►
Description
For the meeting agenda please visit: https://www.cb14brooklyn.com/meetings
A
B
B
Everyone
welcome
back
straight
into
it.
This
public
hearing
is
called
to
order
at
6
31
pm
on
September
7th
2023
at
the
Brooklyn
community
board
14
district
office.
The
purpose
of
this
hearing
is
to
hear
public
testimony
with
respect
to
a
special
permanent
application
to
the
board
of
standard
and
appeals.
Calendar
number
2023-21-bz.
B
application
has
been
made
pursuant
to
section
73-622
of
the
zoning
resolution
of
the
city
of
New
York,
to
request
a
special
permit
to
allow
the
enlargement
of
an
existing
single-family
home
in
an
R2
zoning
District.
Contrary
to
the
underlying
floor
area,
far
ZR
23-141,
open
space,
osr,
z,
r,
23-141,
side
yard,
zr23-461a
and
rear
yard,
ZR
23-47
requirements.
B
If
members
of
the
public
wish
to
testify
on
this
issue,
you
must
registered
for
time,
please
sign
up
at
the
back
table
with
Sarah.
Please
stay
clearly
for
the
record
you,
if
you're
a
resident
and
or
organization.
If
you
are
representative,
this
first
speaker
will
be
the
representative
for
the
applicant
and
I
want
to
welcome
Jay
Goldstein
here
and
presenting
for
the
applicant
will
be
Bonnie
Rose.
B
C
B
B
B
Okay,
so
the
application
that
we
are
bringing
before
you
tonight
is
for
an
enlargement
of
the
existing
two-story
and
sellers
similar
family
home
located
at
1337,
East
24th
Street.
B
Then,
as
mentioned
the
science
of
an
Autism
District,
it
has
approximately
5
000
square
feet
of
rock
Dahlia
and
I'm,
just
as
the
housekeeper
wrote
wrote
this
for
tonight's
hearing
was
distributed
to
community
members
within
400
feet
of
the
property
and
was
fair
slide.
Please,
the
applications
are
seeking
an
enlargement
of
the
hand
at
the
floors
at
all
levels,
as
well
as
at
the
rear,
we're
selling
through
second
service
to
considerate.
This
we
are
seeking
out
of
Hawaii.
B
Towards
the
South
and
our
most
application
will
just
seek
a
straight
line.
Extension
of
those
side
yards
straight
back
and
just
as
the
sun
inside
yard
is
compliant.
So
this
will
really
just
be
ordered
from
outside.
Here
additional
programs,
which
is
proposed
to
be
too
much,
we
can
find
front
yards.
B
B
Next
slide,
please
at
the
first
floor,
expanded
kitchen
environment
area
as
well
as
a
failure
next
slide.
Please
I
was
second
floor.
We
enlarged
my
mother
for
a
master
suite
bathroom,
as
well
as
an
additional
and
a
laundry
room
next
slide.
Please.
B
As
well
as
an
additional
alphabet,
so
at
this
point,
if
there
are
any
questions,
just
a
quick
recap.
B
Extension
of
existing
side
efforts,
if
there
are
any
questions,
I'd,
be
very
happy
to
address
them.
Thank
you.
Yes,
I
just
I,
don't
see
any
members
of
the
public
here,
hi.
B
B
A
D
F
B
B
Sure
foreign.
B
So
and
I'm
not
quite
interesting
where
it
says:
263
chips
on
the
east
side
of
the
building,
which
is
different,
learn
right.
This
entire
facade
is
going
to
be
side.
B
B
So
basically
the
existing
Mouse,
expanding
and
fund
plan.
B
B
Thank
you
following
question.
We
find
third
members
of
the
congressman
Cesar.
A
B
Thanks
for
your
question,
so
that's
not
part
of
the
proven
patient
work
application,
and
so
so
I
was
hoping
that
to
account
I'll
send
a
contact.
But
basically
my
question
is
in
the
time
that
I've
been
here.
They
have
been
questions
where,
even
if
those
bars
underneath
the
one
now
I've
always.
C
C
So
be
seeking
to
increase,
it
definitely
are
as
well.
So
thank
you.
A
D
A
B
Thanks
for
your
question,
if
we
could
go
back
towards
the
second
second
slide,
that
one
thank
you
gives
you
a
sense
of
what
the
scales
above
additional
consumers
would
be.
The
options
application.
B
In
terms
of
car
I'm,
not
certain
how
many
cars
the
family
owns,
they
do
have
one
existing
garage,
so
I'm,
you
know
I'm
assuming,
but
everyone
plans.
Thank
you.
B
So
we've
been
operating
for
the
past
two
years,
remotely
with
public
hearings
for
these
special
applications
and
in
order
to
gain
consensus,
we've
taken
a
formal
vote
because
it's
the
sweeps
you
do
it
online.
Typically,
when
we've
met
in
person
before
that
it
was
always
done
by
consensus,
and
this
predates
movie
chair,
but
I've
sat
on
a
few
public
hearings,
so
I'd
like
to
try
to
go
back
to
where
we
were
and
I
would
start
by
asking.
Does
anyone
have
any
objections
for
this
special
permit.
B
Okay,
so
then
I
I
think
that
the
consensus
here
is
that
make
a
recommendation
to
the
full
board
on
Monday
to
approve
to
recommend
to
approve
the
special
permit.
B
A
C
B
B
2023-27-Bz
3199
Bedford
Avenue
block
2607
lot.
15.
application
has
made
pursuant
to
sections
73-6c
622
of
the
Zone
resolution
of
the
city
of
New
York
Special
permit
to
allow
the
enlargement
of
an
existing
zoo
family
implemented.
Opportune
zoning
District,
contrary
to
the
underlying
floor
area,
23-141,
open
space,
OS,
osr,
ZR,
23-141,
side
yard,
zr23-4618,
ZR,
23-47
requirements.
B
If
members
of
the
public
relationship
testify
on
this
issue,
you
must
register
for
time.
Please
sign
up
at
the
back
table
with
Sarah.
Please
stay
clearly
for
the
record
if
you're
a
resident
or
organization.
If
you
are
representative,
there's
a
speaker,
the
first
speaker
will
be
the
representative
to
the
applicant
I
want
to
welcome.
Jay
Goldstein,
representative
and
representative
will
be
Bonnie
Rose.
B
63
and
once
again,
requests
as
well
as
inspired
improved
seeking
straight
line
extensions.
B
B
B
B
B
A
Is
subject
to
an
exposing?
Well,
could
you
just
describe
what
the
differences
are
between
what
was
previously
improved
and
what
is
being
proposed
here,
and
they
mentioned
there
are
some
changes
and
maybe
it's
reduced.
So
if
you
just
kind
of
walking
through
sure.
B
16.
different
on
side
yards
are
11
feet
which
is
inches
somewhere
seeking.
A
F
Is
this?
Is
this
an
application
because
of
the
changes
instead
of
being
a
special?
It
would
be
a
SOC
if
it
had
been
the
same,
but
it
has
to
be
a
whole
application
because
of
the
changes.
B
B
So
a
question
from
board
member
for
his
own
body,
update
I,
also
wanted
it.
The
neighbor
on
the
left
responded
to
what
about
and
was
curious
about,
the
expiration
date.
That
was
why
I
was
obviously
in
this
question,
but.
B
A
B
You
any
additional
questions,
just
some
question
from
the
board
member
Talisha
stainville.
Thank
you
so
I
just
have
just
for
clarification.
Can
I
see
the
plans
again.
B
So
that
they're,
actually
already
three
bedrooms
at
the
second
floor
in
terms
of
net
Edition
being
added,
is
the
master
bedroom.
B
A
B
Did
you
again
Bonnie,
so
the
feedback
on
both
yourself
could.
B
Yes,
on
the
the
front
yard
would
still
be
compliant
at
the
second
Point
yeah.
It
would
be
15
feet,
so
it
would
change
from
existing
metrics,
but
it
would
still
before
you
complain
that
question.
B
Any
other
questions
alrighty
do
we
have
any
objections
to
the
special
permit?
B
No
one
objects
so
can
I
assume
the
consensus
is
that
we
will
meet
the
recommendation
to
the
full
board
to
approve
recommendation
to
approve
the
special
permit.
All
right
see
a
lot
of
heads.
Okay,
great
I'm
gonna
make
that
recommendation
to
the
full
board
to
approves
the
special
permit.
Thank
you.
Everyone
and
this
public
hearing
is
adjourned
at
7
pm.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
All.
C
D
B
Please
this
public
hearing
is
called
to
order
from
Thursday
September
7th
2023
at
704
P.M
community
board
14
district
office.
The
purpose
of
this
hearing
is
to
invite
public
comment
on
major
African
Communications
on
Zoning
for
carbon
neutrality,
which
will
be
submitted
to
the
city
planning
motion
or
compiled
during
the
season.
14's
Committee
of
the
home
that
was
held
virtually
on
Monday
August
21st
2023.
B
You
know
that
Community
board's
office
is
during
July
and
August
board
housing
engaged
into
zoning
text,
Amendment
proposal
on
several
intrusions
December
15
2022
housing
units
committee
for
the
presentation
from
planning
fellow
Federal
Morgan
Luther,
introducing
texting
women,
a
letter
of
the
public
review
process.
Amendments.
B
June
12
2023
General
board
meeting
where
we
discussed
and
modified
the
recommendations
to
be
submitted
as
preliminary
confidence
to
gcp
August
21st
2023
Committee
of
the
home
during
leaders
to
organize
a
recommendation
further
so
that
event
can
be
ratified
at
the
general
meeting
of
the
board.
Monday
September,
11th
and
so
I
went
to
CBC
I
had
their
schedule
moving
on
September
13th
review.
B
B
Therefore,
the
Planning
Commission
will
be
taking
their
decision
without
a
finding
document.
Didn't
11
provide
comments
at
the
barber
board
that
affect
the
needs
of
this
Draft
before
us.
Those
will
be
included
on
the
board's
recommendations
to
CPC
those
wishing
to
ask
questions
or
testify
and
see
for
the
record
Union
organization
in
the
applicable
find
prior
to
giving
testimony.
Testimony
will
be
limited
to
two
minutes.
B
F
She
expressed
some
ongoing
concerns
about
solar
panel
installations,
some
of
those
kind
of
seem
to
be
based
on
an
understanding
that
they
can
be
required,
and
so,
since
they
are
not
I,
don't
think
that
that
has
to
be
with
our
concern
reflected
in
comments.
F
Others
were
just
about
educational
programs
that
should
go
along
with
carbon
neutrality,
which
wouldn't
be
part
of
this
application,
but
we
can
take
that
moment.
Agencies
and
then
other
concerns
are
reflected
in
our
comments,
such
as
tree,
canopy
and
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
I
think
that
those
comments
will
be
reflected.
B
Thank
you
very
much.
I
want
to
know
that
I
received
an
email
from
Boardman
croissant
and
he
improved
some
additions.
Just
grammatical
and
just
you
know,
keep
changing
some
time
to
Graphics
well
Eric.
This
is
so
it
didn't
change
the
body
of
the
draft
that
you
have
before
you,
but
we
appreciate
the
the
oversight
I'll.
Thank
you.
Much
appreciated
I'd
like
to
open
up
the
floor
too
and
start
a
discussion.
If
you
have
any
questions
on
the
draft
that
you've
received
our
board
members
team
plan.
C
C
B
Understanding
has
been
mostly
like
the
fire
issues
are
just
related
to,
like
you
know,
batteries
that
have
been
bought
by
like
third
parties
that
just
like
have
like
technical
issues
with
them
like
I'm,
not
aware
of
like
the
major
issues
with
like
charging
charging
stations.
Irons-
and
this
comes
from
an
electric
vehicle.
B
So
this
document
is
the
conversation
that
took
place
at
the
committee
of
the
whole
I.
Don't
remember
the
conversation
about
this
I.
F
Another
PCP
public
hearing
stating
that
they
didn't,
they
simply
did
not
I,
think,
was
storage
and
residential
zones.
As
of
right
and
fda's
common
group.
They
simply
did
not
have
any
experience
fighting
with
the
environmental
requirements
on
roofs,
so
that
that
was
where
I
recall
that
the
concern
came
from
as
of
right
in
residentialism
without
any
sort
of
prescription
as
to
what
it
would
be
right
up
at
the
ground.
B
So
then
are
we
is
the
request
that
extrapolating
from
Storage
on
roofs
and
concerns
from
safety,
based
on
the
fact
that
epidemic
had
an
experience,
fighting
battery
storage
on
moves,
we
are.
We
are
reflecting
the
same
concept
onto
the
ground.
B
This
this
start
this.
This
is
not
illegal
right.
This
conversation,
this
is
where
we're
talking
about
charges
stations
that
are
charging
stations
pipelines
by
Corrals,
yeah
I,
guess
you
know
my
conclusion
is
solely
with
regard
to
the
burden
to
charging
stations.
I.
Think
if
you
took
that
part
out
it
just
made
it
more
General.
That
seems
fine
to
me.
B
A
Might
might
occur
while
charging,
but
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
a
charging
station
yeah
no
I
I
would
like
on
that
I
think
that
maybe,
if
you
just
take
out
charging
station
and
put
in
energy
storage,
yeah
I'm
thinking
with
the
to
find
term
in
the
text,
amendment
is
whatever
that
term.
Is
you
know
energy
storage
facility
ready,
G,
Storage
right
system
yeah?
Maybe
we
just
swap
out,
then
it
seems
like
a
good
I.
B
In
transportation,
the
expectation
is
that
there
will
be
like
and
scooter
parking
meetings
available
more
widely
as
of
right.
So
are
we
talking
about
charging
for
those
types
of
e-bikes
and
scooters
in
buildings,
because
that's
what
I'm,
seeing
here
in
this
statement,
I
think
that
would
make
more
sense
for
transportation
right.
But
then
it's
going
to
make
more
sense
to
you
now
that
the
concern
is
maybe
not
with
charging
stations
themselves,
but
with
the
actual
Vehicles
being
charged.
B
Sorry,
but
this
with
this
particular
I
think
because
resulting
tax
amendment
makes
a
waveform
one
bike
parking
which
will
include
e-bikes,
which
will
be
charging
facilities.
I,
think
the
concern
is
extrapolated,
but
based
on
fires
of
aftermarket
lithium
batteries,
so
this
would
be
fire
safety.
Education,
pertinent
to
batteries
that
are
reliable,
does.
A
D
E
Yeah
I
think
my
understanding
of
this
is
both
that
the
batteries
themselves
potentially
pose
risks
have
been
uncompliant
and
I.
Think
that
there
are
a
lot
of
ways
that
when
people
build
charging
stations,
they
could
include
ways
to
protect,
say
the
section
of
the
the
bikes
that
are
electric
bikes
that
have
batteries
regardless
of
it.
They
are.
You
are
UL
certified,
relatively
sync
batteries
or
otherwise.
You
know
you
could
put
in
a
few
fire
safety
measures.
E
B
Campaigns
about
OEM
batteries
and
then
we'll
add
the
information
that
the
board
that
board
member
added
about
the
charts
building
charging
stations
that
brick
package
from
malfunctioning
batteries
for
okay.
B
Work
next
anything
any
other
questions,
there's
just
yeah.
No,
you
had
two
yeah
sorry
yeah
I
wanted
the
older
movies
yeah.
So
the
paragraph
three
columns
right
before
energy.
B
It
deals
with
I,
don't
know
foreign
labor
practices,
human
rights
of
workers
around
the
world
and
I,
don't
know
just
reading
it.
I
realize.
B
A
A
Us
locally,
but
we
don't
have
negative
impacts
otherwise,
but
also
wasn't
comparing
like
oh
Romans
fossil
fuels,
which
you
know
those
those
frackings
those
negative
impacts
to
that
so
I
mean
it
just
I
would
think
should
be
concerned
with
local
residents
and
it
seems
like
launcher.
Education
is
good
information
because
there's
just
a
lot
of
lots
of
missions,
so
we're
breathing
out
unless
my
bad
stuff
on
a
daily
basis,
yeah
I
think
you
know
obviously.
A
Know
come
back
over
time
pretty
easy
things
like
that
outside
of
review.
I
mean,
like
you
know,
to
me
it's
like
with
regards
you
know,
based
on
the
fact
that
we
just
had
these
public
hearings.
A
B
Know
what
you
know:
potential
human.
A
B
You
I'm
not
sure
if
you
were
at
the
committee
of
the
whole,
this
statement,
at
least
the
part
of
his
name
I,
think
it's
important,
even
if
it's
outside
of
review,
to
make
note
that.
B
There
is
a
potential
that
we're
making
the
rest
of
the
world
dirty
to
do
so.
I
will
open
it
up
to
the
floor
for
another
comment
and
and
discussion.
E
Hi
yeah.
E
And
I
would
note
that,
as
we
kind
of
centralize,
maybe
electrification
and
other
sorts
of
ideas,
and
to
ask
this-
you
know
the
city
and
the
state
and
federal
government
and
so
forth,
control
of
making
sure
that
that
energy
is
delivered
cleanly
to
us.
So
I
think
that
this
is
maybe
just
so
in
my
view,
I,
like
the
idea
that
you
know
we're
trying
to
make
that
easier
for
them,
as
well
as
part
of
the
consideration
and
I
think
this
looks
awesome.
B
Responsibly,
I
remember
the
first
comments
here.
It's
about
we're
trying
to
make
a
bunch
of
proposals
we're
trying
to
keep
it.
A
C
Member,
oh
I
got
it.
C
B
B
C
B
Well
say
that
the
top
of
my
head
I,
don't
know
of
any
and
I,
don't
know
how
to
include
that
in
this
document.
I
just
remember:
Sean
Campbell.
F
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
it's
this
is
not.
This
is
not
it's
not
a
condition
of
of
approval.
It's
a
question.
It's
a
question
of
what
you
know
what
can
see.
We
do
to
make
a
statement
that
acknowledges
the
you
know,
chair,
labor
and
and
and
even
the
benefits
in
one-time
countries
to
to
various
groups
in
those
countries.
What
can
the
city
do
to
acknowledge?
F
B
So
since
we
have
some
objection
to
this
paragraph,
I
think
what
we'll
do
is
we'll
put
it
to
a
vote
or
whether
to
keep
it
in
the
document.
B
So
I'll
start
with
those
in
favor
of
keeping
it
in
documents,
and
it
doesn't
mean
that
we
don't.
We
can't
change
it
from
where
it
is
now,
but
those
in
favor
keep
you
in
the
document.
If
you
would
raise
your
hands,
please
keep
them
ready
as
to
one
two,
three,
four
five
six
ten
numbers
would
like
to
keep
them
in
recommend
those
objectives.
B
A
C
B
C
A
C
C
F
F
That's
those
note
those
concerns,
but
that
I
I
hear
you
on
I
could
add
enough.
Somebody
calls
her
if
you
know
someone
who's
just
giving
the
importance
to
see
I
think
they'd
said
I'm
about
enough
to
use.
Is
it
do
be
to.
F
C
C
B
That
one
some
thought
over
when
the
22
is
just
introduce
yourself.
E
Yes,
amendments
coming
through
I
think
it'll
be
really
helpful
if
we
can
request
before
the
Euler
period
begins
addition
to
our
presentations
from
DCP,
particularly
as
we
will
pertain
to
water
district,
if
they
could
give
us
kind
of
some
statistics
on
that.
But
I
think
that
would
help
us
have
a
really
not
went
into
this.
This
time
crunch
and
these
Publications.
B
So
let
me
make
a
suggestion
if
I
am
correct,
sees
the
presentations
before
Community
boards
does,
but
we
just
see
programming
and
we
don't
vote
on
it.
We
just
see
the
presentation
and
there's
a
lot
of
seats
that
are
unfilled
in
that
room.
So
when
it's
on
the
calendar
for
borrow
board,
if
board
members
want
to
get
their
feet,
we
should
do
that.
Can.
F
I
answer
that
I
mean
we
did
have
them
come
sometimes
as
a
specific
and
what
a
plan
was
very
hyper
focused
on
our
district
and
there
are
several:
what
do
you
call
them
when
they
have
their
information
sessions?
I
think
there's
one
next
week
on
Tuesday
or
Wednesday,
so
pretty
much.
Everybody
did
check
those
out
they're
willing
to
certify
city
of
Jasper
economic
opportunity
in
October
and
and
so
then,
they'll
have
90
days
from
October,
so
we're
trying
to
give
them
knit
October.
But
yes,
yes,
and
still
somehow
do
you.
B
B
A
B
Because
because
we
had
a
community
because
it
was
August
to
meet
this
document,
actionable
we
were
able
to
do
was
make
a
recommendation
to
this
public
hearing
and
this
draft
document.
Public
hearings
only
big
recommendations
to
the
floorboard.
We
can't
ratify
anything
so
during
the
sheriff's
report,
General
on
September
11th
by
this,
but
with
the
full
remote.
So,
yes,
it
will
be
after
according
to
the
system
and
we'll
make
them
aware
that
we
wantbridge
Virginia.
F
One
other
thing
on
that
side:
I
also
had
a
proper
fit
this
morning
and
asked
them
to
delay
this
to
the
October
I.
Don't
know
and
I,
don't
think
they've
done
cameras,
but
I
did
call
Quantum
repair
Lewis.
Who
was
our
use
committee
and.
F
We
just
simply
put
a
September
13th
moves.
Canceled.
F
So
there's
still
a
chances
we'll
get
in,
but
even
if
it
doesn't,
you
know,
showbone
said
it
will
be
distributed
to
you
know
to
to
stakeholders
and
decision
makers,
I
mean
including
the
city
council,
land
use
committee.
E
So
be
then
available
for
city
council
to
review
as
well
who,
after
the
CPC
meeting
in
the
unit
process,
just
to
give
my
notification.
C
C
A
B
A
You
would
fall
somewhere
in
between
regarding
variety
accessory
use,
and
then
you
know
even
some
it
questions.
Okay,
we
create
this
separate
use
categories.
A
You
know
I,
guess
that
would
be
the
suggestion
and
that
would
be
I
mean
contrary
to
what
the
murals
of
these
texts
so
so
I'm
trying
to
craft
it
and
fit
it
in
I
think
it
would
be
difficult.
But
you
know
if
you
don't
have
a
language
statement
that
talks
about
any
definition
or
success
reviews.
A
A
With
the
approach,
because
you
know
I
had
my
own,
you
know
reservations.
You
know
in
terms
of
how
they
were
trying
to
characterize
it.
You
know
I
mean
we
created
this
ten
thousand
square
foot
size
as
sort
of
a
cookie
cutting
one
size
fits
on
right.
You
know
to
come
to
the
easily
back
into
your
process
or
something
like
it.
A
I
don't
know,
I
mean
I
can
open
up
to
the
group
the
same
one
thing,
but
you
know
again
it
creates
a
conflict.
I
think.
E
B
And
there
are
overview.
The
the
third
paragraph
we
talked
about.
Some
portions
are
prescriptive.
Many
other
elements
of
The
Proposal,
till
after
flexibility
in
terms
of
Technologies.
B
Would
this
be
an
appropriate
place
to
talk
about
the
overuse
of
the
accessory
and
what
apps
there
needs
to
be
more
specific
groups,
accessories.
C
A
C
B
F
B
All
right
any
further
discussion
on
this
matter,
all
right,
so
any
objections
to
making
the
recommendation
to
the
full
board
to
accept
this
is
our
final
and
well
thought
attempt
to
make
sense
of
city
of
yes,
carbon
neutrality
text
Amendment,
seeing
the
objections,
then
the
consensus
is
that
we
will
make
the
recommendation
to
the
full
board.