►
Description
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2022, 6:30 PM
Location: Online via Webex
Agenda
1. Street co-naming criteria
2. CB14 committee meeting practices
3. Other business
A
C
C
D
Yeah
I
guess
my
feeling
is:
if
the
council
member
wants
us
to
weigh
in,
we
may
as
well
weigh
in
I
mean
we're
an
Advisory
Board
representing
the
community.
So
you
know
if
we
have
input-
and
you
know
we-
you
know
we
we're
like-
we
could
be
the
first
first
first
line
of
input
to
let
the
council
member
know
I
I
kind
of
see.
C
B
So
when
we're
asked
to
weigh
in
on
some,
but
then
others
are
done
by
the
initiative
of
council
members
and
we're
not
even
we're,
not
only
have
we
not
been
asked
to
weigh
in
on
them,
we
haven't
been
notified
of
all
of
them.
Some
of
them
we've
been
invited
to
a
ribbon
cutting
for
Street
cone,
aiming
that
we
weren't
aware
of
until
invited
to
a
ribbon
cutting
and
others
proceeded
without
without
even
out
you
know
without
that
invitation.
B
C
G
Clearly,
as
relating
to
some
of
those,
so
I
guess
like
to
me,
some
of
like
I
think
it's
reasonable.
If
we
want
to
like
I
I,
agree
that
it
would
be
ideal
to
have
like
a
uniform
process
throughout
the
district.
I
think
that
it
makes
sense,
though,
if
you
know,
if
we're
not
giving
the
opportunity
to
weigh
in
or
people
or
council
members,
do
want
us
to
to
take
that.
G
Member
I
didn't
see
how
one
of
these
people
fit
into
that
standard,
even
though,
like
their
story,
is
very
important
and
something
that
I
think
could
have
been.
You
know
recognized
in
this
way
in
the
district
and
it
I
guess
like
maybe
it
would
make
so
if
we're
going
to
do
this
on
like
kind
of
a
piecemeal
basis
and
we're
not
going
you
know
if
we
are
going
to
potentially
have
our
own,
you
know
not
have
our
own
either
have
our
own
standards
or
not.
G
G
Because
of
that
that
that
situation
and
I
think
that
that's
one
we
should
try
to
resolve
if
we're
going
to
provide
this
for
him,
because
we
want
to
be
very
transparent
and
we
want
to
make
it
very
transparent
for
community
members
who
might
want
to
weigh
in
to
give
their
input
about
these
matters.
If
that
makes
sense,.
G
No
I
think
that
more
there
wasn't
I
guess.
I
was
like
a
little
surprised
that
an
application
like
it
felt
like
to
me
and,
of
course
people
can
disagree
that,
like
some
of
these
applications,
did
not
necessarily
meet
those
standards
and
I
think
that
there's.
That
was
maybe
why
some
people
were
voted
against
them
not,
but
it
would
I
think
it
would
be.
G
Guess
what
I'm
trying
to
say
is.
It
was
weird
to
vote
on
something
where
we're
voting
on
someone
else's
standard,
that
we
didn't
necessarily
have
all
the
information
about
like
if
they
like
I,
guess
not
having
that
information
to
me,
like
I,
don't
know
if
it's,
because
these
people
did
not
meet
that
standard,
necessarily
or
if
it's,
because
the
information
about
how
they
met.
That
standard
was
not
very
clearly
presented
at
these
meetings,
and
so
that
I
think,
is
what
I
want
the
clarity
on
in
the
future.
Let.
C
Me
stop
you
there
that
each
of
that
each
of
the
applicants
in
the
second
public
hearing
that
we
had
when
we
had
that
criteria
in
hand,
they
were
instructed
that
they
had
to
demonstrate
that
the
applicant
met
the
criteria.
So
if
at
any
point
which
a
parent
to
several
board
members
who
had
voted
one
way
or
another,
they
did
not
meet
the
criteria.
So
if
they
didn't
present
the
information
during
the
during
the
public
hearing,
it's
because
either
they
evaded
the
question
or
they
neglected
to
answer
it
and
I.
C
C
H
H
should
provide
input
and
Street
code
naming
requests,
whether
they
come
from
city
council
or
the
community
itself,
or
is
the
question
B
when
community
board
14
receives
a
street
code
name
and
request
from
a
city
council
of
the
community?
How
best
does
it
proceed
like
I'm,
trying
to
figure
out
if
this
conversation
is
about
A
or
B?
If
I
completely
understand
the
scope
incorrectly
and
there's
something
else,
that's
my
question.
C
Okay,
so
the
the
question
at
hand
right
now
is
whether
or
not
we
should
hear
them
at
all
and
I,
and
because
the
practice
of
this
community
board
has
been
that
we
only
hear
applications
for
Street
code
namings
directly
from
a
council
member.
Then
it
would
only
be
directly
from
a
council
member,
so
the
council
member's
office
would
initiate
with
us.
We
would
not
hear
an
application
directly
from
the
applicant
without
city
council
support.
I
Hi,
thank
you
chair
good
evening.
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
I
think.
If
we
do
hear
from
applicants
wanting
to
do
Street
namings,
there
should
be
something
more
uniform.
That's
presented,
I
guess,
because
I
did
feel
that
for
the
October
3rd
I
think
that's
the
date
that
had
that
public
hearing
that
the
two
things
of
evidence
or
whatever
that
was
submitted.
One
of
them
was
like
one
paragraph
and
another
person
had
like
a
lot
of
like
evidence
backing
it
up,
but
I
was
like
I.
I
C
C
That's
going
to
be
co-named
and
then
sufficient,
a
sufficient
Public
Announcement,
which
is
beyond
which
would
be
on
the
onus
of
the
applicant
to
let
the
public
know
and
the
businesses
know
in
the
area
that
this
is
being
considered
and
I
can
I
can
give
you
examples
of
that.
If,
once
we
move
forward
with
the
decision
that
we're
going
to
hear
them
or
not,
I
see
Sean's
hand
is
up
first
and
then
Carl.
B
B
But
then,
after
the
first
one
it
didn't
feel
like
there
was
enough
a
public
Assurance,
so
we
submitted
I
think
that
a
questionnaire
or
a
list
of
criteria,
which
is
why
the
quality
of
the
second
applications
was
a
little
bit
better
in
meeting
those
criteria.
But
if
we,
if
this
board,
does
develop
criteria,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
control
over
ensuring
that
the
applicant
Endeavors
to
demonstrate
that
they
meet
the
criteria
and-
and
there
will
be
another
part
to
this
conversation.
B
It
seems
to
me
that
this
board
will
want
to
develop
its
own
criteria,
maybe
very
closely
based
on
criteria-
that's
already
out
there
from
other
boards.
But
you
know,
there's
both
a
qualitative
aspect
and
a
quantitative
aspect.
You
know
and
you're
going
to
be
able
to
empirically
demonstrate
that
X
percent
of
the
Block
in
question
signed
to
support,
petition
and
empirically
I'm
sure
document
that
the
person
is
deceased
and
then
there's
going
to
be
stuff
about.
You
know
how
good
the
person
was
and
how
much
they
did
for
the
community.
B
That
will
be
a
little
more
subjective,
but
but
I.
You
know
that
would
have
to
be
developed
and
the
reason
why
it
wasn't
developed
and
those
hearings
is
because
they
we
were
asked
to
do
it
very
quickly,
and
we
were
assured
that
the
council
member's
office
was
making
sure
that
they
met.
You
know
that
they
were
that
they
were
eligible
to
be
put
on
an
Omnibus
Bill
in
city
council.
H
I
withdraw
my
stuff.
I
mean
Sean
basically
touched
upon
it.
I
was
just
thinking
a
lot.
What
Sean
basically
mentioned
I
was
thinking
along
the
lines
of
whenever
we
have
developer
proposals
in
front
of
us
and
we
basically
say
like
yes,
but
reservations
are
nowhere
preservations
and
what
Sean
proposed
was
in
my
head,
I,
viewed
it
as
something
along
those
lines.
You
know
if
I
end
up
voting.
Yes,
we
should
accept
co-naming
applications
brought
To
Us
by
city
council,
so
that's
it
chairwoman.
Thank
you.
E
B
E
J
E
E
E
That
way,
you
know,
there's
no
hey,
we
didn't
know,
you
know
why?
Don't
you
just
take
our
word
for
it
and
that
they
they
will
be
prepared.
The
council
will
know
to
refer
them
to
us,
and
then
we
consider
it.
In
accordance
with
those
criteria,
I
mean
to
Sean's
Point
yeah.
You
know
whether
or
not
a
person
was
quote
unquote.
A
good
person
is
not
exactly
a
Criterion
that
you
know
one
can
mandate
then
there'll
certainly
be.
E
C
C
C
A
year
it
happens
in
October
and
in
April,
so
we
definitely
if
we
have
decided
that
we're
going
to
hear
these
applications.
We
should
have
some
protocols
in
place
so
that
the
applications
can
be
done
in
a
manner
that
they
can
go
before
city
council
by
April.
Otherwise,
we're
going
to
be
in
the
same
place
that
we
are
now.
C
A
Just
a
quick
comment
to
what
Barney
had
said
in
the
chat
I
wrote.
There
was
plenty
of
Street
namings,
in
fact
former
council
member
of
this
District.
That's
all
they
spent
time
doing
I
believe
and
we
can
look
on
the
record
as
far
as
legislation
passed
versus
the
amount
of
Street,
namings,
I
I
think
they're
about
equivalent,
if
not
more
so,
on,
Street
namings,
so
and
I.
C
C
B
To
click
find
your
point
on
what
what
was
just
decided,
we
will
hear
the
board
will
hear
them
upon
request,
or
are
we
going
to
reach
out
to
council
members
once
criteria
are
developed
to
say
you
know
it
is
our
preference
to
hear
all
Street
cone
aimings
before
they
move
forward
in
the
city
council
and
invite
them
to
bring
their
proposals
before
us?
Are
we
only
are
we
going
to
still
refer
people
who
come
to
this
office
asking
what
the
process
is
to
the
council
members
and
do
it
only
upon
council
member
request.
C
No
I
would
only
to
the
Merit
of
pointing
out
the
fact
that
we
don't
want
to
hear
an
application
that
might
be
contrary
to
a
council
member's
position
on
speaker
namings
in
their
District
I
would
only
I
would
recommend
to
the
board
that
we
only
hear
applications
that
come
from
council
members
that
is
so
of
an
application
an
applicant
reaches
out
to
the
office.
They
will
be
deferred
to
their
council
member.
The
council
member
feels
it's
worthy.
They
will
come
back
to
us
and
I.
C
Okay,
so
getting
back
to
what
I
was
talking
about
so
I'll
tell
you
what
a
community
board
eight
is
doing.
It's
the
honoree
meets
the
guidelines
set
forth.
Fourth
by
city
council
and
the
application
should
be
submitted
to
the
board
office
and
will
be
reviewed
by
their
livable
streets
committee.
So
they
have
a
committee
called
livable
streets
that
is
hearing
these
applications.
If
the
application
is
approved
on
principal,
that
means
that
they
have
met
those
got.
You
know
there.
C
There
is
some
principle
there
that
it
should
be
reviewed
further.
The
applicant
shall
petition
the
community
and
will
provide
proof
of
notice
to
Residents
and
businesses
within
a
reasonable
radius.
These
documents
will
be
brought
before
the
committee
for
review
in
a
in
a
formal
meeting
during
a
regularly
scheduled
committee
meeting.
If
the
committee
approves
the
final
documents,
a
recommendation
of
approval
will
be
brought
before
the
full
board
for
a
vote.
So
that's
community
board.
C
Eight
community
board
five
requires
that
a
petition
of
residents
and
individuals
in
a
two
block
radius
be
provided
and
then
community
board
six
requires
that
the
honoree
be
deceased.
For
three
years.
City
council
only
requires
two
years:
a
petition
of
50
signatures
within
one
quarter,
mile
of
the
proposed
location
and
20
of
those
50
signatures
will
be
from
residents
or
businesses
on
the
street
itself.
C
E
I
think
there's
some
great
ideas
in
there
I
think
we
could
pick
and
choose
from
those
and
maybe
others
from
other.
You
know
boards
and
I
think
a
task
force.
You
know
sort
of
ad
hoc,
just
hammer
out,
you
know,
recommendations
and
bring
it
to
the
board
for
a
vote,
and
then
we
have
the
criteria
set
so
that
that
sounds
like
an
excellent
ideal
way
to
pursue
foreign.
C
C
That's
my
is,
let
me
just
ask
you
how
many
people
here
would
sit
on
an
ad
hoc
committee?
It
doesn't
have
to
be
many
people,
it's
just
a
matter
of
maybe
one
meeting,
which
would
probably
be
an
hour
long
just
to
hammer
out
and
make
recommendations
to
the
full
Board
of
what
those
guidelines
would
look
like
additional
guidelines
to
what
the
council
member
what
the
city
council
already
has
in
place.
So
how
many
people
here
would
be
willing
to
sit
on
it.
C
I
see
one
two,
let's
see
four
okay,
we've
got,
we've
got
some
people
all
right,
okay,
so
I'm.
Sorry
I
just
want
to
read
some
of
the
things
that
are
in
the
chat:
okay,
alrighty,
so
good
I
appreciate
everyone
who
put
their
hand
up
I'm,
counting
on
you
to
at
least
be
at
that
that
one
meeting
where
you
can
deliberate
over
adding
some
of
these
Concepts
from
other
Community
boards,
so
I
guess
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
to
form
a
very
short-lived
ad
hoc
committee
called
the
street
code.
C
Anyone
opposed
to
forming
this
ad
hoc
committee,
all
right
so
at
our
general
meeting.
I
will
put
it
before
the
full
board
as
a
recommendation
from
the
executive
committee
and
interested
board
members
to
form
this
small
ad
hoc
committee,
which
we'll
just
go
ahead
and
bolster
the
city
council
guidelines
with
some
thoughtful.
B
Go
ahead
at
the
risk
of
saving
undemocratic
for
the
second,
not
time
in
the
night
would
the
would
the
ad
hoc
committee
be
limited
to
the
people
who
are
on
this
meeting
tonight
so
that
they
already
have
the
benefit
of
the
conversation
the
background
going
into
it?
Are
you
going
to
open
it
to
the
full
board?
B
C
C
So
if
we
can
go
ahead
and
get
a
commitment
from
the
people
who
raise
their
hand
here
say
that
you
are
the
Slate
I'd
be
happy
to
announce
this
late
at
the
meeting,
then
it's
one
and
done,
and
then
we
will
schedule
the
meeting,
probably
in
January,
get
that
hammered
out
and
we'll
get
them
approved
by
February,
so
we'll
be
ready
for
April.
How
does
that
sound?
Sean
sounds.
B
C
Here
all
right,
well
again,
I
want
to
thank
everybody
who
volunteered
to
do
that.
I.
Think
you
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
productive
than
trying
to
hammer
it
out
tonight
and
you
could
be
a
little
bit
more
thoughtful
and
we
can
share
some
links
with
you
with
the
other
community
boards
and
you'll
have
some
some
already
known
anybody
gotcha
all
right
just
reading
in
the
chat
all
right.
C
C
I
think
a
lot
I
think
many
people
will
agree
with
me
that
it
was.
It
was
a
good
experience
to
have
the
general
meeting
in
person
and
the
when
we,
so
we
can't
100
be
sure
if
the
state
of
emergency
in
New
York
City
is
going
to
continue
it's
being
renewed
on
a
month-by-month
basis,
I
think
right
now
it's
been
renewed
up
until
January.
If
memory
serves
me
correctly,
it's
January
22nd
the
way
the
open
meeting
law
is
construed.
C
Now,
however,
most
of
our
work
done
is
work
of
our
most
of
the
work
that
is
done
in
this
community
board
is
in
committee,
and
so
we
Sean
and
I
met
with
our
legal
committee
for
attorneys
on
this
board
three
members
and
we
went
over
the
opens
meeting
open
meeting
law
and
it
was
determined
that
if
there
are
no
binding
decisions
made
during
committee
meetings,
which
there
are
no
binding
decisions,
they're
usually
recommendations.
We
can
continue
to
meet.
C
C
We
need
to
have
another
resolution
to
form
or
to
you
know,
organize
how
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
meeting
based
on
the
fact
that
the
concept
of
a
state
of
emergency,
especially
a
public
state
of
Public
Health
state
of
emergency,
is
sort
of
not
guaranteed
right.
Now,
it's
really
just
based
on
the
the
mayor's
renewal
of
such
so.
C
It's
already
been
stated
that
we
don't
have
the
capability
yet
to
have
hybrid
meetings,
so
they
will
be
in
person
and
they
will
be
live
streamed,
but
there
will
be
no
two-way.
You
know
communication
between
those
that
are
offside
and
those
that
are
on
site
and
then
all
the
committee
meetings
will
remain
as
remote
by
a
WebEx
I
see
that
there
are
a
few
hands
up,
but
I
want
to
get
to
those
questions
before
I
say
any
for
anything
further.
So
Deborah
Valentin,
you
have
your
hand
up.
G
Yeah
I
had
a
couple
of
quick
questions.
One
I
I
was
noting
that
or
I
guess
I've
noted
that
in
some
other
community
boards
there
is
a
brief
public
session
speaking
at
the
beginning
of
the
general
board
meeting
in
part,
because
they
often
have
recommendations
from
committees,
but
not
everyone
necessarily
goes
to
them,
and
so
when
there
is
a
public
vote
they
like
to
have
some
another.
G
You
know
chance
for
people
who
maybe
don't
have
good
access
remotely
or
something
to
have
these
meetings
to
to
weigh
in
before
the
decision
is
made.
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
this
board
should
be
considering
or
if
it's
something
you
know,
I,
don't
really
know
how
some
boards
got
got
to
this
structure
versus
hours.
Where
we
don't
have,
you
know,
don't
have
any
discussion.
G
You
know
I
think
like
when
I
read
the
the
topic
of
like
attendance
here,
one
of
the
questions
I
had
a
little
bit
was
or
in
the
the
email
about.
This
was
just
that
I
didn't
know
if
there
was
a
goal
to
try
to
like
increase
attendance
generally
among
board
members
and
the
public
at
our
meetings.
I
certainly
think,
that's
something
that
you
know
I
think
most
board
members
would
agree.
G
G
The
general
board
meeting
is
the
most
accessible
meeting
for
people
to
get
to
because
those
dates
have
been
announced
like
basically
a
year
in
advance,
and
then
the
committee
meeting
sometimes
coming
out
like
since
they
don't
have
a
regular
schedule,
I
think
has
posed
some
issues
for
people
I
know
in
the
community
to
make
it
to
meetings
that
they
want
to
go
to
and
I
know
it's
a
little
easier
with
WebEx
and
doing
them
virtually.
But
it
was
just
you
know.
Like
I
said.
G
I
know
this
might
not
be
the
topic
here,
but
it's
something
that
I've
been
hearing
a
lot
about
and
might
be
worth
thinking
about,
because
maybe
that
you
know
maybe
that
informs
a
little
bit
of
why
people
have
some
public
comment
at
the
beginning
before
decisions
are
officially
made.
If
that
makes
sense,.
C
Yeah,
so
the
practice
of
the
sport
is
that
we
do
not
have
discussions
in
the
general
meeting
that
of
about
topics
that
we've
had
at
the
committee
meeting,
because
we've
just
had
an
hour
an
hour
and
a
half
a
two-hour
meeting
in
a
committee.
So,
unlike
maybe
other
boards
who
don't
freely,
give
out
the
WebEx
access
so
that
the
public
can
ask
questions
if
you
contact
the
community
board
for
if
you
contact
community
board
14,
you
will
give
you
the
web
WebEx
link.
C
So
everyone
is
free
to
join
a
meeting
and
if
they
have
comments
they
can
raise
their
hand
and
they
will
be
called
on
by
the
co-chairs.
So
it
just
doesn't
make
sense
for
us
to
have
a
public
comment
period
in
the
beginning
of
a
general
meeting
about
matters
that
we've
already
discussed
and
then
regarding
agenda.
A
C
Sometimes
we
reserve
those
committee
meetings
to
revolve
around
something
significant,
that's
going
on
in
the
district,
so,
unfortunately
having
a
month's
notice
for
a
taco
committee
is
the
way
that
it
is
because
they're
more
topical
and
they're
more
relevant
to
the
time
at
hand.
I
hope
that
answers
your
question.
H
H
This
upcoming
December
one,
each
monthly
board
meeting
through
June,
would
be
in
person,
or
would
that
mean
that,
if
the
board,
if
the
committee
votes
yesterday,
it
would
mean
effective
the
January
board
meeting
each
one
would
be
in
person
through
June,
so
I'm
just
wondering
what
would
be
the
start
if
the
board
votes?
Yes,.
I
B
B
I
B
F
Good
evening,
how
are
you
a
few
points?
Number
one
I
think
personal
meetings
are
great,
unfortunately,
not
everybody's
able
to
make
them
now
that
we
have
this
new
thing
that
we
can
go
on
WebEx.
Maybe
it's
a
possibility
for
those
members
aren't
able
to
make
it
some
personal
reasons
that
they
can
be
put
on
WebEx
for
the
meeting
at
least
to
hear
and
see
it.
What's
going
on
for
one
number,
two
I
noticed
a
new
thing
on
the
agenda
for
this
month.
F
B
Okay,
that
that's
been
heard
and
I'll
and
I'll
see
if
we
can
get
the
plans
from
Jake,
Olson
I
did
a
15-minute
hearing,
because
past
experience
has
shown
that
that
has
been
sufficient.
So
I
was
going
based
on
that
and
then
the
huge,
the
huge
time
like
we
had
in
between
the
last
one
and
then
just
to
be
clear.
The
reason
why
I
put
the
public
Hearing
in
front
of
the
board
meeting
instead
of
having
a
separate
night
for
it,
was
because
the
public
hearing
since
it
is
it
is
actionable.
B
I
think
pardon
me
I
think
it
was
decided
that
public
hearings
and
board
meetings-
and
this
is
Up
For
Debate,
but
public
hearings
and
board
meetings
should
be
public,
whereas
committee
meetings
can
still
be
held
remotely
because
they
aren't
finding
and
the
legal
committee
can
jump
and
if
I've
Mangum.
But
that's
why
the
public
hearings
are
now
all
before
the
board
meeting
and
and.
F
F
B
Yeah
well,
the
hard
copies
will
be
available
as
they've
always
been
at
the
regular
public
hearings
in
the
past.
So
those
paper
copies
should
be
available.
The
night
of,
but
I
will
ask
the
the
attorneys
to
make
sure
that
we
have
digital
copies
that
can
be
distributed
to
the
board
members
and
I'll.
Let
you
know
what
they
say
and
if
they
say
okay,
then
we'll
distribute
them.
B
F
C
Yeah
we
we
this
this,
this
public
hearing
and
this
general
meeting
fees
and
for
this
foreseeable
future
will
there
will
not
be
a
WebEx
link
to
join.
You
will
only
be
able
to
watch
these
live
meetings,
this
public
hearing
and
these
General
meetings
by
a
live
stream
on
YouTube.
This
is
not
going
to
be
on
webinars
because
we
don't
have
the
capability
to
do
a
hybrid
right
now.
F
F
C
C
But
I
I
just
want
to
touch
upon
the
fact
that
once
the
emergency,
the
the
disaster
emergency
evaporates
from
the
city,
the
way
that
you
co-chairs
are
going
to
be
doing
things
in
committee
has
to
change
a
little
bit.
With
regards
to
recommendations,
you
won't
be
able
to
solicit
a
vote
among
the
board
members
and
committee
members
that
are
present.
C
You'll
only
be
able
to
find
consensus
because
again,
if
it's,
if
it's
a
virtual
meeting,
it's
non-binding
so
you'll,
basically,
you
know
and
we'll
set
forth
a
set
of
you
know
a
a
language
that
you
can
use
when
there
is
no
state
of
emergency
by
saying.
Do
I
have
a
consensus
rather
than
asking
for
a
vote.
C
A
E
Yeah,
actually,
the
first
thing
I
had
been
planning
to
say
is
the
I'm,
probably
stating
the
obvious,
but
I,
think
it's
great
to
have
the
committee
meeting
zoomed,
because
they're
recorded
I
mean
up
until
Zoom.
We
did
not
even
you
know,
keep
minutes
from
our
committee
meetings
and
I
found
it
hugely
valuable
to
be
able
to
like
go
back
scroll
through
fast
forward
for
certain
things
and
to
have
you
know
a
complete,
accurate
recording
of
the
events
of
that
particular
committee.
E
But
coming
back
to
the
other
topic
that
was
just
discussed,
I
feel
very
strongly
that
we
should
not
I
see
moving
back
to
consensus
as
a
big
step
backwards
for
the
board.
I
really
believe
that
it's
important
that
people
be
able
to
feel
that
they
can
cast
a
vote
to
abstain
or
deny
in
and
that
it
would
be
recorded
and
that
the
search
for
a
consensus
in
every
occasion,
I
feel
disenfranchises
people
if
a
certain
number
of
people
just
all
of
a
sudden,
pipe
up
and
say
yeah
yeah.
That
sounds
a
good
idea.
E
So
I
would
be
very,
very
interested
to
hear
if
other
boards
feel
similarly
constrained.
I.
Don't
think
that
something
is
binding
until
the
four
to
my
interpretation
until
the
full
board
votes
on
it
and
that
the
committee
can
vote
on
making
a
recommendation
to
the
full
board.
But
I,
don't
think.
Each
committee
should
be
bound
to
Simply,
put
forth
a
consensus
and
not
for
people
to
feel
free
that
they
can
express
their
dissent
by
actually
being
able
to
say
no
or
abstain
them.
E
C
You're
not
let
me
speak
to
that
for
a
minute
and
I
think
it's
just
a
matter
of
how
a
co-chair
is
going
to
handle
the
room.
I
think
it's
about
you're,
not
looking
for
consensus,
you're
you're
for
lack
of
a
better
word.
You
know,
do
I,
you
know,
do
I
have
a
consensus
and
people
can
turn
to
you
and
say
no
I
do
not
agree
with
this
issue
and
the
end
result
can
be.
It
was
a
draw
or
there
was
no
consensus
to
be
found.
C
C
C
L
So
it's
it's
going
to
be
a
balancing
act.
Really,
you
know
how
we
move
forward.
So
maybe
if
it's
not
consensus,
maybe
still
reporting
what
the
meaningful
input
from
the
committee
was,
can
still
help
the
board
move
forward
from
there,
but
it
it
it's.
It's
just
going
to
be
very
we're.
Gonna
have
to
be
very
careful
about
it,
just
to
make
sure
we
don't
run
a
foul
so
that
that's
that's
what
we've
been
trying
to
wrestle
with.
C
I
mean
that
we're
having
this
discussion
right
now,
because
we
really
want
to
retain
the
robust
public
engagement
that
we've
had
over
the
past.
You
know
what
close
to
30
months
and
not
just
you
know
and
not
just
lose
all
that,
and
you
know,
once
the
disaster
emergency
is
lifted
and
not
renewed.
Then
there's
two
choices:
we
lose
public
engagement,
we
have
our
meetings
in
the
in
the
office
and
you
can
have
all
the
votes
you
want,
or
we
can
really.
E
So
it'll
be
basically
at
the
chairs
discretion
to
ask
whether
or
not
it'd
be
virtual
or
in
person
just
on
the
basis
of
the
agenda.
For
a
particular
I
mean
it
doesn't
have
to
be
Global
over
the
course
of
a
year,
but
is
basically
the
option
going
to
be
up
to
the
chairs
on
the
basis
of
whether
or
not
they
foresee
a
potentially,
you
know
voting
issue
as
to
whether
or
not
it
could
be
by
Zoom
or
it
could
be
in
person.
C
So
you
know
know:
I
can
certainly
see
in
transportation.
I
can
certainly
see
the
issues
going
on
in
Prospect
Park
South
with
the
flooding
that
meeting
probably
should
be
in
person
or
maybe
it
might
not
be
based
on.
You
know
you
might
want
to
have
the
widest
sloth
swath
of
opinions.
So
it's
going
to
be
a
balancing.
A
C
B
I
I
can
answer
that.
The
short
answer
is
yes:
there's
been
far
more
participation
remotely
than
there
was
in
person,
and
that
goes
for
the
board
too
I
mean
Glenn
Wallen
used
to
be
the
only
one
who
came
to
all
committee
meetings,
and
now
he
has
company
at
meetings
outside
of
his
own
committee
with
other
board
members
so
and
I
could
get
that.
I
could
get
that
Quantified
I
could
look
at
sign-in
sheets
from
the
days
of
in
person
and
look
at
our
our
list
for
the
following
meetings.
B
But
it's
been
it's.
It's
been
significantly
greater
online
and
Arden
I
I
wanted
to
kind
of
jump
in
on
steering
a
meeting
that
if,
if
something
becomes
unexpectedly
dramatic,
the
committee
could
always
table
that
item
into
a
board.
You
know
up
into
a
board
meeting
or
or
recognize
that
it
might
now
rise
to
the
merits
of
a
public
hearing
and
table
it
for
a
public
hearing,
so
I
don't
think
anybody's,
really
trapped
into
anything
and
I.
Think.
B
As
far
as
consensus
goes,
anybody
who
had
you
know
a
consensus
doesn't
mean
you
agree
with
the
thing.
It
means
that
it
came
to
some
resolution
that
you
could
at
least
live
with
to
bring
forward
so
that
it
lives
on
for
a
proposal
that
you
can
then
still
vote
against.
You're,
not
you're,
not
trapped
into
supporting
it
once
it
moves
forward.
B
It's
just
a
matter
of
is
this
now
in
good
enough
shape
to
bring
before
the
full
board,
for
you
know,
discussion
ratification
if
that
makes
sense
right,
yeah
I
think
that's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
Oh
I
do
have
one
more
thing
to
add
and
about
the
hybrid
meetings.
I,
don't
know
Joanne
you
touched
on
it,
but
in
order
to
meet
the
criteria
to
hold
a
hybrid
meeting,
it's
it's
not
like.
B
Whoever
wants
to
come
can
come
and
whoever
wants
to
stay
home
can
stay
home,
the
the
legal
definition
or
the
legal
Merit
that
has
to
be
met.
Is
you
still
have
to
have
a
physical
Quorum
in
the
room,
so
you
have
to
have
enough
board
members
who
are
saying
I'm
willing
to
show
up
in
person,
and
then
you
have
to
know
that
you're
going
to
make
Quorum
by
that
number
and
then
you're
going
to
have
to
know
who's
going
to
come,
and
then
the
people
who
participate
remotely
have
to
have
a
significant
reason.
B
I
I,
don't
know
if
that's
the
word
significant
substantial,
something
like
that
and
then
there's
a
little
bit
of
controversy,
and
this
is
why
I
got
Snappy
about
pearl
Hall.
There's
some
controversy
over
whether
or
not
that
reason
has
to
be
certified
somehow
or
if
you
can
self-report
I'm,
not
sure
Joanne.
If
burlboard
ever
came
to
a
final
resolution,.
C
I
mean
it's
just
ongoing,
it's
like
we,
we
came
up
with
something
to
you
know
just
to
be
able
to
work
with,
but
it's
going
to
be
amended
every
single
time
I
mean
yeah,
it
was.
It
was
a
struggle.
I
took
a
special
meeting.
It
took
another
40
minutes
of
another
meeting,
just
to
come
up
with
procedures
for
a
hybrid
meeting
right.
B
B
C
And
and
just
a
circle
back
I
mean
and
Sean
brings
up
a
good
point.
You
know
the
the
discussion,
the
the
the
meat
of
the
discussion
of
your
issue
is
going
to
occur
in
your
committee
meeting
right,
but
your
vote
is
still.
The
vote
is
still
gonna
happen
by
the
full
board
and
board.
Members
still
have
an
opportunity
to
stand
up
at
the
general
meeting
to
talk
about
what
went
on
in
the
topical
committee
and
how
they
feel
about
it.
C
G
Yeah
I'll
try
to
make
this
quick,
I
guess
just
I
think
it
was
at
the
lunch
and
learn
series
that
there
was
I
was
watching
that
there
was
some
suggestion
of
holding
kind
of
like
a
public
feedback
session
and
then
like
a
discussion
session
and
I
sort
of
wonder.
If
they're,
you
know
just
as
an
idea,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
something
in
the
resolution,
but
like
a
possible
thing,
would
be
to
have
a
meeting
a
committee
meeting
held.
G
You
know
that
what
like
some
contingents
or
some
you
know
some
groups
of
constituents
like
particularly
disabled
right
bus
riders,
for
instance,
might
not
be
as
able
to
attend
an
in-person
meeting
and
I
think
it's
very
valuable
that
we
would
hear
them.
I
say
that
both
from
the
general
accessibility
issues
of
in-person
meetings,
but
also
with
an
ongoing
pandemic,
whether
or
not
there's
an
ongoing
state
of
emergency.
G
So
just
something
I
wonder
if
that's
something
that
can
also
be
considered
to
have
a
public,
a
virtual
feedback
session
as
part
of
the
meeting
and
then
something
you
know.
I,
don't
want
to
like
put
more
time
on
people
as
volunteers
like
I,
know
it's
very
hard
to
get
to
a
lot
of
meetings,
sometimes
for
people,
but
just
would
feel
bad,
not
throwing
that
out.
There.
C
C
D
Sorry
about
that
not
exactly
new
business,
but
there
was
an
assignment
that
Shahid
and
I
were
given
way
back
pre-covered
about
I,
guess
like
about
I
guess,
criteria
for
for
Sean
and
I
just
wanted
to
see.
I
know
we
we
gave
like
Sean
an
evaluation
recently,
but
I
wasn't
sure
if
that,
if,
if
what
should
and
I
were
asked
to
do,
if
that's
still
something
that
that
should
be
done
or
if
it's
kind
of
been
already
taken
care
of
going
forward.
B
B
A
C
C
Seconded
second,
all
righty
no
further
delay.
This
meeting
is
adjourned
at
7
42..
Thank
you.
Everybody
have
a
good
week
and
I
will.
If
I
don't
see
you
I'll
see
you
at
the
general
meeting,
feel
better
Joanne.
There's
a
house
thanks:
everybody,
housing
and
land
use
Thursday,
be
there
be
square
it'll,
be
a
good
one.