►
From YouTube: Brimbank City Coucil OCM 19 Aug 2020
Description
Continuation of the Ordinary Council Meeting for August 2020
A
A
This
meeting
is
a
continuation
of
our
ordinary
council
meeting
last
night.
That
meeting
was
adjourned
because
of
the
number
of
items
on
our
agenda
and
the
fact
that
we
ran
out
of
time
last
night
to
deal
with
all
of
those
items.
There
are
six
substantive
items
left
for
consideration
by
council
today.
A
A
A
A
I
ask
councillors
to
remain
standing
for
the
council
commitment.
Others
may
be
seated
as
a
council.
We
will
act
in
the
best
interests
of
the
greenback
community
and
consider
the
immediate
and
long-term
impacts
of
our
decisions.
We
will
make
these
decisions
fairly
and
without
buyers.
We
will
uphold
all
of
our
obligations
under
the
laws
of
victoria
and
council's
local
laws
and
will
act
in
accordance
with
our
councillor
code
of
conduct.
Thank
you.
You
may
be
seated.
A
Item
three
apologies:
I
note
that
councillor
tarkos
councillor
allen
and
councillor
or
an
apology
from
this
meeting-
item
4
disclosure
of
conflicts
of
interest
councillors.
Are
there
any
conflicts
of
interest?
A
B
A
Okay,
do
I
have
a
second
for
this
notice
of
motion,
counselor
borg.
C
Sorry,
madam
mayor,
I
have
some
questions
and
I
wouldn't
mind
asking
them
probably
before
councillor
heritage
speaks
on
the
application.
C
A
C
Three
of
madame
air
and
to
the
director
conwash,
the
I
understand
we
we
haven't
been
briefed
on
this,
so
I
understand
that
the
there
is
a
delay
on
collecting
information.
If
you
could
explain
that
and
the
also
it
is
normal
practice
with
these
type
of
things
to
keep
the
matters
confidential,
could
you
explain
why
we
would
want
to
do
that?
C
Man
mayor,
I
was
just
seeking
clarification.
I
was
I
was
under
the
impression
we
may
be
limited
to
the
number
of
questions,
so
I
was
putting
them
all
wrapping
them
all
together,
but
if
I
I've
got
four
questions,
if
I'm
allowed
to
ask
all
four
I'll
ask
them
individually,
if
that's
okay,.
C
Just
simply
that
there
is
a
delay
in
collecting
the
information
for
this
matter.
If
that
could
be
explained,
please.
D
So
council
officers
have
commenced
a
preliminary
assessment
of
the
heritage
values
of
the
of
the
grain
store.
As
part
of
that
work,
we
look
at
public
records
to
establish
some
of
the
history
of
the
site
due
to
covered
restrictions
covered
19
restrictions.
The
public
record
office
is
currently
closed,
precluding
us
from
accessing
some
records
associated
with
the
the
grain
stores.
C
Thank
you.
The
the
next
question
relates
to
with
these
things,
sometimes
because
of
the
potential
for
an
interim
control.
The
matter
may
not
be
or
may
be
considered
confidential.
Is
that
correct?
If
you
could
explain
that
and
also
are
there
any
concerns
in
making
this
public
this
proposal
public.
D
The
what
how
can
I
best
it's
through
you,
madam
mayor,
the
undertaking
of
preliminary
work
by
council
is
often
done
prior
to
making
it
public.
We
do
a
whole
lot
of
work
before
it
is,
is
put
into
the
public
domain
in
terms
of
heritage
investigations.
D
A
Thank
you,
mr
walsh.
A
councillor
lancashire.
I've
just
received
information
from
governors.
We
did
say
yesterday
that
there
wouldn't
be
more
than
two
questions
per
councillor.
So
that's
your
second
question.
Councillor.
E
Goodiche.
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
also
have
a
question
to
director
walsh
through
you.
I
note
in
the
officer
advice
that
it
is
not
supported
to
go
ahead
with
this
motion
simply
because
by
making
it
public
in
this
way,
it
may
actually
expedite
the
demolition
of
the
silos,
which
then
would
really
be
detrimental.
Should
we
have
wished
to
pursue
an
interim
heritage
overlay?
Is
that
quite
right,
mr
walsh,.
D
That
is
correct
through
you,
madam
mayor,
that
is
correct.
Counselor
judith
show.
That
is
the
advice
that
I
provided.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councillors.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
points
of
clarification,
counselor
aziz,.
B
Point
of
order,
madam
mayor
point
of
order,
I
have
a
question
also
for
as
a
result
of
the
answer
that
mr
walsh
has
given
that
actually
will
provide
more
clarity
around
the
may
expedite
demolition
comment.
There
is
a.
There
is
also
a
whole
lot
of
work
going
on
in
the
council
offices.
If
that
order
came
in,
it
would
be
dealt
with
immediately
to
the
minister,
there's
there's
another
answer
that
needs
to
be
given
to
councils
before
put
motions
put.
This
is
unfair,
very
unfair.
A
Councillor
heritage,
thank
you.
I
will
allow.
A
B
Director
walsh,
in
our
conversations
I
asked
you
the
question
around:
if
a
demolition
order
was
provided
to
the
council
as
a
result
of
the
an
immediate
demolition
order
as
a
result
of
the
process,
closing
on
the
27th
of
august
would
council
be
able
to
expedite
it
immediately,
and
you
said
yes,
the
trouble
is
council
can't
make
it
as
my
understanding
is.
The
council
can't
make
a
decision
on
this
until
next
council
meeting
unless
something
extraordinary
is
called,
which
is
well
beyond
when
the
eoi
process
concludes.
B
So
my
question
is:
if
a
demolition
request
came
in
council
may
be
able
to
expedite
it
immediately
taking
away
all
these
fears,
that
councils
are
raising
at
the
moment.
D
A
Okay,
councillor
headed
you
can
ask
one
more
question.
B
Thank
you
in
point
d
of
the
notice
of
motion
director
walsh
that
the
there's
a
point
the
council
writes
to
the
minister
planning
advising
that
the
investigation
is
stalled
due
to
covert
impacts
and
there's
an
inability
to
access
the
records.
In
that
case,
it
is
a
reasonable
thing
to
do.
Is
it
not
to
actually
make
this
open
and
transparent
to
both
the
the
person
who's
selling
the
site
and
that
the
community
itself
that
this
this
work
is
going
on?
And
there
is
a
possibility
of
this
happening
everyone's?
B
It's
an
open
and
transparent
mechanism,
then
that
everyone
knows
before
someone
buys
the
site
and
before
the
community.
The
community
that's
affected
here
that
I
do
want
to
see.
A
retention
of
these
silos
for
heritage
reasons
can
have
have
their
say
as
well.
D
Through
you,
madam
mayor,
I
councillor
heritage.
We
told
you
respect.
This
is
your
notice
of
motion.
I
have
not
formed
a
view
on
the
reasonableness
or
otherwise
of
the
motion.
I've
provided
advice
to
counsel
about
the
officer's
preferred
direction
in
relation
to
dealing
with
this
matter
and
in
providing
you
and
council.
D
With
that
advice,
I
detailed
the
officer's
views
on
risk
of
ventilating
this
in
the
public
domain
prior
to
completing
the
heritage
assessment
versus
maintaining,
enabling
the
officers
to
complete
the
the
full
assessment
once
covered.
19
restrictions
are
listed.
We
have.
A
Thank
you
councillor
headache
your
answer.
Your
question
has
been
answered.
Okay,
all
right
councillors
are
there
any
other
councillors,
councillor
farm.
F
Thank
you
madame.
I
would
want
to
ask
that,
because,
at
this
stage
of
the
coffee,
retricion
is
preventing
council
from
accepting
the
public
record
based
on
what
the
answer
on
the
public
question.
So
if
we
gonna
go
and
do
that,
are
there
any
estimate
time
if
we
can
get
the
answer
back
from
you
know
the
authority
that
and.
A
F
A
Okay
is
anyone
else
hearing
something
in
the
background,
yeah
yeah,
so
you'll
need
to
turn
off
the
you've
got
something
else
on
we'll
get
we'll
ask
mr
walsh
to
answer
your
question
in
the
meantime.
Can
you
just
put
yourself
on
mute,
please
thank
you.
D
Three,
madam
mayor,
unfortunately
I
am
unable
to
provide
counsellors
with
an
estimate
on
on
the
time
frames
due
to
the
decisions.
Are
decisions
of
the
state
government
in
terms
of
lifting
restrictions.
G
Thank
you,
mother,
mayor,
a
question
to
director
walsh
if
the
request
a
demolition
or
mother
mayor
how
long
it
takes
for
counsel,
to
answer
back
and
what's
there,
of
course,.
D
I'm
sorry,
madam
mayor,
the
last
part
of
the
question
dropped
out.
D
So
through
you,
madam
mayor,
there
are
no
planning
requirements
on
the
site
for
for
for,
for,
in
relation
to
demolition
control,
the
the.
If
someone
were
wanting
to
demolish
the
building,
they
would
need
to
get
a
building
permit.
As
part
of
that
process,
council
officers
would
receive
an
inquiry
concerning
any
other
controls
on
the
site.
D
That
would
then
we
would
then
be
alerted
to
imminent
consideration
of
demolition
of
the
building,
and
at
that
point
the
officers
would
provide
counsel
with
advice
on
options
of
whether
they
would
like
to
proceed
in
in
seeking
from
the
minister
interim
controls
for
for
the
building
and
the
site.
A
Okay,
any
other
questions
or
points
of
clarification
counsellors.
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
that.
All
right,
counselor,
headache.
A
We
can't
counsel
a
headache.
We
can't
hear
you
sorry
right,
so
we're
going
back
councillors
to
councillor
heritage.
Speaking
to
the
motion
at
this.
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
all
the
questions.
I
think
they're
they're
really
valid
ones,
and
it
is
a
vexed
question
about
how
to
do
this
best.
B
So
I'll
explain
why
we're
I'm
putting
forward
this
notice
of
motion
that
the
the
council
notes
that
the
process
is
stalled,
that
we
can't
access
historical
records
and
there
is
no
timeline
to
do
that.
There
is
a
timeline
on
the
expression
of
interest
process
that
the
owner
grain
core
has
at
the
moment.
That
concludes
on
the
27th
of
august.
The
next
council
meeting
is
until
september.
B
B
So
the
point
I
make
is
that
by
having
this
matter
dealt
with
as
a
notice
of
motion
and
after
a
conversation
with
caddy
hall,
the
local
mp's
office
who
were
requesting
that
council
provide
advice,
and
they
would
provide
a
letter
of
support
to
the
minister
on
this
and
other
mps
likely
to
too
that
council
process,
something
that
enables
them
to
do
that.
B
Given
the
timelines
that
there
is,
there
are
for
sale
at
the
moment,
an
expression
of
interest
process
could
be
concluded
in
a
week
or
so,
and
a
sale
made
and
a
demolition
order
come
in.
And
so
the
point
of
this
notice
of
motion
is
to
identify
that
the
process
is
stalled
for
some
for
some
unknown
time
of
developing
an
assessment
of
whether
a
heritage
application
is
valid
or
not,
and
that
there
are
risks
in
terms
of
possible
demolition
occurring.
B
Should
a
letter
not
be
sent
to
the
minister,
as
requested
here
in
d
of
this
notice
of
motion
that
we
write
to
them.
As
the
council
writes
to
the
minister
advising
that
the
preliminary
heritage
investigation
on
intramural
permanent
heritage
overlay
is
currently
stored
and
an
inability
to
access
the
public
records
office
so
that
the
minister
can
consider
an
intervention
himself
while
this
process
finishes
it's
not
about,
you
know,
proactively
starting
demolition
of
the
place.
B
It's
about
proactively,
having
the
minister
aware
that
the
process
is
stalled
and
that
the
minister's
office
can
consider
the
right
moves
in
terms
of
this
going
forward.
Given
that
there
is
a
large
community
out
here,
that
is
that
highly
values
the
the
silo
site
and
does
want
to
see
it
protected
under
heritage
under
heritage
values.
B
There
are
others
who
don't
and
that's
acknowledged,
but
I
think
the
whole
purpose
of
this
particular
notice
of
motion
is
to
identify
the
risks
of
not
taking
this
action
immediately
and
letting
the
minister
know
and
not
taking
this
action
and
letting
the
local
mps
know
that,
so
that
they
can
also
write
letters
of
support
to
the
minister
asking
him
to
consider
the
best
possible
option
going
forward,
noting
that
this
process
has
stalled
that
council
and
has
no
no
timeline.
For
conclusion.
B
In
terms
of
delay,
I
think
that
delay
is
is
what's
caused.
All
of
this,
that
we
we
cannot.
There
is
no
certainty
around
what
might
happen
or
not
happen
with
the
silos
unless
we
do
something
as
a
council
and
that's
our
role,
the
minister's
been
saying
openly,
the
council
should
take
action
on
these
heritage
matters
it's
in
their
belly
week
and
what
this
notice
of
motion
does
is
say
to
council.
B
Well,
let's
do
the
right
thing
here,
given
the
stall
process,
given
that
we
have
no
certainty
around
when
it
might
conclude
and
when
something
might
come
to
council
and
given
the
council
is
the
place
where
decisions
get
made
and
there
won't
be
a
decision
made
until
next
council
meeting
and
there
could
be
a
possible
sale
and
demolition
order
in
on
the
council
very
quickly.
B
The
no
summation
to
the
councillors
as
the
best
option
now
and
the
most
acceptable
option
to
community
you
know,
and
local
and
I'll
leave
it
at
that
as
to
community.
And
it's
also,
I
think,
a
an
open
and
transparent
thing
on
on
behalf
of
providing
information
to
grancor
about
what
council's
thinking
and
doing.
A
A
F
Thank
you,
melon
bay.
I
have
done
a
bit
of
searching
on
the
internet
and
I
saw
on
the
silotrail.com.au
the
sunshine
victoria's
silo
is
actually
come
up
at
one
of
can
we
say
the
heritage
building
and
also
last
year
you
remember,
we
have
the
silo
projection
project
which
bring
bank
city
council
was
a
partner
project
partner
in
doing
the
projections
project
on
the
silo.
F
If
counselor.
I
remember
that
so
I
thought
is.
I
hear
both
of
the
expression
from
from
diff
from
counselor,
but
I
think
it's
it
actually
have
quite
significant
value
to
this
building.
Also,
I
have
visited
the
grassland
reserve.
F
I
can't
remember
exactly
the
name
very
close
by
the
silo
and
I
think
a
lot
of
time
people
visiting
that
grassland
reserve
and
and
would
want
to
see
this
silo
being
there
as
well.
So
that's
what
my
little
shirt
on
the
internet
and
also
remembering
the
past
project
and
that's
what
I
can
see.
Thank
you.
A
G
B
It's
an
expression
of
interest
for
a
sale
yeah,
so
it's
it's
seeking
offers
from
interested
parties.
It's
a
commercially
zoned
site.
G
B
There
is
there
is
a
risk
of.
There
is
a
risk
of
demolition,
as
I
understand
it,
from
people
who
are
advising
me
who
have
expertise
in
this
area.
They
say
that
there's
a
real
risk
of
it
and
I
think
the
the
process
is
finishing
on
the
27th
of
august,
councillor
davis
and
expressive
interest
process,
so
parties
will
have
their
bids
in
by
then
and
then
there'll
be
an
acceptance
of
them
or
not
we'll
be
over
very.
A
Quickly
councillors,
thank
you.
Is
there
any
other
counsellor
that
would
like
to
speak
to
this
motion.
Councillor
goodichi.
E
Thank
you
mayor.
I
find
this
motion
extremely
baffling
to
tell
you
the
truth
is
expressions
of
interest
are
finishing
on
the
27th
of
august.
Today
is
the
19th
of
august.
What
could
this
possibly
achieve?
E
Our
preliminary
studies
haven't
shown
whether
it's
should
be
or
shouldn't
be.
Our
preliminary
studies
are
certainly
not
going
to
find
whether
we
should
or
shouldn't
be
by
the
time
we
send
a
letter.
It
will
be
the
end
of
the
week
if
this
motion
is
accepted.
Mr
win
will
probably
not
receive
it
before
the
expressions
of
interest
are
finished,
so
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
message
we're
sending
out
there,
a
demolition
order
could
come
in
at
any
time
they
could
demolish
it.
E
Regardless
we
had
when
we
were
first
elected
to
council.
We
had
that
group
from
kenley
who
demolished
a
pub
in
the
city.
Remember
what
happened
to
them?
Nothing
much!
So
if
a
developer
is
willing
to
spend
millions
and
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
buying
it,
they
may
want
to
also
risk
millions
of
dollars
of
fines
in
actually
demolishing
it.
So
I
think
by
alluding
it
out
there.
I
don't
I'm
not
sure
I
don't
have
enough
information
about
a
council
or
heritage.
You
had
not
briefed
the
council
in
time.
E
A
B
Sorry,
I
hear
the
count
the
comments
of
counselor
goodacay
and
I
think
they
demonstrate
very
clearly
why
we
should
be
proceeding
with
this.
There
are
risks,
real
risks
and
by
not
advising
the
minister
that
we
have
a
stalled
process
and
that
there
is
an
expression
of
interest
process,
including
on
the
27th
of
august,
and
that
there
are
wide
community
concerns
about
the
possibility
of
demolition.
B
The
whole
point
is
that
the
the
council,
which
is
what
the
minister
has
called
on
councils
to
do
when
these
sort
of
heritage
issues
are
around,
is
to
make
decisions
in
their
own
value
that
deal
with
things
effectively.
This
notice
of
motion
does
that
it.
It
puts
the
information
on
the
minister's
desk
very
quickly
before
a
you
know,
a
whole
series
of
preemptive
approaches
could
happen
and
says,
there's
a
real
issue
here.
B
I
think
it's
a
very
valid
notice
of
motion
that
it
has
all
the
benefits
of
openness,
transparency,
proactive
and
benefit
benefits
for
all,
a
win-win
for
the
the
seller,
a
win-win
for
the
community,
potentially
a
win-win
for
the
council,
in
that
it
is
dealing
with
the
issue
in
a
timely
way.
Now
it
makes
no
difference
to
you
know
a
whole
range
of,
I
guess
possible
options.
It
just
says
upfront
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
an
interim
assessment,
an
interim
assessment
of
whether
a
heritage
application
should
be
made.
A
A
Down
all
right,
so
all
those
in
favor
we've
got
counselor
headache
and
counsellor
farm.
Thank
you
all
those
against
hands
up,
please
councillor
borg,
councillor
aziz,
councillor
david
councillor,
goody,
chair,
councillor,
lancashire
and
councillor
papafodio.
Thank
you.
A
B
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
This
particular
item.
The
sunshine,
leisure
strategic
assessment
report
on
council
to
acknowledged
the
highly
valued
spirit
of
community
partnership
and
engagement,
has
occurred
with
the
local
community
over
the
past
eight
years
during
the
sunshine,
leisure
centre
review
and
the
recent
master
planning
processes
regarding
potential
future
facility
enhancements.
B
Thank
you.
Madam
mayor
councils
will
recall
that
this
was
an
item
that
I
raised
through
a
rescission
motion,
and
that
is
an
item
that,
after
discussions
with
the
the
officers,
I
have
subsequently
put
forward
as
a
non
notice
of
motion.
B
The
reason
I'm
putting
it
forward
is
that
when
council
decided
to
do
the
strategic
assessment
back
in
august
last
year,
it
moved
at
that
council
meeting
in
section
h
that
it
go
back
to
community
to
prepare
the
strategic
assessment
and
involve
the
community
in
that
process.
B
The
the
matter
came
to
council
recently
and
council
decided
that
it
would
accept
the
strategic
assessment,
but
it
was
under
confidentiality
provisions
for
for
reasons
and
that
the
community
and
one
one
thing
that
happened
in
that
process
was
the
report
also
identified
the
community
hadn't
been
involved
in
developing
the
assessment
and
hadn't
been
involved
in
the
process.
B
So
I
put
my
recision
motion
forward
on
that
basis
that
it
hadn't
met
those
requirements.
I
was
going
to
put
it
forward
that
way,
but
in
subsequent
conversations,
we've
come
to
the
point
where
it's
possible
to
produce
a
a
community
facing
report,
a
version
from
the
strategic
assessment
that
the
community
can
see
that
takes
out
all
those
confidential
issues
that
were
included
in
the
original
report
that
went
to
council
and
accepted.
B
So
this
notice
of
motion
asks
that
we
value
that
highly
that
that
that
amount
of
community
partnership
and
spirit-
that's
been
around
this
whole
sunshine
leisure
centre
process
for
many
many
years
after
all
the
hassles
we
had
previously
and
that
we
continue
that
that
spirit
of
engagement
and
partnership
by
preparing
and
publishing
a
clear
and
concise
community-facing
report
on
the
key
findings
and
recommendations
suitably
de-identified,
so
that
those
commercial
aspects
are
not
there
on.
B
The
recently
concluded
strategic
assessment,
and
there
are
a
number
of
things
in
that
that
strategic
assessment
that
the
community
can
have
a
say
on,
and
the
council
officers
believe
that
a
report
like
this
with
that
sort
of
community
facing
focus
and
the
ability
for
the
community
to
have
a
say,
would
deal
with
that
ongoing
desire
to
retain
the.
I
guess
spirit
of
partnership
and
the
the
value
of
having
that
community
working
with
council
on
the
future
of
this
place.
It
will
be
a
long
time
relationship.
B
There's
a
lot
of
work
still
to
do.
We
acknowledge
that
there's
no
money
in
capital
works
programs,
but
the
the
problems
you
know
the
the
problems
are
best
solved
working
together
on
this.
B
So
it's
a
community-facing
report
that
enables
the
community
to
have
a
say
is
what's
recommended
here
and
that
we
also
see
community
and
local
state
and
federal
mp's
feedback
on
this
community
facing
report,
so
that
better
informs
the
planning
and
development
of
the
leisure
centre
going
forward
over
the
coming
years,
because
it
will
be
many
years
before
anything
happens
there
I'll
leave
it
at
that.
Thank
you,
madame.
A
Okay,
councillor
farm,
would
you
like
to
speak
to
this
motion.
A
You,
okay,
thank
you,
council
of
farm.
Are
there
any
other
councillors
that
would
like
to
speak
to
this
motion?
A
A
A
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Yes,
this
this
matter
was
brought
to
council
last
meeting
by
councillor
tacos
on
my
behalf.
When
I
was
away
sick.
B
This
particular
notice
of
particular
rescission
motion
is
put
forward
as
I
I
believe
that
councils
did
not
have
a
clear
enough
understanding
of
what
the
intent
of
my
notice
of
motion
was,
that
it
was
misunderstood
and
that
there
were
a
number
of
comments
made
that
do
not
reflect
the
whole
rationale
behind
what
I
was
proposing.
So
I
I
picked
the
the
counselors.
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
As
I
said,
I
put
this
notice
motion
forward
last
meeting
through
councillor
tarkos,
and
thank
you
for
that.
B
This
particular
piece
of
no
summation
was
put
forward
so
that
we
take
a
stronger
focus
on
it
over
the
next
couple
of
years,
and
we
do
some
interim
work
and
some
longer
term
work,
which
I
notice
is
happening
through
the
creating
better
street
strategy
which
takes
two
years.
But
this
was
more
about
getting
our
head
around
what
we
can
do
now
with
what
we've
got
and
what
we
might
be
able
to
do
in
the
future
and
separating
out
the
short
from
the
medium
term.
B
So
my
my
notice
of
motion
called
on
an
aligned
suite
of
a
holistic
approach
to
street
thinking
about
it
in
a
whole
way
around
both
the
built
fabric
and
the
natural
environment.
B
For
investors
or
the
public
and
community
and
various
others,
and
that
we
consider
that
as
part
of
a
report
that
goes
to
council
just
a
report,
I
should
say
up
front
that
this
is
a
report.
It's
not
a
finished
work.
It's
a
report
on
what
might
be
possible
in
an
aligned
suite
if
you
set
out
the
six
or
seven
things
that
you
might
focus
on
in
the
street,
like
landscape
and
architectural
design,
guidelines
for
an
activity
center
or
an
industrial
zone
like
local
laws.
B
We
we've
heard
since
from
the
offices
that
the
local
laws
do
have
a
10-year
review
period
and
we
can't
do
much
there,
but
that's
advice
that
can
go
to
a
council
in
a
council
report
in
february
that
there
is
limited
possibility
of
doing
things,
but
here's
some
areas
that
we
think
need
to
be
thought
about
going
forward.
There
may
be
some
more
work
is
needed
before
the
10
years
is
up,
but
a
report
that
identifies
the
really
key
issues
that
are
being
identified
by
community
as
problems
with
local
laws.
B
B
We
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
complaints
coming
into
counsellors
and
and
others
about
things
happening
in
streets
that
aren't
being
dealt
with
quickly
and
that
they're
causing
people,
distress,
litter
cars,
all
sorts
of
different
problems
in
the
street,
and
this
is
about
identifying
what
sort
of
resources
are
in
place
at
present
and
what
could
be
put
together
in
future
in
a
report
to
council
in
february,
without
a
lot
of
effort
in
that
we
don't
want
the
streets
deteriorating
for
another
couple
of
years.
It's
about
saying
this
is
where
we
stand
now.
B
The
next
point
was
around
that
I
made
was
around
a
quality
service
plan
where
council
officers
can
develop
and
they're
saying
they
can
develop
a
plan
readily
that
identifies
like
we
do
for
the
the
garbage
collection
that
it
comes
every
every
week,
and
these
are
the
bins
that
are
collected.
We
have
something
else
that
tells
us
when
streetscaping
street
sweeping
occurs
or
any
other
council
function
happens,
and
we
have
that
identified
in
a
service
plan
that
the
community
has.
B
We
have
streetscape
policy
connections
and
we
also
have
something
we
can
put
to
them
on
what's
happening
around
footpaths,
bike
and
walking
paths
and
things
we
might
be
able
to
do
in
the
coming
year
or
two
that
that
improve
that
and
one
of
the
things
last
night
I
put
forward,
was
to
increase
the
budget
in
those
areas.
B
F
I
think
it's
all
explained
very
clear
by
councilman
haddish
of
what
hit
intentionally
for
this
decision
motion.
So
I
wouldn't
say
anything
extra.
A
A
A
A
Okay,
meet
in
close,
so
thank
you
all
for
attending
and
for
your
interest.
In
today's
meeting,
I
declared
this
meeting
closed
at
2
45
p.m.
I
instruct
the
host
to
stop
recording
this
meeting.
Thank
you.
Thank.