►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 12-8-20
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 12-8-20
A
Okay,
ready,
let
me
start
off
today.
This
is
the
meeting
of
the
board
of
appeal
meeting
for
december,
8th
by
congratulating
jessica,
thomas
she's,
the
new
assistant
commissioner,
and
will
be
continuing,
miss
ambassador,
so
welcome
jessica.
A
Thank
you.
So
the
zoning
board
of
appeal
for
december
8th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law
and
executive
order
of
governor
baker,
suspending
certain
provisions
thereof
due
to
the
ongoing
public
health
crisis.
A
A
To
comment
on
an
appeal:
please
click
the
raise
your
hand
icon
in
the
application
via
the
webex
event
platform.
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
here
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click,
the
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
virtually
raised.
A
A
Those
are
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads
the
address
into
the
record
before
we
start
I'd
like
to
take
a
roll
call
of
board
members.
A
Thank
you,
mr
ehrlich,
here,
mr
rogerio
here,
mr
lagris
good.
A
Morning,
mr
kendall.
A
Mr
davao
president,
good
morning
good
morning,
can
we
jessica?
Can
you
please
tell
me
when
mr
candel
joins
and
please
all
members
make
sure
that
your
video
is
streaming
I'd
like
to
just
confirm
jeff
I
jeff
hampton
from
the
bpd.
I
thought
I
held
you
earlier.
You.
A
Good
morning,
okay,
so
let's
begin
mr
fortune.
B
G
G
B
H
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
james,
christopher
of
rcalc,
with
business
address
of
415
dupont,
ave
yeah,
we're
working
on
this
is
500
and
502
he's
probably
approved
before
this
board
and
the
decision
is
set
to
expire.
In
a
few
months.
We
are
working
on
the
building,
parameter
drawings
now
and
have
filed.
We
just
thought
that
it
would
be
beneficial
to
seek
the
extension
in
case
we
hit
any
snags
and,
as
a
matter
of
precaution,.
A
You
know,
I
appreciate
you
jumping
the
gun,
mr
christopher,
but
can
we
hold
off
on
this
until
we
are
closer
to
the
date,
because
then
you
can
inform
us
whether
you
in
fact
do
or
do
not
need.
We
are
reluctant
to
to
give
too
many
extensions,
so
we
just
want
you
to
be
cautious
and
give
us
a
heads
up
when
we
get
closer
to
the
date.
Okay,
so
we'll
see
you
in
madam.
B
Madam
chair,
I
should
call
them
into
the
record,
though
just
so
just
for
so
I'm
going
to
recall
both
cases
and
then
we'll
we'll
go
from
there
so
case.
Boa
787,
634,
500
to
500
east
broadway
case
boa
832,
215,
36,
spring
garden
street.
So
the
motion
seekers
will
see
them
in
2020.
B
Calling
the
next
case
for
building
code
calling
doa
112
9365
103
warren
avenue.
This
is
this-
is
the
ninth
edition
780
cmr
1011
install
a
roof
deck
the
violations
of
1011.12.2
roof
access
where
a
stairway
is
provided
to
a
roof.
Access
to
the
roof
shall
be
provided
through
a
penthouse
complying
with
15
10.2
the
exception
in
buildings.
Without
an
occupied
roof,
access
to
the
roof
shall
be
permitted
to
a
roof,
hatch
or
trap
door,
not
less
than
16
square
feet
in
area
and
having
a
minimum
dimension
of
two
feet
name
and
address
for
the
record.
B
J
John
moran
alpine
advisory
services
alpine
way
boston
mass
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board.
We
are
seeking
relief
from
the
requirement
of
a
penthouse
access
to
a
roof
deck,
which
is
code
compliant,
suggesting
that
a
safety
compliant
alternative
is
the
proposed
patch,
which
is
the
customary
means
of
egress
to
roof
decks
in
the
south
end
historic
district.
J
A
Hold
on
mr
olek.
G
Yeah,
the
the
drawing
show,
hatch
and
as
as
you
certainly
know
that
would
be.
We.
B
B
K
Hi
man
chair
member
sport-
this
is
mike
ross
for
the
business
address
of
one
international
place
attorney.
I
have
one
more
after
this
we're
working
with
the
mayor's
office,
as
well
as
the
district
city
council
to
work
out
some
remaining
issues
relating
to
community
concerns.
We've
been
at
it
for
quite
some
time
on
this
project.
Jim
would
ask
for
a
deferral.
I
M
K
Sure,
members
of
the
board
mike
ross
attorney
again,
this
is
a
similar
we've,
been
at
it
around
the
same
time,
also
in
east
boston,
and
we
would
prefer
just
to
get
a
little
bit
more
time
to
work
through
any
of
the
community.
Concerns
have
been
raised.
A
Thank
you
is
it.
I
noticed
the
applicant
on
both
cases
is
the
same,
is,
is
there
a
good
back
and
forth
that's
occurring,
or
is
it
stalled
in
some
way.
K
There
is
a
good
back
and
forth.
There
has
been
probably
six
versions
of
this
building
gradually
getting
smaller
and
smaller
and
we're
getting
close.
A
K
N
Mr
fortune
200
l
street,
please.
N
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
morency,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members.
Unfortunately,
the
revised
plans
have
not
been
stamped
by
isd,
so
they're
not
available
for
the
board
to
see
this
morning.
Therefore,
I'm
going
to
have
to
ask
for
a
deferral.
Please.
B
O
B
Call
the
first
case
the
boa
108
5883
197
chelsea
street.
This
is
a
rehab
existing
structure
erect
a
vertical
addition
onto
the
existing
building
change
oxygen
to
a
larger
mat
on
the
first
floor
and
three
residential
units
above
the
violations,
article
2017
h5.
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
9.
A
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
B
Article
53,
section
9,
the
floyd
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height
is
accessible
article
53,
section
9.
The
brilliant
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
rare
yacht
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
52
rule
structure,
restriction,
article
53,
section
56,
austrian
parking
is
insufficient
and
article
9
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
P
C
Chair
attorney
wins
one
second,
madam
chair
coastal
lakers,
recusing
himself.
A
Okay,
so
this
is
mr
kendall
on.
Q
P
You,
madam
chair,
this
is
a
pre-existing
non-conforming
use
a
non-component
structure
located
in,
I
guess,
would
best
describe
as
lower
eagle
hill.
It
consists
of
a
laundromat
at
the
ground
level
with
two
residential
units.
Above
our
proposal
involves
a
complete
rehabilitation
of
the
entire
building,
including
upgrades
to
life
safety.
We
are
proposing
a
change
of
occupancy
from
the
existing
conditions
of
two
units,
a
laundromat
to
three
units
in
a
laundromat.
P
It
is
located
in
the
three
f
2000
district
and
while
the
use
for
the
three
residential
units
would
be
predictable
under
article
53,
the
inclusion
of
the
laundromat,
which
serves
a
broader
neighborhood,
would
continue
a
non-conformity.
So
we
do
require
relief
for,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
photos.
This
is
a
corner
condition
where
the
structure
is
located
at
the
corner
of
harrion
street
and
we
are
proposing
a
vertical
addition
with
no
roof
that
would
accommodate
the
third
proposed
unit,
where
that
was
equal.
The
laundromat
pretty
much.
P
The
lower
level,
as
well
as
a
portion
of
the
basement
level
that
will
remain,
we
will
reprogram
the
two
existing
units,
which
are
currently
three
bedroom
one
bath
and
then
the
addition
of
the
third
unit
would
also
be
a
three
bedroom
one
bath.
This
is
currently
operated
as
a
rental
project.
It
will
continue
as
rental
with
that
additional
unit
being
added.
So.
A
Hold
on
hold
on
counselor,
so
the
how?
How
high
is
this
going.
P
P
We
are
not
proposing
any
roof
deck
above
the
fourth
level,
and
we
certainly
received
a
good
response
from
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
the
director
butters,
especially
because
we
are
keeping
the
laundromat
at
the
lower
level,
and
this
will
also
involve
a
substantial
improvement
to
the
exterior
of
the
building.
I
know.
A
P
S
T
V
P
B
You
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
1130385
33-35
maverick
square.
This
is
a
change
logs
from
a
laundromat
with
four
residential
units
to
retail
office,
with
five
residential
units
violations.
Article
53
section
12,
the
forward
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
27-5
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod
and
article
53,
section
56
insufficient
parking
additional
unit
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
W
Here
today,
on
3335
marburg
square
very
quickly.
This
is
actually
a
proposal
to
make
a
building
jacket
meet
what
is
currently
there
that
has
been
there
since
the
90s.
In
doing
some
work.
My
client
realized
that
the
building
jacket
did
not
meet
what's
inside
the
actual
building,
so
there
hasn't
been
a
laundromat
there
in
quite
some
time.
It's
actually
a
jewelry
store
on
the
retail
level
and
there
are
five
units
unit.
One
is
a
465
square
foot
studio
unit.
A
W
I
can't
speak
to
the
past
when
my
client
purchased
the
property
in
1998.
This
is
how
he
purchased
the
property,
so
it
does
appear
that
you
know
a
ceo
never
issued
for
how
the
building
was
so.
I
can
only
speak
to
as
from
when
my
client
has
now
had
it.
A
Okay,
there
is
there
anything
in
is
the
applicant
on.
Can
he
speak
or
she's
speaking.
X
A
G
G
I
don't
see
how
I
mean
it
sounds
like
it's
a
question
of
legalizing.
I
can't
quite
figure
this
out.
A
G
A
Okay,
I
noticed
the
one
that
we
have
on
the
first
floor
plan.
There
is
no,
there
is
no
must
be
a
studio
which
has
a
sleeping
look.
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
U
V
G
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
prove,
I
think
basically,
given
these
are
existing
conditions,
I'll
second,
that
joe.
A
I
too,
anybody
in
opposition.
Z
A
B
On
calling
the
next
case
calling
bla
105
3851
92
bennington
street,
this
is
to
build
a
new
roof
deck
for
the
exclusive
unit
of
unit
3.,
the
violation
article
2017.
This
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section,
52,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
the
open
roof
deck
shall
be
accessed
by
a
roof
hatch
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AA
A
Okay,
hold
on
and
it's
accessed
by
the
roof
hatch.
Mr
mr
ehrlich,
how
are
the
plans
I'm.
G
O
It
looks
like
we
have,
let's
see
him
here:
oh
what
no
market
yeah
he's.
Having
looks
like
he's
having
some
issues
with
this
he's
trying
to
get
back
in.
AA
I'm
back
sorry,
I'm
not
sure
where
I
cut
out,
but
my
internet
could
cut
out
on
me.
I'm
so
sorry.
So.
G
Cass
I
I
was
the
you
said:
you
said
that
this
is
a
rooftop
would
be
accessed
by
hatch,
but
the
drawing
show
head
out.
So
I'm
curious
as
why
there's
a
head
house
there.
No
I'm
sorry.
AA
The
the
access
the
citation
was
for
a
hatch,
but
the
proposal
is
to
access
the
rift
deck
by
the
pre-existing
head
house
that
existed
when
my
client
purchased
the
building.
As
shown
on
the
plans.
AA
The
building
the
work
in
the
building
has
already
been
done.
The
units
are
complete,
this
amendment
permit
was
filed
back
in
january
and
then
got
just
got
caught
in
covet,
but
the
renovations
were
completed,
the
certificate
of
occupancy
has
been
issued,
the
units
have
been
sold
and
my
client
megan
ayers
is
on
the
line,
as
is
josh
smith,
the
architect,
and
they
are
both
prepared
to
give
testimony
that
the
head
house
was
existing
when
they
purchased
the
building
and
and
prior
to
the
renovations
that
were
conducted.
G
AA
I
think
that
relates
to
the
violation
comments
on
the
refusal
letter.
Mr
ehrlich,
it
says
open
roof
deck
shall
be
accessed
by
roof
hatch,
that's
the
violation
and
the
conditional
use
permit
that
we
seek
under
article
53
section
52
is
to
access
the
roof
deck
through
the
pre-existing
head
house.
A
AA
Understood
and
megan
ayers,
if
a-y-r-e-s
jessica,
thomas,
if
you
could
unmute
her
she.
AC
Can't
question:
yes,
I
just
unmuted
myself,
so,
yes,
I
can
attest
to
the
fact
that
the
head
house
was
there.
It
was
pre-existing
when
we
purchased
the
property,
we're
not
touching
it
we're
just.
You
know,
seeking
approval
for
the
deck
itself,
but
we
we're
not
touching
the
head
house
that
was
pretty
existing.
AC
I
Okay,
do
you
man
I'm
here?
I
just
got
a
question.
Go
ahead,
I
I'm
looking
at
like
google
earth
pictures.
Do
you
own
90
as
well?
Is
that
no
okay,
so.
AC
G
T
U
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
doa
107
1304
2222
paris
street,
this
is
a
change
of
market
to
an
existing
two
family
dwelling
to
a
four
family
dwelling
and
constructing
new
third
story.
Rare
edition
new
grand
porches
roof
deck
the
violations
article
2017
section-
this
is
in
the
east
boston
ipod,
article
53,
section
8.
The
basement
apartment
is
forbidden,
article
53,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
lauder
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
as
sufficient
article
53
section
9
48
ratio
is
excessive.
B
Article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
rare
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
52
group
structure,
restrictions
and
article
53
section
56.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
director.
Please.
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
mr
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
an
actress
with
11
beacon
street
presenting
the
petitioner,
and
we
also
have
adam
glassman,
is
the
architect
on
this
project.
This
project
description
has
changed
and
I
just
wanted
to
go
over
that
change
from
what
was
read
into
the
record,
and
the
plans
will
reflect
that
as
to
earlier,
the
proposal
is
to
change
the
occupancy
of
the
existing
two-family
residential
dwelling
to
a
three
family.
AE
We
are
also
proposing
to
erect
a
rare
addition
to
the
third
story,
rare
egress
stairs
and
a
roof
deck
and
completely
renovate
the
building
as
well.
The
previous
proposal
mentioned
four
units.
It's
now
three
just
to
go
over
the
license.
AE
A
AE
Sure
so
the
basement
right
now,
that's
the
lower
level
of
unit,
one
that
would
house
one
bedroom
and
one
bath
that
has
a
ceiling
height
of
seven
foot.
Six
there
would
be
a
bedroom
in
office.
Both
would
have
full
egress
windows
into
the
into
window
wells
and
each
unit
would
have
their
mechanicals
inside
the
unit,
so
no
common
space.
We
would
then
go
up
to
the
first
floor
together
with
the
basement.
AE
That
unit
is
1800
feet,
that
is
a
three
bedroom
and
three
bath
unit,
and
that
would
have
two
means
of
egress
on
the
first
floor
as
well.
The
second
floor
has
unit
two.
That's
a
three
bedroom
two
bath
with
rare
egress
steels,
that's
a
950
square
foot
unit
and
also
mechanicals
are
inside
that
unit
the
third
floor.
If
you
look
at
the
photo
of
the
building,
the
front
of
the
building
already
has
a
top
floor
space
we're
just
adding
to
the
rear
of
that
infilling.
AE
That
would
be
a
three
bedroom
two
bath
with
rare
egress
stair
at
a
thousand
fifty
square
feet,
and
that
would
have
seven
foot
seven
ceiling
height
for
that
top
floor.
Then
there
would
be
an
exclusive
roof
deck
for
that
unit
accessed
through
an
exclusive
staircase
that
would
go
up
to
the
top
floor.
So
there's
no
head
house
for
that:
roof
deck
and
the
roof
deck
is
27
feet
by
14
five
about
390
square
foot,
roof
deck
in
the
rear
of
the
building
violations,
as
was
mentioned
and
changed
so
additional
lot
area.
AE
We've
got
665
square
feet
for
the
new
unit.
We
need
a
thousand,
so
that's
pre-existing
far.
Existing
is
1.7.
We're
proposing
2.3
and
what's
allowed,
is
1.0
in
height.
We're
existing
because
of
the
front
of
the
building
already
goes
up.
38
feet,
2
inches,
so
we
are
slightly
over
from
what's
required
of
35
feet.
Open
space,
we
have
270
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit
and
300
is
required.
AE
A
So
counselor,
if
I'm
collette,
can
you
please
roll
back
to
the
basement?
The
proposed
plans
am
I
reading
these
plans
right
at
that
bedroom?
Number.
Three:
that's
in
the
basement
does
not
have
a
window
well
or
does
not
have
a
window
or
set
finder
that
small
window
in
the
rear
is
the
only
access
to
light.
AE
L
G
Well,
unfortunately,
these
are
the
only
plans
that
I
did
that
were
not
made
available
for
me
to
preview.
So
I'm
looking
at
the
plans
at
the
same
time
as
you
are,
mr
drago,
the
usual
questions
that
we
have
about
adding
living
space
to
basement
it's
hard
to
tell
since
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
look
at
them
what
the
relationship
is
to
grade
and
whether
that's
really
adequate.
G
What's
the
floor
to
in
the
basement,
what's
the
floor
at
a
grade
height
and
also
you
did
mention
the
sit
with
the
window
sill,
but
please
go
over
all
that
again.
AE
G
Mean
this
is
a
problem
we
are
seeing
over
and
over
and
over
and
over
again,
which
is
basements
that
were
intended
that
are
dark
and
below
grade
that
are
intended
for
storage
are
now
being
repurposed
for
a
living
space
and
that's
not
what
they
were
intended
for.
Nor
should
that
would
be
it's.
You
know
it's
one
thing
to
have
a
play
room
in
there,
but
or
even
an
office,
but
to
have
a
bedroom
just
doesn't
make
any
sense,
but
but
I
can't
tell
because
I
don't
have
the
plans
in
front
of
me.
You.
A
Know
I'm
I
I
just
mr
glassman
and
counselor:
can
you
guys
make
sure
because
jeff
we're
seeing
so
many
of
these
basements
in
eastie
that
just
don't
make
sense?
We
are
not
trying
to
move
back
to
those
overcrowded
days
of
of
your
of
years
gone
by,
and
this
is
just
exactly
what's
happening.
Is
this
is
a
space
that's
not
calm
and
welcoming
and
mr
olek
and
the
rest
of
the
board
members.
We
can
approve
the
project
but
eliminate
that
bedroom
in
the
basement.
AE
He's
on
the
phone
he's,
not
he
wasn't
able
to
get
on
the
computer,
but
I
know
he's
on
the
phone.
I.
AE
AE
A
Blah
blah,
you
know
this
is
the
the
the
place
where
decisions
get
made.
O
O
Need
somebody
else?
Okay,
I
don't
see
him
any
other
hand,
I'm
not
sure.
If
he's
still
he's
on
the
call
adam,
if
you're
on
the
call,
can
you
raise
your
hand
by
pressing
star
three.
A
In
the
meantime,
miss
ambassador
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
T
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
lena
trammelling,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
in
support
of
this
proposal
during
the
community
process,
the
applicant,
where
would
be
a
virus
and
address
most
of
their
concerns?
This
proposal
also
receives
support
from
recovery,
neighborhood
central
association,
and
we
receive
letters
of
support
from
viabilize.
Thank
you.
AF
Yes,
that's
me,
I'm
sorry
about
that.
So
the
the
average
grade
is
two
feet
below
the
first
floor,
and
the
basement
floor
is
about
five
and
a
half
feet
below
average
grade
now.
This
does
not
include
the
enormous
window,
well
that
we
have
in
the
back
that
provides
escape
egress
for
both
the
bedroom
and
the.
G
Office,
I
mean
technically
with
the
window
wells.
It
is
code
compliant,
but
that
five
feet
below
grade
is.
Is
I
don't
think
what
we're
looking
for.
A
Yep
in
the
meantime,
miss
ambassador
any
other
raised
hands.
L
Okay,
may
I
have.
G
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
to
provide
those
bpda
design
review
with
one
and
second,
that
there
be
no
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
AE
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
109
8399
41
mount
vernon
street.
This
is
to
renovate
the
existing
three
family
extend
living
space
into
the
basement,
new
second
floor
bay
window
constructed
rare
edition
and
deck
at
the
third
level
in
direct
roof
deck.
The
violations,
article
62
section
25,
will
structure
restrictions
and
article
62
section
8.
The
florida
air
ratio
is
accessible
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
N
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
a
proposal
for
a
renovation
of
an
existing
three
family
dwelling
at
41.
N
Mount
vernon
street
in
charlestown
being
proposed
here
is
an
extension,
a
living
space
into
the
basement,
which
I
will
of
course
address
a
new
second
floor
bay
window
and
construction
of
a
rear
addition
on
the
third
floor
level
of
the
building,
with
a
deck
at
the
rear
of
that
for
the
use
of
the
unit
below
and
then
a
roof
deck
for
the
use
of
unit
3..
The
plans
that
are
showing
on
the
screen
now
are
revised
plans
and
to
answer
an
anticipated
question
from
the
board.
N
The
revised
plans
do
eliminate
one
of
the
recited
zoning
code
violations,
the
violation,
the
setback
violation,
is
removed,
the
setback
violation
owed
to
the
proposed
third
floor
edition.
It
was
slightly
violative
of
the
code
redesign
of
the
plan
eliminated
that
violation
leaving
two
violations:
roof
structure,
restrictions
related
to
the
the
decks
and
an
far
violation.
This
is
article
62..
It's
a
three
of
2000
zoning
district.
The
maximum
far
here
is
2.0
with
the
addition
and
extension
of
living
space.
N
A
N
Sure
would
you
like?
Actually
I
know
it
was,
was
just
an
issue.
Would
you
like
me
actually
to
start
with
the
with
the
basement
as
proposed,
because
that
will
just
continue?
I
know
there
was
just
a
conversation
about
basement
living
space
and
better.
A
N
Go
ahead,
oh
and
this
one
right
on
on
sheet
a1,
since,
since
an
expansion
into
the
basement
is
being
proposed,
it
is
showing
as
two
bedrooms
down
there.
The
rear
bedroom
was
actually
intended,
as
I
think
a
study
and
should
be
a
study.
My
client
would
certainly
change
that
from
a
bedroom
floor
to
ceiling
height
down,
there
is
eight
feet.
N
The
front
bedroom
has
as
an
egress
window,
that's
on
the
mount
vernon
street
side
of
the
building,
and
it
does
benefit
from
light
because
there
is
sort
of
a
patio
area
on
that
side
of
the
building
in,
and
you
know
there
would
be
natural
light
there
if,
if
we
could
scroll
down
which
might
help
the
board
and
mr
ehrlich
sheet,
a4
will
also
address
visually
questions
that
the
board
might
have
about
the
it's,
a
cross-section
of
the
building
that
shows
the
basement
level
and
its
relationship
to
grade.
N
So
the
board
can
see
the
you
know.
The
existence
that
there
in
the
bulkhead
to
the
basement
an
area
way.
A
I
don't
think
we
go
quite
as
far
we
are
at
a
what
what
what
sheet
of
yarn.
A
AG
G
N
So
understanding
the
previous
conversations
about
about
bedrooms,
you
know
my
client
is
certainly
willing
to
abide
by
whatever,
whatever
the
board
might
decide
with
respect
to
that,
and
that
is
that
is
the
violation
the
far
and
then
the
decks
and
just
very
briefly
on
the
decks.
The
roof
deck
is
approximately
nine
feet:
ten
inches
by
twenty
feet:
nine
inches
access
by
hatch
and
then
the
third
floor.
Deck
is
smaller.
That's
about
12
feet
by
13
feet
that
is
also
accessed
by
hatch.
L
G
Drawings
are
what
mr
morantzy
described:
the
hatch
access
to
the
roof
deck,
which
is
fine
and
the
basement,
is
well
below
grade
and
should
not
have
any
bedrooms,
and
they
currently
do.
And
if
we
approve
it,
we
should
eliminate
that.
AH
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
quinlan
walk
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
The
barters
meeting
was
held
back
in
july
on
july
30th,
10th
of
all
many
neighbors
in
the
area.
While
we
are
supporting,
we
do
want
to
make
sure
that
the
board
is
aware
there
is
opposition
at
the
neighbors
next
door
from
39
specific
to
the
addition
of
the
third
floor
and
the
roof
decks.
U
B
Chair
before
that,
the
secretary
here
we
have
numerous
letters
of
support
and
numerous
letters
of
opposition
as
well.
AI
Yes,
thank
you.
I'm
annie.
Yes,
alien!
I'm
a
director
butter.
I
live
at
39
mount
vernon
unit
3.,
so
this
is
a
two-floor
unit
and
it's
been
my
home
for
more
than
20
years.
I
have
three
brief
points
and
then
I'll
stop.
The
first
point
is
the
applicant
doesn't
meet
any
of
the
legal
requirements
under
section
7-3
of
the
zoning
code
to
obtain
these
variances.
A
AI
The
rear
edition
I'd
like
to
make
this
is
probably
my
next
point
is
that
the
rear,
the
rear
edition
and
the
roof
deck
the
rear
edition.
It
puts
my
home
in
a
shadow
for
a
substantial
part
of
the
day
and
I'm
going
to
lose
a
lot
of
fresh
air
and
light
and
where
I
have
open
views
outside
some
of
my
den
windows,
I'm
going
to
be
looking
at
a
wall,
so
I've
submitted
a
sunlight
and
shadow
study.
AI
That's
in
your
packet,
and
it
was
done
by
an
intern
architect
at
el
casman,
freddy,
and
if
you
have
a
moment,
I
realize
time
is
tight,
but
there's
exhibits
exhibit
one.
It
shows
how
the
expansion
basically
blocks
all
the
light.
Coming
into
my
den
my
living
room,
my
kitchen
areas,
I
work
from
home,
I'm
self-employed
I've
been
working
from
home
for
15
years.
AI
This
is
going
to
really
detract
from
the
quality
of
my
life
and
my
living
conditions
and
how
I
work,
as
I
shared
my
in
exhibit
two
you're
gonna,
see
that
the
rear
story
completely
blocks
anything
looking
out
of
my
den
windows.
So,
instead
of
seeing
a
skyline
in
trees,
I'm
looking
at
a
solid
wall,
you
know
six
feet
away.
Thank
you,
then.
I
okay.
O
AJ
AJ
I
did
submit
a
letter
for
the
november
10th
hearing
and
my
my
objection
is:
we
have
the
charlestown
design
overlay
district
and
this
neighborhood
is
in
it,
and
I
find
it
objectionable
that
variances
have
been
creeping
on
to
extend
the
property
and,
as
soon.
A
As
let
me
just
ask
you,
your
objection
is
based
on
the
rear
edition
or
the
decks
both
on
both.
Thank
you.
May
I
have
somebody
another
person,
please.
Okay,
yep.
O
I
have
a
second
I've
been
kevin,
finnegan
you've
been
unmuted.
AK
Thank
you.
I
live
at
26
mount
vernon
street
with
my
wife,
margaret
we've
been
here
for
17
years.
We
sent
a
detailed
letter
to
you
why
we
oppose
this.
I
hope
you
have
it
in
front
of
you.
Maybe
you
don't.
I
especially
am
sympathetic
to
ani
azarian's.
AK
It
seems
to
me
this
comes
down
to
a
choice
between
whether
a
developer
who
never
intends
to
limit
this
property
can
maximize
his
profit
by
putting
an
addition
index
on
that
block,
review
and
wind
up
with
her
having
a
diminution
in
the
value
of
her
property
and
a
diminution
in
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
her
property.
That's
the
decision
that
has
to
be
made
here
and
it
seems
terribly
unfair,
especially
in
light
of
the
high
hurdle
that
40a
imposes.
On
these
appearances.
AK
A
N
Yes,
there
is
man,
I'm
sure,
thank
you,
george
forensie
speaking
manager.
I
just
wish
to
point
out
that
the
there's
opposition
to
the
third
floor
edition,
but
it
is
in
fact
dimensionally
compliant.
It
meets
all
setbacks,
requirement,
there's
no
height
violation.
The
third
floor
setback
gives
an
opportunity
to
what's.
N
Yes,
that
that
violation
is
eliminated.
I
have
an
updated
refusal
letter
that
was
issued
yesterday
by
darrell
boyd,
which
cites
only
far
which
can
be
attributable
to
the
expansion
into
the
basement
and
through
structure
restrictions,
which
is
not
a
variant
standard.
It's
a
conditional
use
permit
but
the
top
floor
unit.
In
this
case,
the
entire
unit
is
currently
less
than
30
feet
by
20
feet.
It
is
an
undersized
unit
by
almost
anyone's
standards,
and
this
is
a
case
where
a
zoning
compliant
dimensionally
compliant.
A
I
think
you
appreciate
the
position
we're
in
where
we
have
somebody
who
has
a
home
office
and,
and
some
will
potentially
suffer
the
consequences
of
of
this
edition.
N
Of
an
addition,
that's
dimensionally
compliant,
I
I
don't
think
it
would
send
a
good
message
for
the
board
to
deny
an
addition
that
meets
the
dimensional
setback
requirements
because
there's
opposition
I
mean
in
that
case,
then
then
I
mean
the
you
know.
The
board
should
be
limited
to
look
at
what
zoning
relief
here
is
being
requested,
there's
an
far
variance
that
we're
seeking
that
could
easily
be
made
into
a
conforming
use
with
respect
to
eliminating
space
in
the
basement.
G
Well,
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
bpa
designers
you
I
I'm
not
happy
about
the
the
expansion,
but.
A
The
council
is
right,
but
may
I
ask
you,
mr
ehrlich,
how
about
elimination
of
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
G
Yes,
no,
those
would
be
to
provide
those
again
I
mean
the
counselor
is
correct.
Unfortunately,
it's
only
compliant
even
if
it's
not
an
attractive
option
for
the
for
the
neighbors,
so
we
really
can't
speak
to
that
so
with
bpd.
So
my
motion
be
to
approve
bpda
design
review
and
no
no
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
A
Is
there
a?
Is
there
a
second
second
to
this.
A
Okay,
counselor
can
you
so
we
remember
this
case.
Quite
clearly,
I'd
like
you
listen.
Can
you
mute
everybody?
I
don't
know
where
that
experience
is
coming
from.
AM
Yes
and
mr
mayerson,
who
is
represents
patriot
care,
the
line,
they
will
be
entering
the
premises
from
separate
doors.
They
will
be
serviced
differently
and
that's
how?
Because
there's
a
door
on
the
side
as
well
as
a
door
on
the
front
and
that's
how
we'll
be
able
to
accommodate
both
of
them.
And
this
has
been
approved
by
the
campaign.
A
Is
there
a
strategy
for
accommodating
lines
or
demand.
AN
AM
There
are
conditions
imposed
by
the
boston,
cannabis
board.
The
conditions
are
very
clear:
there's
also
a
mitigation
agreement
with
the
downtown
bid.
It
will
be
my
appointment
only
and
for
at
least
the
first
six
months,
so
there'll
be
staggered.
Visitations,
the
medical
use
has
been
there
for
about
five
years.
There's
never
been
a
problem
with
lines
whatsoever.
AM
A
And
this
is
for
both
my
medical
and
adult.
Yes,
okay,
how
are
the.
A
V
AM
The
traffic
study
has
been
submitted
to
the
board.
I
believe
it
was
last
friday.
It
showed
that
85
of
the
people
who
our
customers
are
already
downtown
or
are
traveling
on
public
transportation.
AM
This
is
certainly
is
about
as
trans
oriented
location
as
one
can
get
being
within
steps
of
the
blue
line
orange
line
station
by
the
old
south
meeting
house.
In
addition,
the
traffic
study
identifies
over
a
thousand
parking
spaces
within
walking
distance,
the
pile
of
garage
being
very
close.
So
we
believe
that
that's
not
an
issue
has
not
been
an
issue
at
all.
When
we've
had
the
medical
abuse.
C
What
is
the
impact
of
the
expansion
of
the
use
to
recreational
with
respect
to
delivery.
AO
Thank
you.
The
question
was:
was
about
delivery,
so,
on
the
medical
side,
we
we
do
are
required
by
the
city
to
offer
delivery.
We
don't
we
don't
do
any
delivery
out
of
the
mill
street
location.
However,
we
bring
any
deliveries.
C
That's
not
my
question.
My
question
is
delivery
of
product
to
the
location.
How
is
that
is
the
cadence
increased
and
the
method
methodology
with
respect
to
delivery,
increased
in
life
of
the
expansion
to
recreation.
AO
I
I
apologize.
I
thought
you
were
talking
about
outbound,
so
the
methodology
is
exactly
the
same.
There
it's
possible.
There
could
be.
You
know,
slightly
greater
frequency.
I
think
we
go
currently
two
times
a
week.
AO
AO
You
know,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
protocols
involved
with
it,
which
I
can
get
into
if
you
want,
but
we
would
be
following
everything
the
same
way
that
we
currently
do
medical,
because
it's
coming
from
the
same
facility.
A
Okay
and
then,
finally,
that
bottom
space
was
supposed
to
go
out
to
retail
or
art
uses
in
the
basement.
It's
not
entirely
a
basement
is
that
is
there
any
proposal
to
expand
into
that
space?
For
this
use.
AO
Well,
the
should
I'll
answer
that
larry,
so
the
downstairs
space
originally,
when
we
were
medical
we
were,
we
saw,
we
had
a
sub-tenant
there.
That
was
a
community
group
or
a
non-profit
that
I
should
say
the
intent
is
to
utilize
the
space
that
you
see
downstairs
from
the
from
the
window.
AO
So
the
space
that
we
had
built
out
will
be
utilized
for
adult
use
downstairs
to
have
additional
adult
use.
Stations
downstairs
if
needed,.
AP
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
lisa
high
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
we
held
in
the
barters
meeting
on
september,
4th
2019..
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
to
support.
They
have
received
support
from
the
downtown
boston
bid,
as
well
as
the
downtown
boston
residents
association.
AP
AQ
Good
morning,
mother
of
the
chairman
yourself
from
counselor
feelings
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
own
recurring
support
due
to
their
history
of
engagement
and
being
responsible
in
the
district.
They
have
worked
with
collaboratively
with
boston,
police
and
the
city
of
boston.
They
also
have
the
numerous
community
meetings
with
the
downtown
village
and
have
their
support
as
well.
Transfer
of
things
supports
us.
The
team
has
always
been
professional
and
responsive
to
any
neighborhood
concerns
on
core
issues.
Thank
you.
AR
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
nat
shively,
I'm
president
of
revolutionary
spaces,
which
owns
and
operates
the
old
south
meeting
house
directly
across
the
street.
From
this
location.
We
strongly
support
increasing
commerce
and
pedestrian
activity
in
the
neighborhood
and
patriot
care
has
demonstrated
itself
to
be
a
really
great
neighbor.
They
have
a
strong
track
record
of
supporting
boston,
nonprofits
like
ours
and
specifically,
we've
partnered
with
them
over
the
past
year
to
to
create
inclusive
cultural
programming
for
residents
of
boston.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
jeff,
hampton
bpda
we're
on
record
in
supporting
this.
Is
you
know
we
often
have
these
discussions.
We'd,
like
this
to
you,
know,
be
applicable
to
this
appellant.
Only
and
everything
else
is
pretty
much
state
required
at
this
point,
but
we
are
on
record
and
support.
A
Do
you
need
design
review
for
any
exterior
work.
B
B
AS
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
daniel
toscano,
an
address
of
one
state
street
suite
1500
boston,
mass
02109.
I
represent
raffi
properties
who
owns
the
property
120
sales,
it's
on
the
property
for
a
number
of
years,
and
we're
really
just
correcting
the
certificate
of
occupancy.
The
existing
conditions
actually
have
eight
residents,
I'm
sorry,
nine
residential
units
in
one
commercial
space.
Madam
chair,
there
has
never
been
two
commercial
spaces
at
this
particular
location,
so
really
just
correcting
the
certificate
of
occupancy.
AS
As
my
client
recently
became
aware,
the
certificate
of
arkansas
back
in
2002
had
eight
residential
units
and
two
commercial
spaces,
but
there
has
always
been
nine
residential
units
and
one
commercial
space.
A
Let
me
counsel,
and
let
me
just
ask
you
a
question
which
tell
us
which
unit
tell
us
the
the
the
square
footage
and
the
breakdown
of
each
of
the
units
and
also
tell
us
if
taxes
have
been
paid
as
nine
residential
and
one
commercial.
AS
Okay
to
answer
the
taxes
yes
have
been
always
paid
for
nine
residential
and
one
commercial
space.
The
units
going
through
unit
one
is
actually
543
square
feet
of
space.
Two
bedroom
units,
three
five,
seven
and
nine-
are
all
identical
at
615
square
feet.
AS
Two
bedroom
units,
one
bath
in
units,
two
four
six
and
eight
643
square
feet,
identical
two
bedroom
one
bath
and
they've
been
existing
for
as
long
as
I
can
remember,
and
I'm
a
lifelong
resident
in
the
neighborhood
there's
never
been
two
commercial
spots
at
this
particular
location.
I
can
go
over
the
zoning
code
violations
for
you.
A
U
V
B
Call
in
the
next
case
calling
boa
106
5617
230
to
238
hanover
street.
This
is
off
street
parking
for
residential
vehicles,
15
max
violation,
article
54,
section,
21,
austrian
parking
loading,
article,
6,
section,
3a,
additional
condition
and
restricted
pumpkin
district
name
and
address
to
the
record.
Please.
AS
AS
I
represent
the
owner
of
the
property
matteo
gallo,
who
is
now
asking
for
your
support
to
approve
this
parking
plan
at
230,
238
anniversary.
This
is
an
existing
parking
area.
It's
always
been
used
as
an
allowable
use.
Mr
gallo
owns
the
properties
like
I
said,
from
230
to
238.
Those
are
residential
buildings.
They've
always
been
an
allowable
use
as
an
accessory
to
the
parking.
However,
he
now
rents
out
some
of
the
parking
to
some
of
the
residents
and
some
of
the
local
business
owners
for
who
come
in
during
the
day.
AS
So
now
we
have
to
change
the
use
of
it
to
to
parking
lots
or
you
know
no
more
than
15
parking
spaces.
Madam
chair,
so
in
regards
to
the
violation,
we
do
have
a
maneuverability
violation,
as
you
can
see
the
tandem
parking
in
the
back.
AS
This
is
a
seven
over
seven
thousand
square
foot
lot,
there's
a
maneuverability
issue,
but
I
can
say
that
the
majority
of
the
parking
is
done
during
the
day
and
once
the
park
people
are
there
talk
that
there
are
business
owners
are
working
in
the
businesses
they're
there
for
the
day.
So
this
creates
no
traffic
issues
for
the
neighborhood
that
comes
out
on
a
hanover
street.
It
creates
no
nuisance
to
any
of
the
the
the
owners
or
pedestrians,
and
so
there's
really
no
no
issues
there.
AS
So
once
they're
parked
they're,
usually
there
for
the
day
and
most
of
the
spots
are
almost
empty
during
the
night
in
regards
to
sex
article
six
section
three
a
I
spoke
with
the
city
of
boston
in
regards
to
the
park,
and
I
think
because
this
is
residential
parking,
it
doesn't
qualify
for
that.
We
would.
This
is
an
exempt
from
the
parking
freeze
that
is
issued
by
the
city
of
boston,
so
we
would
not
need
any
approval
from
the
was
it
the
air
pollution.
So.
AS
A
A
couple
of
questions:
one:
are
there
bedroom
windows
or
residential
units
right
over
the
spaces
and
two
is
not
north
of
the.
AS
Yes,
he
owns
half
of
it,
so
the
fir
the
the
half
to
the
right,
which
is
about
six
feet,
eight
inches
and
the
other
half
is
owned
by
another
property
owner.
So
it
is
private,
so
and
it
will
be
paved.
Mr
gallo
will
be
paving
the
the
existing
conditions
and
adding
some
drainage
pursuant
to
conversations
with
the
building
department.
AS
Also,
when
answering
accepting
questions
the
back
of
the
property,
you
see
the
one
story:
that's
the
a
restaurant,
it's
a
one-story
restaurant.
So
there
are
no
windows,
it's
just
a
second
means
of
egress,
so
we
added
a
three-foot
walkway,
as
you
can
see,
which
will
be
put
there
with
some
ballad,
so
no
costco
back
there
and
in
the
back
with
all
those
tandem
parking.
It's
there's
no
windows,
it's
just
brick
wall,
cement,
walls.
G
A
couple
of
questions
the
the
chair
asked
about
north
hanover
court.
Is
there
an
easement
for
for
use
of
the
as
a
driveway.
AS
Did
there
is
and
there's
an
easement
and
second
meeting
to
egress
or
one
of
the
restaurants?
That's
on
salem
street,
where
which
we
will
not
be
you'll,
see
it
there's
a
sign
that
says
concrete
block
wall
right
after
that
there's
a
a
doorway
for
a
second
means
of
egress.
We
will
not
be
blocking
that
it's
it's
not
even
on
it's,
not
on
our
property,
but
yes,.
G
AS
G
Well,
please
please
find
out.
That's
one
question:
the
other
is
on
the
tandem
parking.
Is
there
an
attendant
there?
How
did.
AS
Right
so
there's
no
intended
so
so.
This
is
why
this
is
an
example
from
the
commercial
parking
space,
because
it's
not
for
public
parking
that
people
can
come
in
and
out.
These
are
monthly
parking
spaces,
usually
they're
the
majority
of
the
spaces
that
are
rented
in
the
back.
There
are
people
that
work
at
the
local
businesses
and
once
they're
in
there
during
the
day,
they're
pretty
much
in
there
and
they
really
regulate
themselves
if
they.
If
someone
needs
to
really
get
in.
You
know,
if
there's
someone
being
blocked.
G
AS
A
Thank
you
is
anybody,
any
questions
from
the
board.
V
B
Madam
chair
secretary,
here
we
have
a
handful
of
letters
of
support.
A
Thank
you
so,
given
this
information
from
bob
d'amico-
and
you
know
to
understand
that
this
is
to
relief
on
street
parking
pressure
for
for
business
owners,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
B
AW
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
johanna
schneider
with
the
business
address
of
75
state
street
in
boston,
I'm
here
with
gabriella
varadakis
from
sweet
six
medical
aesthetics.
We
are
seeking
a
conditional
use
permit
to
operate
a
medical,
aesthetic
spa
at
311
summer
street.
This
med
spa
is
licensed
by
the
massachusetts
department
of
public
health.
It
employs
licensed
medical
doctors,
nurse
practitioners
and
registered
nurses,
and
it
follows
a
rigorous
health
and
safety
protocol.
AW
AW
The
premises
overall
is
2500
square
feet.
There
will
be
five
private
treatment
rooms.
We
anticipate
having
approximately
20
patients
per
day.
There
will
be
approximately
13
employees
in
the
space.
The
hours
of
operation
will
be
monday
through
thursday
9
a.m,
to
7
p.m,
and
saturdays
and
sundays,
from
9
00
a.m
to
5
p.m.
A
Okay,
and
is
this
ground
floor
use?
Yes,
it
is
okay,
okay,
and
what
was
the
previous
use
in
this
space.
AW
I
believe
it
was
some
sort
of
office
or
retail
use.
It's
the
ground
floor
of
an
office
building
that
is
currently
occupied
by
a
large
architecture
firm
and
it's
been
vacant
for
some
time.
So
this
is
a
good
way
to
revitalize
the
space.
G
AW
If
gabriella
and
verodakis
could
be
unmuted,
she
could
answer
that.
I
can
also
answer
that
they
already
do
have
a
strict
code
protocol
in
place,
including
temperature
testing,
our
clients,
upon
arrival,
using
adequate
ppe
and
using
decals
on
the
floor
to
indicate
distances
and
plexiglass
in
between
different
public
spaces.
AX
Yes,
that's
correct,
we
are
taking
all
precautions
and
using
all
ppe
equipment,
all
my
staff
has
been
educated
and
trained
and
proper
protection
through
this
covet
pandemic
and.
AX
No,
I
have
one
in
newburyport
and
we
are
following
very
strict
regulations,
state
regulations
and
codes.
Yes,
gabriela.
A
Can
you
hold
on
please
any
other
questions
from
the
board
joe?
Did
you
have
a
question?
No.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AY
AQ
It
is
also
counselor
flings
view
that
it
is
critical
to
always
to
support
women
and
minority
owned
business,
who
has
been
heavily
impacted
to
the
economic
fallout
class
by
carbon
19.
In
addition,
the
proponent
has
the
support
of
the
neighbors
from
the
four
point,
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you.
V
B
X
G
O
A
D
C
B
Calling
your
last
case
for
9
30
calling
voa
111
8789
14
to
16
west
broadway.
This
is
a
build
out
of
existing
shell
space
for
new
bank.
The
violation
article
68
section
7
bank
uses
the
conditional
leaders
in
the
zoning
sub-district
in
article
68,
section
33.
Austria
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
N
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
an
application
to
convert
existing
shell
space
in
the
building
at
14
west
broadway
ground
floor
space
into
a
bank
use.
My
client
is
harbor.
One
bank
joining
us
in
this
meeting
is
david
tidwell
who's.
Vice
president
of
corporate
services
for
harbor
one,
the
branch
would
be
approximately
1540
square
feet.
N
It's
located
in
an
mfr
ls,
multi-family
residential
local
service
sub-district
on
west
broadway
in
south
boston,
which
is
somewhat
curiously
a
location
that
requires
zoning
relief.
In
this
case
the
form
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
bank.
There
are
you
know
anyone
who's
familiar
with
west
broadway.
It
is
a
main
commercial
thoroughfare
of
south
boston.
There
are
many
banks
on
both
west
broadway
and
east
broadway.
The
relief
being
sought
as
the
conditional
use
permit
and
relief
for
the
complete
inability
to
provide
parking
for
the
use.
AY
AQ
AQ
Due
to
feedback
from
the
west
broadway
neighborhood
association,
who
reported
no
issues
but
at
the
same
time,
counselors
will
also
like
before
to
ensure
that
there
are
no
outstanding
issues
in
terms
of
pedestrian
safety,
accessibility
for
persons
with
disabilities
and
ada
compliance
and
access,
as
there
are
challenges
in
the
past
that
the
city
has
had
to
work
with
the
developer.
To
congratulate.
Thank
you.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
council,
wassabi
george's
office,
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
and
echo
the
sentiments
of
counselor
flynn.
Thank.
A
All
those
in
favor
all
right,
the
opposed
motion
carries
it
is
now
10
55.
Our
next
set
of
cases
is
at
12
30.
The
board
is
now
adjourned
until
then.
In
the
meantime,
any
applicants
requesting
a
deferral
or
withdrawal-
please
let
miss
ambassador,
know
about
your
request,
so
we
will
reconvene
12
30
on
the
dot.
Thank.
A
You
june
the
board
of
appeal
for
december.
8Th
is
back
in
session.
Mr
ford,
just
let
me
take
a
roll
call.
Is
mr
fortune
here,
I'm
here,
madam
chair.
Thank
you,
mr
erlich.
V
A
A
Miss
ambassador,
please
let
me
know
when
mr
candel
is
back
on
because
I
know
sometimes
he
has
problems
with
audio
okay,
okay,
okay,
let's
let's
go
ahead!
Mr
mr
fortune,.
B
BA
BA
B
BA
B
BB
Yes,
ma'am
chair
was
seeking
a
deferral
after
the
community
process
concluded,
we
did
receive
it
in
a
discussion
request.
Yes,
we
are
going
to
comply
with
and
then
have
another
meeting.
B
A
date
of
march
23rd
at
12
30.
B
AV
Good
morning,
matt
good
afternoon
brother,
madam
chan,
members
of
the
board,
we
began
the
community
process
reaching
out
to
the
lower
middle
civic
association.
Back
in
august,
we
were
in
front
of
the
e-board
and
then
had
two
follow-up.
Abutters
meetings
briefed
the
e-board
on
the
results
of
those
abutters
meetings
and
the
outreach
to
the
community.
They
asked
us
to
defer
to
go
in
front
of
their
membership
there
reconvening
again
in
january,
so
they
just
asked
us
for
deferral
to
update
the
association.
B
B
A
B
AU
B
B
Y
My
address
is
70
hoyt
road
in
belmont
m,
a
0
2
4,
7
8.,
my
clients
own
this
condo,
which
is
part
of
a
three
condo
association,
and
they
have
an
existing
attic
which
is
unfinished
and
they're,
trying
to
finish
the
attic
into
a
playroom
and
an
office
without
changing
the
the
mass
of
the
house.
Or
you
know
the
volume
in
any
way
and
sold
on
telling.
Y
The
addition
that
the
finished
action
expansion-
yes,
it's
374
gross
square
feet,
and
this
is
a
single
family.
No
it's
a
condo.
So
it's.
G
The
plans
are
okay,
but
it's
pretty
tight
in
terms
of
headroom.
It's
really
only
seven
feet
for
a
single
family
house.
G
You've
got
living
space
with
with
a
height
of
seven
feet,.
Y
G
What
I'm
looking
at
and
it
says,
seven
feet
height
line,
I'm
looking
at
that's
exactly
what
I'm
looking
at.
A
So,
okay,
so
so
we
just
have
to
register
that
as
an
issue.
However,
this
is
a
partially
used
space.
Is
that
what
it
is
just
an
office
and
a
family
room.
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AG
Good
afternoon
sure,
members
of
the
board,
my
name,
is
lindsay
santana
from
the
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
voters
meeting
was
held
on
september
3rd
2020,
where
the
applicant
addressed
the
butter's
questions
and
concerns.
The
applicant
also
received
the
support
of
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
council,
so
the
mirrors
on
selected
blog
records,
but
thank
you.
V
Sorry,
good
afternoon,
chairwoman
and
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
counselor
side
b
george's
office
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
AG
Madam
chair
jonathan
mccleary
from
mountain
mile
his
office
is
muted
he'd
like
to
speak.
R
I
thank
you
lindsay
mr
mcclary
from
city
councilor
matt
o'malley's
office.
The
council
would
also
like
to
go
on
american
support.
G
A
You
is
there.
D
B
Q
A
A
Okay,
thank
you
go
ahead.
Do
I
need
to
hear
from
the
applicant's
name
and
address
for
center
street.
X
B
B
The
violations,
article,
eight
section:
seven,
three
family
residential
dwelling
units
forbidden
use
in
the
osrc
sub-district
article
55,
section
40.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
9.
Radio
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
55
section
9,
the
height
requirement
is
excessive:
three
story:
maps
three
and
a
half
is
proposed.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
lottery
of
additional
drawing
units,
insufficient
article
55,
section
9.
The
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9
on
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
side
yacht
is
insufficient
in
article
55
section
9.
BF
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
mikel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
advocate
of
eleven
beacon
with
this
afternoon
dave
and
tracy
steves,
the
owner,
the
owners
of
24
spaulding
street
david
is
also
the
project
architect.
As
mentioned,
the
proposal
is
direct,
a
free
family
building
with
keeping
spaces
a
very
brief
background.
BF
This
lot
was
sold
to
the
thieves
by
the
mass
department
of
transportation
approximately
two
years
ago
and
during
that
purchase
process
since
massdot
sponsoring
the
project,
the
steves
and
massdot
agreed
to
certain
use
restrictions,
as
was
mentioned,
one
with
the
first
floor
would
be
a
fully
accessible
unit
and
it's
also
going
to
be
owner
occupied,
and
the
second
restriction
is
that
one
of
the
units
would
be
at
80
pmi,
with
the
third
unit
being
a
market
rate,
so
those
are
all
recorded
in
the
deed.
It
is
the
description.
BF
The
zoning
sub-district
is
technically
an
open
space
recreational.
This
is
based
on
the
fact
that
it
was
formally
owned
by
massdot
clearly
by
the
the
feed
and
the
discussion
between
massdot
and
the
applicants.
This
is
the
kind
of
development
that
was
proposed
and
contemplated
when
selling
the
property
to
to
a
private
citizen.
The
lot
size
is
five
thousand
square
feet
just
to
go
through
the
violations.
Very
briefly,
as
I
mentioned
the
use
technically,
we
are
still
in
an
open
space.
BF
Zoning
district,
but
we
are
bought
directly,
a
3f
5000
subject
and
all
the
other
properties
on
the
street
are
three
family
dwellings
area.
For
dwelling
unit
we
need
2
000
per
extra
unit.
We
have
2
000
total
the
floor.
Air
ratio
1.6
we're
at
1.1,
which
is
right
around
or
below
kind
of
the
street
average.
A
And
then
I
think
you
know
we
understand
the
rest
of
it.
Tell
us
about
this.
New
construction
tell
us
about
the
off
street
parking.
BF
It's
new
construction
on
the
vacant
lot.
There
are
two
proposed
parking
spaces.
They
are
tandem.
One
bases
will
accommodate
a
handicap
accessibility.
So,
as
you
can't
see,
you
can
see
it
kind
of
on
the
bottom
right
here.
The
building
juts
out
a
little
bit
in
the
rear.
So
in
the
front
we
have
about
a
14
foot
clearance,
or
so
so
we
can
accommodate
a
handicap
vehicle
with
a
ramp,
and
then
it
does
narrow
a
little
bit
to
about
12
feet
in
the
rear.
So
there'd
be
two
parking
spaces.
BF
One
would
be
located
on
the
first
floor,
predominantly
with
an
interior
staircase
to
two
bedrooms,
so
the
first
floor
itself
would
have
a
full
ramp
access
and
living
quarters
bedroom,
one
bedroom
room,
a
living
room
in
the
kitchen
and
then
the
second
floor,
which
is
that
the
two
bedrooms,
the
second
floor,
which
is
supposed
to
be
the
affordable
unit
at
80
ami,
would
have
two
bedrooms
and
one
bath
as
well
as
a
rear,
porch
and
unit.
AG
The
applicant
worked
closely
with
neighbors
to
address
concerns
and
they
have
received
the
support
from
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
councils.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
vote
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
R
V
B
Z
BG
Sure
my
name
is
jeannie
testa
and
I
live
at
16
rosemary,
I'm
a
neighbor
of
the
steve's
family
and
I
support
them
100
percent
in
their
intention
to
build
the
house.
I
think
it's
a
great
idea,
especially
they'll,
have
a
handicapped
entrance
to
the
house,
which
is
perfect
for
their
son,
who,
who
uses
a
wheelchair
so.
A
AF
Hi,
this
is
curtis
perrin,
19
kenilworth
street
in
roxbury.
A
Yes,
and
are
you
speaking
on
spaulding
street,
no.
BH
BH
So
miss
peng
is
my
wife
and
she
has
the
same
concern.
B
B
The
violation
article
50
section
43
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
28
office
uses
conditional
article
50
section
29,
the
floyd
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
and
deep
article
50
section
29,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
50
section
29.
The
ray
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
Who's
this
joe
joe,
accusing
himself
okay,
go
ahead.
BB
Madam
chairman
is
the
board
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
erect
a
four-story
office
building
on
the
site
by
the
way
background.
This
is
a
vacant
lot,
or
rather
the
two
lots
of
vacant
lots
after
a
seven
alarm,
fire
that
occurred
in
2014
prior
to
which
time
from
1997
to
2014
was
veterans,
benefit
clearinghouse,
which
was
a
commercial
use
and
then,
prior
to
that
1969-1997
it
was
the
office
of
roxbury
defenders.
BB
So,
as
it
sits
as
a
vacant
long
in
the
last
six
and
a
half
years,
my
client
is
proposing
to
erect
a
four-story
building
with
parking
on
the
first
level.
As
the
as
the
secretary
had
mentioned,
we
are
seeking
relief
for
parking
because
it
is
just
over
ten
thousand
square
feet
of
office.
Space
ten
spaces
would
be
required.
However,
we've
provided
eight
spaces,
and
it's
worth
knowing
the
previous
users
had
no
parking
for
the
office
space.
BB
L
BB
BB
The
requirement
for
side
yard
is
ten
feet
and
we
are
seeking
relief
for
five
feet
of
that,
and
the
leader
yard
requirement
is
15
feet
in
the
shell,
a
lot
exception
without
you
just
20
feet,
and
we
are
seeking
relief
of
that
with
this
proposed
side
yard
of
five
feet.
As
shown
in
this
drawing
above
this
is
this
is
a
our
sight
survey,
which
is
a
good
drawing
to
show
the
setbacks.
A
Okay,
then
tell
us
about
the
parking.
BB
The
parking
is
accessed
on
winthrop
street
and
it
is
by
the
center
of
the
building
the
building
fronts
on
water
warren
street.
The
corner
of
winthrop
parking
will
ingress
in
ingress
on
winthrop
street
and
there
is
eight
parking
spaces,
five
full
spaces
and
three
compact
or
excuse
me,
four
compact
spaces
and
four
full
spaces,
as
shown
below
which
are
seven
feet
by
eighteen
feet
for
the
compact
spaces
and
eight
and
a
half
feet
by
twenty
feet
for
the
full-size
spaces.
A
Which
is
okay,
and
so
this
is
office.
How
many
square
feet
of
this
is
office.
BB
It's
approximately
ten
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet.
We
have
a
small
office
area
on
the
first
floor
to
activate
warren
street,
so
it
isn't
just
a
parking
garage
and
then
on
the
floors.
Two
three
and
four
is
entirely
office
in
each
each
floor,
including
the
elevator
and
stairs,
is
approximately
3
57
square
feet.
A
Okay,
may
I
see
a
collect,
may
see
a
rendering
of
what
this
looks
like.
G
Are
mr
mahoney
you've
got
a
lot
of
stuff
going
on
in
the
roof?
You
got
the
elevator
head
house,
mechanical
room,
head
house
and
stairs
head
house.
Is
there
some
way
that
some
of
that
could
be
combined
to
reduce
the
the
roof
line.
BB
Yes,
mr,
like
we
could
eliminate
the
stair
head
house
to
hatch
because
it
is
four
feet
and
there's
no
accessible.
Rather
there's
no
livable
space
up
there,
there's
no
deck
as
to
say
everything.
There
is
for
mechanical
purposes,.
A
Okay,
one
question
so
you're
providing
eight
parking
spaces,
eight
full
a
full
full
full
compact,
what's
required
by
zoning.
A
And
you're
providing
eight
okay,
okay,
any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
BI
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
carpenter
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
two
brothers
meetings
were
held
on
8,
13
and
9
22
concerns
from
residents
regarding
density
and
design
were
heard.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
with
strong
bpda
design
review.
We
would
also
like
to
know
that
we
are
support
from
roxbury
main
streets,
as
well
as
the
boys
and
girls
club
of
roxbury.
BI
B
Unfortunately,
I
don't
have
any
other
than
that.
BJ
Madam
chair,
this
is
members
of
the
board
somewhere
from
the
office
of
president
kim
jenny,
so
we
have
asked
the
appointments
to
defer
to
allow
for
more
time
to
resolve
some
of
the
issues
multiple
issues
raised
by
by
that
by
the
community.
We
have
received
multiple
letters
of
not
not
support.
We
understand.
There
are
many
good
aspects
about
this
project,
but
there
are
so
many
concerns
about
the
proximity.
BJ
A
BJ
BK
Hi,
so
I'm
lorraine,
wheeler,
I'm
here
representing
roxbury
forward
neighborhood
association,
and
you
know
if
I,
if
I
could
have
a
a
buck
that
says
ambivalent.
That's
what
I
would
say
and
it's
because
we
have
her
from
a
number
of
butters
on
warren
street
who
would
like
changes
in
the
design
but
at
the
same
time
the
design,
because
it
the
front
of
it,
is
actually
towards
warren
street
and
because
they're
row
houses
a
lot
of
those
houses.
Don't
have
any
view
of
the
warren
street.
BK
So
then
we
really
changed
our
interest
toward
the
historic
warren
house,
which
is
a
pending
landmark
and
the
neighborhood
has
supported
that.
And
so
we've
heard
from
the
owners
of
the
warren
house
who
are
on
the
call
today-
and
I
hope
we
can
hear
from
them
just
because
of
the
way
this
building
may
not
be
as
sensitive
to
the
warren
house
and
doesn't
have
the
setbacks.
BK
BK
I've
talked
to
the
owner
enough
to
know
that
he
is
open
to
continuing
to
talk
to
the
neighbors,
so
our
our
biggest
issue
at
this
time
is,
if
we
could
have
the
landmarks
commission
give
some
of
their
experience
with
you
know
fitting
a
modern
building
into
an
old
neighborhood
and
making
just
making
adjustments
to
it
that
doesn't
result
in
too
modern
a
building
on
that
corner.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
E
My
name
is
ricky
thompson,
I'm
a
board
member
of
the
caribbean
foundation
of
boston
and
we
supply
health
aides
to
boston
seniors.
We
provide
employment.
A
BL
You
I
reside
at
19th
winthrop
street.
The
office
space
that
is
being
provided
along
with
the
four-story
height
is
too
much
for
this
particular
area
from
130
warren
street.
All
the
way
down
to
88
warren
street.
There
are
10
parcels
of
which
seven
of
them
are
below
three
feet
in
height.
The
previous
building
that
was
on
this
land
had
the
substantial
front
side
yardage
on
the
property,
and
it
was
only
three
feet
in
height
the
fact
or
the
argument
that
commercial
space,
modern
commercial
space
is
needed
in
the
new
york
square
district.
BL
L
BM
Main
streets
design
committee
met
with
the
developers
and
believe
that
this
that
this
project
fits
within
the
raspberry
strategic
master
plan
and
it
can
facilitate
more
growth
in
the
business
district.
We
see
this
project
bringing
a
lot
of
foot
traffic
into
the
square
to
enhance
the
business,
we're
desperately
looking
for
new
audiences
and
new
and
new
customers.
So
we
support
this
project
and
it
fits
within
the
roxbury
master
plan
and
the
strategic
plan.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
So
I
have
a
question
for
the
developer.
This,
the
developer's
representative.
This
is
an
mfr
ls,
so
basically
the
ground
floor
use
is
supposed
to
be
a
local
service
and
the
upper
floor.
Residential
you're,
proposing
the
entire
building
to
be
commercial.
A
Yes,
and
the
thing
about
nubian
square
is
that
the
city
has
issued
a
whole
number
of
rfps
developers
have
been
designated
they've,
come
to
this
board
and
have
received
approval
for
the
construction
of
class,
a
office
space.
So-
and
this
is
a
little
bit
outside
of
nubian
square.
A
The
euvian
square
market
analysis
talks
about
the
need
to
limit
the
additional
office
space
and
commercial
space,
that's
outside
of
the
square,
and
so
can
you
give
us
a
response
to
that.
A
Nice,
I
remember
this
building.
I
remember
visiting
vba
veterans
benefit
clearinghouse
vbc
all
those
years
ago,
so
I'm
completely
aware
of
the
building.
However,
it's
burnt
down
it's
gone.
It
hasn't
been
reconstructed
in
the
two-year
time
frame,
so
essentially
the
the
the
zoning
the
mfr
ls
prevails.
So
tell
us
about.
BB
This
and
I
understand
that
position,
however,
my
client
proposed
office
space.
He
bought
this
land
from
a
previous
developer,
who
failed
at
proposing
multi-family
residential.
So
as
the
board
mentions,
the
zoning
does
allow
for
residential
the
previous
previous
developer
or
not.
Our
client
here
tried
to
go
through
that
process
for
a
year
and
then
could
not
do
any
type
of
development
that
the
community
was
was.
A
Yep,
so
so
I
you
know
for
me
personally,
I
think
that
this
this
you
know
because
you
just
you
haven't.
I
guess,
responded
to
my
question.
Why
so
much
office
space
is
necessary
when
there
is.
There
is
a
good
amount
of
vacancy
already.
BB
Well,
they
have
a
client
with
a
letter
of
intent
who
wrote
a
letter
of
support
who's,
seeking
this
space
who's
already
in
the
area
seeking
to
move
to
new
space.
So,
although
I
think
there
may
be
some
office
space
available,
my
clients
who
already
purchased
the
property
is
seeking
to
build
a
new,
a
new
building
and
house.
His
prospective
client
and
who's
currently
in
the
area
in
a
neighboring
property
and
they're
they're
in
non-profit
and
they'll,
be
taking
one
floor
of
space
which
will
leave
one
form
of
the
space
for
his
own
use.
BB
So
I
mean
I
I'm
sure
my
client
owns
the
land.
It
was
office
space
before
we
are
seeking
relief
for
that,
but
he's
intending
to
use
it
for
himself
as
well
as
one
of
the
supporters
who
is
seeking
to
take
the
floor
of
the
space
he's
already
purchased
the
land
right
resident,
residency.
A
So
I
think
it's
clear
to
the
board
that
the
zoning
here
is
multi-family
residential
with
a
minimal
amount
of
ground
floor
retail
space.
A
There
is
a
study
which
I
have
to
say
I
have
no
vested
interest
in,
but
I
do
have
a
vested
interest
in
that
talks:
the
need
of
limiting
commercial
space
to
nubian
square,
so
the
vacancies
on
commercial
and
office
space
are
decreased.
A
There
is
also
class
a
space
coming
along
with
the
three
rfps
that
have
been
approved
by
the
city
and
have
been
two
of
the
three
have
been
approved
by
this
board.
So
I
just
leave
it
out
there.
So
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
AB
A
G
A
In
opposition,
because
this
goes
against
everything
that
has
been
detailed
in
what
is
necessary
for
the
growth
and
expansion
of
nubian
square.
So
but
the
motion,
however,
because
there's
five
people
in
support.
A
So
the
motion
is
denied.
Thank
you
for
that
reminder.
Thank
you.
So
the
motion
is
denied.
The
project
is
denied.
Thank
you.
B
For
calling
the
next
case-
oh
man,
it's
it's
110.,
I'm
going
to
call
the
one
o'clock
cases
for
deferrals
or
withdrawals.
Could
you
please
give
me
your
address?
First,
please.
This
is
one
o'clock.
The
burrows
are
withdrawals.
B
AE
BN
A
A
Jesus,
what.
O
B
P
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
lenz,
I'm
actually
standing
in
for
attorney
george
morenzy,
requesting
a
deferral
this
matter.
I
believe
there
are
plans
that
are
being
updated,
need
to
be
reviewed
by
isd
based
on
changes
that
were
made.
B
B
Madam
chair,
this
is
the
billboard
sign.
They've
had
numerous
referrals
so
that
they're
withdrawing,
but
should
we
make
a
motion
for
denial
or
denial
without
prejudice.
B
B
Article
60
section
40
parking,
maneuverability
article
669,
insufficient
lot
size,
article
60
section,
I
institution
additional
lottery
per
unit;
article
60,
section
9,
excessive
far,
article
60,
section,
9
institution,
open
space,
article
60,
section
9
is
sufficient
front
yard
setback
and
article
60,
section
9,
insufficient
side,
job
setback.
Just
for
the
record.
A
BO
So
the
project
is
to
construct
three
family
tree
units
residential
building
on
six
trees.
A
couple
of
things
I'd
like
to
point
out
for
this
site
is
that
there
are
four
five
vacant
properties.
The
vacant
man
on
the
left
side
of
the
lodge-
and
there
are
a
few
more
across
the
street
on-
occurs
the
street,
and
there
has
been
recently
approval
of
the
stimulus
across
this
difficulty
across
from
this
side
for
three
family
development,
and
we
are.
BO
Sure
we
are
providing
tree
parking
for
this
project,
one
for
each
unit
and
there
will
be
on-site
and
yes-
and
there
are
all
the
draco
bothers-
are
truly
supportive
of
the
project.
A
Okay
hold
on
mr
erlick.
How
are
the
plans.
G
A
Yeah
we
can
get
to
that
any
questions
from
the
board.
Mr
earlier.
C
BO
G
Yeah,
I
know
it's
a
it's.
A
10-year,
10
10
feet
wide
driveway,
which
is
standard,
and
you
know
it's
very
tight,
but
it
could
be.
It
can
be
done.
BP
Yes,
madam
chair
whitney
seleston
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
did
hold
in
a
butters
meeting
for
this
project
on
october
21st.
After
they
met
with
the
woodrow
ave
neighborhood
association
on
october
15th.
We
would
like
people
on
record
and
support.
We
also
advise
strong,
ppda
design
review
just
because
of
the
parking
concerns
and
also
the
character
being
given
the
neighborhood
that
it's
in
with
the
such
a
new
design.
Thank
you.
BK
BQ
V
B
Following
your
next
two
cases,
calling
voa
110-63365
tovar
street,
that's
a
companion
case,
boa
one
one:
zero,
six,
three,
four:
three:
nine
tobar
street.
This
is
for
five
toba.
This
is
a
renovating
converter,
three
to
a
four
family
residential.
The
violations.
Article
65
section
8
of
4
family
use
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
maximum
allowed
four
day
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
15
article
65,
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
B
This
is
for
nine
tow
bar
directly
three
family
residential
building
violation,
article
65,
section,
41,
austrian
parking
and
loading
article
65
section,
98
lottery
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
9
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9
lot:
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69,
the
floating
ratio,
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9.
the
building
has
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65,
section,
9,
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9
rarely
odds
insufficient
in
article
66,
section
42,
austria,
parking
and
loading
name
and
address
of
the
record.
Please.
BN
Thank
you
very
much.
Members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
scott
kirkwood,
representing
breck
properties.
The
owner
address
is
1904
washington,
street
roxbury.
BN
So
we
have
the
rehab
of
the
existing
building
at
five
tovar
street
and
that
building
was
vacated
by
fire
in
september
of
2019.
BN
We're
proposing
splitting
the
first
floor
and
basement
down
the
middle
to
essentially
create
two
side-by-side
duplex
units.
It's
gonna
be
four
units
in
total,
with
one
parking
space
provided
for
the
additional
unit
that
is
being
added.
The
lot
previously
had
no
parking
and
then
at
nine
tovar,
which
is
currently
a
vacant
lot
we're
proposing
to
construct
a
new
three
family
building
that
is
smaller
than
the
existing
building
at
nine
touvar.
A
lot
of
surrounding
buildings,
with
two
out
of
the
three
parking
spaces
required
provided
on
site.
A
A
Okay,
yep,
okay,
so
at
five
tovar
there's
going
to
be
one
space
and
three
at
offline.
A
Okay,
then,
going
back
to
five
tovar.
Can
you
express
explain
to
us
the
use
of
the
basement?
Is
there
any
bedroom
space
what's
the
floor
to
ceiling
height?
How
far
above
grade
is
is,
is
the
the
sill?
Can
you
talk
that,
through
with
us.
BN
So
I
the
the
seal,
will
be
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
under
the
building
code,
going
to
shoot
from
finished
shielding
height.
A
So
you
will
continue
to
excavate
if
you
should
need
to
to
get
to
what
you
need
to
do.
G
Well,
here
we
go
again:
nine
touhou
is
fine.
Five
toes
are
the
basis,
though
what
they've
done
is
to
it
broken
up
front
and
back
and
the
rear.
It's
not
so
much
of
a
problem
because
the
below
grade
about
two
feet,
but
the
front
is
below
grade
four
for
ten,
almost
five
feet
so
and
you
got
you've,
got
a
bedroom
right
in
the
front.
So
I
there's
I
mean
this
is
the
same
problem
we're
running
into
over
and
over
again.
BN
BR
Greetings,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shan
salima
barboza
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
Anna
butters
meetings
was
held
on
october
26
of
this
year,
where
the
applicant
presented
both
proposals
and
received
support
from
the
director
betters.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
O
I
have
two
raised
hands
and
a
raised
hand
from
lorraine,
I'm
not
sure
if
she
wants
to
speak,
but
I
have
two
other
raised
hands
with
this
problem.
B
Secretary
here
we
have
numerous
letters
of
support.
A
Okay,
can
I
is
this
dorchester.
BN
O
A
Okay
may
so,
let's
take
I'd
like
to
get
to
a
motion.
Let's
take
five
tobar
street
first
may
I
have
a
motion.
A
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
miss
ambassador
time
has
come
and
gone.
We
are
in
the
promotion.
Thank
you
for
trying
anyway,
so
five
tova.
This
is
a
request
to
convert
from
a
three
to
a
four
family
dwelling.
Your
motion,
mr
alec.
BM
C
I
will
second
the
motion,
subject
to
a
cross
cross
easement
with
respect
to
five
tovar
and
nine
tovar
for
the
parking
easements.
A
Okay,
so
you
are
supporting,
then
the
conversion
from
a
three
to
a
four
family.
B
BU
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AG
V
Good
afternoon
from
cameron,
foley
councilwoman
george's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
I
A
You
all
those
in
favor.
B
A
rare
edition
and
creation
of
six
parking
spaces
to
combine
lots
to
form
one
new
lot
of
six
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet:
six
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet:
the
violations,
article,
sixty-five
section,
forty-one,
r
street
parking
lot
of
mcdo
ring
article
65,
section
8
and
the
mfr
is
forbidden.
Article
6569
excessive
far
article
6569,
insufficient
rayon
setback
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AE
Just
to
point
out,
there
will
also
be
a
full
historic
renovation
of
this
project
in
our
work
with
the
community
to
go
over
the
floor
plans.
This
particular
area
is
a
zone.
Three
f
5000,
which
is
common
to
this
area,
and
our
lot
size
is
6
500
square
feet.
AE
The
one
is
in
the
front
building,
which
is
the
existing
building
that
will
be
renovated.
That
will
have
a
separate
entrance,
would
be
a
one
bed
one
and
a
half
bath
at
767
square
feet
unit.
Two
in
that
same
front
structure
would
also
be
767
square
foot,
one
bed,
one
and
a
half
bath
with
a
separate
entrance.
AE
Then
we
go
into
the
addition
portion,
which
would
be
unit
three
and
four,
which
would
be
three
bed
two
and
a
half
bath
units,
the
height
of
these
buildings.
The
building
would
remain
what
it
is
now,
which
is
a
two
and
a
half
story
structure.
We
had
an
original
proposal
to
raise
the
building,
but
in
working
with
the
community
we
wanted
to
keep
this.
It
is
pending
a
further
study
at
the
landmarks
commission
going
working
with
them.
We
came
up
with
this
plan.
Yep.
A
AE
So
the
the
addition
is
32
feet
wide
sorry
32
feet
by
in
length
by
36
feet
wide
the
existing
building.
AE
Correct,
madam
chair,
that's
that
rare
addition
to
the
building
the
front
building-
I
don't
know
if
james
is
on
the
call
if
he
can
attest
to
that
it
is,
and
the
reason
for
this
edition
is
the
community
was
adamant
about
keeping
this
building.
H
H
A
AE
AE
There's
an
existing
curb
cut
on
the
building
madam
chair,
and
there
will
be
six
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
There
would
be
three
full-size
spaces
with
three
tandem
spaces
behind
it,
and
so
we
actually
removed
our
parking
violation
from
our
last
iteration.
So
we
are
parking
compliant.
We
have
three
existing
violations.
AE
X
B
Chair
secretary
of
just
bob
bob
d'amico
from
btd
has
spoken
this
one
yeah,
he
said
16
house
street
should
be
approved
for
four
spaces.
Only
also
the
curb
cut
shown
plans
is
20
feet.
It
should
not
exceed
12
feet
because
there
is
no
on
street
parking
on
both
sides
of
howe
street.
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
BR
Greetings,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
This
is
shantar
lima
barboza.
With
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
applicant
started
a
community
process
with
my
predecessor
since
then,
they've
had
multiple
abilities
meetings
and
presentations
to
the
hancock
street
civic
association,
while
hancock
street
civic
association
opposes
the
proposal.
The
applicant
has
made
significant
changes
to
the
plans
to
address
the
concerns
presented
by
the
community.
That
being
said,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
O
Hi
caller
407.
BV
Hi
this
is
tiffany
and
janna
sails
the
butters
to
16
house
street,
we're
one
of
the
many
director
butters
who
have
opposition
to
this
project
for
the
excessive
unit,
as
well
as
excessive
tandem
parking
spaces.
In
addition,
the
building
has
a
short
value.
We
would
really
like
it
as
well
as
a
lot
of
neighbors
who
see
the
pennant
the
outcome
of
the
larry
mock
commission's
position
on
this
home,
but
we
have
been
against
this
against
this
project.
BV
Due
to
the
many
details
I
just
described,
so
I
just
wanted
to
go
on
record
saying
that
again
that
again
ourselves
as
well
as
some
of
the
directors
that
are
affected
through
street,
it's
just
many
different
variables.
We
do
not
support
this
project.
O
Z
BT
BT
There
are
a
number
of
features
of
it,
the
density
I,
the
lack
of
accuracy
and
communication.
There
is
no
current
curb
cut.
You
can
see
that
clearly
on
google
maps,
I
don't
know
why
the
developer
is
stating
that
there's
a
curb
cut,
there
is
none
there
and,
in
fact,
there's
a
light
post
directly
where
they
plan.
L
A
You
jeff
from
the
fba.
D
Madam
chair
members
support
jefferson
bpda.
Our
recommendation
was
denial
without
prejudice
to
echo
mr
ehrlich's
comments.
The
addition
of
this
is
just
massive
and
because
it's
a
forbidden
use
and
the
density
of
the
proposal,
we
are
on
the
record
in
opposition.
J
A
B
BE
A
A
Thank
you.
So
can
you
please
tell
us
what
the
business
is,
the
name
of
the
business,
the
petitioner
and
if
they
have
experience
with
takeout.
BE
Yep,
so
the
the
applicant
is
3339.7.
He'll
have
he's
a
property
owner
who's,
applying
to
remove
the
to
remove
the
proviso
this
they
have
a
separate
entity.
That's
going
to
be
coming
in
to
operate
the
the
this
is
the
former
venice
pizza
location
at
that
spot.
It
operated
for
over
40
years.
As
I
take
out,
restaurant
space,
jason
weisman
and
the
management
team
are
going
to
return
this
neighborhood
institution
right
to
provide
the
affordable
options
for
the
residents
of
community.
BE
They
have
the
management
team,
which
is
winter
brothers
llc,
which
has,
among
others,
josh
warner
who
has
experience
in
the
restaurant
industry
and
john
alexia
chairs.
Who
also
has
a
lot
of
experience
in
the
restaurant
industry?
Hey.
BE
BW
BE
And
madam
chair,
I
can't
say
I've
spoken
with
the
the
applicant
regarding
those
grades.
They
are
willing.
A
G
Motion
to
approve
for
this
petition,
or
only
with
the
usual
takeout
language,
with
the
design
review
as
far
as
grades
are
concerned,.
A
B
BX
BX
BX
Madam
chair,
we
currently
have
an
existing
non-utilized
restaurant.
The
proponent
has
submitted
plans
to
isd
there's
associated
refusal
letter
from
2019
in
september.
They
have
been
through
all
of
the
ups
and
downs
inside
and
outside.
A
So
this
is
571
b.
What's
the
b
for
it's
is
this
next
to
the
citizens
bank.
BX
A
A
This
is
recreational
right,
so
give
us
details.
Please
heard.
BX
I
will
let
the
project
architect
step
in.
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that,
as
provided
to
cba
council,
we
just
received
dated
today
a
letter
of
support
from
the
boston
cannabis
board
and
that's
been
provided
to
cba
council
solely
seeking
a
variance
for
you
recreate
or
for
the
use
conditional
use
of
a
cannabis,
dispensary
I'll.
Let
the
project
architect,
step
in
to
answer
square
footages.
A
Etc,
so
I
I
whoever
it
is:
that's
on
the
tv
can
answer
this
tell
us
how
the
flow
is
going
to
work.
Tell
us
when
deliveries
are
where
deliveries
are
stored.
BY
Jeff,
are
you
on
the
call?
If
not
I
can
step
in
as
the
ceo
robert
nichols,
madam
chair,
so
the
hours
of
operation
are
10
am
to
9
pm
per
our
host
community
agreement.
As
far
as
security.
BY
It
is
seven
days
a
week,
however,
we
are
going
to
see
how
the
quick
flow
is
and
make
adjustments
accordingly
to
see
what
days
will
close
or
we
will
reduce
hours
from
what
we
understand.
You
know
sunday
evenings
in
in
this
industry
have
been
very
quiet,
so
more
than
likely
yet
be
minimal
hours
on.
A
BY
As
far
as
how
we're
going
to
handle
the
lines
at
the
location,
so
we
are
encouraging
pre-ordering.
Our
goal
is
to
try
to
get
as
many
pre-orders
as
much
as
50
to
70
pre-orders,
so
that
people
can
come
in
very
quickly
and
pick
up
and
drop
off.
There
is
a
municipal
lot
to
the
left
of
the
building,
we're
attached
to
a
store
there
that
isn't
operational
right
now,
there's
about
43
municipal
parking
spaces
in
the
city
lot
there.
BY
So
we
plan
on
utilizing
that
space,
so
that
folks
know
they
can
come
in
pick
up
and
leave
very
quickly,
we're
also
within
a
short
walk
to
shaman
t
station.
So
you
know,
obviously
there
will
be
a
lot
of
folks
coming
via
transit
and
then
we
are
going
to
have
a
bike
rack
at
the
rear
of
the
building,
so
that
people
can
store
bikes
if
they
want
to.
You
know
ride
their
bikes
over
to
the
location,
so.
A
So
tell
us
about
deliveries
of
the
of
the
product
to
the
store.
When
will
that
occur,.
BY
So
deliveries
will
be
tentatively
in
in
the
off
hours
and
it'll
be
at
the
rear
of
the
building
so
that
it
doesn't
disturb
our
normal
flow
of
business
or
flow
of
traffic.
There
is
an
adjacent
parking
lot
which
we
have
an
easement
to
access
for
deliveries
there,
and
so,
as
the
product
comes
in
at
the
rear
door.
BY
Here,
as
you'll
see
on
the
plan
it'll
be
taken
in
and
then
we
can
confirm
that
we
have
the
proper
product
and
it
will
be
brought
down
into
our
storage
boat
in
the
lower
level
of
the
space.
Total
square
footage
is
1700
square
feet
on
the
upper
level
same
for
the
lower
level
on
lower
level
will
be
used
primarily
for
storage.
Only.
L
A
BY
A
BY
Yes,
there
will
be
so
we'll
have
security
when
we
initially
open
we're
gonna
have
two
to
three
security
personnel
on
site
during
all
hours
of
operation,
as
well
as
the
first
month.
The
boston
police
officer
detail
just
to
really
ensure
the
flow
of
traffic
is,
is
happening
in
a
way
that
is
conducive
to
not
disrupt.
You
know,
common
square,
which
we
know
is
a
very
busy
location.
A
And
do
you
does
anybody
in
your
team
have
experience
with
running
on
one
of
these
facilities.
BY
So
we
have
strategic
partners
we're
in
talks
with
to
help
with
the
day-to-day
operations,
but
being
that
it's
a
new
business,
you
know
I
have
a
significant
amount
of
business
experience
on
my
partner
jeff
as
well,
so
we've
run
real
estate
offices.
I
have
a
retail
background.
I
worked
from
the
retail
industry
at
the
executive
level
as
well
for
stockton
shop
corporate
for
many
years.
So
while
we're
new
to
cannabis,
we're
not
new
to
retail
sales
and
retail
business.
BR
Greetings,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
this
is
chantalia
barbosa
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
A
community
process
was
held
by
my
predecessor
for
this
proposal,
while
the
common
square
neighborhood
council
opposes
cannabis
establishment
in
this
area,
we
acknowledge
that
this
is
an
equity
applicant
that
has
been
approved
by
the
boston
cannabis
board.
Additionally,
this
proposal
is
located
in
the
business
district
and
will
stimulate
economic
development
in
this
area.
That
being
said,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
It's
rudy.
L
BZ
How
are
you
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
I'm
members
of
the
board?
My
name
is
derek
and
I'm
located
at
356,
lincoln
street
apartment,
five
waltham
massachusetts
and
I'm
speaking
in
favor
of
the
proposal
by
loki
dispensary,
justin
million
rob
nichols
and
no
keem
done
so
much
with
community,
so
I'm
in
full
support
of
minority
owned
businesses
in
the
area
getting
opportunity
to
give
back
and
stay
back
within
the
community.
So
hopefully
thank
you.
CA
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
everybody
and
the
members
of
the
board
and
chairman
I'd
like
to
speak
in
support
of
loki
dispensary,
opening
up
a
dispensary
in
the
comments
square
location.
I
think
it
would
be
great
for
the
community
and
that
they'll
do
a
lot
of
good
work.
You
know
and
hiring
in
the
minority
aspect
and
also
just
providing
you
know
good
space
for
their
employees
and
the
community.
CA
Yes,
27
more
street
dorchester
massachusetts.
CB
My
hand
in
support
of
jeff
and
locate
dispensaries
because
it
brings
much
needed
jobs
to
the
community.
It
also
enables
and
empowers
people
that
have
been
marginalized
by
the
war
on
drugs
and
in
addition
to
that,
I've
spoken
to
them
extensively.
We're
training.
People
on
you
know
how
to
set
up
llcs
and
overall,
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
I
live
at
61
bernard
street
dorchester,
mass.
CC
BA
A
BX
B
You,
madam
chair,
thank
you
thanks
for
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
104,
3391
16
colonial
avenue.
This
is
two
car
parking
violation:
article
10
section
1,
the
limitation
of
our
street
parking
area
and
article
65,
section
9,
usable,
open
space
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
A
B
B
B
CD
The
board,
my
name
is
alfonso,
I'm
the
architect
and
I'm
representing
the
decline
of
vidal
garcia
and
what
we're
proposing
is
a
single-family
residence,
a
gambrill
style
in
basically,
three
bedrooms
with
four
bathrooms
finished
basement,
finished,
first
floor
and
second
floor
and
not
finish
attic.
CD
CD
I
mean
right
now:
there's
there's
parking
in
the
back.
The
client
lives.
If
you
can
see
on
the
left
of
the
he
lives
on
the
left
side,
and
he
owns
this
lot
and
he
uses
the
back
of
it
right
now
for
parking,
but
we're
shifting
the
the
curb
cut
to
the
right
so
that
we
can
have
a
driveway
to
the
back.
So
it
will
work,
I'm
proposing
it
seems
like
it
works.
BI
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
joe
college
and
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
opposition
to
this
proposal.
We
did
facilitate
a
community
process
for
this
application.
Unfortunately,
they
were
not
able
to
get
any
support
from
any
of
buttons.
There
were
some
concerns
around
the
parking
situation,
the
size
of
the
pod,
as
well
as
the
size
of
the
house,
and,
I
believe,
a
number
of
letters
of
options.
A
So
may
I
ask
you:
this:
is
one
family
proposed
in
a
one
family
zone
and
so
this
and
it
feels
like
it's
800
square
feet
smaller,
but
I'm
suspecting
that
all
the
lots
pretty
much
on
the
road
are
non-conforming
to
6000.
BI
Yes,
no,
I
don't
understand
the
lot
size
and
I
believe
the
number
of
the
lots
on
the
street
are
equal
or
close
to
5200
what
this
one's
presenting
we
didn't
hear.
I
haven't
heard
any
support
for
this
proposal.
Since
the
application
came
across
my
family,
okay,.
CE
Hi,
my
name
is
alexis
rosenblatt.
I
live
in
30
doncaster
street,
I'm
immediately
next
door
to
the
proposed
construction.
I
have
strong
opposition
to
the
property
one.
There
are
just
too
many
variances
and
the
lot
size
is
simply
too
small
for
the
size
of
the
closed
house
and
the
other
is
that
part
of
the
proposal
which
you
can
see
includes
property
beyond
the
chain
link
fence.
CE
A
Essentially,
your
st
the
bottom
line,
issue
that
I
gather
from
you
is
that
you
feel
a
building
is
too
big
and,
secondly,
you're
concerned
about
the
parking
I'm.
A
A
O
Joe
pondak
you've
been
I'm
muted.
CF
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
joe
pondak.
I
live
at
111
gallivan
boulevard
in
dorchester,
speaking
on
behalf
of
my
aunt
and
uncle,
who
live
at
10
doncaster
street,
on
an
8
000
square
foot
lot
and
they've
been
there
for
50
years.
I
just
want
to
reiterate
what
I
said
in
my
letter.
This
project
is
much
too
big.
CF
It
is,
in
reality,
a
three-story
host
with
the
potential
for
four
thousand
square
feet
of
living
space
that
could
be
added
within
the
house
in
the
future
and
that
there's
also
that
there's
this
will
take
away
the
parking
from
the
existing
22
doncaster
streets,
so
they're
well,
they're
providing
two
parking
spaces
for
the
new
house,
they're,
taking
away
all
of
the
parking
for
existing
pumps.
CF
I
mean
that
absolutely
no
hardship
demonstrated
here
or
special
circumstance
that
would
justify
the
variance,
therefore
uncle
philip
and
susan
smedley
are
in
strong
opposition
to
this,
and
also
with
that,
there
are
a
number
of
lots
on
that
street
next
door
and
across
the
street
that
are
that
exceed
the
six
thousand
square
feet.
So
this
is
not
today.
Thank
you.
CF
A
Okay,
okay,
we've
moved
on
so
just
stay
on
and
we'll
get
back
to
you.
So
so
did
we
hear
from
everybody
let's
hear
from
the
attorney
for
the
project
or
the
applicant
or
the
architect,
for
the
project.
CD
Yes,
basically,
I
I
don't
agree
with
many
of
the
comments.
The
first
of
all
the
survey
was
certified
by
a
surveyor,
and
there
was
there's
the
property
is
owned
by
by
vidal
garcia.
I
never
heard
of
any
adverse
conflict
or
such
and
second
of
all,
all
the
properties.
A
I'm
looking
at
google
maps
and
there's
a
fenced
in
area
is
that
part
of
your
proposed
property.
A
So
I'm
looking
at
google
maps-
and
it
looks
like
all
the
properties
on
that
side
of
the
street
have
these
smaller
lots.
However,
they
look
like
they're
one
and
a
half,
possibly
two
stories,
so
I
can
speak.
I
can
see
on
that
side
of
the
street
why
the
opposition
is
there?
The.
A
So,
given
this
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please
and
remember.
Sometimes
the
hardest
thing
to
build
is
a
one
family
in
a
one
family
zone.
A
A
Motion
there's
your
opposed
motion
carries
and
please
jeff.
Can
you
make
sure
this
very
significant
design
review
because
it
does
not
look
like
this
proposed
design
is
contextual.
I
will.
BO
A
B
B
This
is
for
32
perkins
to
change
the
box
from
a
three
family
dwelling
to
a
two
family
dwelling
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
with
the
second
kitchen
for
unit
one,
the
violations,
article
55,
section,
41.122,
more
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot,
article
55
section
9..
The
main
entrance
must
face
the
front
lawn
line:
article
55,
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9
side
yards
insufficient
article
55
section
9
in
the
rare
yards
insufficient
article
55,
section,
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
This
is
for
32
rear,
32r
birkin
street
demolished
the
existing
carriage
house
garage,
constructing
new
one
family
structure
of
similar
size,
both
buildings,
the
renovation
and
change
for
both
buildings,
the
violation,
article
55,
section,
40
off
street
parking
and
loading.
The
client
no
front
yard
parking
is
allowed.
Article
55
section
40
bar
street
parking
loading
requirement,
article
55,
section,
40.58
parking,
maneuverability,
article
55,
section,
41.122,
more
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot:
medical
55,
68
use
of
regulations,
article
55
section
insufficient
article
55,
section
9.
The
floridian
ratio
is
excessive.
B
CH
A
CH
Yes,
that
was
a
proud
just
a
little.
Over
a
year
ago,
we
appeared
before
the
board
and
that
request
was
denied.
A
Yes,
so
so
at
that
point
it
was
essentially
the
same
layout
of
the
current
building
and
then
that
second
building
on
the
same
lot-
and
I
think
we
had
an
issue
then
with
the
second
building
on
the
same
lot-
tell
us
what's
changed.
I
mean,
in
addition
to
you,
know
the
concept
of
of
that
air.
That
illegal
airbnb
tell
us
what's
changed
in
this.
In
this
version.
CH
Yes,
the
we
went
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
the
the
idea
was
to
convert
the
three
family
that
you
see
here
in
the
photograph
to
a
two
family
and
then
to
rebuild
the
carriage
house.
That's
in
the
back.
You
can
just
see
a
little
bit
of
it
there
behind
the
building
and
the
photograph
on
your
screen,
and
that
would
be
a
single
family.
CH
A
Okay,
I'm
still,
I
don't
know
tim,
you
might
know
that
you
know
we're
generally
not
supportive
on
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot,
because
it
allows
very
little
privacy
and
open
space
and
and
and
use
of
the
backyard.
So
you
know
just
to
put
that
out
there.
The
second.
A
CH
The
there
would
be
additional
living
space
in
the
basement.
It
has
a
nine
foot
ceiling,
it's
quite
a
it's
nice
and
dry.
It's
quite
a
good
basement
to
work
with
again
with
a
nine
foot
ceiling.
It
doesn't
seem
too
much
like
a
basement.
The
the
sill
would
be
for
the
egress
windows
which
we
are
used
to
on
the
left
there,
that
sill
would
be
30
inches
below
grade
and
well
within
the
three
feet
that
is
allowed
before
you
need
to
add
a
ladder
to
a
window.
CH
CH
Okay,
the
first
floor
are
the
is
the
primary
living
space
for
that
unit.
The
proposed
addition
is
a
new
stairway
at
the
rear
of
the
building,
because
the
existing
stair
isn't
it's
an
old,
very
small
stair,
so
we're
looking
to
improve
the
access
to
the
upper
level
unit
with
that
stairway.
L
A
Okay
and
in
the
carriage
house,
what
is
the
proposed?
It's
proposed
as
a
one
family
structure
of
similar
size.
The
existing
building
is
that,
what's
being
proposed.
CH
That
is
correct.
We
did
go
through
the
article
85
demolition
review
with
this
carriage
house
yeah.
L
CH
Proposed
replacement
carriage
house
would
be
have
2185
gross
square
feet
of
floor
area,
and
there
would
be
a
total
of
four
bedrooms
in
that
as
well.
The
existing
carriage
house
is
in
it's
in
fairly
poor
condition
that
did
have
a
fire
at
one
time,
so
we
proposed
to
add
a
sprinkler
system
to
this.
CH
Well,
yes,
I
think
that
a
lot
of
what
I'm
seeing
today
is
that
a
bedroom
is
often
used
for
an
office
for
where
people
are
working
remotely.
So
but
yes,
that
is
correct.
Okay,.
A
CJ
Plants
more,
we
have
12
bedrooms,
not
16
12..
It's
three.
A
Okay,
thank
you
mayor,
mr
erlick.
How
are
the.
G
A
G
Just
looks
a
lot
like
the
same
warmed
over
plants.
I,
mr
burke,
you
said
that
the
that
the
kitchenette
in
the
basement
had
been
removed.
It's
on
the
plants
that
I
have.
CH
CH
G
Okay,
well
that
I
mean
that
that
was
that
caught
my
eye,
because
it
seemed
like
that,
in
fact
it
was
the
goal
was
to
create
a
separate
unit.
CH
CH
B
Madam
chair
bob
d'amico
has
spoke
on
this
one.
He
said.
32
perkins
should
only
have
three
spaces.
There
exist
on
street
park
in
the
office
side
of
the
building.
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AG
Good
afternoon,
I'm
sure
members
of
the
board,
my
name,
is
lindsay
santana
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
and
a
voters
meeting
was
held
on
september,
1st
2020,
where
butters
expressed
support
for
this
proposal.
The
jamaica,
plain
neighbor
council
also
supported
the
proposals.
The
bureau's
office
would
like
to
wonder
and
support.
Thank
you.
V
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley,
would
like
from
council
wasabi
georgie's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank.
O
O
R
O
Right-
and
I
also
have
david
jerry
second,
have
you
been
unmuted.
CK
CG
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
madam
chair,
my
name
is
max
glickman.
I
live
at
seven
glendale
terrace
in
jamaica
plain.
I
fully
support
this
project.
I
agree
that
we
need
more
density
in
jamaica
plain
and
I
like
the
fact
that
there
are
four
parking
spaces.
Thank
you.
A
And
for
the
record,
I
two
I
mean
I'm
opposed
because
two
buildings
on
the
same
lot
on
a
very
small
lot
like
this
seems
overly
dense.
There
are
five
five
people
in
support,
so
the
motion
carries.
B
AU
Okay,
my
name
is
cesar
de
silva,
representing
dominguez
the
silva
good
morning,
madame
chair
and
members
of
the
board.
A
AU
G
Well,
as
you
can
see,
it
is
in
his
side
yard.
So
that's,
okay,
the
drawings!
Can
you
just
scroll
down
just
a
little
just
a
little
bit.
I
believe.
No,
the
other
way,
the
other
way,
I'm
sorry
scroll,
it's
a
14
foot
curb
cut.
There's
no
reason
for
that.
The
12
12
is
is
funny,
and
you
know
the
sidewalk
spaces
it's
precious,
so
other
than
that.
It's
fine.
BP
A
Okay,
so-
and
it's
been
second
motion-
that
is
all
those
in
favor
aye
aye
closed
motion
carries.
B
Following
your
next
case,
calling
boa
one
one,
one:
three:
seven:
nine
36
knowing
circle
this
is
to
remove
and
demo
the
existing
one-story
frame
structure,
the
existing
foundation
directly,
two
and
a
half
in
new
construction
relations,
article
55,
section
9,
the
floyd
area
issue
is
accessible
article
55,
section
9..
The
villain
has
accepted
his
stories
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BD
BD
We
are
proposing
to
save
the
existing
foundation,
remove
the
existing
one
story,
888
square
foot
ranch
and
we
proposed
to
add
an
addition
26
by
24
edition
off
the
back
and
add
a
two
and
a
half
story:
structure:
single
family
home
on
the
top
of
that
combined
old
and
new
foundation.
BD
BD
The
existing
house
has
actually
a
garage
under
on
the
rear
of
it
with
proposing
the
same
concept,
we're
not
moving
the
curb
cut
and
obviously
with
that
at
that
24
by
26
edition
off
the
rear
there.
BD
That
two
car
garage
would
be
basically
under
part
of
the
two
and
a
half
story
frame
and
the
additional
ten
feet
would
become
a
flat
roof
that
would
entertain
the
deck
for
that
house.
AG
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
lindsay.
Santana
from
the
office
of
paper
experiences
and
a
voters
meeting
was
held
on
august
31st,
2020
and
the
applicant
received
the
support
of
the
jamaica
hills,
association
and
the
jamaica
indiana
council.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
support.
Thank
you.
V
B
Thank
you
very
much
on
the
next
case,
calling
voa
one
one,
two
one,
six,
four,
four
one:
forty
three
dentistry,
mr
wrecked,
a
new
single
family
dwelling,
divine
least
article
56,
section,
39
rsp
markings
insufficient
article
56,
section
8.
A
lot
with
is
insufficient
article
56,
section
8
law
brunswick
is
insufficient.
B
CL
Well,
brendan
donovan
143
death.
AL
AL
All
right
so
we're
proposing
to
tear
down
and
rebuild
an
existing
single
family.
The
existing
home
is,
I
believe,
1075
square
feet.
The
new
proposed
home,
the
finished
first
second
floor
will
be
2
690
square
feet,
not
including
the
basement.
AL
It's
going
to
be
a
four
bedroom:
three
and
a
half
bathroom
single
family
homes,
a
big
reason
for
doing
this
project,
at
least
for
brenton
and
his
father
john.
I
was
to
actually
have
john
come
and
move
into
the
home
with
him.
John
will
kept
living
on
the
first
half,
so
we
won't
have
the
you
know
battling
with
the
stairs.
He
currently
lives
in
roslindale
right
now
and
really
really
needs
to
be
living
under
one
story.
A
CL
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
We
had
a
butters
meeting
back
in
october
october,
8th,
I
believe,
only
one
neighbor
attended,
who
was
in
support
brendan
then
went
before
the
west
rocks
neighborhood
council
on
october
27th
and
received
their
full
support.
V
A
It
a
second
all
those
in
favor
he
opposed
motion
carries.
I
noticed
fonzie
that
you
are
on
and
I
notice
eric
that
you
two
are
on,
I
don't
know,
is
jean
on.
No,
we
had
hoped
to
have
an
end
of
year,
conversation
with
you,
eric
with
you
hanzi
at
all
board
members,
but
it
looks
like
this
meeting
is
going
to
run
pretty
late.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
two
and
perhaps
the
rest
of
the
board
is
available
for
perhaps
a
45-minute
conversation
next
week.
A
A
A
Okay,
so,
let's
and
and
all
the
board
members
who
are
at
this
meeting,
please
make
sure
you're
on
it
and
can
I
ask
kevin
if
you
can
set
it
up?
Okay,
that
would
be
fantastic.
Thank
you.
So
much
guys,
sorry,
everybody.
Thank
you.
No
worries
bye-bye.
Y
B
We're
gonna
call
the
next
case
calling
boa
one:
zero,
zero.
Four
six,
seven,
two
two
forty
nine
corey
road.
This
is
a
changing
of
nursing
home
to
a
multi-family
residential
erect,
49
344
square
feet,
four-story
34-unit
building
in
basement
with
33
parking
spaces.
The
violations,
article
51
section,
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
use
of
forbidden
use
building.
Is
it
forbidden
article
51,
section
9?
The
florida
region
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
9,
the
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
Article
51,
section,
9,
the
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
51,
section
9
in
the
ad
setback,
is
sufficient.
Article
51
section
9
on
the
front
yard,
set
back
on
jordan
street.
Isn't
sufficient
article
51
section
56,
austria
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
57.2
the
front
modal
alignment
of
corey
road
mark
is
not
vet.
Article
51
section
56
ostrich
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
57.3
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner
payment
address
for
the
record.
CJ
Good
afternoon,
mr
secretary,
madam
chair
attorney
joe
hanley
mcdermott
quilting
miller,
28
state
street
in
boston
here
on
behalf
of
the
proponent
jeff
furman
of
brookline
development,
corp
who's.
Also
on
the
line.
Also
with
me
is
the
project
architect,
niddy
john
from
privilege,
czelinski
architects.
Just
briefly
to
give
you
the
details,
madam
chair,
if
I
may,
this
site
is
approximately
17
952
square
foot
lot
at
249,
corey
road
in
brighton
towards
the
top
of
the
hill.
CJ
What
is
being
proposed
is
to
remove
a
existing
non-conforming
structure,
which
was
formerly
the
corey
nursing
home
building
on
this
oversized
lot
in
the
2f
5000
zone,
with
a
new
residential
development
of
four
stories
for
34
residential
units
with
33
parking
spaces.
I
will
note
too,
that
the
bedroom
counts
for
these.
These
is
of
these
32
34
units.
A
majority
of
them
are
two
bedroom
units
and
they
are
nearly
a
thousand
square
feet,
so
they
are
intended
to
provide
options
for
young
families
and
generously
sized
two
bedrooms.
CJ
There
are
16
one
bedrooms
that
are
up
to
800
square
feet
and
no
studios
whatsoever,
there's
also
almost
8
000
square
feet
of
open
space,
which
includes
a
17
17,
I'm
sorry,
8,
000
square
feet
of
open
space,
which
includes
a
1700
square
foot,
rear
courtyard,
as
well
as
1500
square
feet
of
roof
terraced
spaces.
CJ
L
A
CJ
Yes
ma'am,
so
this
this
we
have
.97
spaces,
which
is
essentially
one
per
unit,
and
those
are
all
garage
spaces
that
are
and
that
have
a
driveway
off
jordan
road,
which
is
as
far
away
from
the
intersection
of
corey
and
that's
something
that
was
carefully
developed
with
btd
and
the
bpda
through
the
article
80
process.
We
actually
came
in
with
more
parking
than
that,
madam
chair
and
the
community
and
the
city
through
the
bpda
had
asked
us
to
adjust
the
parking
down.
CJ
We
think
that
one
per
per
unit
is
sufficient.
We
would
have
liked
a
little
more
we're,
also
needing
relief
to
have
some
tandem
spaces
which
you'll
see
on
the
plan,
not
all
tandem
spaces.
Just
that
small
section
towards
the
middle
top
that
you
see
down
in
the
plan
on
the
right
and
those
we
would
be.
CJ
CJ
So
the
the
roof
terrace
is
1500
square
feet,
it's
common
to
the
building,
but
the
way
mr
fuhrman
has
several
very
high
quality,
long-term
tenant
rental
buildings
in
brighton
and
the
way
they
work
on.
This
is,
and
it's
kind
of
coveted
reflected
if
you
will,
where
they're
they're
broken
into
movable
sections
and
reserved
for
folks
in
the
buildings.
So
listening
to
you,
madam
chair,
and
the
members
of
the
board
about
good
sized
units,
it's
also
important
that
folks
have
open
space
on
the
development,
so
we're
pretty
proud
of
that.
A
Roof
space
and
if
you
look
at
the
back
hold
on
hold
on
joe
I'm
sorry
collette,
can
you
please
show
us
the
the
roof,
the
the
roof
terrace?
CJ
Yeah
and
the
other
because
we
are
seeking
relief
for
the
rear
yard
is,
is
the
courtyard
at
the
rear
which
you'll
see
on
the
landscape
plan,
which
I
believe
is
a
few
clicks
down
from
where
you
are
right
now,
and
that
space
is
approximately
1500
square
feet
of
pretty
lush.
CJ
You
know
blue
stone,
courtyard
sort
of
patio
space
that
is
also
accessible
off
the
units
in
the
rear.
So
I
think
if
you
keep
going
down
nitty
on
this
sorry,
I'm
on
mine
too,
here,
if
you
can,
if
you
go
down
you'll
see
the
landscape
plan
is
age.
CM
A
Because
I
was
just
curious
to
see
how
you
blocked
out
the
roof
terrace
so
that
there
were,
you
know
mods
or
you
know,
split-off
spaces.
BC
CJ
Way
they
do
that
madam
chair
and
jeff
pearman
can
talk
about.
It
is
to
use
planters
and
bollards
that
are
movable
and
I'm
sorry.
We.
CJ
A
Okay,
mr
olek,
how
are
the
plans.
G
The
drawings
are
very
nice.
My
only
question
is
context.
This
seems
like
a
surprisingly
large
project
in
the
middle
of
a
neighborhood.
That
is
mostly
you
know,
small
two
or
three
smaller
multi-family.
CJ
CJ
If
you
look
at
the
front
photo
of
the
site,
it
all
goes
up
towards
the
back,
and
so
what
we
did
with
the
architecture
is
we
took
the
building
and
kind
of
set
it
into
the
grade
and
then
the
third
level
steps
back
to
the
fourth
level,
if
you
will
and
that
helps
to
kind
of
mitigate
and
put
it
into
context-
and
I
think
niddy
has
at
the
end
of
that
presentation.
CJ
You
know
there
are
a
few
renderings
that
show
how
it
then
begins
to
comport,
considering
the
undulation
of
the
site.
A
Okay,
so
is
there
a
great
change
between?
No,
I
guess
there
isn't.
So
all
the
great
change
is
on
this
property
in
brighton,
the
brookline
lots
are
still
on
grade
or
are
they
fairly
level.
CJ
Yes,
jordan
then
goes
up
again,
so
that's
the
undulating,
and
so
that's
why
it
was
so
important
for
us
to
move
the
vehicular
entrance
and
we
also
created
a
separate
ingress
space
for
amazon
and
uber
and
lyft,
and
all
that
as
far
away
from
that
intersection,
because
it
becomes
down
towards
the
intersection
it
sort
of
drops
down
into
a
little
ravine.
If
you
will
so
it's
a
very
unique
property
and.
A
So,
and
so
this
is
on
a
separate
lot
from
the
brookline
lots,
because,
because
if
the
developer
should
go
ahead
and
develop
the
second,
those
other
lots,
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
this
this
project
sits
on
its
own
bottom.
Yes,
there
isn't,
you
know
shared
parking
or
parking.
A
CJ
CN
CN
There
were
two
public
meetings,
one
before
the
pandemic
in
person
at
the
brighton,
marine
and
then
another.
The
most
recent
was
september
24th
of
2020..
They
also
met
with
the
brighton
allison
improvement
several
times,
olson
brighton
improvement
association
several
times
where
they
scaled
back
the
building
away
from
from
neighbors.
They
worked
closely
in
creating
that
other
egress,
specifically
for
delivery
vehicles
and
ubers,
and
addressed
a
lot
of
concerns
of
the
neighborhood.
CO
L
Okay,
go
ahead.
CO
Jennifer
goldsmith,
148,
jordan
road,
so
I
live
in
the
house
that
abuts
the
two
brookline
lots.
So
you
know
next
to
the
next
to
the
new
building,
and
I
I
just
want
to
comment
both
that
mr
fuhrman
and
his
team
have
met
multiple
times
with
the
community
and
we
brookline
and
austin
brighton
have
met
together
with
him.
We
don't
sort
of
see
a
big
dividing
line.
CO
CG
CO
Number
five
washington
project
is
two
blocks
away.
Winchester
is
two
blocks
away
with
a
number
of
three
or
four
story:
brick
buildings.
So
this
isn't
so
out
of
character
and
given
that
it's
going
to
be
built-
and
it's
been
an
inactive
nursing
home,
we
feel
like-
and
I
have
neighbors-
and
I
who
have
signed
a
letter
to
this
effect-
that
this
is
a
reasonable
use
and
a
responsible
response
to
the
community's
concerns,
and
thank
you.
O
CC
V
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
city
conference
usabi,
georgia's
office,
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Annabelle.
CP
CQ
Madam
champions
aboard
paul
sullivan
on
behalf
of
city
council
live
michael
flaherty
concert
to
go
on
record
and
support,
as
well
as
going
record
support
for
143
dent
street.
The
last
project.
CQ
A
CJ
B
CR
CR
This
deck
was
built
in
2019
2018.,
the
original
deck
was.
There
was
an
original.
X
CR
On
the
roof
of
that
was
115
square
feet,
we're
proposing
we're
trying
to
make
corrections
to
that
deck.
That
was
built
in
2018
as
an
expansion
and
bring
it
up
to
code.
A
So
was
it
built
with
with
adequate,
with
with
adequate
permits.
CR
No,
it
was
not,
it
was
a.
It
was
a
miscommunication
between
the
homeowners
association,
the
owner
and
the
contractor.
CR
A
CR
CR
There's
this
this
floor
is
a
penthouse
level.
It's
one
level
below
the
main
roof
of
the
building,
and
this
deck
is
dedicated
to
just
the
homeowner's
use.
A
I
no
no
no
please
hold
on
mr
owlette.
Can
you
please
help
clarify.
CR
G
G
All
right,
so
so
it's
a
step
out
deck.
So
that's
fine,
but
you
said
it
had
to
be
code
compliant.
Why
was.
CR
The
the
problem
with
the
original
deck
was
that
when
it
was
constructed,
it
didn't
have
any
tie-down
devices
in
terms
of
storm
uplift
and
then
also
the
loading
on
the
the
roof
wasn't
adequately
distributed
and
the
the
new
design,
the
revisions
to
the
deck
incorporate
distribution
of
that
load
across
the
roof.
G
CR
CR
Yeah,
well,
it
went
from
115
and
then
the
proposed
deck,
the
adjusted
and
corrected
deck
would
be
534.
A
Okay,
any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AQ
From
councillor
springs,
please
know
we
are
not
necessarily
opposed
to
the
project.
We
appreciate
the
owners
willingness
to
reach
out
and
get
your
office
with
any
questions
concerns
we
had
on
the
proposal
at
the
same
time
as
root.
Decks
might
also
be
a
concerns
for
the
same
defense,
lower
end
neighborhood
association
as
well
as
neighbors
in
the
area.
We
would
like
to
see
a
little
further
engagement
with
the
community
on
this
issue
before
proceeding.
Thank
you.
G
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
approve,
but
I'm
going
to
ask
for
bpda
to
sign
you,
because
this
is
a
trust,
bold
increase
in
the
size
of
the
deck,
and
I
think
that
the
it
would
benefit
from
from
being
reviewed
for
for
the
scale.
BO
D
B
Following
the
first
case
for
rediscussion
calling
voa
961
465
36
37
monmouth
street,
this
is
a
change
of
oxy
from
two
to
four
unit
residential
renovate
direct
addition
with
head
house
and
roof
deck.
The
violation
article
53
section
9,
the
poor
family
dwelling
use
is
forbidden.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53
section,
the
9
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
53,
section,
9,
the
height,
is
excessive
in
story.
B
P
For
the
record,
please
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
lin's
245
sumner
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner,
we're
back
before
the
board
for
rediscussion
after
a
deferral
that
has
resulted
in
some
changes
to
this
project,
which
I
do
have,
and
I
believe
war
has
as
well,
several
of
which
would
have
eliminated
some
of
the
variances
that
were
being
requested.
P
As
the
secretary
indicated,
this
is
a
pre-existing
two-family,
bundling
it's
located
in
eagle
hill,
section
of
east
boston.
Our
proposal
would
involve
the
complete
rehabilitation
of
the
interior
of
this
building,
while
the
exterior
is
in
somewhat
of
good
condition,
we
propose
obviously
to
preserve
the
existing
structure.
We
will
also
make
some
improvements
consistent
with
the
guidelines
and
suggestions
of
the
hill
civic
association
standards
that
they
have
for
properties
in
eagle
hill.
P
I
want
to
highlight
for
the
board
a
couple
of
the
changes
that
we've
made
when
once
we
heard
opposition
from
director
butters.
This
is
so
so.
A
Council,
can
you
just
tell
us
what
is
being
proposed?
I'm
not
kind
of
interested
in
the
changes
I'm
interested
in
what
the
zoning
requires
and
what
you're
proposing.
P
Sure
so
this
is
a
2f2
000
district,
while
the
long
and
pre-existing
use
would
be
conforming.
We're
proposing
to
make
changes
that
would
result
in
several
dimensional
violations,
as
well
as
the
use
the
proposed
use
would
be
four
units
versus
the
two
units
and
again
this
would
result.
This
would
be
the
result
of
a
small
addition
to
the
rear,
which
would
be
two
stories
total
and
a
small
addition
to
the
existing
third
level,
which
presently
doesn't
go
all
the
way
back
to
the
rear
portion
of
the
property.
P
P
Occupancy
in
the
basin
is
proposed,
all
of
the
living
would
be
on
levels,
one
two
and
a
half
level.
The
third
one
of
the
units
is
a
two
bedroom
plus
and
the
others
are
all
one
bedroom
all
one
bath.
P
Was
the
original?
I
think
the
description
has
remained
the
same
adams
here,
but
that
house,
since
our
last
year,
both
the
head
house
and
the
roof
deck
above
the
third
level
have
been
eliminated.
If
we
can
go
to
the
elevation,
I
believe
it's
the
next,
I
believe
to
the
next
screen.
I
think
we're
showing
existing
conditions
there.
P
The
addition
now
on
the
top
level
only
goes
back
about
five
feet
and
there
was
a
roof
deck
that
would
sit
above
the
second
level
no
longer
above
the
third
level.
Again,
this
is
to
address
specific
issues
that
we've
heard
from
hunters
regarding
a
view
quarter
that
would
allow-
or
at
least
a
lot
of
continued
view.
This
that's
the
city,
skyline.
T
With
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
run
the
record
support
during
the
community
process,
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
through
paris
meetings
where
the
applicant
addressed
several
of
the
concerns.
We
also
received
two
letters
of
support
from
director
parents.
Thank
you.
O
Madam
chair
counselor,
ricardo
patron
from
council
edward's
office,
would
also
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
they're
having
issues
on
getting
back
into
webex,
but
they
did
send
an
email.
Okay.
Thank
you.
L
P
Thank
you
very
much
and
having
a.
A
O
A
B
This
is
to
correct
and
unsafe,
remove
the
front
facade
of
the
building
and
structural
elements
and
the
violations
article
13
13-1,
insufficient
radioactive
setback,
article
32,
section
4:
this
is
in
the
g-card
and
for
building
code
we
have
the
9th
edition
780
cmi
chapter
7,
section,
705.8,
exterior
wall
openings
proposed
three
feet
from
the
lot
line
is
not
permitted
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AD
My
name
is
stephen
kane
173,
norfolk,
ave
roxbury
mass
also
on
this
call
today
is
the
is
the
homeowner
here,
david
trust
and
cbt
architects,
dan
gellar
armini
and
alfred
wojowski
harry
burles
and
chris
erickson
from
mcphail
geotechnical
engineers
and
jeff
lewis
from
boston
coastal,
consulting
civil
engineers
and
mark
berth
hume
from
greenberg
tauric
attorney.
A
So
you
know,
as
is
usually
our
place,
we
deal
with
the
building
code
violation
first,
before
going
to
the
essence
of
the
case,
so
tell
us
about
something
called
violations.
Are
you
still
requesting
that
those
those
that
really
from
the
building
code.
AD
A
Okay,
so
if
so,
so,
you
are
still
continuing
to
request
building
code
relief,
then
yes,
is
this
building
proposed
to
be
sprinkled,
sprinkle
it
in
any
way?
Yes,
okay!
So,
mr
early,
please
does
that
respond
to
the
to
this
request
or
this
response
to
the
building
code.
Well,.
G
I
mean
we
as,
as
you
said
we
verge,
except
in
the
case
of
head
houses
and
hatches.
We
never
grant
building
code
release
and
I'm
reluctant
to
do
so
in
this
situation
there
are.
There
are
other
alternatives,
routes
that
the
applicant
has,
but
I
don't
think
that
we
should
break
a
precedent.
Can.
A
CS
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
christian
siminelli,
boston,
groundwater
trust.
Well,
we
do
have
the
bwsc
approval
and
no
harmless
from
the
applicant.
I
would
request
a
hold
for
signature
at
this
time.
CS
My
reasoning
behind
that
is
that
it's
my
understanding
that
there's
been
ongoing
discussions
between
the
proponent
and
some
of
butters
and
there
needs
to
be
a
modification
to
the
approved
groundwater
recharge
system.
So,
therefore,
we
would
need
a
new
set
of
plans
and,
with
the
new
set
of
plans,
would
come
a
new
boston,
water
and
sewer
approval
letter
highlighting
those
changes.
A
Thank
you
so
please,
mr
payne
and
team
tell
us
what's
being
proposed
and
why
you're
before
us.
AD
We
are
we're
before
you
because
we
thought
we
were
doing
a
buy
right
renovation
and,
at
some
point
isd
would
deep
into
this
with
all
sorts
of
short
form
permits
for
various
aspects
of
this
isd
said:
oh
well,
this
isn't
this
isn't
a
renovation.
This
is
new
construction,
so
we,
anyway,
the
existing
rear
wall.
AD
A
Okay,
what
is
the
best
sheath
that
we
should
be
looking
at
so
that
collect
can
get
through?
So
we
can
see
what
this
proposed
building
looks
like.
CT
Sure
dan
joe
armini,
from
cbt,
architects,
110
canal
street
boston,.
L
CU
Sorry
guys
it's
a
little
bit
slow
just
because
the
pages
I.
CT
Thank
you.
The
intent
is
to
rebuild
the
home
to
the
exact
envelope
and
dimensions
that
it
previously
existed.
We
had
done
some
demolition
to
correct
some
deficiencies
in
the
structure
and
the
waterproofing,
and
so
what
we're
doing
is
we're
we're
in
we're
attempting
to
rebuild
the
home.
The
square
footage
will
remain
the
same.
The
gross
square
footage
if
you
here
we
go
so
the
basement
level
here
is
below
grade
parking.
There's
mechanical
space
utility
space
in
laundry
on
the
basement
level.
CT
BK
CU
CT
In
the
third
floor
remains
the
same:
there'll
be
a
den
area
and
a
roof
deck.
X
AD
AU
A
Yes,
okay
and
and
daniel,
as
you
said,
you
maintain
the
envelope
you're
going
to
still
have
a
garage
door
that
will
allow
you
to
drop
a
car
into
the
basement
and
you
will
have
a
a
car
on
that.
That
level.
Two
great.
CV
A
Okay,
so
two-car
garage
will
you
have
a
roof
deck.
BH
CM
CT
So
you
know
in
a
large
part,
the
exterior
and
the
interior
is
remaining
identical
to
what
was
previously
there.
G
The
plans
are
thorough,
they're,
fine.
A
Okay,
so
and
then
why
so,
let's
see
what
was
christian
referring
to,
I
know
we
have
to
hold
it
for
signature,
but
what
discussions
might
result
in
you
changing
the
location
of
your
system,
your
recharge
system.
CT
I'd
like
actually
to
have
jeff
lewis,
our
civil
engineer
answer
it,
because
he
can
obviously
be
more
accurate
and
more
detailed
in
the
explanation.
Jeffrey,
are
you
available?
Okay,.
AZ
Yes,
based
on
the
based
on
the
comments
from
the
butters,
we've
moved
the
system
to
the
center
of
the
building
of
seven
biggest
place.
AZ
We've
also
addressed
the
overflow
and
put
a
drain
out
in
the
street,
so
the
overflow
will
drain
out
of
a
catch
basin,
so
those
plans
will
be
resubmitted
to
boston
water.
Sewer
we've
been
in
contact
with
both
them
and
christian
on
this
to
get
final
approval
from
boston
sewer
on
these.
L
Okay,
okay,.
A
Let's
see
how
about
and
said
mark
did
I
ask
you
how
the
plans
were
yeah.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
F
Oh
yeah
rob
whitney;
yes,
I'm
I'm
sorry,
I'm
trying
to
unmute.
This
is
robert
whitney,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
beacon
hill,
civic
association.
I
wanted
to
note
that
the
we
are
speaking
in
support
of
the
requested
zoning
relief.
We
had
three
meetings
of
our
zoning
and
licensing
committee
and,
after
lots
of
discussion,
we
determined
to
not
oppose
the
requested
zoning
release.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
S
You've
committed
the
board.
May
I
speak
yes,
this
is
shanice
pimento
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
proposal
has
participated
in
an
extensive
community
process
and
at
this
time
there
is
substantial
opposition
on
record
this
property
abuts
the
park
street
school
on
beacon
hill.
We
have
received
many
letters
of
opposition
from
parents
of
students
at
the
school
who
are
concerned
about
the
safety
of
the
school's
property
in
regards
to
the
water
and
infiltration.
S
S
A
So
from
what
I
can
understand
is
that
what
is
what
is
the
name
of
the
school
again
up
there
on
people,
so
the
park
street
school
is
concerned
about
the
groundwater
infill,
the
groundwater
infiltration
system
affecting
their
building
is
that
what
I
can
understand
is
the
bottom
line.
S
I
believe
the
abutters
just
have
issues
because
they're
the
plans
reflected
something
different.
There
was
a
updated
plans
for
the
groundwater
infiltration
and
they
just
want
the
plans
to
be
submitted
to
boston,
water
and
sewer
commission,
and
for
that,
for
those
the
updated
plans
to
be
approved
by
them.
I
believe
they
haven't
done
so
yet.
A
Okay,
so
as
I
understand
as
I
understand
it,
then
it's
the
ground
since
it's
just
a
simple
one:
family
dwelling,
the
the
the
the
groundwater
system,
whatever
it
may
end
up
being
and
where
it
might
end
up
being
located,
is
what's
of
interest
to
the
park
street
school,
and
the
second
is
that
far,
but
it
looks
like
the
far
has
for
the
most
part
been
resolved,
because
I
just
can't
see
that
there
would
be
significant
decr
discrepancy
between
the
isd
calculations
and
anything
else.
Yes,
I
agree
with
that.
Madam
chair.
Okay,.
S
S
A
A
Is
there
anybody
online,
representing
kenzie
bach
or
does
the
counselor
just
want
to
remain
silent
on
this.
A
A
CU
Okay,
yeah
jessica.
She
actually
can't
hear
anyone
right
now
so
she's,
just
she's
working
on
it.
Okay,.
CV
A
CV
Madam
chair,
we
support
the
denial
of
the
building
code
violation.
We
support
the
change
to
the
g-cod
and
resubmission,
and
there
have
been
this
discussions
with
the
neighborhood
and
the
school
whereby
the
plans
were
changed.
The
architect
mentioned
earlier
that
the
interior
is
being
built
exactly
as
it
was
that's
true
in
terms
of
the
discussions
we've
had,
but
not
true
in
terms
of
the
plans
that
are
before
you.
CV
The
difference
between
the
plans
that
are
before
you
and
what
the
of
applicant
has
promised
to
the
neighborhood
is
that
they've
agreed
to
do
a
sloping,
rear
roof
on
the
third
floor
instead
of
a
full
height
third
floor
as
these
plants
represent.
So
our
understanding
is
that
they
need
to
submit
revised
plans
with
the
revised,
far
calculations
to
isd
before
this
can
move
forward.
A
Okay,
so
this,
how
does
okay
so
you
are
requesting
a
sloping
rear
roof
at
the
top
of
the
at
the
topmost
floor.
A
A
Q
L
Q
See
in
the
chat
that
alarm
brodie
wrote
that
john
spelaine
from
council
box
office
is
unable
to
speak,
I'm
searching
for
him,
but
I
don't
see
his
name
on
anywhere,
where
I'd
be
able
to
unmute
him.
A
Okay,
so
he
sits
in
the
chat
and
by
you
reading
it
out
loud
it's
in
the
record,
so
we
end,
but.
A
So,
yes,
exactly
can
we
get
a
sense
from
lauren
brody
if
he's
in
support,
if
the
counselor
isn't
supporter
in
opposition
in
the
meantime,
may
I
have
a
response
from
the
applicant
whoever
chooses
to
respond,
because
I
understood
that
the
envelope
was
supposed
to
stay
exactly
the
same.
Can
you
respond
to
this
sloping
weird
roof
thing,
yeah.
A
So
is
that
reflected
in
the
drawings
that
are
in
front
of
the
board
and
which
page
is
it
on.
CT
We
we
haven't
resubmitted
the
the
rear,
sloped
roof.
G
Madam
chair,
can
I
make
a
suggestion.
There
seem
to
be
enough
between
the
groundwater
issue,
between
the
building
the
slow
roof
and
between
the
building
code
relief,
which
will
require
some
redesign.
It
sounds
to
me
like
a
deferral
might
be
in
order,
because
they've
got
something.
A
I'd
actually
like
to
surface
all
the
issues
and
hold
everything
for
signature
until
we
get
the
revised
points
this.
This
has
taken
up
a
lot
of
space
a
lot
of
time,
and
so
I'd
like
to
have
a
decision
made
by
us.
We
can
hold
for
signature
until
we
get
water
and
sewer
and
hold
for
signature
until
we
get
the
revised
drawings
and
we
have
an
understanding
that
the
applicant
has
in
fact
touched
base
with
the
abutters.
A
CM
CM
CM
Additionally,
our
office
is
grateful
to
the
proponents
for
adjustments
in
their
plans
in
order
to
restore
the
slanted
roof
line
of
the
prior
building
and
relocate
hvac
systems
to
the
second,
rather
than
third
floor
deck
and
hope
to
see
those
plans
submitted
as
well.
Our
office
is
also
aware
of
potential
fire
code
issue
regarding
the
rear
windows.
However,
the
counselor
is
not
well
versed
in
this
matter
to
weigh
in
but
ask
the
board
to
review
this
matter
as
well.
A
So
so
may
I
have
a
motion.
A
I
L
I
Usually
you
come
prepared,
especially
after
being
deferred
already,
but
I'll,
make
a
motion
to
approve
hold
the
signature
for.
I
I
Off
motion
approved
holds
the
signature
for
the
data
ground
system
and
I
plans
with
the
sloped
roof.
A
I
A
Okay
motion
carries
because
there
are
five
in
support,
so
just
know
that
this
is
not
to
the
applicant
just
know
that
this
is
not
going
anywhere
until
we
get
all
these
pieces
in
place
and
we
are
sure
that
groundwater
is
taken
care
of
and
that
we
understand
what
that
roof
design
is
going
to
look
like.
Thank
you.
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
104
6244
3305
to
3307
washington
street.
This
is
to
combine
existing
lots.
2257
lot,
2258,
it's
a
1,
9,
378
square
foot.
Lot
addition
renovation
should
create
four-story,
mixed-use
buildings,
change,
oxford
office
to
one
apartment
and
intern
overnight
accommodation
to
a
commercial
space.
Multi-Family
dwelling
14
units
in
garage
12
vehicles,
upper
floor
units
will
have
individual
roof
decks
evaluation.
Article
55
section
40
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
B
Article
55
section
40.5,
a
off-street
parking
design,
maneuverability
article
55,
section
41
conforming
with
the
existing
building
alignment
articles
by
section
8
of
multi-family
article
55,
section
8,
the
commercial
space
is
forbidden.
Article
55,
section,
8
accessory
blocking
is
forbidden.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
lottery
positions
volume
is
insufficient.
Article
55
section
9
the
floor.
Air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
article
55
69,
the
building
height
number
of
stories.
That's
excessive
article
55,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
CW
Tim
johnson,
architect,
599
east
broadway
boston
with
my
client,
brian
markland,
I'm
madam
clear
members
of
the
board.
This
project
was
before
the
board
this
past
march,
an
additional
renovation
to
create
15
residential
units,
one
commercial
with
eight
parking
spaces.
At
that
time,
the
board
felt
the
project
was
too
dense
and
gave
us
the
opportunity
to
defer.
CW
Out
of
respect
for
the
jamaica,
plain
civic
associations,
we
asked
the
bpda
for
a
tenth,
affordable
unit
and
he
agreed.
Therefore,
the
project
before
the
board
is
an
additional
renovation
to
create
10
residential
units.
One
commercial
unit
and
10
parking
spaces
combine
two
lots.
The
existing
victorian
building
will
be
largely
preserved
and
renovated
into
four
duplex
units.
CW
A
So
I'm
sorry
so
this
is
I'm
tell
us
which
drawing
we
should
look
at.
So
I'm
seeing
this
is
the
corner
of
here
in.
CW
A
Okay
and
tell
us
how
parking
is
going
to
work
if.
CW
We
could
scroll
down
a
few
more
3d
views
to
the
site
plan.
Please
all
right
right!
Next
one!
Please
thank
you.
So
you
can
see
ophir
street
on
the
right.
We
have
an
existing
curb
cut
where
we'll
access,
eight
garage
parking
spaces
and
this
isn't
the
site
plan.
So
two
off
street
parking
spaces
were
cut
off
at
the
top,
so
there'll
be
ten
spaces.
CW
Provided.
Madam
chair.
CW
L
I
I
have
a
comment
I
had
to
see
you
went
with
ten
with
one
or
four.
I
think
that
nine
would
have
been
a
sad
thing
and
I'm
glad
to
see
you
did
that.
So
I
want
to
commend
that.
A
Yes,
we
were
seeing
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
nines
won't.
We
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
BI
D
This
is
chef
anthony
from
the
bpda.
I
would
like
to
echo
tim
johnson's
comments
that
the
bpda
is
in
support
of
this
redesign
last
time
that
they
had
their
hearing.
We
were
against
this
proposal,
but
I
can't
confirm
that
the
bpda
is
in
support
of
this.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
V
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
counselor
sabi
georgie's
office,
I'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you.
CW
A
And
so
colette
can
you
pull
those
up
so
how
many
bedrooms
are
in
that
basement.
L
A
Okay,
okay,
so,
given
that
information
and
given
the
fact
of
the
new
construction
being
so
close
to
this
victorian,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
I.
I
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
what
bpda
design
review,
especially
on
addition
part,
maybe
like
a
man,
side,
roof
or
something
to
make
it
look
more
with
everything
else,
but
emotion,.
A
And
then
no
no
bedrooms.
A
So
we're
going
to
take
like
a
10
minute
break,
because
I
want
to
make
sure
that
mr
class,
this
is
on
for
the
rest
of
our
conversation
for
the
rest
of
us.
B
Mountain
chair
yeah
before
we
go
any
further,
is
parent
street
on
madam
ambassador,
because
I
have
it
in
my
records
that
they're
going
to
be
deferring.
CD
A
Mr
rivera
stop,
may
I
have
a
motion
for
deferral.
Make.
B
A
30
12
30.,
so
we're
going
to
take
a
10
minute
break
and
we
will
resume
precisely
at
3
40..
Please
keep
an
eye
out
for
costa
so
that
we
can
proceed
when
he
gets
on
and
that
he
doesn't
assume
we're.
A
A
Appeal
for
december,
8th
is
back
in
session,
miss
the
fortune.
Please
go
ahead.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Only
the
next
two
cases
calling
voa
971
287
643
morton
street.
There
is
a
companion
case,
boa
971,
286
643
morton
street.
This
is
a
change
of
auctioning
from
child
care
center
to
a
three
family
dwelling,
no
work
to
be
done.
The
violation
is
article
60,
section
9..
The
additional
lot
area
is
insufficient
in
madam
chair.
We
have
building
code.
B
CX
Yes,
good
afternoon,
adam
chair
members
of
the
board
joseph
feaster
from
the
law
firm
of
mckenzie
and
associates,
183,
state
street,
sweet
steaks,
boston
and
I
just
want
to
say
I've.
I've
bought
it
out
for
dinner
and
for
hotel
spaces
for
you
guys.
But
this
is.
CD
A
Participated
can
you
hold
on
a
second?
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
have
a
full,
a
full
board
here,
mr
fortune
you're
here,
mr
pollock
you're
here,
mr
rogerio,
are
you
back
I'm
here
perfect?
Mr
legris,
are
you
back.
BH
A
Thank
you,
mr
davao.
Are
you
on
okay?
So
it
looks
like
we
are
a
sixth
member
board.
Please
give
me
a
heads
up
when
mr
ligras
joins
us
again
go
ahead.
Mr
feaster.
CX
Madam
chair,
thank
you
very
much
and
I
want
to
say
hello.
It's
unfortunate.
I
won't
have
the
pleasure
of
seeing
all
of
you
in
person,
as
particularly
the
new
members
of
the
board,
who
have
yet
to
meet
so
welcome
to
the
board
of
appeals.
It's
a
great
board-
and
I'm
happy
to
be
here
today.
Along
with
me,
is
the
architect
michael
washington,
miss
thomas.
I
believe
he
may
be
on
phone
if
you
could
admit
him.
CX
CX
It
will
be
michael
washington,
and
I
know
you
want
to
talk
about
the
building
code
initially,
so
let
me
start
there
with
at
least
trying
to
frame
it
and
see
if
I
can
convince
the
board
of
the
reason
why
we're
still
seeking
to
build
a
code
release
this
three
family
building
is
owned
by
the
by
the
a
church
in
in
in
dorchester
holy
tabernacle,
and
then
they
had.
CX
For
my
understanding,
some
of
this
was
this
may
have
been
more
than
just
during
the
day.
There
may
have
been
overnight
as
well,
but
as
siobhan
scott
is
also
on
here,
miss
thomas,
so
I
would
have
her
or
possibly,
mr
washington
might
be
better
to
elaborate
on
that
particular
aspect
of
it.
There
has
been,
and
there
is
now
a
very
elaborate
and
intricate
alarm
system,
which
I
would
like
them
to
speak
to
you
on.
A
CX
Well,
that's
what
you
well
see,
madam
chair
you've,
gotten
to
know
me
too
well
over
the
years,
and
yes,
what
I
am
attempting
to
do
here
is
to
say
that,
in
that
the
the
so-called
change
of
loose
is
a
slight
change
from
or
even
a
lesser
change
than
what
was
there
previously.
CX
And
yes,
in
the
direct
response
to
your
question,
I
am
trying
to
say
that
this
elaborate
alarm
system
should
be
should
subs
can
substitute
for
the
sprinkler
system.
Yes,
a
sprinkler
system
which,
by
the
way
with
we,
where
yes
in
in
keeping
with
the
possibility
that
the
board
would
not
permit
this,
is
somewhere
in
the
vicinity.
I
believe
of
30
something
thousand
dollars
for
them
to
install
for,
for
this
three
family.
A
Michael
washington,
on
mr
washington,
can
you
tell
us
you
know
you're
a
registered
architect?
Can
you
tell
us
that,
in
fact,
this
is
a
good,
a
good
response
to
this?
This
request
for
building
code.
CY
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
for
sure.
Can
you
hear
me
I'll
say
unless
we
can't
agree?
I
thought
I
missed
you.
Yes,
this
is
it's.
We've
been
working
on
this
for
years
for
the
church
and
what's
happening
is
the
church
was
changed
from
three
family
house
to
daycare
and
it
came
got
to
the
point
where
they
need
to
change
back
and
we
only
want
to
change
back
to
a
three
family
house.
There's
not
any
construction
necessary.
A
A
CY
Well,
when
we
first
came
in,
we
asked
for
relief
on
the
sprinkler
system
and
we've
decided
that
I'd
be
better
to
go
ahead
and
put
the
sprinkler
system
in
now.
So
we
we're
going
to
withdraw
our
requests
for
for
relief
on
that
and
we're
going
to
put
the
sprinkler
system
in.
CX
A
Please
know
that
mr
feaster
was
our
past
chair
of
the
board,
and
so
he
knows
the
that
how
the
winds
change
here
so
those
that
are
on
the
on
the
occupancy.
CX
Yes,
I
will
have
mr
washington
do
that
as
well.
The
reality
is
that,
as
is
indicated,
there
is
not
going
to
be
any
any
work
done
on
this
particular
building.
The
issue
here,
the
zoning
violation
is,
is
simply.
Let
me
just
see
here.
The
only
violation
is
that
what
was
for
the
change
of
occupancy
is
that
it
was
only
nine.
There
was
only
nine
feet
short
of
what
was
required
for.
CY
So
washington,
can
you
elaborate
on
this
yeah
they're
they're,
really
they're
too
joel
one
is
the
number
of
units
that
they
changed
to.
Originally,
they
change
from
three
units
back
to
going
to
a
daycare
center
and
we
will
just
want
to
change
from
if
they
can
send
it
back
to
the
three
units.
CY
CY
G
Are
fine,
there's
no
work
to
be
done,
so
it's.
This
is
a
very
simple
process.
B
CY
A
So
thank
you
for
putting
that
on
the
record.
Okay,
because
it
sounds
like
it's
the
lock
requirement,
so
mr
olek
plans
are
adequate.
We
have
clarification
on
mr
fortune's
question.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
and
support.
AN
BP
Afternoon,
chair
witnessa
lesson
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
I
held
in
a
butters
meeting
for
this
project.
The
wellington
association
was
present
at
that
abutters
meeting
we'd
like
to
go
in
support
of
this
change
of
occupancy
from
the
care
to
the
three
family,
purely
because
it's
adding
more
housing
to
the
area
and
it's
returning
to
its
own
status.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
CX
C
A
All
those
in
favor
all
right,
any
opposed
motion
carries
you're
all
set
mr
washington,
mr
fisa
thank.
B
Follow
your
next
case
calling
voa
103
9457
1r
lorenzo
street
mr
combined
parcels
274
and
erect
a
new
two
and
a
half
two
family
dwelling
with
red
decks
and
four
r
street
parking
spaces.
The
violations,
article
65
section
42,
the
application
of
dimensional
requirement
conforming
to
an
existing
building
alignment,
article
65,
section
9..
The
number
of
allowed
habitable
stories
has
been
exceeded,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
CX
CW
Thank
you,
mr
feaster,
tim
johnson,
architect,
599
east
broadway
boston.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
client
shirley
and
george
bragel
are
proposing
to
erect
a
two-story
two
and
a
half
story.
Two
family
dwelling
with
four
off-street
parking
spaces
and
combine
two
lots.
CW
If
we
can
scroll
to
these
will
be
two
duplex
units.
The
first
floor
and
lower
level
unit
will
be
a
two
bedroom
unit
of
1324
square
feet.
Those
are
fine,
those
images
are
fine
and
the
upper
duplex
unit
will
be
three
bedroom
unit
at
1,
330
square
feet.
All
units
will
have
rear
decks
and
we
will
build
to
the
stretch
engine
code
for
city
code.
A
Okay,
mr
johnson,
I'm
looking
at
lorenzo
road
looks
like
these
are
all
attached
dwellings
and
it
looks
like
there's,
maybe
five
of
them.
The
last
one
ends
with
a
brick
with
a
bit
of
a
bay
window
and
is
the
is
that
vacant
lot.
Next
to
it.
The
lock
where
this
proposed
dwelling
is
going
to
go
in.
CW
Yes,
madam
chair,
that
has
that
is
correct
and
the
lot
behind
it,
which
is
landlocked,
we're
completing
the
the
lot
that
fronts
lorenzo
with
that
landlocked
parcel.
This
previously
had
an
address
of
six
berry
street,
but
we
are
orienting
the
building
toward
lorenzo
street.
A
And
is
it
a
separate
lot
or
you
know,
how
is
that
a
separate,
deeded
landlocked
lot
in
the
back?
Is
that
what
it
is.
CW
A
Okay
and
how
are
the
plans,
mr.
B
G
Thanks
mark,
I
wasn't
aware
the
drawings
are
a
little
problematic.
G
I
understand
the
reasoning
for
reorienting
from
barry
to
lorenzo,
but
by
doing
that,
you
created
a
rear
dwelling
in
front
yard
parking
because
the
the
the
given
that
the
entrance
now
is
from
lorenzo
you
got
four
cars
that
are
in
front
of
the
house
and
so
that's
a
problem.
The
other
problem
is
that
we've
got
below
grade
bedrooms.
CW
Yes,
the
the
lot
that
fronts
lorenzo
mr
ehrlich
contain
contained
the
original
parking
for
the
property.
There
was
an
existing
garage
there,
so
the
the
use
of
that
front
parcel
has
not
changed
it's
the
existing
driveway.
Well,
I
I.
CW
Right,
what
came
it
came
out
of
necessity?
You
can
see.
Barry
street
access
was
only
eight
feet
wide
to
the
to
the
landlocked
parcel.
There
was
no
room
to
to
navigate
from
the
parcel
to
berry
street
through
that
eight
foot
wide
passageway.
CW
G
I
know
I
mean
mr
johnson,
I
understand
the
logic,
I'm
saying
that
the
consequence
intended
or
unintended
is
that
the
result
is
frontier
parking,
which
is
a
which
is
a
problem
for
this
board.
A
So
so
so,
let's
go
to
the
building
the
proposed
two
and
a
half
unit
building
two
two
unit
building,
so
I
missed
out.
So
this
is
to
erect
a
two
and
a
half
story.
Two
family
dwelling.
Can
we
have
a
rendering
to
see
what
that
looks
like
when
what
is
the
square
foot
of
each
unit.
CW
Yes,
madam
chair
again,
these
are
duplex
units,
so
the
first
and
lower
level
is
a
two
bedroom
at
approximately
1
300
square
feet,
and
the
upper
duplex
unit
is
a
three
bedroom
at
approximately
1350
square
feet
and
to
address
mr
ehrlich's
comment
about
bedrooms
in
the
lower
level.
Unlike
the
older
utility
basements,
which
are
seven
eight
feet
below
grade
this
floor
is
five
and
a
half
feet
below
grade
with
a
generous
five
foot
by
five
foot
window.
Well,
an
interior
perimeter
drain
to
a
sump
and
we
are
outside
the
100
year,
flood
floodplain.
A
So,
mr
johnson,
the
issue
really
is
that
this
is
new
construction
and
I
think,
with
new
construction.
There
is
a
way
that
you
can
completely
avoid
having
units
in
the
basement.
A
You
know
so
I
I
tossed
it
out
there,
because
I
think
we
are
really
getting
overly
very
concerned
about
the
fact
that
we
are
seeing
all
this
basement
space
and
then
this
building
on
top
of
it,
is
a
building
behind
buildings.
A
So
you
know
there
could
be
that
could
be
density
issues
clearly
related
to
this.
So
I
need
to
understand
from
you
what
what
your
clients
perspective
is
and
from
mr
feaster
about
eliminating
those
bedrooms
and
the
basement.
Playroom
is
fine
but
bedrooms.
We
are
having
continue
to
have
issues
with.
CX
CX
I'm
a
little
more
concerned
about
the
point
that
mr
ehrlich
has
raised.
This
too
was
a
conversation
that
took
place
with
the
community
with
regards
to
the
reorientation
of
the
property,
and
that
reorientation
was
done
not
only
because
of
what
mr
johnson
said
is
about
about
the
narrowness
of
the
access
from
berry
street,
but
there
was
also
some
matters
pertaining
to
the
water
and
sewer
connections
that
were
there
that
were
resolved.
CX
CX
Only
from
the
standpoint
of
of
course,
you
were
correct
that
this
previously
had
a
garage
that
was
in
the
rear,
but
I
would
I
would
say
that-
and
I
would
ask
mr
johnson
and
give
some
examples,
because
I
believe
that
you've
had
some
of
those,
mr
johnson,
that
you
might
be
able
to
persuade
the
board
to
support
this.
CW
Well
again,
the
the
building
proposed
two
family
replaces
a
two
family
on
that
landlocked
parcel.
CW
The
parking
on
the
parcel
that
fronts
lorenzo
is
shown
is
replacing
a
dilapidated
garage,
so
we
are
not
mixing
uses
one
prop
one
parcel
had
housing.
The
other
parcel
had
parking.
CW
L
G
Well,
just
just
sort
of
to
complete
this
conversation.
I
completely
understand
why
you
did
what
you
did.
I
I
just
don't
know
how
we
handle
the
the
reality
that
it
is
front
yard
parking
and
perhaps
because
it's
a
that's
a
rear,
building
and
landlocked.
Maybe
we
look
at
it
somewhat
differently,
but
the
reality
is,
it
just
is
front
yard
parking
and
with
respect
to
the
basement
units,
as
mr
johnson
said
they
I
looked
at
the
plans
in
the
section
it's
five
and
a
half
feet
below
grade.
That's
that's
the
that's
substantial!
G
You
know
the
the.
As
you
know,
the
the
minimum
to
the
the
sill
height
for
a
window
is
44
inches,
so
you've
got
five
and
a
half
feet
of
just
wall
space
that
is
underground
and-
and
I
think
that
this
board
increasingly
is
trying
to
avoid
that
and
to
miss
to
the
chairs
comment
that
and
new
construction.
It's
one
thing
to
argue
that
that's
the
only
option
in
renovation,
but
construction
should
have
more
flexibility,
so
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
BQ
Madam
chairman
of
the
board,
patrick
crandall,
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
this
went
through
a
robust
community
process.
There
was
two
of
waters
meetings
for
this
proposal
and
they
were
in
contact
with
the
port
norfolk,
civic
association
on
numerous
occasions,
the
merits
of
the
zoning
weren't
of
concern.
Through
this
process.
There
were
concerns
related
to,
as
mr
feaster
made
note,
of
the
sewage
connections
from
the
private
way
on
berry
street
and
the
parking
situation.
X
G
Prejudice
so
that
the
applicants
can
come
back
with
with
a
redesign
that
speaks
to
some
of
the
concerns,
so.
V
A
G
CX
Okay,
madam
chairman,
I
should
speak
to
that
particular
point.
I
would
ask
for
the
board's
indulgence
for
the
deferral,
because
if
we
come
starting
with
a
in
particular
with
the
covert
and
trying
to
get
the
project
managers
in
isd's
attention
on
some
of
these
matters
has
not
been
as
swift
and
that's
understandable.
CX
So
if
we
had
a
deny
with
our
prejudice,
mr
ehrlich,
we
have
to
start
over
again,
so
I
would
I
would.
I
would
invite
the
board
to
iffy.
They
would
give
us
a
deferral
at
times
that
we
can
come
back
sometime.
I
would
say
possibly
in
february
that
would
be
our
okay.
G
That
that's
it's
a
good
project
and
and
I'm
and
I'm
sure
that
you
can
solve
some
of
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
so
I'll
make
a
motion
to
defer.
CX
B
A
You
I
I
saw
that,
thank
you,
so
is
there,
anybody
is
mr
ralph
versade
or
a
representative
husband
is
on
this
on
this.
This
meeting.
L
A
CI
CI
A
X
AG
A
Miss
ambassador
is
mute,
every
single
person,
but
the
board
members.
Okay,
all
set
okay,
everybody's
muted,
shirley
bregel-
is
muted
everybody
else,
okay,
good,
okay.
So
now
we,
as
you
know,
for
these
cases
we
usually
reach
out
to
the
city
of
lars
law
department,
and
the
reason
I
asked
mr
pulgini
for
transportation
is
that
my
notes
had
said
that
it
was
accessory
use
of
the
main
building
management
and
the
is,
and
the
law
department
needed
clarification
on
that.
A
So
now
that
we
have
that
the
we
will
essentially
state
that
we
are
looking
at
this
and
we
feel-
and
as
stated
by
the
law
department
in
their
in
their
information
to
us,
that
this
is
located
in
the
clear
cleary,
slash
logan
square
area.
Thus
the
parking
requirement
is
one
parking
space
per
dwelling
unit.
I
know
there
was
some
question
as
to
which
parking
district.
This
was
in
so
I
mean
sorry
which
neighborhood
shopping
district.
A
This
was
in
so
based
on
the
analysis,
it's
in
the
clear
in
the
cleary
logan
square,
neighborhood
shopping
district.
Thus,
the
parking
as
an
accessory
use,
the
ratio
is
one
to
one
and
the
building
management
office
is
also
accessory
to
this
residential
use.
Thus,
the
recommendation
is
that
isd
did
not
er
in
issuing
this
public.
So
may
I
have
another
shift
to
that.
AO
A
Any
opposed
motion
carries
thank
you,
mr
cooker,
for
for
coming
up
being
part
of
the
meeting
today
and
mr
pulgini.
Likewise,.
B
Madam
chair,
the
last
order
of
business
is
the
hearings
that
were
held
at
1010
mass
ave
last
thursday
and
I'm
going
to
call
them
into
the
record
and
we
just
need
a
motion
at
the
end.
So
I'm
gonna
call
each
one
into
the
record
case.
Boa
one
one.
Two,
two
four
three
seven
102
high
street
was
a
renovation,
a
kitchen
garden
level
and
145
square
foot,
rare
garden.
It
was
approved
case
boa
999,
999
4946,
mount
vernon
was
heard,
was
deferred
to
211
of
the
subcommittee
2021
case.
B
Boa
one
one,
one,
eight
zero,
two,
seven
one
thirty
five
athens
was
heard
today
case
boa
one
zero,
two,
nine
five,
three
nine
sixty
six
dorchester
street
was
denied
kcoa
one
one,
three,
three:
zero,
nine,
eight
fifteen
naira
avenue
it
was
a
complete
gut.
Rehab
of
the
existing
structure
was
approved
case.
Boa
one
one,
two
one:
zero
four
one.
Thirty
six
gaston
street
was
deferred
to
the
subcommittee.
B
B
1.21148
18
spalding
street.
It
was
the
new
dormer
on
the
right
side
of
the
home,
an
extended
dormitized.
On
the
left
side,
it
was
approved
with
bpda
voa
one
one,
two,
seven,
nine
six
three
twenty
three
mcdonald
street
was
to
prepare
a
site
for
a
sun
room
addition
removing
the
siding.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
109
9592
215
dana
avenue
was
a
first
floor
second
floor,
an
attic
renovation.
It
was
approved
at
bpda
case
b.
B
0810901787
harborview
road
was
to
replace
I'm
sorry.
It
was
a
two-story
edition
and
the
north
of
the
rare
yard
and
an
entry
vestibule
at
the
salt
front
yard
was
a
food
with
bpda
case.
Boa
112
3884
three
paragon
road.
There
was
a
razor
roof,
an
existing
house
and
built
a
new
edition.
It
was
approved
with
bpda.
That
concludes
the
subcommittee's
report
of
last
thursday
of
2010
thursday
december
3rd
baby.
You
need
a
motion.
A
You
just
heard
our
decision,
so
we
are
looking
at
parking
garage
as
an
accessory
use
to
the
main
use.
It's
not
a
parking
garage.
Okay,
so
I
missed.
We
are
just
concluding
our
our
meeting
here,
mr
coker,
so
thank
you.
BZ
A
Fellow
board
members,
thank
you.
I
we,
as
I
said
before,
I'd
like
to
have
a
meet
and
greet
on
tuesday.
We
have
a
number
of
alternate
members,
a
few
new
members
and
I'd
like
to
have
a
meet
and
greet
on
tuesday
at
10
o'clock.
Okay,
so
thank
you,
everybody
and
kevin.
If
you
can,
please
help
us
with
that.
Everybody
else
is
on
the
call
see
you
in
the
new
year.
Thank
you.