►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeals 8-24-21 Part 1
Description
Zoning Board of Appeals 8-24-21 Part 1
A
A
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout,
unless
administratively
muted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
and
opposition.
A
A
Those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
rogerio,
sorry
rogero
reads.
The
address
into
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
irrelevant
address
is
called
also
once
you
have
spoken,
please
put
your
hand
down
so
that
there
is
not
confusion
for
for
the
next
case
and
subsequent
cases,
because
some
days
we've
seen
hands
raised
all
day.
A
A
Good
morning
mr
ruggiero
is
today
acting
as
is
acting
secondary,
miss
dong
good
morning,
madam
chair
good
morning,
mr
robinson.
A
A
C
Okay
good
morning,
the
first
order
of
business
is
their
approval
of
the
hearing
minutes
for
february
23rd
june,
8th
and
june
22nd
2021,
and
I
have
a
motion.
C
C
F
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
palcini
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
anthony
rashido,
as
mr
mujero
stated,
this
is
due
to
expire
at
the
end
of
this
month.
Due
to
covet,
there's
been
a
significant
delay.
The
plans
are
with
isd,
so
we're
asking
for
a
small
extension
just
so
we
can
get
those
plans
out
and
receive
our
permit.
B
D
C
G
Hi,
this
is
jeff
harris
for
28
monument
square
yeah.
Just
we
were
approved
in
late
september
of
29th
of
2019
had
meetings
scheduled
with
the
bpda
to
for
for
another
height
variation
because
they
had
to
approve
what
the
zoning
board
approved.
G
That
meeting
was
delayed
till
january
and
then
postponed
again,
and
then
we
were
in
march
of
2020.
So.
C
Calling
the
next
two
cases,
the
companion
cases,
boa
seven,
eight
nine
one,
six,
forty
rug,
road
and
122
and
boa
seven,
eight,
nine
one,
eight
seven,
eighty
braintree
street
in
ward
22..
This
is
the
first
extension
it
is.
It
was
due
to
expire
in
july,
13
2020,
but
it
is
told
due
to
the
executive
orders
name
and
address
for
the
record.
H
Good
good
morning,
chris
rainey,
from
goldstein
in
stores
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
Thank
you
members
of
the
board.
As
stated,
these
are
companion
cases
for
the
development
of
a
project.
The
tolling
act
extended
the
lab
state
until
october
of
this
year
and
we
are
working
to
close
a
construction
loan
and
are
confident
and
optimistic
about
commencing
construction.
But
we
respectfully
request
a
one-year
extension
of
the
told
lab
state
to
make
sure
we
have
some
elbow
room
to
commence
the
project.
A
The
calling
act
hold
on
may
I
have
a
motion
for
an
extension
from
today's
date.
Please.
E
J
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
morancy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
the
purpose
of
this
hearing
is
to
perfect
the
record
with
respect
to
the
plan
set.
This
matter
was
approved
by
the
board
on
october
6th
of
2020.
J
Both
the
plans
examiner
and
I
subsequently
reviewed
the
video
of
the
october
6th
hearing
and
concurred
that
my
description
of
the
project
and
all
relevant
zoning
matters
was
accurate
and,
in
conformance
with
the
operative
plan
set,
which
is
presented
here
for
display
and
viewing
by
the
board.
Today,
these
revised.
A
Plans
depicted
hold
on
mr
marantzy,
mr
robinson.
Have
you
seen
the
revised
plans.
D
A
I
reviewed
the
revised
plans
and
is
it
fairly,
in
conformance
with
the
presentation.
D
C
F
F
This
project
was
approved
back
on
july
21st
2020.
At
the
time
of
the
approval,
the
approval
was
subject
to
bpda
design
review.
There
was
there
was
some
conversation
after
the
approval
that
stated
lowering
the
building
height.
We
went
back
as
a
team,
we
met
with
bpda
design
and
we
were
able
to
bring
the
building
down
into
compliance
at
thirty
33
feet,
and
those
plans
are
with
the
board
this
afternoon.
This
morning,
sorry.
A
Yes,
thanks:
don't
don't
jump
ahead,
please
for
us,
so
so
has
anything
changed
beside
the
height
as
the
number.
F
Yes,
we've
also,
I
could
I
could
list
it.
So
what
happens?
The
garage
ceiling
first
floor,
elevations
we
reduced
by
six
inches
second
floor.
Elevations
are
reduced
by
six
inches
third
floor.
Elevation
is
reduced
by
six
inches.
We
reduce
the
slope
of
the
roof
and
we
reduce
the
pro
the
height
of
the
ridge
height
and
that
was
overall
led
to
a
foot
in
one
foot.
11
inches
brought
down
through
the
process.
We
also
narrowed
the
building,
but
I
don't
hear
one
of
the
things
was.
F
You
know
there
was
parking
underneath
the
building
in
a
garage
because
of
the
lot
width,
which
is
40
feet.
It's
consistent
with
all
the
lots
in
that
neighborhood
so
that
only
to
a
ppa
designer
view,
there
was
no
way
to
get
a
driveway
to
go
on
the
side
of
the
building,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at,
which
is
what
you
know
the
other
buildings,
the
other
neighborhood
houses
in
that
neighborhood
have
parking
in
front
of
their
property,
which,
obviously,
as
you
all
know,
would
trigger
another
violation
before
the
zoning
board.
A
And
so
on,
the
record
you're
you're,
stating
that
there
is
no
way
to
accommodate
that
those
vehicles
at
the
side
of
the
building.
A
Okay,
I
know
miss
miss
better
walks
down
the
street
from
there,
so
I
don't
know
if
she
left
you
a
note,
mr
robinson.
D
I
I
did
not
see
a
note
from,
but
I
I
mean
I
have
reviewed
the
plans.
Obviously
I
wasn't
part
of
the
original
hearing
and
I
mean
the
plans
are
consistent
with
the
the
note
as
the
mr
pulgini
is
referenced,
but
the
parking
is
I
mean
it
does
still
show
the
garage,
obviously
entrance
and
sort
of
access
point,
but.
F
L
Yeah
hello,
good
morning,
members
of
the
board,
madam
chair,
this
is
mike
ross
with
the
business
address
one
international
place
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
You
may
recall
this
matter
was
before
the
board
and
approved
in
december
of
last
year.
L
This
was
a
campus
establishment
originally
for
approved
for
a
basement
condition
of
around
4
200
square
feet
and
at
the
time
you
may
remember
that
mr
ruggiero,
mr
legross,
both
commented
on
the
basement
issue
was
really
the
only
one
of
the
only
comments
about
it
and,
in
short,
we're
here
today,
because
we
agree,
the
beacon
compassions
was
able
to
renegotiate
its
lease
with
its
landlord
and
move
to
an
upper
floor.
The
size
actually
was
reduced
to
around
three
thousand
square
feet,
but
it's
a
much
better
layout.
L
L
Of
approximately
three
thousand
square
feet,
that's
correct
man,
chair
and
just
one
other
item
there
is.
There
was
a
proviso
that
related
to
that
lift
that
we're
no
longer
using
and
the
two
handicap
spaces.
So
I
just
you
know,
maybe
that
gets
converted
to
like
bpda
design
would
that's
up
to
you,
but
I
just
want.
L
It
wasn't
there,
there
was,
there
was
sign,
review,
design
review,
this
app
can
only
lift,
and
then
there
was
the
the
two
handicapped
spaces
because
of
the
lift.
A
Yes,
yes,
exactly
exactly
so
may
I
have
a
motion
please
to
approve
this
trans
this.
This
decrease
in
size
from
4
200,
to
approximately
two
three
thousand
to
the
first
floor
and
put
a
little
bit
more
clarification
on
the
provisos.
C
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
change
and
to
clarify
the
provisos
that
it's
bpda
designer
who
review
with
specific
attention
of
signage
and
screening
and
buffering.
D
A
That
you're
welcome
before
we
get
on.
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
mr
candela
is
on.
A
Okay,
so
so
just
for
clarification
to
all
the
people
who
are
here
for
the
hearings
that
we
have
a
six-member
board
and
we're
going
to
proceed
with
that.
That
means
that,
for
a
project
to
be
approved,
you
need
five
members
in
support.
A
Okay,
please
go
ahead.
Mr
regiro.
C
O
Yes,
thank
you,
mr
secretary
good
morning,
madam
clear
member
of
the
boards,
joseph
feaster
from
the
law
firm
of
mckenzie
and
associates
183
state
street
in
boston,
zero,
two
one,
zero
nine.
My
client
has
been
in
discussion
with
two
neighborhood
groups
regarding
this
particular
project.
O
D
A
Okay,
we'll
see
you
then
in
the
fall,
mr
feaster.
O
P
Seeking
a
deferral,
first-time
request
for
additional
community
outreach,
we
can
we
reached
out
to
the
mayor's
office
to
let
them
know
early
on
and
we'd
be
asking
a
deferral.
The
other
reason
is
the
applicant.
The
owner
of
the
property
is
away
on
a
long
plan,
family
vacation
to
the
west
coast,
so
he's
not
able
to
be
available,
we'd,
be
asking
for
a
deferral
and
be
ready
to
go
forward
at
that
time.
Q
R
Madame
stevens
of
the
board
87
to
89
west
walnut
park.
A
Okay,
so,
while
so
go
ahead,
mr
rogero.
C
R
A
So
may
so,
yes,
please,
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
we'll
go
straight
to
emotion.
R
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
james
christopher
rca
llc,
with
the
business
address
of
1154
dorchester
ave,
requesting
a
administrative
deferral
for
87.89
westmoreland.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion.
D
C
C
For
final
violations,
article
54
section
10
for
area
ratio,
excessive
article
54,
section,
18,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
32,
section,
zero;
four.
She
caught
applicability
proposed
work
to
include
fourth
floor,
addition
to
the
building,
along
with
a
roof
deck
and
added
living
space
in
the
basement.
This
application
is
with
zoning
refusal
and
variants
needed
payment.
S
Address
for
the
record
good
morning,
chairmans
of
the
board,
william
carollo
law
office
at
28,
state
street
boston,
mass,
also
on
the
line
of
the
owners
which
are
charlie,
reed,
ingrid
begston,
who
is
also
the
architect
of
this
project.
This
is
a
building
in
the
north
end.
That
is.
A
So
hold
on
mr
farillo
christian.
Are
you
on.
A
S
Yes,
the
the
occupancy
is
a
three
family
and
it
will
remain
a
three
family
but
be
reconfigured
the
the
process
of
doing
that.
This,
this
building
was
principally
unoccupied
when
it
was
purchased.
S
This
past
year
signed
for
the
building
keeps
in
the
three
family
by
taking
the
lower
level
the
lower
level,
which
is
approximately
four
and
a
half
feet
above
ground
at
the
front,
but
above
ground,
on
the
side
and
on
the
rear,
where
there's
a
nine
and
a
half
foot
ceiling
height
in
the
lower
level,
full
access
to
a
rear
yard
windows
on
on
three
of
the
sides
of
that
level,
that'll
be
a
single
apartment
with
two
bedrooms.
S
S
It's
not
currently
habitable
we're
proposing
to
extend
that
over
between
the
walls
of
the
two
adjoining
buildings
for
an
area
of
approximately
296
square
feet
to
join
with
the
bottom
two
floors.
There's
the
owner's
unit.
That
unit
would
be
2
000
square
feet
third
unit.
This
will
have
a
deck
on
the
top
okay.
D
Yeah,
so
you
know
it's
not,
it
does
have
a
appear
to
have
per
the
drawings
full
kind
of
access
out
of
the
rear
of
the
building.
So
it's
it's
one
of
these,
where
it's
higher
at
the
street
lower
at
the
back,
so
the
the
bedroom
units
are
pushed
to
that
side.
So
I
think,
there's
you
know,
there's
full
access
in
the
rear.
It's
not
those
bedroom
units
are
not
below
grade.
A
And
that
the
roof
edition,
let's
see
miss
edwards,
can
you
scroll
back
a
little
bit
because
on
the
rendering
hold
on
just
you
just
pass
it
from
the
rendering
it
looks
pretty
massive?
How
does
it
feel
right
there?
How
does
it
feel.
D
So
I
mean
it
is
consistent.
You
can
see
the
building
to
the
left
of
it
with
the
yellow
top,
which
is
existing,
so
they
are
picking
up
that
roof
line
and
bringing
it
across
and
kind
of
completing
that
height.
So
I
think
in
terms
of
its
immediate
contents,
I
think
it's
actually
pretty
consistent
with
the
existing
buildings
and
the
ones
actually
around
are
a
little
bit
taller,
actually
a
story
or
two,
so
I
feel
comfortable
with
the
approximate
massing
of
that
top
okay.
A
T
Members
of
the
board-
this
is
john
romano
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
project
has
received
support
from
both
the
north
end,
neighborhood
waterfront,
council
and
the
north
end
neighborhood
residents
association,
and
at
this
time
our
office
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
I
K
A
Yes
and
the
bpda
recommendation
is
for
a
special
attention
to
the
roof.
Deck
setback
on
a
no
building
code,
relief.
D
I
will
add
those
to
that
bpa
review
with
special
attention
to
the
roof
deck
step
back
and
with
no
building
code
relief.
A
Okay,
all
those
in
favor.
J
C
Calling
the
next
calling
the
next
case
boa
1199022,
705
to
711
boylston
street.
The
violation
is
article
eight
section:
three
conditional
abuses
take
out
takeover
purpose
capital.
One
banking
center
change
of
occupancy
to
include
bank
with
take
out
use
tenant
will
renovate
the
existing
retail
location
on
basement.
First,
second
and
second
floors
work
to
include
build
out
of
bank
drywall,
electric
electrical
and
fire
alarm
sprinklers,
plumbing
hvac
and
finish
work
name
and
address
for.
P
The
record
good
morning,
mr
secretary,
madam
chair
members,
this
is
dennis
quilty
attorney
at
28
state
street,
representing
the
applicant
with
with
me
this
morning.
I
hope
are
on
frank,
delgiducy
from
capital,
one
and
susanna
chan
who's
the
project
architect.
This
is
a
a
change
of
location.
Basically,
this
existing
store
bank
and
pete's
coffee
combination
exists,
one
block
west
at
the
corner
of
fairfield
street.
Presently
that
lease
is
up,
they
were
looking
for
a
new
location.
The
present
location
is
literally
one
block
east
at
the
corner
of
exeter
street.
P
It's
the
former
tannery
building
across
from
the
lenox
hotel,
which
has
always
been
a
retail
commercial
space.
The
applicant
seeks
to
occupy
for
the
very
same
purpose
which
it
did
at
the
other
end
of
the
block.
So
it's
a
capital
one
bank
with
a
pete's
coffee
facility
inside
where
people
would
sit
around
etc.
A
So
hold
on
hold
on.
How
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
A
U
Madam
sharkey,
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
connor
armstrong
from
439
marlborough
street,
representing
neighborhood
association
of
back
bay.
The
applicant
did
meet
with
us
and
we
do
not
oppose
this
case.
A
Okay,
anybody
from
the
elected
elected
officials,
okay,
hearing
none-
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
P
P
C
Okay
calling
next
case
boa
one:
two:
zero
five,
six,
four,
nine
two,
seventeen
newbury
street
in
ward,
five
violation
is
article
six
section,
four
other
conditions,
purpose
to
remove
the
proviso
take
out.
You
says
granted
to
this
petitioner
only
for
this
use
only
from
bzcc32725.
K
V
Yes,
yes,
I
do
sorry
about
that,
so
that
is
our
alternative
and
I'm
the
owner
of
the
of
of
the
two
217
birth
street
and
at
the
boston,
massachusetts,
zero.
Two
one
zero
two.
V
Yes,
we
were
trying
to
remove
the
when
trying
to
remove
the
takeout
takeout
use
granted
to
this
conditioner
on
influence.
V
V
W
A
A
Okay,
any
opposed
motion
carries
you're
all
set
good
luck.
C
Calling
next
case
boa
one:
two
one,
three
one:
five,
four,
two,
forty
seven
newbury
street
board:
five
violation
is
article
8,
section,
7
conditional
use
fitness
fitness
gyms.
Are
the
conditional
use
in
a
b365
district
purpose,
added
gym
studios
to
existing
occupancy
name
and
address
for
the
record.
A
K
Sorry
we
had
a
real
santa
day
check-in,
but
I
don't
see
him
here,
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone
else
is
on
the
call.
A
Okay:
okay,
let's
move
to
the
next
case,
I'm
sorry.
C
Following
next
case,
boa
one
one:
nine
four,
six:
seven:
three:
thirty
three
eastman
street
ward:
seven
violations,
article
65,
section,
nine
residential
dimension
regulations,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
10-foot
requirement.
We
have
purpose,
we
have
an
existing
short-form
permit
for
renovations
on
third
floor.
We
removed
the
sheetrock
on
the
third
floor
and
discovered
the
roof
was
badly
rotted.
We
are
requesting
to
amend
the
permit
to
add
an
eight
foot
by
six
foot,
shed
dormant
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
C
J
I
represent
jim
grossman
and
his
wife
lisa,
who
own
and
plan
to
reside
at
401
morrissey
boulevard
with
their
five
children,
which
they're
currently
in
the
process
of
renovating,
in
conformance
with
code
requirements
as
part
of
the
site
renovation.
They
seek
to
add
an
accessory
parking
garage
in
the
rear
yard
of
the
property
property
fronts
on
and
is
of
course
addressed
on
morrissey
boulevard.
There
is
a
long
time
curb
cut
existing
on
morrissey
boulevard,
which
provides
vehicular
access
to,
but
not
from
morrissey
boulevard.
J
Access
to
the
property
is
achieved
via
fox
point
road,
private
way,
with
right
of
public
access
which
terminates
before
and
connects
with
morrissey
boulevard
for
pedestrians
only
after
an
approximately
four
foot
raid
drop.
So
while
this
is
officially
a
corner
lot,
it
is
one
which
exists
on
a
private
way
and
on
a
corner
with
no
meaningful
connection
to
the
intersecting
public
way,
namely
morrissey
boulevard.
I
relate.
J
No,
there
was
a
garage.
There
was
a
garage
across
I'm
sorry
next
to
the
property
which
is
shown
on
the.
U
J
Plans
view
that
showing
on
the
screen
now,
you
can
see
a
garage
and
then
there's
another
view
which
shows
a
second
garage.
So
there
was
a
garage
on
fox
point
road
that
was
at
the
board
a
few
months
ago.
I
think,
but
not,
but
not
this
address.
A
J
I
I
just
related
the
information
about
the
about
fox
point
road
being
this
the
side
street,
because
the
citations
here,
obviously,
which
you
know
seem
somewhat
curious-
are
for
front
yard,
setback
violations
and
accessory
uses
in
front
yards.
So
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
the
zoning.
Subdistrict
is
one
of
seven
thousand.
The
property
is
in
fact
a
single
family
dwelling,
so
the
two
violations
cited
arise
under
article
10,
section
1
and
article
65,
section
9.
J
The
width
is
there,
there's
really
not
much
of
a
meaningful
curve
there.
There
is,
so
it
is
existing
in
the
sense
that
there's
really
no
no
built
up
curb.
This
is
a
private
way,
so
it
it's,
it's
less
a
matter
of
a
curb
cut
than
simply
the
location
of
a
garage.
J
D
The
plans
are
fine,
you
know
I
live
in
this
area.
I'm
very
familiar
with
this.
I
mean
fox
point.
Road
is
a
is
a
small
private
way
and
it
it
does
not
have
curbing
on
it.
So
this
is,
you
know,
a
paving
right
into
a
garage.
D
I
mean,
I
think,
the
I'm
a
little
curious.
You
know
the
garage
the
size
of
the
garage
seems
large,
especially
based
on
the
garage
sitting
next
to
it,
and
I
guess
I
just
would
like
to
understand
a
little
bit
more.
It's
showing,
I
believe,
a
six
car
capacity
with
a
lift
system
in
it.
D
If
I'm
not
mistaken,
then
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I'm
reading
the
plans
correctly
and
understanding
that-
and
I
guess
I'll
be
interested
to
hear
the
the
the
sort
of
the
neighborhood
in
terms
of
the
abutter
support
on
this
fairly
small
drive
lane
later.
But
if
you
can
clarify
that
mr
morantzy,
please.
J
I
will
certainly
the
garage
size,
mr
robinson,
is
approximately
30
by
35
feet
with
a
mean
height
of
approximately
15
feet,
and
it
is,
as
you
noted,
designed
to
accommodate
a
hydraulic
lift
system.
Since
my
college
clients
have
college-age
children,
the
size
of
the
garage
is
not
a
subject
of
the
requested
relief.
The
two
violations
for
which
variances
are
requested
are
variants
under
article
10,
section
1.,
the
article
10
variants
recited
owing
to
the
location
of
the
garage.
A
Or
it's
called
under
the
code.
Sorry,
mr
marie,
yes
got
it
because
I
yes
you're
right,
because
this
is
two
theoretically
two
front
yards,
so
we
got
it.
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Z
Madame
chair,
this
is
joe
mcgregor
with
city
council,
frank
baker's
office.
We
are
going
on
record
in
opposition
based
on
the
butter,
pear
butters
being
not
in
support
of
the
project
as
well.
Z
I
think
size
and
not
having
a
curb
cut.
Just
I
don't
know
I
I
don't
think
they
were
just
too
keen
on.
It
was
the
impression.
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
speaking,
this
is
george
when
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
speaking
on
behalf
of
my
predecessor,
pat
fandel,
for
this
specific
project,
the
applicant
notified
abutters
and
has
presented
to
the
civic
association
multiple
times,
and
this
is
an
amendment
to
a
previously
issued
permit.
So
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you.
K
Okay-
and
I
have
a
few
raised:
hands
matthew
you've
been
unmuted.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
AA
I
am
matt
russell
eight
fox
point
road
in
dorchester
and
I'm
just
going
on
record
in
opposition
to
this.
This
is
not
a
house
on
fox
point
road
and
the
design
of
this
house
could
easily
have
accommodated
entry
and
exit
via
marcy
boulevard.
This
was
presented
to
us
last
year
refused
by
the
civic
association.
The
builder
said:
I'm
going
to
go
as
of
right
and
now
we're
a
year
later
asking
for
the
same
thing.
So
we're
saying
no.
W
Please,
oh
thank
you.
My
name
is
andrew
donovan,
11
fox
point
road,
I'm
right
next
to
the
project.
Thank
you
for
hearing
me,
madam
chair,
and,
very
briefly.
The
401
home
had
a
two
two
car
garage
on
the
lower
level,
the
proponent
ripped
it
out
to
create
living
space.
Then
he
decided
to
build
the
house
much
larger
and
longer
without
a
variance
by
declaring
the
entire
lower
level,
which
had
three
bedrooms,
two
baths
and
and
the
two
car
garage
to
be
seller
storage.
W
A
Need
so
so,
thank
you
and
please
anybody
who's
already
spoken.
Please
lower
your
hand,
so
we
know
who
is
still
still
up
to
speak.
Okay,.
K
AB
Yes,
my
name
is
donna
blythe
mccolgan.
I
live
at
203,
seven
hill
avenue,
let's
see
split
some
hams
and
voicing
and
my
position
as
opposed
to
this.
This
garage,
I'm
also
a
member
of
the
great
of
the
seven
hill
civic
association
executive
board
and
the
planning
committee
we've
reviewed
these
plans.
We
have
opposed
the
garage
and
the
oversized
home
that
they're
building
down
there.
Thank
you.
A
Ma'am,
thank
you
welcome.
So
let
me
ask
for
I
see
a
number
of
additionally
raised
ants.
Please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
if
you
have
new
information,
add
it
if
you
don't
it's
okay,
to
just
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
say
you're
that
you're
either
opposed
or
in
support.
Okay,
okay,.
AC
AD
AE
AF
K
N
A
Thank
you,
okay,
miss
ambassador.
Is
that
everybody?
Yes,
it
is
please
everybody
who
has
your
hands
up,
please
put
them
down,
so
we
know
that
we
don't
get
confused
down
the
road.
Given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
J
May,
madam
chair,
may
I
rebut.
J
Again,
ma'am
george
francis
just
to
crystallize
this
we're
talking
about
a
garage
structure
with
a
mean
height
of
approximately
15
feet.
The
dimensions
here
are
not
in
violation
of
the
code.
The
violations
here
accrue
to
the
fact
that
isd
is
regarding
fox
point
road
as
a
front
yard
to
the
building,
when
it
is
in
fact
clearly
the
side
yard
area
of
the
building,
but
for
the
location
on
morrissey
boulevard,
which
fox
point
road
does
not
even
connect.
J
These
two
violations
would
not
have
been
cited.
This
is
a
garage
to
enclose
vehicles
for
again
a
seven
person
household,
and
if
there
were
no
garage
there,
then
the
vehicles
would
be
relegated
to
surface
parking
exposed
surface
parking.
This
would
be
subject
to
bpda
design
review,
specifically
with
respect
to
the
size
and
functionality
of
the
garage.
Were
this
board's.
Would
this
were
the
board
to
see
fit
to
grant
the
two
requested
variances.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
C
Madam
chair,
just
for
the
record,
mr
demigo
from
beef
across
the
transportation
department
spoke
on
this.
He
said
that
it
should
at
most
be
allowed
for
only
three
cars,
and
it
should
be
a
curb
cut.
They
should
close
the
curb
cut
on
morsi
boulevard.
A
Okay,
okay,
close
so
close,
close
coco
and
marsie,
and
three
cars:
okay,
okay,
so,
given
all
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please
tom.
N
I
just
want
to
interject
quickly.
I
just
want
to
confirm
for
the
board
that
mr
kendall
has
been
here
for
this
hearing.
A
A
A
So
there's
I
I
two
am
in
in
opposition,
so
the
motion
doesn't
carry.
It's
been
denied.
C
Thanks,
okay
next
case
okay,
I
would
the
gentleman
for
33
eastman
street
was
on
the
phone
the
whole
time,
so
I'm
going
to
go
back
to
that
one!
That's
fine!
Thank
you!
Voa
1194673.
AG
A
C
The
insufficient
real
effect
article
65
section
9
insufficient
size,
article
6569,
insufficient
side
yard,
sex
setback,
article
65,
section,
9,
excessive
far
artificial
65,
section,
9,
front
yard
setback
front
porch.
The
purpose
is
to
construct
a
new
four
unit
residential
building,
as
per
the
plans
attached
name
and
address
for
the
record.
F
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
palgini
tenfold's,
road
and
braintree
with
me
today
is
james
baker,
who
is
the
owner
developer
together
with
james
christopher,
who
is
the
team
architect.
So
this
is
180
182
sydney
street
in
dorchester.
The
zoning
is
two
family.
Five
thousand
it's
unit
size
is
4185
square
feet.
I'm.
A
A
Okay,
I'm
sorry:
what
was
the
square
footage
again.
F
And,
as
mr
ruggiero
stated,
it's
proposals
to
build
a
new
four
unit,
condominium
building
on
a
vacant
lot
with
five
off
street
parking
spaces.
This
lot
is
located
just
a
few
blocks
from
the
jfk
train
station
I'll
touch
on
the
violations.
Madam
chair,
rare
yacht
allowed
us
thirty.
We
are
ten
to
eleven
and
a
half
feet
lot
size.
We
just
went
through
five
thousand
with
four
thousand
one
hundred
eighty
five
square
feet.
F
Use
is
violation,
2f
zoning
multi-family
proposal
side
yacht
is
10,
we're
at
5
and
13
feet,
4
inches
far
0.5
and
we're
at
1.49
front
yard
is
15
and
we
meet
the
modal.
F
The
unit
sizes
are
unit,
one
is
thirteen
hundred
and
ten
square
feet,
which
is
a
two
bed
two
bath
unit.
Two
is
twelve
hundred
sixty
eight
square
feet:
two
bed,
two
bath
unit,
three,
thirteen
hundred
and
ninety
three
square
feet:
three
bed,
two
bath
and
unit
four
is
fourteen
hundred
two
square
feet:
three
bed:
two
bath:
there
is
a
roof
terraces
that
were
just
for
the
two
top
units
that
are
not
grouped
decks
the
terraces.
F
This
went
to
a
robust
community
process.
Madam
chair,
we
received
the
approval
from
the
saturn
hill.
F
So
we
there's
I'm
sorry,
so
we
comply
with
parking.
We
have
five
parking
spaces
for
four
units.
A
Okay,
it's
all
underground!
Okay
and
the
cub
cut
is
if
you're,
looking
at
the
house
on
the
right
hand,
side.
Okay
and
there's
is
there's
no
basement
occupancy.
R
D
The
plans
are
good.
Mr
christopher
is
correct
in
terms
of
his
explanation
of
the
grade.
It
does
drop
down,
so
there
doesn't
appear
to
be
any
below
grade
living
and
I
think
it's
consistent
with
the
height
of
some
of
the
other
buildings
along
sydney
street.
C
Y
K
I'm
sure
I
do
have
one
raised
hand:
nancy
you've
been
unmuted.
Can
you
stitch
your
name
and
address
for
the
record?
Please.
O
A
Okay,
miss
this
ambassador,
so
there's
nobody
else
that
you
can
see.
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
support.
I,
I
think,
with
bpda
design
review
specifically
looking
at
the
ground
floor
level
as
it
meets
the
ground
and
as
well.
I
think
they
will
need
to
incorporate
accessibility
for
a
unit,
so
if
they
could
work
with
the
bpa
on
resolution
of
that
front,
elevation
that'd
be
great.
M
M
C
Calling
next
hpoa
one
one:
six:
six:
six:
two:
seven:
sixty
stanley
street
in
wood,
fifteen
violations,
article
65,
section,
eight
forbidden
thirteen
family
use;
article
6569,
dimensional
regulations,
front
yard,
section
9
far
far;
article
65
section,
42.3
traffic
visibility
across
corner
article
65,
section
9,
building
height
excessive
in
stories;
65,
section
65-41,
off-street
loading
requirement;
article
65,
section,
9
side
yard,
insufficient
article
65,
section,
9
radar,
insufficient.
C
The
purpose
is
to
construct
a
new
three-story
residential
building,
says
with
13
units
updated
to
eight
units.
As
of
march
2021,
with
r3
parking,
as
per
attached
plans
to
combine
the
two
existing
parcels,
one:
five:
zero
one:
nine
six:
three:
zero
zero,
consisting
of
three
thousand
nine
hundred
and
ninety
five
square
feet
and
parcel
one:
five:
one:
zero
one:
six:
nine:
two:
zero
zero.
F
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
john
fulgini
104th,
road
and
braintree
with
me
this
morning,
is
chris
who's,
the
owner
of
the
property,
together
with
james
christopher
who's,
the
architect
so
60
stanley
streets
located
in
the
zoning
sub
district
at
2f6
000.
It's
currently
a
dilapidated
vacant
lot
and,
as
mr
joe
said,
his
approximate
loss
size
is
8
100
square
feet.
F
T
F
Now
so
that
obviously
comes
right
off
and
and
if
they're
not
eliminated.
Obviously
the
far
comes
down
because
the
the
project
came
down
from
13
units
to
eight
units
down
a
chair.
A
F
F
Right,
I
will
do
that.
Yep
go
ahead
uses.
Obviously
it's
a
multi-family
residential
in
a
2f
zone,
front
yard
setback
is
15
feet,
we're
at
one
foot
and
three
feet
which
is
consistent
with
what
was
built
in
the
neighborhood.
Far
0.4
we're
at
1.38,
as
mr
virginia
stated
in
height
requirement,
is
35
2
and
a
half
feet,
we're
at
30
feet
with
three
stories.
So
we
meet
the
st
we
meet
the
height
requirement,
just
exceed
the
stories
side
yards
ten
we're
at
seven
and
then
one.
F
We
have
a
street
that
one
foot
side
yard
is
not
a
budding
neighborhood,
but
it
butts,
which
is
a
a
street
that
runs
up.
The
side
of
this
and
parking
is
1.25
for
49
units,
we're
proposing
nine
nine
parking
spaces
for
this
proposal.
Do
you
want
me
to
go
to
the
unit
sizes
managed
here.
F
Okay,
I'll
go
through
the
unit
sizes
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
james
christopher.
To
talk
about
the
parking
unit.
One
is
a
two
bed.
One
bath,
that's
983
square
feet.
Unit.
Two
is
two
bags
one
bath
983
square
feet
unit
three
is
two
bath:
a
three
bed
two
bath:
that's
twelve
hundred
and
thirty
square
feet.
Unit.
F
A
And
1281:
okay,
okay,
and
tell
us
again
how
parking
works.
R
Good
morning,
good
morning,
madam
chair,
the
parking
will
be
accessed
off
of
cane
street.
Part
of
the
building
will
be
cantilever
so
that
the
vehicle
will
enter
off
of
cane
street,
pull
those
into
the
building
with
some
columns
underneath
the
cantilever
portion,
and
then
the
building
will
be
open
to
the
rear.
With
the
30
foot,
rare
yard
setback.
R
It'd
be
the
landscape
planes.
If
you
go
up,
miss
edwards
could
be
at
the
the
first
set
of
drawings.
Keep
going
keep
going,
keep
going
up
right
here
down.
AC
F
Yes,
man
of
chair
there
is
but
the
roof
deck
is
it's
exclusive
to
the
top
three
units.
So
it's
and
it's
set
back
behind
a
parapet
and
again
this
always
came
out
through
the
community
process
they
want.
They
did
not
want
a
common
root
that
they
wanted.
Exclusive
use
room
decks
for
those
units.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
D
The
plans
are
consistent
with
what
the
applicant
is
proposing.
I
could
could
you,
I
guess,
speak
to
the
the
front
yard
setback
I
mean
the
the
neighborhood
is
really
a
series
of
you
know.
I
don't
know
if
they're
ones
or
twos
but
buildings
within
their
site
and
you're
pushing
up
right
onto
stanley,
street
and
kane
street,
which
is
not
consistent
with
any
of
your
budding
houses
or
neighbors.
R
Sure
we
worked
very
closely
with
the
neighbors
on
the
signing
of
this
building.
We
did
have
several
iterations.
We
felt
it
important
that
the
building
addressed
the
corners
because
it
is
on
two
corners
and
that
it
be
prominent.
The
the
primary
concern
for
the
butters
was
screening
and
buffering
on
the
ends
and
the
rear
of
the
property.
So
in
order
to
accommodate
the
parking
at
the
rear
and
several
iterations
later,
the
building
was
a
little
bit
larger.
We
had
the
parking
interior.
R
This
was
the
option
that
we
came
in,
that
we
arrived
at
and
presented
with
the
community
group
and
worked
closely
with
them,
which
was
well
received.
Excuse
me,
and
there
is
there's
not
a
lot
of
modal
on
this
section
of
stanley,
but
we
do
feel
that
it's
appropriate
siding
in
the
building.
A
Genie
how
many
affordable
units
in
this
building.
F
Madam
chair
there's
not
any
affordable
units.
It's
a
eight
unit
building,
as
I
stated
before,
we
went
with
a
13
unit.
Building
which
would
have
would
provide
affordability
through
the
community
process
that
mr
pittsburgh
just
talked
about.
They
felt
that
they
wanted
this.
F
I'm
sorry
they
wanted
home
ownership,
madam
chair,
so
we
they
wanted
condominiums
for
this
area.
Okay,.
A
So
these
are
condos.
Okay,
any
questions
from
the
board.
D
I
just
have
one
sorry,
one
other
question
so
when
the
building-
maybe
I
missed
this-
I
apologize
when
the
building
came
down
from
13
to
the
current
number
of
units.
Did
you
say
that
the
square
footage
did
not
reduce
or
it
did.
R
R
If
you
look
at
the
current
first
floor
plan,
the
the
lobby
with
the
media
room
and
the
bike
storage
room
was
originally
a
unit
and,
as
we
were
working
with
the
community
they
would
they
were
discussing
that
they'd
prefer
to
see.
You
know
some
some
building
amenities
space
there
and
that's
how
we
arrived
at
this
iteration.
A
And
is
this
an
elevator
building.
R
R
Sure
so
we've
we've
incorporated,
you
know
some
some
small,
shrubs
and
street
trees
at
the
front
of
the
property
shrubs
where
possible,
and
then
we
would
propose
to
incorporate
screening
and
buffering
on
the
right
end
of
the
building
we're
facing
on
the
street
to
use
some
larger
trees
and
shrubs
there.
R
B
Madam
chair,
the
the
I
realize
mr
hampton's
not
here,
but
the
bpda
comment
is
that
they
recommend
denial
due
to
eccentric
density.
I
guess
my
question
is:
was
that
based
on
it
being
13
units,
I
mean
their
comment?
Their
comments
said
updated
to
eight
residential
units,
so
I
I
believe
they
still
consider
it
excessive
excessively
dense.
Mr
robinson,
is
that
a
judgment
you
would
agree
with.
D
Yes,
I
do,
and
I
feel
like
it
just
it
just
doesn't
necessarily
fit
in
with
the
context
of
the
neighborhood.
I
I
feel
like
this
is
a
great
site
for
development,
certainly
in
support
of
that,
I
just
feel
like
it's
just
feels
still
too
dense
and
too
pushed
up
to
the
street
edge
because
of
that
density,
I
think
so.
F
On
the
managerial,
if
that's
a
big
issue,
we
would
gladly
redesign
the
front
and
pull
it
back
and
come
before
the
board.
If
you
would
issue
a
deferral
for
the
today.
A
D
I
I
would
make
I
would
at
least
I
would
make
a
motion
for
deferral
and
I
think
I
think
there
is
a
project
here.
I
just
think
this
one
is
still
a
little
bit
too
big.
A
Is
all
those
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
carries
the
date.
Please.
C
Calling
next
case
boa
1173647
173
westville
street
in
ward
15
violations,
article
65,
section,
8,
youth
regulation,
3
family
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section,
9
thought
area,
insufficient
article
65
section
9
lot
with
insufficient
article
65
section
9
lot.
Frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
948
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
building
height
accessible
stories,
article
65,
section,
9
side
yard
is
insufficient.
C
Article
65
section
9
rare
artisan
article
65
section
42.2
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment;
article
65
section
41,
off-street
parking
and
loading
required
purpose
seeking
to
erect
a
three-family
residential
dwelling
space
dwelling
with
three
parking
spaces
on
a
vacant
lawn
name
and
address.
AH
For
the
record,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street.
With
me,
I
have
the
applicants
judy
akbin
and
gene
raymond,
the
owners
of
the
lot
and
also
talia
konistra
who's,
the
architect
on
the
project
from
port
1.,
as
was
mentioned,
and
you
can
see
in
the
rendering
in
front
of
you.
This
is
a
an
existing
vacant
lot.
If
we
just
pause
on
that
picture
right
there,
I'm
sorry,
my
clients
own
the
two
family
directly.
AH
Next
to
it
where
they
live,
they
are
proposing
to
erect
a
three-unit
building.
This
would
be
a
rental
building
with
three
tandems
parking
spaces
on
an
existing
curb
cut.
If
you're
looking
at
this
picture,
you'll
see
the
curb
cut
on
the
right
side.
The
lot
size,
as
was
mentioned,
is
3
000
square
feet,
which
is
similar
to
most
of
the
lots
in
that
area.
The
height
proposed
is
32
feet,
2
inches
the
floor
plan.
These
are
all
three
bedroom.
AH
Three
bath
family
sized
units,
all
of
the
units
are
1195
square
feet
just
to
go
over
the
floor
plan.
The
first
floor
would
house
the
three
bed
two
bath
again.
Those
are
11.95
that
would
also
house
through
a
separate
entrance,
the
sprinkler
room
that
would
be
accessed
through
a
door
on
the
left
side
of
the
building
and
that's
an
exterior
entry.
Only
the
second
floor
would
host
the
second
three
bed
two
bath
and
the
third
floor
would
house
the
third
three
bed
and
two
bath.
AH
Both
the
second
and
third
floor
have
front
decks
on
them.
The
first
floor
does
not
obviously
just
to
go
over
the
violations
that
were
listed.
This
is
a
2f
district,
although
most
of
the
surrounding
buildings
are
three
units
and
we
are
proposing
three
f.
So
there
is
a
use
violation.
AH
Minimum
lot
size
is
5000,
we
are
proposing
three.
The
lot
with
and
frontage
required
would
be
50
and
we
are
at
40.
far's
0.5
we're
at
1.38.
AH
We
do.
We
are
below
the
35
foot
height
requirement,
so
we
do
meet
that
in
feet.
However,
it's
a
two
and
a
half
story
requirement
and
we
are
at
three
which
is
common.
As
you
can
see
up
and
down
that
street.
The
side
setback
we
is
required
is
10
and
we
meet
that
on
the
right
side.
That
is
where
our
parking,
where
our
curb
cut
entrance,
is
we
are
at
ten
foot
seven.
AH
AH
We
have
five,
but
again
the
building
jogs
in
bringing
it
up
to
10,
and
we
do
have
a
green
space
area
back
there
parking
because
they
are
tandem
spaces.
You
can
see
up
and
down
that
street
there
are.
There
is
a
lot
of
parking
that
go
along
with
it.
A
So
if
I
get
this
right,
where
is
your
open
space?
If
your
rear
yard
varies
from
five
to
ten
feet
and
only
the
top
two
units
have
decks?
How
is
your
open
space
met
for
your
lower
ground
floor.
AH
So
there
is
an
area
in
the
back
of
open
space
and
then
we're
also
so
you
can
see
where
I
don't
know.
If
we
can
pull
that
up,
it
does
jog
in
in
the
back
for
a
10
foot
area
of
green
space
and
then
five
around
the
rest,
and
then
we
could
also
you
know
we're.
We
were
planning
on
doing
a
paved
driveway
because
it
goes
back
pretty
far
to
fit
the
tandem
cars.
We
could
use
a
section
of
that
as
well.
A
Okay,
can
you
please
tell
miss
edwards,
which
drawings
you
should
pull
up,
so
we
can
see
the
parking
spaces.
AH
Oh
emily,
so
you
could
see
the
actual
layout
of
the
parking
on
a
dash
101
so
more
towards
the
beginning,
right
there,
sorry
yeah,
so
that
you
can
see
the
on
the
left
on
the.
If
you're
staring
at
the
left
hand,
side
three
tandem
spaces
laid
out,
you
can
see
where
the
building
jogs
in
in
the.
I
AF
D
Excuse
me,
the
plans
plans
are
good.
You
know
I,
I
I'm
a
I'm
struggling
a
little
bit
with
the
rear
yard
setback.
Looking
in
the
context,
the
rear,
a
budding
property
on
the
other
street,
which
I
think
is
leroy
street,
is
a
smaller
building,
but
so
there's
a
little
bit
more
relief.
I
think
the
front
is
consistent
with
the
street
and
the
height
and
the
sizes
just
wish.
We
had
a
little
bit
more
rear
yard
setback,
but
in
general
terms
I
think
the
project's
pretty
good.
A
AG
AI
A
So,
given
that
information-
let's
see-
and
this
is
westville
and
the
bpda-
is
proposing
approval
with
design
review,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpa
design
review
and
would
request
one
more
look
and
see
if
we
could
maybe
increase
the
rear
yard
setback
as
they
go
through
design
review.
B
C
Philosophy
in
wars,
20.,
violations
of
article
67,
section
32,
off-street
parking
and
loading
requirement,
article
67
section
9
insufficient
additional
lot
area
per
unit
and
article
67
section
9
insufficient,
open
space,
improved
purposes
to
improve
the
existing
attached
garage
to
be
used
as
a
living
space
for
the
handicapped,
homeowner,
no
change
in
height
or
size.
No
structural
work
need
energy
code,
meets
building
code,
install
heat
and
hook
up
bathroom
sewer
pipe
to
existing
house
to
it
name
and
address
for
the
record.
T
D
I
K
I
do
not
see
the
name,
nor
did
they
check.
C
Should
I
move
forward?
Yes,
please:
okay,
calling
next
case
boa
one,
one:
six,
five,
eight,
two:
two:
nine
everett
street
in
ward,
22.,
violations
of
article
51,
section
8,
youth
regulation,
multi-family
dwelling
unit
is
forbidden.
Article
51,
section,
9,
lard
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
9
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section,
9,
height
requirements
and
success
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section,
9
height
requirement,
is
excessive
stories
and
feed
article
51,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section,
9,
sayad,
says
setback
is
insufficient.
C
Article
51
section
56,
our
street
parking
requirements,
insufficient
articles,
section,
56
off
street
parking
design,
maneuverability
change
of
occupancy
from
a
two
family
dwelling
to
a
seven
family
dwelling,
add
vertical
edition
to
create
a
fourth
fourth
story.
At
rare
edition,
add
five
off
three
parking
spaces
at
grade
in
the
rear
to
be
accessed
via
existing
curb
cuts,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
J
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
the
property
owner's
city,
realty
development
project
architecture
calls
to
design
and
tanya
carrier
from
carlson
joins
us
from
carlson
joins
us
this
morning.
J
J
Literally
my
next
sentence,
the
lot
size
is
four
thousand
seven
hundred
ninety
six
square
feet
and
it
is
located
in
a
three
f
four
thousand
zoning
sub
district
under
article
51,
the
austin
brighton,
neighborhood
article,
madam
chair.
The
building
would
change
from
its
present
three
stories
to
four
stories
unit.
J
One
would
be
a
one
bedroom
unit
of
885
square
feet
unit,
two,
a
one
bedroom
unit
of
716
square
feet;
unit;
three,
a
two
bedroom
at
eighty,
eight
hundred
eighty
eight
square
feet
unit;
four,
a
one
bedroom,
seven
hundred
sixteen
square
feet
unit;
five,
a
two
bedroom
of
eight
hundred
eighty
eight
square
feet
unit;
six,
a
one
bedroom,
six
hundred
twelve
square
feet
and
unit;
seven,
a
two
bedroom
of
eight
hundred
seventy
four
square
feet.
Although
this
project
is
not
subject
to
an
idp
requirement,
it's
seven
units,
five
units
being
added.
J
A
M
J
Being
shown
there
are
the
floor,
plans
manager
obviously
would
be
helped
if
they
could
be.
A
J
You
know,
as
we
can
see
there,
it's
it's
kind
of
tough.
Looking
at
the
plans.
There's
there's
the
first
floor
at
the
bottom,
as
the
plans
are
now
situated.
D
The
planes
are
good,
I'll,
be
honest.
I
I
sort
of
choked
when
I
first
heard
the
two
to
seven
on
the
density
change.
D
However,
it
you
know
there,
it
is
a
transitional,
I
think
moment
on
the
street,
there's
a
much
larger
building
under
construction
or
going
up
on
the
right-hand
side,
and
I
think
the
if
I'm
correct,
mr
rancy,
the
the
front
yard
is
basically
remaining,
as
is
so
that's
consistent
with
the
the
buildings
to
its
left
and
then
the
roof
lines
are
changing
a
little
bit
but
fairly
consistent
with
the
style.
It's
just
getting
a
little
there's
another,
obviously
adding
some
more
upper
level
space.
Is
that
correct.
J
That's
correct,
mr
robinson,
and
and
you're
right
on
all
counts.
The
front
yard,
as
I
said
now,
actually
has
been
used
for
vehicular
parking
and
that's
going
to
get
a
full
landscape
makeover
and.
M
J
You
also
know
the
actual
neighborhood
context
here
is
critically
important
to
properly
considering
the
proposed
project.
Nine
everett
street
is
located
just
over
a
hundred
feet
from
everett
street's
intersection
with
north
beacon
street
across
the
street,
which
is
owned.
Local
industrial
is
an
area
characterized
by
large
scale,
commercial
and
residential
development,
both
existing
and
planned.
Specifically,
this
is
not
far
from
boston,
landing
and
associated
sites
directly
across
everett.
J
At
37,
north
beacon
is
a
five-story
72-unit
apartment
building
whose
construction
was
just
completed
this
summer
and
a
budding
the
property
on
the
right,
as
viewed
from
everett
street
at
one
everett
street,
is
a
five-story
17-unit
building.
So
it
is
very
much
a
neighborhood
in
transition
from
when
it
was
originally
zoned,
three
or
four
thousand
thirty
years
ago.
J
Yes,
one
was
submitted,
I'm
not
sure
where
it
is
on
on
the
plan
set
being
displayed.
Hopefully
it
is
there,
but
there
is
a
a
full
whole
landscaping
plan
that
was
done
by
landscape
architecture.
A
Please
tell
us
what
cheat
it
is
because
I
know
there's
been
difficulty
rotating
the
plans,
so
just
tell
us
what
she
did
so
that
we
get
a
sense
of
what's
happening.
J
It's
so
it
was
produced
by
a
landscape
architect,
so
it's
not
part
of
the
architectural
drawing.
So
I
it
would
not
necessarily
be
embedded
in
the
architectural
drawings.
So
I'm
not
certain
whether
it
is
in
possession
of
the
board.
D
F
D
Am
familiar
with
verdan
and
you
know
I
actually
think
they
do
nice
work.
So
I
can't
say
that's
happening
here,
but
hopefully
there
will
be
a
robust.
E
J
Importantly,
the
existing
front
retaining
wall,
which
is
rather
handsome,
is
going
to
be
kept
in
place.
It's
going
to
be
repaired,
the
entire
front
area
of
the
building
will
be
landscaped.
The
existing
street
tree
is
going
to
be
protected
and
remain
on
site
in
front
of
the
building.
J
There
will
be
two
trees
planted
in
the
front
in
the
front
side
yard,
along
with
the
planted
lawn
area
and
and
in
planters,
there
would
be
a
bordering
aluminum
fence
by
ameristar
the
herbie
permeable,
paving
areas
will
include
winter,
marble,
winter,
marble,
pavers
and
granite
blend
pavers,
and
there
will
be
two
additional
trees
in
the
back.
J
Actually
one
of
them
is
an
existing
crab
apple
tree
that
will
be
protected
and
will
remain
after
construction
and
there's
also
a
permeable
paved
patio
area
in
the
far
right
left
rear
corner
of
the
building
in
the
parking
area
where
there
are
five
proposed
new
parking
spaces.
A
And
apropos
to
that,
can
you
please
tell
us
where
what
plan
we
should
be
looking
at
to
the
to
see
the
parking
plan,
so
we
just
get
a
sense
that
to
connect
to
miss
panato's
question,
how
is
that
parking
space
being
sheltered
by
a
tree
or
shaded
by
a
tree
or
whatever.
J
C
This
is
from
mr
demigod
boston
transportation.
Department
parking
plan
as
submitted
does
not
work.
I
request
that
spaces
one
and
three
be
removed
and
spaces.
Two
and
four
be
parked
on
a
45
degree
angle
for
adequate
and
safe
maneuverability.
A
Okay,
so
that
essentially
brings
it
down
to
three
parking
spaces.
Based
on
his
comment,
mr
ruggiero.
A
Right,
okay
and
mr
marantzy
looking
at
the
plan
right
now,
is
that
proposed
fencing
against
the
rear
or
better.
J
Yes,
the
the
the
the
site
perimeter
would
be
would
be
fenced.
A
Okay,
so
there's,
but
there
is,
however,
no
screening
and
buffering
to
protect
the
real
yard
of
the
rear
of
butter.
J
There
is
there's
again,
the
verdant
landscape
plan
is
not
included
with
the
plan
set,
but
there
is
a
in
the
rear
would
be
a
wood
fence,
either
solid
wood
board
or
picket
front
fencing
and
along
the
the
right
side.
The
parking
area
would
be
aluminum,
fencing
again,
which
which
looks
like
wrought
iron,
but
in
the
back
there
would
be
there
would
be
a
wood
fence
for
those
three
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
A
Okay:
okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
AJ
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
we
conducted
a
butters
meeting
on
april
8th
prior
to
that
meeting
and
afterwards
the
applicant
continued
to
work
with
director
butters.
The
app
can
also
went
on
to
the
austin
civic
association
and
worked
very
closely
on
design
landscaping
considerations,
parking
considerations.
AJ
They
are
in
close
proximity
to
the
boston
landing
just
over
the
bridge
so
yeah
they
ended
up
achieving
support
from
the
aca
and
support
from
a
number
of
director
butters
as
well.
So
we
think
this
is
appropriate
for
the
area.
Thank
you.
AK
Unmuted
yeah
madam
chair
members
of
florida,
annabel
gomes
from
the
brighton
nelson
improvement
association,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
support
the
fact
that
they
are
keeping
the
the
character
of
the
house
instead
of
like
their
neighbors
across
and
next
door,
that
really
just
built
a
box
building
and
that
they
do
have
an
affordable
unit
and
that
these
are
in
fact
condo
units
versus
rentals
on
the
on
the
other
units
being
built.
Thank
you.
AL
We
particularly
appreciate
the
proponents
participation
in
the
and
including
an
affordable
unit
through
the
oneplus
program.
Thank
you.
K
D
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpda
design
review,
I
think
specifically
looking.
Obviously,
the
parking
needs
a
little
bit
of
work
and
also
ensure
that
there
is
adequate
screening
and
buffering
for
the
parking
in
the
rear
to
the
rear
butters
and
to
the
cider
butters.
E
Madam
chair,
I
realize
my
employer
colliers
represents
city
realty
on
another
project,
so
I'd
like
to
recuse
myself.
AB
A
She
will
not
be
participating
in
the
vote,
so
there's
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second.
B
B
J
C
12
14
to
22
birch
street
in
wood,
20.
violations
of
article
67,
section
11
cannabis.
Establishment
in
the
in
kitchen
use
is
conditional
article
67,
section
11.
Any
cannabis
establishment
shall
be
cited
at
least
one
half
mile
from
another:
existing
cannabis
establishment,
change
of
occupancy
to
a
commercial
cannabis,
kitchen
and
retail
bakery
shop.
No
structural
work
will
take
place
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AD
Good
morning
my
name
is
kijana
rose
business
address
22
bird
street
in
roslindale,
also
a
resident
of
roslindale
from
182
poplar
street
good
morning.
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
grateful
to
be
here
today
to
present
to
you
guys
we
are
proposing
a
cannabis
product
manufacturing
commercial
kitchen
and
a
retail
bakery
in
apothecary
at
22
birch
street,
mostly
we're
here
today
to
talk
about
the
buffer
zone
issue.
If
we
can.
Y
A
So
I'm
looking
at
the
the
map-
and
it
wants
to
take
me
to
14.:
what's
what
is
the
space?
Is
it
the
yoga
space
that
you're
taking
over.
A
Oh,
it
is
the
royalty
space
yeah.
It's
a
corner
in
that
pathway
to
sofia's.
A
A
Yes,
so
hold
on.
You
know
we
have
our
usual
standard
questions
that
we
need
to
ask
okay.
So
so,
can
you
just
talk
through
how
this
space
is
going
to
work?
So
this
is
going
to
be
a
commercial
cannabis,
kitchen
and
retail
bakery
shop
right?
There
will
be
no
other
forms
of
cannabis
being
sold
in
it.
AD
There
will
be
cannabis,
baked
goods
and
also
pre-rolls
infused
pre-rolls
herbal
infused
pre-roll.
So
there
will
be
cannabis,
flour
and
cannabis
baked
goods.
A
Okay,
so
just
tell
us,
then,
how
you're
going
to
what
the
flow
is
for
somebody
who's
entering
the
space.
AD
Okay,
someone
coming
into
the
space
from
the
front
if
they're
coming
in
for
retail,
they
will
come
in
from
the
front
location
for
22
birth
street.
If
they're
coming
into
the
space
to
you
know,
have
an
appointment
with
us,
it's
going
to
be
an
appointment-based
operation
and
we'll
also
have
a
take-out,
so
people
coming
for
takeout
will
come
and
pick
up
from
the
back
where,
across
from
sofia's
is
in
the
front.
They'll
come
in
they'll,
probably
be
seated
until
one
of
our
concierges
is
ready
to
sit
with
them.
They'll
have
an
appointment.
A
So
if
I
want
to
go
into
so
you're
going
to
be
appointment
based
if
I'm
coming
here
to
pick
up
something,
how
tell
me
just
so
it's
going
to
be
waiting
for
me
in
the
back
of
the
retail
back
bakery
store
or
or
is
there
another
way
of
getting
from
the
basement
so
that
in
fact,
there's
a
strong
barrier
between
the
cannabis
product
product
and
the
bakery
product.
AD
Yeah,
so
all
the
baked
goods
will
be
downstairs,
but
the
take
out
section
will
be
in
the
back
of
that.
So
if
you're,
if
you're,
looking
at
the
design
on
the
left
of
this
slide,
so
the
back
of
the
house
so
the
top
of
the
picture,
the
top
of
the
layout,
that's
the
back
of
the
house.
So
all
of
that
will
be
set
up
where
all
the
takeout
orders
will
just
be
lined
up
and
ready
to
go.
AD
We'll
have
security
back
there
we'll
have
the
person
who's
designated
back
there
to
be
handling
the
takeout
and
then
in
front.
We'll
have
the
same
operation
where
they'll
have
a
security
person
in
front
and
they'll
come
in,
and
those
people
who
come
in
through
the
front
might
actually
have
an
appointment
where
they'll
sit
down
with
someone
discuss
what
they're
buying
that
day.
That
kind
of
thing.
A
AD
A
Okay,
and
so
so,
this
pic
the
the
rear
pickup
will
be
during
all
seasons,
including
the
winter
correct,
okay,
okay
and
your
hours
of
operation.
A
And
tell
us
about
the
sale
to
dispensaries.
When
will
your
pickup
vans
come
to
pick
up
product
to
take
them
elsewhere?.
AD
A
Okay,
so
fresh
edibles,
daily,
okay
and
okay
and
9
to
10
p.m.
On
a
sun
on
friday
through
sunday,
okay,
is
anything
even
open.
Till
10
pm,
I
guess
bistro
is
open
and
grotto
is
open.
Okay,
okay
and
we
know
that
you're
within
one
half
mile
of
the
other
one
up,
the
street
yeah.
AD
A
It
feels
like
it's
an
entirely
different
neighborhood.
AD
Entirely
different
neighborhood
and
concept:
actually,
we
won't
have
any
product
overlap
with
that
store
because
we'll
only
be
selling
our
own
products
in
the
store.
Also
they've
not
started
any
construction
on
that
site
and
if
you
go
back
and
read
their
proposal
that
they
made
to
you,
their
proposal
was
essentially
dependent
on
other
cannabis
shops
being
open
in
the
neighborhood
by
the
time
they're
open.
A
I'm
a
roslindale
resident,
so
I'm
familiar
with
with
the
the
ins
and
outs.
So
the
other
question,
I
think
that
I
need
to
ask
you,
is
that
the
street
is
has
now
become
a
seating
area.
So
how
are
you
going
to
do
pickups
and
deliveries?
If
that's
true.
AD
Well,
you
mean
for
the
products
manufacturing
yep,
because.
A
I
think
they
close
off
the
street-
I
don't
know
if
it's
gonna
be
summer
or
all
year
round
to
have.
AD
They
have
it's
gonna,
be
closed
off
all
year
round.
There's
two
ways
that
we
can
get
in
to
do
our
deliveries.
One
is
that
we
can
pull
into
birch
because
we
still
can
pull
in
right
there
and
just
not
go
any
further.
It's
blocked
off
about
halfway
up
the
street,
so
we
can
pull
in
right
there.
We
can
also
go
back.
We've
been
I've,
been
talking
with
my
friend
at
up
the
street
about
potentially
going
back
in
to
get
deliveries.
But
again
we
really
don't
anticipate
that
being
a
big
issue.
AD
A
Okay?
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
D
The
plans
are
good,
I
think
you
know
my
only
question,
which
is
I
it
looks
to
be
tricky.
Is
you
know
the
building
is
not
accessible.
So
there's
steps
up
to
the
main
floor
and
I
guess
it's
one
of
the
things
I'm
noticing
and
there
will
be
no
public
access
to
the
lower
level
correct.
That's
only
for
operations
and
house.
D
AD
No
access
to
the
lower
floor
and
yeah
there
it's
it's
not
to
go
inside
to
the
retail
location.
Unfortunately,
right
now,
that
area
is
not
handicap
accessible.
The
whole
building
is
not.
A
AD
Our
signage
will
actually
just
be
our
logo.
It
won't
even
say
that
we're
a
cannabis
bakery
it'll
just
be
our
logo,
and
I
and
I
rose
garden
in
our
our
logo-
is
the
rose
of
venus,
so
it
has
no
kind
of
cannabis,
insenia
or
any
kind
of
relation
to
cannabis.
The
only
way
young
kids
would
know
that
our
shop
was
a
cannabis
shop
is
if
you
or
their
parents,
tell
them,
because
we
won't
tell
them.
AD
A
Y
AM
Thank
you
so
much
good
afternoon,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jordan
fries
here
from
council
recorder
world's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
of
this.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
C
P
A
Applicant
only-
and
we
will
also
just
emphasize
that
it
is
friday
through
sunday,
so
that
there's
no
confusion
right
nine
to
10
p.m,
right,
okay,
there's
a
second
from
tyrone
all
those
in
favor.
D
AD
C
Okay,
you
want
me
to
go
back
and
do
the
9
30.
C
Okay,
are
there
any
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
11
o'clock.
AN
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
1209
bennington
street,.
C
AN
Good
morning,
madam
chair,
we
are
requesting
a
shot
deferral
on
this
matter.
We
have
a
couple
of
outstanding
issues
with
the
butters
that
we
believe
that
we
may
be
able
to
work
with,
through
with
the
change
of
plans
and
also
to
address
the
parking
concerns
that
the
ppda
had
brought
up.
Okay,.
A
Stuff
for
the
record,
I
just
need
to
make
very
clear
that
everybody
understands
that
mr
ruggiero
is
recusing
himself.
Thus,
thus
will
not
be
working,
not
be
voting.
Excuse
me,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
A
AF
C
AG
His
name
would
be
eric
brian,
I
know
he.
Let
me
know
that
he
was
on
the
call,
I
think,
he's
calling
in
from
a
phone
jessica,
okay,.
C
In
ward,
seven
violations,
article
65,
section,
nine,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback.
This
plan
is
to
add
a
eight
foot
by
six
picture.
X
C
AO
Okay,
so
we
we
started
to
renovate
the
third
floor.
We
plan
to
put
a
bathroom
in
there
when
we
demo
the
sheetrock.
We
found
some
a
lot
of
rot
in
a
section
to
the
rafters,
which
led
us
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
homeowner
as
well,
possibly
if
we'd
replace
the
rafters
and
we're
putting
in
a
small
shed
armor
to
allow
us
to
have
a
legal
bathroom
in
there
regarding
head
height
would
have
been
on
the
third
floor.
D
The
plans
are
good,
very
minimal
edition
of
space.
AG
A
C
My
next
no
that's
that's
next
is
the
apple
gunny
for
247
newberry.
Yes,.
C
Yes,
all
right,
let
me
call
the
case
in
boa
one:
two,
one
three
one:
five,
four
247
newbury
street
violations
of
article
eight
section:
seven,
the
use
is
conditional
for
a
fitness
gym
to
add
a
gym
studios
to
the
existing
occupancy
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
So,
mr
sandy,
please
tell
us
what
you're
proposing
to
do.
Q
A
Okay,
so
so
the
way
this
works
is
you
basically,
and
so
the
building
is
so
what
will
be
your
hours
of
operation.
Q
A
And
all
days.
A
Okay,
saturday
and
sunday-
and
this
is
this
by
appointment
or
how
many
people
do
you
expect
in
the
space?
So
is
this
one-on-one
coaching?
How
does
it
work.
Q
Yes,
so
this
is
private
training
or
small
group
training.
So
a
total
people
in
this
space
comfortably
is
six
the
architecture
the
architect
design
said.
I
could
fit
10
people
in
here
at
one
time,
but
this
is
one-on-one
training
and
small
group
training.
So
I
don't
expect
more
than
six
people
in
the
studio,
including
myself
at
one
time.
A
Okay,
and
just
because
we've
heard
this
in
other
places-
and
it
sounds
like
you
have
residential
occupancy
above
will
there
be
any
noise
reduction
materials
put
in
place.
Q
Yes,
so
I
will
be
purchasing,
I
think,
there's
foam
for
the
walls,
so
the
the
sound
cannot
travel
through
the
walls.
The
landlord
did
instruct
me
that
all
of
the
flooring
and
the
ceilings
are
soundproof.
A
Q
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mr
robinson.
D
The
plans
are
fine,
can,
if
maybe
the
proponent
could
just
are
these
it's
sort
of
all
shown
as
red
in
terms
of
the
walls
are.
Are
you
adding
these
walls
in
terms
of
the
layouts,
or
are
these
all
existing
conditions.
Q
No
everything
is
already
existing,
that
I'm
adding
is
the
sound
for
the
wall
for
the
walls
and
the
rubber
flooring.
X
Yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
molly
griffin,
with
the
office
of
neighborhood
services,
there
was
an
abutters
meeting
held
on
wednesday
july
7
2021,
with
no
major
concerns
raised
from
abutters.
The
applicant
also
met
with
the
neighborhood
association
of
the
back
bay,
who
do
not
oppose
their
proposal.
So
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
A
C
C
A
All
those
in
favor
aye
any
opposed
motion
carries
it's
now
in
the
11
30.
In
a
few
minutes
we
will
take
a
10
minute
break,
so
we
will
resume
at
11
35
and
we
will
go
directly
to
to
the
recommendations
and
get
that
out
of
the
way
before
we
review
with
the
11
o'clock
hearings
meeting
is
now
adjourned.