►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 9-17-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
I'd
like
to
offer
our
thanks
to
Bruce
Bickerstaff,
who
has
been
on
this
board
as
a
community
representative
for
very
many
years,
so
he
he
has
recently
resigned.
I'd
also
like
to
welcome
two
new
members:
Joe
Rosario
from
East
Boston
he's
a
community
representative
and
the
Dean
Fallon
who's,
a
rare
real
estate
representative.
B
C
D
B
Long,
the
next
case
4G
card
calling
boa
nine
nine
two
one,
nine
eight
six,
eighty
six
Massachusetts
Avenue.
This
is
a
change
lock
receipt
from
the
group
care
residents,
general
to
group
residents,
limited
increase
residents
in
24
to
28,
install
a
stormwater
system
in
the
ground,
water
conservation,
overlay
district
and
install
a
rooftop
mechanical
equipment.
A
E
B
The
next
case
for
Building
Code
calling
boa
9
9
0
144
142
Chandler.
This
is
to
construct
a
new
roof
deck
and
seriously
away
up
to
the
roof
deck
a
new
kitchen,
a
bathroom,
the
violations.
The
9th
edition
70
80
cm
are
10
11
stairways
where
a
stairway
is
provided
to
roof
access.
The
loop
shall
be
provided
through
a
penthouse
complying
with
section
15.2
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
F
F
F
A
H
B
B
I
Morning,
my
name
is
Stewart
Schreyer
I'm,
an
attorney
with
an
office
at
1005,
Dorchester
Avenue.
The
reason
was
seeking
in
deferral
is
because
we
have
had
the
neighborhood
on-site
meeting.
We've
actually
met
once
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
clamp
point,
but
they
asked
us
to
come
back
for
a
second
time
because
they
wanted
some
changes,
the
owners
making
the
changes
and
they
don't
meet
again
until
October
21st.
I
A
A
A
K
B
A
B
A
B
Madam
chair,
the
that
the
third
page
Burnie
streets
at
Rahman
I'm,
going
to
call
these
into
the
record,
calling
boa
eight
zero.
Eight
one:
three
six:
nine
Burnie
street
case:
boa
92
96,
79,
Street,
boa
92,
96
to
1508
to
1509
Street,
VOA,
92,
96,
5,
15,
16
to
15
18
trem
on
Street
and
boa
92,
955
15,
20
chemistry.
This
is
being
deferred
to
the
October
29th
meeting
at
11:30.
Refused
a
letter
I'll
make
a
motion
for
deferral.
A
B
The
first
two
cases
to
9:30
calling
boa
9700
for
119
Ellis
Street,
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
9700,
3
917
illustrate
this
is
for
19.
This
is
a
direct
III
family
residential
building
which
she
had
driveway
and
three
parking
spaces
in
the
rare
violations.
Article
10
section
1
limitation
of
off
street
parking
area,
particle
69,
section,
29,
insufficient
off
street
parking
and
location.
Article
69,
section
8,
a
3
family
uses
forbidden
article
69,
section
9,
the
Lodi
area
is
insufficient,
article
69
section
I
and
the
Floyd
a
ratio
is
excessive.
B
B
17
Ellis
Street:
this
is
directed
three
family
residential
building
with
a
shared
driveway,
three
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
The
violations,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
Osprey
parking,
article
69,
section,
29,
Osprey
Park-
means
insufficient
location.
Article
69,
section,
803
family
is
forbidden.
Article
69,
section,
9,
Lodi
areas,
insufficient
article
69,
section
9
lot:
width
is
insufficient,
not
equal,
69
69
lot.
Frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
69,
section
I
of
Claudia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69
69
to
building
high
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
69,
section
9
usable
when
space
is
insufficient.
L
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
George
Moran.
Seaman
attorney
was
a
business
address
of
350,
west,
broadway
and
south
boston.
Madam
chair
members,
plan
submitted
to
the
board
are
in
the
form
of
five
pages
pertaining
to
17
LS
and
then
five
pages
pertaining
to
19
Alice
tree
they're,
essentially
the
same
building.
What
is
occurring
is
there
is
an
existing
two
family
structure
with
an
accesory
garage
on
a
10,000
square
foot
lot.
Those
structures
ought
to
be
raised.
The
law
has
already
been
approved
for
a
subdivision
pursuant
to
separate
alt
application.
L
There
is
all
would
be
to
five
thousand
square
foot
Lots.
Seventeen
LS
in
nineteen
LS
on
each
lot
would
be
built
a
new
three-decker,
a
three-story
three
family
building
with
three
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
The
second
page
of
the
handout
is
the
proposed
site
plan
for
17,
LS
I,
believe
it
may
be
19
LS
in
your
packet,
but
again,
basically
the
same
layouts
on
the
site,
the
same
the
same
buildings,
a
three
unit,
three-story
building
in
the
front,
a
shared
driveway
between
and
then
three
off
street
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
area.
L
This
is
a
2
F
5000
zoning
sub
district
in
Hyde
Park
under
Article
69.
Therefore,
there
is,
of
course,
a
use
violation.
Since
a
three
family
dwelling
is
being
proposed
in
a
two
family
district.
There
are
citations
related
to
the
off
street
parking.
Three
spaces
are
being
provided
for
each
three
unit
building
that
is
insufficient
under
article
69.
L
A
L
It
should
be
for
4.5
I,
think
it's
1.5,
not
I,
think
that's
the
case,
though
right
so
be
rounded
down
to
four
and
each
one
is
a
three.
There
are
citations
here
for
insufficient
one
area
and
insufficient
lot
within
frontage.
The
required
width
and
frontage
in
the
sub
district
is
50
feet.
A
50
feet
is
provided
for
each
each
building
and
each
spot.
The
height
violation,
owes
only
to
the
storey
height
of
the
buildings.
This
is
a
two
and
a
half
story:
35
foot
district.
L
These
are
three-story
buildings,
but
the
maximum
linear
height
of
each
building
is
only
32
and
a
half
feet.
Citation
for
insufficient
usable,
open
space,
1,750
square
feet
is
required
in
the
sub
district.
These
Lots
do
not
meet
that,
but
there
is
certainly
I
would
say
about
an
excess
of
1500
square
feet,
total
provided
on
each
lot.
Their
side
yard
areas
in
rear
yard
areas.
A
L
No
no
no
backs
at
all
exactly
these
are
prototypical
three
Decker's,
as
we
see
all
over
the
city
and
finally,
there's
a
side.
Ii
audience
efficiency
side
of
the
required
side
yard.
Here
is
ten
feet.
The
building's
actually
meet
those
setback
requirements
on
each
side
outside
side
of
each
lot.
There
is
one
citation
here
for
one
of
the
buildings
of
recitation
insufficiency,
which
is
occurring
where
the
the
shared
driveway
is,
and
that
is
a
12-foot
shared
driveway.
A
L
As
long
as
the
law
to
remain
in
common
ownership
and
easements
not
necessary,
if
the
buildings
in
the
in
the
in
the
parcels
fall
out
of
common
ownership,
there
would
be
a
recording
cross
easement.
The
units
are
three-bedroom
units
there,
1,100
square
feet,
plus
each
and
straight
floor
through
units
on
floors.
One
two
and
three.
L
That's
the
side,
yard
setback,
that's
the
portion
of
the
17
LS
lot
that
contains
six
and
a
half
feet
of
the
12
feet.
Driveway
8.3
feet,
not
necessarily
not
8.3
they're,
a
manger
of
the
driveway.
The
greater
portion
of
the
of
the
driveway
is
on
the
1900
side.
So
it's
a
12
foot
driveway
there
is
a.
There
is
a.
L
A
L
Correct
but
there's
no
there's,
there's
a
disincentive
to
do
the
owner
selling
one
of
the
two
buildings
or
the
two
buildings
two
to
third
parties,
not
recording
and
easement.
Clearly
that
would
occur.
It
is
a
legal
nullity.
Now
an
easement
cannot
be
recorded
between
two
properties
in
common
ownership,
so
it's
not
possible
to
record
an
easement
at
the
registry
if
one
or
both
of
the
buildings
is
sold.
D
D
M
A
A
A
N
There's
a
long
history
of
violence,
issues
with
tenants
and
other
issues
with
trash
and
rodents
going
on
on
the
street
I
believe
that
adding
this
area
to
that
home,
which
the
homeowner
I
knew
just
moved
away
and
the
new
owner
that's
purchased.
That
area
I
think
that
it
should
be
left
as
a
two-family.
If
that's
what
it
actually
is
on
that
side
of
the
street,
it
would
look
conducive
to
what
is
on
that
side
of
the
street.
L
A
O
B
An
x3
case
is
calling
POA
9
6
9
0
8
0
13
b
River
Street
River
Street,
yep,
okay.
There
are
two
companion
case:
bo
a
nine
six:
nine
zero,
seven,
a
13,
a
river
street
and
bo
a
nine
six,
nine
zero,
seven
zero
13
River
Street.
This
is
for
13
River
Street.
This
is
addition
alterations
to
an
existing
structure
at
13,
River
Street
and
for
13
a
and
13b
River
Street.
This
is
to
separate
the
buildings
in
the
rear
of
the
lot,
the
violations,
article
65,
section
42,
two
or
more
dwellings.
B
B
13
a
river
street
directing
new
four-story
to
family
dwelling
on
existing
eleven
thousand
six
hundred
and
sixty-three
square
foot
lot
parking
will
be
located
under
the
building.
This
will
be
one
of
three
dwellings
located
on
the
same
lot.
The
violations,
article
65
section,
42
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment,
not
equal
65,
section
42.
Two
more
dwellings
on
the
same
lot:
article
65
section
I
on
the
main
entrance
to
a
dwelling
shall
face
the
front
log
line:
article
65
69.
A
lot
here
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
9.
The
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
B
Article
65
section
9,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive,
equals
65,
6
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
article
65,
section
I
on
the
bill
and
I
stories.
A
successive
article,
65
section
9
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
65
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
B
A
P
A
A
P
A
A
A
P
P
A
B
Is
the
moment
this
is
to
demolish
an
existing
single-family
at
265
Hancock
Street
and
construct
a
new
six
family
at
265
and
combined
lot
with
259
Hancock
Street,
an
existing
three
family
and
an
existing
for
filming
and
turn
13
parking
spaces?
As
shown,
the
violation
is
article
65
exit
41
watch
beach
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit
is
forbidden,
use
article
65,
section
42
to
more
dwellings
on
the
same
line,
article
65,
section
9,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
height
is
excessive.
B
S
Brown
arrest,
18
I,
am
allowed
I'm
Dorchester.
A
R
R
R
R
R
A
A
R
R
A
A
U
A
A
R
R
A
D
D
D
V
A
B
G
Y
G
A
Y
V
B
You
next
case
is
calling
boa
8:
3
2
2
5,
3
36
good
deal,
Road,
companion
cases,
boa
8,
3,
2,
2,
5
2
in
the
527
North
Park
Street,
boa
8
3
2,
2,
5,
1,
5
25
north
park
street
boa
8
3
2
2,
4,
9,
5,
23,
North,
Clark,
Street,
boa
a
three
two:
two
six
one:
nine
Lessons
Street
VOA
8
3,
2,
2,
5,
9,
13,
hosmer
street
and
boa
8
3
2,
2,
5,
7,
11,
Hosmer
Street.
This
is
for
36
good
deal
is
to
construct
a
new
single-family
dwelling.
B
This
is
the
city
of
Boston
navel
at
homes,
initiative,
project
violations,
article
60,
section,
41;
conformity
within
existing
building
alignment;
article
60,
section,
9
law,
diaries',
insufficient
article
60,
section,
9,
side
yard
is
insufficient.
This
is
527.
North
walk,
Street
to
subdivide
lot
and
construct
a
new
single
family
in
the
city
of
Boston,
neighborhood
homes,
initiative
project,
the
violations,
article
60,
section
41,
conforming,
an
existing
building
alignment
and
nautical
60
section
9
the
light
air.
Is
it
sufficient?
This
is
for
525
North
Clark
Street.
A
B
Missus
stuff
divided,
live
and
construct
a
new
single-family.
This
is
a
city
of
Boston
neighborhood
homes,
initiative
violations,
article
60,
section
41
conform
to
an
existing
building
alignment;
article
60
section
9
a
lot
areas:
insufficient
article
60,
section,
I'm,
usable,
open
spaces
in
space.
This
is
for
523
North
Park.
This
is
a
subdivide
lot
construct
new
to
family
dwelling
violation,
article
60,
section
41,
conforming
an
existing
building
alignment,
article
60,
section
9,
the
lighter
areas,
insufficient
radical
60
section
and
a
lot
width
is
insufficient.
B
B
This
is
foot
9
molestin
constructing
a
single-family
dwelling
for
the
city
of
austin,
navel
at
homes,
initiative,
project
the
violations,
article
66
and
9yt
areas
insufficient
an
article
66,
an
eye
front
yard,
isn't
sufficient.
This
is
for
13
hos
MA.
This
is
subdivide
logic:
constructing
new
single-family
semi-attached
dwelling,
the
violation
of
article
60,
section
41,
conforming
an
existing
building
alignment,
an
article
60
section
9,
the
la
tierra
is
insufficient
and
this
is
411
hosmer,
subdivide
lot
and
constructing
new
single-family
dwelling
violations.
B
Z
A
Z
Ate
yesterday,
8
individual
addresses
yes
they're
different.
How
are
the
scattered
sites
throughout
them
out
of
town,
but
there
are
in
the
general
area
of
each
other.
36
good
deal
is
being
proposed.
In
fact,
all
of
these
projects
are
being
proposed
on
existing
locks.
Some
lots
of
them
subdivide
it
in
the
case
of
36
good
deal.
That
is
there.
That
is
an
existing
lot
in
which
we're
putting
a
single
family
home
on
that
line.
Z
5
27.45
23
not
work
in
527,
525,
no
4
and
523
Darfur
is
being
being
built
on
a
larger
lot.
That
is
being
subdivided
into
3
lines.
In
order
to
the
first
lot
subdivision
lot
is
523
north
walk,
which
we're
proposing
a
2
family
structure
on
that
lot,
the
other
lot
is
being
the
other
second
portion
is
of
that.
Lot
is
525
and
527.
Now
525
and
527
are
actually
sync.
There
are
single
family
homes.
There
are
being
done
on
a
similar
lot,
but
their
lives
being
the
subdivided.
Z
Nine
Lessons
Street
also
has
been
subdivided
it's
a
minimal
subdivision
in
that
we
are
giving
a
piece
of
that
lot
to
brother
because
he
needs
adjacent.
He
needs
additional
lost
base
in
order
that
he
could
accomplish
his
driveway
on
Western
Street.
We're
proposing
a
single
family
home
with
three
family
home
on
less
the
street
has.
AB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
good
morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board,
when
he
said
I
said
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
here,
speak
in
support
of
this
project.
They've
gone
out
to
the
neighborhood
and
we've
also
had
one
last
abutters
meeting
send
back
neighbours
to
discuss.
We
support
the
homeownership
aspect
it
brings
to
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
AC
A
AD
B
A
next
two
cases
calling
boa
nine:
eight
nine
zero,
zero
eight
twenty
four
Judson
Street,
whose
companion
case
boa
nine,
eight
nine
zero
zero
one.
Twenty
four
Judson
Street.
This
is
for
twenty
four
air.
This
is
directly
one
car
garage,
the
violations,
article,
fifty
section
44,
the
garage
needs
to
be
at
least
four
feet
from
all
lot
lines.
B
This
is
for
twenty
four
Judson
Street.
This
is
direct
a
new
three
family
dwelling.
This
new
triple
decker
will
have
a
front
porch,
rear
deck
and
roof
deck.
The
proposed
attached
one-car
garage
the
violations
article,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine
additional
lot
areas
and
sufficient
article.
Fifty
section
29
of
the
foyer
ratios
excessive
medical,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
article.
Fifty
section
29
of
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient
ethical.
B
AE
AE
AE
AE
O
V
AD
B
This
has
changed
artists
from
six
units
to
seven
units.
The
violations
article,
fifty
section
twenty
eight
seven
unit
building
is
a
forbidden
news,
article,
fifty
section
twenty
nine,
the
la
tierra
traditional
drawing
unit
insufficient
article,
fifty
section,
twenty
nine,
the
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50
section
twenty
unusable
open
space
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
hi.
AF
AF
AF
X
G
AF
We
actually
owned
the
plot
next
door
and
we
utilize
that
for
parking,
so
53:8
Dale
Street
I
have
a
small
screen
shot
of
what
that
would
what
it
looks
like,
but
the
property,
the
plot
455
Dale
Street.
It
can
hold
four
vehicles
in
the
back
end
of
plot
of
55
Dale
Street
we
owned
53
a
which
could
hold
an
additional
ten
vehicles
on
that
plot,
a
lane
which
is
already
paved
and
you
access
it
through
the
same
driveway.
So
you
come
in
and
you
need
to
go
straight
or
turn
into
parking.
H
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members,
at
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
we
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
August
1st
2019,
and
we
received
34
signatures
of
support
from
director
butters.
Some
butters
also
felt
like
this
parking
was
adequate,
there's
more
than
enough
space
for
parking
on
the
side
lot.
It
was
an
originally
a
5
bedroom
and
they
felt
like
splitting
it
up
to
smaller.
AG
AH
AI
B
E
X
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I,
see
a
number
of
new
faces
here,
if
you're
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project,
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
why
you're
in
support
or
in
opposition,
and
if
your
concern
has
already
been
raised.
The
reason
for
your
support
has
already
been
raised.
Put
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
We
are
interested
in
fact-finding,
so
use
your
chance
at
the
mic
to
give
us
new
information.
A
B
L
An
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston,
madam
chair
members.
This
is
an
article
80
small
project.
It
has
been
approved
by
the
BBB
a.
However,
we
do
need
present
to
Andrews
Square
Civic
Association
at
their
October.
9Th
meeting.
I,
therefore
respectfully
requested
tomorrow.
A
A
B
B
Hearing
none
I'll
call
the
first
case
calling
VOA
9
6
6
5
7
8
111,
113,
H
Street,
it's
h-street
him.
Okay,
this
is
a
change
of
arcing
from
a5
filming
and
still
with
36:82.
A5
family
and
liquor
store
no
work
to
be
done.
The
violations
article
68
section
7,
the
liquor
store
use,
is
conditional
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
AJ
Morning,
my
name
is
Rashi
monlik,
with
derma
cruelty
and
Miller
at
28
State
Street
in
Boston.
This
is
my
client
interval
in
hotel.
He
is
the
the
officer
of
shri
Cano
incorporated,
which
owns
a
store
at
113,
H
Street.
Jaime's
variety
he's
here
today
seeking
your
approval
to
add
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
liquor
store
to
be
added
to
the
premises.
There's
no
construction
to
be
done.
The
applicant
has
owned
the
store
for
a
couple
years
now
and
would
like
to
add
beer
and
wine
to
the
premises.
A
A
AJ
A
AK
Services
in
support
with
the
understanding
that
they're
gonna
have
two
coolers
filled
with
high-end
craft
beer
and
wine.
Again
we
understand
that
we'll
have
to
have
a
license
a
meeting
as
well,
but
we
wouldn't
support
it
if
something
were
to
change.
I
also
want
to
recognize
that
we
have
108
letters
of
support
that
people
have
reached
out
to
me
all
directive.
AK
AL
Members
of
the
board,
my
name-
is
Jay
Lance
Dean
I
live
with
my
wife
and
three
kids
at
4:22,
East
5th
Street,
which
is
just
up
the
block
from
Jamie's
variety.
We've
lived
in
our
house
now
for
nine
years
and
for
two
years
prior
to
that
it
was
just
two
blocks
down,
so
I've
been
in
the
neighborhood
a
long
time.
The
guys
that
run
the
store
are
true.
It's
a
true
neighborhood
store,
they're
nice
to
everyone
who
comes
in.
They
know
everybody
by
name.
They
know
what
everybody
buys
their
there
time
for
the
kids.
AL
You
really
couldn't
ask
for
better
neighbors
I,
really
can't
see
any
reason
to
be
opposed
to
giving
them
a
chance.
Some
of
the
reasons
that
my
neighbors
have
cited
in
opposition
is
trash
which
couldn't
be
further
from
a
problem.
I
took
a
picture
the
other
morning
and
I
was
like
this.
My
car
in
the
morning.
Their
trash
is
without
exception.
Every
single
week
is
stacked
neatly
in
boxes.
It
looks
a
lot
better
than
most
of
my
neighbors
excuse.
AL
AL
AM
Good
morning,
I'm
Josephine
stack,
552,
eSports,
Street
and
I
just
want
to
reiterate
everything
that
Jay
said,
and
the
young
people
who
are
running
this
store
are
wonderful
people
they're
young
immigrants
like
I,
was
myself
one
time
and
they
deserve
a
chance,
just
like
everybody
else,
and
I
am
here
to
support
it.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
AN
The
chair
members
of
the
water
and
I
Calderon
from
Council
of
links
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal
at
their
borders
meeting.
The
meeting
didn't
go
well
and
the
neighbors
and
our
voters
have
concerns
of
quality
of
life
issues
in
the
gain
of
having
Neighborhood
Association
is
also
in
opposition.
Thank
you.
AN
AI
AH
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Karen
Foley
from
City
Council,
Anissa
asabi
George's
office,
I,
attend
today
about
his
meeting,
and
we
were
told
that
there
would
only
be
one
cooler
in
the
store.
That's
what
they
said.
Everybody
was
surprised.
They
were
saying.
How
can
you
make
money
from
one
cool
or
a
beer
and
wine,
but
that's
what
the
people
were
told
so
we'd
like
to
go
in
record
in
opposition
to
this
project,
there's
enough
beer
in
wine
in
South
Boston.
Thank
you.
A
AO
Problem
is
that
we
will
inundated
with
liquor
stores
and
we
don't
need
them
and
another
point
I'd
like
to
make
what
I
think
is
important.
This
gentleman
here
does
not
own
the
building.
We're
about
his
meeting.
I
brought
this
up.
It's
a
change
of
occupancy.
He
is
not
the
owner
of
the
building.
Okay,
so
I,
don't
know
how
you
can
sit
there
and
try
to
get
a
change
of
occupancy
when
he's
not
the
owner.
I,
don't
know
where
the
owner
is
at
the
last
about
is
meeting
the
owner
did
not
show
up.
AO
So
they
said,
let's
have
another
about
his
meeting.
I
couldn't
couldn't
attend
it
when
I
asked
this
lady,
who
are
you
representing?
Are
you
representing
the
owner
of
the
building
of
the
liquor
store
now
I,
don't
know
how
this
works,
but
on
a
change
of
occupancy
I
would
assume
that
the
person
the
owner
would
be
the
person.
This
gentleman
is
a
store,
went
to
okay
and
I.
Think
it's
a
very
important
point.
AO
AP
Christina
duddy
I
live
at
434,
East
Fifth
Street
I
believe
that
either
four
or
five
doors
up
from
the
store
I
don't
have
anything
against
this
gentleman
he's
a
perfectly
nice
gentleman.
It's
a
great
thing
to
have
a
corner
store
nurse
store.
I
I
do
think
it
is
a
quality
of
life
issue.
I
personally,
don't
think
I
want
to
live
four
doors
up
from
a
liquor,
store
and
I
have
seen
one
other
store
that
changed
from
a
convenience
store
like
a
local
community.
AP
AP
One
number
two
I,
don't
understand
why
South
Boston
has
to
have
more
liquor
stores
than
any
other
neighborhood
I
mean
I,
go
to
other
neighborhoods
I'm
in
south
bought
I've
lived
in
the
Back
Bay
I've
lived
in
South
Boston
for
26
years,
but
before
that
I've
lived
in
the
Back
Bay
I've
lived
in
the
south
end.
You
don't
have
a
liquor
store
a
beer
and
wine
store
on
every
corner.
We
live
in
a
residential
area,
I
moved
there
because
it
was
a
residential
area.
AP
Otherwise,
I
would
have
lived
on
Broadway
that
you
know
the
there
are
11
liquor
stores
within
our
beer
and
wine
stores
within
5
or
10
minutes
from
this
store,
and
this
gentleman
I'm
not
trying
to
prevent
him
from
being
in
business.
This
is
not
his
only
business.
There
are
other
businesses
as
well,
so
I'm
not
trying
to
prevent
him
from
being
in
business.
I
hope
he
stays
as
a
convenience
store.
I
hope
that
store
continues
to
exist.
I
think
it's
an
excellent
place,
but
I'm
not
in
favor
of
it.
AP
AP
We've
had
to
go
out
twice
in
the
last
month
to
speak
to
young
neighbors
that
were
imbibing
a
lot
of
booze
in
the
middle
of
the
night
that
were
really
really
loud.
We
have
old
people,
we
have
young
people.
This
is
a
neighborhood
with
families
on
it.
This
isn't
just
a
place
with
25,
26
and
30
year
olds
on
it
and
I
really
don't
see
any
reason
to
make
it
even
easier
for
them
to
get
alcohol
when
they
can
go
out
to
Broadway
or
wherever
also
they
can
go
to
the
clubs.
AP
There
are
clubs
everywhere,
I,
basically
can't
I,
don't
feel
like
there's
anywhere.
We
can
go
if
you're
my
age,
which
I'm
in
my
60s
to
have
a
meal
or
a
drink.
That's
not
really
loud
and
really
alcohol
infused,
so
I
have
nothing
against
Valenti's
I,
like
our
neighbors,
but
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
make
alcohol
any
more
accessible
to
the
folks
in
our
area.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
AQ
AJ
G
A
G
AR
A
AR
I
know
they
give
our
liquid
license
and
the
idea
is
to
build
up
South
Boston
in
the
communities
to
have
more
people
come
in
and
make
it
more
accessible
and
more
lively.
But
this
is
the
corner
store,
not
a
not
a,
not
a
nightclub,
not
a
I'm
lunching
whatever.
This
is
just
a
corner
store
and
my
sister,
my
daughter,
lives
there.
Now,
when
you
bring
a
liquor,
store
or
search
for
this,
our
liquor
store
in.
AR
If
you
want
to
don't
pack
an
area
that
you
can
go,
but
this
is
a
residential
area,
so
my
point
is
I
know
you
give
out
licenses
to
people,
but
this
is
the
corner
store
not,
and
he
has
it
in
this
very
history
of
a
corner
store
bringing
in
I
just
want
to
sell
a
couple
of
six-packs
of
beer
to
changing
over.
So
that's
all
I
want
to
say
thank
you.
If.
AJ
I
may
address
a
couple
of
the
points
that
were
brought
out.
Yes,
I
did
reach
out
to
the
Gate
of
Heaven
Association.
They
never
got
back
to
me,
and
so
you
know
we
were
happy
to
discuss
any
concerns
they
had,
but
I
had
never
heard
from
them.
Additionally,
I
filed
a
landlord
authorization
letter,
so
the
change
of
occupancy
is
authorized.
D
D
AJ
A
B
The
next
case
calling
VOA
92844
nine
Douglas
Street-
this
is
to
add
a
twelve
by
twelve
roof
deck
in
conjunction
by
I'm.
Sorry,
the
violation,
the
optical
68,
section,
twenty
nine,
the
roof
structure
restricted
to
district
access
must
be
through
a
roof
hatch.
Only
article
68
section,
eight
really
odd
setback,
recliners
insufficient
the
spiral
stair
to
be
at
least
15
feet,
minimum
away
from
the
lot
line
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AS
AS
AK
B
AU
There
are
numerous
other
commercial
uses
in
that
building,
including
cafe
Nero
Verizon
beet
own
Fitness
carved
nail
salon
on
the
upper
floor,
we're
proposing
again
a
first-class
pizza
restaurant
with
33
seats.
Space
is
approximately
1,500
square
feet
on
the
ground
floor,
538
square
feet
of
storage
space
in
the
basement.
There's
no
alcohol
service
or
liquor
license
proposal.
As
part
of
this
pizza,
restaurant.
AU
A
AU
AK
AN
AH
A
B
You
Somali
POA,
nine,
eight,
nine
three
four
to
171
K
Street.
This
is
to
extend
the
third
story.
Addition
over
an
existing
second
floor,
extend
roof
deck
and
head
house
full
renovations
into
an
existing
single-family
dwelling,
the
violation
article
27
s,
section
5.
This
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
particle
68,
section,
29,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
68,
section,
8,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68,
section
8,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
B
AV
AV
AV
AV
AV
AV
A
AV
AV
AV
D
A
A
AV
AV
D
A
AK
AN
D
A
K
B
A
next
case
calling
VOA
nine
seven
zero,
six,
six,
nine
seven.
Ninety
eight
B
East
Third
Street.
This
is
to
construct
a
rare
addition
and
one
story
vertical
addition:
honor
detached
single-family
dwelling
and
extend
living
space
to
the
basement.
The
violations
article
27
s
section
five:
this
is
in
the
hyper
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
29
of
the
roof
structure.
Restrictions
in
article
68,
section
a
side
yard,
isn't
sufficient.
They
have
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
J
X
A
B
B
Call
in
the
next
case
calling
VOA
nine
six,
two
two
nine
six,
two
zero
one,
eight
sixty
South
Street
this.
This
is
an
improvement
to
the
office
building
phase
one.
It's
a
reconfiguration
of
the
restrooms
clause,
2
to
7
phase
2
is
an
extension
of
egress
stairway
to
the
roof
from
levels
12,
11
and
12,
and
then
added
stop
and
for
one
elevator
to
roof
level,
build
a
roof
deck.
The
tenants,
pastry,
building
a
lobby
addition,
indoor
and
walkins
week
reconfiguration.
AW
AQ
A
A
AX
I'll
try.
My
name
is
Christopher
Lucy
live
at
107
South
Street
unit
3
B,
as
in
boy
Boston,
Mass,
Oh,
2,
1,
1,
1,
2,
8,
4,
0
and
I
do
face.
My
unit
faces
the
applicants.
Building
I
am
in
support
of
the
applicants
proposal,
but
I
did
discuss
with
them
my
concerns
of
anything
ever
getting
blown
off
the
roof
deck.
They
assured
me.
They
have
large
heavy
furniture
that
will
get
stored
during
storms,
no
litter,
no
excessive
noise.
We
live
in
a
noise
prone
neighborhood.
AN
AY
AY
B
This
is
a
change
of
oxygen
from
a
three
family
to
a
four
family
also
to
renovate
the
building,
including
the
rare
and
four-story
addition.
The
violations,
article
2070,
section
5.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
56
off
street
parking
Lord
and
done
that's
proposed
article
53,
section
8,
the
useless
forbidden
article,
53,
section,
9
additional
and
insufficient
additional
audio
for
a
dwelling
unit,
radical
53
section
and
excessive
FA,
our
article
53
section
9,
insufficient,
open
space,
medical
53
section
and
the
maximum
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded.
B
AZ
It's
kinda
with
matters
of
15,
Broad
Street
last
minute
and
talk
about
have
been
sitting
Realty
the
property
before
you
shown
in
the
plan.
I
just
want
to
note.
We've
made
modifications
that
will
change
the
project.
You
have
the
plans
that
show
that
mr.
Lee
cecum
still
to
change
the
occupancy
from
the
three
family
residential
throwing
to
a
four
family
residential
dwelling.
Our
original
proposal
at
a
fourth
unit
on
the
top
of
the
building
that,
since
of
working
with
the
community,
come
off
it's
a
fourth
unit
and
the
basement.
AZ
A
AZ
AZ
All
of
the
other
units
are
existing
three
bed
two
bath
with
a
rare
addition
on
the
building,
so
there
would
be
a
16-foot
addition
in
the
rear
that
would
make
those
units
a
little
bit
larger.
We've
worked
with
the
community
to
eliminate
and
modify
this
project,
which
was
eliminating
the
fourth
floor
and
doing
so,
we've
taken
away
those
violations
for
height
and
stories
height
and
feet
and
front
yard.
With
no
story
addition
I
will
go
over
the
violations.
AZ
Use
is
a
violation,
so
it's
a
three
family
we're
proposing
for
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling.
A
thousand
required
we're
at
five
hundred
SAR
1.0.
That
1.29
currently
would
be
increasing.
To
one
point:
sideout
is
a
pre-existing
violation.
The
structure
would
not
change.
There
would
be
no
change
in.
BA
AZ
AZ
BB
Running
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Lena
tourmaline
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
during
the
community
process.
The
developer
address
the
concern
of
dear
brothers
and
also
got
the
strong
support
from
Jeffrey's
point
Neighborhood
Association.
Thank
you.
A
BD
AZ
B
Gonna
call
the
Fenway
case
back
calling
VOA
nine
eight
three
zero,
six
zero
twenty-eight
Fenway.
This
is
a
change
of
art
from
a
rooming
house,
the
rooming
house,
the
two
residential
dwelling
units
change
to
increase
rooming
house
to
forty
two
rooms:
constructiveness,
630,
vertical
addition
with
roof
deck
on
an
existing
footprint,
the
removal
of
the
fire
escape
balcony
and
stay
away,
the
violation
article
29.
This
is
in
the
G
pod
applicability
article
32,
section
forth.
This
is
in
the
G
code,
applicability,
an
article
66
section,
38,
roof
structure
and
building
height
radical
66
section
9.
B
A
BE
AS
So,
as
far
as
violations
go,
we
have
G
pod.
We
are
working
with
the
parks
department
on
that
G
Cod.
We
have
an
approval
for
that
room
structure,
building
height
in
the
statehood,
any
increase
in
height
triggers
that
variance
as
well
as
the
building
height
is
excessive.
Fa
are
we
were
actually
under
FA
are
FA
are
is
a
four.
We
are
at
three
point
three
seven
and
we're
Yod
insufficient,
pre-existing.
A
AS
You
I'll
just
go
through
that
quickly
again
the
violations
gpiod
parks,
we're
working
with
them
right
now,
jihad
we
have
approval
from
groundwater,
trust,
room
structure
and
building
height
every
time.
There's
a
increase
in
the
size
of
the
building
in
this
neighborhood.
It
triggers
that
FAI
we're
actually
below
FAI,
where,
where
there's
a
four
we're
at
three
point,
three:
seven:
where
yeah
it's
insufficient,
we're
not
doing
anything
outside
the
building
envelopes.
That's
all
extending
priests
and
big
preexisting
non-conforming
the
went
through
a
community
process
I
provided
them.
A
A
BE
It
is,
it
can
be
that
and
it's
covered
by
a
variety
of
resources
to
discover
the
units,
but
it's
typically
out
of
towners
my
clients.
The
owners
run
several
of
these
throughout
Boston
and
the
is
perhaps
a
visiting
medical
student
in
town
for
two
months
for
a
training
seminar
or
something
like
that.
So
it
is,
is
it
as
a
temporary
use
for
residents
so
they're
there,
roughly
250
300
square
foot
units,
they
feature
a
pen.
BE
AS
Chair
should
I
just
address
one
quick
thing:
the
through
the
community
process.
You
guys
have
a
letter
of
non
opposition
from
the
Fenway
CDC
and
you'll
see
this
MOU
attached
to
that.
One
of
the
requirements
throughout
the
community
with
this
was
not
to
be
rented
out
to
students
and
the
owner
has
agreed
to
that
as
part
of
a
member
of
understanding.
A
BE
A
BE
E
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Krishna
ciminelli
Boston,
groundwater
trust
on
this
case
was
actually
before
you
in
February.
It
was
G
card
only
at
the
time
the
board
approved
at
that
time,
and
the
water
and
sewer
approval
letter
has
not
changed
because
those
calculations
are
just
based
on
the
area
of
the
building
and
that
that
hasn't
changed.
We
do
as.
Q
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shanece
provincial
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicant
completed
a
successful
community
process
in
which
they
received
full
support
from
the
immediate
abutters.
The
applicants
met
with
the
Fenway
Civic
Association
and
the
Fenway
Community
Development
Corporation
I
attended
the
F
CDC's
meeting
on
September
September
4th
to
make
sure
I
cleared
up
any
concerns
regarding
the
community
process,
both
the
FCA
and
the
F
CDC
expressed
concerns,
and
we
appreciate
the
applicants
willingness
to
accommodate
the
community's
requests.
Q
However,
I
would
like
to
make
it
explicitly
clear
that
many
of
the
concerns
expressed
we're
not
regarding
the
proposal
nor
the
variances
requested.
In
fact,
support
was
expressed
towards
the
architectural
design
and
an
historic
lunch
integrity,
and
we
asked
up
and
continue
working
continue,
developing
a
neighborly
relationship
with
the
community
and
given
this
information,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
proposal.
Thank
you.
O
B
Boa
9
3
4
85
199,
Trenton
Street.
This
is
erected
edition
with
roof
deck,
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
and
changed
Oxford
from
a
to
2
to
4
units,
the
violation
of
article
9,
section
1,
reconstruction
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
article
2070.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod,
an
article
53
section
56
and
sufficient
parking
design.
Article
53
section
9
edition
its
insufficient
additional
lot
area
per
unit.
BF
Full
directly
to
the
members
Richard
Lin's
245
Sumner,
Street,
East
Boston,
on
behalf
of
petitioner
Cole
I'm
Cheers,
a
proposal
to
for
the
complete
rehabilitation
of
existing
to
family
dwelling,
as
you
can
see
from
the
pack
of
the
materials
that
I
provided
the
board,
this
building
is
in
condemnable,
condition
that
it's
located
the
Eagle
Hill
square
section
of
East
Boston.
Our
proposal
would
be
for
a
complete
rehabilitation
and
renovation
along
with
a
vertical
addition
that
would
resolve
the
change
of
occupancy
from
a2
to
a4
family
dwelling.
BF
Each
of
these
units
would
be
reprogrammed.
The
lower
units
would
be
duplex
tile
with
living
space
located
in
the
basement
with
main
living
space.
Look
in
the
first
level
units
3,
&,
4,
we've
located
our
second
third
level,
designed
as
flats,
of
course,
because
of
the
extent
of
the
renovations
that
are
being
proposed.
This
building
would
have
a
complete
upgrade
to
the
Life
Safety,
which
doesn't
presently
exist.
We
are
able
to
include
two
plus
parking
spaces
of
the
rear
of
the
property.
There.
BF
As
well,
that
would
be
exclusive
to
Unit
four
and
that
roof
deck
would
be
accessed
by
hatch.
No
ahead
house
is
proposed
based
upon
commentary
that
we
heard
from
the
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association
during
the
community
process.
Upon
completion.
This
is
intended
for
homeownership
would
be
owned
as
individual
condominium
units.
We
did
have
an
opportunity
to
present
this
extensively
to
both
the
little
Civic
Association,
as
well
as
the
abutters,
and
we
do
have
a
favorable
letter
of
support
from
Eagle
Hill
with
respect
to
the
unit
breakdown.
These
are
generous
sized
two-bedroom
and
three-bedroom
units.
BF
The
lower
levels
range
between
a
thousand
almost
1,100
square
feet
up
to
about
1,700
square
feet
for
two
bedrooms
and
the
unit
304
or
around
eleven
to
fourteen
hundred
square
feet
for
three
bedrooms
on
the
upper
levels.
Respect
to
the
relief
that's
necessary
of
secretary
correctly
identified.
What
is
contained
in
the
public
notices
is
read.
This
is,
would
be
a
read
instruction:
extensive,
a
non-conforming
building
because
of
the
existing
3f
2000
sub
district
and
the
zoning
dimensional
regulations
that
are
applicable
under
article
53.
BF
With
respect
to
screening
buffering,
we
obviously
can
address
that
through
the
BPD.
A
design
review
process
of
this
board
were
to
grant
relief
and
then,
with
respect
to
the
additional
items
there
all
triggered,
basically
based
upon
the
proposed
renovation
and
addition
and
fit
out
of
the
building,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
design
that
we've
incorporated
based
upon
the
architects
concept,
for
this
is
consistent
in
size
and
scope
of
what
is
adjoining
on
each
side
of
the
property.
This
would
look
and
have
the
feel
of
a
traditional,
triple
decker
in
the
Eagle
Hill
neighborhood.
A
BF
BB
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Berlin,
a
trembling
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I,
would
like
to
warn
the
wrecker
in
support
during
the
community
process.
The
developer
address
many
of
the
concerns
of
the
up
barriers.
Also,
there
was
a
strong
support
of
this
project
tool
in
their
various
meeting
and
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association
voted
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
BC
A
B
BF
The
owner
and
operon
madam
chair,
we
anticipated
proceeding
this
morning
with
respect
to
the
proposal
before
the
board,
we're
informed
before
the
hearing
that
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services,
received
some
additional
concerns
or
comments
from
abutters.
As
this
is
not
a
time-sensitive
petition,
the
outdoor
seating
is
seasonal
and
likely
to
not
ramp
up
until
next
April
we're
happy.
If
the
board
is
so
inclined
to
take
a
short
deferral,
trying
to
work
on
any
additional
items
that
come
up
with
the
butters.
G
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
VOA
nine
five
six
one
zero
five
200
William
McClellan
highway.
This
is
a
change
of
our
key
to
an
auto
body
shop
and
build
a
45
by
25
foot
addition
to
the
garage,
the
violations,
article
2070
five.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
in
article
53,
section
15,
a
repair
garage
is
forbidden
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
good!.
BD
BD
A
BD
The
since
1979
the
property
has
been
used
as
an
auto
body
shop
and
there's
a
dispute
between
the
AISD
and
mr.
DeSimone,
the
owner
about
whether
or
not
permits
were
properly
issued
for
an
auto
body
shop.
But
there
is
absolutely
no
question
about
that.
For
almost
40
years,
thousands
and
thousands
of
cars
have
been
prepared.
They
are
stored,
they're
painted
there.
The
city
has
taxed
the
property
based
on
this
use.
G
BG
A
BD
Sure
so
the
first
page
shows
where
the
property
is
located:
McCullen,
highway
route,
1
a
southbound
heading
into
heading
into
bus
and
I'm
sure
you
all
know
the
area
it's
filled
with
commercial
uses.
There
is
an
auto
body
shop
at
the
corner
of
Ashford,
Street
and
McCullen
highway.
That's
been
there
for
several
years
and
in
2017
this
board
approved
a
medical
marijuana
facility
on
the
abutting
property
at
220,
McClelland
Highway.
The
first
page
shows
the
plot
plan
and
it
shows
the
existing
building
end
to
the
side
of
it.
BD
BD
D
BB
A
BD
B
B
This
proposal
involves
constructing
a
new
two
family
residential
with
parking
for
one
thousand
eight
square
feet
and
the
raft
the
violations
article
25
section
five.
This
is
in
the
flood
hazard,
District
applicability,
nautical
33609,
the
live
size
directly
to
family
is
insufficient
nautical
53:6
nine.
The
minimum
lot
width
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
minimum
la
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
I,
the
minimal
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Radical
53,
section
I,
the
moon
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
B
BH
A
A
BH
BH
BH
G
A
A
J
BH
BI
A
A
BB
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Lena
Tommy
Lee,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood,
Services
and
I,
would
like
to
wander
recording
support
during
the
community
process.
This
has
a
strong
support
from
their
bodies
as
well
from
the
Jeffress
Point
neighborhood
association,
that
has
a
strong
support
of
the
design.
Thank
you.
BC
AB
G
A
A
A
B
BK
We
were
originally
scheduled
back
in
July
and
there
was
deferred
because
they
wanted
some
more.
They
wanted
me
to
meet
with
a
group
called
Belle
melt
who
made
the
mayor's
office
was
not
familiar
with,
so
we
had
trouble
meeting
with
them
because
people
if
somebody's
sister
died.
Somebody
was
on
vacation,
so
we
met
just
before
the
just
before
I
went
away
on
vacation.
There
just
hasn't
been
a
lot
of
time
to.
A
BK
A
AA
B
A
X
B
B
Okay,
this
is
new
construction
of
a
three
family
on
a
vacant
lot:
violation
Donegal,
sixty-five
section,
nine
valetti,
Aires,
insufficient
article
65,
section:
nine
additional
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
65,
section
9,
a
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69
lot
frontage
is
insufficient
article
65
section:
nine.
The
fluid
e/a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section,
nine,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories
not
equal.
Sixty
five,
six,
nine
usable
open
spaces,
insufficient
nautical
65
section
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
65
6,
an
eye
on
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Y
R
R
D
G
R
A
A
D
R
AB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Whitney
Celestin
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
so
this
property,
this
proposal
was
reviewed
at
the
Rock
Neighborhood
Association
in
the
Karman
square
council.
We
did
hold
a
nut
butters
meeting
for
this
proposal.
While
we
do
understand
there
are
quality
of
life
concerns
from
the
right
side
of
butter
because
of
the
side
yard
that
was
flagged
for
the
architect,
who
did
say
he
looked
into
fixing
that,
but
at
this
time
we
do
not
find
any
reason
to
oppose
this
three-family
going
into
this
3f
lot.
AB
S
S
A
S
E
R
D
A
A
A
AD
B
The
next
case
calling
VOA
eight
eight
zero,
zero
five
six
to
forty
nine
two
two
fifty-one
tree.
This
is
a
demolish:
an
existing
building,
erecting
new
three-story
nine
unit,
residential
building
with
siding
roof,
decks
and
fourteen
parking
spaces
in
garage.
The
violations,
article
65
section,
eight,
a
multi-family
dwelling-
is
forbidden,
use
article
65,
section,
nine,
the
fluid
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section,
nine.
The
building
has
excessive
in
stories
not
equal.
Sixty
five,
six
and
I
in
the
villain
head
is
excessive
and
feet
nautical
65-69.
The
front
yard
is
insufficient
in
article
65
section.
BL
AZ
BL
The
members
of
the
board,
the
most
updated
set
of
plans
and
mr.
Ehrlich
has
been
provided
during
the
break
with
the
ISD
stamp
copies
as
a
result
of
our
thorough
participation
in
the
community
process.
What
was
originally
the
subject
of
this
room
appeal
was
a
nine
unit,
three
story,
building
with
underground
parking
underneath
it.
The
most
recent
plans
call
for
six
units.
A
BM
Chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
a
site
bounded
on
three
sides
by
a
road
or
private
way.
There's
a
20
foot
grade
difference
from
the
rear
to
the
front.
Initially,
you
put
the
garage
into
the
hill
with
residential
units
above
through
extensive
community
outreach
end
negotiations.
We
reduce
the
unit
count
from
nine
to
six
units,
remove
the
garage
and
put
the
parking
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
It's
still
a
three
storey
building,
but
now
it's
a
six
unit
building
with
eight
parking
spaces
down
from
a
nine
unit,
building
with
15
parking
spaces.
A
BM
A
D
A
BN
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
van
nelle
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
went
through
an
extensive
community
process,
including
a
presentation
to
the
Ashmont
Adams
civic
associations
and
five
on-site
of
butters
meetings.
The
applicant
has
worked
extensively
with
a
community
to
accommodate
their
concerns
with
a
unit
count
and
design
the
parking
and
the
site
conditions,
including
the
Mosel
time
to
dumpster
on
site
for
coffee.
At
the
traction
concerns
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
BM
Course,
madam
chair,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
site
is
founded
on
three
sides
by
roads
in
fronts:
the
public
way,
which
is
minded
street,
but
it's
bounded
on
the
right
side
in
the
rear
by
mine
at
Park
Road.
So
we
would.
The
occupant
would
access
a
mining
park
via
park
street
drive
up
the
small
hill,
the
20
foot,
a
great
change
and
park
in
the
rear
of
the
building
and
then
would
step
down
to
the
rear
staircase
for
entrance
to
the
building
and.
A
R
B
Calling
VOA
nine
four
five:
three
five:
six
185
London
Street:
this
is
a
complete
renovation
in
living
space.
Edition
change,
locks
for
three
family
to
a
full
family,
the
violation,
article
25
section:
five-
is
the
flood
hazard
district
article
53,
section
8,
a
4
family
dwelling
unit
is
a
forbidden
use.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
law
area
for
additional
drawing
in
is
insufficient
article
53,
section
9
deployed
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
B
BO
A
BO
It's
not
zoning
sub-district
is
a
three
f2000.
Our
lot
size
is
2500
square
feet.
The
zoning
violations
are
as
follows:
for
family
uses
forbidden
use
if
they
are
required.
A
Fire's
1.0,
we're
proposing
one
point
for
the
building
height
requirement
is
three
stories
at
35
feet:
we're
proposing
four
stories
at
40
feet:
five
inches
front
yard
setback
requirements,
five
feet,
we're
doing
a
mobile
frontage
side
yard
is
two
and
a
half
require.
BO
BO
BO
A
A
BO
A
BB
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
Berlin
and
family
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
I,
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
of
opposition
for
this
project.
At
this
time,
this
project
didn't
get
any
support
from
the
community
via
Barron's
have
many
concerns
about
the
proposal
and
also
maverick
central
neighborhood
association
board
against
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
BC
BC
A
BI
Michael
main
juicy
193
London
Street
I'm
about
three
houses
to
the
left
of
it
of
that
project.
The
187,
like
you
said,
is
very
similar
to
it.
Unfortunately,
by
some
unknown
accident,
none
of
the
opposing
abutters
were
notified
about
it
until
after
that,
187
was
was
already
passed,
but
on
this
one
here,
the
lot
size
is
insufficient
dis,
already
they're
doing
the
fourth
storey
the
same
owners
on
187
there's
another
couple
of
houses
that
are
going
to
forth
stories.
There's
not
enough
parking,
there's
already.
BI
No
parking
left
on
the
street
and
people
are
coming
down
from
upper
end
of
the
street,
lower
ends
of
the
street,
trying
to
find
parking
spots
so
adding
another
story
to
it.
It
is
a
three
of
2,000
lot
and
by
the
size
of
it,
is
going
to
be
about
almost
to
the
almost
4,000
square
feet,
because
they're
planning
and
adding
probably
part
of
the
basement
you've
got
four
storeys.
BI
BO
BF
K
A
G
AE
AP
B
Is
a
renovation
of
an
existing
building
at
658,
ep's
Broadway
to
include
the
magician
and
the
rig
on
an
additional
floor
to
combine
lost,
654,
656,
656,
R
and
658
660
East,
Broadway
Street,
and
demolish
the
existing
building
at
654
East
Broadway
Street
change,
oxygen
from
a
restaurant
offices
and
three
units,
the
restaurant
offices
and
eight
units,
the
violations,
article
68,
section,
8
Floyd,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
69,
section
9,
the
height
is
excessive.
Radical
69,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
69,
section
9
of
the
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
B
G
B
AS
O
AS
If
misfortune
run
out
madam
chair,
this
proposal
is
basically
you
have
the
one
restaurant
with
a
playwright,
and
then
you
have
two
buildings
behind
it.
Those
two
buildings
we
raised
combined.
They
have
five
residential
units
and
then
we're
renovating
an
existing
three
units
and
adding
a
floor
net
is
going
to
be
8
units
to
8
units.
So
there
will
be
no
additional
units
and
currently
what's
existing
on
the
property.
AS
AS
D
AK
BP
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Evan
from
counselor
Edmonds
office,
would
like
to
one
record
in
opposition.
There
was
a
subsequent
community
meeting
after
the
abutters
meeting,
in
which
civic
groups
and
residents
relayed
concerns
about
quality
of
life
issues.
The
applicant
then
deferred
her
at
the
CBA
and
met
with
the
neighbors
recently
again
on
these
issues.
It
looked
like
both
sides
worked
to
negotiate
in
good
faith
and
make
a
compromise,
but
unfortunately
they
couldn't
come
to
a
consensus.
We'd
like
to
see
everyone
come
back
to
the
table
and
try
to
work
out
these
outstanding
issues.
AI
Jim's,
what
Paul
Sullivan
we
have
said:
Cobb
Lodge
Michael
Flaherty,
due
to
the
communal
efforts
that
went
into
drafting
article
68.
The
council
has
not
support
this
project
as
proposed.
He
does
know
that
the
proponent
worked
with
the
neighborhood,
but
there
are
still
many
concerns
from
director
butters
and
do
that
fact
that
council
does
not
support
the
project.
AH
BQ
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
board,
my
name
is
Luanne
O'connor
and
I
represent
the
City
Point
Neighborhood
Association
vice
chair,
as
well
as
speaking
for
the
Gate
of
Heaven
Neighborhood
Association
as
well
working
in
conjunction.
We,
we
oppose
this
project
for
several
reasons,
and
what
we're
asking
the
board
to
consider
today
is
to
actually
uphold
the
legal
zoning
of
article
68.
A
BQ
BQ
East
Broadway
is
under
article
68.
It
was
an
ffar
of
1.5
and
height
of
35
feet.
The
proponent
is
asking
to
triple
I,
mean
I'm,
sorry
to
EE
up,
they
are
to
2.99
and
to
ask
for
an
additional
10
feet,
so
Broadway
East
Broadway
has
not
been
zoned
for
that.
So
with
that
the
quality
of
life
issues
that
are
bringing
forth
with
this
project
are
the
expansion
of
the
playwright.
We
cannot
get
into
capacity,
he
won't
come
through
with
that.
BQ
He
owns
another
bar
and
I
do
use
bar
versus
restaurant
on
Thursday
Friday,
Saturday
Sunday
nights,
this
particular
project.
You
can't
utilize
the
sidewalk.
There
are
crowds
of
young
Millennials
out
there,
smoking
vaping
drinking
and
it's
right
a
butting
to
the
public
library,
the
South
Boston
Public
Library,
which
is
open
in
the
evenings.
BQ
BQ
A
BQ
BQ
That's
where
we'd
like
for
mr.
Ikari
and
his
attorney
to
come
back
to
the
table
we
want.
We
would
like
for
him
to
have
a
discussion
about
height
and
density
if
we
can
reach
somewhere
in
the
middle
with
height
and
density,
then
I
think
that
we
can
both
be
happy,
but
with
this
current
height,
it's
going
to
be
too
tall
too
dense,
no
parking,
everything,
ok,.
A
T
Marry
me
Oh
Larry,
director
butter,
651,
East,
Broadway,
South,
Boston,
Mass,
I,
live
directly
across
the
street
from
it,
and
I
have
some
pictures
of
what
the
lines
look
like
at
10:30
at
night,
it's
very
very
loud
and
the
patrons
there's
also
a
package
store
right
beside
the
playwright
and
they
sometimes
go
when
they
buy
some
nips
and
stuff
and
they
stop
their
drinking
while
they're
in
line.
They
also
use
the
library
parking
lot
as
they
are.
Urinal
and
I
have
some
pictures
of
that
as
well.
T
AS
AS
That's
a
very
good
point,
because
if
we
go
back
to
when
we
initially
would
up
here
before
you
guys,
we
asked
for
a
deferral
at
that
point.
At
that
point.
I
had
submitted
a
letter
which
you
all
have
up
there
and
there
were
several
issues
that
Ed
Flynn
myself,
Joey,
Akari
and
Charlie
from
Ed's
office.
We
sat
down,
we
talked
about,
they
said
these
are
the
issues
and
those
were
soundproof
in
the
building
making
valium
the
balconies
Juliet
balconies
crowd
control
at
Clos.
Closing
bands
moved
to
the
rear
of
the
building
closer.
A
AS
AS
So
we
had
a
meeting,
not
this
past
Friday,
the
Friday
before
we
walked
out
of
the
meeting
all
those
situations,
all
their
requests
that
were
on
the
sheet
were
met
in
that
letter,
which
you
guys
have
was
sent
to
Ed
Flynn
and
we
agreed
to
everything
they
requested
now
at
the
eleventh
hour-
and
this
comes
up
regarding
a
licensing
issue,
not
a
zoning
issue
with
respect
to
the
capacity
of
the
playwright
bar
which
is
being
redone.
That's
the
issue
that
they're
getting
stuck
on
right
now,
that's
something
that
has
to
go
through
the
fire
department.
A
AS
A
AS
A
Generally
increasing
capacity
for
establishments
like
this
come
to
them
to
this
board.
First,
before
going
to
licensing
you
know
so
so
this
sounds
to
me
that
you're
proposing
same
capacity
more
space,
and
if
it's,
if
that's
not
true,
then
you
know,
maybe
you
need
to
get
a
new
rejection
letter
requested
a
Perl
get
a
new
rejection.
Letter
or
I
mean
it's.
It's
a
decision.
AS
For
you
to
make,
so
that's
not
true,
because
the
I'm
not
going
to
mislead
anybody
on
this
board
that
the
intention
is
to
expand
the
use
of
that
bar,
and
that
was
several
things
that
came
into
that
a
vestibule
soundproofing
and
all
the
other
things
that
go
along
with
it.
So
if
that's
the
board's
suggestion,
then
we
would
get
an
updated
refuse.
The
letter
that
would
address
that
and
come
back
before
the
board.
Okay,.
AS
AE
BI
A
B
Calling
boa
nine
four
seven,
two
two
three
sixty
three
Marion
Street:
this
is
a
change
of
octave
from
a
free
family
into
a
two
family,
then
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
level
and
adding
new
roof
deck
to
be
accessed
by
a
hash.
The
violations
article
2070
five.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
I
fought
article
53
section
I
on
excessive
FBA
FA,
our
medical
53,
section
9.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded
and
article
53,
section,
52,
roof
structure,
restrictions
name
and
address
full
erected.
Please
have.
BF
A
chair
members
of
the
board
Richard
since
245
southern
Sudanese
Boston
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
Jeffrey
he
was
attending
to
the
point
he
could
not
be
deferred
and
chaired
the
last
meeting
for
two
reasons.
One
I
believe
the
updated
set
of
plans
needed
to
get
to
the
board
I,
don't
believe
they
were
available
at
the
last
hearing.
In
addition,
there
was
a
request
to
consider
locating
the
utilities
at
each
of
the
units.
BF
This
proposal,
just
a
recap-
involves
a
change
of
occupancy,
rarely
seen
from
a
three
family
to
a
two
family,
actually
reducing
the
number
of
units
in
the
building.
This
will
be
intended
to
be
owner-occupied.
The
reprogramming
of
the
building
will
result
in
two
duplex
units,
so
there
will
be
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement.
There
is
a
proposed
roof
fact
that
also
doesn't
look
ahead
house
the
original
position.
BF
There
was
an
update
to
the
plan
that
was
filed,
I
believe
that's
the
planet,
and
that
was
also
presented
to
the
neighborhood
and
the
evil
of
Civic
Association,
which
did
approve
this
unanimously.
The
question
that
typically
arises-
and
we
know
the
people
is
sensitive
to
the
head
house
issue-
is
the
view
and
the
proximity
of
other
buildings
in
the
area.
The
Eagle
Hill
square
seems
to
be
the
more
sensitive
area
for
head
houses.
This
is
located
well
outside
the
Eagle
Hill
square
and
there
was
no
specific
objection
to
the
head
house
proposal
for
access,
so.
BF
A
BF
BF
Roof
deck
would
be
the
upper
unit
only
and
again.
Access
by
that
house,
mr.
Jeffrey
and
looking
at
the
design
of
the
hatch
was
not
comfortable
intends
to
occupy
this
with
his
family
and
the
safety
issues
that
go
along
with
accessing
the
roof.
Deck
were
we're
considered,
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
house
was
proposed
so.
G
D
BF
D
BB
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Lena
Tommy
Lee
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
I,
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
during
the
community
process.
The
developer
address
all
the
concerns
of
their
barriers
and
also
had
strong
support
from
the
barriers
and
from
the
equal
Hill
Civic
Association.
Thank
you
good.
BC
D
U
B
Very
much
calling
the
last
case
of
the
day
calling
VOA
nine
two
two
four:
seven:
five
69
to
71
maverick
school:
this
is
a
change
of
art
from
a
dry-cleaning
store,
with
accessory
storage
to
six
apartments
in
a
registered
marijuana.
Dispensary.
The
violations,
article
53
section,
11,
cannabis
establishment-
is
a
conditional
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BR
An
attorney
representing
the
petitioner
we're
at
52
Congress
Street
in
Boston,
had
the
firmest
Smith
pistol,
avec
prophet
and
with
me
to
my
left
is
George
Morenci,
who
is
working
with
us
in
the
zoning
component.
We
do
allow
cannabis
and
our
firm
and
to
my
right
is
Steve
Vasco
Steve
as
a
part
of
the
ownership
group
resided
21
Farms
Avenue
in
East
Boston.
BR
BR
A
L
George
Moran
said:
oh
I've
been
introduced.
My
name
is
George
Moran
see
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston,
a
procedural
history.
This
matter
was
before
the
board
in
March
of
2019,
there
were
two
cannabis
cases
in
succession
direct
succession
at
the
hearing.
This
was
the
second
after
the
first
was
approved.
The
question
at
the
time
was
because
of
the
1/2
mile
buffer
zone,
that
is
in
the
code
whether
this
warden
could
in
fact
approve
under
a
conditional
use
standard,
which
is
the
standard
in
this.
L
A
L
Application
is
simply
for
a
conditional
use
permit.
That
is
the
sole
violation
that
is
before
the
board.
It's
not
a
variance
standard
at
the
marsh
hearing
of
the
matter
was
substantially
put
on
record
in
terms
of
appropriate
facilities
being
established
and
maintained.
Mr.
hunt
can
go
mr.
Smith
can
go
through
that
again
for
the
forward.
I
realize
that
some
members
sitting
today
we're
not
here
in
March.
The
reason
why
we
are
here
today
proceeding.
L
I
will
obviously
speak
to
Zoning
again
if
there
is
that
recurring
question
on
how
the
board
may
approve
this
on
a
conditional
use,
standard
right
now,
attorney
Smith
can
and
I
think
it
would
benefit
the
record
Ian.
The
members
of
the
board,
we're
not
sitting
in
March
just
to
have
the
particulars
of
the
the
actual
operation
of
the
proposed
use.
Put
on
record.
Please.
A
BR
Have
stories
in
the
back?
We
also
have
the
basement
available
to
us
under
the
regulations
which
are
really
strict
in
terms
of
storage,
they'll
be
actually
a
vault.
The
product
itself
has
walked
at
all
times
until
there's
an
opportunity
for
a
sale,
in
which
case
a
park
is
then
delivery
and
the
transaction
that
takes
place,
but
that
is
completely
that
is
always
off
the
floor.
That
is
always
off
the
retail
center.
BR
BR
There's
a
couple
of
things
in
play
with
line,
certainly
we've
all
very
familiar
with
the
first
two
openings.
When
Cara's
came
from
pretty
much
the
entire
northeastern
part
of
the
United
States
there
are
22
stores
have
opened
since
then.
Lions
have
not
really
been
an
issue.
There's
been
a
number
of
ways
that
happens
as
more
stores
open.
Clearly,
the
impact
is
spread
throughout.
BR
BR
There's
always
we
have
security
at
all
times
live
security,
unarmed,
clearly,
at
all
times,
for
crowd
control.
If
lines
do
develop,
we
will
have
some
room
inside
our
store.
We
would
move
to
appointment.
Only
we
don't
want
lions.
We
want
to
enhance
the
square,
not
harm
the
square.
Our
goal
is
to
make
mark
squared
the
kind
of
square
that
I
think.
All
of
us
hope
it
in
in
big
city
can.
D
BR
Will
tell
you
based
on
the
CCC
process.
We
probably
can't
open
this
store
until
the
middle
of
2020
optimistically.
By
that
time,
he
might
be
the
hundredth
store,
opened.
I,
don't
think
this,
probably
there's,
probably
more
more
economic,
more
store,
more
customers
at
a
Dunkin
Donuts
they'll
be
here.
If
there
are
any
issues
at
all,
we
don't
want
lines
in
the
square
with
my
lines
at
our
door,
we
will
go,
we
will
a
have
our
security
at
all
times.
BR
A
BR
Has
not
been
the
experience
I,
think
of
the
folks
who've
come
before
us
would
be
the
letter.
We
will
gladly
accept
appointment.
Only
initially,
that's
not
a
problem
for
us.
We
don't
think
that
that,
but
we
think
that
that
has
worked
in
a
number
of
stores
across
the
Commonwealth.
Typically,
what
happens?
BR
It's
a
claimant
only
and
then,
after
a
period
of
time,
when,
because
this
kind
of
normalizes
that
process
kind
of-
and
sometimes
it's
a
matter
of
a
week
or
two
sometimes
could
be
a
month
or
two
in
brookline,
which
is
an
extraordinary
store
given
its
again
within
128.
It's
the
only
store
right
now
Frank
and
it
has
no
appointments
and
is
very
popular
store
but
as
I
say,
we'll
be,
but
100th
I
would
estimate
there
be
at
least
200
was
in
front
of
us,
but
we'll
gladly
go
up
women-only,
initially,
not
a
problem.
L
Chair
members,
I
think
testimony
has
been
presented
that
this
store
would
likely
not
open
until
mid
2020.
Yet
the
board
is
being
asked
to
approve
this
today.
So
as
the
chair,
as
other
members
have
pointed
out
whether
or
not
there's
a
Lion,
King
and
maverick
Square,
is
it
today
issue
I
think
my
clients
would
be
happy
if
it
were
the
desire
of
the
board
to
approve
this,
with
the
proviso
that
it
be
by
appointment.
L
Only
certainly
at
the
outset
of
operations
by
the
ton
of
this
were
to
open
I
think
it
could
be
better
a
judged
to
whether
that
would
be
necessary.
It
certainly
could
and
would
open
that
way
if
it
were
the
desire
of
the
board,
and
then
that
could
be
modified
in
terms
of
input
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
in
the
local
look
at
what
the
officials
and
the.
BR
BR
BR
A
BR
Be
a
security
vestibule
when
people
enter
prior
to
entering
the
store
you
must
you
can't
open
the
door
get
through
that
first
door
without
having
a
government-issued
ID
that
shows
you're
at
least
21
years
of
age.
That's
done
by
a
camera
or
wire
a
live
security
person.
Can
you
get
inside
our
store
and
there
there's
a
there
is
one
of
those
machines
that
actually
test
to
make
sure
that
what
you
have
is
a
legitimate
government
ID.
BR
That's
the
second
point
where
we
visually
and
we
determine
that
you
are
the
appropriate
age
and
legal
to
do
business
with.
The
third
point
is:
when
you
actually
make
a
purchase.
We
checked
the
ID
a
third
time,
and
at
that
point
this
is
the
purchase.
You
will
have
a
product
that
is
sealed
that
cannot
be
opened
in
the
store,
it's
against
the
regulations
and
gets
the
law.
Frankly,
you
can't
open
it
in
the
store
and
the
childproof
seal,
which
has
have
been
approved
by
the
CCC,
is
an
incredibly
aggressive
seal.
BR
I
know
firsthand
of
that
I've
seen
a
number
of
these
they're
very
challenging
to
open
the
eye
and
nobody
is
allowed
to
open.
Obviously,
on
premises,
we
have
security,
five
premises.
We
have
tremendous
amount
of
cameras
which
I
required
by
the
CCC
we're
going
to
go
beyond
the
CCC
requirements,
cameras
that
only
go
up
and
down
our
side
of
the
square,
but
across
the
spirit
coz
of
my
unique
location,
which
is
not
on
a
street.
We
actually
have
a
square
at
no
point
in
time
in
that
party
opened.
D
L
Our
position
from
the
beginning
and
I
was
not
here
in
March,
but
since
I've
been
brought
on
board
in
at
that
time,
I
think
the
the
applicants
position
has
been
that
with
respect
to
what
is
in
the
zoning
code
with
respect
to
the
half-mile
buffer
zone,
existing
means
existing
for
anyone
unfamiliar
with
the
language,
its
contained
in
both
article
to
an
article
2
way
of
the
code.
It's
done
that
this
half
mile
buffer
zone
is
being
called
was
imposed
by
means
of
a
definitional
amendment
to
the
code.
L
Hence
it's
in
article
2,
an
article
to
a
zoning
code,
definitions
in
neighborhood
zoning
code,
definitions
and
what
what
the
definition
of
cannabis
establishment
says
is
that,
as
a
use,
it
is
conditional
in
commercial
sub-districts.
It
is
forbidden
in
residential
sub-districts.
There
is
an
asterisk,
are
two
asterisks
I
believe
after
both
conditional
and
forbidden
as
indications
of
the
status
of
the
uses,
and
then
that
asterisk
information,
essentially
a
footnote,
says
that
provided
that
no
cannabis
establishment
shall
be
within
one
half
mile
of
another.
L
Existing
establishment,
this
board
I,
think
struggled
with
the
definition
of
what
or
the
the
the
interpretation
of
what
that
meant.
What
is
existing
me?
These
cases
this
case
in
the
case
that
came
immediately
before
it
in
March,
brought
that
issue
into
into
into
you
know,
start
consideration.
We
just
approved
one.
How
can
we
approve
another
moment
than
a
half-mile
and
it
hinges
on
the
fact
that
existing
means
it
is
existing
in
terms
of
statutory
construction?
L
Now
there
is
an
acknowledgement,
I
would
suggest
on
the
part
of
the
city
between
and
then
and
between,
each
time
that
we
have
deferred
until
today,
when
we're
going
forward,
the
City
Council
has
addressed
the
issue
working
with
the
mayor's
office.
The
City
Council
has
drafted
a
proposal
that
would
be
submitted
to
the
Zoning
Commission.
L
It's
not
been
acted
upon,
I,
don't
know
if
the
mayor
has
officially
signed
off
on
it,
but
what
the
City
Council
has
said
in
its
proposed
amendments
of
being
submitted
to
the
Zoning
Commission
is
that
existing
henceforth
will
mean
anything
that
is
in
existence
in
use
or
any
estab
that
has
received
any
approval
whatsoever
from
the
city
of
Boston,
including
zoning
approval.
That's
what
it
will
say.
L
D
At
the
time
that
that
was
raised
in
the
balcony
was
why
there
were
two
host
agreements
drafted
one
in
an
obvious
situation
where
there
was
a
conflict
and
let's
say
it
takes
six
months
from
approval
to
two
building.
The
project
did
pick
some
arbitrary
number
right,
so
you
prove
one
defer
the
second
and
now,
if
we
potentially
approve
that
one,
the
other
one
has
a
few
months
head
start
at
a
certain
point,
it
will
become
existing.
Does
that
mean,
then
that
is
no
longer
accurate
because
it
no
longer
applicable.
A
Your
guards,
alright,
let's
let's
stop
the
conversation
right
there,
because
I
just
need
us
to
just
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
this,
because
current
current
current
zoning
talks
about
existing
as
existing
operational
with
moments,
whatever
existing
means.
So
let's
stop
right
there.
Let
me
ask:
is
there
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
BB
AI
AI
The
council
also
would
like
to
point
out
that
he
feels
that
there's
a
compelling
interest
to
get
an
equity
and
veteran
owned
business
open
under
the
new
legislation,
but
also
would
like
to
emphasize
that
this
would
be
a
stringent
exception
and
not,
and
not
the
rule
to
the
half
mile
buffer
zone
regulation
so
due
to
that
you're
not
American
support.
Thank.
BJ
BJ
BG
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Francis
McCune
Deacon
from
Most
Holy
Redeemer
parish
in
East,
Boston,
Most,
Holy,
Redeemer
parish
in
our
school
East
Boston
Central
Catholic,
located
very
close
to
Maverick
square.
We
have
over
2,000
parishioners
and
our
school
serves
students
who
were
three
two
years
old
through
the
eighth
grade.
BG
Approximately
150
students
use
the
team
to
get
to
the
school
maverick
square,
is
the
heart
of
East
Boston
and
no
place
for
applied
shop.
The
location
is
too
close
to
schools
such
as
ours.
In
the
McKay
school
at
122,
Cottage
Street,
the
Dante
Alighieri
Montessori
School
at
37
Gulf
Stream
coordinates
counseling
LLC
at
154
Maverick,
an
addiction
specialist
is
only
230
feet
from
the
proposed
new
location.
BG
BG
BG
BG
A
BG
J
BS
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Denise
McHugh
and
I
live
right
around
the
corner
from
the
central
square
facility.
What's
your
address,
fifty-six
Princeton
Street
is
Boston
and
I
believe
the
law
is
meant
to
implement
and
not
to
seek
advantage
and
change
it
around
for
advantage.
So
I
would
like
the
law
of
being
too
close
to
the
other
facility
for
the
law
to
be
for
us
to
be
law-abiding
and
to
not
just
fiddle
faddle
with
the
lorentz
just
to
impose
the
law
as
the
law
stands.
Instead
of
reinventing
the
law,
Thank
You.
L
This,
in
virtue
roots,
signed
host
community
agreements.
The
same
day,
they
appeared
at
the
board
of
appeal
in
March.
On
the
same
day,
they
appeared
in
succession
to
one
another
those
facts
painted
in
bright
light:
the
fact
that
the
zoning
code
amendment
as
written
created
the
potential
for
ambiguity
and
conflict
with
respect
to
the
half-mile
buffer
zone.
That
issue
is
being
addressed.
L
This
issue
should
not
come
up
in
the
future
on
subsequent
cases,
it
came
up
here
but
to
say
simply
that
whoever
was
first
in
line
literally
at
the
hearing
should
be
able
to
proceed
an
open
and
establishment,
and
the
other
should
not
be
because
the
former
may
or
may
not
open
is
is
unfair.
Quite
frankly,
this
is
a
zoning
approval
right
now
that
zoning
approval
requires
that
this
board,
as
a
conditional
use
matter,
only
approve
a
facility
that
is
not
located
within
a
half
mile
of
an
existing
facility.
There
is
no
such
existing
facility.
BR
Madam
chair
just
add
a
closing
point
on
and
I
wanted
to
make
this
point.
Our
ownership
group
to
my
right
is
Steve
Basco
steam
and
his
father
owned
50%
they're,
not
fronts
they
own
50%
of
our
businesses
of
the
business.
There
are
four
owners
in
their
entirety.
All
four
reside
in
these
Boston.
You
just
heard
the
name
of
the
other
entity
Berkshire
roots
they're
from
Berkshire
County,
which
is
appropriate
name
Steve.
Miss
Phinney
is
in
the
military
he's.
BR
The
veteran
half
of
ownership
is
Latino,
which
is
what
the
council
and
the
CCC
frankly
and
all
of
us
frankly,
I
tried
to
entice
in
encourage
in
this
business.
It's
a
very
unique
situation.
We
are
from
the
square
we
own.
The
building.
Almost
everybody
who
comes
before
you
will
be
will
come
as
a
Rita
as
a
tenant
or
what
service
greeters
renting
space
we
own
this
space
and
beyond
the
building
next
door
in
the
business
next
door.
BR
BR
BR
A
D
BO
D
Which
is
that
I'm
doing
this,
because
on
the
merits
of
this
particular
case,
and
have
this
been
first
in
the
agenda
back
in
March,
we
might
have
in
the
story
so
in
some
ways,
there's
a
problem
of
fairness,
but
this
board
never
should
have
been
put
in
this
position
in
the
first
place
and
I
continue
to
feel
that
way
and
maybe
who's
gonna
get
corrected.
But
it
was.