►
From YouTube: Feb. 23, 2022 Marshall Fire Community Meeting: Article 19 Provisions - Unincorporated Boulder County
Description
Marshall Fire Community Meeting - Article 19 Provisions for Rebuilding in Unincorporated Boulder County, Feb. 23, 2022. Learn more at https://www.boco.org/MarshallFire #MarshallFire
A
B
C
C
We
urge
you
to
consider
for
meetings
where
we'll
use
an
interpreter.
We
want
you
to
speak
slowly
and
don't
interrupt
the
speaker.
You'll
be
having
opportunities
tonight
for
folks
to
ask
questions
to
participate
in
polling.
We
want
to
maximize
the
opportunity
for
you
to
have
input
next
slide.
Please.
C
C
I
try
to
hold
hold
back
from
going
into
too
much
detail
about
your
specific
situation
or
property,
although
that's
important
tonight's
really
about
general
concepts,
and
I
would
ask
my
colleagues
to
put
the
email
address
for
for
in
the
chat
for
specific
questions
about
your
property,
marshall,
rebuilding.
C
Finally,
I
just
want
to
reiterate
this:
we've
had
some
instances
in
past
meetings,
where
some
participants
have
felt
the
need
to
advertise
their
services-
and
this
is
not
the
place
in
time
for
that.
This
is
a
neutral
meeting
where
we
are
really
attempting
to
share
information
with
fire
survivors
and
their
architects
and
builders
and
get
their
input,
and
so
we'd
ask
you
to
refrain
to
advertise
your
services
there's
other
venues
for
that
there's
a
building
expo
friday
and
saturday.
C
You
are
welcome
to
attend.
If
you
do
post
your
services,
we
will
remove
you
from
the
meeting,
I
guess
and
then
just.
Lastly,
before
I
hand
it
off,
I
want
to
celebrate
a
big
win
today
and
this
meeting's
about
rebuilding,
but
I
I
can't
help
myself
just
to
just
celebrate
the
the
news
that
all
three
communities
are
going
to
support
the
cost
of
foundation
removal.
I
hope
that
relieves
a
lot
of
anxiety
from
your
shoulders
to
know
that
that
will
be
covered
in
the
debris
removal
program.
C
We
will
be
hosting
a
informational
session
on
the
whole
debris
removal
program
next
tuesday,
at
six
o'clock
march
first
and
we'll
be
sending
out
more
information
and
links
and
how
to
participate
in
that
and
that'll
be
recorded.
Just
like
this
meeting
is
so
again,
that's
exciting
news,
but
now
it's
time
to
jump
into
the
marshall
rebuilding
approach
and
thank
you
again
all
for
coming
and
I
want
to
hand
it
over
to
hannah
hipple
in
the
planning
department.
Thank
you.
D
D
D
If
you're
not
comfortable,
sharing
here
in
this
meeting
in
any
way,
there
are
other
ways
that
you
can
reach
out
to
us
and
provide
input.
D
But
what
we
hear
tonight
will
assist
us
in
creating
approach
to
rebuilding
that
we
hope
works
for
those
of
you
impacted
by
the
marshall
fire.
D
A
D
Okay,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
folks
whose
home
were
destroyed
and
a
variety
of
the
other
categories
as
well.
Thank
you.
C
A
A
D
Thanks
everyone
for
participating.
Can
we
go
to
the
next
slide.
D
So
you
may
have
heard
us,
you
know
talking
about
article
19,
but
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
moment
here
and
really
explain
what
that
means.
Article
19
is
really
a
chapter
in
the
boulder
county
land
use
code
where
we
are
able
to
establish
new
procedures
following
disasters.
D
So
it's
a
shortcut
we
use
as
staff,
but
really
what
we
are
hoping
to
do
is
use
this
section
of
the
code
to
create
a
tailored
approach
for
rebuilding.
After
the
marshall
fire.
D
It
allows
us
to
address
disaster
specific
issues
related
to
rebuilding
after
the
fire,
particularly
related
to
the
type
of
review
that
could
that
is,
required
or
could
have
been
necessary.
For
instance,
site
plan
review
is
not
required
when
you're
rebuilding
the
same
home
using
the
same
footprint
and
the
same
height
and
size.
D
D
To
explain
this
a
slightly
different
way,
the
current
code
has
two
paths
towards
rebuilding.
D
As
I
mentioned,
one
of
them
is
rebuilding
the
same
structure,
and
it
has
some
parameters
that
go
along
with
that,
including
a
time
frame
to
commence
within
a
year
for
structures
that
might
have
been
in
a
setback
because
they're,
you
know,
predate
the
land,
use
code
or
any
regulations
and
are
non-conforming.
D
The
restoration
of
those
structures
and
uses
is
to
commence
within
six
months.
There
are
some
benefits
in
that
this
is
a
fast
process.
If
you're
rebuilding
the
same
thing,
you
go
straight
to
a
building
permit.
However,
it
doesn't
provide
a
lot
of
flexibility,
really
none
and
the
time
frames
are
short.
D
So
what
the
marshall
rebuilding
approach
tries
to
do
or
hopes
to
create,
is
a
third
path
that
allows
us
to
pull
the
best
things
from
both
of
these
existing
paths
into
a
set
of
regulations
that
will
again
allow
us
to
adjust
the
time
frames,
create
a
streamline
process
and
address
disaster.
Specific
issues
such
as
site
cleanup,
temporary
housing
and
resiliency
issues.
D
No
two
disasters
are
the
same,
and
this
will
help
us
clarify
what's
needed
for
this
particular
event,
and
we
know
this
is
necessary
for
some
basic
health
and
safety
reasons.
The
lots
just
really
can't
sit
as
they
are
for
extended
time
frames.
D
D
How
do
we
ensure
that
that's
a
safe
condition,
and
then
this
also
would
clarify?
Oh
I'm
sorry,
I
skipped
the
time
frames.
D
There
is
a
time
frame
component
again
because
we
don't
want
this
situation,
that's
out
there
that
we
know
is
hazardous
to
remain
in
it
for
an
undetermined
amount
of
time
again
setting
expectations
for
the
community
and
things
that
they
can
rely
on
a
time
frame
that
you
all
can
rely
on
for
clean
up
to
happen
in
your
neighborhood,
and
then
it
does
clarify
that
there
is
a
permit
and
inspection
process
that
will
go
along
with
this.
D
Thank
you
so
at
this
point
in
time
is
it
is
an
opportunity
for
folks
to
raise
their
hands
and
make
comments.
If
you
have
any
suggestions,
we
just
wanted
to
pause
here
and
collect
input.
C
So
so
can
here's
a
question?
Do
you
I'm
sorry,
do
you
have
the
policy
established
for
what
is
required
for
cleanup
and
is
it
published
anywhere
with
work,
steps
and
conditions
for
permits
and
inspection.
D
So
I'm
I
am
reading
the
chat.
Someone
asked:
if
could
construction
fencing,
be
sufficient
to
protect
a
basement
hole
from
fall
hazards?
Those
are
exactly
the
kinds
of
things
that
we're
thinking
about.
That
is
the
approach
we
took
in
the
cowood
fire
to
require
fencing
to
be
around
a
foundation
hole.
E
E
D
Great
question:
I
don't
think
we
would
anticipate
you
having
to
scrape
the
soil
off
your
entire
property,
but
the
areas
where
maybe
a
structure
where
it
was
destroyed
in
the
ash
is
is
sitting
on
the
ground
that
perimeter
as
far
as
how
how
deep
of
a
soil
removal
needs
to
take
place.
D
F
Yes,
hi:
this
is
ron
flex,
I'm
the
chief
building
official
for
the
county,
with
the
current
site.
Cleanup
permits
that
we're
issuing
there's
essentially
two
pathways
in
terms
of
figuring
out
what
needs
to
be
cleaned
up.
We
are
focusing
on
the
the
area
of
the
the
at
what
we're
calling
the
ash
footprints.
So
it's
the
portion
of
the
the
site
where
we
have
the
the
byproducts
and
debris
from
the
the
structures
that
were
on
the
site
and
we
we've
sort
of
laid
out
two
pathways.
F
One
is
involving
you,
remove
some
soil
and
then
there's
a
testing
protocol
that
we've
worked
through
with
both
the
boulder
county,
public
health,
as
well
as
the
state
public
health
officials.
F
So
you
would
remove
soil
and
essentially
re
keep
removing
soil
until
the
site
tests
clean,
there's,
also
a
pathway
by
which
you
can
remove
12
inches
of
soil,
in
which
case
at
that
point,
it
would
be
deemed
to
comply.
The
there's
a
fair
bit
of
detail
in
that
process,
and
we
have
that
sort
of
laid
out
and
we
can.
We
can
make
sure
to
get
that
in
the
hands
of
anyone
who
who's
interested,
but
but
we
have
no
interest
in
having
anyone
remove
any
more
material
from
these
sites
than
than
is
necessary.
C
One
of
the
things
we
want
to
make
sure
like
hannah
indicated,
is
that
people
who
are
doing
their
own
site
cleanup,
who
opt
out
of
the
coordinated
program,
know
the
regulations
and
and
they're
posted
now
on
the
website,
but
also
have
a
expected
timeline
when
they
will
complete
the
cleanup.
We
don't
want
this
hazard
material
being
left
out
for
a
long
period
of
time,
so
that
will
be
included
that
time
frame
in
the
article
19
regulations.
D
G
Hey
this
is.
G
For
ron,
you
just
mentioned
that
there
were
going
to
be
standards
for
we've
actually
gotten
a
couple.
Building
permits
approved
already
it's
great.
The
building
permit
has
a
qualification
that
we
have
to
pass
this
epa
6020
test
to
some
minimal
standard,
but
the
minimal
standards
not
specified
in
there
and
I'm
hoping
I
can
get
an
answer
as
to
what
that
is,
because
I
think
that's
the
quantitative,
I
think
that's
the
quantitative.
The
site
is
clean,
that
we're
going
for.
D
C
D
The
approach
that
we're
creating
for
marshall
fire
rebuilding
again
is
intended
to
relieve
the
pressure
that
the
code
currently
has
in
the
timelines
in
the
past.
The
path
that
we
created
allowed
three
years
for
folks
to
rebuild
after
the
event
and
that
three
years
extended
the
time
frame
by
two
years
for
most
people,
because
the
exemption
from
site
plan
review
for
a
destroyed
structure
only
provides
one
year
for
those
with
non-conforming
structures
or
uses
again,
where
we
might
have
a
historical
setback,
encroachment
or,
or
something
like
that.
D
We
do
know
the
rebuilding.
You
know
the
construction
situation
out
there
right
now
is
different
than
it
has
been,
and
so
these
time
frames
that
were
that
were
used
to
kind
of
that
we've
used
in
the
past
three
years
might
not
really
work
for
folks
today,
and
so
we
do
want
to
ask
again
through
the
poll
how
much
time
you
think
you
will
need
to
rebuild.
D
D
We
are
doing
our
best
at
this
time
to
draft
a
set
of
regulations
that
we
think
will
work
for
the
for
folks.
So
if
you
don't
know,
that's
okay.
D
D
E
I'll
ask
my
question:
instead
of
typing
it
in,
and
it's
mostly
just
are,
their
thoughts
are
going
to
be
provisions
for
a
year
two
years
from
now
when
it
becomes
clearer
how
long
it's
going
to
take
to
rebuild
to
changing
the
guidelines
that
were
are
going
to
be
established
now
I
would
just
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
have
some
sort
of
a
checkpoint
to
say.
Okay,
it's
not
three
years,
it's
going
to
be
more
like
four
or
five
across
the
board.
D
C
I
suppose
I
also
see
in
the
chat
that
there's
a
there's
a
theme
here
that
it's
hard
to
tell
right
now,
because
there's
a
number
of
things
that
are
outside
of
people's
control,
like
when
their
debris
will
be
removed
when
the
article
19
regulations
will
be
adopted
and
and
ready
for
approval.
And
so
there's
just
there's
just
a
number
of
things.
It's
hard
to
predict
the
theme
as
well
as
insurance
settlements,
and
we
just
want
to
recognize
that
those
are
all
valid.
D
Great,
I
think
we
can
probably
move
on
to
the
next
topic
we
get
to
the
next
slide.
D
So
temporary
housing,
while
rebuilding
temporary
emergency
housing,
is
something
that
can
be
permitted
by
the
chief
building
official.
The
purpose
of
addressing
this
in
the
marshall
fire
rebuilding
approach
is
that
it
would
help
us
clarify
a
couple
of
items.
What
types
of
structures
or
what
things
can
be
used
for
temporary
housing
could
be
addressed
in
this
section.
D
H
D
Thank
you.
That's
helpful.
The
next
question
we
have
is
about
what
types
of
things
you
think
should
be
allowed
to
be
used
as
temporary
housing.
D
If
you
do
think
rv
should
be
allowed.
What
do
you
think
is
the
appropriate
length
of
time
to
allow
rv
living.
D
Someone
asked
the
question:
if
the
answer
was
supposed
to
be
in
days
or
years
you,
this
is
a
free
form
answer
you
can
type
it
in.
However,
you
like.
D
A
One
year,
one
year,
maximum
the
full
article
19
time
span
indefinitely
18
months
until
the
houses
are
rebuilt,
as
long
as
it
takes
to
build
their
home
as
long
as
they're,
actively
engaged
in
rebuilding
up
to
the
duration,
to
build
back
in
part
to
provide
security
for
materials
to
be
safely
stored
to
prevent
theft
until
the
certificate
of
occupancy
is
received.
D
We
do
have
a
pause
for
comment
on
this
topic
again,
so
comments
like,
as
we
have
been
doing,
can
go
in
the
chat
where
everyone
can
see
them
or
if
you
want
to
raise
your
hand
to
make
comment,
you
can
take
it
that
way
as
well.
D
D
They
would
be
included
here
to
be
followed
shortly
by
a
generalized
building
code,
update
that
would
apply
county-wide
the
standard
sort
of
methods
we
have
for
trying
to
mitigate
the
risks
of
wildfire
include
using
ignition
resistant
construction
installing
a
non-combustible
perimeter
creating
defensible
space.
A
And
hannah
this
is
rick
hackett
staff.
Again,
I'm
allowing
folks
to
talk
if
they
raise
their
hand,
so
you
should
be
able
to
unmute
yourself.
If
you
do
have
a
question.
Just
please
give
us
your
name
when
you
ask
your
question
so
go
ahead!
Hannah.
I
I
raised
my
hand.
This
is
stephen
lichty
and
those
four
bullets
all
look
good,
but
they're
very
vague,
and
we
need
better
definition
on
what
that
is
what
it
looks
like
what
it
costs.
C
G
Hand
already-
and
I
already
had
the
opportunity
to
move
so
I'm
going
to
do
it's
phil
mostly.
I
think
these
are
great
things
for
houses
in
general.
My
concern
with
with
this
is
twofold:
in
our
construction
of
our
barn
in
2016,
we're
actually
prevented
by
the
county
for
using
it
from
using
some
ignition
resistant
construction
techniques
due
to
energy
efficiency,
energy
efficiency
guidelines
that
are
being
imposed
on
us.
G
I
would
like
to
see
that
change
so
that
we
can
use,
say
aluminum
frame
windows
instead
of
vinyl
or
wood
things
like
that
to
at
least
allow
some
of
the
ignition
resistant
construction
techniques
to
be
used
down
in
this
area.
I'm
not
a
huge
fan
of
imposing
them
as
a
requirement,
although
I
think
with
everyone
here.
I
also
don't
want
to
see
my
house
burn
down.
C
J
Yes,
we
can
talk
about
all
the
mitigation
you
know
steps.
We
can
take
I'm
curious
about
what
we
took
in
terms
of
the
initial
response
to
the
fire.
Who
was
the
initial
two
brush
trucks
to
the
shed?
What
what
responding
fire
department
was
that.
C
J
But
the
reason
I
ask
it
is
because
two
brush
trucks
were
sent
and
yet
they
were
asked
there
was
one
of
the
news
stations
that
had
the
transmission
when
they
had
knocked
it
down,
they
were
asked.
Do
you
want
us
to
send
additional
units
which
would
have
been
the
full-sized
pumper
trucks
and
they
said
no,
we've
got
it.
Then
the
next
video
on
another
station
from
somebody
was
there
saying:
where
did
they
go?
J
If
you
had
pumper
trucks
on
site
and
it
had
been
knocked
down
with
115
mile
an
hour
wind,
you
probably
needed
an
all-day
approach
to
keeping
that
fire
and
making
sure
it
didn't
come
back
up
and
soaking
that
ground,
because
I
believe
there
was
no
fire
hydrant
available.
So
is
anybody
looking
at
the
question
is:
is
anybody
looking
at
the
approach
to
the
fire
situation
in
a
high
wind,
which
we
get
quite
often.
D
I
don't
know
the
answer
guys.
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
this.
To
that
question,
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
focus
on
today
are
the
things
that
we
can
do
through
this
one
particular
avenue
in
the
land
use
code.
J
Okay,
I
thought
you
maybe
I
know
I
know
they're
doing
a
facilitated,
facilitated,
learn,
learning
assessment
right
now
and
I
didn't
to
look
at
what
could
have
been
done
differently
in
the
fire,
and
I
thought
your
agency
was
possibly
involved
along
with
mitigation,
should
be,
in
my
mind,
the
approach
to
what,
if
you
have
a
fire
and
a
high
wind,
which
we
do.
C
J
C
K
Yeah
question
on
creating
defensible
space
boulder
county-
I
I'm
not
sure
who
does
it,
but
there's
the
energy
assessment
and
that's
been
going
on
for
decades.
K
You
know
for
the
house,
is
it
possible
to
do
a
similar
program
or
creating
defensible
space
or
fire
and
flood,
maybe
combined
where
you
would
actually
get
an
assessment
that
would
tell
the
homeowners
you
can
do
abc,
and
these
are
the
biggest
defensible
things
you
know
cut
down
the
vegetation
right
next
to
your
house
and
whatever,
like
a
checklist,
is
it
possible
to
create
a
small
program
like
that.
K
D
Okay,
so
the
marshall
fire
rebuilding
approach
that
we
are
trying
to
create
is
one
we
think
can
be
fast
if
we
keep
the
the
set
of
issues
that
we
look
at
pretty
narrow
and
we're
able
to
establish
clear
parameters
for
modifications,
it
really
is
the
idea
for
this
to
be
a
brief
administrative
staff
review
that
accompanies
the
building
permit
so
again,
something
you
know
that
a
planner
might
be
able
to
do
once
a
building
permit
is
in
sort
of
over
the
counter
or
by
taking
a
few
measurements.
D
D
D
D
So,
as
we
think
about
you
know
what
minor
or
moderate
changes
might
occur,
it
helps
us
to
know
what
what
did
you
appreciate
about
your
neighborhood
or
your
home?
That
you
hope
redevelopment
will
not
change,
and
if
you
have
concerns
about
how
redevelopment
might
change
things,
what
are
those
concerns?
D
So
again,
this
is
a
short
answer
question.
So
it's
kind
of
a
free
form
response.
You
can
answer
either
parts
of
these
questions,
but
really
we're
just
trying
to
understand
what
it
is
that
you
might
be
interested
in
in
preserving
as
people
rebuild.
D
I
turn
my
camera
off
in
a
bit.
A
Again,
this
is
rick
hackett
staff.
If
you've
asked
a
question
and
you're
not
muted,
I
will
meet
you
now
just
wanted
to
let
the
folks
know
who
had
already
asked
your
question.
I
muted
them
temporarily.
If
you
have
another
questions,
you
can
ask
them
again.
You
can
unmute
when
you're.
If
you
have
another
question
coming
up.
A
And
again,
this
is
rick
hackett
staff.
If
you
don't
see
the
poll
question,
you
can
answer
it
in
the
chat.
The
question
is:
what
did
you
appreciate
about
your
neighborhood
or
home
that
you
hope
redevelopment
will
not
change?
What
concerns
you
the
most
about
how
redevelopment
could
change
things
and
you
can
enter
that
answer
in
the
chat?
If
you
don't
see
the
poll
question.
H
A
A
A
And
as
gary
sampson
said,
we'll
wrap
this
poll
up
at
seven.
So
a
few
more
seconds
here
and
we'll
end
this,
and
then
I
will
try
to
share
the
results
again
like
I
did
last
time,
since
these
won't
be
displayed
for
everyone
like
the
multiple
choice
or
single
choice,
questions.
I
Yeah,
this
is
steve
like
the
again
and
I
think,
a
lot
of
the
properties
in
boulder
unincorporated
boulder
county
we're
on
acreage.
I
We
all
live
quite
a
ways
from
each
other
and
I
think
we
all
need
to
have
latitude
to
make
minor
changes
in
our
square
footage,
our
footprint
and
height
and
so
forth,
so
that
we,
you
know,
because
a
lot
of
us
don't
have
the
architectural
plans
that
we
were
built
with,
or
maybe
we
didn't
like
things
about
our
house.
I
Maybe
the
master
bedroom
was
up
on
the
top
floor
and
we
wanted
on
the
main
level
and
things
like
that,
so
we
need
to
have
the
latitude
and
I
don't
think
a
lot
of
us
have
too
big
a
concern.
If,
if
we're
you
know
making
minor
minor
changes,
that's
that's
just
the
way.
I
I
kind
of
view
our
neighborhood
anyway,.
H
A
And
this
is
rickhack
staff
again
I
will
post
the
responses
to
this
question
in
the
chat.
I'll
have
to
do
it
in
sections,
since
we
have
a
lot
of
answers-
and
I
can't
put
them
all
at
once-
but
I
will
start
posting
those
now.
We
also
have
answers
in
the
chat
post
and
lookout
and
again,
staff
will
be
reviewing
all
of
your
answers
in
both
the
poll
and
the
chat.
D
D
To
pre-existing
structures
within
defined
parameters,
so
the
outcomes
provide
some
predictability
to
the
to
the
community,
so
we
do
think
changes
in
size.
Adjustment
to
location,
a
new
home,
design
or
height
are
things
that
would
be
addressed
through
this
marshall
fire
rebuilding
approach.
So
again
we
do.
We
are
curious
about.
You
know
what.
D
How
would
you
like
your
home
to
be
different
than
it
was
so
that's
what
the
first
poll
question
is
is
intended
to
get
to
that,
so
that,
if
you
don't
know
yet
you
can
answer
that
as
well.
C
H
E
C
C
Thank
you
great
great
we're
getting
a
great
picture
from
folks.
Who've
contributed
in
the
chat
what
people
are
looking
to
achieve.
That's
very
helpful.
Thank
you.
A
And
gary
this
is
rick
hackett
staff.
I'll
read
some
of
these
responses.
Since
what
I
can
see
it
gave
me
the
whole
question,
but
I'll
just
read
some
other
responses.
I
will
post
these
in
the
chat.
A
Some
of
the
responses
to
I
would
like
my
new
home
to
be
different
than
previous
home
and
the
following
ways
include,
probably
smaller,
more
appropriate
for
my
uses,
healthier
and
safer,
better
utilization
of
floor
space
and
square
footage
added
square
footage
for
us
1000
square
feet,
smaller,
more
modern
design,
same
square
footage,
different
location,
single
story
versus
multi-story,
more
bathrooms,
more
square
footage,
lower,
mostly
more
one-story
and
more
energy
efficient,
a
main
floor
master
or
ranch
instead
of
a
two-story
more
covered
torches
master
on
the
first
floor,
lower
profile,
changing
the
footprint
better
suited
to
aging
in
place,
rooftop
access
with
an
attached
garage
and
faulted
ceilings,
one
story,
one
level
to
be
a
ranch
instead
of
a
tri-level,
add
solar
rope,
rotate
the
footprint
slightly
and
expand.
A
Add
a
couple
hundred
square
feet
of
finished
space
new
freestanding
garage,
so
we've
got
a
lot
of
disadvantages
here.
There's
also
allow
for
an
adu
which
is
an
accessory
dwelling
unit,
a
larger
garage,
maybe
larger,
bigger,
more
square
feet,
higher
extra
garage,
more
or
less
the
same,
more
solar,
more
ignition
resistant,
more
energy,
efficient,
updated
design,
more
aging
friendly
with
fewer
staircases
for
a
ranch
design.
A
So
those
are
some
of
the
answers
I
will
try
to
post
all
these
in
the
chat
and
again,
staff
will
will
have
all
access
to
all
of
these
after
the
meeting
and
as
we
move
forward
the
regulations
so
back
to
you.
Hannah.
D
Thanks
rick,
you
know,
we
know
that
building
a
custom
home
or
having
a
custom
home
built
includes
a
lot
of
decisions,
a
lot
of
details
and
for
some
folks
that
may
be
more
than
they're
interested
in
in
dealing
with.
D
So
the
next
poll
question
is:
if
pre-approved
master
home
plans
were
available
to
you.
How
interested
would
you
be
in
using
one
of
these
plans
for
your
new
home?
So
this
is
rating
your
interest
level
from
one
to
five,
with
one
being
the
lowest
interest
level
and
five
being
the
highest
interest
level.
D
So
this
has
come
up
in
the
comments
already
size
is
always
a
parameter
that
we
deal
with
when
building
in
boulder
county.
We
just
want
to
be
clear
to
express
you
that
property
owners
will
be
allowed
to
rebuild
the
same
floor
area
that
was
legally
existing
on
the
property
pre-fire.
D
So
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
up
first
and
then,
as
we
think
about
what
size
increases
could
be
allowed
and
normally
we
think
about
size
increases
when
we're
drafting
these
approaches
to
rebuilding,
because
it's
typically
where
size
increases,
have
the
potential
to
have
new
impacts
if
people
are
building
smaller,
that's
typically
less
of
an
impact.
D
So
these
types
of
regulations
that
we're
drafting
usually
set
a
top
limit
rather
than
a
floor
site
plan
review,
which
was
the
second
path
that
I
talked
about
earlier.
That
exists
is
required
prior
to
a
building
permit
when
residential
floor
area
on
a
property
exceeds
the
size
that
is
presumed
to
be
compatible
with
the
defined
neighborhood
and,
in
this
case
that's
125
percent
of
the
median
residential
floor
area.
For
that
neighborhood
site
plan
review
is
also
triggered
when
more
than
a
thousand
square
feet
has
been
added
to
a
property.
D
So
I
think
here
we
have
another
stop
for
questions
or
feedback
for
some
of
those
folks
out
there
who
asked
about
size
increases
in
size.
Just
does
this
make
sense
to
you.
C
E
I
just
wanted
to
be
be
clear:
you're
saying,
you're
dropping
the
restriction
of
a
thousand
square
feet
and
it
only
having
size
up
to
the
combat
compatible
size
for
the
neighborhood.
D
That
is
the
concept
we're
considering
at
this
point.
D
Okay,
we
know
this
is
another
big
topic
for
folks,
because
it
can
have
impacts
to
you
know
if
your
neighbors
are
moving
their
house
around,
it
can
have
impacts
on
perhaps
your
views.
D
That
was
one
of
the
things
I
I
caught
in
the
question
in
response
to
the
question
about
what
folks
value
about
their
neighborhood,
we
do
think
this
approach
could
allow
certain
defined
modifications
to
the
location,
but
primarily
that
rebuilding
and
reusing
the
existing
footprint
provides
predictability
and
helps
minimize
new
impacts
and
that
any
allowed
location
modification
needs
to
be
well
defined.
Again,
if
we're
doing
a
brief
staff
review,
it
really
needs
to
be.
D
Those
parameters
need
to
be
clearly
spelled
out.
That's
for
us.
I
think
it
also
allows
folks
designing
a
home
to
know
what
to
design
to
and
before
we
jump
into
the
poll
questions
here,
which
you
can
read
and
might
consider.
While
I
talk
about
this
next
piece,
this
is
a
section.
D
D
So
in
this
instance,
small
small
shifts
downhill
might
make
a
big
difference
to
a
neighbor's
view
down
the
street.
D
It
also
might
make
a
difference
in
impacts
to
the
property
itself,
how
much
additional
earthwork
or
grading
might
be
necessary
in
order
to
locate
a
house
further
down
the
hill
and
thirdly,
for
those
folks
who
live
below
on
spring
drive
if
homes
move
closer
to
them,
what
impact
does
that
have
to
those
people
and
how
they
might
rebuild
or
live
in
their
properties
going
forward?
D
You
know
if
you're,
providing
more
space
between
two
homes,
maybe
shifting
one
direction
or
another,
so
our
challenge
is
really
to
define
a
reasonable
amount
of
modification
that
can
be
allowed
through
this
review.
A
D
L
Yeah,
I
guess
I
I
had
it
on
the
last
time,
but
I
didn't
know
how
to
mute
myself.
So
well.
My
last
questions,
but
I
guess
it's
the
modification,
the
modifications,
if
you're
using
basically
the
same
hole
in
the
ground.
D
H
D
The
starting
point
for
thinking
about
how
things
might
be
located,
you
know
again
kind
of
looking
along
the
north
side
of
panorama
drive.
You
can
see
how
some
of
those
homes
are
really
angled
on
the
lot.
The
views
up
there
are
gorgeous,
and
so
I
understand
why
someone
might
want
to
ship
their
house.
You
know
angle
it
a
little
bit
more
than
it
is
or
move
it
one
way
or
the
other
on
a
lot.
D
L
Hey
hannah,
I
got
another
question:
if
you're,
if
you're
are
you
going
to
orient
towards
the
average
size
in
the
neighborhood,
more
so
than
strictly
what
your
house
is
allocated
based
on
records.
D
I
have
not
considered
that
question
before,
but
I'll
write
it
down
and
consider
it
further.
L
I
mean
we're
looking
we're
looking
at
the
house,
and
the
basement
is
absurd.
I
mean
the
foundation
is
much
larger
than
the
square
footage
of
the
basement.
So
and
you
know
so,
there's
something
wrong
with
our
historical
records.
D
H
D
Reason
that
we
have
will
assign
rebuilding
coordinators
is
to
help
folks
work
through
those
individual
questions.
D
C
Thank
you
thanks,
thanks
jim,
let's,
let's
keep
moving
hannah.
We've
got
a
lot
of
really
good
feedback
in
the
chat
next
poll.
D
A
Sorry
this
is
rick
hackett.
We
have
a
lot
of
questions,
a
lot
of
answers
to
our
last
poll
question,
but
we'll
go
to
the
next
one.
A
A
5
increase
in
square
footage,
slight
change
in
square
footage
allowed,
but
different
shapes
of
no
concern
at
all
just
enough
to
accommodate
the
move
foundation
due
to
the
cut
off
piers
so
three
to
five
feet.
Maybe
I
don't
have
an
idea
at
this
time.
A
As
long
as
you
build
on
the
same
footprint
and
within
the
setbacks
to
neighboring
property,
you
should
be
able
to
build
back
with
square
footage.
You
had,
plus
what
you
need
extended
to
easements
prior
to
fire,
up
to
30
percent
of
the
original
footprint,
rotate
orientation
of
house
90
degrees
to
maximize
view
and
move
site
higher
up
the
hillside
and
in
giving
more
space
and
ada
allowances
to
the
three
bedrooms.
We
want
to
bump
up
to
a
second
story.
C
D
Can
choose
multiple
answers?
There
are
a
number
of
ways
that
we
could
measure
this
essentially,
and
this
is
a
list
of
various
options
for
for
measuring
how
things
might
be
able
to
move
on
a
property.
C
A
H
C
All
right,
let's
wrap
up
and
we've
got
a
few
more
poll
questions
to
go.
So
thank
you.
D
Okay,
so
in
the
last
slide
we
really
talked
about
the
location.
You
know,
where
is
the
footprint?
Where
is
the
house
being
placed
it's
sort
of
in
that?
You
know
looking
at
a
map
in
a
aerial
view,
kind
of
moving
that
little
box
around
the
footprint
of
the
house
around
on
the
site
and
maybe
turning
it
in
different
directions?
D
The
ideas
that
we
need
to
think
about
in
this
slide
are
really
sort
of
what
comes
out
of
the
ground
in
that
location
and
the
idea
again
behind
this
marshall
fire
path
is
really
to
allow
the
flexibility
to
build
something.
D
You
know
that
was
a
little
different
than
what
you
had
before,
and
I
picked
a
couple
pictures
from
the
internet
this
morning
to
sort
of
show
different,
but
rebuilding
without
parameters
or
without
us.
Thinking
about
this
could
have
really
different
homes
come
out
of
the
ground
and
for
us
to
consider
what
might
be
appropriate.
D
You
know
in
the
aftermath
of
the
marshall
fire,
I
think,
in
the
picture
on
the
left
presume.
If
someone
had
a
single
family
ranch,
you
know
the
the
picture
immediately.
Adjacent
to
the
right
might
be
something.
That's
a
really
minor
change.
It's
still
a
ranch
they've
changed
the
roof
lines.
Maybe
it's
a
tiny
bit
taller
and
reoriented
the
garage
in
the
next
picture
over
this
takes
those
changes,
I
think
a
step
further.
D
Where
again,
maybe
we
have
a
different
bottom
floor,
but
now
there's
a
second
story:
that's
been
added
to
the
middle
of
the
home,
so
this
one
looks
footprints
a
little
bigger
and
it's
taller,
and
then
the
last
picture
is
both
of
those
things.
We
have
a
larger
bottom
story
and
we
have
an
entire
second
story
so
again,
focusing
our
review
on
minor
or
moderate
changes
in
height,
floor
plan
and
roofline
doesn't
necessarily
allow
us
to
get
to
the
picture
all
the
way
on
the
right
and
again
just
like
with
the
location.
D
D
K
No,
I
didn't
have
a
question.
Okay,.
C
D
We
could
allow
increases
in
height
up
to
the
maximum
allowed
by
zoning,
but
only
in
a
certain
percentage
of
the
structure.
So
it's
not
a
full
second
story.
These
are
you
know,
ideas,
I've
considered
or
possibilities
for
how
to
define
this,
and
so
we're
curious
about
what
you
think
here
would
work.
C
D
There
was
a
comment
where
someone
didn't
pick,
because
the
all
the
choices.
D
She
didn't
like
they
didn't
like
any
of
the
choices,
and
that's
fine
thanks
for
putting
that
comment
in
the
chat.
If
you
have
suggestions,
we'd
also
like
to
hear
those.
C
D
Speak
at
that
meeting
to
to
planning
commission
planning
commission
will
make
a
recommendation
on
these
regulations
at
that
march
16
meeting,
and
then
they
will
move
to
the
board
of
county
commissioners
for
decision
making.
Again
that's
a
public
hearing
where
public
comment
and
input
is
taken
and
we're
anticipating
these
to
be
able
to
go
to
the
florida
county
commissioner's
public
hearing
immediately
after
the
planning
commission
public
hearing.
But
there
is
there
may
be
some
need
to
push
that
out.
If
there
are
sections
of
the
proposal
that
need
more
investigation
or
evaluation.
C
Yeah,
thank
you
hannah.
It
was
very
informative
and
detailed
and
really
appreciate
your
in
your
instructions
and
helping
to
understand
this
process
and
solicit
so
much
great
input
so
we'll
pass
it
on.
F
Hello,
so
I
wanted
to
just
take
a
moment
to
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
building
codes.
So
what
what
hannah
was
talking
about
was
really
part
of
the
the
planning
process
and
that
has
to
be
sorted
out
before
you
can
submit
for
a
building
permit,
but
hopefully
without
what
will
get
you
into
a
process
where
you're
ready
to
start
to
prepare
your
permit
documents,
and
I
just
wanted
to
briefly
cover
a
couple
of
things
here.
F
The
first
off
is
that
we
are
currently
using
the
2015
building
codes.
We
we've
adopted
them
and
they've
been
in
force
since
january
of
2016.,
so
they're
they're
pretty
well
established,
we've
been
using
them
quite
successfully.
We've
worked
out
many
of
the
kinks,
so
hopefully
that'll
make
things
a
little
bit
more
straightforward,
a
little
bit
easier
for
everybody
by
not
having
a
major
update
to
the
building
code
at
the
same
time
as
you're
dealing
with
everything
else.
F
I
do
want
to
just
point
out
a
couple
of
items
for
those
folks
who
maybe
aren't
working
with
a
design
team
that
has
had
a
lot
of
direct
experience
working
in
boulder
county,
so
boulder
county
has
amended
the
the
energy
code
portion
of
the
building
code.
We
we
call
that
that
set
conglomeration
of
codes.
F
We
call
that
build
smart
and
it's
really
just
just
our
our
local
energy
code
and
it
does
behave
a
little
bit
differently
than
the
standard
building
code
or
the
standard
energy
code
that
maybe
out
of
town,
architects
or
contractors
or
whoever
your
is
on
your
design
team
might
be
familiar
with,
or
maybe
they're
maybe
they're
from
from
around
town,
but
just
haven't
done
a
lot
of
work
in
the
unincorporated
portion
of
boulder
county.
F
So
to
that
end,
what
I'm
going
to
be
putting
together
is
is
a
build
smart,
specific
workshop.
That
really
is
going
to
be
designed
to
help
help
your
design
team
really
dig
into
some
of
the
details
of
what
this
energy
code
is,
what
it
isn't
and
help
you
help.
F
You
navigate
that
if
you
have
questions
about
building
codes,
specifically
whether
it's
before
or
after
that
meeting
or
whether
it's
about
the
energy
code
or
some
other
aspect
of
the
building
code,
there's
the
the
email
they're
building
at
bouldercounty.org
that
that
that
email
address
is
monitored
by
a
team
of
code
professionals
that
that
are
really
quite
responsive.
F
I
do
ask
that,
if
you
send
in
questions,
it's
really
helpful
to
include
your
the
street
address
of
the
property
in
question
and
just
the
word
marshall
fire
someplace
in
that
subject
line
because
we
are
prioritizing
questions
and
projects
that
are
related
to
the
rebuilding.
So
we
can
just
make
sure
we
don't.
We
don't
miss
those
things
and
we
get
you
as
responsive
an
answer
as
possible.
So
I'm
not
gonna
go
into
too
much
more
detail
about
that.
F
The
the
details
of
the
amendments
are
are
found
on
our
our
websites
and
there's
some
some
links
here
and
we're
happy
to
help
you
with
that.
But
I
I
wanted
to
give
some
time
now
to
to
zach
and
he's
gonna
be
talking
a
little
bit
about
some
of
the
resources
that
are
available
to
to
help.
You
help
you
with
the
to
build
as
energy,
efficient
and
sustainable
of
a
home
as
as
possible.
M
M
M
I'm
excited
that
in
we're
expecting
in
the
next
couple
of
days,
an
announcement
from
excel
on
their
incentives,
a
formal
announcement
from
excel.
So
I'm
excited
about
that.
I
unfortunately
can't
share
that
tonight,
but
we're
expecting
it
in
the
next
couple
of
days,
there's
also
state
legislation,
that's
in
the
works
discussions
of
low-cost
financing
from
the
colorado,
clean
energy
fund
and
many
discussions
with
manufacturers,
distributors
and
installers
on
providing
discounts.
M
So
I
know
you
would
like
to
have
all
that
information
today.
Unfortunately,
it's
still
all
in
the
works,
but
we
are
working
on
it
as
quickly
as
we
can,
and
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
that
you
know
these
incentives
that
we're
talking
about
putting
together
will
you
know
they're
not
going
to
cover
a
large
under
insurance
issue.
M
Unfortunately,
they're
they're
intended
to
support
the
decision
to
build
a
more
high
performance
home,
and
unfortunately
you
know
we
we
just
can't
ask
you-
know
excel
energy,
for
example,
to
to
cover
a
large
under
insurance
issue.
So
I
want
to
call
that
out
that
you
know
when
the
package
comes
together
and
everything's
comes
together.
You
know
that's
sort
of
what
we're
what
we're
working
towards,
and
I
know
that
others
are
working
on
the
under
insurance
issue.
M
Next
slide
for
folks
interested
in
meeting
with
builders,
finding
out
more
information
about
high
performance
homes
and
just
generally
gathering
more
information
this
friday
and
this
saturday
is
the
boulder
valley
build
expo.
We
will
have
county
and
municipal
staff
present.
You
can
come
say
hi
to
me
at
the
energy
smart
table
we'll
be
there.
Both
days.
Can
answer
questions
about
building
a
high
performance
home
building
all-electric
and
I
see
the
link
is
in
the
chat.
Thank
you.
M
M
The
colorado
green
building
guild
is
a
local
non-profit,
that
of
energy
efficiency
and
green
building
professionals,
and
they
hosted
a
really
excellent
session.
I
have
to
say
you
know
I
work
in
this
and
you
know
I've.
I've
heard
it
before
and
I
thought
the
quality
of
the
session,
the
information
provided.
M
You
know
the
feedback
and
engagement
with
a
couple
hundred
people
who
attended
was
really
good.
So
I'll
put
the
link
to
the
recording
it's
available
in
both
english
and
spanish.
I'll,
put
the
link
to
the
recording
in
the
chat,
and
there
will
be
more
sessions
which
we
will
keep
you
posted
on
as
they
come
next
slide
and
then
my
last
slide
for
tonight.
Is
you
know
if
you
have
any
questions
about
building
a
high
performance
home?
M
Please
come
see
us
at
the
builder
expo
otherwise,
rachel
bramblitt
is
our
energy
advisor
she's
been
working
with
energy
smart
for
over
six
years.
You
can
reach
her
at
the
phone
number
and
the
email
listed,
and
we
would
be
happy
to
help
answer
any
questions
you
have
about
energy,
star,
certification,
building,
a
passive
house,
building,
electrification,
etc.
M
N
Sure
I'll
just
take
a
30
seconds
sort
of
maybe
a
minute
max
here,
so
we'll
take
your
brain
away
from
rebuilding
for
just
a
minute
here.
If
you
were
on
the
session
two
weeks
ago,
you
heard
me
talk
about
the
marsha
fire,
related
transportation
and
transit
resources
webpage,
so
there's
an
image
of
it.
N
I
know
they're
going
to
share
the
links
here
in
the
chat
for
you
too,
but
just
wanted
to
share
quickly
for
those
of
you
who
may
have
had
to
relocate
or
possibly
lost
vehicles
or
are
just
dealing
with
different
transportation
needs
than
you
were
before
this
site
will
give
you
some
of
the
discounted
prices
or
resources
that
are
out
there
and
available
for
all
of
you
who
have
been
impacted
by
the
fire
and
we're
also
releasing
tonight
and
we're
going
to
share
with
you
in
the
chat
a
new
transportation
needs
survey.
N
This
is
going
to
help
us
understand
where
you
all
lived,
where
you
all
are
living
now
and
how
to
best
organize
some
of
the
resources
that
are
available
to
help
you
all
who
may
be
dealing
with
different
transportation
needs,
while
you're
temporarily
displaced.
So
I
know
another
survey
doesn't
sound
like
a
whole
lot
of
fun.
But
if
you
have
a
few
minutes
to
answer
this
10
questions
survey,
that
would
be
great
and
just
like
zach
mentioned,
we
will
also
be
at
the
green,
build
expo
this
weekend
on
friday
and
saturday.
N
C
Thanks
kami,
and
why
don't
you
send
me
that
survey
link
as
well
and
I
can
send
it
cheryl
who's?
The
kind
of
the
communication
guru
for
the
unincorporated
area
can
put
that
out
tomorrow
to
everyone
just
perfect,
fill
out
as
well.
Okay,.
B
Everyone
yeah
I'm
coming.
This
is
just
a
recap
on
what
we've
gone
over
tonight:
hi
everyone,
I'm
kim
sanchez
deputy
director
at
community
planning
and
permitting.
Thank
you
all
for
the
responses
tonight.
B
I
think
it's
challenging
to
try
to
get
input
in
this
setting
and
we've
tried
to
do
our
best
to
get
some
of
the
questions
that
we
have
addressed
from
you
through.
The
polling
exercise
so
appreciate
your
patience
and
responses.
In
that
I
do
think
we
were
able
to
get
a
lot
of
really
informative
feedback
tonight
and
again.
This
is
the
beginning
of
a
conversation
that
will
continue
to
happen
through
the
public
process.
B
So
just
to
recap,
as
others
said,
the
boulder
valley
build
expo
will
be
friday
and
saturday
in
louisville.
The
address
for
that
is
at
ascent
community
church,
that's
at
550,
mccasland
boulevard
in
louisville,
and
that
address
was
just
put
into
the
chat.
B
So
again,
all
of
this
will
be
noticed
and
we'll
also
make
sure
that
it's
communicated
to
the
marshall
fire
list
serve
another
plug
for
that
most
of
you
are
likely
signed
up
for
that.
But
if
you
haven't
subscribed
to
marshall
fire
news,
please
visit
the
marshall
fire
rebuilding
webpage
and
there's
an
orange
button
on
there.
That
allows
you
to
subscribe
to
get
emails
on
all
of
these
meetings
that
we're
holding
upcoming
meetings
and
things
like
the
the
planning,
commission
and
board
of
county
commissioners
hearings.
B
So
you
can
stay
up
to
date
on
news
all
of
the
contact
information
is
listed
there.
Our
emails
for
right
now,
please
email
us
with
any
rebuilding
questions
at
marshall.
At
marshall,
rebuilding
at
boulder
county
dot
org,
once
the
article
19
provisions
are
adopted,
then
we
will
be
able
to
assign
rebuilding
coordinators
to
each
property
owner,
but
until
then
we
can
help
you
through
the
marshall
rebuilding
email.
So
we're
already,
you
know
getting
a
lot
of
questions
from
people
about
the
specifics
on
their
property.
B
B
So
the
last
thing
that
we
wanted
to
announce
and
gary
feel
free
to
jump
in
if
you'd
like,
but
gary
and
katie
arrington,
who
are
recovery,
manager
and
assistant
recovery
manager
are
both
now
offering
office
hours.
So
gary
is
holding
his
on
monday
afternoons
virtually
so
a
setting
like
this,
where
you
can
speak
face
to
face
over
the
computer,
he's
also
available
on
friday
afternoons
for
in-person
meetings
at
the
st
ambrose
episcopal
church
in
boulder
katie
has
appointments
on
monday
afternoons
in
person
and
she's
available
virtually
all
day
on
wednesdays.
B
So
if
you
have
you
know
more
general
topics,
you
can
talk
to
them
about
just
recovery
in,
in
general,
for
the
specific
questions
about
your
property,
please
feel
free
to
contact
us
at
that
marshall,
rebuilding
boulder
county
dot,
org
email
to
book
appointments
with
gary
and
katie.
You
can
schedule
through
the
booking
link
that
is
listed
on
this
slide,
and
all
of
these
slides
will
be
posted
on
the
marshall
fire
webpage
by
friday.
B
So
you
can
go
through
the
slide
deck.
If
you
know
people
that
weren't
able
to
attend
this
meeting
that
may
be
interested
in
hearing
the
presentation,
there
will
also
be
a
video
available
for
them
next
slide.
Please.
B
So
I
think
that
concludes
where
we're
at.
We
were
we're
hoping
to
have
a
little
bit
of
time
for
questions
and
answers
tonight,
but
we're
we're
bumping
up
against
the
8
o'clock,
stop
time
and
to
respect
your
time
and
and
all
of
the
thought
and
response
that
you
put
into
tonight's
meeting
we'll
go
ahead
and
end.
I
think
we
answered
many
of
the
questions
through
the
q,
a
and
and
as
I've
mentioned
each
time
that
we've
met
with
you
virtually
we
are
available
to
you.
B
You
can
reach
us
through
the
email.
We
are
happy
to
talk
with
you
over
the
phone
and
again
this
is
the
the
beginning
of
a
conversation
that
we
plan
on
having
with
you
to
assist
your
rebuilding
efforts.
So
thank
you,
everybody
for
attending
and
gary
I'll.
Let
you
close
us
out
thanks.
C
Thank
you
kim
and
again
thank
everyone
for
participating
and
and
really
providing
excellent
feedback
and
input
about
how
you
want
to
rebuild
and
recover.
This
is
something
we
do
after
every
disaster.
I
think
we're
unique
in
this
and
that
we
take
the
time
to
gather
all
this
input
to
try
to
tailor
make
the
regulations
to
fit
your
needs.
C
C
I
want
to
thank
the
the
unincorporated
boulder
committee
county
committee.
If
you
don't
know,
there's
residents
neighbors
in
every
neighborhood
in
the
unincorporated
area
who
meet
every
friday
to
be
a
voice
for
you,
you're
welcome
to
go
to
that
meeting.
It's
at
noon
at
the
saint
ambrose
church,
and
also
I
just
want
to
finally
thank
cheryl
gordon
for
her
amazing
commitment
to
help
with
communication.
C
So
again,
thank
you
all
for
your
time.
This
is
not
the
end,
as
you
saw
on
the
schedule.
There'll
be
opportunity
to
provide
feedback
before
the
planning
commission
during
the
planning
commission
hearing
and
at
the
county
commissioner
hearings
as
well.
So
thank
you
very
much
and
again,
we'll
see
you
next
week
on
tuesday
for
the
debris
removal
program,
update
thanks
and
have
a
good
night.