►
From YouTube: Boulder County Regional Opioid Council (October 2022)
Description
Second Meeting of the Boulder County Regional Opioid Council (BCROC). Recorded Oct. 21, 2022
For more information on Region 6 Opioids Abatement activities, visit: https://boco.org/Region-6-Opioids-Council
A
Email
that
he
said
what
happened
um
there,
we
go
that
he's
that
he
sent
out.
um
What
we're
trying
to
do
today
is
see
if
we
can
agree
on
the
projects
and
services
that
the
advisory
Council
forwarded
to
us
so
that
we
can
move
forward
with
the
submittal
uh
on
some
recommendations.
Advisory
Board
operations,
board
I
guess
it
was
uh
to
submit
our
first
two-year
plan
and
um
and
Robin
and
um
others
are
going
to
walk
us
through
that
process
with
with
the
really
great
tools
that
was
sent
with
the
materials.
A
So
that's
the
extent
of
the
uh
intro
that
I
want
to
do
here,
so
we
can
get
down
to
work,
but
um
I'm
I'm
just
going
to
call
names
uh
because
in
the
order
you're
on
my
screen
and
just
ask
you
to
say
who
you
are
and
who
you
work
for
and
why?
Why
you're
here?
So
Robin
will
hear
a
lot
from
you
later
later,
but.
A
A
E
A
A
H
F
A
K
L
A
B
All
right,
so,
um
commissioner,
Levy
really
um
shared
the
the
goal
of
the
meaning
and
the
outcome
that
we
hope
to
get
to
and
I
just
want
to
remind
everybody,
um
especially
for
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
on
our
meeting
um
just
some
guidelines.
We
have
about
virtual
meetings,
um
so
this
is
not
intended
to
be
a
public
hearing,
which
means
we
will
not
be
taking
public
comment
or
having
interaction
with
the
public
um
and
for
stakeholders
and
members
of
the
public
who
are
not
Regional,
Council,
Members
or
presenting
staff.
B
C
You
Robin,
so
we
did
want
to
start
with
just
a
little
bit
of
a
recap
from
September.
We
know
that
it
was
our
inaugural
meeting
um
of
the
council,
and
so
we
threw
a
lot
of
information
at
you
all
and
wanted
to
sort
of
um
re-ground
ourselves
in
what
we
sort
of
accomplished
in
that
discussion
and
where
we
left
off,
which
is
really
where
we're
beginning
today,
with
the
review
of
the
shovel
ready
uh
programs
that
we
put
forth
as
recommendations.
C
C
um
Talking
about
the
landscape
analysis
exercise
that
the
opioid
operations
board
did
and
some
other
quantitative
data,
um
also
talking
about
some
of
the
foundational
structures
that
have
been
put
forth
from
the
state
to
really
guide
the
allocation
process.
So
the
memorandum
of
understanding
from
the
Attorney
General's
office,
which
also
outlined
the
approved
purpose
areas
those
five
areas
that
are
eligible
for
funding,
which
you've
heard
us
talk
a
lot
about
so
far.
We
also
talked
about
the
work
of
the
operations
board.
C
Our
opioid
operations
committee
has
been
working
since
May
meeting
by
monthly,
from
May
to
September,
to
really
uh
both
gather
shovel,
ready
programs
for
those
initial
recommendations
and
then
really
review
sort
of
the
criteria
against
which
we
were
rating.
Some
of
those
programs
had
a
few
exercises
dedicated
to
our
understanding
of
priority
areas
across
those
five
approved
purpose
areas
and
then
dedicated
particular
funding
amounts
that
were
in
alignment
with
the
prioritization
of
those
five
areas.
C
So
a
lot
of
sort
of
methodology
and
process
to
from
that
board
to
go
into
developing
the
recommendations
that
we
also
spent
time
introducing
to
you
in
September,
and
so
we
did
talk
to
you
about
what
our
proposed
project
areas
are
and
the
allocation
amounts.
And
then
we
gave
a
little
bit
of
homework
in
the
closing
of
that
discussion,
which
was
really
our
supplemental
materials
that
listed
out
the
allocation
amounts,
the
projects
that
we're
putting
forward
and
then
a
little
bit
of
an
ask
from
Council
Members
to
review
that
and
come
up
with.
C
C
But
really
this
is
our
primary
charge
of
today
is
to
determine
if
those
recommended
programs
are
at
a
place
where
we
feel
comfortable
submitting
them
um
to
the
attorney
general
to
release
funds
to
our
region,
and
so
the
the
process
that
we're
gonna
sort
of
go
through
um
is
first
we're
going
to
look
at
each
of
those
project.
Areas
they're
broken
down
in
the
same
way
that
you
receive
them
in
that
supplemental
information
packet.
C
C
This
is
a
reminder
that
we're
going
to
probably
come
back
to
a
few
times
today.
We
are
not
needing
to
approve
the
dollar
amounts
that
are
going
to
particular
programs
today.
So
really,
in
order
for
us
to
draw
down
funding
from
the
state,
what
we
need
to
do
is
just
approve
our
allocation
amounts
at
that
approved
use
area.
Those
three
categories
noted
above
so
not
yet
the
project
area.
We
will
have
additional
time
and
process
in
place
to
confirm
that
the
allocation
amounts
going
to
particular
projects
is
really
what
we
want
to
see.
C
So
before
we
go
into
our
exercise,
I
did
want
to
do
a
little
bit
of
a
reorientation
to
the
information
packet
that
was
sent
out
to
you
all
after
our
September
meeting.
um
This
is
sort
of
the
table
breakdown
that
you'll
see
here
today.
uh
So
the
green
header
is
again
that
approved.
Use
section
over
to
the
left
is
the
approved
use
area.
C
So
we
kind
of
think
of
that
as
like
a
subcategory
within
the
approved
use
section
and
again,
that's
how
that's
reflected
in
a
drop
down
sort
of
uh
categorization
of
the
cost
system,
and
so
the
body
of
the
actual
table
shows
the
program
name
and,
of
course,
the
owner
who
put
forward
that
uh
that
recommendation
or
that
program
and
then
over
to
the
right.
You
can
see
our
totals
so
the
section
total
and
so
that
top
bubble
that
shows
the
125
000
amount.
C
All
right,
so,
let's
dive
into
our
actual
exercise,
so
we
want
to
start
with
a
reminder
of
the
funds
that
we're
working
with
um
so
our
total
for
year,
One
funds
comes
to
one
million,
six
hundred
and
fifty
six
thousand
three
hundred
and
sixty
dollars
the
way
that
we
broke
this
down
and
again.
This
was
a
process
that
a
priority
prioritization
process
that
our
opioid
operations
group
took
on
um
was
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
allocated
to
recovery
programs.
C
So
that
said,
I'm
gonna
pause
and
give
you
a
little
uh
idea
of
the
process
here.
I
know
these
slides
are
dense,
so
bear
with
me.
I'll
I'll,
walk
us
through
these,
and
just
sort
of
you
know
give
a
high
level
summary
of
the
program
description.
So
um
you
know
give
your
eyes
a
little
bit
of
a
break
from
trying
to
read
through
it
with
me.
um
I
will
go
through
these
one
section
at
a
time,
so
I'll
pause
after
the
treatment
section
and
ask
any
blocking
questions,
concerns
Etc
and
I'll.
C
So,
starting
with
our
treatment
programs,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
minimize
my
Zoom
speaker
panels,
so
I
can
see
my
full
slide
here.
um
So,
starting
with
our
treatment
programs,
the
first
step
was
the
jail
map
program
and
really
this
was
uh
the
the
program
description
is
to
sustain
the
delivery
of
medication,
assisted
treatment,
that's
currently
offered
in
the
jail,
so
there
is
insufficient
funding
to
continue
the
program
for
the
full
year.
The
JL
mat
program
is
comprehensive.
It
offers
assessment
planning,
individual
and
group
therapy.
C
um
So
one
thing
I
will
also
point
out-
should
have
done
this
at
the
beginning
there,
but
so
we
have
a
new
column
that
was
additional.
It
was
not
reflected
in
the
original
um
supplemental
package
that
went
out
to
council
members,
but
we
did
want
to
show
how
the
original
five
approved
purpose
areas
were
folded
into
the
three
approved
use
areas
so
over
on
the
right
that
original,
approved
purpose
area
is
just
where
this
program
originally
was
categorized
when
we
were
working
across
that
that
spectrum
of
five
approved
purpose
areas.
C
So
our
next,
um
our
next
treatment
program
is
the
cope
program,
the
County's
comprehensive
opioid
abuse
program.
This
is
offered
by
Community
Justice
Services
in
the
jail
and
it
partners
with
the
map
program
above
to
provide
medication,
assisted
treatment
and
support
or
treatment
support
to
the
medication
component.
This
is
an
existing
program
that
provides
case
management
to
opioid
users,
the
rewind
program
this
proposition
was
to
or
excuse
me,
this
proposal
was
to
expand
the
city
of
longmont's
rewind
program
by
adding
an
additional
bilingual
FTE
licensed
addiction
counselor.
C
This
is
a
program
for
youth
that
have
been
charged
with
violating
the
long
Municipal
ordinance
rewind
specializes
in
meeting
the
needs
of
Youth
with
mental
health
and
substance
use
concerns.
The
goal
is
to
address
delinquent
Behavior
informally
in
the
community
to
prevent
subsequent
offending
the
lead
program.
C
Did
I
hear
a
question:
come
up,
no
okay,
uh
the
lead
program.
So
the
description
of
the
lead
program
um
really
seeking
to
expand
an
already
existing
lead
program
by
adding
an
additional
community
outreach
intervention
uh
position.
This
position
will
connect
with
community
members
or
connect
community
members
to
community-based
resources.
The
initiative
will
support
ongoing
work
by
building
infrastructure
to
support
linking
Community
Partners
with
people.
C
And
I
think
we
have
three
slides
dedicated
to
our
treatment
program,
so
um
so
next
up
is
our
opioid
case
manager.
The
program
description
is
that
this
is
really
to
expand
a
currently
half-time
opioid
case
manager
position
that's
located
in
the
jail.
um
The
the
offer
is
to
to
make
this
a
full-time
position
restart
studio.
So
the
program
description
is
to
sustain
restart
Studio
program,
restart
Studio
offers
substance,
use,
art
therapy
and
Recovery
support
to
youth.
C
There
are
licensed
art,
therapists
and
addiction,
counselors,
providing
counseling
to
youth,
who
have
had
police
contact
next
up,
Community
Health
worker.
So
this
program
is
to
expand
the
mental
Mental
Health
Partners
Community
Health
worker
program
by
adding
an
additional
FTE
Community
Health
worker.
The
program
is
really
to
address
social
determinants
of
health
challenges
for
priority
populations.
C
These
chws
bring
resources
and
services
to
where
community
members
are
currently.
This
program
offers
individual
support
through
resource
navigation
web-based
and
in-person
Outreach
psycho-education
events
and
Disaster
Response
the
leaf
mental
wellness
and
addiction
recovery
program.
So
the
proposal
is
to
expand
Lion's,
Leaf
mental
wellness
and
addiction
recovery
program
with
additional
staff.
This
program
will
include
substance,
use
disorder,
counseling,
Telehealth,
in-person,
in-person
groups,
medication,
assisted
treatment,
coordination
and
case
and
referral
management.
These
services
will
be
available
in
lions
and
neighboring
Mountain
communities,
pride
and
recovery.
C
So
the
proposal
is
to
sustain
out
Boulder
County's
pride
and
recovery
programs.
Pride
and
Recovery
offers
lgbtq
specific
peer-led
substance
use
recovery,
support,
including
recovery,
coaching
recovery,
focused
activities,
groups
geared
towards
harm
reduction
and
relapse
prevention,
as
well
as
access
to
harm
reduction
supplies
contains
contingency
management
and
transportation
assistance.
C
And
our
last
set
of
treatment-based
programs,
oops
Got,
a
duplicate
there,
pride
and
recovery,
so
I'll
move
down
to
the
next
one.
Adventure
recovery
um
expand
Adventure,
expand
Adventure
recovery
program
through
a
scholarship
fund.
This
program
is
an
outdoor
education
and
mentorship
focused
program,
helping
individuals
in
recovery,
some
from
substance
use
disorder
and
mental
health
concerns
such
as
employ
certified
peer
counselors
who
work
on
a
one-on-one,
one-on-one
basis
providing
counseling
and
emotional
support,
foreign
accudetox
and
ACU
Wellness.
So
the
proposal
is
to
sustain
natural
highs,
acudetox
Accu,
wellness
program.
C
This
program
is
an
acupuncture
protocol
to
treat
addiction,
trauma
and
mental
health
issues
and
finally
matte
Expansion
Project.
So
the
proposal
is
to
expand
Mental
Health
Partners
mat
program,
adding
additional
staff
that
will
increase
access
to
an
engagement
with
mat.
Other
services
include
therapy
wraparound
services
such
as
housing
navigation.
The
project
will
expand
services
to
other
locations
in
other
locations
in
Boulder
County,
so
I'm
going
to
pause
there
and
see
if
there
are
any
initial
questions,
concerns
about
the
treatment
programs
that
I
just
went
through.
G
Hey
Kelly,
it's
Susan,
um
I,
just
I
first
want
to
acknowledge
again
how
much
work
went
into
this
and
just
with
a
team.
That's
leading
this.
It's
just
incredible
detail.
Thank
you
as
I
read
through
the
materials
and
thinking
about
the
last
meeting,
I
think
that
thing
I'm
I'm
struggling
with
a
little
bit,
is
how
how
are
some
of
these
connected
and
if
we're
successful
in
some
areas,
is
it
going
to
impact
other
areas?
G
Is
it
going
to
impact
um
people
moving
into
other
areas
and
reduce
a
need
in
other
areas,
so
I
think
there's
just
this
larger
picture
that
I
feel
like
I'm,
missing
I.
Think
that
that's
one
of
my
questions
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
narrative
around
that
or
if
you
all
talked
about
that
that
piece
at
all
um
that
that's
just
my
I
think
my
first
question
about
it.
Yeah.
C
um
You
know
I,
think
we
mentioned
in
our
first
meeting
that
our
strategy
in
this
period
of
time
was
largely
largely
driven
by
the
fact
that
we
had
sort
of
a
short
lead
time,
um
and
so
we
had
a
strategy
of
shovel
ready
programs.
That
was,
um
you
know,
sort
of
driven
by
that
that
time
constraint,
and
so
what
the
opioid
operations
group
is
going
to
be
dedicating
themselves
to
moving
forward,
is
developing
an
entirely
different
funding
strategy.
C
That
looks
at
you
know
again
that
Vision
State,
what's
the
Continuum
we
want
to
create,
and
how
are
we
being
strategic
about
what
we're
selecting
to
build
that
Continuum
and
similarly
over
time?
How
and,
and
you
know,
what's
our
method
to
revisit
what
the
the
programs
that
we
are
funding
to
determine
you
know,
are
they
having
a
measurable
impact
against
that
vision
and
if
not,
what
is
our
method
to
maybe
Sunset
funding
for
some
of
these
programs
to
allow
additional
funding
to
free
up
for
more
of
those
aspirational
programs
that
might
better
suit
that
Vision?
C
um
So
we're
going
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
in
our
sustainability
approach,
which
is
just
you
know,
what's
our?
How
are
we
going
to
continue
to
fold
in
new
programs
that
really
build
that
that
broader
puzzle
um
and
and
move
away
from
just
sort
of
this,
this
time
crunch
strategy
of
shovel
ready
programs?
C
G
Helpful
thanks
that
was
part
of
my
second
question
just
around
evaluation,
so
I
recall
that,
from
the
last
meeting
of
talking
about
some
evaluation
component
of
these,
these
programs
and
I
think
I.
Just
I
just
want
to
name
that.
Historically,
we
have
not
always
been
great
about
um
making
decisions
to
stop
things
when
they
may
not
be
working
and
so
I
think
just
as
a
whole,
not
just
around
these
dollars.
I
think
us
um
kind
of
developing
that
muscle
around
it.
G
If,
if
things
aren't
working,
we
do
need
to
be
able
to
let
go
of
them.
I
know
it's
hard
because
sometimes
there's
people
attached,
um
you
know
if
we're
not
doing
it
through
attrition.
There
are
staff
attached
to
that
I.
Just
you
know.
Some
of
this
I
just
have
to
say
seeing
the
big
list
of
this.
um
Some
of
it
makes
me
a
little
bit
nervous
um
without
having
that
more
kind
of
comprehensive
view
of
how
this
all
fits
together
and
some
of
the
dependencies
of
those.
C
F
I
just
wanted
to
as
we're
talking
through
all
of
these
I
just
want
to
double
down
on
that
previous
comment
and
appreciate
Susan
you're,
bringing
that
up
and
I
know,
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
um
data
as
well
like
I,
I,
think
these
are
fine
as
they
move
forward,
particularly
for
that
shovel
Readiness
that
you
mentioned
Kelly
I,
think
that's
great,
but
we're
we're
supportive
of
programs.
I.
Think
generally,
we'll
all
need
to
sort
of
see
how
do
we
share
the
data
to
make
sure
that
we're
seeing
those
impacts?
F
Frankly,
some
of
them
across
jurisdictions,
um
because
uh
where
the
county
may
have
a
program,
for
example,
how
do
I
share
out
with
my
council
members
on
Council?
How
that
impacts,
Boulder
right,
so
I
think
we.
We
got
to
continue
to
think
about
that
data
sharing
and
tracking
in
the
future,
but
get
and
appreciate
the
operations
team
focus
on
what
do
we
have
right
now
in
the
short
turn
around
foreign.
C
C
So
hearing
no
additional
questions
on
treatment,
programs
I
will
move
into
the
prevention
section.
So
our
first
program
on
prevention
go
ahead
and
minimize
my
menu
here
again,
so
I
can
read
it
Youth
and
recovery.
So
this
program
is
Youth
and
Recovery.
School
programs
with
expand
the
youth
and
recovery
program
in
schools
with
additional
staff.
Youth
and
Recovery
offers
in-school
presentations
about
Fentanyl
and
oud
naloxone
training
and
offers
peer
recovery.
Coaches
parenting
support.
C
So
the
proposition
to
is
to
expand
the
city
of
longmont's,
nurturing
parenting
class
coordinators
hours
to
become
full-time,
that
expanded
staff
will
allow
active
parenting
and
Community
reinforcement
and
family
training
or
craft
to
be
offered
free
of
charge
in
English
and
Spanish
substance
use.
Advisory,
Group,
The
Proposal
is
to
expand
and
sustain
the
Boulder
County
substance
use
Advisory
Group,
which
sits
in
Boulder
County
Community
Services.
This
group
brings
together
professionals
Advocates
and
those
with
life
experience
of
addiction
to
collaborate
within
the
sud
care.
C
Current
infrastructure
is
supportive
for
adults
to
have
training
and
to
obtain
naloxone,
but
there's
not
one
for
youth,
so
specific
efforts
would
include
youth,
naloxone
access
and
education,
as
well
as
train
the
trainer
models
dedicated
towards
youth
population
harm
reduction
staff
at
crisis
center.
So
the
program
would
expand
harm
reduction
efforts
at
mhp's
crisis
center
and
embed
a
full-time
staff
member
from
the
works
at
the
MHP
crisis
center.
C
During
key
times,
Mental
Health
Partners
has
been
asking
for
the
for
the
position
and
The
Works
programs
uh
sees
it
as
a
very
pressing
need
overdose
prevention,
vending
machines.
So
the
description
is
to
install
vending
machines
with
harm
reduction
supplies
in
Lafayette
and
Netherland.
Currently,
these
vending
machines
don't
exist
county-wide.
This
would
increase
access
to
life-saving
naloxone,
clean
syringes
and
other
harm
reduction
supplies.
C
Harm
reduction
supplies
and
servicing
the
program
would
expand,
availability
of
harm
reduction
supplies,
overdose,
reversal,
medication
and
syringe
disposal
locations.
This
would
bolster
The,
Works
programs,
supply
of
naloxone
and
Fentanyl
test
strips
that
can
be
distributed
throughout
the
county.
This
would
also
insult
install
syringe
disposal
units
in
each
of
the
Longmont
housing
authorities,
sites,
I,
believe.
That's
it
for
prevention,
so
I
will
pause
again
and
see
if
there's
questions
or
concerns
about
the
list
of
prevention
programs.
C
All
right,
so
our
final
set
of
proposed
programs
fall
into
the
additional
areas
category
in
the
cost
system.
So
first
up
investigation
equipment
celebrate
premium,
so
this
would
expand
law,
enforcement's,
opioid
related
interdiction
efforts
and
this
tool
unlocks
password
protected
cell
phones.
It
also
increases
the
chance
of
intercepting
drug
traffickers,
investigation
equipment,
true
narc,
so
this
tool
would
allow
or
expand
law
enforcement's
opioid
relation
opioid
related
interdiction
efforts.
This
tool
is
a
portable
narcotics
analyzer
and
increases
the
chance
of
intercepting
drug
traffickers
and
investigating
drug-related
crimes.
C
Another
investigation,
equipment,
called
gray
key
and
so
gray
key
has
the
ability
to
unlock
and
retrieve
data,
specifically
from
iPhones,
increasing
the
chance
of
intercepting
drug
traffickers
into
investigating
drug-related
crimes
and
identifying
individuals
in
od
related
cases
and
finally,
Community
Health
worker
training,
and
so
the
proposal
is
to
expand
Mental
Health
Partners,
current
community
health
workers,
training
related
to
addiction,
Outreach
and
prevention.
This
additional
staff
will
ensure
sustainability
of
addiction-based,
Outreach
expertise
and
capacity
to
reach
Target
populations.
C
F
Was
I
I,
don't
know
if
you
can
go
back
to
the
previous
slide
a
moment,
um
and
so
just
wanna
I
guess
I'd
want
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
um
safeguards
for
some
of
this
law
enforcement
work
um
and
not
that
I,
don't
a
supportive
of
generally
the
efforts,
but
I
know
that
I
will
get
questions
about.
How
do
we
know
that
it
is
limited
restricted?
F
D
It's
Joe
Pelley,
um
it's
protected
by
the
Fourth
Amendment.
It's
it
requires
a
search
warrant.
um
So
um
that's
the
protection
is
constitutional
and
it's
there's
case
law
and
in
many
many
years
of
um
of
constitutional
layers,
of
protection
built
into
the
use
of
these
sort
of
search
engines
or
search
uh
tools.
F
And
I
appreciate
that
Joe,
and
certainly
as
a
lawyer,
myself
right,
like
I,
get
the
Fourth
Amendment,
but
there
are
nuances
with
that
with
any
of
this,
that
and
and
what
other
partners
I
mean
I'm
sure
you
were
paying
attention,
but
Lord
knows
I
had
a
earful
about
just
the
jttf
agreement
that
we
put
forward
uh
with
our
own
Council
right.
So
you
know,
I
I
still
feel
like
I
want
to
know
a
little
bit
more
about
some
of
these
efforts
and
um
I.
F
You
know,
I
may
be
the
only
person
that
has
these
concerns,
um
but
I
I
feel
like
there's
more
to
this
before
I
can
give
a
nod
of
yes
to
to
certainly
understand
a
little
bit
more
of
who
else
would
have
access
what
other
purpose
could
they
be
used
for
um
if
we
are
putting
opioid
related
dollars
to
it,
but
certainly
for
the
on
its
face.
Am
supportive
I
just
need
to
have
more
details.
B
F
G
C
G
Yeah,
that
would
that
would
just
be.
My
question
is
what,
if
you,
if
you're
hiring
a
staff
position
to
conduct
the
training?
What
is
the
money
for
the
training
unless
they
have
to
pay
for
the
training
I'm?
Just
not,
uh
they
have
to
pay
to
use
the
training.
I,
just
I'm,
not
clear
what
what
that
money
would
be
used
for
yeah.
C
E
Kelly
I
can
jump
in
for
a
second
too,
that
the
training
is
um
substance,
use
specific
training
for
the
team
of
community
health
workers
and
then
the
um
FTE
requests
with
to
add
an
additional
uh
community
health
health
worker
to
the
the
team.
But
the
training
itself
was
to
expand
the
current
team,
which
I
believe
was
uh
seven
employees.
Their
ability
to
address
substance
use
concerns
in
the
community.
A
We
are
going
to
have
to
be
very
careful
about
how
this
is
um
how
this
is
messaged
out
and
um
I'm
gonna
need
to
understand
it
actually
a
little
bit
better
about
how
once
you
unlock
the
phone,
how
what
are
the
constraints
and
I
know
in
the
world
of
search
warrants
and
wiretaps,
and
things
like
that
back
in
the
80s
and
90s,
when
I
was
doing
this
kind
of
stuff.
um
You
know
you
just
had
to
not
listen
to
the
stuff.
A
You
weren't
supposed
to
listen
to
It's
a
little
harder
in
the
digital
age,
and
so
I
think
we
are
just
gonna
have
to
be
very,
very
careful
with
the
community,
though,
to
make
sure
they
understand
the
constraints
here
and,
and
then
just
in
terms
of
you
know
what
our
scope
is
today,
that
we're
just
approving
the
program
areas
um
we
I
as
I
understand.
We
really
don't
have
any
other
programs.
A
um
Programs
that
are
on
the
table,
and
so
I
think
that's
why
you
know
we're
looking
at
this
list
and
we'll
come
back
and
we'll
fine-tune
it
in
terms
of
actual
dollars,
but
I
think
as
we
go
forward.
We
should
assume
that
these
these
areas,
these
programs
that
are
we've
just
been
reviewing,
are
going
to
be
the
ones
that
will
be
funded
within
each
of
these
areas.
B
C
C
C
B
K
D
uh
Yeah
um
I
did
make
some
comments.
I
I
understand
completely
the
importance
of
treatment
and
the
balance
of
the
treatment
dollars.
I
also
believe
that
um
a
portion
of
this
is
properly
allocated
to
investigating
the
distribution
of
the
of
the
stuff,
so
but
I
don't
have
any
blocking
concerns.
I
would
vote
for
the
allocation,
as
it's
laid
out
today.
I
um
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
on
the
same
page,
what
we
are
approving
today
is
the
allocation
of
the
dollars
into
these
three
particular
areas
and
we're
doing
approximately
a
million
dollars
to
its
treatment.
Approximately
half
a
million
dollars
to
its
prevention
and
125
000
approximately
to
its
additional
use
areas,
yeah.
B
B
I
I,
you
know
again,
I
really
pre
appreciate
everyone's
understanding
about
where
we
are
um
in
this
space
and
time
with
regard
to
shovel
ready
projects
and
the
work
that
our
staff
teams
did
to.
First
of
all,
take
an
inventory
and
then
really
reduce
that
inventory
to
um
you
know
a
workable
number
and
then
do
the
math
problem
of
figuring
out
the
allocations.
B
A
So
I
don't
have
any
concerns
about
these.
These
allocations,
as
just
reflecting
our
first
year
priorities
and
the
input
that
we
received
and
the
fact
that
we're
trying
to
focus
right
now
on
travel,
ready
projects.
So
we
can
put
these
funds
to
work.
I
think
the
the
real
interesting
discussion
will
come
when
we
look
at
what
else
we
need
to
do.
That
is
going
to
change
the
landscape.
This
um
you
know
yes,
we're
looking
at
prevention
here
in
education,
but
uh
you
know
with
the
crisis
that
we
have
right
now.
A
A
B
A
Well,
I
think
what
we
should
do:
yeah
I
I-
guess
it's
my
job
to
actually
bring
us
to
that
that
vote,
that
we'll
need
to
move
forward.
um
I
think
the
easiest
way
is
for
people
to
use
the
hand,
raise
function
um
to
indicate
their
support
and
and
then
we
can
just
announce
the
results
of
that.
So
it
all.
Those
in
support,
please
do
use
the
raise
hands
function,
indicate
your
support.
A
C
The
slide
forward-
yes,
I,
was
just
gonna,
say
it
looks
like
we're
ready
to
move
ahead
here,
so
um
we
did
want
to
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
today.
Talking
about
what
our
process
looks
like
moving
forward,
a
lot
of
which
we've
already
sort
of
dipped
our
toe
into
by
talking
about
what
we
want,
what
we
hope
to
see
and
what
the
process
looks
like
moving
forward.
C
um
We
know
that
we
need
to
First
approve
our
projects.
We
know
we
need
to
talk
about
sustainability
and
what
that
looks
like
how
it's
married
to
our
sort
of
Grand
Vision
of
what
we
want
to
accomplish,
and
some
of
that
will
be
reflective
in
some
of
our
shifts
in
the
work
of
the
opioid
operations
group.
C
C
C
D
I
was
just
this
is
Joe
Kelly,
the
sheriff
I
was
going
to
suggest
um
it
seemed
to
the
questions
or
the
concerns
did
center
around
the
enforcement
piece
and
I
would
be
willing
to
have
a
group
of
folks
present,
including
a
county
attorney
and
Nico
the
commander
of
the
unit
on
process
and
to
answer
questions
that
type
of
thing.
If
that
would
be
helpful,.
D
B
A
A
um
I
know.
We've
talked
a
lot
about
the
the
data
after
the
funding
um
and
how
we're
going
to
look
at
that,
but
um
maybe
some
history
on
the
the
recipient.
uh
What
their
track
record
is
longevity,
what
their
practices
are
on
um
being
Fidelity,
you
know
being
faithful
to
um
to
the
the
evidence
um
that
sort
of
thing
just
to
you
know
know
that
we
are
actually
funding
evidence-based
programs
and
that
there
is
a
high
degree
of
fidelity
on
that.
Just.
M
Similar
to
what
Claire's
I
think
I
just
need
more
depth
in
the
information
to
really
understand
what
questions
I
may
have
and
it
gets
to
the
so.
What
so
we're
we're
asking
for
this
and
I'll
use
the
city
of
Longmont
programs
I,
understand
and
have
more
depth
of
knowledge
into
it,
but
if
I
didn't
my
question
would
be
so
what
do
you
want
to
do?
What
do
you
want
to
accomplish
with
this?
What
are
you,
what
are
you
you
know?
How
many
clients
are
you
going
to
add
to
the
mix?
C
M
Addition,
that's
just
one
element,
so
you
know
I
guess.
The
best
example
is
when
I
go
through
my
internal
budget
reviews
I'm
asking
what's
the
outcome,
what
are
you
already
doing?
How
many
people
are
you
serving
in
you
know?
Is
this
an
incremental
impact?
Are
we
having
a
tangible
impact
in
terms
of
what
we're
doing
it's
but
I
just
don't
know
what
questions
to
ask,
because
the
information
is
limited.
B
So
Kelly
I'm
wondering
if
the
operations
group
you
know
we
have
not
done
an
RFP
process.
So
it's
not
like
people
put
in
a
proposal
with
that
level
of
detail.
um
Has
the
operations
group
talked
about?
Will
that
be
part
of
the
process
or
or
how
will
we
get
this
level
of
detail
for
the
rock
to
be
able
to
vote
it's
sort
of
like
a
funding
board
right.
C
Yeah
I
don't
think
that
we've
talked
specifically
about
those
particular
pieces,
but
we
have
held
space
and
recognized
that
there
might
be
some
additional
content
about
the
programs
um
that
the
council
would
want
to
see
and
so
I
think
that
we
are
prepared
to.
um
You
know
we're
in
contact,
obviously
with
all
of
the
the
program,
administrators
and
folks
that
put
forward
their
proposals,
um
and
so
you
know
throughout
this
process
we
have
asked
for
a
little
bit
more
meat
and
depth
about
their
details
about
their
programs
and
I.
B
M
J
Okay,
so
Robin
I'm
thinking
that,
since
in
some
way
we're
going
to
have
to
develop
a
contract
with
anything
that
we
fund,
we
could
come
up
with
a
standard
kind
of
proposal,
format
and
budget
um
template
and
have
organizations
that
have
requested
funding
to
fill
that
out.
So
that
we've
got
a
little
bit
more
depth
and
then
the
the
those
can
be
reviewed
by
Brock
members
in
preparation
for
making
final
decisions
about
what
the
dollar
amounts
would
be.
J
It's
crazy
just
so
so
folks
know
in
terms
of
the
timeline
here.
So,
given
that
we've
approved
the
general
funding
allocation
amounts,
we
can
now
submit
that
information
to
the
state,
but
the
state's
going
to
take
about
a
month,
maybe
a
little
bit
longer
to
actually
approve.
So
we've
got
time
in
between
our
submission
and
actual
access
to
the
funds
which
would
allow
us
to
go
through
these
projects
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
to
examine
them
and
make
decisions
about.
J
F
I
just
wanted
to
um
concur
with
Harold
that
that
a
little
more
depth
and
I
don't
mean
a
deep
dive
right,
because
we
don't
want
to
make
this
too
onerous
to
what's
happening
and
and
I
and
would
be
helpful
and
it
will
differ
between
who's
asking
for
money.
So,
for
example,
to
use
you
Harold
I
hope
you
don't
mind
as
an
example
right
like
if
you've
got
that
one
extra
bilingual
coordinator.
F
What
have
you
been
your
outcomes
generally
before
and
how
would
that
increase
right
is
just
helpful
without
having
to
know
all
the
details
of
of
everything
there
and
if
it
were,
somebody
new
I,
think
to
Claire's
comment
earlier.
We'd
want
to
make
sure
if
it's
somebody
who's
getting
new
funding.
That's
a
new
organization
like
you
know
how
I
wouldn't
ask
this
of
a
city,
but
I
might
ask
that
of
a
new
non-profit.
That
is
just
form
like
you
know.
F
B
F
Yeah
and
and
I
think
you
put
some
of
that
in
the
recommendations.
I
thought
that
was
super
useful
as
well
as
Joe's
earlier
comment
about
what
things
are
statutorily
required
or
not,
because
then
that
kind
of
makes
a
different
kind
of
decision.
So
those
kind
of
I
think
nuances.
I
would
be
really
helpful
to
me
yeah.
Thank
you.
M
Rob
and
I
had
my
hand
up
again
and
I
think
you
know
for
me,
um
it's
a
relatively
simple
concept,
but
it's
who?
What
when,
where
why
and
then
what's
the
impact
or
the
significance
that
I
tend
to
look
for,
because
that's
a
quick
and
dirty
way
to
get
it
and
and
then
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
that
and
I
know
we're
going
to
talk
about
program
evaluation
later.
B
D
B
B
A
K
C
B
C
Good,
no,
not
really.
uh
We
just
wanted
to
mention
that
we
had
heard
that
that
concern
come
true
loud
and
clear,
um
both
in
our
September
Rock
and
then
also
today,
and
so
we
did
have
a
preliminary
approach
to
approach
the
subject
with
our
operations
group
on
Monday
um
we've
done
some
work
to
already
parse
through
our
shovel
ready
programs
and
figure
out
are
any
of
them.
Just
a
one-time
funding
need
versus
which
are
ongoing.
C
um
Most
of
them
are
ongoing
funding
needs,
and
so
the
conversation
shifts
to
what
we've
talked
about
today,
which
is
you
know?
How
are
we
making
sure
that
we're
measuring
monitoring
programs
against
our
intended
impact
to
ensure
that
we
have
a
mechanism
in
place
to
Sunset
programs
and
bring
on
additional
programs
um
that
really
align
with
that
vision?
And
so
the
last
question
was
really
just
do
council
members
have
any
additional
concerns
about
sustainability
that
they
would
want
to
have
the
operations
group
sort
of
chew
on
on
that,
at
that
Monday
meeting.
M
So
we
can
open
up
the
door
for
other
opportunities
and
ideas
in
the
future
and
um
that's
how
we
treat
one
time
our
term
limited
positions.
We
start
that
way
to
see
if
it
works.
If
it
works,
then
we
start
figuring
out.
How
do
we
bring
that
back
within
our
own
budgets
so
that
we
can
create
capacity
for
other
things
and
I?
Don't
know
how
you
build
that
into
it,
but
I
think
it's
an
important
question
to
ask
a
lot
of
these
groups.
G
B
L
B
G
Do
you
want
to
go
ahead?
Yeah
sure,
thanks
um
so
I
think
just
that
knitting
together
of
the
two
plans
to
really
to
really
look
at
those
comprehensively
and
where
we
can
leverage
dollars-
um
and
you
know
I
think
just
I
know
this
will
happen,
but
full
transparency
on
the
front
end
with
people
that
we
are
funding
that
this
you
know
where
there
will
be
an
ongoing
evaluation
um
and
we'll
be
looking
at
really
what
what
has
positive
outcomes
and
the
need
moving
forward
and
there's
no
kind
of
guarantee
of
ongoing
funding.
G
J
Well,
I
think
there
are
probably
two
phases
of
looking
at
the
evaluation.
The
first
is
given
that
as
Susan
um
relayed,
these
are
kind
of
a
scatter
shot
of
projects
that
don't
necessarily
come
to
form
a
hole.
We're
going
to
have
to
look
at
what
we
do:
evaluation
wise
on
a
more
program
by
program
basis
and
then
moving
forward,
as
we
think
more
strategically
about
how
future
dollars
are
used.
How
do
we
create
a
more
comprehensive,
targeted
or
focused
evaluation?
C
C
Absolutely-
and
this
is
the
last
thing
and
we've
already
touched
on
it-
so
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
hand
over
to
Robin.
um
This
is
just
what's
next
for
the
operations
group,
a
lot
of
which
has
come
up
in
the
course
of
today's
conversation,
brought
our
funders
funding
strategy
um
really
being
conscious
and
intentional
about
monitoring
the
effectiveness
of
the
programs
and
then
additional
voice
fusing
in
um
that's
kind
of
pinging
off
of
our
discussion
in
September
of
who
needs
to
additionally
be
at
the
table.
C
B
B
C
E
D
um
So
there
has
to
be
some
someone,
some
buddy,
some
group
responsible
for
determining
who's,
going
to
make
presentations
and
and
I
would
suggest.
Maybe
like
some
of
the
existing
long-time
existing
programs
may
not
require
presentation
as
much
as
new
non-profits
or
um
the
questions
around
the
enforcement
piece
that
uh
Maria
and
Claire
had
um
just
don't
know
how
you
get
there,
but
25
presentations
and
that's
just
not
gonna
work.
D
B
So,
rather
than
getting
into
the
into
the
details
about
how
this
is
going
to
work,
I
would
just
like
to
ask
the
board
if,
if
they're,
okay
with
the
staff
coming
up
with
the
recommendation,
how
to
manage
this?
Given
that
we've
taken
in
your
comments
and
concerns
um
and
then
and
then
we'll
move
forward.
H
G
D
B
B
A
um
Yeah
thanks
Robin,
thanks
to
everybody,
for
your
participation
here
and
um
respect
to
our
task,
and
we
got
it
done
um
and
I
I
do
appreciate
everybody's
questions
and
comments
and
I
I.
Think
we're
really
coming
together
on
this,
but
um
I
guess
I
would
invite.
If
anybody
else
has
anything
they
feel
they
need
to
say
before
we
uh
before
we
end
this
meeting
um
I
would
I
would
invite
that
and
then
I
actually
well.
A
I
have
a
question
that
I
meant
to
ask
earlier
and
Robin.
When
you
did
your
introduction-
um
and
you
said
we
were
not
taking
public
comment
at
this
meeting,
and
but
could
you
lay
out
what
the
opportunities
for
public
input
will
be
as
we
go
down
the
road
um
just
do
that
quickly
and
then
I
would
invite
other
people
if
they
have
any
last
minute
um
comments
they'd
like
to
make
to
go
ahead
and
participate.
B
C
We
have
so
I
think
this
is
another
one
of
those
things
that
we
sort
of.
um
Unfortunately,
I,
don't
want
to
say
put
aside,
but
we
did
um
sort
of
make
a
lean
Avenue
for
Community
input
and
because
of
the
shovel
ready
approach
and
so
um
out
of
respect
for
wanting
to
to
kind
of
go
back
and
fuse
that
in
from
the
process,
moving
forward
um
we're
looking
at-
and
this
will
be
part
of
our
conversation
in
the
operations
group
on
the
24th.
C
A
Thanks
for
addressing
that,
I
think
the
public
is
interested
in
this
and
just
knowing
that
there
will
be
an
opportunity
and
at
what
level?
Where
will
it
be
and-
and
you
know,
I
recognize
that
we
do
have
the
operations
board
and
and
we're
working
with
the
community
of
um
group
as
well
already,
but
just
general
members
of
the
public
I'm
sure
are
very
interested
in
what
we're
doing
um
yeah,
Lexi
and
and
then
really
just
um
anybody
else.
Just
go
ahead
and
jump
in
and
we've
got
about
three
minutes.
Two
minutes.