►
From YouTube: Feb. 28, 2022 - Housing Working Group breakout session
Description
American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) kick-off meeting on Feb. 28, 2022 - Housing Working Group breakout session.
A
See
so
many
people,
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
people
here.
I
don't
know
either
and
paul
and
I
are
we
did
send
out
an
email
on
sunday
which
hopefully
you
had
a
chance
to
look
at
just
sort
of
introducing
ourselves,
and
we
thought
it
would
be
a
good
idea
if
we
just
spent.
You
know
a
minute
each
just
to
introduce
everyone
paul.
Does
that
sound
like
a
good
idea?
It.
C
Karen
and
paul
I'm
going
to
jump
in
so
sure
to
clarify
the
format,
for
this
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
different
than
the
general
and
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
consecutive
translation
to
spanish,
which
is
going
to
slow
the
conversation
down
a
little
bit.
But
I
think
it's
the
best
way
that
we
can
capture
the
entire
conversation
on
a
recording
for
the
public
to
see.
D
E
Everybody,
yes,
this
is
jennifer,
so
I'll
be
your
spanish
interpreter.
So
yes,
the
consecutive
mode
requires
that
you
pause.
Take
short
pauses,
try
not
to
talk
for
several
minutes
at
a
time.
We
can
do
a
pretty
good
job,
but
the
idea
is
if
you
could
keep
your
interventions
just
keeping
that
in
mind
and
then
pause
for
me
to
give
the
rendition
into
spanish
or
english
as
corresponds.
Thank
you.
A
F
There,
my
name
is
anne-marie
jensen,
I'm
the
executive
director
of
the
east
county
housing,
opportunity
coalition.
We
are
an
education,
training
and
advocacy
group
working
with
local
governments
to
try
and
secure
more
affordable
housing
and
equitable
housing,
and
I
have
to
step
out
just
for
five
minutes.
I'm
sorry!
I
will
be
right
back.
A
A
H
Don't
you
want
to
allow
for
interpretation.
E
G
A
Thanks
for
the
clarification
commissioner
levy,
yeah.
G
Thank
you.
My
name
is
claire
levy.
I
am
a
boulder
county,
commissioner,
and
I'm
the
commissioner
that's
going
to
be
the
link
between
this
group
and
the
rest
of
the
commissioners
and
I'm
very
happy
to
have
this
opportunity
to
work
on
affordable
housing.
It's
something
I
spent
some
effort
on
in
my
advocacy
work
in
denver
after
I
left
the
legislature
and
had
the
privilege
of
serving
on
the
board
of
border
housing
partners
as
well,
which
was
a
tremendous
learning
opportunity
for
me.
A
H
My
name,
my
name,
is
anna
fernandez,
frank,
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
effa
and
I'm
the
public
policy
and
community
outreach
coordinator.
My
name
is
anna
fernandez.
A
Thank
you,
so
I
think
that
took
care
of
the
translation,
correct
and
then
do.
We
want
to
introduce
also
support
staff.
I
Very
close
stephanie
fanchy
and
I'm
with
elevation
community
land
trust.
We
are
a
community
land
trust
that
has
come
to
be
in
just
the
last
three
years
and
we
are
aiming
to
be
provide
community
land
trust
with
already
several
communities
in
boulder
county.
F
J
E
D
Hey
everyone
I'm
laura
scheinbaum.
I
am
the
director
of
real
estate
development
for
boulder
housing
partners.
We
are
the
housing
authority
for
the
city
of
boulder
and
I
oversee
new
construction
development
renovation
of
our
existing
portfolio
and
then
purchasing
preservation,
units
for
affordable,
deeply,
affordable
and
perpetuity
housing,
and
more
so
thanks
nice
to
be
here.
K
Hi,
yes,
I'm
I'm
michael
pierce,
I'm
a
former
adjunct
faculty
at
the
university
of
colorado
teaching.
L
Philosophy
now
a
leader
for
the
group
called
colorado
coalition
of
manufactured
homeowners,
also
on
the
the
board
of
the
national
mobile
homeowners
association
and
just
recently,
the
president
of
the
sansei
cooperative,
a
group
of
residents
that
just
found
a
susie
mobile
home
park.
E
M
Good
afternoon,
so
I
am
the
director
of
housing
and
human
services
for
the
city
of
boulder,
but
I
have
two
other
roles.
M
Whoops.
Thank
you.
Sorry.
The
the
regional
housing
partnership
in
homeless,
solutions
for
boulder
county.
F
N
Housing
and
community
investment
for
the
city
of
longmont,
we
that
includes
our
affordable.
F
O
E
O
Oh,
I
I'm
sorry,
excuse
me
boulder
county,
okay,.
B
B
In
the
interest
of
time
I
I
won't
read
every
one
of
these
points,
but
I
think
that
hopefully
we
can
all
agree
that
you
know
these
points
are
going
to
guide
our
work.
These
are
our
goals.
B
And
I
think
you
know
just
to
highlight
a
couple
of
things
just
again,
something
you
know
we're
looking
for
for
work.
That
is
transformational
and
you
know
trying
to
strike
that
balance
between
long-term
transformational
change
and
short-term
immediate
relief.
I
think
you
know
to
me
if,
if
we
could
achieve
that,
that
that
would
be
a
great
start
for
any
work
that
we
do.
B
And
I
think
you
know
the
real
wins
for
us
here
would
be.
You
know
doing
that,
while
also
achieving
solutions
that
are
sustainable.
That
also
are
able
to
let
potentially
leverage
other
funds
and
existing
processes,
which
I
think
that
that's
part
of
the
conversation
I'm
very
interested
in
looking
at.
B
B
F
Sorry,
like
regard
to
the
goals
is
how
we
look
at
what
else
is
being
done
at
the
state
level,
and
I
mean
longmont
showed
that
they're
doing
a
lot
already
and
do
we
do
we
measure
our
success
on
the
goals,
and
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
earmark
that
we
should.
F
A
And
I
think
that's
something
that
we
all
will
decide
as
a
group.
You
know,
as
we
start
talking
about
how
we're
going
to
move
forward.
That's
certainly
something
we
you
know
we're.
We
are
allowed
to
break
up
into
smaller
groups
and
there
could
be
a
group
that
goes
off
and
sort
of
researches
and
gathers
that
information
and
comes
back
and
makes
a
recommendation
to
the
larger
group.
We
can
also
be
communicating
with
each
other
via
email
in
between
meetings.
So
definitely
that
will
be
something
on
our
radar.
E
A
A
So
something
that
paul-
and
I
have
been
talking
about
and
exchanging
emails
about,
is
how
we
want
to
hold
this
space
and
we
want
it
to
be
inclusive
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone's
voice
is
heard
and
that
everyone
is
empowered
to
do
so.
And
of
course,
we
appreciate
any
input
or
feedback
that
any
of
the
members
would
like
to
share
with
us
as
we
are
moving
forward
as
a
team.
E
B
B
And
I
think
that
karen
would
join
me
in
wanting
to
acknowledge
that
our
role
is
really
to
be
facilitators.
We're
not
here,
you
know
we're
we're
called
co-leads,
but
it's
not
a
role
where
we're
going
to
be
directive
or
prescriptive.
We
have,
we
have
no
more
say
than
anybody
else
as
far
as
what
comes
out
of
this
group,
so
we
want
to
just
assure
folks
up
front
that
we
are
here
just
to
guide
the
process
forward
and
guide
the
conversation.
E
B
So
here
on
this
slide,
we
just
wanted
to
take
a
kind
of
a
quick
overview
kind
of
what
we
were
looking
at
karen
and
I,
as
far
as
looking
at
the
phase
one
work
and
trying
to
categorize
it
in
some
way.
So
we
came
up
with
these
buckets
of
work
here.
E
B
And
I
don't
think
you
know
we're
claiming
that
this
is
exhaustive
or
complete.
This
again
is
just
kind
of
one
vision
of
major
categories
of
work,
kind
of
with
some
sub
bullets.
Looking
at
some
of
the
the
things
that
came
up
in
the
the
feedback
from
phase
one.
B
And
I
would
just
note
that,
on
the
bottom
bullet
for
promoting
equity
and
accessibility,
obviously
this
bucket
will
pour
into
all
the
other
ones.
But
we
wanted
to
call
out
a
couple
of
specific
bullets
here,
just
because
those
were
ones
where
the
feedback
was
just
very
much
centered
on
an
issue
of
equity
or
accessibility.
E
E
A
So
if
we
just
look
briefly,
we've
got
the
financial
relief
assistance
for
housing,
so
we've
talked
a
lot
about
that
with
rent
and
utility
assistance,
property,
tax
assistance,
home
ownership,
middle
income,
assistance.
E
A
The
second
bucket
is
creating
more
affordable
housing
inventory
and
we
did
see
quite
a
few
requests
from
the
public
and
from
our
elected
officials
and
from
others
who
participated
in
phase
one
for
workforce,
housing
and
innovation
in
design.
E
A
And
then
our
fourth
bucket
creating
sustainable,
affordable
housing,
so
rehab
and
repair
to
to
existing
buildings,
leverage,
funding
and
build
partnerships,
trust
fund
and
expand
existing
programs.
E
A
And
then,
as
paul
said
earlier,
our
last
bucket,
which
is
promote
equity
and
accessibility,
that
will
actually
pour
into
all
the
buckets
so
we're
talking
about
racial
equity,
low
income,
the
potential
for
immigration
and
citizenship
requirements
to
be
waived.
A
Although
I
understand
from
the
presentation
that
that's
already
been
shown
that
it
won't
be
paul,
did
I
get
that
right
that
if
immigration
status
won't
be
taken
into
consideration
for
these
programs,.
M
I
do
thank
you.
It
takes
me
a
minute
to
get
to
the
mute
button,
so
this
is
a
very
helpful
list.
However,
in
the
previous
presentations
by
the
urban
land
institute,
they
talked
about
different
land
use
policies.
M
That
would
be
beneficial
and
just
wondering
if
that's
a
role
that
we're
playing
in
either
suggesting
or
recommending
potential
land
use
policies
that
either
are
contingent
on
funding
or
go
along
with
funding
or
in
some
way
encourage
different
land
use
policies
to
be
made.
If
that's
the
role
of
this
committee.
E
B
Yeah
kurt
that
that's
a
good
question.
I
saw
that
come
up.
I
think,
in
the
chat
when
the
urban
institute
was
presenting,
and
I
don't
think
that
we
necessarily
got
an
answer.
So
I
can
check
with
leslie
irwin
to
see
if
that's
an
accessible
use
of
funding,
but
I
think
you
know
in
in
the
broader
scope
anything
is
on
the
table
really
and
let's
you
know,
we
can
certainly
discuss
what
it
might
look
like,
but
I'll
try
to
get
an
answer
to
that
quickly
from
leslie.
A
M
H
A
You're
saying
is:
would
we
still
want
to
consider
those
things
as
recommendations
to
pair
with
whatever
recommendations
we're
making
for
the
use
of
the
arpa
funds,
but
go
but
go
ahead
and
I'm
I
may
not
have
that
right.
M
E
E
A
So,
that's
certainly
something
that
this
group
can
decide
upon.
If
that's
something
that
we
want
to
be
doing
as
well
kurt
did
you
have
another
question.
E
J
I
know
a
lot
of
the
this
work
was
done
prior
to
the
marshall
fires,
and
I'm
wondering
if
you
know
the
loss
of
1100
housing
units
or
homes
impacts
any
of
our
thinking
around
this
or
if
it
simply
just
made
everything
that
much
worse.
A
One
thing
I
can
say
is
that
paul
and
I
reached
out
to
the
city
of
louisville
for
instance,
and
asked
if
they
wanted
to
get
more
involved
in
this,
but
they're
overwhelmed
and
I
believe,
superior
as
well.
I
don't
know
if
commissioner
levy
would
like
to
say
something
about
this
or
not
or
paul.
If
you
have
something
to
add.
G
Thanks,
I
did
unmute
myself
just
you
know
to
appreciate
ann's
concern.
G
You
know
this
we're
trying
to
address
really
a
long-term
problem,
a
problem
that
has
been
building
for
a
long
time
that
kovid
just
shined
a
spotlight
on
and
the
unfortunately
marshall's
fires
will
not
be
the
last
natural
disaster
we
have,
and
I'm
hopeful
that
if
we
do
our
work
well,
we
will
be
addressing
the
the
kinds
of
problems
that
the
loss
of
1100
units
of
housing
is
creating,
but
because
this
is
specifically
covid
response,
I
don't
think
we
want
to
target
louisville
or
superior
for
to
sit
on
the
committee.
L
I
was
curious
if,
since
rent
stabilization,
types
of
measures
are
potentially
one
avenue
of
solutions,
whether
there's
room
for
arpa
funding
of
of
say,
programs
that
are
that
are
in
the
neighborhood
of
rent
control,
that
aren't
quite
there,
such
as
tax
incentives
or
tax
policies,
where
the
goal
is
to
try
and
take
some
of
the
error
out
of
the
incentive
to
raise
rents
and
and
so
stabilize
housing
in
part
through
through
tax
policies
or
or
similar
kinds
of
programs.
A
Okay,
we're
going
to
take
a
pause
for
our
our
translation
and
we
have
two
translations
if
you
can
to
do
the
commissioner's
response
as
well
as
michael's
question.
E
A
So
the
only
comment
I
have
and
then
we'll
see
if
paul
or
anyone
else
wants
to
comment
michael,
is
that
that
seems
like
a
great
question
for
the
greater
group-
and
I
I'm
not
sure,
if
we're
going
to
have
time
in
this
limited
arena,
to
try
to
dive
deeper
into
those
kinds
of
details
or
if
we
want
to
wait
until
our
next
meeting
so
anyways
that
that's
what
I
have
to
add
at
this
point.
B
F
Yes,
I
started
piggybacking
what
michael
was
saying
about
tax
incentives.
I
think
it's
buried
in
here
somewhere,
but
the
preservation
of
existing
sort
of
lower
end
housing
stock,
which
may
not
be
officially
affordable.
You
know
it
may
not
be
that
a
you
know.
F
A
person
60
to
80
percent
or
below
of
ami
is
living
there,
but
how
we
can
preserve
smaller
units
is
is
something
that
I
think
is
is
in
here
and,
and
I
actually
have
been
working
with
some
of
the
families
displaced
by
the
fire
and
one
of
the
universal
issues
that
comes
up
is
legal
assistance,
which
I
think
would
be
also
an
eviction
defense.
F
I
know
boulder
already
has
that,
and
I
know
there
are
some
limited
services
through
bridge
to
justice,
but
they're
still
charging
a
hundred
dollars
an
hour.
You
know
that's
a
reduced
rate,
but
low
income
people
can't
really
access
that,
so
the
whole
concept
of
how
we
can
help
people
stay
in
their
homes.
If
they
have
something
that
works
for
them.
F
I
I
don't
really
see
that
there,
but
I
think
it
might
be
implied
in
some
of
the
categories.
So
I
just
want
to
pull
that
out
as
something
specific
that
I
think
we
should
work
on.
E
A
A
H
Yeah
I
picked
up
from
the
presentations
earlier
that
one
of
the
focus
of
the
housing
bucket,
if
you
will-
is
providing
water
and
sanitation
services,
and
I
don't
see
that
in
this
list
I
think
that
that's
important,
especially
for
manufactured
homes-
and
you
know-
maybe
it's
not
top
of
mind,
because
most
people
assume
that
boulder
county
everyone
has
bottled
water.
But
that's
not
the
case.
So
I
wanted
to
hide
like
that.
A
A
I
Hi,
sorry,
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
expand
on
what
anna
said
to
say
that
the
in
the
first
section
it
was
really
about
all
types
of
infrastructure,
so
that
couldn't
be
it
for
new
development
of
housing.
So
it's
not
specific
to
mobile
home
parks,
although
I
think
that
it's
a
great
use
of
those
funds,
but
let's
just
make
sure
that
we
put
it
in
as
broad
terms
as
possible.
E
A
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
there
isn't
anything
left
that
needs
to
be
said
about
that
list.
If
there
was
anything
else
that
was
missing
and
if
you
think
about
it
after
this
meeting
just
go
ahead
and
and
email
us
and
paul
I
was
thinking,
does
it
make
sense
to
share
that
whole
bucket
list
with
everyone
after
this
meeting
and
then
other
thoughts,
people
have
tweaks
they
want
to
make,
they
could
do
afterwards.
B
Yes,
I
think
that
makes
perfect
sense
karen
and
I
think
what
we
can
do
is
really
just
start
a
working
document.
You
can
check
with
johanna
to
see
if
there's
a
preferred
format,
but
if
we
start
a
working
document
now
with
these
ideas
and
thoughts,
then
we
can
each
go
in
ad.
Add
comments
start.
You
know
discussion
within
that
at
our
our
ideas
that
we
may
have
that
are
a
little
bit
more
specific.
B
So
I
think
one
thing
to
do
as
we're
working
our
way
through
giving
our
input
is,
is
you
know,
use
use
what
we're
seeing
here
now
on
the
screen
to
guide
us
these?
These
questions.
E
G
Yeah
thanks,
I
it's
probably
implicit
here,
but
it's
you
know.
One
of
the
most
important
things
is
that
we
have
to
be
able
to
actually
spend
all
the
money
by
the
end
of
2026.
G
And
I
think
that
is
going
to
be
one
of
the
challenges
in
trying
to
do
any
new
development
that
is
not
on
the
drawing
board
already.
So
it's
just
something
to
keep
in
mind
that
it's
actually
a
pretty
short
time
frame
for
developing
an
affordable
housing
project,
another
concept
and
actually,
if
the
translators
need
me
to
stop
now,
I'm
happy
to
wait
before
I
say
my
other
ideas.
E
G
Thanks
and
the
other,
the
other
criteria
is,
you
know,
bang
for
the
buck
and
really
optimizing
these
funds.
A
So
again,
really
good
points
and
as
we
develop
our
plan
going
forward,
I
think
that
will
be
something
we
need
to
consider.
I
think
leslie
is
on
this
call
and
leslie.
If
you
are,
could
you
just
clarify
that
if
money
gets
put
into
a
certain
bucket,
so
let's
say
a
trust
fund
or
a
fund
to
support
home
ownership
or
whatever
it's
called,
and
it
happens
before
the
due
date?
Is
that
good
enough.
P
A
This
came
up
during
our
our
our
bigger
group
presentation
where
the
question
was:
if
the
money
gets
appropriated
and
allocated
to
a
fund,
let's
say
like
a
a
land
trust
fund
by
the
deadline.
Is
that
good
enough,
even
if
the
land
hasn't
actually
been
purchased.
P
I
am
doing
a
little
research
on
that
whole
concept.
I
looked
in
the
final
rule
and
the
final
rule
is
absolutely
silent
on
housing
trust
funds.
It
does
talk
about
landmaking
where
you
do
purchase
the
land,
so
you
would
have
that.
So
I
need
to
get
back
to
you
on
the
eligibility
parameters
around
housing,
trust
funds.
P
As
far
as
you
know,
home
ownership
assistance
that
would
that
could
look
like
a
down
payment
assistance
program
and
that
would
need
to
be
obligated
in
some
way
and
we
would
have
to
discuss
what
that
would
be
by
that
december
2024
deadline,
but
I
will
provide
this
group
more
guidance
around
the
housing
trust
fund.
I'm
researching
that
right
now,
great.
A
Thank
you
we'll
take
time
now
for
translation.
A
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
say
before
we
go
to
our
next
two
comments
or
questions
we're
going
to
have
to
figure
out
our
next
meeting
dates,
so
we
I
do
believe
we
have
a
time
for
these
two
more,
but
then
we're
going
to
have
to
set
our
schedule.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear
to
everyone.
F
So
I
I
want
to
echo
that
I
think
the
trust
fund
question
and
getting
a
clear
answer
to
that
is
really
important,
because
it
may
give
us
some
time
not
to
have
to
be
as
specific
and
tight
with
some
of
our
decisions
if
we
can
create
a
county-wide
housing
trust
fund.
That
then
could
look
at
things
more
slowly
or
you
know
not
by
the
deadlines
in
arpa
I'm
putting
in
the
chat.
Michael
anderson
is
the
national
guy
who
does
housing
trust
fund
work
he's
at
the
center
for
community
change.
F
E
F
So
the
couple
other
questions
I
have
are
procedural
questions
and
one
is
sort
of
I
I
think
in
the
federal
language
they
use
the
term
maintenance
and
effort.
But
if
we
have
communities
like
we
saw
that
longmont
has
done
a
lot
on
affordable
housing
with
its
own
arpa
dollars,
and
then
we
have
other
communities
that
may
have
done
nothing
are
we
are
we
going
to
favor
those
who
put
some
in
of
their
own
money?
Procedurally
where
they
have
some
matching?
F
If
we,
for
example,
some
might
say,
longmont
and
erie
are
the
two
least
expensive
neighborhoods
that
we've
got.
F
Should
we
put
all
our
affordable
housing
back
to
the
whole
question
of
the
most
bang
for
our
buck?
If
we're
gonna,
do
land
banking,
for
example,
do
we
do
it
there,
where
it's
the
cheapest
land,
or
do
we
have
a
principle
of
trying
to
spread
affordable
housing
out
around
the
county?
And
I
I
could
argue
it
both
ways,
but
I
think
this
group
needs
to
decide
what
its
value
is
or
are,
as
we
think
about
that.
A
E
A
So
it's
a
great
it's
a
great
statement
and
comment,
and
we
should
take
that
into
consideration
and
I
think
once
we
figure
out
how
we're
moving
forward
if
we're
going
into
subgroups
or
how
we're
going
to
attack
these
different
buckets.
We
definitely
do
want
to
consider
that
ann
marie.
That's
a
good
point.
M
M
So
I
wanted
to
comment
a
couple
of
things.
Anna
marie
mentioned.
The
first
was
about
the
eviction
prevention.
One
of
the
things
that
I'll
mention
is
our
eviction.
Prevention
program
in
the
city
actually
works
in
the
county
courts,
and
so
our
staff
are
challenged
with
not
being
able
to
help
people
because
they
don't
live
in
the
city
of
boulder,
but
it's
the
same
process.
M
It
would
be
pretty
easy
and
relatively
simple
to
expand
that
program
to
cover
the
county.
The
infrastructure
is
already
there,
however,
I'll
just
add
that
this
is
paid
for
by
landlords
they
pay
75
a
year,
it'd
be
nice
to
have
a
better
approach
than
arpa.
I
believe
that
would
be
a
sustainable
funding
source
similar
to
that
that
we
should
also
consider,
and
then
I
have
one
more
I'll
stop
there
and
I'll
have
one
more
comment.
M
The
second
comment
that
I
wanted
to
make,
I
think,
also
related
to
anna
marie,
is
what
how
we
spread
the
funds
to
different
projects
around
the
county,
and
I
would
advocate
that
we
spend
them
as
she
mentioned
in
areas
where
we
can
get
more
bang
for
the
buck
and
like
lewisville
lafayette.
M
Well,
probably
lafayette,
longmont,
erie
those
areas
or
or
lions
in
netherland,
and
if
we
put
all
of
our
resources
into
simply
supporting
affordable
housing
projects,
it
would
probably
support
somewhere
between
250
and
300
units.
M
So
that's
the
average
tax
credit
project
may
be
as
high
as
75.
Let's
say,
so
that's
only
four
or
five
projects,
and
I
do
believe
that
for
the
this
the
speed
to
get
the
the
resources
spent,
I
think
we
actually
could
purchase
land
and
get
the
most
bang
for
the
buck.
M
L
Yeah
I
was,
I
was
curious
just
about
the
the
what
kurt
was
saying
and
and
was
hoping
to
to
identify
another
way
of
spending
money
on
on
creating
well,
not
exactly
creating
funding,
affordable
housing,
but
but
securing
it,
and
that
would
be
through
something
similar
to
what
we
were
doing
with
the
mobile
home
park
and-
and
I'm
thinking
stefan
could
could
speak
to
this
as
well,
but
using
money
in
in
in
ways
where
we
would
be
purchasing
existing
rental
units
through
a
combination
of
of
part,
grant,
money
and
loan
money
and
then
possibly
using
the
setting
up
the
money.
L
The
loan
money
is
a
revolving
fund,
and
then
that
would
feed.
I
mean
payment
into
that.
L
Repayment
of
that
fund
would
feed
money
back
into
the
fund,
and
it
just
strikes
me
that
that's
a
way
of
stretching
the
dollars
a
lot
further
and
and
so
so
the
idea
would
you
you'd,
buy
a
rental
housing,
partly
with
a
grant
just
to
get
the
mortgage
cost
down
and
then
and
then
basically
having
the
the
renters
support
the
rest
of
the
purchase
cost
and,
and
that
way
it
just
seems
like
you
could
you
could
acquire
a
lot
more
affordable
units.
A
Before
I
call
on
stefka
to
reply,
I
just
want
to
say
one
of
my
intentions
that
paul-
and
I
talked
about-
is
that
after
this
conversation,
we're
going
to
just
take
a
pause
and
if
there's
anybody
who
hasn't
spoken
yet
today
and
really
would
like
to
contribute
we're
going
to
offer
you
that
time
so
stefa.
Would
you
like
to
respond
to
michael's
suggestion.
I
Great
and
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
really
interesting
idea-
I
I'm
seeing
what's
happening
in
the
chat
too,
where
ann
marie
kind
of
chimed
in
saying
that
it
is
still
unclear
at
the
state
level
whether
that
loan
fund
is
actually
a
something
that
can
actually
be
used
under
arpa.
I
I
see
you
said
that
they're
saying
it
can't
be,
but
I
I
thought
that
it
was
still
in
question,
but
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure
about
that.
I
I
would
also
like
to
know
on
the
idea
of
the
bullet
point.
We
talked
about
earlier
revolving
leveraging
existing
funds
that
it
would
be
really
helpful,
and
this
could
be
like
an
interim
homework
piece
or
something
for
everyone
to
talk
about
ways
that
they,
the
things
they're
already
doing,
that
need
a
final
piece
or
like
we
just
did
receive
funding
from
the
state
from
the
ahip
funds.
That
is
specific,
around
bipark
homeownership
rates,
and
so
things
like
that
that
are
already
happening.
I
I
would
like
some
to
kind
of
know
an
inventory
if
you
will
of
what's
going
on
so
that
we
know
what's
out
there
to
leverage.
So
that's
one
thing
and
on
the
front
of
what
is
eligible
or
not,
does
anyone
know,
or
can
we
put
a
question
out
as
to
how
the
local
the
local
government
funds
can
be
layered
or
not
with
the
statewide
funds.
E
A
M
That's
correct
I'll,
be
very,
very
quick,
so
what
michael
described
is
a
a
very
good
approach
that
that
is
sort
of
figured
out
as
far
as
buying
existing
market
rate
apartments
or
units
and
putting
them
into
affordable
housing,
and
it
it
leverages
the
money
by
probably
four
or
five
to
one.
So
if
we
put
in
a
million
dollars
of
arpa
fund
into
purchasing
a
apartment
building,
it
would
be
matched
by
by
four
or
five
million
dollars.
E
A
P
P
It's
super
wonky
regulatory
language,
but
housing
trust
funds
are
not
eligible.
There
was
a
public
comment,
question
about
making
economic
development
corporations,
etc,
etc,
considered
obligated
when
you
set
that
up
and
so
that
you
could
extend
the
expenditure,
timeline
and
treasury
says
no
and
refers
back
to
the
expense
has
to
be
incurred,
meaning
obligated
by
december
31st
2024.
So
that's
a
no
and
on
land
banking.
I
just
need
to
let
you
know.
There
are
specific
parameters
in
treasury
guidance
around
land,
banking.
P
It
is
eligible,
you
could
purchase
the
land
and
there
are
parameters
around
that
that
I'd
be
happy
to
provide
to
this
group
third
and
is
revolving
loan
fund,
and
we
can
do
that.
The
first
loan,
though,
has
to
be
made
by
that
deadline
of
2020
december
2024,
and
then
treasury
has
parameters
on
how
we
treat
repayment
of
principal
and
interest
and
if
a
loan
doesn't
mature
by
2026
how
we
calculate
repayment
beyond
that
date,
so
it
gets
a
little
complicated.
But
yes,
it's
eligible
and
I'll
pause
there
for
interpreting.
E
A
And
you
just
got
a
shout
out,
thank
you
for
interpreting
excellent
job,
what
a
great
job
you're
doing.
So.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
so
much
before
we
talk
about
our
next
meeting
time
and
our
next
steps.
We
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
for
some
of
you
who
have
been
doing
such
a
great
job
of
listening,
if
there's
something
that
you
want
to
to
add
to
the
conversation
and
if
so
just
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand.
E
A
J
Well,
thanks
I'll
defer
to
laura,
because
I
love
laura's
question.
I
I
have
a
different
one,
but
if
laura
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
go.
D
Thank
you
ann,
so
the
question
was
there
are
already
established
mechanisms
within
the
county
and
city
and
I'm
sure
all
the
other
municipalities
in
the
in
the
county
for
distribution
of
funds.
So
would
that
count
as
not
establishing
a
new
trust
but
using
an
already
established
mechanism
for
distribution
of
money
elongate
or
extend
the
timeline?
So
that's
one
question
and
I
wanted
to
speak
to
our
ideas
on
pipeline
and
as
somebody
who
actually
does
some
of
this
work,
what
we've
got
going
on
and.
E
A
And
and
leslie
that's
a
great
question
and
I
think
it
is
you
can
put
arpa
funds
in
an
existing
mechanism.
Although
leslie
has
left
the
meeting,
so
we
could
double
check
with
her
unless
claire
do
you
do
you
know
the
answer
to
that
question?
No.
D
Okay,
second
thing
I
wanted
to
mention
is
as
a
as
the
housing
authority
in
the
city.
D
You
know
we
do
all
of
these
things
that
have
been
talked
about
already
today
and-
and
I
will
pile
on
with
what
kurt
was
saying
in
terms
of
timeline-
is
that
and
and
claire
as
well
is
that
it's
going
to
be
tough
to
spend
on
new
initiatives
or
new
projects
that
are
not
already
in
either
an
entitlement
pipeline
or
even
in
a
twinkle
in
the
eye
in
terms
of
a
purchase
of
land,
because
the
due
diligence
that
it
takes
to
actually
purchase
things
does
take
a
bit
of
time,
but
I
think
that
it's
doable
to
expend
if
we,
if
we
need
to
on
on
things
that
are
already
in
the
works
and
and
bhp,
for
example,
has
quite
a
robust
pipeline
of
land
that
we
can
start
developing,
perhaps
in
an
accelerated
manner,
and
I
wouldn't
want
to
speak
for
other
entities
in
the
community,
but
as
we
saw
with
longmont
and
and
I
know
with
boulder
county
as
well
paul,
I
won't
speak
for
you.
D
But
of
course
I
know
that
nori
has
quite
a
bit
that
she's
working
on
too
so
last
point
with
that
is
investment
in
community
asset
through
public
entities
will
give
back
to
the
communities
down
the
road
as
well,
and
so
just
to
keep
that
in
mind
as
we're
thinking
about
where
and
how
to
prioritize
those
funds.
D
Thank
you
and
I'm.
I'm
gonna
have
to
hop
off
camera
and
get
on
my
phone,
so
you
won't
see
me,
but
I
will
I
will
be
here
thanks.
J
G
G
I
I
raised
my
hand
to
make
this
comment
and
and
laura
sort
of
addressed
it,
but
I
think
what
we
don't
have
on
the
list
is
investing
in
projects
that
are
in
the
pipeline
for
the
purpose
of
a
speeding
up
their
development
or
an
and
allowing
deeper
affordability,
and
that
is
another
way
to
leverage
funds
here,
where
we
can
use
this,
invest
in
something
that
maybe
was
going
to
be
affordable
at
60
percent
of
ami
and
allow
affordability
as
low
as
30
percent
of
ami.
J
Yes,
thank
you
so
kind
of
switching
gears
a
little
bit.
I'm
I'm
also
thinking
about
the
the
the
need
to
invest
in
kind
of
pre-housing
supports,
and
obviously
we
work
with
a
number
of
families
that
find
themselves
homeless
because
of
domestic
violence,
and
I
know
anna
works
with
with
families
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
or
on
the
verge
of
homelessness.
Because
of
a
lot
of
different
reasons.
J
And
so
my
concern
is
that
a
lot
of
these
resources
really
leave
out
people
who
are
already
you
know
already:
housing,
housing
and
stable
or
experiencing
homelessness
and
are
just
kind
of
in
the
on
the
sort
of
the.
N
J
Waiting
platform-
and
I
know
that
there
have
been
conversations
in
the
past
about
you-
know
a
family,
homeless,
shelter
and
I
personally
don't
believe
that
that's
the
direction
to
go.
A
Thank
you.
It's
a
great
another,
great
topic
that
we
should
be
thinking
of
as
well.
So
I
don't
know
johanna
if
you
want
to
lead
this
conversation
about
when
our
next
meeting
is
or
did
you
want
me
or
paul
to
do
that.
C
I'm
happy
to
and
I'll
pause
in
a
moment,
but
just
gonna
go
into
setting
our
next
two
meeting
times
one
for
the
week
beginning
march
14th
and
the
next
will
be
the
week
beginning
march.
28Th.
C
E
C
So
I'm
gonna
put
I'll
put
those
in
the
chat,
so
you
can
also
see
them
and
then
I
think
the
best
easiest
way
to
go
about
this
is
just
everyone
please
respond
tuesday
or
wednesday,
and
we're
just
going
to
go
for
the
one
that
we
can
get.
The
most
people
to
participate
in
is.
C
Those
two
weeks,
so
it
is
tuesday,
let's
see
tuesday
march
15th
three
to
five
p.m
or
or
wednesday
march
16th
from
8
to
10
a.m.
C
That's
the
first
week
that
you'll
have
here
that's
the
first
week.
You'll
have
your
next
working
group
meeting
and
then
the
second
week
that
everyone
will
be
meeting
is
the
week
of
the
28th.
So
that's
tuesday,
march
29th
3
to
5
p.m
or
wednesday
march
30th
8
10
a.m.
C
Doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
just
by
means
of
convenience,
it's
usually
easier
for
people,
but
if
we
have
to
do
a
tuesday
and
a
wednesday
thing
I
I
imagine
paul
and
karen,
you
can
make
a
decision
on
that.
A
C
Great,
I
will
send
out
after
this
meeting
the
calendar
invitation
for
those
meetings.
E
H
C
And
to
clarify
so
there
are
only
two
more
working
group
meetings.
They
are
going
to
be
occurring
every
other
week
and
you
will
be
able
to
communicate
on
these
issues
in
between.
If
you
would
like
me
to
help
set
up
a
platform
for
you
to
communicate
on
either
slack
or
if
there's
something
else
that
you
prefer
happy
to
do.
That.
A
Johanna,
we
don't
have
to
go
out
of
this
room
right.
This
is
where
everybody's
going
to
be
joining
us
again,
so
we're
good,
correct,
okay,
good
and
there
stuff
guy
was
just
going
to
talk
about
next
steps,
and
one
is.
A
We
talked
about
sharing
the
bucket
list,
which
I
think
the
the
link
was
shared
in
the
chat,
although
we
can
johanna
can
send
it
to
everybody,
and
then
you
had
suggested
a
homework
project
where
we
all
kind
of
look
at
what
are
what's
in
the
pipeline
and
could
just
need
some
extra
support,
and
so
I'm
not
sure
how
we'd
like
to
do
that.
Maybe
johanna
you
could
set
up
a
a
document
that
we
could
populate.
C
Yes,
so
on
the
document
that
I
pasted
some
of
those
slides,
it
can
add
on
there,
and
I
think
that
would
be
an
easy
place
to
share
thoughts
and
ideas,
and
then
sophia
will
also
be
sharing.
The
meeting
notes
from
today
that
will
have
some
action
items
and
next
steps
that
need
to
be
taken.
So
we
can
put
a
note
in
there
karen
and
paul.
I
can
speak
with
you
after
about
what
specific
action
items
we
want
to
include.