►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 2-23-21 - PART 2
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 2-23-21 - PART 2
A
And
that
is
definitely
unsafe.
I
myself
need
a
catty
corner
from
this
home.
I
have
no
driveway,
so
I
have
no
option
for
off-street
parking.
Many
of
the
residents
do
not
have
options
for
off
street
parking,
which
is
already
over
saturated,
and
none
of
us
are
in
support
of
this
property
and
going
from
a
six
to
a
five
unit,
doesn't
make
it
any
better.
B
A
D
D
D
A
Grancock
of
anderson
and
krieger
at
kiki
milk
street,
on
behalf
of
ken
flynn,
the
appellant
here,
okay,.
B
Hold
on
so,
you
are
request
representing
the
petitioner.
Is
the
owner
or
a
representative
of
the
owner
at
34
to
42
warren
street
on.
C
Madam
chair,
it's
stephen
miller
and
I
am
representing
the
tate
bakery
and
cafe,
I
believe,
also
attorney
joanna
schneider
is
on,
as
is
brendan
boyle,
who
is
a
representative
of
bakery
and
cafe.
B
Okay
and
nina:
do
you
have
any
any
co-counsel
with
you?
No
it's
just
me
today,
oh
my
goodness,
okay,
so
we
heard
this
case
a
few
months
ago
and
I
think
at
that
time
the
issue
that
I
raised
was
whether
this
was
actually
subject
to
our
review.
B
That's
because
it's
in
an
urban
renewal
plan,
so
we've
studied
this
and
looked
at
it
in
greater
detail,
and
so
we
we
are
concluding-
and
I
will
state
this
on
behalf
of
the
board-
that
we
as
the
board
of
appeal,
lack
the
authority
under
the
enabling
act
to
rule
on
an
appeal
when
no
applicable
violation
of
the
zoning
code.
All
the
state
building
code
really
exists.
B
Thus
we
have
no
jurisdiction
and
we
need
to
ensure
that
we
and
when
we
are
going
to
be
deferring
to
the
bpda
as
a
final
and
binding
authority,
since
this
is
all
subject
to
an
urban
renewal
plan.
So
from
our
perspective,
isd
did
not
err
in
issuing
the
permit.
So
may
I
have
a
motion
to
that
effect.
Please.
B
C
Her
in
for
overtime,
madam
chair.