►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 6-11-19 (Part 2)
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 6-11-19 (Part 2). Meeting starts at 6:07 mark.
A
B
C
You,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
attorney
Jeff
Drago,
with
Drago
in
Toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
Broad
Street.
We
are
seeking
a
second
deferral
on
this
matter.
We
actually
worked
with
a
number
of
the
abutters
to
get
support.
However,
there
we
are
being
asked
to
defer
by
the
Civic
Association,
who,
like
us,
can
to
continue
to
make
additional
changes
on
the
progress.
C
C
D
C
A
A
B
E
E
E
F
B
A
27
August
27th
11:30.
Are
there
any
other
deferral
who,
with
Charles
hearing
none
we'll
go
to
the
first
case,
her
rediscount
8
6
8
80,
Cottage
Street.
This
is
the
revised
plan
to
create
additional
bathroom,
mezzanine
Leslie
level
and
new
private
roof
deck
to
the
top
living
unit.
The
violations
article
27
G.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section,
52,
roof
structure,
restriction,
article
53,
section,
9,
the
fluidity,
a
ratio,
a
success
of
name
and
address
full
record.
Please
good.
G
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
Lucas
Lucas
law,
75,
Arlington,
Street,
Boston,
Mass
attorney
for
the
applicant,
who
is
to
my
left,
William
filler
Ito's.
This
is
an
existing
three
family
which
is
remaining
a
three
family
in
the
East
Boston
district
in
a
three
family
sub
district.
So
the
use
is
allowed.
G
Both
structure
that
had
street
level
retail
store,
which
is
part
of
the
proposal
for
adding
the
mezzanine
space,
the
street-level
retail,
had
ceiling
heights
in
excess
of
20
feet.
So
on
the
first
floor,
in
order
to
create
an
additional
living
area
and
bathroom
a
29,
but
mezzanine
is
being
added
half
way
through
the
first
floor.
The
other
aspect
of
this
proposal
is
creation
of
a
225
square
foot,
roof
deck
for
the
exclusive
use
of
unit
number
three.
The
three
violations
are
one:
it
is
in
the
newly
created
East
Boston
iPod
so
requires
an
iPod
permit.
G
Second,
is
the
roof
structure
requires
a
conditional
use
permit
and
the
third
is
the
FA
are
by
adding
the
mezzanine
level
purely
on
the
interior
of
the
building
increases
the
living
area.
So
the
fa
r
goes
from
2.8
to
3.2,
but
in
order
to
achieve
that,
no
changes
were
made
to
the
building.
No
changes
to
the
exterior
purely
the
insertion
of
the
floor
plate
at
the
ground
floor.
A
G
A
G
F
A
H
I
G
B
There's
a
companion
case,
boa
seven,
six,
three,
six:
three:
nine
thirty,
seven
Winthrop
Street
these
projects
have
both
together
service,
correct,
okay.
This
is
erect
a
new
church
with
the
proposed
9r
street
parking
on
the
same
law.
An
existing
building
violation,
article
10
section,
1
off
street
parking
shall
not
be
located
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side.
Lot
line:
article
50
section,
twenty
nine
side
yacht
is
insufficient,
I
think'll.
Fifty
six
to
twenty
nine.
The
rear
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
fifty
section
forty
four
point,
one
three:
two
or
more
dwellings
on
the
same
lot.
B
This
is
for
thirty-seven
Winthrop.
This
is
to
legalize
the
existing
building
on
a
lot
of
a
two-family
dwelling
in
Church,
which
was
approved
under
permit.
We
are
seeking
to
erect
a
two-story
Church
in
the
rear.
The
same
lot
no
work
to
be
done:
violations
article
50,
section,
29
Reyat,
is
insufficient
article
50,
section
43.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
44
point
one
three,
two
or
more
dwellings
on
the
same
lot.
They
have
an
address.
The
record.
Please.
I
A
K
J
Reason
for
the
deferral
is
that
the
community
group
wanted
us
to
meet
with
them
and
they
had
some
minor
concerns
mostly
around
where
we
had
got
place
the
parking
they
felt
that
they
didn't
like
that
particular
location
for
the
for
the
nine
spots.
So
they
wanted
us
to
have.
You
know,
work
on
that
and
I
think
also.
They
were
concerned
about
minor
things
in
terms
of
plants
in
a
location
and
the
height.
J
They
just
wanted
to
get
more
information,
I
guess
at
that
point,
and
so
we
met
with
them
and
we
worked
through
all
the
the
issues
in
terms
of
the
parking
and
change.
Some
of
that
I
think
one
of
the
pieces
that
we
we
had
was
to
I
think
of
the
five
feet
issue
near
the
setback.
We
were
able
to
actually
make
an
adjustment,
so
we
wouldn't
have
that
in
this
meeting.
F
J
J
37
Winthrop
Street,
yes,
the
violation
that
I
recall
was
there
was
an
issue
with
a
retaining
wall
that
we
had
done
and
I
think
at
that
point
we
cured
that.
So
when
we
went
back
there
was
a
confusion
as
to
where
we
redoing
the
the
same
attachment
so
forth
and
so
on.
So
it
was
very
difficult
to
try
to
explain
insight,
we're
not
going
to
do
that.
J
A
D
A
D
D
D
L
J
D
D
D
D
D
J
L
M
D
A
So
you're
meeting
them
there
yeah
no
I'm,
just
thinking
of
public
assembly,
because
you
still
this
is
a
you
know.
You
just
need
to
make
sure
all
the
requirements
for
public
assembly
are
being
met.
You
know,
but
that's
a
separate
issue
is
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
N
Good,
madam
good,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
with
BPD
a
review
when
they
met
with
the
Neighborhood
Association.
There
were
concerns
about
the
plans.
They're
fine,
they're,
they're,
fine
with
it
as
well.
There
was
also
a
butters
who
were
in
support
of
the
project.
O
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
is
a
member
of
the
board.
My
name
is
Michaela
Parkin
and
I
am
here
from
City
Council
Kim
Cheney's
office.
We
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
of
this
project,
but
what
conditional
support
of
the
project
as
long
as
the
developers
go
with
DPA
BPD,
a
design
review
as
well
as
continue
meeting
with
the
Neighborhood
Association,
with
updates
to
their
plans.
Thank.
B
You
on
your
next
case,
calling
BOA
eight
nine
three
three
one:
five
eighteen
to
twenty
six
Bradshaw
Street.
This
is
a
direct.
Do
five
new
townhouses
violations,
article
60
section,
eight,
a
forbidden
use,
the
maximum
number
of
townhouse
buildings
in
a
three
F
sub
district
and
straight
article,
sixty
section,
nine
insufficient
minimum
lot
area;
article
sixty
section,
nine
and
sufficient
minute
a
lot
with
article
sixty
section
I
on
insufficient
minimum.
A
lot
frontage,
nautical
sixty
section,
nine
excessive
FA
are.
A
P
B
The
next
case,
we're
gonna,
call
boa
nine
zero
zero
one.
Eight
nine
twenty
seven
leads
Ville
Street.
This
is
new
construction
of
a
three
failing
residential
property
on
the
vacant.
Lot
violation
static,
sixty
five,
six
and
nine
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
M
M
Because,
initially,
the
plan
has
a
handicap
ramp
and
we
went
through
the
butters
and
the
neighborhood
meetings,
and
you
know
the
neighbors
kind
of
didn't
really
want
that
ramp
to
be
there.
Thinking
that
it's
gonna
take
some
space
away
from
the
sidewalk
to
walk
like
a
sidewalk,
so
they
requested
that
we
removed
it
and
when
we
did
it
and
submit
the
plan
over
it,
it
was
enough
time
or
something
so
now,
we've.
A
L
L
B
F
L
Q
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
quaff
anthem,
neighborhood,
surface
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
were
like
record
and
support.
The
applicant
didn't
go
through
a
full
committee
process
and
they
have
been
accommodating
to
the
director
butters
from
removing
the
handicap
ramp,
as
well
as
installing
fencing
around
around
the
property
as
well.
B
A
A
A
B
Matter
fear,
so
this
was
the
meeting
on
Thursday
May
16th
at
the
mini
Zoning
Board
at
10:10,
Mass
Ave
first
case
boa
8,
8,
3,
4,
7
1,
constructing
a
rooftop
deck
on
an
existing
roof
structure
was
approved,
boa
nine
three
zero
six,
two
one
one
Ludlow
Street
was
adding
a
floor
floor
area
levels,
2,
&,
3,
adding
a
bathroom
was
approve
of
PDA
case,
boa
nine.
Three:
eight
zero,
zero
two
208
Herald
Street
was
a
change
of
legal
action
to
include
retail
convenience.
B
It
was
approved
view
PDA
for
signage
case,
boa
nine
one,
two
three
three,
six
one.
Oh
one,
two
one:
oh
three
Ross
in
the
street
there
was
a
finished
basement
square
footage.
An
existing
home
was
was
drawn
denial
without
prejudice,
cage,
boa
nine,
two,
three,
eight
nine,
eight
twenty
six
are
enacted
in
the
street.
It
was
proposed
new
second-floor
addition
rear
addition.
Ruth
Texas
was
approved
the
case
boa
nine,
two,
two
five,
eight
seven
twelve
wall
dextry
was
remodeled
attic
and
used
useful
living
living
space.
B
Not
to
come
back
to
that
goes
nothing
next
to
it
case.
Boa
9
0,
3,
7,
3,
6,
4,
1600
Avenue.
There
was
a
constructing
new
rear
addition
rear
deck
front
porch.
It
was
approved
to
hold
for
sign
signage
case
boa
8
3
4
4,
1,
9,
2,
43,
West,
Selden
Street.
It
was
constructing
new
dormer
addition
to
an
existing
to
family
dwelling.
It
was
a.
It
was
approved
that
hold
for
signature,
he's
boa
nine
one,
nine
one,
eight
four
13
Woodland
Road.
It
was
a
dormer
rear,
rear,
section
the
roof
and
had
a
bath.
B
It
was
proof
but
hopeful
signature,
HBO,
a
90210
85
52
Cohasset
Street.
There
was
an
interior
the
next
day,
a
remodel.
In
addition,
it
was
approved
boa
911
78
to
a
twenty
twenty
four
Durant
Street
is
adding
two-story
addition
to
an
existing
home
was
approved,
he's
boa
911
five.
Four
three
zero
34
Edgemere
road
was
removed,
the
existing
porch
and
back
were
house
and
building
that
existing
footprint
or
two-story
addition
was
approved
case.
Boa
nine,
four,
four,
two
one
two
1431
Center
Street.
It
was
installed
Gomez
in
the
third
floor.
B
It
and
add
bathroom
was
approved,
but
hopeful
signature
case,
boa
nine
zero,
seven,
three,
eight
seven,
twenty
seven
peaceable
Street
was
a
mover
Visal.
Granted
to
this
owner
was
approved.
We
do
have
to
go
back
to
one.
We
have
to
find
a
would
happen
in
case
boa
92,
five,
four,
four
zero
three
110
Avenue
was
to
construct.
We
have
nothing
next
to
it.