►
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
Part 2: https://youtu.be/13Nz5bY-mDA
A
A
B
Okay,
good
morning,
everyone
good
morning,
the
city
of
Boston,
Zoning,
Board
of
appeal
hearing
for
April
25th
2023,
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
Provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature
last
year.
The
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice
of
holding
virtual
hearings
until
March
2025..
This
hearing
of
the
board
is
being
held
remotely
via
the
zoom
webinar
event
platform.
This
hearing
is
also
being
live
streamed.
B
In
order
to
ensure
this
hearing
of
the
board
is
open
to
the
public
members
of
the
public
May
access
this
hearing
through
telephone
and
video
conferencing.
This
information
is
the
information
for
connecting
to
this.
Hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
Public
Notices
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
B
As
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
in
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
and
opposition.
The
order
of
comments
is
as
follows:
elected
officials,
representatives
of
elected
officials
and
members
of
the
public,
the
chair,
May
limit.
The
number
of
people
called
upon
to
offer
comment
and
the
time
for
commenting
as
time
constraints
require.
For
that
reason,
the
board
prefers
to
hear
from
members
of
the
public
who
are
most
impacted
by
a
project
that
is
those
individuals
who
live
closest
to
the
project.
Thank
you.
B
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform.
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
When
the
host
sees
your
hand,
you
will
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
You
must
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself
after
you
receive
the
request
from
the
host.
B
In
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so,
please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
Mr
Stembridge
reads.
The
address
into
the
record:
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
or
the
leading
host
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
These
instructions
were
repeated
throughout
the
hearing,
all
right,
Mr
Collins,
yes,
MS
panado,
here,
Mr
Aiken.
D
Folks,
I'm,
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
approval
of
the
here
during
this
from
March
14th
2014
to
2020
2023
transactions.
C
G
B
D
H
Good
morning,
Madam
chairwoman,
members
of
the
board,
William
Farrell
on
behalf
of
Rochelle
Luongo
Trustee
of
three
selling
place.
This
is
a
three
unit
family
building,
but
not
then
that's
been
in
the
family
for
three
generations.
Since
we
have
seen
you
last,
we
have
submitted
all
revised
plans
to
ISD
in
turn.
H
We
have
also
obtained
all
additional
requested
information
and
City
Department
approvals
with
one
exception
and
that's
bpda's
review
and
approval
plans
were
submitted
to
them
in
March,
we're
still
waiting
for
the
review
on
approval
so
that
we
can
resubmit
to
ISD.
So
we're
close
to
the
finish
line
and
hopefully,
we'll
receive
an
extension.
So
we
can
finish
that.
B
I
J
G
J
G
J
H
Yes,
just
briefly
initial
extensions,
primarily
with
due
to
covet
issues
and
resulted
both
in
a
change
of
family
members
involved
in
the
plans
and
the
change
of
the
plans.
So
we
went
through
that
process,
at
least
on
two
occasions,
resulting
in
these
various
delays,
and
as
mentioned,
we
are
now
at
the
point
where
our
last
step
is
to
receive
the
bpda
approval
and
then
obtain
a
permit.
J
D
D
K
The
Marty
Madam
chairman
of
the
board
attorney
Lawrence
patino,
representing
the
owner
of
the
property,
might
have
a
business
address
at
245
Sumner
Street
in
East
Boston
we're
requesting
a
further
one
year
extension.
The
original
extension
was
based
on
covid
and
then
the
next
extension
that
we're
requesting
on
relief
for
was
there
was
a
death
in
the
family
and
some
family
illnesses
going
on
with
this
issue,
but
we're
hoping
to
have
all
of
the
plans
submitted
to
ISD
within
this
year
to
change
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family.
K
I
D
M
B
M
N
Well,
good
morning,
Madam
chair
Peter
gaming,
at
1.35
person,
we
have
a
homeowner
we're
just
asked
her
for
one
year
of
extension,
Financial
observations
and
what
those
have
been
resolved,
and
so
now
we're
just
looking
for
them
to
finalize
the
structural
plan
and
hopefully
started
construction
is
far
thank.
I
O
I
N
D
P
Clifford,
yes,
hi
good
morning
yeah,
we
were
just
wondering
if
we
could
extend
it
for
another
year.
Just
you
know
from
foreseen
circumstances
and
we
need
to
extend.
P
P
We
have
a,
it
was
basically
zoned
as
a
two
family,
and
we
are
planning
on.
You
know
like
a
five
unit.
P
I
D
D
A
Great
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
Joe
discipio,
owner
of
59th
Common,
Street
I'm,
seeking
an
extension
to
our
boa
case,
we're
in
the
process
of
moving
forward
with
a
demo
permit.
We
can
then
move
forward
to
the
EGA
for
design
view
and
continue
to
move
forward
with
the
project.
I
B
D
Q
R
N
B
L
B
T
U
Chair
before
we
move
on
I'm
just
having
a
little
difficulty
with
my
camera.
Sorry
about
that
I
am
here
I'm
listening,
but
are
you
not
going
to
be
able
to
see
me
for
a
minute.
V
Bring
his
dance
here,
let
me
just
oh
yeah,
Greg
McCarthy
one
second
I'm
Greg
I'm,
making
you
a
panelist.
You
can
just
prove
it
when
it
pops
up
on
your
screen
and
you'll,
be
able
to
mute
yourself
and
stay.
What
you're
looking
to
do.
W
Hello,
everybody
sorry
about
that.
No
worries
good
morning,
good
morning,
members
of
the
board,
so
we're
here
for
today
for
to
210
West,
Springfield
Street.
This
is
the
the
variants
that
we're
sinking
is
for
roof
deck
access.
We
have
been
to
the
zba
about
four
or
five
months
ago,
and
it
was
our
plans
were
approved
for
the
provisio
to
change
the
access
from
the
roof
deck
from
head
hubs
to
a
bubble
hatch.
W
W
So
we
wanted
to
come
back
and
request
for
me
on
that
which
is
access
to
the
group.
Fetch
is
by
Bubble
hatch,
which
is
not
allowed
by
zoning
code
building
code.
My
apologies
no
problem
and
then
the
other
revision
we
made
is
we
had
big
rear
decks
off
the
back
of
the
building
which
we
reduced
down
to
five
feet.
W
L
U
I
B
D
Next,
as
we
will
move
into
the
hearing
schedule
for
9
30
A.M
at
this
time,
we'll
ask
if
there
are
any
requests
for
different
withdrawals
at
this
time.
D
Hearing
on
the
first
case
will
be
boa.
X
Good
morning
I
am
this:
is
Mike
Ross
attorney
with
the
law
firm
of
principal
at
one
international
Place
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
I'm
here
with
the
architect
on
this
project,
Elita
Alba.
X
What
we
have
here
is
a
proposal
to
erect
five
new
town
homes
with
nine
parking
spaces
in
this
one
at
five
thousand
sub-district
of
Brighton,
which
is
very
close
to
the
Newton
order
right
on
the
left
of
the
building
to
the
left
of
the
building
in
this
side
here,
and
what
you're
looking
at
close
up
is
the
rendering
the
building
on
the
left
with
the
tree
in
front
of
it.
That
is
143
Tremont,
and
that
is
what
we
are
proposing
on
this
lot.
That's
11
230,
it's
a
long,
narrow
lot.
X
X
Pretty
much
has
the
exact
same
property
size
and
it's
around
that
11
000
Plus
square
footage
just
below
this
image
here,
there's
a
in
the
rendering
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
here,
the
the
the
and
you
can
see
that
long,
narrow
Rod
that
slopes
upwards
as
it
goes
back
the
gray
or
the
the
hatched
black
hatches,
your
that
is
the
original
building.
That's
that's
up
today.
X
That's
a
two-family
building
and
what
we're
proposing
is
that
light
blue
outline
there
to
allow
for
the
five
townhouses
and
then
the
parking
next
to
it.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
can
give
you
a
little
more
context
is
to
wear
this
where
this
is.
X
This
is
good,
so
you
can
actually
see
the
Newton
border
right
there
on
the
left,
so
we're
pretty
much
the
last
house
before
noon
and
then
there's
that
long
narrow
lot
and
then
you
can
see,
though,
that
companion
lot,
it's
you
know
not.
It
just
happens
to
be
next
to
us:
it's
not
the
same
ownership.
It's
just
interesting!
It's
it's
around
the
same
size
and
a
similar,
similar
building
massing.
Let's
call
it
a
next
slide,
please.
X
And
here
you
have
now
the
site
plan,
so
what
we
have
here
is
you're
looking
at
the
ground
floors
of
each
of
the
five
townhouses,
which
will
have
its
own
parking.
We've
moved
trash
into
the
actual
units
at
the
request
of
the
community
process.
You
see
these
four
parking
spaces
to
the
right
of
the
building.
So
together
that
makes
nine,
which
is
the
required
number
by
zoning
and
that
fence
you
see
at
the
bottom.
X
X
Do
you
have
yeah
the
existing
curb
cut,
just
one?
Thank
you,
yeah
the,
and
so
then
here
you
have
just
a
close-up
of
what
you
were
looking
at
on
the
first
floor.
But
now
you
see
the
second
floor
just
below
it
and
the
second
floor.
X
What
you
see
there
is
one
one
of
the
bedrooms,
the
kitchen,
the
living
room,
one
of
the
bathrooms
and
there's
a
balcony
off
each
of
the
bedroom
set
there,
and
just
to
give
you
a
sense
that
these
these
units
they're
about
2
000
square
feet,
so
they
range
from
1979
square
feet
to
2
256
square
feet
and
each
are
a
three
bedroom.
Two
and
a
half
bath
next
slide.
Please
and
now
this
would
be
the
third
floor.
X
The
next
slide
here,
I'll,
give
you
a
little
more
I.
Think
the
elevations
will
give
you
some
some
sense
of
what
we're
doing
here.
So
the
Opera
elevation
is
your
view
from
Tremont
Street.
X
X
The
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
the
reverse
elevation,
so
you
have
the
upper
one,
is
the
back
of
the
building,
it's
from
you
from
viewed
from
the
backyard
and
then
the
left
side
of
the
building
is
the
lower
and
each
one
of
those
doors
there
empties
out
to
a
patio,
an
individual
patio
for
each
of
the
townhouses.
X
You
know
for
you,
for
where
you
could
grill
or
do
it.
You
know,
have
a
little
patio
area
right
there
next
slide.
Please.
X
So
these
are
just
some
context.
Images
you
saw
the
one
in
the
upper
left.
The
one
in
the
upper
right
shows,
you
know,
shows
the
building
from
the
other
side,
the
middle
view,
what
you
see
what
you're
seeing
there
is
our
buildings
along
with
the
tree
in
front
of
it.
That's
the
existing
two
family.
That's
there
today,
the
lower
left,
it's
on
the
right
side
of
the
street.
X
X
So
it's
it's
a
use,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
looking
to
do
five
townhouses
and
that
one
F
five
thousand
townhouse
being
forbidden
and
multi-family
being
forbidden
and
because
we're
creating
the
additional
four
parking
spaces.
Those
parking
spaces
are
considered
forbidden
too.
The
dimensional
regulations,
far
in
this
part
of
the
city,
is
0.5.
X
We
are
at
1.1
the
building
height,
even
though
we
have
a
man-side
roof.
We
are
still
at
three
floors
and
in
this
part
of
the
district,
it's
a
two
and
a
half
floor
requirement.
X
We
are
actually
below,
however,
the
height
restriction
of
35,
we're
at
32
and
a
half
for
our
height
on
the
side
yard.
We
meet
one
of
the
side
yards,
which
is
12
feet,
so
we
have
22
feet
on
one
side,
but
on
the
left
side
we
only
have
a
five
foot
side
yard
setback,
because
the
location
of
the
main
front
door
is
for
only
one
of
the
units
facing
Tremont
Street
and
the
other
four
units
are
not
facing
the
main
Frontage.
X
We
were
cited
for
that
as
well,
and,
finally,
the
front
yard
requirement
for
this
section
of
of
the
district
is
20.
We
are
at
14.5
or
the
for
the
front
yard
just
on
community
process.
We
were
sure
about
to
hear,
of
course,
from
I
want
to
ask.
We
did
go
in
front
of
baia
and
or
approved
there
I'll
pause
there
Madam
chair
and
see.
If
there
are
any
questions.
J
U
J
A
balcony
is
there,
you've
got
four
parking
spaces
and
a
retaining
wall,
so
is
there
open
space
for
use
in
the
rearrowers
at
essentially
an
accessible
I'm,
just
looking
at
sort
of
the
site
design,
and
seeing
that
this
is,
you
know
very.
You
have
a
building
that
was
that
recently
99
Tremont
I,
guess
that
has
a
slightly
lower
than
a
one
and
a
half
parking
ratio
from
what
I
understand
so
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
some
of
the
site
plan
layout
considerations
for
the
release.
X
Request:
yeah,
we
it's
it's
a
low
retaining
wall,
Mr
Aiken,
and
so
it
is
an
accessible
yard.
I
mean
there
is
some
Pitch
to
it,
but
there
is
a
lot
of
yard
with
this
project
because
of
the
large
size
of
the
of
the
rot
itself,
and
we
were
not
cited
for
open
open.
X
You
know
a
violation
for
the
open
space,
so
you
know
that
plus
I
think
the
individual
unit
balconies
and
the
patios
you
know
create
ample
opportunity
for
for
access
to
that.
To
that
open
space,
all.
L
X
Yeah
I'm
not
sure
we
we
didn't
bring
on
a
landscape
artifact
on
this
one.
We
we
are
not
taking
down
any
trees
for
the
construction
of
this
project
and
including
that
front
Tree
on
the
street
tree.
Of
course,
it's
not
our
tree
to
take
down
it's
the
city
of
Boston,
but
we're
not
disrupting
any
trees.
All
the
plantings
you
see
around
the
perimeter
of
the
building
will
be
bushes,
and
you
know
our
architect
is
on
the
call.
X
Elita
could
probably
talk
more
about
what
she's
planning
to
do
there,
but
it
you
know
other
than
the
the
retaining
wall
and
those
bushes.
That's
really
the
extent
of
of
what
we're
doing
landscape
wise.
There
will
be
a
pervious.
The
the
the
parking
area
you
see
is
a
previous
material
so,
and
that
was
part
of
the
community
process.
So
you
know
the
groundwater
will
go
right
back
into
the
ground
through
that.
X
That
was
something
that
came
up
as
well,
and
then
we
I
think
we
added
a
little
bit
of
green
just
even
to
the
front
of
each
of
the
unit.
You
see
a
little
Bush
there,
so
that
was
done.
You
know
deliberately
to
try
to
create
a
little
bit
a
little
bit
more
green.
B
X
B
Any
other
questions
from
the
board
hearing
Nunn:
let's
open
it
to
public
testimony.
Y
Yes,
second
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Frank
Mendoza
here,
Olson
Brighton
liaison
for
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
deferring
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board,
but
here
to
testify
about
SUV,
Community
engagement
process
for
this
property,
the
applicant
having
a
Butters
meeting
and
also
met
with
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association,
the
local
Civic.
For
this
area.
Y
We
didn't
really
hear
back
any
significant
opposition
from
the
community
or
from
Butters,
with
the
exception
of
one
of
the
residents
of
the
current
property,
who
did
not
really
understand
the
process
and
the
timeline
associated
with
it.
But
I
understand
from
the
developer
that
they
were
able
to
connect
with
that
individual
and
talk
things
through
with
him
and
help
him
with
his
understanding.
What
that
said
was
refer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
As
always,
and
thank
you.
Z
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Annabella
Gomes
from
the
Brighton
awesome
Improvement
Association.
We
voted
to
support
this
project.
We
feel
that
this
is
a
great
location
to
add
quality
family
size
housing
and
they
have
really
good
care
to
adding
more
landscaping
and
the
criminal
pavers
and
everything.
Z
So
we
really
feel
it's
a
great
location
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
existing
housing
and
the
complements
the
building
that
was
approved
by
this
board,
probably
10
years
ago,
that
pretty
much
matches
it,
except
this
project
actually
will
give
us
more
green
and
really
make
it
a
great
family
housing
size
for
people
to
live
in.
Thank
you,
Brasco.
B
You
with
that
man
have
a
motion.
I
O
B
AA
Yes,
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Mark
lacasse
Lacoste
law,
75
Arlington
Street
in
Boston
attorney
for
the
project
proponents,
which
in
this
case
is
Josh,
zika
and
Mike.
Flynn
are
the
project
components
also
with
us
is
the
architect
David
of
Sullivan,
and
this
is
a
proposal
to
demolish
an
existing
building
at
309
Summit
Avenue
in
Brighton,
which
is
at
the
corner
of
Austin.
Street.
AA
Here
is
the
location,
it's
basically
one
block
down
from
Commonwealth
Avenue
in
in
area
across
the
street
and
along
Allston,
and
some
of
that
multi-family
residential
structures,
large
apartment
buildings
and
this
proposal
is
to
align
with
those
types
of
buildings
as
well.
Next
slide
in
here
is
just
an
aerial
view
of
the
site
location.
One
block
can
come
out
of
the
intersection
of
Summit,
Ave
and
Allston
next
slide.
AA
Here's
some
photographs
of
the
existing
context
of
the
building
on
the
left
are
photographs
of
the
existing
structure,
which
is
proposed
to
be
demolished
on
the
lower
right
is
the
large
multi-family
building
across
the
street
diagonally
across
the
street
from
the
subject
property
next
slide
again,
just
more
photographs
of
the
existing
context.
Lower
right
was
the
rear
of
the
existing
property
with
the
multi-family
across
the
street
and
houses
across
seminar
on
the
other
photos.
AA
Please-
and
this
is
the
rear,
with
the
curb
cut
for
the
entrance
to
the
garage
at
the
lower
level
with
parking
for
nine
spaces,
and
it
is
proposed
to
be
a
nine
unit
building
with
three
units
on
each
floor.
Each
of
the
units
are
three
bedroom
size
units,
important
to
note
that
this
project
started
many
years
ago
as
a
very
different
proposal.
Under
a
small
project,
we
grew
with
the
bpda.
AA
AA
This
is
the
lower
levels
around
the
parking
garage
with
nine
spaces
or
compact
Spaces
by
standard
size,
spaces
and
a
bicycle
storage
room
with
space
for
16,
bicycles,
mechanical
systems
in
a
trash
room
and
the
elevator
bit
like
side.
Please
typical
floor
plans
on
the
left
is
the
first
floor
plan.
You
can
see
they're
larger
size
units
three
units
per
floor
on
the
right
is
the
typical
second
and
third
floor
plans.
AA
AA
These
are
elevations
front
on
the
right
front.
Is
the
309
Summit
Ave
entrance
and
the
side
is
one
side
of
the
building
with
the
lower
level
not
trying
to
miss
side
next
slide.
Please,
and
these
are
elevations
with
the
bottom
right,
showing
the
rear
of
the
building
with
the
garage
entrance
and
three
floors
of
residential
above
next
slide,
and
that's
it.
One
item
I
would
like
to
note
for
the
recommended
chair
is
that
on
the
plans
and
the
refusal
letter,
the
far
is
noted
as
2.97.
That's
a
math
error.
AA
The
actual
proposed
far
is
1.48
significantly
lower
than
what's
shown
on
the
plans
with
that
I'll
conclude
my
presentation
and
take
any
questions
and
comments.
AA
Thing
so
the
required
parking
is
1.75
per
dwelling
unit,
which
would
be
16
spaces.
We
have
a
1.0
there.
Here
we
go,
we
have
nine
spaces,
which
is
one
101,
given
the
transportation
location
of
Commonwealth
Avenue,
a
block
away
everything,
that's
sufficient
and
provided
the
16
bike.
Storage
traffic
visibility
is
cited.
It
is
a
corner
lot
of
the
corner
of
Summit
Ave
and
Austin
Street,
but
because
the
building
is
pulled
back
from
some
of
that
there's
more
than
sufficient
visibility
for
cars
coming
in
either
direction.
AA
It
is
in
a
3F
sub
districts
of
the
multi-family
use
is
forbidden,
but
as
shown,
there
are
lots
of
the
predominance
of
buildings
in
this
particular
area
or
larger
multi-family
residential
buildings.
National
lot
area
per
dwelling
unit
is
2
000,
so
that
would
require
18
000
square
feet.
This
is
a
9
200
square
foot
Lots
of
far
Max
is
0.8
2.97,
which
is
not
correct.
The
actual
FDR
is
1.48.
AA
I'm
building
height
was
cited
for
proposed
four
stories
again
three
stories
in
the
front
four
stories
in
the
back
because
of
the
slope
of
the
land,
the
height
in
feet.
Max
is
35,
we're
at
39.
usable,
open
space
5850
would
be
required.
We
have
2970
with
the
introduction
of
the
balconies
and
actually
leaving
a
lot
of
the
lot
area
about
50
of
the
lot
area
remains
as
open.
AA
There
is
so
the
herb
cut
utilizes
the
existing
perpet,
which
will
be
the
entrance
to
the
garage
at
the
lower
level.
Okay,.
AB
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
The
bpda
board
recommended
denial
without
prejudice.
The
number
of
violations
is
successive.
We
feel
that
the
proposal
is
successive,
also
in
speaking
to
what
Mr
Lucas
had
mentioned
about
the
multi-family
dwellings
across
the
street
kitty
corner
to
this
project.
The
zoning
District
sub
sub-district
line
does
go
down
Summit
Ave,
so
those
buildings
are
zoned
MFR
for
multi-family
residential
uses.
This
is
zone
three
family
and
we
just
feel
that
the
project
itself
is
too
big
for
the
slot.
Thank
you.
J
J
It
doesn't
okay,
one
question:
there
looks
like
at
least
historically
sorry,
it's
for
the
proponent
there's
a
very
large
tree
on
the
site.
Is
that
still
there
at
this
point
in
time.
AA
It
is
not,
there
are
the
treatments
causing
significant
damage
to
the
existing
building
and
the
tree
has
been
removed.
Okay,.
J
AA
F
AA
So
Josh's
sake
I'm
going
to
see
us
raising
his
hand
who's
the
project.
You
want
to
jump
in
on
that
sure.
AC
Thank
you,
commissioner.
I
think
you
know.
Initially,
we
were
at
19
units
which
did
receive
some
significant
support
from
the
community
through
conversations
with
director
Butters.
They
felt
that
that
was
too
large
of
a
project
for
this
site.
We
worked
in
concert
with
them
to
reduce
the
size
and
create
larger
units
to
be
family
size
units.
We
have
maintained
that
green
space
along
Summit
Ave,
knowing
that
there's
a
real
need
for
that
in
the
community.
AC
Excuse
me
and
I've
talked
to
parks
department
about
installing,
and
you
know,
maintaining
and
paying
for
Street
trees
along
Alston
Street,
recognizing
that's
really
important
for
this
community.
You
know
I,
know
myself.
My
partner,
Mike
Flynn,
have
both
lived
on
this
street
in
years
past
and
are
really
committed
to
this
area
and
know
how
important
adding
that
green
space
is,
and
we
felt
that
you
know
being
in
a
harmonious
existence
with
our
direct
bodies
with
the
belief
of
Santa.
AC
Letters
of
support
for
this
project
at
this
point
was,
was
really
critical
to
move.
F
Forward:
okay,
thank
you.
Yes,
I'm.
Looking
at
the
street
view
and
I
see
that
family
meetings
across
the
street
and
down
the
street,
so
I
went
you're
thinking
about
losing
those
units
and
you
went
from
19
to
nine.
So
technically
the
city
is
losing
two
IDP
units
with
that
reduction.
So
I'm
just
going
to
point
out
to
to
that
the
family
built
inside
close
the
street
already.
Y
Yes,
good
morning,
Madam
chair,
excuse
me
members
of
the
board
Frank
Mendoza
here,
Austin
Brighton
liaison
from
the
mayor's
officer,
Neighborhood
Services.
Y
Y
B
Thank
you
all
right.
Okay,
yep,
let's
proceed
I
think
he
needs
to
restart
okay.
V
So
Greg
can
you
thank
you.
I
mean
I
just
go
to
the
record,
please
once
I
needed
than
Annabella.
M
AD
Madam
chair
members
of
board
Annabelle
gone
to
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association.
This
project
has
gone
through
a
lot
of
iterations
since
2021
and
with
concerns
from
the
neighbors
of
it
being
too
large.
They
have
reduced
the
project
to
this
size.
This
is
how
the
neighbors
there
feel
comfortable.
AD
AE
Members
of
the
board
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
judge
from
the
board.
As
you
heard,
this
project
previously
went
through
a
BPA,
bpda-led
Community
process,
where,
after
hearing
concerns
from
Neighbors,
the
project
was
dramatically
changed
over
the
course
of
many
years.
It
meant
many
times
with
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association,
which
is
a
local
Civic
for
this
area.
I.
Would
that
be
refer
to
the
board?
Thank
you.
AE
F
I'm
sure
I
would
like
to
post
forward
emotion
to
approve
the
project
with
repudiating
the
second
review,
because
just
looking
at
the
context,
the
projects
that
I
lost
10
units
to
accommodate
the
feedback
from
the
abolers-
and
there
is
a
multi-family
unit
buildings
across
the
street
in
the
next
block
as
well
so
I
think
the
project
existing
believer
in
many
units
that,
unfortunately,
are
not
income
restricted,
but
still
we
are
building
some
affordable
housing.
For
that
reason,
my
emotions.
F
L
L
D
B
AA
AF
Good
morning
to
Madam
chair
on
board,
my
name
is
Derek
rubenoff,
Derek,
Ruben
off
architect,
I'm
here
to
present
Architects.
The
project
with
me
is
a
knock
knock
from
our
office
and
also
our
client
Mike
Donahue,
Mike
and
Aaron
have
a
growing
family
and
they're
looking
for
a
little
more
space
in
their
existing
single
family
home
here
in
West
Roxbury,
they
have
family
roots
in
the
in
the
neighborhood.
In
fact,
Mike's
in-laws
live
next
door
on
the
left
and
seeking
to
add
about
750
square
feet.
AF
So
this
is
called
this
house,
so
it's
existing
single
family
in
a
single
family,
six
thousand
Zone-
and
we
are
proposal
to
has
some
space
to
the
third
floor,
which
is
currently
attic
storage
space
and
then
we're
adding
a
small
increase
to
the
footprint
of
the
house.
AF
If
we
look
at
the
that
plan
right
right,
there
yeah
so
the
back
right
hand
corner
of
the
house
and
site
plan
there
on
the
left
on
the
left.
There
yep,
you
can
see,
there's
a
little
bathroom
that
we're
adding
on
the
ground
level
and
that's
the
only
change
in
the
footprint
of
the
house
and
then
on.
The
second
level
we
are
increasing
the
area
on
the
right
side
for
some
additional
bedroom
space
and
then
on
the
third
floor,
adding
additional
bedroom
space
up
there.
AF
So
our
violations,
as
you
can
see,
on
the
on
the
top
right
there.
In
the
section
we
are,
we
have
a
violation
for
a
number
of
Stories.
The
building
height
will
conform
in
terms
of
feet,
there's
no
extension
of
the
building
height.
However,
the
the
third
floor
attic
space
will
become
a
third
Story
part
of
the
zoning
code
and
we
also
are
cited
for
sites
yard
setback.
As
you
can
see
in
that
site
plan
a
moment
ago
that
we
have
about
five
and
a
half
feet
on
the
side
yard.
AF
That's
existing
and
the
way
we're
filling
out
the
back
right
corner
of
the
building
will
maintain
that
five
foot
six,
but
it's
extension
of
existing
non-controllability.
O
AF
So
if
we
look
at
the
the
the
illustrations,
I
think
it's
on
page
14.
15
of
that.
AF
AF
You
can
see
how
we
are
filling
out,
the
right
side
of
the
house
and
we're
extending
that
existing
smaller
cable,
that's
in
line
with
the
main
part
of
the
roof
for
extending
that
up
to
the
existing
overall
Ridge
of
the
of
the
roof,
and
then
we're
extending
that
second
floor
front
Dormer
to
the
right.
So
the
idea
is
to
to
have
the
the
addition
look
like
it
was
almost
there
and
then
in
the
rear
of
the
house,
we're
getting
that
additional
space
on
the
third
floor.
AF
On
that
second
row
there
you
can
see
that
there's
already
an
existing
Dormer
on
the
second
floor
that
goes
across
the
rear
and
we're
adding
another
Dormer
higher
than
that
to
get
that
additional
bedroom
space
on
the
third
level.
So
most
of
the
addition
won't
be
visible.
Most
of
the
added
space
will
be
of
the
street
and
what
is
visible
from
the
street
will
being
maintaining
the
Integrity
of
the
design
of
the
existing
house.
AE
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
this
time.
The
mayor
is
also
like
to
defer
to
the
judgment
on
this
board
to
speak
on
the
community
process.
Our
office
had
the
homeowner
circulate
a
flyer
to
a
Butters,
no
concerns
or
race
from
the
Butters,
and
we
received
several
letters
of
support
which
we
forwarded
to
this
board.
The
applicant
then
went
on
to
meet
with
the
West
Roxbury
neighborhood
Council,
which
voted
to
support
the
proposal
as
well
with
that
we
refer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
B
I
T
T
Okay,
we're
proposing
to
build
a
three-family
home
that
will
have
three
off-street
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
These
units
will
be
marketed
as
condominiums
in
order
to
provide
a
membership
opportunities.
This
proposal,
it
only
has
two
zoning
violations
that
we
are
seeking
relief
for
the
first
one
is
use
forbidden
since
we're
proposing
to
build
the
three
family
and
the
2f
sub
District
that
created
a
violation.
T
The
second
violation
is
the
building
height
excessive
for
the
stories
only
it's
required
to
have
two
and
a
half
stories,
but
like
the
other
three
families
that
are
on
the
street,
we're
proposing
three
stories.
As
shown
in
the
proposed
plan
unit,
one
has
1440
square
feet
of
living
space
unit.
2
has
1430
square
feet
of
living.
Space
and
unit
3
has
1546
square
feet
of
living
space.
All
three
of
these
units,
Mr.
T
Please
proceed
all
three
units
have
three
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
an
open,
open
floor
plan
and
heated
storage
space
in
the
basement
at
this
time,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
members
of
the
board
may
have.
L
T
Yes,
there's
a
sufficient:
if
you
can
go
to
the
second
drawing
the
slide,
you
can
see
the
green
space
on
page
two,
oh
there
we
go
there.
We
go
there's
plenty
of
green
space,
so
we
need
the
code
requirement
for
that,
as
well
as
the
driveway.
We
have
the
parking
spots,
it
would
be
a
paved
yard.
So
to
answer
your
question,
we
have
enough
space
for
that.
T
Okay,
it's
asphalt
so
we're
going
to
have
a
drainage
system
so
that
it's
pitched
into
the
drainage
system
in
the
driveway
to
collect
all
the
water,
so
it
can
drain.
You
know
carefully.
L
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
we
like
to
see
permeable
pavers
on
these
projects
as
well.
So
we'd
like
you
to
consider
that,
can
you
just
speak
a
little
more
to
the
landscape
and
what
you
intend
to
do
with
that
green
space.
T
Well,
it
would
be
grass
on
the
left
side
of
the
building.
If
you
can
scroll
down
to
the
next
slide
Jessica,
it
will
be
grass
on
the
left
side.
We
will
have
some
Shrubbery
and,
of
course,
bpding
prop
more
than
likely
be
today
review
and
they
definitely
go
over
the
Landscaping.
So
we'll
have
a
more
detail,
landscape
and
drive
to
show
exactly
the
trees
and
the
shrubberies
that
would
be
on
the
Green
Space.
AE
But
yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services
at
this
time
to
marry
salsa
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board
our
office,
helmet,
Butters,
being
on
March
2nd.
The
applicant
then
went
on
to
meet
with
the
greater
Mattapan
neighborhood
Council,
which
eventually
voted
to
support.
The
Proposal
with
several
Provisions
I.
Believe
we
provided
that
letter
to
this
board.
AE
There
were
some
discussions
around
the
parking
layout,
showing
the
plans
and
indicate
that
the
three
parking
spaces
take
up
open
yard
space
at
the
back
porch
of
the
building.
There
were
also
conversations
with
the
Woodhaven
Colbert
and
Regis
neighborhood
association,
which
is
acting
in
the
area
and
I
do
not
believe
the
Afghan
has
had
a
chance
to
present
to
the
Woodhaven
call
Bird
right,
Regis
neighborhood
association
at
this
time,
although
they
have
been
in
contact
with
them.
With
that
we
reflect.
Thank
you.
B
AG
D
Have
we
have
one
letter
from
points.
D
Yeah,
what
we
play,
which
which
was
a
regards
to
pocket
yes
and
some
other
comments
that
were
made.
B
That's
okay:
let's
proceed
with
Mr
Arroyo's
office.
AH
Good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Jordan
fries
here
from
councilor
Ricardo
Arroyo's
office,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
of
this
proposal
to
Echo
Connor.
We
do
have
the
we
just
wanted
to
point
out
the
provisions
that
the
Great
American
Council
had
laid
out.
I
can
email
those
to
Connor
and
then
he
can
send
them
your
way
if
that's
okay,
I'm
having
trouble
trying
to
copy
and
paste
them
into
the
chat
at
the
moment.
Well,
we
all
want
to
be
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
AI
AG
AJ
L
B
D
C
Yes,
good
morning,
everyone
good
morning,
chair
and
all
the
members-
it's
myself
here
topic
only
enjoy
where
both
the
owners
of
these
10
winter
streets
and
six
winter
streets
as
I
might
already
know.
So
the
area
has
gotten
a
little
bit
busy
and
there's
a
little
bit
of
traffic
around,
and
since
we
do
not
have
an
open
curb
to
park
our
cars,
we
have
decided
to
jointly
file
this
permit
request
to
get
our
car
sparked,
and
this
is
what
we
are
here
for
today.
C
We
have
received
a
lot
of
support
from
the
meeting
house,
Hill
Association
as
well
as
I,
think
I'll.
Let
Ashley
speak
to
that,
and
so
that's
that's
what
we're
here
for
today.
So
both
buildings
are
showing
on
both
sides
and
what
we're
really
asking
for
is
a
single
curb
cut
that
will
allow
cars
to
park
tandemly
in
between
the
buildings,
buildings
being
10
winter,
on
the
right
six
winter
on
the
left,
and
that's
that's
what
that's?
What
the
layout
of
the
plans
look
like?
AK
Don't
share
our
members
of
the
board.
All
the
microbe
TVs
I've
worked
with
the
applicant
to
adjust
the
parking
plan
because
the
way
it
was
originally
proposed,
but
it
was
front
yard
parking,
which
is
something
that
we
don't
approve,
but
he
did
push
them
back
and
it
does
work
from
an
operational
standpoint
and
as
far
as
Greenery
is
concerned,
I'll
leave
that
up
to
the
bpda,
but
from
an
operations
perspective.
Hd
approves
this.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
Sorry,
what
one
quick
question
can
I
just
understand
is
the
sidewalk
is
potentially
about
four
feet
wide
at
the
point
where
the
between
the
curb
cut
and
then
and
the
property
line.
Is
that
what
the
the
level
part
of
the
sidewalk
will
be
and
I
don't
know
if
Bob's
there
to
weigh
in
on
that
being
acceptable.
AK
From
what
I
can
see,
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
is
I,
think
6.1
6.1
inch,
which
is
appropriate
and
it
does
work.
The
curb
cut
has
to
be
14
feet
because
it
allows
for
a
more
appropriate
maneuverability.
J
AK
No,
it's
a
six
foot
one
inch
now,
but
when
you
put
in
the
curb
cut
that
will
be
reduced
to
a
like
a
four
foot
width
and
again
that's
something
that
is
pretty
common
and
that's
why
I
have
a
wall
position
to
it.
Thank
you.
AJ
Good
morning,
I'm
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Ashley
Grahams
from
the
mayor's
office,
enabled
Services
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
The
office
held
in
the
butters
meeting
late
of
20,
2022
members
and
headquarters
of
the
meeting
household
Association
social
support
and
approved
of
this
shared
driveway,
no
significant
impact
on
the
community
with
that
with
the
parts
of
the
board
of
this
trend.
AJ
AL
B
V
Yes,
yep
his
hand
is
raised
one
second,
making
him
a
panelist.
B
AM
This
proposed
proposal
is
for
31
Downer,
half
Dorchester
Mass
02125
I
am
proposing
to
change
my
existing
two
family
into
a
three
family
with
three
parking
spaces
in
the
rear,
I
will
live
on,
I
will
live
in
unit
one
and
other
two
millions
will
be
provided
for
home
ownership
opportunity,
I'm,
seeking
relief
for
the
following
violations:
one
three
family
detached
dwelling
forbidden
to
restricted
roof
structure;
District
three
youth,
forbidden,
Four,
ndo,
ndod,
review
required
five
Conformity
would
exist
in
building
alignment,
six
floor
area
ratio,
excessive,
seven
Building
height
excessive
for
stories;
eight
front
yard
insufficient
in
nine
side
yard
insufficient.
AM
As
shown
in
the
proposed
plans
unit,
one
has
1907
square
feet
of
living
space.
There
will
be
two
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
where
open
floor
plan.
On
the
main
floor,
there
will
be
a
master
bedroom
and
study
room
in
the
basement
unit.
2
has
1176
square
feet
of
living
space.
There
will
be
two
bedroom:
two
bathrooms
working
floor
plan
unit
three
as
1176
square
feet
of
living
space.
There
will
be
two
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
with
open
floor
plan
as
well.
There
will
be
a
rooftop
exclusive
for
unit
three,
that's
accessible
by
hatch.
D
G
D
L
Back
to
the
basement
plan
just
trying
to
understand
ceiling,
Heights
and
windows
in
the
basement,
okay,.
AM
So
ceiling
height,
if
they
bring
up
the
plan
for
the
basement
proposed,
that's
it.
On
the
on
the
left
hand,
side,
the
the
house
is
on
the
hill,
so
the
right
side
of
the
house
has
a
slope.
The
sailing
height
is
at
seven
feet
right
now,
roughly
and
with
the
height
of
the
building
going
to
a
three
family,
it
is
under
the
maximum
height.
AN
AM
AM
AN
B
AK
Yes,
Madam
chair
lady
and
the
members
of
the
board
welcome
to
Miko
BTD
unless
I
missed
it,
I
saw
the
parking
area,
but
I
didn't
see
any
vehicles
depicted
on
the
parking
area,
which
is
very
important
because
you
have
to
take
measurements
of
the
vehicles
themselves
and
make
sure
they
have
enough
maneuvering
areas.
AK
AM
You
pull
up
the
you
pull
up
the
rear
of
the
building
where
you
have
the
parking,
the
three
parking
spaces.
Yes,
okay,
I'm,
sorry
right
there
yeah
I,
see
it
okay,
so
the
three
parking
spaces
are
there
in
the
swing
area.
It
goes
up
all
the
way
to
the
back
of
the
building.
There's
two
parking
spaces
that
are
existing.
So
maybe
that's
why
the
maybe
right,
you
know,
Leonard
didn't
put
the
actual
Vehicles
there.
AB
Thank
you,
madam
chairman.
Our
recommendation
for
this
was
approval
with
design
review
and
to
miss
panado's
points,
no
building
code
relief,
knowing
that
they
need
a
minimum
of
seven
six
in
the
basement.
We'd
recommend
approval
with
no
building
code,
also
for
the
record.
George
Chester
does
not
have
a
restricted
roof
structure.
District
I,
don't
know
why
that
was
cited,
but
it
does
not
have
that
regulation
in
there.
So
I
just
want
to
clear
that
up,
but
we're
on
record.
It's.
AM
No
building
code
relief,
sorry.
AB
AJ
Good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Ashley
Collins
again
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Midwood
Services,
some
background
information
on
the
community
process.
We've
done
an
app
office
on
the
butters
meeting
back
of
2022,
but
as
members
from
the
Jones
Hill
Association
project
I
believe
that
the
proposal
stands
in
the
best
interest
of
the
shared
Community.
With
that
we
would
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
L
I'll
make
a
motion
for
approval
with
bbda
design
review
no
building
code
relief.
We
have.
J
B
C
AM
AD
AO
AO
Trying
to
legalize
a
basement
apartment
from
three
family
to
a
four
family.
The
basement
unit
is
a
very
nice
unit.
There
is
no
trace
of
a
moist
or
water
problem
and
since
the
last
neighborhood
meeting
with
David
Barron
I
have
my
electrician
has
separate
public
meter
from
and
brought
another
another
socket
for
a
new
meter.
Now
we
have
the
room
for
five
meter:
five
electric
meter
and
I
enlarged
two
window
from
the
living
room.
AO
B
AO
AO
AO
L
B
AB
Yeah
I
mean
the
extension
of
Living
Spaces
into
the
basement.
We
don't
have
a
problem
with
it,
but
we
also
put
a
Proviso
with
no
building
code,
but
I
would
agree
with
Miss
panado
that,
since
there
are
no
elevation
shown
on
this,
not
that
I
think
anyone
would
deliberately
give
the
board
wrong
information
without
the
PLA
and
showing
the
elevation.
I.
Think
Miss
panado
is
correct,
and
this
should
be
the
third.
I
U
B
R
AQ
Yes,
Mr
Stembridge.
Thank
you
good
morning,
members
to
the
board
chair
Madam
chair.
My
name
is
George
Morenci
I'm,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston
I
represent
Casey
Kenney,
the
owner
of
the
property
located
at
584
East
4th
Street
in
South
Boston
within
an
MFR
multi-zoning.
Sorry
multi-family,
zoning
residential
sub-district
under
article
68
Madam
chair
members,
in
August
of
2020.
AQ
The
award
approved
the
underlying
alt
application
here
to
change
the
building
at
554
East
4th
Street
from
a
one
family
to
a
three
family,
ISD,
subsequently
determined
that
they
missed
a
zoning
violation
on
the
original
refusal
error.
Society
I'd
set
back
requirement
for
the
approved
third
floor.
Rear
deck
purpose
of
this
missionary
is
for
the
board
to
add
the
required
relief.
If
you
see
Fish
pursuing
to
the
same
plan.
The
background
balcony
in
question
is
again
on
the
third
floor.
At
just
over
60
square
feet.
AQ
The
plans
being
displayed
now
are
exactly
the
same
as
the
plans
improved
by
the
board
in
August
of
2020.
Nothing
has
changed.
The
depicted
rear
deck
should
have
been
cited,
not
being
set
back
three
feet
deep
from
the
sidewalk
line.
Again,
nothing
is
changing
here.
This
is
simply
a
matter
of
perfecting
the
record
or
ISD.
The
permit
has
been
issued.
Work
has
been
done
substantially
complete,
but
no
work,
of
course,
has
been
yet
done
on
this
third
floor
deck
with
bad
power
on
to
take
any
questions
that
members
may
have.
AE
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor
saw
us
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board.
We
had
the
applicant
flyer,
the
area
just
to
kind
of
let
the
Buddhist
know
that
they
were
going
back
before
the
board,
that
no
real
changes
to
the
project
were
going
to
occur.
We
did
not
get
any
letters
of
concern
and
I
believe
the
outcome
was
also
in
contact
with
the
neighborhood
association
as
well
with
that
we
refer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
AR
Thank
you
good
morning
my
name
is
Calderon
from
Council
president
fling's
office.
The
councilor
would
like
to
go
on
recording
support
again
to
choose
feedback
from
Neighbors
and
a
good
Community
process
to
respectfully
request
that
the
performance
continues
to
work
closely
with
neighbors
during
the
construction
phase.
Thank
you.
AI
A
B
I
D
You
before
we
go
to
the
next
case
as
we
approached
11
A.M.
Are
there
any
withdrawals
for
patrols
being
requested
for
the
11
A.M
timeframe.
AA
AA
If
we
could
enlarge
to
show
that
photograph
in
the
upper
left-hand
corner,
just
to
give
you
a
sense
of
the
existing
properties,
so
98
100
are
currently
separate,
deeded
properties
that
my
client
has
acquired
both
of
them,
and
the
proposal
here
is
to
combine
the
lot
in
order
to
create
two
units,
but
essentially
two
single-family
homes,
and
to
join
the
look
of
the
properties
at
the
front.
These
are
important
historic
buildings.
AA
So,
on
the
plot
plan,
you
can
see
that
there's
you
know
the
what's
left
is
right.
The
same
buildings
proposal
includes
construction
of
a
one-story
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
existing
structures,
which
is
similar
to
the
building
shown
along
Gold
Street
next
door.
It's
a
Condo
building
with
a
garage
on
the
ground
floor
and
retention
of
that
four
foot
alley
passageway.
AA
AA
Also,
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
property
at
96,
F
Street.
We
worked
closely
with
that
neighbor
to
maintain
that
passageway
or
actually
granting
her
an
easement
because
functionally
that's
access
to
her
backyard
and
a
desired
access
route
to
bring
trash
to
the
street
side.
So
we
worked
with
that
owner
and
will
preserve
an
easement
for
her
next
slide.
AA
On
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
screen
is
the
level
two
plan.
There
are
two
walkout
Terraces
from
each
of
the
single
units
and
those
Terraces
are
on
top
of
the
proposed
new
garage
and
then
on
the
third
level.
There
are
two
small
balconies
from
each
of
the
bedrooms
on
the
upper
level
of
those
units.
Next
slide.
AA
Some
staircase
elevations
next
slide.
So
these
are
the
proposed
elevations
upper
left
hand.
Corner
is
the
view
from
Gold
Street
facing
the
side
of
the
building.
There's
the
one
story
proposed
garage
with
the
walkout
Terraces
on
top
and
the
small
rear
deck
at
the
third
level
and
the
Small
Bump
out
on
the
side
of
the
house
on
the
upper
right
hand,
side
the
front
of
the
building
again
will
be
preserved.
AA
AA
Other
elevations
lower
left
hand.
Side
will
be
the
elevation
from
next
door
at
96,
F
Street,
and
then,
if
you
were
standing
in
the
condo
building
on
Gold
Street,
that's
the
elevation
of
the
property
from
outside
the
property.
Again
we
worked
closely
with
those
unit
owners
and
the
sort
of
the
blank
wall
at
grade
is
the
garage
level,
but
that
is
the
same
condition
of
their
building
with
the
three
four
foot
three
to
four
foot
passageway
between
the
two
properties
next
slide.
AA
AA
And
the
next
slide,
we
can
go
yeah.
So
this
is
the
existing
conditions.
Elevations
upper
left
hand
corner.
You
can
see,
there's
sort
of
a
box
edition
of
the
upper
level
with
a
side
staircase,
that's
all
being
removed
behind
number
98.
There's
a
one-story
box
with
a
sloped
roof,
that's
being
removed
upper
right
hand
corner!
AA
AA
Our
Zone
violations
are
fairly
straightforward.
We
need
a
conditional
use
permit
for
the
walkout
Terraces
on
the
roof
of
the
garage,
we're
excited
for
front
yard
insufficiency,
but
of
course
that's
in
existing
condition
and
there's
no
change
to
that
condition.
AK
Actually,
no
I
understand
that
the
stand-up
parking,
but
the
one
thing
that
if
this
was
commercial,
then
I
would
have
a
problem
with
it.
But
since
it's
residential
I'm,
assuming
that
they'll
discuss
one
with
one
another
about
movements
of
the
vehicle,
so
I'm
fine
with
that,
based
on
the
fact
it's
residential
and
not
commercial.
AK
AA
AS
Good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
I'm
Anna
white,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
ons,
hosted
in
a
Butters
meeting
for
98
through
100
F
Street
on
January
4th
2023.,
multiple
directed
voters
attended
the
meeting
and
the
proponent
answered
all
questions
and
responded
to
all
concerns
we
have
received.
One
letter
of
support
in
the
Cityside
neighborhood
association
is
in
support
of
this
proposal
because
of
how
responsive
the
proponent
was
to
addressing
a
Butter's
concerns
at
this
time,
we'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you
very
much.
AS
B
AR
Good
morning
of
the
share
membership
Council
presidents
Link's
office,
the
castle
would
like
to
go
on
recording
support
due
to
a
good
Community
process
and
work
with
their
buyers.
You
respect
for
this
requests
that
the
proponent
continues
to
work
closely
with
language
in
the
construction
phase.
Thank
you.
AI
AG
J
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
bpda
provisos
or
design
review
and
with
attention
to
increasing
the
side
yard
setback
for
a
minimum
five
foot
sidewalk
may.
I
AA
AB
Doing
oh,
this
is
a
catch.
What
we're
trying
to
have
developers
do,
especially
on
these
smaller
streets
in
South
Boston
is
accessibility
has
become
a
real
issue
and
I
don't
know
if
those
three
Ballers
are
still
existing,
but
there's
no
way
that
someone
needing
accessibility
down
old
streets
could
be
able
to
make
a
passenger
property.
So
now,
with
these
smaller
streets,
the
BDA
is
asking
that
there
will
be
a
minimum
sidewalk
requirements
so
that
accessibility
can
be
maintained.
AT
Good
morning
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Moran
attorney
for
the
owner
Louis
Lagoon.
We
are
seeking
relief
for
a
g-cod
permit
and
also
building
code
relief
in
reference
to
the
G
card.
Permit
the
old
homeless
letter,
water
and
soil
stamp
drawings
and
a
letter
of
compliance
from
water
and
store
have
been
duly
filed.
Meeting
the
requisites
for
the
issuance
of
a
g-card
permit.
AT
Madam
should
you
wish
me
to
then
address
the
building
code
relief?
Yes,
in
reference
to
the
building
code
relief,
we
are
cited
under
Section
1011.12.2
for
access
to
the
proposed
roof
stack
requirements
that
it
be
a
penthouse.
We
are
proposing
a
hatch
as
access
as
a
compliance
alternative.
The
property
is
located
within
the
South
End
landmarks
District.
It
is
a
contributing
building
to
the
accredited
National
Historic
District,
adding
a
roof
Penthouse
would
distort
the
street
profile,
which
is
one
of
the
identified
criteria
of
the
landmarks.
AT
The
proposed
hatch
access
complies
with
the
zoning
code.
If
a
head
house
is
proposed,
a
variance
from
the
zoning
code
would
be
required.
The
hatch
access
is
a
common
means
of
approved
egress
within
the
district
and
has
been
approved
on
numerous
projects
and
is
then
Dean
day.
Safe
condition,
alternative
the
hatch
access
we
suggest
is
an
acceptable
compliance
alternative
under
Section
34
12
compliance
Alternatives,
the
renovated
building
will
be
fully
sprinkled.
AT
No
has
it
to
the
occupants
of
the
building
will
be
presented
by
granting
this
variance,
and
the
building
will
remain
totally
within
all
fire
fighting
equipment
and
safety
vehicles,
and
since
this
is
a
gut
ring,
reconstruction
renovation,
all
of
the
materials
and
workmanship
must
comply
with
new
construction.
Based
upon
that,
we
request
the
variance
to
install
a
hatch.
R
AN
Hi
yes,
good
afternoon,
Madam,
chair
and
members
of
the
board
came
here
Shirley
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
the
mayor's
office
place
to
defer
to
the
board
on
this
matter.
Our
office
has
received
no
questions
or
concerns
from
the
about
us,
just
as
they
coordinate
any
construction
with
other
projects
in
the
area.
Thank
you.
AJ
AR
AR
AI
AG
V
B
B
AK
Tamika
or
anyone
yes,
I
am
I,
I
reviewed
the
plan
and
it
is
doable.
It
might
be
kind
of
tight,
but,
like
I
said
before
with
another
case,
it's
not
uncommon
for
this
type
of
design
to
be
you
know
in
operation,
so
I
have
no
opposition
to
this.
Okay.
Thank.
B
AM
B
I
B
Yep,
okay,
so
you
have
a
second
thank
you.
Mr
Collins,
yeah,.
I
B
AP
Guess
Mrs
stanbridge
I
am
here
attorney
good
afternoon
everybody
good
afternoon,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Jonathan
genie
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
for
68
Lakeshore
Road
in
Brighton.
AP
This
is
a
68
Lakeshore
Road
is
zoning
is
one
out
five
thousand
the
lot
size
is
5794
square
feet
I'm
with
here
I'm
here
with
today,
Adriana
Rojas,
along
with
the
partner
ETI
and
Dano,
who
are
the
owners
of
Lake
Shore
Drive.
They
purchased
a
single
family
home
almost
10
years
ago
and
are
looking
to
update
and
renovate
their
living
space.
AP
The
proposed
Edition
will
include
two-tier
two
car
tandem
garage,
two
additional
bedrooms,
one
on
each
floor
and
two
bathrooms
one
on
each
floor.
The
floor.
The
first
floor
of
the
addition
will
also
include
an
office
space
as
well
as
a
living
room.
Additional
will
also
expand
the
front
porch
and
the
dwelling.
So
this
home
is
currently
1615
square
feet.
The
addition
would
bring
it
up
to
24
177
square
feet
for
a
Net
game
of
800
square
feet.
AP
Y
It's
time
to
the
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board
I'm
sorry.
This
is
Frank
Mendoza
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
Austin,
Brighton
liaison
at
this
time.
Y
Ons
would
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board,
but
we
would
like
to
testify
to
the
community
engagement
that
this
applicant
underwent,
namely
reaching
out
to
Butters
and
also
reaching
out
to
the
local
civic
association,
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association,
the
zoning
chair
of
which
I
believe
is
on
to
testify
right
after
me,
we
didn't
hear
very
much
opposition
from
a
butter,
so
mostly
folks
who
reached
out
and
wanted
to
see
a
copy
of
the
plants
or
the
refusal
letter,
but
didn't
actually
have
any
follow-up
comments
to
me.
Y
There
was
a
single
letter
of
opposition
which
we
forwarded
to
the
board
and
the
board
should
have
on
file
but
other
than
that
we're
unaware
of
any
significant
opposition
from
either
nearby
Butters
or
from
the
community
at
large.
With
that
said,
we'd
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
AU
Z
AG
D
S
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Elon
Myers,
and
this
is
my
wife,
Ella
Myers
Property
Owners
of
5
Delaney
Circle,
presenting
on
behalf
of
ourselves.
We
purchased
our
home
in
2009.
We
have
lived
in
it
since,
with
our
growing
family
mean
that
our
family
has
grown
thank
God
to
five
children
and
expecting
we
saw
the
needs
for
additional
space
and
hope
to
be
granted
relief
to
add,
in
addition
to
our
existing
home,
to
describe
our
project,
we're
seeking
to
add
two
additions
to
our
home.
S
Firstly,
we'd
like
to
add
bedrooms
to
the
top
floor
by
removing
the
roof
of
the
second
floor,
raise
the
walls
and
build
a
new
roof
which
you
can
see
here
in
this
image.
This
would
add
three
bedrooms
to
our
home,
as
well
as
a
bathroom
that
can
be
seen
here
in
this
slide
over
here
next
slide,
please.
S
Secondly,
we
would
like
to
extend
the
dining
area
of
our
first
floor
to
the
rear
of
our
home.
That
extension
can
be
seen
here
in
this
slide.
For
these
additions,
we
are
seeking
relief
in
three
areas.
Number
one
is
far
the
maximum
allowed.
Far
in
our
area
is
0.5,
our
home
is
currently
at
0.38
and
we
are
proposing
a
new
far
of
0.58,
which
is
about
400,
Suite
or
square
feet.
Over
number
two
is
the
story's
Heights.
S
S
This
is
just
the
site
plan
where
you
can
see
where
the
rear
extension
the
proposed
first
floor,
Edition,
it's
just
shy
of
a
few
feet
on
one
side
of
the
rear
setback,
as
well
as
about
just
over
six
feet
on
the
other
side.
Next
slide,
please
just
as
a
comparison
to
a
neighbor,
that's
right
across
from
us.
They
recently
were
granted
relief,
also
a
home
in
expanding
their
home
to
three
stories
and
an
far
of
0.95
Which
is
far
more
than
our
proposed
Edition.
S
Next
slide,
please
wanted
to
just
give,
as
far
as
the
stories
hikes
relief
believe
that
there's
some
special
consideration
regarding
the
Topography
of
our
home
and
the
surrounding
Community,
as
you
can
see,
our
home
is
situated
on
a
hill,
with
the
elevation
continuing
to
rise
behind
our
home
next
slide.
Please.
S
And
over
here
you
can
see
that
from
the
entrance
of
our
home
to
Rushmore
Street
behind
us,
there's
a
difference.
Elevation
there's
a
gain
of
over
20
feet.
So
we
feel
that
extending
that
additional
story
won't
have
a
great
impact
on
most
of
the
neighbors
around
us.
It
won't
appear
to
be
a
towering
structure
as
a
three-story.
How
horny
sound
to
be
next
slide
please
now.
This
is
just
an
image
taken
from
Rushmore
Street,
the
street
level,
looking
towards
our
home,
which
is
in
the
center
of
the
picture.
S
So
you
can
see
that
the
current
second
floor
of
our
home
is
level
more
or
less
with
Rushmore
Street.
Therefore,
adding
a
third
floor
would
not
really
impact
our
buddy
Neighbors
in
terms
of
Burling
height,
also
due
to
the
position
of
our
home
in
relation
to
East
and
West.
Adding
a
floor
would
only
detract
sunlight
from
the
home
that
you
see
on
the
left
and
they
are
not
in
objection
whatsoever
to
our
project
and
very
supportive.
Thank
you
for
your
time
and
consideration.
Y
Yes,
good
morning,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Frank
Mendoza
Austin,
Brighton
liaison
for
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
he'd
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board
this
applicant
had
in
the
butters
meeting
and
also
met
with
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association.
There
were
also
a
number
of
letters
we
received,
which
we
forwarded
to
the
board
14
and
support
two
in
opposition,
one
of
butter
reached
out
and
didn't
ask
to
be
forwarded
to
the
board,
but
did
mention
a
concern
regarding
the
height
and
specific.
Y
Some
of
the
aboutters
who
were
in
attendance
at
the
at
the
abutters
meeting
had
similar
concerns
as
well.
A
couple
of
those
and
some
of
the
other,
most
of
the
other
abouters
who
were
present
and
later
wrote
letters
were
in
support
with
that
said,
relates
to
the
threat
to
the
Judgment
of
the
board
and
I
believe
Annabella
Golems
is
on
to
testifies
to
The
Stance
of
the
baia.
Thank
you
thank
you.
AU
Z
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Annabella
goes
to
the
Brighton
Austin
approving
Association
and
voted
to
support
this
project.
We
do
feel
that
the
height
will
have
little
to
no
impact
on
the
ability
neighbors
and
they
have
supported
the
one
that
does,
and
we
think
it's
important
to
keep
a
growing
family
in
the
neighborhoods
who'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
B
V
D
AP
Yes,
thank
you:
Mr
stanbridge,
Attorney
John
felgini
good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Attorney
General
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
mapping.
You
know
Joe
de
jangi
with
me
this
afternoon
is
William
Lee
from
money,
French,
architects,
who
will
help
with
the
presentation
as
Mrs
ambran
stated.
This
is
an
article
80
project,
10
35
1037
Commonwealth
Ave
is
in
Austin
Brighton.
Zoning
is
community
commercial.
Two.
The
lot
size
is
11
993
square
feet.
AP
The
Proposal
students
raise
an
existing
structure,
it's
a
one-store
in
retail
location
and
you
all
remember
the
city,
sport
retail
store.
It's
been
vacant
for
about
12
years,
Believe,
It
or
Not
Over
by
bu
and
constructing
approximately
new
six-story
building
with
55
residential
units
and
3653
square
feet
of
ground
floor
retail
in
the
55
units
will
be
comprised
of
to
the
community.
We
have
five
three
bedrooms
on
average
size,
1024
square
feet,
15
two
bedrooms,
898,
seven
square
feet,
21
bedrooms,
662
square
feet
and
15
Studios.
It's
an
average
of
479..
AP
This
building
will
include
a
residential
entry,
Lobby
and
service
spaces.
Zero
parking
spaces
will
be
provided
in
55.
Bicycle
spaces
will
be
provided.
Nine
of
the
units
approximately
16.5
percent,
will
be
affordable
at
70
Ami.
The
proponent
is
also
making
a
15
125
contribution
to
BTD
to
support
the
blue
bikes
program
in
Austin
Brighton,
and
this
was
approved
by
the
bpda
board
on
February
16
2023..
AP
Additionally,
with
respect
to
community
benefits,
the
applicant
has
been
working
with
Council
of
reading's
office
on
making
a
sizable
donation
to
a
park
in
their
area
and
he's
working
on
that
now.
Violations
far
too
is
allowed
under
the
zoning
code,
where
47
height
is
35
or
68..
Acting
is
two
per
unit,
we're
not
proposing
any
parking,
and
that
came
as
a
result
of
our
article
leading
process
same
with
the
loading
zone.
AP
AP
That's
really
it
we
have
like
I
said
we
went
through
a
very
lengthy
process.
We've
worked
extensively
with
the
community
this
building,
where
it's
located.
There
are
much
higher
buildings
than
it,
especially
right
behind
it,
and
we
went
through.
We
met
with
the
ACA.
Had
great
meetings
with
them,
I
think
they're
in
full
support,
and
you
know,
had
separate
meetings
with
the
counselor
and
have
done
a
tremendous
community
outreach.
B
E
AP
A
good
question:
there
is
five
three
bedroom
units
and
that
was
as
a
result
of
the
community
because
they
want
a
family
style
units,
15
two
bedroom
units,
21
bedroom
units
and
15
Studio
units.
So
it's
not
geared
toward
a
college
student
at
all.
This
is
more
geared
toward
a
graduate
student
professionals
live
in
the
area
that
would
like
to
have
the
trolley
right
in
front
of
the
building
so
that
they
could
get
in
town.
It's
a
perfect
Tod
development.
E
AP
They
have
it.
We
have
used
a
union
in
the
past,
the
same
developer,
so
I'm,
assuming
that's
the
way,
he'll
go
on
this
as
well
he's
still
going
through
the
entitlement
period
and
getting
permits
and
approvals
and
I
would
say
the
timeline
of
a
building
of
the
size,
because
one
of
the
things
that
came
a
result
of
the
bpda
article
80
process
was
they
wanted
us
to
preserve
the
facade
of
the
existing
structure,
which
we
have
done
in
these
filings,
so
I
would
say
probably
about
18
months
of
construction.
AP
J
It
looks
like
maybe
historically,
there
was
some
parking
and
there
was
going
to
be
stacker
parking,
so
just
trying
to
understand
exactly
when
that
was
reconciled
with
the
notes
that
we
have
about
the
refusal
and
related
to
the
BPD
approval
and
what
we're
seeing
now.
So
you
can
just
walk
us
through
the
history
on
that
briefly
sure.
AP
The
bpda
we
had
gone
to
the
BPA
because
they
really
because
of
where
this
building
is
located,
it's
kind
of
a
commercial
area.
They
would.
They
really
wanted
us
to
have
much
more
of
a
retail
presence
on
that
street
and
they
felt
like
because
of
its
location
right
on
trains
and
trolleys
that
really
there
would
be
no
need
for
parking.
So
that's
why
that
changed.
It
evolved
through
the
articulating
process
and
after
the
article
process
too,
with
further
conversations
with
the
bpda.
AP
And
we
are
initially
I
think
when
it
finally
went
David
it
was
somewhere
and
I'm
sorry
Mr
Aiken.
It
was
somewhere
around
three
parking
spaces
at
the
end
and
the
bpda
said
at
that
point.
You
know
what
it's
kind
of
pointless
to
have
those
three
spaces.
You
can
use
it
as
drop-offs
or
deliveries,
and
things
like
that.
However,
with
respect
to
the
parking,
this
building
is
a
packing.
A
building
that
screams
we
don't
need
parking
because
of
its
location,
yeah.
J
No
thank
you
for
that.
Another
two.
Two,
the
last
questions
you
mentioned
about
the
three
bedrooms
and
being
family-sized
units.
But
what
is
the
intent
of
actually
leasing
those
to
to
Families?
How
does
the
opponent,
I
guess,
intend
and
at
least
those
to
unrelated
individuals,
if
that's
the
intention
of
their
family
units
just
curious
how
they
they
intend
to
manage
that?
It's
not
a
zoning
piece
per
se,
but
when
we
get
those
comments
about
that,
I
think
there's
a
Divergence,
perhaps
sometimes
from
how
they're
actually
operated
right.
AP
And
that's
another
good
question,
so
throughout
the
processes
you
guys
are,
you
know,
aware
of
when
you
go
to
the
community
you're
proposing
different
size
units.
Everybody
is
looking
for
family
style
units,
especially
in
an
area
like
Austin
Brighton,
where
we
have
many
more
small
units
and
not
many
large.
So
the
goal
is
one
of
these
will
be
designated
affordable
as
well.
The
goal
is
to
Market
these
toward
families
and
not
toward
I
mean
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
beautiful
nice
building.
AP
J
AP
Yeah,
so
we
had
met
with
the
reason
why
that
happens
is
when
you're
exceeding
the
affordability
like
we
are.
The
Community
benefits
can
sometimes
be
dismissed
on
that,
but
Mr
Panino
and
I
had
conversations
that
I
believe
more
McCray
from
Council
breathing's
office
is
on
this
call
to
designate
some
money
outside
of
this
toward
in
a
sizable
amount
of
money.
He's
this
guy
lives
in
Brighton,
he's
lived
there.
AP
His
whole
life
he's
done
several
other
developments
there
he
understands
this
is
not
going
to
be
his
last
project,
so
he
would
like
to
work
well
with
the
community.
So
we've
had
some
conversations
with
the
council's
office
about
making
a
sizable
donation
to
a
part
which
they
are
very
involved
with.
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
explanation.
Thank.
F
What
is
the
reason
why
the
project
is
not
allowing
some
of
those
units
to
have
deeper
levels
of
affordability,
I'm
thinking
about
all
the
families
who
are
in
the
30
40
64
60
of
the
area,
medium
income?
And
they
don't
have
an
opportunity
to
get
access
to
accounts
that
you
are
proposing,
so
why
all
the
units
are
70
and
not
lowered
or
a
mix
of
incomes.
AP
I
mean
with
you
know:
normally,
when
you're
going
to
the
article
80
process,
a
condominium
would
be
80,
Ami
and
a
apartment
would
be
70
Ami,
that's
what
the
traditional
thing
is.
So
this
was
negotiated
when
we
were
preparing
for
the
BPA
board
and
obviously
giving
more
than
13
affordability
was
something
that
fact
in
that
as
well.
AP
B
AP
Y
Yes,
so
good
morning,
Madam
chairman
members
of
the
board,
Frank
Mendoza
here
mayor's
ultimators
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
Austin
Brighton
liaison
I,
just
wanted
to
testify
that,
as
part
of
their
Community
engagement
process,
this
applicant
reached
out
to
the
Austin
civic
association
earlier
this
morning,
the
fortune
to
received
a
letter
of
support
from
the
Austin
civic
association
regarding
this
proposal.
With
that
said,
we'd
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
the
war
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
AU
She
supports
this
project
because
it
will
replace
a
currently
vacant
storefront
and
will
provide
housing
in
an
excellent
Transit
oriented
location.
Thank
you.
AW
V
J
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
a
Proviso
that
they
I
think
provide
some
satisfactory
evidence
regarding
the
contribution
needed
for
the
part
piece
since
that
was
not
picked
up
in
the
bpda
approval.
AP
AX
G
B
AY
Good
morning
Madam,
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jennifer.
My.
G
AY
The
site
is
an
existing
one
and
a
half
Story
three
family
townhouse
with
two
car
two
tandem
car
park
in
the
driveway.
The
applicants
are
proposing
a
third
story
addition
to
the
house,
as
well
as
expanding
the
decks
and
porches,
as
well
as
adding
three
I'm
sorry,
adding
six
parking
spaces
on
the
lot
to
the
rear
of
the
building.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide.
AY
Here
you
can
see
the
existing
building
to
the
left
and
to
the
right
is
the
proposed.
We
will
retain
the
existing
first
floor
and
basement,
and
footprint
of
the
building
will
remain
the
same.
We
are
adding
on
top
of
it
one
another
one
and
a
half
stories
in
the
front
elevation.
You
can
see
that
that
is
consistent
with
the
neighbors
in
terms
of
height
and
style,
and
you
can
see
in
the
next
slide.
AY
Thank
you
that
the
rear
of
the
building
is
because
of
the
large
Dormer
is
a
three-story,
and
so
that
is
going
to
be
the
same
position
as
where
the
existing
deck
is
in
the
left
picture.
It's
just
that
the
decks
will
be
expanded
to
the
left
and
right
so
that
each
unit
will
also
have
their
own
privatized
back
and
so,
and
you
can
look
at
the
next
slide.
Please
thank
you
here.
AY
You
can
see
the
existing
units
are
set
up
so
that
they're,
splits,
23,
25
and
27
their
basements
will
remain
the
same.
The
first
floor
will
also
remain
the
same.
It's
an
open
kitchen
and
dining
and
living
room
space
with
a
bathroom.
The
second
floor
will
remain
pretty
much
the
same.
It
was
a
two
bedroom
we
did
is
added
another
bathroom
and
then
the
biggest
change
is
the
third
story,
where
that
will
become
a
a
primary
bedroom
with
ensuite,
bathroom
and
walk-in
closet.
AY
U
AY
So
here
sorry,
we
can
talk
about
the
the
yes
sorry
the
variances
we
are
seeking,
so
the
existing
building
has
is
a
non-conforming
building
so
that
the
setbacks
is
on
the
on
the
front
is
allowed
15
feet,
but
we
have
existing
five
feet,
set
back
the
side,
yard
setbacks
allow
10
feet,
we
have
an
existing
one
foot,
seven
inch
setback,
the
building
height
allowed
is
two
and
a
half
stories.
AY
Oh,
the
next
slide.
Sorry
thank
you
and
then
this
is.
This
is
just
the
plans
that
were
submitted
for
ISD.
So
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
repeat
of
the
information.
I
just
presented
we're
open
to
questions.
B
Thank
you.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
AY
So
that's
a
very
good
question,
so
we
went
through
an
intensive
Community
process
that
started
in
October
last
year
and
a
lot
of
the
changes
in
the
Landscaping
actually
is
represented.
AY
AY
So
what
is
going
to
happen
is
that
the
the
one
and
two
in
the
front
that's
going
to
belong
to
Unit,
23,
so
they're
tandem
spots,
but
therefore
one
unit,
the
parking
for
three
and
four
is
Tandem
Tandem
parking
spaces
for
the
Middle
East
at
25
and
then
start
I,
think
I'm,
sorry,
I,
think,
I
I
said
the
numbers
Wrong
five
and
six
is
tandem
for
23
and
three
or
four
is
for
25,
and
one
and
two
is
for
27.
AY
and
I
want
to
add
that,
because
we
had
added
these
parking
spaces
and
add
some
more
pavement.
That's
where
we're
proposing
permeable
pervious
surfaces
for
one
and
two
that's
closer
to
the
rare
neighbor,
and
also
for
four
and
six,
which
is
closer
to
the
rare
neighbor,
and
so
those
specifically
will
be
gravel
or
purpose
surface
and
they
also
we've
added
EV
charger
for
those
two
parking
spaces.
Four
and
six.
AY
There
is
also
an
additional
pit.
Driveway
easement,
when
you
enter
into
the
existing
driveway
that
we're
allowing
number
29
to
31
better
to
use
that
driveway
as
an
easement
to
access
their
their
driveway.
L
AY
There
is
one
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
can
see
my
finger
when
I
I
guess
I
can
use
my
mouse.
Yes,
if
you
can
see
my
mouse,
there
is
a
large
tree.
That's
oh
request.
Okay,
there's
a
large
tree,
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
can
see
my
mouse,
but
in
the
rear,
where
our
one
and
two
is
and
there's
also
some
trees
that
are
in
the
back,
where
the
parking
three
or
four
is
so.
AY
At
the
request
of
the
rare
butter,
we
will
be
removing
those
large
trees
because
they're
not
in
great
condition
but
and
instead
we
won't
be
planting
a
buffer
of
trees
and
the
rare
towards
the
rare
neighbor
as
well
to
the
side
towards
17
and
19..
So
this
would
be
an
environmental
buffer
as
well
as
a
privacy
buffer
between
the
the
Lots
yeah.
B
You
speak
to
your
the
context.
It
looks
like
a
lot
of
one
family's
surrounding
you.
Could
you
just
talk
about
your
three
family?
Yes,.
AY
So
to
the
right
of
us
is
a
two-family
townhouse
to
the
left
of
us
is
a
two-family
town.
Also
29,
31,
17
and
19.
to
the
front
of
us
is
a
two
family
townhouse
and
then
diagonally
in
front
of
us
is
a
two-family
townhouse.
So
this
is,
there
is
a.
There
is
a
four
family
that
is
diagonally
across
the
street
behind
another
building,
and
there
is
also
most
of
them,
I
think
are
like
as
a
single
family
Zone.
But
there
are
some
two
families
around
us.
AY
AJ
AY
View
you
will
see
that
our
Butters,
so
I
guess
in
this
view
that
there
is
two
and
a
half
most
of
our
neighbors
actually
are
all
two
and
a
half
stories
that
that
are
against
the
Cedar
Street
across
the
street,
as
well
only
two
and
a
half
story,
so
we
will
be
consistent
in
terms
of
high-end
Style,.
B
Okay
hearing
none
may
I
have
public
testimony.
V
AE
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
board.
There
was
a
lengthy
Community
process.
With
this
we
heard
from
any
of
Butters
in
support
and
in
opposition
we
received
33
letters
in
support
and
20
in
opposition,
including
from
the
River
Street
Civic
group.
AE
The
greater
Mattapan
neighborhood
council
did
vote
to
support
this
proposal
with
two
provisos
that
during
design
review,
the
mass
of
the
front
of
the
building
be
worked
on
and
reduced
as
well
as
reduction
of
Tandem
parking
as
well
for
the
site.
There
were
some
concerns
expressed
by
the
proponent,
about
some
community
members
being
pressured
to
oppose,
but
with
that
that
should
cover
the
full
testimony.
We
refer
to
the
board
at
this
time.
Thank
you.
AZ
Yes,
I'm
here
representing
councilor
Brian
Worrell
good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
from
the
city
council
of
Warehouse
in
regards
to
23
to
27
Cedar
Street.
AZ
The
applicant
did
receive
32
total
letters
of
support
and
one
from
greater
greater
Lower
Mills,
and
they
did
receive
one
letter
proposition
from
burrow
Street
Civic,
despite
all
of
that
they
did.
It
actually
hold
three
different
voting
sessions,
so
two
for
River
Street
and
then
one
for
regular
Mills
and
they
did
four
of
Butters
meetings
throughout
their
entire
process.
Up
until
today's
date,
and
with
that
being
said,
the
council
would
like
to
refer
to
the
discussion
of
the
board.
AZ
BA
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
Michael
dower
I
live
in
Tennessee
to
Street
diagnosed,
with
the
property
I've
been
to
I.
Think
all
four
of
the
meetings
of
the
about
our
meetings
and
universally
it's
been
almost
almost
100
opposition
for
the
people
that
actually
live
on
Cedar
Street.
So
when
I
heard
the
president
before
say
about
all
the
support
that's
been
given,
but
it's
been
primarily
for
people
that
don't
live
on
the
Street
Cedar
Street
is
a
very
narrow
Street.
BA
The
parking
is
actually
pretty
dangerous
on
one
side
of
the
street
by
cars,
I
live
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
street.
My
car
has
been
struck
multiple
times
so
I
have
to
park
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
Parking
is
a
huge
problem
here
and
if
you're,
throwing
some
snow
is
going
to
be
all
bets
are
off.
BA
I
feel
like
the
developer
has
not
listened
to
the
people
that
live
on
the
street.
Who've
asked
numerously
that
this
be
converted
to
a
true
unit
instead
of
a
three
because
most
of
the
homes
here
are
single-family
homes,
there's
a
few
that
are
duplexes
and
one
multi-family
up
the
street.
But
it's
primarily
it's
not
congruent
the
homes
that
are
in
this
area
and
I
say
this
as
actually
as
a
developer,
I'm.
BA
V
G
AV
Is
William
Jeffers
at
45,
Cedar,
Street,
okay,
I
had
a
question
I'm
looking
at
a
at
the
refusal
letter,
another
copy
of
a
refusal
letter,
that's
also
showing
violations
of
article
9
section
one
and
article
65,
section
65-41.5,
which
don't
seem
to
be
referenced
on
today's
agenda
and
I
was
wondering
if
these
These
are
also
being
voted
on
for
Relief.
At
this
time.
AV
Well,
I'm
in
opposition,
because,
if
it
is,
you
know,
there
hasn't
been
a
full
discussion
of
its
violation
of
artists,
articles
9,
section
one,
it's
more
than
a
25
increase
of
an
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
and
I.
Don't
believe
that
that
has
been
fully
discussed
and
I
I
do
not
support
that.
Okay,.
BB
Name
is
Curtis
Wilson,
I'm,
29
and
31
Cedar
Street,
okay,
yes
and
I
am
in
full
support.
I
think
that
they
have
took
up
all
our
concerns.
Parking
Pest
Control
throughout
the
build
tenant
offered
to
buy
option
new
fencing
some
tree
removal,
some
trees
that
other
neighbors
have
had
have
busted
through
fences
and
done
some
stuff.
So
they're
going
to
take
care
of
that
fencing
in
the
trees,
nice,
new
landscape
for
privacy
and
any
concern
that
pops
up
they've
been
right
there.
BB
If
you
have
a
concern
or
you
need
something
done
to
help.
You
know,
like
I,
said
the
Privacy
with
the
landscape
they're
on
board
right
away.
Once
you
tell
them,
there
was
a
lot
more
support
in
the
beginning
and
due
to
some
neighbors
with
certain
opinions
and
strong
opinions,
it
has
drove
some
people
away
from
support
and
I
think
it's
a
great
project
and
there
are
a
lot
of
people
in
support.
Thank.
AX
Yes,
this
is
Francine
Dancy,
Carruthers
I
am
directly
and
back
of
this,
my
blood
pressure
is
up
behind
this
I'm,
going
to
start
with
Curtis
who
just
got
off
the
phone
or
I
just
got
offline.
AX
B
G
B
AX
Thing
is,
there
has
been
over
80
something
people
on
the
meetings
that
are
against
this.
This
is
directly
in
my
back.
Y'all
Sturbridge
street
is
Cedar.
Street,
sits
up
a
little
higher
than
service
street,
so
we're
down
like
in
a
valley
or
a
ditch
So
within
this
building
being
Sky
High
in
my
backyard
and
all
the
other
neighbors
that
are
on
Sturbridge
Street.
AX
This
is
what
we're
we're
taking
and
looking
at,
as,
as
the
woman
stated
before,
the
design
on
the
architect,
she
had
said
the
front
of
it
will
be
equal
in
height,
but
the
back
of
it
will
take
and
be
higher
than
everything
else
so
and
in
terms
of
cocking
six
cars
in
the
backyard
and
my
fence
is
right
there,
that's
all
of
that.
AX
Within
my
backyard,
there
are
a
lot
of
neighbors
or
most
of
the
neighbors
take
and
sit
in
their
backyard
during
the
summer
during
the
Spring
get
the
kids
are
running
around,
so
they
have
these
cars
all
within
the
backyard.
In
addition
to
it
is
a
small
backyard
I
know
you
all
have
the
footage
and
everything,
but
to
have
six
cars
back
there
and
then
let's
go
into
top
chopping
down
trees.
They
have
to
do
at
least
six
trees
have
to
be
cut
down
in
the
back
and
with
the
roots
of
the
trees.
AX
But
all
of
that
has
to
take
and
go
into
my
yard
so
as
they
take
and
do
all
of
this
all
the
my
backyard
has
to
be
demolished
or
dug
up
as
well.
B
AY
Yes,
so
in
regards
to
one
of
the
headbutters,
the
support
that
we
have,
we
have
33
letters
of
support,
they're
all
within
the
300
feet
of
the
project,
but
actually
18
of
those
letters
are
from
Cedar
Street
itself,
so
they're
all
and
a
lot
of
them
actually
are
direct
about
ours.
10
letters
are
from
one
block
distance
and
then
five
letters
are
coming
two
blocks
distance.
There
are
no
letter
support,
that's
from
three
or
four
block
systems.
AY
These
letters
of
support
were
not
acknowledged
by
River
Street,
neighborhood
association
as
part
of
their
boat
and
I
for
for
to
reference,
sorry
to
respond
to
Francine
the
so
that
there
will
be
trees
that
will
be
taken
out.
That
was
talked
about
with
Francine
and
a
couple
meetings
and,
of
course
anything
that
is
on
her
yard
or
any
problems
that
would
happen
from
digging
up
those
trees
that
we
will
work
with
her.
AY
J
Guess
I'd
just
like
to
overall
comment
that
the
building
appears,
at
least
in
renderings
it'll,
be
a
nice
building.
These
don't
seem
to
completely
out
of
context
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
about
the
site
plan
with
all
of
the
asphalt
I
realize
a
couple
of
the
the
requests
are
for
existing
conditions
because
you're
reusing
the
building
but
I
guess
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
to
there
to
fellow
members
of
the
board
that
a
little
bit
troubled
by
the
number
of
trees
that
are
being
taken
down,
there's
been
a
number.
J
It
looks
like
they've
been
taken
down
over
the
years.
That's
not
part
of
the
case
here
now,
but
you
know
what
the
mitigation
is
for
some
of
the
landscape
and
all
the
asphalt
and
parking
areas,
and
certainly
some
of
the
context
of
the
feedback
that
we've
heard
from
some
of
Butters.
It's
not
quite
clear
the
the
what
the
level
of
support
really
really
is,
or
isn't
this
juncture
so
not
offering
emotion
at
this
time.
Just
some
thoughts.
F
Mm-Hmm
I'm
sorry
I
I
mean
just
basically
the
comments
from
the
awards
and
my
colleagues
at
the
Sony
board.
I'm
thinking
about
the
excessive
parking
and
I
would
like
to
perform
one
emotion
to
approve
the
project
with
the
providing
that
the
parking
is
reduced
from
CX
parking
units
to
from
six
parking
spots
to
three
parking
spots.
F
B
Thank
you,
okay,
so
we
have
a
motion
to
improve
with
a
Proviso
to
reduce
parking
from
six
to
three
and
BPD
design
review,
and
we
have
a
second
Mr
Collins.
Yes,.
I
I
BC
B
Hey,
can
you
introduce
yourself
name
an
adjustment
record
and.
BC
So
good
afternoon,
Madam
president
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
James
Sandy,
Hook
and
Bricks
construction,
also,
a
fun
print
Realty
here,
representing
74
Corona
Street,
the
owner's
number
Wallace
and
Leroy
Wallace
as
well.
This
is
a
three-bang
renovation
that
we're
doing
Norman
Wilson's
owned
the
property
since
1999.
it
was
a
three
family,
three
beds,
one
bad
each
unit
last
year,
February
5th
on
the
hospital
on
fire,
the
place
of
three
families.
So
what
we
did
we
actually
went
through
and
upgraded
the
whole
property
installed
in
the
sprinkler
system.
BC
Fire
alarm
and
work
pertains
in
the
basement
three
beds:
two
baths:
Central
AC
Washington
dry
unit,
but
now
we're
trying
to
install
potential
rear
egress
in
the
back.
It
was
all
about
increasing
safety
after
that
fire
last
year,
the
owners
were
they
had
someone
that
got
injured
and
they
were
close
to
the
family.
So
they
wanted
to
create
a
access
to
get
out
right
down
into
getting
more
feet
to
get
the
side,
yard
and
graveyard
space,
as
you
can
see
here
so
right
now,
we're
looking
for
probably
to
increase
the
safety.
J
AJ
Good
afternoon
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
actually
going
to
mayor's
office
and
Neighborhood
Services
our
office
did
Holden
the
voters
meeting
in
the
beginning
of
March.
Your
Butters
in
attendance
of
that
date,
with
Lucerne
shared
at
the
moment,
is
a
big
of
that
area.
That
neighbors
has
not
had
a
chance
to
vote
on
the
project
this,
yet
due
to
scheduling
with
that,
we
like
to
adjustment
to
the
political
time.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
B
AZ
With
this
project,
the
developer
was
not
able
to
appear
before
the
local
Civic,
which
was
a
United
neighborhood
association,
and
the
leader
would
like
to
invite
them
to
come
to
their
meeting
this
coming
week
in
order
to
engage
with
the
community
and
maybe
flesh
out
any
concerns
that
the
neighborhood
may
or
may
not
have
with.
That
being
said,
the
counselor
would
like
to
purchase
the
board.
O
V
You
have
another
hand
here
Leroy,
can
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
let
us
briefly
your
support
opposition.
BD
BD
BD
so
I
know
my
neighbors
I
know
the
new
neighbors
I've
been
there.
My
whole
life
and
I've
tried
to
get
in
contact
with
Brian
Barrow's
office
for
plethora
of
reasons
and
I
never
get
any
feedback
from
him.
Maybe
I'm
not
qualified
enough,
but
I.
BD
This
project
can't
go
on
any
further
because
I
have
a
70
year
old
mother
that
needs
a
place
to
live,
so
civic
association
or
not
I,
mean
I
know
all
my
neighbors
and
my
neighbors
have
no
problems
with
this
and
that's
on
my
street
on
Geneva
Ave
and
streets.
Parallels
list.
B
L
BC
So
we've
had
met
with
golden
Street
Association
and
that's
what
we
were
going
through
to
have
our
meeting
with
and
then
I
guess
it
was
understood
it
was
going
through
the
Festival,
the
board
history.
Associated
approved
it
again.
This
was
all
about
safety,
the
biggest
piece
on
there.
It
wasn't
about
making
anything
larger
having
that
area
to
come
outside,
so
it
was
worthy,
we're
looking
for
me,
I
mean
after
the
fact
it's
that's
been
the
biggest
thing.
Yes,.
L
U
AJ
Was
just
about
mishap
and
the
overlapping
of
the
civic
association
since
there's
so
many
in
circles
in
the
area,
but
they
are
looking
to
present
to
them
this
week
for
feedback
yeah.
B
Yes,
and
just
there
is,
there
is
a
lot
of
support
from
Baldwin,
Geneva,
Main
Street
and
somebody
else
who
seems
to
be
in
a
butter.
We.
G
BE
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
My
name
is
alexie
Edwards
I,
actually
own
a
home
on
Westfield
Street,
which
in
its
street
over
I'm,
definitely
in
favor
with
this
particular
project.
If,
if
James
the
contractor
leave
this
leave,
it
original
size,
it'll
be
hard
for.
First
command
is
to
to
to
come
in
and
and
get
to
this
particular
property.
If
it's
another
emergency,
so
I
applaud
them
to
to
try
to
make
this
egress
a
little
bit
bigger.
BE
So
first
responses
could
actually
get
into
the
back
the
back
egress
and
the
front
egress
easily
it
I've
been
through
a
fire
and
I
know
when
I'm
you
know
putting
a
renovating
again,
I
want
to
make
it
easy
to
avoid
a
fire
or
make
it
easy
for
those
to
come.
Save
anyone
in
the
house,
so
I
really
applaud
them.
To
try
to
to
make
this.
BE
This
porch
a
little
bigger,
spend
a
little
bit
more
money,
but
at
the
end
you
know
it's
it's
a
it's
a
great
chance
for
everyone
to
be
safe
and
get
taken
out
of
the
house
if
the
emergency
occurs
again.
So
I
definitely
applaud
this
and
applauded
James
and
and
I
agree.
I
B
AQ
Yes,
Mr
stanbridge.
Thank
you
good
afternoon,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
George
foreign
way
in
South,
Boston
I
represent
Charles
McCarthy,
the
owner
of
the
property
located
at
630
Dorchester
Avenue
in
South
Boston.
This
is
an
application
to
add
a
garden
level.
Fourth
dwelling
unit
and
existing
three
family
dwellings,
the
law
type
2079
square
feet
and
the
zoning
is
an
L1
local
business
district
under
the
1964
base
code.
This
is
not
article
68,
South
Boston.
AQ
The
most
relevant
plan
sheets
here
are
page
c01,
which
includes
renderings
the
floor
plan
of
the
unit
in
question,
which
is
Page
a01
and
then
the
building
cross-sections,
which
are
at
a06
and
a07.
AQ
The
lower
level
of
this
building
had
been
previously
built
out.
It
was
occupied
by
a
commercial
business.
It
was
actually
a
seamstress
job
most
recently,
and
the
property
was
actually
assessed
for
a
period
of
time
as
a
mixed-use
residential
commercial
property.
My
client
purchased
the
building
and
considered
a
simply
making
unit
one
of
bi-level
unit,
but
in
that
case
there
would
have
been
potentially
at
least
six
bedrooms
in
such
a
unit.
The
proposed
new
unit,
by
contrast,
would
be
a
1211
square
foot
three-bedroom
unit.
This
is
shown
on
sheet
a01.
AQ
This
is
not
a
proposed
basement
unit
and
has
not
been
cited
as
such
by
ISD,
because
the
unit
is
at
least
50
percent
at
or
above
grade,
and
it
is
a
full
walkout
in
the
rear.
Also
the
building's
not
located
within
a
flood
Hazard
area
nor
within
a
coastal
blood
resilience
overlay
District,
the
Lord
is
feeling
height
in
the
unit
ranges
from
eight
to
nine
feet.
With
respect
to
the
requested,
zoning
relief
of
variance
is
thought
for
insufficient
wide
area
for
the
additional
dwelling
unit.
AQ
As
I
mentioned,
this
site
is
governed
by
the
base
code,
not
article
68.
The
old
code
requires
a
minimum
five
thousand
square
foot
pot
for
only
one
unit
four
units
that
would
require
8
000
square
foot
lot.
The
size
of
this
lot,
as
I
mentioned,
is
just
over
2
000
square
feet,
which
makes
the
variants
necessary
code
also
requires
400
square
feet
of
usable
open
space
for
the
new
unit,
but
there
is
no
way
to
create
open
space
on
the
lot
since
there's
already
a
building.
AQ
Here,
the
only
way
to
do
that
would
be
to
add
a
roof
deck
and
my
clientelected
not
to
propose
a
group
deck
given
neighborhood
sensitivities
on
that
subject,
there's
no
way
to
add
parking
to
the
site,
of
course,
so
there's
zoning
violation
and
relief
requested
for
insufficient
off
street
parking,
but
I
would
point
out
that
the
building
is
located
just
across
Andrew
square
of
the
mbta's
Andrew
station.
Finally,
there's
a
violation
for
excessive
floor
area
ratio.
The
maximum
fa
far
here
is
one.
J
AQ
Yeah,
that's
what
I
believe
it
is
not.
I
am
referencing
the
zoning
refusal
letter,
even
if
it
were
it,
is
not
subject
to
article
26
and
it's
not
an
article
80
small
project,
and
so
you
know
it
wouldn't
be
subject
to
the
requirements
to
see
fraud,
even
if
it
were.
AE
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
at
the
sign
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
Judgment
of
this
board
some
background
information,
the
community
process
our
office
held
in
Butters
meeting
in
early
March.
There
was
one
about
her
in
attendance
to
express
some
concerns
about
the
lack
of
parking
proposed
with
the
proposal.
AE
The
app
can
explain
that
the
previous
use
for
this
area
was
was
a
tailor
which
also
led
to
an
increasing
number
of
vehicles
coming
in
out
of
the
square.
Other
members
that
were
on
for
the
butters
meeting
were
in
support
of
the
proposal
and
they
eventually
went
on
to
meet
with
the
Andrew
Square
Civic
Group,
which
should
not
express
any
concerns.
AE
BF
Good
afternoon
Madam,
chair
and
CBA
ppta
members,
my
name
is
John
pecatowski
lifelong
resident,
small
business
owner
in
Andrews
Square
also
I
serve
as
ASCA
development
committee.
Chair
I'd,
like
to
thank
Mr
McCarthy
for
his
engagement
of
the
community
process
in
addressing
any
quality
of
life
concerns
The
Proposal
may
bring.
It
is
our
opinion
that
the
requested
relief
will
have
no
negative
impact
on
the
surrounding
area.
We
are
in
full
support.
Thank.
J
Make
a
motion
to
approve
with
the
epda
design
review
as
they
requested
it.
B
AQ
Didn't
matter
just
for
the
record,
I
want
to
correct
my
testimony.
This
is
within
the
Deep
Rod
I
put
this
into
chat.
It
is
not
subject
to
cpride,
so
I
apologize
for
the
misstatement.
Thank
you.
D
V
Oh
sorry,
machine
raised
hands
here,
Robin
and
Matt,
and
you.
V
BG
I
can
hear
us
yes,
I'm
out
chairman
members
of
the
board,
thanks
for
hearing
us
today.
My
name
is
Matt
Doyle
I'm
here
with
Canada's
kids
Rick
Ellis.
We
are
currently
traveling
right
now,
so
we
are
in
the
car.
We
represent
the
owners
at
49,
East
Broadway,
blank
Street
Coffee.
We
have
three
other
locations
in
Boston,
two
in
Beacon
Hill
and
one
on
Boylston.
We
are
looking
to
create
a
cafe
here
with
to
go
fruit
and
and
Aussie
fairly
simple,
build
out.
BG
We
are,
you
can
see
from
the
drives
there
from
the
construction
plan
we're
looking
to
put
in
18
seats.
Majority
of
this
is
to
go
traffic.
We
will
put
in
the
ABA
restroom.
BG
We
have
full
Pest
Control.
We
have
garbage
pickups
throughout
the
week.
U
Yeah,
absolutely
so
operating
seven
to
five
no
food
prepared
on
site,
just
identical
operations
of
the
existing
three
local
vendors
use,
where
possible
and
as
Matt
stated
trash
pickup
is
all
stored
in
silent.
So
pick
up
overnight.
BD
BG
Right
now
it
is,
it
was
a.
It
was
a
jewelry
shop,
so
it
was
commercial
and
turned
over
into
a
real
estate
office.
Got.
B
Okay,
any
other
questions
from
the
board.
AE
Yes,
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services
this
time
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
to
the
judge
from
this
board
some
background
information,
the
community
process
our
office
had
the
applicant
flyer
to
a
Butters
within
300
feet.
We
did
receive
word
from
one:
a
budding
business
owner
who
expressed
opposition
due
to
concerns
with
trash
double
parking
from
people
using
takeout
as
well
as
concerns
that
work
might
have
done
been
done
on
the
site
ahead
of
time.
AE
Beyond
that,
we
did
not
hear
from
any
other
residents.
The
outcome
did
go
on
to
meet
with
the
Gate
of
Heaven
neighborhood
association,
which
I
understand
the
Gate
of
Heaven
off
of
their
full
support
with
the
project.
With
that
we
refer
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
AR
I
B
Panado
yes,
Mr
Incan,
yes,
Mr
Stembridge,
yes,
Mr
Shepard,
yes,
Mr
Valencia,
yes,
chair
also
votes,
yes,
motion
carries.
Let's
take
a
15-minute
break.