►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 1-9-18
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Good
morning,
Happy
New
Year,
the
Court
of
Appeal
for
January
9th,
is
is
now
in
session
just
to
remind
to
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
please
take
all
conversations
that
you
may
want
to
have
outside
of
the
room.
The
acoustics
in
here
I'm,
not
good.
If
you're
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
a
project.
Please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record.
A
We
are
here
to
gather
new
information,
so
if
somebody
has
already
stated
your
concern
or
something
that
you're
in
support
off
just
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record,
we're
here
to
gather
as
much
new
information
as
possible,
and
that
would
be
very
helpful
to
us,
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law
I'm,
informing
you
that
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed
as
a
board.
We
would
like
to
think
about
for
all
the
work
she's
done
on
supporting
the
staff
and
supporting
the
board
and
all
getting
their
notices
out
and
everything
so
Val.
Thank
you.
A
A
B
B
C
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lin's
245
Sumner
Street
II
spots.
On
behalf,
the
petitioner
noted
sure
this
is
this-
is
approved
by
the
board
for
the
construction
of
a
38
unit
residential
structure
in
East
Boston.
The
current
extension
expires,
I
believe
in
March.
We
are
in
the
process
of
completing
the
first
phase
of
this
project,
which
is
to
relocate.
The
existing
funeral
home
has
located
that
site.
Once
that
is
complete,
we
can
begin
construction
in
earnest,
we're
ready
with
financing
and
with
permits.
So
we
would
need
an
extension
of
the
time.
One.
A
B
C
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Linz,
245
summers,
Judy's
boss,
on
behalf
of
petitioner
I'm
sure
this
was
also
approved
by
the
board
sometime
back
444
residential
units
in
the
Orion
Heights
section
of
East
Boston.
This
project
is
also
just
about
ready
to
go.
There
is
some
environmental
cleanup,
that's
ongoing
once
that
is
concluded,
we'll
be
ready
to
pull
permits
and
proceed
well.
B
D
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Ruth
Suleman,
with
Nixon
Peabody,
representing,
saw
enough
hospitality.
This
is
for
a
proposed
hotel
at
104
Canal
Street
for
90
guestrooms.
The
original
relief
was
granted
in
February
of
2015.
Last
year
we
were
here
and
obtained
a
one-year
extension
we're
seeking
a
further
one-year
extension.
The
owner
is
in
discussions
with
various
hotels
to
get
a
flag
quote
unquote
for
the
hotel.
They
were
very
close.
A
E
F
A
A
G
A
B
A
A
H
H
H
A
A
H
A
K
A
C
C
C
A
C
A
L
A
M
A
B
Next
case
calling
POA
771
174
164
170
Sumner
Street.
This
is
erecting
new
four-story
six
unit
mixed-use
building
on
a
lot
with
a
proposed
commercial
ground-floor.
Restaurant
would
take
out
retail
use
at
three
residential
floors
violations.
Article
53
section
12
excessive,
and
they
are
article
53,
section
12,
excessive
height
article
53,
section
12,
insufficient
rear
yard
setback,
article
53,
section
56
insufficient
parking
in
article
53,
section
54
screening
in
Bufferin,
none
of
proposed
name
and
address
full
erected.
Please,
yes,.
A
N
This
mixed-use
development
of
six
residential
units
in
a
commercial
unit
on
the
dark
floors
and
a
neighborhood
shopping
district,
so
that
the
use
is
allowed
I
have
to
say
that
this
particular
project
really
is
the
poster
child
for
transit
oriented
development
within
a
500-foot
radius.
We
have
the
MBTA
Blue
Line
maverick
station.
We
have
hub
bikes,
I
think
at
least
probably
30
pub
bikes,
we're
also
close
to
what
a
transit
stops
within
again
500
feet,
two
of
them,
one
operated
by
Boston
harbor
cruises
and
the
other
one
operated
by
Rose
Wharf
taxi.
A
Service,
so
this
is
a
proposal
for
six
with
ground
flow,
commercial
use
and
three
residential
units,
three
residential
floors.
Yes,
so
your
violations
are
f,
AR
and
height.
It's
this
new
construction,
or
is
this
an
existing
building
new
construction?
Okay,
so
tell
us
what's
required
on
height
and
what's
been
proposed.
O
Decided
to
allow
the
ground
floor
to
be
commercial
as
it's
a
local
services
district
as
being
about
better
use,
as
well
as
its
as
Diana
mentioned,
its
proximity
to
a
variety
of
transit
options.
This
makes
it
ideal
someone
to
get
to
where
they
want
to
go
and
easily,
while
then
providing
services
to
the
neighborhood
in.
O
L
J
P
Yeah
well,
I
mean
the
building
itself
is
way
too
big
I
mean
the
zoning
envelope
allows
for
thirty
five
and
one
they're
asking
for
almost
three
times
the
density
in
ten
feet
overnight,
plus
there's
no
parking,
I
understand
what
the
Tod,
but
you
know,
that's,
never
been
something
that's
been
discussed
within
the
zoning
code.
That's
you
know
something
that
we
allow
for
the
granting
of
variances
may
I.
N
Yes,
thirty
six
hundred
square
foot
Lots
is
basically
a
double
lot.
If
these
are
to
three
families,
you
would
have
six
units.
In
addition
to
that,
you
know:
I'm
I
assume
that
the
each
of
those
three
families
would
exceed
the
one
point
zero
if
they
are,
and
secondly,
you
know
this-
the
City
of
Boston
comes.
You
know,
comes
out
with
these
policies
when
developers
try
to
meet
those
policies
by
building
in
proper
locations
that
are
close
to
transit.
I
would
think
that
the
Boston,
Redevelopment,
Authority
or
PB
DA
would
support
that
this.
A
N
I
B
R
Chien
I'm
at
9,
Wall
Street
in
Charlestown
I'm,
here
representing
Joe
castle
II,
who
couldn't
be
here
on
the
developer,
we're
just
looking
to
put
on
a
16
foot
square
roof
deck
which'll
is
a
three
unit
building,
but
just
the
top
floor
third
unit
will
have
access
to
the
deck.
Through
a
hatch,
we
had
a
neighborhood
meeting,
which
was
I.
Think
one
part
was
lightly
intended
to
I.
Think
one
person
showed
up,
but
it
went
well.
They
seemed
okay
was
a
neighbor.
They
seemed
okay
with
the
deck
and
again
it'll
just
be
for
one
unit.
L
B
S
S
A
A
J
S
L
U
B
Boa
seven:
seven:
three,
eight
nine
four
fourteen
I'm.
Sorry
just
call
that
one
calling
boa
seven:
three,
nine
two
one:
five:
three
fifteen
to
3:33
Washington
Street:
this
is
a
change
doctor
from
a
jewelry
business
to
pain,
relief,
massage
therapy
interior
innovation
of
sweet
615,
but
ten
infidel
and
two
non
bearing
walls
violation.
Article
38,
section,
18
oppose
use
forbidden
in
a
midtown
cultural
district
name.
An
address
for
the
record.
Please
good!.
V
Being
proposed
is
a
pain
therapy
clinic.
This
is
a
site
where
Miss,
Lucy,
Liu
and
her
staff
does
acupressure
pain,
relief,
sports
therapy,
massage
it
is
not.
It
was
cited
as
a
massage
parlor,
it's
more
like
a
clinic,
although
they
don't
take
tests
or
provide
medicine.
It's
an
alternative
to
pain,
medication
and
whatnot,
where
you
would
go
specifically
to
address
some
type
of
situation,
chronic
headaches
back
pain
or
the
like.
It's
not
like
a
massage
parlor
where
you
would
go
for
routine
stress
relief.
Massage
is.
A
L
A
V
Q
B
B
Boah,
seven,
five,
seven,
four,
four,
eight
one,
eighty
Endicott
Street
this
is
to
change
doctors
from
three
apartments
to
four
apartments,
not
adding
any
additional
floor,
nor
increasing
the
number
of
bedrooms,
the
violation
of
article
54,
section,
ten
usable,
open
spaces
insufficient
and
article
54,
section
21.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
W
Lord
William
400
McDermott,
Colton
Miller
of
28
stage,
3
on
behalf
of
180
Endicott
speed,
LLC,
dr.
Simcoe
Weller,
as
manager
as
you
have
before
you
this.
This
property
is
a
four-story
building
of
The
Moth
then
was
Rizzoli
constructed
as
three
apartments
with
a
ground-level
commercial
space
in
1976,
the
owners
converted
the
ground-floor
to
a
residential
unit
for
a
handicapped,
family
member
and
at
the
same
time
they
only
used
the
third
and
fourth
floor
as
his
own
unit,
never
really
connected
them,
but
used
it
as
one
unit.
So,
therefore,
the
occupancy
became
three
residential
units.
W
Only
we're
proposing
to
go
back
to
a
four
unit.
Building
four
residential
units,
one
on
each
floor,
renovate
the
entire
building
the
building
will
be
sprinklin
the
size
of
each
unit
as
a
one-bedroom
is
approximately
530
square
feet.
Excuse
me
as
one
1-bedroom
occupancy.
This
has
been
reviewed
by
both
community
groups
and
supported
by
both
groups.
W
A
W
I
I
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Murray
lands
a
man's
office,
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
we
held
in
a
Buddist
meeting
for
this
project
on
November
15th
of
last
year,
which
they
gained
the
support
of
their
butters
and,
like
Fraternity
Furillo
stated,
they
also
have
the
support
of
the
non-that
waterfront
neighborhood
council
and
the
north
and
waterfront
residents
association.
Thank
you
thank.
M
M
A
B
Boa
seven:
seven:
four
zero
three
two
12:30
21264
Washington
Street:
this
is
a
change
of
oxygen
from
a
pizza
shop.
Are
you
moving
forward
to
project
there?
Please
change
of
auxin
from
a
pizza
shop,
37,
36
offices,
barber
shop,
retail
industrial
manufacturing
employment
office
and
nail
salon
and
driving
school
to
pizza
shop,
a
37,
36
offices,
barber
shop,
retail
industrial
manufacturing,
neal
salon
in
a
fitness
studio,
no
material
changes
to
the
building
or
structure
required
violation,
article
64,
section,
18
fitness
center
is
forbidden
name
and
address
of.
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AC
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
face
the
Sherif
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
postal.
We
did
hold
an
on-site
at
butters
meeting
and
they
did
also
meet
with
their
any
pretty
sociation.
Many
of
the
neighbors
are
actually
really
enthusiastic
about
activating
the
space
it's
currently
vacant.
There's
no
residences
on
top
we're
not
really
concerned
about
the
noise
in
that
sense,
and
it's
the
perfect
location
on
Washington
Street,
so
we're
really
looking
forward
for
them.
Opening
thank.
A
AD
Name
is
John
Vernon
and
I
speak
for
myself,
as
well
as
a
neighbor
of
mine,
John
Stebbins,
who
also
lives
at
1280
Washington
Street,
the
neighborhood
development
area
is
a
very
small
area
and
when
you
take
out
the
park
and
the
school,
it's
even
smaller,
we
are
reluctant
to
endorse
any
change
in
use
in
this
area,
because
this
is
the
largest
undeveloped
parcel
on
the
entire
section
of
the
development
area
and
we're
particularly
concerned
of
what
may
happen
once
the
entertainment
use
is
approved.
On
this
parcel,
which
I
believe
is
at
least
a
half
acre.
A
AD
A
B
Boa
75397
710
Huntington
Avenue.
This
is
a
change
of
our
ground
floor.
The
fitness
center
used
utilizing
five
thousand
three
square
feet
and
for
Matt
Turner
fisheries
restaurant
space-
and
this
is
a
change
of
use
of
the
occupancy
and
existing
structure
from
hotel
garage,
retail
salon,
restaurant
spa
and
accessory
uses
to
hotel
the
hotel
garage
retail
store
to
salon
three
restaurants
bar
and
other
accessories
used
to
the
hotel
and
fitness
center.
The
violation
is
article
41,
section,
17
health
club
or
gym
as
a
conditional
use
on
ground
floor.
AE
Steven
Miller
McDermott
Colton
Millett
28
State
Street
morning,
madam
chair
members,
we're
here
seeking
your
approval
for
a
fitness
center
at
this
location,
which
part
of
which
was
formerly
Turner
fisheries.
The
violation
is
because
of
the
zoning
and
the
the
address
is
listed.
It's
the
Westin
Hotel
building
and
it's
listed
as
10
Huntington
Avenue
any
ground
floor.
Space
of
more
than
forty
square
feet
requires
zoning
relief.
It's
a
conditional
use.
Our
entrance
is
actually
on
Stewart
Street,
but
because
the
building
is
listed
as
ten
hunting
can
have,
that
requires
a
conditional
use
approval.
AE
AF
AG
E
Z
J
A
B
A
AH
We
are
proposing
a
deck
off
of
the
rear.
On
the
second
floor,
when
originally
submitted,
we
had
a
deck
that
was
full
width
and
six
foot
deep
working
closely
with
the
abutters
we
have
modified,
which
is
the
second
sheet
attached
the
deck
in
regards
to
discussions
with
the
neighbors
in
terms
of
sight
line
into
their
unit.
So
you
can
see
on
sketch,
1b
we've
pulled
the
deck
about
seven
foot,
two
off
of
the
property
line
to
the
left
next
to
seven
Claremont
and
also
in
the
other
direction.
A
C
AH
AH
A
AC
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
who
face
the
Sherif
with
mayor's
office
immigrant
services,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
and
support,
we
did
hold
multiple
abutters
meetings
regarding
this
roof
deck.
There
is
one
small
contention
with
the
directive
butter
next
door,
but
the
vast
majority
of
the
folks
in
attendance
were
in
support
of
it.
It
does
fit
in
with
the
character
of
the
surrounding
buildings,
and
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank.
I
AI
B
This
is
to
change
use
for
two
residential
units,
interior
renovation,
exterior
renovations
and
extend
the
red
bay
from
the
first
level
down
to
the
ground
floor,
installed,
rear
decks,
construct
a
new
addition
at
roof
to
include
a
penthouse
addition
of
Jordan's
260
square
feet
and
roof
deck
and
install
a
new
fire
suppression
system.
The
violation
is
article
32,
section,
4
applicability,
article
64
section
8,
the
2
F
and
a
1
F
sub
district
is
forbidden.
Nautical
sixty-four
section,
9,
townhouse
row
house
extensions
into
the
rail
yard
in
article
64,
section,
nine
dimensional
regulations,
excessive
FAA.
AH
A
A
AH
You,
madam
chair,
so
it's
an
existing
single-family,
we're
seeking
conversion
to
to
family
dwelling
units
on
the
garden
level,
we're
looking
to
extend
the
existing
rear
bay
down
to
the
garden
level
patio
and
on
the
roof,
we're
looking
to
erect
a
penthouse
working
with
the
abutters
at
nine
Claremont
Park.
We
have
modified,
which
you
have
submitted
a
the
penthouse
in
in
discussions
with
them
to
make
sure
sight
lines
and
issues
were
addressed
as
well,
and
these
drawings
reflect
that
change.
A
A
A
AH
AC
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
face
a
shriek
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
we'd,
also
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal
as
well.
I
believe
they
did
work
out
some
of
the
concerns
that
the
neighbors
had
and
the
neighbors
are
in
support
of.
What's
presented.
A
A
B
B
K
K
Compliance
with
the
State
Building
Code,
this
particular
building,
is
in
the
south
end
historic
district
subject
because
of
its
location
to
review
by
landmarks.
It
is
a
contributing
district.
We
have
contributing.
Building
to
the
district,
we
have
asserted
the
exemption
rights
under
Chapter
11
of
the
State
Building
Code,
section
308,
which
states
that
alterations
additions.
Restorations
need
not
apply
if
the
building
code
official
deems
the
substitute
this
case,
the
hatch
does
not
constitute
a
distinct
life
safety
hazard.
The
glazing
on
the
proposed
hatch
is
safety.
K
Glazing
I
have
submitted
a
example
in
the
package
for
building
code
review
of
the
proposed
hatch,
which
will
open
to
the
side.
There
is
continuous
head
room
clearance,
there
will
be
a
railing
and
a
fence
around
the
deck
and
a
continuous
railing
on
the
stairway,
as
shown
in
the
example
of
what
is
being
proposed
as
access.
I
K
I
That
the
effect
of
transportation
in
terms
of
people
walking
up
and
down
it
is
therefore
minimized,
because
it's
really
dealing
with
simply
one
unit,
not
the
whole
building.
I
believe
that
the
code
really
intended
that
section,
common
access
running
all
the
way
up
to
the
building
I
make
a
motion
to
draft
the
building
code.
In
a
second.
AK
AK
K
Rear
deck
is
at
the
second
floor
if
the
last
page
of
the
submission
shows
that
it
will
be
supported
by
brackets,
projecting
six
feet
the
usual
during
the
community
process.
We
modify
the
deck
by
pulling
it
back
from
the
adjoining
building
at
36.
I
would
like
to
commend
mr.
Sharif
on
our
excellent
community
process,
this
project
that
generated
some
opposition,
which
was
resolved,
and
we
we
now
have
no
known
opposition.
K
AL
K
I
I
K
E
AC
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
one
final
time,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
My
name
is
face
Sherif
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
We
did
hold
an
extensive
community
process
regarding
lists
and
the
proponents
did
work
with
their
director
butters
to
address
all
the
concerns,
including
the
sizing
of
the
deck
and
also
the
privacy
issue
with
the
skylight.
Thank
you
thank.
I
B
A
B
This
is
a
change
of
used
space
from
a
laundromat
to
restaurant,
to
two
restaurants
violations,
article
9
section
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use,
adding
a
second
restaurant
to
the
building
article
32
section,
32
point
for
brown,
water
conservation,
overlay
district,
article
66,
section
8:
restaurant
is
forbidden,
use
in
an
MFI
to
sub
district
name
and
address
of
the
record.
Please
Madame.
A
AJ
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Krishna's
Simonelli
bus
and
roller
trust,
there
has
been
some
debate
on
whether
or
not
this
fraud
this
project
actually
even
triggered
the
jihad
based
on
the
applicants.
Description
of
the
project
to
me,
I
didn't
see
that
any
of
the
triggers,
in
fact,
were
work
meant
to
forty
cot.
It
was
forwarded
to
my
comments
were
forwarded
to
inspection
services
to
James,
Kennedy
and
basically,
I
was
in
a
holding
pattern
to
wait
to
hear
back
from
him
he
did
intended.
AM
Course,
there's
one
structure
on
the
site:
it's
split
in
half,
there's
basically
thirteen
times
of
square
feet
on
either
side.
The
left
side
has
a
restaurant.
Currently,
the
right
side
has
a
launderette
we're
going
to
seek
you
to
change
the
use
of
the
right
side
to
a
tea
house.
It's
unfortunate
that
it
has
to
come
into
the
restaurant
category
because
they
don't
serve
any
food
there.
But
it's
really
just
like
a
coffee
house
except
tea.
The
Fenway
Civic
Association,
has
come
out
and
support.
AM
AM
J
AG
J
J
A
B
You
calling
VOA
seven
seven,
two:
six:
zero,
five,
nine
twenty,
seven,
two:
nine
twenty
nine
East
Broadway.
This
is
a
modify,
an
existing
dormer
with
new
exterior
door
and
access
to
new
roof
deck.
This
is
also
constructed
new
roof
deck.
The
violation
is
article
68,
section:
twenty
nine
roof
structure,
restrictions
name
an
address
to
the
record.
Please.
A
AN
A
A
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
were
not
able
to
go
on
record
in
support
at
this
time,
simply
because
we
have
heard
from
the
city
quaint
neighborhood
association
that
they
are
not
in
support
due
to
the
butters
meeting,
where
there
were
some
concerns
around
the
deck
being
across
the
street
from
a
historic
building.
And
you
know,
noise
issues.
A
AO
AP
I
AN
AK
B
E
J
I
P
AR
Q
A
E
A
AS
B
A
AI
A
A
AS
B
Seven:
seven:
nine
eight
six
zero
fourteen
I
street
as
a
companion
case,
boa
seven,
seven,
nine,
eight
six
one
fourteen
High
Street:
this
is
adding
a
roof
deck
on
an
existing
flat
roof
portion
of
the
owners,
roof
rights
as
per
condo
deed,
adding
access
to
a
roof
or
a
new
spiral.
Staircase
ascending
from
existing
private
deck
belonging
to
the
owner
of
the
top
floor.
This
is
cut
through
an
existing
parapet,
wall
a
roof
and
for
this
for
the
staircase.
B
AU
A
A
AU
I
AU
I
AU
J
AU
AU
A
AV
A
A
AU
A
I
AU
E
AU
I
AU
I
AU
A
A
AU
A
AU
AU
I
I
AU
J
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
John
Allison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
We
did
hold
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
and
people
were
generally
supportive
due
to
the
fact
the
roof
deck
is
somewhat
concealed
from
neighboring
buildings,
as
well
as
exclusive
to
to
this
unit.
Thank
you.
Thank.
AO
AP
AA
A
B
S
S
It's
currently
being
extensively
renovated
the
handout
that
I
provided
to
the
board
on
the
second
page
actually
shows
the
building
in
the
midst
of
renovation,
and
it
shows
the
area
to
the
rear
that
would
be
decided
to
to
perform
Straub
Street
parking
spaces.
There
is
to
the
rear
of
the
building
or
to
the
side
of
it.
As
one
is
facing
the
building
from
on
the
marine
Road
side
and
directly
adjacent
to
the
proposed
parking
area.
S
There
is
a
two-car
garage
with
an
existing
curb
cut
that
would
essentially
be
extended
12
feet
down
to
provide
access
to
the
two
proposed
parking
spaces,
thus
creating
one
on
street
parking
space
for
two
aw
street
parking
spaces.
The
parking
spaces
would
be
eight
and
a
half
by
20
feet,
meeting
BTD
requirements,
the
sole
zoning
violation
is
or
insufficient
usable
open
space.
Essentially,
the
rear
yard,
as
open
space
is
being
traded
for
two
parking
spaces.
This
building
is
one.
S
S
A
L
AO
AP
I'm
Jim
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan,
obviously
council,
as
michael
flirty,
through
the
extensive
work
that
wouldn't
have
went
into
drafting
article
68,
the
council
is
unable
to
support
the
product.
This
particular
the
time
of
the
council
recognizes
that
there
are
product
that
does
have,
but
that
do
have
a
merit
and
we
live
to
discretion
of
the
board.
S
Well
again,
it
depends
on
DPW
I
know
that
it
is
showing
two
flares
on
the
plans
on
the
left
side,
whether
again
it
depends
on
what
BT
up
I'm
sorry
what
the
DPW
requires
a
fee
I
see
whether
or
not
the
flares
are
gonna
be
there
or
whether
there
will
be
a
continuous,
curb
cut.
I
think
the
preference
sometimes
is
to
put
in
the
the
curbing
flares.
But
again
that
will
depend
upon
DPW.
A
B
You
call
our
last
three
cases:
the
9:30
calling
boa
778
3
0
2,
2,
24,
M,
strum,
sorry,
vo
boa
779,
0,
99,
47
Havas
tree
there
to
companion
cases,
boa
7,
7,
7,
1,
0,
147,
Rioja
mystery
in
boa
7,
7,
7,
1,
0,
7
53
to
55
hava
stream.
This
is
447
is
proposed
to
off
street
parking
additional
floor
off
street
parking,
solace,
6
off
street
parking,
447
rear
harvest
rate
violations,
article
65,
section,
8,
ancillary
parking
is
a
conditional
use.
Article
65,
6,
&,
9
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
This
is
47
rare
harvest
change
boxes
from
a
16
carriage
house
to
four
residential
units
renovate,
including
a
new
fire
sprinkler
system.
Work
will
remain
within
the
existing
building
envelope
to
meet
the
our
street
parking
requirements.
The
violations
article
65
section
41,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
for
residential
units
are
forbidden
news.
Article
65,
section,
9
utility
access
shall
be
readily
accessible
by
an
individual
tenant.
Floating
air
ratio
is
excessive
and
for
53
to
55
harvest
Street
opposed
for
our
street
parking
and
ditional
to
our
street
parking.
S
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name,
is
George.
Moran
seem
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston
I'm
joined
to
my
immediate
right
by
Kevin
D,
blur
of
Road
a
architects
project
architects
and
to
his
right
by
our
client
and
the
owner
of
the
property
Adam
Sabbath
Adam
owns
both
47
and
53
50.
Five
to
the
left.
Revised
plans
have
been
submitted
to
the
board.
S
The
major
change
being
is
that
the
conversion
proposed
conversion
of
the
rear
carriage
house
into
a
four
unit
dwelling
building
has
been
modified
and
reduced.
The
current
proposal
is
to
modify
that
converted
into
a
two
unit
dwelling
building
the
result
rezoning
is
that
the
forbidden
use
for
the
four
F
disappears,
since
this
is
a
2f
district
and
also
47
our
harvest.
Street
on
one
of
the
three
refusal
letters
is
cited
for
insufficient
off
street
parking.
A
S
Both
existing
buildings
are
three
family
dwellings.
This
is
not
a
consolidation
of
Lots.
The
lot
line
is
going
to
remain.
That
is
the
cause
for
the
ancillary
parking
violations
on
the
refusal.
Letters
essentially
what's
happening.
Is
there
is
an
existing
carriage
house?
That's
going
to
be
converted
to
a
two-family
dwelling
within
its
present
footprint
that
building
will,
along
with
the
other
two
buildings,
53
55
and
47,
which
are
rental
buildings
that
my
client
owns
will
be
serviced
by
two
parking
spaces
in
the
carriage
house
conversion
for
the
two
units.
S
But
then
there
will
also
be
four
parking
spaces
to
the
rear
of
53-55,
Harvest
Street
and
then
two
parking
spaces
between
the
carriage
house
building,
that's
being
converted
in
the
existing
structure
at
47,
Harvest
Street.
The
result
is
the
site.
If
it
were
considered
to
be
a
single
site
would
have
eight
Welling
units
and
eight
parking
spaces.
There
are
currently
six
dwelling
units
in
no
off
street
parking
spaces.
A
S
And
the
driveway
would
be
effectively
a
common
driveway
and
the
six
parking
spaces
on
the
site
would
be
used
by
the
existing
three
family
dwelling,
a
53-55
in
a
47
and,
of
course,
the
two
units
within
the
carriage
house
conversion.
The
two
spaces
within
the
carriage
house
can
view
conversion
would
be
for
those
two
units
in
that
building.
J
S
J
AR
A
S
47
is
six
thousand
four
hundred
seventy
seven
square
feet
and
53-55
is
five
thousand
three
hundred
forty
square
feet
going
through
the
zoning
refusal
letters
for
47
harvests.
The
violations
are
the
ancillary
use
violation
for
the
parking,
because
there
are
four
spaces
on
a
separate
lot,
which
may
in
fact
end
up
serving
some
of
the
residents
of
forty
seven
and
the
reason
I
say
may
is
because
these
a
rental
building,
so
it
kind
of
depends
on
who
is
renting
them
at
the
time
whether
they
have
a
vehicle
and
whether
they
need
a
parking
space.
S
The
other
violation
on
forty
seven
is
an
insufficient
usable,
open
space
violation.
Not
much
of
the
usable
open
space
was
being
used
as
such,
but
there
would
be
two
parking
spaces
introduced
and,
of
course,
the
paved
driveway
for
t7r,
which
relates
to
the
conversion
of
the
carriage
house.
Building.
That's
existing
the
violations
were
insufficient
off
street
parking
that
violate.
It
goes
away
with
the
reduction
in
the
number
of
units.
A
multi-family
dwelling
is
that
forbidden
use.
That
violation
goes
away
because
it's
now
a
two-family
dwelling
and
there's
an
excessive
FA.
S
S
AI
S
AI
AI
AI
A
AI
The
carriage
house
is
being
essentially
recreated.
This
is
a
kind
of
an
example
that
you
see
an
in
Dorchester
on
larger
Lots,
but
pretty
good
one
with
a
center
entrance,
so
we're
maintaining
all
that
this
has
really
kind
of
met
its
demise,
a
little
bit
just
out
of
decays.
So
this
is
a
restoration
of
that
too.
AI
It
looks
it
looks
that
way,
but
we're
we
have
all
the
you
know
record
right
in
our
proposal,
you're
about
where
that
footprint
is,
as
well
as
accurate
measurements
to
its
eve,
it's
just
sort
of
kind
of
impossible
to
reproduce
this
type
of
structure,
even
though
we're
kind
of
keeping
a
slab
on
grade,
but
we're
gonna
maintain
and
actually
restore
some
features.
You
see
some
of
the
the
cupula,
the
patterning
of
the
windows
center
entrance.
A
A
AI
S
AW
S
L
Chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellison
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services.
We
would
like
to
own
record
and
support
at
this
time.
They
do
have
the
support
of
the
McCormack
Civic
Association,
as
well
as
some
abutters,
as
reflected
in
the
letters
I
think
they've
submitted.
We
did
have
Anna
butters
meeting
on
this,
at
which
people
were
vehemently
opposed
to
the
four
unit
project.
One
common
thread
at
that
meeting
was
people
did
feel
a
two-unit
project
might
be
appropriate.
So
we
are
in
support
of
the
two
unit
project.
A
S
S
AX
I'm
Isabel
Blanca
I
live
at
45,
Harvard,
Street
and
I'm,
representing
myself,
and
also
our
condo
association,
where
we
have
two
units
where
the
closest
building
to
that
project
were
in
support
based
on
the
proviso
list
that
was
provided
to
the
board
and
also
special
concern
with
our
views
not
being
affected.
We
have
a
roof
deck,
and
this
is
in
the
line
of
sight
of
like
the
Prudential
and
the
smile
line
in
general.
So
I
trust
that
this
will
be
reviewed
in
the
VRA
Design
Review.
A
A
A
A
S
I
just
want
to
make
sure
for
the
previous
focus
if
the
speaker,
since
she
was
kind
of,
have
to
speak
in
support
for
a
specific
concern
about
views,
had
to
do
with
the
cupola.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
on
the
record,
because
we
did
have
a
conversation
in
the
hall
and
I
said
that
we
would
specifically
make
sure
that
the
VRA
looks
at
that
cupola.
Thank.
S
AY
AZ
E
A
A
B
BA
AL
A
BA
Are
proposing
a
change
of
occupancy
from
warehouse
to
fitness
center?
We're
not
making
any
change
to
the
physical
structure
we're
doing
minor
renovate
renovations?
The
Phoenix
is
a
nonprofit
organization.
We
provide
free
fitness
and
sports
to
individuals,
families
in
the
community
that
have
a
minimum
of
48
hours,
continuous
sobriety.
Our
mission
is
to
provide
free
recovery
support
services
and
to
reduce
the
stigma
around
addiction.
BA
A
A
A
BA
BA
Currently,
we've
been
operating
in
a
2,000
square
foot
facility
in
the
Carter
auditorium,
which
was
supported
by
the
mayor's
office
originally
about
18
months
ago.
We
have,
in
18
months,
served
close
to
500
individuals
so
with
having
11,000
square
feet,
expect
to
serve
upwards
of
2,000
to
5,000
in
the
in
the
first
year
and
grow
our
membership
from
there.
BA
We
offer
we'll
offer
peer
recovery.
Coaching
all
of
our
services
are
our
peer
to
peer,
led,
there's,
no
clinical
or
therapeutic
interventions
on-site
or
as
part
of
our
mission.
So
the
the
peer
to
peer
model
is
that
we
hire
staff
who
are
individuals
with
lived
experience,
either
in
their
own
recovery
from
addiction
or
family
members
of
loved
ones
that
have
over
with
that
have
experienced
addiction
and.
Q
I'm
familiar
with
you
with
your
goals
and
and
one
of
my
questions
is,
is
out
of
this
facility?
Will
you
be
running
groups
like
I
know?
In
some
places
you
offer
mountain
biking,
you
offer
mountain
climbing.
We
be
offering
excursions
from
this
to
other
places
and
continue
to
do
that
kind
of
work
to
bring
those
those
people
currently.
BA
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellis
and
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
Josh
McFadden,
we
would
like
to
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
They
have
garnered
the
support
of
their
abutters
in
the
business
community
through
the
New
Market
Business
Association.
Thank
you,
madam.
BD
A
Q
A
A
B
Boa
seven:
seven,
nine
one:
three:
seven:
twenty
eight
Leyland
Street:
this
is
a
change
dr.,
May,
three
family
to
a
group
home
for
24
persons
and
also
adding
new
fire
or
an
alarm
sprinkler
system.
The
violations,
article
50
section
28
group
residents
general-
is
a
conditional
use
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
A
BF
A
A
BE
It's
being
proposes
is,
is
hope,
houses,
the
oldest
drug
and
alcohol
recovery
program
in
the
state
of
Massachusetts,
and
currently
we
have
a
six-month
residential
program
over
in
Lower
Roxbury,
behind
Boston
Medical
Center.
That
program
consists
of
three
phases:
intensive
intensive
treatment
case
management
for
employment
and
other
opportunities,
and
then
stabilization
because
of
the
high
prices
in
Boston
in
the
metro
area.
BE
A
lot
of
the
graduates
from
that
program
have
had
to
move
off
out
of
the
city
and
they've
got
derails
from
their
primary
that
from
their
medical
services,
from
the
from
the
12-step
community
and
from
their
employment.
So
we're
proposing
a
graduate
program
which
would
be
added
as
as
phase
4,
which
would
continue
the
services
of
Hope
House
to
24
24
minutes,
so
they
can
remain
in
the
community.
A
BE
The
way
the
facility
is
designed
there
is
a
24/7
living
resident
manager
there
there
is,
and
then
there
was
two
case
managers
when
is
a
licensed
social
worker,
and
the
other
is
a
case.
Man
case
manager,
but
they
also
what
is
unique
to
this
particular
project
is
that
they
have
the
full
services
of
the
Hope
House.
So
in
the
in
the
event
that
someone
has
has
an
issue
because
of
our
full
continuum
of
care
were
able
to
move
the
person
backwards,
as
opposed
to
discharging
up
to
the
for.
A
Q
BE
Y
BE
L
BD
Sue
Sullivan
New,
Market,
Business,
Association
and
I'm
speaking
in
support
of
Hope
House
and
the
work
that
they
do.
They
have
been
wonderful
neighbors
on
forums
straight.
They
they
they
really
maintain
a
great
facility
and
to
have
a
this
is.
The
continuum
of
care
is
something
that
has
been
so
important
and
missing
in
a
lot
of
our
recovery
programs
and
just
to
have
a
graduate
program
that
they
can,
that
they
mil
manage.
Well,
we
are,
it
would
be
fully
supportive
of
having
them
in
in
any
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
A
Q
A
B
Voa,
seven
one
six,
one:
three,
seven,
seventy-six
Allegheny
Street
this
is
to
construct
a
new
penthouse
bed,
expand
living
space
into
the
basement
and
change
docks
from
a
two
unit
bill
into
a
three
unit.
Building
the
violation
is
article
59,
section
7
at
three
family
dwelling,
it's
forbidden
radical
59,
section
8
the
floor
da
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
59,
section
37,
the
Austria
parking
is
insufficient.
An
article
59
section
8,
the
height,
is
excessive
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
X
Currently,
there
exists
a
two-year
in
a
building
with
the
with
a
front
to
back
layout,
so
one
unit
is
addressing
Allegheny
Street
and
then
there's
a
additional
residential
unit
behind
that
the
proposal
is
to
subdivide
the
front
building
to
create
two
units
within
it.
Currently
there
are
four
bedrooms
in
unit
one
which
is
the
rear
property.
A
X
Currently,
it's
it's
A
to
F
five
thousand,
so
the
use
of
self
is
violation
there.
The
FA
are
is
excessive.
Where
point
six
is
required,
our
proposed
will
be
0.98.
The
parking
is
a
violation,
but
we
believe
that
the
five
cars
are
sufficient
for
three
units
at
the
rear
and
the
height
is
thirty
seven
feet
which
is
existing.
There's
no
change
there.
X
A
X
If
the
demand
is
there,
as
we
all
know,
a
Mission
Hill,
there's
a
lot
of
student
housing
in
that
area,
but
I
could
certainly
address
that
with
the
ona.
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
kept
the
square
footage
is
large
because
of
the
parking
and
the
size
of
the
units.
We
believe
that
they
would
be
desirable
to
families
or
students
in
the
area.
A
AG
BG
AW
BH
X
X
I,
don't
this
particular
version
of
the
project
was
not
madam
chair
I
think
that
originally
using
those
jut,
the
mr.
larezo
and
several
properties
in
the
area
and
I
think
this
was
a
part
of
a
previous
proposed
project
that
was
not
pursued
and
finished.
So
the
the
unit
that
was
distracted
at
the
rear
of
the
property
was
done
as
of
right
with
in
the
square
footage
in
the
setbacks.
So
the
the
project
has
been
discussing
it.
This
morning
was
not
plausible.
B
Its
doughnuts
caught
here,
yeah,
okay,
calling
boa
six
nine,
two,
seven
five,
six,
two
two
four
Dolan's
caught.
This
is
pocket
for
one
residential
vehicle
violation:
article
9
section,
one
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
in
article
55,
section
40
off
street
parking
loading
and
quiet
parking
is
not
allowed
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AY
Drive
safe
Hawkins
been
there
for
a
while,
so
the
house,
if
you
look
at
the
blueprints
on
English
Street,
this
dome
quarters
is
the
side
street
with
a
set
a
set
of
stairs
a
that's
the
main
interest
of
the
house,
the
drive
the
pocket
exactly
side
pocket
on
the
house.
So
when
you
look
at
the
pictures,
there's
no
entrance
there
that
and
that's
a
that
goes
into
a
private
driveway.
AY
AY
A
AY
AY
AY
A
Because
you
know
when
we
look
at
projects
all
projects
here,
we
are
not
really
looking
at
it
today
we're
looking
at
for
the
as
far
as
the
long-term
impact
on
the
community,
because
you
know
that
space
may
be
there
for
the
next
50
years
or
whatever
it
is.
So
that's
what
we
have
to
consider
as
we
look
at
these
cases.
Ok,
so
so
that's
why
they're
kind
of
about
trying
to
get
clear.
What's
going
on
how.
A
Q
A
E
E
I
A
More
instructive,
okay,
so
this
is.
This
is
a
side
entrance.
You
know,
house,
okay
and
there's
nothing
that
could
happen
in
that
graveyard.
Big
he's
looking
to
park
this
vehicle
right
there,
it's
not
there
in
the
front
yard,
but
directly
about
the
budding
a
Murray
Street.
A
AY
A
I
AY
AY
So
the
property
line
goes
from
five
six
five
three,
but
when
the
developer
built
back
there,
they
bumped
it
out
defense
so
that
I
get
a
one
spot
back
down
and
the
reason
it's
1890,
I
guess
somewhere.
That's
that's.
How
hold
the
houses
so
I
had
to
get
another
clock
plant
cuz
when
I
originally
went
to
ten
ten.
You
guys,
like
I,
can't
use
this
plot
plan
that
they
had.
It
was
stamped,
but
it
was
his
hole
and
he
says
that
it
doesn't
say
anything
on
their
both
pockets
basis.
C
BI
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
board
members
I'm,
a
Ellen
Timmy
I
live
at
65
Cornwall
Street
in
Jamaica,
Plain
I
directly
abut
Scott
McKay
and
live
in
the
cohousing.
That
people
were
mentioning
a
30
unit
condominium
and
we
are
in
complete
support
of
of
mr.
McKay's
appeal.
It's
clear.
It's
totally
evident
that
the
place
that
is
in
in
question
is
not
even
a
yard.
It's
a
side
strip,
it
doesn't
constitute
a
yard
if
there
were
no
car
park
there
and
that
his
front
is
is
not
on
a
Murray
Street.
A
BI
A
E
M
BJ
Like
to
speak
in
favor
of
Scott's
proposal,
Howard,
Katz,
65
or
Wall
Street
number,
two
or
nine
I'm
also
a
neighbor
of
Scott,
could
I
give
a
very,
very
brief
context.
A
In
place,
we.
BJ
Q
Q
A
AY
Where
did
you
park
before
they
had
the
colossal
I
packed
in
that
driveway,
so
there
used
to
be
a
junkyard
that
went
around
there,
a
will
scrap
yet
and
then
that
got
sold
up,
and
then
they
get
the
development.
It
was
a
between
my
grandmother
and
the
owner.
They
said
we
could
use
that
and
we've
used
it
at
50
years
and
then
kind
of
won
the
cohousing
way.
Q
I
A
I
The
address
is
actually
on
goulancourt,
that's
the
address
of
the
house
and
therefore
the
space
on
every
street
is
silent.
The
problem
is
it's
the
visual
disconnect
and
the
reason
there's
a
visual
disconnect.
Is
you
have
a
chain
commencement
that
clearly
shows
your
honor?
If
that
was
working
with
the
VRA.
AE
B
The
next
case
calling
VOA
7
6
5
6
to
1
for
22
Seaver
Street.
This
is
to
construct
a
new
rare
addition
in
new
dormer
to
an
existing
two
family
residential
violation,
article
50
section
29.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
article
50,
section
29.
The
rail
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
hi.
BH
This
k22
family
unit
with
one
bedroom
in
the
first
floor
and
two
bedroom
in
the
second
floor.
It's
a
very,
very,
very
small
house
and
I
have
to
a
boy
and
a
girl.
You
know
children
and
I,
don't
have
enough
room,
you
know
for
them
to
sleep
and
I'm
there
right
now,
they're
sleeping
with
me
in
the
same
bedroom
with
my
wife.
A
BH
BH
BH
A
BH
The
same
yeah
it's
already
on,
there
is
already
an
antique
high,
but
it's
just
converting
normal.
There
is
already
an
attic
there.
L
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
John
Ellison
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
behalf
of
Flavia
to
Vega
we'd
like
to
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you.
BK
A
B
BL
Morning
my
name
is
Stuart
Schreyer
I'm,
an
attorney
with
an
office
at
one
zero,
zero,
five
Dorchester
Avenue
in
Dorchester
with
me,
is
Adam
dong,
who
is
the
owner
of
54
sorry,
56
I
always
get
confused.
These
houses
are
attached
in
the
middle
and
they
are
two
essentially
two.
Three
family
houses
they've
been
completely
rebuilt
from
there
were
fairly
deplorable
houses
in
very
poor
condition.
For
many
years
they
were,
residential
houses
had
been
converted
to
a
church
juice
and
a
daycare
center.
BL
We
were
before
this
board
to
convert
them
back
to
residential
use
during
the
construction
phase.
Mr.
Donnell
owns
a
three
family
home
and
mr.
Winn
owns
a
three
family
home
attached
in
the
middle.
The
houses
have
been
completely
rebuilt.
The
outside
is
very
attractive.
This
parking
in
the
rear,
the
issue
became
as
they
were,
building
them.
The
units
are
two
bedroom
units,
so
each
building
has
three
two
bedroom
units
the
first
floor.
He
would
like
to
extend
into
the
basement
what
they
tell.
BL
Essentially,
it
will
still
be
a
two
bedroom
unit
on
the
first
floor,
with
a
family
room
in
the
basement,
they're
using
about
a
hundred
and
sixty
square
feet
in
the
basement
to
make
one
additional
room
that
room
will
have
then
we'll
move
the
laundry
down
to
the
basement
and
there'll
also
be
a
half
bath,
not
a
full
bathroom.
The
basement
ceiling.
BL
A
BL
BL
BL
Utilities
are
in,
there
are
utilities
in
the
basement,
but
they're
in
a
separate
area.
This
is
not
the
whole
basement.
This
a
small
area
and
they'll
be
building
an
interior
unit
staircase
down
so
in
effect,
they're
not
really
increasing
their
square
footage
that
much
because
they're
gonna
lose
36
square
feet.
BM
A
BL
A
L
U
A
BL
A
B
This
is
to
addy
five
foot
by
twenty
six
foot
porch
with
shed
roof
overhang,
a
4-inch
slab
with
a
five
foot
by
eight
foot,
attached
storage
shed
on
the
rear
of
the
house.
The
shed
roof
and
storage
is
off
the
back
to
the
basement
level.
No
living
space
is
being
at
it
and
porch
does
not
block
windows
or
doors
violation,
thought
equal
nine
section
one.
The
building
is
a
two-family
dwelling
in
a
1f
5000
district.
The
covered
porch
is
an
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
I
E
AL
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board,
my
name,
is
David
Connor
from
the
mayor's
office.
I
think
what
services
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
We
held
an
on-site
abutters
meeting.
All
the
butters
who
attended
express
their
full
support
for
the
project.
Opponents
also
have
the
support
of
the
lower
mill
Civic
Association.
Thank
you,
madam.
A
B
Boa
seven:
five:
five
one:
eight
zero
156
West
Selden
Street.
This
is
a
new
two
family
home.
The
violations,
article
60
section
8
family
dwelling,
use
to
the
forbidden
use
article
60,
section
40.
Our
street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9
the
lot
size
to
erect
a
new
dwelling
is
insufficient.
Article
60
lot
with
direct
a
new
dwelling
is
insufficient.
Article
60
lot
quantities
insufficient
article
60
Floria
ratio
is
insufficient.
B
Article
60,
a
high
requirement
in
excess
is
excessive.
Two
and
a
half
stories
as
the
maximum
allowed
article.
Sixty
section
nine
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article,
sixty
section,
nine,
the
side
yard
requirement
is
insufficient
and
article
60
section
nine.
The
rear
yard
requirement
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
my.
A
A
AB
Currently,
we
own
the
property
with
a
total
square
footage
of
just
under
11,000
square
feet.
We've
owned
the
property
since
1987
parents
owned
it,
my
brother
and
I
apart
from
our
parents
three
years
ago.
It
is
a
subdivided
lot,
so
we
currently
have
a
house
on
on
one
lot
and
the
second
love,
which
is
where
we're
proposing
to
build
a
second
home
so
tell.
AB
A
AB
I
I
J
A
Sorry
tell
us
about
the
units:
what's
a
sighs,
how
many
bribe
four
bedrooms
the.
AB
A
AB
AB
AQ
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Whitney
Celestin
with
the
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We're
here
to
support
this
project.
We've
had
two
butter's
meetings,
including
one
with
the
West
Selden
Association.
The
butters
didn't
have
some
worries
about
the
size
of
the
dormer,
but
the
owner
did
adir
the
plans
you
know
to
meet
that
requirement
and
also
the
parking
we
did
discuss
that
in
meetings,
and
they
did
tell
us
that
they
would
be
parking
in
the
back
of
the
home,
as
just
mentioned.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
AV
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Walsh
Applewhite
council
McCarthy's
office,
I,
like
to
echo
the
sentiment
of
the
mayor's
office,
and
also
you
know.
The
property
owner
has
owned
the
property
since
that
leave
the
mid
80s
and
the
West
Selden
group
was
encouraged
by
the
fact
that
the
property
that
they're
trying
to
build
will
be
for
the
brother.
So
it
the
family
is
going
to
remain
on
the
property
you're
not
going
to
rent
it
out.
We'd
like
to
go
on
record
as
support.
Thank.
A
BK
J
A
B
B
Q
B
B
The
next
case
calling
boa
seven:
four:
nine
zero,
eight
to
nineteen
ranch,
a
Shia
Street.
This
is
erect
a
new
two-car
garage
violations,
article
55
section,
forty
one
accessory
buildings
on
the
side,
o
Riyadh
article
55,
section,
nine,
the
maximum
percentage
of
Riyadh
covered
by
the
accessory
building,
an
article
55
section,
nine,
a
side
yard
isn't
sufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
C
AR
AR
AR
AR
L
AI
B
A
BH
BJ
E
E
B
A
AK
B
AK
A
B
There
any
other,
deferrals
or
withdrawals
for
11:30
bearing
Emma
go
back
to
the
10:30
cases,
calling
VOA
seven
four,
nine
four
zero
850
Eldridge
Road.
This
is
to
modify
and
enlarge
an
existing
third-floor
DOMA
and
construct
a
new
bathroom
on
the
third
floor,
the
violation
article
9
section
1,
this
extension
of
non-conforming
use,
name
and
address
for
the
record
late
Thomas.
A
A
AZ
L
E
BN
B
A
B
A
A
A
B
We'll
go
back
to
the
1030
cases,
calling
VOA
77265
8
599
Cambridge
Street.
This
is
the
redevelopment
of
a
mixed
use,
property
to
commercial
and
to
residential
modifying
an
existing
Victorian
by
adding
four
townhouses
in
eliminating
to
commercial
spaces
from
the
next
phase.
Studios
for
a
total
of
six
residential
units
is
Cambridge,
Street,
Hill.
Okay,
this
is
a
violation.
Article
10
section
1.
B
AS
BO
BO
BO
BO
0.6,
this
is
a
single-family
one,
a
6,000
zone,
it's
sort
of
a
little
bit
of
an
anomaly
along
Cambridge
Street.
The
existing
current
use
is
to
commercial
units,
there's
a
dent
to
dentistry
medical
office
units
and
to
residential
units
in
the
existing
Victorian,
we're
proposing,
as
we've
said,
we're
gonna
keep
the
existing
house
and
we're
gonna
put
four
townhouses
on
the
back
of
it,
which
are
commensurate
in
style.
BO
BO
They
are
basically
living
dining
and
then
four
bedrooms
above
and
the
existing
Victorian
house
will
be
converted
to
two
units
which
have
surface
parking
outside.
One
of
the
violations
is
that
there
is
parking
along
the
side
that
extends
into
the
five
yard
foot
setback.
If
you
look
at
the
existing
site
plan,
there
is
parking
all
along
that
side
existing
already
and
most
of
that,
we're
actually
we're
buffering
with
a
small
garden
area.
BO
BO
BO
The
intent
is
to
extend
the
existing
language
as
I
think
Michael
pointed
out.
The
sisters
originally
had
some
concerns
on
the
proposed
project,
as
did
some
of
the
civic
associations,
I,
think
keeping
the
house
and
changing
the
density
and
has
really
helped
quite
a
bit
Akemi
family.
That
dentists
have
been
there
for
quite
a
while
they've
raised
their
families
and
I
think
that
everyone's
in
tune
with
what
the
fact
that
keeping
the
house
is
very
important
to
people
and
that's
what's
been
proposed.
So.
A
A
BO
AS
J
A
BP
Madam
chair
names
are
the
board
Warner
Reilly
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
The
original
plans
were
met
with
a
lot
of
feedback,
and
then
they
came
back
to
the
community
and
there
was
a
support
at
the
abutters
meaning
there
was
a
letter
of
opposition.
That's
been
submitted
to
you,
but
overall
the
majority
would
support
we
like
to
go.
He
was
off
his
plane
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you
good.
BS
BO
E
E
A
AK
B
The
next
three
cases
calling
boa
seven,
seven,
three,
three:
seven:
six,
seven
spa
Hawk
Street
next
case,
boa
seven,
eight,
two,
three
three:
six:
nine
spot
hawk
street
and
boa
77340
one
787b
spa,
Hawk
Street.
This
is
for
seven
spot
Hogg
Street.
This
is
confirm:
oxy
as
an
existing
to
family
dwelling
on
15,000
463
square
feet
and
combined
seventh
spot
with
nice
park
to
be
known
as
seven
nine,
three
seven
nine
spot
Street
to
be
a
total
of
four
apartments.
B
The
violations,
article
51
69,
excessive
fai
article
51,
section
56
la
street
parking
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
51,
section
57
to
a
war,
two
more
of
dwellings.
On
the
same
lot
in
article
9
section,
one
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use:
this
is
for
tonight's
Baha.
Confer
market
is
a
two-family
dwelling
on
15,000,
463
square
feet
and
combined
seven
spots.
Nine
spot
can
be
known
as
seven
and
nine
and
to
be
a
total
of
four
apartment
violations.
Article
51
6,
&
9,
the
Florida
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Nautical
51
is
609.
Usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
B
Article
51
section
I
Austria
parking
is
insufficient.
Michael
51,
section
57,
two
more
dwellings
located
on
the
same
lot
in
are
equal
nine
section,
one
extension
of
a
non-conforming
youth.
This
is
7a
7b,
Sparhawk,
directiy
new
to
family
dwelling
built
in
the
rear,
so
I've
been
existing
for
family
dwelling
on
existing
15,000
476
square
feet.
This
will
be
one
and
two
dwellings
located
on
the
song.
One
of
two
dwellings
located
on
the
same
lot
violations
article
51
69
fa
are
is
excessive.
B
Article
51
69,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
article
51,
section
9,
2,
building
height
number
success
of
nautical
51
usable,
open
spaces
and
sufficient
medical
51
section
9.
The
side
yacht
is
insufficient.
Nautical
51
section
9
real
yacht
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
56
Osprey
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
57
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment
in
article
51,
section
57,
two
or
more
dwellings
located
on
the
same
lot
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
S
S
My
name
is
Julie
Moran
see
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West
Broadway
and
South
Boston
I'm
joined
by
d'artagnan
Brown
of
embarked
architects.
The
project
architect,
madam
chair
members.
This
is
for
this
application
is
to
consolidate
into
one
law
two
Lots
on
each
of
which
there
is
a
semi
attached
to
family
dwelling.
S
Consolidation
of
the
lot
would
then
result
in
a
change
of
occupancy
of
these
two
2f
buildings
into
a
single
four
family
dwelling,
no
change
in
the
number
of
units
there,
but
by
simply
consolidating
the
Lots
and
changing
this
from
two
twos
to
one
fourth
family.
We
incur
the
the
use
violation,
the
only
change
the
existing
building
is
actually
a
reduction
in
its
footprint.
There
is
a
non
historical
rear
addition
that
was
put
on
the
building
at
some
point,
which
would
be
removed
as
part
of
this
application.
S
Reducing
the
footprint
of
the
existing
building
by
approximately
six
hundred
square
feet
and
increasing
the
separation
distance
are
resulting
in
a
separation
distance
between
the
existing
building,
the
rear
facing
wall
and
the
the
new
proposed
two-story
townhouse
style
buildings
to
just
over
28
feet.
This
was
deferred
in
order
to
allow
for
the
perfection
of
the
record
with
respect
to
the
advertised
refusal
letters
when
I
deferred
this
matter.
It
had
been
advertised
properly
advertised
as
seven
and
seven
a
Sparhawk
street.
S
There
was
a
refusal
letter
that
did
not
issue
until
days
before
the
hearing,
which
was
benign
Sparhawk,
which
was
simply
pertain
to
the
consolidation
of
that
lot
with
seven.
Nonetheless,
in
order
to
perfect
a
record-
and
here
these
all
at
the
same
time,
we
deferred
to
allow
to
be
riad,
ver
ties
which
it
was.
A
AH
AH
Through
correct
so
so,
we've
included
two
packets.
The
first
packet
is
what
we
took
to
the
community
just
to
show
the
greater
context
and
our
proposed
building,
which
is
the
last
two
sheets
just
showing
the
existing
and
proposed
on
the
left
side.
There
is
an
existing
parking
space
that
we
are
looking
to
keep
it
keep
asses.
S
A
S
See
if
it
was
ever
legalized
as
such,
but
it
exists
elsewhere
on
the
street.
Looking
at
you
know,
you
can
see
it
occurring
also
at
3:00
on
between
3:00
and
5:00
Sparhawk
and
again,
I
would
characterize
that
beside
you,
a
driveway
rather
than
a
front
yard,
because
it
is
not
parking
in
front
of
a
building.
S
A
substantially
debilitated
garage,
a
rear
outlined
building
on
nine
Sparhawk
Street
when
this
was
deferred
the
first
time
the
board
recalled
I,
think
11
Sparhawk,
which
is
to
the
right,
which
was
a
similar
case.
It
was
before
this
board
in
2011,
and
that
was
for
the
erection
of
a
new
building
to
the
rear.
This
is
a
conversion
of
actually
it
is
a
new
building,
but
there
is
an
existing
building.
They
had
a
camp
in
preserved.
A
S
A
AH
AH
S
A
AH
J
J
S
BP
BQ
BR
B
Well
next
case
calling
VOA
seven
six,
two
one
one
931
Colwell
Street.
This
is
to
add
dormice
to
an
attic
of
an
existing
building.
The
violations,
article
50
violation,
article
51,
section,
9
the
floor.
The
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section,
9
number
of
stories
is
excessive.
Article
51
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
51
6,
an
eye
on
the
side
yard,
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Keva.