►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 7-28-20
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
Meeting starts at 4:30
A
A
A
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen.
You
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted
and
asked
to
comment.
As
with
our
input,
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
A
A
A
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
store
three
to
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
your
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hands
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads
the
address
into
the
record.
A
A
Okay,
one
two
three
four.
Therefore,
we
have
a
five
member
board.
Any
applicants.
Until
we
hear
from
the
mr
kendall
any
applicants
to
be
aware
that
we
have
a
five
member
board
and
to
get
approval
of
a
project.
You
need
all
five
members
in
part
you
can,
when
your
case
is
old,
requested
administrative
deferral-
if
you
feel
that
this
is
is
not
in
your
best
in
interest,
can
we
use
the
fortune
to
be
start
with
the
extensions?
Please.
B
A
Just
to
remind
applicants
that
we
are
expecting
projects
that
we've
two
three
years
ago,
four
years
ago
to
proceed
so
may
I
have
the
alphabet
down
the
line.
Please.
A
Okay
is
miss.
It
miss
mr
claudia
there
because
he's
probably
very
he's,
usually
pretty
good.
A
Please
one
year
right
as
we
usually
do.
A
Oh
I'm
sorry
it's
listed
on
the
on
the
agenda
as
an
extension.
B
A
F
F
Morning,
chair
richard
lin's,
245,
sounder
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petition
here,
requesting
a
one
year
exception.
The
last
extension
this
last
expired
on
march
30th
of
this
year,
we're
asking
for
a
one-year
extension
to
march
through
21.
F
Although
it
did
expire
on
march
30th.
I
would
point
out
that,
under
the
governor's
order,
all
variances
and
approvals
that
were
in
effect
at
the
time
the
governor's
order
went
into
effect
were
told
during
that
period
for
additional
time.
So
we
did
make
our
request
during
that.
During
that
executive
order.
A
And
what's
the
reason
and
how
many
extensions
have
you
had
so
far,
this.
F
We're
finalizing
plans
and
details.
This
involves
some
conservation
commission
issues
that
we're
working
through.
We
believe
we'll
have
this
wrapped
up
in
the
next
six
to
eight
weeks,
and
I
know
that
the
design
part
of
this
process
has
also
been
completed.
B
F
Good
morning,
madam
chair
richard
linz,
again
45
sumner
street
east
boston
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner.
This
matter
originally
expired.
Most
recently
expired
on
june
30
of
this
year.
It
has
been
extended
once
previously.
F
B
B
Madam
chair,
I
believe
the
next
three
cases
are
combined,
I'm
not
sure
if
the
if
the
counselor
could
tell
me
if
bennington
street
is
involved
in
this
particular
next,
three
addresses.
F
All
of
the
maverick
street,
mr
secretary,
are
part
of
the
same
average
173
to
177.
Now
all
included.
Okay.
B
I'm
going
to
call
those
into
the
record
calling
boa
8254
473
173
to
177
maverick.
There
are
two
companion
cases
case:
boa
825,
475,
175
maverick
and
boa
825
478
177
maverick
madam
chair.
These
all
expired
on
july
13th
of
this
year
and
they've
already
had.
This
would
be
their
first
extension
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
F
Good
morning,
madam
chair,
richard
lim's,
245
center
street
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
also
going
through
and
finalizing
the
design
for
this
building.
There
has
been
some
analysis
as
to
whether
or
not
this
could
be
rehabbed
or
it
needs
to
be
taken
down.
We're
finalizing
that
with
the
engineering
and
we
we
tend
to
have
a
decision
on
that
within
the
next
next
few
weeks.
G
F
B
F
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
lenz,
245
sumner
street
east
boston
of
the
african
petitioner.
This
involves
a
change
of
use
and
occupancy,
which
is
the
lesser
of
the
concern
here.
This
also
has
some
renovations
to
an
existing
gas
station,
retail
location
and
they're
in
the
process
of
still
finalizing
the
plans
to
address
what
was
raised
as
part
of
the
community
process.
B
F
F
Richard
lin's
245
sumner
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner,
as
the
secretary
indicated,
this
does
expire
at
the
end
of
this
year.
They
are
in
the
process
of
finalizing,
but
this
also
involves
conservation
commissions
as
a
person,
that's
located
very
close
to
the
water,
so
anticipation
of,
hopefully
having
that
done.
We
just
wanted
to
ensure
that
we
request
timely
and
we're
hoping
for
a
one
year.
Extension
on
this
as
well.
A
So
may
I
have
an
extension
from
well
from
from
the
from
the
december
day
place.
B
Madam
chair,
because
it's
extensive
amount
of
cases
here,
I'm
going
to
call
into
the
record
the
first
case
to
the
last
case
and
give
the
address.
If
that's,
okay
with
the
chair.
B
A
Mr
feaster,
as
that's
what's
right
into
the
record
this
ex
all
these
skills
is
all
these
applications
expired,
and
this
puts
us
in
a
very
difficult
mission
of
of
approving
something
that
has
been
expected.
Can
you
please
explain?
Yes,.
H
Yes,
let
me
do
that
adam
and
I,
and,
and
certainly
it
is,
I
understand
the
board's
processes,
but
what
occurred
here-
and
I
just
want
to
take
the
board
back
to
his
original
granting
of
this
development
project
back
in
july
of
2005..
H
This
was
99
units
of
housing
that
were
built
and
they're
built
on
spec
by
the
developer,
having
persons
who
want
houses
built
based
upon
specs,
so
they
don't
just
build
the
houses
out
beside
the
financing
issues
and
the
circumstances.
There
are
only
not
eight
nine
to
ten
parcels
that
remain
in
this
now.
Regrettably,
the
developer
did
not
contact
me
missed
the
date
for
for
when
their
extension
expired,
and
I
did
in
fact
file
this
relatedly
in
terms
of
may
of
this
particular
year
now.
H
H
Why
community
support
on
the
state
hospital
grounds
and
the
circumstances
here
is
just
an
inadvertent
oversight
on
the
fact
that
of
not
making
the
request
for
an
extension
for
that
period
of
time?
I
also
if
the
board
is
generous
enough
and
desirable
of
doing
that.
One
of
the
things
that
I
is
clear
here.
I
know
the
board
likes
to
do
one-year
extensions
and
I
certainly
would
welcome
that,
but
the
reality
of
this
in
this
market,
in
this
climate
etc.
H
Unless
the
board
wants
us
to
be
making
this
request
each
and
every
year
the
likelihood
of
these
nine
to
ten
lots
being
developed
in
that
period
of
time
is
unlikely
and
or
remotely
likely,
and
I
would
look
if
the
board
is
generous
enough
to
grant
us
an
extension
at
all
since
we're
making
a
request
after
the
date
has
passed,
the
board
might
look
at
a
longer
period
of
time,
because,
unfortunately,
the
method
of
trying
to
track
the
extensions
is
oftentimes
done
in
the
developer's
shot
a
shop,
and
so
therefore,
these
inadvertent
occurrences,
not
getting
the
requesting
timely,
might
occur
in
the
future.
A
I
think
I'm
sympathetic
to
your
requests,
so
did
you
mention
that
this
was
the
first
application
came
in
in
2005?
A
Yes,
and
I
have
to
say,
I
recently
drove
by
the
site-
and
it
looks
like
construction
is,
is
proceeding
the
the
the
thing
that
I'm
really
absolutely
concerned
about
is
the
precedence
that
this
sets
honestly,
I'm
very
sympathetic
to
the
developer.
I
know
this.
The
state
hospital
site
very
well
and
I
completely
understand
it,
but
this
puts
us
as
the
board
in
a
terribly
awkward
position,
so.
H
May
I
speak
to
that
before
you
rule
adam
cheering
members
of
the
board.
I
understand
the
circumstances
which
this
request
puts
you
in,
but
I
know
that
it
has
always
been
the
board's
position
that
nothing
is
presidential
in
the
sense
of
what
it
might
do.
H
I'm
I
I
guess
I
I'm
throwing
myself
on
the
leniency
of
the
board,
because
no
as
a
practitioner
I-
and
I
think
that
what
I
will
do
is
take
over
responsibility
if
the
board
grants
this
extension
to
ensure
that
within
our
system-
and
I
believe,
attorney
frazier
is
on
as
well
that
we
will
track
this
because
the
communication,
sometimes
once
we
move
past
the
zoning
and
with
the
developer,
is
non-existent
until
certain
a
circumstance
like
this
occurs.
H
So
I
recognize
the
the
quandary
that
this
request
puts
the
board
in,
but
I
hope
that
the
board
will
be
lazy
enough
to
grant
at
least
a
one-year
extension
from
the
date
of
the
october
date
and
I'll,
be
certain
I'll
be
coming
right
back.
Turning
around
making
another
request.
If
that
is
granted.
A
C
You
said
that
these
lots
are
being
built
on
specs,
so
that
they're
only
so
that
you
really
don't
know
when
they
might
be
built.
Is
it
possible
for
for
you
to
just
grant
the
extensions
on
the
projects
that
you
know
are
coming
up
in
the
near
future
and
then
withdraw
on
the
others
and
then
reapply
as
as
they
become
active
it?
It
just
seems
like
you're
asking
us
for
an
open-ended
blank
check.
H
Mr
erlick
not
really,
and
I
wish
I
had
the
exact
number
of
the
logitech,
because
even
on
the
list
which
was
written,
I
missed
a
fortune.
Many
of
those
apostles
are
have
or
have
housing
on
it
at
the
present
time.
I
think
your
point
is
definitely
well
taken,
as
I
was
was
pointed
out
to
me
by
their
developer.
H
Is
that
they're
only
about
eight
to
ten
lots
with
guard
which
are
still
undeveloped?
So
I,
if,
if
you're
asking
that
you
want
certain
addresses
you're
more
than
happy
to
provide
the
board
with
that?
I
don't
have
that
information
right
now
and
even
as
I
look
at
the
lists
of
of
certain
addresses,
I
know
that
those
particular
lots
are
in
fact
have
houses
built
on
them
and
they
are
occupied.
H
A
Okay,
so
given
that
information,
I
honestly
count
counselor,
we
honestly
I
mean
this
is
breaking
my
heart,
because
I
know
how
important
boston
state
hospital
is,
but
I
would
request
a
motion
for
denial,
because
if
it's
8
to
10
watts,
I'm
sure
that
it
would
be
fairly
easy
to
clean
the
racket,
get
everything
off.
That's
already
done
and
come
in
with
those
specific
cases.
So
the
record
is
clean
and
you
can
start
with
a
clean
slate
slot,
starting
with
a
two-year
two
years
automatically.
H
No
thank
you.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members.
Just
one
question
to
the
chair
is
this:
does
this
require
that
they
that
they
start
starting
new?
Is
that
what
this
does,
or
I'm
just
not
sure
what
the
motion
does?
I
know
it
doesn't
grant
the
extension
but
customarily
when
that's
done
to
start
anew
and
start
the
process
going
through
the
community
prosper.
Is
that
what's
intended
here.
A
A
B
Madam
chair
calling
the
next
case
calling
board
final
arbiter,
calling
voa,
820-974-29
commonwealth
avenue
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
J
So
what
we
have
here
is
a
very
finite
matter.
It
relates
to
the
groundwater.
What
you're
seeing
on
your
screen
is
our
letter
of
no
harm
from
our
geotech
engineer,
harry
burlis,
who
I
think
is
on
the
phone
somewhere
there's
the
issue
is:
is
that
this
building
29
commonwealth
avenue
received
zoning
relief,
including
g-cod
relief
at
its
hearing
about
two
years
ago,
it's
under
construction
and
as
we
got
to
the
you
know
the
difference
between
the
zoning
plans
and
the
actual
building
plans.
J
There
was
greater
detail,
of
course,
and
when
we
got
to
that
greater
detail
as
it
relates
to
the
basement
garage
and
if
you
could
go
to
maybe
the
other
file,
so
I
could
show
you
this.
We
yeah
it
would
be
great
to
just
compare
it's
just
one
sheet
on
each.
So
this
is
the
the
zoning
when
we
appeared
before
you
in
2018
you'll.
Just
you
know
this
is
the
underground
garage
and
then,
if
you
look
at
the
lower
part
of
this
plan,
you'll
see
that
there's
just
a
detail
on
the
left.
J
But
if
you
open
up
the
actual
construction
plan,
if
you
can
go
back
out
to
the
file
yeah
there
you
go.
Thank
you
so
much
you'll
see
at
the
bottom
on
that
lower
right
section.
A
K
So
this
case
was
before
you
on
june
12
2018.
At
the
time,
the
board
approved
it
for
a
g
card
for
the
one
inch
capture
and
it
was
contingent
upon
the
architect
stating
that
there
was
no
work
that
was
going
to
be
done
below
elevation,
7
boston
city
base,
which
is
the
no
harm
threshold
for
g-cod.
K
K
That
was
essentially
in
violation
of
the
conditional
use
permit
that
was
granted
by
this
board,
because
if
they
were
going
to
go
below
elevation
seven,
they
needed
the
no
harm
letter,
which
was
the
first
file
that
attorney
ross
had
up
on
the
screen.
There.
L
A
I
I
just
like
just
christian
to
have
the
floor.
Please,
okay,.
K
So
again,
since
that
time,
since
we
discovered
that
the
project
was
de-watering,
they
were
essentially
in
violation
of
the
no
harm
requirement.
They
moved
very
quickly.
We
have
the
no
harm
letter
from
the
engineer,
as
attorney
ross
was
the
first.
That
was
the
first
file
that
that
was
shown
we're
comfortable
moving
forward
that
the
project
will
have
no
negative
impact
once
they
come
up
on
the
ground.
K
In
addition,
the
project
engineer,
harry
burles,
who
is
on
this
line,
is
also
monitoring
the
water
levels
in
the
area
throughout
the
work
and
then
one
month,
post
construction,
which
again,
is
what
would
have
been
required
at
the
time
of
the
2018
hearing.
So,
in
a
nutshell,
we're
comfortable
moving
forward.
The
proponents
been
very
responsive
and
acted
quickly,
really
to
remedy
this
violation.
M
A
Before
the
hearing
starts,
I'd
like
to
to
state
that
we
now
have
a
six-member
board,
therefore,
any
all
applicants
need
to
be
to
know
that
they
need
five
members
in
support
of
their
proposal
for
the
for
the
motion
to
carry.
Thank
you,
mr
fortune.
B
B
C
A
I'm
sorry
miss
miss
small.
We
now
have
a
six
member
board,
so
you're
still
requesting
a
deferral,
yeah.
P
I
B
I
Q
B
P
Thank
you.
My
name
is
jeremy
sears
business
address
of
one
federal
street
in
boston
sitting
in
on
behalf
of
patrick
mahoney,
requesting
referral
for
nine
231
bunker
street.
We
have
to
correct
the
refusal
letter.
We
have
to
have
a
rear,
a
rear
yard
that
finally
added
and
then
obviously
we
have
to
get
that
advertised
as
well
before
we
can
come
back
to
the
board.
A
And
just
for
the
record
joe
rose
is
refusing
himself
on
this,
so
we
need
five
members
and
support
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
Richard
lens
245,
sumner
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
madam
chair,
requesting
a
deferral,
we
have
one
modification
to
the
project
that
will
go
back
to
electronics
isd
for
an
update.
This
will
actually
address
a
couple
of
butter
concerns
that
were
raised
during
the
process.
A
B
F
F
We're
modifying
the
project
to
reduce
the
height
of
the
building
and
office
of
neighborhood
services
is
asked
that
we
present
this
again
to
the
community
and
we
have
a
scheduled
date
in
august
to
do
so.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
B
F
R
F
F
A
Okay,
is
that
significant
enough
for
you
to
have
a
different
until
the
fall.
F
I
believe
the
mayor's
office
is
opposed
to
this,
although
I
believe
the
district
city
council
is
in
support.
I
think
we
wanted
to
have
that
opportunity
to
have
that.
One
further
conversation
about
this.
F
A
B
A
B
Calling
the
first
case
boa
101
3461
116
to
120
more
street.
This
is
the
combined
lots
and
raise
the
existing
building
erecting
19-unit
residential
dwelling
with
17
parking
spaces.
The
violations
article
2017-5.
This
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
8,
the
use
of
regulations
and
mfr
use
is
forbidden.
B
Article
53,
section
9
excessive
far
article
53
section,
nine,
a
number
of
allowed
stories.
Two
and
a
half
some
acts,
article
53
section,
nine,
the
maximum
allowed
height,
has
been
exceeded:
article
53,
section,
nine,
insufficient,
yad
rayad
setback,
article
53,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
guard
setback
and
article
53,
section
56,
austrian
parking
and
loading
requirements
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
O
Lindsey,
if
you
could
wait
for
one
second,
I
am
going
to
recuse
myself
from
this
matter.
A
A
Let
the
record
reflect
the
recusal.
This
means,
I'm
sure
that
you
need
all
the
the
standard.
Five
members
support
of
this
project.
This
you
can
either
go
ahead
or
request
an
administrative
default.
F
You
ask
madam
chair
richard
lin's
on
behalf
of
the
petitioners.
Helen
dia
and
deborah
white.
Also
with
me,
is
tim
miranda
from
embark
studio,
the
architect
on
this
project.
F
This
project
is
located
in
the
harbour
view
section
of
east
boston
and
there
is
a
presently
a
pre-existing
multi-family
dwelling
on
the
site,
which
would
be
a
non-conforming
use.
Our
proposal
would
involve
the
demolition
of
the
existing
multi-family
dwelling.
This
board
has
also
granted
relief
to
allow
for
a
separate
four
unit
dwelling
to
be
built
on
an
adjacent
lot.
We
would
be
abandoning
those
approvals
so
there's
a
total
of
right
now
would
be
13
units
approved
on
the
site.
F
We
would
then
combine
the
lots
and
directly
single
now
would
now
be
a
14
unit.
Building
with
parking
for
14
vehicles
and
the
total
lot
size
would
be
9
800
square
feet.
F
This
project
will
be
intended
for
home
ownership
because
we
are
requesting
relief
and
we
are
proposing
more
than
10
units
of
housing.
This
would
still
be
subject
to
the
inclusionary
development
policy,
so
there
would
be
a
total
of
two
idp
units
reserved
as
part
of
this
project.
Can
you
just
text
out.
A
For
mr
mr
lynn's.
G
F
Yes,
thank
you.
I
was
muted.
I
apologize
I'm
sure
so.
As
I
said,
this
is
intended
for
homeownership
and
two
of
the
14
units
that
are
being
proposed
would
be
included
as
ivp
units.
Just
we
can
scan
to
the
next
slide,
just
a
quick
overview.
This
is
located
at
the
end
of
moore
street,
closest
to
the
mbta
right
away
with
the
mass
support
property
located
off
to
towards
the
top
of
the
screen.
You
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
some
more
close-up
view
of
the
existing
conditions
on
the
site.
F
F
F
Sure
you
just
keep
scrolling
down.
Okay
next
slide.
There
we
go
so.
Madam
chair,
the
ground
level
here
is
showing
the
total
of
14
parking
spaces.
We
can
see
the
building
outlined
and
the
relationship
to
the
buildings
to
the
right.
There
is
no
building
to
the
left
of
this
property.
There
is
an
open
lot
that
has
buildability
restrictions
on
it,
so
it
will
remain
as
open
space.
F
F
Slide
just
a
rough
layout
of
the
the
units,
and
I
can
run
through
what
the
units
look
like.
We
have
a
total
instead
of
14
units.
Four
of
those
would
be
one
bedroom.
Seven
of
those
are
two
bedroom
and
three
of
those
are
three
bedroom.
The
two
bedroom
units
are
duplex
style
units,
so
they
do
have
two
levels
of
living.
They
will
be
entered
on
the
third
level
and
have
the
ability
to
have
internal
stairwells
up
to
the
level
next
slide.
F
Sure
a
total
of
three
three
bedrooms
just
about
eleven
hundred
square
feet
on
the
square
footage.
The
two
bedrooms
are
rather
generous
manager,
they're
about
1300
square
feet
and
the
one
bedrooms
are
about
730
square
feet.
F
Next
slide,
we
do
show
roof
decks
that
are
included
and
they're
exclusive
to
the
upper
level
units.
F
We
come
up
with
a
design
to
avoid
inclusion
of
head
houses,
so
this
would
be
a
more
skylight
style
hatch
to
create
a
lower
profile
on
the
upper
level
of
the
building,
and
that
was
something
that
was
raised
through
the
community
process.
So
we're
happy
to
incorporate
that
as
well.
Each
of
the
units,
the
upper
levels,
have
some
outdoor
space.
You
can
see
some
of
the
decks
that
are
proposed
that
are
shown
off
the
back
of
the
building,
as
well
as
the
front
next
slide.
A
F
I
think
the
next
slide
is
a
rendering
manager,
one
more
yeah,
so
our
proposed
rendering
and
again
this
was
probably
our
fourth
iteration
based
upon
a
false
community
process,
both
with
the
butters
as
well
as
the
harbour
view
neighborhood
association.
I
would
point
out
the
high
review
neighborhood
association
did
vote
to
support
this
project.
A
F
So
that
that
lot
portion
of
that
lot
is
part
of
this
proposal,
we
do
have
a
setback
on
that
side.
The
predominant
portion
of
that
lot,
I
believe,
is
controlled
either
by
the
massachusetts
port
authority,
the
mbta
and
is
preserved
for
open
space,
so
that
will
remain
as
open
space.
No,
no
structures
can
be
constructed
on
that
line.
A
T
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
lina
tramelli
the
mayor's
office
of
services
and
would
like
to
go
on
the
recording
support
during
the
community
process.
The
applicant
addressed
most
of
the
concerns
we
are
buyers.
The
office
of
neighborhood
services
received
25
letters
of
support
from
our
barriers
and
26
learners
from
members
of
the
harvard
view
community,
also
the
harborview
neighborhood
association,
bordering
support
of
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
A
A
E
Is
but
I
muted
caller
20.
do
you
want
me
to
mute
ricardo
first.
V
Yes,
my
name
is
charles
marcella,
178,
wordsworth,
street
east
boston
and
madam
chair,
I
am
opposed
to
this
particular
project.
Although
the
developer
on
this
project,
our
families
that
have
lived
in
the
neighborhood,
I
think
this
has
been
somewhat
controversial
because
of
I
think
their
impact
on
the
neighborhood,
as
well
as
the
community
they're
good
people.
A
V
V
I
think
a
lot
of
the
letters
that
people
submitted
were
for
the
four
units
that
originally
was
proposed,
and
I
think
the
neighborhood
felt
at
least
the
butter
and
I'm
speaking
for
the
director
butter
at
fort
114
moore
street,
as
opposed
to
this
particular
project
as
is-
and
I've
submitted
at
least
15
letters
of
opposition
from
abutters
on
this
project,
not
the
neighborhood.
V
V
You
know
this
is
a
two
and
a
half
story
area,
and
certainly,
if
you
wanted
to
do
three
stories,
that's
fine,
but
this
is
just
too
much
for
that
neighborhood
there.
One
of
the
abutters
says:
please
do
not
allow
this
hotel
to
be
built
in
the
neighborhood.
Now.
A
S
A
E
You
debbie
white.
A
So
please
both
debbie
white
and
helen,
the
gates,
since
you
are
the
applicants
and
mr
liz
is
representing
you,
we
will
put
you
on
mute,
please
and
please
put
your
hands
down
and
we
will
go
to
neighborhood
of
butters
to
hear
from
them.
X
My
name
is
tom
chapsonary
and
I
live
at
142
wordsworth
street
in
east
boston.
I
also
own
144
wars,
rest
street
in
east
boston.
My
entire
family
lives
in
this
neighborhood.
We
are
in
strong
support
of
this.
We
have
we.
We
work
very
closely
with
the
white
and
gator
families
around
this
community
and
on
strong
support
of
this
project.
X
A
Okay,
caller
21
is
in
in
support
mr
lynn's,
a
quick
rebuttal.
Please.
F
Yes-
and
you
know
I
I
respect
mr
marcella's
comments,
I
know
he's
an
active
member
of
the
harvard
neighborhood
association
and
we
did
do
a
very
you
know,
extended
outreach
for
this
project.
We
did
reach
out
directly
to
director
butters
and
in
this
particular
case
I
think
the
evidence
is
clear
from
the
letters
of
support
that
you
have.
I
I'm
not
sure
what
mr
marcel
was
referring
to.
We
were
very
clear.
F
We're
demolishing
the
nine
and
we're
abandoning
the
four
that
were
permitted,
so
there
are
13
units
essentially
allowed
in
this
site.
Presently
we're
proposing
to
simply
do
this
one
building
and
the
and
the
benefit
to
the
community.
Madam
chair
would
be
as
a
result
of
this.
We
have
to
add
two
idp
units,
so
14
12
market.
F
D
B
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
durango
and
toscano.
The
business
address
of
15
broad
street
here
in
boston
with
me
on.
This
call
is
super
meniger,
the
applicant
for
58
everett
street.
As
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
for
unit
one.
The
project
will
convert
356
square
feet
in
the
basement
of
storage
space
from
that
private
storage
space
to
actual
living
space
for
unit.
One.
A
Okay,
so
so
just
let
me
clarify
you
are
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
this
is
a
flood
air
flood
hazard
area
that
no
living
space
is
allowed
in
flood
flood
hazard
areas.
Are
you
then,
asking
us
for
relief
to
allow
this
space
in
the
basement,
where
we
know
clearly
ahead
of
time
would
be
subject
to
flooding?
A
Y
Am
madam
chair,
we
do
have
our
elevation
certificate
completed
and
approved.
Now
that
was
one
of
the
violations,
but
we
had
that
done
prior
to
coming
before
you
and
prior
to
going
to
the
community,
so
that
was
presented
to
the
community
and
it
is
on
record.
A
And
so
tell
us
about
that,
an
elevation
sort
of
what
is
the
base
flood
elevation
of
this.
Y
Q
Y
Z
A
Okay,
given
the
fact
that
this
is
in
the
in
the
blood
district,
what
has
an
area
we
have
a
record
of
not
approving
anything?
It
could
be
some
flooding
that
could
possibly
put
residents
at
risk.
Z
A
Do
actually
may
we
just
take
fact
that
that
motion
portfolio
for
denial
without
prejudice,
so
we
can
have
a
clean
record
that'll,
give
us
enough
time
for
anybody
who's
involved
in
the
technical
analysis
of
it.
As
far
as
the
bppa
or
the
other
three
agencies
to
give
us
an
opinion,
let's
see,
okay,.
B
471-477
hanover
street,
this
is
a
change
of
argument
from
an
existing
building
from
seven
units
to
six
units.
Interior
and
exterior
modifications.
Exterior
wood
decks
to
be
built
in
the
rear
of
the
building
building
once
was
2
bills
that
were
previous
combined,
which
is
why
471
477
hanover
stream
violations,
article
54
section
10.
The
flooding
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
54,
section
10,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
54,
section
18,
roof
structure,
restrictions
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
Y
Thank
you,
madam
chair
good
morning,
once
again
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
15,
broad
street
sweet
610
here
in
boston.
I
am
representing
tyler
murphy,
the
applicant
who
is
also
on
this
call
for
471
477
hanover
street.
The
proposal,
as
mentioned,
is
to
change
the
occupancy
from
seven
residential
units
to
six
residential
units,
renovate
the
building
and
erect
rear
decks.
Y
The
zoning
districts
are
multi-family
residential
local
services,
sub-district
and
the
lot
size
is
2
289
square
feet
in
terms
of
the
unit
breakdown,
we're
proposing
one
one-bedroom
unit
at
670
square
feet,
two
two
bedroom
units
at
about
1450
square
feet
and
then
three
three
bedroom
units
have
an
average
of
1575
square
feet.
Now,
as
mentioned,
we
do
have
a
few
violations.
Y
One
being
floor
area
ratio
allowed
in
this
area
is
a
3.0.
We
are
proposing
a
3.77.
This
is
a
pre-existing
violation
at
3.25.
Also,
we
need
a
rear
yard
variance
allowed
required
it's
12
feet.
Currently
we
have
an
11
foot
rear
back
with
the
decks.
We
would
net
six
foot
rear
setback,
so
the
only
on
the
back
is
those
decks.
Y
Finally,
we
have
a
roof
structure
restriction
because
we're
proposing
to
make
a
full
shed
dormer
as
opposed
to
the
two
individual
dormers
that
you
can
see
in
the
picture.
That's
up
right
now,
so
the
roof
structure
restriction
is
just
for
the
for
that
dormer.
Y
AA
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
quinlan
lock
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
The
barters
meeting
was
held
back
january
27th
and
was
lightly
attended.
The
project
was
also
supported
by
the
north
end
waterfront
neighborhood
council,
but
opposed
by
the
north
end
waterfront
residents,
association.
E
B
AB
B
B
Square
feet
of
which
2130
square
feet
is
exposed,
the
building
is
non-conforming
and
addition
will
require
relief.
The
violations
article
15
section
15-1
48
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
16,
section
1,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
and
article
21-section,
21-1
setback
requirements
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AE
My
name
is
james,
green,
I'm
an
attorney
with
reuben
and
redmond
at
53
state
street.
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
exeter
towers.
Llc
also,
who
has
signed
in
is
our
project
architect,
aaron
hodges
from
stantec.
This
is
a
building
at
the
corner
of
exeter
and
newbury
street.
It's
an
existing
nine-story,
96
unit,
rental
apartment,
building
with
first
floor
retail
and
restaurant
space.
AE
The
proposal
before
you
is
to
convert
the
existing
roof,
which
is
not
occupied,
was
only
mechanical
into
an
antenna
amenities
base
which
would
be
used
by
the
tenants
of
the
building.
Only
the
area
of
the
roof,
which
would
be
exposed
approximately
six
thousand
square
feet
and
an
elevator
head
house
must
be
constructed
to
provide
access
to
the
roof.
AE
AE
C
The
drawings
are
are
fine,
as
far
as
I
can
tell.
The
one
question
I
have
is
in
the
renderings.
Is
that
white,
clad
structure
on
on
top?
Is
that
the
where
the
the
the
guts
of
the
elevator
system
is
that
what
that's
for.
AE
Maybe
aaron,
maybe
I
believe
that
that
might
be
the
cladding
of
the
upper
floor
of
the
building,
because
it's
brick
with
the
cladding
above
it.
If
you
can.
C
See
the
gray
cladding
for
the
no?
No!
No!
No
I'm
looking.
First,
I'm
looking
at
the
the
glass,
the
glass
section
in
the
of
the
four
pictures,
the
top
right
one
and
then
right
behind
that
there's
a
gray
cladding
up
above
the
brick.
That
is
that,
where
the
elevator.
AE
AF
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
It's
a
modest
change
to
the
existing
building.
Thank
you.
A
AE
This
project
happened
had
been
originally
proposed
in
early
2019
and
was
opposed
by
the
community
because
of
the
size
of
the
extension,
which
was
over
2
800
square
feet.
We
reduced
that
to
297
square
feet
and
met
with
neighborhood
association,
the
back
bay
in
january
of
2020
and
received
their
letter
of
non-opposition.
A
E
R
This
is
susan
frindle
from
the
neighborhood
association
with
back
bay.
I
live
at
140
marlborough
street.
As
mr
green
said,
the
proposed
was
initially
a
much
larger
project
and
it
was
violently
opposed
by
a
large
number
of
people,
and
we
appreciate
the
fact
that
it
is
limited
in
size.
We
have
also
asked
him
about
the
elevator
override,
but
I
think
the
likely
architectural
commission
can
take
care
of
that
issue
in
support
of
the
boss.
C
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
I'd,
include
recommendation
for
bpd
sign
review
for
the
house.
AH
AE
B
Much
man
calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
104
6011
50
rogers
street.
This
is
a
constructed
duplex
townhouse
with
one
car
garage
one
and
a
half
baths
for
each
unit:
roof
deck
and
shared
each
townhouse
violations.
Article
14
section
14-1
lot
size
is
insufficient.
Article
14
section
14-3
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
14
section
4
lot.
Frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
15
section
1,
the
floridia
ratio
is
excessive.
B
Article
16,
section
8
restricted
roof
structure.
District
article
17,
section
1,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
18,
section
1
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
18
section
2
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment.
Article
20
section
8,
is
an
insufficient
rare
yard
of
certain
shallow
lot.
Article
16
section,
1
building
height,
is
excessive
and
article
16,
section
1.
The
building
has
excessive
in
stories
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
there's
no
letters
at
all.
A
AI
AI
All
right,
thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
I
apologize
for
bill
mohan.
I
don't
know
what
happened,
but
obviously
technical.
Yes,
we
come
before
you
with
a
proposed
two
townhouse
development
right
outside
andrew
square.
It's
a
small
lot.
This
is
an
infill
project.
A
AI
Certainly,
starting
at
the
top
a
lot
went,
it
is
a
narrow
lot
of
41.5
feet,
so
the
lot
requirement
being
50
floor
area
ratio
or
this
is
a
local
services.
It's
a
mixed
zoning
district.
So
it's
an
l
point
five.
AI
Therefore,
zoning
being
point
five
or
we
have
a
one
point:
seven
eight,
which
for
a
building
or
a
house,
is
quite
modest,
we're
restricted
root
structure.
We
do
have
two
roof
decks
on
top
and
with
the
community
they
were
okay
with
the
roof
decks.
In
fact,
they
like
the
penthouse
access
to
separate
them.
We
sloped
the
roof
of
the
penthouse,
so
it
slopes
back
from
the
street.
AI
A
Sorry
for
one
minute,
council,
mr
stefanov,
can
we
get
to
the
parking
and
let's
see
how
the
parking
is
supposed
to
be
working.
AI
Oh
certainly,
if
you
go
into
the
plan,
we
have
two
parking
spaces.
One
per
unit,
that's
within
the
building
structure
and
we've
done
tests
to
show
maneuverability
in
any
project.
You'd
have
1.5
or
two
parking
spaces
required
per.
Please
look
at
this
here
actually
park.
Parking's,
not
a
violation,
meet
the
parking
requirement.
A
AI
Well,
that
that
is
correct.
It
does
have
two
front
doors,
because
there
are
town
houses
with
a
garage
underneath
on
the
first
floor.
AI
The
neighbors
were
okay
with
that
at
our
presentation
we
do
have
a
small
mechanical
there's,
another
door
there
for
mechanical
purposes:
okay
from
town
houses,.
C
Well,
it's
a
very
boxing
and
not
very
attractive
design.
It,
as
you
said,
faces
the
street
and
it's
got
two
doors
on
either
side.
A
10-foot
garage
door
looks
kind
of
suburban
and
then
there's
quite
a
big
head
house
and
even
though
the
the
roof
has
been
sloped
to
minimize
or
at
least
to
reduce
the
impact
on
the
screen,
it
just
seems
unnecessarily
large.
I
it's
I
you
know
for
and,
and
it
I
mean
occupies
the
entire
lot.
It's
I
don't
know
I
have
you
know.
A
Okay
is,
may
I
have
any
information
from
the
bpda.
Z
Yes,
madam
chair
jeff,
hampton
from
the
bpda,
we
recommended
denial
without
prejudice
on
this,
because
the
density
was
too
high
and
also
we're
not
in
favor.
Obviously,
if
the
the
head
house,
we
prefer
to
see
a
hatch,
I'm
not
sure
why.
If
mr
stefanov
said
that
they're
below
the
height,
I
don't
know
why
they
would
have
been
cited
for
building
heightened
stories.
Z
My
only
guess
would
be
that
the
the
head
house
occupies
more
than
one
third
of
the
roof
area,
but
in
any
case
we'd,
probably
if
this
were
to
be
approved
by
the
board,
we'd
ask
for
a
significant
design,
review
and
elimination
of
the
headhouse.
A
Thank
you,
may
I
have
is
any
questions
from
the
board.
I.
D
AI
AJ
Hi,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
haley
dylan
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services.
We
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
overwhelming
support
from
the
community.
As
joe
just
saw
on
maps.
It
was
a
rundown
building,
so
they
were
more
than
happy
to
see
something
nice
go
there
and
people
living
there
rather
than
have
it
be
vacant.
Thank
you.
AK
A
AH
Phantom
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
on
behalf
of
city
council
at
large
michael
flaherty
council,
like
to
go
on
record
of
support
with
epda
design
review.
AL
I
would
like
to
speak
in
opposition.
Can
you
hear
me.
AL
Hi,
my
name
is
paul
morice,
I
own
the
adjacent
property
of
23
preble
street
2468
windella,
and
I
would
like
to
voice
my
opposition
to
said
project
due
to
the
fact
that
it
is
too
close
to
the
property
line,
I'm
okay
with
the
project.
Aside
from
that,
I
would
just
like
to
see
it
not
so
close
to
my
boundaries.
AL
C
Yeah,
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
for
denial
without
prejudice.
I
I
recognize
that
there
is
community
support
for
the
improvement,
but
I
think
they're
just
too
many
things
that
are
wrong
with
the
design
that
disco
bpda
design
review.
I
would
suggest
that
mr
stefanov
kind
of
rethink
the
proposal.
I
mean
with
the
bpda
and
come
up
with
something
that
is
more
appropriate.
AH
B
Call
the
next
case
calling
voa
104
7746
83
to
87
highland
street.
This
is
seeking
to
change
location
of
an
existing
mixed-use
building
from
two
residential
dwellings
and
the
store
to
three
residential
dwellings.
The
violations,
article
50
section
29
additional
lotteries,
insufficient
article
50,
section
29,
usable
open
space,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AB
AM
O
A
Yeah
he
should
be
on
the
line
or
somebody
from
his
law
office
should
be
on
the
line.
He
is.
A
Yes,
please
go
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
what
you
propose.
Yes,
sorry.
AP
About
that
I
was
muted,
I'm
just
raising
my
hand,
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
broad
street,
representing
my
client
dylan
brennan,
the
owner
of
83-87
highland
street.
This
is
a
straightforward
proposal
to
change
the
occupancy
from
an
existing
two-family
dwelling,
with
a
store
on
the
first
floor
to
change
that
first
floor
to
a
residential
unit.
This
particular
area
is
a
zoning
district
of
row
house,
so
this
use
would
be
more
conducive
to
the
neighborhood
just
another
point
to
reference.
AP
AP
The
two
violations,
just
to
mention
one.
When
you
change
that
unit
to
residential,
you
are
required
for
an
additional
lot
area
of
2
000
square
feet
which
we
do
not
have,
and
usable
open
space
is
required
of
200
per
unit
square
feet
per
unit.
We
have
400
total.
The
building
will
remain
as
it
stands.
There
will
be
some
renovation
to
the
exterior
putting
in
windows
where
some
of
those
doorways
are
there's
a
bunch
of
different
entrance
ways
that
are
unnecessary.
AP
Sure,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
madame
clerk,
thank
you.
This
just
shows
you
the
proposed
new
first
floor
unit.
Now,
what's
as
proposed,
it's
1428
square
feet.
It
is
a
three-bedroom
two-bath
area.
On
that
space.
AP
A
That's
a
could
be
a
pretty
handsome
building.
Okay,
is
this
an
architectural
or
ndod.
AP
A
It
is
not
okay,
and
this
this
is
the
proposed
unit
is,
and
it
has
a
so
it
is
three
bedroom
plus
an
office.
F
AQ
In
order
managing
members
of
the
board,
this
is
thomas
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We'd
like
to
go
on
to
support
the
project.
The
butters
meeting
was
february
12
2020
and
they
also
met
with
the
hong
kong
partner
coalition.
We
did
not
hear
any
opposition
they're
the
butters
or
neighbors,
I'm
so
again
to
support.
E
A
A
Thank
you
is
anybody
here
to
speak
this.
AR
Someone
retired
from
council
president
kim
jamie
yes
to
speak
on
on
opposition
molly,
wanted
to
ask
for
a
deferral.
We
heard
from
the
naval
association
that
they
had
a
meeting
with
with
the
team
in
this
conversion
from
commercial
to
housing,
but
they
didn't
see
the
final
proposal
so
would
like
the
opportunity
for
the
neighborhood
parts
to
see
the
final
representation
from
the
naval
association
acid
stand.
We
cannot
support
this
project.
A
A
Counselor
for
the
project
we
are
still
in
deliberations,
so
please,
please
hold
on
miss
ambassador
any
more
raised
hands.
Yes,.
E
A
C
Z
A
It
is
an
mmd
okay,
please
maybe,
and-
and
we
just
need
to
note-
that
is-
for
design
review-
okay,
design,
review
counselor.
Are
you
there.
AP
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
so,
just
just
to
finesse
the
record
please,
mr
alex,
can
you
amend
your
motion
to
include
design
review.
C
Yes,
my
motion
is
to
approve
with
design
review.
AP
B
Calling
max
case
calling
doa
104-2832-88
womback
street
this
is
to
erect
a
three-story
three-family
dwelling
on
an
existing
4025
square
foot
vacant
lot.
The
violations
article
50
section
29
additional
lot
area-
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29,
the
floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
AS
A
AS
AS
Yes,
they
are
there's
no
question
about
it.
It's
it's
a
it's
a
it's!
A
lovely
neighborhood,
crawford
street,
harold
street
howling
street,
the
the
the
the
lots
of
well
maintained.
This
would
be
three
condominium
units,
so
there
would
be
home
ownership
opportunity,
the
as
you
would
know
that
this
building
would
have
sprinklers
and
the
first
floor
unit
would
be
accessible
with
a
lift
and.
A
As
I
look
at
the
drawings
and
as
I
look
at
the
you
know,
the
streetscape
tell
me
how
this
would
be
complementary.
How
this
would
complement
this
design
would
complement
the
street.
AS
A
That
that
is
the
exception
to
the
street.
The
right
street
looks
looks
as
if
the
design
is
pitch
roof.
It's
you
know
it's.
It's
a
different
kind
of
design.
AS
There
are
pitched
roofs,
there
are
roof,
there
are
turrets.
There
are
any
number
of
different
designs
on
this
street.
Of
course,
at
the
end
of
of
juan's
actually
near
humboldt,
you
do
have
the
the
trotter
school
and
the
trotter
school
playground.
So
what
warehouses
down
at
that
end?
Aren't
there
anymore.
AS
Some
of
these
houses
are
our
three
families.
We,
we
could
have
designed
a
pitched
roof,
but
it
would
have
because
of
the
elevations.
It
would
have
required
a
height
violation
which
this
does
not
have
and
it.
So
it's
true.
It's
consistent
with
the
traditional
three
decker
in
that
it
has
a
bay
windows
on
the
front
and
all
three
floors,
and
it
has
the
front
porches
that
replicate
what
you
would
see
going
up
and
down
any
particular
street
in
in
roxbury
dorchester.
Most
countries.
AS
AS
Oh
well,
this
process
has
been
going
on
well
over
a
year
and
I
think
that
he's
owned
it
under
two
years
but
close
to
two
years.
A
And
how's
the
current
maintenance,
because
I'm
looking
at
the
lot-
and
I
don't
know
when
these
photos
were
taken-
it's
copyrighted
2002.,
the
watch,
clear.
Okay.
A
Okay,
can
you
please
stay
on
the
line
on
the
on
this?
Mr,
like
how
are
the
plants.
C
Well,
I
I
totally
agree
with
it's
completely
out
of
context
with
the
budding
neighborhoods.
It
just
looks
odd
in
that
the
columns
on
the
porches
look
odd
the
whole
kind
of
using
a
triple
decker
format
in
that
neighborhood,
it's
out
of
character.
So
you
know
the
plans
are
again
technically
fine,
but
I
would
think
if
we're
going
to
prove
it,
it
should
have
very,
very
strong
ppda
design
review.
Z
Madam
chair
jeff
hanson
bpda
again,
I
couldn't
agree
more
with
the
chair
and
mr
ehrlich
about
the
neighborhood
context.
Usually,
when
we're
looking
at
triple
deckers,
the
entire
street
is
triple
deckers.
This
is
not
the
case
on
womback.
Anything
significant
design
review
would
be
necessary.
I
don't
know
to
the
counselor's
point
also
if
we
were
to
change
the
roofline,
what
does
that
do
in
terms
of
a
zoning
violation
that
they
don't
have
now?
Z
A
Two
bedrooms:
two
baths.
Okay,
please
stay
on.
While
I
continue,
I
would
like
to
take
the
following
process.
I
would
like
to
hear
from
elected
officials
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
A
I
understand
that
there
are
two
attendees
at
the
bra
board
room
attendees.
Thank
you
for
making
it
down
to
city
hall.
I
would
then
like
to
have
them
get
on
the
record
on
womback
street.
So
please,
representatives
of
elected
officials,
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
Please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record.
AQ
AQ
A
AR
Yes,
man,
I'm
cheering
members
of
the
board,
samuel
rutalo
from
council
president
kim
janey.
We
are
asking
for
a
deferral.
We
cannot
support
the
project
as
it
stands:
prayer
for
kind
of
president
jainis
to
preserve
the
character
of
this
neighborhood.
A
A
E
You
I
have
michael
flatty's
hand
raised.
A
Okay,
please
be
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
A
Okay,
let
me
go
to
the
bra
board
room
and
whoever
is
there
from
the
community
on
warm
back.
Please
put
your
name
on
an
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
verbally
what
your,
what
your
support
or
opposition
is
based
on.
AT
Hi,
my
name
is
grant
calendar
19
brooklyn
street,
I'm
the
owner
of
number
90
a
lot
at
number
90
wombeck
street,
and
I'm
here
to
oppose
the
project.
A
Now,
if
I'm
looking
at
the
street
mr
calendar,
which
houses
yours.
AT
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
you
own
90
and
do
you
live
at
85.
AT
A
Okay,
okay
and
you're
in
the
bpda
boardroom,.
AT
A
A
And
tell
us
if
you
are
in
support
or
in
opposition:
what's
what
is
the?
What
is
it
based
on
insufficient.
W
And
provide
information
requested
and
not
having
information
on
the
plot
plans
that
we
specifically
requested
at
one
of
the
meetings
that
they
attended.
Basically,
this
is
a
on
a
hill.
There
are
no
indications
of
any
type
of
retaining
wall
that
can
be
solar
erosion.
We
don't
know
what
type
of
foundation
they're
using
there's
a
number
of
questions
that
they
have
not
removed.
A
So
did
this
connie
did
this
go
to
the
full
association
meeting?
At
some
point,
there
was.
A
Okay,
so
so,
as
you've
heard
on
the
on
this
side
on
this
call
and
this
video
conference
here
that
it
is
a
two
three
four
three
family
you've
heard
the
sons.
What
did
you
respond
to
that.
W
A
A
So
are
you:
are
you
opposed
the
concept
of
the
three
family?
Are
you
opposed
to
the
fact
that
the
applicant
did
not
come
to
the
meeting?
What
what
I'm
trying
to
get
clarity,
I'm
trying
to
separate
the
project
from
the
applicant?
If,
if
that's
an
okay
question,
to
ask
oh.
W
There's
not
enough
details
to
even
make
any
type
of
determination,
except
it's
it's
the
variances
that
they're
asking
for
when
they
bought
you
properly.
They
knew
what
the
article
50
was.
You
know
gary
was,
but
there
was
no
substantial
hardship
being
demonstrated,
so
we're
trying
to
be
as
open,
flexible
and
transparent
as
possible.
A
Forward:
okay,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
any
comments
from
the
the
representative
to
the
applicant.
AS
Madam
chair
attorney,
mcdevitt
speaking
with
me,
is
the
agric
alfonso
sarah.
He
attended
that
meeting.
He
had
the
drawings
and
he
did
the
details.
AS
My
understanding
about
mr
calendar's
opposition
is
that
he
has
a
big
spot
next
door.
He
was
concerned
about
snow
removal
because
of
the
slope
of
the
lot
of
retaining
wall
has
to
be
built
from
the
lot
line
and
because
I
think
that
the
great
benefit
of
this
is
that
it
is
condominium
and
snow
removal
will
be
on
the
budget.
Last
year.
You
could
have
removed
no
in
20
minutes
for
the
whole
year.
AS
We
don't
know
what
will
happen
next
year,
but
having
it
in
the
budget.
If
there's
a
lot
of
snow
it'll
be
treated
like
any
other
condo
project
in
the
city,
where
they
have
phenomenal
amount
of
snow,
they
take
it
away
in
a
bobcat,
but
his
concern
would
still
be
pushed
onto
his
bacon
of
land,
and
I
think
that
at
the
retaining
wall
it
would
be
a
must
for
snow
onto
his
land.
A
Okay,
can
you
please
wait
a
minute,
mr
mr
mcdevitt?
Miss
ambassador?
Can
you
please
unmute
louis
alisa,
mr
lisa,
if
you're
on
the
phone,
please
press,
star,
3,
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
please
tell
us
your
reason
for
either
support
or
opposition
of
this
project.
AN
My
name
is
louis
elisa.
I
live
at
68
steven
street,
but
I'm
president
of
the
garrison
toronto
naval
association
had
43
years
representing
this
neighborhood
and
we've
done
a
number
of
projects
and
we've
tried
to
be
fair
with
all
projects,
understanding
that
change
is
inevitable,
but
we
don't
want
change
just
for
the
sake
of
making
or
enriching
someone
else.
Well,
when
we
ask
proponents
for
projects
to
come
into
the
garrison
trial,
the
standard
is
the
same
for
every
person
we
invite
or
every
person
we
accept
coming
in
to
present
a
project.
AN
We
ask
that
they
bring
information,
that's
clear
to
us
so
that
we
can
share
with
the
members.
We
also
have
a
housing
review
team
that
takes
the
time
other
than
the
monthly
meetings
to
go
over
the
plans
and
specifications
that
the
opponents
or
projects
wish
to
provide
us
with
this
proponent
has
failed
to
meet
those
standards
and
so,
in
the
sense,
we're
not
planning
to
reject
the
project.
We
ask
that
be
deferred
because
he
has
not
fulfilled
the
requirements
that
we
asked
for
him
to
make
the
information
available.
AN
There
was
concerns
raised
by
the
butters,
but
there
were
concerns
raised
by
the
members
of
the
housing
committee.
In
addition,
you
raised
some
of
the
issues
that
we
had,
that
each
of
us
have
that
haven't
worked
with
a
number
of
projects,
the
refers
to
design
and
character
and
nature
of
the
project
itself,
people
putting
up
structures
for
pedestrian
purposes,
just
to
put
up
a
structure
and
make
some
money.
I
understand
their
concern,
but
I
ask
them
to
take
in
consideration,
nature
and
character
of
a
community
that
should
be
on
his
historic
register.
AN
If
it's
not,
it
has
a
history
and
it
has
basically
a
culture
that
this
design
doesn't
speak
to.
I
think
they
just
want
to
move
it.
This
intellectual,
you
know,
type
idea
that
you
can
just
put
in
a
flat.
Three-Story
building
is
not
encounter
and
seeing
what
goes
on.
I
think
a
little
bit
more
time
and
effort,
and
maybe
some
support
from
the
dp
boston
planning
development
agency
may
get
the
proponent
to
where
he
needs
to
be.
AN
It
also
may
cost
him
a
little
bit
of
space
and
time
and
may
not
be
able
to
three
stories.
I'm
not
sure,
but
I
really
would
request
that
you
defer
and
give
him
an
opportunity
to
come
back
to
something
that
meets
the
character
and
concerns
of
the
community
and
allows
us
to
work
with
him
to
get
where
he'd
like
to
be.
A
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
thank
you,
mr
lisa.
Can
you
hold
up,
can
can
we
have
everybody
muted
but
excuse
me,
but
for
the
board
members,
given
that
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
D
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
defer.
C
C
So
I'm
wondering
mr
ruggiero
whether
it
makes
more
sense
to
do
a
denial
without
prejudice
is
literally
go
back
to
the
boards
deal
with
the
community
stuff
and
then
come
back
with
a
re-configured
project
that,
with
whatever
violations
may
be
in
place.
Yeah.
C
A
Let
me,
let
me
add
my
two
cents.
The
reason
I
think
that
denial
without
prejudice
might
work
is
that
I
think
that,
given
the
number
of
violations
that,
in
fact
that
working
with
looking
at
and
working
with,
the
neighborhood
might
actually
result
in
a
project,
that's
that
may
decrease
the
violations
and
actually
be
more
visually
supportive
of
the
neighborhood
big
self
willing
to
give
them
a
chance
to
kind
of
really
get
to
the
drawing
boards
through
a
deferral
process
and
work.
This
through.
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
956
971
118
harrisof
street.
This
is
a
change
oxley
from
a
three
family
dwelling
to
a
four
family
dwelling
by
adding
a
new
apartment
into
the
basement.
Renovate
existing
basement
remove
and
replace
staircase
on
the
first
floor,
foyer
to
basement
in
the
same
location,
install
a
half
bath
in
the
basement
construct
a
new
dormer
addition:
the
violations,
article
50,
section,
28
use
of
regulations.
Multi-Family
dwelling
is
forbidding
article
50,
section
29
additional
lot.
Air
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
B
A
While
the
applicant
is
getting
ready,
I
would
like
the
applicant
or
representative
of
the
applicant
to
start
off
very
briefly,
describing
we
understand
that
this
is
an
extension
to
the
basement,
but
can
be
moved
directly
to
the
violations.
E
Yes,
the
only
raised
hand
is
from
president
janie's
office.
A
Is
anybody
from
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
I.
AQ
Am
here
I
they
did
reach
out
earlier.
They
were
having
some
issues
logging
in,
but
it
seemed
like
they
were
on
about
a
half
an
hour
ago.
So
I'm
not
sure
what
happened,
but
they
were
having
issues
this
morning
getting
in.
They
were
saying
issue
with
the
password.
A
Jessica,
do
you
know
who
is
representing
them
on
this.
AQ
It
should
have
been
prince
colon,
he
was
the
developer
and
erleen
brown,
I
believe
the
owner
they
both
had
reached
out.
Okay,.
E
So
middle
chair,
let
me
go
through
some
of
the
callers
and
see
if
indeed
prince
colon
is
on,
if
you
call
them.
Thank
you
caller
you're
on
muted,
your
name.
Please.
AD
Oh,
I'm
I'm
not
in
this
case
I'm
waiting
for
the
14th
street
a
lap.
AU
Yes,
hello,
hi
yeah.
This
is
prince
carmen,
I'm
the
art
designer
on
the
project
and
I'm
here
with
the
owner.
We
are
speaking
hello.
AU
Yeah,
my
name
is
prince
colon.
I
live
some
days
thunder
street
in
marathon,
I'm
the
art
designer
on
this
project,
I'm
here
with
the
owner.
We
are
seeking
the
variance
from
the
vba
for
change
of
occupancy
from
three
family
dwelling
to
four,
including
they
added,
but
we
want
the
basement
to
be
independent
unit.
So
the
last
time
we
had
a
meeting,
it
was
a
match.
The
issue
was
calculation
through
the
basement
to
the
rear
and
then
come
to
the
front
entrance.
AU
A
Okay,
I'm
looking
at
a
picture
of
the
building
on
google
maps.
Can
you
please
tell
me
unit
what
the
number
of
units
are
currently
how
many
bedrooms
per
unit?
What
and
what
the
proposed
expansion
expansionists
and
how
many
bedrooms
will
be
on
that
third
floor
and
in
the
basement.
AU
AU
A
Okay,
yes,
stop
right
there!
Thank
you,
so
you
already
have
an
existing
bedroom
in
the
basement.
AU
A
Okay,
mr
early
tell
us
about
this
about
this
plan.
How
are
the
plans
on
this.
C
Well,
the
the
access
and
egress
and
the
circulation
works.
Okay,
under
this
design,
the
I
guess
the
applicant
just
said:
it's
eight
feet,
there's
a
there's,
a
number
of
windows.
C
Can
you
tell
us
what
the
floor
to
the
bottom
of
the
window
is?
Is
the
height
what
point.
AQ
Jessica,
yep,
okay,
good
good
good.
We
have
to
okay
good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
We
had
in
a
butters
meeting
back
in
september,
12
2019,
a
rep
from
the
garrison
charter.
Neighborhood
association
was
there
as
well.
We
we
found
a
site
visit.
I
was
able
to
look
at
the
plants
and
also
the
space.
There
was
concern
about
the
egresses,
but
it
looks
like
it
was
depressed.
AR
We
have
no
comment
on
this.
Okay.
E
He
said
he
has
no
comment.
Can
you
just
question.
A
A
Okay,
just
for
the
record
to
let
us
to
let
everybody
know
that
that
was
representative
from
counselor
janie's
office.
Is
anybody
else
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition?
Just
as
in
the
previous
case,
we
will
go
to
the
bpda
board
room,
because
there
are
two
members
of
the
community
there
to
speak
on
this
project.
A
A
Echo
is
there
a
way
of
ameliorating
that.
AV
AN
AN
Louis
lisa
68
steven
street
roxbury
garrison
president
gaston
carter,
neighborhood
association,
I'm
here
to
raise
the
questions
that
were
not
asked
answered
when
they
did
come.
I
believe
it
came
twice
to
the
meeting
and
we
asked
for
elevations.
We
asked
for
longitudinals
to
get
some
clear
understanding
about
the
height
in
the
basement,
the
specifics
of
it.
We
did
not
get
to
see
those
on
board
that
information.
We
also
had
a
question
which
I
didn't
see
in
the
in
the
original
presentation.
AN
He
was
creating
dormers
and
I'm
not
sure
what
the
dominant
impact
was
going
to
be
on
the
on
the
sidelines
and
how
they
fit
into
the
rest
of
the
community.
On
one
drawing,
I
see
two
dormers
one
on
each
side
of
the
building
and
on
the
drawings
that
were
presented
at
the
council
here
today
I
saw
one
dormitory,
I'm
not
clear.
AN
My
recommendation
is
that
they,
you
know
that
they
come
back,
something
that's
much
clearer
than
what
we
saw
and,
as
the
secretary
ms
forbes
said,
we
had
questions
about
parking
and
how
it
was
going
to
be
handled.
You
were
told
the
architects
that
he
didn't
handle
the
plot
plan,
so
he
didn't
have
that
information
and
no
one
has
yet
presented
that
information.
So
the
association
did
meet
on
this.
AN
We
did
talk
about
it
discussed
in
the
housing
committee
discussed
it
and
we
were
left
inconclusive
because
the
lack
of
information,
so
if
your
architect
is
good
with
the
announcements
that
all
the
heights
and
spaces
are
working,
I
can
accept
his.
But
I
do
have
some
challenges
given
that
the
new
designs
that
we've
seen
have
formers-
and
we
don't
know
how
they
fit
up-
see
more
elevations,
no
front
or
side
view
visions
as
to
how
they
fit
in
with
the
other
buildings
in
the
area.
A
B
Madam
chair,
we
still
have
letters
of
support
in
opposition.
I
haven't
had
put
on
the
record.
A
Okay,
given
that
information
may
have
a
motion
for
this.
C
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
for
a
deferral.
The
drinkings
pretty
clearly
show
one
door,
one
new
dorm,
but
there's
there
are
enough
questions
and
the
issue
of
sprinkling
is
something
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
So
I
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
if
the
applicant
met
with
the
with
the
neighborhood
association
one
more
time
and
then
came
back
to
the
board
with
a
clear
proposal.
A
A
B
N
A
Just
before
we
go
on,
mr,
mr
small,
was
this
a
legal
pre-existing
use?
Yes,.
R
A
N
Bring
it
up
to
code,
you
know
all
the
fire
codes,
all
new
mechanicals
do
everything.
We
have
two
two
violations:
backyard
violation
requirement
is
ten
feet.
We're
at
six
and
the
second
violation
is
the
sec
exist,
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
and
it's
a
pre-existing
non-conforming.
A
A
Give
us
give
us
the
sizes
of
each
proposed
unit.
A
Sorry
again,
two
bedrooms,
three
bedroom
and
one
four
bedroom:
okay
and
how
is
parking
being
accommodated.
N
Parking
is
in
the
rear,
we
have
four
spaces
in
the
rear
and
that's
permitted
under
a
use
and
occupancy
permit
given
by
instructional
services,
department.
A
Okay,
any
anybody
with
raised
hands
to
speak
in
support
of
this.
E
I'm
gonna
have
counselor
stevie
george's
office.
M
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
stelli
from
counselor
sabi
george's
office,
we're
going
to
go
on
the
record
and
ask
for
deferral.
We
have
heard
that
they
have
not
met
with
the
zoning
committee.
The
greater
matapan
neighborhood
council
and
the
community
would
like
a
chance
to
discuss
the
project
with
the
developer.
Thank
you.
A
AF
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
and
just
outline
the
community
process
that
this
project
has
had
a
butters
meeting
back
on
february
6th
of
this
year,
and
they
also
met
with
the
erie
ellington
neighborhood
association,
who
didn't
you
know,
express
any
outstanding
concerns
at
this
time.
So
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
is
anybody
else
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
Please
raise
your
hand
if
you
are
on
the
phone.
Please
press
star,
3.
A
AV
My
name
is
34
burma
street
matapan,
I'm
I'm
chair
of
the
chair
of
the
greater
matapan
neighborhood
council.
I
had
just
a
few
questions.
There
was
a
question
why
it
was
coming
up
under
article
60
if
it
was
already
an
existing
use
for
a
five-family
dwelling
going
as
far
back
as
1990.
AV
AV
AV
It
looks
like
a
single
family
house,
that's
that's
what
we
were
didn't
realize
it
was
a
multi-family.
That's
what
we
wanted
to
thank.
A
Okay,
please
respond
counselor.
N
A
Yes,
I'm
looking
at
this
on
google
maps,
it
looks
like
it's
being
renovated
already,
which
is
good
but,
as
I
had
asked
before
it's
so
it
was
a
legal.
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
it
was
a
legal
non-conforming
use
82
below
hillary,
that.
A
And
count
the
please
be
in
touch
with
the
matapan
group,
just
so
that
they're
clear
on
what's
happening.
N
N
Q
B
AW
A
Okay,
okay
and
so
here
is
you're
having
some
sit
down
and
you're
having
takeout,
okay,
yes,
okay,
how
please
stay
on
the
line?
Do
you
have
any
experience
with
takeout.
AW
AX
Project
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
chantal.
Alima
barboza
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
and
a
butters
meeting
was
hosted
on
march
13
of
2020.
applicants
received
support
from
direct
the
butters
greater
boat
and
geneva
neighborhood
association
and
boat
in
geneva
main
street.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
supporting
this
project.
E
AM
A
A
Madam
ambassador,
everybody
counted
for.
E
Yes,
thank
you.
Aisha,
just
raise
your
hand,
please.
AY
B
Madam
chair,
before
we
get
a
motion,
the
two
letters
of
opposition
brought
up
some
existing
issues
with
trash
garbage
rodent
infest
infestation.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
on
the
record
that
those
two
letters
of
opposition
were
from
abutters
in
regards.
Thank.
A
AW
No,
no
hello,
hello!
Go
ahead.
Yes!
Yes,
it's
not
a
new,
it's
not
a
existing
restaurant,
but
it's
a
new
restaurant,
but
this
question
that
was
raising
he
was
raised
last
time
when
I
was
on
the
board
of.
I
think
we
already.
We
already.
AK
AW
Another
restaurant-
that's!
I
cannot
allow
me
to
put
it
so
I
got
the
letter
and
on
on
a
record
and
then
also
the
the
second
one.
It
was
for
kind
of
some
event
and
stuff
that
I
have
to
figure
out
with
my
okay.
Just
please.
A
Stay
on
the
line,
I
I
would
suggest
that
this
applicant
might
need
some
assistance
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
to
clarify
that,
in
fact,
any
that
eventually
neighborhood
concerns
will
be
addressed
and
that
he
completely
understands
the
takeout
process.
AX
This
is
chantal
from
neighborhood
services,
so
the
there's
a
restaurant
right
in
bowdoin
street
right
across
from
him
that
has
agreed
to
help
him
with
trash
management.
These
questions
were
answered
during
the
neighborhood
association
meeting,
I'm
not
sure
when
those
letters
were
sent
to
zba,
but
there's
been
an
understanding
that
he
has
the
support
to
manage
the
trash,
because,
as
of
right
now
it's
not
a
restaurant.
AX
A
Okay,
given
that
information,
the
motion,
please.
D
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
993-386-11
greenmount
street
this
direct
a
new
four
unit
building
and
parking
the
violations-
article
65
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit-
is
a
forbidden
use.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
lard
area.
Additional
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient
article
65
section
9
on
the
floor.
Air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
height,
is
excessive
number
of
stories.
B
AC
Good
afternoon,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
represent
the
project
developer,
edward
hearn,
madam
chair
members.
This
is
an
application
to
demolish
an
existing
two-family
dwelling
on
a
3161
square
foot
lot
at
9-11
greenbound
street
in
dorchester,
and
to
replace
it
with
a
new
four-unit
building.
AC
The
site
is
located
on
green,
mount
mid
block
between
pleasant
street
and
dorchester
avenue.
It
is
also
directly
across
greenmount
street
from
the
the
dot
block
project.
AC
The
units
would
be
above
a
a
five-car
parking
garage
that
is
partially
open
in
the
rear
unit.
One
would
be
an
850
square
foot
two
bedroom
unit.
Two
would
be
a
740
square
foot
two
bedroom
in
a
three:
a
sixteen
hundred
twenty
square
foot,
bi-level
two
bedroom
plus
and
unit
four
in
eighteen,
890
square
foot,
bi-level
two-bedroom,
plus
the
zoning
violations
are
for
insufficient
usable
open
space.
I'm
sorry
insufficient
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
units.
AC
This
is
a
3fd
3000
district
under
article
65
for
four
units,
4
500
square
feet
would
be
required.
The
lot
is,
as
I
said,
3161
square
feet.
The
maximum
far
here
is
1.3.
The
proposed
far
is
2.1.
AC
The
maxwell's
height
is
three
stories
and
40
feet.
This
building
is
a
four-story
building
41
feet.
High
300
square
feet
of
open
space
for
dwelling
unit
is
required.
With
the
small
front,
balconies
rear,
balconies
and
the
two
private
roof
decks.
There
would
be
an
average
of
245
square
feet
per
unit
per
unit.
AC
This
matter
was
deferred
before
the
hiatus,
owing
to
concerns
of
the
community
that
were
addressed
in
a
new
plan
seat
that
the
board
did
not
get
in
time.
For
that
hearing
as
a
result
of
that
community
process,
this
was
reduced
from
a
five
unit.
Building
to
the
to
its
present
five
story.
Building
to
its
present
four-story
building
the
side
yards
were
increased.
The
setbacks
from
three
feet:
they're,
now
five
foot
side
setbacks.
AC
There
is
a
rearfoot
setback
of
10
feet,
10.4
feet.
It
is
cited
as
a
violation,
but
it
is
in
fact
compliant
with
respect
to
rear,
set
back
and
side
setbacks.
There
are
two
roof
decks,
as
I
said
they
are
accessed
by
by
head
houses
head
houses.
Are
preferable
means
of
accessing
the
roof?
There
are
safer
means
of
accessing
the
roof.
This
began
as
a
five-story
building.
It
is
located
across
from
dot
block,
as
I
said,
which
is
a
five
story
project,
so
this
building
is
little
yes,.
A
Please
stay
on
this
on
this
on
this
video
conference.
Call
here,
mr
alex,
this
is
a
3sb
project.
This
is
a
3fp
which
is
a
pretty
much
a
triple
decker.
Zoning
district
comes
with
the
plans.
C
The
plans
are
okay,
miss
morancy,
I'm
a
little
confused
you're,
not
showing
a
plot
plan.
You
said:
mirror
elevation
appears
to
show
that
the
parking
spaces
underneath
are
accessible
to
the
rear,
but
I
don't
see
a
plot
plan
that
shows
an
egress
or
ingress.
AC
AC
Yes,
exactly
and
and
the
drive
runs
up
the
right
in
in
in
the
rear.
If
you
go
to
the
elevation,
if
you
were
to
go
to
eight.
C
Yes,
any
31
there's
a
rear
elevation
that
shows
it's
open,
but
I,
but
there's
no
plot
plan.
Do
they
get?
Can
they
get
out
up
to
the
street?
That
way.
AC
No,
it's
it's
it's
through
the
driveway
and
out
on
to
greenmount
street
okay.
AC
I
don't
know
if
my
client
is
is,
is
on
the
on
the
call
it
enclosing
the
garage
I
I
guess
could
be
accomplished
it
would
it
would
have
implications,
I
guess
for
fire.
Suppression.
C
AC
Yeah
the
knowing
that
that
would
be
an
issue.
As
I
said,
it
did
sort
of
begin
life
as
a
five-story
building.
It
is
directly
across
from
dot
block.
So
in
terms
of
context,
it's
going
to
be,
you
know
a
five-story
project
across
the
street.
You
know
this
issue
always
comes
up.
I
mean
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
that
that
it's
just
a
lot
safer
and
better
to
provide
access
where
context
allows
where
neighborhood
context
allows
by
penthouse
rather
than
roof.
AC
Hatch,
that's
why
it
is
a
requirement
to
the
building
code.
These
could
be
minimized
as
much
as
possible.
There's
you
know
centrally
located
on
the
building,
and
that
could
probably
even
be
you
know
more
attention
given
to
that
fact.
They
are
sloped
penthouses,
they
slope
with
the
with
the
staircase,
but
you
know
frankly
for
anyone
you
know
in
a
unit
it
is.
It
is
quite
honestly
preferable
to
be
able
to
you
know,
particularly
for
older
individuals.
AC
It
is
preferable
to
be
able
to
access
the
the
roof
and
the
roof
hatch
and
the
amenities
by
means
of
penthouse.
As
I
said,
it's
not
always
appropriate
in
terms
of
neighborhood
context,
but
given
the
large
multi-family
project
going
up
across
the
street,
this,
I
don't
think
would
would
stick
out,
as
as
it
might
in
some
other
areas,.
AC
Yes,
I
I
think
fundamentally,
but
again
I
I
point
to
the
fact
that
even
even
technically
it's
it's
why
it
is.
A
A
AC
Yes,
and
also
I
just
want
to
get
back
to
the
garage,
the
open
air
in
the
in
the
back,
mr
relic.
That
also
provides
additional
maneuverability
within
the
garage.
If,
if
the
walls
came
down,
sheer
just
wouldn't
be
as
maneuverable.
C
AC
Yeah,
there's
about
a
10
there's
about
10
feet,
four
inches
to
the
rear
lot
line.
AC
I
assume
it
would
be
grass,
you
know,
maybe
you
know
paved
around
the
perimeter
of
the
building
in
the
rear.
Two
will
plow,
you
know,
walk
around
and
then
grass
behind
that
to
the
lot
line.
AC
There's
no
rendering
included
in
the
submission.
No,
I,
if
somebody
you
know
we're
able
to
share
a
you
know
a
google
street
view,
but
it's
it's
not
in
the
it's
not
in
the
submitted
package.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
last
week,
as
a
board,
we
were
pretty
determined
about
that
3d,
designation
that
the
buildings
look
like
triple
deckers.
May
we
so
then
I
just
want
to
ask
the
bpda.
Z
Thank
you,
madam
chia
jeff,
hampton
bpda
to
your
point.
I
was
going
to
mention
heckler
street
from
last
week.
With
this
being
the
triple
decker
district.
We
would
be
adamant
that
it
remained
a
triple
decker
if
they
were
to
tear
down
the
existing
structure.
Z
As
you
head
down
towards
green
mountain
to
dorchester
avenue,
there
are
triple
deckers
on
the
left-hand
side.
I
believe
even
the
abutting
properties
to
the
left,
if
you
were
looking
at
eleven
greenmouth,
are
triple
deckers,
maybe
with
a
more
modern
look
to
it,
but
they
are
triple
deckers.
Z
So
if
we
had
recommended
denial
because
of
the
height,
we
reviewed
this
at
a
five
story
project
and
it
didn't
have
any
setback
requirements
at
the
time.
But
again,
like
I
said
last
week,
with
this
neighborhood
being
the
only
one
with
triple
decker
zoning
we'd
like
to
stick
to
that.
AD
Madam
chair
members
of
the
word
patrick
fandale,
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
honor
in
support
of
this
proposal.
We
ran
a
whole
community
process
for
this
and
then
a
butter's
being
held
on
site
september
23rd
of
last
year.
I
know
they
also
met
subsequently
with
the
area
of
butters
informally
and
have
had
numerous
conversations
with
the
columbia
savannah
health,
civic
association.
AD
I
C
A
So
design
review-
and
this
is
it's
house-
okay
and
a
classic
podex
designer
all
those
in
favor
aye
aye
motion-
carries
jeff.
You
got
that.
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
9934
9623
arcadia
street:
this
is
a
change
of
auction
from
two
residential
units
to
eight
residential
units.
Correct
can
construct
a
rare
addition
to
extend
living
space,
also
an
addition
of
eight
parking
spaces,
the
violations,
article
10,
section,
1
limitation
of
off
street
parking
area,
article
65,
section,
41,
austrian
parking
and
loading
article
65,
section
41,
rs3
parking
loading,
maneuverability
and
the
multi-family
is
forbidden.
Article
65,
section,
8,
use
of
regulations.
Multi-Family
is
forbidden,
article
65,
section,
9,
a
floyd
ratio
is
excessive.
B
L
L
L
The
lot
size
is
approximately
ten
thousand
92
square
feet
of
the
eight
units
that
are
being
proposed.
They
are,
they
are
all
bi-level
unit.
One
and
unit
two
are
buy
levels.
On
the
first
floor
in
the
basement,
units
three
through
eight
are
bi-level.
On
the
second
and
third
floor,
the
eight
units
comprised
our
five
two
bedroom
two
bath,
ranging
from
1084
square
feet
to
1335
square
feet.
L
There's
one
two
bedroom
and
one
bath,
that's
1427
square
feet,
and
there
are
two
three
bedroom,
two
baths
that
are
one
thousand
one
hundred
and
forty
three
square
feet
to
one
thousand
three
hundred
and
thirty
square
feet.
We
did
participate
in
an
extensive
community
process.
We
had
a
butters
meeting
on
september
fifth
and
then
we
met
with
the
fields
corner
civic
association,
three
separate
times
first
on
november
12th,
due
to
the
lack
of
participants
of
that
meeting,
it
was
a
date
where
voting
was
occurring
at
the
air
where
the
meeting
is
located.
L
L
At
that
point,
we
cut
out
around
a
thousand
square
feet
of
square
footage
of
the
existing
proposal.
We
decreased
the
bedroom
count
from
20
to
18
bedrooms
and
we
decreased
the
bathroom
count
from
16
to
8
total
bathrooms
in
addressing
the
violations
that
are
listed.
The
first
three
that
are
listed
in
the
refusal
letter
are
related
to
the
10
parking
spots
that
we
are
trying
to
fit
on
the
location
due
to
concerns
related
to
the
concern
for
parking
in
this
particular
neighborhood.
It's
a
very
saturated
neighborhood.
L
It's
comprised
largely
of
triple
deckers
that
almost
comprise
the
entire
lots
of
most
of
the
surrounding
lots
that
are
much
smaller
between
four
and
five
thousand
square
feet.
In
this
area
of
fields
corner,
we
were
able
to
fit
ten
parking
spots
by
accessing
the
parking
to
the
left
of
the
structure.
I'm
gonna,
let
mr
christopher
address
the
parking
plans
that
have
been
presented
before
the
board.
L
The
next
violation
is
the
fact
that
this
is
a
2f5,
000
neighborhood
again,
there's
a
large
number
of
three
families.
There's
a
six
family
in
this
particular
neighborhood
as
well.
We
are
requesting
that
the
variance
to
build
a
eight
unit
building
here
the
far
as
proposed
is
1.17
in
a
district
where
the
allowed
far
is
.5.
L
L
The
side
yard
again,
that
is
in
large
part
of
the
side
yard
violation
is
created
by
trying
to
allow
for
the
underpass
on
the
left
side
of
the
structure
for
potential
people
living
at
this
site
to
be
able
to
pull
off
of
arcadia
street
and
into
the
parking
lot
without
causing
any
traffic
by
parking
on
the
street.
A
L
I
A
So
I
have
you
been
able
to
adequately
translate
for
them
on
the
presentation
that
has
occurred
already,
or
are
they
comfortable
or
do
they
or
I'm
assuming
if
they're
speaking
in
support,
they
already
understand
what
the
proposal
is.
A
Okay,
you
may
want
to
also
hope
that,
because
we
are
going
to
be
proceeding
with
some
questions
to
the
representative
of
the
applicant,
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they
understand
the
excuse
me
the
full
extent
of
of
the
process.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
can
we
just
thank
you?
Thank
you,
mr
secretary.
I
just
want
to
go
now
and
talk
about
the
project.
I
want
to
ask
the
the
representative
of
the
applicant,
given
that
this
is
a
2f5
000
zone,
and
this
is
a
10
000
square
foot
lot.
How
many
units
would
be
allowed
as
of
right.
L
It
is
a
two
f
five
thousand
square
foot
s.
It
is
a
two
f
five
thousand
lot.
That
said,
you
that's
a
bottom
chair.
This
lot
is
located
about
point
three
miles
from
the
fields
corner
train
station.
You.
A
Know
I'm
not
I'm
just
asking
about
the
project
itself:
I'm
not
ready
to
go
into
the
traffic
stuff
understand
what
is
a
lot,
what
is
allowed
as
a
right?
So
if
it's
of,
if
zoning
is
2005
to
f
5
000
and
the
lot
is
10
000
square
feet,
you're
saying
under
a
quote
worst
case
scenario,
the
subdivision
would
result
in
an
additional
two
units
to
to
the
to
to
the
neighborhood
right.
A
Yes,
okay
and
you
represent
that
this
is
basically
a
two
two
up
up
to
a
six
family
neighborhood
right.
I
just.
I
A
Sorry,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
my
understanding
is
correct.
Okay,
so
tell
us
the
rationale
for
why
we
should
be
moving
up
to
eight
units.
You
need
to
also
know
that
this
board
is
not
entirely
in
favor
of
basement
living
or
basement
space
in
the
living
space
in
the
basement,
especially
if
there's
going
to
be
an
extension,
a
rear
extension
and
any
new
construction.
L
A
Thank
you
and,
in
the
meantime
I
want
to
make
sure
mr
interpreter.
Do
you
need
time
to
interpret
for
your
for
for
your
clients
and
for
the
people
on
the
line
that
so
that
they
are
understanding
what
our
process
is
and
what
the
questioning
is.
I
Sure
I
probably
can't
speak
for
the
whole
design,
but
I
can
go.
I.
A
AZ
Good
morning
mountain
championship,
my
name
is
james,
christopher
business,
address
of
415
to
pasada
with
the
project,
architects,
essentially
we're
constructing
an
addition
to
the
existing
two
family.
Building
with
that,
we
decided
to
use
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building
and
capture
the
additional
living
space
in
the
basement
to
to
add
on
to
those
routes.
One
and
two
primarily
the
living
space
for
those
units
will
be
on
the
first
floor,
with
the
bedroom
and
living
space
on
the
first
floor,
an
additional
bedroom
and
a
family
room
in
the
basement.
AZ
As
far
as
the
unit
count.
Obviously,
we
worked
with
with
our
clients
to
to
provide
a
project
that
was
financially
feasible
and
we
believe
that
this
is
an
appropriate
to
the
site
by
canceling
the
rear
portion
of
the
building.
We
were
able
to
accomplish
the
parking
at
grade
which
we
wanted
to
get
as
many
vehicles
off
the
street
understanding
the
concerns
of
this
neighborhood,
so
we
thought
that
that
was
an
appropriate
use.
AZ
Furthermore,
most
of
the
aquatic
structures
are
three
families
that
occupy
the
the
majority
of
their
site,
and
this
building
would
be
similar
in
that
we
would
be
occupying
more
of
our
site
comparable
to
what
the
abiding
properties
are
using.
However,
at
grade
we'll
have
parking
space
and
a
small
amount
of
open
space
along
a
small
amount
of
space
for
screening
and
buffering.
We've
also
kept
the
footprint
of
the
existing
building
at
the
street
and
created
the
pass-through
garage
to
anchor
it
to
the
street,
which
we
feel
is
an
appropriate
design
choice.
A
Thank
you.
How
are
the
plans
mr
ellick.
C
It
is
a
pretty
massive
expansion
of
from
two
to
ten.
Two
to
eight,
I
mean
to
eight
right,
although
I
gather
the
original
plans
had
a
thousand
square
foot
even
even
more
anyway,
two
to
eight
and
the
the
driveway
is
a
you
know,
nice
effort
to
get
cars
off
the
street.
I
would
say
one
two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
seven,
eight
nine
to
say:
there's
ten
spit
workable
spaces
is
being
generous.
C
I
don't
know
if
mr
d'amico
ever
took
a
look
at
it,
but
there'll
have
to
be
a
lot
of
they'll
need.
They'll
need
a
traffic
cop
out
there.
A
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
there
any
thoughts
from
the
bpda.
Z
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jeff
hampton
bpda.
We
recommend
it
to
niall
mr
ehrlich,
you
use
the
word
that
I
was
going
to
use
it's
massive.
I
mean
it's
just
too
big
for
us.
A
Okay,
I
am
looking
at
it
at
street
view
and
it
is
a
handsome
existing
structure,
and
I
I
can
see
that
this
is
makes
an
attempt
at
that.
However,
you
know,
as
we
go
back
to
the
the
the
further
design
and
the
density
there
is.
There
are
a
lot
of
questions
in
the
meantime
is:
is
anybody
from
the
mayor's
office
or
elected
officials
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal?.
AF
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
are
going
on
record
in
support,
but
we
also
acknowledge
that
you
know
this
has
been
a
controversial
project
from
the
beginning.
It
has
had
numerous
community
meetings
and
meetings
with
the
civic
groups.
The
fields
corner
civic
association
does
remain
opposed,
based
on
concerns
that
the
board
is
also
listing,
which
is
the
size
of
the
project.
AF
However,
we
do
acknowledge
that
the
applicants
have
tried
to
work
with
their
direct
butters
who
are
in
support
of
this
project.
We
were
flooded
with
over
100
letters
of
support
from
folks
who
lived
in
the
immediate
surrounding
streets,
and
they
were
appreciative
that
they
did
go
down
in
number
of
bedrooms
and
also
a
bathroom
count.
Thank
you.
A
Are
there
any
other
raised
hands
to
speak
in
support
of
this
project.
A
Thank
you
and
please
just
reminder
that
if
you're
calling
in
press
start
three,
so
we
know
of
your
intention
to
speak
on
this
project,
anybody
else
to
speak
in
support
of
this
project.
May
I
have
mr
translator
on
the
line.
Please.
A
Mr
fam,
please
thank
you
is
so
let
me
get
the
first
caller
in
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
the
reason
for
your
support.
Our
opposition.
E
I
I
E
Is
yes,
we
can
hear
you.
I
AB
AB
AB
Q
AB
E
G
BA
BA
Hello,
mr
you're
unmuted.
Yes,
dear
members
of
the
zoning
board
of
appeal
appeals,
my
name
is
kim
tully.
I
live
in
2.9
west
view
street
unit
02.
dorchester
I
made
0212.
I
am
part
of
the
acardia
street.
I
want
to
speak
in
support
of
this
project.
I
support
this
proposal
and
believe
it
will
be
a
great
addition
to
the
community.
Thank
you.
E
P
I
AB
U
Yes,
this
is
tommy
twain,
elite,
33,
dickens,
street
dorchester,
zero,
two
one,
two
two,
I'm
part
local
community
of
ukraine.
I
want
to
speak,
support
this
project.
I
support
this
project
and
believe
this
great
edition
for
community.
Thank
you.
E
BB
A
Thank
you,
so
we
can.
We
determine
how
many
because
we
have
you
know
I
I
want
to
give
this
information
to
the
translator.
So,
mr
mr
pham
just
to
let
you
know
that,
generally,
when
we
have
a
lot
of
call-ins
be
limited
to
a
certain
number
in
support
or
in
opposition.
A
So
I
would
like
to
close
any
call-ins
in
on
this
in
support,
because
I
think
we
have
a
fair
representation
of
the
level
of
support
that
this
project
has.
So,
if
you
could
please
let
the
community
know
that
fact
that
would
be
very
helpful
to
us.
I
A
Thank
you
just
to
make
one,
and
one
last
request:
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
opposition.
I
I
A
A
A
Miss
miss
ambassador
tell
us
what
we
are
expecting.
I
think
we've
kind
of
heard
from
everybody.
I
just
don't
know
who
colin
used
a
nine
and
52
are
caller.
E
A
Okay,
given
all
that
information,
the
in
input
from
the
bpda,
can
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
C
A
I
too
and
pose
so.
The
motion
doesn't
carry
I'd
like
to
entertain
another
motion
that,
because
this
motion
basically
denies
the
eight
residential
units.
A
C
Well,
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
motion
to
deny
without
prejudice
that
I
ask
I
mean
there
clearly
is
a
lot
of
community
support,
so
I
would
just
ask
that
they
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
reduce
the
the
size,
I'm
reluctant
to
exactly
say
what
what
steps
they
should
say,
but
it
it
it's
too
massive
the
way
it
is
so
that's
my
motion.
AH
A
All
those
information
hi
any
opposed
motion
carries
for
denial
without
prejudice.
Please,
mr
translator,
we
let
everybody
know
it
was
denied
without
prejudice
and
please
let
them
know
too
that
with.
A
I
A
Thank
you.
Can
we
get
to
the
next
case.
B
Sure
case
boa
968,
679
707
walk
hill
street.
This
is
to
raise
the
existing
garage
and
wrecked
a
three-story
building
with
four
residential
units
and
three
parking
tickets.
The
violations-
article
60
section
8,
a
multi-family
residential
dwelling.
Four
units-
is
a
forbidden
use
adequately.
Section
37.
pocket
requirement
is
insufficient.
B
Article
60
section
9,
the
lot
size
to
erected
dwelling
unit
is
section
insufficient.
Minimum
lot
width
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9,
the
minimum
watt
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9
the
floor.
Air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
height
requirement,
is
excessive.
In
storage,
article
60,
section
9,
the
height
requirement
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
60
section
9,
open
space
requirement
is
insufficient.
B
AP
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
broad
street.
Just
a
point
of
clarification,
I'm
going
to
be
sitting
for
the
next
three
hearings,
just
from
miss
ambassador.
Hopefully
that
makes
things
easier
from
a
technology
standpoint,
but
I
represent
on
this
case
at
707
block
hill
street
matapan,
willie
mandrell
who's
here
he's
the
owner
on
the
zoo
on
the
call
and
peter
bartash
the
architect.
AP
The
proposal
is
to,
and
you
can
see
the
rendering
in
front
of
you
we're
proposing,
is
to
raise
an
existing
garage.
It's
a
pretty
much
a
site
that
hasn't
been
used
in
in
a
long
time.
It's
only
used
for
parking
it's
lighted
and
to
raise
the
existing
garage
and
erect
a
building
with
four
residential
condominium
units
and
three
parking
spaces
will
also
be
because
right
now,
if
madame
ambassador,
could
just
go
to
some
of
the
site
pictures,
you
will
see
that
everything
there's
a
massive
curb
cut,
we're
restoring
one
on
street
spot.
AP
A
Counselor,
can
you
please
then
speak
to
how
this
is
in
in
how
this
fits
into
the
neighborhood
and
then
speak
jump
to
the
violations.
AP
Sure
so
there
is
a
mix
of
different
buildings.
Next
to
us
is
a
three
family:
there's
condo
buildings,
four
to
six
up
and
down
the
street.
There's
some
twos,
it's
in
a
2f
5000
area.
Our
lot
size
is
3120
square
feet
and
we
actually
have
been
working
on
this
for
the
better
part
of
the
year
in
making
changes
based
on
feedback
we
actually
deferred
at
the
last
hearing
and
we're
working
with
the
wellington
hill,
neighborhood
association.
A
Listen
counselor
we're
we'd
like
to
just
get
to
the
meat
of
the
project.
We
will
hear
about
your
community
process,
as
you
know,
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
and
representatives
from
the
community
who
may
be
on
this
call.
You
you'll
be
relying
on
your
technical
expertise,
talk
about
the
violations
that
have
been
garnered
proposal.
A
AP
Okay,
so
it's
a
two-f
district
and
we're
proposing
four
units,
a
variance
for
use.
Minimum
lot
area
is
required.
Five
thousand.
We
have
three
thousand
one
hundred
and
twenty
square
feet.
There
was
a
mis-sighting
of
additional
lot
area.
It
is
not
applicable
over
two
units,
so
that
was
an
incorrect
violation.
AP
Rare
yard
violation
is
also
removed
because
of
the
shallow
lot
exception.
We
have
an
80
foot
deep
lot,
which
brings
us
to
a
29
foot.
Rare
setback
and
30
would
be
allow
12
20
is
what's
required
under
the
code,
under
the
shallow
exception
that
also
was
met.
Minim
minimum
lot.
Width
45
would
be
required.
We're
proposing
39,
seeking
a
variance
for
that.
0.8
far
is
what's
allowed
we're
proposing
1.42
height
in
feet,
we're
proposing
39
feet,
6
inches
35
is
what
the
code
allows.
So
we're
seeking
a
variance
for
that.
AP
AP
A
You,
please,
can
you
please
hold
on
for
a
minute,
steph
steph.
Could
you
please
get
to
the
rendering?
So
we
can
see
what
this
looks
like
on
the
site?
Go
ahead,
counselor,
while
stephanie
pulls
up
the
the
appropriate
one.
AP
Yes
and
then
parking,
so
we
do
have
three
four
would
be
required,
but
we
are
creating
one
spot.
I
can
go
over
the
floor
plans,
madam
chair,
the
exterior
just
the
three
parking
spaces.
AP
I
don't
know
if
the
site
plan
we
already
passed,
if
you
want
to
see
that
the
free
spaces
are
in
the
rear
of
the
property,
there's
also
a
trash
enclosure
that
you
can
see
fenced
in
along
the
side
for
our
receptacles,
we
are
proposing
four
units,
so
three,
three
bedroom
units
at
a
thousand
nineteen
square
foot
average
in
one
two
bedroom
at
nine
hundred
and
twelve
square
feet.
AP
The
first
floor
is
unit
one,
which
is
a
three
bedroom
one
bath
at
950
unit.
2
on
the
second
floor
is
a
three
bedroom
one
bath.
It
also
has
a
deck
and
that's
950
square
feet
and
the
third
and
fourth
layer,
the
levels
have
bi-level
units
so
up
and
down
unit.
AP
Three
and
four
on
the
third
floor
have
living
area
and
kitchen:
that's
a
912
square
foot,
two
bed,
one
bath
and
the
two
beds
in
one
bath
or
on
the
fourth
floor
for
that
unit
and
then
on.
The
third
floor:
we
have
the
lower
level
for
unit
four,
which
has
a
living
area
kitchen
and
deck.
That's
a
1157
square
foot,
three
bedroom,
one
bath
with
three
bedrooms
and
one
bath
on
the
fourth
floor.
These
are
all
condominiums,
just
if
I
haven't
mentioned
that
yet.
A
Okay,
counselor.
Can
you
please
stay
on
the
on
this
there's
some
in
the
meantime,
mr
ellick,
how
were
the
plans.
A
AF
Madam
chair
members
board,
my
name
is
fisa.
Sharif
of
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal,
had
several
meetings
with
the
wellington
hill,
neighborhood
association
and
then
also
they
do
have
the
support
of
several
of
their
butters
as
referenced
by
mark.
Thank
you.
AM
M
AV
Hi,
this
is
fatima
ali
swarm,
greater
matapan,
neighborhood
council.
The
council
supports
the
militant
hill
neighborhood
association's
position
and
agrees
that
so
long
as
the
plans
are
stamped
and
actually
show
the
parking
in
the
back
as
well
as
full
landscaping.
Thank
you.
B
Calling
the
next
case
calling
doa
992
741
66
to
66b
fondale
road.
This
is
seeking
and
erect
a
three-story
residential
building
with
three
units
and
three
parking
spaces:
the
violations,
article
67
section,
32,
design,
parking
spaces
and
sizes;
article
67,
section,
33
conformity
with
an
existing
street
wall
alignment;
no
model.
B
AP
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
jeff
drago,
again
of
drago
and
toscano,
with
an
address
of
15
broad
street
representing
tom
falcucci
and
his
family.
We
also
have
arthur
chu
as
the
architect
on
the
line
at
66-66
b,
fondale
road
again.
This
proposal
is
directed
three-story
condominium,
building
three
units
and
sixteen
six
interior
parking
spaces
on
an
existing
vacant
lot.
This
project,
just
to
point
out,
was
before
this
board
and
deferred
to
get
to
get
a
better
design
right.
AP
No
bye.
AP
And
we
came
back
with
the
based
on
the
boards,
ask
for
a
design
more
conducive
to
the
area
and
we
can
show
those
if
madame
ambassador
puts
those
up.
This
zoning
district
is
a
3f
4
000.
Our
lot
size
is
3
hundred
and
twenty
eight
square
feet
just
to
go
over
the
zoning
violations.
AP
The
lot
size
required
is
four
thousand
we're
at
three
thousand
two
hundred
and
twenty
eight
square
feet
additional
lot
size
2000.
We
have
zero
fa
ours,
0.8
we're
at
1.33,
open
space,
800
we're
at
316.
AP
AP
AP
AP
I
know
we
passed
some
of
the
proposed
renderings
of
what
the
exterior
is.
We
hope
this
is
more
in
line
what
the
board
was
looking
for
from
our
last
we
showed
a
previous
rendering
and
then
a
new
rendering
elevation
slide.
A
AP
Correct,
but
that
was
part
of
our
modification
with
we
actually
had
three
bedrooms
in
working
with
our
butters.
We
reduced
three
bedrooms
to
two-bedroom
based
on
their
feedback
and
increased
that
pushback
as
well
in
the
rear
that
they
asked
for
and
added
some
decks.
These
are
all
based
on
what
the
butters
had
asked
for
over
the
process.
A
A
Excellent
okay,
so
you've
went
you've
gone
through
all
the
violations.
You've
gone
through
the
parking.
How
are
the
plans,
mr
eric.
B
Secretary
here
just
a
question:
I
have
a
letter
from
bob
d'amico
at
the
btd.
He
said
that
66
and
66
b
fondale
is
he's
opposed
because
all
the
spaces
are
only
16
feet.
The
letter
is
dated
july
27th
of
this
year.
A
BC
AY
AY
At
that
time,
we
did
have
a
low
turnout,
but
the
counselors
staff
at
the
time
did
request
for
additional
parking
to
be
made
in
the
project
to
concerns
in
the
neighborhood
of
a
lack
of
parking
in
the
neighborhood,
especially
with
the
you
know,
the
bus
lane
on
washington
street
does
not
have
it
restricts
parking
throughout
the
day
they
were
able
to
make
those
adjustments
as
well
as
work
with.
You
know,
director
butters,
and
I
believe
they
did
support,
send
in
letters
of
support.
As
of
today.
AY
That
being
said,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
BD
E
C
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
with
design
review.
B
Last
case
of
the
day
calling
it
away
993
904
104
to
106
warren
street.
This
is
a
change
of
occupancy
from
a
two
family
dwelling
to
a
seven
family
dwelling
with
five
parking
spaces
violations.
Article
10,
section,
1
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses
article
51,
section
9.
The
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
in
is
insufficient
article
51
section
9,
the
fourier.
Q
B
AP
Thank
you
attorney
jeff
drago,
with
an
address
with
dragon
scanner
with
an
address
of
15
broad
street
representing
city
realty,
and
we
have
josh
fetterman
on
the
call
and
tonya
carrier
from
tulsa
design
is
the
architect
for
project
at
104-106
warren
street.
The
proposal
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
family
to
a
seven
family,
with
five
parking
spaces
on
site.
A
AP
We're
keeping
the
existing
building
and
building
on
it,
so
that
will
include
side
editions
in
a
fourth
story
edition,
but
also
completely
renovating
the
building
which
is
in
dire
need
of
that
as
well.
This
is
multi-family
residential,
so
the
existing
building
is
two
everything
around
us
is
a
large
apartment
style.
The
lot
size
is
six
thousand
seven
hundred
and
forty
four
square
feet
and
just
to
go
over
the
layout.
So
the.
AP
A
AP
Our
unit
breakdown,
so
we
have
six
two
bedroom
units
at
890
square
feet
and
we
have
one
three
bedroom
unit.
That's
668
square
feet
are
just
to
go
over
the
the
layout,
so
in
our
basement,
we'll
only
house,
storage
units,
16
bicycle
spaces
and
repair
area
for
bikes
and
our
electrical
and
sprinkler
and
elevator.
AP
As
we
go
up
to
the
first
floor,
we
have
our
main
entrance
lobby
and
a
trash
enclosed
area.
We
also
have
unit
one,
which
is
the
two
bedroom
two
bath
unit,
two
two
bedroom
one
bath,
and
then
we
go
up
to
the
second
floor,
which
houses
units
three
and
four:
that's
an
859
square
foot
two
bed
one
bath
and
that
has
a
deck
a
rear
deck
unit.
Four
is
a
975
square
foot
two
bed
two
bath
with
a
deck.
AP
Then
we
go
up
to
the
third
floor
unit
five
and
six
859
square
foot,
two
bed,
one
bath
with
a
deck
unit,
six
970
square
feet,
two
bed,
two
bath
with
a
deck
and
then
unit
seven
is
on
the
fourth
floor.
That's
our
larger
unit,
three
bed,
three
bath
with
balconies
and
that's
a
thousand
six
hundred
and
sixty
eight
square
feet.
A
A
B
Secretary
here,
bob
d'amico
also
commented
on
this
one
104
106
warren
street.
He
was
opposed
due
to
front
yard
parking
and
all
the
spaces
are
only
18
feet.
AP
AP
Yes,
you
can
see
all
the
spaces,
so
we
were
not
cited
for
front
yard.
We
pulled
it
to
the
side.
We
were
asked
to
create
more
parking
to
go
along
with
this,
as
we
went
through
the
community
process.
So
that's
how
we
got
to
the
five
and
we
were
asked
to
keep
the
building
and
we
wanted
to
maintain
ample
green
space.
So
this
was
a
way
to
to
get
all
of
the
requests
in
parking.
Green
space
pull
it
as
far
as
we
could
from
the
front.
AP
No,
you
would
go
over,
there's
like
a
paver
in
the
front
and
you
would
go
right
over
that.
There's
one
curb
cut
on
the
left-hand
side,
so
the
parking
space
there's
one
on
the
left.
You
can
see
that
backs
right
out.
The
other
one
is
tandem
and
then
there's
three
across
on
the
right.
That
would
all
go
over
that
front,
drive
over
the
front,
perm
pavers
and
go
out
the
one
curb
cut.
AP
A
Here,
there's
a
garage
in
the
left
and
so
you're
not
you're,
knocking
down
that
side
entrance,
because
that's
that
driveway
currently
looks
pretty
narrow.
O
AP
I
know
josh
fetterman
is
on
the
call
there
if
there's
a
way
to
unmute
him.
I
think
he'd
be
better
suited
on
that
question.
BE
A
BE
This
is
josh
fetterman
320
washington
street
in
brookline.
To
answer
your
question
when
we
looked
at
the
parking
scenario
currently,
as
you
noted,
there's
a
very
narrow
rear,
driveway
that
leads
to
a
one-car
garage
and
the
current
setting.
As
you
know,
although
it's
not
ideal,
there's
a
paved
front
yard
area
where
cars
have
been
parking,
so
we
studied
a
couple
options.
BE
BE
The
discussion
came
up
around
room
to
allow
for
some
pick-up,
drop-off
or
delivery,
and
this
this
arrangement
helps
to
also
meet
that
need.
So
after
some
deliberation
we
settled
on
here
and
it
was,
it
was
received
pretty
well.
A
Well,
you
I
mean
if
you
and
your
attorney
have
been
before
this
board-
often
enough
to
know
that
this
board
is
not,
does
not
look
kindly
in
any
front
yard
parking
in
any
way
shape
or
form,
and
I
am
looking
at
the
existing
condition
on
the
map
and
you're
right,
but
it
doesn't
mean
it's
the
best
design
form
or
anything
else,
and
it
doesn't
mean
that
it
was
by
any
means
reviewed
by
this
board,
and
so
since
this
is
new
new
work,
new
construction,
new
edition
of
tours
that
we
look
to
you
to
actually,
you
know
figure
something
out.
A
Something
else
that's
different,
but
I
just
put
that
down
as
a
statement
for
the
record
for
now.
Mr
erlich,
please
both
of
you
stay
on
mr
early.
How
are
the
planets.
A
Okay,
any
questions
from
the
court.
May
I
have
elected
officials,
go
on
record
representative
from
the
mayor's
office
first
record
speaking
on
this
project,.
BF
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
support
of
this
proposal.
We
conducted
in
a
butters
meeting
back
in
october
october,
9th,
where
residents
in
attendance
didn't
raise
any
serious
concerns.
They
went
on
to
the
from
nelson
improvement
association
and
met
with
them
several
times.
The
crux
of
those
conversations
was
mostly
around
parking.
BF
They
were
in
conversations
with
the
brighton
marine
hospital
across
the
street
and
also
had
extensive
conversations
with
the
franciscan
children's
hospital
next
door
regarding
construction
and
other
matters.
So
we
feel
that
they've
taken
the
appropriate
steps
to
address
concerns
electrical
record
support.
A
Thank
you
any
any
other
representatives
from
elected
officials
on
on
this.
Z
Hampton
from
the
bpda
is
this
from
seven
units
or
eight
units,
because
on
all
the
zba
documentation
says
seven,
but
I
had
noticed
on
the
last
slide
that
they
had
the
proposed
eight
unit.
When
we
were
looking
at
the
parking.
B
Madam
chair,
the
opposition
basically
was
off
street
parking,
multi
multi-unit,
brick
apartment
that
also
lacks
parking
ratio,
yard
space.
A
Hold
on
hold
on
mr
alec
anybody
else
to
speak
with,
raised
hands
in
support
or
in
opposition.
AO
AO
AO
Well,
I'm
definitely
in
support
of
this
project.
I
think
the
current
structure,
that
is
there
right
now
has
been
an
eyesore
ever
since
I've
I've
lived
here.
E
I
have
wayne
e
from
councillor
breden's
office.
Thank
you.
BE
E
Annabella
you're
unmuted,
madam.
BG
Chair
members
of
the
board,
annabelle
gomes
and
the
brighton
austin
improvement
association,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support,
we
definitely
would
be
open
to
having
bta
design
review
on
on
the
parking.
That
was
one
of
our
issues,
but
we
did
have
issues
with
people
in
the
area
that
did
want
a
pulling
in
the
front
for
delivery
so
that
they
wouldn't
be
parking
on
warren
street
because
it
is
a
very
busy
street.
The
property
is
consistent.
The
property
next
door
is
5
000
square
feet
with
23
000
gross
living
area.
BG
C
Yeah
I
had
a
question
for
mr
fetterman
and
and
mr
frago,
you
actually
have
10
feet
along
the
left
side
between
the
edge
of
the
building
and
the
plot
lot
line.
Is
there
a
reason
why
you
didn't
think
of
using
the
driveway
and
doing
the
parking
in
the.
C
AP
BE
I
can
jump
into
jeff,
mr
ehrlich.
We
did
look
at
it
and
we
found
when
we
got
to
the
rear
of
the
property
it
the
amount
of
space
we
had
back.
There
would
limit
to
just
a
couple
spaces,
so
we
would
have
to
deal
with
a
tight
driveway
condition
and
then
a
couple
spaces,
and
then,
when
we
took
it
into
consideration
with
the
other
comments,
we
got
about
creating
usable,
open
space
which,
through
our
landscape
architect,
we
programmed
the
backyard,
I
think
very
nicely
so
that
residents
could
use
it
like.
BE
A
Okay,
so,
given
all
this
information,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
A
Wait
a
second
maybe
just
have.
Basically,
maybe
we
just
need
to
be
firm
or
prescriptive
and
just
eliminate
parking
in
the
front
yard.
On
think
about
that.