►
From YouTube: Bothell City Council Meeting - January 10, 2023
Description
0:02:20 - Meeting Agenda Approval
0:05:15 - Visitor Comments
0:09:10 - Special Presentation: Sound Transit Stride Program and Real Property Overview
0:52:40 - City Manager Report
1:00:00 - Council Committee Reports
1:03:50 - Projected Agenda Discussion
1:04:00 - Consent Agenda
1:04:40 - Public Hearing regarding Amendments to Title 21: Impact Fees and
General Fee Schedule
1:24:50 - Ordinances & Resolutions: Consideration of Reproductive Health Care Resolution
2:05:20 - Study Session: Consideration of Citywide Bike Plan
3:01:00 - Council Conversations
B
The
city
of
Bothell
is
now
providing
the
option
of
attending
Council
meetings
remotely
or
in
Person.
Public
comment
will
be
allowed,
both
in
writing
or
verbally
verbal
comments
may
be
taken
either
in
person
or
remotely
sign
up
sheets
were
provided
online
by
the
city
clerk's
office
via
link
from
the
agenda.
A
call-in
number
was
provided
on
the
meeting
agenda
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
call
in
by
phone
to
listen,
live
to
the
meeting.
B
If
you
have
called
in,
we
ask
that
you
mute
your
device
so
as
to
not
interfere
with
the
meeting
if
a
participant
fails
to
meet
their
connection
and
causes
A
disruption
to
the
meeting.
The
connection
will
be
terminated
at
this
point.
We
will
take
a
moment
to
take
roll
call
of
the
council
members
by
position.
Number.
Please
say
here
when
the
city
clerk
calls
your
name
council.
D
B
B
Thank
you
clerk
next
I'd
like
to
reiterate
some
meeting
guidelines
for
all
remote
meeting
attendees.
Please
speak
clearly
and
pause,
frequently
state
your
name
each
time
before
speaking,
mute
your
microphone
when
not
speaking
for
Council
attending
remotely,
please
use
the
raise
hand
feature
in
Zoom
when
you
wish
to
speak
and
I
will
call
on
you.
I
will
try
to
notice
council
member
aldricks
speak
clearly
and
pause
frequently
and
remember
to
mute
your
mic
when
not
speaking.
E
And
mayor
before
we
turn
to
the
approval
of
the
agenda
staff.
Over
the
last
couple
of
days,
we've
been
doing
some
additional
work
and
would
like
to
request
to
pull
item
7B
its
agenda
bill
23001.
First
of
the
year
the
KNL
Gates
contract
from
tonight's
agenda.
We
will
anticipate
bringing
that
back
in
February
when
there's
some
additional
work
tied
up
fantastic.
B
B
F
C
I
B
C
J
My
name
is
Ezekiel
bambolo
and
I'm.
The
executive
director
with
Antioch
adoptions
here
in
the
area
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
around
the
resolution
on
Health
Care,
productive
Healthcare
resolution,
and
so
my
my
concern
essentially
is
just
that
I
wish
anyway,
and
how
many
of
us
have
been
injured
critically
and
did
not
call
an
expert
to
come
in,
take
care
of
what
we're
dealing
with
right.
We're
talking
about
some,
ladies
here
and
I
see
a
lot
of
the
the
reading.
J
The
resolution
It
quotes
a
lot
of
disportionate
impact
on
people
of
color
low
income,
and
what
have
you
and
and
some
other
things
here,
also
involving
the
pain
and
loss
that
people
feel
in
these
situations.
My
organization,
along
with
another
30
or
so
organizations
in
this
area,
provides
free
support.
J
Whether
it's
adoption
needs,
whether
it's
oil
change
or
what
have
you
for
young
women
who
are
in
crisis,
trying
to
make
decisions,
because
every
time,
in
fact,
in
the
last
30
days,
we've
placed
two
babies
and
families
in
our
local
area.
Here
that
are
women.
That
would
not
have
to
deal
with
the
scars
created
by
an
abortion
situation.
J
We
had
a
great
conference
at
Cedar
Park
Church
in
Bothell,
about
October
1st
that
Amplified
all
of
those
resources
being
available,
that
there
should
be
no
reason
for
someone
who
is
underprivileged
or
what
have
you
have
to
go
through
that
scarring
process
and
I
know.
We
would
have
enough
time
to
go
through
all
of
that
tonight.
My
hope
is
that,
instead
of
pushing
this
resolution
through
that,
you
have
a
good
conversation
with
some
of
the
experts
in
the
industry
that
are
dealing
with
these
situations
on
every
single
day
basis.
J
Support
us
through
foster
care
or
private
adoption
and
I
mean
that's
as
simple
as
I.
Don't
think,
I
even
need
a
free
message.
I
hope.
It's
over
I,
don't
care
I,
don't
need
a
three
minutes
right
now.
I
just
wanted
to
say
please,
instead
of
just
not
having
enough
chance
to
talk
with
the
experts
who
are
dealing
with
these
young
people
every
day
and
seeing
these
cars
and
the
pain.
In
fact,
in
my
comments,
I
put
the
link
to
a
video
that
we
did
to
show
local
businesses,
local
churches
and
a
variety
of
organizations.
J
That
said
whatever
is
required.
We
will
provide
as
necessary
to
make
sure
that
these
young
people
don't
have
to
go
through
these
circumstances.
So
my
request
again
is
that,
hopefully,
instead
of
passing
a
resolution
that
we
have
a
serious
conversation,
let's
look
at
both
sides
of
the
conversation,
not
just
The
Narrative
of
what
is
happening,
but,
more
importantly,
what
are
we
really
dealing
with
on
a
regular
basis
and
see
we
can
help
each
other
out
in
this
process?
Simple,
as
that,
thank
you.
C
Thank
you.
We
also
received
five
written
comments.
The
first
one
is
from
Dennis
Grodd
and
these
were
all
emailed
to
the
council
and
will
be
made
part
of
the
record
first
moments
from
Dennis
groad
wrote
in
opposition
of
the
reproductive
Health
Care
resolution,
Cindy
Dahl
wrote
in
opposition
of
the
reproductive
Health
Care
resolution.
Kathleen
Strunk
wrote
in
opposition
of
the
reproductive
Health
Care
resolution,
Dave
Morgan
wrote
in
opposition
of
the
reproductive
Health
Care
resolution
and
Brad
Payne
wrote
in
opposition
of
the
reproductive
Health
Care
resolution
foreign.
E
Bus
Rapid
Transit
project,
as
well
as
they'll,
have
a
brief
update
too
about
the
other
other
bus,
Rapid
Transit
initiatives
touching
our
borders
just
for
by
way
of
background
for
Council
to
contextualize.
Here,
there's
approximately
40
Parcels
in
Bothell,
with
potential
probable
Acquisitions
specific
to
this
project
along
522.
that'll,
be
the
focus
of
the
property
acquisition
part
again,
not
the
405
project,
but
the
522..
E
As
you
know,
stride
is
not
a
city
project,
but
certainly
there's
a
partnership
and
involvement
with
the
city
as
well.
The
Sound
Transit
as
an
agency,
has
full
condemnation
Authority
on
property
Acquisitions.
That
intent
is
once
the
transit
contemplates
the
property
acquisition.
The
city
will
work
with
sound
transit
for
to
deed
permanent
easements
and
for
the
Acquisitions
of
the
city
of
Bothell
to
incorporate
it
as
part
of
our
street
right-of-way.
So
we
will
sync
back
up
at
the
end
of
this
because
of
that
the
staff
has
been
absolutely
partnering
with
Sound
Transit
staff.
E
Also,
staff
does
intend
to
be
back
in
spring
with
some
of
the
next
steps
around
how
we
might
administratively
accept
the
property
as
permanent
thesis.
So
there's
there's
more
to
come
on
that
not
the
last
up
here
of
this,
so
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Rick
and
faith
and
again
just
thank
you
to
them
and
then
also
to
our
colleague,
Ariel
Taylor
who's
here
running
slides
for
us
tonight
online.
So
Ariel.
Thank
you
for
your
time
as
well.
Go
ahead.
K
Great
thank
you
Kyle
for
the
introduction
and
thank
you
all
for
the
opportunity
to
be
here
this
evening.
Next
slide.
Ariel.
Thank
you
for
running
those
remotely
so
I'm
going
to
spend
a
few
minutes
tonight,
just
giving
you
a
very
kind
of
high
level
kind
of
refresher
overview
of
the
Sound
Transit
bus,
Rapid,
Transit
project
and
then
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
my
colleague,
faith
and
faith
is
going
to
talk
to
you
a
little
bit
more
about
our
real
property
acquisition
and
relocation
process.
Next
slide
Ariel.
K
So
a
little
refresher
on
the
program
next
slide.
So
I
think
you
all
are
familiar
the
stride,
bus
Rapid,
Transit
program.
When
it
is
up
and
running,
we
will
have
three
separate
service
lines
that
serve
the
Greater
Community.
The
first
service
line
is
S1.
That's
going
to
run
from
Burien
all
the
way
up
to
Bellevue
on
the
405
Corridor.
You
can
see
that
on
the
map,
the
S2
line
will
run
from
Bellevue
all
the
way
up
to
Linwood
on
the
405
Corridor.
We
do
have
several
stops
that
run
through
the
city
of
Bothell.
K
Along
that
route,
the
S3
line
will
go
east
to
west,
from
Shoreline
over
to
Bothell,
along
the
SR
522
and
523
corridors.
On
that
service
line,
we've
got
four
stations
that
will
be
serving
the
city
of
Bothell,
specifically
to
the
service
lines.
I
want
to
point
out
on
the
map
in
the
upper
upper
right
hand,
corner.
We
are
also
building
a
bus
operations
and
maintenance
facility.
K
You
know
real-time,
up-to-date
information
in
terms
of
bus,
departures
and
arrivals
in
terms
of
the
buses
themselves,
I'm
excited
to
mention
for
our
S3
Corridor.
We
are
using
articulated
fully
electric
buses.
You'll
have
charging
infrastructure
on
both
sides
of
the
S3
Corridor
to
serve
those
buses
and
for
S1
and
S2
we've
got
double
deck
buses.
L
You
all
thank
you
and
again
it's
it's
good
to
be
back
in
Bothell
I'm,
an
ingleborg
grad
I'll,
just
say
that,
and
I
probably
was
one
of
the
last
classes
to
graduate
at
pop
keaney
in
the
rain
a
long
time
ago.
So
this
is
old
home
for
me.
Next
slide,
please
Ariel
I
always
like
to
start
with
with
what's
important
when
it
comes
to
buying
land
from
folks
for
public
infrastructure
projects.
L
Our
job
is
to
treat
everybody
fairly
and
with
respect
that's
important
to
me,
it's
important
to
my
team
and
all
the
Consultants
that
work
with
us
and
and
we
treat
everybody
consistently
throughout
the
project,
and
so
that's
I
always
like
to
lead
with
that
and
end
with
that,
because
that's
really
what
we
do
I
know
it
doesn't
feel
like
it.
It's
scary
for
for
folks
it's
concerning
for
folks,
and
so
we
really
do
work
hard
at
at
spending
time
with
folks
to
build
that
trust
and
give
them
information.
L
L
Please
I
always
like
to
also
remind
folks
how
much
regulation
goes
into
the
work
we
do
we're
driven
by
the
uniform
act,
every
project
that
we
build,
whether
funded
with
local
dollars
or
federal
dollars,
follows
federal
guidelines,
and
so
that
really
is
consistent
across
our
projects.
So
you'll
hear
us
call.
L
Is
that
truly
the
driver
for
all
public
infrastructure
projects,
the
board
policy,
sound
transits
acquisition
and
relocation
policy
and
procedures
drive
us?
We
have
the
Federal
Transit
Agency
circular
5010.
That
gives
us
further
Direction
and,
of
course,
the
the
code
that
that
drives
how
we
follow
our
litigation
process.
Should
we
reach
that
point
next
slide?
Please.
L
When
we,
when
we
buy
land,
we
either
buy
the
whole
thing
we
buy
part
of
it
or
I
buy
a
layer
of
Rights
on
it,
temporary
or
permanent,
and-
and
this
is
how
we
start
our
our
process
when
we
explain
to
property
owners
in
most
of
the
projects
that
we're
talking
about
today
for
the
bus,
Rapid
Transit
we're
buying
very
small
slivers
small
easement
areas
that
are
permanent
easements,
but
but
just
an
overlay
of
existing
property
or
we're
buying
a
temporary
construction
easement.
A
lot
of
the
project
is
built
within
existing
right-of-way.
L
The
522
Corridor
has
a
lot
of
right-of-way
there.
Some
of
it
appears
to
be
built
out,
as
you
know,
with
your
work
here
in
Bothell
and
and
others
maybe
doesn't
appear
to
be
built
out
yet,
but
the
existing
right-of-way
we
really
have
tried
to
to
modify
and
work
with
within
the
constraints
of,
what's
there,
so
we're
buying
as
little
as
possible.
L
Oftentimes,
it's
not
clear
and
I
think
that's
where
some
of
our
issues
are
with
with
folks
is
well.
My
fence
has
been
here
for
a
long
time,
but
my
fence
isn't
necessarily
on
my
property.
It's
actually
in
public
right-of-way,
so
we're
working
through
those
issues
parcel
by
parcel
with
folks
next
slide,
please.
L
So
how
do
I
get
from
Blue
lines
on
the
map?
Like
you
see
on
the
left
to
that
nice
station
that
we
have
on
the
right,
I
mean
that's
really
the
piece
that
that
oftentimes,
when
the
public
first
hears
about
a
project
I'm
showing
them
the
prod
map
on
the
left.
You
know
it
sort
of
looks
like
well
you're
you're,
touching
my
property,
but
what
are
you
doing?
And
and
so
once
we
have
that
alignment
we
go
through
our
environmental
process
and
a
record
of
decision
is
made
as
you
all
are
familiar.
L
You
know
we
figure
out
at
this
point:
do
we
need
a
temporary
impact
or
a
permanent
impact?
Our
ground
survey
work
that
we've
been
doing
recently,
especially
along
the
522
Corridor,
which
really
is
highlighted
where
the
right-of-way
is
and
and
that's
when
we
start
working
with
folks
next
slide.
Please,
as
as
Kyle
mentioned
earlier,
the
board
authorizes
us
to
move
forward
on
all
acquisitions.
Our
fifth
and
final
project
authorization
is
upcoming.
We
have
system
expansion.
L
This
Thursday,
followed
by
our
full
full
board
meeting
in
two
weeks
and
with
each
each
authorization
that
the
board
grants
us.
They
also
grant
us
the
right
to
use
eminent
domains.
Should
that
step
be
required.
I'll
tell
you
that,
on
on
the
average
200
parcel
project,
we
probably
have
one
or
two
properties
that
we
don't
reach
agreement
on.
So
while
it
feels
like
it's
being
authorized
on
the
entire
project,
we
really
do
work
closely
with
each
property
owner
to
try
to
find
a
negotiated
agreement.
L
L
We
we
appraise
each
property
every
property
owner
is,
is
invited
to
participate
in
fact,
encouraged.
We
want
them
to
tell
us
about
their
property.
Tell
us
why
it's
valuable
and
what
it's
worth
we
follow
the
same
relocation
and
acquisition
process
in
parallel
when
we,
when
we're
going
out
to
work
with
folks,
there
are
very
few
relocations
and
displacements
within
this
project.
There
aren't
any
in
Bothell.
So
most
of
these
are
temporary
construction,
easements
and
or
temporary
easements
for
sidewalk
and
pedestrian
safety
improvements.
L
But
if
somebody
is
displaced,
we
provide
them
all
of
the
relocation
benefits.
We
negotiate
in
good
faith
and
avoid
litigation.
That's
actually
one
of
the
shells
in
the
uniform
act.
The
uniform
act
gives
me
243
things
that
I
shall
do
and
244
that
I
may
do
just
for
the
record,
and-
and
so
we
are
directed
very
clearly
on
how
we
process
every
acquisition
and
good
faith
negotiations
and
avoid
litigation
is
a
shallow
in
the
uniform
act
and
we
give
notices
along
the
way
next
slide.
L
Please,
every
property
owner
has
an
agent
assigned
to
them
that
that
make
sure
that
they're
understanding
the
information
we're
giving
them
whether
it
is
a
need
for
translation
services
if
they
need
legal
services
to
review
our
information.
Sound
Transit
reimburses
up
to
7
500
per
property
owner
for
reimbursement
of
legal
fees
associated
with
reviewing
our
information.
We
reimburse
up
to
five
thousand
dollars
per
property
owner
for
appraisal,
should
they
want
to
get
their
own
appraisal,
and
should
they
need
to
solicit
an
accountant
to
talk
about
the
impacts
to
them.
L
We
reimburse
up
to
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
and
if
you've
done
Acquisitions
and
followed
wash
dots
procedures,
that
reimbursement
is
statutory
at
750.
So
this
is
fifteen
thousand
dollars
worth
of
reimbursements
that
we
provide
to
each
property
owner
to
work
with
us
to
analyze
the
information
that
are
offered.
We
think
that's
above
and
beyond
what
most
agencies
are
able
to
do.
L
We
do
that
because
it
really
is
how
folks
can
see
the
information
that
we're
giving
them
and
analyze
it
and
helps
us
reach
agreement,
and,
in
addition,
should
we
have
to
relocate
folks
again,
I
said
we,
we
provide
move,
benefits
and
other
things
that
that
are
available
from
the
start.
The
other
reason
that
I
always
like
to
point
out
about
eminent
domain
that
gets
lost,
there's
two
benefits
to
eminent
domain
that
every
property
owner
receives.
L
The
first
is
that
they
have
longer
to
reinvest
under
capital
gains,
and
the
second
is
that
it
helps
waive
the
real
estate
excise
tax
for
the
for
the
transaction
and
both
of
those
are
statutory.
Once
we
authorize
that
eminent
domain
so
rather
than
just
giving
it
to
the
person
who
is
the
person
we
can't
reach
agreement
on
everybody
in
the
project
gets
the
same
benefit
next
slide,
please
and
so
I.
As
I
said,
every
every
project
does
have
the
authorization
at
the
front
end
with
our
board.
I
always
say
you
know
folks
say
well.
L
L
Then
we
work
to
convey
that
to
the
to
the
jurisdiction
once
the
Project's
built
next
slide,
please
so
I'll
start
wearing
where
I
began,
which
is
we
treat
everyone
fairly
and
consistently
and
with
respect,
that's
my
commitment
to
you
here.
That's
why
we're
here?
That's
why
we're
out
working
with
each
of
the
jurisdictions
each
of
the
communities,
small
groups,
individuals
to
make
sure
that
they
have
all
the
information
and
benefits
available
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
F
F
One
is
I'm
concerned
about
businesses
being
displaced,
but
I'm
even
more
concerned
about
you
know.
Looking
at
where
these
are
happening
are
are
currently
afforded.
You
know
homes
that
would
fall
within
the
affordable
home
category,
and
so
can
you
tell
me
about
how
much
of
these
are
homes
versus
businesses
that
are
being
impacted
just
roughly
sure.
L
There
are
two
businesses
in
Kenmore
that
are
being
impacted,
their
their
access,
they're
right
on
the
corner
and
and
their
access
on
both
away
is,
is
being
impacted,
and
so
there
are
two
businesses
that
appear
to
be
full
Acquisitions
in
Kenmore.
There
is
one
in
the
shoreline
Seattle
part
I
call
it
Shoreline
Seattle,
because
it's
at
the
other
end
of
the
line.
That
again
is
an
access
problem.
So
because
they're
right
on
a
corner
and
driveways
around
the
corner,
we
are
impacting
their
access.
L
The
team
tries
real
hard
to
try
to
perfect
that,
and
so
to
the
extent
we
can
perfect
and
access.
We
do
try
to
do
that,
and
so
those
are
the
three
businesses
that
we're
currently
impacting
residential.
We
have
two
folks
that
we
haven't
yet
been
able
to
perfect
their
driveway
issues.
They're,
it's
quite
steep
slope,
and
once
you
improve
the
roadway,
your
your
steepness
become
times
more
intense,
and
so
we
are
working
to
see
if
we
can
regrade
and
not
impact
those
or
or
have
a
work
around,
but
those
may
be
full
Acquisitions.
L
L
F
L
L
Okay,
that's
the
difference
on
that
that
piece
right,
and
so,
if,
if
it's
determined
to
be
on
economic
or
unviable,
like
I
said,
if
we
take
somebody's
driveway
and
they
can't
get
in
their
garage,
that
can
be
could
be,
a
problem
could
be
a
problem
yeah
and,
and
so
we
would
offer
to
buy
it.
A
landowner
can
say:
I
don't
want
to
sell
you.
My
whole
house,
you
know
I
want
you
to
sell
it
back,
I'll,
keep
it
and
I'll
tear
it
down
and
I'll
rebuild
myself.
L
F
Perfect
and
then
one
other
question,
I
I
was
looking
at
your
example.
I
think
it
was
some
Seattle,
a
Seattle
line
where
there
was
acquisition
and
it
moved.
I
noticed
the
properties
that
were
that
yeah
yeah
that
one
that
would
now
had
a
buffer
between
themselves
and
traffic.
Now
they're
sitting
right
on
traffic.
Do
you
do
you
ever
have
neighbors,
who
are
directly
not
touched
by
their
property?
You
understand
where
I'm
going
with
this,
but
who
say?
Oh
my
goodness
now
this
effect
that
affects
my
property
diet.
K
Sure,
well
I
mean
we.
We
will
engage
with
those
property
owners
and
you
know
do
the
best
we
can
to
explain.
You
know
what
the
project
is
and
what
we're
doing
and
to
the
extent
that
we
end
up
during
construction,
for
example,
working
even
closer
to
their
property,
we'll
do
our
best
to
mitigate
the
impacts
to
their
property
and
communicate
with
them
all
the
way
through.
So
okay.
F
L
L
F
L
F
K
Noise
studies
done
I'll,
let
you
yeah
I'll,
say
during
during
design
as
we're
progressing.
Things
and
kind
of
you
know
figuring
out
exactly
what
the
Project's
going
to
be.
That
type
of
feedback
is
useful
for
the
project.
In
terms
of
you
know,
coming
up
with
ways
to
to
mitigate
some
of
those
potential
impacts.
We
do
during
the
preliminary
engineering
phase
of
our
projects,
do
detailed
environmental
analyzes
to
study
whether
or
not
there
are
going
to
be
additional
noise
impacts
in
the
long
run.
K
F
H
You
mayor,
thank
you
for
the
presentation,
I
look
forward
to
seeing
more
Vikings
graduated
pop
again
and
all
the
high
schools
we
have
here
in
the
North
Shore
area.
My
question
is
around
current
ridership
future
ridership
and
we
talk
about
impacts.
What
what
are
the
majority
of
the
ridership
coming
from
now
out?
Where
do
we
see
that
ridership
coming
from.
N
We
do
have
those
ridership
numbers
and
we
are
happy
to
pass
along
to
this
group
I'll
go
ahead
and
send
them
to
Kyle
and
he
can
get
them
out
to
all
of
you.
But
what
I
will
just
say
quickly
is
that
the
anticipated
ridership
for
stride
for
this
S3
service
specifically
will
we
are
planning
to
have
a
lot
of
the
current
522
St
Express
522,
the
bus
that
you
might
be
seeing
in
your
community.
N
Now
a
lot
of
those
writers
we
anticipate
will
become
stride
writers
when
the
service
is
up
and
running
King
County
Metro
is
also
actually
going
to
be
benefiting
from
the
Capital
Improvements
here
in
Bothell
and
along
the
entire
route
of
what
we
call
that
three,
the
522
line.
So
between
the
number
that
we
will
give
you
will
be
between
King,
County,
Metro
and
future
stride
ridership.
We
look
at
it
all
as
like
an
entire
Transit
Community,
when
we
do
those
Transit,
analyzes,
fabulous.
H
And
that
kind
of
leads
into
why
I
was
asking
the
question
when
we
have
the
conversation
around
property
acquisition?
What
is
the
value?
How
do
we
value
that?
What
does
that
ridership
look
like
so
we're
building
out
a
system,
so
it's
important
to
have
the
conversation
around
how
it's
impacting
not
just
our
community
but
communities
along
the
actual
route
itself.
H
L
That's
one
of
our
project
costs
that
we
reimburse
the
landowner
for
those
cost
anchor.
It's
a
it's
a
spend
to
get.
So
if,
if
they
take
our
offer
package
to
an
attorney
and
that
attorney
charges
them
two
thousand
dollars,
then
we
aren't
we
reimbursed
for
that.
Two
thousand
dollars.
Okay,
and
so
it's
a
reimbursable
for
them
to
go,
get
their
own
appraisal,
get
their
own
legal
analysis,
get
their
own
accountant
to
review
the
impacts
to
them.
H
H
In
an
example,
you
have
somebody
who
lives
along
the
522
Corridor.
They
don't
need
to
live
in
Bothell
or
Lake,
Forest,
Park
or
camera
I'm.
Just
going
to
give
you
an
example,
if
they
have
a
property
they
that
they
purchased
for
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
ten
years
ago
fifteen
years
ago,
and
we
sound
transit
needs
to
acquire
their
property
for
the
project
to
move
through.
H
They
do
an
appraisal
and
appraisal
comes
back
at
700
000.,
but
that
landowner
is
not
able
to
find
a
property
in
and
around
the
area
for
that
price
anymore,
because
the
prices
have
quadrupled.
What
happens
in
that
situation?
Are
we
relocating?
Are
they
forced
to
relocate
out
and
I
know?
You
said
only
one
or
four
people
have
we've
had
that
issue
with,
but
I
just
I
want
to
know
just
for
my
sake.
What?
What
is
that?
What
does
that
look
like
for
somebody.
L
I'll,
give
you
a
bigger
example.
Using
sort
of
your
parameters,
which
you
know
the
the
valuation
is
always
current
value,
so
it
could
be
worth
four
times
what
they
paid
for
it.
It's
current
value
and
that's
that's
what
they
are
paid
and
in
an
average
Market.
That
is
what
they
then
can
go,
spend
to
get
a
property.
There
are
a
lot
of
complexities
to
relocating.
If
we're
relocating
a
house,
there
are
differentials
that
could
be
paid
as
a
part
of
that.
L
If
you're
talking
about
single-family
residence,
where
we're
we've
offered
them
700,
but
they
can
only
find
an
800
000
house,
there's
actually
a
differential
reimbursement
as
a
part
of
relocation
benefits.
Relocation
benefits
are
different
than
acquisition.
We
buy
dirt.
We
relocate
personal
property.
There's
mortgage
rate
differentials
as
part
of
relocation
benefits.
I
had
a
three
percent
mortgage
now
I
can
get
a
five
percent
mortgage,
there's
actually
differential
reimbursements
as
a
part
of
relocation
benefits.
I
didn't
get.
H
Into
the
Weeds
on
that,
because
no
you
answered
my
question
perfectly
so
what
you're?
What
you're
telling
me
is
that
this
is
potentially
a
hardship
on
some
folks,
maybe
not
everybody,
but
some
folks.
It
might
be
a
hardship
and
to
go
out
and
get
a
loan
today
is
far
different
than
it
was
10
years
ago.
Right
so
you're
telling
me
that
you're
looking
at
that,
which
is
that's
a
positive
thing-
that's
that's
I'm.
H
One
of
my
shells-
okay,
shells,
okay,
I,
love
that
and
then
I-
would
agree
with
council
member
Zorn's
a
concern
for
for
businesses.
You
mentioned
a
couple:
businesses
in
Kenmore,
while
those
are
not
not
in
Kenmore,
is
still
good
for
us
to
have
an
understanding
of
what
that.
What
does
that
mean
when
you
relocate
a
business
and
the
business
is
impacted?
And,
let's
say
business
has
been
in
the
community
for
15
or
20
years?
H
L
Provide
advisory
services
from
day
one,
the
minute
we
know
somebody
is
going
to
be
displaced,
especially
businesses.
Businesses
are
unique
because
we,
the
thing
we
don't
do
is
is
tell
them
that
they
have
to
stay
in
business.
You
know
a
landowner
can
say:
I'm
a
business
owner
can
say:
I'm,
I'm
out,
I'm
retiring.
You
know
you
can
still
move
me
or
they
can
say.
I
want
to
grow,
I
want
to
shrink,
so
we
try
to
work
with
all
of
those
parameters.
L
I've
had
large
and
small,
we
have
businesses
that
are
a
single
storefront
and,
and
we
have
businesses
that
are
two
and
three
million
dollar
relocation
reimbursement.
So
so
the
move
expenses
are
not
limited
at
all.
The
cost
to
move
is
not
limited
under
relocation
benefits
and
the
re-establishment
we
provide
up
to
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
them.
To
reconnect
something,
we've
moved
that
sort
of
thing
so
relocation
is,
is
a
very
complex
and
robust
reimbursement
program,
and
we
try
very
hard
to
keep
them
in
your
community.
Well,.
H
H
It's
important
that
you
know
we
hear
from
our
community
and
we're
the
voice
for
our
community
and
I
would
say
if
you
can
in
future,
presentations
can
share
some
of
the
positive
outcomes
that
might
be
great
for
us
to
be
able
to
share
with
our
community.
But
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
effort.
Happy
too.
Thank
you.
O
O
You
there
was
a
a
slide
that
had
bullet
points
of
the
Outreach
process.
Was
that
in
order
or
was
that
just
you
just
listed
the
bullet
points,
because
my
question
is
you
know
the
properties
you
want
to
go
after
right
as
part
of
the
planning.
Do
you
talk
to
those
folks
up
front
like
ahead
of
time
way
ahead
of
time
ahead
of
all
the
town
halls
and
and
Community
conversations.
K
O
O
O
N
Foreign,
at
least
from
the
this
side
of
things,
if
can
you
all
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
okay,
great
The,
Sound
Transit
board
has
the
ability
first
of
all,
I
should
start
out
by
saying
no,
we
work
a
lot
like
the
city
has
local
control
over
a
lot
of
what
you
guys
do
every
day,
we're
working
the
hand
in
hand
with
Kyle
and
his
team
on
the
development
of
the
project
they're.
N
You
know
we
are
a
an
essential
public
facility
in
a
lot
of
regards,
because
we
have
a
program
that
we're
trying
to
build
out.
You
know
we're
not
out
there
trying
to
like
change
your
code
or
do
anything
like
that.
So
when
it
comes
to
like
the
controls
that
the
cities
have
you
still,
you
still
have
it
I'm
gonna
say
right
now:
I'm,
not
an
attorney,
but
we
are
working
hand
in
hand
with
Kyle
and
the
team.
N
So,
while
a
community,
let's
say
if
a
community
was
feeling
very
upset
and
they
wanted
their
counsel
just
to
step
in,
obviously
we
would
be
listening
and
we
would
be.
You
know
really
coming
at
this
with
an
empathetic
tone
here.
We
don't.
We
don't
want
to
force
something
in
where
something
doesn't
fit,
but
I
think
that
there
is.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
wherever
we
are
building
something
that
we
are
leaving
the
community
better
than
when
we
found
it.
O
Okay,
thank
you.
I
know,
I
asked
a
tough
question,
so
it's
okay,
just
for
my
my
and
a
lot
of.
If
you
know
when
people
watch
this,
they
have
an
understanding.
The
eminent
domain
issue
I
mean
it's
kind
of
related,
like
you
get
to
a
point
where
you
have
this
one
or
two
owners
who
are
like
say
no
way
so
you
say:
okay,
fine,
we're
gonna,
just
take
everything
we'll
just
give
you,
whatever
the
market
value,
whatever
the
fair
value
of
this
thing.
So
you
mentioned
something
about
it
affects
all.
O
L
So
Sound
Transit,
as
an
agency,
has
the
power
of
eminent
domain
under
State
statutes
and
and
what
our
board
chooses
to
do
when
we
authorize
a
package
of
Acquisitions.
So
the
the
the
package
that's
going
there
starting
Thursday
at
system
expansion
and
then
to
the
full
board
for
recommendation,
is
52
parcels
and
so
they're
authorizing
me
to
go
forward
and
buy
the
the
property
that's
needed
for
those
52..
Some
of
them
are
temporary
easements.
L
Some
of
them
are
little
strips
of
fee,
simple
interest
and
once
that
authorization,
then
that's
when
our
process
starts
to
to
make
an
offer
to
negotiate
in
good
faith,
to
attempt
to
reach
agreement.
If
we
don't
reach
agreement
in
eminent
domain,
it's
because
we
didn't
agree
on
price,
the
the
step
that
we
have
determined
that
it's
for
the
Public's
use
and
it's
necessary
for
this
project
comes
with
that
board
action.
And
so
then
it's
about
negotiating
the
price.
O
L
O
O
L
O
P
You
and
thanks
for
your
presentation,
I,
really
appreciate
it.
The
deputy
mayor's
first
question
got
me
curious
and
it's
okay.
If
this
is
like
a
longer
question
that
needs
follow-up
but
and
I'm
gonna
make
up
a
city
in
order
not
to
pick
it
on
anybody.
So
let's
say
we're
going
down.
522
we
got
Bothell,
Kenmore,
CityVille,
Lake,
Forest,
Park,
Shoreline
and
CityVille
says
no
way.
I
don't
want
this.
By
what
mechanism
does
that
like?
Is
there
a
way
to
not
sort
of
have
to
scrap
the
whole
thing?
P
K
I
could
say
that
there's
opportunities
for
that
City
to
engage
with
Sound
Transit,
obviously,
at
the
project
level.
We
do
that
quite
frequently,
as
as
we
work
with
with
Kyle
and
other
other
cities,
we
we
meet
frequently
with
the
cities
we
meet
with
the
residents,
so
there's
that
opportunity,
but
there's
also
opportunities
to
engage
with
other
members
of
Sound
Transit,
including
the
Sound
Transit
board,
so
I
think
I
would
say.
P
Okay-
and
my
question
was
more:
how
does
Sound
Transit
make
sure
that
so
like?
If
someone
like
I
said
right
in
the
middle
just
says?
No,
we
don't
want
it
and
they
put
up
a
lot
of
opposition.
Is
there
still
a
way
to
proceed
because
I
think
that's
one
of
the
fears
you
have
being
on
one
side
or
the
other
of
a
plan
line
is
okay.
It
has
to
kind
of
get
all
the
way
to
the
other
side.
There.
K
N
And
I'll
go
ahead
and
just
add
on
to
that
Rick.
Thank
you
for
that,
and
thank
you
for
this
question.
This
is
a
you
know.
As
a
Transit
Agency,
you
know
we
don't
just
build
in
one
city
and
we
build
you
know
through
multiple
jurisdictions,
because
people
ride
in
between
cities.
They
want
to
connect
to
other
places
when
you're
building
a
line
in
one
place
in
the
middle
has
a
lot
of
heartburn
or
issues
that
they
really
feel
like
need
to
be
resolved.
N
N
The
board
themselves
will
make
that
final
decision
that
they're
in
the
meantime,
while
they're
well
they're.
Having
that
conversation
and
and
having
those
discussions,
the
team
is
still
working
to
make
sure
that
they're,
at
least
in
the
other
sections
of
the
corridor,
they're
still
progressing.
So,
even
if
there
was
like
a
pause
on
one
section
of
the
project,
the
rest
of
the
project
will
keep
going.
N
P
Q
So
my
apologies
for
the
the
cold
voice
that
you're
hearing
but
I
just
really
want
to.
Thank
you
all
for
the
presentation
tonight
and
for
making.
Typically,
it's
really
intimidating,
I
think
for
the
public,
I'm,
really
transparent
and
clear.
It's
really
helpful
to
see
all
of
the
I
think
I'll
call
them
controls
that
you
have
in
the
process
for
fairness
and
and
so
I
really
appreciate
you
coming
tonight
and
walking
us
through
it.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
Believe
that
you
know
I
I
would
thank
you
for
coming
explaining
this
process
to
us.
I
think
it's
really
helpful
for
us
and
the
community
to
hear
kind
of
all
of
the
thought
and
all
of
the
shawls
that
go
into
this
I
guess
I
would
just
say
you
know.
We've
we've
already
had
delay
in
this
project
and
if
there's
anything
that
I
or
we
can
do
to
help,
make
sure
that
this
moves
forward
without
any
additional
delays
we
would
love
to
do
so
in
the
city
of
Bothwell.
B
E
You
Marin
I'll,
just
say:
there's
a
few
things
in
life
that
help
make
a
city
manager
be
grateful
and
I'll
say
one
of
them
is,
is
that
when,
when
named
as
a
person
that
sound
transits
working
with
there's
a
village
behind
me,
that
really
makes
that
happen.
So
thank
you
to
the
teams
in
public
works,
Community,
Development,
executive
office
city
attorney's
office.
E
The
list
goes
on
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
that
goes
behind
this
and
again
it's
we
spend
time
on
the
things
that
matter,
and
this
certainly
matters
so
I'm
grateful
for
the
team
joining
us
this
evening
as
well.
I'm
also
excited
to
make
a
welcome
at
tonight's
meeting.
We
are
now
three
months
in
a
row.
I
have
first
meeting
of
November
December
and
January.
E
We've
been
able
to
welcome
on
new
members
of
the
executive
leadership
team
and
we'll
slow
down
that
Trend
here
coming
up,
but
it
is
with
great
great
gratitude
that
I
welcome
Quan
Wong
as
our
new
Director
of
Finance
here
at
the
city
of
Bothell
Kwan
has
over
20
years
of
experience,
as
you
may
know,
and
most
recently
was
the
director
of
finance
and
administrative
services
at
the
Seattle
Municipal
Court,
with
the
hiring
of
an
executive.
It
also
means
that
we
had
a
vacancy,
so
I
do
also
want
to
acknowledge
of
really
again.
E
E
Our
colleagues
as
well.
Overall
I'm
really
encouraged
about
the
next
steps
that
we
have
before
us
and
you'll
hear
from
Quan,
and
then
I'm
going
to
ask
him
to
do
a
brief
introduction.
But
I
will
just
say
that,
through
the
interview
process,
through
reference
checks
and
validated
by
his
first
five
six
days
on
the
job,
I
would
absolutely
say
with
confidence.
Quan
is
a
problem.
E
M
Thank
you
Kyle
for
all
the
kind
words
I,
don't
know
how
to
follow
that,
but
again
with
deep
gratitude
that
I
hope
to
earn
your
trust
and
continue
to
perform
as
expected
and
again
good
evening,
council
members
I'm
so
glad
to
be
here.
This
is
my
sixth
day
on
the
job
I'm,
counting
because
I'm,
a
finance
person
but
but
I
think
I
would
love
to
have
more
conversations
with
the
council
members,
because
I
see
my
job
is
really
to
support
and
to
sustain
the
priorities
that
you
set
up.
M
So
I'm
excited
to
be
a
part
of
your
a
team
right
next
to
me
to
be
again
the
problem
solvers
to
make
sure
that
we
sustain
the
growth
and
also
preserve
what
we
love
in
Bothell.
I
have
14
years
of
software,
us
with
the
city
of
Seattle
I
hope
you
are
not
going
to
hold
it
against
me.
I
am
learning
and
I
am
also
listening.
That's
my
primary
role
for
this
for
for
now,
but
I
also
want
to
lead
but
lead
with
a
servant.
M
Leader
background
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
here
to
serve
you
as
council
members,
serve
you,
as
my
exact
as
my
peers,
and
also
I,
am
here
to
serve
the
residence
of
Bothell.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
this
opportunity
and
I'm
very
excited
and
again,
as
Kyle
said,
I
really
want
to
thank
the
finance
Team.
Every
single
one
of
them
really
stepped
up.
M
M
O
Thank
you
thank
you
and
welcome.
It's
awesome.
It's
great
to
have
have
you
I
know,
as
Kyle
said,
Maureen,
Ted,
Gretchen
and
the
rest
of
the
team
did
an
amazing
job
over
the
past
year,
but
it's
great
to
have
a
permanent
permanency
in
this
in
this
role,
because
we
do
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
as
you
probably
only
one
with
your
one-on-ones
with
Kyle
I've
have
talked
about,
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
for
the
future
of
our
city,
and
we
need
to
get
the
foundation
right.
O
B
B
B
Q
Thank
you
mayor.
Just
welcome
we're
glad
you're
here
I
know.
My
colleagues
have
said
the
same
thing,
but
I
know
just
how
much
Kyle
has
been
looking
forward
to
rounding
out
the
elt
and
and
he's
just
you
know
his
his
High
Praise
of
you
means
that
I'm
just
excited
to
to
be
working
with
you.
I
do
have
one
question.
Yes,
and
that
is:
will
you
be
able
to
join
us
at
our
priority
setting
Retreat?
Are
you
going
to
be
there
for
any
of
that?
Councilmember.
Q
R
P
You
so
the
I
believe
it
was
the
last
time
we
met
I
was
appointed
to
go
to
the
AWC
to
represent
Bothell
and
we
did
vote
in
Wendy,
weiker
and
Amy
Falcone.
For
some
reason,
I
was
spacing
on
Amy's
last
name
but
Wendy
wanker
and
Amy
Falcon
I'm
from
Mercer
Island
in
Kirkland
respectively.
So
just
an
update
and
they
were
only
two
people
nominated.
So
it
was
not
very
contentious.
They
they
wanted
it.
P
H
H
E
Q
My
update
is
that
I
was
reappointed
to
sda's
domestic
violence
task
force
and
we
met
today
for
a
new
orientation,
and
it
was
just
a
really
excellent
overview
of
the
work
of
the
task
force
and
efforts
being
made
by
King
County,
especially
to
to
help
victims
to
help
and
also
to
prevent
domestic
violence
from
occurring,
so
grateful
to
be
able
to
serve
there
and
continue
on
representative
Dewar's
work
in
that
area.
And
if
there
are
updates
I
will
share
them
in
the
future.
Q
I
Thank
you,
mayor
I
almost
forgot.
We
had
a
public
safety
committee
meeting
last
week
with
police
and
fire
and
we
received
an
update
from
fire
regarding
Staffing.
We
found
out
that
the
building
is,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
complete,
they're
moved
in,
but
we're
still
waiting
for
a
date
for
the
open
house
for
the
public.
They
are
still
doing
some
work
in
the
back
on
grading
they're
working
on
taking
down
the
temporary
structure
as
well.
I
So
we
believe
that
we
will
wait
until
those
are
complete
before
we
invite
the
public
in
to
take
a
look
and
then
the
last
item
on
the
fire
side
was
they
are
moving
from
their
CAD
system
at
norcom
to
Tyler
Technologies.
So
there's
been
some
challenges
there,
just
in
terms
of
data,
but
they
are
making
that
move
which
is
going
to
be
good
in
the
end
and
then
on
the
police
side.
I
The
Advisory
council
is
being
formed
as
we
speak
and
Staffing
I
did
not
believe
this
I
told
that
she,
if
I,
did
not
believe
this
when
he
told
me
last
year,
but
we
are
nearly
nearly
fully
staffed
for
both
regular
positions
and
Levy
positions.
So
that's
something
that's
very
exciting.
It's
been
a
long
time
since
we've
been
almost
fully
staffed,
so
I
want
to
give
a
congratulations
again
to
the
chief
in
public
for
making
it
happen.
So
those
are
the
some
of
the
updates.
F
B
E
Thank
you
mayor
and
we
do
have
with
this
item.
There
are
really
two
two
questions
being
asked
for
Council
on
staff
will
walk
you
through
that
and
make
sure
that
it's
clear
want
to
give
Nick
here
a
minute
to
get
his
PowerPoint
up
too.
So
let
me
just
frame
for
you
that
what
you're
considering
tonight
this
is
an
annual,
an
annual
process
that
that
the
city
engages
in
in
partnership
with
the
North
Shore
School
District
we've
been
talking
about
how
we
have
a
joint
meeting
coming
up
with
the
school
district.
E
I
think
that'll
be,
if
there's
ever
any
more
information
that
the
council
is
interested
about,
how
these
fees
work
and
generated.
That
would
be
a
good
opportunity
to
have
joint
discussion
with
them,
but
in
the
meantime,
for
tonight's
we're
joined
by
Ashley
wenchel
who's,
the
deputy
director
of
Community
Development,
but
our
presentation
tonight
will
be
led
by
Nick
schmeck
he's
a
planner
with
CD.
He
also
joined
the
organization
about
five
months
ago,
so
this
may
be
the
first
time
that
you've
had
an
opportunity
to
meet
Nick.
E
S
Perfect,
can
you
hear
me
great
hi
everyone?
My
name
is
Nick
I
am
a
planner.
Thank
you
for
introducing
me
Kyle
I,
appreciate
it
just
to
jump
in
and
say
thank
you
for
having
me
here.
I'm
really
appreciated
to
be
employed
with
the
city
of
Bothell
I'm,
having
a
great
time
in
my
first
five
months
and
yeah.
Just
thank
you
jumping
into
the
presentation
we're
here
today
for
the
North
Shore
School
District
impact
fees
I'll
be
abbreviating
with
NSD
for
a
lot
of
the
PowerPoint.
S
S
You
know
how
we
look
at
impact
cases
when
new
development
comes
in.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
that
new
development
and
that
additional
growth
is
going
to
be
you
know,
accounted
for,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
that
growth
in
the
that
new
development
has
additional
demand
and
need
for
public
services
such
as
you
know,
parks
and
fire
response
requirements
and
as
well
as
Schools
public
facilities.
So
that's
why
we
take
in
this
impact
fee
specifically
here
today.
S
We're
just
talking
about
school
impact
fees,
but
I
wanted
to
set
the
stage
for
that
kind
of
the
concept
of
impact
fees
is
just
growth
paying
for
growth
moving
along
just
to
let
you
know
so.
We,
as
the
city
are
not
necessarily
the
ones
that
are
creating
the
fee.
We
are
adopting
a
fee
that
is
established
by
NSD,
the
North
Shore
school
district
and
we
are
going
to
be
the
lead
Agency
for
taking
in
permits.
So
nor,
as
you
can
imagine,
the
school
district
isn't
going
to
be
reviewing
these
permits
for
new
buildings.
S
S
S
S
Moving
on
to
step
two
here
number
two
item:
the
agenda
bill
is
to
amend
the
fee
schedule
to
include
the
NSD
2023
impact
fees
explicitly
once
again,
this
is
not
established
by
Community,
Development
or
the
city.
These
fees
are
established
through
a
annual
update
of
the
school's
six-year
Capital
facilities
plan.
Currently
we
are
in
the
2022
to
2028
Capital
facilities
planned,
you
saw
a
ex
exhibit
I
should
say
of
that
Capital
facilities
plan
in
the
excerpt
of
the
agenda
bill.
S
So
this
next
slide
is
also
some
more
education
opportunity
and
just
kind
of
a
glance
for
both
the
council
and
our
public
to
understand
how
the
fees
work.
This
just
to
say,
has
nothing
to
do
with
us
updating
our
code
today
this
and
moving
the
code
to
the
general
fee
schedule.
This
is
just
talking
about
how
fees
are
established.
So
if
some
of
you
are
probably
familiar
with
the
growth
management
act
adopted
in
1990,
this
is
a
list
of
statutes
that
forces
jurisdictions
like
the
city
of
Bothell
to
plan
plan
for
growth.
S
This
RCW
establishes
the
legal
Authority
for
North
Shore,
School
District
to
a
charge
for
school
impact
fees.
So
therefore,
the
next
step
is
going
to
be
for
them
to
create
that
six-year
plan,
which
is
where
they
establish
those
fees,
and
the
next
step
under
that
is
our
Bothell
Municipal
Code,
currently
under
2112,
is
where
we
have
the
legal
authority
to
collect
fees
on
their
behalf.
S
Next
is
where
we
are
currently
today
we're
here
at
Bothell,
City
Council,
to
adopt
these
fees
on
an
annual
basis,
so
we'll
be
back
next
year,
but
hopefully
it'll
be
under
the
agenda
with
all
of
the
other
fees
as
well,
and
for
the
last
two,
the
city
staff
will
collect
fees
from
the
new
development
projects.
As
you
can
imagine,
lot.
D
down
here
had
Associated
impact
fees
in
all
of
the
new
single-family
development.
S
So
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
ordinance
amending
the
Bothell
municipal
code
to
move
this
NSD
impact
fees
to
our
general
fee
schedule,
as
well
as
a
resolution
amending
the
fee
schedule
to
include
the
updated
2023
impact
fees
which
was
established
in
the
six-year
Capital
facilities
plan
adopted
last
year.
Any
questions.
F
F
T
I
believe
that's
correct,
and
some
of
that
is
they
essentially
look
at
the
impact
that
those
units
are
creating
and
then
put
it
through
some
form
of
equation.
That's
that
gives
us
what
those
impact
Feats
should
be
so
based
on
the
analysis
that
the
school
district's
done,
it's
showing
that
decrease
for
single
family
and
then
the
increase
for
multi-family.
F
I
have
to
say:
I,
you
know,
spend
a
lot
of
time
up
at
wooden
elementary
and
right
at
the
base
of
the
hill
is
a
huge
project
coming
in
and
I
imagine
most
of
those
kids
are
coming
up
to
wooden
and
I
I
thought
I
saw.
The
increase
of
students
was
about
200,
200
and
200,
and
some
change.
Maybe
it
was
closer
to
300
I
thought.
That's
optimistic
because
there's
a
lot
of
units
that
are
going
in
yeah.
S
That's
that's
great,
and
just
for
prospective
Ashley
in
our
new
director
of
Community
Development
has
been
in
discussion
with
the
school
district
and
they
are
going
to
be
bringing
some
new
development
projects
for
expansion
of
schools
updates,
facade
changes,
new
mechanical
units.
A
lot
of
things
are
going
to
be
coming
thanks
to
some
of
these
impact
fees,
good.
F
T
F
You
know
to
be
fair.
It's
a
little
bit
of
a
busybody
question,
but
the
but,
but
also
part
of
that
is,
is
the
community
at
large
good
with
these
fee
changes,
or
was
there
a
huge
outcry?
There
wasn't
a
huge
outcry.
Okay,
all
right
all
right!
Well,
thank
you.
I!
Don't
need
any
more
details
in
that,
but
I
think
you've
answered
all
my
questions.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you.
It's
always
good
to
hear
how
our
impacts
our
development's,
paying
for
developments
paying
for
the
impacts
it
has
on
the
community.
I
had
a
couple
questions,
so
what
was
the
there
was
a
reduction
from
last
year?
Correct.
Do
we
know
what
that
that
was
because
I
didn't
have
my
Habit
in
the
packet
I
didn't
see
it.
S
So
yeah,
as
we
established,
that's
something
we
could
follow
up,
there's
a
whole
methodology
behind
the
school
district's
accounting
of
how
they
arrive
at
this
number.
It
changes
on
a
yearly
basis.
It's
identified
in
that
six-year
cfp
and
of
how
they
arrived
at
that
number,
and
that's
something
we'd
be
happy
to
to
write
up
a
memo
and
get
back
to
you
with
with
with
why,
okay.
H
And
I've
seen
these
impact
fees
for
quite
some
time
they
keep
coming
forward.
You
know
development
should
be
paying
for
the
impacts
that
it's
having,
but
it's
really
important
that
we
have
that
information
on
on
what
it
actually,
if
it's
going
up
or
down
how
much
is
going
up
or
down
because
that
leads
into
the
next
question
is
you
know,
development's
paying
for
development
here
in
Bothell?
So
right?
If
somebody
builds
in
Bothell,
it's
it's.
The
impact
fees
are
servicing
Bothell
right.
H
S
Ahead,
as
you
can
see
so
this
fee
that
we're
adopting
today,
Kenmore
has
already
adopted
and
they
are
paying
the
same
share.
Okay.
So
my
next
question
is
wooden
bill.
So
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
today
in
this
slide,
but
Woodenville
is
they
have
taken
a
different
approach
with
Snohomish
County?
The
numbers
are
similar,
but
instead
of
having
a
multi-family
unit
calculation,
they
have
a
extent
of
that
which
is
town
homes,
I.
T
Think
the
other
thing
to
think
about
with
impact
fees
for
this,
since
it's
different
than
a
city
like
we
have
our
boundaries
and
and
happens
outside
of
them
like
we
have
interlocal
agreements
with
Snohomish
County
about
development.
That
happens
there
that
have
that
impacts,
Bothell
and
I.
Think
when
they're
doing
the
capital
facilities
plan
they're
looking
at
the
district
without
City
boundaries,
but
the
impact
fees
are
related
to
how
each
City's
impact
fees
are
structured.
T
H
Yeah
so
I'd
be
very
interested
in
learning
more
about
that
I'm
so
interested
in
meeting
with
the
school
district
between
councils.
Hopefully
we
can
have
a
joint
North
Shore
Community
set.
The
councils
can
all
meet
with
the
school
district
because
you
know,
as
council
member
zorns
alluded
to,
we
we
do
want
to
get
kids
out
of
Portables.
You
know-
and
that's
not
our
job,
to
do
that.
H
All
for
ensuring
that
we
have
equal
and
equitable
spaces
for
our
kids,
and
so
that
goes
along
with
portals,
but
also
goes
along
with
with
impacts
of
active
spaces
right,
and
we
need
to
find
ways
to
partner
with
the
school
district
on
those
active
spaces,
so
kids
can
get
out
stay
safe.
You
just
heard
me
talk
about
the
RPC
and
we're
going
to
have
a
meeting
about
a
crisis.
Centers
I
want
us
to
start
thinking
proactively.
H
How
do
we
keep
kids
from
getting
into
crisis
or
people
within
our
community
get
into
crisis,
and
so
I
think
the
school
district
plays
a
big
part
if
we're
going
to
help
collect
those
fees
for
the
impact
of
the
growth
and
development
in
our
community.
Let's
see
if
we
can't
work
together
and
solve
that,
but
I
appreciate
you
putting
this
together.
I
mean
I've,
heard
it
a
lot
I'm
in
the
industry
that
actually
pays
these
impact
fees
and
I'm
a
firm
believer
that
we
should,
as
we
develop
pay
for
those
impacts.
H
P
I
did
have
a
question
so
on
page
100
of
our
packet
there's
a
note
that
says
it
has
the
Snohomish
County
and
wooden
Bill
and
then
King
County,
Bothell
Kenmore
differential,
and
it
calls
out
that,
if
bother
Kenmore
determine
the
Snohomish
County
model
of
segregating,
townhomes
and
having
a
separate
fee,
then
they
they
request.
We
have
that
fee.
Why?
How
did
we
determine
which
model
we
were
going
to
use.
S
S
Our
code
isn't
structured
to
have
the
separate
Town
town
home
fee,
as
we
don't
Define
that
in
our
code,
perhaps
as
this
discussion
with
missing
middle
housing
continues
to
go
forward,
we
might
be
looking
at
that,
and
maybe
the
next
year's
annual
update
of
this
code
and,
like
council
member
McNeil,
said
having
an
ongoing
conversation
with
the
school
district
and
we
can
kind
of
hash
out
why
Snohomish
County
and
the
City
of
Woodinville
went
that
direction.
But
at
this
time
I
don't
think
that
is
in
the
interest
of
it.
T
Just
so
you
know,
all
of
our
impact
fees
are
separated
into
single
family
and
multi-family
units,
so
anything
like
a
duplex
would
pay
the
multi-family
fee,
and
so,
if
we
use
the
town
home
fee,
it
would
be
calculating
our
impact
fees
differently.
For
this
versus
all
of
the
other
impact
fees,
so
I
think
has
impact.
The
conversations
can
continue,
that's
something
that
could
potentially
be
explored
and
then
see
if
there's
necessarily
like
a
benefit
or
incentive
to
doing
it
differently
than
we
do
it
today,
totally.
T
E
I
I
I
know
you
don't
have
an
answer
for
this
today,
but
I
would
love
to
see
the
calculation
formula
just
from
a
standpoint
of
I.
Think
it's
interesting
I
think
it's
interesting
and
would
be
insightful
to
know
just
how
we
go
about
calculating
these
also
the
history
of
how
we
decided
single
family
versus
multi-family
and
not
breaking
it
out
by
maybe
square
foot
or
a
lot
of
square
footage.
A
house
square
footage
whatever
it
is
so
just
more
of
a
curiosity
than
anything
else,
but
thanks
for
consolidating
appreciate
it.
B
B
Fantastic
I
have
a
motion
from
Deputy
Mayor
alcabra
and
a
second
from
Council
of
resorts
to
move
the
recommended
action,
which
is
to
adopt
the
proposed
code
amendments
to
move
the
North
Shore
School
District
impact
fees
to
the
general
fee
schedule
and
adopt
the
proposed
fee
resolution
with
fees
at
the
level
requested
by
North,
Shore,
School
District
city
clerk.
Please.
C
B
E
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
how
to
work
that
into
my
introduction,
but
thank
you
for
that.
No
tonight,
as
you
mentioned,
the
we
are
returning
with
a
draft
resolution
for
Council
requests
per
Council
request,
just
as
by
way
a
background
and
walking
through
how
we
got
here
on
November,
2nd
2022.
There
was
a
projected
agenda
discussion
in
a
form
requesting
a
potential
marriage,
equity
and
reproductive
Health
Care
resolution.
As
we
recall
in
our
last
meeting
in
December,
there
was
further
discussion
and
again
an
update
of
in
respect
for
the
federal
action
for
the
marriage.
E
Marriage
act,
respect
for
marriage
act
that
taking
that
without
outside
of
the
scope
of
the
requested
resolution,
which
was
generally
supported
by
Council.
The
staff
direction
that
we
received
was
to
take
a
look
at
some
of
the
other
jurisdictions
in
our
area,
who
had
passed
similar
religion
resolutions
and
provided
draft
for
Council
to
consider
tonight,
which
is
what
is
in
your
packet
I,
want
to
thank
our
City
attorney.
Paul
Byrne
and
our
assistant
city
manager
Becky
range
for
their
work
on
pulling
that
together.
E
O
G
F
H
E
H
We
received
some
emails.
We
received
some
public
comment
tonight.
Have
we
looked
into
working
or
reaching
out
to
some
of
the
experts
within
our
community,
one
of
which
came
I?
Guess
clergy
came
today
to
to
speak
to
us.
Have
we
taken
the
opportunity
before
or
maybe
language
within
this
to
speak
to
them?
First
before
we
put
something
forward.
E
There
are
times
when,
yes,
when
we're
working
on
something
either
on
behalf
of
the
council
or
that's
on
work
plans,
and
that
we
do
to
additional
work
beyond
that,
and
that
in
this
case,
in
the
process
that
the
council
has
set
up
of,
you
were
able
to
request
work
of
the
of
the
city.
The
council
considers
it
as
a
whole.
The
majority
of
the
council
directs
it.
Then
we
look
at
bringing
it
back
forward.
So
again.
E
H
R
Councilmember
McNeil
I'm
happy
to
answer
that
question
for
you.
We
did
do
as
much
research
as
we
could
in
the
short
amount
of
time
that
we
had.
We
started
with
the
city
of
Kirkland
resolution.
That
was
a
very
specific
request.
We
also
looked
at
what
Kenmore
had
drafted,
what
the
city
of
Bothell
had
drafted
and
also
the
city
of
Edmonds.
We
dove
into
those
a
little
bit
deeper
and
then
tried
to
just
look
across
the
region
at
what
the
resolutions
might
look
like.
Okay,.
H
R
Don't
know
that
I
could
give
you
probably
probably
at
least
four
hours
of
reading
through
their
resolutions
and,
to
be
honest,
it
is
a
difficult
topic
and
one
that
we're
not
experts
on.
So
it
took
a
little
bit
of
time
just
to
research
it
and
try
to
understand
the
verbiage
that
the
other
cities
had
in
their
resolutions
and
theirs
were
also
quite
different,
because
many
of
them
included
the
original
topic
of
marriage,
equality,
which
we
did
not
include
in
this
scope
of
the
resolution.
H
H
E
B
Absolutely
you
know
legal
and
safe
abortion
is
supported
by
roughly
70
percent
of
the
population,
depending
on
what
poll
that
you
give
and
the
Supreme
Court
took
away
protections
that
had
been
existing
for
just
about
an
entire
generation.
So
there's
a
whole
lot
of
people
in
Bothell
that
can
get
pregnant.
That
I
want
to
know
that
their
Council
supports
them,
making
their
own
decisions
without
somebody
else
being
involved
in
that
decision
in
terms
of
their
own
medical
history.
B
The
other
piece
to
it
that
is
actually
a
policy
piece
is
that
if
a
different
state
that
has
made
it
illegal
is
looking
to
punish
a
woman
to
find
and
punish
somebody
who's
had
an
abortion.
I
do
not
want
our
police
to
cooperate
with
that,
and
I
want
people
that
live
in
Bothell
to
know
that
if
they
have
friends,
family
and
dear
loved
ones,
from
a
different
state
who
have
elected
to
have
a
medical
procedure
where
it's
not
legal
that
if
they
come
and
visit
us,
they
don't
have
to
worry
about
our
Police
Department.
B
Q
Thank
you,
mayor,
I,
think
the
the
work
that
staff
has
done
clearly
lays
out
the
abortion
protections
that
exist
in
Washington
state
and
it
shows
that
they
are
long-standing.
You
know
up
upheld
over
over
Generations
now,
and
so
those
are,
if
I'm,
understanding,
councilmember
McNeil's
question
correctly.
Those
are
the
legal
protections
for
Washington
residents
and
what
this
resolution
does
like
the
mayor
said
it
provides
protection
from.
Q
With
this
resolution,
the
way
that
is
worded
I
appreciate
the
the
policy
that
stated
there
of
we're
not
going
to
be
helping
States,
prosecute
people
who
are
exercising
their
rights
to
make
choices
for
their
bodies
and,
and
so
with
that,
I
hope
that
that
offers
some
clarification
and
some
help
understanding
it.
Thank
you.
H
So
it
sounds
like
we
do
have
State
Protections
in
place
and
if
we
have
state
Protections
in
place,
would
this
if
another
state
reaches
in
and
we
don't
pass
this-
would
that
allow
them
I'm,
not
sure
I'm
understanding
how
this
would
protect
us
if
another
state
I
mean
the
protection's
already
there?
How
does
this
protect
us
further
I
mean?
Are
we
going
to
be
able
to
do
something
against
another
state.
G
If
it's,
if
there's
a
a
different
state,
that
brings
a
specific
action
towards
the
city
of
Bothell,
then
we
would
have
the
right
to
respond,
but
it's
difficult
for
me
to
kind
of
Envision
a
scenario
where
that
would
occur
in
terms
of
what
they
would
bring
against
the
city.
Bothell,
specifically,
okay,.
H
We
want
to
have
these
protections.
We
have
these
protections
currently
under
Washington
State
we're
a
local
jurisdiction.
Why
do
we
need
to
to
do
this?
Also
I?
Look
at
this,
as
are
we
supportive
of
these
things
and-
and
you
know
for
me
personally-
I
am
but
again,
I'm
hung
up
on
a
resolution
talking
about
something
which
I
support,
but
I
I
don't
know,
understand
the
legalities
behind
it.
H
F
F
F
If
you
look
at
the
science
of
embryology,
that
embryo
is
a
whole
human
being
it's
not
a
it's,
not
a
massive
specialized
tissue,
it's
just
in
a
state
of
maturation.
Some
of
us,
which
I
think
that
would
be
me
here
at
the
diocese,
has
reached
more
maturity
physically
than
everyone
else
here
at
the
diocese.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
My
problem
with
this
is
that
it
doesn't
represent
all
of
Bothell,
and
a
resolution
should
represent
all
of
everyone
who's
sitting
here
at
the
diocese.
If
it
does
not
represent
everyone
sitting
here
at
the
diocese
and
it
has
to
be
solved,
then
it
needs
to
go
to
the
people
and
they
decide,
because
it's
very
divisive
and
people
feel
passionately
about
it.
F
Or
does
it
also
signal?
We
don't
want
to
respect
state
rights.
Are
we
going
to
reach
far
enough
that
we're
going
to
tell
our
lobbyists
we
want
you
to
Lobby?
That
is,
there
is
a
national
ban
against
restricting
abortions
I.
Certainly
don't
want
to
be
on
that
page.
I,
don't
want
to
step
into
state
rights,
so
I
cannot
support.
This
I
appreciate
the
passion
and
concern
on
this
I
know
intimately
what
that
feels
like,
and
this
is
not
the
place
for
us
to
be
making
that
decision.
B
I
I
So
what
I
ultimately
came
to
the
conclusion
on
is
that
I
I
don't
agree
with
us
making
and
taking
a
position
on
behalf
of
our
residents
for
things
like
State,
constitutional
ballot
measures
and
initiatives,
and
anything
else
that
they're
already
represented
by
another
body
specifically
for
I.
Don't
think
it's
right
for
us
to
get
in
the
way
of
that
Direct
relationship
that
they
have
with
their
other
lawmaker.
That's
there
for
a
different
purpose.
I
I
We
have
the
same
ability
to
do
that
as
our
constituents
do
we
can
go,
we
can
testify,
we
can
hold
rallies,
we
can
go
to
public
hearings,
we
can
sit
with
our
legislators
or
call
legislators
or
write
our
legislators,
so
I'm
not
sure
why
we're
passing
a
formal
resolution
as
a
council
on
this.
When
again
it's
not
something
that
was
brought
forward
by
our
residents
and
is
not
related
to
any
City
business.
I
So
we've
already
reaffir
we've
our
firmed
and
we've
reaffirmed
our
commitment
to
a
safe,
welcome
and
Equitable
City
for
all
we're
just
doing
it
now
again
under
a
different
lens
and
under
a
different
topic,
but
it's
one
that
actually
doesn't
make
it
welcome
and
Equitable
for
all,
because
we're
telling
if,
depending
upon
which
statistic
you
use
a
portion
of
our
population,
that
has
a
different
opinion
or
a
different
View.
And
again.
This
is
a
it's
a
contentious
topic.
I
It's
a
personal
topic
for
many
people,
regardless
of
what
side
you're
on
we've
received
a
lot
of
public
comment
on
it,
both
now
and
before
of
differing
opinion.
We
have
a
pretty
diverse
opinion
up
here
ourselves,
so
I'm
not
seeing
why
we
would
move
forward
with
the
resolution
as
it's
written
today
or
why
would
we
even
come
forward
with
this
resolution?
I
I
I
think
the
last
thing
that
I
really
thought
about
was
we
haven't
done
any
community
outreach
on
a
topic.
That's
a
huge
deal
huge
deal.
We
haven't
asked
staff
to
do
it
for
us.
We
haven't
slowed
down
to
do
it
ourselves
or
directed.
We
do
it
ourselves,
but
we
haven't
done
the
work
we
haven't
done
the
work
we
want
to
pass
a
strong
statement
stronger
than
a
proclamation.
We
want
to
pass
a
resolution
on
something
we
haven't
even
solicited
feedback
on
publicly
I.
I
Don't
think
that's
right,
I,
don't
think
that's
right
at
all
for
us
to
do
that.
Council
member
zorns
mentioned
that
resolutions
are
intended
to
be
things,
we're
United
on
and
we're
clearly
not
United
on
this.
If
we're
to
pass
it
with
a
5-2
or
a
4-3
vote.
What
does
that
say
to
our
community
I?
Don't
think
it
says
what
the
original
intent
was
for
this
and
I.
Don't
think
it
would
be
helpful.
I
think
some
people
might
feel
good.
I
They
might
feel
supported,
maybe
not
if
it's
not
a
full
7-0
vote
on
it,
but
we
know
for
sure
we
would
be
alienating
some
in
our
community
that
feel
differently,
and
do
we
want
to
do
that.
Are
we
comfortable
doing
that?
I?
Do
not
feel
that
way.
Myself
I
think
we
all
have
to
ask
ourselves
that
I
think
it's
helpful,
helpful.
I
We
can't
debate
up
here
we're
not
like
the
other
groups
of
legislators,
but
we're
having
a
discussion.
You
know
good
discussion,
it's
not
heated.
It's
not
combative,
but
I
would
like
to
see
our
lawmakers
have
the
discussions
that
need
to
be
had
at
those
levels.
I
think
that
they
should,
because
again
it's
the
fundamental
way
that
our
Republic
works.
It's
how
we
operate
it's
the
rules
we've
agreed
upon.
So
for
all
of
these
reasons,
I
guess,
to
sum
it
up
is
I,
cannot
be
supportive
of
this
today.
I.
B
B
This
says
that
we
don't
want
to
be
involved
in
that
incredibly
personal
and
difficult
decision
and
furthermore,
we
don't
want
to
be
involved
in
punishing
somebody
that
made
a
decision
that
somebody
else
didn't
approve
of
everyone
in
Bothell
should
have
the
ability
to
make
this
decision
for
themselves
with
the
Council
of
anyone.
They
choose,
whether
that
be
their
doctor,
whether
that
be
their
pastor
and
regardless
of
people,
people's
varying
convictions.
B
People
say
this,
isn't
a
local
issue.
I,
don't
understand
that
because
I
consider
law
enforcement
to
be
a
pretty
core
local
issue,
that's
one
of
the
basic
things
that
we
do
and
because
other
government
bodies
have
decided
they
do
want
to
involve
themselves
in
this
personal
decision
and
have
criminalized
abortion.
If
we
do
this,
at
least
our
residents
can
know
that
our
department
here
in
Bothell,
if
they
have
friends
and
family
that
have
had
to
do
this
in
a
state
where
it's
illegal,
they'll
be
safe
here
and
I-
think
that's
an
incredibly
local
issue.
B
B
Imposing
religious
beliefs
through
legislation
is
something
that
Jesus
was
entirely
uninterested
in
in
his
time.
In
his
mission
here
on
Earth
when
challenged
Jesus
said,
my
kingdom
is
not
of
this
world
on
that
particular
issue.
So
you
see
it
actually
a
diversity
of
belief
among
Faith
communities
on
this
issue
and
I
don't
want
to
let
any
particular
religious
sect
claim
that
position.
There
is
a
diversity
of
beliefs
that
I
think
are
really
important
and
no
one
of
them
gets
to
own
the
Christian
Perspective.
B
Burned
for
the
crime
of
denying
Christian
doctrine,
including
infant
baptism
at
a
civil
beliefs,
was
wrong
then
and
I
think
it's
wrong.
Now
people
are
complicated,
I've
read,
Calvin's
Institutes
I
own
Calvin's
commentary
set
it's
a
full
set,
except
for
the
Book
of
Revelation
that
he
didn't
wrote,
because
even
John
Calvin
was
like
I,
don't
know
what
to
do
with
that.
B
Q
I
think
you
mayor
for
your
words
and
I
I
feel
like
I,
would
I
would
be
remiss
to
to
also
appreciate
the
going
back
to
you
know
the
story
of
John,
Calvin
and
I
also
just
want
to
add
that
my
family
was
very
like
this
is
my
family
history,
but
500
years
ago
in
France,
my
family
was
chased
out
of
France
with
John
Calvin
and
they've
sought
refuge
in
Geneva
and
back
in
France.
My
my
you
know.
What
are
we
talking?
Q
20Th
great
grandfather
was
burned
an
effigy
at
the
stake
for
his
religious
beliefs,
because
because
government
involved
and
religious
matters
and
appreciate
that
we
can,
we
can
make
a
statement
here
tonight
and
say
that
government
respects
people's
freedom
without
letting
religion
dictate
what
the
government
is
doing
so,
especially
a
you
know,
a
marginal
belief
from
a
a
small
cross-section
of
of
the
diversity
of
religious
thought
that
exists
in
the
world.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
it.
You
know
it's
not
often
that
I
get
to
reflect
on
my
family
history.
F
B
H
City
clerk,
I'm,
sorry,
Mr,
Mayor
I
would
like
to
speak
to
them
in
the
motion,
so
several
several
things
have
been
brought
up.
I
want
to
thank
everybody
for
their
for
their
words.
There
was
a
lot
of
different
things
that
were
brought
up,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
as
a
as
a
body
as
a
council,
whichever
direction
we
decide
to
go
tonight,
I
think
everybody's,
very,
very
passionate
about
this,
and
so
I
think
for
me,
while
I'm
going
to
be
supportive
of
tabling
this
indefinitely.
C
To
the
amending
motion,
please
say
yes
or
no
and
I
call
your
name:
council
members
orange,
yes,
Peter,
Thompson,
no
councilmember,
all
Dirks,
no
councilmember
McNeil,
yes,
councilmember
Mankey,
yes,
councilmember
Dodd,
no
Deputy,
mayoral
Cobra!
No,
it
fails
four
to
three
with
council
members,
Thompson
mayor
Thompson,
councilmember,
Alders,
councilmember,
Dodd
and
Deputy
mayoral
cover
in
the
negative.
B
G
B
H
Thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you
for
the
clarification,
so
I
will
be
abstaining
from
this
vote.
I
am
in
support
of
ensuring
that
we
we
listen
to
everybody
and
we're
a
welcoming
Community.
As
a
council
member
Mankey
has
brought
up.
We
have
done.
We've
done
this
in
the
past.
We
have
state
laws
that
are
in
place
and
I
think
that
it's
once
again,
I
think
it's.
What
comes
to
mind.
Is
it's
not
that
I'm,
not
supportive
of
this?
H
B
E
You
mayor,
we
do
have
one
study
session
on
the
agenda
tonight.
It
is
consideration
of
the
bike.
Plan
is
laid
out
in
your
agenda
bill
this
evening.
There
there's
quite
a
history
in
terms
of
efforts
related
to
the
bike
plan
and
well,
there's
there's
references
back
to
2015
and
17.
the
last
time.
This
was
at
Council,
there's
actually
two
briefings
for
Council,
one
back
in
February
of
2021
and
then
again
the
most
recent
one
on
April
12
2022
to
talk
through
the
bike
plan.
E
There's
been
a
public
open
house
in
May,
there's
been
work
being
done
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
then
tonight
is
the
opportunity
to
be
re-engaging
with
this
with
the
city
council.
The
anticipated
Next
Step
would
be
a
public
Hearing
in
February.
Okay
joining
us
tonight
are
Steve
murakawa.
The
capital
division
manager
in
public
works,
as
well
as
our
presenter
Sherman
goon,
who
is
the
transportation
planner
also
in
public
works,
and
with
that
I
will
turn
things
over
to
Sherman.
U
H
U
That's
okay,
all
right,
so
the
goal
of
this
bike
plan
is
to
develop
a
system
for
many,
if
not
all,
users
through
the
public
input
process.
The
result
of
the
plan
is
essentially
a
protected
bike.
Lane
Network
We
Begin
Council
review
of
this
plan
with
tonight's
study
session
to
cover
the
plant
highlights
and
the
recommended
comprehensive
plan
amendments
to
adopt
the
plan.
U
Tonight's
meeting
will
be
followed
by
public
hearing
on
February
21st
to
discuss
the
plan
a
little
further
and
see
if
there's
any
other
additional
comments
and
then,
since
the
plan
cannot
be
officially
adopted
until
the
comp
plan
amendments
have
been
approved,
a
public
Hearing
in
March
or
April
will
be
scheduled
to
approve
the
2022
comprehensive
plan
amendments
and
the
bike
plan
will
be
adopted
via
resolution.
Following
that.
U
The
public
input
was
followed
by
Planning
Commission
review
from
June
to
November,
with
our
final
meeting
to
discuss,
findings,
recommendations
and
conclusions
on
December
7th,
the
public
input
and
Planet
commission
recommendations
resulted
in
an
ultimate
vision
for
the
bike
plan
that
consists
mainly
of
the
protected
bike
facilities
and
finally,
a
secret
determination
of
non-significance
was
just
issued.
January
6
this
month
with
a
21
day,
comment
period
that
will
end
on
January
21st,
27th.
U
The
other
two
goals
relate
to
bike
use
in
the
city
are
ghosts.
G6
and
G8.
Gold
G6
says,
create
a
transportation
system
that
supports
both
fiscal
and
environmental
sustainability
and
G8
States
prioritize
Transportation
Investments
to
support
the
development
of
the
Canyon
Park
regional
growth
and
Community
Activity
Center,
the
downtown
community,
Activity
Center,
the
North
Creek
Regional
activity
center,
and
also
other
community
and
local
neighborhood
activity.
Centers.
U
So,
just
let's
summarize
the
vision
that
we
developed
in
that
process.
There
are
no
on-street
bike
facilities
that
will
be
proposed
any
longer.
The
ones
we
have
will
remain,
of
course,
that
are
already
on
the
network
until
a
time
when
we
can
be
updated
to
protected
facilities
will
allow
for
neighborhood
Greenways,
which
is
essentially
the
use
of
cheryls
for
neighborhood
directional
process
and
we'll
get
into
that
a
little
bit
more
later.
U
U
U
Recreation
access
to
is
access
to
Trails
or
parks.
Connectivity
is
access
to
adjacent
jurisdiction
facilities
or
our
bike,
our
bikes
by
Network,
which
is
basically
going
to
be
the
Buffalo
Highway
connection
to
up
to
Thrasher's
Corner
via
9th
Avenue
and
then
safety.
Does
the
project
make
a
route
safer
than
it
is.
U
U
They
are
always
directional
and
maybe
a
six
and
a
half
foot
bike
with
with
a
five
foot,
sidewalk
adjacent
to
it.
At
the
same
level,
sidewalk
level
they're
easier
to
assign
to
developers
as
half
Street
improvements
and
they're
less
visible
than
the
bike
Lanes
on
Street
at
intersections
and
driveways,
because
they're
a
little
set
back
from
the
street
as
a
protected
facility.
U
The
next
type
is
the
shared
use
paths
they
are
separated,
but
could
be
adjacent
to
traffic
shared
by
bikes
and
pedestrians
and
they're
bi-directional
12
feet
cross
sections
they're
difficult
to
assign
to
developers
because
they're
going
to
be
on
one
side
of
the
street
or
the
other,
so
it
can't
keep
shifting
them
back
and
forth.
So
it
makes
it
a
little
tougher
to
assign
that
kind
of
a
Improvement
as
a
frontage,
Improvement.
U
And
then,
finally,
we
have
our
neighborhood
Greenways.
This
is
where
bikes
share
the
roadway
with
traffic
and
may
take
the
lane
take
the
road.
It's
the
use
of
Cheryl
pavement
markings,
they're
used
on
low
traffic
volume
and
low
speed
roadways
like
25
miles
per
hour
or
less,
and
their
excellent
wayfinding
tool
through
the
neighborhoods
connect
to
other
other
bigger
routes,
other
more
important
routes.
U
So
that's
kind
of
the
plan
right
now.
What
the
plan
you
have.
There
were
a
few
minor
plan
edits
that
we
are
working
on
in
the
planet,
didn't
make
it
to
your
copy,
they're,
primarily
related
to
the
maps
and
Graphics.
So
I
just
want
to
kind
of
go
over.
Those
real
quick
map,
number
four,
which
shows
the
ultimate
Vision
Network
we'll
include
the
the
extension
of
the
protected
bike,
Lanes
on
240th
Street
corridor
from
Meridian
Avenue
to
the
West
city
limit,
which
kind
of
attaches
to
Shelton
Shelton,
View,
Elementary,.
U
We
are
updating
the
parks
and
trails
facilities,
mapping
that
was
included
on
on
several
of
the
several
of
the
maps
by
our
GIS
division.
They
have
a
more
up-to-date
map
that
just
didn't
get
included
when
the
consultant
prepared
them
and
we're
just
going
to
update
the
bike
plan,
map,
titles
and
footnotes
to
be
consistent,
they're
all
kind
of
say
they
kind
of
say
some
different
things.
They
say
the
same
thing
but
they're
different,
all
right.
Moving
on
to
the
comp
plan
amendments,
this
is
the
second
part.
U
I
would
like
to
discuss
these
comp
plan
amendments
and
the
recommendations
that
were
identified
by
the
Planning
Commission
review,
our
city,
legal
department
and
and
staff.
So
Planning
Commission
recommends
that
Council
adopt
and
the
comprehensive
plan
amendments.
This
will
allow
for
the
adoption
of
the
Citywide
bike
plan
by
action.
U
Other
amendments
identified
included
ensuring
that
maintenance
of
bike
facilities
are
accounted
for
in
the
future
operating
budgets,
advocating
for
good
bike
connections
and
to
improve
the
ease
and
access
of
onboarding
to
transit,
buses
and
finally,
to
require,
rather
than
require,
rather
than
encourage
employers
and
businesses
to
provide
convenient
bike.
Storage.
U
U
So
our
next
steps
to
prepare
for
a
public
hearing
on
February
21st
for
Council
to
give
it
a
head
nod
or
let
us
know
if
there's
any
other
revisions
to
come,
we'll
be,
will
happen.
Then
at
then,
and
barring
any
other
significant
revisions
to
the
plan
or
the
amendments,
then
we
will
hold
another
public
Hearing
in
March
or
April
to
actually
adopt
the
comprehensive
plan
amendments
to
approve
and
adopt
the
bike
plan
by
action
through
the
resolution.
P
The
Planning
Commission
commission,
six
cyclists,
including
myself
and
there's
at
least
four
of
us
on
Council,
and
we
all
had
a
lot
of
thoughts
and
feelings
about
the
bike
plan.
So
the
the
good
communication
and
just
helping
us
answer
all
our
questions.
I
I,
cannot
overstate
how
great
it
was
so
I
really
appreciate
it.
I'm
list
being
listed
twice
in
acknowledgments,
I've
had
my
say,
but
I
just
wanted
to
say.
Thank
you.
F
I
just
have
to
add
my
thank
yous
for
this,
both
to
Planning
Commission
and
staff
that
put
on
a
lot
of
hours
on
this
and
I.
Think
you
said
words
that
just
resonated
with
all
of
Council
of
eligible
for
grant
funding
just
resonated
with
all
of
us
and
I
also
appreciated
you,
noting
that
this
plan
will
have
flexibility
so
that
if
we
things
come
down,
the
pipeline,
we
need
to
make
changes,
am
I
understanding
you
correctly.
We
can
make
that.
So.
Thank
you
for
doing
this.
F
H
H
U
Where
those
you
know
where
those
those
those
connections
are
in
the
neighborhoods
that
only
you
know
the
little
kid
can
drive,
ride
his
bike
and
knows
what
the
best
way
and
safest
way
that
is
and
improve
those
kind
of
connections,
but
that
that
process
we
haven't
gotten
to
at
this
level.
This
is
a
more
city-wide
infrastructure.
U
H
Appreciate
that,
and
and
thank
you
for
your
proactive
approach
on
that
I
think
it's
important
as
we
go
throughout
the
community.
We
can
see
where
we
have
development,
that's
done
their
share
on
their
side
and
then
there's
not
further
development
beyond
their
development
and
we
are
fractured
in
some
of
those
spaces,
so
I
think
as
a
living
document,
as
you
I
think
alluded
to.
We
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
looking
at
holistically,
because
one
thing
that
I
was
drawn
to
was
the
the
document
that
was
left
for
us
up
here
on
Council.
H
That
I
focused
keyed
in
on
was
the
the
serious
injuries
and
the
injuries
in
general,
and
so,
if,
as
we
look
at
these
plans-
and
we
talk
about
improving
and
doing
bike
plans
and
things
like
that,
for
me,
what
resonates
is
is
those
safe
routes
for
kids,
because
if
we
get
them
in
a
a
place
where
they
think
they're
safe
and
then
they
turn
into
a
place.
That's
not
so
safe.
H
That's
what
that's
what's
concerning
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
reach
out
to
the
community,
understand
how
the
community
is
going
to
use
these
bike
Lanes,
how
they're
going
to
access
Transit
if
they're
going
to
use
them
and
what
that
actual
bike
ridership
is
and
what
it
could
be
in
the
future.
So,
but
thank
you
both
I'm,
looking
forward
to
continuing
the
conversation
and
continuing
to
work
on
this
living
document.
U
Thank
you,
I
just
I'll
just
add
response
a
little
bit.
You
know
the
safety
considerations
for
bikes
that
are
always
going
to
be
at
specific,
pretty
much
at
the
intersections
where
you're,
where
you're
exposed.
So
you
know
it's
going
to
be
very
important
that
we
don't.
We
don't
have
a
specific
way
of
how
we
are
going
to
address
those
treatments,
we're
following
the
guidelines
that
the
nacto
specify,
but
they
you
know
each
case,
we're
going
to
work
on
those
Case
by
case.
So
you
know
that
is.
That
is
one
that
is
one.
U
Q
Q
It's
just
really
helpful
to
see
it
all
laid
out
based
on
you
know,
here's
the
highest
scoring.
This
is
what
we
can
prioritize
first
and
to
see
the
different
tiers,
and
it
also
kind
of
gives
us
an
idea
of
of
phases
of
development
that
we
might
be
able
to
work
on
and
and
I
and
at
the
same
time,
I
know
that
that
doesn't
necessarily
say
how
long
it
will
take
any
one
face
for
us
to
do
any
one
phase
or
all
of
them
together.
Q
Q
U
All
right,
let
me
start
that
and
then
I'm
probably
going
to
let
Steve
answer
that
you
know
we're
going
to
incorporate
this
as
fast
as
resources
become
secure
for
projects.
We
already
have
projects
that
are
that
have
this
under
design
that
have
this
protected
bike
Lanes
under
design,
our
Bothell
Way
project
from
downtown
to
up
to
240th
has
protected
bike
Lanes
under
design.
So
again
it's
already
in
the
in
the
works.
U
We
have
a
project
on
228th,
which
is
actually
we're
sharing
with
Snohomish
County
from
35th
to
39th.
That's
also
has
protected
bike
Lanes
in
the
mix
and
I
think
you
know
it's
just
a
matter
of
again
when
and
as
soon
as
the
funding
comes
and
how
how
much
we
want
to
incorporate
that
so
I'll.
Let
Steve
answer.
V
I
think
the
way
we're
looking
at
this
is
we
want
you
folks.
We
want
the
city
to
put
the
vision
there
and,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
the
vision,
it's
the
environment
and
transportation
is
changing
quite
rapidly.
If
this
happened
about
10
years
ago,
I'd
say
it
was
a
long
shot
to
get
this
done,
and
it's
still
going
to
take
a
lot
of
time.
But
that's
why
there's
a
priority
list?
V
The
things
are
changing
we're
going
to
do
our
comprehensive
Plan
update,
starting
now
through
2024.
Currently
we
have
transportation
impact
fees
that
can
only
be
used
for
vehicle
capacity
projects,
but
we
hope
to
be
multimodal.
So
we
can
do
pedestrian
bike
Transit
vehicle
projects,
so
that
will
help
we're
seeing
grants
that
there's
more
money
in
The
Pedestrian
and
the
bike
pot
now
they're,
not
necessarily
larger
and
I,
think
this
is
part
of
their
transition.
V
V
So
we
think
there's
going
to
be
more
and
more
opportunities,
which
means
we
can
do
this
quicker
and
quicker,
but
it
will
take
a
Time
the
long
time
I
mean
we
look
at
our
pedestrian
and
our
sidewalk.
We
have
a
lot
of
gaps
in
our
sidewalk
and
it's
a
huge
amount
of
money,
but
I
think
more
money
is
coming
in.
V
So
I
think
what
the
council
should
do
is
look
toward
the
comp
plan,
because
that's
going
to
set
the
20-year
goal
and
that's
just
a
year
from
now
another
year
or
so
down
the
road,
there
will
probably
be
other
opportunities
for
funding.
So
hopefully
we
start
gaining
momentum.
So
I
think
that
question
is
a
great
question
and
I
have
I.
I
would
say
it
would
take
decades
to
do
the
whole
thing,
but
to
make
a
substantial
difference,
I
don't
think
you
have
to
do
the
whole
thing.
U
Mikey
Steve
and
I
council
member
man,
oh
I,
just
finished
with
a
little
yeah,
a
little
thought
that
you
know
when
I
first
came
to
the
city.
I
worked
for
a
consultant
that
had
a
vision
for
the
downtown
and
the
vision
of
the
streets
that
were
how
they
were
aligned
down
here
in
downtown.
At
this
main
intersection-
and
you
know
it's
only
been
15
years
but
wow
it's.
That
was
a
vision
that
somebody
started.
It
was
like
a
you
know.
U
I
U
I
U
V
Starting
the
civil
engineer
side,
so
there's
a
couple
other
things
from
a
construction
point
of
view.
It's
slightly
easier
and
cheaper
from
a
drainage
point
of
view.
If
we
have
different
levels
and
you
have
one
like
the
bike,
Lanes
lower
than
the
other
drainage
becomes
quite
challenging,
you
gotta
understand
that
we
have
driveways
to
cross
and
if
you
have
start
dropping
things
like
that,
you
have
to
transition,
and
then
you
have
to
transition
per
code,
so
it
becomes
quite
complicated
as
well.
V
This
is
what
we
think
will
work.
Good,
I
think
the
other
thing
is
we're,
calling
it
bike
and
we're
calling
it
sidewalk,
but
it's
one
slab
of
asphalt
and
concrete,
so
people
could
cross
over
a
little
bit
now.
You
know
like
if
you're
riding
a
bike
you
could,
if
it's
clear,
past
somebody,
we
don't
want
to
encourage
it
because
safety
wise,
but
it's
also
flexible
that
way,
and
then
it's
very
interesting
because
the
other
side
is
because
they're
level
we
have
to
start
thinking,
ADA
requirements.
V
V
I
V
Think
it's
the
combination
of
things
and
I
will
say
one
more
thing.
We
had
a
very
interesting
conversation
on
education
and
I.
Think
that's
going
to
be
a
large
component
as
well,
and
it's
not
going
to
be
just
educating
bikes.
It's
going
to
be
educating
the
pedestrians
and
the
vehicles
and
the
people
coming
in
and
out
of
driveways.
So
we
think
that's
going
to
be
a
big
component
of
the
program.
I
Makes
sense
in
terms
of
a
large
business
park,
that's
private,
like
the
Canyon,
Park,
Business,
Park
I
know
that
this
applies
to
you,
know
city,
streets
and
sidewalks.
Does
it
apply
to
an
area
like
that
which
would
be
very
useful
to
have,
but
knowing
that
we
don't
own
the
right-of-way
in
there?
How
do
we
negotiate
that
as
a
city
and
what's
our
what's
our
current
process?
For
that.
V
So
Canyon
Park,
Sherman
and
I
worked
on
this
and
that
actually
preceded
the
bike
plan
which
made
it
very
interesting
but
North
Creek
Trail
goes
through
that,
so
our
intent
was
at
least
to
take
care
of
connecting
to
North
Creek
Trail.
So
if
you
can
imagine
220th,
which
goes
east
west,
that's
one
of
the
primary
entrances
into
the
Business
Park
from
both
arbit
Highway
and
it
wraps
around
and
turns
into
26th
29th
yeah,
okay,
so
that
220th,
the
way
we
have
it
laid
out
is
on
the
north
side
of
that
private
road.
V
When
washdot
builds
the
17th
Avenue
on-ramp
they're,
going
to
build
a
cycle
track
on
one
side
and
on
the
220th
vert
portion
between
17th
and
bothered
Highway
that
short
stretch
they're
going
to
build
the
west
side
of
that
shared
use
path,
So.
Eventually,
as
things
occur,
you
should
see
a
shared
use
path
in
the
north
side
of
220th,
from
both
River
Highway,
all
the
way
to
26th
and
29th,
and
we
actually
proposing
potentially
a
road
diet
for
26
29
to
get
some
sort
of
bike
facility
on
that
section.
I
That's
that's
great
in
terms
of
the
packet
itself
on
page
149
of
the
packet
on
page
23
of
the
actual
bike
plan,
but
149
of
the
packet
I
was
curious.
What
percentage
of
the
plan
is
like
rebuild
or
upgrade
of
current
facilities
versus
brand
new
facilities?
I
know
you
mentioned
part
of
it
would
be
upgrade
current,
but
I
was
I,
couldn't
tell
from
the
packet
what
the
percentage
of
approximate
percentage
might
be.
U
I
To
be
honest,
not
not
a
problem
at
all,
we
can
always
if
we
want
to
take
it
offline
and
get
back
up
later
on.
Okay.
My
last
question
is
just
around
one
of
the
one
of
the
proposed
paths:
there's
one
that
goes
up
and
over
Norway
Hill,
which
is
I,
think
that'd
be
if
you're
a
bicyclist,
probably
pretty
fun,
to
go
up
and
over.
If
there
was
a
new,
you
know
a
new
Trail
there
that
was
protected
I.
I
Imagine
it's
going
to
cost
a
lot
of
money,
given
the
treacherous
road
there
and
the
hillsides
and
the
Steep
declines,
but
I
did
not
see
one
going
from
that
road
down
to
East
Riverside
as
a
connection.
So
I
was
wondering.
Why
was
that
one
not
on
the
map
going
down
to
East
Riverside,
since
it's
a
main
connection
right
into
the
Heart
of
the
City.
V
So
that
that
is
a
very
interesting
road,
so
it's
a
local
Road,
it's
not
an
arterial,
it's
not
a
collector!
It's
on
a
hillside.
That
is
a
pretty
interesting
Hillside.
It
would
take
substantial
amount
of
money
to
rebuild
that
roadway
into
any
type
of
standard.
That
would
be
acceptable,
so
that's
kind
of
that
hanging
out
their
Road
Local
road
that
we're
not
sure
in
the
long
run.
What
we're
going
to
do
with.
V
We
recently
used
some
of
our
Paving
funds
to
fix.
We
called
it
patching,
but
you
could
see
their
patches
that
are
150
feet
long
and
you
know
to
kind
of
rebuild
sections
of
the
road,
but
frankly
we're
in
a
quandary
with
that
one
and
we
think
in
a
future.
At
some
point,
our
Paving
program
will
have
to
talk
about
that
road
and
what
the
future
for
that
road
is.
V
I
That
different
than
than
going
up
Norway
because
Norway
seems
to
be
the
same.
It's
very
windy,
it's
very
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
as
Landslide
prone
as
the
other
road
is,
but
it
having
driven
up
there.
It's
pretty
you
know
it's
gonna
be
pothole,
because
the
water
just
running
down
the
road,
there's
not
a
lot
of
drainage,
and
it
seems
like
a
tough
one
to
cut
out
the
side
to
create
a
protected,
Lane
hi.
U
Kind
of
made
me
think
about
what
your
first
earlier
question
about:
rebuild
versus
brand
new
I,
think
you
know,
since
we
have
no
protected
facilities,
everything
we
do
is
going
to
be
a
rebuild
right.
So
every
facility
we
don't
have
any,
we
we
will.
We
will
build
sections
that
will
connect
to
existing
facilities
and
then
ultimate
those
existing
facilities
will
get
rebuilt
again.
U
So
we're
talking
about
100
percent
rebuilt
right
for
Norway
Hill
from
my
knowledge
of
Norway
Hill,
there's
at
least
there's
going
to
be
opportunity
because
it's
not
just
a
cliff
on
one
side
and
then
a
share.
You
know
and
then
wall
on
the
other
side,
where
you
have
to
cut
in
and
again
create
space
to
add
a
bike
facilities
where
Norway
Hill
there's
you
know,
there's
going
to
be
challenging
spots,
but
not
like
the
whole
Court
the
whole
way
down
112..
U
So
our
our
vision
on
that
is,
you
know,
and
you
know,
and
every
every
project
we'll
look
at
it
individually
and
how
the
best
to
what
best
facility.
You
know
how
we
can
get
that
facility
on
there.
But
you
know
just
my
experience,
driving
along
through
Norway
Hill
and
up
and
down
104th
105th
all
the
way
down.
It's
there's
at
least
room
in
the
right-of-way
or
close
to
the
roadway,
where
you
can
expand
to
to
build
a
facility
without
having
to
create
a
wall
or
or
you
know,
build
out.
Basically,
you
know
you
got.
U
I
Recognize
too,
that
that's
I
think
it's
number
50
something
on
the
plan
if
I
remember
right,
so
it's
many
many
years
out,
but
right
final
thought.
I,
just
I
appreciate
that
we're
building
for
all
experiences,
all
levels
of
use,
beginner
to
expert
I-
think
that's
really
helpful
to
do.
It
encourages
more
people
to
get
out
on
the
trails
and
feel
comfortable,
feel
protected
and
feel
safe
and
I
know
having
an
unprotected
bike.
Lane
I
wouldn't
ride
in
it,
and
I
wouldn't
take
my
kids
in
it,
which
is,
which
is
what
we
got
it's.
I
O
Come
here,
thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you,
chairman
Steve.
This
is
great
as
a
non-bicyclist
I
think
I'm
in
the
minority
I'm
looking
forward
to
something
like
this,
like
council
member
Menke,
said
like
when
I
grew
up
when
I
grew
up,
I
like
I
biked,
all
everywhere
extremely
dangerous
I
bought
my
parents
I,
don't
know
why
they,
let
me
do
it
I,
but
I,
don't
let
it
happen
to
my
son
and
we
the
the
elementary
school,
like
it's
literally
two
minute
drive
by
car,
but
I.
O
O
So
I'm
really
looking
forward
to
to
having
this,
and
that's
where
the
time,
hopefully,
when
we
have
the
public
hearings
and
all
the
well
the
timelines
and
maybe
funding
sources
will
be
more
clearer,
even
if
at
a
high
level,
so
that
we'll
have
really
good
conversation
around
this.
The
question
I
have
about
prioritization.
Why
is
safety
at
the
bottom
of
the
list
amount
of
points
I.
U
U
Are
our
our
thought
process
was
from
who
are
we
serving
with
this
facility?
We're
building?
You
know
we're
building
this
bike,
these
bike
facilities
and
who
you
know
who
this?
Who
in
the
city
are
we
trying
to
serve
and
what
do
we
what's?
The
purpose
of
them
is
kind
of
how
we
kind
of
started
out
with
Equity.
U
O
O
The
getting
into
requirements
for
developers
so
we're
adding
yet
another
requirement
for
developers
which
means
that
impacts
development
costs,
which
means
it
impacts
the
prices
for
the
actual
consumers,
buyers
or
renters.
Can
we
do
something
about
limiting
those
costs
that
that
the
developer
will
incur
and
I
know,
councilman
McKinney
will
hate
me
for
this
question,
but
pardon
my
my
ignorance
here
in
this
one.
Well.
U
These
facilities
are
not
they're,
not
going
to
be
any
more
from
a
cost
standpoint,
necessarily
because
developers
already
have
to
do
Frontage
improvements,
we're
not
the
design
would
be
if,
if,
if
a
roadway
was
required
to
put
in
a
bike
lane,
they
would
still
need
to
provide
five
feet
in
the
street
of
bike
lane.
Instead
we're
basically
asking
them
to
move
the
curb
out
and
then
add
the
five
feet
behind
behind
the
landscape,
so
they're,
not
six
and
a
half
so
well.
U
Okay,
get
technical
student
foot
and
a
half
to
what
is
kind
of
required
now,
but
essentially
they
still
have
to
make
that
Frontage
Improvement
and
that's
where
they
put
the
bike
lane
instead
of
in
the
street
instead
is
now
next
to
sidewalk.
It's
essentially
the
gonna
be
the
same
cost
for
that
for
the
developers.
In
my
opinion,.
V
I'll
I'll
give
you
more
history
when
we
started
looking
at
it.
Our
first
go
around
was
using
nacto
design
standards,
so
the
various
streets
per
the
national
guideline
had
different
types
of
facilities,
many
of
which
were
on
the
roadway.
So
some
of
the
roadways
were
like
Beardsley
Boulevard
is
example.
Currently,
as
a
five
foot,
Pike
Lane,
the
nacto
would
say
five
foot
bike
lane
with
a
two
to
three
foot
buffer.
V
So
if
a
developer
were
to
have
to
build
that,
they'd
have
to
put
eight
foot
of
pavement
carbon
gutter
planter
sidewalk
with
a
protected
bike
facility.
There's
no
more
pavement.
There's
five
foot
planter
six
and
a
half
foot
on
the
curb
asphalt
and
a
five
foot
sidewalk.
So
you
know
there
may
be
incremental
costs.
I
mean
putting
asphalt
behind
a
curb
is
probably
more
expensive
than
on
the
road,
but
it's
thinner.
So
you
can
go
back
and
forth.
So
we
think
it's.
V
V
So
if
that
was
the
facility
we're
going
to
have
there
which
it's
not
by
the
way,
it
would
be
protected
because
it's
so
crowded
that
you
know
we're
gonna
have
to
do
all
that
or
developers
are
going
to
have
to
redo
that
or
combination
of
both.
So
it
will
be
more
money,
I
think
but
I.
We
think
in
the
long
run
it's
probably
an
incremental
increase.
It's
not
a
substantial
yeah
yeah
good.
O
Point
speaking
of
that
last
point,
when
you
go
into
Crowder
streets
and
over
the
decades
and
like
a
century
for
a
bottle,
we
we've
developed
streets
without
looking
into
without
thinking
about
anything
but
cars.
But
now
that
we're
going
to
be
exp,
maybe
if,
if
I
don't
know,
are
we
going
to
assume
the
same
amount
of
Lane
same
amount
of
I
guess
capacity
that
we
have
today
for
Cars
Plus,
additional
bike,
lane
bike
Lanes
or
this
for
this
project?
U
Like
we
kind
of
try
to
explain
is:
is
that
you're
not
taking
more
right
away,
necessarily
except
like
like
she
was
mentioning
that
extra
foot
and
a
half,
because
it's
not
a
five
foot
bike
lane
it's
a
six
and
a
half
foot
bike
facility,
but
for
for
roadway
projects
in
this
city?
There's
not
really
there's
only
a
few
more
streets
honestly
that
we're
going
to
be
adding
capacity
to
where
we're
building
roadway,
adding
Lanes,
not
very
many
more
opportunities
like
that
and
not
needed
really.
U
You
know
I
mean
you
can
keep
building
and
building,
but
you
can't
build
your
way
out
of
congestion,
so
you're
preaching
to
the
choir,
you
know.
Ultimately,
we
don't
need
to
I
think
the
plan,
since
it
doesn't
require
necessarily
a
lot
more
right
of
way.
Maybe
like
Steve
did
just
a
you
know
that
little
increment
left
is
is
not
going
to
be
something
that
we
have
to.
That
is
going
to
be
more
require
more.
You
know,
costs
basically
to
build
for
us.
V
V
If
you
have
a
perfectly
straight
road,
you
could
probably
have
a
fairly
Narrow
Lane,
even
with
Freight
there,
but
once
you
start
at
speeds
trying
to
learn
you
you
got
to
give
them
room,
I
mean
you
don't
want
to
be
in
an
11
foot
Lane
with
a
bus,
that's
10
and
a
half
feet
wide,
going
around
a
steep
curve,
yeah
I
think
as
Vehicles
evolve
and
as
the
trend
goes
toward
more
toward
alternative
means,
or
we
can
look
at
that
more
I.
Think
already.
V
The
city
is
trying
to
reduce
the
size
of
Lanes
on
both
or
Everett
Highway,
we're
trying
to
get
it
down
to
11
and
we're
working
with
Transit,
because
transit's
the
one
who's,
mainly
driving
that
width
and
they're
coming
around,
which
is
a
good
thing,
but
we
also
have
to
think
about
Freight.
We
still
have
large
Safeway
trucks,
I'm,
not
picking
on
Safeway,
but
trucks
coming
down
and
they're
ten
and
a
half
feet
wide,
and
if
you
put
a
10
and
a
half
foot
Lane
there
during
rush
hour,
that's
not
a
good
thing.
O
V
V
But
let's
say
the
road
is
busy
again
it's
very
hard
because
now
they're
all
protected,
so
the
road
can
be
busy.
But
let's
say
the
road
is
busy
and
there's
an
intersection
and
we
have
to
slow
people
down.
So
maybe
that
is
a
road
that's
primed
for
traffic
calming
of
some
sort.
So
maybe
we
have
to
address
not
just
the
bike
facility
but
slowing
cards,
cars
down
in
vehicle
safety
as
well.
So
there's
something
in
the
design
standards
that
say
we're
going
to
try
to
look
at
it
holistically.
So.
O
V
V
Else's
problem,
you
you,
the
plan
is
more
like
a
vision
and
an
intent.
We
still
have
to
fund
the
projects.
We
still
have
to
that's
what
I'm
saying
we
still
go
to
the
council
and
say:
do
you
want
to?
Is
this
in
the
city's
best
interests
to
purchase
this
land
to
get
this
facility
for
the
greater
good
of
the
city?
So
that's
still
a
process.
We
will
have
to
go
through.
Okay,.
B
You
know
I
like
to
think
that
I
like
to
try
to
be
predictable,
like
so
people
know
what
they
get,
but
I
have
no
comments
or
questions
on
the
bike
plan.
It's
great
I
appreciate
it
I
appreciate
the
questions
that
everybody
else
has
brought
up
so
far,
and
just
the
discussion
that
we've
had
around
this
but
I'm
super
pumped
to
go.
Ask
people
for
money
for
stuff,
like
I'm,
just
really
excited
to
see
what
what
we
can
do
with
this
and
seeing
this
plan
come
to
fruition.
B
B
U
Fact
even
Kenmore
has
they.
If
you
drive
up
68
going
up,
wait,
Juanita
I
guess
wanted
to
drive.
They
just
created
a
facility
there
that
has
narrowed
the
lanes
to
ten
and
a
half
feet
and
Metro
rides
their
buses
and
they
bought
into
that
so
surprisingly,
but
they
they
got
done
and
it's
curbed
on
both
sides
of
that
lane.
Going
going
that
way
on
that
section
of
we
need
to
drive
and
wanting
to
drive,
and
so,
like
Steve
said
it's
going
trending,
it's
trending.
U
B
B
F
Have
a
couple
things:
one
book
council,
member,
aldricks
and
I
had
the
lucky
chance
of
crossing
paths
with
Austin
pacinich
who
I
mentioned
I.
Don't
know
this
fall
sometime
on
his
save
our
salmon
murals.
That
he's
got
going
around
and
there's
some
projects
that
he's
working
on
that
most
likely
will
be
more
independent
of
the
city
working
with
the
campus,
but
it'll
be
a
chance
for
us
to
get
in
there
and
do
some
painting
or
fun
painting
ourselves
so
stay
tuned
and
then
in
2020.
What's
that
on
this
wall?
F
F
Out
of
curiosity,
I
went
and
went
to
look
at
I
loved
the
start
of
this
year.
You
know
ab23001,
which
was
really
great
and
I,
went
and
looked
at
how
many
agenda
bills
we
had
last
year
188
to
188.
Who
knows
if
we
want
to
top
that
or
not,
but
we
did
some
work
last
year
and
then
this
is
directed
to
our
chief,
because
nobody
told
me
that
yesterday
was
national
law
enforcement,
Appreciation
Day.
So
a
belated
thank
you
to
you
in
the
department.
So
that's
that's
all
I
have
to
converse
it
about.
I
Doing
good
work
for
us,
but
I
was
driving
to
the
Home
Depot
over
Christmas
break
and
happened
to
look
left
as
I
was
heading
across
the
intersection
and
I
looked
up,
Holly,
Hills,
Drive
and
I
noticed
it
was
paved
and
so
I
actually
flipped
a
U-turn
and
went
up
the
Holly
Hills
Drive
just
take
a
look
because
I
I
know
that's
been
something:
we've
talked
about
for
quite
a
while.
As
I
drove
up
it
was
paved
and
it
was
paved,
it
was
paved
and
I
started.
I
Seeing
I
don't
know
if
I
call
it
protected,
but
it's
more
protected.
Walkway
on
the
right
side
of
the
street.
There
were
vertical
I,
don't
know
what
you
call
them,
I,
don't
know
what
technical
term
is,
but
there's
a
vertical
separation
of
rods
between
the
walkway
and
the
street,
and
it
was
paved
most
of
the
way
up.
So
I
don't
know
if
that
is
City
Paving
or
if
that
is
development
Paving.
But
it's
noticed
it's
appreciated
and
it's
great
having
that
road
fix
most
of
the
way
up.
So
thank
you.
Yeah.
F
I
want
a
second
to
thank
you
on
that,
because
I
went
up
and
looked
at
it
and
tried
to
legally
take
pictures
of
it,
because
it's
really
nice
and
like
you
I,
don't
know
if
that's
the
project
that
went
in
or
you
know,
but
whoever
made
made
that
magic
happen.
I
know
everyone
on
the
hill
is
is
probably
welcoming
that
it's.
Q
Oh
mine
is
like
a
completely
different
topic,
so
I'm
gonna
have
to
go
check
out.
Ollie
Holly
drive
to
to
see
that
I
did
see
the
work
that
was
being
done
on
it,
but
now
that
it's
completed
I'll
have
to
go
over
there.
My
contribution
to
the
conversation
tonight,
because
I
am
trying
not
to
talk
very
much,
is
just
a
reminder
that
next
Monday
is
Martin
Luther
King
Jr
day
and
we
have
an
opportunity
to
get
outside
in
whatever
weather
it
will
be
and
and
rip
up.