►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 11-17-20 (Part 2 of 2)
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 11-17-20 (Part 2 of 2)
A
Mr
garrity's
plan
for
the
future
is
to
is
to
renovate
the
building,
but
it
is
fully
occupied.
Presently
he
has
lived
in
it
himself
and
you
know
there
are
no
plans
to
do
any
work
in
regard
to
this
application.
There
are
future
plans,
of
course,
just
upgrading
and
renovating
property
generally
and
again
he
and
mr
garrity.
If
successful
this,
would
this
would
be
his
home.
The
the
29
rear
building
would
be
his
home.
We
obviously
went
through
the
process
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
B
Mr
quilty,
you
know
the
mayor's
office
will
give
us
all
that
information.
Yes,
ma'am,
like
to
hear
from
you
as
a
representative
of
the
applicant,
is
the
details
there
are
now,
because
there
is
the
the
proposed
building
behind
the
building.
There
are
now
violations
that
are
created,
429
bigelow
street,
and
then
there
are
a
number
of
violations
for
29
are
bigelow
street.
So
can
you
speak
through
those
violations?
B
A
Yes,
ma'am
I'll
I'll
go
through
as
much
as
I
can,
and
I
would
probably
turn
it
over
to
mr
chu
and
to
get
into
further
detail,
but
as
to
parking
number
one.
There
is
ample
parking
429.
It
already
exists
in
the
rear
of
that
building.
There's
a
great
open
space
if
you
will
at
closest
to
that
building,
which
provides
existing
parking
and
the
parking
for
mr
dirty
at
29r
will
be
created
in
the
garage
which
you
see
is
proposed
as
part
of
these
of
the
plans
for
that
property.
A
B
B
A
Yes,
yes,
ma'am,
as
the
plans
indicate
there
is
a
basement,
and
there
is
a
garage
edition
on
the
side
of
the
building
the
basement,
arthur
you'd
have
to
tell
me
I
don't.
The
basement
doesn't
appear
to
go
under
the
garage,
but
rather
under
the
main,
the
main
portion
of
the
building,
if
you
will,
which
is
all
the
existing
okay,
okay,.
C
B
A
E
F
I
G
Bit
of
an
echo
2019,
but
we
sorry
sounds
like
there's
no
recognize
that
the
applicant
is
a
lifelong
brighton
resident.
They
received
some
support
from
jason
of
butters,
but
I
know
that
there's
particular
concerns
from
the
rear
butters.
It's
very
close
to
the
rear
property
line,
which
we
view
as
a
concern.
G
J
K
K
M
Yes,
paul
dancerow
28
bigelow
street.
I
live
across
the
street
from
this.
This
proposed
project
and
I
am
in
opposition,
but
there
are
two
things
that
I
need
to
point
out.
There's
a
lot
of
misinformation
provided
by
the
the
person
who
spoke
earlier.
I've
lived
in
this
neighborhood
for
almost
40
years
and
I'm
not
aware
of
any
other
carriage
house.
That's
been
converted
to
a
reference.
The
other
thing
that
I
want
to
point
out
is
that
the
carriage
house
does
not
exist
anymore.
M
L
O
P
P
B
Q
My
name
is
david
bove,
I'm
at
40,
adair,
road
and
and
madam
chair,
I
I
really
fished
this
because
I
believe
it's
a
quality
of
life
issue,
because
the
proximity
that
we
live,
we
directly
about
on
29
bigelow,
as
well
as
31
bigelow
as
well
as
27
bigelow.
The
number
of
people
in
each
of
those
homes
would
shock.
You
would
shock
you
there's
two
people
per
bedroom
in
each
of
those.
You
can't
sleep
here
in
the
summer
with
the
windows
of
them,
because
the
college
kids
are
partying,
there's
so
much
loud
noise.
Q
L
B
B
S
S
S
S
It
is
madok
jeff,
sorry
about
that.
Thank
you
for
reminding
me.
There
is
a
companion
case,
boa
one
zero,
two,
seven,
six:
nine
zero
five.
Ninety
six
tremoline
street
this
is
to
build
a
new
roof
deck
according
to
plans
of
violations,
9th
edition
780
cmr
1011
stairways,
1011.1,
2.2,
roof
access,
jewelry,
penthouse
name
and
address
for
the
record.
S
P
V
V
So
we
went
to
a
neighborhood
meeting
and
there
was
some
pushback
from
the
owners
of
an
abundant
roof
deck
and
faisa,
who
was
our
neighborhood
liaison
at
the
time
reminded
us
that
the
south
end
landmarks
folks
would
not
allow
a
penthouse
that
was
visible
from
the
side
streets
and
advised
that
we
come
back
seeking
relief
from
that
section
of
the
building
code.
That
requires
that
and
the
getting
ahead
of
things
here.
You
want
me
to
keep
going.
W
W
Our
office
held
in
a
butters
meeting
back
on
january
27
2020,
where
the
proponents
presented
their
proposals
to
their
neighbors,
who
were
generally
in
support
of
the
roof
deck.
The
only
issue
that
came
up
was
related
to
access.
We
support
the
proposal
with
proviso
that
access
to
the
roof
deck
must
be
through
a
hatch
and
we
are
opposed
to
access
via
penthouse.
Thank
you.
O
B
D
S
Calling
the
next
two
cases
calling
boa
one
one,
one:
two:
five:
three:
six:
thirty
six
rossimo
road,
there's
companion
case,
voa
one
one,
one,
two,
five,
three
one:
thirty
four
rossville
road:
this
is
for
36..
This
erect
a
three-family
dwelling,
the
violation,
article
55
section
40.,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
party,
offstreet
parking
design
and
maneuverability
article
55,
section
9,
the
lottery
air
for
additional
dwelling
units
is
insufficient.
Article
55,
section
9
of
the
fluidity
ratio,
is
excessive.
S
X
Y
B
B
Y
T
T
Z
O
AA
Can
you
hear
me
yeah,
I'm
jennifer
erhane?
I
live
at
47
rossmoor
road
diagonally
across
the
street
from
these
two
projects,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
the
developer
mr
lyden
worked
very
well
with
the
community.
He
listened
to
ruins
concerns
and
implemented
changes
accordingly
to
achieve
a
good
project
for
the
neighborhood,
so
I'm
in
support
of
these
two
projects.
AA
E
AB
S
Only
next
case
calling
boa
one
one,
one,
eight
one:
six:
seven,
ten
old
colony
terrorists.
This
is
direct
a
new
single
family
dwelling
and
raised
existing
building
on
a
separate
permit.
The
violations,
article
29
section
four:
this
is
in
the
g
pod
applicability,
article
65,
section,
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
and
article
65,
section
9,
the
radio
is
insufficient
even
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
AC
AD
Madam
chair
remembers
the
board
pat
van
del
mayer's
office,
neighborhood
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
This
went
through
a
full
community
process,
including
at
a
butters
meeting
in
october,
as
well
as
a
presentation
in
front
of
the
columbia
saving
hill,
civic
association,
who
voted
to
support
this
proposal
as
well
with
that
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
mark's
been
a
lifelong
member
of
saving
hill,
and
he
is
his
property
that
we'd
like
to
support.
L
B
O
AC
AF
AF
AF
S
AF
S
S
Two
to
four
will
each
contain
three
to
two
three
bedrooms
and
a
total
of
nine
units,
two
retail
spaces.
On
the
first
floor,
the
violations-
article
50
section
28,
the
local
retail,
is
conditionally
used
in
an
mfr
sub
district
article
50
section
29
additional
lottery
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29,
including
the
ratio,
is
excessive.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
S
AB
AB
AI
AB
I
AB
B
D
AB
AB
AB
B
AJ
Greetings,
madam
chairwoman
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
chantal
lima
barbosa.
With
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
my
predecessor
held
the
community
process
for
this
proposal.
While
the
applicant
receives
support
from
the
community.
There
are
concerns
in
regards
to
parkinson's
safety
and
traffic,
which
is
detailed
in
the
greater
abode
in
geneva
neighborhoods
association
letters.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
encourage
the
applicant
to
continue
to
work
with
the
community
to
address
those
concerns.
The
mayor
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
the
proposal.
Thank
you.
AK
AL
B
Thank
you.
You
know
the
issue.
I
have
mr
miele
with
this
project.
It
was
it's
an
arrest,
it's
a
multi-family
residential,
the
the
relief
goes
with
the
property
and
not
with
the
owner,
and
I
and
I
find
it
very
difficult
to
start
inserting
retail
in
there,
because
I
know
we're
seeing
projects
with
retail
because
it
helps
with
the
financing.
B
But
this
is
a
residential
district
and
I
I
know
everybody
tells
us.
Yes,
we're
in
proximity
to
you,
know
x,
number
of
bus
routes
x,
number
of
public
transportation
options,
but
the
problem
becomes.
There
are
those
people
who
walk
off
schedule
and
that's
why
it's
very
difficult
to
have
a
project
with
absolutely
no
parking
for
somebody
who
might
work
at.
I
don't
know
logan
at
three
in
the
morning
or
someplace
like
that,
and
so
I
I'm
having
a
really
hard
time
with
this
project.
AB
If
I
may,
our
initial
proposal
had
nine
parking
units.
I
mean
because
we're
always
sensitive
effect
that
people
want
marketing
this
community,
both
via
butters
and
local
communities,
requested
that
we
provide
retail
space
dance.
There
is
a
couple
of
small
retail
shops
nearby,
so
it's
not
it's
not
out
of
place
and
we're
trying
to
abide
by
the
community
once.
B
Yes,
but
sometimes
you
know,
zoning
zoning
prevails
or
people
who
you
know
have
a
longer
history
with
land
use.
Perhaps
need
need
to
to
think
about
this.
So
I'm
wondering
if
there
is
a
way
of
decreasing
your
violations
by
looking
at
a
way
to
accommodate
on-street
parking
through
design
review,
so
perhaps
eliminating
one
of
those
or
both
retail
spaces
and
looking
at
at
off
street
parking.
B
I
S
Following
the
next
case,
calling
doa
voa
105
3337
64
clockwood
street-
this
is
a
construction
of
new
four-time,
four
new
townhouses,
the
violations,
article
60
section
9.
usable
open
space-
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
11,
the
use
is
forbidden,
article
60,
section
9.
The
lot
area
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AM
B
B
I
AO
B
B
AQ
Yes,
romaine
mills,
tech,
68,
clockwood
street
mattapan
mass,
I'm
speaking
in
opposition.
Madam
chairman
of
this
proposal
today
is
the
first
time
that
we
have
been
able
to
see
these
plans
with
any
changes
that
he
has
made
in
reference
to
changes
to
these
townhouses.
The
neighborhood
has
not
seen
these
plans.
There
has
not
been
another
neighborhood
meeting
to
discuss
the
changes
that
were
submitted
and
are
being
offered
up
for
approval.
Today
we
would
like
to
have
an
opportunity
to
address
him
and
the
changes
that
he
is
proposing
with
the
neighborhood.
B
AQ
AO
AR
AL
This
is
the
very
first
time
that
we
are
hearing
about
any
changes
to
the
plans
for
this
development
on
this
property
to
coming
from
the
townhouses
to
now,
a
three
family
and
a
three
family
also
isn't
in
line
with
the
look
of
the
neighborhood.
The
majority
of
the
homes
on
the
neighborhood
in
the
neighborhood
are
a
two
family
home
and
as
it
stands
right
now,
parking
is
a
complete
nightmare
within
this
street,
and
it
would
just
I
feel,
as
though
it
would
just
add
more
problems
and
okay.
H
Glendale,
okay,
my
name
is
brenda
chaney.
I
live
at
61
clockwood
street
and
I
was
disappointed
to
not
get
a
second
time
to
look
at
any
of
proposal
that
was
supposed
to
be
given
out
to
us,
because
I
was
at
the
first
one
that
was
in
september
or
late
october,
early
october,
and
we
were
told
we
would
get
more
information.
H
E
B
B
S
S
S
B
O
S
So
whether
we
do
this
matter,
if
it
makes
life
easy,
I
do
have
a
breakdown
of
how
they
are
like
the
first
two
cases
of
the
same
purpose,
same
violations
and
then
the
next
two
cases
have
the
same
violation:
the
same
purpose,
yeah
next
two
cases.
Let
me
do
this,
so
I'm
going
to
call
zero
six,
nine,
three
nine
fourteen
lawn
street,
which
containing
all
their
all
companion
cases,
but
it's
the
similar
case,
doa
one
one:
zero,
six,
nine,
zero,
eight,
twelve
local.
S
This
is
for
12
lawn
directly
new
semi
attached
single
family
dwelling
proposed
one
on
street
blocking
relations.
Article
60,
section
9.,
hungary
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9
log
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
So
madam
chair,
12
and
14
are
the
same
purpose
and
the
same
violation.
So
I'm
going
to
leave
that
it's
going
to
get
a
little
confusing
here.
Okay,
this
is
for
19
angel
and
21
angel.
This
is
doa
110695619
angel
street.
S
There
is
this
companion
similar
case
boa
one,
one:
zero,
six,
nine,
four,
five,
twenty
one
angel
street.
This
is
a
subdivide
lot
into
two
lots
and
lot
a
to
erect
two
two
detached
two
family
residential
dwelling
with
one
austrian
blocking
the
violations,
article
60
section
9,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
that
is
going
to
be
the
similar
case,
the
same
purpose
and
21
in
the
same
violation
at
21..
S
This
is
a
subdivide
law
into
two
lots
and
wrecked
two
new
semi-attached
single-family
dwelling
townhouse
style,
prohibits
proposed
one
austrian
parking,
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one:
a
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses,
article
60,
section,
40,
the
location
of
our
street
parking
in
the
front
yard
and
article
60,
section,
40,
bus
street
parking
design
and
maneuverability
mountain
chair.
Those
are
the
same
violations,
the
same
purpose
and
same
violations
as
39,
and
that
concludes
ward
14..
Do
you
want
to
leave
it
at
that?
Then
we
go
to
ward
17.
S
AS
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
book,
my
name
is
ralph
parent,
15,
greenlock
street
dorchester
massachusetts.
I
have
with
me
our
architect,
rashmi
ramaswani,
my
partners
and
I
have
been
designated
by
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
to
develop
new
construction,
affordable
homes
on
city
of
boston,
owned,
foreclosed
land.
AS
These
are
vacant,
infield
lots
that
once
had
homes
that
were
demolished.
We
are
seeking
relief
from
minor
dimensional
regulations
and
other
violations,
the
type
of
homes
that
we
built
with
single-family
homes,
two
families,
stacked
and
side-by-side
duplexes
you'll
work
in
conjunction
with
department
of
neighborhood
development
and
the
bus
and
home
center,
and
all
the
homes
will
be
sold
as
affordable.
AS
B
B
F
Hampshire
street
cambridge
mass
and
I'm
the
architect
for
this
project,
so
these
are
two
side
side-by-side
residences
and
each
of
them
has
a
driveway.
The
driveway
width
is
eight
foot
six
inches
I
mean
it
allows
for
a
small
landscape
buffer
adjacent
to
it.
So
the
idea
is
that
these
can
be
used
for
tandem
parking,
that
the
car
would
back
out
into
the
street.
F
B
F
I
think
you
might
want
to
just
go
to
the
site
plan.
Please
if
you
don't
mind,
and
if
you
I
don't
know
if
it's
easy
to
zoom
into
it,
but
you
can
begin
to
see
that
the
intention
isn't
to
use
the
front
yard
to
park.
We,
you
know
we
had
dimension
the
driveway
to
be
past
the
front
yard,
so
I'm
a
little
surprised
that
that
was
flagged
as
a
violation.
AN
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
faisa
sharif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
As
we
understand,
these
are
affordable
housing
units
in
partnership
with
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
and
we're
excited
to
see
these
home
ownership
opportunities
coming
to
atapan
and
greater
rochester.
Thank
you.
L
AP
E
AS
AH
AT
B
S
Battle
chairman
to
call
the
next
four,
which
are
ward
17
into
the
record,
and
they
are
different,
except
for
the
last
two,
so
this
will
be
boa
one:
one:
zero,
six,
nine
six,
three
two
forty
two
to
two
forty
four
no
well
street
is
erect
a
new
single
family
residential
dwelling
proposed
one
off
street,
blocking
the
violation:
article
10
section,
1
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
use,
article
65,
section,
41,
location
of
our
street
parking
article
65,
section
41,
austria,
parking
design,
maneuverability
article
65,
section
9.
The
lot
area
is
insufficient.
S
Article
65
69
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
65
section
9.
The
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
69,
the
billing
height
number
of
stories,
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
I
in
the
side
yard
is
a
sufficient.
S
AU
D
S
S
Last
two
113
and
115
wheatland
street
wheatland,
half
voa
one
one:
zero,
six,
nine
six,
eight
one,
thirteen
wheatland
avenue
one
one:
zero,
six,
nine
seven,
two
one
fifteen
wheatland
on
this-
will
subdivide
the
lot
into
two
lots:
direct,
a
new
semi-attack
single
family
dwelling,
townhouse
style
and
proposed
one
on
street
parking.
The
violence,
article
10
section
one:
the
limitation
of
your
accessory
use
news,
article
65,
section,
41,
off
street
parking
location,
article
65,
section,
41,
austrian
parking,
design,
maneuverability
article
6569
lot
area
is
insufficient
article
6569,
a
lot
width.
Is
it
sufficient.
S
AS
Record
please
greenhouse
street
dorchester
massachusetts.
I
have
with
our
architect
rashmi
ramiswani,
my
partners
and
I
have
been
designated
by
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
to
develop
new,
affordable
homes
on
city
of
boston,
owned,
foreclosed
land.
These
are
vacants
that
once
had
homes
that
were
demolished,
we
are
seeking
relief
on
minor
dimensional
regulations
and
other
violations.
The
types
of
homes
that
will
be
developed
are
single
family
homes.
AN
AK
L
B
B
AR
B
O
O
S
B
O
AR
U
B
S
S
I'm
going
to
call
the
next
case
calling
voa
111
5095
10
to
10
a
hallett
street.
This
is
direct.
A
new
four-story
two-family
dwelling
on
a
vacant
land,
the
violations,
article
65
section
8,
the
two
family
dwelling
mr,
been
used
article
65
69.
The
light
area
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
9.
The
lot
width
is
insufficient
article
65
section
9.
The
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
9.,
it's
literary
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
69,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65,
section,
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
S
B
AV
Yes,
ma'am
tim
johnson,
599,
east
broadway
boston.
My
client
jim
pascal,
is
hand
raised.
This
is
in
the
one
f
5000
sub
district.
It
is
a
vacant
through
lot.
My
client
is
proposing
to
erect
a
four-story
two-family
dwelling
with
a
two-car
garage
situated
between
an
existing
three-family
and
two-family
dwelling.
AV
The
main
entrance
to
the
project
will
be
off
hallett
street.
The
garage
entrance
will
be
in
the
rear
off
ann
street,
which
is
a
20-foot
wide
private
passageway.
These
both
units,
madam
chair,
will
be
duplex
units.
The
lower
duplex
will
be
a
two
bedroom
at
fifteen
hundred
square
feet
and
the
upper
duplex
will
be
a
three
bedroom
at
two
thousand
square
feet.
B
AV
AV
AV
AV
Yes,
these
are
both
duplex
units.
Madam
chair,
the
lower
duplex
unit
is
a
two
bedroom
at
fifteen
hundred
square
feet.
The
upper
duplex
is
a
three
bedroom
and
two
thousand
square
foot
square
feet.
There
is
a
great
change
between
hallett
street
and
ann
street
of
approximately
four
feet
and
I
could
go
through
the
zone.
AV
B
Okay
and
tim,
you
know
you're
before
this
board,
often
enough
and
you
get
approved
often
enough,
so
please
do
not
put
placeholders
as
as
renderings
or
as
drawings.
Please
try
and
make
it
so
that
it's
contextual,
you
know,
because
this
kind
of
raises
my
eye
every
time
I
see
these
placeholder,
these
placeholder
sketches
that
are
that
come
in
for
you
know
before
this
board,
and
this
is
not
you
know
you
specifically,
but
it's
a
lot
of
the
projects
we're
seeing.
AV
AV
AD
Madam
chairman
is
the
board
patrick
fandell,
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
this
proposal.
There
was
a
community
meeting
held
in
october
and
the
applicant
also
submitted.
I
believe
it
was
five
letters
of
the
butter
support
from
the
area
of
butters.
We
would
just
ask
for
continued
bpda
design
review,
but
would
like
to
go
on
support.
L
AL
I
B
S
B
X
S
Calling
the
next
case
calling
boa
112,
3382
270,
talbot
avenue
this
is
a
closed
project-
includes
a
four-story
building
with
21
apartments
and
about
2700
square
feet
of
retail
project
also
includes
eight
nine
r
street
parking
spaces.
The
violations-
article
65
section
41
austrian
parking-
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
41..
Our
street
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
42,
confirming
with
an
existing
building
alignment
article
65
section
8,
the
multi-family
dwelling
is
the
bid
article
65
section,
8,
a
retail
storage
event.
Article
65,
section,
8
restaurant
is
forbidden.
S
Article
65,
section
8
office
is
forbidden,
article
65,
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
bill
in
height
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9,
the
bill
and
height
number
of
stories
is
excessive
and
article
65,
section
9
of
the
point
guard
is
insufficient.
Give
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AH
Jacob
taylor,
I'm
with
klein
hornig,
101
art
street
in
boston
and
I'm
council
to
travis
lee
and
t
lee
development
llc
good
afternoon.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
the
proposed
270
ave
project
is
a
four-story
21
unit.
Workforce
housing
development
with
approximately
2
700
square
feet
of
commercial
space
on
the
ground
floor
divided
into
two
separate
commercial
units
and
the
proposed
bedroom
mix
is
11
studios.
Seven
one
bedrooms:
three:
two
bedrooms.
AH
B
Week:
okay,
let's:
let's
go:
let's
leave
the
residential
forbidden
use
aside
and
talk
talk
through
the
rest
of
the
requests
for
office,
restaurant
office
and
restaurant
use
for
other
and
retail
use
of
the
ground
floor.
Tell
us
what
what
this
is
going
to
propose
to
look
like
collecting
I'm
looking
at
google
maps,
but
in
the
meantime,
can
you
pull
up
the
rendering
of
what
this
ground
floor?
Space
is
supposed
to
look
like.
B
So
travis
you've
been
you've
been
before
this
board.
Before,
can
you
talk
us
through
it?
This
talk
us
through.
There
are
a
number
of
forbidden
uses
here
and
I
just
want
to
talk
through
the
commercial
uses,
the
retail,
the
restaurant
and
the
office
uses
before
we
talk
in
more
detail
about
the
residential.
R
Yes,
ma'am
as
you're
as
you're,
aware
talbot
avenue
is
a
fairly
major
commercial
corridor
from
codman
square
over
to
blue
hill
avenue,
granted
a
portion
of
talbot
avenue
fronts,
harambe
park
and
it's
quite
residential,
but
the
the
part
of
talbot
avenue
from
the
commuter
rail
station.
All
the
way
up
to
codman
square
has
a
variety
of
commercial
uses.
As
we
went
through
a
city
of
boston,
rfp
process
to
be
selected
as
developers
for
this
city-owned
site.
R
B
B
AH
AH
E
B
B
What's
the
access
to
the
parking,
is
it
a
separate
parking
lot
or
is
it?
Is
it
or
is
it
underground
parking?
What
does
the
parking?
Look
like?
Okay?
So
it's
it's
okay,
so
it
is
selfish
parking,
okay
and
how
is
access
to
the
building
for
the
residential
use
is
off
of
talbot
street.
Any
sense,
mr,
like
on
the
sides
of
those
units.
E
R
I
R
E
E
AO
Adam
chairman
members
of
the
board
vanessa
lesson
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
have
witnessed
this
applicant
going
working
with
the
neighborhood
development
and
they've
put
a
lot
of
effort
into
this
project.
We
do
agree
with
you
in
terms
of
the
positioning
communal
and
such
and
we
would
like
to
go
and
work
in
support
because
they're
offering
more
housing
in
the
community
and
offering
more
restaurant
space,
because
that
area
is
a
bit
of
a
food
desert.
So
we
would
appreciate
the
restaurants
and
add
it
to
that
area.
Thank
you.
AK
L
Z
X
S
Chair,
thank
you
follow
your
next
case,
calling
boa
835,
348
883
high
block
avenue.
This
is
to
renovate
the
existing
commercial
space
to
convert
from
a
day
care
center
to
a
registered
marijuana
dispensary.
The
violations,
article
69
section,
11,
innocence
establishment
is
a
conditional
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
X
Good
afternoon
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
daniel.
Toscano,
drego
and
toscano,
located
at
one
state
street
suites,
15
boston
mass.
I
represent
the
applicant
evergreen
farms,
I'd
like
to
also
introduce
coal
council.
I've
been
working
very
closely
on
this
kaitlyn
buresson
from
memo
strategies
who
should
be
on
the
line
and
now
I'd
like
to
introduce
evergreen
farm.
The
owners
and
operators
of
evergreen
farms
are
sean
bernie.
X
He
is
a
lifelong
resident
of
boston
mass
lives
in
prosecco,
with
his
wife
and
children,
he's
a
certified
economic
empowerment,
applicant
and
also
a
social
equity
program.
Participant
armani
white
is
also
another
owner.
He
is
a
lifelong
resident
in
the
city
of
boston,
he's
a
community
organizer
and
currently
living
in
lowell.
Roxbury
he's
also
a
certified
economic
empowerment
applicant,
and
I
also
like
to
introduce
julian
dominicci,
who
is
sean
berg's
wife.
They
live
in
the
roswell
area,
she's,
currently
a
social
equity
program
participant
and.
X
Business
owner
in
the
north
end
of
boston,
as
the
secretary
points
out,
we
are
seeking
all
support
to
open
a
marijuana
dispensary
at
883
high
park
avenue,
and
the
only
violation
for
this
particular
area
is
a
news
regulation
conditional
use.
Madam
chair,
the
existing
plans
are,
as
a
one-story
commercial
building
approximately
2050
swiss
feet
of
space.
What
we're
going.
X
It's
2050
square
feet
of
space.
That's
on
a
3,
000
square
foot
lot.
We
are
going
to
renovate
the
existing
property,
so
there's
no
building
going
up
any
stores
and
no
building
how
we're
going
to
just
simply
renovate
the
existing
property.
This
is
properties
located
in
a
local
convenience.
Stop
district
of
guibar
area,
the
the
the
operation
is
gonna
in
terms
of
the
operation.
We're
gonna
have
15
to
20
employees.
At
this
particular
location.
We
have.
B
X
So,
in
regards
to
parking,
as
you
can
see,
madam
chair
point
out,
there
is
no
parking
on
site.
We
have
entered
into
an
agreement
with
the
property
at
875,
which
is
two
bullets
down
for
10
parking
spots,
exclusive
for
evergreen
farms.
Those
won't
be
used
by
the
employees
but
specifically
for
customers
have
ever
been
found.
In
addition,
we've
done
our
research
in
regards
to
off
street
parking
so
along
within
a
quarter
mile.
B
B
We
need
to
make
sure
that
that
comes
in
as
ancillary
parking,
because
we
need
to
make
sure
that
everything
is
is
more
tightly
and
that
it's
not
you
know
here
today
and
gone
tomorrow,
especially
for
a
use
that
could
for
the
number
of
employees
that
you're,
anticipating
create.
You
know
a
certain
amount
of
traffic,
so
I
I'll
just
put
that
out
there,
because
we
are
concerned
about
the
quality
of
life
issues
for
the
abutters.
B
B
X
So
as
I
was
moving
on
as
you
pass
as
security
after
you
present
your
identification
to
security
you're
going
to
be
met
by
one
of
our
evergreen
farms,
staff
registration,
they
will
take
all
your
registration
and
background
information
when
you're
waiting
in
the
lobby
area,
which
is
secured
and
then
once
you're
able
to
enter
the
another
lock
door,
which
gets
you
into
the
retail
portion
of
the
property
and
then
there's
the
cashier
and
then
there's
a
vault
behind
the
cashiers
which
will
store
products.
There's
no
consumption
on
site,
there's
no
packaging
on
site.
X
Everything
is
there's
no
cultivation
on
site.
Everything
is
going
to
be
pre-packaged,
but
at
the
time
of
delivery.
So
we
anticipate
for
first-time
users
using
this
establishment
of
15-minute
process
in
and
out
we're
checking
in
registration
and
purchasing
your
product
once
you're
registered
things
will
get
a
lot
easier.
We
can.
We
anticipate
registration
after
you're.
X
Registered
people
come
in
maybe
a
two
to
three
minute
process
of
getting
in
and
out
during
during
a
sale,
also
we're
working
with
our
web
designer,
consisting
especially
during
this
covet
online
registration
and
in
products
online.
So
you
can
come
in
just
pick
up,
we'll
make
things
a
little
a
lot
smoother
and
quicker
as
you
as
you
enter
the
establishment
and
exit.
So
things
will
be
smooth.
We
anticipate,
like
I
said,
15
minutes
for
a
first
visit,
but
once
you're
registered
things
will
be
a
lot
quicker.
X
So
that
the
hours
are
operational,
it
could
be
10
am
to
7
pm
daily
7
days
a
week.
We
believe,
based
on
our
square
footage
in
the
front
lobby
and
the
check-in
unit
that
accommodated
approximately
20
people
comfortably
during
covert
we're.
Certainly
once
we
get
up
and
running
and
if
it's
still
covered,
we
certainly
will
comply
with
any
city
and
state
regulations
to
make
sure
that
this
we
maintain
social,
distancing
and
everybody's
safe.
X
B
X
Yeah
so
I'll
I'll,
let
one
of
our
members
refer
to
either
sean
almighty
speech
at
the
security
delivery.
We
anticipate
two
to
three
deliveries
per
week.
They
will
be
staggered
on
the
off
hour
because
we
do
not
have,
as
you
can
see
from
the
time.
I
don't
have
a
loading
zone,
but
they
will
be
met
by
security
and
they
will
change
regularly
so
so
for
security
reasons.
In
terms
of
the
timing,
if,
if
sean
armani
and
jillian
and
caitlin
need
to
have
something.
I
X
AX
Sure
I
I
can
add,
all
of
our
deliveries
are
going
to
be
sorry.
Thank
you
for
having
me
all
of
our
deliveries
are
going
to
be
off
hours
and
randomized,
so
that
they're
not
the
exact
same
time
as
well
as
our
security
system.
We've
sat
down
with
the
captain
at
area
e18,
and
we
will
link
our
security
system
directly
to
the
police
station.
B
D
X
L
AY
AI
BA
Hello
hi:
this
is
jim
kirker.
I
live
at
56
davidson
street
in
hyde
park.
I'm
president
of
the
high
park,
neighborhood
association
we
are
in
the
entire
association,
is
in
support
of
this
project.
It's
the
the
sean
has
always
been
available
at
our
meetings
to
answer
any
questions.
They've
worked
very
hard
on
this,
and
parking
should
be
fine,
as
there
has
been
restaurants
there
before
it's
never
really
been
a
problem,
so
we
are
again.
We
are
in
strong
support
of
this.
This
project.
L
B
AT
B
S
S
O
O
B
B
AY
O
B
AM
AT
S
Follow
your
next
case
calling
two
four
voa:
two
forty
four
to
forty
six
belgrade
avenue
facilitate
three
story:
eight
residential
unit
building
or
one
commercial
space.
The
violations
article
sixty
seven
seconds
to
thirty
screening
and
buffering-
is
insufficient
article
sixty
seven
section,
thirty
32.
Obviously
parking
is
insufficient.
S
Article
67,
section
33
traffic
visibility
across
the
corner
lot:
article
67,
section
12
the
floor:
air
ratio
is
excessive
cycle,
67,
section
12,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
67
6-12
the
side.
Yet
as
a
division
in
article
67,
section
12,
the
ray
god
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BB
BB
AI
B
BB
BB
In
between
the
cooperative
bank
and
the
folsom
funeral
home,
it's
also
diagonally
across
the
street
from
the
roslindale
train
station.
The
proposal
is
to
raise
a
former
auto
body
truck
storage
facility
to
your
point
and
build
a
new
three-story
unit.
Condominium
building
it'll
be
32
feet
in
height,
there's
one
commercial
retail
space
of
1380
square
feet
that
will
be
that
grade
and
there
are
12
os
street
parking
spaces
with
an
entrance
off
of
belgrade
and
have
offices
to
the
folsom
funeral
room.
BB
B
E
BB
AY
AY
I
would
also
like
to
note
that
there
were
some
concerns
around
the
number
of
parking
spaces
provided,
but
we
believe
with
the
proximity
to
the
rossdale
village
t-stop
and
the
washington
street
bus
song,
that
it's
an
amount
of
parking
spaces
and
creates
a
a
transit
oriented
development
so
to
speak.
We'd
also
like
to
note
that
one
one
about
it
did
note
some
concerns
about
construction
management.
So,
if
this
is
to
be
approved,
we
just
ask
that
they
work
with
the
the
butters
to
make
sure
that
runs
smoothly.
Thank
you.
B
Yeah,
you
know
I'm
all
for
transit
oriented
development
if
the
transit
is
affordable,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
commuter
rail
is
affordable
to
to
everybody.
I
don't
know
what
is
it
seven
dollars
one
way
or
something,
but
be
that
as
me,
so
anybody
else
to
speak
in
support
of
this
project
are
in
opposition.
B
BC
Hello,
madam
chair,
my
name
is
steve
goodis
I
am
in
a
butter.
I
live
on
amherst
street
when
I
open
my
front
door.
I
look
at
the
back
of
this
auto
body,
stop
and
would
look
at
the
back
of
this
new
building.
I
wanted
to
express
my
support
for
this
for
this
project,
but
also
to
reiterate
what
was
just
expressed.
Amherst
street
is
a
one-way,
very
narrow
street,
with
parking
on
both
sides,
even
without
construction.
BC
It
is
very,
very
tight
and
very
congested
and
is
one
of
the
main
thoroughfares
in
toronto
square
construction
and
construction,
zoning
and
parking,
and
this
construction
site
is
a
huge
concern
of
mine.
The
other
area
of
concern
of
mine
and
again
I
am
in
support
of
of
this
project-
is
the
size
and
the
height
of
the
building.
It
is,
if
you
look
at
the
pictures,
they
look
absolutely
lovely
if
you
walk
into
roslindale
square.
BC
It
has
been
a
concern
of
residents,
myself
included
at
roslindale
in
the
past
of
the
height
of
new
buildings,
and
it
is
a
concern
of
mine,
the
height
of
this
building,
in
terms
of
how
it
connects
to
the
skyline
of
the
rest
of
roslindale,
I'm
pleased
to
hear
about
the
the
parking,
but
I
am
continue
to
be
concerned
about
the
parking.
If
there
are
eight
units,
each
of
two
bedrooms,
as
you
know
and
have
expressed
roblindale,
is
a
is
a
driving
community.
BC
BB
I
B
BB
I'm
sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
we
actually
gave
that
a
lot
of
thought
and
we
came
into
this.
The
building
heights
32
feet
in
a
35
foot
zone.
We
were
very
aware
of
the
neighbors.
They
were
very
respectful
when
we
had
the
community
meetings.
As
mr
fortune
stated,
we
were
we
in
addition
to
the
community
meetings,
canvassed
the
neighborhood
and
met
with
them
showed
them
the
plans
and
in
all
I
know
some
of
them
didn't
make
it.
B
Yeah
my
question
is,
and
it
was
just
for
another
project
we
saw
in
dorchester
earlier.
Is
you
know
if
there
is
a
need
for
your
commercial
space?
Even
though
this
is
neighborhood
shopping?
If
you
know
you
could
you
know
reorient
it?
So
you
have
a
great
number,
a
great,
a
a
decent
lobby
and
a
greater
number
of
parking
spaces
so
that
the
neighborhood
isn't
overly
impacted
by
overflow
parking.
BB
Yeah
we
just
felt,
like
you
know,
12
parking
spaces
for
eight
units.
Was
you
know
I
I
would
suggest
probably
more
than
adequate,
and
you
know
where
is
proximity?
And
I
I
understand
your
your
point
regarding
the
commuter
rail.
However,
we
are
right
on.
You
know
a
short
walk
down
the
street
to
work
street
to
washington
street,
where
you
can
get
the
buses
back
and
forth
from
forest
hills.
B
B
B
B
AW
W
W
B
S
Madam
champion,
madam
chair,
just
for
a
record
here
before
we
go
to
the
interpretation,
a
cape
that
was
called
at
11
30
street
was
actually
on
the
books
to
one
o'clock,
which
one
was
which
one
was
that
I'm
sorry.
It
was
the
first
case
for
11
30
rediscussion
saratoga
407
saratoga
yep.
I
made
a
motion
for
denial
without
prejudice
and
the
interim
we've
been
notified
that
they
were
on
for
one
o'clock
and
it
did
say
one
o'clock
on
the
paperwork,
unfortunately,
but
I
believe
they're
on
now.
S
S
This
is
kcoa
one:
zero,
zero,
six,
seven,
six,
five,
four
seven,
seven
two
orca
street
was
extended
living
area
to
unit
one
into
the
basement
by
building
an
interior
wall
petition
to
propose
enlarged
two
windows
and
one
door
opening
to
meet
the
basement.
Egress
requirement
the
violation,
article
53
section,
9,
employee
ratio
is
excessive,
better
chance.
I
said
before
I'm
going
to
take
back
my
motion
to
deny
without
prejudice
seconds.
BD
B
BD
E
Yeah,
so
if
you
look
at
the
drawing
on
a13
the
proposed
basement
plan,
you've
got
a
mechanical
closet.
That
is
separate,
which
is
what
you
were
asking
about.
You
have
a
for
the
elevations.
You
have
a
drop
in
grade
so
that
it's
so
that
by
the
rear,
it's
okay,
but
the
drawings
show
seven
foot
seal
floor
to
ceiling.
E
BD
B
AN
AT
B
I
want
to
ask
our
board
members
to
stay
on
for
a
few
minutes
after
the
after
the
hearing
closes,
because
you
know
if
we
were
in
person,
we
would
have
had
a
chance
to
talk
to
mr
ligaris,
but
since
we
are
remote,
I
just
want
to
give
everybody
a
chance
to
do
a
meet
and
greet
an
online
meet
and
greet
okay.
So
please
stay
on
thanks
for
watching
the
interpretation.
S
AG
AU
Good
afternoon
man
and
chair
members,
that
would
be
me
and
cheer
members,
I'm
george
morancy,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
I
was
joined
by
one
of
the
property
owners,
david
mateo,
who
has
a
residential
address
of
870
east
6th
street
in
south
boston,
also
joined
by
the
project.
Architects,
anthony
pazzani
and
william
of
bazanian
associates
374
congress
street
in
boston.
B
AG
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
are
requesting
this
interpretation
because
we
believe
that
the
building
permit
was
issued
in
error.
There
have
been
changes
to
the
developers
project
that
merit
and
require
resubmission
of
the
plans
to
this
board
for
re-review
in
connection
with
a
conditional
use
permit,
which
is
how
this
project
came
into
light.
B
AG
So
the
project-
I'm
obviously
not
the
proponent
of
the
project,
but
this
is
a
it-
was
a
proposed
before
this
board
under
a
special
permit
or
conditional
use
permit
as
a
three-story
building
with
six
units,
this
board
denied
the
conditional
use
permit.
That
matter
was
appealed
to
the
superior
court
came
back
to
this
board
in
2018
with
instructions
to
issue
a
conditional
use
permit
under
the
g-pod.
AG
AG
AG
The
application
for
this
project
was
filed
in
april
2017
prior
to
approval
of
the
ipod
regulations
and
and
the
applicant
knew
all
along
that
this
proposal
would
have
to
come
to
the
zva,
given
its
location
in
the
g-pod
under
the
ipods
language.
However,
this
project
was
exempt
from
the
ipod
regulations.
Thus
we
submit
article
68
applied
that
was
undoubtedly
isd's
initial
opinion
as
well.
They
issued
a
refusal
notice
dated
june
12
2017,
citing
violations
of
article
68
as
bases
for
denial.
AG
AG
The
ipod
regulations
were
temporary
when
they
were
initially
passed,
were
extended
for
only
a
short
time
and
have
subsequently
been
appealed
more
than
a
year
ago.
There's
no
good
reason
for
this
project
to
be
exempt
from
their
grandfather
from
the
applicable
zoning
under
article
68,
when
it
was
continued
beyond
permits
that
were
issued
at
risk,
it
was
exempt
from.
B
AG
AG
I
am
questioning
height,
okay
and
I'm
also
questioning
whether
this
parking
plan
can
work
portions
of
the
parking
garage
where
the
height
is
only
five
foot
eight
and
it
proposes
to
have
nine
spots
in
there,
and
I
think
it's
requires
somebody
to
work
a
tetris
miracle
to
get
those
cars
in
and
out
of
those
spots.
Okay,.
BE
Well,
the
permit
was
injured,
it
was.
There
was
only
one
violation:
the
violation
was
dissolved
at
the
board
and
then
there
was
an
issue
after
that
about
the
packing
being
under
flood
zone.
According
to
conservation
district,
they
went
there,
they
went
to
the
process
for
about
nine
months.
They
raised
up
the
building
for
a
few
feet,
so
they
won't
be
under
the
flood
zone
and
but
the
entire
building
met
the
code.
The
height
is
good,
everything's,
good
and
grenadiae.
AU
Certainly,
my
version
is
quite
simple.
Madam
chair
members.
The
board
approved
this
matter
on
march
26
2018,
that
was
on
a
remand
order
from
the
superior
court.
The
board
had
previously
denied
of
the
petitioner's
application
for
green
belt
protection
overlay
district.
Permit.
My
clients
appealed
that
decision
to
the
superior
court.
AU
AU
AU
Base
flood
elevation
here
is
15
feet.
Okay
result
was
that
the
building
had
to
be
raised
two
feet
two
feet
when
it
was
initially
approved
by
this
board.
It
was
zoning
compliant
at
approximately
37
feet,
11
inches.
It
is
now
remain.
Zoning
compliant
at
approximately
39
feet,
11
inches
the
revised
plans,
based
on
the
order
of
conditions
issued
by
the
conservation.
AU
The
design
review
architect
at
the
bbda
michael
canozzo,
granted
design
review
approval
to
the
revised
plans
on
june
12
2020,
and
my
client
then
verified
with
mr
joseph
plans
examiner
that
no
new
zoning
violations
or
no
zoning
violations
were
were
created
by
the
change.
The
building
permit
then
issued
and.
B
AU
It
is
indicated
that
the
the
appellants
here
believe
that
the
matter
should
have
been
brought
back
to
the
board
of
appeal
so
that
the
revised
plans
could
be
reapproved.
It
was
isd's
determination
that
this
was
not
necessary
again,
because
there
are
no
zoning
violations
created.
They
remain
zoning
compliant
and
also
that
that
that
the
current
height
may
in
some
way
be
violative
of
the
code
which,
which
is
also
not
true.
As
I
said,
the
code
here
is
39
feet.
B
BF
AG
B
AU
AU
BE
AG
BE
B
O
B
Mr
joseph,
who
is
the
technical
expertise
on
this
talks
about
the
definition
of
height,
so
that
in
fact
it
is
not
not
exceeding
the
height.
So
it
sounds
to
me
like
the
permit
was
issued
as
it
should
have
been
issued
following
all
the
process
and
all
the
different
reviews
that
it
should
have
followed.