
that
that
makes
sense,
but
I
would
have
to
speak
with
the
owners
in
order
for
them
to
to
to
move
forward
at
this.
At
this
point,
I
think
that
would
be
the
best
options
that
we
can
come
together
and
make
the
final
decision
on
the
feasibility.
C
Okay,
so
do
you
want
to
have
a
couple
of
minutes
to
speak
with
them
offline,
or
would
you
like
us
to
make
a
decision
now?
Yes,.
E
If
we
can
just
have
a
couple
minutes
to
speak
with
them
offline
and
then
we
can,
I
will
be
able
to
contact
them
and
then
we
can
speak
further.
C
D
Q
Hi,
my
name
is
justin
rice
at
20
orchard
street.
In
jamaica,
plain,
my
wife
and
I
live
in
a
single
family
home
here
at
20
orchard
street,
with
our
three.
R
Q
Children
we
are
seeking
a
modest
four
and
a
half
foot
side,
yard
setback
relief
for
a
dormer,
for
I
just
have
to
correct
you.
It's
for
a
primary
bathroom,
not
for
a
bedroom
that
will
allow
us
to
most
efficiently
use
our
space
and
bring
our
home
up
to
modern
standards.
C
Okay
hold
on
hold
on
sir,
so
so
just
so
that
we
are
clear
that
the
only
space
in
the
only
use
for
that
space
in
the
attic
is
going
to
be
a
bathroom,
correct,
no
bedroom.
But
the
plans
before
us
show
a
bedroom.
Q
Sorry,
my
my
designer
is
going
to
get
into
the
into
the
details
for
me.
If
I
may
just
have
a
quick
moment,
I
won't
take
too
much
time
our
home's,
an
existing
non-conforming
building,
the
dormer
will
sit
within
the
home's
footprint
and
not
exceed
the
existing
line.
We
do
not
seek
to
change
the
existing
setback.
Q
The
dormers
designed
for
the
southwest
corner,
because
plumbing
for
the
bathroom
was
brought
up
to
the
third
floor
by
the
previous
owner.
The
previous
owner
also
installed
an
adjacent
hvac
system
that
makes
it
difficult
and
expensive
to
relocate
the
dormer
to
another
space.
Q
C
Hold
on
mr
rights,
we'll
get
all
that
information
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
sure,
okay!
So
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
I
Plans
are
good.
I
have
reviewed
everything
they're
they're
included
with
there
were
shadow
studies.
I
I
think
this
is
a
fairly
straightforward
proposal
and
fairly
de
minimis
in
terms
of
the
the
ask
of
the
square
footage,
but
I
think
no,
no
questions
in
terms
of
the
proposal.
C
No,
it's
okay!
May
I
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
C
S
Thank
you,
madam
secretary
and
chair
I'll,
be
very
brief.
Due
to
the
time
constraints
here,
there
are
five
direct
abutters
to
this
property.
There
are
four
letters
of
opposition
to
this
proposed
project
and
I
have
sent,
I
believe
they
have
always.
C
Said
so
hold
on,
so
I
need
your
name
and
and
your
address
and
a
very
specific
reason
why
you're
opposing
this
proposal.
S
Okay,
thank
you.
Cheer
peter
elmet's,
21
prince
street.
S
Yes,
I
am
a
direct,
a
butter.
I
live
right
behind
20
orchard
street
I've
been
here
a
resident
for
54
years
and
it's
going
to
it's
looming.
The
proposed
project
is
going
to
be
looming
over
the
site
that
I
have
from
my
house.
There
are
five
director
butters
to
this
property.
There
are
four
letters
of
opposition
which
your
office,
I
believe,
has
so
four
out
of
the
five
about
us
are
opposed
to
this
project
and
also
the
at
the
december
6th,
jamaica,
pond
association
board
meeting.
C
Okay,
yes,
go
ahead,
close
a
few
comments.
Okay,.
S
Thank
you
all
right,
a
couple
more
things.
They
were
stated
at
the
jpnc
that
they
miss
rice
had
mentioned.
There's
only
one
bathroom
in
the
house:
they
actually
there
are
two
full
bathrooms
and
a
half.
So
two
and
a
half
bathrooms
already
exists
there,
and
also
the
application
indicated
that
there
is
no
living
space
down
in
the
basement
where
there
is
a
family
room,
the
measurement-
I
don't
know,
if
you're
interested
measurement
you
have
that
in
the
documentation.
H
I
believe
daniella's
on
danielle
you're
on
mute.
H
C
H
No
ma'am,
I
have
no
additional
hands.
Thank
you.
J
I
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
vpda
design
review
just
to
make
sure
that
they
understand
what
the
constraints
of
the
the
dormer
are.
But
I
think
it's
fairly
straightforward.
D
All
right
calling
the
next
case
calling
doa
one
two:
seven:
seven:
three:
eight
zero
eleven
danville
street
this
to
construct
a
one-story
addition
to
the
rear
of
an
existing
single-family
detached
dwelling.
The
addition
includes
a
finished
basement
and
a
family
room.
On
the
first
floor,
the
violations,
article
56
section
8,
the
floridian
ratio-
is
excessive.
Article
56,
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
T
And
and
that's
from
our
office,
it's
derek
rubinoff
from
derrick
rubinoff
architect
and
he
too
springfield
as
well
and
my
colleague
and
not
we'll,
take
the
lead
here
present.
M
Hi
good
evening,
so
we
are
proposing
a
rare
addition
to
the
single
family
in
the
west
roxbury
and
we
are
showing
that
the
addition
have
a
side
setback
violation
on
the
north
side.
M
Yes,
actually,
if
you
can
scroll
down.
M
Be
looking
at
actually
I'm
sorry.
C
A
sheet
this,
this
looks
good
one.
Can
you
please
blow
it
up,
so
we
can
see
it
better,
perfect,
okay!
So
it's
meeting
the
this,
the
prop
the
building
line
and
the
it
is
it
a
five
foot.
What
is
the
dimension
of
that
addition
again.
M
The
dimension
of
the
edition
is
about
20,
the
length
is
26
feet
and
the
depth
toward
the
rare
yard
is
about
12
foot,
six.
Okay,.
C
F
C
I
Plans
are
fine
and
I
think
it's
fairly
straightforward,
the
rear
setback
is
is
in
it's
just
an
extension
of
the
side
yard.
No,
no
questions.
It's
pretty
straightforward.
R
Good
evening,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
jake
lacy
from
the
office
of
neighborhood
services,
a
community
meeting
was
held
with
the
west
roxbury
neighborhood
council
on
the
25th
of
january
of
this
year,
where
the
council
voted
7-0
in
support
of
the
project.
R
We
have
not
received
any
letters
of
opposition,
and
at
this
time
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
E
In
there
and
subcommittee
again,
this
is
jolene
collins
from
representing
bishop
glenn,
prosper
and
pastor
pauline
prosper
for
43
peer
street.
After
speaking
with
the
owners,
we've
decided
to
defer
to
a
future
meeting
so
that
we
can
can
devise
and
redesign
a
new
plan
that
is
better
accommodating
to
the
concerns
of
the
bpda,
as
well
as
the
board
of
appeal
office.
E
C
Well,
let's
so,
first
so
tom,
if
you
could
make
sure
miss
collins
gets
the
a
copy
of
the
bpda
recommendation.
That
would
be
helpful,
okay,
okay
and
me.
So
let's
go
ahead
and
get
a
motion
on
the
table
here.
Madam.
D
Chair
secretary,
would
you
want
to
see
this
in
the
full
board,
or
would
you
rather
see
this
at
a
subcommittee
meeting
and
if
so
we
can
do,
we
can
do
a
subcommittee
in
april,
but
maybe
it
might
be
beneficial
in
may.
D
Calling
the
next
case
calling
poa
one
two:
eight:
zero,
zero,
eight
three
fifteen
gertrude
road:
this
is
a
renovation
and
edition
of
unit
two
in
the
existing
two
family
condominium
building.
The
scope
includes
a
slightly
revised
layout
on
the
second
and
in
an
addition
of
a
shed
dormer
in
the
attic
floor
to
the
right
side
of
the
house
to
contain
a
master
suite,
there's
no
change
to
the
building
footprint
or
height
the
violations,
article
9
section,
1,
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
and
article
56,
section
8
excessive,
far
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
T
And
and
derek
rubinoff
you're
back
in
october's
colleague,
also
from
82
spring
street
dark
grouping
of
architect,
and
then
we
also
have
adam
detour
of
15
gertrude
road,
who
is
the
owner
of
of
this
condo.
The
upper
condo
in
this
two
family.
C
It's
a
one
f
district,
and
so
this
is
a
two
family
in
a
in
a
one
family
district,
okay,
tell
us
what
is
proposed
as
a
shed
domer.
M
We
are
proposing
on
the
third
on
the
second
floor,
so
the
attic
space
actually
sorry
we're
adding
a
shed
dormer
that
will
have
a
master
bedroom
and
a
master
bath.
M
Good
question:
okay,
just
a
second.
T
C
So
quick
question
for
you:
derek
how's,
this
old
house
doing
with
your
building.
T
Thank
you
so
much
for
asking.
We
just
filmed
up
filmed
our
rap
episode
last
wednesday
and
we're
all
done
so.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
asking
appreciate
you.
C
Yeah,
so
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson
plans.
I
Are
good?
No,
no
questions
very
straightforward.
J
I
will
make
a
motion
to
approve.
I
will.
D
D
Calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
128
3696
1230
soldiers
field
road
we've
built
a
fitness
center.
It
consists
of
shows
restrooms,
locker
rooms,
office,
space,
exercise
area,
the
violations,
article
51,
section
16.
The
fitness
center
is
conditional
use
in
the
cc-1
sub-district
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
C
C
Okay,
so
tell
us
tell
us
about
this:
fitness
center,
the
hours
of
operation,
how
is
parking
to
be
accommodated.
U
So
there's
an
existing
parking
lot,
that's
quite
large
and
we
will
have
a
portion
of
those
spaces
designated
to
us
by
our
landlord.
It's
a
4700
square
foot,
fitness
club,
community,
driven
small
business,
we're
not
affiliated
with
any
other
gym
or
chain
like
we
said
we're,
not
changing
the
existing
building
at
all
and
yeah.
C
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
I
I
G
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
so
the
applicant
flyer,
the
neighborhood
our
office
did
not
hear
any
concerns
from
the
butters.
They
also
went
to
the
austin
civic
association
received
their
full
support
as
well.
Thank.
S
D
Calling
the
last
case
for
rediscussion
calling
case
boa
119-4620-33
bartlett
street.
This
is
a
renovation,
an
existing
third
floor.
Attic
renovated
space
will
consist
of
a
master
bedroom,
not
a
bathroom,
a
bedroom
along
with
the
bath
and
guest
room
bedroom.
The
existing
gable
roof
will
be
enlarged
with
an
addition
of
shed
and
gable
dormas.
The
violations,
article
62
section
25
two
dormers-
are
proposed:
roof
structure
restriction
and
article
62,
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
N
Hello,
my
name
is
timothy,
shannon
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project
yeah.
In
short,
this
is
an
existing
single
family
owner
house,
and
this
current
third
floor
attic
is
just
too
small,
so
we're
making
it
bigger.
Basically,
the
building
will
be
about
three
and
a
half
feet.
Higher
it'll
still
be
almost
four
feet
under
the
35
foot
requirement.
You
know
the
35
maximum
height
requirement
and
essentially,
what
we're
doing
is
we're
adding
a
master
bedroom,
a
minimal
bedroom
and
a
bathroom
on
this
third
floor.
N
The
neighborhood
process
we've
been,
you
know:
we've
had
a
few
deferrals.
We've
worked
your.
C
N
We
just
needed
time
to
work
with
the
neighbors.
It's
gone
really
well
with
the
neighbors.
I
think
we
even
have
a
letter
for
support
and
we
were
just
working
with
the
abutters
at
35,
devin
bowe
and
paul
at
31
on
the
right.
So
we
just
took
the
time
to
do
a
shout
out.
You
know
a
couple
of
shadow
studies:
okay
and
yeah
move
some
windows
around.
We
eliminated
that
gable
on
the
left
and
on
the
right
side
we
just
moved
the
domer
back.
You
know
to
help
the
solar
angle
for
paul
31.
C
I
Believe
so,
yes-
and
it
looks
fairly
straightforward-
I
mean
obviously,
I
think,
raising
it
changes
a
little
bit
of
the
proportion,
so
that
would
sort
of
be
my
only
kind
of
question,
but
not
necessarily
a
question
for
the
proposed
scope.
So
I'm
fine
with
what
what
the
proposal
is.
Yeah.
C
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
an
opposition.
G
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
connor
newman
with
the
mayors
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board
from
their
notes
from
the
leaves
on
the
conduct
of
the
community
process.
No
concerns
were
raised
from
abutters
and
at
this
time
we
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
C
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
I
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
I
think,
would
be
pda
design
review
just
because
of
the
raising
of
the
entire
roof.
Just
to
make
sure
everything
proportionately
looks
good.