►
From YouTube: March 31, 2022 - ARPA Economic Challenges Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hi
everyone,
sorry
for
the
delay.
I
got
my
wires
crossed.
I
thought
johanna
was
the
host
and
I
was
so.
A
C
So
we
I
we
dropped
the
we
dropped
the
agenda
in
the
chat
and
you
can
pull
that
up
on
your
own
screen
if
you'd
like,
and
what
we
are
going
to
do
today,
the
first
hour
we
are
going
to
debrief
out
each
of
our
groups
works.
So
we
have
the
child
care
work
group,
and
then
we
also
have
the
small
business
and
nonprofit
work
and
we
each
have
a
slide
deck
that
will
go
through.
C
So
we
can
all
learn
about
what
we've
been
up
to
for
the
last
week
and
a
half
or
so
we'll
take
a
quick
break
and
then
we'll
come
back
and
we'll
talk
about
decisions
that
we
have
to
make
the
process
going
forward
and
anything
else
that
comes
up
in
this
hour
together.
A
Rebecca,
can
you
give
me
a
thumbs
up
if
you
can
see
my
screen?
I
see
your
screen.
It
looks
great
awesome
great.
Well,
it's
great
to
see
everyone
and
heard
some
updates
of
the
other
group,
I'm
just
so
excited
by
the
work.
That's
been
happening
the
last
couple
weeks
and
just
a
ton
of
appreciation
again
for
everyone.
A
Who's
been
a
part
of
of
this
work,
thus
far,
so
I
think
for
people
who
were
in
the
non-profit,
small
business
group,
you
may
remember,
we
didn't
have
many
people
who
signed
up
for
the
child
care
group
who
were
from
this
group.
We
had
jorge
julie
and
I
and
then
daphne,
as
staff
support,
were
the
main
people
in
that
group.
So
we
got
some
awesome
suggestions
from
people
for
additional
members
who
had
child
care
expertise
to
join
this
group.
We
had
a
great
turnout.
A
We
had
about
12
additional
people
who
were
involved
either
behind
the
scenes
or
in
the
meetings.
We
had
two
meetings
and
I'll
share
with
you,
those
who
those
people
were
just
so
you
can
see
what
the
full
group
looked
like
and
again
would
love
to
hear
from
people
who
were
not
involved
with
this.
If
there's
anyone
that
you
feel
like
we're
missing
and
especially
as
we
share
what
our
initial
recommendations
are
and
how
to
move
forward.
A
They
weren't
terry
and
matt
weren't
able
to
make
the
meetings,
but
I'm
actually
meeting
with
them
separately
tomorrow
to
give
them
information
and
detail
about
our
recommendations
and
get
their
feedback
that
was
recommended
from
the
group
and
then
commissioner
lochiman
had
recommended.
I
reach
out
to
melanie,
who
is
the
executive
director
with
family
village,
and
I
had
a
great
conversation
with
her.
I'm
going
to
be
sending
out
information
that
she
sent
to
me
some
possible
directions.
A
So
just
to
review
these
are
the
four
areas
that
we
started
with.
We
reviewed
these
four
kind
of
main
buckets
of
work
around
child
care,
one
being
expanding
our
contracting
for
slots
for
c-cap
and
then
also
potentially
direct
financial
assistance
just
to
see
cap
families
or
to
to
families
that
aren't
qualifying
for
ccap
direct
financial
assistance
for
families
to
access
eligible
ffm
providers
and
then
some
type
of
guaranteed
basic
income
trainings
for
for
low-income
families
with
children
zero
to
five.
A
The
third
one
is
funding
for
nonprofits
to
specifically
cover
child
care
for
staff
and
clients
and
families,
and
then
the
fourth
idea
which
came
from
the
group
was
really
around
a
policy
change.
It
was
changing
the
colorado
state
constitution
to
age
0,
to
grade
12
for
free,
appropriate
public
care
and
education.
A
So
that's
what
we
started
with
our
next
step
before
our
second
meeting
was
to
survey
the
group
to
see
if
we
could
narrow
the
focus
and
what
what
came
up
from
that
survey
is.
There
was
really
an
interest
in
focusing
on
the
family,
friends
and
network
child
care
and
then
also
the
direct
assistance.
So
we
talked
quite
a
bit
about
that
during
the
second
meeting.
A
A
We
did
a
jamboard
activity
using
several
of
the
questions
from
our
criteria,
checklist
to
start
to
get
people
to
think
through
what
are
the
areas
we
really
think
meet
all
this
criteria.
Where
are
there
potential
overlaps
here?
Where
are
there
places
that
we
could
leverage?
Where
are
there
places
that
are
there's
other
resources
coming
in
from
the
state
or
the
feds
that
we
want
to
avoid
duplication?
A
So
we
had
a
process
with
a
group
where
everyone
contributed
to
that
and
where
we
landed
was
our
recommended
focus
area
kind
of
our,
I
would
say
top
focus
area,
and
this
doesn't
mean
that
this
is
our
only
focus
area
at
this
point
that
is
looking
at
direct
assistance
to
families.
A
We
can't
we
can't
decide
to
give
two
million
dollars
to
one
family,
for
example,
and
so
one
of
the
options
that
we
could
follow
is
to
follow
the
child
tax
credit
amount,
which
is
the
300
per
month
per
child,
and
just
you
know,
we.
We
also
wanted
to
be
realistic
about
how
far
this
money
would
really
go,
how
many
families
it
would
serve.
So
if,
if
we
were
looking
at
this,
allocating
seven
and
a
half
million
for
direct
assistance
to
families,
this
would
reach
2083
families
with
one
child
for
a
year.
A
A
This
julie
was
great
at
helping
other
they're
doing
a
lot
of
this
through
effa
helping
to
for
us
to
understand
different
avenues
that
we
could
take
to
avoid
this
and
one
being
that,
if
the
money
was
going
to
be
used
for
child
care,
then
we
could
potentially
give
money
to
frcs
who
could
pay
the
providers
directly
for
that?
A
There
was
also
some
some
advocacy
for
us
to
not
dictate
how
the
money
is
spent.
I
think
from
from
a
couple
of
the
people
on
the
call
that
really
wanting
to
support
and
trust
families
to
use
the
money
that
they
get
in
the
way
that
they
feel
feel
is
best
for
their
own
family,
so
so
not
dictating
again.
What
that
money
is
for
and
then
some
other
kind
of
potential
areas
we
talked
about,
is
you
know?
How
do
we
narrow
down
the
scope?
You
know?
Obviously
there
there
are
so
many
families
in
need.
A
We
know
that
this
money
cannot
reach
every
single
family,
that's
in
need,
but
could
we
potentially
focus
the
direct
assistance
for
families
with
kids
age,
zero
to
three
or
zero
to
five
and
target
neighborhoods
with
a
higher
social
vulnerability
scores?
And
so
our
group
has
taken
a
quick
look
at
some
of
the
gis
heat
maps,
the
geographic
heat
maps
and
those
were
able
to
look
at
neighborhoods
that
have
higher
social
vulnerability
scores
and
if
this
larger
group
is
interested
in
that
we
certainly
can
make
a
plan
for
for
sending
that
out.
A
You
know
sending
that
information
out
to
the
larger
group.
I'm
gonna
pause
there
and
see
if
there's
any
any
additional
things,
I'm
forgetting
at
this
point
from
debbie
julie,
jorge.
A
So
these
are
some
other
areas
for
consideration
we
did
have
you
know
some
of
the
things
we
struggled
with
a
bit
were
we
can
give
direct
assistance
to
families,
but
if
we
don't
help
support
some
stability
in
the
workforce,
we're
not
going
to
have
the
slots
available
in
child
care,
so
that
was
one
of
the
things
we
talked
about.
E
A
So
there
was
some
advocacy
for
us
to
provide
some
professional
development
dollars
for
child
care
workers
who
are
working
within
the
family,
friends
and
neighbors
child
care,
centers
or
settings.
I
should
say
so:
that's
one
of
the
things
I
think
we
still
like
to
explore
and
then
the
other,
the
other
piece
which
the
group
really
wasn't
involved.
A
In
that
conversation
again
it
was
an
interest
or
suggestion
from
commissioner
lo
chamin
is
potentially
to
invest
in
a
pilot
with
family
villages
or
other
models
that
have
drop
in
where
we
really
can
address
the
gap
that
we
see
for
slots
for
infants
and
toddlers,
and
so
shannon
brian,
who
is
another
staff
person
with
boulder
county's
on
the
call
of
the
day,
and
I've
asked
her
to
do
a
little
bit
of
research
just
on
any
similar
models
that
we
might
have
in
boulder
county
to
family
villages
or
any
other
drop-in
centers
that
we
could
focus
on
that
could
potentially
fill
that
gap.
A
And
I
just
talked
about
this
a
little
bit.
You
know
the
need
for
child
care,
workforce
recruitment.
You
know
again,
it's
not
going
to
do
people
any
good.
If
there
are
any
spots.
A
People
to
go
to-
and
you
know
we
haven't
narrowed
down
exactly
how
we
want
to
the
population
we
want
to
focus
on,
but
I
think
the
question
has
come
up
is,
and
you
know
the
idea
of
having
a
transformational
idea,
and
could
we
really
reduce
the
number
of
families
that
we're
supporting
but
increase
the
amount
of
assistance
for
those
families
over
a
longer
period
of
time.
A
The
other
thing
that
came
up
for
us
was:
it
feels
really
important
to
be
able
to
provide
services
for
these
families
to
make
sure
that
they're
we're
really
looking
at
the
full
continuum
of
social
determinants
of
health.
We
also
know
that
there's
all
of
these
home
visitation
universal
home
visitation
services.
A
And
then
the
other
thing
I'll
add
that
I
didn't
put
up
here
is
that
we
did
get
an
overview
of
the
state
funding.
That's
coming
down
for
child
care,
centers
and
there's
quite
a
bit.
I
think
many
of
you
probably
saw
that
just
just
a
couple
days
ago,
the
rfp
came
out
for
the
circles
grants
from
the
governor's
office
that
child
carrier
centers
can
apply.
A
For
so
I
think
we
felt
that
there
there
is
a
lot
there's,
I
would
say
a
lot,
there's
other
opportunities
for
funding
to
come
into
child
care
centers,
and
so
we
wanted
to
be
able
to
focus
on
this
direct
assistance,
ffn
and
then
filling
some
of
these
gaps
around
slots
for
infants
and
toddlers.
A
How
do
we
evaluate
the
impact
here
and
then
a
question
I
think
for
the
other
group
is:
will
the
small
business
and
sub
group
be
providing
funding
to
child
care
centers
to
support
with
workforce
issues,
so
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
our
group
wanted
to
understand.
A
bit
better.
A
So
I
will
just
open
it
up
for
julie,
debbie
and
jorge
is
jorge
on.
Let's
see
him
to
add
any
comments.
Anything
I
missed.
A
E
I
have
a
couple
questions
if
I'm
just
really
curious,
I
don't
know
I'm
gonna
be
aware
of
time,
but
if
you
can
briefly
explain
what
the
family
religious
model
is
someone
who's
not
in
childcare,
that'd
be
really
cool
and
then
the
second
question
was,
I
guess,
around
the
workforce.
Concern
too.
I
was
curious
to
know
if,
even
with
that
state
funding,
if
the
child
care
workforce
concern,
is
still
like
a
big
flag
for
y'all.
A
Yeah,
so
I
can
answer
the
first
question
that
I
might
I
might
look
to
debbie
for
the
second
question.
If
she
has
insight
on
matter
so
the
family
villages
model
is
a
kind
of
community-based
model
really
intended
to
support.
Not
only
the
child
care
challenges
that
parents
have
but
be
able
to
build
some
community
for
parents.
A
So
it's
I
don't
want
to
call
it
a
co-op
model
as
much,
but
it
really
is
a
space
for
parents
to
come
and
collaborate
and
work
on
sites,
but
also
get
child
care
there.
It's
a
drop
in
so
there's
there
are
no
issues
with
kind
of
age
or
you
know
slots
necessarily
it's
a
more
affordable
option
for
parents.
Parents
do
need
to
stay
on
site,
but
they're
separate
areas.
A
A
It
has
attracted
a
lot
of
women,
mostly
who
are
who
are
looking
to
start
a
small
business.
Have
a
small
business
want
to
connect
with
other
people,
they've
also
described
it
as
really
the
feedback
they've
gotten
is.
It's
been
also
mental
health
support
for
the
parents,
because
there
can
be
such
an
isolating
factor
of
having
small
children
for
parents,
and
so
there's
that
connection
with
other
parents
for
60
hours
a
month.
A
It's
five
it's
560
dollars,
so
I
think
a
more
affordable
option
for
for
for
child
care
and
they
have
one
site
in
east
boulder
right
now
and
they're
looking
to
to
open
a
site
in
lafayette
and
long
monsoon.
A
And
then,
as
far
as
the
grants
coming
from
the
state,
I
don't
really
have
a
kind
of
a
fiscal
assessment
of
if
how
much
it's
really
going
to
help
support
recruitment
and
retention
of
child
care
workers.
I
would
say
none
of
this.
You
know
the
money
is
never
enough,
but
maybe
would
ask
debbie
if
she
has
a
sense
of
how
far
that
those
funds
will
go.
D
Yeah,
I
know
they
just
opened
up
the
circle
grant
rfp,
so
we're
still
diving
a
little
bit
deeper
too
into
this.
To
really
see
do
some
financial
modeling
to
see
what
this
is
really
going
to
look
like,
and
what
can
the
impact
of
that
be?
So
maybe
what
we
can
do
is
we're
find
out
more
information
about
that.
D
I
hate
to
give
wrong
information,
so
I
I
will
say
everything
every
bit
does
help,
though
I
think
considering
that
there's
some
changes
in
licensing
and
pieces
that
they're
looking
at
more
qualifications
for
early
child
care
providers,
that's
creating
some
challenges
of
like
how
do
existing
child
care
providers
who
do
not
have
degrees.
What
does
that
look
like
in
terms
of
getting
them?
The
education
and
training
needed
to
be
able
to
do
that?
D
So
it's
kind
of
interesting
because
we
have
a
couple
things
working
at
the
same
time,
there
are
some
national,
obviously
some
national
legislation-
that's
looking
at
this
as
well,
and
that
is
somewhat
more
focused
on
the
on
the
actual
teachers
and
providing
some
dollars
for
career
development
and
bonuses.
But
I've
not
seen
anything
obviously
finalized
on
that.
So
sorry,
for
not
being
able
to
provide
a
little
more
information.
But.
A
The
other
thing
I'll
add
is
that
I'm
in
close
touch
with
the
city
of
boulder
who's,
doing
a
guaranteed
income
pilot
through
ours.
All
of
you
know
from
the
first
kickoff
day
for
for
our
work
here
to
ensure
that
we're
not
going
to
overlap
with
them.
If
we
do
decide
to
go
in
that
direct
direction
or
if
it
is
approved
by
the
the
commissioners
that
we
go
in
that
direction,
so
that
will
all
be
work
that
we'll
do
during
the
deeper
dive
planning
period.
C
Okay,
you
guys
can
see
my
screen
yeah
all
right.
I
very
quickly
put
together
a
slide
deck
once
I
heard
susan
was
going
to
do
one,
so
I
welcome
my
group
to
jump
in
at
any
point
to
expand
on
any
of
these
slides.
So
our
group
has
titled
our
project
community
revitalization,
through
equitable
investments
in
people
and
places.
C
So
concerns
about
workforce
stabilization
vacancies,
taking
care
of
our
staff
recruitment
ways
to
invest
in
the
business.
All
of
those
problems
and
challenges
belong
to
both,
and
so
we
decided
to
rather
than
create
two
tracks,
try
to
work
to
have
an
umbrella
category,
which
is
community
revitalization
through
equitable
investments
in
people
and
places,
and
then
the
path
to
that
be
applicable
to
both
nonprofits
and
and
small
businesses
that
fit
within
an
established
set
of
criteria.
C
And,
finally,
this,
what
we
discovered
and
realized,
as
we
went
along
in
our
discussions,
is
that
we
wanted
to
honor
the
small
business
and
the
non-profits
ability
to
be
flexible
and
invest
in
the
ways
that
they
know
they
need
investing
in
order
to
stabilize
their
business,
whether
it's
primarily
around
the
workforce,
whether
it's
infrastructure,
whatever
the
issue,
is
that
this
opportunity
needs
to
be
flexible
enough,
while
advancing
equity
initiatives.
C
The
eligible
small
businesses
and
nonprofit
organizations
will
have
the
opportunity
to
make
the
short-term
and
long-term
investments
that
will
allow
them
to
stabilize
their
workforces
while
advancing
racial
equity
initiatives.
So
that's
the
big
that's
the
the
high
level
concept,
so
we
have
lots
of
goals
and
objectives
tied
to
this
idea.
C
We
want
them
to
these
grants
need
to
advance
racial
and
economic
equity,
yet
be
flexible
enough
for
the
small
business
and
non-profit
to
invest
in
the
area.
They
believe
will
have
the
greatest
impact,
so
we
don't
want
to
be
overly
prescriptive
and
then,
through
an
administratively
simple
but
effective,
set
of
success.
Metrics
we'll
have
the
ability
to
report
back
on
greatest
impact.
Those
greatest
impact
outcomes
will
need
some
work
in
developing
what
that
looks
like,
so
that
it
both
is
the
right
one.
Is
it's
effective?
C
It's
accurate,
but
it's
also
administratively
simple,
to
implement,
there's
an
asterisk
at
the
bottom
that
there
may
be
additional
work
required
to
reduce
the
number
of
eligible
small
businesses
and
non-profits
so
that
this
work
is
administratively
manageable.
So
we
don't
have
to
add
boulder
county
staff,
but
also
so
that
the
grant
amounts
are
meaningful,
that
they're
materially
large
enough
to
be
meaningful
and
that
sort
of
gets
back
to.
C
I
think
a
comment
susan
made
at
the
end
of
her
slide
deck,
which
was
you
know
every
bit,
helps,
but
can
is
it
necessary
to
try
to
narrow
the
scope
so
that
the
amounts
are
impactful?
C
C
C
The
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
that
on
the
next
slide,
so
small
businesses,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
those
owned
by
historically
underserved
and
underrepresented
communities,
small
businesses,
geographically
located
in
zip
code
below
the
poverty
level,
small
businesses
that
have
not
received
any
covered,
19
relief,
funding,
non-profit
serving
communities
hardest
hit
by
the
corporate
19
pandemic,
low-wage
workers,
remote
communities
and
vulnerable
retail
sales
districts.
C
This
slide
is
a
snapshot
of
examples
of
how
grant
proposals
can
zoom
in
on
ideas
that
advance
racial
and
economic
inequities,
while
also
investing
in
the
businesses
as
well
as
their
workforces.
This
is
certainly
not
an
all-inclusive
list,
but
it
is
a
list
that
we've
started
to
bring
some
visibility
into.
What
we're
trying
to
accomplish
here.
C
So,
for
instance,
if
a
business
is
trying
to
hire
individuals
who
don't
yet
have
the
ability
to
legally
work,
could
we
invest
some
legal
resources
into
that
organization
to
help
make
that
process
happen,
faster
retention,
bonuses
for
under-resourced,
small
businesses
and
non-profits
employee
wellness
benefits
that
encourage
rest
and
healing
from
vicarious
trauma,
sustained
by
being
a
front-line
worker
staff,
development
training
to
help
create
income,
earning
potential
in
career
progression,
hiring
staff
who
are
representative
of
program
service
and
or
disproportionately
impacted
community
members,
language,
translation
and
interpretation
services,
cultural,
cultural
broker,
services,
funding
and
technical
assistance
to
support
historically
underserved
entrepreneurs
and
small
business
owners
and
consulting
services
to
help
the
small
business
and
or
non-profit,
achieve
sustainable
growth
and
address
vulnerabilities.
C
So
the
when
we
think
about
how
this
work
can
be
transformational,
these
are
some
of
the
things
that
have
bubbled
up
to
the
surface.
For
us,
the
first
is
this
group
has
talked
about
the
appointment
of
a
selection
committee,
and
the
selection
committee
would
be
made
up
of
a
diverse
group
of
community
members
who
go
through
vigorous
equity
training
and
they
could
potentially
be
developed
involved
in
the
development
of
further
development
of
the
criteria
for
this
grant
proposal.
C
We're
doing
all
this
work
on
the
front
end
understanding
the
problem,
we're
trying
to
develop
ideas
through
the
lens
of
equity,
and
now,
let's
make
the
decision
through
that
lunge
as
well,
and
so
the
selection
committee
could
be
a
way
to
make
sure
that
that
happens,
and
that
could
be
really
transformational
specifically,
you
know,
grant
programs
are
not
new
original
or
sexy
ideas,
but
they're,
important
and
they're
necessary,
and
the
grant
criteria
could
be
the
place
where
this
is
transformational,
meaning
that
we
are
zooming
in
really
closely
on
the
parts
of
the
community
that
have
been
disproportionately
impacted
by
kobet.
C
Another
way
this
could
be
transformational
is
that
the
the
the
winners
of
the
awards
could
be
paired
with
cultural
brokers
and
business
coaches
to
help
implement
their
ideas,
understand,
business,
vulnerabilities
and
otherwise
further
invest
in
the
business
and
then
also,
very
importantly,
we
learned
in
the
phase
one
of
baladesh
that
from
from
the
community
that
a
lot
of
people
don't
know
about
the
programs
that
are
available
to
them
or
how
to
find
them
how
to
access
them.
C
So,
let's
not
repeat
that
problem,
not
with
the
roll
out
of
this
or
any
of
the
things
that
we
do
in
this
in
in
this
in
the
conclusion
about
of
our
work
together,
let's
make
sure
that
the
marketing
and
the
outreach
to
get
people's
input
is
just
as
aggressive
and
thorough
and
thoughtful
on
the
other
side
and
implementing
the
things
that
we
do
and
then,
in
close
similar
to
the
to
the
question,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
that
susan's
putting
in
front
of
us
is.
Are
we
transformational
enough
with
this
idea?
C
Have
we
gotten
clear
enough
on
who
we're
trying
to
serve
how
we
are
going
to
do
it
or
are
we
too
broad
and
we
risk
essentially
watering
down
the
money
so
much
that
it's
not
going
to
make
a
transformational
impact?
I
think
these
are
really
important
questions
that
we
have
to
discuss
as
a
team,
both
as
subgroups
and,
of
course,
as
a
global
team
as
well,
and
the
economic
development
group.
D
D
One
of
the
questions
I
had-
and
I
know
it
came
up
in
our
group
too-
was
really
how
we
scope
and
scale
the
dollars.
So
I
was
just
curious
little
one
about
what
we
think.
Maybe
that
range
could
look
like
and
it
sounds
like
there's
still
conversation
happening
about
that.
D
The
other
thing
is,
and
I
know
this
gets
challenging.
I
do
sometimes
worry
if
we
make
the
process
too
complicated.
You
know
like
that.
There's
a
grant
process
and
then
there's
this
and
I
don't
know
if
it
might
even
be
worth
considering
to
have
a
coach
or
somebody
that's
helping
people
prepare
grants.
I
just
feel
like
especially
when
we're
thinking
about
equity
and
underserved
communities
anyway,
I
would
just
hate
to
put
up
too
many
barriers
so,
but
yet
I
understand
there
needs
to
be
a
process,
so.
C
Yeah,
I
don't.
I
don't
know
what
the
right
answer
is,
although
I
will
say,
the
boulder
county
staff
are
getting
me
in
touch
with
some
people
who
have
were
involved
in
the
first
round
of
grants
going
out
and
I'm
hoping
to
learn
from
them.
What
worked
and
what
didn't
and
see,
if
there's
ways
that
we
can
do
things
different
or
better
this
time
around
and
then,
as
far
as
scope,
that's
a
hard
question.
C
One
of
the
questions
that
we
have
still
in
our
criteria
document
is:
we
don't
know
how
many
people
this
captures
or
how
many
businesses
yet
because
the
the
the
funnel
is
pretty
broad
but
not
at
the
same
time
and
then
in
terms
of
impactful
grant
amounts.
I
think
that's
going
to
really
range
depending
on
what
your
p
l
is
right.
If
you're
an
itty,
bitty,
200
000
shop
versus
your
20
million,
that's
totally
different.
Your
workforce
issues
are
so
different,
yet
they're
equally
as
important,
the
cost
I
mean.
C
Well,
if
there
are
no
other
questions
or
comments,
we
are
running
ahead
of
schedule,
which
is
always
exciting,
because
that
leaves
us
more
time
to
actually
work
together.
Susan,
do
you
want
to
just
keep
going
until
two
before
we
take
a
break,
or
what
do
you
all
want
to
do?
I
think
keep
going.
C
Okay,
how
about
we
update
the
group
on
the
conversation
from
this
morning.
C
A
Okay,
so,
as
I
think
all
of
you
know,
the
steering
committee
meets
every
thursday
morning
at
eight
and
we
the
last
couple
meetings
we
have
done
updates
from
each
of
the
three
groups:
housing,
the
mental
health
and
social
resilience,
and
then
our
group
as
well
so
each
of
the
groups
provided
some
detailed
updates
on
their
proposals
or
their
initial
recommendations
and
how,
where
they've
kind
of
narrowed
down
those
ideas.
A
So
we
did
a
round
of
that
with
questions.
There
were
questions
from,
I
think
amy
who's
on
right
now
and
commissioner
lochiman
just
around
kind
of
how
is
this
different
from
what's
already
happening?
Is
it
transformational
so
just
letting
this
group
know
that
that
you
know,
as
we
know,
from
our
criteria,
that's
a
focus
but
that
that
had
come
up
this
morning
as
well,
and
then
we
talked
about
next
steps
which
we'll
talk
about
a
bit
more,
but
we
talked
about
kind
of
our
timeline.
A
What's
coming
up
what
to
expect
kind
of
the
milestones
between
now
and
may
3rd,
when
we
will
be
presenting
to
the
commissioners
and
in
full
transparency,
I
had
horrible
internet
this
morning,
my
I
live
up
in
netherland
and
when
I
lose
my
internet,
I
have
to
get
in
the
car
and
drive
down
the
road
to
get
my
cell
phone
to
work.
C
What
I
would
add
is
that
we
have
a
due
date
of
april,
8th
of
finalizing
our
proposal
to
turn
it
over
to
boulder
county
staff
for
further
development
and
work
over
the
next
few
weeks.
C
We
talked
about
the
desire,
the
really
strong
desire
to
have
a
have
the
presentations
represented
and
led
by
people
other
than
susan,
and
I
so
you
all
hear
that
we
need
people
to
help
us
present.
This
work
to
the
boulder
county
commissioners
in
may.
It
can't
just
be
susan,
and
I
so
be
thinking
about
if
you're
somebody
who
wants
to
play
ball
and
help
us
stand
up
in
front
of
the
commissioners
and
presenter.
I
would
our
idea
that
would
be
really
helpful.
C
B
I
think
you
covered
just
about
everything.
The
only
thing
I
might
add
is
also
in
those
weeks,
if
you
have
an
expressed
interest
of
being
someone
that
the
county
staff
can
call
on
to
return
to
follow-up
questions
as
they're
going
through
this,
I'm
sure
there
will
be
questions
that
need
clarification
if
you
are
at
capacity
at
this
point
and
need
a
break
from
the
whole
process.
That
also
is
completely
understandable.
B
So
just
if
you
want
to
communicate
that
to
susan
or
rebecca,
you
know
how
you
want
to
stay
involved
and
to
what
extent
you
can
in
the
next
weeks
it's
not
going
to
be
standardized
meetings
or
anything
like
that,
but
just
to
be
in
you
know,
an
additional
sounding
board
when
needed.
C
Okay,
so
a
couple
of
things
that
we,
I
think
we
should
spend
some
time
talking
about.
The
first
is:
is
there
any
overlap
between
our
the
recommendations
of
the
child
care
group
and
the
community
revitalization
projects
that
we
want
to
address
and
clarify.
A
I
think
the
one
question
our
group
had
for
the
nonprofit
small
business
group
was,
and
I
and
I'm
hearing-
maybe
this
has
this
detail
that
hasn't
been
worked
out,
but
will
there
be
any
specific
investments
in
child
care,
centers
or
kind
of
the
family,
friends
and
neighbors?
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
areas
that
we
weren't
sure
about,
because
one
of
the
suggestions
that
we
had
was
to
provide
funding
for
non-profit
workers
and
clients
for
child
care.
A
You
know,
I
think,
in
some
ways,
through
our
proposal
for
direct
assistance,
we
have
the
non-profit
clients
or
the
people
that
non-profits
serve
covered,
but
not
necessarily
the
the
workers
in
nonprofits.
So
I
think
that
was
one
of
the
areas
that
we
saw
a
connection,
a
potential,
not
an
overlap.
I
think
just
a
potential
connection
in
the
work.
C
So
the
proposal
as
it
stands
does
identify
low-wage
workers
which
child
care
workers
can
be,
and
young
children
as
part
of
underrepresented
groups,
and
so,
if
a
small
business
that
is
a
child
care
center,
is
applying
for
a
grant
opportunity.
I
think
it
would
fall
within
the
parameters
of
this
project.
We
haven't
excluded
them.
A
C
I'm
just
looking
at
the
notes
here:
do
we
want
to
spend
some
time
talking
about
the
idea
of
a
an
appointed
selection
committee?
I'm
curious
how
the
child
care
group,
what
the
child
care
group
thinks
about
that
idea,
either
or
both
for
the
community
revitalization
project
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
has
a
role
in
the
child
care
effort
as
well.
C
So
again,
the
concept
of
an
appointed
selection
committee
of
diverse
community
members
who
go
through
vigorous
equity
training
and
they
understand
the
scope
of
this
project
would
help
further
shape
the
selection
criteria
and
then,
as
well
select
the
people
who
are
receiving
the
awards.
At
the
other
side,.
A
I'm
wondering
right
back,
I'm
just
looking
at
the
agenda.
Just
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
go
back
just
really,
quick
and
sorry
sorry
about
this.
I
missed
it
when
we
were
looking
at
it.
I
wonder
if
we
could
just
do
a
round
robin
with
everyone
to
just
hear
from
people
how
the
ideas,
because
you're
hearing
about
different
ideas,
how
they're
landing
with
people
and
if,
if
there
is
a
feeling
that
some
or
all
of
this
is
tran,
potentially
transformational
for
our
community
kind
of,
I
wonder
if
that
would
be
okay.
A
G
Sure,
thank
you
yeah,
so
I
continue
to
struggle
with
the
idea
that
direct
assistance
to
individuals
can
be
transformational
when
it
has
an
expiration
date.
G
I
think
you
know
a
permanent
ebi
program
or
a
permanent
tax
credit
has
and
we've
seen
on
a
short-term
basis,
in
particular
with
the
child
care,
tax,
credit
or
child
care
tax
credit
that
that
does
have
the
opportunity
to
be
transformational,
but
that
if
and
when
it
ends
it,
the
transformation
goes
back.
So
that's
the
one
concern
I
have
there
and
then
I'm
a
huge
fan
of
the
family
village
co-op
and
that
that
concept
they
used
to
be
in
longmont
now
they're
in
in
nywat.
G
The
one
thing
that
I
would
say,
though,
is
for
the
most
part,
individuals
that
have
the
opportunity
to
work
remotely
and
stay
with
their
children
during
that
time.
That
they're
working
remotely
are
probably
not
the
of
greatest
need.
So
when
I
think
about
like
frontline
workers,
as
likely
being
in
the
greatest
need
just
based
on
socioeconomics,
those
aren't
people
that
can
you
know
kind
of
stay
with
their
kids
and
work
remotely.
A
Thanks
jessica,
all
great
points
and
yeah,
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
we
I
talked
with
family
village
around
is
what
really
kind
of
what
is
the
demographic
that
they're
seeing
and
you
know
they
they
did
say
it
hasn't.
It
hasn't
attracted,
understandably
people
who
are
lower
income
and,
and
would
it
if
there
were
scholarship
opportunities?
I
don't
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that.
So
thanks
so
much.
H
Sure
I
can
dive
in,
I
could
see
how
it
doesn't
seem
like
a
year
or
two
year
or
three
year.
Payment
stream
to
families
will
be
transformational.
I
just
want
to
suggest
looking
at
a
different
way.
First
of
all,
it
is
where
the
greatest
need
is
for
most
vulnerable
kids
in
this
community,
zero
to
five
low
income
and
child
care.
I
mean
it's
just
been
highly
impacted
by
covid,
so
I
wanna
just
put
that
out
there,
but
also.
H
I
do
think
that
if
we
do
this
an
intentional
way
with
good
impact
evaluations
that
you
know
we
built
the
case
for
focusing
economic
supports
on
that
level,
we're
in
a
well-resourced,
community
and
just
looking
at
some
of
the
experiences
we've
had
like
with
the
city
of
boulder
on
keep
family's
house
just
showing
what
that
does
to
families.
It
can
build
sustainability
to
to
move
resources
into
that
area,
and
it's
not
lost
in
the
sense
that
you
know.
For
those
years
those
children
would
have
been
to
child
care.
H
They
wouldn't
have
probably
been
able
to
access
otherwise,
and
so
just
like
a
little,
I
have
a
little
different
view
on
that
and
I
I
finally
struggle
with
what
is
transformational-
and
you
know,
is
this
really
ever
enough
money
to
be
transformational,
but
I
think
proving
the
case
of
something
can
be
transformational.
H
I
like
the
idea
of
the
grants.
I
don't
know
it's
just
general
comments,
but
I
like
the
idea
of
the
grant
program,
the
first
time
I've
heard
you
know
this
hearing
the
others
group
side.
I
think
that's
really
creative.
I
don't
see
the
same
application
to
rebecca's
question
on.
Would
you
need
a
screening
thing
to
choose
families
and
whatnot,
because
that's
a
different
kind
of
interface
with
families
through
our
that's
in
the
community,
as
opposed
to
having
a
group
picking
families
to
get
that?
H
It's,
I
would
say,
they're
the
question
that
you
asked
for
echoes:
would
it
be
the
same
instrument
I
think,
could
be
very
different
instruments.
You
kind
of
want
to
have
a
program
wrap
around
families
that
are
engaging
on
that
front
as
opposed
to
like
a
grant
competitive
grant
process
but
yeah.
I
think
at
all
I
think
it
I
think,
both
sound
exactly
like
what
our
community
needs.
Some
in
favor
of
moving
on
with
details.
E
E
I
mean
I
can
jump
in
I
I
kind
of
suck
at
julie's
point.
E
I
was
really
excited
about
the
child
care
groups
like
money
for
families,
and
I
think
that
also
makes
sense,
because
then
that
money
gets
to
pay
for
child
care
and
that
would
support,
hopefully
support
the
workforce
too
right
and
some
of
the
at
least
the
pilots
that
have
happened
around
guaranteed
income
have
even
only
been
a
few
years,
but
like
the
mayors
for
guaranteed
income
project,
shows
that,
even
in
a
couple
year,
pilot
programs
that
they
have
been
pretty
transformational
for
those
communities
so
and
that
they
work.
E
So
I
feel
like
that
is
the
right
step
in
terms
of
also
like
what
is
transformational
is
a
great
question
and
like
it
does
seem
like
a
good
step
in
that
direction.
E
My
curiosity,
I
guess,
is
how
to
reconcile
that
piece
around
like
giving
it
with
no
restrictions
and
like
the
cliff
effects,
and
so
I
heard
you
said
you
talked
about
it,
but
I'm
really
curious
about
what
that
looks
like
in
a
more
detailed
way-
and
I
think
I
do
still
like
have
questions
about
whether
our
group
has
like
is
that's
transformational,
the
grant
inc
the
grant
program.
We
talked
about
it
so
much
and
I
think
just
still
lingering
questions
around
how
to
like
scope
it
in
a
way.
E
That's
really
targeted
towards
like
workforce
support
and
also
it
doesn't
get
too
diluted
is
still
just
really
lingering
in
my
mind,
and
that
feels
like
the
place
to
narrow
in
on,
in
terms
of
like
transformation,
I
guess
or
something
close
to
closer
to
that.
So
that's
still
my
lingering,
but
like
I
kind
of
go
back
and
forth
depending
on
the
moment
so,
but
I
I
also
agree,
I
think,
we're
kind
of
on
the
right
track.
A
All
right
thanks,
hayden
bernice,
you
put
something
in
the
chat.
Do
you
want
to
share.
I
Yeah
sure,
thank
you,
susan.
I
think
I'm
talking
just
about
about
the
friends,
neighbors
and
family
child
care
centers,
I
think,
related
to
transformational.
J
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
the
comments
so
far
and
I'm
still
digesting
some
of
the
ideas
too.
I
was
excited
to
see
the
ideas
that
you
created
in
the
child
care
group.
It's
exciting
to
me
and
I
think
for
me,
my
concerns
are
more
around
making
sure
that
the
programs
that
we
do
come
up
with
are
able
to
reach
the
intended
audiences
and
that
there's
support
to
also.
J
As
we're
talking
about
underserved
communities,
helping
people
actually
access
and
use
the
services,
at
least
on
the
small
business
side,
it
takes
a
lot
of
time
and
extra
resources
when
we
work
with
folks
who
may
be
low,
socioeconomic
status
may
not
have
access
to
technology
or
people
who
don't
speak
english.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
so
far.
J
D
Well,
I
think
it's
really
impressive
how
far
everybody
we've
gotten
in
a
short
amount
of
time.
I
I
think
we're
all
struggling
a
little
bit
with
this
transformational
piece.
I
think
that
a
lot
of
times
it's
you
know
like,
can
we
go
for
the
sexy
thing?
What's
the
exciting
thing
to
go
for,
and
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
the
areas
that
we're
looking
at.
I
agree
with
julie,
they're,
the
ones
that
are
needed,
and
I
also
feel
like
this
idea
of
sort
of
how
is
it
different
or
new?
D
You
know
when
you
start
looking
at
building
a
program
from
the
bottom
up.
You
know
that's
a
lot
of
cost
and
time,
so
you
know,
even
in
our
group,
we're
trying
to
look
at
you
know
what
are
some
of
the
existing
systems
in
place
that
have
experience
with
this
to
be
able
to
facilitate
some
of
that
process
as
well,
and
I
just
think
that's
an
important
thing
to
keep
an
eye
on
is
that
I
don't
think
we
need
to
reinvent
the
wheel.
D
D
The
last
thing
I
wanted
to
say
is
that
there's
been
so
many
great
topics
discussed
because
there's
multiple
challenges
that
all
intertwine
to
what
we're
trying
to
solve,
and
we
know
these
one.
This
one
thing
will
not
do
all
of
that,
and
so
I
do
think
it's
worth
capturing
some
of
those
other
areas
that
were
talked
about
that
maybe
don't
fall
under
this
funding,
but
that
would
be
important
to
share
with
the
commissioners,
because
I
think
it's
something
we
have
to
address
as
a
community
to
actually
solve
the
problem
and
be
transformational.
D
So
I
just
don't
want
to
lose
sight
of
those
or
track
of
those
during
this.
I
think
it's
a
real
opportunity
with
this
incredible
group
of
people
you've
had
together
just
to
make.
A
Sure,
thanks
so
much
for
having
that
debbie.
You
know
that
johanna
and
amy
brought
that
up
this
morning
is,
I
think
it
was
them,
if
not
I'm
giving
credit
to
them
that
the
idea
of
when
we
do
present
to
the
commissioners
in
may
that
we
will
have
our
main
recommendations,
but
also
to
include
maybe
on
a
final
slide,
or
something
of
these
are
some
of
the
other
top
ideas
like
it
didn't
make
it
to
the
very
top.
A
F
Thank
you
yeah.
I
really
don't
have
much
to
add.
I
I
completely
agree
and
especially
with
debbie's
last
message.
This
is.
F
Can
you
hear
me
is
that
okay
yeah?
Can
you
hear
me?
F
Okay,
thanks
yeah,
so
I
just,
I
think,
debbie's
message
particularly
around
just
the
the
brain
power
and
the
community
awareness
that
was
part
of
both
of
these
groups
that
this
these
are
the
things
that
we
should
be
focused
on,
and
I've
struggled
with
the
concept
of
how
transformational
to
be
from
the
beginning
of
that
being
put
out
there
as
one
of
the
expectations.
I
think
it's
appropriately
transformational
and
I
think,
by
investing
in
the
areas
that
our
community
needs
best.
A
Thanks
simon,
I
think
that's
everyone
from
the
group,
so
thanks
rebecca
for
letting
us
just
do
that
that
little
round
robin
just
to
see
where
everyone's
at
so
and
I
know
we
wanted
to
pick
up
on
the
the
groups
you
were
talking,
you
were
asking
about
the
advisory
groups.
C
So
I
think
we
were
going
to
step
into
these
discussion
about
selection
committee.
C
D
Sure
I
I
think
that
the
for
the
child
care,
I
agree.
D
I
think
that
we
should
probably
use
a
different
process,
because
we
are
looking
at
distributing
funds
a
certain
way
to
a
large
group
of
individuals
based
on
criteria,
but
but
I
like
the
idea
that,
with
the
other
group
really
focusing
with
a
group
of
non-profit
and
corporations
of
what
that
looks
like
I,
I
also
wonder
sort
of
how
you
set
up
what
the
criteria
is
for
the
selection
committee
and
then
make
sure
that
you
know
we
have
that
mix
on
the
in
that
group
too.
D
That
would
just
be,
of
course,
that's
always
the
an
important
piece
of
that
too
again,
you
know
just
always
with
any
kind
of
grant
process
and
selection
process.
It's
just
also
like
I
said
earlier.
I
think
making
sure
there
are
barriers
and
if
there
are
barriers,
how
are
we?
D
What
are
we
doing
to
alleviate
those
so.
J
D
J
Sure,
thanks
rebecca
just
to
add
kind
of
piggyback
on
what
debbie
said,
I
think
it
really
does
depend
on
the
criteria
we
come
up
with
I've
seen
or
been
a
part
of
some
grant
programs
that
are
a
simple
self
selection,
where
the
entrepreneur
just
says
that
they
were
impacted
by
covid19,
but
also
on.
J
I
guess,
a
heavier
criteria:
side
where
they
may
need
to
demon.
The
small
business
may
need
to
demonstrate,
show
their
economic
injury
that
they
actually
like
showed
their
lots
of
revenues
and
things
like
that
that
they've
experienced
during
covid.
But
I
get
concerned
for
the
reasons
debbie
said
it
may.
When
we're
talking
about
underserved,
we
don't
want
to
discourage
anyone
from
applying
and.
J
Gosh
there
was
something
else
to
that
and
I
just
lost
it,
I'm
so
sorry,
but
we
don't
want
to
discourage
anyone
from
applying
and
if
I
remember
my
second
point,
I'll
put
it
in
the
chat.
Sorry
guys.
C
Thanks
rachel
jessica,
you
had
your
hand,
hand
up
next.
K
G
There
it
goes
sorry
about
that.
So
one
thing
that
I
wanna,
that
I'm
kind
of
very
passionate
about
is
so
yes
important
that
we're
using
these
funds
and
require
that
we're
using
these
funds
to
support
individuals,
organizations
that
were
negatively
impacted
by
covet.
So
I
think,
certainly
that
would
be
a
criteria.
G
But
for
me
for
the
arpa
dollars
and
for
if
we're
talking
about
transformational
as
important
or
potentially
more
important
is
the
intended
use
of
those
dollars
investing
in
revitalization,
whether
it
be
of
the
individual
organization
or
the
area
that
they're
in.
So
I
would
be
hesitant
to
support
something
where
it's
just
a.
I
was
impacted.
G
I
was
negatively
impacted
by
covid
without
some
sort
of-
and
this
is
how
I
can
use
these
dollars-
to
invest
in
revitalization
again
of
my
company,
of
or
of
the
area
that
my
company
is
located
in.
C
Thank
you,
hayden.
C
I
think
they
may
have
gotten
a
little
bit
meshed,
but
the
question
really
was
about
the
role
that
a
an
appointed
selection
committee
could
play
in
getting
this
these
projects
over
the
finish
line
in
terms
of
the
equity
work.
E
Yeah
well
rebecca
knows
my
opinion
and
everyone.
E
But
yeah
I'm
definitely
for
it
in
terms
of
selection
committee
having
some
kind
of
decision-making
power
in
terms
of
these
groups,
because
I've
been
a
part
of
grant-making
committees
that
are
very
diverse,
that
have
like
really
important
perspectives,
especially
from
community
members
who
maybe
aren't
always
given
that
decision
making
process
who
can
say
like
oh
yeah,
this
organization
does
really
important
work.
I
have
like
really
important
perspectives
on
like
the
need
from
a
different
angle.
E
I
don't
know
if
it
necessarily
has
to
be
only
community
members,
but
I
think,
having
like
a
large
body
of
community
voice
in
that,
can
be
really
helpful
for
making
these
big
decisions
and
I've
been
a
part
of
grant
making
committees
that,
I
think,
are
the
opposite
where
people
are
like.
Oh
no,
this
group,
this
identity
group
is
fine.
You
know
where,
like
maybe
they're,
not
actually
and
people,
don't
really
have
that
lived
experience
to
say
so.
E
So
that's
what
I'm
usually
for
like
a
more
diverse
like
and
and
just
having
like
to
the
point
around
equity
like
community
voice
in
the
decision
making
process,
I
think,
is
really
important,
especially
when
most
of
us
like
that
get
opportunities
to
make
decisions,
aren't
necessarily
living
the
lives
that
the
people
that
we're
trying
to
serve
are.
E
I
feel,
like
we
really
want
to
talk
equity
like
getting
that
voice
in
the
room
is
so
important
and
then,
in
terms
of
like
the
point
around
like
grant
barriers,
I
thought
that
was
an
awesome
idea.
Debbie
to
like.
E
I
don't
know
how
much
money
that
would
cost,
but
if
there
are
supports
for
businesses
or
organizations
that
maybe
aren't
as
good
at
writing
grants
or
don't
have
that
experience
or
are
like
smaller,
and
maybe
you
don't
have
the
resources
I
feel
like
that
could
really
like
that
would
be
on
there
like
kind
of
writing
and
writing
your
proposal
idea
side
of
things,
but
I
feel
like
that
could
really
help
especially
a
lot
of
the
smaller
orgs
or
maybe
people
who
don't
have
a
ton
of
traditional
experience
in
that
to
make
it
a
little
more
equitable.
C
I
agree:
I'm
glad
you
brought
that
back
up,
because
that
could
be
something
that
actually
creates
a
meaningful
flywheel
for
people
right.
If
they're,
given
the
opportunity
to
learn
the
skill
practice,
the
skill
for
the
interaction
then
rinse
and
repeat,
however,
many
times
over
the
course
of
their
career.
A
A
I
think
this
is
to
debbie's
play
my
my
hope
is
that
you
know
we
don't
over
complicate
stuff
and
that
that
both
groups
are
looking
at
new
ways
of
reaching
out
to
businesses,
nonprofits
and
individuals
that
we
don't
normally
serve
or
who
are
underserved
by
us.
My
I
think
that
I
love
the
idea
of
a
kind
of
a
grant
coach,
because
I
think
what
we
started
talking
about
internally
within
the
county
is
equity
in
grant
making
and
how
often
the
criteria
that
we
have
to
even
apply
for
a
grant.
A
It
makes
it
impossible
for
some
of
these
really
small
nonprofits
that
don't
have
the
capacity
to
apply
or
to
provide
the
data
that
we're
wanting,
or
things
like
that.
So
I've
just
been
thinking
through
on
our
side
for
the
child
care,
especially
since
we
can
do
direct
cash
assistance
to
people
who
are
undocumented
undocumented.
Is
you
know
what
are
we
missing
as
far
as
our
outreach
connection
with
people
who
may
not
be
involved
with
some
of
our
organizations,
you
know
what?
A
How
could
we
do
this
a
little
bit
differently,
just
as
far
as
a
broader
outreach,
so
that
is
my
two
cents
on
that.
C
I
think
that
brings
up
a
good
question.
It
might
be-
and
I
segue
into
another
part
of
this
conversation,
which
is,
I
think,
that
both
groups
have
a
desire
to
to
do
outreach
differently
to
make
sure
that
the
intended
audiences
a
caption.
What
what?
What
does
that
actually
look
like?
What
are
we
doing
that
doesn't
work?
D
Yeah,
I
was
just
thinking
about
even
our
representation
in
this
group
and
I
feel
like
we
really
need
cultural
brokers
in
that
discussion,
because
I
do
believe
when
there's
trust
within
a
community
and
relationships
already
that
that
may
be
one
of
the
most
powerful
ways
for
us
to
be
able
to
reach
into
to
go
into
communities
versus
expecting
communities
to
come
to
us.
And
so
I
was
even
thinking
with
that
question
like
who
else
needs
to
be
around
the
table.
J
E
Yeah
second,
dad
that's
super
helpful.
I've
been
thinking
about
that
and
just
thinking
about
like
what
cultural
brokers
and
what
other
community-based
like
community-led
groups
are
around
that
have
that
trust
established
and
like
also
like
word
of
like
I
mean
I
guess
we
all
have
a.
Maybe
we
could
all
start
getting
the
word
out.
E
You
know
through
these
community-led
non-profits
we
can
get
a
lot
of
word
out
or
I
guess
all
businesses,
but
word
of
mouth
is
also
a
really
huge
way
that
people
share
information
and
sometimes
like
just
putting
things
on
the
internet.
You
know
doesn't
always
work
and
so
like
using
those
kind
of
community
networks,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
another
important
avenue.
C
D
D
Then
we
should
talk
about
the
how
because
I
actually
think
it
could
be
a
more
impactful
discussion
and
conversation
at
that
point
and
even
identifying
who
would
be
the
right
cultural
brokers
that
we
look
at
along
the
lines
for
all
of
the
projects
and,
like
I
said
I
know,
there's
like
this
urgency,
but
some
of
these
pieces
I
feel
like
we
have
to
be
a
little
bit
more
cautious
and
pushing
forward
too
quickly.
Without
you
know,
I
think
you
all
have
done
a
great
job
about
trying
to
engage.
D
You
know
different
expertise
in
this,
but
I
guess
I'm
just
wondering
if
a
recommendation
is
maybe
the.
How
is
how
do
we
actually
get
to
the?
How
and
what
does
that
process
look
like,
so
that
we
can
do
really
meaningful
and
impactful
outreach.
C
A
Yeah
yeah-
and
I
would
you
know,
johanna
could
can
maybe
jump
in
or
isa
can
jump
in
as
well,
but
you
know
I
think,
that
the
they
want
to
have
a
good,
a
good
concept
and
make
sure
that
we're
answering
the
questions
from
the
criteria,
the
best
that
we
can.
A
You
know
if
we
have
information
about
all
of
those
questions.
That's
great.
That's
essentially,
is
my
understanding.
What's
going
to
be
presented,
that
information
will
be
presented
to
the
commissioners
after
the
third
there's,
you
know
that's
when
more
of
the
detailed
planning
and
to
your
point
I'd
be
the.
How
will
some
of
that
will
happen?
I
do
think
it's
important
that
we
answer
some
of
the
big.
A
So
I
think
some
of
that's
still
a
little
bit
in
the
in
the
gray
zone
for
me,
but
you
know
what
we
know
is
that
the
the
dollars
need
to
be
obligated
by
2026,
and
that
means
there
is
still
time
for
some
additional
planning
and
implementation
phase
kind
of
a
pre-implementation
phase
for
for
some
of
this.
So
I
don't
think
the
expectation
is
that
every
question
is
answered
around
that
prior
to
prior
to
may
3rd.
B
I
think
that's
absolutely
right
susan
and
to
add
to
that
the
engagement
team
is
already
starting
to
think
about
what
that
kind
of
additional
engagement
would
look
like
after
a
decision
is
made
to
fill
in
some
of
those
questions
that
remain
around
implementation.
B
So,
let's
say,
for
example,
just
this
was
talked
about
in
you
know
the
meeting
before
with
one
of
the
other
groups
figuring
out
if
there
need
to
be
mental
health
resources
in
a
certain
place,
going
back
out
talking
to
the
community
to
re-identify
those
gaps
where
data
might
not
exist,
so
that
type
of
thing
might
need
to
happen
again
prior
to
those
implementation
pieces
for
your
proposals,
I
think
debbie
what
you
said
about
identifying.
B
Maybe
what
those
things
what
those
types
of
outreach
or
other
steps
would
need
to
be
is
a
great
way
to
do
it.
Obviously,
the
engagement
team
is
going
to
build
off
of
you
know,
methods
that
worked
really
well
in
phase
one
and
learnings
from
phase
one,
but
I
think
if
there
are
other
things
that
this
group
can
recognize,
that
would
be
really
important
to
that.
Those
are
really
important
pieces
to
call
out
as
well.
A
But
what
I
don't
anticipate,
having
or
need
to
have
by
may
3rd
is
the
specifics
of
exactly
how
we
will
outreach
to
these
families,
who
exactly
will
be
involved
in
that
who
will
be
kind
of
administering
the
dollar.
You
know
dollars
how
it'll
be
administered
exactly
so,
if
I'm
wrong
about
that-
and
I
see
that
commissioner
has
joined
us-
welcome-
please
please
jump
in,
but
I
think
that's
kind
of
the
level
in
our
conversations
that
I'm
understanding
we
need.
We
need
to
land
on.
K
Thanks
susan
and
I
apologize
because
I
missed
a
little
bit
of
what
you
were
saying,
while
my
audio
was
doing
something
fun
good
afternoon,
everybody
apologize.
I
was
in
a
public
hearing
that
just
ended.
So
that's
why
I'm
running
behind.
But
if
there
are
specific
questions,
because
I
think
I
missed
a
little
portion
of
that-
that
I
can
be
helpful
with
I'm
absolutely
here
to
do
that.
B
C
A
So
I
think
we
were
just
sharing
that
generally
speaking,
that
that
there
will
still
be
some
implementation
questions
that
are
not
answered
by
may
3rd
and
the
expectation
is
not
to
have
every
detail
work.
It
worked
out
by
may
3rd.
It's
it's
really
to
be
able
to
answer
those
criteria,
list
of
questions
to
the
best
of
our
ability
and
that
you
know
some
of
the
higher
level
how
you
know.
How
are
we
going
to
do
this
ideas
should
be
worked
out,
but
very
specific
implementation.
K
Who
were
you
hearing
from?
Who?
Did
you
maybe
not
hear
from
in
your
particular
role,
but
that
we've
heard
through
from
phase
one
about
where
those
needs
were
and
where
for
a
lot
of
folks,
they
still
existed
right
over
the
last
couple
years
with
the
goal
of?
Is
there
a
way
to
do
some
transformative
change?
K
Is
there
a
way
to
use
some
of
this
arpa
funding
to
do
something
different
to
do
something
new,
and
so
when
I
say
that
I
also
as
you
get
closer
to
your
right
susan
and
I
appreciate
that
direction.
We're
not
going
to
have
absolutely
all
the
answers
when,
when
folks
get
to
present
in
may
and
just
stating
that
you're
going
to
do
this
work,
that's
been
done
differently
because
now,
you're
going
to
and
I've
heard
this
utilize
cultural
brokers
or
incorporate
cultural
brokers
isn't
really
going
to
show
us
how.
K
So
it's
not
all
the
details,
but
I
would
just
encourage
you
to
really
differentiate
what
your,
what
the
plans
are
from,
what's
already
out
there
and
and
be
able
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
your
what's
going
to
be
different.
So,
hopefully
that's
helpful,
but
you're
right.
There
will
be
some
time
of
the
actual
implementation.
K
K
The
board
did
make
a
decision,
that's
been
being
in
the
works,
talked
about
for
a
little
while,
but
the
our
family
resource
center.
So
the
our
center
effa
and
sister
cardman
are
all
going
to
receive
250
000
during
this
process
to
do
direct
financial
assistance
to
look
at
operational
expenses
based
on
some
of
the
updates
that
we
received
for
the
american
rescue
plan
act
in
the
update
on
january
6
that
changed
some
of
the
ability
to
use
funding.
K
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you're
aware
of
that,
because
I
know
there's
been
some
other
nonprofits
that
were
on
the
ground
in
march
2020,
in
with
all
of
the
different
responses
and
addressing
specific
sectors
of
community
that
weren't
at
the
forefront
before
that.
So
just
want
to
share
that,
because
that
might
give
you
some
things
to
think
about
as
well.
H
Does
julie
good
news,
I
hadn't
heard
that
have
been
improved,
so
I
made
my
day,
but
just
for
the
working
groups,
so
sister
carmen
our
center
and
f
we
put
together-
and
our
view
is.
This
is
like
for
immediate
funding
to
keep
doing
while
this
bigger
planning
process
is
going
on.
H
So
the
three
of
us
are
orienting
this
to
direct
financial
assistance
in
the
normal
lines
we
have,
which
is
not
child
care,
for
example
it's
rent
and
utilities,
and
that
kind
of
thing,
food,
critical
food
purchases
for
the
food
banks
and
then
some
staff,
development
and
staffing
stuff
coming
out
of
cobit.
So
just
to
give
you
an
idea,
we
intend
to
have
it
spent
within
two
years,
rather
than
like
the
longer
timeline
of
this
arpa
work.
H
So
I
think
it
was
to
keep
things
going
right
now,
while
the
longer
term
planning
kicks
in
yeah.
K
I
appreciate
that,
and
also
just
want
to
share
too
that
we,
I
was
in
a
call
with
congressman
goose,
maybe
two
weeks
ago
now,
and
just
what
we're
saying
nationally,
his
encouragement
was
to
speedily
expedite
the
use
of
those
funds.
Despite
the
fact
that
there
is
a
longer
timeline.
K
There
is
some
conversation
about
states
having
to
give
back
their
money
if
it
hasn't
been
used,
and
so
that
puts
us
in
back
into
this
conundrum
of
how
do
we
do
transformative
change,
and
how
do
we
show
that
we're
using
the
money
to
indicate
that
there
is
an
immediate
need
so
not
to
toss
too
many
challenges
in
the
into
the
virtual
room,
but
also
want
to
share
the
information
that
I
have
too.
A
Thanks,
commissioner,
so
I
think
the
last
thing
we
wanted
to
talk
about
is
just
in
a
little
bit
more
detail,
some
of
the
next
steps
and
kind
of
engagement
of
this
group
and
the
subgroups,
and
I
know
that
several
people
have
dropped
off.
So
we've
got
a
little
bit
of
a
smaller
group
right
now.
A
A
So
we
would
just
love
to
hear
from
people
what
what
kind
of
engagement
you're
able
to
to
give
or
commitment
you're
able
to
give
over
the
next
five
weeks
and
to
johanna's
point,
there's
no
issue.
If,
if
this
is,
if
this
is
kind
of
what
you
can
do
and
that's
it,
I
think
we
just
want
to
get
a
picture
of
of
who
could
be
involved
in
some
of
this
more
detailed
work.
You
know
the
more
input
that
we
can
get
from
from
the
larger
group
and
the
subgroups
the
better.
A
The
more
involvement-
and
I
think
again
to
rebecca's
point
we
we
really
would
love
to
have
as
much
participation
in
presenting
these
ideas.
The
recommendations
to
the
commissioners
on
the
third
so
would
love
to
have
people
if
you
want
to
put
in
the
chat,
if
you're
available
to
do
that
or
not
even
if
you're
you're
not
available
to
participate
in
work
or
have
more
meetings
over
the
next
five
weeks.
We
will.
Our
commitment
to
you
is
to
continue
to
forge
you
any
updates
as
we
move
along.
A
A
So
with
that
said,
just
just
wondering
if
there,
if
people
have
a
sense
right
now,
if
if
they
want
to
be
involved,
the
next
five
weeks,
if
they're
available
to
be
involved
the
next
five
weeks
and
then
also
if
there's
an
interest
or
availability
in
presenting
on
the
third
of
may.
A
D
A
A
Thanks
julie
appreciate
it
and
I
already
yeah,
I
already
set
up
a
meeting
with
julie
tomorrow
to
talk
through
that.
You
know.
Julie
and
effa
have
really
been
piloting
and
spearheading
a
lot
of
this
direct
assistance
and
how
to
increase
amounts
to
families
and
how
to
do
it
creatively
and
not
have
to
deal
with
the
cliff
effect.
So
I'm
going
to
pick
her
brain
tomorrow
a
little
bit
as
well
great
hayden.
Thank
you
and
thanks
rachel.
That's
awesome,
so
you
know
again,
I
think
we
will.
A
We
will
kind
of
regroup
here
continue
to
to
reach
out
to
you
all
and
I
think
maybe
look
for
potentially
another
meeting,
whether
it's
a
subgroup
or
the
larger
group.
I
think
the
other
thing
we
want
to
think
through
is
we
have
to
really
we're
going
to
need
to
join
our
presentations
together
and
and
work
on
that
as
a
larger
group.
So
we'll
have
some
subgroup
work
and
some
of
the
larger
group
work
group
work
together.
B
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
add-
and
I
think
this
group
is
already
all
over
it,
but
if
anyone
needs
any
assistance,
setting
up
collaborative
documents
or
anything
like
that,
organizational
things
as
you
move
away
from
these
meetings
and
more
into
talking
offline
happy
to
help
with
those
and
everyone
on
the
engagement
team
is
also
readily
available
to
help.
A
Great
well,
thank
you
all
so
much.
I
really
appreciate
it
and
just
be
looking
for
materials
or
another
reading,
invite
from
us
and
have
a
wonderful
rest
of
your
day.