►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 1-31-23
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
A
The
Jerk,
regarding
virtual
hearings,
the
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice
of
holding
virtual
hearings
through
March
2023.
This
hearing
of
the
board
is
being
held
remotely
via
the
zoom
webinar
event
platform.
This
hearing
is
also
being
live
streamed
in
order
to
ensure
this
hearing
of
the
board
is
open
to
the
public
members.
A
A
As
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
in
opposition.
The
owner
of
comments
is
as
followed
elected
officials,
representatives
of
elected
officials
and
members
of
the
public.
The
chair
May
limit.
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
offer
comment
and
the
time
for
commenting
as
time
constraints
require.
For
that
reason,
the
board
prefers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
a
project
that
is
those
individuals
who
live
closest
to
the
project.
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform.
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
when
the
host
sees
your
hand,
you'll
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes,
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk.
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
A
You
must
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself
after
you
receive
the
request
from
The
Host
that
was
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
State
their
name
and
address
first
before
they
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
Ms
Rio
reads.
Their
address
into
the
record.
Do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
meeting
hosts
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
A
These
instructions
will
be
repeated
throughout
the
hearing.
Okay,
roll
call,
Ms,
we
well
you're
good.
A
Good
morning,
Mr
Langham
good
morning,
I'm
here,
thank
you.
Mr
Stembridge,
the.
A
I
C
A
C
K
G
J
We
have
a
few
extensions.
The
first
is
COA.
J
881804-141-151
Condor
Street
Jeffrey
Drago
is
the
applicant.
If
Mr
Drago
here.
A
Good
morning,
can
you
explain
the
reason
for
your
extension?
Yes,.
L
Well,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jeff
Drago
from
Dragon
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
my
client,
the
neighborhood
of
affordable
housing.
We
are
seeking
a
one-year
extension
for
a
project
at
141-151,
Condor
Street
in
East
Boston.
This
project,
just
by
the
way
of
background,
is
part
of
a
large,
larger
article
80
project
that
was
approved
back
in
2019
due
to
the
pandemic
and
that
need
for
delays
on
funding
from
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Community
Development.
L
A
You
may
I
have
a
motion.
N
L
O
A
Morning
good
morning,
can
you
explain
the
reason
for
the
extension
yeah.
O
This
extension
is
really
coming
as
a
result
of
financing
delays.
Initially,
this
project
was
an
article
80
that
was
approved
for
rental
housing
due
to
the
recession
and
with
the
interest
rates
are
now
a
dozen
pencil
out,
as
that,
so
it
looks
like
we
may
have
to
go
back
to
the
PDA
or
which
is
not
a
bad
thing,
but
home
ownership
rather
than
Apartments,
because
it
just
senses
out
that
way.
So,
due
to
that
fact,
we're
requesting
one-year
extension.
A
Great
thank
you.
May
I
have
a
motion.
A
Okay
may
I
have
a
second.
A
Q
Certainly,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
boy.
My
name
is
George
Moran
Sam,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address,
350
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston.
Q
This
is
a
first
expansion
request,
this
matter,
which
is
an
appeal
associated
with
the
new
mixed
use,
building
to
contain
One
commercial
unit
and
three
dwelling
units
was
approved
by
the
board
on
September
10
2019,
owing
to
the
tolling
period,
which
ran
contingent
with
the
governor's
executive
order,
number
42,
the
actual
date
of
expiration,
that
this
decision
has
extended
February
6
2023
by
client,
because
this
would
require
knocking
down
an
existing
building
with
both
the
commercial
and
residential
tenants
did
not
want
to
expel
anybody
from
the
property
of
course,
during
the
covet
pandemic.
Q
H
A
Excellent
Miss
barbaraza.
C
N
J
835
for
six
General
William
H
Divine
Way,
the
applicant
is
Patrick
Mahoney.
We
do
have
some
information
on
this
one.
The
board
has
granted
three
extensions
of
this
relief
with
the
most
recent
expiring
March
1st
2023.
This
is
the
applicant's
fourth
request
for
a
one-year
extension,
but
we
do
have
a
recommendation
that
the
board
of
Grants
it
if
appropriate,.
S
Good
morning
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
attorney
Patrick
Mahoney
I'm,
representing
William
Smith
at
six
William
Divine
way.
We
are
seeking
a
one-year
extension.
The
relief
expires
on
March
1st
2023..
Currently
the
applicant
is
a
you
know,
owner
operator
applicant
who
operates
the
auto
garage,
he's
hiring
Tim
Johnson
to
the
architecture
taken
through
and
help
him
with
the
building
permit
process.
Mr
Johnson
has
confirmed
to
me
that
all
of
the
items
are
in
ISD.
S
However,
the
plans
examiner
that
was
working
on
the
project
has
recently
been
promoted
with
any
Administration,
so
a
new
one
will
be
scheduled,
as
well
as
that
they're
completing
the
article
85
demo
delay,
which
is
just
it's
a
single
story
garage
in
a
residential
area,
so
that
it's
not
out
of
historical
significance,
but
you
know
it'd
be
unlikely.
That
department
would
be
issued
within
the
next
30
days
and
for
that
reason
we
are
seeking
a
one-year
extension,
although
the
permit
should
be
issued
far
before
that.
A
A
N
J
Next
is
Boa
450351
at
1181-1183
Bennington
Street,
the
applicants
Richard
Linz.
The
board
has
granted
four
extensions
of
this
relief
with
the
most
recent
expiring
March
25th
2023.
This
is
now
the
applicant's
fifth
request
for
a
one-year
extension.
We
do
have
a
recommendation
that
the
board
grants
it
if
we
find
appropriate
to
do
so.
T
Yes
good
morning,
thank
you,
Miss.
We
well
and
Madam
Chancery
to
the
members
Richard
Linds
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
with
the
business
address
of
245
Sumner,
Street,
East,
Boston,
Madam
Chair.
By
way
of
very
brief
history
for
this
project.
This
was
an
article,
any
project
crew
by
this
board
and
the
bpda
back
in
2016.
that
will
allow
for
a
transit-oriented,
multi-family
44
unit
dwelling
to
be
built
upon
the
site.
T
It
will
also
involve
the
cleanup
of
a
contaminated
site
that
has
been
used
for
many
years
as
a
auto
repair
facility,
and
it's
located
precisely
between
both
the
Suffolk
Downs
and
Orient
Heights
T
stations.
The
reason
for
the
delay
and
the
reasonable
request,
I
should
say,
is
with
good
cause
after
the
approvals
but
prior
to
our
acquisition,
this
project
was
subject
to
a
seizure
by
the
Department
of
Justice
for
the
prior
owner.
T
It
was
my
client
actually
was
required
to
litigate
the
seizure
in
order
to
apply
the
premises
we
ultimately
prevailed
and
as
five
titles
of
the
premises.
However,
in
addition
to
this
project,
the
Boston,
Planning
and
Development
agency
has
also
conducted
a
taking
with
respect
to
a
portion
of
property
that
my
client
must
also
acquire
in
connection
with
this
development.
T
My
client
has
completed
all
of
the
prerequisites
in
order
to
acquire
the
parcel,
including
the
relocation
of
utilities
and
a
number
of
items
that
were
handled
to
the
public
Improvement
commission
for
the
site.
So
we
are
ready
to
proceed
with
respect
to
the
final
step
of
this
process,
which
is
to
acquire
the
site
from
the
bpda
and
to
proceed
with
construction
as
soon
as
practical.
So
we
are
requesting
a
one-year
extension
and
we
anticipate
we
should
be
able
to
finalize
our
building
plan
within
that
time
and
proceed
with
this
project.
A
All
right,
excellent,
thank
you,
may
I
have
a
motion.
A
C
C
A
J
Next,
we
have
boa
1050291
for
32
Orleans
Street.
The
applicant
is
Richard
Lynn
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
March
10
2021,
so
the
relief
is
valid
until
March
10
2023..
This
is
the
applicant's
first
request
for
an
extension.
We
have
a
recommendation
to
Grant
it
if
we
find
appropriate.
T
Richard
Lynn's
245
Sumner
Street
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
as
Ms
leewell
indicated.
This
is
our
first
request.
For
extension,
this
project
involves
the
construction
of
a
new
six
unit,
multi-family
dwelling
just
outside
of
Maverick
Square.
Our
client
has
completed
all
filings
with
inspectional
services
for
the
building
permit.
The
only
remaining
item
involves
a
Conservation
Commission,
because
this
is
located
within
a
flood
zone,
so
we
are
finalizing
the
conservation
issues
as
we
speak.
We
anticipate
this
should
be
resolved
within
the
next
few
months.
H
C
N
U
J
Next,
we
have
boa.
T
Yes,
thank
you
again,
as
we
welcome
Madam
chair
good
morning
for
the
record
Richard
Lynn's
245
Sumner
Street
East
Boston
behalf
of
the
petitioner
Madam
chairs,
our
first
request.
This
involves
a
renovation
of
an
existing
building
mixed
use,
ground
level,
retail
with
residential.
It
actually
involved
the
change
in
the
occupancy
to
add
an
additional
dwelling
unit.
The
applicant
is
in
the
process
of
finalizing
the
permits
for
this,
and
we
anticipate
to
have
this
completed
relatively
soon
so
requesting
a
one-year
extension.
C
A
T
Thank
you
again
for
the
record
Richard
Lynn's
245
Sumner,
Street,
East
Boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
Madam
chairman
of
support.
This
is
our
first
request
with
respect
to
197
Chelsea
Street.
This
involves
the
complete
renovation
of
an
existing
mixed-use
building
with
an
addition.
Our
client
is
in
the
process
of
finalizing
a
BPD
design
review,
which
is
a
provisor
with
this
board
and
expects
to
have
that
completed
within
the
next
three
to
four
months.
Upon
completion
of
that,
we'll
pull
it
up
immediately
and
proceed.
A
Okay
may
I
have
a
motion.
A
K
A
B
J
Yeah,
we
do
have
a
little
bit
of
information
on
this
one.
The
board
previously
determined
that
the
relief
is
valid
until
February
6
2023,
including
all
covid
tolling.
However,
the
board
was
not
made
aware
of
Prior
litigation
in
this
matter.
That
litigation
was
pending
for
680
days,
so
the
relief
is
told
for
that
time
period,
including
litigation
tolling.
This
relief
remains
valid
until
September
12
2023..
The
applicant
is
now
requesting
a
one-year
extension
to
expire,
September,
12
2024.
B
Absolutely
Madam
board
members
of
the
chair.
My
name
is
Jessica
Camano
I
have
a
business
address
of
400
Atlantic
Avenue
Boston
Massachusetts
I'm
here
today
to
explain
our
request
for
a
one-year
extension
until
September,
12
2024.,
so
ask
them
back
on
this
project.
It
proposes
a
building
with
approximately
75
residential
units,
some
Associated
amenities
and
underground
parking.
It
was
originally
approved
by
the
board,
in
conjunction
with
a
companion
project.
B
That's
located
right
across
Kilmarnock
Street
for
ease
of
reference,
I'll
refer
to
this
project
as
the
West
site
project
and
that
companion
project
as
the
East
site
project,
so
that
Eastside
project
is
currently
under
construction
and
is
anticipated
to
be
completed
in
late
summer
of
2024..
We're
here
today
making
this
request
for
an
extension
because
there's
a
number
of
relationships
between
those
two
projects
that
makes
commencing
construction
on
the
west
site,
while
the
east
side
is
under
construction,
quite
difficult
So.
B
V
V
X
B
So,
in
light
of
all
this,
we
are
requesting
today
that
the
board
request
that
the
board
Grant
an
extension
of
that
September
12
2023
date
out
to
September
12
2024,
at
which
point
we
think
the
appellant
will
be
in
very
good
shape
to
have
started
construction
on
this
website
project
in
light
of
the
site
projects
being
completed.
Ideally
in
late
summer
of
2024..
B
G
A
J
And
next
we
have
boa
109
3724
for
85
Regent
Street,
the
applicant
is
Thomas.
Miller
is
Mr
Miller
here.
Y
I
am
good
morning
Madam
Secretary
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Tom
Miller
from
mcdermaculty
Miller,
with
a
business
address
of
28
State
Street
in
Boston
on
behalf
of
John
Cochran,
the
homeowner
and
resident
of
85
Regent
Street.
Y
Can
as
you're
aware,
the
board
granted
the
lead
for
this
project
during
the
height
of
the
pandemic,
complete
the
repairs
started
and
the
renovations
began
on
his
home.
This
is
our
first
request
for
an
extension
from
that
time
period,
since
the
grant
of
relief,
Mr
Cochran
has
been
working
to
overcome
issues
related
to
the
pandemic,
both
in
locating
financing
and
locating
in
a
a
quality
contractor
to
complete
the
work,
which
is
one
of
the
reasons
we
were
originally
here.
It's
not
locating
a
a
not.
Y
Contractor
so
we're
here
today
to
ask
for
an
extension,
so
you
can
complete
the
work
and
finalize
this
financing.
He
is
close
to
being
able
to
move
forward
with
this
project
and
because
of
that,
we
are
requesting
a
extension
of
the
relief
for
one
year.
A
May
I
have
a
second
thank
you.
Miss
bedraza,
yes,
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Mr
Valencia!
Yes,
we
will
yes
Mr
Langham.
Yes,
thank
you.
Mr
Stembridge,
yes,
well,
chair,
also
votes.
Yes,
motion
carries
good
luck.
J
Z
Z
Madam
chair,
yes,
so
Jerry
and
Francie,
they
live
at
four
Garrett
Street,
so
they
actually
live
on
the
same
street
as
this
project.
It's
a
new
single
family
home.
Z
They
recently
purchased
the
property
in
the
project
on
the
street
from
the
original
homeowner
who
went
through
the
process
with
the
zoning
board
and
so
they're,
requesting
the
one-year
extension
of
the
zoning
relief
in
order
to
finalize
the
building
permit
with
the
ISD
to
construct
a
single
family
home.
This
is
the
first
zoning
extension
request
for
the
project.
They
do
have
all
other
permits
and
approvals
in
place.
Madam
chair,
including
bpda,
design,
review
stamped
plans,
as
required
under
this
owning.
Z
So
they're,
ready
and
willing
and
able
to
perform
on
the
approvals
they
just
need
the
extension
in
order
to
go
ahead
and
file
with
ISD.
It
may
take
30
days
for
the
building
department.
Sorry,
madam
chair,
go
ahead.
A
That's
okay.
Are
you
looking
for
a
new
extension
just
until
October
of
this
year
or
the
one
for
one
year.
Z
Until
October
3rd
2023
would
be
more
than
would
be
more
than
enough
I
mean
Mr,
mcgath
I
think
is
ready
to
go
down
as
soon
as
possible
to
files
of
the
building
department.
So
we
should
not
be
longer
than
that.
Yes,.
A
Excellent,
thank
you.
May
I
have
a
motion.
C
V
A
AA
Hi
madam
chair
I'm
board,
thanks
for
your
time,
I'm
Ryan
Gavin,
the
homeowner
of
72
High,
our
architect,
highlighted
in
the
Reds
and
changes
that
we've
submitted
those
good
kind
of
two
pieces,
one
there's
some
small
points
because
we
went
through
the
bpda
design
review
on
the
roof
deck
so
that
moved
around
a
little
bit.
That's
what's
going
on
on
the
top.
AA
Our
requested
that
I
think
is
really
we'd
like
to
add
a
small
deck
on
the
back
of
the
house
on
the
third
floor
and
there's
a
deck
there
today,
but
we
were
initially
going
to
take
it
off,
but
we
wanted
to
provide
some
outdoor
space
for
some
grandparents
who
are
moving
in
there,
your
house,
away
from
the
kids
and
so
inside
a
small
deck
back.
There
basically
slide
out
the
one
that
is
there
today.
That's
me
at.
F
Madam
chair
no
I
had
the
chance
to
review
the
drawings.
The
changes
are
minor
and
there's
no
additional
zoning
violations.
Thank.
I
A
J
All
right
so
now
we
can
move
on
to
building
code.
Only
we
have
boa
1421197
204-206
Cambridge
Street.
The
applicant
is
Shake.
J
W
Hi
he's
gone,
I
just
sent
a
request
to
make
him
a
panelist
I
hope
it's
heavy
them.
J
Could
read
out
the
violations
and
yep
so
violation?
One
two:
zero
eight
point:
two
minimum
ceiling
height.
J
Minimum
ceiling,
Heights,
occupiable
spaces,
habitable
spaces
and
corridors
shall
have
a
ceiling
height
of
not
less
than
seven
feet.
Six
inches
bathrooms,
toilet
rooms,
kitchens
storage
rooms
and
laundry
rooms
shall
have
a
ceiling
height
of
not
less
than
seven
feet.
The
prep
area
in
the
basement
only
has
a
height
of
six
feet
and
two
inches.
AB
AC
AC
I'm
here
to
see
believe
from
the
building
code
for
ceiling
height
in
the
food
prep
area
in
the
basement,
Mr
James
Kennedy
on
427
of
2022.
He
issued
our
permits
and
approved
our
Amendment
for
the
long
form
for
the
basement
to
be
used
as
a
prep
area.
Even
though
the
architectural
stamped
drawings
were
stated
that
the
pursuing
height
was
under
the
proper
height,
it
was
still
not
picked
up
during
the
review
process
and
we
had
a
final
final
building
inspector
Mr,
Martin,
Dunlap,
building
inspector.
AC
He
come
on
August
3rd
and
he
found
the
ceiling
height
to
be
lowered
and
then
on
August
4th.
He
advised
us
that
we
can
only
receive
a
tent
co
due
to
all
this
and
that
I
would
have
to
go
through
the
appeal
and
Miss
Jill
Fox
I'm
Sorry,
Miss,
Jill,
Cox
assistant
commissioner
and
Mr
James
Kennedy.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Brazzer,.
F
Yes,
I
I
do
have
I
have
a
couple
of
questions,
so
is
there
egress
direct
egress
to
a
public
way?
Is
it
on
on
Russell
Street.
AC
Yes,
so
it's
on
204,
Cambridge
Street,
yes,
the
the
other
street
is
Russell
Street.
Okay,.
F
So
I'm
not
seeing
a
site
plant
that
shows
egress
just
wanted
to
point
to
that.
Is
it
sprinklers.
AC
No,
the
building
is
not
sprinkled.
We
do
have
a
fire
station
right
next
to
us
right
next
door.
F
No
I
I
saw
that
so
that
you
have
a
fire
station
next
door
is,
does
it
have
a
fire
alarm
system?
Yes,.
F
Okay,
are
there
any
obstructions
below
the
ceiling,
the
existing
ceiling.
F
AC
Yeah,
no,
no,
there
is
none
so
because
there
was
a
food
on
427
2022
we
had
done.
Much
of
you
know
we
I
have.
This
is
my
first
restaurant
and
I
have
spent
a
lot
of
money
fixing
everything
in
the
basement
for
the
prep
area,
including,
but
not
limited
to
a
grease,
trap
or
floor
drain.
AC
You
know
the
ceilings
making
sure
the
the
floors
are
done
correctly
for
with
polycrete
I've
spoken
to
the
health
department
and
enclosed
everything
in
the
ceiling,
even
like
little
gaps
and
stuff
just
so
that
it
can
be
okay
for
the
prep
area,
and
this
is
the
reason
I'm
here
today,
as
I've
done
a
lot
in
there.
After
the
approval,
which
again
I
guess
it
was
by
mistake,
there
was
a
fruit.
F
Okay,
so
I
don't
have
drawings
in
regards
to
whether
you
have
you
know,
the
fire
system
installed,
whether
you
have
detectors
I
I,
can't
assess
whether
you
have
obstructions
I,
find
that
you're
lacking
just
photographs
for
me
to
understand
this.
A
Yes,
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
for
for
the
board
members
to
understand
the
State
Building
Code.
So.
F
One
other
thing
I
want
to
just
point
out.
Is
you
know
if
it
was
two
inches?
You
know
I,
it's
fine
right
like
one
can
almost
they
there's
only
two
inches
from
the
seven
feet
of
building
code,
but
this
is
almost
a
full
12
inches.
So
I,
just
I,
don't
have
enough
information
in
front
of
me
to
ensure
that
it
is
in
safe
conditions
or
a
one
or
two
person
to
be
in
the
basement.
Yes,.
D
So,
typically,
you
know
that
people
can
feel
these
building
code
faces
to
the
zoning
board
on
the
board
does
sometimes
Grant
building
elderly
instances
where
it's
familiar,
you
can
like
understand
the
cases
you
know
like
with
our
the
hatches
the
root
deck
access
the
board
routinely.
Does
this.
D
I
would
just
recommend
that
the
board
deny
this
and
then
have
the
applicant
secretly
so
that
they
have
a
chance
to
weigh
in
and
offer
their
recommendations.
I
think
that
Fatima
architect
is
certainly
qualified
to
do
that.
But
I
don't
know
if
the
rest
of
the
board
members
can
have
the
kind
of
expertise,
but
the
building
going
to
do
more
investors.
F
A
Miss,
better
Braza,
yes,
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Mr
Valencia,
yes,
Ms!
We
will
yes
Mr
lamb,
yes,
Mr
Stembridge.
Yes,
the
chair,
also
votes,
yes
motion
carries
we
recommend
to
the
applicant
that
you
follow
and
appeal
with
the
State
Board
code
building
code
appeal
board
for
this
case.
Thank
you.
A
J
AD
Hi,
everyone
and
my
cameras
looks
like
no
change
in
a
moment,
so
you
can
see
my
face.
I
just
apologize.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
attention
today
hearing
our
appeal.
We
are
asking
the
board
to
approve
legalizing
a
basement
apartment
that
was
built
more
than
30
years
ago
and
to
allow
its
long-time
occupant
Willie
Castro
to
remain
in
his
home,
we're
not
seeking
to
change
how
the
property
or
unit
have
been
used
for
the
past
30
plus
years.
AD
I
spoke
with
Lionel
donkletes,
who
purchased
the
building
in
the
early
1990s
and
sold
it
to
another
party
in
the
late
20
teens,
and
he
told
me
that
this
unit
was
present
in
the
building
when
he
bought
the
house
at
the
time
it
was
extremely
dated,
so
he
updated
it
and
then
continued
to
rent
it.
The
earliest
documented
use
of
the
building
that
of
the
unit.
Excuse
me
that
I
could
find
in
City.
AD
Turning
to
the
specifics
of
our
project,
what
we're
seeking
to
do
is
make
changes
to
the
unit
so
that
it's
in
compliance
with
building
codes,
particularly
with
respect
to
Fire
and
sanitary
needs,
by
adding
an
egress
window
and
increasing
the
height
of
the
entry
door
from
78
to
80
inches,
and
you
know
I
just
want
to
emphasize
we're
not
seeking
to
change
the
unit
or
how
the
property
has
been
used.
I
held
multiple
meetings
with
the
west
of
Washington
Coalition
and
their
directors,
Lakeisha
Burke
and
Lauren
Washington
who's.
AD
A
F
A
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
We
recommended
approval.
The
only
provider
that
we
wanted
was
that
there'd
be
no
building
code
relief.
We
didn't
see
any
building
code
issues
and
I
putting
the
appellant
they've
updated
it,
but
that's
our
own
concerns.
AF
AE
K
Morning,
chair
members
on
the
board:
it's
just
actually
going
to
made
with
services
on
behalf
of
the
mayor
and
office,
we'll
like
to
defer
the
judge
on
the
board
at
this
time
on
the
Civic
and
the
numbers
really
have
been
done.
No,
no
there's
a
proposition.
AG
Chad,
it's
Lindsay
can
I,
go
absolutely
yep
hi
everyone
good
morning,
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
Lindsay
Santana
from
the
office
counselor
morale,
the
applicant
received
the
support
of
the
west
of
Washington
Coalition
and
has
worked
with
the
butters
to
address
concerns,
so
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
Thank
you.
M
And
make
a
motion
and
make
a
motion
to.
We
saw
that
no
reading
Court
will
be
granted.
A
A
You
should
we
ask
for
any
deferrals
for
the
930s
before
we
continue.
A
Y
Street
85,
what
I'm
sorry
one
Everett
Street
I
apologize.
J
So
was
ever
boa
1309-297
one
Everett
Street.
The
applicant
is
Everett
development,
Partners
LLC.
Y
Thank
you,
Madam
Secretary,
Madam
chair
members,
again
Tom
Miller
from
Montgomery
Court,
Saint
Miller
of
28
State
Street
in
Boston
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
We
are
here
requesting
a
deferral,
as
this
project
has
wound
its
way
through
the
process.
We
have
engaged
in
an
extensive
Community
process
so
far,
but
we
are
requesting
a
deferral
at
the
request
of
ons
and
city
council
Coletta's
office
to
finalize
our
discussions
with
the
welcome
neighborhood
association,
the
jpna,
so
that
we
can
answer
their
final
questions
and
discuss
the
final
iteration
of
this
project.
A
N
J
O
Said
so,
this
is
a
plan
we
have
unanimous
Community
Support,
except
some
plans
were
revised
and
those
were
filed
with
ISD
and
we
haven't
received
those
back
yet
we
should
get
them
any
day.
So
if
we
could
get
a
short
referral,
that
would
be
much
appreciated.
AH
N
A
J
J
So
next
we
have
bla
one
three:
six:
nine,
zero:
three
nine
forty
Elmont
Street.
The
applicant
is
Eric
zackerson
here
seeking
to
build
a
new
two
family
building
with
violations
for
off-street
parking
law
area
or
area
ratio,
Building
height,
usable
open
space,
front
yard,
insufficient
side
yard,
insufficient
and
rear
yard.
Insufficient.
L
With
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
Johnny
and
Anna
Singh
and
I
also
have
Eric
zackerson
from
Context
design
who's
the
architect
in
this
rendering
you're
looking
at
this
is
a
proposed
two-family
dwelling
that
were
proposed
to
build
on
a
vacant
lot.
We
are
also
creating
two
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
through
a
curb
cut.
Driveway,
that's
shown
in
this
rendering
here
you
can
go
on
to
the
next
slide.
Thank
you
just
to
go
over
the
floor
plans.
L
If
you
go
on
to
the
next
slide-
and
this
is
just
an
aerial
view-
I
can
stop
here
for
a
moment.
You
can
see
our
rendering
try
to
blend
this
building
in
with
the
context
of
the
other
buildings
in
the
area
we
have
to
the
right
to
the
left.
To
the
right
of
us.
We
have
two
family
buildings
to
the
left
of
us
is
a
one.
Family
behind
us
are
Threes
And
across
the
street
are
all
twos,
and
this
is
a
two
F
5
000
square
foot
District.
The
next
slide,
please
Madam
ambassador.
L
This
just
shows
our
site
plan,
so
you
can
see
our
13
foot
curb
cut
that
enters
the
parking.
This
would
be
creating
those
two
full
parking
spaces
that
are
eight
foot
and
a
half
by
Twenty
next
slide.
Please,
and
now
we
get
into
the
the
plans
for
the
project.
These
are
two
bedroom
unit.
Two
three
bedroom
units-
these
would
be
condo
units
in
the
basement
would
just
be
used
for
common
storage
and
mechanical
room.
We
then
go
up
to
the
first
floor.
L
L
This
second
floor
also
houses
the
lower
level
of
the
second
unit
and
that's
1570,
Square
75
square
foot,
three
bedroom
unit
as
well,
and
on
that
second
floor,
that
would
house
the
living
space
in
one
bath
and
then,
finally,
as
they
go
up
to
the
third
floor,
that
is
the
upper
level
you
can
see
that
here
and
that
would
host
the
additional
two
bedrooms
and
two
baths
and
this
picture
and
this
rendering
you
can
see
the
elevations.
L
We
are
at
37
feet,
8
inches,
which
blends
into
the
context
of
this
neighborhood.
We
only
have
rare
egress
stairs
that
then
lead
into
a
rear
yard
in
the
back
just
to
go
over
the
violations
that
were
mentioned.
It
is
a
5
000,
minimum
watt
area,
rent
2925
square
feet,
although
the
two
family
buildings
that
I
mentioned
are
all
within
that
2
300
to
2
400
range,
which
is
what
we
are
in
as
well
a
little
bit
bigger
than
that.
AI
L
Cited
for
Sao
1.19
0.5
is
what
the
requirement
is
we're
at
three
stories:
37
Feet,
and
so
that
that
is,
if
you
look
at
the
context
that
does
that
is
prevalent
in
this
neighborhood
of
the
height
allows
two
and
a
half
and
35
feet.
Our
open
space
is
490,
so
we're
under
the
requirement
of
750
and
then
our
side
yard
is
three
feet
on
the
right-hand
side,
although
there's
a
large
side
yard
next
to
us,
and
then
we
meet
the
requirement
with
13
feet
on
the
left
side.
L
A
F
I
have
I
have
maybe
the
plans
there
it's
adequate
and
for
a
two
F
five
thousand
sub
District
The
Proposal.
It
seems
reasonable.
A
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members,
support.
Actually
we
do
not
have
a
formal
recommendation,
but
I'd
like
to
Echo
Miss
edible's
comments
that
a
two
family
dwelling
in
a
two-family
district.
Thank
you.
AH
K
Morning
all
Madam
chair
members
of
the
foreign
Services
on
bathroom
and,
of
course,
would
like
to
defer
the
judgments
before
at
this
time.
So,
if
we're
going
to
put
our
meetings
up
and
done,
we
do
have
a
letter
of
opposition
Harvard
Washington,
normal
neighborhood
association,
indicating
the
space
would
be
better
served
as
on
one
family
instead
of
the
two
women.
Thank
you
thank.
A
AG
Lindsay
good
morning,
Madam,
chair
and
members
of
the
board
Lindsay
Santana
from
the
office
of
counselor
Brian
Rowe
I,
would
like
to
Echo
what
Ashley
just
said.
We
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board
for
judgment.
We
do
have
a
letter
of
opposition
and
non-op
position
from
Harvard
Washington,
normal
neighborhood
association.
Thank
you
thank.
A
You
Jessica
are
there
any
other
raised
hands,
no
other
raised
hands.
Okay
may
I
have
a
motion
from
the
board.
F
Madam
chair
I
like
to
put
for
a
motion
of
approval
with
to
Proviso
that
it
goes
under
bpda
design
review
and
the
second
is
to
provide
pervious
surface
to
offset
heat
island
fact.
C
A
F
AA
A
J
A
You'll
be
presenting,
can
you
walk
us
through
the
plans
and
let
us
know
how
many
bedrooms
there
are
as
well
in
in.
AJ
Yep,
it's
it's
a
mixture
of
units
so
there's
a
studio
on
the
first
floor
and
then
three
two
bedrooms
on
the
the
second
floor
and
then
two
bedrooms,
sorry
I'm
just
going
through
here.
Do
we
want
to
go
through
who
we
are
or
anything
of
this
or
the
meetings
or
just.
A
I
guess
you
can
feel
free
to
introduce
yourself
if
there's
anyone
else
presenting
for
you,
they
can
identify
themselves
at
that
time.
Yeah.
AJ
Colin
my
brother
is
online
Elizabeth
Wilson
was
online
from
from
Franklin
Street
off
for
another
meeting.
Unfortunately,
and
Paul
you
are
our
protect
us
online.
If
there's
questions
that
relate
more
to
the
plans
that
I
can't
answer.
Thank
you.
AJ
So
we're
doing
so
it's
seven
units
total
seven
parking
spots.
We
originally
presented
to
the
neighborhood
in
2021
a
12
unit
project,
our
initial
feedback
on
the
site.
Was
they
really
wanted
a
one-to-one
parking
ratio?
So
if
we
could
fit,
you
know
seven
parking
seven
units.
We
could
have
seven
seven
parking
spaces,
we
could
have
seven
units,
so
it's
parking
underneath
the
building.
AJ
The
neighborhood
in
general
was
supportive
with
a
couple
of
carrizos
that
you
know
won
they.
They
wanted
to
see
that
there
was
some
affordability
there
too.
We
would
have
some
cameras.
There
would
be
some
neighborhood
benefits
so
part
of
it
is
this
coroner.
They
want
to
have
more
security
and
lighting.
AJ
That
was
one
of
the
things.
Is
they
want
to
have
something
built
on
it?
Those
are
things
that
we've
done
it
for
ages
and
it's
just
sat
there
and
it
just
hasn't
been
feasible
to
build
it.
A
AJ
Yep
dude
pull
down
sorry
to
the
architecture,
plans
or
I.
Guess
if
Paul
do
you
want
to
present
the
plans
themselves
if
you're
on.
AJ
C
W
AL
The
proposed
building
is
to
build
a
seven
unit
building
on
the
vacant
lot.
You
start
with
the
ground
floor
with
the
one
Studio
unit
and
service
packing
for
seven
parking
spaces
unfinished
basement
for
mechanical
space
and
the
second
floor.
We'll
have.
AL
A
A
AO
AN
AL
The
hip
they
want
the
therefore
yeah.
So
that's
the
the
the
corner
units
in
the
front
facing
Corner
units
are
going
to
be
the
duplexes
in
the
rare
units.
Being
the
rail
yard
is
going
to
be
the
two
bedroom
units.
AL
And
here
are
the
upper
level
space
for
the
two
prices
on
the
third
and
fourth,
we
say:
private
outdoor
outdoor
space.
AJ
M
Can
I
ask
what
are
the?
What
is
the
NW
income
for
the
restricted
units,
eighty
percent
and
90,
okay?
AE
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chairman.
We
actually
recommended
to
now
with
our
prejudice.
It's
a
new
lot.
They're
choosing
put
seven
units
on
there
and
now
it's
a
three
family
district
and
a
lot
of
the
buildings
around
that
are
three
families.
AE
So
to
us
this
is
just
a
little
too
insensitive.
AI
Yes,
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Keisha
Santana
from
the
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicant
met
with
the
Butters
and
dsni
Dudley
Street
neighborhood
initiatives
what
they
presented
to
their
sustainable
development
committee.
AI
There
were
some
questions
on
affordability,
but
they
do
believe
that
this
project
could
be
a
benefit
to
community.
Dsni
has
decided
to
not
write
a
letter
of
support,
but
it's
not
in
opposition
to
this
project,
and
at
this
time
we
would
like
to
defer
the
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
AI
Yeah
so
there's
no
known
no
other
known
support
in
terms
of
brought
to
our
like
letters
brought
to
our
office.
AI
Attendance
there
was
just
questions
on
affordability
and
Community,
more
Community
benefits,
but
no
known
support
our
opposition.
A
F
You
Madam
Madam
chair.
Is
it
okay
if
I
make
a
quick
comment?
Yes,
please:
okay,
okay,
sorry
I
just
to
just
provide
some
context
as
well
to
Jeff
Hampton's
feedback
in
terms
of
the
neighborhood
being
the
3F
District.
AN
F
It's
probably
three
Parcels
down
from
the
property,
so
I
just
wanted
to
give
that
context
in
terms
of
it
is
in
a
three
family
right
down.
The
street
is
awesome.
Multi-Family
residents.
A
Thank
you
all
right.
Let's
continue
with
the
public
testimony.
Is
there
anyone
else
to
speak
in
support
or
opposition?
Please.
A
As
well,
do
you
have
do
you
have
those
on
file?
A
J
A
Can
you
give
us
a
sense
of
how
many
and
what.
J
A
W
W
W
AJ
We'd
like
to
we
don't
know:
if
we
can,
we
actually
planted
some
more
trees
on
the
back
of
the
neighboring
property
as
well.
So
we
love
it.
What
I
think
they're
commenting
now
is
the
fence
is
actually
in
the
wrong
location
on
the
property
line,
so
the
the
fence-
that's
there
on
the
pictures.
This
is
not
you
know,
doesn't
represent
or
change
the
actual
lot
size
but
ages
ago,
prior
to
us
owning
a
lot
when
the
fence
put
up
it's
on
top
of
the
owner's
yard
as
well.
AJ
You
have
to
move
that
fence
as
part
of
that
we'll
have
to
work
with
them
to
figure
out
with
the
trees,
because
they're
on
that
fence
would
be
able
to
stay,
but
we're
going
to
work
through
that
we're
going
to
move
that
fence,
tear
it
down,
put
it
on
the
actual
property
line
and
then
make
sure
that
the
trees,
if
we
do
anything,
will
move
there,
but
every
single
property.
We
have
we
like
to
keep
trees
because
we
think
residents
like
it.
P
R
Have
a
question:
yes:
okay,
can
we
explain
again?
We
have
a
seven
parking
spots
will
be
due
to
the
fact
that
our
West
College
Street
on
that
side
does
not
provide
parking
and
also
of
side
street
as
well
as
definitely
usually
packed
and
I,
also
like
to
say
as
far
as
the
multi-unit
at
the
end
of
the
street,
that
has
a
setback
and
a
parking
lot
as
well.
AJ
The
parking
lot
the
entries
is
on
West
Side,
it's
on
the
side
and
there
is
no
parking
so
and
that
was
the
neighborhood
community
brought
that
on.
If
we
originally
had
it
on
Galen
and
they
said
hey,
this
is
important:
don't
take
away
a
parking
spot
on
Galen,
there's
no
parking
already,
and
we
thought
you
know
what
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
it
goes
on.
AJ
AP
S
A
I
said
I'm,
sorry,
it
said
it,
it
looks
like
you
have
a
curb
cut
already
on
West
Cottage.
Are
you
using
your
existing
haircut.
AJ
AB
AJ
H
AC
A
Thank
you
with
that.
May
I
have
a
motion.
D
Madam
chair
this
is
Tom,
can
I
just
make
a
suggestion
to
the
board
sure
if
anyone,
if
the
boy
isn't
going
to
improve
it,
if
the
board
wants
one
thing,
someone
could
included
Proviso
that
the
applicant
identifies
the
affordable
units
for
the
certificate.
Not
you
can
see
with
ISD
that
will
help
us
track.
34
million
of
the
building
so.
F
F
That
in
a
chair,
I
like
to
put
for
emotion
of
approval
with
BTD
and
bpda
design,
review
of
building
a
location
on
the
site
plan
and
the
amount
of
parking
spaces
and
all
clearance,
paying
special
attention
to
the
ground
floor
to
maximize
Open,
Space
Preserve
trees
as
much
as
possible
and
increase
rear
yard
setback
and
any
other
Proviso
which
Tom
stated
to
officially
put
on
record
the
two
income
restricted
units
with
ISD
and
moh.
F
A
F
J
A
AA
I
M
J
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Langham,
yes,
Mr
Stembridge,
yes,
chair,
also
votes.
Yes,
motion
carries
good
luck.
W
Thank
you.
The
falls
for
the
10
30s,
keep
going
all.
Z
Yes,
Madam
chair,
Madam,
Secretary
attorney
Nix
Azula.
This
is
a
9
Oswald
Street.
It
is
about
halfway
through
Madam
Secretary.
On
page
six
of
the
agenda.
Z
Yes,
absolutely
Madam
chair
again
attorney
Nix
Azula
McDermott,
cruel
Gene,
Miller,
28,
State
Street
in
Boston
Madam
chair.
This
is
just
a
simple
needed
to
be
re-advertised,
to
add
two
zoning
violations
that
weren't
on
the
original
hearing
notice
for
today's
date.
In
order
to
be
compliant
with
the
enabling
act
and
Zoning
code,
it
needs
to
be
on
the
refusal
letter,
open
space
and
location
of
main
entrance
to
the
refusal
I
believe
it
already
I'll
deferred
him
as
to
attorney
Broome,
but
I
believe
it
already
has
been
advertised
again.
J
Oswald
Street
applicant
nine
Oswald
LLC
seeking
change
abuse
three
to
four
family
with
living
space
in
the
basement.
A
Thank
you.
Do
I,
have
a
motion.
A
D
Madam
chair,
this
is
Tom
just
the
last
one
behind
Oswald
street
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
have
re-advertised
that
yet
I
don't
know.
If,
okay,
we
don't
know
what
the
next
day
would
be.
If.
Z
Z
Yes,
sir
February
7th
at
11
30
a.m,
I
believe
Stephanie
sent
out
and
we
did
receive
it
in
time
and
I'm
looking
at
it
now.
Yes,.
A
That's
okay.
Thank
you
was
that
may
I
have
a
motion
Festival!
A
J
Yes,
next,
we
have
VOA
one
three,
nine,
six,
six,
four,
eight
nineteen
coverall
Street
the
applicant
is
Peter
haranes.
They
are
seeking
to
construct
a
roof
deck.
The
violations
are
that
the
building
height
is
excessive
in
terms
of
the
feet.
AR
A
AR
AR
The
Jones
Hill
area
is
a
very
steep
area.
The
front
of
this
property
drops
off
over
15
Steps
to
the
sidewalk,
which
lends
itself
to
our
request
for
this
relief.
AR
We
made
some
adjustments
to
our
initial
plan
in
deleting
the
pergola
by
condo
documents,
making
it
an
exclusive
third
floor,
use
only
roof
deck
and
limiting
all
future
structure
to
the
height
of
the
rail,
which
is
36
and
a
half
feet
above
grade
and
I.
Think
that
about
covers
it.
If
you
have
any
questions,
thank.
J
D
A
N
F
AR
K
Morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Ashley
combs
for
member
services,
on
behalf
of
the
mayor
officer,
elected
to
defer
the
judgment
to
the
board
at
this
time.
Jones
Hill
Association
about
his
health
concerns
throughout
the
size
of
the
deck
that
was
already
built
products
without
getting
approval
and
going
to
the
proper
steps.
The
previous
contractor,
that
was
on
a
project
thank.
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
Mrs
board.
Our
concerned
for
these
plants
was
pergola,
but
since
that's
been
removed
we
don't
have
a
concern,
I
guess:
I
guess
it
just
depends
on
whether
or
not
they're
going
to
do
with
interior
access
with
the
hatch
or
head
hose.
I.
Don't
know
if
the
head
house
would
be
coming
back
to
you
so.
AR
It
is
our
goal
to
have
an
exterior
egress
access
that
complies
if
we
cannot
achieve
that.
I've
worked
with
the
owner
to
work
on
an
interior
access
that
does
comply.
A
Okay,
thank
you
was
that
may
I
have
a
motion.
F
Madam,
chair
I'd
like
to
put
forward
emotion
but
to
Proviso
one
bpda
design,
review
on
the
size
of
the
roof,
deck
and
two
that
it
would
be
a
roof
access
directly
from
the
unit
and
not
through
next
year.
Rear
spiral.
Stair.
C
AS
N
AR
J
Okay,
next,
we
have
boa
140991245
Worcester
Square.
They
are
seeking
to
amend
a
prior
permit
to
reconfigure
room
sizes
from
the
original
plans
on
different
levels
and
to
construct
a
new
exterior
deck
off
of
the
second
floor.
There
are
violations,
include
dimensional
regulations
for
floor
area
ratio,
townhouse,
Row,
House
extensions
into
the
rear
yard
and
restricted
roof
structure
regulations.
J
V
D
Eckel
with
Drago
and
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
here
on
behalf
of
five
Worcester
Square,
as
mentioned,
this
is
an
amendment
to
a
previously
issued
permit.
Essentially,
what
we're
seeking
to
do
is
some
minor
interior
reconfigurations,
which
really
don't
have
an
effect
on
zoning,
but
moving
a
couple
of
kitchen
islands
and
mechanical
areas
around
the
heart
of
the
matter
is
we
are
seeking
a
rear
deck
and
a
roof
deck,
and
this
would
allow
for
all
three
units
to
have
their
own
dedicated
outdoor
living
space.
D
Currently,
the
first
unit
has
a
exterior
patio
out
the
rear,
we're
proposing
a
rear
duct
for
unit
2,
which
would
extend
over
that
rear
patio
and
then
a
roof
deck
which
would
be
for
exclusive
use
of
unit
3..
As
mentioned,
we
were
excited
for
three
zoning
violations
far
is
allowed
at
a
2.0
currently,
where
2.61,
but
the
staircase
access
to
the
roof
deck
would
increase
RFI
to
2.71,
so
a
nominal
increase
based
upon
that
stairwell
our
rear
yard.
D
We
will
maintain
our
20
foot
three
rear
setback,
but
we
are
extending
into
the
rear
with
the
deck.
So
that's
why
we
got
cited
for
that
and
then
finally,
roof
structure
restriction
because
of
the
proposed
deck
and
penthouse
on
the
roof.
This
proposal
did
go
through
the
South
End
landmarks
process
and
was
approved
by
that
commission.
The
roof
deck's
been
set
back
approximately
15
feet
from
the
front
of
the
building.
D
As
you
can
see
kind
of
up
the
far
right
there
we
centered
the
roof
deck
as
much
as
we
could
to
make
sure
that
it
would
not
be
visible
from
the
street.
Install
these
kind
of
decks
and
penthouses
are
quite
common
here
on
the
south
end
and
we
did
get
approval
from
the
south
end
landmarks.
Commission,
with
that
I
will
pause
and
take
any
questions
about
the
proposal.
F
And
their
no
questions.
F
Yes,
it's
pretty
common.
The
penthouse
and
diverse
deck
in
this
District.
D
A
You
Matthew,
of
course,
thank
you.
May
I
have
public
testimony.
E
Hi,
yes,
Kim.
Crucially
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
we
had
an
abutters
meeting
in
November
of
2022,
where
support
was
shown
by
the
abutters.
They
received
no
opposition
from
the
Western
square
area,
neighborhood
association,
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
was
that
may
I
understand.
Should
we
hear
from
bpda.
F
A
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chairman
board.
My
only
question
Matt
did
landmarks
plus
everything
on
your
project.
They.
AE
A
Thank
you
was
that
may
I
entertain
a
motion
with
you.
A
A
You
miss
Ben
Barraza,
yes,
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Mr
Valencia.
Yes,
we
will
yes
Mr
Langham,
yes,
Mr
Stembridge,
yes,
chair
also
votes.
Yes,
motion
carries
good
luck.
Thank.
J
Bla135-1164
170
Old
Colony
Ave,
the
applicant
is
Timothy
Johnson.
They
are
seeking
relief
for
the
Youth
law
area,
brought
with
lot
Frontage
floor
area
ratio,
open
space,
front
and
side
yard,
off-street
parking
requirements,
dimensional
regulations,
they're
seeking
new,
demolish
the
existing
structure,
erection,
youth,
four-story,
four
unit,
building
with
garage
and
front
balconies,
and
that's.
AT
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
Tim
Johnson,
architect,
599
East,
Broadway,
South
Boston.
My
client
Kevin
Kerr,
is
also
on
the
Zoom
meeting
at
first
page.
Please
thank
you.
This
.03
Acre
Site
is
located
in
the
base
code.
Sub-District
m-1,
where
multi-family
is
a
conditional
use.
It
is
also
located
in
the
old
colony
of
high
growth
Corridor
identified
by
the
bpda.
The
buy
right,
Building
height
in
this
Corridor
is
40
feet
same
as
the
building
height
as
in
all
of
South
Boston.
AT
Thank
you.
My
client,
Kevin
Kerr
has
owned
this
property
for
23
years
and
is
proposing
to
demolish
that
slide.
Please
can
hold
there
for
a
second
thank
you.
My
client
Kevin
current
owned
this
property
for
23
years
and
is
proposing
to
demolishes
the
existing
structure
interact
a
new
four-story
four
unit,
building
with
one
car
garage.
Can
we
go
to
the
previous
slide?
Please
thank
you.
AT
We're
proposing
a
new
four-story
four
unit
building
with
one
car
garage,
the
three
two
bedroom
and
one
one
bedroom
units
will
be
rentals
and
priced
as
Workforce
housing.
The
bpda
identifies
Workforce
housing
as
housing,
affordable
to
households,
earning
between
60
and
120
Ami,
and
includes
firefighters,
teachers
and
health
care
workers.
AT
AT
Or
the
BP
per
the
bpdas
planned
South
Boston
170
Old
Colony
Ave,
as
shown
on
the
right
label,
is
located
in
the
as
of
right,
40-foot,
height
Zone
and
the
density
bonus,
60-foot
height
Zone,
we're
proposing
four
stories
at
40
feet:
photos
of
Old,
Colony,
High
growth,
Corridor
on
the
left,
show
three
four
five
and
six
story
buildings.
The
170
site
is
identified
by
the
small
dark
blue
building
in
the
photos.
AT
Next
slide,
please,
the
proposed
site
plan
shows
the
main
entrance
to
the
building
off
Old
Colony
at
the
bottom
right
and
at
the
top
left
of
the
building
is
the
garage
entrance
which
faces
Earl
Street.
The
site
is
also
located
in
the
flood
zone
X
and
conforms
to
the
bpda's
coastal
flood
resilience
requirements.
That
is
the
lowest
level
of
the
proposed
building.
Is
one
foot
above
flood
base
elevation
next
site
next
slide.
Please
next
slide.
Please.
AT
AT
You
this
3D
view
from
the
corner
of
Earl
and
Old
Colony
shows
the
garage
entrance
on
the
right
side
facing
Earl
Street
and
the
main
entrance
on
the
left
side
facing
old,
Columbia
Ave
each
unit
has
a
generous
balcony
and
no
roof
deck
decks
are
proposed
next
slide.
Please
again.
This
is
a
view
of
the
main
entrance
which
faces
Old,
Colony,
Ave
and
I
also
want
to
note.
AT
AT
Finally,
the
proposed
Workforce
housing
within
a
five-minute
walk
of
a
transit
station
will
be
100
electric
for
heating,
cooling
and
cooking.
There
will
be
no
fossil
fuel
hookups
to
this
building,
reducing
its
carbon
footprint
over
the
life
of
the
building,
and
with
that
Madam
chair,
my
clientele
will
take
questions.
F
Madam,
chair
I
did
have
the
opportunity
to
review
the
plans
and
it's
pretty
much
adequate.
The
only
question
I
have
is:
how
did
you
determine
just
one
parking
space.
AT
Oh,
could
we
go
down
to
the
site
plan
previous
previous,
the
other
way
Direction,
please
one.
AP
AT
AT
A
AT
Well
again,
Madam
chair
this
site
is
located
in
the
Old.
Colony
have
high
growth.
Corridor,
where
four
story
is
a
buy
right
is
by
right
per
the
bpda
South
Boston
plant.
Also,
the
maximum
Building
height
in
all
of
South
Boston
is
40
feet.
So
we
felt
that
going
four
stories
at
40
feet
was
appropriate
for
this
area.
H
AT
Well,
right
now,
because
of
again
the
small
building
footprint,
we
didn't
have
a
lot
of
latitude
for
circulation,
so
it
was
an
easy
adjacency
to
make
between
unit
one
and
the
parking
space.
As
you
can
see
on
this
site
plan
here,
the
door
of
the
garage
leads
right
into
unit
one
okay.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
AT
AT
This
is
a
four-story
multi-family
and
will
be
sprinkled,
so
a
basement
has
for
the
IBC
and
have
one
means
of
egress
from
the
lower
level
was
a
travel
distances
of
less
than
125
feet.
So
we
do
meet
that
code
requirement.
Therefore,
we
have
the
one
stair
which
leads
up
to
the
unit
and
then
out
the
front
or
rear
floor.
M
AT
AT
F
Chair
can
I
get
a
clarification
from
Jeff
Hampton
and
it
was
going
to
also
here
Jeff
and
Bob.
Jimmy
kills
BTD
feedback
on
parking.
I
have
a
question
on
the
sea
fraud
that
there
should
be
no
living
space
below
grade,
but
does
that
also
include
kind
of
media
spaces
or
storage
type
spaces?
So.
AE
We
we've
recommended
with
our
friends
on
this
project.
One
of
the
reasons
is
because
the
living
space
that
is
below
gray,
whether
it's
the
media
room
or
whatever
it's
still
a
living
space,
so
we
recommended
denials
like
that.
AE
You
know
we'd
also
like
to
see
some
increased
setback
on
the
building
design.
One
of
the
things
that
Mr
Johnson's
throwing
around
is
that
as
of
right,
40
feet,
planning
document
has
been
adopted,
but
the
zoning
has
never
been
codified.
That's
why
they've
been,
which
is
why
they're
here
so
I,
don't
want
that
to
sound
misleading,
that's
40
feet,
and
it
has
them
for
right,
because
it's
not
because
they
got
cited
for
Building
height
plan
has
been
adopted.
AE
The
zoning
recommendations
have
never
been
caught
in
that
area,
but
in
terms
to
your
answer
again,
it
is
that
the
living
space
below
grade
we'd
like
to
see
that
on
it.
Thank.
AU
Madam
chairman
Bob
benico
BTD
Mr
Johnson
that
one
parking
space
is
not
going
to
require
a
new
curb
cut.
AT
Currently
there
are
Earl,
Street
has
no
Granite
curving.
It
is
a
basically
a
paved
driveway
up
up
to
each
garage
door,
there's
no
discernible
curbing
on
that
street.
So
the
answer
your
question
is:
oh,
we
were
just
continuing
the
existing
conditioner.
AU
Okay,
we
require
a
curved
by
through
Public
Works
and
the
BTD
is
against
one
parking
space
for
anything
because
you're
taking
away
parking
from
the
street
and
it's
one
space,
it's
just
something
we
can't
approve
because
again,
you
know
taking
one
practice
away
from
the
neighborhood,
so
I
like
to
go
on
Reddit
and
a
dialogue
that
one
parking
space
Bank
of
manager.
AU
Well,
I
understand
that,
but
unfortunately,
when
you
build
a
new
building,
those
types
of
things
are
not
grandfathered
in
we
go
by
the
new
regulations
and
not
the
old
ones,
so
based
on
their
new
regulations.
Again
like
a
lot
with
response
to
this
project,
the
BTD
perspective
we
requested
Denial
on
that
parking
space.
Thank
you
thank.
A
AV
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time
in
there
should
also
defer
judgment
to
the
sport.
Some
bad
information
background
information
on
the
community
process
onsl
and
the
butters
meeting
on
August
8th
residents
that
were
in
attendance,
expressed
concerns
regarding
the
hype
saying
that
they
felt
it
would
create
a
bad
precedent
for
that
quarter.
There
were
also
some
concerns
expressed
about
Road
and
activity
around
the
property
they
went
on
to
the
Andrew
Square
civic
association,
which
voted
to
oppose
this
proposal.
AW
Office,
the
councilor
would
like
to
congrat
Korean
support
based
on
a
thorough
Community
process
that
the
project
will
consist
of
affordable
apartments
in
our
Workforce
housing
and
the
attention
to
sustainability,
with
the
building
being
fully
electrified.
Council
presidents
live
respectfully
request
that
the
proponent
work
closely
with
the
community
Through
the
doing
the
construction.
Thank
you.
A
AK
You
Anna
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
also
city
council,
at
live
with
Michael
Larry,
echoing
the
sentiments
of
Council
of
Flynn's
office.
The
council
feels
that
this
is
a
fair,
honest
project,
that's
in
line
with
the
other
properties
in
the
neighborhood
and
would
like
to
lent
his
unequivocal
support.
W
AB
I
AB
In
opposition
and
I'm
in
opposition
for
the
following
reasons,
the
proposed
renovation
will
take
up
the
entire
lot.
It's
a
huge
size
for
a
very
small
space,
absolutely
no
room
around
it.
There's
not
enough
parking
for
the
tenants,
so
more
cars
will
need
to
park
on
already
congested
streets.
Earl
is
a
very
small
private
way
and
I'm
worried
about
how
this
will
affect
my
ability
to
get
in
and
out
of
my
own
house.
AB
The
existing
property
hasn't
historically
been
managed.
Well,
it's
dilapidated
and
an
eyesore
that
the
owner
hasn't
lived
on
that
property
when
he
ever
did
and
then.
Lastly,
the
proposed
renovation
would
exceed
the
heightened
size
of
all
the
properties
of
budding
it
they've
referenced
other
properties
on
Old
Colony,
but
none
of
those
are
nearby
and
it
will
block
our
sunlight
and
overall,
be
a
negative
effect
for
our
home
values.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
Michelle
can
the
additional
testimony,
please
add
value
to
that
and
add
more
information.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AQ
Good
morning,
Madam
chair
and
CBA
members,
John
pigatowski
lifelong
resident
of
Andrew
Square
South
Boston,
also
co-chair
of
the
Andrew
Square
civic
association
development
committee,
ASCA
after
engagement
to
the
community
processing
capable
review
of
The
Proposal
in
ISD
plans.
Examiner
findings
stand
in
opposition
to
this
proposal
and
I'd
like
to
thank
Mr
Hampton
for
adding
Clarity
to
the
2016
South
boston.f
study
and
in
my
own
opinion,
this
proposal
does
not
lend
itself
to
the
city's
adopted
climate
action
plans,
but
rather
continuously
heat
island
effect.
Thank
you.
AQ
AX
Thank
you.
Yeah
I
got
it
now
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Roberto
Gomez
I
own
13,
Earl
Street,
the
direct
of
butter
to
to
this
proposed
building
I'm
an
opposition
due
to
the
the
hype.
If
I,
if
you
go
back
to
slide
two
of
the
presentation
you
can
see,
the
all
the
immediate
buildings
are
kind
of
capped
at
the
current
three
stories
of
the
townhouses.
That
is.
N
AX
And
going
above
that
right
would
not
really
fit
in
with
the
the
current
neighborhood
and
also
as
Michelle
brought
up
the
the
owner.
Mr
Kerr
currently
owns
the
the
building.
That's
there
now,
which
has
been
in
a
very
bad
state
of
disrepair
for
for
over
a
decade
and
the
Warriors
with
with
these
as
rentals
that
he
will
not
keep
up
with
taking
care
of
this
future
building.
AY
Good
morning,
I'm
John
okowinski
at
the
164
Old
Colony,
my
brother,
Rob
and
I
direct
about
his.
We
both
strongly
support
this
project.
Kevin
Kerr
has
been
a
pretty
good
neighbor
for
a
long
time
like
20
years
and
I
would
like
to
see
the
project
done
and
completed.
Thank.
AY
D
That's
one
thing
you
know,
but
BTD
doesn't
weigh
in
on
the
permits,
usually
for
the
parking
for
residential
buildings
unless
it's
part
of
the
article
80
process
and
so
without
a
provides
of
no
there's,
no
BTV
review.
D
You
know
to
remove
parking
or
BTD
to
look
at
a
particular
piece
of
the
parking
would
be
an
approval
onto
the
planet.
That'll
put
a
board
today.
A
Now
is
the
time
for
our
board
discussion.
Yes,
okay,.
J
AT
This
is
Tim
Johnson
the
project
architect
we
could
isolate
the
garage,
so
the
only
way
to
get
to
the
garage
would
be
go
out.
The
building
to
the
garage
door
itself,
I.
A
AT
AT
That
would
be
a
household
earning
between
60
and
120
Ami.
So.
A
AT
We
could
go,
we
could
start
at
the
the
lower
end
for
the
lower
unit
and
then
go
up
from
there
so
that
the
lower
end
of
the
scale,
the
Ami
scale-
could
be
unit
one,
and
then
we
go
up
from
there.
So
yes
unit,
one
would
be
the
lowest
scale
of
the
Ami.
A
AT
Know
we
could
say
unit,
one
would
be
the
lower
end.
60
handline.
AF
AF
A
We
understand
your
your
comment,
however.
Mr
Johnson
has
indicated
that
these
are
Workforce
units
from
60
to
120,
Ami
and
I.
Believe
the
nature
of
the
questions
from
the
board
are:
how
do
you,
how
do
we
ensure
that
the
full
range
is
met
within
the
project.
H
I
want
to
know
it
sounds
like
a
wonderful
project,
but
have
you
met
with
the
the
tenants
or
the
neighbors
because
it
seems
like
they
against
this
project?.
A
AF
If
I
could
answer
that,
yes,
we
went
to
the
community
process.
We've
left
Shadow
studies,
we've
made
every
effort
to
talk
to
neighbors,
including
the
immediate
Butters
that
who
have
been
discussed
and.
AE
Back
Madam
chair,
it's
Jeff
can
I
say
something
first,
yes,
sir,
the
bpda
does
not
have
an
adopted
policy
for
workforcement
I
just
got
off
the
phone
with
the
director
of
housing
for
us,
so
about
these
Amis
or
even
the
workforce.
I
was
like
I
just
got
off
the
phone,
and
this
isn't
something
that's
an
adult.
M
And
make
a
motion?
Yes,
I
make
a
motion
I
consider
that
Workforce
units
are
important,
and
but
still
there
are
things
that
the
proportion
has
to
figure
it
out
with
the
Boston
transportation
department.
So
I
make
a
motion
to
upload
with
probably
so
that
plans
will
be
submitted
to
the
BP
in
the
egg.
For
the
second
review
into
a
repeat:
Boston
Transportation
Department
for
the
science
review
of
the
proposed
parking
space,
Mr.
M
D
You
yeah,
this
is
Tom
this
one.
You
know
in
instances
where
an
applicant
is
representing
that
the
important
units
are
going
to
be
affordable,
but
the
bpda
process
doesn't
happen
like
in
this
project.
So
this
is
only
a
four
unit.
Building
it's
not
hard
enough
to
trigger
any
kind
of
large
project
or
small
project
review
with
the
bpda.
J
Madam
chair
can
we
make
a
motion
to
defer
I
do
I
just
think
this
applicant
has
some
more
work
to
do
regarding
this
proposal
and
I'd
like
to
see
them
pay
more
attention
to
the
unit
mix,
the
affordability
and
the
parking,
and
also
the
bpda
concerns
with
the
front
yard
setback
and
the
cfrod
design
guideline.
A
May
I
have
a
second
okay.
Okay,
with
that
missile.
K
AH
V
A
D
J
F
I
think
we
should
just
reiterate
that
some
of
the
to
attempt
to
address
some
of
the
BPA
concerns
in
terms
of
Frontier
setback,
to
address
the
parking
ratio
relative
to
the
amount
of
residents
in
the
unit
and
to
also
to
also
look
into
the
basement
unit.
That
should
that
this
is
in
a
sea
fraud
District
that
no
species
should
be
inhabitable,
take
all
of
our
feedback
and
to
and.
P
AF
J
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
add
a
roof
deck
to
be
used
exclusively
by
unit
3
and
to
improve
access
to
the
roof
by
replacing
the
alternating
tread
device
with
a
normal
stairwell.
The
size
of
the
roof
allows
for
large
setbacks.
For
this
deck,
their
violation
is
the
building.
Height
is
excessive
in
terms
of
number
of
feet
and
the
applicant
is
George
Moran.
Okay,.
A
Behind
schedule,
if
you
could
be
brisk,
that
would
be
appreciated.
Q
I
will
do
so
Madam
chair
good
morning,
Madam
chairman
Mr
Ford.
My
name
is
George
marante
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston.
This
is
a
proposal
for
an
exclusive
use:
roof
deck
and
201
West
8th
Street
in
stumpwell
Austin.
My
client
is
Tyler
Jorgensen,
who
owns
and
lives
in
the
top
four
units
with
his
family
and
would
like
to
add
a
reasonable
amount
of
private
open
space
for
their
use.
Q
There
are
three
units
in
the
condominium
which
is
a
three-story
building
and
the
other
two
unit
owners
are
supportive
of
this
application,
as
are
several
other
directed
Butters.
The
roof
deck
would
be
144
square
feet,
12
feet
by
12
feet
with
a
small
walkway
to
the
deck
from
the
point
of
roof
access.
The
deck
would
be
well
set
into
the
middle
of
the
building
and
not
visible
from
any
public
way.
Q
The
point
of
access
to
the
roof
will
be
provided
from
the
jurgensen's
unit
by
means
of
a
hatch
30
inches
in
height,
in
compliant
with
compliance
with
code
requirements,
there's
actually
an
existing
hatch,
providing
group
access
now
for
maintenance,
which
would
be
repositioned.
The
new
hatch
would
allow
for
better
and
safer
access
from
within
the
unit
itself
by
means
of
a
traditional
stairway
within
unit
3.
Has
the
current
access
to
the
roof
is
by
mean
to
the
drop
down
device?
Q
The
zoning
issue
here
is
quite
simple:
to
propose
roof
deck
requires
a
single
variance
or
a
roof
height
violation.
The
height
of
the
building
itself,
is
40
feet,
which
is
in
compliance
with
zoning
requirements
under
article
68..
This
is
an
MFR
multi-family
zoning
sub-district.
The
issue
is
that
the
deck
platform
itself
Rises
nine
inches
above
the
roof
line,
and
the
code
therefore
counts
this
as
Building
height.
A
Thank
you,
Miss
Barbara.
Do
you
have
any
questions
on
the
plans.
AV
Madam,
chairman
to
the
board,
called
anyone
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
this
board
I,
don't
have
a
lot
of
background
information
on
the
public
process,
but
we
did
receive
four
letters
of
support
from
the
butters
that
was
provided
by
the
proponents
representative
referred
to
this
board.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
A
AW
A
AW
Perfect
hi
everyone.
AW
Anna
Calderon
from
Council
president
philing's
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
record
in
a
position
based
on
feedback
from
Neighbors
and
the
city
Side
neighborhood
association,
who
also
mentioned
a
policing
opposition
to
reflect
proposals.
Council
president
fling
has
been
in
record
for
years
in
opposition
to
additional
proof
that
proposals
due
to
their
negative
impacts
on
the
quality
of
life
for
Neighbors
in
terms
of
loud
parties
at
all
hours
and
trash
removal
issues
which
were
unfortunately,
exacerbated
by
the
pandemic.
AW
This
quality
of
life
issues
has
been
repeatedly
expressed
to
our
office
for
years
from
our
seniors
presumed
with
disabilities
and
families
with
young
children
trying
to
sleep
for
school
to
the
next
morning.
For
these
three
songs
of
presidents
links
three
main
supposed
to
similar
proof
that
proposals.
Thank
you.
AE
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
We
recommended
approval
on
this
one.
A
All
right,
Miss,
Miss,
better
Baraza,.
I
N
J
Next,
we
have
boa
141-5266
for
230-232
Silver
Street.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
change
the
use
from
two
residential
units
in
a
pet
clinic
to
three
residential
units.
The
violations
include
off
street
parking
and
loading
requirements
with
no
off
street
parking
required
provided
in
the
usable,
open
space
is
insufficient
and
the
applicant
is
Mary
stereo.
L
With
Drago
and
Toscana,
with
a
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
here
on
behalf
of
my
client
Mary
Serio,
and
we
also
have
Scott
trineer
from
chewing
company,
he
was
the
architect
on
the
proposal.
This
is
pretty
straightforward.
You're
looking
at
the
building
in
this
photo,
it's
2
30,
Silver,
Street
230-232.
L
Just
by
way
of
background,
this
did
have
does
have
two
existing
apartments
above
on
the
second
and
third
floor,
the
first
floor
and
basement
level.
Space
had
previous
previously
been
used
as
a
tenant
as
a
pet
clinic.
L
They
had
moved
out
prior
to
my
client
purchasing
the
building,
so
there
is
no
tenant
in
there
now
there
was
a
pipe
that
broke
prior
to
them,
purchasing
the
building
as
well
that
caused
extensive
damage.
So
most
of
everything
is
removed.
L
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
this
particular
zoning
district
is
an
MFR
multi-family
residential.
We
felt
that
changing
the
occupancy
from
two
units
to
three
was
more
conducive,
a
layout,
as
was
mentioned,
the
the
first.
The
first
unit
would
be
the
largest.
It
is
the
newer
unit,
it's
1
758
square
feet
and
that
would
have
living
space
in
the
basement
level.
That
is
now
shown
as
exam
rooms
and
office
space
from
the
prior
tenants.
L
That
bottom
level
would
have
no
bedroom
set,
so
it
has
living
room
office
and
one
bath
floor
to
ceiling
height
is
nine
feet.
It
has
a
Stairway
up
to
the
exist
to.
L
Floor
and
that
would
house
the
three
bedrooms
one
bath
in
kitchen,
that
first
floor
would
also
house
the
main
entrance
to
the
building,
and
then
we
go
up
to
the
second
or
existing
units.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
Madam
Ambassador.
L
These
units
are
853
square
feet,
two
bedroom
two
bath
with
a
living
area,
an
office
and
then
unit.
Three
is
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
at
974
square
feet
with
living
area
and
office.
Most
of
everything
around
this
is
either
condo
or
residential
rental
units
in
the
immediate
area
and
then
just
to
go
over
the
zoning
violations.
They
are
at
a
minimum.
The
first
one
is
open
space,
and
that
is
a
pre-existing
violation
because
we're
not
changing
anything
on
the
building
it
what's
required
is
200
feet.
We
have
37
and
then
parking.
L
We
are
not.
You
know
we're
keeping
the
building
so
there's
no
currently
No
Parking
On
Site.
However,
we
get
sales
with
meeting
with
the
community
that
having
a
commercial
space
would
potentially
bring
a
lot
more
traffic
to
the
area
with
pickups
and
drop-offs
than
one
residential
unit.
With
that,
we
can
pause
and
answer
any
questions.
The
board
may
have.
A
You
Mrs
Bene,
you
have
any
questions
on
the
plans.
A
Hearing
none
I'm
going
to
move
to
public
testimony.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
in
support
or
opposition?
Yes,.
AV
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Conor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office,
like
refer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board,
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
Our
office
hosted
an
abutters
meeting
on
September
14th.
There
were
eight
residents
in
attendance
two
of
Butters
and
expressed
some
concerns
about
parking.
We
understand
the
applicant
has
continued
to
work
with
those
of
Butters.
They
ended
up
achieving
support
from
the
city
Side
neighborhood
association,
with
that
we
refer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board.
Thank
you.
AW
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
recording
support
based
on
a
good
Community
process
and
working
closely
with
the
city
Side
neighborhood
association,
to
reduce
the
bathroom
Counts
from
that
second
and
third
floor
to
two
bathrooms.
Each
Council
presidents
live
respectfully
requests
that
the
performance
continued
to
work
closely
with
their
borders,
neighbors
and
Civic
groups
on
quality
of
life
issues
and
during
the
construction
phase.
Thank
you
thank.
AK
You
Andrew
Adam
ja,
members
of
the
board,
Paul
Solomon.
Is
the
council
Allied
out
loud
Michael
Flaherty,
the
council,
recognizing
the
communal
process
that
went
into
drafting
article
68
does
acknowledge
that
there
are
projects
that
do
have
Merit
this
being
one
of
them.
The
council
will
Echo
the
sentiments
and
Council
Clinton's
office
involved.
AK
AB
A
A
J
Next,
we
have
boa
139
6904
for
204
West,
Brookline,
Street
they're,
seeking
new
construct,
a
six
foot
deep
bracket
supported
balcony
off
of
the
second
level,
and
they
will
convert
a
window
to
a
door
for
Access.
Their
violations
are
townhouse,
Row,
House
extension
into
the
rear
yard,
and
the
applicant
is
Meg
vadia.
AP
Hi
good
morning,
my
name
is
Timothy
Burke
I'm,
the
architect
for
the
project
and
we'll
be
representing
the
owners
who
are
also
on
the
call
I
have
a
business
address
of
142
Berkeley
Street
in
Boston
and
Meg
and
Luke
are
looking
to
have
a
little
bit
of
outdoor
space
for
their
unit
and
we're
proposing
that
we
construct
a
balcony.
The
next
drawing
shows
the
balcony
on
the
back
of
the
building.
There
is
a
very
similar
one
on
the
third
floor.
AP
A
Thank
you
with
that.
I'll
take
public
testimony.
E
Hi,
yes,
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
Silly
from
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
our
office
held
innovators
meeting
in
November
of
2022
or
no
opposite
excuse
me.
No
opposition
was
shown
by
the
butters.
No
concerns
were
risen
by
the
block
neighborhood
association.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
defer
to
the
board
on
this
matter.
Thank
you.
Kimberly.
AW
I
A
V
N
W
I
AA
K
J
T
Good
morning,
I'm
Adam
chair
members
of
the
board
for
the
record
Richard
Linds
245,
Saunders
Street
on
behalf
the
petitioner
Madam
chair.
This
is
a
request
for
a
referral
to
allow
for
the
re-noticing
of
this
hearing
to
address
violations
that
were
not
originally
included
in
the
refusal
letter.
So
the
I
believe
that
refuse
letter
is
issued
and
the
new
notice
has
been
sent.
I
think
Mr
Broome
has
a
date
I
believe
it
was
the
end
of
February
for
the
next
hearing.
A
Okay,
great
thank
you,
may
I
have
a
motion.
R
A
Is
this
better
Braza
here?
Yes,
okay,
sorry
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Ms
Valencia,
Mr
Valencia,
yes,
Miss
Lee!
Well,
yes,
Mr
Langham!
Yes,
Mr
Stembridge!
Yes,
chair
votes,
yes
motion
carries!
Do
we
have
that
date
because
we
will
do
you.
T
Yeah
I
go
I'm,
mad
I'm,
sure
I
believe
the
date
has
already
been
set,
because
let
me
know
this:
it's
already
been
prepared.
I
thought
it
was.
J
've
bla136-9883
8-10
Mercer
Street
applicant
Mark
little
seeking
new
erect
course
story.
Building
with
five
dwelling
units.
Q
Good
morning
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
George
maranti
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston,
Madam
chair.
This
is
the
identical
situation
to
the
preceding
extension.
This
needs
to
be
re-advertised,
therefore
need
a
a
deferral
day
consistent
with
the
advertising
requirements.
Thank.
A
A
A
J
Bla136-1465-272
East
Eagle
Street
seeking
new
erect
a
four-story
residential
building
with
six
units,
Foods
balcony
Terraces,
six
parking
cells
parking
is
on
the
ground
level
within
an
open-air
garage
and
is
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
violations
include
parking
less
than
five
feet
from
the
side.
Lot
line
up
street
parking
insufficient.
The
use
is
forbidden,
East,
Boston,
iPod
applicability,
Conformity
with
existing
building
alignment
for
area
ratio,
excessive
height,
excessive
in
terms
of
stories
and
feet,
side
and
rear
yard
insufficient,
and
the
applicant
is
Mr
Drago.
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
Madam
Secretary.
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jeff
Drago,
Drago
and
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
here
on
behalf
of
my
client
and
owner
and
applicant
Fraser
Allen,
and
we
also
have
Mike
Finch
who's.
The
architect
on
the
project
from
Joy
Street
Design
This
is
a
rendering
of
the
new
proposed
building,
as
was
mentioned,
we're
proposing
to
erect
a
new
residential
condominium,
building
with
six
residential
units
and
six
Associated
parking
spaces
accessing
through
the
garage
shown
in
this
website
of
the
building.
L
This
particular
zoning
district
is
a
2f
2000.
We're
going
to
show
you
some
sight,
pictures
that
shows
there's
multi-family
and
three
all
around
us,
but
our
watt
size
is
6015
square
feet,
so
we
felt
my
client
felt
it
appropriate,
given
that
it's
a
2f
2000
or
over
6
000
square
feet,
but
the
six
units
was
appropriate.
The
through
this
process.
We
actually
reduce
the
unit
count
from
seven
units
to
six
and
we're
asked
by
the
community
to
increase
our
three
bedroom
count.
L
L
This
just
shows
the
rear
of
the
building.
So
we
wanted
to
create
open
space
on
the
bottom
level,
as
you
can
see
with
the
patio
that
would
also
host
two
parking
spots
off
to
the
right
and
then
every
floor
has
deck
space.
One
thing
in
working
with
our
neighbors:
we
pulled
the
building
in
on
the
third
floor,
we
have
a
10
foot,
rear
pullback,
where
the
decks
up
and
then
on
the
fourth
floor.
L
Obviously
we're
pulled
back
to
match
that
third
floor
in
the
rear,
but
also
we
have
a
10
foot,
pull
back
in
the
front
to
reduce
density
and
mass
just
to
go
over
to
the
next
slide.
Please
I'm
out
of
Ambassador.
This
is
just
an
aerial
view.
The
red
area
is
the
existing
structure.
That's
there
now
and
around
us.
You
can
see
a
multi-family
as
you
go
down
the
street
along
Putnam
and
the
end
of
East
Eagle.
L
L
Now
we
get
into
the
the
floor
plans,
so
the
first
floor
would
house
our
main
entrance.
It
would
have
a
mail
room
area
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide.
Sorry
utility
room
interior
trash
recycling
area
and
then
it
houses
our
six
parking
spaces.
So
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
to
next
slide,
sorry,
two
that
this
is
perfect.
Two
of
four
of
the
parking
spaces
are
off
to
the
right
and
then
two
are
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
Those
are
the
ones
that
are
exposed.
L
The
we
were
asked
to
keep
a
one-for-one
parking
ratio
with
this
project.
Our
units
are
mostly
upper
and
lower
level
so
unit,
one
on
the
first
floor
that
houses,
the
bottom
or
lower
level
of
that
unit.
That's
a
1656
square
foot,
three
bedroom
the
first
floor
would
host
one
bedroom
of
that
unit
and
then
two
baths
with
a
patio
yellowish.
L
When
we
go
up
to
the
second
floor,
that
houses
the
upper
level
of
that
unit
one
and
that
houses
the
additional
two
bedrooms
and
two
bath
unit,
two
is
also
on
that
floor.
That
is
the
only
two
bedroom.
That's
a
thousand
ten
square
foot!
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
Jessica
I
believe
that'll
show
that
thank
you.
That's
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
that
has
living
space
and
a
rare
deck
and
then
unit
three
is
also
on
the
second
floor.
That
is
a
three
bedroom
two
bath
and
living
space
with
a
rare
deck.
L
That
unit
is
1337
square
feet
and,
as
was
mentioned,
we
now
go
up
to
the
third
floor.
That
houses
the
pullback
in
the
rare
10
foot,
where
our
decks
are
located
that
are
exclusive
to
those
units.
All
of
the
units
in
the
third
floor
are
bi-level
units,
that's
units,
four
five
and
six
they're
fifteen
hundred
and
forty
six
square
feet:
1561
and
50
851
square
feet
respectively.
L
On
the
third
floor,
they
house
open
living
space,
Den
a
half
bath
and
a
rear
deck
and
then,
finally,
as
we
get
up
to
the
fourth
floor,
that
has
the
10
foot
front
pullback
and
the
upper
levels
of
those
units-
those
are
all
the
bedrooms.
The
blue
bedrooms
and
two
baths
are
what's
located
on
the
top
floor,
just
to
go
over.
The
zoning
variances
requested
use,
because
this
is
six
units,
so
use
variants
to
be
required.
Far
we're
at
1.56
height
we're
at
38
feet,
6
inches
at
four
stories.
L
35
feet
would
be
allowed
side
yard.
We
do
meet
it
on
the
left,
hands
on
the
right
hand,
side
on
the
left,
we're
at
three
feet
in
our
rear
yard.
What's
what's
the
loudest
24
we're
close
at
20
feet
and
then
parking
we
would
still
require
under
the
code
would
be
nine,
but
we
are
at
a
one
for
one
parking
ratio
with
six,
and
with
that
there
was
a
lot
of
information.
I
can
pause
to
answer
any
questions.
Important.
A
F
Regarding
your
left
side,
step
back
that
is
currently
in
three
feet:
I
see
that
there's
your
adjacent,
the
adjacent
building
it
seems
like
at
the
rear,
is
right
on
the
property
line.
Is
that
a
deck
that
is
right
on
the
property
line.
L
F
Are
you
open
to
adjusting
adjusting
at
the
rear
to
have
at
least
a
five
foot
and
kind
of
set
back
from
your
adjacent
property.
G
One
question:
through
a
clarification:
please,
that's
here
I,
believe
you
said
that
you
were
requested
by
the
community
to
add
in
re
re
bedroom
units
and
hardware
and
how
many
are
that
will
let
me
know
so.
L
BA
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
on
Natalia
Benitez,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
meeting
for
this
project
in
October
of
2022.
no
Butters
attended
the
meeting.
The
applicant
also
met
with
the
eagle
Hill
civic
association
twice.
The
association
voted
to
support
the
project
with
11
residents
in
favor
and
five
in
a
position
the
association
mentioned.
The
building
needs
more
states
with
trash
without
I
think
Jeff
touch
upon.
They
would
like
to
see
more
storage
room
and
a
credible
land.
BA
W
There
any
anyone
else
running
elected
official's
office,
Bob
I,
see
you
you're
looking
to
get
the
testimony
here
as
well.
Bob.
L
The
the
hey
Bob,
the
the
all
the
four
spaces,
are
full
size,
so
eight
and
a
half
by
Twenty
and
then
there's
two
compact
spaces
in
the
rare
okay.
Thank
you.
W
C
My
name
is
Darlene
Haley
I'm
at
242,
East
Eagle,
Street
I
am
five
houses
up
from
where
they
intend
to
build
this
six
story.
Unit
and
I
am
okay
with
that.
Thank.
W
AP
Yeah
I
support
this
project
too
I
think
it's
I
think
it's
well
thought
out
and
I,
like
the
plan
on
to
just
two
doors
down
at
2780s
to
Eagle
and
I.
Think
this
would
be
great
for
the
neighborhood,
wonderful.
W
Thank
you,
Phil
Sebastian,.
AH
W
A
A
It
does
not
seem
available.
Okay
cpda
recommends
the
Nile
without
prejudice
proposal
contemplates
a
building
that
is
excessive.
Proponent,
should
consider
a
structure
with
reduced
height
and
removal
of
Austrian
prepping
spots
to
better
accommodate
units
with
story
format
with
that
may
I
have
a
motion.
F
A
Main
Street
building
that
is
kind
of
higher
in
story
with
that.
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
with
for
Proviso
to
to
approve
with
four
Proviso
the
first
one
being
that
the
ground
floor,
parking
and
layout
be
reviewed
by
bpda
and
BTD
buys
rare
open
space,
so
the
second
would
be
to
remove
the
two
parking
spaces
at
the
rear.
F
This,
which
are
compact.
The
three
are
vpa
review
of
fourth
floor
massing
and
exterior
materials
materials
to
distinguish
the
three-ton
house.
Typology
four
is
to
provide
a
five
foot
left
side
yard,
set
back
to
provide
five
feet
clearance
from
the
abutting
property,
so
only
at
the
only
at
the
corner.
A
A
F
A
J
Okay,
next,
we
have
boa
1411319
148
Falcon
Street.
The
applicant
is
148
Falcon
Street
Realty
Trust.
They
are
seeking
to
confirm
occupancy
as
a
two
family.
However,
change
to
a
four
unit,
residential
dwelling
by
adding
in
rare
Edition
renovating
living
space
into
the
basement
and
adding
rear
and
roof
decks
or
violations
include
East
Boston,
iPod
applicability,
use
regulations,
roof
structure,
restrictions
proposed
off
street
parking
is
insufficient
for
area
ratio.
Excessive
height
is
excessive
in
terms
of
stories
and
the
feet
side
and
rear
yard.
Insufficient.
T
C
AS
T
O
T
Gone
on
in
the
property,
including
the
removal
of
rodents
and
a
substantial
amount
of
trash
that
was
in
the
building
itself,
our
proposal
would
change
the
legal
occupancy
of
this
building
from
two
units
to
four
units
complete
a
full
renovation
of
the
building
which
would
upgrade
the
life
safety,
including
the
addition
of
sprinklers.
If
we
jump
to
the
next
slide,
we
can
just
get
a
quick
context.
T
Overview
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood
I
would
direct
your
attention,
members
of
the
board,
to
the
lower
right
corner,
to
show
what
the
surrounding
context
appears
to
be
for
this
section
of
Falcon
Street.
As
you
can
see,
we
do
about
Condor
Street,
which
is
the
street
directly
behind
us
on
Condor
Street
has
been
the
focus
of
new
opportunities
for
development
in
this
section
of
East
Boston
I.
T
Street
are
very
consistent
in
size
and
context
for
what
we're
proposing
for
the
renovations
at
148
Falcon
directly
behind
us
is
a
12
unit.
Multi-Family
new
new
building
was
just
recently
built
and
four
stories
and,
as
you
can
see,
it's
a
pretty
dense,
Building
located
directly
behind
our
site.
If
we
can
go
to
slide
eight,
that
will
show
the
proposed
rendering
for
the
building
that
we're
looking
to
excellent
there.
We
go
perfect
so,
as
you
can
see
here,
I
believe
we
have
Eric
zackerson
from
Context
here
as
well.
T
We
are
looking
at
some
of
the
other
buildings
along
this
side
of
Falcon
Street,
including
the
one
that's
actually
Four
buildings
down
that
was
recently
renovated
to
try
to
keep
with
some
of
the
character
that
we
typically
see
in
Eagle
Hill
Neighborhood,
based
upon
what
we
typically
here
at
Eagle
Hill
Neighborhood,
the
proposed
Renovations
would
result
in
three
three
bedroom
units.
Those
are
all
roughly
around
1100
to
1200
square
feet
and
then
one
two
bedroom
unit,
which
is
located
at
the
lower
level.
T
Although
the
violation
and
refusal
letter
did
indicate
basement,
I
would
Point
down
when
we
see
the
elevations.
That
is
a
full
walkout
level
and
so
we're
able
to
not
only
achieve
appropriate
sailing
height
but
light
and
air
inside
of
the
unit
based
upon
its
location
from
the
grade
at
the
sidewalk
on
Falcon
Street.
If
we
could
scroll
down
to
the
next
slide,
we
can
get
to
the
you
know
probably
go
to
the
next
slide
after
this
second
one.
T
So,
with
respect
to
the
site
plan,
members
of
the
board
we
do
see,
the
existing
building
is
already
non-conforming.
With
respect
to
the
side
yard
setbacks,
we
have
a
1.3
foot
setback
on
the
left
side
and
about
a
two
and
a
half
foot
setback
on
the
right.
While
the
prevailing
setback
requirement
of
the
district
is
two
and
a
half
feet,
because
we
are
proposing
a.
AS
T
Use
under
article
53
and
therefore
the
required
set
of
factor
is
actually
five
feet.
Our
proposed
Edition
does
not
exacerbate
or
increase
any
of
the
setback
or
non-conforming
setbacks.
Currently
we
do
have
our
structure
actually
go
within
17
feet
of
the
rear
property
line
and
the
decks
actually
extend
a
little
bit
further,
so
the
decks
are
actually
about
10
little
over
10
feet
from
the
rear
property
line.
T
I
would
point
out
that,
because
this
is
considered
a
shallow
a
lot,
it
does
qualify
for
the
shallow
wide
exception
under
article
53
and
therefore,
while
the
30
feet
is
typically
required.
We're
able
to
reduce
that
down
to
about
23
feet
as
the
required
setback
for
this
area
and
I
would
point
out
again
that
that
12
unit
multi-family
is
located
directly
behind
us,
which
sits
at
four
stories.
T
If
we
scroll
to
the
next,
we
can
walk
through
the
floor
plans
so,
as
you
can
see
here,
a
reading
from
actually
it
goes
from
right
to
left.
The
lower
level
basement
plan
is
the
two
bedroom
unit.
We
do
have
some
outdoor
space
shown
at
the
back
of
the
property
and
then
units
the
units
at
levels.
One
two
and
three
are
all
actually
pretty
similar
in
size
with
the
layout
of
all
being
three
bedroom
units.
We
can
go
to
the
next
side.
Please.
D
T
T
T
T
AS
T
Our
side
at
about
a
little
over
two
and
a
half
feet
on
the
neighbor's
property,
to
allow
for
at
least
a
five
foot
passageway
that
comes
through
the
buildings
to
allow
for
egress
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
As
I
mentioned,
our
rear
yard
requirement
is
about
23.75
feet,
based
upon
the
exception
of
article
53.
The
building
itself
sits
at
about
17
feet
and
the
decks
go
with
a
little
over
10
and
a
half
feet
to
the
rear
yard
setback.
T
We
don't
really
change
it
in
respect
to
the
front
yard,
because
that
is
already
an
existing
condition.
With
the
exception
of
the
addition
that
we
are
putting
up
the
third
level,
we
do
have
about
275
square
feet
of
open
space
in
total,
and
that
includes
the
rear
yard,
the
proposed
decks
and
the
roof
deck
under
article
53.
There
is
actually
no
requirement
for
open
space.
All
of
this,
not
necessarily
something
I,
think,
is
preferred
by
the
board.
We
do
provide
open
space.
That's
specifically
each
particular
unit
in
the
in
the
project.
T
T
Two
and
a
half
stories
is
what
is
an
article
53,
but
I
believe
that
the
examples
that
we've
shown
along
that
section
of
Falcon
Street
keeps
this
proposed
project
with
well
within
the
context
of
what's
seen
in
the
media
vicinity,
the
height
limit
is
35
feet
in
the
district,
we're
slightly
above
that
36
1
I
believe
with
the
roof
Tech
and
last
but
not
least,
is
parking.
Currently,
there
is
no
parking
requirements
in
the
two
units
that
presently
exist,
as
they
predate.
T
Code,
article
53
states
that
were
only
required
to
provide
parking
for
the
additional
units
we
propose.
So
in
this
case,
two
additional
parking
spaces
would
be
all
that's
required
into
zoning,
and
it
is
quite
practical
to
introduce
a
curb
cut
to
this
site
into
have
any
option
properties
we're
able
to
do
that.
It
would
be
to
the
detriment
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood
as
well.
So
with
that
I'll
stop
and
answer
any
questions
of
the
board.
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Williams,
Mrs,
better
brazo.
Do
you
have
any
questions
on
the
plans.
F
F
And
in
regards
to
your
left
side
elevation,
you
have
Windows,
which
are
mostly
the
bathrooms
and
I
just
saw.
There
were
windows
for
the
bathroom
on
the
left
side
and
in
a
hallway
to
the
washer
dryer.
What
what?
If?
What's
the
space
from
that
elevation
to
the
abutting
property.
T
Is
on
the
call
I'll
defer
to
him?
No.
U
Yeah
I'm
here
sorry,
the
question
was
on
the
right
side:
what
is
the
distance
on.
F
F
U
F
A
budding
property,
how
close
are
they
to
the
property
line.
T
Think
we
can
go
to
if
I
may,
we
can
go
to
the
street
view
that
probably
will
show
the
proximity
of
the
existing
buildings,
probably
back
up
to
either
slides
four
five
or
six.
F
You
are,
can
you
remind
me,
what's
your
existing
left
side
and
said
back
what
1.33
1.3
feet
and
you're
keeping
it
at
1.3
correct.
T
So
the
building
the
existing
plan
of
the
building
that
we
see
here
is
not
is
not
intended
to
change
right.
F
So
that
means
that
you're
a
budding
property,
probably
is
it's
two
feet
away
or
one
foot
away.
P
K
P
X
J
T
U
Yeah
we
took
the
back
piece
and
we
shifted
it
to
the
left
side
so
that
we
could
have
Windows
on
the
right
side
and
have
them
be
three
foot
from
the
new
windows.
Neutron
collect
from
her
property
line
and
then
the
building
just
got
very
narrow.
If
we
didn't
get
it
close
to
the
left
side.
AH
I
Is
intended.
T
System
bridge
for
a
residential
unit,
but
as
you
can
see
in
our
we
can
scroll
down
forever,
please
why
don't
we
go
to
the
elevation
further
further
down
next
slide?
Here
we
go
so
we
see,
on
the
right
hand,
side
the
purpose
floor
layout
and
that
shows
the
two
bedroom
unit
with
a
living
space.
We
can
jump
to
the
next
slide
for
elevations
two
slides
ahead.
Please
will
show
the
here
we
go
so.
T
From
the
sidewalk
down
to
the
rear
of
the
property
from
the
rearmost
property
line
is
about
a
ten
and
a
half
foot
separation,
a
great
difference
and,
as
you
can
see,
we
do
have
the
ability
to
introduce
full-size
windows
on
that
side,
as
well
as
a
a
clear
walkout
at
the
back
portion
of
the
property.
U
There
are
actually
two
means
of
egress
from
this,
because
you
can
walk
out
the
back
through
the
living
room
onto
the
rear
deck
and
enter
the
common
stare
at
the
front
of
the
building.
Okay.
BA
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
that's
how
everybody
needs
us
at
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
ons
hosting
the
butters
meeting
for
this
proposal
in
August
of
2022.
I
want
a
butter,
attended
the
meeting
and
stated
that
parking
is
very
difficult
in
the
area.
The
applicant
also
met
with
the
Eagle
Hills
Association
twice
the
association
voted
9
and
support
and
nine
in
that
position.
Those
who
supported
believe
the
house
really
needs
the
upgrade.
BA
A
Okay
is
Mr
Hampton
with
us.
AE
I
am
Madam
chair.
My
apologies
for
missing
the
last
couple
of
cases
bpda
recommended
to
now
without
prejudice.
Our
Focus
was
more
on
the
rear
Edition
in
the
in
the
increased
lot
coverage.
So
that
was
our
concern
on
this
case.
My
only
suggestion,
if
the
board
deems
approval
that
we
do
design
review
and
maybe
Limitless
rare
Edition
thank.
A
W
A
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Mr
Valencia.
Yes,
it's
really
well,
yes,
Mr
Langham,
yes,
Mr
Stembridge,.
N
A
Chair
also
votes
yes,
motion
carries.
Can
we
take
a
15-minute
stretch,
bio
food
break?
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
All
right
roll
call.
C
P
J
A
J
We
have
boa
1405027
for
29
Orange
Street.
The
applicant
is
Ivan
Hernandez.
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
construct
a
new
two-family
townhouse.
The
violations
are,
the
side,
yard
is
insufficient
and
then
for
area
ratio
is
excessive.
BC
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
we're
proposing
I'm
actually
here
with
my
client
Mike
Lambo
who's
also
joins
us
I'm,
we're
proposing
a
townhouse
units
that
two
family
townhouse
units
side
by
side,
typical
layout
on
an
existing
empty
lot
in
on
the
Orange
Street
29
Orange
Street
in
Roslindale,
as
you
see
there
by
the
plants
are
made
for
the
unit,
is
going
to
basically
consist
of
an
unfinished
basement
space
on
the
in
the
basement.
Level.
BC
BC
The
back
portion
of
the
house
would
contain
a
semi-flat
roof
combination
of
slope
and
roof
slope
and
flat
roof
area,
and
then
the
front
would
be
a
gable
roof.
That
would
be
parallel
to
the
street
side
to
side.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
you'll
see
the
planet
of
the
roof.
There
would
be
a
dormer
facing
the
front
of
the
of
the
house
and
then
that
minor
flat
portion
on
the
back
of
the
of
the
house
with
the
slope.
BC
If
you
proceed
to
the
next
Slide,
the
elevation
on
the
upper
left
side
is
the
front
elevation
of
the
house
again
single
front
entrance
Door.
Our
objective
here
was
to
kind
of
make
it
look
like
a
single
family
house
and
try
to
keep
it
more
in
in
line
with
the
other
structures
on
the
street.
Up
above
you'll
see
the
the
Dormer
right
side.
Elevation
shows
us
the
right
side
of
the
house
entrance
to
the
mudroom
area.
BC
Up
above
you
can
see
the
cable
with
dylomers
and
then
again
the
other
roof
portion,
there's
stairs
from
the
to
the
back
of
yard,
which
are
shown
that
platform,
the
steps
on
the
right
side
and
then
front
porch
to
the
left,
which
would
bring
you
out
to
the
street.
The
lower
left
elevation
is
the
rear
of
the
house
or
the
structure
showing
the
two
egresses
from
the
units,
as
second
equals,
coming
out
to
a
platform
and
steps
to
the
backyard
and
then
the
left
side.
BC
If
you
the
set
of
plans,
actually,
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
you'll
see
the
site
plan
here
and
as
long
as
side
setbacks,
the
front
setback
I
believe
for
the
most
part
we're
fine
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that
side,
setback
violation
might
be
because
of
the
two
window
wells
that
we're
proposing
for
the
bright
and
left
side
there,
but
we
basically
meet
the
front
setback,
side,
setbacks
for
the
most
part
and
then
the
rear
set
back
at
the
40
feet.
BC
The
main
issue
here
is
the
the
full
area
ratio
and
then
decide
a
setback
which
I
believe
is
for
those
Wells.
That's
a
pretty
much
our
proposal
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
F
BC
Right
now,
it's
going
to
be
unfinished
basement
space.
There's
no
plan
for
the
basement.
It's
just
simply
an
unfinished
basement.
The
reason
for
the
as
the
windows
being
Incorporated
is
in
the
future
if
they
want
to
finish
it
that
they
have
it
set
up
for
that
purpose,
but.
BC
It's
seven,
six
minimum
I
believe.
F
A
Hearing
Nunn
Mr
Hampton.
Can
you
weigh
in
if
you're
still
here,
yep.
AE
Thank
you.
Madam
chairman
support.
We've
recommended
approval
with
design
review,
I've,
never
seen
window
placement
as
a
Proviso,
but
it
must
be
a
reason
for
it,
so
we're
just
looking
at
the
scale
of
Dormers
and
window
placement,
but
we're
on
board
for
approval.
AE
A
F
A
F
Jeff
I
I
agree
with
you.
I
thought
that
Proviso
didn't
make
sense
to
me,
but.
P
A
You
may
I
have
public
testimony.
BD
We
hosted
the
meeting
for
29
Orange
Street
on
the
15th
of
November.
There
were
about
three
people
that
were
there.
Everyone
seemed
to
be
in
general
support.
There
were
some
questions
on
building
use,
whether
it
be
used
for
family
members
and
some
were
concerns
regarding
parking
and
the
aesthetic
of
the
house,
but
the
homeowners
said
that
they
would
be
working
to
meet
those
concerns,
and
my
office
has
received
two
letters
of
support
in
regards
to
this
project
and
at
the
moment
we
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
V
A
Okay
hearing,
none
may
I
have
a
motion.
A
C
A
A
J
1417892
for
31
Wellington,
Hill
Street,
the
applicant
is
Seeking
a
curb
cut
for
three
parking
spaces.
Their
violations
include
rear
and
side
yard
insufficient,
as
well
as
off-street
parking
and
loading.
BB
Here
good
afternoon,
this
is
Angela
Middleton
on
behalf
of
the
owners
at
the
community
I'm
going
to
Hill
Street.
We're
happy
to
be
here
to
request
a
relief
from
the
board
of
appeals
for
our
request
for
curb
cut
at
our
owner
occupied
three
fan:
family
Condo
building
as
you'll
see
from
this
rendering,
particularly
the
sketch
on
the
left.
There
is
no
curb
cut,
but
the
driveway
does
allow
for
cars
to
be
parked
here.
A
AW
X
X
X
So
if
you
look
here
on
the
left
side,
this
biggest
drawing,
which
is
an
Ariel,
it
is
to
the
right,
and
so
it
is
this
Lane
here
that
tapers
off,
and
so
that
is
the
driveway
which
wraps
around
to
the
back
of
the
house,
which
continues
the
concrete.
This
is
all
concrete
to
the
right
of
the
driveway
as
you're.
Looking
in
this
rendering
is
a
fence
and
an
open
lot
that
lot
cannot
be
built
on.
That
lot
is
owned
by
our
neighbor.
X
A
F
Okay,
I
think
the
parking
is
at
the
rear.
There's
like
there's
like
three
spaces
at
the
rear,
not
at
the
front.
X
Yes,
according
to
this,
drawing
there
are
three
spaces
at
the
rear
we
could
certainly
park
there.
However,
it's
really
difficult
to
get
cars
out
of
there,
so
you
know
we'll
go
with
what
we're
permitted
for,
but
it's
also
possible
to
park
in
tandem
in
this
driveway
here
and
though
it's
not
front
yard.
If
you
have
three
cars
parked
here
in
this
driveway,
the
last
car
actually
is
still
by
the
house,
not
by
the
front
yard.
X
A
M
Go
ahead.
Sorry,
thank
you.
Is
there
a
tree
in
the
back
of
the
property
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
you
are
going
to
build
the
parking
spaces
in
your
back
is
do
you
have
to
cut
the
tree.
X
X
AU
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Amigo
BTD.
These
plants
are
very
poor
and
I
can't
see
the
three
spaces
are
elected
on
this.
Drawing
and
I'm
really
nervous
about
the
the
rear
area
and,
quite
frankly,
I.
Don't
think
you
can
fit
feed
spaces
there
and
it'll
have
very
poor
maneuverability,
and
if
the
bullets
don't
use
it,
so
you
know
if
they
wanted
to
prove
it.
AU
I
would
like
to
put
in
a
Proviso
from
18d
review,
but
from
what
I
can
see,
there's
no
space
reflected
on
the
plans,
and
it
makes
me
uncomfortable
so
at
this
point
in
time,
I
like
to
request
denial.
X
F
I'm,
sorry,
just
to
just
in
terms
of
the
review
of
the
drawings
there,
we
do
need
a
survey
drawing
the
the
drawings
are
incomplete
to
understand.
What
is
the
curb
cut
Dimension
being
proposed
was
the
aisle
with
what
are
the
proportions
of
the
parking
space,
so
drawings
are
lacking
in
terms
of
surveying.
X
A
I
think
you
need
a
professional
engineer
two,
because
we
cannot
okay,
we
cannot
see
from
here
any
dimensions.
That's
why
I
was
asking
you
were
you
planning
to
park
on
the
side,
because
I
actually
couldn't
tell
there
were
Drop
Like
spaces
being
allocated
to
the
back
the
rear,
so
I
think
it's
it's
difficult
to
see
from
here
whether
you
can
actually
fit
three
parking
spaces.
X
I,
you
know
what
I
I
really
have
to
walk
through
some
of
the
context
around
this
proposal
for
the
board
to
understand
what
we're
really
dealing
with
here.
If
you
don't
mind.
A
X
F
People
to
allow
the
applicant
to
get
survey,
drawings,
depict
parking,
Dimensions,
curb
cut
width,
aisle
parking
spaces
and
that
they
also
review
BTD
design
guidelines
for
all
street
parking.
That's
online.
Thank
you.
Excuse.
A
Yes,
the
chair,
also
votes.
Yes,
motion
carries
Ms,
we
will,
if
you
could,
provide
them
with
a
date.
So
so,
basically,
we
need
better
drawings
that
have
the
the
information
and
the
dimensions
Etc.
That.
X
I
can
I
can
I
just
you
know:
we've
been
through
this
process
for
months
and
actually
years.
This
is
our
second
time
going
through
this
and
so
to
wait
for
nearly
two
and
a
half
hours
to
get
to
this
point.
I
would
just
appreciate
two
minutes
of
your
time
to
really
have
an
understanding
of
what
it
is
that
we
need
to
do
in
the
context
of
our
proposal.
We.
A
BE
X
J
Madam
chair,
we
have
March
28th
at
11,
30
available.
I
would
also
suggest
the
applicant
consider
a
digital
copy
of
the
plants.
The
creases
and
the
plants
make
it
difficult
to
read.
AK
A
It,
however,
what
we've
indicated
is
that
there's
insufficient
information
on
the
plans.
Currently,
we
so
appreciate
the
information,
the
context
that
you
want
to
provide,
but
without
the
basic
information
it's
it,
we
would
be
unable
to
approve
at
this
time,
so
so
I
think
we're
trying
to
offer
you
the
opportunity
to
go
back
and
provide
that
information
so
that
we
can
make
an
informed
decision.
F
Make
a
recommendation
at
the
applicant
contacts
Jessica
and
Jessica
can
provide
the
ons
neighbor
liaison
and
clarify
with
Jessica
and
the
ons
liaison.
What
were
specifically
requesting,
which
is
a
survey
drawing
of
the
proposed
parking.
X
F
A
J
Next,
we
have
boa
one
three,
four,
five,
six,
five
five
for
eleventh
Spring,
Garden
Street,
the
applicant
is
ciao
nougen,
sorry
I
know
I,
probably
butchered
that
and
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
demolish
an
existing
single-family
home
and
erect
a
four-story
to
family
home,
and
their
violations
include.
The
law
area
is
insufficient,
lot,
width
and
sufficient
front
edge
is
insufficient
floor
area
ratio
is
excessive,
height
is
excessive
in
terms
of
stories
and
feet,
usable
open
space
and
sufficient
side
yard
and
sufficient
and
rear
yard
insufficient.
A
BF
Yes,
good
afternoon,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
Kevin
Cloutier
I'm,
an
attorney
representing
the
applicant
and
owner
child
Wynn
I
have
a
business
address
of
1990
Center
Street
in
West
Roxbury
and
we're
also
joined
by
the
project,
architect,
Gavin
Driscoll,
and
if
I
can
just
take
the
quickly
take
the
sort
of
the
High
View
and
then
to
pass
it
over
to
Gavin
to
talk
the
design.
BF
But
we
believe
this
is
an
excellent
opportunity
for
the
board
to
approve
this
project,
which
would
allow
for
an
additional
single,
an
additional
dwelling
unit
on
Spring
Garden
Street
in
Dorchester,
but
without
increasing
any
off-street
parking.
Spring
Garden
Street
is
a
pretty
tight
Road.
It's
a
one-way
and
parking
is
certainly
one
of
the
primary
issues
there
and
I
just
provided.
If
you
stay
on
this
first
slide
for
now,
this
shows
obviously
the
home
that
we're
seeking
to
demolish
and
then
to
create
a
two-family
four-story
home.
BF
It
would
include
both
units
would
have
three
bedrooms
and
two
and
a
half
baths,
and
they
would
each
be
1771
square
feet
and
again
we
would
have
sufficient
Wall
Street
parking
and
a
first
floor
garage
area
and
the
photo
on
the
right
just
gives
a
little
bit
of
the
area
context
with
that
I'd
pass
it
over
to
Mr
Driscoll,
to
talk
the
plans
and
I'll
briefly
touch
on
some
of
the
zoning
and
mitigation
factors.
Thank
you.
AM
Thank
you,
Kevin.
Please
go
to
the
next
slide.
AM
This
is
just
a
copy
of
direct
Butters
that
we
have
outlets
for
approval,
for
you
can
go
to
that
next
slide.
Please
there's
just
some
pictures
for
contacts
on
the
left-hand
corner.
You
can
see
a
picture
of
the
existing
home.
AM
There
is
a
shared
driveway
that
is
needed
not
to
be
allowed
to
be
parked
in
on
the
bottom
left-hand
Corner,
that's
the
rear
of
the
property
up
in
the
bottom
right
hand
corner
you
can
see
the
the
rear,
Park
the
rear
property
as
well,
and
that,
on
the
upper
right
hand,
corner
picture,
you
can
see
the
existing
home
on
the
right
of
the
patient.
You
can
go
to
the
next
Slide.
The
foot
front
of
the
building
is
staying
the
same
left
to
right.
AM
We
are
extending
it
to
the
rear
ends
of
the
front.
The,
like
you
haven't
said.
The
total
square
footage
is
3
542
square
feet
of
living
space
on
a
lot.
That's
2
175
square
feet
and
we
are
in
a
two
out
of
5
000
Zone
with
a
1.63,
far
we're
proposing
a
mirror
image
units
from
the
front
and
the
rear
I
mean
go
to
the
next
slide.
AM
Please
this
is
just
the
official
plot
plan
showing
the
project
next
slide,
and
then
here
is
the
existing
condition
plan
up
finger
next
next
slide.
Please-
and
you
can
see
here
on
the
left
side-
is
the
the
garage
plan
we
do
have
an
oversized
garage
because
of
the
maneuverability
of
this.
To
throw
up
is
18
6
by
23..
AM
We
know
it's
going
to
be
tight,
but
you
can
get
the
two
cars
that
Americans
bring
on
the
street.
Is
such
a
a
small
street
with
only
parking
on
one
side
and
during
the
neighborhood
process?
Parking
was
just
a
big
aspect
of
it,
so
we
wanted
the
two
units
to
have
two
option
parking.
AM
AM
The
third
level
is
going
to
be
the
master
bedroom
master
bath
unit,
also
600
square
feet,
and
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
on
the
upper
level
up,
it's
up
we're
actually
stepping
back
5.6
from
the
front
of
the
building
and
we're
gonna
have
two
bedrooms
with
a
bath
on
the
top
there,
and
we
are
also
pulling
it
back.
Five
foot,
six
from
the
real
the
property
as
well
Memphis,
roof
town
west
side.
AM
You
can
see
from
the
elevation
we
put
that
entry
door
on
the
front
to
get
the
the
same
aspects
of
the
other
buildings
on
the
street,
with
the
like
the
representation
of
the
three
family
home
at
the
stadium
characteristics.
On
the
left
hand
side
you
can
see
the
there's
two
oversized
doors,
132
new
Aesthetics,
of
having
two
the
oversized
so
that
the
cars
can
have
the
maneuverability
to
get
on
into
those
oversized
spots
and
then,
on
the
bottom
right
hand
corner
you.
Can
see
the
railroad,
rare
elevation
and
then
on
the
bottom.
AM
Left-Hand
side
is
the
right
elevation
which
will
have
a
one
out
of
five,
because
it's
the
the
distance
from
the
property
line
and
if
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
there's
just
the
one
slide
time
we're
going
to
shows
the
theme
from
Sprint
artistry.
Oh
I
can
live
there
and
entering
portions
and.
BF
If
I
could
just
address
some
of
the
zoning
issues
because
of
the
size
of
the
law,
which
is
2175
square
feet
and
a
two
out
of
5000
Zone
by
virtue
of
having
an
ERT
which
is
and
we're
looking
to
demolish
and
build
something
new,
but
there
are
already
a
number
of
automatic
violations
that
are
baked
into
that,
including
wide
area,
Frontage,
side
yard
and
rear
yard.
Though
I'd
suggest
the
size
of
this
lot
is
not
abnormally
small
or
inconsistent
with
a
lot
of
the
Lots
in
the
surrounding
area.
So
some.
BF
BF
We
wanted
to
build
in
in
this
in
this
place.
We
those
violations
automatically
be
triggered,
and
again
this
is
going
to
be
an
owner
occupied
to
family.
Miss.
Terwin
has
lived
in
this
property
for
over
20
years
and
has
been
a
Boston
resident
for
30.
His
daughter
would
be
graduating.
Umass
Boston
soon
would
likely
be
moving
into
that
second
home,
with
the
respect
to
some
of
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
during
the
community
process,
which
began
in
2019.
In
fact,
this
is
the
fourth
iteration
of
the
project.
BF
Actually,
this
is
a
great
slide
to
stay
on.
Regarding
the
height
as
you
can
see,
the
fourth
story
has
been
set
back
from
both
the
front
and
the
rear
to
avoid
any
of
that
additional
massing
onto
either
Spring
Garden
Street
or
to
the
rear.
So
the
top
of
the
third
story
is
actually
28
feet.
The
top
of
the
fourth
story,
which
again
is
set
back
and
out
of
the
line
of
sight
from
Spring
Garden,
is
37,
which
is
only
two
feet
higher
than
the
allowable
35
feet.
BF
And
if
you
look
at
the
top
left,
in
fact,
those
those
triple
Deckers
which
are
very
common
for
this
neighborhood
with
that
sort
of
raised
little
parapet
at
the
top.
Essentially,
the
top
of
our
proposed
building
would
essentially
be
equal
to
that
to
the
just
to
the
right
of
it
again
at
about
37
feet
and,
secondly,
the
other
the
other
primary
issue
being
with
the
parking.
We
did
engineer
that
parking.
If
actually,
you
want
to
go
back
to
slide
slide
number
seven.
BF
We
do
have
I
mean
we're
required
one-off
street
parking
per
unit.
We
do
show
two
there
practically
it'd,
probably
be
one
car
in
either
garage,
but
the
the
the
single
parking
space
would
certainly
be
sufficient.
BF
I
think
two
would
be
tough,
we're
just
showing
that
we've
engineered
it
that
two
can
get
in
there,
but
we
are
providing
one
off
street
parking
legal
officer
parking
spot
per
unit
and
we
suggest
I
would
certainly
mitigate
what
is
one
of
the
primary
concerns
with
any
sort
of
Redevelopment
or
development
on
Spring
Garden
would
be
parking
congestion,
and
so,
for
those
reasons
we
suggest
that
this
is
a
I
think
a
great
opportunity
to
allow
a
an
additional
dwelling
unit
owner
occupied
without
adding
to
any
further
off
Street
or
I'm,
sorry
on
Street,
Park
and
congestion,
and
if
the
board
would
entertain
I
know.
BF
Mr
Winn
is
available
to
speak
if
they'd
like
to
hear
from
the
owner
about
this
project
and
why
he
wants
this
done.
A
Thank
you
can.
Could
you
answer
a
couple
questions
one
is:
is
there
an
existing
curb
cut
and
also
the
number
of
bedrooms?
Yes,.
AM
Oh
yeah,
there
is
Duty
that
no
one's
allowed
to
pack
in
the
existing
driveway
the
neighbor
on
13
has
a
parking
space
in
the
rear,
so
that
would
be
an
existing
curb
cut
an
existing
driveway.
AM
It
would
be
no
one
would
be
allowed
to
park
there
and
be
three
veterans
two
and
a
half
baths
each
unit.
So
a
total
of
six
bedrooms.
Thank.
U
F
I
had
a
chance
to
review
the
drawings,
and
you
know
I'm
I'm,
just
looking
at
the
neighborhood
and
the
neighborhood.
The
street
is
aligned
with
many
two
stories
and
three-story
buildings.
I,
don't
necessarily
see
a
four-story
building
on
on
the
street.
Nor
do
I
see
the
topology
of
having
enclosed
garage
on
the
side.
Elevation
of
the
building
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
No,
but
the
drawings
are
adequate.
You
know
so
I
guess
the
question
would
be
why
you
know.
Why
are
you
requesting
a
relief?
BF
That
off
street
parking
option
again
I
mean
I
I,
think
it's
it's
almost
impossible
to
try
to
put
a
two
family
on
Spring
Garden
without
Osprey
parking
I
mean
there's
just
no
room
on
that
street.
This
was
that
was
raised
from
start
to
finish
by
residents,
so
the,
whereas
we're
at
the
level
we
are
because
I
believe
I,
don't
think
you
can
do
it
too
family
without
with
off
street
parking
in
this
space.
It's
just
not
it's
not
practicable
to
be
able
to
do
that.
BF
Decision
to
put
those
off
street
parking
spaces
and
I
know
the
off
street
parking
seem
to
be
pretty
well
received
by
the
you
know
by
the
by
the
community
and
obviously
all
the
immediate
Butters
are
in
support
of
this
project.
For
those
reasons,.
AU
Yes,
Madam
chairman
before
I'd
like
to
meet
with
you
TV
again,
I
I,
don't
see
the
parking
space
is
reflected
on
the
apartment,
storage
area
and
that's
important
because,
according
to
the
bgp
regulations,
we
require
50
of
the
parking
space
would
be
eight
and
a
half
by
20
and
the
other
half
can
be
seven
by
eighteen.
AU
But
more
importantly
than
that,
although
that
is
important,
is
I
need
to
see
the
spaces
reflected
on
the
plan,
which
is,
but
we
went
to
a
little
while
ago,
but
I'd
like
to
ask
for
a
Proviso
that
they
have
to
buy
BTD
review.
That's
okay
with
the
board
and
the
cheap,
really
anything.
BF
AM
J
Okay,
I
have
no
more
questions.
Thank
you.
A
W
AM
Yeah
you
can
go
down
to
them.
We
did
pull
it
down
as
much
as
possible,
but
with
the
the
regulations
but
getting
the
cars
on
that
first
floor
and
then
obviously
having
the
sufficient
head
height
in
the
actual
spaces
for
a
living
space.
We
did.
If
you
can
just
go
down
to
the
up
one
sections
of
the
outpatients.
We
did
bring
down
the
ceiling
lights
on
each
floor
with
you
can
just
see.
Okay,
you
can
see
the
Heights
Park
Shore
up.
AM
Okay,
we
see
we
have
eight
foot
two
which
is
going
to
be
typed
for
parking.
On
the
first
floor,
it's
six
in
the
first
floor
and
then
on
the
upper
levels.
We
do
have
seven
foot
tattoo.
AM
There
is
a
little
bit
of
wiggle
room
with
the
seven
foot
six
minimum,
but
we'll
just
have
to
obviously
consider
the
the
structure
and
all
that
other
stuff
to
make
sure
that
we
we
could
try
and
get
it
down
to
the
35,
but
it
would
be
very
close
just
to
as
we
go
through
everything
we
need
to
leave
a
little
bit
of
Wiggle
around
with
the
subject,
depending
on
the
structure.
A
Now
is
Mr
Hampton
still
with
us,
I
know
he
had
to
leave
soon.
A
Okay,
I
would
just
read
his
recommendation
into
the
into
bpd's
recommendation
into
the
record
and
then
we'll
take
public
testimony.
Bpda
recommends
approval
with
Proviso
that
plans
be
submitted
to
bpda
for
design
review.
AZ
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Ross
Cochran
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board
the
applicant
at
11,
Spring
Garden
Street,
has
completed
their
Community
process
within
a
Butters
meeting
on
September
7th
of
last
year
and
ultimately,
the
local
Civic
Group
Columbia
Seven
Hill
voted
to
approach
the
project
after
a
close
vote,
we'd
like
to
defer
the
board
to
the
board's
Judgment
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
BG
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Joe
McGovern
city
council,
Frank
Baker's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
in
opposition
of
the
applicant
today.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Okay
with
that
may
I
have
a
motion.
M
C
N
AM
J
W
Heard
you
going
to
make
you
a
panelist
want
to
accept
it
when
you
introduce
yourself
and
then
make
yourself.
G
BH
Hi,
yes,
my
name
is
Sergio
and
I'm,
one
of
the
Consulting
managers
Bakery
and
we
are
proposing
to
put
in
a
walk-in
cooler
in
the
rear,
with
a
a
store
dry
storage
unit
as
well
on
the
back,
we've
already
gone
through
the
Jamaica
Plain
Community
process
and
we've
gotten
their
blessing
on
that.
We've
also
talked
to
our
Butters
as
well
about
the
project
and
we
haven't
received
any
opposition.
Our
walk-in
exterior
cooler
is
gonna,
be
it's
not
going
to
be
adjacent
to
the
building.
BH
There
is
going
to
be
a
space
in
between
I
think
one
of
the
violations
was
that
we
were
within
eight
feet.
We've
actually
pushed
it
back
as
well,
so
we
actually
are
within
that
that
distance
from
the
building
we
currently
have.
You
can
see
there.
There
is
three
parking
spots
where
the
car
is
where
the
car
is
located
is
the
is
the
second
parking
spot
where
that
black
car
is
behind
the
one
of
the
owners
Philip.
BH
We
have
two
spots
that
we
do
use
for
15
minute
parking
for
our
customers,
so
we
for
the
the
residents
of
the
building,
including
us.
We
have
three
parking
spots.
We're
looking
to
use
one
of
the
parking
spots
to
be
able
to
put
in
this
temp
this
dry
storage
container
and
a
exterior
walk-in
cooler.
We
will
have
a
walkway
in
there.
We
won't
be
eight
feet
apart
and
I
beat
them,
and
one
of
the
violations
is
that
we
would
need
sufficient
parking.
BH
We
do
have
two
left
over
and
we
do
have
the
possibility
of
having
two
more
on
the
side
of
the
building
as
well
for
a
total
of
four
if
necessary,
and
then
the
other
one
is
going
to
be.
That
is
the
residential
area
and
we
are
a
commercial
business.
This
with
this
space
has
been
located
there
for
a
number
of
years
and
it
used
to
be
in
pizza
shop
before
us.
We've
existed
there
for
roughly
almost
five
years
and
we
do
need
this
is
the
container
and
we
do
need
some
additional
space.
BH
Luckily,
the
pandemic.
Actually,
we
we
did
drive
and
we
did
a
very
good
amount
of
business
and
which
is
why
we're
requiring
some
additional
space
to
be
able
to
hold
our
dry
goods
and
our
refrigerator
products.
We
have
received
approval
from
the
health
department
to
be
able
to
house
our
products
inside
of
this
exterior,
welcome
cooler
as
well.
A
F
Madam,
chair,
I,
have
I,
did
not
receive
any
site
plan
or
drawings
Jessica.
Do
you
have
a
site
plan
on
file
for
the
applicant
yeah.
Q
F
Do
you
have
the
parking
spaces
line
drawings
as
well,
or
no.
BH
There
should
be
another
plan
on
there:
I
don't
think
the
the
parking
spaces
are
marked
off,
but
there
is
marked
off
where
the
walk-in
cooler
would
be
located.
There
should
be
another
another
plan
that
we
submitted.
Okay,.
F
And
Madam
chair,
we
heard
that
they
received
support
from
the
from
the
butters.
Is
that
correct.
A
We
will
hear
from
public
testimony
in
a
minute.
Thank
you.
AV
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Conor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time
in
mayor's
office.
Let's
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board
some
background
information
on
the
community
process,
our
office,
social
networking
on
November
1st,
where
the
applicants
brought
their
proposal
to
the
community
and
addressed
questions
and
concerns
from
a
Butters.
They
went
on
to
secure
overwhelming
Community
Support
receiving
support
from
the
Jamaica
Plain
neighborhood
Council
and
the
JP
zoning
subcommittee,
who
I
believe
issued
letters
of
support
to
this
to
this
board.
AV
With
that
we'd
like
to
defer.
Thank
you.
A
Do
you
have
those
letters
on
file?
Yes,.
J
We
have
support
from
the
Jamaica
Plain
neighborhoods
Council,
but
we
also
have
a
letter
of
opposition.
A
F
V
A
P
I
J
So
we
have
boas,
oh
back,
to
Buttonwood
one
four,
zero,
nine,
five,
four
three
one
ten
Buttonwood
and
then
we
have
boa
1411401
118
Buttonwood.
The
applicant
is
Shayla
white
and
these
are
companion
pieces.
So
their
violations
are.
AC
BI
Is
Ms
White
princess
hello,
Madam
chair?
My
name
is
Mike
Ross
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
my
associate
attorney
Shayla
white
law,
firm
of
Prince
Lobel
I
am
here
with
architect,
Peter,
vanco
and
Madam
Ambassador,
maybe
just
if
you
can
put
us
on
page
a002,
so
I
can
explain
to
the
board.
Why
we're
here
Madam,
chair
members,
we
are.
This
is
a
return
to
the
board.
We
were
before
the
board
on
March
30th
2021,
the
board
rejected
without
prejudice
the
application
on
the
grounds
of
the
ground
floor
unit.
BI
The
bottom
floor
unit
was
Subterranean.
There
were
head
houses
on
the
property,
there
was
a
roof
deck
on
the
proposed
project
and
there
was
maneuverability
issues
in
the
rear
of
the
project.
We've
since
removed
this
the
Subterranean
condition
of
the
ground
floor
unit
so
that
they
are
now
ground
floor
units
we've
removed,
the
head
houses,
we've
removed
the
roof
deck
and
we've
removed
a
parking
space
to
allow
for
greater
maneuverability
in
the
back.
This
page
here
gives
you
a
really
good
sense
of
what
we're
trying
to
do.
The
White
House
is
the
existing
house.
BI
That
will
remain
it's
a
currently.
It's
a
Triple
Decker,
it's
110
Buttonwood
and
what
we
would
be
proposing
is
building
a
mirror
of
110
on
where
114
is
so.
It
would
be
very
similar,
in
fact,
to
that
brown
house,
that
is
to
the
left
of
that
project
and,
as
you
can
see,
we
will
need
to
raise
the
existing
one
family
structure.
That's
currently
at
one
to
ten
at
114
by
the
way
and
man
bastard.
If
you
go
back
one
page
I
can
show
you
the
site
plan.
Well,
let's
find
that
site
plan.
BI
Let's
go
back
a
little
bit
more
sorry
about
this.
Here
we
go,
I
can
show
you
the
site
plan.
BI
Let's
go
a
little
bit
further
down
I'll
Take
You
Floor
by
floor,
one
more
I'm,
an
ambassador
one,
more
actually
an
ambassador.
Here
we
go
so
we're
just
going
to
kind
of
build.
These
are
all
nine
floor,
height,
Floors,
floor
plans,
I'll
show
you
the
elevations
in
a
second,
but
this
is
this:
is
your
average
floor
plan,
so
this
is
the
ground
floor.
BI
As
you
can
see,
it's
two
units,
each
with
two
bedrooms
and
two
baths:
the
unit
sizes
range
from
1100
square
feet
to
1200
square
feet
and
Ambassador.
You
can
take
us
to
the
second
floor
on
the
next
slide
and
you'll
see
again
same
configuration.
In
this
case.
There
will
be
a
bay.
You
can
go
further
to
the
third
page,
the
third
floor,
Mount
Ambassador,
we're
now
in
the
third
floor
and
then
finally
we're
on
the
fourth
floor,
one
more
slide
and
that
that's
the
eight
units,
the
elevations
will
give
you
a
better
sense.
BI
If
you
go
down
one
more
ma'am
ambassador
past
the
roof
roof
plan,
here
we
have
the
elevations.
The
the
upper
two
are.
The
side
elevations
at
the
lower
left
is
the
rear
elevation
and
then
the
lower
right
hand.
Corner
is
the
front
elevation
and
if
you
go
down
one
more
slightly,
more
detailed
and
and
I'll
point
out.
This
is
a
good
slide
just
to
point
out
a
couple
things.
So,
as
you
can
see,
there
is
still
access
to
the
roof,
but
that
is
purely
mechanical
access.
BI
You
can
see
the
the
ground
floor,
condition
is
now
properly
a
ground
floor,
condition
and
not
a
Subterranean.
It's
only
one
and
a
half
feet
depressed,
as
I
mentioned,
it's
a
nine
foot
ceiling
height
on
all
four
floors,
maybe
just
finally
Madam
chair
I,
just
quickly
just
to
hit
on
the
zoning
release.
BI
They
were.
They
were
mentioned
by
the
secretary,
but
because
we're
expanding
a
a
three
family
and
a
two-family
district
that
creates
the
a
violation.
There
is
the
the
ancillary
parking.
The
two
spaces
behind
118
there
is
the
multi-family
in
a
two-family
district.
There
is
the
maneuverability
still
remained
as
a
violation.
I
think
we're
close
there,
however,
far
we're
at
1.49
and
at
0.5
District
like
many
of
the
properties
in
this
neighborhood.
BI
The
front
yard
setback
calls
for
15
we're
at
eight
feet.
We
do
comply
with
one
of
the
side,
yard
setbacks,
but
the
other
side
we
do
not
height
wise.
We
just
get
there,
but
the
number
of
Stories
We
exceed,
of
course,
the
2.5
I'll
pause
there
and
I'm
chair
and
see.
If
there
any
questions
there
might
be
one
more
slide,
but
after
this
that
you
might
want
to
take
a
peek
at
but
nope,
that's
that
okay
I'll
stop
there
Hampshire
thank.
A
You
and
I
may
have
missed
this.
Is
this
a
homeownership
or
rentals.
BI
We
are
intending
to
do
homeownership
here
Condominiums.
Thank
you.
F
Madam,
chair
I
have
reviewed
the
plants.
I
have
no
questions.
It's
pretty
clear
you.
The
applicant,
has
made
some
concessions
from
previous
hearings,
so
I'm
happy
to
see
that.
J
BI
Sure
man
bash,
if
you
get
back
to
that
site
plan,
that's
way
in
the
beginning.
That
might
be
the
best
way
to
do
it.
BI
So
we
actually
exceed
the
required
number
of
parking
spaces,
because
it's
a
pre-existing
non-performing
on
this
Triple
Decker
we're
really
only
adding
five
additional
units
and
in
this
District
they
asked
for
1.25
for
each
new
additional.
So
that
would
that
would
put
us
at
6.25
but
we're
adding
eight
four
110-18
114..
So
those
eight
would
serve
that
building
and
it
would
it
would
be
deeded
according
to
whatever
Condominiums
docs
are
worked
out.
BI
118
would
preserve
two
parking
spaces,
but
again
that's
a
previous
non-conforming
building
and
in
fact
it's
a
Triple
Decker
which
doesn't
well.
That's
that's
irrelevant.
It's
it's
a
pretty.
It's
a
pre-existing
non-conforming
building,
so
We've
created,
but
none
of
them
has
created
two
parking
spaces:
ancillary
parking
spaces
for
118.
M
BI
Eight
parking
spots
for
eight
units
and
then
two
parking
space
for
the
Triple
Decker
where
none
existed
previously.
Okay,.
AU
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Bob
the
vehicle
BTD,
now
I
discussed
it's
a
parking
design,
the
Ross
and
the
adjustments
were
made
and
the
only
thing
one
record
to
approve
this
current
design.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
Mr
Hampton
has
left
so
I
will
I
will
read
his
recommendation
from
bpda,
which
is
approval
with
Proviso
that
plans
to
be
submitted
to
bpda
for
design
review.
AZ
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Ross
I'm,
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board,
the
applicant
has
successfully
completed
the
community
process
within
a
voters
meeting
on
November
17th
of
2020,
and
they
with
some
reservations
from
the
McCormick
civic
association.
They
passed
McCormick's
vote
as
well.
At
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
AH
AH
A
BG
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
McGovern
City
councilor
Frank
Baker's
office.
At
this
point,
we'd
like
to
hold
and
Reserve
our
support
of
this
project.
Although
we're
not
necessarily
against
the
project,
we
do
have
neighborhood
concerns
regarding
the
maintenance
and
good
Community
upkeep
of
this
applicant's
other
products,
other
properties
in
the
area.
So
at
this
point
we
would
like
to
reserve
our
our.
A
Okay,
with
that
may
I
have
a
motion
from
the
board.
C
C
N
J
Okay,
now
we
can
get
to
Woodville,
so
it
is
DOA
one
three,
three,
three
one:
zero,
two,
four
to
six
Woodville
Park,
the
applicant's
Derek
Hobson.
They
are
seeking
an
additional
dwelling
unit.
Conversion
from
two
to
four
in
an
existing
two
family,
duplex
basements
will
be
reconstructed
into
two
bed
Apartments.
J
Their
violations
include
use
regulations,
dimensional
regulations
for
the
law
area
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
More
area
ratio,
excessive
usable
open
space
and
sufficient
rare
yard,
insufficient
off-street
parking
insufficient
and
that's
what
we
have.
BJ
BJ
I'm
Derek
Hobson
and
this
renovation
consists
of
side
by
side,
firewalls,
upgraded
duplex,
I,
built
this
property
in
2013
and
are
looking
to
increase
the
living
area
of
this
project
of
this
building.
It's
a
three
out
of
5000.
The
proposed
Edition
will
not
increase
the
building's
exterior
footprint.
BJ
The
far
will
increase
from
0.9,
which
it
is
currently
to
1.1.
For
the
open
usable
space.
I
will
add
a
six
foot
by
40
foot
rear
deck.
It's
also
a
dead
inch
Street,
which
I
grew
up
on
myself,
where
the
kids
play
like
in
the
street.
There's
a
park
behind
the
the
street
on
Moreland
Street
I
have
the
real
yacht.
Minimum
is
30
30
feet.
I
have
roughly
22
feet,
which
lands
into
16
and
a
half
feet.
BJ
I
have
about
13
feet
in
width
by
32
feet
in
length
which
accommodates
tangent
parking
for
two
cars
on
each
side.
BJ
The
finished
height
in
there
from
the
ceiling
to
floor
would
be
seven
and
a
quarter
feet
and
this
building
that
I
had
since
2013
I've
been
predominantly
used
for
low
income.
So
if
I'm
able
to
add
these
units
here,
it
would
be
dedicated
to
low
income.
BJ
No,
so
when
how
I
came
up
with
the
idea
to
do
this,
project,
I
was
I.
Looked
and
I
saw
the
additional
dwelling
units.
So
I
initially
filed
this
application
as
an
Adu,
but
because
I
don't
live
there.
I
had
to
revise
it
to
occupancy
change,
which
I
ended
up
doing.
BD
BJ
All
of
it
is
100
low
income
now
and
if
I'm
able
to
do
it,
it
will
continue
to
be
100.
Low
income
I
have
Partnerships
with
Boston
Housing,
Quincy,
Housing
and
metro
housing
Boston,
so
any
property
that
I
own
is
low
income.
Thank
you
welcome.
AH
J
Good
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
Proviso
plan
submitted
to
the
bpda,
for
a
design
review,
with
attention
to
entry
and
egress
side
parking
and
curb
Cuts
in
the
rear.
Dormer.
A
BJ
J
Next
we
have
boa127-2203,
the
address
is
5
Parker
Street,
the
applicant
is
Yang
pay
G.
J
The
applicant
is
seeking
to
construct
a
three-story
Edition
to
the
left
of
the
existing
building
and
confirm
convert
an
existing
one
family
into
a
three
family.
The
violations
are
around
the
roof
structure,
restrictions
and
the
addition
is
changing
the
profile
of
the
existing
group
line.
As
a
note.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jeff
Drago,
with
Drago
and
Toscano,
with
a
business
address
of
11,
Beacon
Street
here
on
behalf
of
Yong
and
representing
5
Parker
Street
in
Charlestown.
This
is
a
rendering
that
we're
looking
at
if
the
project
was
to
be
completed
and,
as
was
mentioned,
we're
changing
the
occupancy
by
way
of
additions
from
a
one
family
to
a
three
unit.
Building
these
would
be
condo
units.
L
This
would
also
create
parking
at
the
first
floor,
first
level
of
the
building
or
in
lower
level,
as
it
would
go
down
through
the
slopes,
so
they
would
be
three
interior
parking
spaces
that
would
go
along
with
those
units
just
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide
quickly.
This
particular
district
is
a
3F
2000
and
our
lot
size
is
3100
28
square
feet.
Just
looking
at
the
composition,
the
building
directly
to
the
left
of
us
is
a
three
unit.
L
Building
to
the
right
of
us
is
a
one
most
of
the
buildings
up
Anonymous
quarter
are
either
two
or
three
and
all
of
our
the
units
proposed
both
of
them
all.
Three
of
them
are
three
three
bedroom
and
two
baths
just
to
go
over
the
layout
and
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
the
lower
next
slide,
please
I'm.
L
Sorry,
the
the
lower
level
is,
has
the
three
parking
spaces
in
it
and
you
can
see
that,
on
the
right
hand,
side
with
plenty
of
maneuverability
a
10-foot
maneuverability
area
in
that
parking
level,
then,
when
we
go
up
to
the
first
floor,
that
would
house
unit
one
and
that
would
be
a
three
bedroom
two
bath.
Thirteen
hundred
fifty
four
square
foot
unit
second
floor
would
house
unit
two:
that's
a
1410
square
foot,
three
bed,
two
bath
unit
and
then
the
third
floor
would
house
unit
3,
1427
square
foot,
three
bedroom
two
bath
unit.
L
If
we
go
to
the
next
couple
of
slides,
we
do
have
a
roof
deck,
we're
proposing.
That
would
be
exclusive
right
here.
It's
shown
on
the
left,
that's
4018
square
feet
and
there's
no
headhouses
accessed
by
a
hatch
that
is
exclusive
to
units
three.
We
have
managed
to
keep
this
building
almost
completely
zoning
compliant
there's
just
the
roof
structure,
restriction
violation,
and
that
is
due
to
the
fact
that
we
are
raising
the
roof
line
and
adding
that
roof
deck
on
top
I
can
pause
for
any
questions
that
the
board
may
have.
L
AH
AN
L
It's
10
a
10
foot
curve
cut
of
Miss
Barraza,
but
there
is
an
existing
curb
cut
now
on
the
left
side
that
we
are
that.
L
We
are
opening
a
new
one
in
the
middle
for
this
new.
The
new
parking
scheme.
G
One
quest
one
question
about
you
so
include
boxing
for
one
building
is
possible
default
building.
L
There's
only
one
building
proposed
Mrs
Stembridge
we're
keeping
the
existing
structure
and
then,
by
way
of
addition,
just
adding
thank.
P
A
Okay
and
I
will
read
bpd's
recommendation,
which
is
approval
with
Proviso
that
plans
to
be
submitted
to
bpda
for
design
review.
Drawing
set
is
incomplete
and
design
review
should
give
special
attention
to
front
yard
setback
in
relation
to
adjacent
structures
and
the
impact
of
the
project
on
the
public
Realm
with
that
I
will
take
public
testimony.
BK
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Sean
Marine
Charleston
liaison
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicants,
the
one
through
the
community
process
and
about
his
meeting,
was
held
on
November
15th.
BK
Our
office
received
no
letters
of
support
or
opposition.
So
with
that,
we
just
started
to
the
board.
C
N
J
Okay:
next,
we
have
boa
136
9296
for
131
Princeton,
Street
they're,
seeking
to
change
occupancy
from
a
two-family
dwelling
to
three
and
to
renovate
a
rear.
Edition
there
are
violations
include
the
East
Boston
iPod
The
Three
Families
is
forbidden.
Four
area
ratio
is
excessive
side
yard,
insufficient
roof
structure,
restrictions,
off-street
parking
is
insufficient.
The
height
is
excessive
in
terms
of
stories
and
feet
in
the
rear
yards
insufficient.
The
applicant
is
Avalar
Cola,
but
it
looks
like
Mr.
Drago
is
representing
them.
L
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jeff
Drago
at
dragon,
with
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
Beacon
Street
here
on
behalf
of
Apple
R
Cole,
and
we
also
have
Eric
zackerson
from
Context
design
who's
the
architect
with
us
today.
So
the
building
and
questioning
I
know
these
are
attached
similar
to
the
building
to
the
left.
Our
building
proposes
on
the
right
and
the
proposals
to
change
the
occupancy
to
actually
match
the
building
on
the
left.
L
So
it's
a
to
go
from
a
two-family
residential
building
to
a
three
family
residential
dwelling,
and
this
will
also
include
Renovations,
in
particular,
the
exterior,
and
also
to
erect
and
infill
the
rare
of
the
property
for
an
addition
carried
to
the
third
floor.
L
The
height
of
the
building
is
it's
three
stories
36
feet,
nine
inches
that
will
remain.
We
agreed
also
to
keep
as
we
worked
with
the
community.
The
mansard
roof
Design
This
is
in
historic,
Eagle,
Hill
and,
like
Ed
mentioned,
it
would
basically
mirror
the
building
to
the
left
interior
with
three
separate
floors.
L
The
bedroom
count
just
to
point
out
now
is
actually
because
it's
laid
out
as
a
two
family.
It's
got
a
six
bedroom
unit
and
then
it
has
a
three
bedroom
unit,
so
the
unit
count
would
actually
remain
the
same,
even
though
we're
proposing
to
add
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
to
a
three.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
side
slide,
please
I'm,
Madam
Ambassador.
L
This
is
just
our
survey.
It
shows
the
area
in
the
back
on
the
left,
where
the
addition
would
go.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide
and
then
we
get
into
the
the
plans
on
the
next
slide,
please,
and
so
the
the
plans
would
use
the
the
basement
level
as
a
duplex
unit,
and
so
that
would
help
as
a
media
room
office
and
laundry
area.
That
would
be
a
1765
square
foot,
three
bedroom.
L
That
would
connect
to
the
upper
level
of
the
first
floor
and
that
would
have
total
three
bedrooms
and
two
baths.
We
go
up
to
the
if
you
keep
going
through
the
slide
deck.
We
go
up
to
unit
two,
and
that
is
1110
square
foot,
three
bedroom
two
bath
and
then
finally
unit
three
would
be
a
thousand
seventy
five
three
bedroom,
two
bath
most
of
the
violations
are
pre-existing.
One
we
are
creating,
obviously,
is
use.
L
We
are
going
from
a
two,
a
two
or
three,
our
far,
our
site
side
yard,
that
that
is
remaining
the
same,
although
it
is
pre-existing
violations
that
were
triggered,
we
are
being
triggered
for
parking.
We
are
walking
distance
to
what
I
own
t
station,
but
we
are
not
because
we're
keeping
the
building.
We
can't
create
any
parking
on
this
site
and
then
because
we're
raising
up
that
level,
we
have
a
move
structure
restriction
as
well
as
I
had
mentioned
most
of
the
buildings.
L
That
immediate
area
are
three
unit
buildings,
including
the
one
we're
connected
to
and
to
the
right
of
us,
and
we
also
I,
know
submitted
letters
of
support
from
our
neighbors
as
well.
I
can
pause
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Mr
grego:
are
you
following
the
same
I
guess
format
as
your
adjacent
property?
Is
that
how
they're
achieving
the
three
units-
oh.
L
Yeah
their
units
are
smaller,
though,
because
we
are
adding
an
addition
and
part
of
the
back
area,
but
it's
going
to
have
the
same
layout
so
right
now,
as
opposed
to
having
you
know,
a
hodgepodge
of
six
bedroom
and
three
over
different
levels.
This
would
have
this
would
include
the
basement
and
then
each
level
would
be
separated
with
the
addition.
H
L
Foot
six
Mr
Langham
and
it's
only
additional
space,
so
it's
only
houses,
the
media
room
office
and
laundry.
There
are
no
bedrooms
now
on
that
base
basement.
Thank
you.
AC
A
Okay
pda's
recommendation
and
take
public
testimony.
Bpda
recommends
the
Nile
without
prejudice
proposal,
contemplates
an
addition
that
is
accessible
in
a
lot
area
coverage
and
reduces
usable
open
space.
Opponents
should
consider
a
project
that
allows
for
the
preservation
of
usable,
open
space
in
the
rear
yard.
With
that
may
I
take
public
testimony.
BA
BA
Those
who
supported
the
project
like
the
design
and
would
really
like
to
see
their
roof
line
be
kept
as
well
as
the
historic
preservation
of
the
eagle,
Hill
architectural
design
and
the
school
posts.
Express
concerns.
If
possible,
displacement.
Our
office
has
receipts
five
letters
of
support,
not
enough
position,
and
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
support
judgment
support.
Thank
you.
P
L
Yeah,
so
there
was
there,
there
were
two
tenants
that
were
in
the
building
didn't
come
to
the
meetings.
They
were
short-term
tenants,
but
they
just
wanted
to
ensure
that
we
were
not
causing
any
evictions
which
we
committed
to
on
the
record
at
Eagle
Hill
and
at
the
abutters
meeting,
and
just
if
I
may
address
I
know
there
was
a
comment
in
the
BPD
about
open
space.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
Is
there
any
other
testimony.
A
Okay
hearing
hearing,
none
may
I
have
a
motion.
P
A
C
A
J
Yes,
next
we
have
the
subcommittee
recommendations
of
the
first
one
is
BOA
136-3941
for
104-106
Trenton
Street
applicant
is
Trenton
Brooks
Corner
Realty
Trust
This
was
deferred
to
February
16th
2023
at
5,
00
PM
for
continued
Community
process,
and
then
the
next
is
BOA
139
1407
7
Armory
Street
applicants
Kevin
Joyce.
This
was
approved
with
the
PDA
design
interview
with
attention
to
the
Dormer
profile.
J
Next
is
BOA
1408249
for
eight
Armory
Street
applicant
is
Kevin
Joyce,
so
this
looks
like
they
are
companion
cases
approval
with
bpda,
with
attention
to
Dormer
profile.
Next
is
BOA
141758
for
101
Baldwin
Street
applicant
is
Sean
Tracy
approved
with
bpda
design
review,
with
attention
to
Dormer
size
profile
as
well
as
materials.
J
Next
boa
1396700,
140
Tremont
Street
applicant
10,
Temple
Place
LT,
just
approved
boa.
J
1405814-647
Boylston
Street
applicant
Anders
Kearns,
which
also
approved
boa
13493676,
Park
Lane,
applicant
Nathaniel,
Hafer
and
Tyrell
butt
approved
with
bpda
designer
View
and
then
boa
one,
three,
four,
four:
two:
nine
nine
three,
forty
nine
seven
Hill
Avenue
applicant,
Chelsea,
Blanchard,
so
I
think
this
was
denied
without
prejudice
with.
J
J
1370974-37830
Center
Street
applicant
Douglas
Salazar
approved
boa
1384419
22
Myrtle
Street
applicant
Michael,
judge
of
approved
with
bpda
design
review,
with
attention
to
the
design
of
the
proposed
dormant,
boa
138,
6357
56,
Boylston,
Street,
applicant
Jennifer
and
John
Kavanaugh
approved,
and
then
we
do
have
a
rediscussion
for
later
never
mind.
J
Oh
two:
more
okay
and
boa
133-5230-510
East
8th
Street
applicant
John
Drago
approved
with
bpda
design,
review
with
attention
and
Dormer
and
catch
the
Dormer
I'm,
guessing
no
roof
deck
and
a
boa.
BI
K
J
M
C
H
N
J
Voa109-4129-44011-4019
Washington
Street
applicant
Neil
volt.
This
is
an
article
80
project
they're
seeking
to
construct
a
new
mixed-use
property
property
will
be
19
residential
units,
a
daycare
and
a
retail
there's
on-site
parking
for
17
Vehicles
proposed
the
violations
include
off-street
parking
is
insufficient.
Traffic
visibility
across
corners
and
sufficient
for
dimensional
regulations
for
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Building
height
and
feet
in
number
of
stories
is
also
excessive.
A
BL
Is
the
applicant
available
yes,
good
morning,
good
afternoon,
Madam,
chair
and
good
morning,
good
afternoon,
members
of
the
board?
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Yes,
we
can.
Yes,
my
name
is
Jonathan
Gold
I
am
the
attorney
for
the
petition
around
the
developer
and
I'm.
My
office
is
at
873
Beacon
Street
in
Boston
with
me
today
is
Ronald
gold,
a
member
of
the
development
team
and
the
project
architect.
BL
Matt
Frankie
who's
here
can
be
responsive
to
any
questions
on
on
the
plans
that
you
that
that
I
cannot
answer
the
building
that
you're
is
being
proposed.
You
see
on
the
first
sheet
there
a
petitioner
proposes
to
raise
the
existing
single
story
structure,
that's
located
on
a
79,
105
square
foot,
lot,
the
corn
on
Washington,
Street
and
lescher
Street
and
replace
it
with
a
four-story
22
753
gross
Square
for
building
containing
19
homeownership
residential
units,
four
of
which
will
be
IDP
units.
BL
BL
My
parking
space
is
located
on
Washington
Street,
the
third
sheet,
which
I
believe
is
labeled
e
X1,
shows
the
existing
conditions
and
the
four
sheet
shows
the
Madam.
Ambassador
shows
the
post
conditions.
The
crotch
was
located
within
the
local
convenient
sub-district
multi-family
use
is
allowed
it's
on
the
Forest
Hills
Washington
Street,
a
transportation,
Corridor
short
walk
to
Washington
to
Washington
to
Roslindale,
Square
and
Forest
Hill
station.
BL
We
originally
filed
this
appeal
in
July
2020,
following
the
initial
refusal
ladder,
which
was
dated
June
6th,
we're
seeking
the
zoning
relief,
as,
as
secretary
stated
for
4
out
of
67
violations
that
you
see
on
November
7th
letter,
one
for
off
street
parking,
38
spaces
required
17
provided
floor
area
ratio
in
this
District
5.5
allowed
2.63
is,
is
proposed.
The
building
height
35
feet
allowed
43.5
feet
per
post,
hiding
stories
two
and
a
half
allowed
four
proposed.
BL
Oh,
we
believe
the
redesigned
drawings
have
addressed
the
corner
and
visibility
trafficked
by
Corner
visibility,
traffic
violation,
but
I'll
leave
that
to
Matt
frankly,
the
country
to
discuss
that.
If,
if
you
so
wishes,
I'd
like
to
give
just
some
brief
historical
context
to
this
proposal.
For
many
years,
this
location
was
the
home,
the
Plumbing
Specialties,
which
was
operated
by
Benjamin
Gold.
Who
happened
to
be
my
father
and
the
development's
father
who
served
the
plumbing
and
and
plumbing
supply
needs
of
the
greater
Roslindale
Community
for
over
40
years.
BL
Additionally,
until
about
a
year
ago,
the
premises
were
occupied,
the
portion
of
the
premises
were
released
by
little
people's
playhouse,
which
was
a
child
day
care
that
served
that
operated
here
since
the
until
the
beginning
of
the
mid
80s
until
until
recently,
and
that
use
was
very
important
to
Mr,
Gold
and
crying
to
his
death,
expressed
his
wish
that
this
use
or
similarly
use
continue
in
that,
if
possible,
and
we're
committed
to
doing
that.
BL
The
project
that
appears
before
you
today
represents
over
three
years
of
effort
working
with
the
Community
organized
Community,
organized
community
group,
private
meetings
with
the
bottoms
and
Community
groups,
conversations
with
with
Roslindale
residents
meetings
with
the
with
Casa
Royal's
office,
discussions
with
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
and,
and
we
feel
that
this
project
has
really
had
been
taken.
Full
advantage
of
the
public
participation
process.
BL
First,
introduction
to
the
neighborhood
back
in
January
of
2020
we're
working
on
the
project.
Well
before
that
in
2019
we
had
our
first
sit-down
meeting
with
City
officials,
including
the
bpda
in
March
of
2020,
who
the
articulating
process
resulted
in
two
public
meetings
in
August
of
2021
and
March
of
2022,
and
continue
to
have
ongoing
and
after
conversations
with
individual
members
of
the
community,
all
along.
As
you
know,
when
you'll
hear
the
bpda
was
born,
approved
the
project
in
July
of
2022
was
throughout
this.
BL
They're
not
as
we
I
stated
previously,
there
are
19
residential
units
on
Floors,
two
three
and
four
of
the
building
13
one
bedroom
units,
four
two
bedroom
units
and
two
Studio
units.
The
four
of
the
units,
the
ITP
and
cruise
share
units
represents
20
percent
of
the
total
number
of
residential
units
being
proposed.
Three
one-bedroom
units
at
80
IMI,
one
unit
at
90,
Ai
and
one
at
100,
Ami.
Now
there's
one
Studio
at
80.
This
project
has
a
10
private
decks,
six
on
Floors
two
and
three
four.
BL
On
the
fourth
floor,
two
of
the
ten
decks
are
reserved
for
the
IDP
units.
The
first
four
and
Basin
tenant
space
you'll,
see
on
the
sheep,
but
plan
a
100
and
a
101.
The
parking,
the
17
parking
spaces
are
located
on
the
first
floor
and
is
accessed
by
garage
entrance
on
Leicester
Street.
There's
an
existing
curb
cut
there
now
we'll
be
expanding
that
out
of
the
week
14
feet.
BL
But
again
the
apologize
map
will
be
able
to
speak
to
that,
if
necessary,
the
resident
parking
bicycle
parking
spaces,
excellent
on
Washington,
Street
and
again,
as
I
indicated,
the
post
and
repacking
it's
on.
Washington
Street,
it's
an
environmental
friendly
building.
We
have
an
all-electric,
no
fossil
fuel.
Building
very
unique
and
you'll
see
in
sheet.
A105
is
a
vegetative,
green
roof.
We
have
electric
cars
charging
stations
and
the
first
floor
for.
BL
Parking
is
a
recycling
Cent
station
for
residents
in
the
basement
level
broken
into
the
construction
action.
But
it's
all
going
to
be
green
about
high
energy,
efficient,
ovoc
super
insulator.
All
that
a
number
of
public
improvements
from
the
project
we
have
an
extended
sidewalk
at
the
corner
of
Washington
lashes
Street
will
be
constructed
with
a
race,
crosswalk
and
signals
with
new
tree
plantings.
Unless
you
Street,
Washington
Street,
a
number
of
community
benefits
been
a
private
small,
affordable
home
ownership
opportunities.
BL
We're
going
to
provide
those
four
IDP
units
to
be
a
financial
contribution
to
parks,
to
support
the
user.
Experience
that
he
we
feel
and
Arnold
Arboretum
Which
is
less
than
one
tenth
of
a
mile
away.
We'll
have
we'll
be
making
a
financial
contribution
to
positive
transportation
to
support
the
Boston
Bike
Share
program,
we're
committed
to
work
with
a
preschool
or
a
daycare
program.
BL
As
again,
this
use
was
very
important
to
Benjamin
Gold,
and
the
developer
has
at
least
a
little
discussions
at
some
time
been
in
discussions
with
the
Boston
outdoor
preschool
Network
and
hopes
to
reach
the
agreements
so
that
they
will
be
able
to
utilize
a
portion
of
the
of
the
first,
the
first
of
all
commercial
space,
the
reduced
parking
and
the
provision
for
bike
parking.
Again.
This
was
a
subject
that
we
discussed
and
came
up
with
the
community
and
the
bbda
and
field
was
a
reasonable
compromise.
BL
BL
35,
we're,
estimating
35,
temporary
construction
and
labor
jobs
will
be
will
be
resulting
from
this
particular
project.
The
lot
is
a
difficult
lot
and
it's
now
in
depth
and
has
some
significant
drainage
and
topographical
constraints,
and
so
and
given
that
we're
also
providing
these
affiliable
market
rate
grip
IDP,
when
it's
and
smaller
Market
ratings
a
proposal,
this
proposal
would
not
be
able
to
reduce
projects
size
without
actually,
you
know
and
be
able
to
provide
the
benefits.
BL
The
community
benefits
substantial
Community
benefits,
but
this
project
we
believe,
is
provided
at
this
time
we're
available
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
specific
to
the
plans
or
any
other
questions.
Certainly
the
community
might
have.
A
BL
BD
A
We'll
look
forward
to
hearing
from
you
later
then.
Are
there
questions
from
the
board.
M
BL
The
little
people's
playhouse
had
been.
BL
Indicated
this
was
a
use
that
was
a
that
was
Community,
Based
and
very
important
to
Mr
ball
to
continue
they
vacated
unexpectedly
a
year
or
a
year
and
a
half
ago.
It's
probably
you
know,
I
believe
it
was
right
around
covert
or
post
covert.
BL
They
had
been
there
since
I
know.
I
walked
on
a
lease
in
1985,
so
they
had
been
there
a
very
long
period
of
time,
and
so
we
would
sincerely
hope
and
we've
tried
to
sort
of
engage
and
we
will
engage.
Obviously
it
was
still
early
in
the
process,
but,
like
I
said,
we
have
been
talking
with
the
the
Boston
outdoor
Network
preschool
Network
program
and
hopeful
and
they've
been
a
supporter
of
our
project
and
hopeful
that
we'll
be
able
to
reach
some
kind
of
agreement.
BL
M
BL
M
Thank
you
finally,
for
the
four
and
four
dollar
units
that
you
are
proposing.
How
many
of
those
are
one
at
two
or
three
bedrooms,
or
what
is
the
layout
for
those
units.
T
BL
Two
on
the
second
floor,
one
of
them
is
563
square
feet.
It's
a
one
bedroom,
one
of
them,
not
the
second
one
is
I.
Think
it's
either
200
on
the
plans.
I,
don't
know
what
cheap
Matt,
but
she
does
that.
A
According
to
the
PDA,
I
can
tell
you
right
now
to
make
it
easier.
There
are
two
units
on
the
second
floor
and
two
units
on
the
third,
a
studio
and
three
one
bedrooms
and
the
studio
is
the
563
square
feet
at
eight
and
eighty
percent
Ami,
the
one
bedrooms
range
from
681
to
seven
sorry,
625
to
765
square
feet
and
us
80
190
Ami.
F
BL
F
And
then,
in
terms
of
your
your
roof
deck,
it
might
have
been
asked
already.
I
know
it's
not
a
roof
deck,
it's
a
kind
of
a
cold
roof,
a
vegetative
roof
in
in
potentially
have
you
considered
if
there
was
to
have
if
there
was
to
be
a
daycare
center
on
the
ground
floor
and
you
wanted
to
in
the
future,
provide
open
space
for
that
use,
and
can
your
project
take
on
a
future
open,
verse
deck
based
on
the
two
cores
that
you
have.
F
And
I
think
that's
right,
because
there's
always
there's
always
this
balance
with
parking
and
open
space
right
and
I
really
and
I
really
commend
your.
You
know
kind
of
the
Outreach
and
your
proposal
for
the
community
to
to
understand
that
there
are
a
couple
of
daycare
centers
along
Washington
Street,
and
so
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
great
use,
and
so
the
question
is,
you
know:
how
do
you
design
an
ecological
building
that
considers
potential
change
of
use
in
the
future,
for
what
the
community
needs
are
so
I
just
want
to?
F
The
other
thing
is,
you
know
when
we
another
I,
commend
you
as
well
for
thinking
about
affordability
and
a
lot
of
projects
that
are
in
front
of
us.
Is,
you
know,
claims
that
you,
you
can't
accommodate
parking
because
it
it
it's
very
expensive,
and
so
you
know
how.
How
did
you
you
know?
How
did
you
make
it
financially
possible
to
provide
affordability,
reduce
parking
potential,
Community
use
and
provide
housing?
F
You
know
that
that's
something
that
is
going
to
be
in
front
of
our
board
as
a
new
board
and
so
I'm
just
you
know,
I
would
just
love
like
an
Insight
on
that.
Well,.
BL
BL
F
BL
J
Chair
I
have
a
question:
how
is
the
parking
allocated
between
the
residential
uses
and
the
commercial.
BL
Well,
that
secretary,
the
the
the
presently
these
are
residential
spaces.
We
haven't
made
any
provision
for
the
commercial
space.
However,
they
will,
the
spaces
will
not
will
be
decoupled
in
the
sense
that
they
will
not
be
sold
with
you,
and
there
was
some
unit
purchasers
who
will
not
want
those
spaces
and
they
will
be
allocated
through
the
condominium
documents
to
unit
owners
or
certainly
conceivable,
that
being
a
commercial
leader
in
order
that
there
may
be
spaces
or
the
one
space
tooth
whatever
that
get
allocated.
BL
AH
J
Thank
you,
and
so
with
the
daycare
use.
There's
a
lot
of
specifics
with
that
use
like
pick
up
and
drop
off
and
various
you
know
activities
is.
Was
there
any
thought
given
to
those
who
are
picking
up
and
dropping
off
their
child
in
a
vehicle,
and
you
know
how
will
that
work
with
attention
and
safety,
and
things
like
that.
BL
Well,
it's
obviously
being
having
first-hand
experience,
because
I
worked
at
that
plumbing
shop
during
their
occupancy.
I
would
say
that
that
it
was
always
certainly
they
were.
There
were
always
staff
members
carefully
who
were
outside
on
Washington
Street.
You
know
making
sure
that
those
safe
don't
know
that
entry
and
exit
from
their
vehicles
was
safe.
BL
I
understand
that,
certainly
we're
going
to
have
to
do
some
additional
when
working
with
the
with
the
tenants
there'll
have
to
be
some
additional
procedures
and
methods
and
procedures
in
place
in
order
to
make
that
both
effective
and
also
safe
for
me,
and
that
that
is
a
challenge
but
I,
don't
think
one
that
we
can
surmount
I
think
that
we
can
certainly
take
care
of
them.
Katie.
F
That's
a
really
interesting
question
because
you
were
one
is
assuming:
that
is
a
resource
for
the
community
and
what
I
thought
was
commendable
is
that
this
building
has
a
residential
structure,
also
houses
that
need
within
its
residents.
So
you
know,
I
was
assuming
because
you're
right
like
this
does
not
work
if
it's
a
daycare
or
a
center
for
the
outside
vicinity,
but
it
is
a
potential
resource
for
the
families
that
are
living
in
this
building.
F
You
know
to
be
able
to
just
go,
you
know,
go
downstairs
or
take
the
elevator
I,
don't
think
there's
an
elevator
here,
but
just
you
know
there
is
an
elevator.
Yes,
okay,
perfect!
You
know,
I
thought
it
was
really
servicing
the
residents
of
the
building,
so
you
necessarily
did
not
need
vehicles
to
use
that.
But
it's
a
really
great
question.
Well,.
A
As
someone
who
has
has
a
is,
has
a
child
in
child
care?
It
is
a
legitimate
question
because
not
everyone
is
able
to
walk
and
not
everybody
lives
there
so
hope
you
will
just
look
into
some
possibility
of
you
know:
15
minute
drop
or
pick
off
pick
up
drop
off
or
something
like
that
to
accommodate
any
other
excuses.
BD
From
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood,
Services
I
attended
this
meeting
just
to
be
an
onlooker
I
received
some
letters
of
support
and
opposition
I
believe
they
should
have
been
sent
someone
from
BPD
simply
to
me
as
well,
so
that
would
be
about.
BD
Let
me
see
14
letters
of
opposition
and
seven
letters
of
support
from
the
letters
you
can
see.
There
are
some
concerns
about
the
parking
spaces
and
the
amount
of
affordable
housing.
At
this
moment,
the
city
of
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
BD
Yeah,
so,
no
so
with
with
the
community
process
for
bpda,
my
office
does
not
hold
those.
We
just
attend
to
take
note
of
what's
going
on,
so
they
probably
report
back
to
the
zoning
board.
AN
AH
A
Okay
hearing
none
I
will
seek
entertain
a
motion
from
the
board.
F
V
A
P
J
138-63978
Rowena
Street
and
the
applicant
is
seeking
to
change
occupancy
from
two
to
three
family,
and
this
includes
converting
the
basement
into
a
third
unit.
Their
violations
consist
of
off-street
parking,
insufficient.
The
three
family
detached
dwelling
is
forbidden
in
the
four
area
ratio
is
excessive
in
the
applicant
is
Eric
krasowski.
A
BM
BM
BM
I
just
got
it,
thank
you,
but
could
my
brother
Evan
be
at
it
as
well.
A
Okay,
it's
a
long
day
for
all
of
us
if
you
could
walk
us
through
the
violations
and
your
proposal.
That
would
be
great.
Thank
you.
BM
Okay,
so
we
are
proposing
a
occupancy
change
from
a
three
a
two
to
three
unit
building
with
the
additional
unit
being
in
the
basement
as
a
two-bedroom
one
bathroom
unit,
we
have
the
kitchen
and
common
living
on
the
right
and
the
bedrooms
and
bath
on
the
left
side
of
the
unit
car
ceiling,
Heights
about
nine
feet.
Yeah.
It
should
result
in
a
pretty
spacious
finished
product
that
won't
feel
too
much
like
a
basement.
BM
BM
If
you're
able
to
scroll
down,
we
designed
it
to
match
the
Dormer
on
the
third
floor
of
the
building
with
a
hip
roof
just
to
keep
the
design
congruent,
and
we
have
two
full
walkout
doors
as
egresses
in
the
unit
and
an
egress
window,
and
one
bedroom
and
a
full
egress
walk
out
door
to
the
rear
of
the
property
and
the
other
I
think
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
add
housing
to
the
neighborhood
and
happy
to
answer
any
other
questions.
A
AV
Yes,
Phantom
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
defer
judgment
to
this
board
some
background
information
on
the
community
process,
our
office
hosting
a
Butters
meeting
on
September
26th,
where
there
were
some
concerns
expressed
for
guiding,
it
seems
to
be
an
egress
issue
and
I
understand
that
they've
been
before
to
the
board
and
were
deferred
with
that
I
would
defer
adjustment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
A
A
N
X
W
J
All
right
next,
we
have
boa
one.
Three,
three,
eight
five
one
four
address:
six
bling
Street
applicant
Rufus
pop
the
applicant
is
Seeking
a
proposed
driveway,
curb
cut
and
off
street
parking
for
two
vehicles.
The
violations
include
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses.
The
off
street
parking
design
and
maneuverability
of
the
off-sheet
parking
does
not
provide
vehicle
impact
protection
for
a
budding
property
at
Fourth,
Lang,
Street
I
think
this
was
a
referral
from
the
subcommittee.
A
Yes,
that
is
correct,
is
Mr
Fox.
Oh.
AO
Yes,
hi
good
afternoon,
oh
Dawn,
just
a
second
to
start
video.
V
A
I
AO
You,
yes,
yes,
I
have
yes,
my
name
is
Rufus
Phelps
senior
I
I
live
at
sixth
Wing
Street
Roxbury.
AO
Let's
see
my
wife
and
I
have
owned
and
occupied
this
single
family
home
for
last
28
years.
The
main
street
is
a
dead
end.
Street
parking
is
on
one
side
of
the
street,
let's
see
so
to
answer
some
of
the
things
we
covered
in
our
last
meeting
in
regards
to
parking
in
the
front
yard,
including
included
a
drawing
that
shows
that
there
is
a
11.5
foot
space
from
the
front
yard
to
that
very
first
car
there
and
at
the
second
car.
AO
Let's
see,
let
me
just
go
through
okay
and
the
the
the
rear
of
the
building
extends
30
feet.
Beyond
that
rare
corner,
you
see
there
to
the
backyard.
AO
Let's
see
that
would
hopefully
we'll
provide
I
believe
it
will
provide
the
necessary
accessibility
to
loading
and
unloading.
That
sort
of
thing
well,
I
I've
received
the
support
of
my
neighbor
at
number
four
and
my
other
neighbors
in
regards
to
any
Dimensions
or
problems
or
questions
you
may
have.
But
hopefully
you
know
if
you
have
any
questions.
You're
welcome
to
to
discuss.
A
All
right,
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
you,
for
we
had
some
different
questions
and
Mr
buff
has,
you
know,
has
endeavored
to
address
those
questions
with
us,
so
we
do
appreciate
it.
He's
a
measured
he's,
measured
the
width
to
help
us
as
well
just
for
context.
We
also
did
ask
already
about
on
street
parking
and
whether
or
not
there
could
be
residential
parking
in
case
anyone
was
going
to
ask
and
listening
is
not
doing
that
right
now.
So
that
is
not
an
option.
A
I
just
wanted
to
say
all
that,
and
because
we
do
have
new
board
members
who
may
have
right
similar
questions
that
we
had
already
you
know
covered
was
that
do
we
have
any
other
questions?
Any
questions
from
the
board.
P
A
Does
anyone
I
I
know
only
hanzi's
from
the
subcommittee
with
me?
If
you
have
anything,
you
want
to
add.
A
You're
on
mute,
if
you're
trying
to
speak,
oh
okay,
then
I'm
gonna
ask
Bob
Bob
race,
this
hand
to
me:
go
from
BTD.
AU
Yes,
Madam
chair
and
the
members
of
the
book
of
the
Miko
BTD
eight
feet
is
kind
of
tight
and
since
it's
residential,
you
know
we
can
push
the
limit
on
on
that
one.
If
it
was
commercial,
it
could
not
be
accepted,
but
is
there
any
way
these
two
vehicles
can
be
put
toward
the
rear,
so
there'll
be
more
maneuverability
I'm,
just
a
little
nervous
at
the
lack
of
and
and
at
the
length,
because
you
need
funny
feet
from
the
front
of
the
house.
AU
Now
when
I
see
the
front
I
don't
mean
the
curve
I
mean
from
where
the
part
of
the
house
begins
back.
You
need
40
feet,
so
I
don't
know
if
the
applicant
can
satisfy
that
requirement,
but
I'd
like
to
ask
him
if
if
he
could
do
so.
AO
Yes,
yes,
the
the
distance
from
what
you
see
there,
as
on
the
left
side
of
the
property,
extends
30
feet
to
the
backyard.
That's
all
yard
area
directly,
North
or
but
towards
the
top
of
the
design.
F
Answer
Bob's
question:
I'm,
really
glad
Bob
that
that
you
asked
that
question
because
you
know
I
I,
really
appreciate
that
you
got
your
Butters
support,
but
you
never
know
if
you're
a
butter
of
my
move
or
sell-
and
you
know
let's
say,
there's
a
fence
which
was
my
original
concern
put
up.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
you
have
enough
clearance
at
the
rear
that
you
have.
When
the
you
know.
You
have
space
to
open
your
car
door
or
anything
like
that.
So
I'm
glad
Bob
asked
that
question.
J
A
Right
well
again,
Mr
folk
I
want
to
thank
you
for
taking
our
questions
and
feedback
under
consideration
in
our
previous
hearings
and
and
putting
forward
updated
plans
Etc.
So
with
that,
may
I
have
a
motion.
F
Madam
chair
I
like
to
perform
a
motion
of
approval
with
a
Proviso
that
Mr
Funk
also
provides
10
feet
of
clearance
behind
his
property,
like
behind
his
building.
A
F
It's
basically
providing
what
Bob
was
requesting,
which
is
almost
like
a
40
feet.
Drive
aisle,
you
know
from
the
front
of
the
property.
D
Just
to
make
sure
just
send
it
to
bpda
for
like
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
attempt
like
the
driveway,
extends
at
least
10
feet
beyond
the
rear
house.
F
I,
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
sent
to
bpda
or
BTD
and
let's
Bob
request,
is
it
I.
J
1330550-37
Jenkins
Street,
the
applicant
is
badamesh
Carol.
They
are
seeking
to
change
the
use
from
a
single
to
a
two
family.
There
are
violations
include
the
floor
area
ratios
excessive
Building
height,
excessive
Open
Spaces,
insufficient.
J
BN
Applicant
on
Adam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Ryan
Spitz,
with
Alexander
Morenci
business
address
of
168,
8th
Street
first
floor
South
Boston
with
me
here
today
is
Fatima
Carroll,
who
is
the
owner
as
well
as
the
architect
Shane
losey
from
chewing
company,
as
this
was
a
subcommittee
hearing
that
was
heard
on
the
19th
and
it
was
recommended
by
Miss
betta
Peraza
to
to
have
a
further
discussion
with
BTD
and
have
this
deferred
in
which
we
did
have
that
discussion
with
Mr
Bob
D'amico,
which
I'm
sure
you'll
hear
from
him
later
and
then
I
will
I'll
get
to
the
parking
scheme
when
we
go
through
the
plans.
BN
That's
great
that
you
have
this
drawing
now.
If
we
could
keep
this
slide
up
here
for
a
few
minutes,
that
would
be
great.
So
this
is
a
proposal
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
single
family
to
a
two
family
with
ground
floor
parking
for
two
vehicles
by
way
of
renovation
and
an
addition,
The
Proposal
is
actually
located
within
L1
zoning
sub
District,
which
is
from
the
old
base
coat
of
South
Boston.
We
currently
have
four
violations.
Far
1.0
is
allowed.
The
proposal
we're
calling
for
is
a
1.79,
the
rear
yard
violation.
BN
The
existing
backyard
has
a
deck
that
fills
the
entire
dimension
of
the
yard.
The
new
proposal
will
now
allow
for
some
green
space
in
the
rear,
under
the
shallow
log
reduction
when
less
than
100
feet
deep,
it
would
require
the
proposal
to
provide
12.5
feet
under
Section
20-8,
and
this
plan
proposes
a
red
yacht
setback
of
exactly
12.5
feet.
So
I
believe
this
violation
was
due
in
error.
The
next
violation
was
the
building
height.
What
is
compliant
is
35
feet
three
stories
and
we're
proposing
39.75
feet
in
four
stories.
BN
We
also
have
a
usable
open
space
violation.
400
square
feet
is
what
is
compliant,
and
the
proposal
calls
for
264
square
feet
in
the
original
plans
going
through
the
community
process.
We
did
have
open
space
with
decks,
although
we're
factored
into
the
plans,
but
due
to
the
neighbor
concerns,
we
removed
those
tax
which
triggered
the
open
space
violation
and
now
I
just
want
to
call
to
your
attention
to
the
to
the
screen
to
the
the
plan
that
we
have
brought
up.
BN
As
you
can
see
here
where
the
red
marker
is,
that
is
the
that
is
the
proposal
in
question.
That
is
the
parcel.
You
can
see
that
there
are
a
ton
of
other
properties
here
that
that
have
significant
Heights
other
than
what
we're
proposing
something
that
I
did
raise
during
the
first
initial
meeting
that
we
had
was
that
again,
this
is
the
old
base
zoning
code,
most
the
South
Boston,
is
actually
zoned
down
to
article
68.
BN
Quite
frankly,
90
to
95
percent
of
Jenkins
street
is
governed
by
article
68,
and
if
we
were
subject
to
article
68,
we
would
have
been
zoning
compliant
under
what
we're
requesting
here.
So
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
and
bring
that
to
your
attention.
If
now,
if
I
can
focus
your
attention
on
page
six
of
the
drawings.
BN
So
this
this
this
page
I'm
going
to
start
off
with
the
ground
floor.
It's
consisting
of
garage
to
park
two
vehicles
which
will
be
accessed
by
a
new
proposed
10
foot,
wide,
curb
cut.
This
is
here
in
question,
so
the
first
original,
if
you
scroll,
no,
this
isn't
the
actual
floor
plan
for
it.
I'm.
Sorry,
maybe
I
gave
you
the
wrong
page.
There's
a
there's
a
page.
Can
you
just
scroll
back
on
the
page?
Please?
Yes,
that's
it
there.
We
go
yep,
perfect,
okay!
BN
So
this
this
again,
this
is
the
ground
floor
level,
which
will
consist
a
garage
to
park
two
vehicles
which
will
be
accessed
by
a
new
proposed
10
foot,
wide,
curb
cut.
So
the
original
plans
that
were
presented
to
the
subcommittee
have
the
two
parking
spaces
with
which
is
one
is
eight
foot
by
six
inches
wide
20
21
feet
long
and
then
the
second
one
is
seven
feet
wide
by
18
feet
long.
Those
two
original
parking
spaces
were
side
by
side.
BN
There
was
no
spacing
in
between
them,
as
you
can
see
from
the
new
proposed
drawings
after
discussions
with
Mr
D'amico
from
the
Transportation
Department,
he
recommended
that
we'd
slide
that
right
hand
space
over
to
provide
a
separation
between
the
two
spaces.
BN
We
have
approximately
about
three
feet
in
between
those
two
spaces,
also
in
the
rear
of
the
garage
you'll
notice
that
we
have
designated
the
area
for
a
trash
storage
where
the
trash
compact
is
also
on
this
ground
floor
level,
all
walkways
will
be
heated
to
assist
with
the
snow
melting
going
scrolling
over
to
the
next
to
keep
and
continuing
on
this
slide
here
unit.
One
layout
plan
is
approximately
913
square
feet,
which
will
consist
of
the
second
floor.
Two
bedroom
unit
catching
in
the
living
area,
will
be
included
as
well.
BN
Unit
two
is
approximately
1635
square
feet,
which
will
consist
of
the
third
and
the
fourth
floors,
which
will
be
a
three
bedroom
with
a
study
in
a
family
room
also
kitchening
living
room
within
there.
Our
roof
plan
consists
of
solely
solar
ready
zones,
so
that
sums
up
our
presentation
I'm
happy
to
open
it
up
at
this
point.
In
time
for
any
questions.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
I
know,
Mr
D'amico
is
on
so
if
you
could
weigh
in
on
the
parking
issue
and
maneuverability
issue,
that
would
be
great.
AU
Yes,
Madam
chair
and
in
the
members
of
the
board
Bob
the
Miko
BTD
Mr
Spitz
has
made
the
adjustments
that
I
requested
and
it
worked
fine
at
like
one
record,
that's
part
of
the
snowfall.
Thank
you
thank.
A
You,
who
is
better
browser
any
questions
on
the
plans.
F
Madam
chair,
the
drawings
are
adequate,
is
I,
I
would
have
I
would
imagine
that
to
remove
the
trash
you
just
have
to
do
it
through.
You
have
to
take
the
trash
all
the
way
inside
the
enclosed
garage,
correct
and
travel
60
feet
to
the
front.
Yes,.
BN
F
BN
F
AO
F
AE
AE
P
BO
A
F
AV
AV
The
applicant
then
went
on
to
meet
with
the
Andrew
Square
civic
association,
who
expressed
concerns
regarding
the
hype.
What
they
thought
was
an
inadequate
parking
ratio
and
concerns
they
felt
there
was
not
enough
open
space
involved
with
the
project.
They
voted
to
a
post
and
I
believe
who
forwarded
a
letter
in
opposition
from
that
group
to
this
board
after
we
deferred
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
AW
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
recurring
support
based
on
author
of
community
process
and
good
faced
compromises
by
the
proponents
with
the
neighbors,
including
front
and
rear
fourth
floor
decks
removed,
as
well
as
the
additions
of
a
roof
plan
with
smaller
Renaissance
trash
compactor
I
hit
a
walkway
to
help
with
the
snow
removal
and
a
security
camera
to
the
front
of
the
building
council.
President
Selena
knowledge
is
outstanding
concerns
from
Neighbors
and
respectfully
requests
that
the
proponent
continue
to
engage
the
community
on
quality
of
life
issues
during
the
construction
phase.
Thank
you.
AK
I
AK
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Paul
Solomon
city
council
at
large
Michael
Flaherty,
echoing
the
sentiments
of
councilor
Flynn's
office,
as
well
as
recognizing
the
community
life
of
the
women
to
the
drafting
of
the
articles,
article
13.,
the
Council
on
record
and
support
due
to
the
the
robust
Community
process,
acknowledging
that
there
still
are
some
outstanding
issues.
But
would
it
would
ask
the
proponent
to
work
with
the?
What
is
the
neighbors?
Thank
you
thank.
AQ
AQ
A
A
I'm
sorry
bpda
recommends
the
Nile
without
prejudice.
Proposal
is
excessive,
address,
ground
floor
parking,
maneuverability
and
element
I'm
guessing.
The
second
part
was
already
addressed
with
Bob,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
Jeff
would
have
a
different
opinion.
BN
Madam
chair
can
I
can
I
respond
to
that
as
well
too
briefly,
yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
before
what
I
spoke
about,
that
over
90
of
the
street
is
governed
by
article
68,
if,
if
for
some
reason,
when
they
rezone
South
Boston
back
in
2016,
what
this
parcel
was
was
not
added
into
article
68,
it's
very
it's
the
first
house
in
off
of
will
Colony
Avenue,
which
is
a
major
thoroughfare.
BN
The
surrounding
buildings,
Heights
are
very
excessive
to
this
one
we
feel
that'll
be
a
recent
fit
and
again
it
was
Article.
68
would
have
been
a
Sony
complying
product,
I.
A
Understood
but
I'm
guessing
Jeff
would
say
it's
not
so
with
that
I
mean
I,
entertain
the
motion
from
the
board.
F
I
like
to
put
for
emotion
of
approval
with
a
bpda
design
review
and
also
which
is
kind
of
request,
that
the
applicant
keeps
the
adjacent,
abutters
and
constant
Communication
in
terms
of
the
construction
process
and
to
ensure
that
the
modification
summaries
of
921
22
are
also
met,
which
seems
like
it
came
from
the
community
process.
V
N
J
They
are
seeking
to
construct
a
new
six-story,
33
multi-family
residential
building
with
four
shell
ground
floor,
local
retail
and
restaurants
for
the
plants
they're
combining
parcels
and
demoing
and
existing
one-story
building
their
violations
include
g-cod
applicability,
the
use
for
the
three
restaurants,
dimensional
regulations
far
exceeds
3.0
Max,
the
usable
open
space,
the
rear
yard,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
off-street
parking
and
loading
requirements.
BO
You
could
just
enlarge
this
screen
a
little
bit
for
context
of
the
photo
just
to
orient
the
board
members,
so
the
large
building
on
the
left,
of
course,
is
the
holy
cross
Cathedral
on
Washington
Street
in
the
South
End,
and
this
property
is
directly
across
the
street
from
the
Holy
Cross
Cathedral.
Currently,
the
one
story
low
rise,
so
it's
basically
a
giant
missing
tooth
in
this
block
of
Washington
Street,
with
the
six-story
kind
of
building
on
the
right
and
the
existing
five-story
building.
But
it's
the
same
proposed
height
on
the
left.
BO
The
proposed
project
that
is
under
consideration
today
is
the
darker
facade.
Building
that
is
inserted
in
between
the
two
existing
buildings
and
I
would
just
like
to
note
that,
because
of
its
location
in
the
South,
End
Landmark
district,
and
also
in
conjunction
with
our
article
80
small
project
review
process
of
the
bpda,
the
building,
iteration
and
design
has
gone
through
extensive
process.
BO
We
have
three
advisory
review
hearings
with
the
southern
landmarks
commission
and,
ultimately,
a
fourth
hearing
at
which
the
South
End
landmarks
commission
approved
the
design
of
the
building
and
the
materiality
in
large
part,
with
details,
of
course,
subject
to
ongoing
South
End
Landmark
design,
Proviso.
So
much
work
and
effort
went
into
what
this
building
looks
like
and
what
it
is
given
its
very
important
location
right
across
from
the
Holy
Cross
Cathedral.
BO
So
again
the
existing
low-rise
one
story
is
demolished.
The
new
building
will
be
six
stories
with
33
residential
units
on
the
upper
floors.
With
the
ground
floor
remaining,
it's
currently
shown
as
three
different
spaces.
It
could
end
up
one
large
space
or
or
three
spaces
with
a
proposal
that
it
be
retail
and
or
restaurant.
BO
The
bpda
board
considered
and
approved
this
project
on
March
10
of
2022,
with
33
units
and
four
IDP
units,
given
this
constraints
of
the
site
and
the
location
of
Washington
Street,
with
the
two
budding
side
streets
that
end
on
Washington
Street,
there's
no
rear
alley
behind
this
building,
unlike
many
of
the
other
streets
in
the
South
End.
So
there's
no
way
to
get
behind
this
building.
There's
a
small
alley
behind
the
building
between
this
building
and
the
Greek
Orthodox
Church
directly
behind
us.
But
it's
not
it's
just
a
pedestrian-sized
alley.
BO
So
there's
no
no
way
to
get
cars
into
or
under
this
building
such
that
this
proposal
is
a
zero
parking
proposal,
but
that
is
done
with
reference
to
its
location,
a
proximity
to
do
the
orange
line.
On
the
one
hand,
the
Red
Line
stop
across
on
the
South
Boston
side.
Washington
Street,
of
course,
is
host
to
the
silver
line,
bus
line
and
there's
also
the
number
eight
bus
and
the
number
10
bus.
BO
So,
in
light
of
its
location
and
its
Transportation
access,
the
bpda
did
approve
this
as
a
zero
parking
building
with
parking
for
34
bicycles.
As
as
an
alternate
for
the
residents
again,
the
One-Stop
process
was
complete
in
March
of
2022.
After
about
nine
months
of
community
meetings,
public
meetings
meeting
with
bpda
staff
Architects
to
design
the
building,
we
then
had
our
final
Southern
landmarks
commission
hearing
on
May
9
2022,
and
that
resulted
in
approval
of
the
design
of
the
building
next
slide.
BO
BO
This
shows
the
parcels
as
combined
you'll
note
across
the
front
of
the
building,
there's
sort
of
a
zigzag
pattern
in
and
out
that
was
a
result
of
bpda
design
suggestions
because
of
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
and
a
desire
to
enlarge
the
sidewalk
and
reduce
the
pinch
points
given
the
location
of
Street
trees
and
accessibility
issues.
So
the
front
lower
floor
of
the
garage
sort
of
zigzags
in
and
out
in
response
to
the
request
for
public
realm
enhancements
next
slide.
P
BP
So
this
is
Rob
from
Embark
studio,
so
this
is
a
section
through
the
building,
on
the
right
hand,
side,
pictured,
Washington,
Street
again
the
building
is
six
stories
and
he
knows
on
the
top
floor,
there's
a
significant
setback
from
the
major
facade
of
the
building
which,
as
we
look
at
some
of
the
embodied
photographs
of
the
neighboring
building,
you'll,
see
that
that
gesture
is
emulated
there
as
well.
BP
P
BP
Is
the
site
pictured
in
between
the
two
party
walls
of
both
1387
and
1407
Washington
Street?
The
building
circled
in
blue
will
come
down
to
the
ground,
we'll
build
new
UPS
there.
The
building
pictured
on
the
right.
The
brick
ends
around
the
fifth
floor
of
that
building.
So
that's
where
our
setback
occurs
in
the
proposed
building
to
respect
the
massing
of
that
building.
BP
Next
slide,
please,
the
ground
typical
floor
plan
is
the
plant-basing
plans
and
the
last
first
floor
plan
again
showing
that
correlated
ground
floor
storefront
condition
on
the
right.
The
building
is
subject
to
the
groundwater
issues,
as
well
as
the
flood
issues,
which
is
why
all
the
residential
related
spaces
on
the
ground
floor
are
raised
up
by
that
five
or
six
steps
that
you
see
at
the
back
of
the
buildings
that
includes
the
electric
room,
the
mail
room
and
the
package
room.
Those
three
buildings
needed
to
be
out
above
that
floodplain
elevation.
BP
BP
Next
page.
This
is
a
roof
plan.
There
is
a
roof
deck
plan
for
the
roof
of
the
building
and
again,
as
that,
stair
became
an
open-air
stair.
On
the
left-hand
side,
we've
now
created
just
a
guard
rail
wall
assembly
to
allow
even
more
light
and
air
to
penetrate
down
the
building.
The
roof
deck
is
only
used
by
the
residents.
None
of
the
commercial
uses
on
the
ground
floor
would
have
access
to
it.
It's
just
for
the
residents
of
the
building.
BO
And
Madam
chair:
do
you
want
me
to
go
over
the
zoning
issues
in
or
just
respond
to
questions.
I
A
M
BO
I
think
the
old
refused
the
letter
as
initial
proposed.
There
were
35
units,
but
that
was
when
there
was
an
additional
floor
in
the
building
that
came
off
prior
to
the
bpda
process.
So
it's
33
units
in
addition
to
the
four
IDP
units
designated
and
approved
by
the
bpda
board.
It
was
a
decimal
point
edition
of
0.29,
and
that
is
the
110
000
contribution
payable
to
the
IDP
Special
Reserve
fund
and
that's
also
expressed
in
board.
Memo
is
part
of
the
Project's
satisfaction
for
ID
requirements.
M
BO
The
Proposal
is
accepted
to
the
December
2015
IDP
policy,
which
is
currently
in
effect.
13
plus.
The
contribution
to
the
fund
was
deemed
to
satisfy
the
existing
IDP
policy.
M
BO
They
had
owned
the
property
for
many
many
many
decades
so
probably
have
a
cost
basis
close
to
zero,
whereas
this
conflict,
you
know,
has
a
very
different
land
cost
basis
and
land
cost,
of
course,
is
one
of
the
basic
component
drivers
of
the
economics
of
any
any
project,
so
I
think
just
an
observation.
That's
probably
a
significant
difference
between
what
somebody
who's
owned
property
for
50
years
can
be
versus
a
more
recent
acquisition.
F
Didn't
answer
it
so
I?
Thank
you
for
that.
I
have
I,
have
a
question
regarding
the
windows.
The
section
here
shows
one
two,
three
four
windows
that
are
existing
correct
and
your
solution.
The
architect
solution
is
to
pretty
much
keep
it
kind
of
an
open,
shaft,
correct.
BP
Yeah,
that's
right.
The
next
page
of
the
actual
show
like
everybody,
the
four
windows
will
be
equipped
with
a
fire
shutter.
F
I
F
Of
reviewed,
and
was
this
a
solution
in
coordination
with
ISD?
How
you
know
with
are
the
neighbors
supporting
that
solution?
Are
you
going
to
be
required
to
come
back
and
and
request
a
building
code
relief?
You.
F
Yeah
I'm,
sorry
I'm.
Sorry,
madam
chair,
for
intervening
here
but
I
think
we're
still
in
the
questioning
phase:
correct,
okay,
great!
So
Mark.
Can
you
please
can
you
respond
to
that?
Okay,
thanks.
AL
BO
There
are
four
windows
in
the
party
wall
at
1411
and
it
is
an
existing
condition
and
the
deed
and
registry
documents
indicate
that
the
windows
are
in
the
party
wall
between
the
two
properties,
which
means
you
know.
The
party
wall
is
owned
to
the
center
line
of
the
party
wall
by
both
both
sides
of
the
property,
but
nevertheless
the
windows
are
there.
So
initially
we
explored
proposals
which
included
closure
of
those
windows
and
moving
them
to
a
different
location
within
the
building
next
door,
which
has
two
existing
light.
BO
Wells,
it's
an
older
building
with
very
unique
interior
Courtyard
light
Wells.
So
we
explored
that
for
many
many
months
with
both
sides,
Architects
Engineers,
to
see
if
that
would
be
a
workable
solution.
Ultimately,
it
was
determined
that
that
was
not
an
optimal
solution,
though
in
response
to
further
requests
from
the
trustees
of
the
building
next
door.
The
request
was
to
create
this
notch
in
the
building.
BO
If
we
could
go
to
the
last
slide,
it
will
depict
the
condition
of
this
interior
stairway
interior
to
the
new
building,
but
exterior
in
the
sense
that
it's
open
at
the
top.
So
it's
like
a
giant
light
well,
essentially
mimicking
the
existing
light,
Wells
of
the
building
next
door,
that
houses
windows
for
bathrooms
and
kitchens
and
other
rooms
within
some
of
the
units
next
door.
So
it
was
reviewed
by
ISD.
BO
The
most
recent
set
of
plans
and
Ambassador
can
we
go
to
the
very
last
slide.
Is
this
the
last
slide
in
the
session?
Okay?
There?
It
is
so
there's
the
cut
side
cut
of
the
proposed.
You
can
see
the
one
two
three
four
windows
in
the
building
next
door,
and
this
will
be
the
staircase
that
is
essentially
creating
a
light
well
by
a
virtue
of
cutting
into
the
new
building,
to
create
this
new
condition
and
Rob.
If
you
want
to
add
anything.
BP
BO
It's
part
of
yes,
it's
part
of
the
set
that
was
reviewed
by
Cheryl
Odom
January,
26
2023,
which
includes
sheet
a301
and
the
proposed
stairway,
and
no
no
building
code
relief
letter
was.
G
Just
one
I'm
just
curious
on
the
first
floor
there
will
be
will
be
commercial
space.
Yes,
you
have
a
preference,
or
will
that
just
be
left.
That's
about
proportions.
Basically,.
BO
So,
as
shown
in
the
plans
Mr
Sandbridge,
there
are
three
separate
spaces,
which
is
the
current
configuration
there's
South
End
Pizza,
which
is
co-owned
by
Peter
and
georgantis
one
of
the
developer
here
and
then
there
are
two
vacant
spaces
that
were
victims
of
covid
by
and
large,
so
it
will
either
be
three
retail
restaurant
spaces.
The
pizza
place
is
coming
back
so
that
that
will
be.
BO
That
will
be
one
and
then
the
other
two
will
either
be
one
large
space
or
two
smaller
ones:
retail,
a
restaurant
consistent
with
you
know
that
stretch
of
Washington
Street
and
the
programming
that
Washington
Gateway
Main
Street
advocates
for
that
Corridor,
which
is
street
level
retail
with
residential
up
above.
O
A
U
A
E
Hi
good
afternoon,
email
and
chair
members
of
the
board
came
through
silly
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood.
Services
is
projecting
through
a
bpda
process
which
addressed
all
concerns
about
Earth,
and
it
did
extensive
community
outreach
as
well
as
worked
with
a
Butters
who
had
questions
or
concerns
regarding
the
windows
on
the
budding
buildings.
This
has
received
no
opposition
and
there's
proposal
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
AB
AW
Good
afternoon
members
of
the
war
I'm
a
Calderon
from
Council
president
Link's
office.
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
recurring
support
based
on
a
patrol
Community
process.
The
project
will
also
bring
much
needed,
IDP,
affordable
units
to
the
area
that
will
provide
chances
for
Working
Families
to
remain
in
Boston.
Thank
you.
W
BQ
My
name
is
Sean
parsigan
MD
I'm
at
1411,
Washington,
Street,
Building
and
I
live
in
the
2B
apartment,
which
has
a
window
on
this
project.
So
pretty
much
you
know
we
don't
have
the
window
situation
approved
by
our
building
or
by
the
four
owners.
Currently
you
know,
I
have
a
sunlight
and
fresh
air
coming.
BR
Hi,
my
name
is
Vincent
grenice
I
reside
at
1387,
Washington
Street
right
next,
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
development
and
I
just
had
a
question,
a
couple
questions
about
the
time
frame,
construction,
time
frame
and
just
what
what
mitigation
is
being
put
in
place
for
us
as
residents
next
door?
What's
you
know,
what's
it
going
to
look
like
on
Washington
Street?
BR
What
type
of
activity
are
we
going
to
have,
and
you
know,
construction
activity,
what
the
overall
duration
of
the
project
is
and
then
what
all's
being
done
about
pest
control
so.
BO
You
yes,
in
order
to
obtain
the
building
permit,
we
will
have
to
have
a
construction
management
plan
approved
by
Boston
transportation
department.
Vincent,
we're
happy
to
circulate
that
to
you.
We
have
a
draft
of
a
comprehensive
construction
management
plan.
That's
been
prepared
by
Howard
Stein
Hudson,
which
you
know
is
an
engineering
firm
that
prepares
such
plans.
We
will
have
emergency
contact
information,
you'll
have
phone
numbers
for
our
project
manager,
you'll
have
Peter's
phone
number,
perhaps
Peter
georgantis,
who
is
in
the
neighborhood.
A
lot,
has
other
properties
and
lives
nearby
as
well.
BO
So
there
will
be
a
full
construction
management
plan
with
full
emergency
access
information
available.
All
the
time
running,
control
is
subject
to
review
and
approval
of
our
plan
by
the
community
sanitation
department
at
ISD,
which
is
also
another
prerequisite
to
obtaining
a
building
permanence.
So
those
will
all
be
fully
same
place
and
we're
happy
to
provide
those
to
the
the
trustees
and
the
unit
owners
at
1387
Washington
as
well.
A
All
right,
thank
you
any
is
that
already
signed
for
this
project.
BE
BE
Next
door,
one
407-1411
to
the
left
of
this
construction,
so
I
represent
the
Board
of
Trustees
on
this
project.
We've
been
in
touch
and
engaged
with
the
developer
for
over
a
year
now
to
come
to
a
plan
regarding
these
windows
that
are
going
to
be
effectively
blocked.
We
did
receive
a
new
set
of
plans
on
Friday,
but
have
not
yet
had
an
opportunity
to
pass
those
on
to
our
vendors
for
review
of
them
on
on
our
end
of
the
project.
BE
So
we
do
appreciate
those
came
in,
but
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
fully
vet
them.
That
being
said,
we
have
some
concerns
and
we
want
to
to
confirm
that
that
will
address
the
code,
issues
that
were
raised
relative
to
the
use
of
the
stairwell.
If
it
will
be
approved,
we'd
ask
that
a
provider
will
be
entered,
that
it
may
only
be
used
for
emergency
use
only
given
as
it
will,
but
Windows
looking
directly
into
living
space.
We
don't
want
residents
to
be
able
to
access
that
large
roof
deck
from
this
staircase.
F
That
that
gets
answered
by
the
applicant,
whether
whether
the
residents
would
need
that
second
piece
of
egress
to
access
the
roof.
BO
Yeah
I'll
start
by
confirming
everything
that
Cameron
said:
we've
been
working
closely
with
Council
and
I
believe
that
we
have
a
good
working
relationship
and
made
a
commitment
earlier
today
to
continue
that
relationship.
Notwithstanding
whatever
happens
here
today,
there
are
ongoing
design
details
that
need
to
be
worked
out
concerning
the
handrail
and
the
guardrail
of
the
stairwells
and
there's
a
comprehensive,
a
better
agreement
that
my
client
has
pretty
much
agreed
to
everything
in
the
butter
agreement
has
actually
signed
the
agreement,
so
we're
very
close
and
and
I
think
Cameron
would
agree
with
that.
BO
I
BR
Chair
this
is
Vincent
Bernice
again
I'm
about
I
just
had
a
question:
what
is
the
construction
duration
or
the
planned
construction
duration
for
the
entire
project?.
A
A
BO
Okay
and
on
on
that
score,
bbda
design
review
is
not
indicated,
because
this
is
stuff
and
landmarks,
and
we've
already
received
review
and
approval
of
the
landmarks
commission
for
the
design
of
the
building.
After
four
hearings.
C
V
A
AS
AS
Today
we
are
here
we
leave
to
legalize
the
14
by
14,
roof
deck
spiral,
staircase
and
head
house
at
this
location,
two
violations
that
we
have
on
this
Boston
iPod
and
the
group
structure
restrictions
you
can
scroll
down.
That's
fine
thanks,
Ambassador
you'll
see
an
aerial
view
of
the
roof
deck
and
the.
AS
The
head
house
and
the
spiral
staircase,
if
you
scroll
down
one
more
or
two
more,
keep
going
it's
accompanied
by
a
three
unit.
Building
the
roof
deck
is
one
of
the
use
of
unit
3.
Only
so
the
third
photo
unit
only
I
just
put
that
a
little
bit
more
see
if
it
shows
the
roof
deck
is
set
back
and
it's
not
visible
from
Maverick
Street
at
all.
AS
It
goes
to
the
25
foot,
height
regulation
and
the
two
buildings
on
the
side
of
us
are
one
story
above
our
building,
and
so
it
does
not
show
from
from
Maverick
Street.
Let's
go
down
a
little
bit
more
once
again
go
down,
try
to
see
if
we
get
the
street
slow
down
a
little
bit
more.
AS
Some
couple
more
I
think
you
can
see
that
it's
not
visible
from
average,
but
any
in
any
event.
Again
that
is,
is
already
constructed
and
again
it's
not
visible
for
the
street
is
I.
Don't
think
this
plan
is
showing
the
outside
pictures
or
pictures
from
the
street
view
I'm,
showing
that
there
to
buildings.
Aside
from
us
on
both
targets,.
AS
AS
H
AS
Yeah
there
are,
as
a
number
of
buildings
in
this
area
have
been
renovated,
mixed
up.
R
Yeah,
how
about
anything
like
you
know,
a
budding
or
you
know,
quotes
and
close
proximity,
I'm
kind
of
asking
I.
AS
Am
not
sure
but
I
take
the
building.
Next
to
us
is
a
I
think
it's
like
a
six
or
eight
unit
building
and
I
think
that
one
has
effects
as
well,
but
I'm,
not
sure.
AZ
A
And
I
think
the
the
it's
it's
not
visible
from
the
street
correct,
that's
correct!
It's
not
visible
from
the
street.
Thank
you
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
Okay,
with
with
and
I,
know,
you're
gonna
ask
me.
So
let
me
offer
bpda's
recommendation
is
approval
with
Proviso
that
plans
to
be
submitted
to
bpda
for
design
review
approval
head
house
to
be
eliminated,
access
to
roof
to
be
provided
via
hatch
with
that,
let
me
take
public
testimony.
AV
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Conor
Newman
with
the
mayor
of
South
neighborhood
services
at
this
time,
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
Our
office
element
Butters
meeting
in
March
2022
nobody's
wearing
attendance,
the
association
yeah
excuse
me.
The
applicant
met
with
the
Gove
Street
citizens
Association
multiple
times
to
discuss
the
roof
deck.
Ultimately,
they
voted
to
be
in
support
of
The
Proposal
with
60
members
in
support,
not
in
opposition.
AV
AV
Sorry
I'm
just
kind
of
passing
through
we
also
mentioned
they
would
not
like
to
see
the
current
owner
being
penalized
for
this
era
with
that
we
refer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board.
Thank
you.
All.
A
You
with
that
may
I
have
a
motion
quote.
A
AW
A
Thank
you!
The
chair
votes,
yes,
and
just
to
confirm.
That's
without
a
head
house,
correct,
Mr,
small.
AS
AA
AS
J
Yeah
all
right.
Next,
we
have
VOA
one
three,
two:
seven,
seven,
eight
six
for
107
Marion,
Street
they're,
seeking
to
change
occupancy
from
three
to
four
family.
With
a
new
basement
unit,
they're
renovating
the
existing
building
erecting
a
new
three-story
rare
debt.
Their
violations
include
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use,
non-conforming
use
change
off
street
parking,
insufficient
of
the
use
and
the
basement
unit
are
both
forbidden.
East,
Boston,
iPod,
applicability,
roof
structure,
restrictions,
floor
area
ratio,
excessive
height,
is
excessive,
with
stories
and
feet,
side
yard
insufficient
and
the
applicant
is
Dario
Carvajal.
L
L
We
also
have
David
Choi
who's,
the
architect
on
the
proposal,
as
was
mentioned,
the
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
and
we're
looking
at
the
existing
conditions
of
the
building
from
a
three
unit
building
to
a
four
unit
and
to
create
a
basement
around
level
space,
and
you
can
see
that
that's
raised
above
on
the
front,
so
that's
exposed
with
a
very
steep
grade
change
as
you
go
back.
L
The
this
will
also
include
renovations
to
the
exterior
property
which
should
badly
needs,
and
then
decks
in
the
back
are
really
small
Decks
that
are
also
going
to
be
used
as
egress
stairs
as
well.
Currently,
all
the
units
do
have
a
second
means
of
egress.
This
would
be
an
additional
piece
of
egress
as
well.
This
building
will
also
be
fully
sprinklered
and
brought
up
to
Life
Safety
standards
as
well.
The
lot
size
is
3
000
square
feet,
and
just
this
is,
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
please.
L
This
is
just
an
aerial
view
for
precedence,
so
it's
a
multi-family
all
around
us.
There
are
some
twos,
but
you
can
see
the
new
building
off
to
the
rear
and
then
my
client
has
the
parking
lot
that
is
used
for
the
tenants.
So
all
of
those
spaces
are
used
solely
for
this
building
for
parking,
Broad
Street
parking,
the
just
the
layout.
If
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
Sorry
next
slide
after
this
Justin
thanks,
sorry
and
one
one
more.
L
Three
of
the
units
are
existing,
but
this
round
level
we're
calling
unit
four
would
be
at
983
square
foot,
two
bedroom
two
bath:
it
has
eight
foot
sailing,
Heights,
Florida
ceiling,
height,
two
full
means
an
egress
one
through
the
front
of
the
building
and
then
one
to
the
side,
and
it
also
will
contain
egress
windows
as
well.
L
We
go
up
to
the
first
floor
that
houses
our
main
entrance
and
houses
unit,
one
which
is
a
926
square
foot
existing
two
bed
one
bath
and
that
would
have
the
rear
deck
of
egress
next
slides.
Please.
L
We
then
go
up
to
the
second
floor,
which
is
a
thousand
square
foot
three
bedroom
one
bath,
that's
existing
with
the
deck
and
stairwell
rare
and
then
the
third
floor
would
be
a
one
thousand
square
foot
same
three
bedroom
one
bath
with
the
rear,
stairwell
deck
just
to
go
over
the
violations
that
were
mentioned.
So
many
of
these
are
pre-existing,
but
obviously
use
so
going
for
that
fourth
baseman
unit
we
would
need
use
variances
far,
which
is
a
pre-existing
violation,
but
because
we're
adding
in
on
the
space
at
that
basement
level.
L
That
would
increase
the
far
to
1.5,
nothing,
changes
on
the
side
yard
or
the
height.
And
again
we
have
the
lot
for
parking,
so
that
would
also
have
plenty
of
space
for
the
new
unit
inside
as
well.
We
were
mistakenly
cited
for
Earth's
structural
restriction,
so
there's
nothing
changing
to
the
roof.
There's
no
roof
that
proposed
no
level
being
added.
The
only
addition
would
be
those
rare
decks
and
the
stairwells
in
the
back
around
us
just
for
contacts,
there's
new
building,
seven
units
on
Lexington,
Street,
that's
right
right
or
to
the
side
of
us.
L
There's
four
units
at
87,
Lexington,
four
to
six
on
Princeton
127
Marions,
the
Barnes
large-scale
condo
complex
directly
adjacent
across
the
street
I
can
pause
for
any
questions
that
the
board
may
have.
J
Yes,
Madam,
chair,
I,
just
want
to
sort
of
understand.
You
know
make
sure
that
route
structure
restriction-
you
know,
is
a
mistake.
Do
you
have
a
root
plan
we
could
see?
Was
there
something.
L
Again,
if
you
keep
going
down
Jessica
we'll
get
into
elevations
and
then
you'll
just
see
the
top
of
the
building
one
more
slide
so
right
here.
C
J
L
Not
proposing
any
any
structure
at
all.
L
It
could
be
from
the
deck
in
the
rear,
yeah
your
deck,
that
they
reference.
That
could
be
it.
Okay,.
L
No
head
house
no
roof
structure
on
top
or
anything.
L
A
It's
a
long
day,
okay!
Well,
let
me
read
bpda's
recommendation
and
then
open
it
up
for
Testimony
BPD
recommends
approval
with
Proviso
that
plans
be
submitted
to
BPD
for
design
review,
with
special
attention
to
the
proposed
rare
deck.
AV
Yes,
Phantom
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor
shops,
Neighborhood
Services,
but
this
time
the
mayor's
office
like
deferred
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board,
some
background
information,
the
community
process,
our
office
hosting
a
Butters
meeting
in
May
of
2022,
two
of
otters,
joined
the
meeting
and
voiced
concerns
regarding
what
they
perceived
as
privacy
concerns
around
the
rear
decks
with
the
applicant
promising
to
work
with
them
on
looking
into
materials.
That
would
address
some
of
those
concerns.
AV
The
applicant
then
went
on
to
the
association,
the
Civic
group
for
that
area,
which
is
the
eagle
Hill
civic
association
meeting
with
them
twice,
and
the
group
voted
to
support
this
proposal
in
September
of
2022.
With
that
we
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board
I'm
sorry,
we
did
receive
one
letter
of
opposition
which
I
believe
we
forwarded
over
to
you
guys
thanks.
AV
A
Okay
was
that
may
I
have
a
motion.
C
AW
J
But
not
least,
we
have
boa
1392663
437
Chelsea
Street
applicant
rakia
as
gravy
they
are
seeking
to
raise
the
existing
structure
erect
a
four
unit
residential
dwelling
with
a
roof
deck.
The
violations
include
the
height
being
excessive,
the
rear
yard,
insufficient
more
area
ratio,
excessive
off-street
parking
insufficient
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
applicability.
T
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
and
yes,
it's
been
a
long
day,
so
I
will
try
to
be
as
brief,
but
as
thyroid
as
possible
for
the
record.
It's
Richard
Lynn's
245,
Senator,
Street,
East
Boston
I
mean
half
of
the
petitioner
with
respect
to
the
property
of
437
Chelsea.
If
we
could
jump
ahead
perhaps
to
slide.
T
This
is
probably
a
good
place
to
start
so
Madam
chair
what
we're
proposing,
as
you
can
see
here,
they're
actually
we're
identifying
439
child
support
groups,
the
last
building
on
Chelsea
Street,
as
you
head
out
of
East
Boston
towards
Chelsea.
Our
building
is
one
building
in
from
that,
and
the
reason
why
439
is
identified
is
that
the
board
had
recently
approved
a
similar
project,
almost
like
the
exact
same
layout
and
size
of
a
four-story
four
unit,
building
at
that
site
at
439.
we're
back
before
the
board,
simply
because
this
should
have
went.
T
At
the
same
time,
however,
we
had
to
re-noticed
this
for
some
issues
in
the
public
notice,
so
we
I
hear
on
our
re-hearing,
so
we
jump
over
to
slide.
Nine
that'll
show
us
probably
the
context
of
what
we're
proposing
with
what
has
already
been
approved
at
at
the
site,
so
that
should
be
Slide
by
thing.
P
T
We
go
perfect,
okay,
so,
on
the
left
side
you
do
see
439
Chelsea
and
then
the
octopus
building
at
437
is
being
rendered
as
well
and
witnessed.
Eric
zackerson
is
a
project
architect.
This
property
is
located
in
the
neighborhood
shopping
district,
even
though
you
do
see
a
number
of
residential
units-
and
this
is
somewhat
of
a
transitional
area,
because
the
site
immediately
to
our
last
to
the
left
of
439
is
a
maritime
economic,
Reserve
District.
Now
you
do
see
a
large
vacant
lot
there.
T
The
zoning
actually
permits
Heights
of
up
to
55
feet
at
higher
density.
For
that
that
lot
adjoining
our
lot,
our
lot
being
in
the
neighborhood
shopping
district
actually
permits
a
multi-family
use,
so
the
four
units
we
are
proposing
is
allowed.
Currently
under
Eiffel
53..
There
is
no
minimum
lot
size.
Although
we
do
have
1626
square
feet,
it
is
relatively
consistent
with
most
of
the
Lots
in
that
area.
We
do
have
a
lot
width
of
25
feet
again,
no
specific
requirement
for
any
lot
width
or
side
yards
step
back.
We
do
set
our
building
back.
T
On
the
left
hand,
side
for
three
and
a
half
feet
which
allows
for
unprotected
openings
and
windows.
We
do
set
our
properties
at
the
lot
line.
On
the
right
side,
we
did
have
conversations
with
the
butter
to
our
right
there.
As
you
can
see
in
the
picture
here,
there
is
some
conversation
and
plans
for
him
to
redevelop
his
site
as
well
that
building
that
sits
on
the
line.
T
435
Chelsea
Street
is
in
need
of
a
little
bit
of
TLC
and
he
is
looking
at
an
option
as
well,
so
we
had
actually
worked
out
the
understanding
that
we
would
set
our
building
at
the
lot
line
and
certainly
support
any
efforts
he
may
have
in
the
future
to
set
this
building
at
the
lot
line
as
well
to
the
left
side,
we
do
have
our
modal
setback,
which
is
consistent
with
what
we
have
on
that
section
of
Chelsea
Street,
and
we
do
have
a
Florida
year
ratio
3.35,
which
right
now
currently
under
the
neighborhood
shopping
district,
is
a
1.0
allowance.
T
I
would
point
out
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
approved
project
for
our
left.
There
is
an
also
additional
proof
project
on
Saratoga
Street
to
our
rear.
That
is
also
four
stories
of
four
unit.
Residential
Building,
as
well
with
respect
to
parking
this
site
does
not
propose
to
have
any
parking.
The
immediate
vicinity
around
this
section
of
Eagle
Square
does
not
have
a
huge
parking
issue,
there's
generally
plenty
of
on-street
parking
in
this
area.
There
are
not
a
lot
of
residential
uses
as
you
go
beyond
our
site
as
you
advance
down
Chelsea
Street.
That's
simply.
T
The
industrial
uses
that
we
see
with
fuel
tanks
and
those
other
industrial
facilities
that
have
their
own
off
street
parking.
The
height
of
our
building
is
proposed
that
the
general
height
of
the
buildings
are
42
feet.
You
do
see
a
head
house
that
is
proposed
and
I'll.
Let
Eric
zackerson
discuss
why
we're
incorporating
that
to
the
height
of
that
is
actually
52
feet,
but
the
bulk
of
our
building
sits
at
42
and
is
in
line
with
the
building
immediately
to
its
left,
which
is
previously
approved
other
than
that
with
respect
to
the
layout.
T
If
we
want
to
jump
ahead
on
the
slides,
we
can
go
to
slide
12,
which
shows
the
floor
plans.
We
are
proposing
this
to
be
slab
on
grade.
There
is
no
basement
that's
being
proposed,
however.
We
do
show
our
first
level,
which
would
be
accessible
as
a
approximately
800,
some
odd
square
feet
below
880
square
feet.
These.
T
The
upper
level
units
are
a
little
bit
larger,
with
the
top
level
unit
being
about
a
thousand
six
square
feet
and
also
being
a
two
bedroom
Eric.
If
you
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
we
proposed
the
head
house
the
way
we
did
with
respect
to
the
roof
Tech
I
did
there
would
be
helpful
since
we
typically
don't
incorporate
a
head
outs.
U
Yeah,
thank
you,
Rich
understanding
that
that
the
head
house
is
not
I
the
ideal
situation.
In
most
cases,
the
project.
This
project
is
on
a
relatively
short
law
and
therefore
the
back
stair
was
something
that
we
we
realized.
We
wanted
to
enclose
or
need
to
enclose,
because
it's
only
three
feet
from
the
rear
property
line
and
in
looking
at
how
to
create
a
little
bit
of
open
space
for
that
top
unit.
U
We
contemplated
either
extending
the
front
stair,
which
is
very
close
to
the
front
of
the
building
or
the
rear
stair,
and
in
order
to
be
in
doing
that,
we'd
be
able
to
kind
of
keep
these
these
two
bedrooms
function.
U
As
you
can
see,
there
isn't
a
ton
of
extra
space
in
there
to
squeeze
a
different
staircase
in,
and
so
we
were
left
with
the
decision
to
either
extend
the
front
stair
and
have
a
hatch
very
close
to
the
front
of
the
property
or
extend
the
rear
stair,
but
the
rear
stair
is
enclosed
because
it's
so
close
to
the
property
lines
on
the
right
and
on
the
on
the
rear.
U
So,
in
this
case,
we
we
elected
to
to
extend
the
rear
stair
up
rather
than
have
something
more
visible
on
the
front
of
the
product
project
and
still
have
be
able
to
have
that
that
roof
deck
space
some
open
space
for
the
project.
U
U
Eric,
did
you
design,
439,
okay,
put
the
same
client.
You
did.
U
U
I
mean
I
I
would
like
to
ask
Jeff
Hampton
some
questions,
but
he's
not
he's
not
here
and
in
regards
to
this
neighborhood
and,
and
so,
if
it
was
up
to
me,
I
would
say
or
I
would
recommend
to
defer
to
allow
for
bpda
to
review
the
project
but
to
get
on
the
next.
You
know
the
next
month
hearing
just
because
I
think
that
some
of
my
concerns
are.
U
You
know
in
terms
of
like
development,
if,
if
we
have
a
radio
Corner
precedent,
that
is
for
story,
we
we
approve
this
project.
You
know
again
with
very
similar
character
of
the
one
that
just
previously
got
approved.
I
don't
have
any
reference
to
that
project.
U
To
does
that
then
allow
the
same
type
of
Lee
away
to
do
four
stories.
Moving
forward,
you
know
so
I,
just
I
just
would
love
to
get
a
little
bit
more
context
from
bpda,
because
we're
looking
only
specifically
at
this
project
but
I
need
to
kind
of
just
because
you
began
to
reference
the
building
next
to
it
so
I,
you
know
it.
It
allows
for
that
kind
of
conversation,
I'm,
sorry
yep,
so
that
I'm
just
talking
out
loud
to
in
conversation
with
my
board
members,
there's
no
there's
no
vote
yet
yeah
yeah.
U
So
so
that's
my
opinion,
but
you
you
guys,
can
put
forward
emotions
as
well.
Mr
Lynn's
also
just
add
to
that
remind
us
why
you're
here
for
the
rediscussion
sure
so,
and
and
thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
in
response
to
this
better
bras.
It's
very
very
good
point
about.
You
know
the
BPD
not
having
their
recommendation.
U
We
originally
presented
439,
which
is
the
building
immediately
to
our
left,
I,
believe
that
was
in
November,
and
we
were
anticipating
because
we
have
these
on
the
same
track
to
have
this
presented
at
the
same
time.
Obviously,
for
purposes
of
you
know
demonstrating
to
the
board
that
this
work,
these
were
similar
our
sites
or
similar
projects.
The
bpda
did
recommend
approval
on
the
439
project.
I
believe
that
is
in
your
records.
U
I.
Don't
know
why
they
didn't
make
a
recommendation
on
this
project.
However
I
don't
believe
I
think
they
review
it
once
and
I'm,
not
necessarily
sure
they'll
go
back
and
review
it
again.
So
my
only
concern
is
if
we
requested
the
bpda
go
back
and
review
this
again,
they
may
not.
They
may
not
do
that,
I'm,
not
sure
their
policy
yeah.
That's
why
I
that's
why
I
would
pick
a
forward
motion
to
defer
to
provide
BPD
to
review
the
project
unless
Tom
can
also
give
me
Tom.
U
Can
you
provide
me
with
a
decision
from
439
in
terms
of
Provisions
that
were
put
on
the
project?
Yes,
Miss
Peraza,
let
me
just
I
think
it
said
so.
Why
don't?
We
continue
with
any
other
questions
as
Tom
looks
it
up.
I
I
did
have
one
other
point.
U
Madam
chair
if
I
may
and
I
know
we're
late
in
the
day
is
part
of
planning's
Boston
I
believe
this
is
and
our
targeted
to
nr4,
because
it
is
Boulevard
or
squares
with
with
some
of
the
recommendations
that
are
being
put
forth
for
new
zoning
in
East
Boston
and
that
does
recognize
increased
height
and
increased
density.
So
four
stories
is
from
what
I
understand
the
norm
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
the
recommendation
was
made
for
439
Chelsea
to
allow
for
the
fourth
story.
U
That's
one
of
the
reasons
why
we're
you
know
I
think,
but
for
the
fact
that
we
were,
you
know,
delayed
because
of
the
notice
issue.
We
would
have
heard
these
in
tandem
at
the
same
time,
and
perhaps
that
recommendation
was,
you
know,
shed
some
light
on
this
project
as
well,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
make
that
clear
for
the
record.
Thank
you.
We
can
also
see,
hopefully
see
if
on
us,
can
shed
some
light
on
on
the
public
process
to
community
process.
Are
there
other
questions
from
the
board
miss
peroza?
U
U
And
that
was,
and
the
bpda
provided
a
recommendation
for
approval
for
story
for
that
project.
Correct
it's
possible
I'd
have
to
look
at
the
actual
physical
file
which
I
don't
have.
U
Sorry
go
ahead,
thank
you,
I'm,
just
looking
at
the
Google
Map
the
satellite
picture,
and
it
seems
that
part
of
the
neighborhood
is
here
in
Seattle,
but
also
across
the
project.
There
are
oil
tanks.
There
is
also
a
highway
in
the
area,
so
I
don't
think
that
the
impact
of
this
project
will
create
on
the
neighborhood
will
be
as
big
as
the
oil
oil
tanks
in
the
highway.
That
is
right
behind
that
block
they're.
U
Looking
at
the
context,
because
we
didn't
have
like
a
better
site
plan
showing
their
Bowlers
like
we're
just
looking
at
that,
and
that
is
what
I
was
thinking
correct.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
That's
helpful
context,
yeah
and
through
the
chair,
this
is
located
directly
across
from
an
industrial
site
which
is
a
fish
processing
facility
which
is
located
across
the
square
as
well.
So
it's
a
relatively
industrial
area
that
is
seeing
some
renewed
interest
for
residential
or
new
residential,
and
these
are
your
rate
housing.
That
is
correct.
U
Thank
you.
Yes,
this
area
looks
fairly
sparse
and
Industrial
from
where
I'm
looking
may
I
take
public
testimony.
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
this
board
some
background
information
on
the
community
process,
so
our
office
element
Butters
meeting
on
August
of
2022
Noah
Butters
we're
in
attendance.
As
you
heard
from
the
applicants,
the
area
is
quite
industrial.
U
The
applicant
went
on
to
meet
with
the
local
neighborhood
association,
the
eagle
Hill
civic
association
meeting
with
them
twice.
The
association
voted
to
oppose
with
10
residents
in
opposition
and
eight
in
favor.
The
association
asked
the
developer
to
commit
to
planting
trees
in
front
of
the
property,
if
possible
in
the
event
that
they
are
approved.
With
that
we
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
Manchester
I
have
no
hands
raised
at
the
moment.
Okay,
any
other
questions
before
we
entertain
a
motion.
U
U
Who's
better
Braza,
yes,
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Mr
Valencia.
Yes,
we
will
yes
Mr
Langham,
yes,
ma'am
all
right,
Mr
Stembridge,
yes,
indeed.
Thank
you.
The
chair
votes,
yes
motion
carries.
May
I
ask
the
board
members
to
stay
for
a
few
minutes.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
thank
you
for
your
time
today.
Thank
you,
Sherry,
just
a
heads
up,
there
is
someone
who
needs
to
occupy
the
room
with
some
of
the
board.
Members
are
at
four
o'clock.
Okay,
this
will
be
quick.
This
will
be
okay,
perfect
super
duper
fast
below.
U
It
was
one
recognized
me,
but
I
want
to
know
what
you
all
know.
I
spoke
with,
recording
stopped.
The
recording
has
stopped
moving
on
to
a
different
role
with
the
city
starting
you
know
next
week,
but
there
will
also
be
around
don't
tell
me
that
oh
come
on.