►
From YouTube: March 17, 2022: ARPA Economic Challenges Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Okay,
well,
thank
you
all
for
being
here
today
for
working
group
number
two.
I
did
drop
in
the
chat,
a
link
to
a
google
doc
with
our
agenda
today,
I'm
going
to
not
share
the
screen
right
away,
so
we
can
all
see
each
other
on
the
screen.
If
you
could,
please
share
your
video,
so
we
can
put
faces
to
name
that
would
be
wonderful.
B
We
had
a
slight
change
to
our
agenda,
based
on
the
discussion
that
we
had
this
morning,
as
in
as
the
the
main
urban
steering
committee
gets
together
on
a
week
over
week
basis,
and
there
were
a
few
things
that
came
up,
that
we
thought
susan
and
I
thought
would
be
important
to
share
with
all
of
you
to
add
some
additional
framework
for
our
work
going
forward,
and
so
there's
two
specific
things
that
I
want
to
go
over.
B
The
first
one
is
that
there
was
a
proposal
template
checklist
that
was
created
to
help
support
each
of
the
working
groups
working
through
the
details
of
our
ideas,
and
we
hope
by
the
time
we
end
today's
meeting,
that
all
of
us
will
be
assembled
into
a
few
different
work
groups
to
dive
into
to
the
idea
that
bubble
to
the
surface
and
the
work
that
we
do
between
now
and
working
group
number
three.
We
will
use
this
template
checklist
to
guide
that
work.
B
The
purpose
of
it
is
to
help
us
really
build
out
the
areas
that
will
give
the
commissioners
enough
information
to
be
able
to
make
good
decisions
about
which
recommendations
to
adopt
and
move
forward
with.
So
that's
one
piece
and
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
here
in
just
a
second,
so
we
can
all
look
at
it.
B
That's
on
the
docket,
all
these
different
pieces
of
information
that
will
help
us
sort
out
if
any
of
our
recommendations
are
duplicative
if
they
are
not
going
to
be
allowable
under
the
other
funding
rules
or
if
they
would
or
any
other
reason
that
would
prevent
them
from
being
the
areas
that
the
commissioners
want
to
adopt
and
there's
four
specific
questions
that
the
county
staff
will
take
these
ideas
and
measure
them
against
to
give
us
some
feedback
on
the
areas
that
we
should
continue
to
build
out
versus
the
areas
we
might
want
to
back
off
on
again
to
avoid
redundancy
duplication
and
any
services
that
wouldn't
be
allowable
under
oath.
B
We
basically
don't
want
to
waste
our
time,
so
I'm
going
to
start
quickly.
First,
with
pulling
up
the
open
recommendations,
idea,
the
the
checklist
and
I'm
also
gonna
just
go
ahead
and
drop
that
link
in
the
chat.
So,
if
you're
somebody
who
likes
to
just
look
at
your
screen
separately,.
B
A
B
B
C
Okay,
it
says
I
can't
share
while
you're
sharing
so
we'll
have
to
wait
till
you
unfreeze
them.
B
So
how
about
this?
Can
somebody
on
the
team
go
ahead
and
spend
five
minutes
going
over
the
checklist?
Well,
I
oh
wait
it.
Does
you
see
yep,
it's
perfect,
I'm
gonna
reboot,
my
zoom
I'll
be
right
back,
it's
perfect,
don't
don't
it
works.
B
Great
you're
still
closing
so
I'll
just
keep
going.
I
guess
it's
doing
it.
It
looks
great
great
okay,
I'm
gonna
do
my
piece
and
and
then
I
may
have
to
reboot
my
zoom,
but
we'll
see
so
you
see
the
checklist,
it's
quite
simple,
but
it's
very
powerful,
because
it'll
help
us
gravitate
around
the
key
questions
that
we
really
need
to
be
asking
ourselves
of
the
proposals
that
we
want
to
invest
in
so
the
at
the
top
of
it
there's
a
checklist
that
encourages
us
to
look
at
whether
or
not
these
are
transformational.
B
If
we're
striking
the
right
balance
between
transformational
and
getting
the
money
out
the
doors,
so
we
can
actually
take
action.
Is
it
easy
to
get
the
money
out
the
door?
Will
it
be
sustainable?
Are
we
looking
at
it
through
the
advantages
of
equity?
And
this
is
groundbreaking?
I
mean
this
is
something
that
the
county
really
couldn't
get
going
without
these
other
dollars
and
without
this
project
and
then
further
on
into
the
document.
There
are
specific
questions
to
help
guide
conversations
so
there's
a
place
for
summary,
there's
a
place
for
goals
and
objectives.
B
They
ask
to
think
about
the
population.
We
want
to
help
how
many
people
it'll
serve.
Where
are
the
equity?
The
areas
have
focused
on
equity
and
access.
Is
this
new?
Has
it
existed
before?
Are
we
striking
that
balance?
You
know
all
of
these
things,
and
so
in
a
perfect
world
in
between
groups,
this
working
group
today
and
the
next
time
we
meet
at
the
end
of
the
month.
B
The
small
groups
that
get
together
will
use
this
document
to
do
your
work,
okay
and
then
this
document
we
can
give
to
our
county
staff
to
along
with
some
maybe
some
additional
information
to
help
get
some
responses
back
from
them
that
were
on
a
path
that
is
still
aligning
with
the
goals
of
the
project
allowable
under
alpha,
isn't
redundant,
etc,
cetera.
B
So
I
think
that's
all
I
want
to
say
about
this
particular
document.
Again.
It's
on
the
google
share
drive,
so
you
can
you
can
get
to
it
yourself,
I'm
going
to
try
to
stop
sharing
my
screen
and
see
what
happens
nothing's
happening.
I
don't
know
what
you
see.
Oh
hi,
I'm
back
all
right!
Let
me
go
back
to
my
agenda
here
before
we
move
into
discussing
the
results
of
the
survey.
B
I
want
to
pause
here
and
ask
if
anybody
has
any
questions
or
concerns
about
the
checklist
or
the
process
going
forward
between
for
what
we're
going
to
try
to
do
today.
B
All
right:
well,
let's
proceed,
I'm
afraid
to
share
my
screen
again.
So
perhaps
one
of
my
teammates
wouldn't
mind
sharing
the
the
ipa
economic
challenges,
ideas
ranking
for
working
group
responses.
These
survey
results.
B
B
You
know
they
had
more
details
to
them
and
we
rolled
them
up
into
these
umbrella
categories,
and
then
we
asked
all
of
you
to
rank
these
umbrella
categories
based
on
your
agreement
level
that
these
were
important
and
then
specifically
to
rank
them
from
one
to
nine.
I
think
it
was
where
you
thought
you
should
be
focusing
for
energy
and
the
result
of
that
effort
based
on
the
survey
is
that
four
areas
bubbled
up
like
the
most
important
the
first
umbrella
category,
is
small
business
and
non-profit
direct
assistance.
B
So
there's
lots
of
ideas
under
that
we
can
pull
them
up
here
in
a
minute.
The
second
one
is
child
care.
The
third
one
is
workforce
development
and
the
fourth
one
is
workforce,
recruitment
and
retention.
So
those
are
the
four
areas
that
bubbled
up
as
the
most
important
based
on
all
of
your
responses
in
the
survey,
and
so
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
somebody?
Could
somebody
share
the
rating
of
ideas?
Google
sheets,
please?
A
B
And
so,
while
she's
bringing
this
up,
what
I
want
to
show
you
is
again,
you
have
the
link
to
the
spreadsheet
on
your
own,
so
you
can
pull
it
up,
but
at
the
bottom
of
this
spreadsheet,
it's
the
same
spreadsheet.
That
we've
been
working
off
of
with
the
ideas
is
that
I
took
the
all
the
initial
ideas
that
were
rolled
up
in
the
umbrellas
and
I
created
four
tabs
at
the
bottom.
The
first
one
is
small
business
and
non-profit
assistance.
B
The
third
foot,
one
is
workforce
development
and
then,
of
course,
the
fourth
one
is
workforce,
recruitment
and
retention,
and
you
can
see
at
a
glance
that
this
is
where
all
of
the
nitty
gritty
ideas
are
living.
Okay.
This
is
really
important
because
I
don't
want
you
to
feel
like
anybody's
ideas
or
the
level
of
detail
got
lost
in
the
process.
We're
trying
to
work
through
like
a
filter
right
like
what
are
the
bigger
themes
and
then
the
work
between
work
group
and
work
group,
two
and
three
will
be
filtering
down
into
this
level
of
detail.
B
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
pause
here
and
open
up
the
conversation
open
up
the
floor
for
conversation
so
based
on
these
four
categories:
small
business
and
nonprofit
direct
assistance,
child
care,
workforce
development,
workforce
recruitment
and
retention.
My
first
question
for
the
group
is-
and
maybe
we
can
stop
sharing
now,
because
if
you
want
to
see
it,
you
can
pull
it
up
on
your
own
screen.
B
D
I'm
rebecca
this
is
julie.
I
just
have
a
question:
are
you
asking
within
those
four
areas
or
are
there
things
outside
of
those
four
errors?
You
might
have
left
out
just
to
clarify
that
question
and
I
didn't
I
didn't
catch.
Did
you
share
I'm
on
my
phone?
So
did
you
share
the
results
of
the
ranking
or
just.
D
B
Okay,
yes,
and
so
to
clarify
my
question
is:
do
you
feel
like
based
on
the
four
categories
that
raised
to
the
surface
that
those
capture
the
most
important
concerns
that
you
have
that
you're,
hoping
that
this
work
group
will
work
on?
You
know,
there's
all
kinds
of
important
things,
but
the
most
important
things
that
we
want
to
accomplish
in
this
group
based
on
the
community
that
you're
representing
the
community,
the
forefront
of
your
mind?
D
I
don't
know
I
guess
like
what,
if
you're
not
asking
for
like.
Oh,
I
really
liked
a
category
that
wasn't
picked
of
those
four
you're
asking
for
things
that
weren't
even
considered.
D
B
Asking
if
there's
anything
that
is
I'm
trying
to
think
of
a
different
way
to
answer
your
question,
all
of
the
ideas
that
were
that
were
brought
to
the
table
to
date
in
this
process,
whether
it
was
through
phase
one,
the
survey
community
input
or
the
brainstorming
outside
the
meetings
or
other
places.
B
All
of
that
was
rolled
up
into
one
of
those
nine
umbrella
areas,
and
then
we
surveyed
right
so
of
those
nine
four
bubbled
up
to
the
surface.
Are
you
concerned
that
there's
another
major
category
missing
that
would
make
you
worried
about
moving
forward
with
the
work
might
make
sense?
Anybody
else
want
to
restate
that.
A
A
You
know
is:
are
you
okay
with
this
being
the
top
four?
Are
there?
Are
there
things
that
to
rebecca's
point?
Are
there
things
that
we're
missing
that
we
can
and
if
everyone's
okay,
with
these
being
the
top
four,
you
know
we
can
move
forward
with
more
detailed
discussion,
but
it
would
be
good
to
just
hear
from
everybody
how
the
the
survey
results
landed
with
you.
A
E
One
I
noticed
in
the
survey
as
I
was
scrolling
through
was
the
one
that
stood
out
to
me.
The
most
was
the
universal
basic
income
category,
because
in
the
actual
rankings
between
strongly
agree-
and
there
was
there-
was
just
as
many
or
more
and
strongly
agree
and
agree
in
that
category
than
some
of
the
others.
E
Actually
so
in
the
last
section,
when
ranked
of
order
of
important
importance,
the
ones
that
bubbled
up
to
the
surface
weren't
necessarily
the
same
as
the
number
of
fives
and
fours,
and
so
that
I
thought
was
really
interesting,
and
I
think
it
was
specifically
that
one
I
didn't
do
a
deep
dive.
E
But
I
was
just
like
looking
through
what
got
ranked
where,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
flag
that
one
as
a
potential
one
for
us
to
maybe
discuss,
because
it
has
10
people
who
said
strongly
agree
or
agree
with
like
this
one
meeting
the
goals,
whereas,
like
I
think,
workforce
development
has
like
nine
in
those
categories
right.
E
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
been
answered
to
like
I
don't
know
if
I'm
saying
like
we
should
definitely
do
this,
but
I
definitely
wanted
to
flag
that
as
a
like,
we
should
maybe
bring
that
up
to
the
group
and
look
at
that.
A
little
closer.
B
I
think
that's
a
great
point
and
I
wonder
if
that
is
a
vehicle
for
potentially
responding
to
some
of
these
areas
of
priority
right.
So
lack
of
child
care
access,
or
you
know,
low
wages
for
workforce
retention
could
be
solved
potentially
with
universal
basic
income.
But
I
agree:
we
should
flag
that
and
keep
that
close
to
the
top,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
where
it
lives
and
how
it
lives.
But
thank
you
for
highlighting
that
okay
love
to
hear
from
others.
Please.
F
Hi
everyone,
I
think
you
know
one
of
the
things
and
I
know
because
they're
they're
so
broad
right
now
and
I
see
how,
on
the
spreadsheets
it
kind
of
gives
an
idea
of
all
the
different
possible
ideas
with
it.
But
you
know
I
was
kind
of
trying
to
figure
out
again
to
your
point:
how
do
these
all
work
together
or
not
and
really
what
is
the
impact
that
we're
going
for
with
them
and
what's
meant
through
this
funding?
F
F
And
then
I
can.
I
just
have
one
last
thing
and
I
think
it's.
I
think
that
15
million
is
an
incredible
like
what
a
great
amount
of
money
to
work
with,
but
I
think
that
it's
also
we
have
to
be
real
about
how
much
it
costs
to
build
programs
to
sustain
programs.
So
I
get
a
little
nervous
around
the
transformational
piece,
because,
if
we're
starting
something
new,
we
just
need
to
be
thinking
about
the
cost,
to
be
able
to
build
a
program
and
implement
it
and
then
hopefully
make
it
sustainable.
F
B
B
F
Yeah
and
I
hate
to
take-
I
just
have
one
comment.
I
don't
want
to
take
the
space
here,
but
I
also
when
I
was
looking
at
this
was
thinking
about.
Yes,
there
is
money
being
infused
into
some
of
these
places,
but
it
this
money
could
help
build
upon
that,
and
so
I
think
that's
the
other
thing
to
think
about
is
you
know
where
there
is
investment
and
we
can
build
from
that
to
make
it
to
even
strengthen
it
more
and
have
it
go
even
further?
F
The
other
thing
I
was
looking
at
with
the
small
business
and
non-profit
direct
assistance.
You
know
we
do
know
one
of
the
big
challenges
for
the
for
small
business
and
nonprofit
right
now
is
of
recruitment
of
talent.
So
maybe
there's
some
ways
that
these
things
can
work
together.
F
You
know
to
say
is
the
impact
that
we're
trying
to
make
in
supporting
small
business
and
nonprofit
to
be
able
to
have
a
workforce.
You
know
develop
that
that
they
can
support
the
salaries
needed
or
I
don't
was
just
trying
to
think
of
how
we
might
look
at
some
of
these
pieces.
Since
all
four
boy,
you
know
kind
of
came
to
the
top.
A
Rebecca,
I
wonder
if
I
wonder
if
we
could
go
around
and
just
hear
from
everybody.
I
know
that
there
are
voices
we
didn't
hear
at
the
last
meeting,
I'm
wondering
if
it
would
be
okay
just
to
hear
from
everybody
on
anything
you
want
to
share
about
the
top
four
potentially
top
five
categories.
A
You
know
again,
if
there's
agreement
that
you
you
feel
like
we
can
move
forward
with
those
again
any
what
rebecca
said.
Any
duplication,
any
other
other
pieces
that
you
may
have
knowledge
of
that
we're
not
we're
not
aware
or
questions
you
have.
A
So
maybe
we
can
start
with
rachel.
G
Sure
so
I
guess
just
starting
from
the
top
with
small
business.
G
They
do
need
support
with
funding
like
revenues,
sales
and
then,
of
course,
those
other
things
like
marketing
or
needing
to
pivot,
their
business
model
like
during
the
pandemic
or
to
online,
and
then
just
in
thinking
of
what
resources
already
exist
and
not
duplicating.
G
I
think
there
is
a
lot
of
support
for
small
businesses,
but
we
could
expand
upon
like
some
of
the
topics
that
I
stated,
especially
around.
Funding
for
underrepresented
entrepreneurs
and
startups,
like
those
have
been.
Those
are
two
huge
gaps
since
the
pandemic,
where
those
businesses
just
aren't
seeing
funding.
So
I
don't
mean
to
ramble.
Those
are
just
things
that
I'm
keeping
in
mind
as
I'm
thinking
about
the
small
businesses
and
then
just
to
add
on
what
rebecca
mentioned.
G
G
There
are
a
lot
of
grant
opportunity
or
there
are
grant
opportunities.
I
guess
maybe
not
a
lot
many,
but
for
the
centers
who
are
providers,
but
especially
the
friends
family
neighbors.
It's
like
folks
who
are
trying
to
start
out
too,
who
are
it's
like
they're
already
doing
child
care,
but
maybe
they
haven't
actually
established
their
business.
G
That's
who
we're
seeing
a
lot
of,
I
think,
a
lot
of
those
folks
and
not
a
lot
of
resources
specifically
for
those
groups.
H
B
Thank
you
for
that.
Let's
pass
it
over
to
jorge.
I
Yeah,
it's
yeah,
it's
hard
to.
It
seems
like
all
this
is
well.
It
is
very
important,
so
it
was
very
hard
to
know
how
to
group
them
and
to
the
most
important.
But
the
first
thing
that
comes
to
my
mind
is
undocumented
families
that
may
have
trouble
accessing
certain
resources.
I
So
my
question
would
be
if,
if
they
are
considered
for
these,
like
for
child
care,
for
example,
in
many
cases
they
don't
they
don't
they
can't
access
like
ccap
so
yeah?
How
would
they
access
that
resource
that
those
fundings
are
going
towards.
B
B
Thank
you
for
that
jessica.
J
Thank
you
yeah.
I
mean
I'm
generally
supportive
of
the
the
four
categories.
Broadly,
I
think
you
know
there's
20
of
us
or
so
here
on
this
call.
So
the
challenge
of
you
know,
consensus
building
amongst
a
large
group
is
obviously
present.
So
I
think
once
we
get
to
you
know
these
are
our
four
categories
and
the
subgroups
and
and
I'll
be
interested
to
see
how
the
subgroups
are
determined.
J
Hopefully,
based
on
you,
know,
different
areas
of
expertise
to
be
able
to
help
address
the
issues
and
then
also
the
other
concern,
and
it's
been
touched
on
is
well
a
couple.
One
is
15
million
dollars
is
not
a
lot
of
money
in
this
in
this
realm.
So
keeping
that
in
mind
and
then
also
there
is
so
much
overlap
across
these
four
categories,
and
so
how
is
that
being
addressed?
So
we
don't
ultimately
end
up
with.
K
K
So
I
do
agree
with
hayden,
maybe
looking
at
the
universal
basic
income
as
well.
C
K
The
city
of
boulder
has
that
in
there
for
funding,
so
I
don't
know,
that's
that's
a
bit
more
transformational
and
innovative
and
some
of
the
like
top
up
ccap
and
these
you
know
things
that
are
already
existing,
so
it
kind
of
depends
which
criteria
you're
working
on,
but
I
think
we
have
plenty
to
pick
from.
I
agree
that
there's
15
million
dollars
is
really
not
much
money,
so
yeah.
H
Thank
you.
I
I
don't
know
that.
I
have
a
lot
to
add
to
what
said.
I
really
agree
with
the
tone
of
everyone.
I
actually
think
that
the
four
topics
that
bubbled
up
to
the
top
really
are
strong
and
feel
like
they're
they're,
in
that
space
of
not
so
groundbreaking
that
they're,
potentially
unsustainable,
but
but
really
can
sort
of
move
the
needle
forward
on
areas
that
we
just
know
are
really
challenged.
H
So,
for
example,
when
we
think
about
the
challenges
of
a
sustainable
workforce,
child
care
is
an
issue
for
a
workforce,
and
when
we
think
about
you
know
how
do
we
create
more
equity
in
opportunities
for
job
advancement?
I
mean
there's,
there's,
maybe
some
lenses
that
we
can
apply.
That
start
to
weave
all
four
of
those
areas
together
and
allow
us
to
be
more
focused
in
our
recommendations.
L
Yes,
hi,
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
recurring
thing.
I
would
say
I've
agreed
with
just
about
everybody's
comments
to
this
point
in
terms
of
the
four
that
came
up,
you
know
I
just
to
share.
When
I
looked
at
the
survey
results,
I
tried
to
think
of
a
unifying
call
it
an
executive
summary
or
elevator
pitch
as
to
what
we
would.
L
Ultimately,
you
know
say
that
would
summarize
the
group
here,
so
I
think
just
maybe
a
recommendation
that
you
know
as
we
we
probably
don't
want
to
show
four
separate
initiatives.
We
want
to
be
able
to
tell
a
holistic
story,
which
is
that
that
spaghetti
idea-
and
I
think
that
would
have
a
lot
of
power
in
terms
of
you-
know,
positioning
how
we're
making
our
recommendations
here.
One
concern
that
I
do
have
is
is
the
long-term
sustainability
of
some
of
these
programs.
L
Well,
just
the
general
concern
of
maybe
one
term
or
one-time
funding
that
goes
in
with
this
15
million
dollars
and
then
in
the
out
years.
What
happens
to
those
initiatives?
Do
they
continue
and
are
we
absolutely
saying
that
they
can
continue,
which
I
I
would
also
put
in
the
category
of
transformational
right,
so
one-time
funding
that
ultimately
leverages
or
enhances
this
the
ability
for
us
to
continue
these
programs,
which
I
think
is,
is
one
of
the
the
checklist
items
that
we
saw
earlier.
L
So
nothing
specifically
just
just
a
general
watchful
eye
across
all
of
the
initiatives.
A
B
M
I
am
back
sorry,
it's
a
crazy
day
up
here.
Can
you
repeat
the
question,
though
rebecca
I've
been
pulled
away
a
few
times.
B
Oh
sure,
no
problem,
we
are
just
doing
a
round
robin
to
make
sure
that
people
feel
comfortable
and
confident
that
we
are
on
the
right
track
with
the
four
areas.
The
four
categories
that
bubble
to
the
surface
are
the
most
important
coming
out
of
the
survey.
M
Yes,
I
do
think
that
those
are
the
best
categories.
I
guess
I
would
just
reflect
on
whoever
just
spoke
just
wanting
to
see
if
they
can
kind
of
tie
together
well,
but
I
think
this
is
the
right
path
to
go
on.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Hayden.
E
E
Like
all
of
my
notes,
I
wrote
down
around
like
maybe
like
if
we
could
look
at
because
none
of
these
some
have
equity
built
in,
and
some
don't
and
like
to
what
debbie
and
jessica,
and
so
many
folks
have
said,
like
they're
all
intersectional,
but
if
we
could
look
at
it
from
an
equity
lens
first,
they
might
very
naturally
tie
into
one
another.
So
I
have
some
nervousness
about
split.
E
I
see
why
splitting
into
groups
makes
sense,
but
it
might
also
like,
maybe
if
we
could
start
with,
if
we
can
start
with
equity
as
our
which
is
the
foundation
of
this
group,
there
might
be
more
natural
tie-ins
that
happen
before
we
split
up
into
these
isolated
categories.
Does
that
make
sense?
I
don't
know.
B
Let's,
could
we
take
a
minute
and
talk
about
that
a
little
bit?
How
would
we
back
into
so?
We
had
envisioned
if
you
look
at
the
agenda
after
we
come
back
from
the
break,
talk
about
assembling
some
some
teams
to
work
on
these
these
groups
and
build
them
out
some
more.
If
we
before
we
do
that,
and
we
we
back
into
it
to
an
equity
lens,
what
would
be
an
alternative
path
or
how
could
we
do
that
better.
E
It's
a
good
question.
I
don't
want
to
totally
sign
really
agenda.
I
think
you
all
are
doing
an
amazing
job.
I
don't
know
the
answer
right
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
thinking
about
how
many
people
have
said
these
are
so
intersectional
like.
If
we
look
at,
I
don't
know,
support
for
the
non-profit.
E
I
have
too
many
tabs
open
number
one
small
business
and
non-profit
assistance
and
think
about
you
know
the
the.
I
think
what
debbie
you
are
saying
around
like
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
right
now
is
like
recruitment
and
retention
of
a
workforce,
and
we
focus
on
marginalized
communities
that
don't
have
access
to
employment
opportunities
like
that.
You
know.
E
Just
support
for
non-profits
in
and
of
itself
is
too
broad,
but
when
we
talk
about
equity
and
like
who
doesn't
have
access
to
this
to
these
higher
paying
jobs
and
who
do
non-profits
really
need
to
be
hiring
like
our
participants
and
people
who
have
lived
experiences
of
our
programming
and
and
how
that
actually
supports
non-profit
workers,
then
they
very
naturally
tie
into
one
another.
I
think,
and
so
I
think,
if
we
all
broke
out
and
did
that
we
might
run
the
risk
of,
I
don't
know
separating
makes
sense
logistically.
E
But
I
think
there's
seems
to
be
agreement
that
there
maybe
are
some
really
natural
tie-ins
to
one
another,
and
I
wonder
if
we
should
like
accept
the
the
sticky
spaghetti,
noodle
bowl,
like
the
situation
that
we're
in
and
somehow
like,
try
not
to
break
it
apart,
where
it
lose
my
analogy,
but
like
maybe,
we
should
just
like
accept
that
in
some
way
and
see
if
we
can
like
with
equity,
as
our
focus
maybe
like,
create
some
groups
that
naturally
fit
together.
E
A
Yeah
yeah.
Oh
sorry,
I
was
just
gonna.
Add
that
I
think
you
know
we.
We
absolutely
want
to
apply
our
racial
equity
tool
to
any
concept
that
we
come
up
with.
I
think
my
question
is
probably
about.
Do
we
have
enough
information
to
even
use
the
tool?
At
this
point
I
mean
there's
some
pretty
specific
questions
that
are
asked
with
the
tool
that
I
think
we
would
need
to
do
a
little
slightly
deeper
dive,
probably
on
some
of
these
concepts.