►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Good
morning,
everybody
and
thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
share
the
city's
draft.
Like
plan
with
you,
I
would
like
to.
A
A
C
A
So
bothell
already
has
some
great
bike
infrastructure,
like
this
protected
bike
lane
on
the
left
side
downtown
where
bike
riders
are
separated
from
the
major
automobile
traffic
by
a
row
of
parked
cars,
curbs
and
landscaping,
but
like
most
cities
bottle
also
has
some
places
that
bike
riders
avoid
or
need
to
be
more
careful
like
this
section
of
walk
away,
which
is
basically
just
a
roadway
shoulder.
A
This
will
make
it
easier
for
people
to
safely
move
around
the
city
without
a
car
and
for
this
presentation
we'll
be
referring
to
bike
lanes
in
the
generic
sense
to
reference
some
sort
of
a
bike
facility
that
you
would
ride
on,
because
there
are
several
types
of
bike
lanes
you'll
see
in
our
plan,
such
as
shared
use,
paths
or
trails
raised
cycle
tracks
which
are
protected
from
traffic
and
also
buffered
or
standard
bike
lanes
which
are
not
protected
from
traffic,
but
help
drivers
and
bike
riders
know
where
they
should
drive
or
ride.
A
A
C
A
D
A
So
protected
bike
lanes
are
simply
bike
lanes
that
are
separated
from
other
users
of
the
road
by
barriers,
landscaping
or
both
for
the
bottle
bike
plan.
The
protected
bike
lanes
will
come
in
the
form
of
a
trail
or
a
separated
path
or
raised
cycle
tracks
which
are
sidewalk
height
and
a
line
between
the
sidewalk
and
the
landscape
buffer,
like
the
ones
shown
here
on
the
right
except
ours,
will
be
one
one
way:
directional
not
two
ways
like
like
the
one
in
the
picture
here:
a
separated
next
side.
A
A
A
cheryl
is
marking
on
the
road
like
the
one
you
see
here,
and
it
tells
cyclists
and
people
driving
cars
that
they
must
both
share
the
same
lane,
along
with
bringing
driver
awareness
that
bikes
are
around.
They
also
help
bike
riders
with
wayfinding
on
routes
through
neighborhoods
in
the
neighborhood
greenways,
for
example.
E
A
A
The
final
plan
development
will
occur
between
now
and
august,
and
it
will
include
comments
from
city
officials
and
professionals,
the
baka
planning,
commission,
general
public
outreach
and
and
then
we'll
incorporate
revisions
and
the
program
and
policy
recommendations.
A
Once
final,
we'll
submit
the
plan
to
the
city
council
for
review,
this
fall
for
approval
and,
ultimately
inclusion
into
the
city
of
mafia
comprehensive
plan.
Next,
so
where
are
we
now?
The
city
of
bothell's
existing
white
network?
Has
these
two
regional
shared
use
trails
that
provide
the
primary
cross
city
spine
bike
facilities,
the
total
length
of
existing
bike
lanes
or
bike
routes
within
the
city
limits
is
currently
about
12
miles.
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
Kind
of
cyclists
you
have,
you
can
see
that
bike
facilities
and
the
types
of
riders
they
attract
are
related.
Shared
use.
Paths
are
attractive
to
almost
all
riders,
because
they're,
safe
and
away
from
you
know
the
stress
of
the
traffic,
and
this
relates
to
something
we
call.
The
level
of
traffic
stress
which
you
can
see
is
on
the
right
side
of
this
graphic.
A
A
Vehicle
traffic
in
these
areas
are
generally
well
separated
from
the
bike.
Traffic
and
bikers
have
plenty
of
room
moving
down
the
scale
to
a
ranking
of
a
level
of
traffic,
stress,
4
or
the
lowest
comfort
level
are
the
streets
in
red,
where
there's
generally
higher
vehicle
traffic
volumes,
higher
speeds
and
little
to
no
separation
between
the
vehicle
and
bike
traffic.
A
A
So
what
about
the
bike
plan
this?
The
goal
of
this
draft
bike
plan
is
to
establish
the
infrastructure,
so
we
can
start
applying
for
funding
to
build
it
out.
Future
elements
that
still
need
to
be
worked
out
in
this
living
document
are
topics
such
as
wayfinding
education
enforcement,
like
storage,
maintenance,
name
just
a
few
next.
A
A
A
A
Some
of
the
major
projects
shown
here
include
the
228
street
corridor.
It's
the
east
west
route
in
purple
there
about
the
levitt,
highway
and
ninth
avenue
with
the
protected
bike
lanes
and
then
a
big
project,
the
washdot
express
tolling
project,
which
is
in
the
center
of
the
map.
There
will
ultimately
provide
a
new
connection
over
I-405
with
protected
bike
lanes
next
slide
and
the
predominant
projects
here
this
is
the
south
end
of
the
city
include
the
both
away
widening
project
which
is
under
design
right
now.
A
This
is
again
the
north
side
of
the
city.
This
is
our
part
b
improvements,
this
close-up
of
the
north
end
of
the
city
with
part
b
improvements.
We
want
to
point
out
that
the
228th
street
corridor
is
no
longer
included
as
a
part
b
project
and
is
now
identified
as
a
part,
a
standalone
project.
A
Also,
we
are
still
considering
whether
or
not
to
put
cheryl's
on
ninth
avenue
as
an
option
before
ultimate
improvements
get
put
in
due
to
higher
traffic
volumes
and
speeds
on
the
street,
depending
on
the
feedback
we
get
from
everybody.
The
proposed
bike
facility
types
in
part
b
may
change,
but
the
identified
corridors
that
they're
on
will
likely
remain
next
slide.
A
In
this
shot
of
the
southern
end
of
the
city
for
the
part
b
plan,
some
changes
have
already
been
identified
from
our
stakeholder
meetings,
including
the
removal
of
most
of
the
80th
avenue
corridor.
You
see
in
the
west
on
the
left
side,
which
is
actually
located
in
the
city
of
kenmore,
so
just
a
little
clean
up
here
we
have
to
do,
and
it
shouldn't
be
part
of
our
pipeline
since
we're
not
building
that
for
them.
A
That
goes
downtown
and
it
will
be
added
as
a
neighborhood,
greenway
and
neighborhood
greenways
are
basically
low
traffic,
low
speed
streets
where
bike
riders
will
share
the
roadway
with
with
cars.
E
So
we
wanted
to
pause
and
see
if
folks
have
any
questions
after
seeing
this
part
of
the
presentation
before
we
break
into
breakout
sessions,
please
drop
any
questions
you
might
have
in
the
chat.
F
F
Okay,
so
were
people
surveyed
or
were
like
community
members
reached
regarding
as
to
if
they
felt
any
sort
of
safety
or
comfort
using
that,
like
does
that,
add
to
a
sense
of
level
of
safety
to
them.
A
A
They
want
to
turn
down
a
say,
local
street.
It
helps
to
make
sure
that
they
know
they're
still
on
the
bike
route
to
go
to
the
next
corridor.
Let's
say
or
something
like
that
and
that's
what
the
purpose
of
them
for
you
know,
but
there
is
some
studies
that
that
that
indicate
that
it's
a
kind
of
provides
a
false
sense
of
security
for
some
riders
that
are
inexperienced,
possibly
and
think
that
you
know
this
is
a
I
own,
the
road
now
so
again
we
have
to
be
careful
where
we
put
them.
A
You
know
it's
not
and
really
it's
it's
not
going
to
be
used.
As
you
know,.
C
A
F
A
In
our
part
b,
we
can
we're
it's
a
flexible
plan,
so
we
we
can
do
you
know
wherever
we'll
have
to
see
where
the
city
council
takes
us
and
how
much
funding
they
want
to
put
at
this.
You
know
where
a
lot
of
the
connections
and
this
you
know
low-hanging
fruit
projects
I'll
say,
can
be
done
if
we
do
like
an
annual
budget
for
the
bike
plan,
but
we're
gonna
be
actively
pursuing
those
part.
A
projects
too,
you
know
our
public
feedback
so
far
is.
A
Is
a
lot
of
people
want
a
new
corridor?
You
know
protected
bike
lane
that
goes
north
south
throughout
the
whole
city.
So
you
know
they
feel
like
a
couple
of
those
projects
are
more
important
than
just
doing
the
quick
connections
that
we
think
the
gaps
are
in.
They
just
want
something.
That's
going
to
be.
A
And
you
know
we'll
just
have
to
see
how
how
council
and
planning
commission
want
to
handle
that.
F
A
Nothing
major,
I
think
it's
just
kind
of
a
direction
right
now
is
is
that's
kind
of
our
biggest
challenge.
Right
now
is
to
figure
out
how
what
projects
to
bring
for
forward
first
and
how
much
you
know
we
want
to.
We
want
to
spend
on
that.
A
There's
some
details,
smaller
stuff,
but
nothing,
nothing
major
that
you
know,
I'm
happy
that
you
know
we
covered
a
lot
of
routes
and
stuff,
but
but
most
of
the
comments
have
been.
You
know
thanks
and
give
me
a
protected
bike
lane
to
provide
my
kid
on.
I
could
bring
my
my
kids
on
that's
kind
of
what
we're
hearing
a
lot
of,
but
there
are
still
those
people
that
say:
hey
just
give
me
some
connections,
so
I
can
get
to
the
trail.
You
know,
and
so
there's
there's
two
thoughts
and
we
have
to.
A
H
Hey
sherman,
I
had
a
quick
question
and
maybe
you
mentioned
it
in
the
beginning,
but
what's
the
bike
ridership
in
both,
though
like?
Is
it
a
significantly
large
amount,
which
is
why
the
bike
plan
is
kind
of
trying
to
be
implemented?.
A
Yeah,
there's
a
there
is
a
very
there's,
a
big
bike
community
here.
It's
just
you
know
it's
because
it's
it's
so
accessible
from.
You
know
from
the
brook
gilman
samantha's
trail.
You
know
that
we're
we're
right
on
it,
so
very
easy
for
people
to
you
know
travel
into
seattle
on
bike
or
go
the
east
side
through
redmond.
Wherever
so
you
know
it's
a
it's
a
big,
it's
a
big,
pretty
big
bike
community
and
it
just
you,
know,
yeah
they
they
want
more.
A
We
we
implemented
the
plan
or
we're
implementing
or
developing
this
plan,
because
you
know
we
just
want
to
catch
up.
We,
our
original
bike
plan,
had
you
know,
identified
every
street
with
you
know
your
normal
standard,
five-foot
bike
lanes
and
the
the
you
know,
the
standards
and
the
types
of
facilities
being
built
are
so
much
different.
Now
that
we
have
to,
you
know,
update
that
and
think
about
where
we
could
put
them
a
safer,
a
safer
network
and
different.
You
know
thinking
with
what
different
types
of
bike
lanes
we
can
put
in
and
use.
A
So
the
whole
the
whole
plan
draft
plan
right
now
it
was
on
available
on
our
web
page
and
you
can
review
which
has
all
the
maps
in
in
there.
If
you
need
a
additional
or
something
don't
have
access
to
that,
let
me
know,
and
we'll
figure
out
a
way
to
get
that
to
you.
E
Okay
and
then
we
have
a
question
here,
why
is
101st
ab
northeast,
not
part
of
the
current
bike
plan?
It's
an
easier
road
to
ride
up
than
104th
avenue
northeast.
E
I
can
pull
up
that
section
of
the
map,
so
I
pull
up
section
a
part,
a
or
part
b
sherman.
A
Sorry
I
was
on
mute
yeah,
this
other
section
there.
The
question
again
is
what
104th.
E
The
the
report
the
person
was
wondering
about.
Why
is
101st
avenue
northeast,
not
part
of
the
current
bike
plan.
It's
an
easier
road
to
ride
up
than
104th
ave
northeast.
A
The
reason
that's
not
in
there
right
now
is
because
it's
basically
we're
in
the
we're
in
the
downtown
core
and
we
haven't
really
identified
a
particular
path
through
the
downtown
core.
Although
I've
had
that
question
asked
already,
we
may
be
considering
you
know
what
the
best
route
is
through
downtown
and
have
a
make
some
designations
there.
But
at
this
point
once
we
felt
we
felt
once
you
got
into
the
major
downtown
core
we
didn't
want
to.
A
A
E
A
There
are
certain
corridors
in
the
in
the
city
that
we
did
identify
where
there
is
parking
in
potential
conflict
with
providing
a
bike
lane,
for
example,
for
bike
facilities,
and
that
is
something
that
we
would
love
to
get
feedback
on
and
ultimately,
before
we
finalize
the
plan,
we'll
probably
go
to
those
specific
neighborhoods
where
those
corridors
have
that
kind
of
a
conflict
existing
and
find
out
if
they
have
those
residents,
particularly
that
have
frontage
with
park
park
vehicles
and
is
also
considered
as
a
potential
bike
corridor
that
they
would
rather
see
one
way
or
the
other.
A
But
at
this
point
in
time
we're
assuming,
I
think,
we're
going
to
assume
that
we
want
to
leave
the
parked
cars
just
for
the
convenience
of
the
communities
there.
But
that
could
change.
I
mean,
depending
on
what
other
people
want
to
see.
You
know
along
their
frontage.
E
Okay,
another
question
speeds
have
increased
and
congestion
has
grown
with
development
adjacent
to
100
ave,
northeast,
has
installation
of
one
or
several
stop
signs
been
considered
to
discourage
higher
speed
through
traffic
and
allow
safe
crossing.
A
A
A
You
know
the
late
lit
crosswalk,
I
guess,
or
the
signed
one
there
at
stipec
park
and
there
is
specific,
potentially
a
crossing
a
little
bit
north
of
there,
so
that
people
can
use
that
one
existing
trail
next
to
lake
plus
lake
pleasant
or
the
water
there
and
get
back
to
the
east
side,
where
there's
where
we'll
probably
we're
we're
considering
putting
another
shared
use
path.
That
will
take
you
further
north,
because
that
section
of
a
hundredth
is
just
too
narrow
to
add
any
other
kind
of
bike
facilities
on
there.
A
E
A
A
That's
a
good
question.
I
will
have
to
consider
that
one
a
little
bit
more,
I'm
not
sure
what
you
know
that
I'm
not
sure
what
the
vault.
You
know,
what
actual
speeds
are
there
and
you
know
how
aggressive
people
are
driving,
but
you
know
that's
yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
tough
one
to
that,
we'll
have
to
kind
of
take
a
look
at
a
little
closer.
It's
a
good
question,
though.
H
E
All
right
and
a
question
about
the
time
frame
of
the
plan
with
climate
change
driving
a
more
rapid
drawdown
on
fossil
fuel
usage,
zero
fossil
fuel
emissions
within
10
years,
a
25
year
plan
seems
too
late.
E
What
why
have
more
aggressive
measures,
such
as
closing
some
streets
to
traffic
not
been
considered.
A
Again,
that
would
be
a
that
would
be
a
question
that
we
would
have
to
that
we're
not
considering
at
at
this
level
of
a
bike
plan.
This
is
that
would
be
something
that
we
have
to
be
answered
at
a
probably
on
a
council
level
as
to
whether
or
not
you
know
how
how
aggressively
we
are
pursuing
this
plan
and
how
much
funding
we
can
afford
to
to
to
move
ahead
with
it.
E
Okay,
somebody
ryan
is
interested
in
the
brickyard
road
bridge
and
how,
when
that
might
happen,
what's
the
time
frame
on
the
brickyard
road
bridge.
A
That's
a
good
question
too.
The
brickyard
road
bridge
is
something
that
is,
I
believe,
we've
considered
that
and
considered
that
in
our
capital
capital
projects,
I've.
I
know
that
is
we're
aware
of
it,
but
I'm
not
100
sure
of
when
the
timing
of
that
project
is.
H
E
And
yeah,
I
know
at
the
end
of
the
the
session
we
have
your
email
address.
So
can
people
email
you
with
some
of
these
questions
too.
E
Here's
another
question:
about
enforcement.
E
A
That's
a
I'm,
I'm
sure
that
that
is
occurring
for
the
school,
pickup
time
periods,
etc
and
yeah
that
we'll
have
to
work
with
the
school
district
on
on
how
that
we
can
make
that
work
better
in
from
an
enforcement
standpoint.
That
is
something
that
we
can
look
at
in
terms
of
expanding
this
bike
plan.
There's
a
lot
of
other
non-infrastructure
questions
that
and
programs
that
we
need
to
consider
down.
A
The
road
enforcement
is
definitely
one
of
those
things
along
with
education,
teaching
people
not
to
park
in
bike
lanes,
etc,
as
well
as
wayfinding
and
and
bike
storage,
for
example.
A
So,
okay,
yeah,
that's
going
to
be
worked
out
with
the
police
department,
school
district
together.
E
Okay-
and
I
think
one
last
question
before
we
move
on
to
breakout
rooms-
donna
is
asking:
do
I
understand
correctly
that
plan
a
this
one
on
the
screen
here?
North
and
south
is
a
patchwork
approach
that
will
rely
mostly
on
private
development.
E
A
The
prioritization
of
those
improv
of
improvements
are
based
on
the
cri
prioritization
criteria,
which
we
use
to
look
at
all
of
the
improvements.
The
part
b
projects
anyways
that
basically
connect
to
well
one
is
a
safety
issue.
If
there's
a
safety
issue,
we
need
to
look
at
that.
A
First
connectivity,
where
there's
obvious
gaps
that
we
could
easily
you
know
make
improvements
to,
or
you
know,
connections
to
underserved
areas
is
something
we're
also
considering,
as
well
as
to
parks,
schools
and
even
very
important,
is
a
connections
to
transit
routes
so
that
people
can
use
this
as
a
multimodal
means
of
transportation.
A
A
E
Yeah,
thank
you.
We
did
have
one
more
question.
Have
you
considered
narrowing
lanes?
I
assume
narrowing
traffic
lanes
like
car
lanes
to
both
calm
traffic
and
create
more
space
for
bike
lanes.
A
We
we
have
considered
that,
and
you
know
it
is
a.
It-
is
a
trend
to
do
that
nationally.
A
A
That
we'll
have
to
take
a
look
at
from
a
you
know,
a
separate,
almost
a
separate
effort,
and
the
main
thing
on
the
lane
with
is
that
is
that
we
have
to
just
consider
larger
vehicles,
school
buses,
our
school
district
input
from
the
school
district
has
been
that
you
know.
A
We
really
want
to
make
sure
that
our
traffic
lanes
are
wide
enough,
so
that
the
buses
don't
have
any
issues
for
school
buses,
but
definitely
narrower
lanes
slows
down.
Traffic
provides
a
little
more
pavement
to
you
know
to
accommodate
bike
facilities,
if
possible,
if
and
when
possible.
So
I
think
the
determination
of
the
lane
width
right
now
we
have
to
we're
on
the
premise
and
the
way
we
base
this
development
of
this
plan
is
is
based
on
our
current
design
standards
for
for
roadway
widths,
which
is
11
feet
as
the
minimum.
A
So
if
we
were
to
look
at
a
revised
plan,
you
know
using
narrowers
travel
lanes,
then
that
would
have
to
come
with
an
approval
of
the
new
design
standards.
First,
thank
you.
E
Okay,
so
I'm
going
to
have
us
move
into
into
our
breakout
groups
just
so
we
keep
things
moving.
Thank
you
so
much
everybody
for
some
really
great
questions
and
thank
you
sherman
for
some
terrific
answers.
E
Let
me
check
in
with
my
co-host
lawrence.
Are
we
ready
for
breakout
groups.
E
Okay,
so
real
quickly,
if
anybody
would
like
to
have
a
breakout
group,
that's
conducted
in
spanish
or
in
mandarin.
E
E
But
otherwise
let's
go
so.
What
we're
going
to
do
is
we're
going
to
have
15
minutes.
We
have
three
questions.
We
wanted
to
ask
everybody
attending
today
and
we
wanted
to
hear
from
you
in
smaller
groups.
The
city
was
really
concerned
that
everybody's
voice
is
heard,
and
so
we're
going
to
be
breaking
into
groups,
and
we
will
see
you
back
here
for
a
quick
report
out
and
then
we
will
wrap
up
the
whole
conversation
after
that.
So
it'll
be
just
a
15
minute
minute
breakout
session
and
we'll
see
you
right
after
that.
Thanks
everybody.
E
E
Let's
see
so,
let's
do
some
quick
report
outs.
Let's
start
with
dave
boyd.
Are
you
ready
to
do
a
report
out.
G
Sure,
whether
ready
or
not
I'll
I'll
dive
in
so
a
small
group,
we
have
four
people.
I
guess
they
probably
were
all
similar.
So
in
terms
of
what
would
make
people
ride
more
in
boston,
one
was
just
more
comfortable
connections,
it
wasn't
missing
connections
just
but
just
making
the
connections.
We
have
more
comfortable,
more
protected
lanes
and
a
definition
of
a
protected
lane
of
something
that
will
stop
a
car
from
intruding
in
that
lane.
G
So
not
paint
not
not
plastic
candlesticks,
but
at
least
a
curb
on
lower
speed,
roads
and
and
more
on
on
faster
roads.
G
The
the
things
that
would
keep
people
from
or
the
destination
there
weren't
specific
destinations,
but
that
were
identified
so
much
as
the
level
of
risk
being
the
main
factor,
particularly
along
buffalo
way,
the
general
lack
of
good
connections
well,
generally,
north
south,
and
particularly
south
of
the
samamish
river.
I
comment
that
that
sharos
are
actually
worse
than
nothing
that
their
their
citation.
B
G
That
they're,
actually
less
safe
than
no
markings
at
all
and
and
then
connections
from
the
bergamon
trail
to
waynita,
are
lacking
and
also
concerns
about
connections
from
the
sammamish
river
trail
to
downtown
are
not
as
good
as
they
they
could
be
and
in
general,
some
concerns
about
the.
What
is
the
intention
for
bike
traffic
through
downtown?
I
know
that
it's.
G
The
idea
is
that
all
of
the
downtown
streets
should
be
low,
speed,
traffic
and
but
a
feeling
that
there
might
need
to
be
a
little
more
thought
given
to
that,
and
then
there
were
comments
about
the
quality
of
the
north
creek
trail
that
there
are
sections
of
it
that
really
are
are
lacking
and
then
the
last
one
general
comments.
I
guess
I've
covered
kind
of
in
in
this.
Oh,
the
final
one
was
protect.
E
How
do
you
do
that?
Well,
thanks
steve,
that
was
terrific,
appreciate
it.
Okay,
I
know
nathan
had
a
room
and
eddie
joined
him,
so
nathan
at
eddie's
room.
What
would
you
like
to
tell
us
about.
B
Yeah,
I
can
kick
us
off
and
then
pass
it
to
eddie.
So,
with
regard
to
question
one,
the
our
attendees
felt
that
the
plan
it
it's
a
really
good
outline
and
a
and
a
great
plan,
but
they
wanted
to
hear
more
about
funding
and
some
of
the
maintenance
that's
been
contemplated
for
existing
facilities.
B
As
you
know,
we
they
realized
that
maintenance
costs
money
as
well,
but
they
wanted
to
hear
if,
if
thought
had
been
given
to
that
and
if,
if
maintenance
has
been
prioritized
at
all,
we
did
have
some
concern
for
safe
routes
for
families
and
children,
and
one
of
our
attendees
was
advocating
for
making
sure
that
we're
connecting
our
neighborhoods
safely
to
some
of
the
main
routes
so
that
our
children
can
have
safe,
safe
routes
not
only
to
school
but
also
connectivity
to
their
own
neighborhoods.
B
With
regard
to
question
two,
there
were
some
places
where
our
attendees
felt
a
little
unsafe
and
unnerving,
and
one
was
by
the
fred
meyer
at
maltby
road
on
that
route.
There's
a
separated
bike
facility,
but
it
still
didn't
really
feel
too
safe
with
cars
buzzing
by
pretty
quickly,
and
we
wanted
to
know
if
we
could
elaborate
on
that
a
little
bit
more
and
then
also
on
88th
approaching
west
hill
elementary,
the
the
lanes
are
pretty
narrow
there
there
and
our
attendees
felt
like
some
more
attention
can
be
given
to
that
area
as
well.
B
The
last
one
I'll
mention
is
one
of
our
attendees
thought.
It
was
sort
of
called
out
on
our
on
the
plan
b.
Part,
I
believe,
and
I
think
it's
south
of
224th,
I
my
I
scribbled
down
my
notes,
pretty
quick.
So
apologies
if
I
got
the
exact
location
wrong,
but
there's
a
sort
of
a
bump
out
for
on
that
facility.
B
That's
not
exactly
intuitive
and
can
make
it
pretty
dangerous
when,
when
you're
riding
on
that
facility
and
the
the
connectedness
isn't
there
as
good
as
it
could
be,
and
so
they
felt
like
some
attention
should
be
given
to
that
as
well,
and
so
with
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
eddie,
see
if
I
missed
anything
there.
Thank
you.
D
Well,
thank
you
nathan.
You
pretty
much
cover.
I
just
have
a
couple
of
added
notes
to
that.
One
is
that
it's
important
from
our
group
to
talk
to
really
prioritize
protected,
so
I
think
that's
a
common
theme
to
provide
protected
bike
also
to
consider
traffic
calming
as
part
of
the
you
know,
as
you
do
those
you
need
to
consider
traffic
calming
in
the
sense
that
you
want
to
be
able
to
calm
traffic
down.
So
it's
not
just
talking
about
bike.
D
Another
areas
that
was
of
concern
was
240th
on
the
sort
of
the
west
side
of
meridian,
where
it
goes
to
shelton
view,
and
that's
a
really
rural
roadway
and
a
lot
of
families
that
are
trying
to
get
kids
to
that
area
and
out
and
in,
and
so
we
should
think
about
some
of
these
areas
that
are
connecting
to
schools
to
make
it
safer
for
the
family,
so
very
much
so
to
ensure
that
when
we
build
out
that
to
to
consider
those
things
trying
to
think
about
climate
change
was
an
important
piece
where
we're
looking
to
make
bike.
D
E
You
thank
you
eddie.
That
was
great
and
nathan.
So,
if
I
recall
correctly,
steve
and
sherman
were
in
the
same
room.
Would
one
of
you
like
to
report
out.
A
Yeah
I'll
start
with,
and
then
steve
can
fill
in.
If
I
miss
anything,
we
heard
that
we
would
like
some
cheryls
on
the
102nd
bridge
from
riverside
to
main
street
and
along
96
connecting
the
valhalla
area
to
the
basically
the
bert
gilman
trail.
A
So
for
that
section
there
we
also
heard
make
some
improvements
more
along
100th
avenue,
north
of
downtown
and
actually
through
downtown
along
101st,
to
put
some
more
focus
again-
and
we-
I
heard
this
just
a
second
ago
about
a
little
more
direction
through
downtown
mentioned
that
earlier,
it's
a
it's,
it's
it's
something
that
we
should.
We
should
consider
now.
A
We
also
heard
that
we
don't
think
that
cheryl's-
and
this
is
just
again
another
repeat
of
one
of
your
comments
from
the
other
group
here-
that
cheryls
are
not
preferable
and
we
should
focus
more
on
providing
for
the
protected
bike
lanes.
Another
common
theme,
as
well
as
as
well
as
looking
at
more
traffic
calming
along
those
bike,
corridors
to
slow
down
traffic,
some
of
the
some
of
the
more
dangerous
or
more
unsafe
areas
that
people
would
like
us
to
look
at
is.
A
Crossing
of
north
creek
trail
at
405
interchange
there
going
across
195th,
particularly
on
the
east
side
of
the
interchange,
potentially
considering
signal,
maybe
advanced
signal
bike
signals
to
help
assist
in
that
and
also
crossing
bothell
everett
highway
over
405
through
the
interchange
there
going
north.
A
See
felt
got
comments
at
the
felt
the
the
draft
plan
is
written.
Well,
consideration
of
the
level
of
traffic
stress
is
understandable
and
helps
to
identify
which
which
improvements
and
what
improvements
needed
is
is
a
is
very
helpful,
helpful
to
understand
how
the
plan
was
developed
and
and
that
we
need
to
push
hard
on
education
so
that
we
get.
A
We
can
encourage
more
bike,
riding
and
more
bike
riders,
more
participants
by
educating
them
to
how
to
you
know,
use
facilities
correctly
and
ride
it
with
traffic
or
or
without
traffic,
and
things
to
look
out
for
it's.
The
other
thing
was
what
to
that.
A
We
we
need
to
look
at
how
to
enforce
where
parked
cars
are
parked
in
bike
facilities
to
and
try
to
figure
out
a
way
that
we
can
discourage
that
specifically,
the
location
we
were
talking
about
was
but
kenya
park
middle
school,
where
pickups
are
parent,
pickups
are
parking
in
the
bike
lane
and
occupying
that
space.
So
you
know
it's
that's
a
that's
a
discussion
that
we
said
would
need
to
occur
between
our
police
department
and
ourselves.
Public
works,
as
well
as
with
the
school
district.
I
E
Thank
you
that
was
really
great
and
it's
I
think
emily
have.
We
talked
to
your
group
yet.
J
Absolutely
no
problem,
we
had
a
group
of
two
plus
emily
and
myself.
The
comments
on
the
first
question
were
better
connectivity
and
definitely
feeling
safer
in
in
whatever
bike
facility
we
have,
whatever
whatever
that
was,
but
feeling
safer.
J
A
little
bit
of
mate
concerns
about
maintenance
of
infrastructure
like
after
wind
storms
to
get
the
bike
lanes
cleared
intersection.
Safety
is
also
to
be
noted
in
that
it's
a
a
dangerous
area
and
need
to
be
addressed
through
the
through
the
plan
and
the
and
the
routes
and
then
and
then
also
having
some
bike
parking
at
the
destinations
on.
J
Regarding
the
second
question
about
areas
we
can't
bike
to,
it
was
more
routes
that
that
are
avoided
and
where
we
don't
feel
safe,
those
routes
were
the
102nd
bridge,
east
riverside,
drive,
meridian
and
bothell
everett
highway
coming
into
downtown
bothell
and
then
just
more
more
safe
lanes
around
schools.
J
And
connecting
to
the
current
bike
trails
with
with
facilities
other
than
just
bike
lanes,
and
then
lastly,
was
the
the
north
creek
trail,
where
it
crosses
across
405
on
195th
was
a
little
sketchy,
to
say
the
least,
with
all
the
off-ramps
and
on-ramps
and
high-speed
and
large
high
volumes
there.
So
and
then.
J
Regarding
our
third
question
about
some
general
comments,
they
both
thought
25
years
is,
is
a
really
long
time
and
and
they'd
like
to
see
it
shorter
to
implement
the
the
plan
elements
and
maybe
an
idea
of
what
it's
going
to
look
like
in
five
years
and
and
ten
years
down
down
the
road
and
they'd
like
to
make
sure
that
public
public
education
is
in
the
plan,
some
sort
of
safety
courses
for
kids
and
adults,
and
definitely
an
enforcement
component
to
go
along
with
the
education
and
just
a
personal
note,
from
one
of
one
of
our
participants
that
they
lived
in
amsterdam
and
were
not
avid
bike
riders
when
they
moved
with
kids.
J
But
after
being
there
with
a
lot
of
safe
facilities,
they
lived
there
for
for
three
years.
I
think
and
never
owned
a
car
and
were
able
to
bike
everywhere
and
everybody
felt
safe,
so
build
the
facilities
and-
and
they
will
come
so
that's
about
it.
Emily
did.
I
miss
anything.
C
E
Okay,
thanks
jason
and
emily
we're
doing
okay
on
time,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
it
looks
like
we
got
two
more.
I
think
quick
questions
here.
Sherman.
Can
we
just
ask
you
a
couple
follow-up
questions,
sure
and
realizing
this
might
not
be
a
might
not
be
a
bike
plan
question
because,
oh
okay,
no,
it
is
minimum
12
foot
lane
for
co-use
of
parked
cars
and
a
bike
lane
is
too
narrow,
considering
risk
of
car
doors
opening.
E
A
I
guess
I
will
just
say
that
you
know
our
our
roadway
design
standards
are
set,
and
I
mean
for
specific
types
of
roads,
whether
they're
local
streets
or
they're,
a
collector
corridor
or
or
major
arterials,
and
we
don't
have
any
parking
on
major
arterials,
but
for
our
collector
corridors,
there's
a
standard
right
now
that
either
with
or
without
parking
and
if
it
does
allow
parking,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
it's
beyond
the
15
foot.
So
I'm
not
quite
sure.
I
understand
that
question.
A
A
B
B
D
Oh
I'll,
try
me,
I
think,
the
if
I
understand
this
question
was
about.
If
there's
a
travel
lane,
then
you
need
to
have
bike
lane.
Then
you
need
a
15
foot
lane.
It's
what
I
think
it's
trying
to
say
that
the
problem
like
we
have
talked
about-
or
at
least
we've
been
brought
to
our
attention,
is
that
can
we
consider
narrow
lanes
because
of
trying
to
calm
the
traffic?
So
so
we
got
to
deal
with
that
part
to
ensure
that
we're
not
pushing
one
and
then
causing
another
problem.
D
D
I
Thanks,
thank
you
if
I
could
add
one
more
thing.
These
are
great
points
and,
as
you
all
know,
they're
kind
of
interconnected,
because
the
streets
are
multi-use.
I
What
we're
hearing
is
use
of
traffic
calming
potentially
narrowing
roads
to
get
speeds
down,
we're
also
hearing
on
the
flip
side,
potentially
protected
facilities
to
get
the
bikes
off
the
road
so
that
more
users,
the
non-comfortable
users,
would
also
use
the
facilities.
I
So
one
opportunity
I
want
to
highlight
is
starting
later
this
year
early
next
year,
there's
going
to
be
a
comprehensive
plan.
Update
and
the
transportation
element
will
also
be
updated
and
that's
an
opportunity
to
look
closer
at
roadways
and
bikes
and
pedestrians
as
a
whole,
and
so
that
would
be
a
great
time
to
participate
as
well.
I
I
think
the
next
step
is
to
work
through
the
comprehensive
plan
to
try
to
get
everything
melded
together
and
address
some
of
the
other
issues.
You've
brought
up
and
then,
as
we
continue
forward
with
our
living
documents,
so
to
be
speak,
we
can
add
elements
to
our
bike
plans
such
as
education
and
enforcement
and
those
things.
E
Sorry,
thank
you.
So
thanks,
sherman,
eddie
and
steve
we'll
just
do
one
more
question
before
we
wrap
it
up
and
it's
about
road
construction
and
how
it
usually
prioritizes
rerouting
cars
and
not
so
much
bicyclists.
E
A
A
I
E
All
right
thanks
for
some
great
questions
and
answers,
everybody
that
was
really
terrific,
and
I
wanted
to
highlight
some
next
steps.
You
can
see
on
the
slide
that
you
can
submit
written
comments
until
may
31st.
E
E
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
you
can
email,
sherman
gong
at
that
email
address
you
see
on
your
screen,
but
you
can
also
find
it
on
the
website.
At
the
url
you
see
there.
I
had
a
quick
ping
from
the
mayor
who
said
he
just
wanted
to
say:
hi
hi.
K
Hi
hi
whitney
my
name
is
mason
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
I'm
the
mayor
of
bothell,
and
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
all
the
community
members
who
took
time
out
of
their
evening
to
come,
give
feedback
tonight
and
a
lot
of
what
we
heard
from
you
is
really
similar
to
the
policy
direction
council
gave
last
month,
especially
around
protected
bike
lanes,
repurposing
parking
and
narrowing
lanes,
which
is
something
we
can
do
through
the
comp
plan.
Alongside
the
bike
plan
that
the
bike
plan
obviously
will
get
adopted
into.
K
Eventually,
it's
really
cool
to
see
community
input
be
so
similar
to
the
direction
council
wanted
to
go,
and
I'm
super
confident.
Our
staff
is
going
to
take
your
feedback
ours
and
bring
us
an
updated
plan
that
looks
a
little
different
with
more
protected
lanes
connectivity
and
bigger,
more
ambitious
projects,
I'm
pumped
to
work
on
advocating
for
grant
money
or
finding
city
money
in
the
budget
to
start
to
build
some
of
the
really
cool,
bold,
ambitious
projects
that
that
I
know
is
coming
back
in
the
final
draft
of
the
plan.
E
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
I
really
appreciate
it
too,
been
some
great
input,
some
great
questions
and
thank
you
all
so
much
for
coming
out
on
a
beautiful
day,
and
I'm
pretty
sure
most
of
the
people
who
are
here
tonight
would
rather
be
riding
a
bike
than
sitting
in
front
of
a
screen
for
another
couple
hours.
So
so
we
really
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
out
of
your
busy
day.