►
From YouTube: Boulder County Regional Opioid Council (September 2023)
Description
Ninth meeting of the Boulder County Regional Opioid Council (BCROC). Recorded September 28, 2023. For more information on Region 6 Opioids Abatement activities, visit: https://boco.org/Region-6-Opioids-Council
B
C
Whoops
off
center
there
all
right
so
welcome
again
to
the
September
meeting
of
the
Boulder
County
opioid
Regional
Council
I'm,
going
to
start
with
just
a
quick
recap
of
our
virtual
meeting
guidelines
as
well
as
our
agenda
for
today.
So
as
a
reminder,
this
meeting
is
open
to
members
of
the
public.
However,
it
is
not
a
public
hearing,
and
so
we
are
not
looking
for
public
comment.
If
you
do
have
any
burning
comments,
questions
concerns
feel
free
to
add
them
into
the
chat.
C
Our
agenda
for
today
I'm
going
to
start
with
just
a
few
brief
updates
that
are
more
General
in
nature
and
then
hand
it
off
to
our
guest
speakers,
Jamie
Feld
and
Jack
Patterson
from
the
Attorney
General's
office,
who
are
going
to
give
updates
more
specific
to
the
work
going
on
at
the
state
and
then
open
up
for
discussion
and
questions
from
the
council.
I
will
also
provide
an
update
on
the
conversation
that
we
started
in
August
around
continuation
funding.
C
So,
as
a
reminder,
we
talked
about
some
of
our
short
and
long-term
planning,
with
the
short-term
Focus
being
around.
What
do
we
need
to
understand
in
order
to
continue
funding
for
currently
funded
programs,
so
provide
an
update
on
our
method
there,
as
well
as
our
update
or
an
update
on
our
method
for
starting
the
process
of
determining
some
longer
term
strategies
as
well.
C
C
We
were
really
thinking
at
the
time
that
there
might
be
a
November
date
for
plan
submission
added,
and
we
do
know
now.
It's
been
confirmed.
November
15th
is
an
additional
plan.
Submission
deadline,
that's
been
added
into
that
calendar,
and
so
that
is
the
the
date
that
we
are
striving
for
in
order
to
submit
Boulder
County's
Regional
funding
plan.
C
C
Again
that's
prevention,
treatment
and
other
uses,
and
then
from
that
deadline
of
the
15th
of
November
through
to
March
15th,
we'll
be
doing
sort
of
that
extended
planning
process
the
longer
term
strategy,
development
we'll
be
working
with
the
community
more
closely.
Our
contractor
will
be
on
board
and
we'll
have
an
expanded
operations.
Group
roster
that
taken
together
are
going
to
help
us
identify
what
those
Regional
priorities
are
and
then
by
that
March
15th
deadline.
C
If
anything
has
wildly
changed
from
our
original
plan
submitted
in
November
from
our
subsequent
planning
process,
we
can
make
those
amendments
and
move
Dollars
around
by
that
March
15th
amendment
period
so
before
I
hand
off
to
Jamie
and
Jack
any
questions
about
the
short-term
calendar.
I
know
that's
kind
of
what
we
had
talked
about
in
August,
but.
B
A
D
B
C
B
H
Can
you
hear
me
all
right,
you're,
correct,
okay,
hi
everyone,
Jamie
Bell,
director
of
opioid
response
at
the
AG's
office,
I've
recently
moved
into
this
role
on
previously
Heidi
Williams
was
our
director
and
I?
Was
deputy
director
recently
became
director,
as
of
August
I'm,
very
honored,
to
be
in
this
position,
and
also
a
thank
you
to
Boulder
County,
where
I
consider
my
roots,
where
I
worked
for
five
years,
and
it's
just
lovely
to
see
folks
that
I
know
and
that
I
also
just
know
the
hard
work
of
you
all
here.
H
So
I
really
love
the
opportunity
to
connect
with
Boulder
County,
directly
I,
often
mention
Boulder
and
the
great
work
you're
doing
so
next
slide
is
just
to
show
our
team.
We
do
have
a
small
team
that
is
administering
These
funds
myself
as
the
Director.
We
have
Jack
Patterson
here
and
I'll.
Let
him
introduce
himself
in
a
moment.
H
He
is
the
person
behind
the
opioids
at
coag.gov
email
so
ensures
that
we
are
accessible
to
the
public
to
Regional
Council
Members.
Any
questions
you
have.
He
is
able
to
provide
really
responsive,
Regional
technical
assistance
and
we're
really
fortunate
to
have
him
on
our
team.
I
always
say:
don't
don't
steal
them
from
us.
We
he's
he's
a
gem
and
then
robin
stoyer,
our
grants
coordinator,
who
manages
our
infrastructure
and
Innovation
grants
that
I'll
talk
about
a
little
bit
later
and
then
20
time
is
Mindy
Baumgardner.
Who
is
a
rural
Outreach
specialist?
H
G
Response
Unit
and
pleasure
to
kind
of
get
work
with
you
on
in
my
previous
role.
I
got
to
help
support
some
of
the
miracle
programming
with
Boulder
County,
Community,
Services
and
parents
will
say
exciting.
I'll
share
daily
sentence,
my
appreciation
to
all
the
great
work
you
all
do
so
thanks
again
for
having
us
today.
H
We
did
have
the
representative
representation
on
our
panel,
which
was
excellent
from
Boulder
Valley,
School
District,
and
also
from
Boulder
County
Community
Services
I'm,
Jim
adamsberger,
and
the
AG
spoke
with
the
representatives
we
had
over
200
people
in
attendance
and
Montrose,
which
is
a
distance
to
get
to,
but
really
excellent,
to
highlight
rural
Colorado
representatives
from
all
19
regions
across
the
city
and
then
attendees
included
elected
officials,
Community
leaders,
law
enforcement
providers
affected
family
members
and
I
think
Jack
added
this,
but
one
dog
too.
So
you
can
see
a
very
friendly
dog
there.
H
It
really
was
an
excellent
opportunity
to
connect
talk
about
best
practices
in
the
state.
We
are
thinking
that
for
next
year
we
will
hold
it
more
along
the
Front
Range,
so
we
would
love
to
have
more
folks
from
Boulder
County
I
know.
Boulder
County,
Public
Health
was
also
in
attendance
too,
through
Georgia,
so
really
helpful
to
have
people
there.
So
we
can
also
share
out
the
good
work
of
Boulder
County.
H
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
we
did
do
a
survey
afterwards,
and-
and
this
was
some
of
the
feedback
that
we
received-
we
also
want
to
offer
up
if
any
Commissioners
or
elected
officials
want
to
meet
with
the
attorney
general
or
us
as
staff.
We
we
welcome.
You
know,
participation
with
elected
folks
with
directors.
E
I'll
I'll
just
say:
I
thought
it
was
a
great
conference
and
there
was
a
lot
that
I
was
able
to
take
away
from
the
presentations
and
I.
Think
some
of
the
key
takeaways
for
me
was
that
many
of
the
communities,
many
of
the
regions
were
experiencing
the
same
kinds
of
things
that
we
are,
which
is
that
it's
this
is
a
complicated
process.
E
It's
a
pretty
heavy,
lift
and
there's
a
lot
of
infrastructure
that
we
need
to
build
to
move
this
work
forward,
so
I
think
that
helped
to
kind
of
damn
Tamp
down
some
of
our
anxiety
around
how
much
work
this
was
to
get
stood
up,
but
also
I,
think
in
terms
of
service
delivery.
The
the
key
importance
of
peers
came
out
very
clearly
looking
at
the
Johns.
Hopkins
criteria
was
also
something
that
was
very
helpful
in
terms
of
looking
at
guidance
and
just
really.
H
Great,
so
yes,
it's
great
to
have
Gem
and
also
your
representative
from
Boulder
Valley
School,
District,
Boulder,
Valley,
School
District,
actually
said
on
both
Broomfield
and
Boulder,
which
we
always
love
to
see
inter-regional
collaboration
and
appreciation.
Just
to
that,
you
participate
in
our
Regional
Council
discussion.
So
there
was
a
discussion
about
Regional
Council
formation
process.
H
So
this
it
looks
like
it
maybe
got
a
little
bit
messed
up
in
the
translation
to
this,
but
basically
that
the
takeaway
here
is
that
over
the
course
of
these
18
years
there
is
770
million
dollars
that
is
coming
to
the
state
of
Colorado.
That's
up
since
the
last
mention
that
we
had,
as
there
was
a
recent
70
million
dollar
Kroger
determination
in
principle
and
so
from
pharmaceutical
companies,
manufacturers,
even
the
consulting
company.
We
are
seeing
this
money
to
the
state
over
18
years.
H
We'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
Boulder
County's
amount.
Specifically
next
slide
shows
how
the
shares
are
allocated.
It's
just
a
reminder
for
anyone.
That's
new
20
goes
by
direct
allocation
to
local
governments
and
Boulder
County.
All
of
your
local
governments
are
diverting
their
funds
to
the
region.
60
goes
directly
to
the
region.
H
H
All
these
funds
are
requiring
full
transparency
and
we
do
have
our
dashboard,
which
posts
the
information
online
next
slide.
So,
as
you
already
know,
we
have
19
Regional
regions
in
the
state.
Boulder
is
its
own
region.
One
item
that
we
were
encouraging
is
the
thought
is
thought
around
inter-regional
collaboration.
So,
as
you
move
forward,
if
there's
options
for
partnering
with
other
regions,
we
know
it's
challenging.
You
know
it's
challenging
to
partner
with
one
within
one
County.
H
It
should
challenge
you
to
create
a
new
Regional
Council,
so
this
is
kind
of
a
long-term
Vision
around
as
you're
identifying
needs.
Perhaps
around
infrastructure
or
around.
Even
you
know,
youth
substance
use
was
one
of
the
facilities
we
heard,
considering
the
the
funds
that
are
coming
to
some
of
your
partners,
such
as
Denver
Adams
Arapahoe,
and
we
want
to
help
facilitate
those
conversations
as
they're
needed
to
next
slide.
H
I'm
gonna
go
just
pass
through
this,
because
Kelly
already
talked
about
the
timeline
next
slide
and
Jack
is
there
anything
you
want
to
bring
up
on
this
part.
I
know
that
Kelly
and
Jim
have
been
our
contacts
here
and
have
been
very
responsive
to
all
the
needs
and
requirements
for
the
Regional
Council.
Is
there
anything
in?
In
particular,
you
want
to
bring
up
Jack
yeah.
G
Just
very
quickly,
no
I
think
the
intent
of
the
mou
to
really
give
region
flexibility
to
continue
to
kind
of
figure
out.
What
is
that
that
strategy,
and
so
I
think
just
that
you
guys
can
continue
to
amend
those
plans
and
then
just
as
we
get
closer
to
that
expenditure,
reporting
you'll
need
to
certify
compliance
with
that,
and
so
it's
we
just
want
to
continue
to
work
with.
You
all
make
sure
this
works
for
you.
H
Great
and
we
are
working
on
some
technical
assistance
resources
too,
to
help
support
you
as
you
get
closer
to
expenditures,
certifications
and
we'll
provide
those
to
Jim
and
Kelly
and
happy
to
come
back
for
a
follow-up
presentation
as
needed
next
slide,
and
my
apologies,
the
the
font
I
think
just
looks
a
little
bit
off
with
with
this,
but
it's
not
a
problem
at
all.
The
information
is
all
there
next
slide,
so
we
wanted
to
share
with
one
of
the
funds
is
an
infrastructure
share.
H
H
Okay,
the
next
one
is
our
opioid
abatement,
Innovation
Challenge,
so
yeah
infrastructure
share.
We
we've
launched
two
rounds.
The
second
round
was
recently
announced
at
our
conference.
We'll
have
the
third
round
starting
November
Innovation
Challenge.
We
had
our
first
round
four
million
dollars.
It
was
opened
and
closed
on
June
30th,
we're
in
the
process
of
reviewing
those
grants,
the
the
they
will
be
notified
shortly
about
it.
I
would
say
we
had
such
a
high
response
and
interest
in
this.
H
We
had
65
applicants
which
totaled
44
million
dollars,
and
we
only
had
four
million
dollars
to
give
out.
We
do
anticipate
that
we're
going
to
do
follow-up
rounds
of
this,
particularly
starting
next
year,
early
next
year.
So
if
there
was
an
applicant
that
did
not
receive
funds,
I
don't
want
that
to
discourage
entities
from
applying
in
the
future.
We
have
these
funds
over
18
years,
and
we
know
we
just
there
were
some
really
great
applications,
but
it
just
wasn't
possible
to
fund
them
all
as
there
were.
H
B
Jamie
this
is
Robin.
I
have
a
question
related
to
both
of
these
funds.
When
I
looked
at
the
awardees
for
the
infrastructure
grants,
I
was
struck
that
many
of
the
projects
seemed
broader
than
just
opioid
response
and
I'm
I'm.
Just
wondering
if
you
can
comment
on
that
in
terms
of
what
would
be
allowable
before
considering
other
other
substance,
use
issues
or
I
noticed
one
included
like
Transportation
I
I.
Just
would
love
love
to
hear
your
perspective
on
that
great.
H
That
was
some
information
that
we
received
from
our
legal
counsel.
I
will
say
too
that
thinking
about
prevention,
some
of
the
programs
are
a
little
bit
broader.
Knowing
that
you
know,
pro-social
activities
are
really
a
a
mitigator
for
not
just
opioid
use
disorder,
but
other
substance
use
disorders
and
so
looking
at
like
at
the
evidence.
Sometimes
it
is
not
substance
specific.
That
is
really
a
good,
evidence-based
tool
to
get
to
the
same
outcome.
H
So
I
would
say
that
there
is
some
broadness.
You
do
have
to
still
connect
it
back
to
opioids.
So
with
the
transportation
you
know
they
talk
about
transportation,
to
substance,
use,
treatment
facilities,
you
couldn't
use
it
just
for
transportation,
like
we
say,
gain
a
law
enforcement
vehicle.
It
couldn't
be
used.
You
know
just
five
percent
of
the
time.
H
H
So
what
we
base
it
off
is
something
called
exhibit
a
in
Colorado
and
exhibit
e
at
the
national
level,
and
those
do
go
through
allowable
uses,
and
so
you
can
kind
of
see
specifically
what
those
are
I
think
your
team
is
aware
of
them.
We
use
the
same
for
these
grants
and
it's
that
is
the
guide
and
you'll
see
within
there.
H
I
would
say
too,
that
you
know
probably
a
program
that
is
just
mental
health.
Like
say
just
Suicide
Prevention
would
not
be
allowable
with
the
funds,
so
something
that
is
just
like
suicide
prevention
has
no
connection
to
substance.
Use
would
probably
not
be
allowable
and
we're
happy
to
provide
some
more
guidance.
If
there
is
any
questions,
thanks.
B
That's
that's
very
helpful.
You
may
you
may
be
aware
that
we
just
completed
a
behavioral
health
strategic
plan,
and
so
there
will
be
projects
and
implementation
of
the
behavioral
health
work,
which
includes,
of
course,
substance
use,
and
so
there's
been
talk
about
how
to
how
to
leverage
all
different
types
of
funding,
including
the
opioid
settlement
dollars
in
implementing
that
work.
H
Great
and
I
do
think
one
thing
that
we
saw
from
Boulder
County,
which
we
haven't
seen
from
all
regions,
is
that
the
funding
of
smaller
non-profits
we
know.
Sometimes
it
can
be
harder
to
do
that
burden
through
procurement,
but
we're
hearing
best
practices
nationally.
Is
that
you're
not?
Is
that
not
excluding
non-profits
because
of
the
challenges
getting
the
money
out
to
them,
and
so
I
think
that's
one
thing
that
is
kind
of
a
success
out
of
Boulder
County
and
we
know,
takes
extra
work
next
slide.
H
As
mentioned
all
of
our
information
around
the
funds
where
they're
allocated
is
available
online,
we're
one
of
three
states
that
does
make
this
publicly
transparent.
If
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
you
can
see
even
for
Boulder
County
that
and
again
online.
It
looks
a
little
bit
less
wonky
than
it
does
here.
You'll
see,
Boulder
County
is
up
here.
H
H
H
Just
quickly
I
wanted
to
mention
that
alley:
Colorado
attorney
general's
law
office,
we
launched
something
called
The
Connect
effect.
It's
the
prevention
awareness
campaign
targeted
to
youth
ages,
10
to
14,
secondary
youth
ages,
15
to
18,
and
then
also
for
both
their
press
parents
or
trusted
adults.
It
really
is
where
our
hope
is
that
it's
evidence-based
around
positive
social
norms,
fact-based
information,
how
to
be
an
active
bystander
and
to
normalize
conversations
and
decrease
stigma.
Focus
groups
were
held
throughout
the
state
next
slide,
and
you
can
see.
H
Some
of
this
is
just
information
for
parents
about
how
to
start
the
conversation
about
pills
and
Fentanyl.
We
want
to
have.
We
have
information
in
Spanish
and
we
are
looking
to
find
some
pilot
communities
that
we
could
give
many
grants
to
to
share
this
information
out.
So
I
would
love
to
Think
Through
Boulder
County
and
if
there's
any
interest
in
one
of
your
communities
receiving
a
mini
Grant
around
getting
this
out
next
slide,
you
can
just
take
a
lit.
Take
a
screenshot
here.
This
is
all
of
our
resources,
social
media.
H
It
could
be
good
as
you're
thinking
through
the
possibility
of
the
mini
Grant,
seeing
if
it's
something
that
you
feel
like
would
resonate
with
your
community,
also
the
the
vendors
so
that
they
are
willing
to
help
customize
it
to
your
local
community
as
well,
so
that
their
colorado-based
vendor
se2
that
they're
very
interested
in
figuring
out.
If
there
is
any
tailoring
or
the
statistics,
need
to
change
for
a
local
community
that
they
would
be
willing
to
do
that
next
slide.
H
So
we
were
just
following
some
of
the
things
that
Kelly
and
Jim
said
would
be
helpful
for
you
all
one
item
we
wanted
to
bring
up
and
I
can
apologize,
that
the
screen
looks
hard
to
read.
Is
around
this
John
Hopkins
award,
the
Colorado
State
received
the
inaugural
award
for
excellence
in
the
application
of
opioid
litigation
principles.
So
we
really
have
to
thank
the
partnership
with
local
government
for
being
able
to
receive
this
award.
H
We
were
the
first
state
to
receive
it
now,
they're,
looking
at
giving
these
Awards
also
to
local
entities
as
well.
So
it
might
be
something
to
consider
as
you're
developing
your
work.
Whether
a
goal
could
be
a
nomination
or
receipt
of
this
John
Hopkins
principles
award,
some
of
their
principles
are
spend
the
money
to
save
lives,
use
evidence
to
guide
spending,
invest
in
youth
prevention,
focus
on
racial
equity
and
then
develop
a
care
and
transparent
process
for
deciding
where
to
spend
the
money.
The
funding.
H
So
those
are
some
of
those
principles
you
can
go
to
their
website
and
we
can
put
the
link
in
the
chat
too
I.
Think
Boulder.
County
is
really
you
know
on
board.
With
a
lot
of
these
pieces
around
evidence
and
youth
prevention,
we
are
trying
to
figure
out
the
state
around
this
fair
and
transparent
process.
We're
trying
to
figure
out
ways
to
you
know
more
actively
incorporate
the
voice
of
lived
experience
again,
the
part
about
open
meetings
or
how
to
make
it
as
transparent
as
possible.
H
We're
also
trying
to
do
more
work
on
racial
Equity,
I.
Think
that's
an
area
for
us
at
the
state
to
work
on
and
how
we
can
incorporate.
Maybe
a
community
responsive,
culturally,
responsive
Grant
at
the
state,
so
I
think
there's
still
a
lot
for
us
to
do
on
that
and
then
the
part
about
spend
the
money
to
save
lives.
I
think
there
is
a
focus
on
that
part
about
harm
reduction.
H
We
are
getting
just
as
a
caveat
some
questions
around
what
is
the
appropriate
role
of
law
enforcement
in
this,
and
so
some
states
are
interpreting
it
differently.
Some
states
are
not
determining
that
Supply
say
side
activities
like
interdiction
isn't
allowable
source.
So
that's
something
to
consider
that
from
these
National
Watchdogs
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
scrutiny
around
using
the
funds
for
more
on
that
interdiction
or
supply
side
next
slide.
H
So
we
invite
any
Regional
Council
Members,
who
are
learning
forums,
Jim
and
Kelly
and
Tucker
have
all
been
great
at
participating.
It
is
open
to
you
all
as
well.
If
you
ever
wanted
to
participate,
we
give
updates
and
then
also
hear
from
regions.
Eventually
we
might
want
to
highlight
Boulder
County
and
some
of
the
successes
of
the
work
you're
doing
so.
These
are
the
ones
that
are
upcoming
and
within
we
have
our
email
too.
If
there's
any
questions
at
all
or
concerns,
we
want
to
be
a
resource
as
much
as
possible.
H
So
if
there's
Regional
technical
assistance
or
you
need
help
connecting
to
another
region,
one
item
we're
also
working
on
is
data.
So
we
have
a
data
work
group
at
the
state
level
to
look
at.
Are
there
State
indicators
eventually
that
we
could
put
into
an
RFP?
That
was
a
request
that
came
from
the
regions?
So
if
you
want
to
get
involved
in
these
efforts
just
reach
out
to
us,
we
are
more
than
happy
to
get
you
connected
and
we
we
appreciate
all
your
leadership
and
work
on
this.
H
H
But
if
you
have
any
questions
about
what
we're
seeing
in
other
communities,
don't
hesitate
to
reach
out
great
well,
that's
it
from
us
again.
It's
Jack
on
our
team
is
amazing,
responding
to
our
opioids
email.
You
can
sign
up
for
our
newsletter
too,
and
that
shows
when
the
new
funding
and
announcement
Awards
announcements
sorry
are
coming
out.
A
I
I
do
have
a
question.
Thank
you,
Jamie
and
Jack
for
your
work
and
also
really
for
recognizing
the
work
that
Boulder
County
is
doing
it
I'm,
proud
of
how
hard
we're
working
to
be
transparent
and
to
meet
those
principles.
I'm
curious
about
the
connector
Pac
program
and
under
whose
auspices
you
would
typically
see
something
like
that
administered
is.
F
A
H
Area
yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
I
think
at
this
point
we
want
the
information
to
get
out
as
widely
as
possible.
So
all
those
materials
are
free
of
charge.
So
really
anyone
can
use
them.
So,
as
many
I
think
all
the
places
you
listed
are
really
excellent.
The
materials
we
can
send
them
out
to
communities
are
all
free
of
charge.
There
are
social
media,
so
there's
no
cost
to
using
it.
It
is
a
public
awareness
campaign.
H
If,
if
there
is
a
partner,
that's
interested
I
think
it's
more
around
the
Readiness
and
willingness
of
that
group
to
participate
and
kind
of
be
a
pilot.
This
is
the
first
year,
and
so
anyone
I
would
say
that
is
interested.
We
are
open
to
talking
with
and
I
think
there
could
be
more
than
one
from
Boulder
County,
potentially
in
this
first
pilot
round.
H
A
H
Exactly
exactly
that's
great,
a
pretty
fairly
small,
lift
I
would
say:
okay,
yeah,
but
anywhere
you
think
of
we.
There
could
be
areas
we're
not
thinking
of
how
to
get
to
trusted
adults.
The
target
is
really
youth
10
to
14
and
trusted
adults,
so
any
entity
that
reaches
those
communities
would
be
a
good
partner.
H
Great
question
in
a
lot
of
ways:
I
think
in
terms
of
planning,
Boulder
County
is
definitely
a
leader
and
so
I
think
your
previous
work.
Having
done
you
know
with
your
behavioral
health
I'm,
going
to
get
the
word
wrong
roadmap,
your
community
health
needs
assessments,
I
think
that
you
you're
the
substance,
use
advisor
group.
Of
course,
like
you,
have
actually
a
lot
more
in
place
to
start
with,
so
I
think
that's.
H
That
I
think
it's
helpful
to
to
not
start
from
zero,
especially
with
you
all
who
have
done
such
great
work,
so
I
think
that's
the
first
step.
Some
places
like
Larimer
County
I
know
has
done.
They
actually
have
a
a
position
in
their
Regional
Council,
which
is
like
an
application
for
a
person
with
lived
experience
and
it's
like
a
it's
a
competitive
application
and
then
there's
people
that
vet,
who
might
be
sitting
in
that
role,
so
they
and
they
have
more
than
one
person.
H
So
that's
one
thing
that
Larimer
County
has
done
for
Community
Health
needs
assessments
at
the
national
level.
I
can
send
a
couple
of
different
examples.
The
the
John
Hopkins
is
shatterproof
has
shared
with
me
about
how
to
go
about
it
and
some
are
at
the
county
level.
So
I
can
definitely
share
those
and
then
I
think
to
figuring
out
State
data
resources.
So
we
can
also
help
you
with
this,
but
getting
some
of
those
State
data
indicators.
H
H
I,
do
think,
like
I
said,
I
think
you
all
are
in
a
better
place
for
that
long
range
planning.
In
many
ways
we
might
look
at
you
as
a
model,
as
we
share
out
to
others
and
I.
Think
the
last
piece
is
there
are
a
couple
resources.
We
have
one
is
that
exhibit
a
which
does
show
the
allowable
uses
which
is
good
to
draw
on
and
then
another
one
is
something
called
the
colorado
blueprint
where
you
can,
as
a
group.
H
H
My
last
comment
in
terms
of
planning
is
we
put
those
numbers
out,
but
that's
really
a
baseline
And.
So
when
you're
thinking
about
planning
not
to
think
about
those
numbers
as
really
specific
down
to
the
the
dollar
and
cents,
we
anticipate,
you
know
there
could
be
future
settlements.
We
have
not
included
in
those
numbers
the
Kroger
settlement,
that's
in
principle.
C
And
I'll
just
chime
in
here
and
thank
you
Damien
duck
again.
I
will
take
responsibility
for
some
of
the
wonkiness
and
the
slides
think
of
translation
as
I
merged
our
decks
cause
that
but
I'll
make
sure
that
they're
fixed.
So
by
the
time
we
have
this
out
to
folks
after
the
meeting
they
won't.
They
won't
look
like
that.
So
apologies,
no.
B
C
Keep
it
moving
forward
here,
okay,
so
we're
going
to
change
direction
a
little
bit
and
talk
about
continuation
funding
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
sort
of
what
we
were
thinking
through
when
we
proposed
the
short
term
and
long-term
funding
plan
in
our
August
meeting.
So
we've
had
a
little
bit
more
time
to
develop
some
approach
and
methodology
around
that
this
I
just
put
up
to
kind
of
recap.
This
was
presented
in
August
and
it
sort
of
shows
everything
the
council
approved
in
terms
of
everything.
C
C
C
So
we
didn't
have
a
ton
of
outcome
reporting.
It
was
really
folded
into
those
at
the
time
we
didn't
really
know
yet
what
might
be
required
of
us
in
terms
of
evaluation
or
reporting
from
the
state,
and
so
now
in
lieu
of
having
outcome
reports
from
from
these
organizations
and
in
lieu
of
us
having
our
longer
term
strategic
priorities.
C
Yet
we're
really
looking
for
objective
areas
to
kind
of
do
some
cost
comparison
of
the
funding
programs
and
try
to
figure
out
how
are
the
funds
utilized
were
the
evils
to
be
utilized
as
intended
Etc.
So
really,
we
started
by
looking
at
spending
patterns
really
as
a
means
to
provide
some
insight
into
which
programs
are
able
to
use
their
funds
as
they
were
originally
posed
and
approved
by
the
council
last
year.
C
C
That
they
only
needed
one-time
funding,
and
so
those
programs
were
taken
out,
and
then
we
looked
across
the
remaining
programs
for
just
Trends
and
how
they've
been
spending
their
dollars,
and
you
can
see
a
breakdown.
This
is
reporting
as
of
quarter
two,
so
July
15th
is
really
what
this
is
representing.
We
don't
yet
have
our
reports
for
quarter
three,
which
will
come
in
October,
so
keeping
that
in
mind.
This
is
where
the
programs
are
currently
sitting
in
terms
of
their
spend
down
for
the
dollars
that
they
were
originally
awarded.
C
100
number
as
well.
Some
of
our
programs
did
request
a
one-time
lump
sum
just
because
what
they
were
requesting
funding
for
was
an
upfront
one-time
cost
so,
for
example,
the
Sheriff's
Office
some
of
those
licenses
that
were
requested.
That's
a
one-time
fund,
Public
Health
also
requested
some
upfront
funding
to
launch
and
develop
some
materials
for
public
awareness
campaign
that
the
council
approved.
C
C
So
if
you
can
recall
a
lot
of
these
programs
were
requesting
FTE
or
sustaining
current
positions,
and
because
of
our
Contracting
process
being
a
little
bit
slower
than
we
thought
it
would
be.
Some
of
our
programs
didn't
receive
their
dollars
until
almost
May,
and
that
said,
they
have
not
yet
been
able
to
spend
as
according
to
what
they
thought
they
would
be
able
to,
and
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
just
getting
staff
on
board.
C
So
what
we
did
with
this
is
we
developed
a
little
bit
of
a
methodology
here,
a
process
to
figure
out
how
to
continue
funding
for
our
programs
that
are
currently
funded.
First
part
of
that
process
is
looking
at
current
spending
trends
that
I
just
showed
as
an
indicator
of
whether
the
dollars
are
being
used
as
originally
intended.
C
C
Just
get
an
understanding
of
where
those
dollars
from
the
first
funding
drop
went
and
then,
with
that
information
we
would
be
extending
funding
to
any
of
the
current
programs
that
Express
they're
still
in
need.
What
we
would
how
we
would
do.
This
is
basically
total
the
three
quarters
of
their
current
spend
and
then
project
out
their
fourth
quarter
of
spend
and
then
extend
that
amount
up
to
the
original
award
amount,
two
programs
for
an
additional
year,
so
a
little
caveat.
There
is
programs.
C
And
then
the
third
part
of
the
process
would
be
that
as
we
create
these
funding
agreements
in
the
second
round
that
continuation
funds
would
just
be
one
additional
Year
and
that
we
would
let
programs
know
that
we'll
be
folding
in
additional
reporting
requirements
moving
forward.
And
then,
at
the
end
of
that
year,
programs
will
be
welcome
to
join
any
other
direct
or
competitive
bid.
Funding
process
processes
that
we
will
have
created
in
the
next
year.
D
C
Good
question
so
I,
don't
think
we
have
it
figured
out.
Quite
yet.
We
do
know
that
we
had
talked
about
competitive
processes
in
a
council
a
couple
months
back
and
the
feedback
from
the
group
was
to
have
sort
of
a
hybrid
approach.
So
some
programs
would
be
more
of
a
direct
funding
approach
if
they're
an
identified
priority
that
the
council
agrees
needs
to
be
a
broader
investment
and
then
we
would
also
offer
a
pool
of
dollars
that
are
through
a
competitive
bid
process.
E
Lexi
I'm
not
sure
if
this
gets
to
your
question,
but
that's
separate
from
this
continuation
funding
process.
So
the
idea
being
that,
as
we
work
with
the
consultant
and
get
more
feedback
from
the
community
about
strategic
areas
that
we
should
be
investing
in
those
within
as
we
determine
what
strategies
we
want
to
invest
in
and
get
kind
of
support
from
this
group,
how
do
we
then
go
about
Distributing
those
dollars?
Do
they
go
out
through
an
RFP?
E
E
D
A
Thank
you,
I
I
think
I've
been
trying
to
digest
this
slide
and
and
what
you
just
said,
Kelly
I
think
that
I'm
not
getting
what,
when
we
go
from
number
two
to
number
three.
So
are
you
talking
about
an
additional
year
here
or
okay?
All
right,
because
I
I
was
hearing
extending
the
original
three-quarters
of
of
reporting
and
projected
for
okay.
I
see
all
right
so
that
you're
going
to
use
that
projection
of
four
quarters
for
an
additional
year.
A
C
E
So
to
make
it
really
I
think
simple
clear
if,
if
an
organization
is
got
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
Grant
and
they've
only
spent
20
000
of
that,
what
we
would
do
is
say
well
you're,
going
to
take
forward
30
000
next
year,
so
we'll
add
twenty
thousand,
since
that
should
look
like
an
annualized
budget
of
fifty
thousand
dollars.
So
it's
it's
really
carrying
over
the
money
from
that's
left
over
from
the
first
year
and
adding
to
that
the
amount
that
should
make
them
whole
as
an
annualized
as
an
annualized
budget.
C
A
C
C
C
Okay
and
it's
gonna
move
us
forward,
and
this
is
just
sort
of
a
list
of
some
of
the
questions
that
we
had
intended
to
ask
just
to
dig
in
a
little
bit
more
with
programs
and
get
an
understanding
of
where
the
funding
has
been
spent,
where
they
run
into
some
barriers
with
spending
money.
Have
they
been
able
to
stand
up
or
sustain
the
programming
that
they
originally
had
approved
by
the
rock
so
just
to
give
a
little
bit
more
information
about
where
their
dollars
have
landed.
Today,.
C
So
you
could
see
those
questions
at
the
same
time,
but
some
discussion
for
the
council
is
just:
are
these
the
most
relevant
type
of
questions
about
current
spending
and
current
outcomes?
Certain
programs
that
you
all
would
like
to
hear
or
are
there
other
questions
or
outcomes
that
you
would
like
to
have
funded
programs
speak
to
in
these
interviews
about
where
their
dollars
have
been
sent?.
B
Kelly
I
wonder
if
it's,
if
there's
a
question
related
to
so
if
people
are
going
to
get
continuation
funding
for
the
program
that
they
originally
wanted
to
do
you
know
things
can
change.
There
can
be
emerging
issues
or
when
you
start
a
program,
you
learn
from
the
community
or
you
learn
something
new
that
you
didn't
anticipate.
B
C
I
would
say:
that's
probably
a
question
for
the
council
to
weigh
in
on
I
think
for
for
me,
if
we're
hitting
that
same
marker,
that
same
dollar
amount
that
was
originally
approved.
I
think
that's
really
the
guidelines
we're
trying
to
stay
within
for
continuation
funding
tips
so
to
the
extent
that
the
scobor
project
has
changed.
C
I
guess
we'd
have
to
to
think
about
whether
the
intervention
has
changed
so
much
so
that
it
is
worthy
of
going
back
to
the
council
to
say:
is
this
still
something
that
we
approve
of
spending
I?
Don't
I,
don't
know
if
that
would
happen,
but
I
think
that
would
that
would
probably
be
a
conversation
for
this
space.
D
Yeah
and
I
kind
of
heard
too
I'm.
Sorry
Claire
go
ahead,
but
no
go
ahead.
Yeah
go
ahead,
yeah
I
was
just
gonna,
say,
I,
I,
think
I
I
think
I
heard
two
kind
of
levels
in
there
Kelly
correct
me.
One
is
like
you
know:
were
there
pieces
missing
that
you
just
didn't
anticipate
it's
still
the
same
scope
as
opposed
to
it.
You
know,
maybe
your
scope
has
actually
been
been
re-envisioned,
which
warrants
coming
back
to
the
council.
Is
that
what
I
heard
yeah.
C
B
B
So
so
that
so
so
ask
the
question
see
if
there's
there
are
items
that
come
back
to
the
Rock,
just
for
our
learning
and
then
and
then
I
like
how
you
framed
that
Lexi
and
your
response
Kelly
about.
If,
if
the
scope
has
so
wildly
changed,
then
yes,
that
should
come
back
to
the
Rock
or
the
continuation
funding.
B
A
D
It
makes
sense
for
us
to
use
the
framework
that
was
developed
through
the
behavioral
health
roadmap,
which
you
know
includes
this
work
right,
because
this
is
this
Behavioral
Health
and
I
mean
it's
I.
Guess
it's
possible
that
there's
something
in
that
road
map
or
that
framework
that
we
would
or
there's
something
that
could
be
funded
through
opioid
settlements.
E
The
idea
is
to
bring
together
multiple
sources
of
information
and
use
that
to
help
Drive
our
thinking
about
where
we
ideally
should
be
making
Investments,
so
part
of
that
certainly
should
be
as
you're
saying,
the
the
roadmap
since
that
has
so
much
information,
that's
specific
to
our
community.
Other
areas.
That
probably
will
be
helpful,
is
just
looking
at
the
data
and
seeing
are
there
particular
populations
that
are
reflected
in
that
data,
where
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
putting
money
toward
the
Johns
Hopkins
stuff.
E
E
E
And
I
think
Claire
just
to
follow
up
on
your
point.
I
think
the
hope
is
that
we
have
this,
this
slate
of
organizations
that
we're
currently
funding.
To
what
degree
do
those
also
continue
to
reflect
what
comes
out
in
the
strategic
planning
process
versus
what
might
fall
away,
because
maybe
it's
a
little
less
of
a
priority
in
the
larger
scope
of
things,
in
terms
of
how
we're
thinking
about
using
the
funds.
D
C
So
long-term
Investments
for
the
region-
yeah,
yes,
so
and
that's
not
to
say
that
we
won't
have
space
to
continue
amending
the
plan
and
developing
longer
term
strategies.
But
that
is
really
the
timeline
that
we're
aiming
for.
Just
because
we
know
we
have
that
amendment
period
in
March
to
say:
hey
things
have
wildly
changed
since
we
started
this
process
and
we
actually
really
want
to
move
our
dollars
into
different
places
than
we
originally
said
in
November
and
we'll
have
that
March
15th
time
to.
C
That
is
a
good
question.
I
am
not
sure.
I
have
the
answer
to
that.
One
I
think
right.
Now,
we've
really
just
been
focusing
on
what
is
it
going
to
take
to
get
the
dollars
out
for
currently
funded
programs,
so
I
think,
as
we
start
the
strategic
planning
process,
that's
where
we're
gonna
have
to
have
the
discussions
around.
C
Do
we
want
to
have
set
aside
for
continuing
for
continuation
funds
on
an
annual
basis,
or
do
we
want
all
of
these
programs
to
sort
of
merge
into
a
broader
process
where
there's
both
directed
funding
options
versus
competitive
funding
options?
So
I
think
all
of
that
milieu
of
like
how
these
dollars
are
going
to
go
out
the
door
after
the
continuation
funding
will
largely
be
determined
by
what
comes
out
of
the
planning
process,
because
then
we'll
be
able
to
sort
of
see.
C
These
are
the
longer
term
elements
that
we
have,
and
you
know
to
Jim's
point
about
directed
versus
competitive
funds.
Are
there
only
one
or
two
agencies
that
could
really
do
some
of
these
broader
long-term
Investments?
So
some
of
those
questions
are
things
we
won't
really
know
until
we
get
into
this
process.
Thank.
E
You
but
I
would
say,
though,
that
there
will
be
certainly
opportunities
to
make
some
Investments
and,
depending
on
how
clear
we
are
about
certain
areas
that
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
investing
in
those
might
happen
sooner
than
others
I
think
we
we
went
into
this
first
process
with
this
kind
of
very
concrete
ask.
It
was
one
point
in
time,
and
so
then
we
we
are
kind
of
in
that
process
for
those
grantees,
but
moving
forward,
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
fluid.
E
We
have
a
lot
of
flexibility
in
how
we
spend
the
dollars
moving
forward
and
it's
not
as
if
we
have
to
come
up
with
one
master
plan.
That
says
this
is
how
we
spend
all
the
money
we
can.
We
can
decide
hey.
This
is
a
really
clear
need.
It's
emergent.
We've
got
to
focus
here.
We've
got
money.
That's
set
aside
in
the
cost
system
to
address
that
issue.
C
C
You
know
we
also
know
that
this
next
year
is
going
to
be
sort
of
a
windfall
of
dollars
and
that
it's
going
to
be
something
where
we're
going
to
want
to
stretch
those
dollars
into
subsequent
years.
So
we
have
these
different
sort
of
processes
for
different
arcs
of
funding
so
to
Jim's.
Point
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
draw
down
dollars
and
have
other
opportunities
along
the
way.
Galaxy.
D
I'm
sorry
I,
just
I,
think
I
had
a
light
bulb
moment,
which
was
tell
me
if
this
is,
if
I'm
understanding
this
between
now
and
March,
we're
coming
up
with
these
are
the
prior.
These
are
the
areas
that
we
want
to
fund
and
then,
after
that,
there's
an
RFP
process
for
actually
awarding
the
funds.
Is
that
my
is
that
right,
yeah,
okay,
okay,.
C
D
C
C
E
E
Think
a
nice
time
frame
in
terms
of
it
gives
us
enough
time
to
work
with
the
consultant
to
begin
looking
at
a
broader
strategy,
but
again,
I
think
if
there
are
immersion
issues
that
happen
between
November
and
March
that
either
come
to
the
attention
of
this
group
within
your
you
know
the
areas
that
you're
working
in
or
they
just
they
they
emerge
because
all
of
a
sudden
there's
a
new
substance
being
used
that
we
need
to
address
in
some
way.
We
have
lots
of
flexibility
about
getting
dollars
out
the
door.
D
H
I
was
just
saying
that
per
Lexi's
comment:
I
did
notice
that
on
the
behavioral
health
roadmap,
I
was
just
going
through
it
quickly
and
I
do
think.
There's
a
lot
of
overlap
between
what
you
have
in
your
roadmap
and
what
could
be
considered
allowable
uses
and
so
I
think
you
know,
because
there
is
a
little
bit
greater
flexibility.
The
intention
is
not
to
cause
a
silosization
of
these
funds.
You
know
we
know
you're
already
doing
a
lot
of
the
work
here
and
I.
Think
with
that
in
mind,
you
know
to
think
through.
H
H
Analysis,
like
I
know,
you
already
have
some
really
great
plans
already
out
there
and
information
and
I
think
a
lot
of
what
is
included
in
there
could
be
considered
allowable
too
so
also
I
think
the
work
you're
already
getting
the
money
out
to
like
some
of
these
smaller
non-profits.
It's
really
great
too.
So,
of
course
that's
for
your
Regional
Council
to
determine,
but
it
looks
like
a
really
great
road
map
and
it's
it's
nice
that
you've
done
that
work.
B
A
Well,
yeah,
and
really
just
very
simply,
it
seems
like
we're
we're
really
starting
to
talk
about
the
remaining
topic
that
we
had
here
on
the
process
for
determining
long-term
strategies
and
I.
Wonder
whether,
if,
if
we
want
to
wrap
up
this
discussion
about
continuation
funding
and
and
get
back
to
Kelly,
for
what
she'd
like
to
walk
us
through
for
the
remainder
of
the
agenda.
Because
it
seems
like
that
the
two
conversations
are
melding
together.
A
C
Right
so
last
thing
we
wanted
to
talk
about
is
determining
our
long-term
strategies
and,
as
a
reminder,
we're
really.
We
have
a
contractor
coming
in
to
help
support
this
work
shortly,
but
we
still
wanted
to
make
most
use
of
our
time
and
our
Resources
with
the
operations
group,
and
so
we
did
get
started
kind
of
dipped,
our
throne
in
the
water
of
developing
our
understanding
of
what
are
the
priorities
that
everyone
on
the
operations
group
at
least
sees
us
a
top
priority
for
the
region.
C
So
we
did
this
via
an
exercise
that
went
out
to
the
operations
group.
They
did
it
this
past
two
weeks
it
started
with
staff
categorizing
all
of
the
approved
used
spending
areas
at
the
full
list
that
Jamie
mentioned
in
appendix
a
of
the
mou,
and
we
had
mentioned
in
August
that
we
did
some
work
internally
to
sort
of
categorize
those
into
a
more
digestible
number
of
service
categories
or
intervention
categories,
so
that
folks
could
look
across
them
without
waiting
through
76.77
approved
spending
areas.
C
So
so
what
this
exercise
was
is
we
took
those
11
theme
areas
and
we
asked
our
operations
group
members.
We
said
if
you
have
a
hundred
points
to
allocate
across
these
11
categories
of
Sony
or
theme
areas.
How
would
you
allocate
those
points
based
on
priority?
You
can
only
ascribe
up
to
20
points
for
one
particular
area
and
for
any
of
the
areas
that
you
have
given
points
to
say.
Yes,
this
is
a
priority
to
me.
C
So
these
are
just
some
high
level
preliminary
results
of
what
came
out
of
that
exercise.
So
you
can
see
that
operations
group
members
did
vote
for
prevention,
General
treatment
as
well
as
treatment
in
the
criminal
justice
days,
recovery
and
harm
reduction,
sort
of
top
five
categories
in
that
thematic
area.
That
theme
level
the
higher
level.
C
Really
what
this
tells
us
you
know
if
we,
if
we
go
into
looking
at
where
the
votes
fell
as
well
at
the
strategy
level,
folks
were
pretty
much
voting
for
The,
broader
language
or
I,
don't
want
to
say
blanket,
but
I've
got
a
broader
types
of
strategies
and
categories.
So
you
know
one
thing
that
came
up
for
trucker
nice
we
were
looking
at
this
is
it
makes
it
relatively
easy?
C
C
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
this
because
we're
a
little
close
on
time,
but
this
I
pulled
the
five,
those
top
five
that
I
just
mentioned
in
the
theme
level
and
then
also
carry
forward
the
top
two
strategies
that
were
rising
to
the
surface
within
each
of
those
thematic
areas.
From
the
opioid
operations
group
feedback.
C
And
so
what's
next
with
this
exercise-
and
we
recognize
that
this
is
just
one
drop
in
the
bucket
in
terms
of
trying
to
determine
what's
our
longer
term
strategy
and
where,
what's
our
temperature
check
on
where
our
priorities
lie
as
a
region.
And
so
this
is
going
to
be
continued
conversation
with
our
operations
group.
Actually.
C
Them
tomorrow,
instead
of
before
today's
conversation
with
you
all
and
that
this
is
this-
is
what
we'll
be
asking
in
that
conversation.
How
do
you
think
your
chosen
themes
and
strategies
are
reflective
of
a
comprehensive
strategy,
we'll
guide
a
digital
selection
of
these
choices
and
which
approved
uses
as
you
went
through
the
exercise?
Did
you
find
yourself
mean
or
wanting
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
and
really
want
you
to
understand
more
to
help
inform
your
decision?
C
One
other
thing,
I
will
note
quickly.
Is
that
we're
also
going
to
have
a
conversation
tomorrow
with
a
group
about
what
areas
of
expertise
need
to
be
represented
in
that
group
moving
forward
for
additional
strategic
exercises
of
this
nature,
and
should
some
of
those
areas
of
expertise
be
one
time
such
as
when
we're
doing
some
of
these
prioritization
exercises,
or
should
we
fuse
them
into
permanent
roster
numbers
on
the
operations
group?
So
we'll
be
talking
about
that
with
them
tomorrow,
I'll
pause
and
see.
If
there's
any
questions
on
that
exercise,.
B
F
No
I
think
that
you're
totally
right
that
the
roadmap
has
come
up
a
number
of
times
and
and
just
like
Jim
mentioned.
One
of
the
things
that
we're
looking
at
is
how
we
can
overlay
a
number
of
different
resources
to
really
guide
our
thinking
and
so
I'm
have
on
my
my
to-do
list
next
week
is:
is
the
roadmap
overlay
kind
of
review
week?
Hopefully.
C
Whoops,
my
button
doesn't
want
to
advance
here
all
right.
So
what
are
we
doing
with
this
information?
So,
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
just
one
ingredient
of
many
ingredients.
That's
going
to
go
into
developing
our
priorities,
we
do
plan
to
supplement
this
and
offer
additional
evidence-based,
crosswalks
or
excuse
me
crosswalks
of
white
papers
or
evidence-based,
such
as
the
Hopkins
strategies
and
the
roadmap
that
we've
been
discussing
and
then,
most
importantly,
taking
this
out
to
the
broader
Community,
wants
to
have
a
little
bit
of
that
facilitation.
C
Assistance
from
the
contractor
and
having
the
operations
group
respond
to
and
lend
subject
matter,
expertise
to
any
of
that
Community
input
so
really
trying
to
create
ideas
a
little
bit
more
at
that
Community
level
and
then
utilize.
The
operations
group
really
is
that
that
lens
of
subject
matter,
expertise
to
kind
of
figure
out.
How
do
we
put
this
into
our
strategic
methodology
and
then
create
recommendations
that
would
go
back
to
you
all
at
the
council.
C
G
C
This
does
bring
up
a
slight
shift
in
roles
again.
This
is
primarily
being
proposed
to
incorporate
a
feedback
loop
or
an
advisory
really
from
the
community
itself
makes
space
for
that
feedback.
We
are
proposing
that
idea.
Generation
comes
both
from
the
operations
group
as
well
as
Community
convenience
in
tandem
and
anything
about
the
community
services
in
terms
of
strategies
and
approaches.
C
Where
again,
we
apply
a
little
bit
of
that
lens
of
subject
matter
through
tease
any
of
that
additional
methodology
that
the
contractor
has
helped
us
develop,
sort
of
mix
that
up
and
then
create
that
into
a
refined
set
of
recommendations
that
would
continue
to
come
back
to
the
operations
group
or
excuse
me.
The
council.
C
Oops,
this
is
just
a
handy-dandy
little
visual
of
everything.
I
just
said,
which
is
eventually
The.
Rock
You
Know
generate
ideas
in
the
critical
of
constituents,
local
issues,
local
needs
and
Investments.
The
community
similarly
generates
ideas
for
investment
proposed.
Excuse
me
generates
ideas
for
proposed
Investments,
but
also
has
a
little
bit
more
of
that
voice.
C
That
life
experience
that
proximity
to
what's
really
happening
in
our
communities,
both
of
those
come
into
the
operations
group
subject
matter,
expertise,
Community
input
and
Council
priorities
sitting
in
together,
we'll
create
recommendations
for
funding
moving
forward
with
Iraq.
So
the
pretty
rudimentary
sort
of
modeling
of
how
our
kind
of
three
bodies
can
potentially
sort
of
work
together
to
highlight
investment
areas
and
then
sort
of
put
them
through
additional
work
and
methodology
before
we
put
them
forward
a
solid
recommendations
for
funding.
B
I
think
for
me,
it
just
reminds
me
that
we're
in
a
developmental
process
as
a
board
and
I'm
really
eager,
we
got
some
really
helpful
feedback
from
the
city
of
Boulder
staff.
Around
matching
the
Ops
group
work
to
our
agendas.
So
there's
a
connection
there
and
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
that
at
the
last
Rock
meeting.
So
I
I
look
forward
to
that
happening
as
as
we
get
caught
up
in
our
developmental
phase.
C
C
One
thing
I
might
offer
just
because
this
kind
of
stems
from
conversation
in
August
we
heard
from
the
council
just
as
a
desire
for
a
little
bit
more
context:
information,
sort
of
building,
a
baseline
of
awareness
and
knowledge
around
the
other
academic
in
general.
The
abatement
process
Etc,
so
that
last
question
is
a
little
bit
more
for
guidance
to
us.
You
know
if
we
did
provide
additional
information,
white
papers,
database,
presentations
or
presentations
from
other
regions.
C
A
B
Well,
I
wonder
Kelly,
since
we're
almost
out
of
time.
As
you
know,
these
are
questions
we're
going
to
continue
to
get
feedback
from
the
council
about,
and
maybe
maybe
it's
council
members,
if
you
have
other
other
Reflections
or
or
answers
to
these
questions,
to
send
them
to
Kelly
your
answers
and
then
she
can
combine
something
to
put
in
our
our
packet
for
next.
Our
next
month's
meeting,
unless
unless
people
have
any
final
comments
for
today,.
D
Just
that
I
find
it
super
helpful
when
you're
able
to
kind
of
curate
a
little
bit
some
of
the
information
just
knowing
how
busy
we
all
are.
Particularly
in
terms
of
you
know,
just
lifting
up,
you
know
best
practices
in
other
places
that
maybe
aren't
on
our
radar,
or
you
know
some
of
that
I
mean
we
may
get
to
a
point.