►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 1-25-22
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Zoning
board
of
appeal
hearing
for
january
25th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
provisions
of
an
act
extending
sudden
covert
19
measures
adopted
during
the
state
of
emergency
that
was
signed
by
governor
baker
on
june
16
2021.
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout,
unless
administratively
muted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
and
opposition.
A
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application,
via
the
webex
event
platform,
to
raise
your
hand
to
to
raise
your
hand.
First
click,
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side.
You
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click,
that
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised.
Virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
A
A
A
The
address
into
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
host
will
not
know
the
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time,
just
a
reminder
for
the
applicants
and
the
attorneys
and
other
agents
that
might
be
representing
them
in
your
presentation.
Please
talk
about
the
project.
We
will
hear
about
the
community
review
process
from
either
the
mayor's
office
or
the
elected
officials.
A
Morning,
mr
rajiro
good.
A
Is
miss
spinato
on
miss
betta
barrazzo
good
morning
good
morning,
chair
good
morning
is
miss.
Miss
dong
is
not
on
yet
miss
spinato.
Are
you
on.
A
Okay,
I
need
to
just
know
that
she's
on
and
that
she
does
not
have
issues
with
being
on
this
meeting.
A
Okay,
let's
give
it
a
minute
until
she
sorts
that
out
with
that
assumption,
I
I'm
assuming
that
this
will
be
a
six
member
board
until
miss
dong
arrives.
Thus,
I'm
informing
all
applicants
that
to
get
an
approval,
they
need
five
of
the
six
six
of
the
seven.
What
is
it
five
of
the
six
board
members
to
be
in
in
support
of
the
pro
of
the
project?
A
Okay,
mr
hampton
are
you
on
good
morning.
A
In
the
meantime,
I
guess
we
can
just
go
ahead
with
the
extensions
miss,
let's
see
with
the
extensions,
and
then
we
will
return
to
minute.
Let's
start
with
the
minute
approvals
and
then
go
to
the
extensions,
okay
and
then,
let's
hold
for
the
hearings.
Until
we
know
miss
pinata
is
certainly
on.
B
A
Well,
let's
go
ahead
because
I
I
think
what
these
are
relatively
relatively
relatively
easy
ones.
So,
let's
go
ahead
in
the
meantime,
I'm
relying
on
tom
and
the
team
to
make
sure
that
she's
has
the
ability
to
not
only
hear
but
also
be
heard.
B
Okay
on
the
two
extensions
I'm
going
to
call
it
into
the
record,
and
then
I'm
just
going
to
ask
the
applicant
to
put
their
name
and
address,
and
then
I'm
going
to
read
what
the
totaling
is
so
case:
boa
773-8586,
evelyn
street
name
and
address
for
the
record,
please
antoine
webb,
six
evelyn
street.
Thank
you,
sir
six
evelyn
street.
The
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
february
2nd
of
2018,
which
means
that
it
expired
on
february,
2nd
of
2020..
B
Nevertheless,
the
board
grant
that
the
first
extension
of
relief
in
2021
one
year
until
february,
2nd
of
2022
trolling,
does
not
apply
to
this
relief,
because
this
relief
expired
prior
to
the
covet
state
of
emergency
that
began
on
march
10
of
2020,
and
the
board
did
not
grant
the
extension
until
after
the
state
of
emergency
began.
The
applicant
now
requests
their
second
one-year
extension
of
relief.
A
So,
mr
webb,
can
you
tell
us
why
you're
requesting
this
extension.
G
Yes,
so,
and
then
we
required
the
extension
just
to
get
additional
financing
to
continue
on
with
the
project.
And
then
we
were
impacted
by
tobi,
with
banking
kind
of
freezing
up.
We
actually
towards
the
end
of
last
year,
got
a
partnership
and
so
we're
able
to
carry
on
with
the
project,
and
we
just
perceiving
the
extension.
A
Because,
because,
as
of
today,
this
project
and
our
relief
for
this
project
has
expired,
so
we
need
you
to
keep
an
eye
on
this
and
also
be
aware
that
our
approval
is
not
a
pocket
approval
that
goes
on
indefinitely.
So
we
will
be
expecting
progress
to
be
made
on
this.
A
H
C
A
All
those
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
carries
so
please,
please
keep
keep
a
note
of
this
okay,
mr
webb.
I
B
B
Thank
you,
sir.
Regarding
94
alexander
street,
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
january
31st
2020.
This
is
the
applicant's
first
request
for
an
extension.
This
relief
would
normally
expire
on
january
31st.
2022,
however,
tolling
applies
to
this
relief
with
tolling.
The
new
expiration
date
of
relief
is
may
8th
of
2023.
A
Any
opposed
motion
carries
so
mr
jaspin,
please
make
sure
that
you
make
progress
on
this,
since
you
do
have
an
extension
until
next
year.
Ms
spenato,
can
I
confirm
that
you're
on
yeah?
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
we
can,
can
you
and
you
can
hear
us
clearly,
so
that's
excellent,
okay
and
miss
dong
is
still
not
on.
So
this
is
to
remind
everybody
that
this
is
a
six-member
board
and
you
will
need
five
members
to
be
in
support
for
your
project
to
proceed.
B
B
K
K
This
is
consistent
with
another
roof
deck.
That's
on
the
building
for
the
adjacent
neighbor
and
we've
held
back
the
the
location
of
the
roof
decks
such
that
it
is
not
visible
from
main
street
from
the
from
the
farthest
end
on
main
street
to
the
top
of
the
railing.
A
So,
have
you
are
you,
was
this
a
recently
built
building
here
or
is
this
an
older
building.
K
There
were
no
restrictions
again,
the
neighbor
has
a
roof
deck
that
is
quite
similar
to
what
we're
proposing
you
know.
The
violations
were
that
we
were
slightly
above
the
allowable
height
setting
back
from
the
main
street.
L
Well,
madame
chair,
I
don't
see
any
structured
drawings
or
any
architecture
drawings
of
the
roof
deck.
This
is
the
only
plot.
The
only
plot
plan
that
I
received,
the
drawings
are
not
adequate.
A
E
Madam
chair,
I'm
not
sure
if
the
plans
examiner
has
reviewed
them
for
the
hearing.
We
have
the
one
you're
stamped
the
pledge
examiner
has
seen,
which
is
the
plot
plan.
I
can
look
at
the
at
the
file
in
our
system
and
see
if
we
have
additional
stamp
plans,
but
usually
we
send
those
all
over.
A
May
I
ask,
is
this
that
this
is
a
did?
You
say
it's
a
three
family
building.
K
It's
there's,
I
believe
there
are
four
units
in
the
building
and
then
a
commercial
ground
floor.
It's
on
this
is
a
three-star
may.
C
Madam
chair
I'll
make
a
motion
to
defer,
but
before
we
do
that,
just
so
we
don't
waste
our
time.
Can
the
applicant
describe
what
the
access
to
the
roof
deck
is?
He
said
spiral
staircase,
but
what
does
that
mean
so.
K
Yeah
on
the
plans
are
on
the
screen.
There
is
showing
the
proposed
bionic
style
spiral
staircase.
This
leads
from
the
existing
deck
off
the
back
of
the
building
to
the
roof
deck.
So.
M
O
N
C
Q
A
In
favor
aye
any
opposed
motion
carries
the
date
is
february
february.
A
B
A
So
tell
us:
what
is
the
name
of
the
business
and
have
you
had
experience
with
takeout
before.
R
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans
to
miss
better.
L
A
I
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
member
of
the
board,
I
am
srilan
hwang
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
of
the
reporter
on
this
matter.
No
concerns
were
raised
by
butters
or
local
civic
associations
on
the
for
this
portal.
Thank
you.
D
Make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
with
the
usual
takeout
proviso,.
D
B
H
That's
yeah,
I'm
the
I'm.
A
Okay,
please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
tell
us
what's
being
proposed.
H
Okay,
my
last
name:
we
want
wang
first
name,
hong
jiang,
the
location
is
210-2216,
lincoln
street
boston
02111.
Actually
I
just
won
the
neighborhood
members
speak
to
me.
They
need
more
more
time
to
set
up
to
wanna,
hear
wanna,
hear
more
detail.
What
I'm
doing
so.
I
need.
A
Okay,
just
let
me
ask
you
so
this
is
this
is
an
existing
spa.
Is
it.
A
And
you're,
just
adding
two
two
micro
blading
seats,
is
that
what
it
is.
A
I
Hi
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
I
am
chulam
hwang
from
the
mayor's
office
of
labor
services.
We
would
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
of
the
board
on
this
matter.
I
apologize,
but
I
don't
have
any
further
details
about
this
case.
I
would
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
of
the
board.
U
U
A
D
I'll
make
a
motion
for
approval,
with
the
proviso
that
outreach
to
the
community
be
me
to
inform
them
of
the
new
venture.
D
A
B
College
next
case
calling
voa
127
748
east
broadway:
let's
construct
a
new
four-story
building
with
nine
residential
units;
first
floor,
retail
and
combined
lots
of
748
east
broadway,
750
east
broadway,
65
l
street
and
demolished
all
existing
buildings.
The
violations,
article
68
section,
8,
insufficient
lot
side,
article
68,
section
8
excessive
far
article
68
section,
8,
the
building
height
is
excessive.
B
Article
68
section
8
is
sufficient
use
of
lope
in
space
article
68,
section
8,
it's
official
front
yard
setback,
article
68,
section,
8,
sufficient
side,
job
setback,
article
68,
section,
8,
insufficient
radio
setback,
article
68,
section;
8,
sufficient
additional
lot
area
per
unit;
article
68,
section
33,
austria,
parking
loading,
article,
68,
section,
34.2,
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner
and
article
68
section
8.3,
dimensional
regulations,
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
V
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
ryan,
spitz
adams
and
morante
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway,
my
colleague,
george
morency,
is
handling
this
actual
proposal.
Unfortunately,
he
is
having
a
very
difficult
time
logging
in
so
if
we
could
ask
for
a
later
call
on
this
proposal,
he's
going
to
try
a
new
computer
now.
B
Following
your
next
project,
calling
voa
124
9462
324
to
328
west
broadway,
this
is
on
a
vacant
fossil
directly
new
five-story
mixed-use
building,
two
commercial
units
and
eight
residential
units
with
front
and
rear
roof
decks
and
elevator
the
violations.
Article
68
section,
29,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
roof
tax
are
proposed.
Article
68,
section,
33,
austrian
parking
loading,
article
68,
section
34.1,
the
conforming
with
the
existing
building
alignment.
Article
68
section,
8,
48
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68,
section
8,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
B
J
B
This
is
directly
a
new
nine
unit.
Multi-Family
dwelling
with
great
parking
and
roof
deck
proposed
retail.
On
the
ground
floor,
the
violations,
article
32
section,
four
g
caught
applicability,
article
64
section
16:
the
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
64,
section
16,
the
building
is
excessive
article
64
section
16,
the
rare
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
64,
section
36
upstream
parking
loading,
article,
64,
section
36,
obviously,
parking
loading
and
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
15,
a
multi-family
dwelling,
use
condition,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
X
X
This
is
a
proposal
to
raise
an
existing
two-story
building
at
the
corner
of
albany
street
and
east
canton
street,
which
currently
houses
or
formerly
has
the
baha'I
center.
The
building
is
in
serious
disrepair
and
is
under
currently
violations
from
isd
regarding
its
structural
stability,
and
I
can
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
With
respect
to
the
dealings
that
we've
had
with
the
south
end
landmarks
district
commission
on
the
proposal
to
raise
the
building,
assuming
that
the
hold.
A
On
a
second
christian,
are
you
on.
Y
Yes,
madam
chair
good
morning,
good
morning,
we
have
christian
siminelli,
boston,
growler
trust,
and
we
have
both
the
boston,
water
and
tour
approval
and
no
harm
letters.
A
E
Tom
remember
dog.
A
Yes
now
it
works.
Okay,
excellent!
Thank
you.
So
this
is
a
full
member
board.
So
let's
please
proceed
mr
johnson.
X
Okay
yeah,
so
we've
tackled
the
one
conditional
use
permit
on
the
g-cod.
The
second
conditional
use
permit
relates
to
the
multi-family
residential
use.
This
is
economic
development
area,
south
sub-district
in
the
south
end
in
which
additional
uses
are
I'm
sorry
which
multi-family
residential
uses
are
conditional.
However,
the
context
of
this
neighborhood
is
that
there
are
large
number
of
residential
buildings,
including
adjacent
on
albany
street
and
behind
on
east
canton
street,
the
new
smith
very
large
residential
development.
So.
A
Please
talk
to
us
about
the
rear
yard
insufficiency
and
the
and
the
off
street
parking
unloading.
X
X
X
So
there's
the
20-foot
private
way
at
the
back
of
the
building
and
the
one
of
the
two
entrances
to
the
parking
garage
is
along
the
rear
of
the
building
as
well
the
the
parking
and
maneuverability
there
are
two
entrances
to
two
separate
garage
components:
there's
one
on
the
side
of
the
building
on
east
canton
street
and
there's
one
on
the
rear
of
the
building
along
that
private
way
thorn
street.
X
We
are
working
with
public
works
department
on
the
size
of
the
curb
cut
on
east
canton
street
to
address
the
maneuverability,
and
that
will
be
a
part
of
the
continuing
design
review.
You
can
see
here
there's
two
separate
component
parts
of
the
garage
three
cars
at
the
rear
with
one
entrance
and
then
the
four
shown
on
the
side
of
the
building,
with
the
entrance
on
the
east
canton
street
side
of
the
building,
with
the
retail
space
at
ground
floor
and
the
residential
lobby
entrance.
X
The
proposal
is
for
four
one
bedroom
units
of
one
thousand
square
feet:
four:
two
bedroom
units.
Fourteen
hundred
thirty
two
square
feet:
each
and
one
three
bedroom
unit
of
twenty
one
hundred
square
feet.
There
are
two
roof
decks:
one
is
private:
roof
deck
for
the
top
floor
unit
and
the
other
is
a
common
roof
deck
or
the
other
residential
units
in
the
building.
These
will
be
condominium
ownership
units,
the
height
of
the
building
occupiable
space,
is
69
feet
which
is
below
the
maximum
limit
of
70..
X
A
Okay
and
other
than
the
common
roof
deck
do
you
have.
Are
there
any
other
decks
related
to
this
building?.
X
Yes,
it's
a
very
contemporary
design,
as
you
may
have
seen
in
some
of
the
elevations.
Each
of
the
units
have
small
balconies
to
provide
the
required
usable
open
space
for
each
of
the
dwelling
units.
A
So
the
I
guess
my
question
is
on
thorn
street.
How
close-
and
I
know
it's
a
private
way,
but
how
close
is
the
building?
On
the
other
side.
X
The
the
building
on
the
other
side
is
the
smith,
which
is
a
large
10-story
residential
project.
There's
there's
some
buffer
there
between
this
here's
thorn
street
private
way
and
then
the
next
building
over
is
the
smith
residential
building.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
the
parking
requirement
is
that
you
have
five
four,
eight
nine
residential
units.
Are
you
proposing?
Any
of
them
be
affordable.
A
No
good
faith
in
proposing
a
one
of
those
units
be
affordable.
X
That
has
not
come
up
during
the
process.
A
Okay:
okay,
how
are
the
plants
miss
better,
but
I'm
sure
the
plants.
H
B
B
A
Okay,
thank
you
any
other
questions.
D
I
just
I
got
a
question.
These
units
seem
very
large
and
we're
at
nine
units.
Has
there
been
any
discussion
of
making
the
units
smaller
and
increasing
units
and
getting
some
affordability
in
there.
X
A
Yeah
I
mean
yeah,
it's
true.
I
mean
what
I'm
what
I'm
agreeing
with
with
mr
rajiro
is
that
in
fact,
you're
maximizing
to
the
to
the
extent
possible
the
the
the
use
of
the
space
the
entire
lot
end
to
end
and
taking
away
certain
x
number
of
meters
on
on
on
on
east
canton
and
providing
very
little
in
return.
X
Andrew
you
want
to
weigh
in
on
that.
Please.
AA
Yes,
man,
I'm
sure
thank
you
for
the
question.
Yeah.
We
looked
at
this
in
a
number
of
different
ways.
We
don't
believe
that
the
units
are
excessively
large
at
1,
000
and
1400
square
feet
approximately
for
eight
of
the
units
we
are
promoting
at
this
location,
a
opportunity,
for
you
know,
stakeholders
to
be
attracted
to
the
building
for
families
for
long-term
use
and
ownership,
given
the
condition
of
cobit
19
and
need
for
more
space,
the
desire
for
more
space.
AA
We
we
felt
that
this
was
the
best
configuration
for
the
property,
also
being
a
very
constricted
space.
The
access
for
the
staircases
corridors
to
access
the
units
and
elevators
there
will
be
significant
loss
of
of
usable
space.
Should
we
reconfigure
to
more
smaller
units.
A
The
way
I
look
at
it
is
that
you
know,
if
you
know
you
take
a
couple
of
those
one
bedrooms
and
decrease
the
space
somewhat,
you
can
reach
a
different
you
can
you
can
actually
create,
as
a
you
know,
an
additional
unit,
but
I'll
leave
it
at
that
for
now
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
C
Well,
I
I'm
not
even
sure
if
we
should
leave
it
at
that.
I
think
this
issue
of
seeing
nine
unit
projects
is
a
way
of
skirting
the
obligation
to
deal
with
affordability
in
the
city.
That
is
desperately
in
need.
So
I
I
I
I
have
a
problem
with
the
proposal.
A
A
All
those
in
favor
aye
any,
I
applause
who
suppose
han's
better
okay
motion
carries
the
date.
Please.
B
You
can
do
march
8
at
12,
30.
B
Okay,
we'll
go
back
to
that
one
on
your
next
case
calling
doa
one
two:
seven,
seven:
two:
zero
five
sixty
church
stream.
This
is
to
legalize
the
existing
driveway
prefer
proposed,
curb
cut
the
violations,
article
65
section
65-41.5,
the
parking
size
and
maneuverability
article
65,
section,
9
side
yards.
B
A
Yeah
whoever's
presenting,
can
you
get
closer
to
the
mic,
so
we
can
hear
you
so
please
tell
us
what's
being
proposed.
O
AB
We're
looking
to
legalize
an
existing
driveway,
there's
a
when
the
owner
bought
the
property
in
2001.
There
was
an
existing
driveway
there,
we're
looking
to
add
a
proposed
curb
cut
and
to
legalize
the
driveway.
That's
been
there
since
2001.
A
Okay,
so
please
give
us
some
more
details.
This
is
number
60
how
many
units
in
this
building.
AB
It's
an
existing
three
family
home
and
there's
the
the
driveway
has
been
used
for
the
last
since
2001
five
and
three
times.
A
Please
you're
here
to
legalize
it,
so
we
need
information
on
the
driveway.
Tell
us
the
width
of
the
driveway,
the
depth
of
the
driveway
and
how
many
cars
you're,
anticipating
parking
in
that
driveway.
AB
It's
it's
getting
blocked
by
the
this,
but
it's
the
same
as
the
existing,
but
all
we're
doing
is
just
adding
a
proposed
curve
cut
there.
As
you
can
see.
A
Okay:
okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss
miss
better.
B
A
Okay,
can
you
tell
us
if
there
is
currently
parking
on
church
street,
I'm
asking
this
of
the
applicant.
AB
Currently,
there's
this
one,
this
parking
on
one
side
of
the
street
and
it
is
in
a
three-family
zone.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
parking
and
there
or
there
isn't
a
lot
of
parking
on
the
street
and
the
applicant
has
been
using
this
in
the
past
and
yes,.
AB
AC
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
denise
desantos
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
service.
At
this
time,
we
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board
this
applicant
did
meet
with
the
proper
community
groups
and
direct
the
butters,
and
they
do
have
direct
the
butters
and
community
leaders.
Support.
U
A
Can
I
ask
a
question
of
the
applicant
yes
just
hold
on
one
minute?
Mr
oh,
look.
I
just
want
to
see
if
there's
anybody
else
who
wants
to
go
on
the
record.
AD
A
T
AE
To
email,
this
is
joe
mcgregor
with
city
council,
frank
baker's
office,
we're
in
support
of
the
driveway.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
AF
A
C
AB
A
A
Is
that
about
okay,
mr
rajira.
A
Okay,
is
there
so
that's
a
second
is
better
all
those
in
favor.
Z
A
Any
opposed
any
opposed
motion
carries
your
approved
with
for
two
spaces,
so
please
make
sure
that
third,
one
in
the
rear
is
eliminated.
B
B
Okay,
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
bowdoin
street
voa
one
two,
six,
two,
nine
four,
four
302
to
316
bowdoin
street.
Are
you
on.
B
B
AG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
joey
arkhari,
who
is
the
owner
of
the
property
dennis
greenwood
from
susa
design.
Architects
is
also
here,
madam
chair
members.
If
this
address
sounds
familiar
and
the
project
sounds
familiar,
it
is
because
it
has
been
for
this
board
before
last
year.
It
was
approved
by
the
board
with
the
ground
floor
restaurant.
However,
it
was
then
discovered
that
there
was
an
error
with
the
advertising.
AG
It
came
back
a
few
weeks
later
and
it
was
denied
by
the
board
at
that
time.
Again,
with
the
ground
floor,
restaurant
my
client
has
removed
the
restaurant
and
is
now
proposing
essentially
the
same
project.
Nine
dwelling
units
above
a
ground
floor,
commercial
unit,
undefined
commercial,
as
of
now
only
something
that
would
be
allowed
by
code.
The
lot
is
four
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet.
It's
located.
A
AG
D
AG
A
I
don't
know
why
I
went
on
automatic
mute,
but
so
let
me
see
if
I
can
get
this
right,
so
everything
as
far
as
the
building
is
concerned.
As
far
as
the
violations
are
the
concern,
everything
is
the
same.
What
was
there
any
so
besides,
the
restaurant
and
the
conversion
of
the
restaurant,
from
out
from
the
proposed
restaurant
to
the
retail,
is
the
only
change.
AG
AH
AG
A
AG
A
Okay,
so
how
would
the
plants
miss
better.
L
AG
Certainly
just
mentioned
that
it's
a
4,
500
square
foot
lot,
it's
located
at
the
corner
of
l
and
east
broadway,
which
puts
it
in
an
mfr,
ls,
multi-family
residential
local
service
district.
There
would
be
three
floors
of
three
units,
each
above
the
commercial
space.
There
would
be
six
one
bedroom
units
and
three
two
bedroom
units
and
all
of
the
units
would
range
in
size
from
970
to
1054
square
feet.
So
again
that
includes.
A
Okay,
in
the
meantime,
let
me
find
out
is
anybody
here
to
speak?
Miss
miss
miss
better.
I
did
ask
you
about
the
plans.
AI
Hi
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
haley
dillon
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
defer
the
vote
to
the
board.
We
would
like
to
put
on
record
that
we
do
have
letters
of
support
as
well
as
opposition,
and
we
do
have
a
letter
of
support
from
the
civic
association
in
this
area
gay
to
heaven.
Thank
you.
U
Good
morning,
madam
of
the
chair,
members
of
the
board,
anna
calderon
from
councillor
flynn's
office,
please
know
councillor
flink
remains
in
support
of
this
project,
which
proposes
to
construct
a
new
three-story
building
with
a
nine
residential
units
and
for
an
unspecified
commercial
space.
At
this
time,
the
counselor's
report
is
based
on
feedback
from
neighbors
and
the
support
of
gate
of
heaven,
neighborhood
association.
W
Madam
chairmans
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
for
city
council,
michael
flaherty,
council
flaherty,
has
consistently
opposed
zoning
relief
under
article
68,
but
he
recognizes
the
unique
conditions
existing
ilani
along
east
broadway.
This
project
is
consistent
with
ongoing
redevelopment
occurring
along
south
boston's
main
commercial
thoroughfares.
The
developer
reduced
the
unit
count
the
building
site
agreed
to
residential
parking
restrictions
and
removed
the
restaurant
component.
If
the
product
is
approved,
the
council
encourages
the
proponent
to
work
closely
with
the
buddhist
and
community
at
large
to
address
any
concerns.
Thank
you.
A
So
let
me
ask
people
who
are
here
to
speak
in:
please
give
us
new
information,
so
go
ahead.
Miss
ambassador,
please
get
the
rest
of
the
people
on.
AJ
My
name
is
angelique.
I
am
at
764
east
broadway,
only
a
few
doors
up
from
this
property.
I
am
in
the.
O
AJ
For
some
reasons,
proper
notification
was
not
given
to
residents
on
east
broadway
between
l
m
for
the
virtual
community
meeting
held
on
december
6th
at
7
30
pm.
AJ
A
A
AK
A
I
see
two
other
raised
hands,
so
may
I
hear
from
them
too
and
please,
ladies,
give
us
new
information.
AL
AL
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
board,
mr
morenzy
is
correct
that
this
project
was
put
before
you
and
there
was
major
objection
to
the
restaurant
portion
of
this.
The
proponent
agreed
to
take
out
that
component.
AL
However,
the
3
000
square
foot
space
still
remains,
and
it's
still
questionable
in
so
far
as
what
that
will
become
in
the
future.
There
is
also
objection,
however,
to
height
and
density
for
nine
units.
The
proponent
was
good
enough
to
reach
out
to
the
city,
point
neighborhood
association
for
our
meeting
and
do
the
presentation
they
had
already
had
a
cba
date
scheduled.
A
Luanne,
please
just
get
us
get
us
to
the
point
of
besides
height
and
density.
Are
there
other
issues.
AL
Yes,
keeping
in
mind
that
height
and
density
is
very
important
right
now
there
are
three
structures
that
need
to
be
torn
down.
That's
absolutely
true:
we
want
something
on
that
corner.
However,
we
want
something
that
is
going
to
fit
in
with
that
major
intersection.
Currently
I
have
a
city
point.
Neighborhood
association
has
an
email
into
the
city
of
boston,
asking
about
the
legality
of
that
parking
program
that
is
being
spoken
of.
I
have.
A
A
Did
somebody
get
in
touch
with
him
to
tell
him
to
be
ready
for
his
presentation,
but
let's
go
on
he's
been
on
this.
T
AM
All
right,
this
is
eileen
mcneil
am
I
on
go
ahead,
yeah
go
ahead
and
I'm
sorry
hi.
Good
morning,
madam
chair
eileen,
mcneil
766
east
broadway,
I'm
solidifying
the
concerns
that
other
abutters
had
around
communications
about
this
project,
but
also
this
is
a
high
visibility,
high
traffic
area.
We
have
three
bus
lines
that
go
down
broadway
and
then
two
that
stop.
Oh
excuse
me,
one
that
stops
on
l
street,
which
is
where
this
corner
is
so
significant
development
and
large-scale
project
development
here
will
significantly
impact
transportation
as
well
as
parking.
AM
AM
That
is
involved
with
the
same
developer,
on
l,
as
curb
cuts
that
also
have
taken
away
parking
significantly
in
this
area
that,
as
well
as
the
affordability
of
housing
yeah,
I
feel
like
they're,
skirting
nine
units
go
for
nine
units
at
the
size
that
you're
going
for.
Why
not
10
and
make
sure
that
something
is
affordable
in
this
neighborhood?
Okay,.
A
Let
me
hear
from
the
next
person
harry.
AN
A
Okay,
okay,
miss
ambassador
anybody
else.
AO
AP
AO
AQ
Yes,
hello,
I'm
sorry,
my
name's
dan
lozartic.
I
I've
had
my
hand
raised.
AQ
You,
my
name,
is
dan
lazarczyk,
I'm
at
724
east
8th
street
in
south
boston.
I
am
opposed
to
this
proposal
and
I
want
to
point
out
to
you
that
this
corner
of
broadway
and
l
hold.
A
On
hold
on
dad,
we
have
had
issues
that
have
been
raised
by
eileen
and
luanne
that
include
parking
height
density
and
the
and
the
the
corner
of
this
of
this
of
this
proposed
project.
Are
you
giving
us
new
information?
We
have
it
on
record
that
you're
opposed.
Are
you
getting?
Yes,
you
have
any
new
information.
A
AQ
AQ
I'm
sorry
I
I
if
you
just,
let
me
say
just
one
or
two
more
sentences.
I
think
you'll
get
to
my
point
that
there
is
no
off-street
parking
on
this
in
this
building
and
there's
no
off-street
loading
area
and
therefore
there
will
be
ubers,
amazons
rub
hub
and
other
delivery
vehicles
that
will
interfere
with
these
bus
stops
and
it
will
make
the
traffic
congestion
problems
at
this
corner
that
much
worse.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
given
that
information,
mr
marantzi,
is
there
any?
Is
there
anything
else
you
need
to
add.
A
Can
we
just
stop
we've
heard
from
a
lot
of
people?
This
is
the
third
time
this
project
is
before
this
board.
Can
I
just
have
a
motion.
We've
heard
things
and
support
in
opposition.
Let's
proceed,
madam.
A
U
Hey,
mr
chairwoman,
this
location
is
specifically
in
the
gate
of
having
a
global
association
who
is
in
support
of
the
proposal.
A
Okay,
okay!
So,
okay!
I
don't
know
if
that
that
has
an
impact
on
this
better,
but
for
clarification.
L
B
B
Sorry
hold
on
hold
on
calling
case
boa
one,
two,
six,
two,
nine
four,
four,
three,
oh
two
to
three
sixteen
bowdoin
street:
this
is
the
removal
proviso
for
takeoff
granted
to
this
petitioner.
Only
the
violations
out
of
seven
section,
four
other
protectional
conditions
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
marthry
310
voting
street
in
rochester.
A
Okay
and
have
do
you
have
experience,
running,
take
out,
take
out
projects
or
restaurants
in
the
city
of
boston.
A
Yeah
in
in
the
city,
not
in
the
suburbs
right.
A
Excellent,
mr
fortune,
can
we
hear
if
there
are
any,
are
you
can
we
hear
if
there's
any
withdrawals
for
10
30.
B
AG
AS
B
B
Moranti
one
of
the
communities
meeting
again.
B
We
can
go
into
the
march
dates
either.
The
8th
of
the
22nd
march
8
would
be
adequate.
Okay,
I'll
make
a
motion
for
mache
at
12
30.
A
B
I'll
go
to
the
last
case
for
the
9
30
hearings:
twice:
boa
864
804
17
bay
street.
This
is
on
the
rare
lot
of
an
existing
auto
body.
Repair
shop
place
four
shipping
containers
in
order
to
cultivate
and
grow
cannabis
and
lettuce
on
the
site.
The
violations,
article
53
section,
54
screening
and
buffering
article
53
section
23,
the
rare
yacht-
isn't
sufficient
in
article
53
section
22.
The
cannabis
establishment
is
a
conditional
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AT
A
Is
hold
on
yes,
whoever's
running
the
the
slides.
Can
you
zoom
in
please?
Yes!
So
go
ahead!
Mr
coney.
AT
Yes,
the
the
it's
50
condor
street,
which
is
part
of
a
through
lot,
so
that
the
the
what
is
what
has
been
considered
the
backlot
is
actually
the
frontage
of
the
space.
Our
lease
is
for
50
condors
street
for
approximately
2
000
square
feet
running
100
feet
along
condor
street.
AT
There
are
currently
four
shipping
container
farms
that
are
are
placed
there
under
allowed
use
of
article
89
and
have
been
in
existence
there.
For
approximately
three
years,
we've
finished
our
host
community
agreement
with
the
city
of
boston.
We've
got
support
from
lydia
edwards,
adrian
madaro
and
eagle
hill.
Well,.
A
AT
Thank
you.
Yes,
the
the
project
is
the
converting
the
use
of
two
or
three
of
the
containers
that
are
currently
there
on
condor
street
to
cannabis,
use
they're
the.
AT
A
That's
about
your
proposed
hours
of
operation,
and
is
it
three
or
two
because
we
need
to
have
clarification.
We
know
that
there
are
four
shipping
containers
on
site
give
us
the
breakdown
of
lettuce
versus
cannabis,
it'll.
A
Okay
and
so
tell
us
about
the
hours
of
operation-
and
you
know
pick
up
and
delivery
all
those
kind
of
issues
because
across
the
street,
looks
like
there
are
residential
uses
and
will
all
these
traffic
can
be
coming
through
condor
on
a
street.
AT
Okay,
the
hours
of
the
hours
will
be
pretty
much
seven
to
six
availability.
There
will
be
no
night
access
unless
there's
a
technical
problem
that
needs
to
be
fixed
which,
and
there
will
only
be
one
person
fixing
it.
Their
pickup
and
deliveries
will
probably
be
less
than
once
a
week,
there's
no
retail
access
and
it
would
mostly
be
a
delivery
setup
where
the
product
would
be
delivered
either
to
dispensaries
in
boston,
manufacturing
facilities
in
boston
or
around
eastern
massachusetts.
A
Okay
and
what
other
uses
on
this
site.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
about
the
auto
body:
repair
shop.
AT
A
Okay:
okay,
let's
see
what
else
I
will
there,
I
I
don't
know
enough
about
cannabis
cultivation,
but
will
there
be
drying
or
other
kind
of
processing
on
site.
AT
There
there
will
be,
there
will
be
drying
and
packaging
of
the
cannabis
on-site.
It
will
be
done
in
each
individual
unit.
There'll
be
no
movement
from
one
to
the
other
there.
In
accordance
with
the
ccc
rulings
or
regulations
there,
there
are
order
controls
that
will
be
in
place.
AT
There
are
access
controls
that
will
be
in
place
and
the
plan
is,
to
basically
add
a
add,
a
screening
of
the
of
the
units
from
from
the
street,
with
cedar
siding
to
the
units
to
actually
increase,
make
it
more
pleasant,
even
more
pleasant
than
it
is
compared
to
what
it
was
before
the
units
were.
There.
AT
A
Okay,
how
do
the
plans
miss
better.
L
A
I
guess
I
guess
the
only
substantive
part
is
that
there
are
four
four
trailers
right
there
by
on
the
street
across
the
street
from
residential
uses,
correct.
D
AT
The
the
existing
security
is
is
fairly
minor
because
we're
growing
lettuce
there
and
the
threat
and
we've
been
we've
been
growing
less
in
east
boston.
For
seven
years,
there's
been
no
cases
of
break-in
we're.
You
know
well
connected
in
the
community.
The
difference
for
the
difference
for
cannabis
is
that
there
will
be
biometric
locks
put
in
and
the
the
actual
doors
will
be.
You
know
fortified
so
that
people
can
be
tracked.
Traced
in
and
out's
gonna
be
traced
their.
AT
What
they're
touching
in
the
facilities
can
be
traced,
but
that's
the
the
difference
I
mean
the
the
units
are
corten
steel,
aluminum,
aluminum
and
stainless
steel.
Break-In
is
really
just
a
question
of
access
to
the
through
the
doors.
AT
A
Miss
better
does
this
with
this.
This
little
help.
L
Yeah,
so
this
is
located
on
condor
street
and
does
it
have
to
be
located
there?
Can
it
be
located
at
the
rear,
closer
to
nay
street,
where
it's
more
industrial
use.
AT
A
L
And
can
you
ask
another
question
and
you're
abutters
or
the
residential,
have
you
been
in
communication
with
them.
AT
We've
had
zero
complaints
from
any
of
the
abutters
this
standard
process
with
it,
you
know,
whatever
the
number
of
feet
is
and
all
people
have
been
invited
and
the
eagle
hill
civic
association,
civic
association,
has
also
been
presented
to
twice
with
zero
complaints.
We've
been
we've
been
a
good
neighbor
in
the
neighborhood.
A
Hold
on,
let
me
go
and
see
if
anybody's
here
to
speak
and
support
it.
C
I'm
sure
can
I
just
make
it
quick,
I
mean
this
seems
like
a
these.
Are
existing
containers
and
all
that's
the
only
change
is
the
use.
I
would
say
the
only
question
would
be
the
issue
of
security.
I
don't
think
too
many
people
are
going
to
break
in
to
get
lettuce.
AO
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
natalia
benitez,
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
to
board
judgment
at
this
time.
They
have
received
support
from
the
eagle
hill,
civic
association
of
butters
and
businesses
in
the
area.
Thank
you.
AL
I'm
sorry,
I
forgot
to
lower
my
hand
from
the
fire
cases.
Sorry.
D
Okay,
I
like
I
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
proviso
that
delivery
stopped
at
5
pm.
A
A
D
AU
F
B
Two:
twenty
two
princeton
street:
this
is
for
direct
a
four
unit:
residential
dwelling
with
roof
deck
violations.
Article
53,
section,
8,
mfr
and
forbidden
use
in
the
three
f
2000
sub
district
article
53
section
9.
The
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53
section
9,
the
side
yards
insufficient
article
53,
section
56
bar
street,
blocking
article
27
s
dash
5.
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
9.
The
additional
odd
areas
is
proficient
article
53
section
9.
B
AV
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
lynn's
245
sumner
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner,
madam
chair,
as
the
secretary
indicated,
there
are
actually
two
cases
here.
The
building
code
relates
to
the
proposed
roof
deck
that
we
are
incorporating
into
this
project
and
consistent
with
the
board's
past
practice.
We
are
eliminating
the
head
house
that
would
be
proposed
in
connection
with
that.
This
is
the
demolition.
It
involves
a
demolition
existing
two
families.
A
AW
AV
You
if
we
could
just
slide
back
perhaps
one
slide
to
show
the
context
of
the
proposed
elevation.
So
what
we
see
here
is
the
what
would
essentially
be
the
existing
or
proposed
conditions.
The
building
immediately
to
our
right
is
a
newly
constructed
four
unit
dwelling
located.
These
are
both
obviously
located
in
the
eagle
hill
section.
We
can
also
see
the
relative
heights
of
the
buildings
both
left
and
right.
As
you
move
up
princeton
street,
we
would
be
demolishing
the
existing
two-family
dwelling
and
replacing
it
with
the
four-unit
dwelling.
AV
AV
A
So
this
is
2500
square
feet.
Okay,
so
is,
is
there
any
parking
being
provided.
AV
There's
no
parking
being
provided
and
I
can
sort
of
enlighten
the
board
a
bit
on
that
conversation.
They're
on
this
side
of
princeton
street.
There
are
several
properties
that
do
have
parking
in
the
rear,
which
results
in
curb
cuts,
obviously
being
added
to
princeton
street.
When
we
reviewed
the
project
immediately
adjacent
to
this
site,
we
did
propose
off-street
parking.
AV
We
did
hear
concerns
over
eliminating
on-street
parking
as
a
result,
because
we're
going
from
a
two
or
four
unit
building,
there's
already
no
parking
condition
that
exists
presently,
so
the
impact
would
not
be
the
same
as
if
we
were
proposing
to
build
from
ground
up
on
a
vacant
lot.
For
example,
there
is
obviously
mixed
views
and
mixed
thoughts
on
adding
parking
on
site.
However,
consistent
with
what
we've
done
in
the
past
in
this
particular
neighborhood,
not
adding
a
curb
cut
seems
to
be
a
preferential
choice
for
for
this
location.
AV
A
AV
Sure
so
the
proposed
project
is
built
at
grade
of
looking
at
it
from
princeton
street.
The
slope
of
the
property
does
angle
up
towards
lexington,
which
is
the
street
immediately
behind
it.
We
are
not
proposing
a
basement.
This
is
actually
going
to
be
slab
on
grade
looking
at
it
from
the
front
of
the
building.
The
foundation
wall
does
increase
as
we
do
move
towards
the
rear,
but
we
do
have
a
walkout
condition
in
the
rear.
AV
With
respect
to
the
side
yard,
the
existing
conditions
already
are
at
0.9
feet
on
the
right
3.2
roughly
about
3
feet
on
the
left.
We
do
maintain
the
side
guide
that
presently
exists
for
the
building.
That's
on
the
site.
Now
that
will
allow
for
openings
on
one
side
of
the
building,
as
we
show
in
the
elevations
with
respect
to
the
rooftop
madam
chair,
that
is
exclusive
to
unit
unit
4,
which
is
the
upper
level
which
will
be
accessed
from
internal
hatch.
A
Okay,
how
would
the
plants
miss
better,
but
I'm
sure
the
plants
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
C
AV
Through
the
chair,
mr
earl,
I
can
probably
jump
to
the
elevation.
I
don't
see
mr
zackerson
on
the
call
he's
usually
here
for
these,
but
let
me
let
me
jump
to
the
elevation
and
do
my
best
to
play
architect.
We
could
jump
to
the
next
slide
please.
AV
AX
Yeah
sorry,
this
is
eric
zacherson,
the
architect
from
context
one
ludlow
street
in
charlestown
yeah.
We
intend
to
do
the
the
same
thing
that
we
we're
doing
at
224
princeton,
which
is
create
a
patio
space
and
then
a
retaining
wall
so
that
the
rear
can
walk
out.
AX
AD
May
I
ask:
are
there
other
roof
decks
or
or
decks
in
the
budding
properties
or
along
the
street?.
AV
Yes,
there
are
the
chair,
the
immediate
adjacent
property
to
the
right
has
a
roof
deck,
as
well
as
several
other
properties
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
Do
you
have
roof
decks
as
well.
C
Just
one
more
question
on
that:
walkout
that
patio
space
that's
being
created:
how
big
is
it
and
is
that
only
available
to
the
lower
level
unit
if.
AV
I
A
And
it's
is,
that
is
that
is
that
lower
floor
unit,
handicapped
accessible?
Is
there
any
accessibility
in
this
building
yeah.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
AO
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
natalia
benitez,
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
her
office
would
like
to
refer
to
the
forest
judgment.
At
this
time.
The
avarice
meeting
was
held
in
july
2021.
They
wish
to
match
the
character
of
the
street
and
people
held
civic
association
of
post
based
of
density
and
the
fact
that
it
will
demolish
a
single
house.
Thank
you.
T
We
also
have
teresa
from
counselor
lydia
edwards
office,
lydia,
you've,
I've,
elevated
you
to
a
panelist.
Are
you.
AY
Hi,
yes,
my
name
is
teresa
melionic
and
I
am
representing
boston
city
council,
lydia
edwards,
and
she
wants
to
go
on
record
as
standing
with
the
eagle
hill,
civic
association
and
being
in
opposition
to
of
this
project.
T
AZ
AZ
B
Madam
chair
secretary,
here
I'm
sorry,
we
do
have
letters
of
support
in
opposition.
The
opposition
is
half
point
four
units.
A
AF
I
work
with
chris
cruel
who
lives
directly
across
the
street
from
222
princeton
him
and
his
wife,
who
owned
215
princeton,
are
also
important.
Where
is
reservoir.
A
AF
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
jeff,
hanson
bpda.
We
actually
recommended
denial
without
prejudice
on
this.
Based
on
you
know,
the
pro
proposal
for
us
is
successful
and
with
no
parking
that
kind
of
raised
the
flag
for
us.
We
actually
approved
or
recommended
approval
of
224
princeton
two
years
ago,
but
at
this
point
with
another
four
units
coming
down
the
pike
and
again
no
more
parking
that
one
didn't
have
parking
either.
I
don't
believe
we
just
could
not
stand
and
support
it.
O
A
Okay,
yes,
let
us
move
on
to
the
next
project
in
the
meantime,
eric
if
you
can
believe
mr
zackerson,
if
you
can
brief
mr
linz
and
then
we'll
return
to
this
case,.
B
B
Okay,
following
the
next
case,
calling
boa
one
two,
six
four
one:
four
four
one:
twelve
pikney
street
this
installed
a
new
private
roof
deck,
which
was
approved
by
the
beacon
hill,
civic
association
for
a
top
unit
at
112
pikmi,
the
violation,
article
13,
section
1,
the
building
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
13,
section,
1
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
13,
section
1.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BB
BB
Exactly
frank,
mcguire,
architect,
architect
for
the
project.
A
residence
is
27,
chestnut
street
boston,
beacon,
hill.
BB
A
What
the
square
footage
is
and
who
and
is
it,
is
this
a
one
family
or
two
family.
BB
A
BB
A
Q
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
molly
griffin
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment
at
this
time
we
held
in
a
butters
meeting
on
november
29th,
where
the
applicant
addressed
a
butter's
questions
and
any
concerns
that
they
raised,
and
they
have
also
received
a
letter
of
non-opposition
from
the
beacon
health,
civic
association.
A
P
Name
is
ramsey
frets.
I
live
at
112,
pinkney
street.
I
am
the
trustee
of
112th
pickney,
I'm
in
support
of
the
project,
and
they
worked
with
us
the
entire
time
to
make
sure
our
roof
deck
was
in
like
kind
to
theirs.
Thank
you.
B
B
AG
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
My
client
is
guytano
marisola,
who
is
the
owner
of
the
building?
He
also
resides
at
200l
street.
He
has
the
third
floor
apartment
there.
This
is
fairly
straightforward.
AG
My
client
owned
and
operated
mirasolas
on
the
first
floor
of
this
building,
which
was
a
store
and
restaurant
in
business
for
approximately
20
years.
He
closed
during
the
pandemic
and
elected
at
this
time
in
his
life,
not
to
reopen
the
store
and
restaurant
business
he's
proposing
to
convert
the
ground
floor
into
a
unis
residential
unit,
an
apartment,
it
would
be
1600
square
feet,
approximately
a
bedroom
unit
with
no
changes
to
the
existing
building
envelope.
Just
simply
a
conversion
of
the
first
floor
space
from
commercial
into
a
dwelling
unit.
AG
Not
for
the
additional
unit,
there
is
the
garage
that
is
part
of
the
building
that
has
been
there.
My
client
initially
wanted
to
enlarge
the
garage.
There
was
opposition
from
the
butter
in
the
rear,
so
my
client
is
proposing
no
changes
to
the
building,
but
again
changing
the
the
restaurant,
which
had
obviously
delivery
traffic
and
delivery
vehicles
to
a
residential
unit.
No
parking
can
be
provided.
The
site
is
located
at
the
corner
and
occupies
the
entire
lodge.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plants
miss
better
and
I'm
sure
the
plants
are
adequate?
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
I
met.
AI
W
And
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
city
council,
michael
flaherty,
article
68,
went
through
an
extensive
community
process
and,
as
you
know,
the
council's
approach
has
been
consistent
over
their
times
with
these
variants
of
software
be
considered
a
substantial
hardship
during
the
community
process.
This
proponent
made
changes
to
address
about
his
concerns.
The
conversion
back
to
residential
will
have
less
impact
on
the
area
than
the
existing
restaurant
use
and
their
opponent
is
well
known
and
respected
throughout
the
community,
the
track
record
being
a
good
neighbor
member
in
the
community.
W
A
A
H
A
Let's,
let's,
let's
do
river
and
then
we'll
come
back
on
mr
lens
in
the
meantime,
just
make
sure
that
you've
been
briefed
by
mrs
ackerson
on
what
happened
in
your
absence.
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
doa
one
two,
five,
two
nine
2941
1385
river
street:
this
is
seeking
to
change
the
arc
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family
and
renovate,
including
dormers.
The
violations.
Article
69
section,
eight
three
family
use
is
forbidden,
article
69,
section
23.
This
is
in
the
neighborhood
design,
article
69
section
29,
our
street
parking
and
loading
article
6969
lord
area
is
insufficient.
B
Article
6969,
the
fluid
air
ratio
is
accessible.
Article
69
69.
The
bullet
hang
success
stories.
Article
69,
section,
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
69
6-9
the
building
has
excessive
at
feet.
Article
69
69,
the
side
yacht
is
insufficient
and
article
69
section
9.
The
radio
is
insufficient
name.
AH
B
AS
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
at
11,
beacon
street
in
boston
with
me,
are
franklin
ortiz,
the
property
owner,
as
well
as
adam
glassman,
the
project
architect.
AS
As
mentioned,
we
are
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two-family
dwelling
to
a
three-family
dwelling
and
to
renovate
the
structure,
including
adding
a
sprinkler
system
and
dormers.
There
is
no
proposed
change
to
the
building
footprint
or
reduction
in
the
open
space.
What
we're
seeking
to
do
is
essentially
turn
in
unoccupied
into
that
third
unit.
Currently,
it
is,
you
know,
built
out
as
a
two
and
a
half
to
three
story.
Building
and
we'd
be
seeking
to
add
some
dormers
just
to
raise
the
ceiling
height
as
the
roof
kind
of
pitches.
AS
We
do
have
a
ceiling
height
of
14
feet
currently
up
there,
but
because
the
roof
is
is
sloped
and
pitched
we'd
have
to
add
dormers,
which
you
can
see
on
the
right
side.
There
we're
proposing
four
dormers
two
in
the
front
and
two
in
the
rear,
pulled
back
from
the
front
and
back
of
the
property.
Okay,.
A
The
lot
sizes
hold
on
mr
counselor,
can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
river
street,
because
this
is
a
2f5
000
district?
So
can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
of
what
river
street
is
and
really
why
this
should
go
through
a
three
family.
AS
Sure,
madam
chair,
so
in
terms
of
the
current
surrounding
buildings,
we're
right
across
the
street
from
a
mixed
use
building.
So
I
believe
it's
a
knights
of
columbus
as
well
as
some
residential
and
then
there's
a
mixture
of
two
and
three
family
condominium
buildings
and
two
and
three
family
rental
buildings
around
us.
So.
AS
But
there
are
some
commercial
uses,
as
well
as
some
other
free
family
dwellings.
We
thought
this
was
an
appropriate
location
for
a
free
family
because,
as
you
can
see,
it
is
not
seeking
to
increase
living
space
into
the
basement,
we're
not
building
on
the
footprint
we're
really
using
existing
space.
On
that
third
floor,
with
the
assistance
of
the
dormers
proposed
to
make
that
a
fully
livable
unit,
we
are
seeking
to
create
that
yeah.
A
What's
that
proposed
third
unit
space
square
footage.
AS
Sure
so
we're
proposing
a
two
bedroom
two
bathroom
unit,
just
over
1100
square
feet
and
as
mentioned
the
ceiling
height,
would
be
14
feet.
We
also
have
two
means
of
egress
that
currently
exists
both
in
the
side
there,
you
can
kind
of
see
it's
highlighted
in
the
blue
on
the
right.
The
two
stairwells
will
go
up
to
the
third
floor.
Okay,.
A
BC
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
danielle
fonseca
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time
we
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board,
but
we
would
like
to
highlight
that
the
applicants
completed
the
community
process.
They
notified
abutters
and
a
community
meeting
was
hosted
by
our
office
on
october
14th,
where
noaa
butters
were
in
attendance.
BC
The
applicants
also
notified
the
appropriate
excuse
me,
the
appropriate
civic
association,
and
they
met
with
the
high
park
neighborhood
association
on
december,
2nd
we
haven't
received
any
letters
of
opposition,
and
we've
received
eight
letters
of
support
for
this
proposal,
which
have
been
submitted
to
the
board
for
review
as
well.
Thank
you.
B
AB
S
A
All
those
in
favor
all
right,
any
opposed
motion
carries
so
let's
go
back.
B
B
AV
A
So,
mr
lens,
I
think
you've
been
brief,
that
in
your
absence
there
was
voices
in
opposition,
including
the
bpda
and
and
and
so
can
you
please
give
us
any
note
to
in
person.
AV
Sure
I
I
on
the
density
and
parking
issue.
I
believe
those
are
the
two
issues
that
were
cited.
We
looked
at
and
examined
the
relative
size
of
buildings
along
that
side
of
princeton
street.
Try
to
remain
consistent.
AV
You
know
our
height
of
our
building,
as
you
can
see
from
the
existing
buildings
on
that
side
of
the
street.
You
know
we
do
have
a
lot
of
raised
foundations
for
existing
three
family
structures,
so
the
height
is
generally
consistent
with
what
you
see
on
that
side
of
princeton
street
same
thing
with
the
depth.
Our
depth
is
about
30
feet
from
the
rear
property
line,
which
is
consistent
with
article
53.
AV
We
do
have
some
decks
and
stairwells
in
the
back,
but
for
the
most
part
we
preserve
a
pretty
good
setback
for
the
back
of
the
building.
You
can
see
most
of
the
buildings
along
that
side
of
princeton
do
go
back,
probably
a
consistent
depth
as
well.
A
Mr
lentz,
I
my
sense
is
that
people
have
the
the
the
conversation
that
we
had
in
your
absence
is
that
you
know
voices
were
raised
that
perhaps
the
street
has
reached
its
carrying
capacity
as
far
as
density
and
lack
of
parking.
You
know,
so
I
just
put
that
on
the
record
for
your
information.
AV
Briefly
on
that,
so
in
order
to
I
mean
we
certainly
examined
the
option
to
have
parking
at
the
lower
level,
which
would
be
you
know,
a
condition
that
doesn't
exist
really
anywhere
on
that
side
of
princeton
street.
So
if
we
were
to
carve
out
a
parking
or
parking
space
at
the
lower
level
which
is
done
on
other
projects
in
the
eagle
hill
area,
it
would
sort
of
be
an
unusual
design.
I
would
think
for
this
for
this
neighborhood.
AV
Moreover,
we
would
be
adding
an
additional
curb
cut
to
the
street,
which
we
did
here
through
community
process,
that
you
know
removing
one
and
a
half
parking
spaces,
essentially
from
the
street,
to
benefit
what
would
otherwise
be.
You
know
two
required
parking
spaces
on
site
didn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
and
that's
the
reason
why
we
approached
this
similar
to
the
way
we've
approached
the
building
immediately
next
door.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
the
board
you've
heard
the
testimony
you've
heard
the
bpda's
opinion.
May
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
A
Any
opposed
motion
carries
so
good
luck.
Mr
lens.
B
A
So,
ms
hawkins,
I
think
what
we
need
to
understand
is
was
this:
who
is
the
applicant
on
this
and
we've?
Have
we
seen
this
project
before.
BA
BA
This
is
an
application
to
co-locate
both
medical
and
recreational
at
the
site,
with
no
changes
to
the
actual
building
plan
that
was
proposed
or
the
operations
the
applicant
has
not
yet
opened
for
medical,
but
it
has
now
been
approved
by
the
ccc
and
completed
its
build-out,
so
it
will
be
opening
with
the
campus
board's
approval
and
issuance
of
the
license
in
the
coming
week.
So
what
we're
back
before
you
for
is
to
actually
add
recreational
to
have
both
of
those
uses
at
the
site.
A
BA
Absolutely
so
the
proposed
hours
of
operation
are
sunday
and
monday,
11
a.m
to
7
p.m
and
tuesday,
through
saturday
10
a.m
to
8
p.m.
As
you
can
see
on
the
plan,
this
is
actually
not
a
a
sizable
establishment.
It's
it's
fairly
small
in
square
footage
with
a
total
capacity
of
22.,
so
the
patrons
will
enter
on
the
left
side
where
they
will
be
id'd.
They
will
be
id
at
two
checks,
one
upon
entry
and
the
second
will
be
upon
the
purchase
of
any
product.
BA
The
exit
is
actually
on
the
far
right
to
the
rear
and
there
is
a
handicapped
entrance
as
well.
There
is
a
dedicated
at
the
rear,
a
dedicated
entrance
for
deliveries.
We've
actually
been
able
to
secure
parking
space
in
the
rear
of
the
building
that
will
be
utilized
solely
for
secure
deliveries
of
product,
as
well
as
the
transportation
of
monies.
A
BA
Go
ahead
go
ahead,
we
do
not
anticipate
significant
queuing,
but
should
there
be
any
over
overage
of
capacity?
Those
patrons
will
be
monitored
by
staff
and
will
actually
be
queued
on
the
far
right
away
from
the
sidewalks.
We
will
not
be
taking
up
sidewalk
space
should
we
have
any
queueing.
The
establishment
will
have
one
dedicated
at
least
security
guard
on
time
on
staff.
At
all
time,
monitoring
this
space
we
will
also
have
a
staff
outside,
in
addition
to
monitoring
any
patrons,
to
ensure
that
there
is
no
double
parking.
A
Please
tell
us
how
medical
of
a
medical
patient
would
be
processed
differently
than
a
recreational
patient.
BA
Absolutely
there
will
be
two
dedicated
lines
for
queuing,
one
for
points
of
sale,
one
for
recreational
and
one
for
medical.
What
we
have
seen
is
that
we're
seeing
a
significant
amount
of
online
ordering
and
we
actually
provide
a
system
through
which
patrons
can
order
online,
and
then
they
actually
receive
an
automated
text
when
their
order
is
prepared.
BA
BA
BA
This
is
non-equity,
however,
it
joseph
lakash
is
of
hispanic
dissent
and
has
is
putting
an
emphasis
on
ensuring
that
the
not
just
the
staff
that
we're
hiring
in
our
management
are
diverse,
but
also
that
we're
contracting
with
third
party
vendors
that
are
owned
by
minorities
and
women
as
well.
A
Okay,
how
the
plans
was
better
when.
L
AY
C
This
is
right
near
forest
hill
station
right,
correct,
yeah,.
BD
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
tiffany
cavallo
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
refer
to
the
board's
judgment.
The
green
process
for
this
proposal
was
largely
facilitated
by
my
predecessor
lindsay
santana.
However,
I
sat
in
on
the
civic
association
with
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
council
last
week,
which
was
on
the
19th
when
they
voted
to
approve.
Also,
I
would
like
to
just
put
on
the
record
that
at
this
time
I
do
not
have
any
letters
of
opposition.
Thank
you.
A
B
On
the
last
case
for
10
30
calling
boa
one,
two,
eight
zero,
three
zero
three
fifteen
to
seventeen
arbor
road.
This
is
an
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement.
Finish
the
existing
basement
by
adding
to
unit
one
to
create
a
two
level
unit.
Configuration
includes
two
bedrooms:
one
bath
family
room.
B
T
AP
A
And
tell
us,
what's
tell
us
first
of
all
tell
us
how
many
units
in
this
building.
A
Okay
and
tell
us
what's
being
proposed.
AP
We're
proposing
to
to
finish
the
basement,
which
probably
last
was
worked
on
back
in
the
50s.
Obviously
we're
finishing
the
walls,
adding
two
bedrooms
and
you
know
heating.
It.
A
AP
T
Z
Okay,
the
floor
ceiling
height
is
approximately
seven
foot,
two
inches
to
seven
foot
three
inches
as
a
finished
height,
proposing
adding
two
bedrooms
and
actually
reestablishing
a
bathroom
down
there.
The
utility
room
in
the
center
is
exclusive
to
unit
one,
and
the
heating
system
in
there
is
exclusive
to
unit
one
you're
seeing
an
older
plant.
A
Yep,
okay
and
let
me
see
okay,
how
are
the
plans
was
better.
L
A
Z
C
And
are
the
bedrooms
in
the
rear
or
the
front.
C
This
rear
this
has
become
now
a
a
bi-level.
The
proposal
is
for
a
bi-level
unit
with.
Is
there
a
way
of
reconfiguring
the
the
room,
so
the
bedrooms
will
be
on
the
the
first
floor.
Z
L
A
Okay-
and
there
is,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
does
not
inadvertently
change
into
a
separate
unit.
A
So
we
want
to
just
confirm
that
with
you
that
this
is
an
extension
off
of
one
family
into
the
basement.
AQ
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
A
Okay,
so
for
the
record,
we're
confirming
that
this
will
not
be
converted
into
another
dwelling
unit,
there's
no
building
code
relief,
anything
else.
Okay
with
that,
may
I
have
a
second
and
all
those
in
favor.
A
Any
opposed
motion
carries.
I
know,
you're
going
to
end
up
being
out
of
breath,
but
maybe
go
through
the
recommendations.
Next.
B
Okay,
so
this
was
the
hearings
that
we
heard
on
thursday
at
10.
10
minutes
ab
case
boa
one.
Two,
three
five,
five
seven
one
seven
quarter
street
was
to
compare
market
is
a
single
family
gun
renovation.
It
was
approved
case
boa
one,
two,
four,
three,
two,
nine
two,
four
mile
vernon
street.
This
was
an
addition
of
168
square
foot.
Third
floor
addition:
it
was
approved
case
boa
one,
two,
six,
four,
seven,
two,
eight
eighty
six
washington
street
was
a
change
of
arc
from
a
single
family
to
a
two-family
constructor
rare
dormer.
B
It
was
approved
with
bpda
for
basement
unit
design
and
no
building
code
related
case.
Boa
one.
Two,
six,
three
one
one,
four
thirty
four
sullivan
street
was
the
modified
plans
to
include
the
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
case
boa
one,
two,
four
zero.
Seven,
four
two
sixty
temple
street
was
to
add
a
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
article
case
boa
one,
two,
five,
nine,
eight,
four,
nine
sixty
one
to
sixty
three
berkeley
street
was
a
change
of
market
include
microblading
body
art.
B
It
was
approved,
hboa
one,
two,
four,
four,
two,
three,
seven,
fifty
six
linwood
street.
It
was
a
closed
parameter,
one
vehicle,
it
was
denied
case
voa,
125
9685
called
womback
street
was
the
confirmed
hockey.
One
family
extend
living
space
to
the
basement
to
reconfigure
the
roof
line.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
and
attention
to
the
dormer
and
the
size
of
the
basement
window
and
no
building
code
relay
boa
126.
B
8316
21
sagamore
street
was
a
tandem
style
driveway
installed
inside
the
house.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
to
extend
the
driveway
install
permeable
pavers
case
boa
five.
Five,
six,
two
nineteen
to
two
twenty
one
gram
on
average
plating
replace
a
rotting
fence
with
a
wood
fence
that
was
approved
case
boa
one,
two:
four:
zero:
five:
zero:
three,
forty
seven
fonts
road.
It
was
adding
dormas
to
an
existing
second
floor
and
full
bathroom
was
approved
case.
Boa
125,
818
930
prescott
street
was
interior
renovation
through
doors
windows.
B
It
was
approved
with
ppda
and
a
new
deck
case.
Eight
boa
123
one.
Eighty
three
chittick
road:
it
was
a
constructed
13
by
16
ground
level,
deck
in
the
rear
of
the
existing
true
family.
It
was
approved
case
boa
126,
4972,
88,
leland
road
was
an
accessible
vertical.
Lift
with
roof
with
the
side
of
it
attached
to
the
house,
it
was
approved
case
boa
one.
Two,
two,
four,
eight
zero,
six,
seven
three
newberg
street
was
constructed
single
story
edition
and
renovate.
B
It
was
approved
case
boa
one,
two,
five,
three:
zero,
eight,
two:
twenty
one
walworth
street
it
was
an
extension
of
living
space
in
the
rear
of
the
single
family
and
front
porch.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
attention
to
the
dormers
case,
boa
one,
two,
six,
four,
three
one,
one:
six
to
six
a
mendem
street.
It
was
constructed
a
third
floor.
Vertical
addition,
existing
two
family
dwelling,
it
was
approved
with
dvda
and
case
boa
one,
two,
six,
four,
four,
two
one:
six
bellier
road.
B
B
I'm
going
to
call
the
11
o'clock
hearings
calling
the
first
case
calling
voa
126,
1925
150
neyland
street.
This
is
directed
22-story
mixed-use.
Building
on
ground
level
will
be
a
building
lobby
space,
retail
bar
and
restaurant
space.
There
will
be
115
dwelling
units
on
the
upper
floors.
There
will
be
amenities
faces
on
the
second
and
third
floors
and
the
building
amenity
roof
deck.
B
The
violations-
article
32
section
six-
this
isn't
the
g
card
article
44
section
10
take
out
restaurant
use
is
conditional
article
44,
section
11..
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
44,
section
12.
Our
street
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
44,
section
5,
the
fluid
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
44,
section
5,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
nautical
4
section
7,
the
sky,
plane,
setback,
regulations
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BE
Good
morning,
madam
chair
member
of
the
board,
don
wiest,
with
the
dane
torpey
firm
at
745
atlantic
avenue
here
for
the
proponents
with
me,
also
is
known
ron,
who
is
a
proponent
of
hudson
group.
Y
Madam
chair
good
morning,
members
of
the
board
christian
seminole
boston,
groundwater
trust.
So
this
case
was
before
you
actually
in
2018
and
just
to
confirm
the
boss
of
lawrence
or
approved
letter
was
approved
at
that
time
and
is
still
valid
as
the
date
of
december
18
2018..
Y
Also,
the
no
arm
letter
was
revised
to
reflect
the
new
construction
and
the
date
of
that
is
october.
25Th
2021
and
we
have
both
of
those
letters.
A
You,
mr
whis,
please
go
ahead
and
just
before
we
go
into
any
detail,
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
when
we
get
a
motion,
should
this
be
approved
that
we
do
not
prove
take
out
because
we
do
not
approve
take
out
until
we
know
who
the
occupant
is
is
proposed.
So
please,
mr
at
least
go
ahead
with
your
presentation.
BE
Very
well.
Thank
you.
Madam
chair,
mr
simonelli
gave
you
a
little
bit
of
procedural
backdrop
here.
This
project
has
been
before
the
board,
as
you
can
see
in
the
central
rendering
here
it
is
a
very
handsome
proposal,
very
contextual
design.
The
original
concept
was
for
a
hotel.
It
was
approved
by
the
bta
and
by
this
board
in
late
2018
that
ended
up
being
a
a
very
difficult
time
to
get
hotel
financing
and
the
proponent
worked
very
hard
to
try
to
put
the
hotel
project
together,
but
it
just
it
proved
impossible.
BE
The
hotel
market
is,
as
as
we
see
today,
stirring
a
little
bit
but
but
still
very
challenged
that
that
may
continue
for
a
while,
so
the
proponent
decided
to
change
the
project
to
a
residential
use.
The
bpda
in
2021
in
may
approved
a
nose
project
change
after
finding
that
the
the
increases
that
the
impacts
excuse
me
did
not
increase
with
the
change
in
use
and
in
fact
the
all
the
indications
were
that
the
impacts
decreased.
So
that's
the
procedural
background.
BE
The
project
is
seeking
the
same
relief
as
before,
because
the
the
dimensional
envelope
is
the
same.
The
only
thing
that
has
changed
the
primary
use
from
a
hotel
to
residential
the
applicable
height
here
is
100
feet.
The
project
is
seeking
again
to
be
permanent,
for
it
had
220
feet
far
17
versus
eight
with
the
underlying
zoning
there
was
no
parking
on
site
is
a
small
site.
This
is
also
one
of
the
most
walkable
locations
in
the
entire
city,
adjacent
south
station
walkable
to
the
financial
district
and
back
bay.
BE
The
zoning
would
call
for
115
parking
spaces,
but
there
is
no
parking
on
site
typical
of
many
of
the
buildings
in
this
area.
And
finally,
there
is
a
sky
plane
setback
requirement
that
the
project
does
not
have
so
that
and
g-cod,
which
mr
simonelli
refer
to.
That's
the
zone,
relief,
we're
looking
for
and
that's
the
backdrop.
Why
don't
I
let
my
co-panelists,
the
proponent,
know
ron,
tell
you
about
the
the
pro
the
community
process
to
dance.
A
BE
A
AS
I
do
want
to
go
ahead
and
thank
you
and
and
the
board
bpda
staff
elected
officials,
numerous
probably
hundreds
of
neighbors
that
came
out
through
a
very
heavily
vetted
process,
the
last
three
years,
I'm
sure,
you'll
hear
from
the
mayor's
office.
I
do
want
to
highlight
that
we
please
overwhelming
support
for
this
project,
and
I
just
want
to
remind
you
I'll
move
on.
I
just
want
to
remind
you
that
this
project
was
fully
approved.
The
only
change
to
that
is
residential
use.
AS
A
Sorry
we're
gonna,
I'm
gonna
lose
my
temper
fairly
soon,
okay,
because
we
have
been
sitting
since
9
30
missed
the
counselor
has
already
gone
through
this.
Please
answer
our
questions
on
the
units,
the
unit
size,
any
decks
and
affordability.
Okay,
let's
just
get
to
the
meat
of
the
matter.
AS
Okay,
we
are
proposing
a
roof
deck
for
the
use
of
residents.
This
is
in
line
with
bpda
guidance
to
provide
outdoor
public
space.
For
you
know
wellness,
especially
during
covet
19.
You
know
a
sort
of
post
pandemic
design
for
fresh
air
and
recreation,
115
dwelling
units
we're
looking
at
a
mix
of
roughly
80
one
bedrooms,
roughly
95
units
and
roughly
20
two-bedroom
units
for
this
project
and
then
affordable
housing.
AS
You
asked
about
we
in
partnership
with
the
chinese
economic
development
council,
are
looking
to
provide
a
rough,
approximately
20
units
of
deeply
affordable,
roughly
30
to
50
ami.
So
the
sort
of
the
most
deeply
affordable
units
available
will
be
provided.
Approximately
two
blocks
away
right
in
the
heart
of
chinatown
on
oxford
street.
A
So
every
it's
a
it's
going
to
be
off
site,
then.
AS
AS
Sure
yeah
there's
a
range
of
550
square
feet
up
to
950
square
foot
units,
with
the
emphasis
on
you
know,
close
to
transit
relatively
efficiently
designed.
AS
AS
The
overall
unit
size
is
550
to
950.,
so
one
bedrooms
range
from
roughly
550
to
700..
We
have
two
bedrooms,
ranging
from
750
to
approximately
950.,
which
is
in
line
with
the
city's
compact
living
guidelines.
Well,.
A
That's
where
I
feel
that
there
is
an
internal
conflict,
because
you
know
you
just
talked
about
compact
living
and
then
you
talk
about
the
roof,
giving
people,
health
and
well-being
and
mental
health
space.
But
then
these
units,
on
the
other
hand,
are
are
awful,
tiny,
but
I'll
leave
it
at
that
how
the
plants
miss
better.
C
AS
C
So,
under
the
city's
compact
guidelines,
some
of
those
units
are
are
are
below
the
the
conventional
standard
size,
correct,
they're,.
C
And
then,
when
there's
a
compact
living
unit,
the
city
also
has
guidelines
for
common
space.
AS
For
common
spaces,
including
what
we're
providing
on
the
second
and
third
levels,
including
fitness
sort
of
meeting
spaces,
as
I
mentioned,
the
top
floor,
roof
amenity
space.
So
despite
the
small
unit
size.
C
Excluding
the
roof
deck
which,
in
the
way
like
today,
I
don't
know
how
many
people
are
going
to
really
want
to
be
spending
a
lot
of
time
up
there.
How
how
many
square
feet
are
a
common
space
inside
the
building.
I
have.
AS
C
AS
L
Can
you
just
then
describe
kind
of
the
loading
for
the
retail
and
trash
management
system
for
the
restaurant
like?
How
do
you
see
it
play
out.
AS
Yeah
happy
too,
you
can
pull
up
a
ground
floor
if
you
like,
but
the
all
loading
will
actually
occur
off
of
neyland
street.
So
excuse
me
not
on
neon
street,
so
on
utica
street,
which
is
a
side
service
street.
So
really
all
loading
and
access
sort
of
page
top
left.
AS
If
you
will,
in
the
view
you're
seeing
here,
vehicles
will
be
able
to
pull
off
the
main
street,
avoid
the
heavily
trafficked
neon
street
corridor
and
there's
a
side
there's
an
area
that's
labeled
receiving
today
is
where
will
be
shared
both
by
the
residential
and
the
restaurant
use,
there's
also
a
passageway
between
our
building
and
our
butter.
C
AS
We're
focused
today
on
condo
for
for
sale
ownership
product,
I
will
say
very
challenging
market
throughout
housing,
so
we're
we're
looking
at
our
options,
but
our
goal
is
for
ownership
condominium
units.
C
And
you
have
any
restrictions
about
speculators
coming
in
and
then
flipping
or
buying
it,
but
then
rent
using
it
for
rental.
AS
Yeah
I'm
happy
to
to
work
with
the
city
on
on
those
specific
requirements.
If
that
makes
it
to
a
deed
or
to
other
sort
of
guidelines,
I'm
not
sure
what
sort
of
the
standard
practice
is,
but
we're
happy
to
do
that
from
a
neighborhood
perspective.
We're
heavily
invested
in
the
neighborhood
and
other
properties
that
we're
we'd
like
to
see
the
most
owner
units
and
not
sort
of
you
know
secondary
rental
units
yeah.
C
I
mean
you're
you're,
you
know
you're,
obviously
very
close
to
downtown
and
there's
been
an
awful
lot
of
non-owner
occupied
ownership
situations
that
have
characterized
a
lot
of
the
high
rises.
So
I
it's
a
problem
in
the
city.
I
agree.
AS
Sure
I'll
say
we're
aiming
for
a
lead
gold,
certifiable
design,
and
I
will
say
also
from
a
resiliency
perspective,
we're
not
building
a
basement,
so
the
lowest
sort
of
level
we
get
to
is
just
an
elevator
pit
below
the
lobby.
All
of
our
mechanicals
are
occurring
upstairs
so
as
far
as
sea
level,
change,
climate
change,
sea
level
rise,
we're
above
that
threshold
and
we're
looking
at
the
most
efficient
way
to
you
know:
utilize,
the
facade
combination
of
glazing
and
masonry
to
to
ensure
kind
of
meeting
of
the
energy
code.
AS
I
Hi
good
morning,
good
morning,
is
it
still
morning
yep
it's
the
morning.
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
I
am
chulam
hwang
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
of
the
board
on
this
matter.
To
my
knowledge,
there
are
no
concerns
raised
by
the
butters
or
local
civic
associations
for
this
proposal.
However,
I
would
like
to
note
that
there
are
multiple
letters
to
support.
Thank
you.
B
U
Thank
you
good
morning,
members
of
the
board
from
councillor
flink's
office.
Please
know
the
councillor
sent
a
support
letter
for
for
this
proposal
to
to
support
from
the
residents
in
the
area
and
the
chinatown
land
trust.
The
change
of
use
to
home
ownership.
Lunas
will
add
to
the
city's
housing
stock
as
well
as
well
as
affordable
housing
stock
through
idp,
it
will
have
less
impact
on
traffic
and
activation
of
the
site
will
also
bring
more
attention
to
the
tragedy,
won't
work.
Thank
you.
AR
AR
N
N
Sorry,
I
I
hadn't
unmuted
myself,
roger
berman,
186,
south
street
boston,
around
the
corner
from
the
site.
A
couple
comments.
I
have
no
problem
with
the
structure
the
elevations
you're,
seeing
they
have
been
approved
before
I'm
pleased
with
the
change
of
use,
I'm
fully
supportive
that
I
think
they've
done
well
so.
A
Mr
mr,
please
get
to
the
point,
tell
us
what
you
are
if
you
are
in
support
or
in
opposition,
and
if
there
are
elements
that
you're
in
opposition
of
please
hustle
and
put
that
on
the
record.
Any
future
speakers,
please
make
sure
you're
adding
more
information,
rather
than
repeating
what
we've
already
heard,
give
us
new
information
and
if
you
just
want
to
be
recorded
speaking
on
this
project,
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record.
Okay.
So
with
those
instructions,
mr
bowman,
can
you
tell
us
directly
what
you're
in
opposition
on.
H
N
BF
Philip
steiner,
121
beach
street
unit
703
in
opposition
to
the
project
additional
comments.
The
building
is
way
too
high.
No
other
building
is
older
than
12
stories
in
the
latter
district.
Another
comment.
N
BF
Utica
street,
which
is
planned
for
loading,
unloading
and
garbage,
is
fairly
narrow.
It
has
currently
no
sidewalks.
We
would
certainly
expect
sidewalks
to
be
installed,
so
I'm
not
quite
sure
that
there's
enough
space
left
for
the
trash
removal,
as
was
previously
indicated,
another
concern
is
noise
from
the
roof
deck
for
surrounding
neighbors.
I
would
like
to
learn
whether
the
roof
deck
outdoor
space
is
north
or
south
facing.
Thank
you.
AY
T
BG
One
sorry
thank
you,
madam
chairman
121
beech
street.
I
own
two
units
in
in
this
building,
which
is
just
north
of
the
proposed
project.
I
am
in
opposition
because
of
the
height
and
the
scale
of
the
project
and
the
lack
of
parking,
the
height
will
cast
a
shadow
over
all
our
units.
It
will
loom
over
our
buildings.
They
are
adding
115
new
residences.
A
T
T
AD
A
Can
you
put
your
hand
down
for
now,
it's
not
on
yet.
AD
T
BH
BH
Hi
ben
rosenberg,
144
lincoln
street,
my
family's
owned
the
building
for
40
years.
I
grew
up
in
the
building,
I'd
like
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
project.
I
think
it's
a
good
project
and
I
disagree
with
the
previous
couple.
Commenters
hold.
A
AW
T
Okay,
christopher
you've
been
unmuted.
If
you
can
stay
your
name
and
address
for
the
record,
please.
M
Christopher
this
is
christopher
engebretson
107,
south
street.
I
have
been
a
resident
of
the
levitt
district
for
22
years.
I
strongly
support
this
project.
M
AW
T
A
T
AH
A
Okay,
so
the
board
board
you've
heard
people
in
support
in
opposition
and
you've
heard
my
introductory
statement
about
that.
We
did
not
give
pocket
approval
for
a
takeout
restaurant.
So
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
O
AH
B
B
Article
64,
section,
9,
insufficient
usable,
open
space,
article
64,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
job
setback,
article
64,
section,
34
group
structure,
restrictions,
article
64,
section
9,
the
flood
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
64,
section
9,
the
builder
height,
is
excessive
article
64,
section
9.
The
rare
yacht
is
insufficient
in
article
64,
section,
9.4,
townhouse
row
house
extension
name
and
address
for
the
record
play.
BJ
Do
you
want
me
to
jump
into
the
proposal
now?
Yes,.
BJ
The
proposal
is
to
construct
a
one
story
and
basement
edition
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
It
should
be
noted
that
at
the
beginning
of
this
process,
it
was
a
much
larger
project.
The
intent
was
to
construct
a
five-story
addition
and
enlarge
each
residential
unit.
BJ
The
proposal
is
for
a
third
13
by
approximately
13,
by
13
addition
to
the
first
floor
and
basement
and
a
new
stairwell
to
create
rare
egress
off
of
the
newly
reconstructed
decks
which
be
increased
in
size,
so
that
the
the
occupancy
to
the
building
and
the
height
remains
the
same.
BJ
The
head
house
is
existing
and
the
red
bar
and
such
has
been
removed
so
that
the
roof
deck
would
be
exclusive
to
the
top
floor
unit,
which
is
the
fourth
unit
and
there's
the
headhouse
will
remain
the
same
size
and
scale,
and
the
only
changes
are
at
grade
at
the
first
level
to
the
rear
that
addition
there
in
the
new
stairwell
off
to
the
left
side.
Let's.
A
Let's
back
up
for
a
minute:
okay,
is
there
occupancy
in
the
basement.
BJ
Yes,
currently,
the
first
floor
and
basement
are
occupied
by
concept
realty
and,
as
part
of
this
addition,
they
are
a
growing
office
and
want
to
stay
on
tremont
street
and
this
extension
allows
them
to
stay
in
the
location
they're.
In
now,.
BJ
First,
lawyers
also
office,
it's
all
concept,
realty
and
then
up
above
is
the
four
residential
units.
A
A
Okay
and
the
deck
is
accessible
to
all
the
units
or
just
the
top
unit.
A
Okay,
sorry,
roof
deck
holds
exclusive
use.
Okay,
how
are
the
plants
miss
better.
Y
C
C
Yeah
that
I
mean
that's
and
okay,
so
the
wet
bar
is
gone,
but
that's
a
larger
than
necessary
to
just
access
the
roof.
What's
what's
it
what's
the
space
used
for.
BJ
BK
Hi,
yes,
good
afternoon,
I'm
chair
members
of
the
board
tim
cuzole
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
our
office
refers
to
the
board
on
this
matter.
Our
office
has
hosted
a
number
of
abundance
meetings
on
this
proposal.
The
main
concerns
are
regarding
privacy
and
security
light
and
the
overall
size
of
the
proposal.
The
abutters
have
also
met
multiple
times
with
the
applicant
and
couldn't
seem
to
resolve
these
issues.
We've
received
numerous
letters
of
opposition
for
this
proposal
from
the
voters,
as
well
as
opposition
from
the
pilot
block
neighborhood
association.
U
Good
afternoon,
madame
of
the
chair
members
of
the
war
anna
caledon
from
councillor
flink's
office,
please
know
the
counselor
has
sent
another
letter
in
a
position
to
the
board
today.
Regarding
this
project,
the
project
proposes
to
build
a
penthouse
with
a
web
and
a
roof
deck
and
has
gathered
significant
opposition
from
our
daughters,
neighbors
and
the
pilot
block.
Neighborhood
association
neighbors
are
especially
especially
concerned
about
the
proposed
their
tower
that
directly
about
six
six
three
three
months
and
extends
more
than
13
seaweed
on
their
aboarding
property.
U
The
stairs
tower
will
block
light
and
airflow
and
creates
privacy
concerns
for
the
avatars,
as
anyone
with
the
access
with
the
stairs
will
be
able
to
look
into
their
mother's
windows.
Moreover,
these
project's
proposed
expansion
will
really
reduce
rear
yard
space
and
exacerbate
the
difficult
parking
situation
at
the
back.
Thank
you.
A
Anna,
the
applicant
has
the
the
representative
of
the
applicant
has
presented
that
the
the
wet
bar
has
been
taken
out
and
they
they
will
be
using
the
current
head
house.
Does
that
change
your
opinion
about
that
roof
addition,
because
I
understand
on
us.
On
the
other
hand,
you
are
opposed
to
the
addition
at
the
first
floor
and
basement.
U
Thank
you,
mother,
mature.
I
did
hear
that,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
about
us
are
aware
of
the
web
bar
changes,
because
the
last
time
we
heard
from
the
neighborhood
association
they
mentioned
that
no
change
were
made
at
their
last
meeting,
but
there
is
still
concerns
coming
from
other
areas
of
the
proposal,
so
the
counselor
remains
opposed.
AF
B
W
Now
I'm
sure
and
chair
members
of
the
board,
echoing
the
sentiments
of
council
flynn's
office,
council,
flower
election
record
in
opposition
also
for
council
clarity.
T
BL
O
BL
AZ
V
BL
I've
already
had
to
file
an
insurance
claim
being
hit
by
a
visitor
to
one
of
the
apartments
already
so.
BL
S
A
You
because
matt
we
would
expect
to
be
in
support
of
the
proposal,
but
thank
you.
Can
we
hear
from
any
anybody
else.
AW
T
T
AU
Noel
blair,
175
west
brookline
street,
I'm
here
representing
the
pilot
block
neighborhood
association.
We
are
in
opposition
to
this
proposal,
which
disregards
both
zoning
requirements
and
the
butter
concerns.
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
what
the
main
and
butter
concerns
had
been
given
the
commentary
so
far.
This
is
not
about
the
deck
on
the
roof.
This
is
about
the
decks
and
the
stair
tower
that
are
going
to
be
constructed
on
the
rear
of
the
building.
AU
So
right
now
there
there
exists
an
existing
set
of
stairs
that
that
goes
up
along
the
back
of
the
building,
extending
seven
feet
from
the
rear
that
is
being
changed
into
a
set
of
decks
that
come
seven
feet
out,
supported
by
posts
all
the
way
up
to
the
top
of
the
building
and
then
another
stairway
that
comes
out
to
the
rear
from
there
creating
an
addition
to
the
rear
of
the
building.
AU
That
extends
20
feet
from
the
rear
wall
of
the
building,
and
that's
where
all
the
concerns
that
you're,
seeing
in
the
letters
and
throughout
the
the
whole
community
process
has
been
are
our
typical
decks
that
are
approved
here
in
the
south.
End
comply
to
six
foot
distance
from
the
back
of
the
building,
with
cantilevered
support
to
minimize
the
presence
of
the
decks.
This.
This
is
creating
a
20-foot
extension
inclusive
of
both
the
new
decks
and
the
stair
tower
that
is
going
to
intrude
on
the
the
privacy
of
neighbors.
A
Don't
thank
that
thank
you
for
that
context
because,
yes,
we
understand
about
the
brackets
supported
decks.
The
rear
bracket
supported
decks.
May
we
just
hear
from
one
more
person
and
then
we
will
take
a
motion.
AK
Hi,
kate,
I
am
in
a
butter
at
6,
5,
5,
55659,
tremont
street,
I'm
also
a
trustee
in
the
building,
and
you
know
our
owners
are
opposed
for
several
reasons:
security,
the
imposition
that
it
is
putting
on
privacy
from
the
back
of
the
building
and
also,
I
would
say,
kind
of
the
responsiveness
throughout
the
community
process.
This
has
been
going
on
for
a
year
and
a
half
and
we
have
not
seen
a
lot
of
concessions
within
reason
to
our
complaints
and
concerns.
A
Thank
you
so
board
members.
Oh
yes,
I
know,
mr
christopher,
do
you
have
anything
to
say
in
response,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
still
outstanding
concerns.
Do
you
have
anything
to
say.
BJ
BJ
It
should
also
be
noted
that,
on
the
budding
property
at
663,
there
is
a
current
addition
at
the
first
level,
so
that
our
stairwell
would
not
protrude
too
far
past
that
about
like
a
foot
at
grade
and
we've
also
committed
with
the
stairwell
to
provide
locking
hardware
at
grade
and
to
provide
some
visual
screening
on
the
stairwell
to
promote
privacy.
We
also
intend
to
use
this
as
a
secondary
means
of
egress.
BJ
A
Thank
you
given
that
information,
given
this
the
history
of
rear
decks
in
the
community
and
other
other
neighborhood
comments,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
B
On
the
last
case
of
the
day,
calling
doa
one
two
zero
three,
four
six,
three,
sixteen
tabor
street.
This
is
the
replace
the
existing
one-story
laundromat,
with
a
new
six-story
mixed-use
building
with
thirty
apartments,
with
floors
through
two
to
six
and
two
retail
and
parking.
On
the
first
floor,
the
violations,
article
50
section
11
excessive
far,
article
50
section,
11,
the
billing
height,
is
greater
than
55
feet,
article
50
section
43,
rc
parking
and
loading
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
patrick
mahoney,
with
a
business
status
of
160
pedal
street
representing
a
developer,
ges
development.
Klaus
kimmel,
the
proposed
project
before
us
today
is
seeking
three
variances.
We
are
combining
the
two
lots.
Actually,
the
two
lots
have
been
combined
upon:
building
permanent
application
and
the
intent
is
to
erect
a
six-story
building
and
we
are
seeking
relief
by
way
of
floor
area
ratio.
The
allowed
employee
ratio
in
the
zoning
sub-district
king
knight
excuse
me.
Zoning
sub-district,
dudley
square
eda
is
2.0.
BM
BM
The
re
the
design
prior
to
bpda
has
been
changed
to
reflect
some
recent
and
great
feedback
from
the
board
and
other
projects
of
multi-family
residential
in
the
area,
specifically
including
family
type
of
housing.
We
have
changed
the
configuration
to
include
two
three-bedroom
units
of
16
two-bedroom
units
and
12
one-bedroom
units
of
of
the
three-bedroom
units.
One
of
them
will
be
part
of
the
idp,
affordable
housing.
BM
A
Do
officially
it's
how
many,
how
many
sorry,
how
many
one
bedrooms.
A
Twelve
one
bedrooms:
what's
the
average
square
footage
of
the
ones
twos
and
threes.
BM
Certainly
so
the
one
the
smallest
one
bedroom
unit
is
645
square
feet
and
it
ranges
to
730
square
feet,
which
is
above
the
standard
metro
sizes,
the
two
bedroom
unit.
Again,
the
smallest
unit
is
851
square
feet
and
goes
up
to
just
under
1100
square
feet,
and
the
three
bedroom
units
are
just
under
1200
square
feet.
BM
Okay,
two
there'll
also
be
two
group
two
units
one
is
required
for
this
size
building
and
of
the
five
parking
spaces.
One
will
be
accessible.
A
Is
this
the
developer
that
did
the
project
at
on
washington
street
warren
is
warren
street
the
alpha.
BM
BM
Only
four
are
occupied
so
night
with
90
of
the
building
sold
out
only
for
the
applicants
have
cars,
and
my
client
did
forward
a
picture
to
me
this
morning.
To
show
me
the
street
last
night
had
no
cars
parked
on
its
surface,
which
I
think
is
a
good
sign
for
this
area.
Now,
tent
tabor
does
not
have
any
three-bedroom
units.
This
building
does
and
again
one
of
them
is
affordable.
BM
There's
at
16
tape
there
is
five
parking
spaces
access
from
palmer
street,
which
is
a
shared
lot
with
10
tabor.
It's
granted
access
for
vehicle
access
it
enters
in
from
palmer,
there's
five
parking
spaces
there,
42
bike
spaces
and
there's
also
two
retail
units,
one
of
a
thousand
square
feet
and
the
other
one
1193
square
feet
in
addition
to
the
gym
space
and
other
common
amenities.
There's
a
shower
area
which
is
required
for
bike
riders
of
both
of
retail
patrons
and
employees
and
residents
of
the
building.
A
Okay,
any
roof
deck
proposed.
A
Okay
and
then
so
the
so
I
guess
my
question
is
you're,
proposing
two
retail
spaces
and
five
five
parking
tell
us
how
you
anticipate
providing
parking
for
people
who
work
at
these
facilities.
BM
BM
Re
the
parking
is
is
for
the
residential
units.
This
isn't
a
restricted
parking
overlay
district,
so
no
parking
is
required
for
the
commercial
businesses.
We
are
hoping
just
like
the
existing
building
at
10
tabor,
that
the
patrons
of
the
retail
and
other
retail
in
the
area
rely
on
public
transportation,
next
door
or
the
parking
lot
across
the
street.
A
Okay
is
how
are
the
plans?
Ms,
that's
better,
I
don't
sure
the
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
A
Is
I
have
a
question
for
mr
hampton
jeff,
you
know
there's
this.
This
neighborhood
is
going
to
be
seeing
a
lot
of
development
in
the
very
near
future.
A
At
the
I
guess,
haley
house
is
closing
its
doors
in
the
very
near
future,
but
the
development
of
that
site
crews
got
the
approval
for
the
development
of
the
site.
Next
to
the
library.
A
The
other
parking
lot
by
the
station
is
going
to
also
be
approved,
and
then
this
one
as
there's
a
lot
of
proposals
for
development
and,
of
course,
the
blair
lot,
and
how
can
I
forget,
parcel
eight
at
the
corner
of
melania,
cass
and
harrison
and,
of
course,
beefit
benjamin
franklin,
so
I'm
sure
that
all
of
them
at
some
level
have
come
in
to
have
their
parking
parking
needs
reduced.
A
A
Oh,
my
goodness,
but.
A
Yeah,
because
you
know
today,
everything
might
look
also
also
comfortable
with,
but
with
all
these
projects
coming
in
without
adequate
parking.
You
know
at
some
point
the
neighborhood
is
going
to
be.
You
know
really
feeling
the
squeeze
not
only
just
the
right,
not
only
the
residential
users
but
the
business
users
that
need
to
see
that
turnover.
A
You
know
on
their
street,
so
I
just
put
that
out.
There.
F
BN
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
jason
gent
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
was
a
vpda
facilitated
process,
but
I
do
want
to
highlight
that
I
did
get
three
letters
of
support
for
the
proposal
and
we
are
going
to
be
deferring
to
the
expertise
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
B
K
AD
BI
You
please
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
arunju
and
board
members,
I'd
like
to
go
on
record
tania
fernandez,
anderson
district
7
city
councilor,
in
support
of
this
project.
My
office
has
received
nothing
but
support
from
businesses
and
residents
zero
opposition.
So
again
I
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
So.
A
Counselor
welcome
nice
to
see
you
because
it's
always
good
to
hear
from
the
counselors
themselves,
because
I
think
it
brings
an
extra
level
of
attention
to
the
community
and
to
the
project.
So
we
appreciate
your
presence
here.
I
hope
to
see.
BI
AD
Yes,
hi,
my
name
is
first
of
all
good
day,
madam
chair
and
board
members.
My
name
is
karen
bunch,
I'm
at
45
quincy
street
here
in
roxbury.
I
am
in
support
of
the
project.
I
think
that
it
would
help
lift
up
the
community.
It
would
also
help
the
small
businesses
in
the
area
and
also
attract
new
business
to
come
into
the
community.
So
I
am
very
much
in
support
of
this
project.
T
BO
A
Okay,
given
this
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
Okay
and
also
jeff
in
the
design,
review
and
and
counselor
mahoney,
can
you
make
sure
that
this
building
is
designed
and
is
special
attention
is
made
so
that
it
works
well
with
that
building?
That's
already
constructed
and,
more
importantly,
with
the
residential
across
the
street,
because
sometimes
people
in
affordable
housing
are
about.
Bha
housing
tend
to
be
overlooked,
so
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
that
they
are
they're.