►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 7-12-22
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Hearing
date
on
july,
12th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature
last
year.
The
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice,
upholding
virtual
hearings
until
july
15,
2022.
A
A
A
A
A
If
you
are
connected
by
telephone,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
The
address
into
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
hosts
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
A
E
A
Morning
so,
in
conformance
with
the
open
meeting
law
after
each
vote
after
each
presentation
and
we're
ready
to
get
ready
for
a
vote,
I'm
going
to
take
a
roll
call
of
each
member
for
their
for
to
register
their
voice.
Vote.
Okay,
so
it'll
take
us
a
little
bit
longer,
but
it
will
keep
the
record
clear.
C
A
C
C
C
C
However,
the
board
granted
a
second
extension
of
relief
until
july
13
2022..
I
recommended
the
board
confirm
for
the
record
that
this
extension
encompassed
all
calling.
If
the
applicant
now
requests
an
additional
extension
until
july
13th
2023,
I
recommend
that
the
board
grant
that
extension
if
it
determines
it,
determines
that
it
is
appropriate
under
the
circumstances.
F
A
C
A
C
I
C
C
C
F
D
A
Mr
fortune
aye,
mr
olek,
miss
dong
hi
mr
rajiro
aye,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
lugus.
I
I
two
are
in
support.
Motion
carries.
I
C
You
kyle
for
regards
to
303
305
bennington
street
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
july
12
2019
and
the
board
granted
his
first
extension
of
relief
until
july
12
2022..
However,
that
first
extension
was
not
necessary
because
of
covert
calling
of
licenses
related
with
calling.
This
relief
remains
valid
until
october
17
2022.
C
I
recommend
that
the
board
confirm
for
the
release.
The
relief
remains
valid
until
that
date.
The
alpha
can
also
request
an
additional
extension
of
october
17
2023..
I
recommend
that
the
board
grant
that
extension
if
it
determines
that
appropriate
under
the
circumstances
keeping
in
mind
there'll
be
the
applicant
first
necessary
extension.
F
I'm
sure
I
hear
my
move
to
confirm
that
any
null
applicable
relief
is
valid
through
october
17
2022,
including
all
applicable
tolling,
and
further
move
to
confirm
an
extension
of
relief
through
october
17th,
2023,
of
course,
including
any
and
all
applicable
tolling.
D
C
C
C
C
However,
the
board
granted
a
second
extension
of
release
until
august
7
2022..
I
recommend
that
the
board
confirm
for
the
record
that
this
extension
encompassed
all
poland.
Diablo
can
now
request
additional
extensions
for
august
7th
2023.
I
recommended
the
board
grant
that
extension
determines
that
it's
appropriate
under
the
circumstances.
F
I'm
sure
I
hear
my
move
to
confirm
that
all
relief
is
valid
through
august
7th
2022,
including
any
and
all
applicable
tolling.
I
further
move
to
confirm
an
additional
extension
of
relief
through
august
7
2023,
which
of
course
would
include
any
and
all
applicable
totally.
D
A
C
C
However,
that
first
extension
was
not
necessary
because
the
code
was
calling
the
price
is
released
with
calling
this
relief
remains
vowed
until
november
7th
2022..
I
recommend
that
the
board
confirm
for
the
release
remain
valid
for
that
date.
The
applicant
also
requests
an
additional
extension
from
november
7th
of
2023.
F
I'm
sure
hereby
move
to
confirm
the
relief
remains
valid
through
november
7th
2022,
including
any
and
all
applicable
tolling.
I
further
move
to
confirm
an
extension
through
november
7th
of
2023
for
for
this
property,
including
any
and
all
applicable
tolling
as
relevant.
F
C
L
L
L
I'm
murray
go
ahead,
just
you
need
to
unmute
yourself.
We
can't
hang
you
now.
M
Can
you
hear
me,
okay,
yeah
there
you
go
okay,
my
name
is
murray
glazer
at
glaycon
contracting
28
liberty
poll
road
in
hingham,
I'm
the
contractor
for
the
project
for
the
owner.
Thank
you,
sir.
C
C
C
I
recommend
that
the
board
confirm
for
the
fuller
records
at
this
extension
cumbersome
bowling.
The
apple
can
now
request
an
additional
extension
of
until
august
7th
of
2023.
I
recommend
the
board
grant
that
extension
determines
that
it's
appropriate
under
the
circumstances.
Keeping
in
mind
that
this
is
the
only
only
second
applicant
necessary
extension.
F
D
A
N
C
Thank
you
councillor
regarding
201
241
stewart
street
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
august
28
2018..
This
means
that
coverton
does
not
apply
because
that
date
is
after
the
beginning
of
the
state
of
emergency.
However,
this
matter
was
appealed
to
the
superior
court.
The
litigation
calling
does
apply.
This
relief
would
normally
expire
on
august
28th
of
2022.
C
F
And
sure
I
hereby
confirm
that
actually
should
be
moved
to
confirm
that
relief
remains
valid
of
august
8th
of
2023
pursuant
to
litigation.
Calling
second.
A
O
A
L
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
moranti,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
My
client
is
timothy
london,
madam
chair
members.
This
matter
an
application
for
a
new
nine-unit
building
at
64
tolman
street
in
dorchester,
was
approved
by
the
board
on
june
29th
of
last
year,
with
the
proviso
of
bpda
design
review
during
the
design
review
process,
the
bbda
required
and
implemented
a
three
foot
front
setback
of
the
building
on
tolman
street.
P
A
I'm
sorry,
mr
martin,
it's
five
compact
and
how
many
s.
A
And
I'm
assuming
that
the
front
yard
was
for
modal
purposes,.
P
And
not
for
modal,
it's
really.
It
was
simply
the
the
fact
that
the
bbda
wish
to
have
a
setback.
There's
a
sidewalk
with
on
tolman
street
is
is
rather
narrow.
This
is
a
property,
that's
in
a
commercial
zone
commercially
and
residential,
that's
between
norwood
street
and
morrissey
boulevard
and
the
bpda
wanted
to
some
setback
on
the
on
the
tolman
street
side
of
the
building
three
feet.
As
a
matter
of
fact-
and
this
just
resulted
in
some
shrinking
of
the
the
size
of
the
garage.
Q
Are
good
and
no
questions?
It
does
reduce
two
parking
spots,
but
I
think
it
creates
a
little
bit
of
a
better
streetscape.
So
I
have
no
real
issue
or
questions
about
the.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
just
to
emphasize
the
board
required
extensive
design
review
on
this
project,
and
it
was
even
mentioned
that,
even
if
it
meant
decreasing
the
number
of
units
and
or
the
size
of
the
spaces
within
this,
so
I
just
want
to
put
that
on
the
record
that
we
were
following
the
director
with
the
board
and
has
the.
A
G
A
So
we
have
a
motion.
Do
we
have
a
second.
D
A
P
T
Address
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
adam
jaspin
53
thomas
park,
south
boston,
I'm
here
for
141
d
street
without
an
amendment
a
one,
three,
three,
five,
four:
seven:
seven
relative
to
ert
one
one:
zero.
A
T
So
we
have
an
approved
permit
to
build
a
single
family
which
we
started
construction.
We
filed
an
amendment
to
reconfigure
the
rear
decks.
Basically,
we
wanted
to
remove
the
stairs
from
the
decks.
It
triggered
the
rare
yard
setback
which
was
already
approved
for
the
eit
permit.
So.
A
What
was
the
rear,
what
was
the
rear
yard
that
was
approved
and
what's
the
rear
yard
under
this,
under
your
request,.
T
T
Q
A
No,
I
think
we
went
through
a
lot
of
back
and
forth,
and
mr
jasmine
and
isd
claim
that
the
roof
deck
is
as
of
right.
So
we
are
not
considering
that
people.
A
A
Second,
okay,
let
me
go
through
the
roll
call.
Mr
fortune
aye,
mr
alec
miss
dong,
mr
ruggiero
aye,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris
aye
aye,
two
women
support
some
motion
carries
you're
all
set
good
luck.
C
U
So
good
morning
my
name
is
david
freed
and
I'm
with
chew
and
company
architects
in
quincy
mass
we're
here
to
get
approval
from
the
board
for
article
32.
Compliance
for
73,
beacon,
street.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
seminale.
C
X
Yes,
good
morning,
mr
fortune
attorney
feaster
21
jones
avenue
in
dorchester
for.
C
X
Good
morning,
mr
secretary,
madam
chair
members
of
the
boy,
joseph
feaster,
from
the
new
law,
firm
of
dane
torpy,
175
federal
street
boston,
zero,
two
one,
one
zero.
X
I
I
guess
reluctantly,
I'm
making
this
request,
because
I
know
with
the
board
for
a
deferral,
because
I
know
what
the
board
schedule
is
for
the
cases,
but
I
received
a
call
on
friday
informing
me
that
the
plans
that
the
architect
has
stated
an
address
of
19
jones
avenue
instead
of
21
jones
avenue
and
that
I
needed
to
submit
it,
submit
corrected
plans
with
the
address
of
21
jones
avenue.
So
that
could
be
stamped
by
the
by
the
plan
examiner.
X
So
the
only
difference
is
between.
The
only
difference
is
the
change
of
address
between
the
two
sets
of
plans,
but
I
requested
a
deferral
would
hope
that
if
that's
the
path,
I
need
to
go.
Madam
chair,
rather
than
something
else.
Then.
Q
A
C
Are
there
any
other
defaults
of
regardless
of
the
930
cases
only
address?
First,
please
hearing
none
I'll
follow
first
case
calling
voa
127
9637
185
london
street.
This
is
interior,
framing
and
emmy
fewer
separate
in
the
third
and
fourth
floor
to
create
an
owner-occupant
adu.
On
the
fourth
level,
the
violations,
article
53
section
56,
austria
parking
and
loading
article
53
section
9,
the
48
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9.
The
villain
has
excessive
stories.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
villain
has
excessive
defeat
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
L
Z
I'm
in
opposition
to
the
project.
AA
AB
AC
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
what's
being
proposed.
AC
A
Okay,
so
so
please,
please
rewind,
please,
so
you
got
approval
for
us
to
change
occupancy
through
a
three
family.
Is
that
what
you're
telling
me
no
ma'am
so
backtrack,
and
just
tell
us
in
words:
what
was
what
the
what
the
story
is.
AC
AC
Current
occupancy
is
three
units,
and
at
that
time
it
did
not
include
it.
I
mentioned
these
because
they
were
referenced
in
the
rejection
letter
and
the
only
the
material
request
that
we're
seeking
today
is
going
from
a
three
to
a
four
family.
On
the
top
floor.
A
Okay,
so
this
is
a
request
for
a
and
who
owns
the
property.
A
AC
AD
AC
R
AC
Feet
yesterday.
AE
A
Okay
and
tell
us
about
the
lease
agreement:
should
you
sell
that
unit
your
unit
will?
Will
that
adu?
Is
there
something
that
states
that
that
adu
will
be
vacated.
AC
We
don't
intend
to
sell.
This
is
a
family
property.
A
G
Okay,
madam
chair,
may
I
speak
on
this.
Yes,
real
quick,
so
this
project
isn't
eligible
for
the
adu
program
and
if
it
were,
it
would
not
be
before
the
board.
So
our
recommendation
on
this
was
a
deferral,
because,
if
they're
just
extending
living
space,
then
it
should
be
that
these
plans
are
mislabeled.
G
They
have
adu
written
all
over
the
place,
and
my
question,
as
you
would
see
in
our
recommendation,
is
if
this
is
indeed
being
changed
from
a
three
family
to
a
four
family
and
if
it
is
then
we'd
like
a
deferral,
because
I
don't
think
anywhere
in
the
refusal
letter.
Does
it
say
that,
specifically
when
it's
a
three-family
zoning
district,
so
it's
a
forbidden
use.
I
think.
AC
D
A
Please,
mr
mr
fortune,
the
date.
A
AC
L
Senator
edwards
was
on
to
give
testimony
here,
so
it
is
deferred
until
september
september.
13Th.
X
Madam
chair,
this
is
attorney
feaster.
I've
sent
an
email,
a
chat
to
you
and
to
mr
ehrlich
regarding
the
previous
case,
21
jones
avenue.
Can
I.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
let's
just
sorry,
mr
fortune,
can
you
please
recall
jones
ass,
so
we
can
get
it
into
the
record
and
let's
get
a
new
date
from
mr
pista.
He
will
be
away.
AG
C
Calling
doa
one
two:
nine
eight,
four:
zero:
nine
twenty
one
kilo
dab
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
X
I
will
be
madame
cheer
that.
C
Will
be
the
date
of
september
13th
at
11
30.
C
Okay
call
in
the
next
case
calling
voa
132
8555
8c
all-state
road.
This
is
an
interior
tenant,
fit
out
exterior
dual
window:
modifications
that
change
from
an
office
snack
to
a
total
wine
liquor
store
the
violation,
article
65,
section,
15,
liquor,
store,
uses
conditional
name
and
address
for
the
record
good.
AH
I
am
joined
this
morning
by
christopher
tracy
from
o'neill
associates
and
bob
schaefer
from
total
wine
and
more
madam
jam
members.
Today
we
are
seeking
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
change
of
occupancy
from
office
retail
store
to
liquor
store
located
at
8c
allstate
road
in
dorchester,
which
is
located
in
the
south
bay
center
in
dorchester
in
the
former
office
match
space.
A
Mr
fitzro,
please
give
us
details
hours
of
operation
square
footage,
so
we
can
get
a
sense
of
what
the
impact
might
be.
AH
The
square
footage
fountain
chair
is
23
000,
approximately
23
400
square
feet
hours
of
operation.
I
will
ask
if
bob
schaefer
from
total
wine
can
actually
speak
to
the
operations
if
the
board
would
like
to
hear
it
from
him.
Now,
that's
that's!
Probably.
As
far
as
the
the
hours
of
operation
security
systems.
A
I
mean
this
is
because
this
is
the
conditional
use,
so
we
can
figure
out
what
the
conditions
are,
even
that
we
should
place
on
this.
So
mr
schaefer
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
give
us
details.
Please.
AI
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair,
my
name
is
robert
schaefer.
My
address
is
6600
rock
ledge
drive
defensive,
maryland,
208
17.
I
work
for
total
wine
and
more
madam
chair.
I,
the
hours
of
operation
are
monday
through
saturday
and
we
we
open
at
9
00
a.m
in
the
morning
and
close
at
9
00
p.m.
I
think
those
are
the
correct
hours.
I
apologize.
I'm
gonna
check
while
we're
conducting
the
hearing,
but
I
think
that's
the
that's.
The
hours
of
operation
permitted
by
law.
AI
Madam
chair,
I
don't
I
don't
know
the
the
sunday
hours
I
apologize.
I'm
gonna
have
to
check
on
that
and
get
back
to
you.
If
you
don't
mind.
A
Yes,
okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
The
plans
are
good,
it's
an
abandoned,
storefront
looks
like
they're
just
on
the
exterior
redefining,
I
think,
there's
a
question.
I
guess
I
have
a
question
about
the
signage
package,
which
is
not
part
of
this
approval,
but
should
be
part
of
the
with
the
bpa.
So.
R
AJ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
george
flynn
with
the
mayor's
office
snippet
services,
so
despite
opposition
small
business
owners,
the
proposal
received
unanimous
support
from
the
licensing
board
in
january
and
based
on
their
promises
to
provide
ample
security,
lighting
and
community
benefits.
The
new
market
business
association
and
the
intersquare
civic
association
have
written
letters
of
support.
The
mccormick
civic
association
has
voted
in
opposition
at
this
time.
Our
office
would
like
to
refer
to
the
board's
judgment.
A
Mr,
mr,
what
were
the
hours
of
operation
that
were
approved
by
the
licensing
board,
because
we
need
to
make
sure
that
that
they
are
respected.
When
we
look
at
this
proposal,.
A
C
Secretary
here
we
do
have
some
letters
of
support.
I
don't
see
any
letters
of
opposition
and
I'm
trying
to
look
at
the
time
they
have
submitted
something
here
from
the
licensing
board,
but
I
don't
see
anything
where
it
has
time,
but.
AJ
Hi,
yes
ben
murphy,
here
from
new
market
business
improvement
district,
I'm
here
to
speak
in
sport.
A
Excellent
ben:
do
you
have
an
idea
of
what
their
proposed
hours
of
operation
are.
L
AG
Yeah
hi
mike
d'alessio,
I
have
an
office
over
here
on
mass
apps
1252
massive.
I
just
want
to
speak
in
full
support
of
this
party.
A
I
bet
I
bet
in
the
meantime.
Let
me
go
back
because
I
want
full
acknowledgement
from
a
total
wine.
Since
you
are,
you
are
not
in
the
state.
Give
me
the
hours
of
operation
for
the
record.
Please.
AI
A
Okay,
okay,
so
we
have
that
on
the
record,
may
I
have
a
motion
place
I'll.
E
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
two
providers:
bpda
design
review
for
signage,
which
will
go
there
anyways
and
the
proviso
for
the
hours
of
operation
9
a.m,
to
10
p.m,
monday
through
saturday
and
10
a.m,
to
8
p.m.
On
sunday,.
A
Mr
fortune
aye
ms
darling,
miss
dong
hi
and
mr
rogero,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris.
What
my
two
women
supports.
The
motion
carries:
good
luck.
Those
providers
thank.
C
You
man,
I'm
sure,
thank
you
board
members
following
your
next
case,
calling
voa
128,
0
6
5
1
9
batch
elder
screen.
This
is
an
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement
for
unit
1
renovation
of
unit
2
and
extension
into
the
attic
as
unit
two
deck
alterations
to
violate
a
new
door's
new
dormers,
the
violation,
article
50,
section,
29
floor
day.
Ratio
is
excessive
and
article
50,
section
29.
The
rare
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AE
Yes
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
attorney
david
click,
neil
and
neal,
and
click
of
85
main
street
hopkinton
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
rea
llc.
I'm
here
or
here
with
me
today,
is
the
architect,
lewis
colton
as
well.
AE
It
is
currently
a
two
family:
it
was
a
pre-existing,
a
five
bedroom,
two
bathroom,
it
was
purchased
january
2020.
It's
has
lot
dimensions
of
35
feet
or
37
feet.
A
AE
So
the
appellant
at
the
time
it
was
purchased
as
a
two
unit,
so
the
renovations
were
performed
on
the
property
and
madam
chair.
This
is
really
where
this
comes
into
play,
as
it
was.
A
AE
So
the
if
actually
there's
a.
AE
This
you
can,
if
I
could
actually
have
command
of
the
screen,
just
to
make
sure
that
I
have.
A
The
right,
oh,
you
know
you,
you
have
not
appeared
before
this
board
before
so
we
just
tell
us
which,
which
drawings.
AE
So
the
proposed
use
in
the
basement
would
be
for
a
two
bed
two
bath
and
then
so.
The
there's
two
units,
the
first
unit,
is
the
basement
and
first
floor,
two
bedrooms
in
the
basement
two
bath
and
then
a
bedroom
on
the
first
floor,
as
well
as
dining
and
living
space,
with
a
rear,
egress
off
the
back
edge
of
the
property
that
you
can
see
clouded
here
in
blue.
AE
A
A
And
tell
us
some
counselor:
we
need
to
hear
from
you
and
the
arc,
your
architect,
what's
the
floor
to
cell
height,
if
you're
proposing
any
window
wells
and
where
do
the
window
wells
open
into,
because
you
need
to
know
that
clearly,
this
board
is
not
a
great
fan
of
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
We
need
to
put
that
out
there
very
clearly
to
you.
AE
AE
Okay,
there
are,
as
far
as
from
the
plan
as
shown
as
a21.
There
are
two
window
wells,
one
in
the
rear
of
the
of
the
building
and
to
the
right
side
along
the.
I
believe
it
is
the
the
eastern
edge.
A
Okay,
and
how
is
is
this,
is
there
possibility
for
access?
Should
it
be
required
from
this
window
well
without
being
hampered
by
a
vehicle.
AE
You're
on
sorry,
madam
chair,
I
would
that
that's
a
fair
question.
I
would
believe
just
given
the
width
of
the
driveway
as
12
and
a
half
feet
that
there
would
be
there.
You
would
have
the
ability
to
do
that,
but
I
would
also
if.
A
Okay
and
then
final
question
is:
is
the
utility
utility
space
accessible
from
the
exterior
and
not
through
the
union
unit.
AN
A
Okay,
so
let
us
know
is
that
utility
unit
utility
space
accessible
outside
of
the
of
that
the
residential
proposed
space
in
the
basement.
AM
Oh
yes,
it
is,
and
the
question
with
regards
to
the
window
well
with
any
interference
of
the
driveway
there
is
a
the
purpose
of
the
driveway,
is
for
a
single
car
unit.
It
does
not
go
all
the
way
back
to
there
so
that
it
does
not
in
any
manner
endanger
the
the
wind
well
and
access
to
that
wind.
Well,
for
egress.
AM
Yes,
that's
that's,
okay,
with
with
everyone,
the
ad,
the
the
attic
originally.
If
you
look
on
the
drawing
it's,
the
existing
condition
had
a
two
bedroom
and
closets
originally
in
the
attic.
The
renovation
of
the
work
then
made
a
revisions
to
those
bathrooms
and
out
to
those
bedrooms
and
added
a
a
bathroom
and
added
a
utility
and
a
laundry
room
that
was
done
in
a
fashion
which
did
not
increase
the
far
fat
area.
AM
It
was
done
with
if
you'll
notice,
on
the
form
the
cover
drawing
and
on
drawing,
are
1.1
it's
what's
known
as
a
peekaboo
dormer,
the
dormer
did
not
extend
out
past
the
face
of
the
the
the
line
of
the
roof.
It
actually
goes
into
the
into
the
space.
So
if
anything,
we
actually
decrease
the
far
for
the
act.
That
purpose.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
The
plans
are
fine,
I
think
they're
no
issue
with
the
attic.
I
think
that's
fine,
the
the
basement
is,
I
I
it's
not
as
there's
no
there's,
not
a
second
bedroom
actually
shown
the
utility
is
accessed
directly
through
the
unit,
at
least
for
the
plans.
That's
all
I
can
review
so
that
is
doesn't
seem
to
be
the
case
and
the
you
know
the
lower
level
is
below
grade.
I
mean
these
are
typical
window
well
units
that
the
board
is
not
so
excited
about.
Q
So
I
think
the
basement
expansion
is
a
problem
because
of
the
bedrooms
as
presented.
A
No
other
questions.
Okay.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either?
Oh
sorry,
any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
AO
AO
Some
background
information
on
the
community
process
is
thea.
Butters
were
all
in
support.
There
was
no
indication
of
opposition
and,
at
this
time
were
deferred
to
the
board.
C
A
D
I'll
make
a
motion
for
approval,
with
a
proviso
that
there
be
no
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
A
Repeating
them
today
and
please,
if
you
could
do
a
spell
check
on
mr
fortune's
name,
so
we
have
it
right
on
the
screen.
Mr
fortune,
it's.
C
I
A
Yes,
let's
I'm
sorry,
I'm.
A
Gone
through
the
roll
call,
so
I'm
assuming
that-
and
I
will
just
take
it
on
the
record-
that
nobody
has
any
issues
with
it
next
case.
C
This
is
a
change
of
option
and
use
of
a
commercial
space
at
951.,
dorchester
avenue
to
include
a
local
retail
business,
allowed
use
and
an
accessory
package
door.
Liquor
stewie
has
been
used
and
a
bakery
use
is
additionally
no
change
to
the
plans.
The
violation
article
65
section
8
vacant
use
is
conditional
and
article
6568,
a
liquor
store.
AD
AD
Madam
chair,
this
is
seeking
permission
to
change
occupancy
of
one
of
the
commercial
spaces
on
the
ground
floor
at
this
building.
It's
an
in-construction
building.
It's
ongoing
construction
right
now.
This
was
an
overall
article.
Eating
small
project
review
project
approved
by
this
board
back
in
april
of
2018
and,
what's
being
proposed,
is
to
add
a
retail
package
store.
AD
A
small
retail
package
store
liquor,
store
use
in
a
bakery
used
to
the
market,
which
was
in
existence
at
this
location
before
construction
of
the
new
building,
and
that
would
provide
for
a
limited
takeout
of
beer
and
wine
only
in
bakery
items
to
accompany
the
the
long-standing
market
concept
of
the
premises.
AD
It's
been
there
for
65
plus
years.
Okay,.
AD
The
bakery
you
swell
so
it's
a
bakery
is
defined
under
the
code.
Madam
chair
is
a
place
where
baked
goods
are
made
or
sold
for
off-premise
construct
consumption.
So
it's
really
not
a
bakery
use
it.
You
know
in
a
traditional
sense,
it's
more
to
cover.
You
know,
production
of
you
know,
small
items
that
would
be
sold
on
the
premises.
A
So
you
could
you
could
get
your
your
donut
with
your
beer
for
tickets
if.
AD
It
was
more
again
that
was
more
of
just
looking
at
the
code
and
understanding
that
you
know
as
an
option
to
be
able
to
make
a
baked
good
and
what
that
actually
is
defined.
As
so
there's
some
traditional
bakery
and
you're
right.
We
tried
to
be
very
specific
as
to
where
this
beer
and
wine
would
be
located.
You
can
see
here
on
the
plant
up
in
front
of
the
board.
It's
a
ten
foot,
wine
rack
display
and
a
six
foot
beer
rack
display
and.
AD
Yes,
ma'am,
so
the
so
the
typical
hours
are
anticipated
as
7
a.m,
to
9
00
p.m.
For
the
market,
we
do
still
need
to
go
to
the
liquor
licensing
board
for
approval
of
the
of
the
issuance
of
the
license,
so
they
would
also
condition
the
hours.
I
believe
the
license
would
go
till
11
pm,
but
we're
not
planning
to
necessarily
be
open
that
late,
okay,
so
we're
looking
at
7
am
to
9
pm.
However,
you
know
the
the
license
would
go
until
11.
so
and.
A
AD
A
No,
I
no,
I
see
that
and
that's
why
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
are
not
approving
so
the
jacket
doesn't
look
like
we
are
approving
a
full
liquor
store.
We
are
proposing
approving
just
this
accessory
use.
How
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
Answer
very
clear
and
straightforward:
no
questions
from
me.
AD
Mr
erlich,
there
will
be
additional
signage.
We
did.
We
did
go
to
design
review
for
the
overall
project
back
in
2018.
However,
to
be
100,
candid,
that
that
is
a
that
that
image
of
the
signage
will
change,
so
there
would
need
to
be
design,
reviews
or
signage,
but
that's
your
question.
Yes,
yeah.
A
Yes,
we
remember
thank
you,
anybody
else
to
speak
in
the
support
of
this
proposal.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
D
AU
A
C
AV
Good
morning
it's
kevin
joyce,
guardia
law
office,
50,
franklin
street,
steve,
291,
baking
street.
C
AV
Kevin
joyce's
daughter
law
office,
50,
franklin
street.
My
appearance
is
limited
to
the
board
of
appeal
here,
representing
the
petitioner
respectfully
requested
referral
for
each
brief
time
so
that
we
could
prove
can
we
conclude
negotiations
in
the
community.
AV
A
C
Mr
joyce,
when
is
when
is
the
meeting
because
they
could
set
a
date
for
august,
23rd
or
september
13th.
C
Welcome
are
there
any
other
deferrals
to
10,
30
or
withdrawals
from
10
30.
hearing
none
will
go
back
to
the
9
30.
follow
the
next
case,
calling
boa
128
0472
18
henry
street.
This
is
parking
for
two
spaces
next,
next
to
their
home.
The
violations,
article
65
section,
9
side
yard,
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
L
Okay,
I
do
have
a
hand
raised
to
talk.
Emily
is
this:
your
are
you
here,
sorry.
AW
AW
A
Okay,
okay,
let's
let's
just
move
on
is
anybody
here
for
henry
is
mr
whitaker
here:
okay,
if
not,
let's
go
on
to
the
next
case,
follow.
C
Your
next
case
calling
voa
128,
3621,
118
r
holmes
avenue.
This
is
wrecked.
The
new
tree
family,
residential
dwelling
with
roof
deck,
an
existing
rear
vacant
lot
of
4
491
square
feet
and
proposed
610
of
our
street
parking,
the
violations,
article
65
section
65-41.4
fogging
in
the
front
yard,
article
65
section,
65-41.5
parking
size,
maneuverability,
article
65,
section,
8,
3f
and
the
2f
is
forbidden,
article
65,
section,
42.13,
two
more
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot,
article
65
section
9,
the
lottery
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
9.
C
AX
AX
AX
Currently
we
are
proposing
a
three-family
dwelling
residential
dwelling
on
this
lot.
There
is
a
there's,
an
easement
driveway
easement,
that's
shared
with
the
building
in
front
of
it
that
has
again
been
in
place
since
the
50s.
We
are
just
looking
to
build
something
on
this
lot.
It's
40
491
square
feet
and
we'd
like
to
like
to
build
something
here.
AX
A
And
you
are
already
below
the
the
basic
requirement
of
a
5
000
square
foot
lot
to
build
a
one
family
or
two
family
and
you're
requesting
a
three
family.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us,
you
have
a
number
of
violations
here,
tell
us
about
how
you're
going
to
propose
parking
and
how
it's
proposed
to
work.
AX
Sure,
thank
you
so,
in
the
in
the,
as
you
see
the
image
up
here,
there's
a
driveway
shared
driveway
with
the
front.
Then
there
is
a
there's
three
existing
parking
spaces
for
the
building
in
the
front
that
are
already
existing
on
the
lot
line.
There
is
currently
a
fence
that
separates
the
two
lots
and
then
you'll
see.
We
originally
proposed
three
parking
spaces
after
meeting
with
the
neighborhood
extensively.
A
Okay
and
what
are
the
proposed
sizes
of
the
units
and
the
bedroom
count.
AX
So
there's
three
units
we
had
originally
all
two
bedroom
two
bath
after
meeting
with
the
neighborhood.
They
wanted
us
to
change,
one
of
them
to
a
three
bedroom,
to
invite
more
of
a
family
atmosphere,
so
they're
all
roughly
nine
hundred
to
a
thousand
square
feet.
The
first
two
floors
are
two
bed
two
bath.
The
top
floor
is
a
three
bed
two
bath.
A
And
one
one:
three:
bed:
okay:
okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
Plans
are
fine.
Excuse
me
in
terms
of
the
proposal,
can
I
just
ask
the
proponent
one
question
looks
like
there
is
a
couple
of
other
rear
buildings
on
the
street
104r
122r.
Can
you
just
just
tell
me
what
those?
What's
this?
The
are,
those
one
family,
two
family.
What
are
those
those.
AX
Are
I
know,
there's
multiple
one
families?
I
believe
one
of
them
is
a
two
family,
I'm
not
exactly
sure,
but
yes,
there
are
other
these.
This
whole
street
has
real
lots,
set
behind
all
the
or
many
of
the
buildings
for
some
reason,
and
they
they
were
there
70
plus
years
ago,
and
many
of
the
neighbors
have
built
structures
in
the
rear.
A
Okay,
any
questions,
mr
d'amico,
can
you
put
your
your
concerns
on
the
record.
AZ
Yes,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
above
the
mako
btd,
I
would
like
to
request
any
front
yard
parking
to
be
removed
and,
secondly,
I'd
like
to
see
spaces
one
and
three
be
removed
for
safe
and
adequate
maneuverability.
A
AZ
Seven
eight,
I
think
it's
four
five,
six
seven,
eight
ten,
it
would
leave
with
eight
spaces.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
A
Can
everybody
please
mute
themselves
any
questions
from
the
board.
D
Yeah
just
put
a
three
family
on
a
on
an
under
5
000
square.
Foot
lot
in
the
rear
of
an
existing
law
seems
excessive.
It's
not
so
much
a
question
as
a
comment.
A
BA
A
few
different
times
back
in
2021
as
well
direct
the
butters
did
have
concerns
around
privacy
with
the
three
decker
coming
up
next
to
them,
overcrowding,
as
and
as
well
as
density
as
the
applicants
they
degradable
in
geneva
did
want
to
see
more
parking
spaces
and
the
applicant
did,
you
know,
show
them
that
present
them
that,
and
they
did
want
to
see
a
one,
a
three
bedroom
unit.
There
was
no
negative
push
back
outside
of
density
and
just
privacy
concerns
and
affordability.
A
Like
a
lot
of
concerns,
though
density
privacy,
parking
and
affordability,
okay,
thank
you.
Any
anybody
else
to
speak
on
the
record.
Yes
good
morning.
B
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
this
is
lester
and
susan
mckenzie,
we're
from
112
holmes
avenue.
We
have
butters
to
that
118
rear
this
property
we've
been
on
in
this
property
for
over
40
years,
there's
never
been
anything
bigger
than
a
one
family.
It
was
zoned
for
either
a
garage
or
one
family
home
for
them
to
want
to
allow
a
three
family
there's
not
enough
space.
There's
not
enough
room,
and
I
have
didn't
hear
anyone.
I
was
at
all
of
the
meetings
they'd.
No
one
asked
for
a
third
family.
BB
A
BB
Opened
this
gentleman
many
times
and
there
were
no
requests,
there
were
no
requests
for
a
three
or
a
three
bedroom
on
top
of
the
two.
Also
we've
been
here
for
a
long
time
and
there's
only
one
house
on
the
back
of
a
lot
here
on
holmes,
ave
going
down
to
to
top
live,
there's
just
one
house
that
have
a
building
behind
it
and
we
explained
it
and
talk
about
that
and
all
these
objections
here
why
that
building
should
not
be
put
there.
A
G
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
chef,
hampton
bpda.
We
recommend
it
to
now
without
prejudice.
We
feel
that
the
proposal
is
excessive
if
they
want
to
come
back
with
a
lower
unit
count
where
it's
more
appropriate
for
the
zoning
district.
We
may
entertain
that,
but
we're
opposed
to
this
project.
A
Okay,
mr
fortune
aye
mr
alec,
miss
dawn
mr
giro
aye,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris.
A
C
Go
into
the
next
case,
calling
voa
131,
5141
16
church
street,
and
this
erected
three
family
dwelling
violation:
article
55
section
65-41,
our
street
parking
sufficient
article
65
section
2
confirming
an
existing
building
alignment;
article
65,
section,
65-14.3,
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner;
article
65,
section
32:
this
is
in
the
neighborhood
design
overlay
district
article
65,
section
9.
The
lot
areas
insufficient
article
65,
section,
9
lot
width
is
insufficient.
C
BC
BC
This
is
a
proposal
to
erect
a
traditional
style,
three-family
dwelling
with
two
off-street
parking
spaces
on
a
approximately
a
2658
square
foot
vacant
corner
lot,
which
was
previously
an
existing
tree
family
back
in
the
early
nineteen
seventies.
This
proposal
is
located
within
a
three
half
five
thousand
sub
districts.
BC
The
three
units
will
be
approximately
one
thousand:
seventy
nine
square
foot
each
with
the
total
living
area
accumulating
to
3257
square
feet.
Unit
1
unit
2
and
unit
3
will
all
mirror
each
other
with
the
layout
consisting
of
a
three
bedroom
on
each
floor.
Kitchen
living
area
two
bath
as
well.
The
proposed
far
is
a
1.22
and
a
0.5
is
what
is
allowed
by
the
code
here.
BC
Building
height
in
in
height
is
actually
compliant
at
34
ft,
but
it's
excessive
with
the
stories
we're
proposing
three
stories
and
complying
is
a
2.5.
BC
BC
BC
Something
else
that
I
think
is
worth
pointing
out
is
that
we
were
cited
for
the
traffic
visibility
on
fifth
field
street,
as
you
can
see,
is,
is
on
on
church
street,
no
matter
which
direction
you
head
and
that
fifth
field
street
is
a
one-way
street.
So
I
think
it
was
important
to
highlight
that
as
well.
Q
Plans
are
good,
I
think
in
general.
The
the
size
and
scale
is
fairly
consistent
with
the
street.
Obviously
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
smaller
lot.
Yeah
I
do
have,
and
I'm
sure
mr
d'amico
will
have
a
question
about
the
parking,
because
there's
a
extra
large
18-foot
curb
cut
on
the
back
to
achieve
the
two
spots,
but
other
than
that
there
is
no
occupancy
in
the
basement.
So
no
other
questions
for
me
on
the
proposal.
BA
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
denise
sansos
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
did
meet
with
director
butters
back
in
may,
as
well
as
the
meeting
hill
house.
Neighborhood
association
butters
would
like
to
see
a
fence
alongside
the
property
as
well
as
lighting.
H
AG
AS
L
AZ
I
would
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
bob
domingo
btd,
and
I
was
just
wondering:
is
there
any
parking
of
where
the
curb
cut
is
going
to
go.
A
AA
A
L
G
Sorry,
I
forgot
to
put
it
down,
but
we
well
since
I'm
on
we're
on
the
record
for
approval
with
design
review.
Please.
L
Q
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpd
design
review
as
well
as
looking
to
see
if
they
can
reduce
the
curb
cut
at
all,
to
be
a
little
bit
more
pedestrian
friendly
from
18
feet.
Z
C
Along
the
next
case,
calling
doa
133
4896
240
norwell
street,
this
erected,
two
families
dwelling
on
a
vacant
lot:
evaluation,
article
65,
section
2
conforming
with
existing
building
alignment;
article
65,
section,
41,
r3
parking
article,
65,
section,
9,
a
lot
of
areas
insufficient
article
65,
section
9
bought
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9
log
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9
fluid
air
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
65
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
I'm
sure
we're
here
today,
seeking
related
to
record
two
family
dwelling
on
a
vacant
lot
zone
accept
district
here
is
a
three
f.
Six
thousand
our
lot
size
is
twenty
two
hundred
square
feet.
The
violations
are
as
follows:
lot
area
insufficient.
Again
we
have
2200
square
feet,
a
lot
with
bottom
punches.
The
requirement
is
50
feet.
We
have
33
feet
far
requirement
is
0.4.
K
K
The
units
are
one
bedroom
one
bath
unit,
one
is
approximately
square
feet
and
unit
two
is
approximately
630
squared.
A
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
Plans
are
pretty
straightforward:
the
parking
spot,
the
setback
is
on
the
right
hand,
side
which
is
tighter.
There
is
a
driveway
on
the
left
inside
just
not
exactly
sure
how
to
get
into
the
parking
spots,
but
they
don't
seem
pushed
back
behind
the
building
far
enough
in
the
site
plan,
but
no
other
questions
for
me
in
terms
of
the
size
and
scale.
It's
pretty
consistent.
It's
a
smaller
lot
for
certain.
So.
A
Yes,
it's
quite
undersized.
A
BA
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
of
denise
de
santos,
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
did
meet
with
the
director
butters
back
in
march
of
2022,
as
well
as
wow
coalition.
A
few
different
times
around.
This
folks
were
more
concerned
around
the
neighborhood
development
projects
being
proposed
on
norwall
street,
and
they
would
like
to
see
this
sold
as
affordable
units.
A
So,
mr
santos,
there
are
a
number
of
dnd
projects
that
will
be
affordable.
How
many
do
you
have
a
sense
in
that
street.
BA
K
A
A
Okay
and
and
it's
doable?
Yes,
okay,
given
all
this
information,
may
I
have
them.
A
Is
proposing
recommending
approval,
with
proviso
for
design
review,
with
an
effort
that
the
existing
trees
be
protected.
BG
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
Q
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
bpda
design,
review
for
site
plan,
specifically
existing
trees
to
be
retained.
D
A
C
You
very
much
happy
birthday
call
in
the
next
case
calling
voa
1
3
2
2
1
2
1,
1,
2,
8,
74,
r,
5
street
you're,
looking
to
a
16
foot
by
25
foot,
long
13,
foot,
high
400
square
foot,
prefabricated
metal
garage
installed
in
the
backyard
of
their
property.
The
property
has
the
existing
driveway
readings.
The
raft,
the
violations
article
60
section,
nine
side
yards
insufficient.
BH
A
Okay,
so
I
see
the
plans-
okay,
yes,
please!
So,
let's
just
see
where
it's
proposed
to
go.
BH
BI
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
Plans
are
pretty
straightforward.
One
question
for
the
proponent,
so
does
the
driveway
currently
go
that
far
back
into
the
site?
It's
a
little
hard
to
tell
from.
BH
No,
so
the
driveway
goes
up
to
you
see
where
right
behind
the,
where
the
stairs
are
in
the
back
of
the
fences,
it's
right.
It
ends
there.
So
I
would
have
to
pour
asphalt
to
connect
the
garage
to
the
to
that
to
where
the
asphalt
line
is
right.
Now,
okay,.
A
BJ
Hi
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
eric
james
of
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
for
74
faber
street,
had
the
butters
meeting
on
may
18
2022.
BJ
They
also
attempted
to
meet
with
the
colorado
street
citizens
group
twice
but
cancelled
due
to
it
was
cancer
due
to
technical
difficulties.
They
also
agreed
not
to
visually
disturb
the
community
and
have
provided
a
list
of
homes
in
close
vicinity
to
the
proposal
with
detached
garages.
R
L
Hey,
which
I
have
don't
break
stats.
Q
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
I'm
going
to
go
against
mr
hampton's
recommendation.
I
think
there
should
be
design
review
for
this,
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
adequately
screened
and
buffered
on
the
backyard
and
the
connection
of
the
additional
driveway
is
done
properly.
A
Is
there
a
second
second
and
I,
mr
fortune,
hi
mr
alec
hi,
miss
dong
hi
mr
ruggiero
hi,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris
hi.
I
200
support
so
motion
for
approval,
but
design
review
carries
good
luck.
C
Thank
you
following
the
next
case
calling
dla
131
55815
bell
avenue.
This
is
an
edition
of
a
second
story
over
the
original
original
house,
the
first
existing
first
law,
the
violations,
article
56
section
8,
employee
ratio-
is
excessive.
Article
56,
section
8,
open
space
is
insufficient
article
56,
section
8,
the
reagan
is
insufficient
and
article
56
section
8.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BK
A
So
mr
buck
tell
us
what's
being
proposed.
BK
It's
an
existing
one-story
house,
as
you
can
see
the
knock.
The
lot
is
kind
of
narrow,
but
the
the
owners
are
looking
to
grow
their
family.
Here
they
would
like
to
add
on
a
second
floor.
We
would
be
adding
on
942
square
feet
to
provide
three
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms
on
the
second
level
and
to
improve
the
first
floor
living
spaces,
thereby
we're
also
moving
the
front
door
to
face
the
street
which
currently
it
faces
the
side
yard.
A
Okay,
and
so
it's
a
three
bedroom
any
so
basement
just
has
laundry
bathroom.
What
is
that
space
that
the
rio
proposed
in
the
basement.
BK
A
And
please,
if
this,
if
this
gets
approved,
I
would
like
that
put
into
the
minutes
which
gets
registered
at
the
registry
of
deed.
So
we
know
that
it's
not
a
two
family
dwelling,
okay,.
A
BL
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jake
lacy
from
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
our
office
hosted
a
community
meeting
on
april
20th
2022.
An
additional
provider's
meeting
was
held
at
west
roxbury
neighborhood
council
on
may
24th
2022,
where
the
zoning
committee
voted
7-0
in
support
of
the
project.
BL
BL
Yeah
definitely
it
was
addressed
at
both
meetings.
I
would
say
for
the
office
neighborhood
services
meeting,
there
was
only
the
direct
to
butter
who
attended
and
it
was
definitely
addressed
and
there
were
no
there's,
no
opposition
toward
that.
A
Yeah
got
it
is
any
miss
ambassador.
Anybody
any
more
raised
hands.
AG
And
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
city
council
at
lodge
due
to
the
lack
of
opposition,
the
council
like
to
go
on
record
support.
A
The
owners-
let's
just
hear
from
your
architect,
we
hope
you're
in
support
of
this
any
anybody
else
with
ambassador.
L
A
Ma'am,
mr
burke,
a
couple
of
questions
on
the
adu:
what's
the
floor
to
ceiling
height.
Q
I'll
make
a
motion
to
prove
with
the
design,
review,
bpda,
design,
review
and
confirmation
that
this
is
approval
of
a
single
family
with
a
adu
unit.
A
BA
Is
here
I
try
to
reach
out
to
them?
Just
they
haven't
responded
back
to
me
to
me.
C
A
Okay,
mr
fortune,.
AT
E
A
C
C
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
business
address,
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
matt
wood,
the
owner
of
the
property.
This
is
an
appeal
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
roof
deck,
which
is
part
of
an
application
to
renovate
the
existing
three
family
dwelling
at
41.
Mount
vernon
street
in
charlestown
extend
living
space
into
the
basement.
P
P
I
mentioned
by
way
of
background
that
this
board
approved
a
nearly
identical
but
slightly
larger
application.
A
version
of
this
application
in
december
of
2020
that
approval
was
appealed
by
an
abutter
whose
primary
concern
was
the
size
of
the
proposed
rear.
Edition
litigation
was
settled,
and
my
client
agreed
to
reduce
the
size
and
height
of
the
zoning
compliant
edition
and
resubmit
his
permit
application,
which
is
why
this
has
returned
to
the
board
unit.
P
One
here
would
be
a
1364
square
foot,
two
bedroom
unit,
which
would
include
approximately
280
square
feet
in
the
basement,
consisting
of
a
bathroom,
a
laundry
closet
and
a
very
small
office,
or
a
very
large
walk-in
closet,
depending
upon
how
one
wanted
to
use
it.
The
ceiling
height
in
the
basement
is
eight
feet.
Unit
two
would
be
a
1215
square
foot
two
bedroom
unit
and
unit
three
would
benefit
from
the
rear
addition
and
grow
from
its
current,
approximately
480
square
feet
to
930
square
feet.
P
Also
with
two
bedrooms
unit
3
would
have
a
zoning
compliant
walk-out
rear
deck
on
the
third
floor
level,
roughly
12
by
13
feet
and
a
similar
sized
roof
deck
accessed
by
hatch.
The
roof
deck
is
the
sole
matter
before
the
board
today,
as
it
requires
a
conditional
use
permit
for
altering
the
building's
roof
line.
As
such,
I
would
pause
it.
P
It's
it's
not
equal
dimensions,
but
it's
roughly
13
by
14
or
12
by
14..
There's
a
if
we
go
down
to.
P
It's
about
12
feet,
but
then
it
goes
out
to
about
14
feet
and
it's
about
14
feet
in
in
width.
Q
BM
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
caitlyn
stapleton,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
our
office
hosted
a
buddies
meeting
on
april
12th.
For
this
proposal.
The
applicant
addressed
all
questions
inherent
concerns
from
the
neighbors.
Most
concerns
were
related
to
sunlight
quality
of
air
and
noise
during
the
construction
period,
along
with
the
other
projects
happening
in
the
area,
the
applicant
has
tried
working
with
the
neighbors.
Since
the
meeting,
I
received
five
letters
of
opposition
in
the
letters
of
support,
but
at
this
time
we'd
like
to
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
D
I
actually
I
did
have
a
question.
I
was
on
mute,
the
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement.
They
move
through
the
floor
plans,
pretty
quick.
What
is
in
the
bait?
What
is
the
use
in
the
basement.
P
The
the
basement
use
is
a
bathroom,
a
small
laundry
room
actually,
if,
where
was
controlling
their
plans,.
A
P
Won
in
the
lower
right
hand,
corner
depicts
the
the
space
in
the
basement,
which
again,
as
I
mentioned,
was
previously
approved.
It
is
a
bathroom,
a
utility
closet
with
the
washer
dryer
and
then
what
is
depicted
as
an
office
or
a
den
which,
as
I
say,
looking
at
it
is
perhaps
more
suitable
as
a
there's,
a
walk-in
closet,
it's
about
six
and
a
half
feet
deep
and
maybe
maybe
10
feet
in
width.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
we
have,
we
have
enough
information,
we
have
testimony.
May
I
have
a
motion,
please.
A
Okay,
mr
fortune
aye
mr
alec,
miss
dong
hi
mr
ruggiero
aye,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris.
A
A
C
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
128,
86
69
97
to
101
newbury
street,
this
combined
97
to
99
101
newbury,
to
be
known
as
97
101
dewbry
street
violations.
Article
8
section
7
uses
conditional
cafe
condition
cafe,
is
a
conditional
use
in
the
b365
sub-district
article
15,
section
1.
The
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
20
section
1,
the
rare
guy's
insufficient
and
article
32
section
32-4.
L
BO
L
A
BG
BG
It's
nice
to
see
you
again,
mr
chairman,
nice,
to
meet
you
appreciate
it.
We're
looking
to
do
renovation
improvements
to
our
existing
building
into
the
adjacent
building
at
97.
101
newberry
street
are
near
the
corner
of
new
green
clarendon
here
with
brian
woods,
who's
executive
vice
president
of
the
applicant,
and
I
hope,
was
john
trufficonti
who's
with
schwartz
silva.
Our
architect,
we've
been
through
a
lengthy
public
process
with
this
project.
We'd
like
to
thank
the
mayor's
office
representative,
livingston
council
bach,
numerous
back
bay,
neighborhood.
A
Association,
so
you
know
you
know
we'd
like
to
go
com.
BG
A
A
Thank
you.
So,
let's
go
directly
to
the
use
and
the
reason
why
the
violation
for
far
excessive
and
rear
yard
insufficient
is
triggered.
BG
Sure
the
the
the
use
of
the
grab
and
go
cafe,
there's
no
cooking,
there's,
no
we're
just
going
to
serve
probably
go
things.
People
will
come
in
for
that.
We
need
a
conditional
you,
it's
not
a
restaurant
of
any
kind
or
anything
like
that.
As
far
as
the
violations
go,
the
far
is
basically
because
of
being
bootstrapped
from
being
a
pre-existing
non-conforming
building
because
of
the
amount
of
money
we're
putting
into
the
renovation
we're
now
boosted
up
into
complying
with
existing
code.
Existing
code
calls
for
three
fpr.
BG
BP
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
yes,
the
far
the
non
the
existing
non-conforming
building
is
a
far
5.7
by
connecting
on
97
to
that
building,
we're
actually
reducing
the
sar
to
5.1
the
97
watt
building
alone.
The
far
what
we're
proposing
is
is
3.3.
BP
If
you
look
at
just
the
97
watt
about
647
feet
over
the
the
the
zoned
far.
A
So,
can
you
please
tell
us
which
drawing
we
should
look
at
to
see
where
the
addition
is.
BP
Yes,
what
we're
proposing
is
to
reconstruct
the
97
building.
So
if
you
scroll
back
up
I'm
sorry,
we
scroll
back
up
to
the
to
the
plan
right
there
within
the
red
box
of
that
plant
is
the
97
y.
We
are
connecting
it
to
the
lower
plan,
which
is
the
99
101
existing
new
new
england,
historic
genealogical
building.
So
what
we're?
BP
What
we're
proposing
is
to
reconstruct
the
existing
to
reconstruct
the
97
building
at
that
location,
extend
the
lower
levels
back
to
the
alley
to
meet
the
facades
of
the
existing
buildings
on
either
side,
so
the
99
on
both
the
east
and
the
west
side.
The
existing
buildings
extend
back
to
the
alley
side
and
are
significantly
taller
than
what
we
have
proposed.
A
Okay,
okay
got
it
and
the
cafe
use
is,
for
general,
the
the
general
public
or
just
for
the
for
for
users.
People
who
use
the
the
society's
space
well.
A
A
Okay,
good,
that
was
the
right
answer,
all
right:
okay,
okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
Plans
are
good,
it's
no,
no
real
questions
on
the
proposal.
It's
it's
very
handsome
in
terms
of
the
addition,
and
it
is
extending
back
to
the
alleyway
on
the
lower
floors,
but
I
think
it's
consistent
with
anything
else
on
the
alleyway.
So
really
no
questions
on
the
proposal.
It
looks
quite
nice.
Q
A
It
is
okay,
any
questions
from
the
board.
BF
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
I
sent
back
our
information
on
the
community
process.
As
you
heard,
from
the
apple
in
our
office
held
in
a
butters
meeting,
there
was
just
one
abutter
who
had
some
concerns
regarding
the
use
of
the
back
alley.
We
encouraged
the
app
to
continue
communication
without
a
butter
throughout
this
process
and
prove
to
continue
to
work
with
them.
BF
The
applicant
also
met
with
nab
the
neighborhood
association
for
back
bay,
and
I
believe
they
were
not
opposed.
That
would
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
L
W
Hi,
this
is
conrad
armstrong
from
439
marvel
street.
I'm
representing
the
neighborhood
association
back
bay.
The
applicant
met
with
us
many
times
normally
nab
would
oppose
a
relief
from
where
yard's
setback,
but
we
do
feel
this
is
a
very
unusual
situation.
All
the
other
buildings
next
to
it
are
already
built
out
all
the
way
to
the
the
alley,
the
curb
of
the
alley.
W
Similarly,
we
normally
would
oppose
increase
in
far
but,
as
was
mentioned,
the
the
new
combined
buildings
of
97
101
actually
lowers
the
far,
and
so
we
do
not
oppose
that.
And
lastly,
we
do
not
oppose
the
addition
of
a
simple
little
cafe
inside
your
space.
Thank
you
thank.
AG
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
mike
velasio,
I'm
a
business
replicapa
327
in
boston
and
we're
in
full
support
of
this
project.
BQ
Q
AA
C
You
thank
you
very
much
I'll
connect
calling
the
next
case
calling
vla
1332,
366,
53
grampian
way.
This
is
to
convert
the
existing
attic
into
living
space
with
two
bedrooms
in
a
bathroom
struck.
Two
dormits
violations,
article
65
section
9.
The
florida
ratio
is
successive
article
65
69.
The
building
has
accessible
stories,
article
65,
section
9.
The
villa
has
accessibility,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
A
So
tell
us
tell
us
about
the
proposal.
BS
Sure
this
is
we're
adding
to
a
dormers
in
the
attic
level.
This
is
a
two-family
remainder
family
and
we're
adding
additional
square
foot
for
the
second
floor
unit.
A
And
tell
us
what
the
total
proposed
square
footage
of
proposed
edition
is:
okay,.
A
A
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
supporter
and
opposition
of
this
proposal.
AJ
A
A
Okay
got
it
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
Q
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve.
I
A
I
too,
am
in
support,
so
motion
for
approval
is
carried
good
luck.
Thank
you.
C
On
your
next
case,
calling
voa
131,
1043
15
fowler
street
resurrected
new
construction,
three
family
dwelling,
the
violations,
article
60
section
9,
the
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9
side
yards
insufficient
article
60,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
41.1
conforming
with
existing
building
alignment.
Article
60
section
9
the
lot
areas
insufficient
article
60,
section
9,
the
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient
and
article
60
section
9
in
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
Okay,
okay,
so
I
have
to
tell
the
applicant
that
we
are
a
six
member
board
and
for
approval.
You
need
all
five
all
you
need
five
members
and
support.
So
you
are,
you
can
go
ahead
or
you
can
request
the
date.
All
seven
members
will
will
be
able
to
sit.
A
BC
Mountain
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
ryan
spitz
from
adam
zimmerntzy,
with
the
business
address
of
168
h
street
first
floor.
South
boston
with
me
today
is
the
owner,
neil
galden,
in
the
architect,
matt
banachi
from
casa
design.
This
proposal
is
to
erect
a
traditional
three-family
dwelling
on
a
4200
square
foot
vacant
lot.
The
proposal
is
located
within
a
three
f
5
000
sub
district.
BC
The
three
units
will
range
from
approximately
14
73
square
feet
to
23
square
feet.
With
the
total
living
area
of
approximately
5
570
square
feet.
Unit
1
will
consist
of
a
three
bedroom.
A
first
floor
along
with
livable
space
in
the
basement.
Basement
height
is
eight
feet.
There
will
be
no
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
There
will
be
two
window
wells
on
the
rear
of
the
property,
one
at
the
size
of
three
by
six
feet
and
the
other
one
three
by
three
feet
and
four
inches
are
for
access.
BC
Egress
means
there
are
also
in
the
basement.
You
will
notice
that
there
will
be
a
build
out
of
of
a
wheelchair
accessibility
in
order
for
that
to
be
built
out
at
some
future
date.
Until
then,
it
will
be
used
as
storage
the
basement
totally.
A
BC
Great
yes,
no,
there
won't
be
any
intentions
of
having
a
basement
unit
in
this
property.
This
is
going
to
be
an
accessible
unit,
so
the
the
shaft
is
actually
just
going
to
be
built
out
to
be
compliant
with
the
code.
Just
in
case,
if
there
is
a
compliancy,
you
know
a
tenant
that
comes
in
in
a
wheelchair,
accessible
shaft
needs
to
be
built,
and
it
will
have
the
accessibility
for
it
to
be
done.
BC
So
so
the
basement,
total
square
footage
of
the
basement
unit
will
be
1148
square
feet
in
the
first
floor
unit
will
be
1475
square
feet.
Unit
2
will
consist
of
a
3
bedroom,
along
with
the
kitchen,
dining
room,
living
and
office
den
space,
with
the
total
square
footage
of
approximately
1474
square
feet.
BC
BC
A
Open
space,
let
me
just
ask
you
about
the
side
yard.
On
the
left
side,
how
close
is
the
abutting
building
to
their
property
line?
So
what's
the
distance
in
essence,
from
the
existing
building
to
your
proposed
building,
I'm.
BC
Going
to
defer
so
mapping
the
architects
here,
I'm
going
to
defer
to
him
on
the
exact
americans
from
the
existing
property
from
11.
I
believe
you
refer
to
11
through
13
fowler
street.
If
I'm
correct.
BC
BU
BV
A
BV
Is
there
is
currently
a
vacant
lot
on
the
left
side
of
15
holler
street
okay
on
the
left-hand
side.
A
And
then
is,
let
me
just
see
front
yards
tell
us
about
the
rear
yard.
R
Q
Plans
are
good,
no
question,
I
think
it's
fairly
consistent
with
the
street.
I
think
the
only
thing
is
the
the
parking
is
right
up
against
the
rear
property
line.
So
maybe
we
can
have
vpa
look
at
that
for
a
site
plan
and
screening
and
buffering,
but
no
other
questions
on
the
proposed
building.
A
BA
Chairs
members
of
the
board
good
this
denise
essentials
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
met
with
direct
the
butters
in
may
and
as
well
as
the
aryan
islands,
neighborhood
association
director
butters
would
like
to
see
like
families
in
these
units,
and
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
prefer
any
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
BI
District
first
city
council,
brian
rowell's
office,
we
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board
thanks.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Can
you
ask
the
counselor
to
come
to
a
meeting
to
speak
at
a
meeting,
so
we
can
meet
him.
I
know
being
remote,
makes
it
difficult.
Okay,.
H
AG
Paul
sullivan
for
city
council
at
large,
michael
flaherty
council.
What.
A
Okay,
miss
ambassador
anybody
else.
Q
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
bpda
design
review
looking
at
site
plan
as
well
for
screening
and
buffering.
H
H
A
Miss
dong
hi
mr
regero
hi,
mr
robinson
hi
and
mr
list
has
recused
I
am
in
support,
so
motion
for
approval
with
design
review
carries
good
luck.
Thank.
BV
C
C
BW
AT
A
Dong
aye
mr
ruggiero
aye,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris
are
two
of
them
in
support.
Some
the
motion
for
deferral
carries
the
date.
Please.
C
C
O
An
address
please
five.
A
Okay,
is
there
a
reason
for
your
request
for
deferral
again?
Is
this
your
second
or
third
request.
O
Second:
request:
for
deferral:
this
is
for
administrative
reasons,.
A
A
Mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris,
I
two
women's
support,
so
the
motion
for
deferral
carries
the
date.
Please
we.
O
C
Hearing
none
go
back
to
the
next
two
cases,
calling
voa
133
9059
25,
barry
street.
There
is
a
companion
case,
voa
133,
9067,
52
bellevue
street.
This
is
for
25
barry
street
to
subdivide
an
existing
lot
of
six
thousand
eight
hundred
thirty
one
square
feet
into
two
lots:
lot:
a
25
battery
street
with
an
existing
three
family.
Drawing
shall
have
3750
square
feet
and
lot
b.
52
bellevue
street
vacant
lot
will
have
3081
square
feet.
C
C
This
is
452
bellevue
stream
to
erect
a
three
family
dwelling
on
a
newly
created
3081
square
foot
lot
building
will
be
fully
sprinkled.
The
violations
article
65
section
7
lottery
is
insufficient
article
65
section
7
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
7
large
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
7
of
a
floyd
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
section,
7
and
building
head
is
excessive
article
67,
section
7,
the
bill
and
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
7,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
C
Article
65
section
7
the
side
jobs
insufficient
article
65,
section
7
of
rhaegar
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
41
r
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
41,
offspring
parking
design
and
article
65
section
42
in
form
of
an
existing
building
alignment
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
The
zoning
sub
district
here
is
the
three
f.
Five
thousand
and
again,
the
new
lot
created
will
be
we'll
have
2691.
A
So
so
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everything
is
clearly
on
the
record.
At
25
barry
street
there
is
an
existing
three
family.
Will
there
be
any
modifications
to
anything
like
parking
or
anything
triggered
by
this
proposed
subdivision.
A
So
tell
us
what
the
rear
yard
is
required
for
zoning
and
what
is
being
proposed
well.
K
Madam
chair
graveyard
requirement
the
sony
sub
district
is
20
feet.
We
are
composing
five
as
a
result
of
the
subdivision.
K
K
K
With
regard
to
the
front
yard
requirement,
the
front
yard
requirement
is
15
feet.
We
are
proposing
five,
which
is
modal
to
some
of
the
other
buildings.
In
that
area,
side
yard
violation
requirement
is
10
feet,
they're,
proposing
five
on
one
side
by
feet.
18
on
the
other
side,
which
includes
the
driveway
rare
yard,
again
is
20
feet
and
we
are
proposing
14
feet.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
Plans
are
good,
I
think.
Obviously,
the
only
real
question
in
my
mind
is
the
sort
of
subdivision
and
the
rear
yard
setback
for
25
52
is
set.
I
think
about
18
feet
off
the
property
line,
so
between
the
buildings
is
closer
to
22
feet
or
something,
but
no
real
questions
on
the
proposed
layout
or
scope
of
the
addition
or
the
new
building
on
the
other
street.
So.
BA
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
denise
desantos
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
state
that
the
applicant
did
meet
with
direct
the
brothers
back
in
january
2022,
as
well
as
the
association
greater
boat
in
geneva.
Greater
boat
in
geneva.
At
this
time
would
like
to
remain
neutral.
BA
Director
butters
was
concerned
around
just
density
and
parking
around
this
area.
At
this
time,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
any
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
L
Okay,
anna
did
you
be
looking
at
a
good
testimony
here.
L
BY
Yes,
reverend
john
adams,
speaking
on
behalf
of
pilgrim
church,
the
pilgrim
church
parsonage
is
at
46
bellevue
street,
so
two
doors
down
from
the
proposed
couple
of
things,
one
of
which
is
it,
is
a
very
densely
occupied
area
and
where
the
driveway
would
be
coming
out
is
an
abandoned,
bellevue
street
right
about
where
kane
street
cuts
in.
So
it
will
be
a
date
more
dangerous
intersection,
as
it's
contested
also
the
closeness
to
the
butters.
BY
BA
Meeting
house
hill
does
fall
into
a
different
catchment
area
than
this.
This
is
technically
greater
boat
in
geneva's,
okay,
guys,
okay,.
L
No
matter
I
have
no
raised
hands.
Thank
you.
A
Mr
hampton,
I
have
a
question
for
you.
You
know
you
know
this.
This
subdivision
creates
a
non-conforming
law
of
at
25,
barry
any
sense
of
the
neighborhood
and
how
many
of
these
can
possibly
be
triggered
through.
A
You
know,
through
these
kind
of
subdivisions,
because
this
was
a
very
comfortable
conforming
lot
at
25
barry
and
now
we
have
we've
created
one
significantly
non-conforming
lot
as
far
as
rear
yard
is
concerned,
and
then
one
you
know
three
family
dwelling
any
sense.
A
Is
mr
hampton
on
no
jeff
are
you
on
nope?
I
guess
we've
lost
them.
Okay,
given
this
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
Q
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve.
I
think
there
can
be
some
work
done
on
again
the
site
planning
in
terms
of
the
I
think
I'm
not
as
concerned
by
the
access
point.
As
the
gentleman
mentioned,
I
think
it's
sort
of
at
the
edge
and
it's
not
directly
aligned
with
cane
street,
but
I
do
think
there
can
be
some
better
work
done
on
the
site
planning
and
the
screening
and
buffering
between
the
two
properties.
Q
A
That's
site
lining:
okay.
Okay,
may
I
have
a
second.
C
BZ
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
pulgini,
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
james
baker,
and
also
with
us
today,
is
chris
drew
who's.
The
architect
from
686
architecture,
69
houghton
street.
Just.
BZ
It's
69
holding
street
in
dorchester.
The
zoning
in
this
neighborhood
is
2f5
000.
The
slot
size
is
3435
square
feet.
The
proposal
is
to
build
a
new
two
and
a
half
story,
two
unit
condo
with
four
oscar
parking
spaces
on
this
vacant
lot.
This
proposal
is
located
at
the
corner
of
houghton
and
tilesboro
streets.
BZ
As
far
as
the
neighborhood,
it's
a
true
mix
of
ones,
twos
and
threes.
We
have
three
families
to
the
left
and
all
similar
size.
Lots
to
this
two
family
proposal,
I'll
touch
on
the
violations
that
mr
fortune
just
read
a
lot
size.
It's
5
000,
it's
required
in
the
zoning
with
3
435
square
feet.
Far
0.5
we're
at
0.74
front
yard
is
15.
We're
at
2,
7.
side
yard
on
the
right
side
is
where
I'm
sorry.
BZ
It's
2.7.
BZ
There's
a
you
know,
james
baker's
with
me
here
the
last.
You
want
to
comment
on
that.
AQ
It
varies
quite
a
bit.
Quite
a
quite
a
few
of
the
homes
are
very
similar
in
terms
of
just
set
back
a
few
feet.
There's
no
there's
no
real
model,
it
varies.
The
housing
stock
is
quite
varied.
A
BZ
And
then
sorry,
side
yard
venom
chair
on
the
right,
10
feet's
a
lot
we're
five,
but
that
is
actually
the
street
side
and
then
very
odd
is
20
required
we're
at
18.5.
BZ
We
obviously
visibility
around
the
corner
because
we're
at
the
front
and
then
the
parking
with
the
front
yard
parking
the
reason
being
the
access
to
this
property
is
off
of
tilesboro
street,
so
the
parking
is
in
the
rear.
Just
it
is,
as
you
know,
because
it's
on
a
corner.
It
has
two
front
yards
technically
the
unit.
One
is
1458
square
feet.
It's
two
bed,
two
bath,
there
is
a
tv
room
in
the
basement
with
a
bath
storage,
the
basement
ceiling
height
is
eight
feet,
there's
no
bedrooms
or
anything
in
the
basement
unit.
BZ
A
Tell
us
about
the
how
far
above
great
it
is,
because
you
know,
honestly,
we
don't
want
to
see
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
You
know
creeping
into
basements,
no.
BZ
I
agree,
madam
chair,
it
is
the
window,
is
44
inches
off
the
floor,
it's
a
full
egress
window
in
the
basement
and,
as
I
said,
it's
eight
foot
ceiling
height.
AQ
Q
Plans
are
good
yep.
I
can
confirm
it
is.
You
know
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
drop
along
tiles
for
street.
So
one
question
on
the
access
for
the
parking
through
the
rear,
so
you're
you're
utilizing
an
adjacent,
parcel's
curb
cut
and
you
have
an
easement
to
access.
That
is
that
how
I'm
reading
that
correctly.
R
A
Now
we
can
hear
you,
I
think
john
might
be
frozen.
BZ
All
right
I'll
ask
you
for
one
second,
mr
evans.
I
apologize
for
that
of
course
yeah.
So
there
is
an
event
that
is
already
referred
to
the
registered
needs
and
has
been.
Q
BZ
The
only
access
is
off
of
tiles,
bro.
A
AJ
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
george
twin
with
the
mayor's
office
and
equipment
services
at
the
butters
meeting
in
april,
a
couple
residents
expressed
desire
for
a
single-family
home
and
as
few
as
two
parking
spots,
citing
a
lot
size
and
traffic
impact.
AJ
L
Okay,
my
I
do
have
a
few
raised
hands
miner
go
ahead.
L
Okay,
tim,
I
sent
a
request
on
you.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
now,
just
for
the
record,
please,
okay,.
AY
Madam
chairman's
aboard
to
of
butter
84
odin
street
speaking
of
position,
my
primary
concern
is
loss
of
visibility
across
the
intersection
on
houghton
and
tom
farrell
street.
As
I'm
sure
you're
aware,
the
mercury
school
is
at
the
bottom
of
tollsboro
street.
All
the
buses,
as
well
as
countless
cars,
pedestrians
crossing
the
intersection
going
to
and
from
the
school
loss
and
disability
at
this
critical
intersection,
will
surely
result
in
accidents
and
injuries.
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
deny
these
variances.
AY
I
also
caution
against
approval,
with
proviso
for
additional
design
review
to
resolve
the
issue
of
visibility
across
the
corner.
The
board
did
that
for
the
development
being
constructed
currently
at
the
bottom
of
townsville
street
across
from
the
murphy
school,
the
resulting
filtering
of
the
building
corner
did
not
result
in
adequate
sight
lines
across
that
corner
and
the
overall
design,
aesthetic
of
the
chamfered
first
level
and
cantilevered
upper
levels,
and
also
just
to
correct
the
record.
This
lot
was
previously
before
the
board
a
number
of
years
ago,
under
a
previous
owner.
AY
At
that
time
there
was
a
proposal
for
single-family
residence
and
the
board
at
that
time
denied
those
variances
due
to
the
size
of
the
law.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
C
Chair
secretary
here
I'm
sorry,
I
missed
it.
We
do
have
letters
of
our
opposition.
AF
Hi
there,
my
name
is
jessica
cookson,
I'm
at
136
138
of
haunted
ave,
and
we
are
in
support
of
this
project
due
to
increasing
the
demand
in
housing,
and
we
think
that
design
fits
well
into
the
neighborhood.
CA
Yes,
I'm
also
a
resident
at
136-138
in
a
poncett
ad,
and
I
won't
comment
on
a
few
things
one.
I
trust
james
judgment.
What
he's
been
doing
to
this
neighborhood?
It's
really
changed.
I
have
a
young
child.
I
walk
these
roads
frequently,
I
feel
as
though
it's
been
it's
been
pretty
safe,
even
with
adding
that
new
development
that
was
at
the
bottom,
one
suggestion
you
could
talk
about
is
actually
adding
another
stop
sign
at
tillsborough
corner.
That
would,
I
think,
make
everyone
stop
at
that
intersection,
rather
than
having
it
a
straight
through.
CA
If
someone
had
an
issue
with
that,
I
think
that
would
slow
down
that
traffic
on
that
one
road.
If
availability
is
an
issue
and
again,
I'm
also
a
local
realtor
and
in
full
support
of
needing
more
housing
in
this
location,
and
I
think
that.
A
A
AZ
Yes,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
baltimore
bcd,
we
can
work
with
the
applicant
to
install
proper
signage
to
make
this
a
very
safe
area.
We've
done
it
before
and
and
we'd
be
glad
to
do
it
again
if
this
is
approved
by
the
board.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
AQ
AQ
This
lot
has
never
been
on
the
zba
previously
just
confirmed
that
it's
never
been
on.
We
would
be
happy
to
work
with
btd
to
trying
to
make
sure
that
intersection
is
safe
as
possible.
A
Q
Looking
at,
I
think
the
site
plan
in
terms
of
the
parking,
I
think,
a
budding
up
to
the
adjacent
building
behind
there's
a
lot
of
blacktop
there.
So
hopefully
they
can
do
a
little
bit
better
job
with
screening
and
buffering
and
vegetation,
and
then
I
think,
working
with
mr
d'amico
and
btd
on
ensuring
a
safe
corner.
I
think
there
also
could
be
some
site
plan
issues
in
terms
of
maybe
terracing
the
wall
down
for
better
visibility
at
the
corner.
A
It
is
now
noon
time
on
the
nose
we,
the
border,
will
take
a
15
minute
break
and
will
reconvene
at
12
15..
Thank.
C
CB
CB
The
scope
of
work
here
basically,
is
that
this
is
a
it's
a
one
and
a
half
story
home
where
there's
two
bedrooms
on
the
second
floor,
their
family
is
expanding,
so
they
can
configure
the
second
floor
to
create
a
few
more
bedrooms,
so
they're
looking
to
increase
the
from
two
to
four
bedrooms,
so
we're
looking
at
building
a
full
height
second
floor
with
an
added
crawl
space
from
the
hvac
system
to
service
that
center.
Q
Plans
are
good,
very
straightforward.
No
questions
for
the
proponent.
CC
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
danielle
fonseca
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
applicants
completed
the
community
process
and
they
notified
all
of
butters
of
their
proposal
back
on
may
17th,
and
they
also
attended
the
reidville
watch,
neighborhood
community
meeting
on
may
19th,
where
they
did
receive
full
support
from
the
group.
CC
A
Yeah
and
I
think
we
do
have
some
emails
that
came
in
in
support,
so
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
Q
I'll
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
I
think,
with
bpda
design
with
you
just
to
make
sure
the
proportions
of
the
windows
and
the
addition
are
good.
So
that's
about
it.
D
A
C
Calling
your
next
case
calling
doa
one
three:
zero:
six:
six:
nine
nine
six,
fifty
four
cummings
highway.
This
is
an
interior,
exterior
renovation,
recording
bombing
room
and
location
of
existing
garage
construction
of
a
new
garage
violations.
Article
9
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
youth
article
60,
section
9:
the
48
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
60,
section
9,
the
rare
yard,
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
BE
Okay,
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
This
is
an
existing
non-conforming
use.
The
davis
funeral
home
has
been
operating
at
this
location
for
nearly
70
years
with
miss
ridley
operating
it
for
the
last
approximately
20.
we're
here
before
you
today,
seeking
relief
to
construct
a
handicap
accessible
bathroom
in
order
to
better
serve
our
patrons,
and
what
this
requires
is
the
relocation
of
the
existing
bombing
room
to
the
space
that
currently
houses
the
garage
for
the
hearse,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
we're
going
to
be
constructing
a
new
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
BE
BE
A
BE
Eight
shows
you
the
changes
to
the
roof
that
would
be
included.
A
Is
is
that
garage
door
facing
the
street
or
is
it
in
the
back?
It.
A
It's
in
the
rear,
okay,
okay
cool:
how
are
the
plans
miss
mr
robinson
lands.
Q
Are
good
just
one
question
on
the
site
plan
you
have
a
much
larger
lot
in
the
back.
That
seems.
Is
that
off
your
property,
or
is
that
your
property
just
a
different
parcel
that.
BE
Is
not
our
property
city
of
boston.
Q
Nice,
okay-
and
you
have
the
use
of
that
park-
is
that
what
how
you
park.
BE
We're
in
discussions-
that's
not
part
of
where
anything
is
being
located
today
and
none
of
our
property.
None
of
our
physical
structure
is
on
that
and
we're
in
discussions
with
the
city
regarding
that
parcel.
Okay,.
BJ
AU
Q
A
I'm
sorry
got
it.
Yes,
mr
robinson.
A
BE
C
C
This
is
new
construction
with
two
family
dwelling
with
four
parking
spots
and
curb
cut
and
driveway
the
violations.
Article
67
section,
9
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
67,
section
9,
the
side
yards
is
sufficient.
Article
67
section
12,
dimensional
regulations,
article
67,
section
9
blood
area
is
insufficient.
Article
67
section
9
along
with,
is
insufficient
article
67
section
9.
The
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
67,
section
9
the
villain
has
accessible
stories.
C
This
is
for
124
glendale.
This
is
subdivide
lot
into
two
large
being
known
as
120
glendaur
violations.
Article
67,
section
9
side
yard
sufficient
before
124
glendolar.
This
extension
of
living
space
into
the
attic
dormis
basement
the
violation.
Article
67
section,
9,
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
67
section
9
a
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
67,
section,
9
log
width
is
insufficient.
Article
67
section
9
before
the
air
ratio
was
excessive
article
67
section
9
the
building
has
accessible
stories.
Article
67,
69,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
6769.
L
Sorry,
we
have
two
way
stands
here.
Pat,
are
you
here.
L
CE
BU
All
right,
my
name
is
olson
lusin,
a
parkview
terrorist
mountain.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
to
do.
BU
Okay,
so
there's
three
things
I'm
proposing
to
do
here.
The
first
is
I
was
adding
a
dormer
to
the
existing
building
and.
A
BU
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
about
the
proposal
to
extend
into
the
attic.
What
is
what
is
the
intent
of
the
use
of
the
attic.
BU
Yeah
we
the
proposed
proposing
what
is
it
one
bedroom
up
to
two
bedrooms
up
there
and
a
bathroom
with
a
small.
BU
Oh,
the
proposed
used
for
the
basements
to
have
two
bedrooms
and
a
bathroom
down
there
and
a
laundry.
A
BU
Going
to
be
eight
feet,
I
think.
BU
AR
Yes,
my
name
is
pat
fisher.
I'm
with
fisher
associates
architects,
35
fisher
road
in
weymouth,
124
glendale
street
is
an
existing
8
500
square
foot
lot
in
a
neighborhood
that
is
zone
2,
f5
000,
and
it
is
a
neighborhood
of
mostly
multi-family
homes.
My
client
is
looking
to
subdivide
this
into
two
lots:
one
of
four
thousand
square
feet,
one
of
forty
five
hundred
forty
eight
square
feet.
I'm.
A
Excited
so
so
so
when,
since
we
are
at
124,
what's
the
square
foot
proposed
for
that
lot.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
speaker,
speak
through
up
through
the
basement
proposed
basement
extension
at
124.
AR
AR
The
basement
will-
and
that
is
drawing
that's
drawing
a7,
if
you
want
to
scroll
to
that.
So
the
basement
will
have
two
bedrooms,
a
small
sitting
area
and
a
bathroom
and
possibly
a
laundry
yes,
that's
it.
On
the
left
hand,
side
the
lot
slopes
dramatically
from
the
back
down
to
the
street,
so
we
could
possibly
have
all
windows
that
are
not
egress
well
windows.
AR
A
Okay,
so
the
the
challenge
I'm
having
is
that
this
is
a
2f,
5000
and
you're,
taking
a
lot
and
creating
two
substandard
lots,
which
will
remove
any
rights
for
future
owners
to
do
anything
on
their
property,
essentially
without
coming
to
this
board,
and
so
you
so
there
are
both.
Both
properties
now
have
a
lot
aryan
sufficiency,
lock
with
insufficiency,
etc,
etc.
CA
AR
AR
It's
the
same
situation.
The
basement
in
the
first
floor
will
be
the
one
unit,
here's
the
basement
plan
and
I'm
going
to
suggest
we
swap
the
rear,
bedroom
and
the
family
room.
So
we
don't
need
an
egress
well
for
that
rear
bedroom
and
that
will
make
those
both
of
those
bedrooms
again.
The
lot
slopes
both
of
those
bedrooms
will
have
normal
egress
windows.
A
And
just
so
that
you
know
this,
this
board
is
not
very
keen
on
bedrooms
in
the
basement,
especially
especially
when
there's
new
construction.
So
please
then
go
ahead
and
talk
about
everything
else.
Okay,.
AR
So
this
building
will
also
have
two
units.
There
will
be
three
bedroom
units.
The
basement
in
the
first
floor
is
one
unit.
The
second
and
well
third
floor
or
attic
will
be
the
second
unit
and
both
of
these
attics
are
half
stories,
so
the
square
footage
is
half
of
the
floor
below,
but
this
will
again,
like
I
said,
there'll,
be
living
room,
dining
room,
kitchen,
three
bedrooms,
two
bathrooms:
the
locks
do
contain
enough
parking
four
spaces
for
each
building.
AR
There
is
some
exterior
open
space
proper
to.
A
Tell
us
which
drawing
to
go
to
it's.
AR
A
different
drawing
it's
by
boston
survey:
do
you
have
that.
A
Was
that
the
first
first
in
the
package
there
it
is?
Oh.
AR
Okay,
yeah,
okay,
so
that's
the
existing
site.
Obviously
right
now
it's
one
lot
that
shows
the
subdivision.
It
doesn't
show
the
other
building.
Okay,
we're
still
not
showing
the
building.
AR
AR
BU
AR
I'm
holding
it
up
to
the
to
the
camera.
This
is.
AR
AR
Y
AR
Oh
well,
there
is
actually
one
that's
been
done
by
george
collins,
but
this
is
in
essence,
yeah
what
he
drew
yeah
there
is
a
so
there's
going
to
be
two
separate
driveways,
two
separate
parking
areas
at
the
rear
and.
A
AU
A
Oh
okay,
about
16
feet
all
told
got
it
okay.
How
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
The
plans
are,
we
just
went
through
them.
I.
Q
A
little
bit
confusing
I
you
know
I
do
question
if
we
can
really
get
full
egress
windows
in
the
basement,
as
as
the
proponent
is
sort
of
it
is
a
sloping
lot,
but
it's
just
hard
to
tell,
because
I
don't
have
that
information
in
terms
of
the
proposed
building
and
and
the
subdivision.
I
don't
really
have
too
many
questions
about
that,
but
I
do
have
a
question
about
how
to
manage
the
lower
level
units.
A
Got
it
okay,
any
questions
from
the
board.
D
Yeah
just
to
follow
up
on
what
mr
robinson
is
saying,
I'm
looking
at
the
google
maps
picture
and
there's
no
way
that
there's
a
walkout
in
the
front.
The
grade
is
it's
above
grade,
but
not
all
that
significantly,
so
that
I
don't
think
and
if
it
slopes
dramatically
uphill
toward
the
rear.
That
would
be
even
more
of
a
problem.
So
I
I
just
I
don't
think
the
bedrooms
are
going
to
work.
A
CE
Morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
hi,
my
name
is
uja
nochi
and
I'm
the
rossignol
liaison
with
the
mayor's
office.
We
held
a
meeting
for
the
124
glendalour
division
portion
on
april
18th
and
the
120
glendale
road
division
portion
on
may
25th
for
the
124
glendale
road
meeting.
There
were
concerns
about
property
lines,
but
that
seems
to
have
been
addressed
by
the
property
owners
for
the
one
funny
glendale
portion.
CE
There
were
concerns
about
the
property
line
again,
and
there
were
talks
of
maybe
going
to
an
assessing
office.
There
were
also
concerns
over
parking
spaces.
CE
But
through
looking
at
the
plans,
look
actually
ended
up
creating
four
spaces
because
of
the
driveway
and
the
mayor's
office
will
be
different
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
L
AV
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
mark
lucian,
partial
owner
licensed
real
estate.
A
CF
Am
indeed
good
afternoon,
there's
a
board,
not
a
chair.
I
am
in
a
butter
at
130
cornell
street
in
roslindale,
and
I
am
let's
say,
an
ardent
opposition
to
this
project.
CF
It
turned
one
the
so-called
120
glendale
road
turns
124
glendaur
into,
as
you
said,
madame
chair,
a
non-conforming
site
lot
and
there
simply
isn't
enough
room
to
shoehorn.
Another
two
family,
whose
foundation
would
go
rather
deeply
into
the
ground.
It
is
a
great
burden
to
the
abutting
neighborhood
118,
as
well
as
to
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
glendale
is
a
one-way
street.
There's
a
school
just
past
the
intersection
with
kittridge.
CF
It
is
not
the
scale
for
this
neighborhood
to
squeeze
these
properties
together
on
the
on
that
one
lot,
quite
frankly
and
the
topography.
Yes,
we
would
be
handed
eight
cars
on
a
platter
above
everything
else,
so
it
would
be
in
terms
of
variances
two
and
a
half
feet
in
some
areas
between
the
two
buildings.
I
think
you've
run
into
some
fire
code
issues
there
and
it's
not
a
city.
This
is
a
more.
This
is
a
more
residential
scale
for
boston,
and
you
know.
CF
Yes,
we
do
need
more
housing
in
boston
area,
but
we
cannot.
We
cannot
sanction
greed
and
opportunism,
which
is
what
this
project
represents.
Thank
you.
L
And
my
chair,
I
have
no
additional
raised
hands.
Thank
you.
Oh
I'm
sorry
my
hand
was
just
raised
connie.
Are
you
looking
to
give
testimony
on
this
proposal?
I
sent
a
request
to
meet
you.
CG
CG
I'm
constance
borab
at
118
glendour
on
the
immediate
abutter,
and
I
also
have
grave
concerns
about
the
division
of
the
lot.
CG
I
know
mr
lucian
said
in
one
of
the
abutters
meetings
that
he
wanted
to
build.
Something
have
the
design
of
something
for
120
that
wouldn't
require
any
variances.
But,
as
you
can
see,
it's
many
the
other
concern.
I
know
where
I
don't
know
where
the
curb
cut
is
supposed
to
go
on
120
and
how
many
parking
spaces
that
would
be
lost
because
of
the
curb
cut,
and
I
will
tell
you
parking
on
glendower.
Almost
every
space
right
now
is
occupied
by
residents.
CG
A
Me
just
ask
you:
a
quick
question
on
glendower
is
a
one-way.
Is
there
parking
on
both
sides
of
the
street?
Yes,
there
is
so
that
really
narrows
the
passageway,
then
for
for
for
travel.
Yes,
okay!
Okay,
thank
you.
Anybody
else,
most
ambassador,
my.
L
A
A
Oh
okay,
because
the
number
of
emails
came
through
last
few
days.
Okay,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please,
let's
start
with
the
basic
the
basic
trigger
on
all
of
this
is
the
the
boa
1304
three
nine
five
one
twenty
four
glenn
hour
street
ward
18,
which
is
a
request
to
subdivide
this
lot
into
two
lots.
D
A
C
Call
the
first
case
of
rediscussion
calling
voa
seven
125,
seven.
Fifty
three
east
broadway:
this
is
a
proposed
renovation
to
change
art
from
a
restaurant
with
takeout
and
office
space
with
restaurant
takeout
and
two
dwelling
units.
The
violations,
article
68
section
33
r
street,
insufficient
article
68,
section
8,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
article
68,
section
8.
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient,
maybe
not
just
for
the
record.
Please.
CH
Good
afternoon,
the
secretary
madam
chair
members,
board
attorney
joe
hanley
28
state
street
in
boston
with
me
is
the
owner
of
the
property
joy
lee
also
with
me
is
devin
reilly
marini.
Who
is
the
project
architect?
CH
A
Tell
us
what
that
tell
us,
then
what
the
the
project
looks
like
today.
Yes,.
CH
Ma'am,
so
current
project
is
you'll,
see
the
photo
of
the
existing
condition
on
the
left.
This
is
an
existing
three-story
mixed-use
building
at
the
corner
of
l
in
east
broadway
in
south
boston.
CH
It
is
an
existing
non-conforming
structure,
meaning
that
it
occupies
most
of
the
lot
it
is
located
in
an
mfr
ls
and
what
the
project
seeks
to
do
is
merely
to
change
the
occupancy
on
the
top
two
levels
that
you'll
see
there
to
an
allowed
residential
use
and
what
is
being
proposed
is
two
residential
units,
their
floor
throughs
one
on
each
floor
to
replace
what
is
vacant
commercial
space
that,
due
to
the
pandemic,
there's
not
a
lot
of
need
for,
but,
more
importantly,
we're.
Obviously
in
a
residential
area.
The
units.
CH
CH
There
is
no
work
to
the
existing
structure
with
respect
to
any
of
the
zoning
violations,
we're
not
expanding
the
structure
we
have
so.
CH
Yes,
so
the
existing
lot,
no
curb
cuts,
no
available
parking
on
site
today,
and
so
what
is
being
proposed
to
address
that
is
the
top
level
unit.
CH
She
runs
moco
restaurant
also
on
east
broadway,
and
she
has
a
parking
space
there
that
she
uses
for
herself,
so
she'll
be
moving
into
the
top
unit,
and
then
we
were
able
to
since
the
deferral
we
were
able
to
locate
two
additional
spaces
that
we
would
be
able
to
lease
at
655
east
2nd
street,
which
is
less
than
700
feet
from
the
site,
and
they
are
deed,
owned
third-party
commercial
spaces
that
we
are
able
to
lease
and
provide.
A
The
other
addresses
need
to
come
to
this
board,
with
a
request
for
ancillary
parking
for
ancillary
parking,
and
so
because
this
is
just
in
essence,
a
statement
by
by
you
know
you,
as
the
representative
of
the
applicant
about
how
this
is
going
to
be
addressed.
But
it's
just
it's
just
short
term,
because
it's
not
it's
not
memorialized,
really
in
any
place.
CH
Madam
chair,
thank
you
for
that.
I
understand
that
you
know
the
fact
is:
this
is
an
existing
building
in
a
residential
zone
with
vacant
commercial
space
that
would
not
otherwise
conform
to
zoning.
This
board
has
talked
about
creating
housing
of
a
scale
that
would
be
amenable
for
families.
These
are
proposed
to
be
three-bedroom
units.
Each
are
12.
A
I
I
I
I
honestly,
you
know
mr
hanley,
I'm
just
glad
you're
not
proposing
t
passes,
subsidized
t
passes,
etc,
etc.
But
the
thing
is
this:
you
know
until
the
owner
at
6,
55
each
east
second
street,
finds
he
can
get
a
higher
dollar
for
it
or
there's
a
demand
in
his
building
for
it.
Those
are
going
to
vanish
in
about
a
second
and
a
half,
and
you
know
we
know
that
this
for
now
is
owner
occupied
and
the
owner
has
a
dedicated
space
at
her
business.
A
But
should
she
sell
her
business,
you
know,
then
what
she's
stuck
you
know
or
should
she
sell
the
unit?
You
know
that
new
owner
is
stuck
because
it's
not
deeded
in
any
way.
You
know
so
you
know.
I
would
suggest
that
you
know
if,
if
there
is
going
to
become
a
response
to
this
off
street
parking
thing
in
anywhere
in
the
city
that
it
be
actual
an
actual
response
and
not
a
you
know
a
shoot
from
the
hip
response.
A
You
know,
because,
frankly,
I'm
okay
with
that
this
doesn't
have
parking,
because
I
understand
that
this
is
an
mfr
ls.
No,
but
then
I
don't
live
any
state,
and
for
for
I
mean
so
south
and
southeast,
so
any
south
boston
resident
you
know,
needs
to
think
about
these
kind
of
deals
twice.
You
know
so
I'll
leave
it
there.
Mr
robinson,
how
are
the
plans.
Q
Plans
are
fine,
no,
no
real
question
on
the
proposal.
I
I
guess
I
I'm
hopeful
that
if
this
is
approved,
we
can
get
some
a
real
design
review
on
the
exterior
it's
it's.
That
corner
is
starting
to
develop
and
I
think
we
want
to
take
a
shot
at
making
sure
architecturally.
This
building
is
sort
of
preferential
to
what's
happening
in
the
neighborhood,
but
no
no
real
questions
on
the
proposed
scope.
A
Excellent.
Thank
you.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
AW
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
anna
white,
I'm
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
project
was
handled
by
my
predecessor,
our
office
held
abotters
meetings
on
2,
28
2001
and
I'm
414
2001..
I
have
34
statements
in
support
of
this
project
from
residents
of
south
boston.
At
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
BX
Good
afternoon,
one
of
the
chair
members
of
the
board,
anna
from
council
presidents
fling's
office
council
president,
would
like
to
go
on
recording
support
based
on
the
proponents,
good
faith,
efforts
and
compromises
to
address
parking
concerns
and
quality
of
life
issues
from
the
neighbors
since
the
last
hearing
date.
The
proposal
has
come
from
four
units
with
from
parking
spaces
down
to
two
units,
one
of
which
will
be
owner
occupied
with
three
parking
spaces
in
the
nearby
area
utilized
by
the
residents
that
will
be
living
here.
Previously,
the
board
rejected
this
proposal.
Last
year.
BX
The
proposal
the
proponent
subsequently
deferred
in
may
a
council
of
presidents
flings
requests
due
to
outstanding
and
legitimate
concerns
regarding
the
existing
parking
crisis
in
south
boston
and
quality
of
live
issues.
During
this
time
the
owner
has
indicated
she
will
occupy
one
of
the
units
and
utilize
her
existing
parking
spaces
in
the
area.
She
has
also
secured
two
parking
spaces
for
the
other
unit
on
its
second
country.
BX
BX
AK
Adam
chairman
members
of
the
vote,
paul
sullivan
city
council,
lads,
michael
flaherty,
article
68,
went
through
an
extensive
community
process,
and
the
council's
approach
has
been
consistent
in
reference
to
that.
That
said,
council
clarity
like
to
acknowledge
the
proponents
changes
to
address
concerns
about
the
plans.
Note
that
there
are
times
when
these
variances
sought
may
be
considered
a
substantial
hardship.
Therefore,
he
would
defer
to
the
board's
knowledge
of
wisdom
for
understanding
and
interpreting
his
own
laws
as
it
pertains
to
unnecessary
and
unintentional
hardships.
Thank
you.
AK
C
We
do
have
letters
of
support
and
we
do
have
a
few
letters
of
opposition.
A
Okay,
anybody
else,
mr
ambassador.
L
AA
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
my
name
is
richard
hayes.
I
am
director
butter
on
757
youth
broadway
and
I
I
listened
very
closely
to
what
the
chair
said
about
the
the
sleight
of
hand,
shoots
being
hit,
and
it's
it's
it's
spot
on.
It's
a.
AA
Apparent
attempt
at
trying
to
rescue
something
that
wasn't
enough
of
an
effort
put
into
it,
and
you
have
to
question
whether
or
not
it
was
really
meant
to
be
a
an
effort
and
solving
the
problem
or
just
kicking
the
can
down
the
road.
AA
This
doesn't
do
anything
as
far
as
pot
and
and
not
only
that
it
hasn't
changed
the
occupancy
at
all.
It
goes
from
four
units
of
six
bedrooms
to
two
units
of
six
bedrooms
that
is
still
the
potential
of
six
people
in
driving
cars
in
one
of
the
busiest
areas
in
south
boston,
one
of
the
most
hazardous
intersections
in
south
boston.
AA
A
Already
great
sir,
thank
you.
So
you
know
I'd
love
to
hear
from
everybody.
However,
you
know
we
try
to
give
each
project
the
time
that
it
takes.
So
I
would
like
to
hear
from
director
butters
they're
wrecked
butters,
and
I
would
like
for
you
to
give
me
new
information.
A
CI
Luanne
o'connor
president
city
point
neighborhood
association
of
which
this
building
lies.
Madam
chair,
this
is
all
new
information.
Please.
CI
BR
AT
Hi,
my
name
is
greg
serago,
I
own
a
3-4
new
hill
place.
I
am
in
a
butter.
I've
been
participating
in
these
meetings
for
a
while.
Now
I
understand
that
the
original
project
planned
for
six
bedroom.
This
goes
back
to
it.
AH
BV
AT
Yeah
sure
so
I
I
am
in
support
and
I
think
that
the
motion
to
do
so
helps
abate
the
supply
constraints
in
the
neighborhood.
Thank.
A
L
Thank
you.
Okay,
caller
781-2781-270.
L
They
have
two
callers
on
it.
It's
that
request
that
I
mute
you
I'll
go
to
frank
cook,
if
you
don't
frank
and
god.
CD
Yes,
yeah,
I'm
in
full
support
of
the
project.
I
think
it
just,
I
believe
it's
greg
said
it.
It
adds
new
places
that
are
of
actual
value
to
the
community
and
the
size
of
the
apartments
for
the
people
that
will
be
living
there,
and
I
don't
think
the
parking
should
be
an
issue.
Thank
you.
O
Can
you
hear
me
sorry,
my
name
is
anthony.
I
reside
on
east
broadway
approximately
about
one
block
property.
I'm
I'm
full
supporter
of
this.
What's.
O
O
And
from
my
experience,
most
people
that
live
in
city
point
now
about
80
do
not
have
cars,
and
so
they
take
public
transportation.
There's
two
bounds
of
public
transportation
right
out
front
on
the
corner
of
elements.
Broadway.
A
Okay,
so,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
Q
A
Okay,
so
mr
fortune
aye,
mr
ehrlich
robust,
miss
stone
hi.
Mr
ruggiero
got
you
with
a
robusta
okay,
mr
robinson.
Y
I
A
C
Zero
three
four
seven
one:
forty
nine
to
forty,
nine,
a
linwood
street
and
a
companion
case,
voa
133,
6276,
51
linwood
street.
This
is
451
linwood
street
up.
This
is
an
existing
dwelling
at
51
lynnwood.
This
is
one
of
two
dwellings
on
the
same
lot:
violence,
article
50,
section
44.13,
two
or
more
dwellings.
In
the
same
lot,
this
is
the
4949a
linwood.
This
is
new
construction
of
a
two-story
detached
slab
on
grade
garage
with
studio
residents.
Above
this
is
one
of
two
dwellings
on
the
same
law.
C
The
violation
article
50
section
43
ought
to
be
parking,
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29
lot
area
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29
large
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29,
the
rare
yards
insufficient
and
article
50,
section
44.13201
dwellings
on
the
same
law
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CJ
Stephen
keys,
51
linwood
street
owner
I'm
going
to
defer
to
my
architect
mike
chavez.
He
also
will
state
why
we
deferred
from
our
june.
CK
Good
appointment,
madam
chair,
I'm
members
of
the
board,
I'm
mike
chavis
architect
at
26
downhill
park
in
dorchester.
CK
CK
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
about
this:
the
detached
garage,
the
size
of
it.
How
and
it's
how
many
cars
does
it
intend
to
house
and
tell
us
about
the
studio
residents
above.
CK
Sure
so
it's
a
it's
about
a
523
square,
foot,
footprint,
gross
square
foot,
footprint,
16
or
17
feet
by
30
feet,
and
it's
got
a
single
car
garage
inside
for
some
additional
storage.
For
mr
keys,
you
know
snow
blowers
and
things
like
that,
and
it's
got
a
single
stair
that
takes
up
to
the
efficiency
studio.
On
the
second
floor,
which
is
got
a
small
again
kitchen
net,
it's
like
a
you
know,
two
burner,
stove
kind
of
thing
and
small
sink
and
under
counter
refrigerator.
So
it's
just
used
for
friends
or
family
come
over.
CK
They
want
to
stay
and
he
doesn't
have
any
room
in
his
house.
They
can
stay
there.
That's
really
what
the
point
of
it
is:
a
small
space,
single
bathroom
shower
and
yeah.
A
So,
mr
chavez,
you
know
that
the
relief
goes
with
the
property
correct,
so
this
is
a
small
if
we
want
to
consider
the
studio
residence,
it's
a
very
small
space,
and
you
know
mr
the
app
mr
key's
intention
may
be
for
spillover
when
this
company,
but
should
he
sell
that
property?
We
then
have
a
small
unit
that
is
then
open
to
the
open
market.
A
CK
Sure
yeah,
that's
so
you
know
mr
keys
is
this:
is
his
forever
house
he's
staying
there
again
if
he
had
to
sell
it?
However,
ideally
this
would
have
gone
through
what
austin's
currently
working
on,
which
is
the
additional
or
accessory
developing
unit
2.0,
which
is
detached
conversion
of
garages
into
you
know
like
accessory
uses
to
the
main
house,
and
we
would
have
preferred
to
have
gone
through
that
process,
but
just
not
set
up
for
us
to
do
that.
CK
Yet
so
we're
open
to
having
it
be
an
accessory
structure
to
the
main
house
and
not
having
it
be
a
single
family
home
in
and
of
itself.
Its
utilities
will
be
connected
to
the
main
house.
Again,
it's
providing
additional
off-street
parking
for
the
for
himself
and
it's
going
to
be
shared.
You
know
that's
his
garage
on
the
first
floor.
It's
not
meant
for
the
unit
above,
so
it's
really
meant
it's
designed
entirely
to
be
an
accessory
structure
to
the
main
house.
BJ
A
AD
BQ
I'm
sure
there's
any
other
assurances,
I'm
a
single,
I'm
still
a
bachelor,
I'm
playing
the
retirement
six
years.
But
if
I
was
to
sell
this
property,
it's
as
one
it's
one
lot,
seven
thousand
square
foot
lot
and
I'm
not
going
anywhere
for
a
while
and
I
I
live
and
work
in
the
neighborhood,
I'm
at
the
bowling
building
right
now,
which
I
managed.
So
I
walked.
Oh.
A
You
got
it
okay,
you
know,
but
but
but
you
know
as
a
neighborhood
resident
and
somebody
who
cares
about
the
community,
we
totally
understand
that
you're,
not
anticipating
going
anywhere,
but
life
may
have
other
plans
for
you
just
like
it
may
have
for
me
and
as
I
am
in
my
forever
home,
you
know
and
we
need
to
always
as
the
board.
You
know
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
look
at
these
proposals.
Q
Plans
are
good,
no
questions.
I
think
everything's
been
addressed
in
terms
of
my
concerns.
Thank
you.
A
Any
questions
from
the
board,
you
know
what
I'm
having
a
hard
time,
remembering
if,
if
mr
robinson
or
mr
owlette
could
help
me
is
what
is
the
size
of
a
you
know,
not
a
micro
unit
but
the
smallest
studio
or
one
fam
studio.
I
would
say.
Q
A
G
G
Knew
you
were
gonna
ask
that
hold
on
just
a
second.
Please.
G
G
Yeah,
it
was,
it
was
just.
It
was
just
adopted
as
only
a
marxist
district,
okay,.
A
Okay,
let's
see
any
other
crime
anything
else
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
AO
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kisha
santana
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
The
owners
met
with
the
butters
so
for
49-51
linwood
was
supported
by
the
highland
park
neighborhood
coalition
and
has
presented
to
them
multiple
times.
We
just
ask
the
applicant
to
remain
in
communication
with
the
coalition
throughout
the
process
and
we
can
assist
if
needed
at
this
time,
we're
deferring
to
the
board.
L
Okay,
the
manager-
I
do
have
a
raised
hand
here
there
are
any
other
elected
officials.
Given
testimony
stephen
fox,
I
sent
a
request
to
unmute
you.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
L
I
may
not
be
wanting
to
give
testimony
here.
I'm
sorry,
I
lower
his
hand.
I
have
no
additional
ways
to
answer.
A
Okay,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
I
think
it's
because
it's
there's
a
there's
now
it's
a
strike
district.
We
don't
need
design
review.
So
it's
approval.
Is
there
a
second.
A
Okay,
mr
fortune
aye
mr
alec,
miss
dong
hi
mr
ruggiero
hi,
mr
robinson
aye,
mr
legris.
A
I
two
women's
support.
I
wish
you
good
luck,
but
do
keep
that
in
mind,
as
as
as
we
proceed,
okay.
C
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
128
7036
1759
to
1763
washington
street,
this
is
a
change
of
opportunity.
Multi-Family
residential
76
units
reduced
to
70
on
7522
and
commercial
restaurant
using
ground
floor,
restore
the
historic
facade,
an
existing
building,
constructing
new
addition
above
the
existing
structure
up
to
13
floors
and
fill
the
adjoining
parcel
two
fossils
to
be
combined
the
violations,
article
50,
section,
28
regulations.
Restaurant
use
is
conditional
article
50
section
29,
the
additional
lot
areas
insufficient
article
50,
section
29,
the
floydia
ratio
is
excessive.
C
Article
50,
section
29,
the
bill
in
height
is
excessive.
In
stories.
Article
50,
section,
29,
the
villain
has
excessive
in
feet:
article
50,
section,
29,
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
50,
section,
29,
front
yard,
isn't
sufficient
article
50
section
29
side
yards
insufficient
in
article
50,
section
29,
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
blade.
CL
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
lacasse
lacasse
law,
75
arlington
street
in
boston
and
with
respect
to
your
comment
regarding
the
board
composition.
My
clients
are
both
on
and
I
would
ask
them
to
give
me
in
the
board
instruction
on
whether
they
wish
to
proceed
with
the
six
member
board.
AJ
Yes,
we'd
like
to
proceed.
Please.
CL
Okay,
all
right,
so
there's
the
answer
to
that.
Madam
chair,
we
were
last
before
this
board
on
april
26th
regarding
this
proposal
and
just
to
give
you
a
brief
history
and
to
remind
the
board
members
where
this
project
has
been
and.
A
What
we
would
like
to
do,
massillo
cass
scheduled
for
11
30,
it's
now
1
15.,
so
we
want
you
to
help
us
save
some
time.
We
und
the
last
time
that
you
would
have.
We
had
significant
comments
about
the
design
and
the
the
layout
of
the
units.
So
tell
us
what
has
been
accomplished
between
the
last
time.
You
were
here
and
today.
CL
Yes,
madam
chair
on
426,
the
board
expressed
concerns
regarding
the
number
of
compact
units
and
the
arrangement
and
distribution
of
the
idp
units.
So
we
went
back
to
the
bpda
to
consult
with
the
idp
staff
and
to
change
the
unit
count
and
to
change
the
mix
of
the
units
and
to
change
the
idp
distribution
of
the
units
and
substantially
redesigned
the
floor
plates
of
the
entire
building
from
its
prior
hotel
use
to
a
proposed
residential
use
and
on
those
specific
items.
I'd
like
tartania
brown,
our
architect,
who
was
responsible
for
engineering.
CL
All
of
those
changes
to
further
address
your
concerns
from
the
prior
hearing,
dartanian.
A
CL
CM
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
d'artanian
architect
from
embark,
if
you
may
forward
please
to
the
next
couple
slides,
I
can
speak
exactly
to
the
questions
raised.
I
think,
if
you
keep
going
please,
this
is
great
right
here.
So
comments
raised
were
again
around
the
number
of
compact
units
and
design
of
the
interior
of
the
building.
CM
If
you
go
to
the
next
page,
please
here
you
can
see
up
in
the
upper
right.
What
we
were
at
back
at
the
last
hearing
was
76
units
we
had
15
studios,
37,
1,
11
ones
and
13
twos,
with
the
reduction
in
unit
count
to
70,
we
dropped
the
number
of
studios
down
to
eight
reduced.
The
number
of
one
bedrooms
kept
the
one
pluses
and
significantly
increased
the
two
bedrooms.
This
took
us
from
33
compact
units
down
to
19.
CM
A
And
then
I'm
sorry
tell
us
about
the
compacts
so
they're
in
the
compacts.
There
are
eight
eight
studios.
A
CM
CM
We
had
two
one
bedroom
pluses,
that's
remained
and
then
we've
increased
our
two
bedrooms
up
to
two
for
one
so
against
reduce
the
studios
and
increased
for
the
larger
units.
So
the
bottom
diagram,
if
you
don't
mind
slightly
scrolling
down,
shows
that
even
distribution
throughout
the
building,
in
addition
to
the
hearing
impaired
so
much
more
evenly
distribu
distributed
both
by
type
and
location
throughout
the
building,
again,
just
to
reiterate,
within
an
entirely
new
residential
core
for
the
building.
CM
Q
The
plans
are
good,
they
definitely
reflect
as
the
proponent
is
just
outlined,
and
I
think
the
the
reduction
in
units
and
the
distribution
has
gone
a
long
way
to
making
the
per
plan
a
little
bit
more
understandable
and
consistent
with
what
I
think
we
discussed
at
the
last
hearing.
So.
A
Sorry,
mr
robinson,
just
like
you
know
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
D
G
Yes,
madam
chair
member
support,
jeff
hampton
bpda
I'd
just
like
to
go
on
record,
saying
that
the
development
team
was
very
receptive
to
the
changes
that
were
brought
to
them
by
bpda
staff,
and
I
would
like
to
just
go
on
the
record
again
that
we're
in
full
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
an
oppositional
proposal.
CN
Oh
yes,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
kim
crusoe
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment
at
this
time.
The
project
has
received
over
130
letters
of
support
from
abutters
within
300
feet
of
the
property
22
letters
of
support
from
directly
abutting
businesses
and
letters
of
support
from
the
claremont
blackstone
franklin
and
worcester
square
area,
neighborhood
associations.
CN
AB
Great
good
afternoon,
everyone-
thank
you,
madam
chair
and
mr
word.
My
name
is
john
santiago.
I'm
a
resident
on
three
clermont
street
in
the
neighborhood.
I
also
represent
the
area
for
the
past
four
years
and
I'm
standing
in
support
of
this
project
once
again
as
many,
this
project
has
the
opportunity
to
revitalize
this
corner
that
has
been
dormant
for
decades
and
particularly
when
you
consider
the
potential
stretching
from
washington
in
the
south
end
all
the
way
down
to
new
being
square.
AB
This
can
really
be
a
thoroughfare
that
is
going
to
provide
a
whole
bunch
of
economic
opportunity
for
the
community
and,
notwithstanding
the
fact
that
two
restaurants
have
closed
there
in
that
corner
there
over
the
past
two
years,
one
of
which
was
minority
owner.
Secondly,
the
need
for
more
housing-
I
can't
say
enough-
has
someone
has
been
fighting
for
more
housing
at
the
city
and
state
level?
This
is
what
we
need
once
this
project
became
a
housing
focus
project
versus
the
hotel.
AB
I've
been
on
board
and
really
been
advocating
to
get
the
community
more
engaged,
and
with
that
said,
the
community
has
been
quite
engaged.
It's
been
a
robust
community
process,
particularly
since
the
last
cba
hearing
folks
have
been
engaged.
The
proponents
have
done
an
excellent
job
going
around
meeting
with
every
stakeholder.
I
appreciate
the
work
and
I
hope
that
the
cba
can
provide
a
favorable
recommendation.
Thank
you
very
much.
L
L
AS
Madam
chair,
joe
mcaron
with
city
council,
frank
baker's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
full
support
of
the
project.
AG
AN
Good
afternoon,
chair
members
of
the
board,
I'm
marion
rahimi
from
council
fernandez,
anderson's
office,
vast
majority
of
the
of
the
fee
bag
counselor
anderson
has
received
from
constituents
is
in
support
of
a
project,
while
none
of
the
minority
opposition
she's
received
has
come
from
abutters.
Additionally,
this
worthwhile
endeavor
will
contain
residential
units
and
ten
of
which
will
be
affordable
and
the
current
entity
is
an
eyesore
could
readily
use
the
beautification
multi-use
system.
AN
In
short,
councilor
anderson
readily
supports
the
alexander
alexander
development,
and
looks
forward
to
the
time
in
the
near
future
when
the
project
reaches
its
fruition.
Thank
you.
BN
Yes,
steve
fox,
I
chair
the
south
end
forum,
which
is
the
umbrella
organization
for
the
combined
neighborhood
associations
of
the
south
end.
I
was
also
a
member
of
the
iag
for
this
project
for
beginning
four
years
ago.
I
I
want
to
offer
my
unconditional
support
for
this
project
without
belaboring.
BN
What
has
already
been
said,
this
will
bring
residential
ownership
opportunities
to
the
south
end,
which
are
really
really
missing,
which
we
desperately
desperately
need,
and
this
project
is
an
example
of
the
best
of
how
to
engage
the
community
in
a
process
that
ultimately
results
in
a
great
project.
That's
all.
Thank
you.
S
S
I
want
to
thank
the
zba
for
directing
the
developers
to
gain
more
community
input
that
community
input
has
resulted
from
over
230
signatures
from
the
roxbury
side
of
mass
have
indicating
their
opposition
to
the
project
for
a
number
of
issues
which
we've
enumerated
and
written
submissions
having
the
zba.
Having
directed
that
the
community
process
be
supplemented,
we
are
now
arguing
that
the
zba
should
honor
those
residents
who
have
indicated
opposition
and
returned
this
project
to
the
bpda
for
proper
review.
We
do
not
oppose
developing
the
corner.
We
support
it.
S
AL
Yes,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
of
supporting
the
alexander
project.
I've
seen
it
in
its
other
form
and
now,
in
its
current
form,
united
neighbors
of
little
roxbury
have
heard
from
some
of
their
neighbors
and
they
like
to
see
something
there
at
the
corner.
That
will
enhance
economic
development.
AL
They've
done
a
good
job
in
reaching
out
to
stakeholders
and
they
try
to
consider
people's
needs
and
desires,
and
so
we
would
like
to
wholeheartedly
what
their
efforts
to
you
know
to
create
something
there
that
hasn't
been
there
for
40
years.
CO
This
process,
the
entire
process,
the
first
day
of
meeting
alexander
hotel,
it
was
determined
that
it
was
going
to
be
the
south
end.
The
bpda
supported
that,
and
even
though
it
was
article
50
and
it
was
a
rockstar
project,
they
did
not
invite
broadway,
neighborhood,
council
or
roxbury
residents
to
be
part
of
the
process,
but
we
know
that
this
location
needs
to
be
developed.
It
needs
to
be
developed
with
the
input
of
residents
on
both
sides
of
the
aisle.
CO
The
last
attempt
by
the
bppa
to
push
this
through
was
to
say
this
is
the
minor
modification
that
they
were
looking
at,
and
it
really
wasn't
so
that
was
just
an
attempt
to
get
this
pushed
through
as
a
minor
modification,
and
we
know
the
bpda
is
not
having
a
long
arms-length
relationship
with
this
person,
it's
like
they
are
advising
them
to
do
things
that
are
incorrect
or
totally
wrong.
CO
There
is
no
outstanding
need,
except
financial
for
13
plus
foot
building,
and
this
building
would
be
towering
over
everything
else
in
the
area.
If
you
look
at
the
picture
they
have,
this
is
the
only
thing
that
you'll
see
on
the
skyline
and
roxbury
residents.
CO
200
plus
have
said
that
they
have
concerns
about
this
and
for
the
process
to
keep
moving
along
with
the
support
of
the
bpda,
which
has
an
agenda
to
get
this
done
and
to
ignore
the
rox-free
residence
which
this
process
is
a
project
is
cited
in
article
50
under
the
roxbury's
zoning
is
incorrect.
It's
wrong.
It
was
not
a
minor
modification.
CO
There
is
no
indication
that
parking
would
be
addressed
and
parking
is
one
of
the
article
50's
requirements
and
I'm
not
sure
why
the
zba
review
letter
did
not
mention
parking
at
all,
but
this
building
is
going
to
go
through
there's
going
to
be
a
hardship
on
the
community
with
the
number
of
units
and
the
height
of
this
building,
so
we'd
like
for
the
zba
bpda
to
listen
to
the
community.
Thank
you
thank.
AB
BO
BO
In
housing
that
does
require
parking
lot,
the
areas
overcrowded
as
it
is
now
number
of
churches,
businesses
and
the
housing
developments
in
the
area
would
be
impacted
without
a
comprehensive
housing
plan.
The
role
of
bpd
is
make
sure
that
development's
innocence,
taking
consideration,
needs,
commands
and
concerns
for
the
residents
of
the
area
is
the
design
and
development,
as
proposed
with
the
number
of
units.
Do
not
take
that
into
consideration.
I'm
not
sure
how
thank
you
would.
A
Thank
you
last
last
question.
Please,
ambassador
yep
bye
go
ahead.
BD
Washington
gateway
has
been
pro
pro
developments
for
the
last
25
years
of
its
existence
from
sheila
grove
all
the
way
through
randy
lathrop
through
myself,
and
mark
leclat
lakas,
who
was
former
president.
This
is
necessary
for,
as
john
santiago
said,
for
the
development
and
sustaining
the
businesses
in
this
area.
It
is.
A
Got
it?
Thank
you,
okay,
so
I
what
I
would
like
to
say
for
the
residents
who
live
in
roxbury,
that
you
should
take
up
the
conversation
with
the
bpda
and
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
about
what
is
roxbury
and
what
is
the
south
end,
and
what
is
that
that
middle
area?
A
AV
A
The
gun
again,
mr
robinson
aye
and
mr
legris
has
recused
himself.
I
two
am
in
support,
so
the
project
carries
unanimously
for
all
the
sitting.
Voting
members.
Good
luck.
H
C
Following
your
next
case,
calling
voa
130-7395
25
gardner
street,
this
will
construct
a
new
14-unit
multi-family
dwelling,
the
violation,
article
51
section,
56,
honesty,
parking
and
loading
article
51,
section,
57.3,
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner,
article
51,
section
9,
the
lottery
is
insufficient
article
51,
section
9.
The
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51
section
9
the
bill
in
hand's
executive
stories,
article
51,
section
9
of
the
bill
and
hence
excessive
and
fee
article
51,
section,
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
F
C
F
A
P
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
george
marante,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
city
realty
management,
architectural
services
are
being
provided
by
tanya
carrier
from
cult
of
design.
I
do
understand
that
this
is
a
six-member
board
and
that
five
of
the
six
members
would
need
to
vote
in
order
for
this
project
to
be
approved,
and
my
client
chooses
to
go
forward
at
this
time.
P
P
The
lot
is:
seven
thousand
two
hundred
sixty
eight
square
feet
with
an
existing
three
family
dwelling
within
a
three
f
four
zoning
sub-district,
which
quickly
transitions
to
harvard
avenue
community
commercial
zoning.
Accordingly,
the
surrounding
area
is
characterized
substantially
by
multi-family
and
mixed-use
buildings
of
the
29
nearest
developed
plots
within
a
300
foot
radius.
There
are
11
two
or
three
family
dwellings,
11
multi-families,
three
mixed-use
buildings
and
four
commercial
buildings.
This
matter
was
deferred,
as
it
was
initially
cited
under
article
50.
erroneously.
This
is,
of
course,
article
51,
the
austin
austin
brighton,
neighborhood
article.
P
It
was
re-advertised
as
such.
My
client
will
be
providing
21
idp
affordability,
rather
than
13
required
with
three
of
these
units
being
committed
as
affordable
units.
The
ground
floor
would
consist
of.
A
Sorry,
are
they
all
on
flight.
P
Yes,
on
on
site,
in
fact,
the
the
ground
floor
would
consist
of
of
two
of
the
proposed
idp
units
units,
one
and
two
of
739
and
743
square
feet
respectively.
We're
working
with
the
city
to
designate
these
as
artist
live
work
units.
The
remainder
of
the
ground
floor
would
consist
of
secure
bike
storage
in
the
building's
main
entrance
and
elevator
lobby.
P
The
second
third
and
fourth
floors
would
each
consist
of
four
units,
a
one
bedroom
unit
of
672
square
feet,
a
two
bedroom
unit
of
817
square
feet
and
two
three
bedroom
units
of
1229
and
1351
square
feet.
Unit
9
on
the
third
floor
is
a
1351
square
foot
three
bedroom,
which
is
the
third
designated
idp
unit.
All
units
would
have
access
to
either
balconies.
A
So
tell
us
how
many
one
bedrooms
there
are
two
twos
and
threes
and
their
average
square
footage.
P
There
are
two
artists
live
workspaces,
as
currently
designated
with
an
average
square
footage
of
741
square
feet.
There
are
three
one-bedroom
units
with
an
average
with
they're
all
the
same
672
square
feet;
three:
two
bedroom
units
of
817
square
feet
and
six
three
bedroom
units
with
an
average
square
footage
of
1290
square
feet.
The
three
bedroom
idp
unit
would
be
1351
square
feet.
P
Correct
all
the
units
would
have
accessed
by
the
balconies
or
patio
space
with
over
eighteen
hundred
square
feet
of
open
space,
provided
ample
storage
for
all
units
would
be
provided
in
the
building's
basement,
where
there
would
also
be
additional
eight
bike.
An
eight
bike,
storage
and
repair
room,
the
roof
of
the
building
would
be
unoccupied.
P
There
would
be
four
off
street
parking
spaces,
taking
advantage
of
the
site's
close
proximity
to
greenline
light
rail
service.
In
numerous
bus
bus
stops,
there
were
originally
six
vehicular
parking
spaces
programmed,
but
during
community
process
it
was
requested
to
eliminate
two
spaces
to
allow
for
a
larger,
enclosed
bicycle
storage
area.
There
are
12
interior
and
four
exterior
bikes
parking
spaces
at
grade,
plus
again
that
additional
room
for
ace
bike,
storage
and
repair
in
the
basement.
P
The
zoning
relief
being
sod
owes
to
insufficient
lot
size
which,
as
I
mentioned,
is
7260
square
feet.
Excessive
floor
area
ratio
which
is
proposed
at
2.37,
as
opposed
to
0.8
by
code,
as
well
as
excessive
building
height.
The
maximum
height
under
zoning
is
3
stories
and
35
feet,
while
being
proposed
is
four
stories
in
43
and
a
half
feet,
which
is
quite
consistent.
Actually,
though,
with
the
existing
buildings
on
the
other
three
corners
of
this
intersection,
the
proposed
front
setback
is
10
feet.
P
While
the
street
mobile
is
actually
zero,
the
required
rear
yard
side
yard
setback
is
5
feet.
It's
10
feet
required
between
structures.
Here,
the
left
side
setback
which
board
is
on
linden
street,
is
a
substantially
seven
feet.
The
right
side
setback
is
eight
feet
from
the
lot
line,
with
ten
feet
of
separation
distance
to
the
building
on
the
budding
lot
required.
P
Rear
yard
setback,
with
the
shallow
lot
exceptions
just
under
20
feet,
while
a
proposed
setback
is
5
feet,
7
inches
to
the
mixed
use,
building
in
the
rear,
there's
a
cited
violation
for
traffic
visibility
across
corner
a
visibility.
Diagram
wasn't
included
in
the
submission
set
of
plans,
but
I
believe
the
site
plan
bears
out.
The
building
is
very
close
to
meeting
cross
corner
visibility
requirements
and
there
is,
of
course,
a
violation
for
insufficient
off-street
parking.
Finally,.
A
P
A
Okay,
thanks
for
the
complete
presentation,
so
there's
no
roof
deck.
Artists
live
work
average
of
741
square
feet.
Okay,
I
did
have
a
question,
but
it
swept
my
mind.
How
are
the
plans
mr
robinson.
Q
A
P
There
would
be
I'm
sorry
and
just
on
the
parking
there'd
be
seven
spaces.
I
wish
to
correct
myself,
so
there
is
a
lift,
a
lift
stacking
system
being
proposed.
So
that's
seven
parking
spaces
in
in
in
the
four
slots,
but
there'll
be
seven
spaces.
One
surface
and
six
unlimits.
A
And
I
think
the
next
question
is
we've
seen
a
lot
of
these
properties
make
ensuring
that
they
go
on
the
market
as
rentals
during
not
during
the
school
year
or
you
know,
peak
rental
season
for
students.
Is
there
such
a
thing
in
place
for
this
proposal.
P
I
can
either
ask
my
clients,
representative
jacob
simmons
to
speak,
or
I
can
represent
that
my
my
client,
the
crm
works
very
closely
with
all
the
communities
where
it
has
rental
units,
particularly
in
in
allston
and
in
brighton,
on
those
issues,
and
you
know
this
is
not
a
building
that
will
be
actively
or
otherwise
marketed
to
students,
and
my
clients
would
take
all
appropriate
steps
in
terms
of
the
timing
of
the
marketing
of
the
units
to
ensure
that
the
the
the
building
population
is
is
targeting
the
longer
term
longer
term
non-student
tenants.
A
Thank
you
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
BF
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office,
like
deferred
judgment,
to
the
board
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
Our
office
conducting
the
butters
meeting
on
march
30th.
There
were,
there
was
a
resident
and
a
butter
in
attendance
who
had
concerns
regarding
the
density.
BF
The
applicant
went
on
to
have
several
constructive
presentations
and
meetings
with
the
also
civic
association
and
achieved
their
support.
The
civic
cited
they
liked
the
look
of
the
building
and
was
pleased
with
the
applicant's
commitment
to
affordable
housing
for
artists,
but
that
would
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
C
AP
AP
C
Z
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
tony
gizarro,
representing
the
austin
civic
association,
we'd,
like
to
echo
all
the
comments
made
previously.
This
project
was
very
attractive
to
our
membership
and
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
CP
A
Tony,
are
you
still
on?
I
am
so
and
and
annabelle
you
too.
What
what's
what
strategies
are
in
place
so
that
this
isn't
a
student
rental
building.
Z
Well,
madam
chair,
you
know
all
we
can
do
and
you
know
we've
been
pretty
consistent
with
the
proponents
on
this
that
when
we
do
have
rental
housing,
we
make
it
very
clear
that
we
do
not
want
to
see
the
property
being
used
for
student
purposes.
We
we've
had
some
good
results
in
the
sense
that
some
proponents
have
agreed
to
include
language
in
the
leases.
I
understand
I
believe
up
in
mission
hill
and
the
fenway.
I.
A
I
I
actually
thought
there
was
one
on
cambridge
street
in
austin
just
down
the
street,
but
you
know
I
may
be
wrong.
Z
H
Z
L
Yep
jacob
simmons
did
you
were
you
looking
to
give
testimony
here?
Okay,.
BY
CQ
A
D
A
Ms
dong
hi,
mr
ruggiero
robinson,
mr
ligris,
has
recused
himself
i2min
support,
so
this
motion
carries
unanimously
by
all
sitting
voting
voting
board
members.
Good
luck.
C
CR
Hello,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
mike
ross.
I
am
an
attorney
with
the
law
firm
of
prince
lobel
at
one
international
place,
I'm
here
with
my
client,
kobe
evans
of
pure
oasis,
who
has
previously
appeared
before
the
board
and
is
an
equity
applicant.
We
deferred
this
case
back
in
may
of
2022.
CR
Just
two
minor
changes
on
the
plan
that
we
weren't
able
to
get
in
on
time
to
the
to
the
board.
We
we
could
start
sure
we
could
start
here.
So
we
are
seeking
a
conditional
use
permit
for
the
use
of
a
cannabis
establishment
at
this
site.
It's
a
straight
conditional
use,
permit.
There
are
no
buffer
conflicts
and
it's
in
an
s1
district.
CR
This
slide
here
shows
you
what
the
current
it's
closed,
but
but
what
the
previous
historic
use
has
been
for
this
site
at
at
535
washington
street.
It
was
previously
swan
cleaner
as
a
dry
cleaning.
It
sits
on
the
corner
of
washington
and
fairbanks
street
and
we'll
have
a
corner
entrance.
A
Tell
us
which,
which
drawing
we
should
go
to
to
understand
operations.
CR
Thank
you
just
focusing
on
the
right
there.
So
it's
a
corner,
building,
fairbanks
and
washington
corner
entrance
separate
exit,
and
in
the
back
you
see
four
parking
spaces.
Those
parking
spaces
are
going
to
be
for
employee.
Only
this
is
an
existing
parking
area
in
the
back
of
the
building,
and
deliveries
will
arrive
through
the
rear
of
the
building.
I'll
show
you
that
in
a
moment,
if
you
go
to
slide
three
now,
I'm
adam
ambassador,
I'm
gonna
walk
the
board
through
the
floor
plan.
CR
So,
as
you
can
see,
you
have
about
3
500
square
feet.
Total
of
this
first
floor.
The
the
public
facing
you
know,
retail
area
itself
is
right
there
on
the
lower
right
hand,
corner
of
the
plan.
You
can
see
the
corner
entrance
with
the
arrows
and
then
you
can
see
the
separate
exit
right.
There
kind
of
mid
building
onto
washington
street.
A
So,
let's
you
know,
we've
seen
a
number
of
these,
so
let's
go
directly
to
the
specifics
on
this.
So
if
you
have
four
spaces
and
their
employee
only
how
many
staff
are
you
expecting
to
have
at
any
one
shift.
CR
You
know
kobe
is
on
the
line
you
can.
He
can
give
you
a
lot
more
detail.
You
know
we
would
we've
submitted
that
we'll
have
between
10
and
12
employees
at
this
site.
This
is
a
very
small
site
and
even
that
might
be
a
little
bit
much
okay,
he's
currently
operating
one
of
these
other
facilities
and
in
the
process
of
opening
another
one
downtown.
CR
So
he
has
great
experience
on
the
ground,
so
we're
happy
to
get
get
more
into
the
weeds
that
if
you
have
questions
on
that,
this
site
here
would
be
very
small.
There'd,
be
five
point
of
sale
stations
so.
CS
I'm
hi
madam
chair
members
of
the
fort
cody
evans
on
430
for
the
lab
pure
oasis.
A
And
you're
the
one
who
runs
the
the
the
open
the
facility-
that's
open
at
grove
hall
right,
correct,
okay,
so
I
I
happened
to
be
in
the
west
end
yesterday
and
walked
by
ascend
and
so
got
a
sense
of
how
these
things
operate.
In
a
city
environment
I
have
not
had
the
I
have
not
walked
through
your
facility
in
grove
hall,
though
I
do
drive
by
it
fairly
frequently.
A
What
I
was
kind
of
disturbed
about
was
that
that
project
on
friends
street
came
in
as
as
a
minority
applicant
and
is
no
longer
a
minority
applicant
very
shortly
into
its
its
time
of
operation.
A
So
I
just
want
to
find
out
what
this
you
know.
This
actually
means
and
mister
council
rust.
You
may
have
a
a
deeper
dive
on
this,
because
I
don't
know
what
the
commitment
is
to
the
city
and
in
your
host
agreement.
You
know:
how
long
does
it
need
to
be
minority
owned
or
minority
participant,
yeah.
CR
Any
changes
of
ownership
have
to
go
back
to
the
board
and
in
no
way
shape
or
form,
shall
it
be
less
than
51
other.
Otherwise
they
would
lose
their
boston,
social
equity
status,
so
they're
they're
different.
A
AK
CR
CR
I
have
to
go
back
to
the
boston
cannabis
board
and
it
would
not
be
allowed
to
transfer
the
ownership
without
their
approval.
They
have
to
approve
it
in
order
for
the
license
to
continue,
and
so
that's
why
they've
created
a
process
for
that,
and
I
do
not
believe
that
they
would
at
this
point
they
haven't
allowed
any
social
equity
applicants
to
sell
out
100
of
their
assets.
CR
CR
Thank
you
for
the
question
mentor
I
didn't
want
to
put
on
the
record
slides
five
slides.
Four
four
is
the
basement:
it's
just
storage,
as
it
has
been
slides
five
through
eight,
will
show
you
some
renderings
of
the
facility
just
so
you
can
get
a
feel
for
it,
but
what
I
did
want
to
place
on
the
record
is
all
the
way
on
slide
nine,
and
that
is
the
the
mcmahon
associates
traffic
study
that
was
conducted.
CR
The
the
engineers
went
out
to
the
field
on
in
october
in
november
and
in
december
and
they've
looked
at
two
key
indicators,
parking
and
traffic,
and
it
was
determined
by
mccann
associates
that
on
street
parking
would
be
adequate
for
the
anticipated
volume
they
anticipated
the
volume
to
be
approximately
300
people
per
day
over
the
11
hours.
We're
talking
about
a
10
am
opening
them
chair
to
a
9
pm,
closing
so
over
an
11
hour
day,
approximately
300
customers,
but
only
half
of
those
customers
would
be
arriving
using
a
vehicle.
CR
The
other
half,
including
35,
would
be
arriving
based
on
the
traffic
study
on
transit
in
this
slide.
Here.
What
you're,
looking
at
the
green,
shows
the
bike
lanes?
This
is
a
very
heavily
biked
area
and
the
blue
lines
show
available
parking
throughout
this
neighborhood.
It's
undesignated,
it's
not
listed
as
resident
or
non-resident.
These
are
all
undesignated
parking
areas
and
we
did
on
the
next
slide,
take
a
look
at
the
historic
parking
patterns
since
from
two
all
the
way
back
to
2011
to
all
the
way
to
2020.
A
Seven
days
a
week,
okay
and
you're,
anticipating
that
you
will
have
10
to
12
employees
who
will
take
okay
and
okay
got
it.
How
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
Q
The
plans
are
good
actually
and
certainly
show
what
the
proponent
is
outlined
in
terms
of
their
operations
and
locations.
So
no
questions.
It
looks
like
they're
actually
also
looking
at
exterior
upgrades
as
well,
so.
AZ
Yes,
madam
chair
lady
members
of
the
board,
above
the
mikko
btv
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
the
parking
plan
on
the
the
drawing
portion
of
it
seems
to
be
different
than
the
actual
photograph
depicting
the
parking
design
and,
secondly,
is
when
I
saw
the
actual
parking
some
time
ago.
It
was
a
dirt
lot.
Is
it
dirt
or
is
it
hot
chocked.
CS
I
believe
this
so
two
things
one
is
there's
an
existing
curb
cut
and
secondly,
there
is
a
considerable
amount
of
dirt
and
it
seems
to
be
over
some
sort
of
base
there.
I
don't
know
if
it's
asphalt
or
concrete,
so
I
can't
tell
you,
but
I
do
know
from
cutting
the
grass
back
there.
There
there's
a
considerable
amount
of
grass
and
dirt
factory
right
now.
AZ
Madam
chile,
I'd
like
to
reduce
the
number
of
parking
spaces,
just
my
suggestion
from
four
to
two
spaces.
CR
Now,
I'm
sure
those
were
just
employee
spaces
for
the
reasons
that
mr
d'amico
pointed
out.
We
we
recognized
that
with
customers
that
wouldn't
be
convenient,
but
for
tandem
parking,
for
which
parking
is
not
required
at
this
site
due
to
the
age
of
this
building.
But
four
spaces
would
be
good
for
our
employees
and
we
just
thought
that
made
most
sense.
A
Yeah
and-
and
you
know
you
just
have
to
be
cognizant-
that
all
the
side
streets
are
fairly
residential
and
you
just
got
to
think
about
community
relations
and
if
that's
a
smart
thing
to
have
all
that
everybody
park
on
residential
streets.
Okay
thanks,
mr
d'amico,
mr
hampton:
what
did
the
bpda
recommend.
G
Thank
you,
madam
chairman
support.
Jeff
hanson
pbda,
we
recommended
approval.
Our
only
provision
would
be
for
signage.
A
Okay,
okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
and
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
BF
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
The
mayor's
office
conducted
two
public
meetings
over
the
course
of
a
long
community
process.
The
first
was
on
april
20th
2021.
BF
BF
There
was
a
lot
of
concerns
regarding
the
proximity
to
the
mary
lyons
lower
school,
which
is
just
outside
the
500
foot
buffer,
as
well
as
proximity
to
residential
units
being
right.
Next
to
it,
concerns
with
the
condition
of
the
road
it
slightly
bends
in
an
arc
which
leads
to
some
blind
spots
as
well
as
langley
road,
which
is
a
very
difficult
street
running
directly
into
that
intersection.
Residents
felt
that
it
was
incredibly
unsafe
and
it's
not
suitable.
The
applicant
mentioned
a
traffic
study.
BF
A
lot
of
criticism
from
the
community
was
at
the
trip
it
did
not
take
into
account
the
impacts
on
a
lot
of
side
streets
where
residents
already
struggled
to
park
during
certain
hours
a
day
such
as
the
proposed
highest
peak
of
customers
attending
this
establishment,
as
well
as
concerns
also
with
the
proximity
to
the
oak
square
ymca.
BF
They
went
on
to
the
right
nelson
improvement
association
received
opposition
from
that
civic
group,
as
well
as
letters
of
opposition
from
brett
moran
and
grab
opponent,
which
are
the
two
local
state
reps
for
that
area.
A
So,
mr,
let
me
just
ask
you
so
the
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
has
a
policy
of
reporting
the
process,
but
not
taking
a
stand
lately.
So
this
is
the
second
project
and
if
I'm,
if
I'm
clear,
the
mayor's
office
is
going
on
record
in
opposition.
BF
Correct
I
do
want
to
mention
just
regarding
letters
that
we've
received.
We
had
roughly
75
residents
reach
out
from
that
immediate
area,
most
of
them
direct
the
butters
they
were
in
opposition
from
the
applicant.
We
did
receive
200
signatures
in
support,
a
good
chunk
of
those
who
are
from
oak
square,
with
also
the
remainder
being
from
the
broader
neighborhood
with
that,
like
I
said
before,
we
wish
to
go
in
opposition.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
I
okay
it
so
the
the
lions,
the
lion
school,
is
outside
of
the
buffer
zone
and
is,
and
the
ymca
is
outside
of
the
buffer
zone
right,
correct.
Okay,
so
then
it
means
that
there
is
an
inherent
conflict
with
what
the
neighborhood
wants
versus
what
the
regulations
put
in
as
a
buffer
zone.
BF
A
A
CP
CT
CT
CT
This
is
based
on
well,
first
of
all
in
hearing
the
presentation
today
it's
a
different
presentation
that
they
gave
to
the
bcb,
and
that
troubles
me
they
showed
pictures
today
of
the
outside
of
their
building,
and
I
have
sent
you.
A
CT
Bullet
points
are
that
is
a
heavily
parked
neighborhood
by
resident.
This
will
take
the
parking
from
that
oasis
will
not
provide
adequate
austin
parking
and
this
will
harm
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you
second
bullet
point
I
say
is
security.
My
building
is
30
inches
away
with
an
alleyway.
I
spent
an
email
today.
I
am
concerned
for
my
first
floor
tenants
about
breaking,
and
I
don't
feel
that
these
that
this
I
feel
that
this
will
attract
persons
who
will
use
my
building
as
a
target,
and
there
are
many
places
to
hide
around
it.
CE
L
You
all
right,
do
we
hear
from
you
yet.
CU
For
the
record,
my
name
is
representative
michael
moran.
I've
represented
this
community
in
this
district
for
18
years
in
the
legislature.
I
would
like
to
join
the
mayor
of
the
city
of
boston
and
my
colleague
from
austin
brighton
representative
honan,
in
opposition
to
this
pure
oasis.
It
is
based
solely
on
the
fact
that
the
I
I
saw
the
pictures
that
they
showed
you
of
parking.
CU
I
don't
know
when
they
took
those
it
might
have
been
during
the
pandemic,
but
I
can
assure
you
with
papa
john
and
all
the
other
businesses
down
there
there.
It
looks
nothing
like
that
on
a
day-to-day
basis,
we've
just
learned
that
they've
cut
their
spots
in
the
back
from
four
to
two
that
accounts
for
deliveries
and
twelve
employees
and
with
no
spots
guaranteed
for
anybody
of
the
150
or
so
per
day
that
are
going
to
be
coming
there
to
shop.
CU
A
C
L
Thank
you.
Okay,
leanne.
AU
Yes,
I'm
leanne
brandon,
19,
langley
road
I've
been
living
here
for
40
years
homeowner.
I
have
to
tell
you
that
parking
right
now
is
almost
impossible
after
3,
30
or
4
o'clock
in
the
afternoon.
The
traffic
survey
and
the
report
seems
to
indicate
there's
heavy
bicycle
traffic.
I
think
I've
seen
five
bicycles,
maybe
a
day
on
washington
street.
A
Thank
you,
so
we've
heard
about
traffic
we've
heard
about
the
residential
uses
and
a
butter
has
talked
about
security.
Can
I
hear
from
the
next
person
and
please
give
us
new
information.
CV
My
name
is
sarah
lipson,
and
I
would
just
like
to
express
my
strong
support
of
this.
What's
your
address,
please
oh
141
brook
street
in
oak
square,
and
I
just
want
to
share
my
strong
support
for
this
as
a
black
owned
business
and
I
think
something
that
would
be
a
big
benefit
to
the
community.
CW
AU
I
live
at
35,
langley,
road
in
brighton
and
I'm
calling
in
opposition
to
this
to
the
pure
oasis,
particularly
because
traffic
and
safety
issues.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
thank
you
so
we're
going
to
close
off
comment,
mr
ross
councillor
ross
any
any
any
brief
rebuttals.
Please
thank.
CR
You,
madam
chair,
I'm
sure
we
would
ask
the
board
to
just
take
a
fact-based
look
at
what
a
conditional
use
permit
requires
and
whether
or
not
the
applicant
achieved
its
burden
when
it
went
out
and
had
its
traffic
engineer
conduct
not
one
not
two
but
three
separate
site
visits
of
the
location
and
came
back
with
a
finding
that
there
is
no
nuisance
or
issue
that
would
be
created.
Were
this
to
be
a
variance
case.
Were
this
to
be
a
case
where
you
did
have
a
buffer
zone
conflict?
CR
I
think
it
would
invite
a
lot
more
subjectivity
and
a
lot
more
opinion-based
comments,
like
we
heard
and
and
much
more
capacity
for
the
board
to
make
a
decision
based
on
that,
but
in
in
the
fact
that
this
is
a
straight
conditional
use.
Permit
opinion
isn't
one
of
the
items
that
the
board
should
be
looking
to
in
terms
of
deciding
whether
or
not
it
meets
the
standard.
So
we
would
just
ask
the
board
to
consider
that.
A
A
Q
I'll
second
down
motion.
A
Okay,
and
so,
is
that
but
design
review
into
this
applicant
only.
A
So
there's
a
motion
a
second.
Let
me
just
walk
down
the
list.
Mr
fortune
hi,
mr
alec,
miss
dong
posed
mr
ruggiero.
E
A
Mr
robinson
aye,
mr
ligres,
nay,
okay,
so
there's
already
three
opposition,
so
it's
been
denied.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Everybody.
A
May
I
just
ask
every
board
member
to
stay
on
for
a
minute.
The
meeting
is
now
with
joan.
Thank
you.
Recording
stopped.