►
From YouTube: Planning Council Meeting - March 23, 2023
Description
Meeting Agenda: https://www.broward.org/PlanningCouncil/Documents/AdvanceAgenda/intro.pdf
A
A
A
A
B
C
F
G
G
C
C
F
A
C
Not
for
the
stick
so
I
I
said
when
I
came
down.
This
is
my
favorite
time
is
when
I
get
to
welcome
somebody
in
the
planning
Council-
and
this
is
the
part
I
don't
like
when
we
get
to
say
goodbye
to
somebody.
So
today,
after
service,
several
different
stints
here
at
the
planning,
Council
Bernie
Parnes
is
going
to
have
his
last
meeting.
He
is
resigning
from
the
council
Bernie,
you
served
from
2015
to
2017,
and
then
you
came
back
on
in
2021
and
we
sure
appreciate
everything.
You've
done.
C
I
I
went
over
and
talked
to
Bernie
a
second
ago
and
said
so
you're
going
to
take
some
time
off.
Take
a
little
bit
of
time.
He
said.
Oh
absolutely,
not
I'm,
not
being
asked
to
be
the
president
of
the
Century
Village
Homeowner
Association
I'm,
going
to
concentrate
a
little
bit
more
on
Deerfield
Beach,
so
for
what
you've
done
throughout
your
whole
career
in
Deerfield
in
Broward
County.
E
B
B
Could
I
just
I'd
like
I'm,
sorry
that
I
couldn't
be
there
today,
but
I
just
wanted
to
personally
welcome
Ryan
Greenberg?
She
is
my
new
appointee
and
I
think
I
I
know
she's
going
to
do
an
outstanding
job.
She
cares
tremendously
about
this
community
and
has
been
very
involved
in
so
many
areas
and
issues.
So
I
just
want
to
welcome
her
and
I
didn't
know
that
this
was
Bernie's
last
meeting,
so
I
also
just
want
to
thank
him.
B
H
C
C
F
Well,
first
off
I
want
to
thank
commissioner
Nan
Rich
for
the
appointment.
I
really
appreciate
your
faith
in
me
and
I
do
expect
to
work
hard,
be
here
in
person
to
work
with
all
the
staff
and
excited
to
work
with
someone
from
my
hometown,
Pembroke
Pines,
commissioner
Angela
Castillo
and
I'm
familiar
with
several
of
the
board
members
up
here,
I'm
sure
we'll
work
well
together.
Thank
you.
So
much
awesome.
H
H
C
C
J
J
I'll
be
real
brief.
First
of
all,
thank
you
all
so
much
for
having
me
here.
I'm
excited
to
be
a
part
of
this.
A
little
bit
background
about
myself.
I
work
as
a
community
organizer
I'm,
very
passionate
about
involving
the
community
and
essentially
Bridging
the
Gap
between
community
and
government.
I
was
appointed
by
a
newly
elected
commissioner,
Hazel
Rogers
and
I
look
forward
to
representing
that
commission
District,
but
also
Broward
County
on
a
whole
with
the
Strategic
plan.
So
I'm
happy
to
be
here.
Welcome.
C
G
C
G
F
H
Thank
you,
I,
don't
identical
planning
agency,
the
the
County's
code
of
ordinances,
the
Land
Development
code
related
to
that's
related
to
the
surf
tax
and
surtax
funding.
So
this
this
code,
ordinance
update,
provides
that
Broward
County
has
jurisdiction
and
over
any
conflicting
local
Municipal
ordinance
when
Surah
tax
funding,
Transportation
improvements
are
located
only
on
County,
owned
or
County
leased
properties.
H
In
coordination
with
the
county
attorney's
office,
the
combined
committees
made
a
recommendation
to
find
the
code
change
consistent
with
the
Broward
County
land
use
plan,
because
that
is
your
role
in
an
LPA
review
for
an
update
to
the
code
and
that
that
vote
was
five
to
one
to
to
recommend
that
Renee
Herod
from
the
county
attorney's
office
is
here.
If
you
have
any
specific
specific
questions
about
the
code,
change.
C
A
C
E
Yeah
normally,
which
is
I,
know
it's
always
one
of
the
highlights
of
the
year
for
the
planning
Council
in
April
I
talk
about
the
the
latest,
the
damage
assessment
from
the
legislative
session.
We're
not
we're
not
you
will
we're
not
likely
to
have
a
April
meeting,
so
I
just
want
to
talk
about
a
couple
of
the
land
use
items
that
are
that
are
going
through
the
process
for
everyone
to.
G
E
Eye
on
and
may
I'll
be
happy
to
we'll
we'll
have
our
assessment
at
that
point
in
time.
One
of
them
there's
a
large
bill
which
has
a
lot
of
very
good
features
for
on
on
affordable
housing
and
seeks
to
obviously
provide
this
financing
issue
and
things
of
that
sort.
A
couple
of
land
use
issues
are
implemented
in
there
and
just
an
interesting
decision
was
made
to.
E
As
you
recall,
in
the
last
few
sessions,
the
the
the
legislature
provided
that
local
governments
could
just
move
ahead
with
affordable
housing
approve
them
projects
in
all
categories,
without
changing
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
idea
was
make
it
more.
You
know
a
more
direct
method
and
cut
the
red
tape
and
let's
do
what
we
can
to
get
those
online,
the
legislature,
the
the
legislation,
Senate
Bill,
102,
that's
moving
forward.
E
The
last
draft
that
I
reviewed
takes
removes
local
government's
ability
to
approve
affordable
housings
on
residential
Parcels
by
bypassing
the
state
and
local
laws.
The
comprehensive
planning
process,
not
in
other
you
know,
it's
still
effective
in
commercial
and
Industrial,
but
they
have
taken.
You
know
and
remember.
This
is
residential
development,
so
they
decided
to
just
eliminate
municipalities
ability
to
take
the
short,
shorter,
more
direct
method
on
residential
property.
So
it's
it's
it's
something
that
is
causing
a
lot
of
discussion
and
debate,
but
that's
in
the
bill.
E
E
That's
that's
something
which
the
comprehensive
plants
are
meant
to
avoid
it's
a
bad
thing.
Some
people
want
to
do
so
what
the
legislature
did
in
in
in
in
amending
the
statue.
The
definition
is,
it
was
a
long
definition
which
was
not
the
not
the
best,
but
they
just
have
now
defined
it
as
uncontrolled
development.
C
E
Let
me
give
you
the
exact
definition:
it
used
to
be
the
definition
used
to
be.
It
means
an
unplanned
uncontrolled
development
pattern
characterized
by
low
density.
It's
either
attempting
to
flesh
it
out.
That's
what
lawyer
try
to
do
you
try
to
give
some
bound
automobile
dependent
development
with
either
single
or
multi
multiple
uses
that
are
not
functionally
related
so
and
it
goes
on
so
it
attempts
to.
You
know,
put
some
meat
on
that
bone.
They've
decided
those
extra
words
that
that
you
could
figure
it
out
on
your
own,
so
the
new
definition
is
urban.
E
But
then
not
not
not.
You
know
content
to
just
leave
that
the
way
it
is
because
it's
understandable
the
following
sentence
was
put
in
levels
of
Service
established
in
a
comprehensive
plan
solely
for
planning
purposes,
may
not
be
the
basis
for
the
denial
of
a
development
order
or
permit
now,
as
the
developers
just
give
you
something
now
they're
going
to
say.
Well,
no,
if
it's
solely
for
planning
purposes,
you
can't
deny
it
well.
E
If
it
says
it's
only
for
planning
purposes,
you
don't
have
to
say
anything
else,
it's
solely
for
planning
purposes,
not
for
the
purposes
of
denial.
They
added
this
language
in
I.
Don't
think
it's
helpful
at
the
municipality,
you
you
or
government
agency
you're,
always
in
a
situation
where
your
actions
could
be
attacked
by
very
smart
people
who
are
looking
for
words
that
can
be
used
against
you.
Well,
they
just
added
some
words
that
we'll
have
to
see
how
how
that
plays
out.
So
that's
some
of
the
legislation.
B
Hi
Mr
chair
could
I,
add,
could
I
add
something
to
this.
You
may
Senator
Rich
yeah.
Thank
you
so
I
just
want
to
say:
I've
been
working
with
Senator
past
Domo
for
over
a
year-
and
you
know
this-
this
affordable
housing
bill
is
is
going
it's
just
the
way
it
is.
We
tried
to
make
a
couple
of
changes,
ask
for
amendments
and
nothing
substance
and
substantive
was
being
accepted.
B
So
one
of
the
things
that
we
wanted
was
to
change
the
formula
for
the
1992
Sebastian
act,
which
sets
up
a
situation
where
monies,
and
especially
since
so
much
more
money
is
going
to
be
coming
in
as
a
result
of
this
to
to
ship.
We
wanted
to
change
that
formula,
which
today
requires
65,
at
least
a
minimum
65
of
anything
that
the
that
is
distributed
by
the
Florida
Housing
Finance
Corporation
will
has
to
go
to
single
family
and
in
places
like
brown
hour.
That
is
impossible.
B
We
are
built
out
and
there
are
multiple
counties
that
share
the
same
issue
and
the
same
problem
we
have.
So
we
had
asked
for
the
flexibility
to
go
to
a
50,
50
split
with
multi-family
and
single
family,
but
that
you
know
was
not
was
not
included
but
I,
but
you
know
all
in
all.
I
just
want
to
say
that
there
are
some
good
things
in
this
bill
and
you
know
sometimes
you
have
to
take
the
good
with
the
bad
and
this
this
bill
does.
B
You
know,
provide,
as
I
said,
a
lot
of
additional
money.
It
provides
some
flexibility,
some
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
to
to
entice
developers
to
come
in
and
do
affordable
housing
projects.
Developments
they're
they're
now
having
this
bill,
which
has
to
do
with
low-cost
interest
loans,
and
we
do
we
do
actually
a
no
no
cost,
no
interest
loan
for
for
when
we
do
this,
it's
a
30-year
payout
but-
and
there
are
also
going
you
know-
for
the
30
years
and
so
forth.
B
So
as
I
said,
this
bill
is
pay,
you
know
it's
going
to
go
the
way
it
is
and
there's
not
much.
You
know
that
we
can
do
about
that.
There's
one
other
bill
that
I
want
to
mention
to
people,
and
if
anybody
feels
the
urge
to
contact
legislators,
there
is
a
a
bill.
The
Senate
bill
is
Senate
Bill
346
by
a
senator
by
the
name
of
desigley
d-I-c-e-g-l-I-e.
B
This
is
an
anti-local
preference
bill
and
in
essence,
what
it
does
is
kill
basically
our
small
business
local
preference
program,
which
is
really
terrible.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
working
on
it.
There
seems
to
be
some
indication
that
there
are
Senators
on
on
both
sides
of
the
aisle
here.
We
know
that
you
know
on
one
side
there
are,
but
there
are,
there
are
Senators
on
the
other
side
of
the
outlets.
Don't
like
this
preemption.
B
They
like
a
lot
of
preemptions,
but
don't
seem
to
like
this
one,
and
this
one
would
require
that
we
could
not
use
our
local
preference
program
even
with
our
own
money.
Now
you
know
that's
that
is
just
unconscionable.
As
far
as
we're
concerned,
I
mean
this
is
our
Tech.
These
are
our
tax
dollars.
This
is
our
money
and
we
should
be
used
to
be
able
to
use
it
to
enhance
our
small
business
program.
You
know
our
cves.
The
other
thing
it
does
is.
It
doesn't
allow
us
to
even
use
our
living
wage.
B
We
have
a
17
17,
17.70
17
living
wage
for
contracted
people
when
we,
when
we
do
contracts
like
security
guards-
and
you
know
all
other
kinds
of
things
and
we
would
have
to
use
the
state
the
state
wage,
which
we
believe
that
this
time
is
going
to
be
end
up
being
about
11
I
mean
and
in
the
middle
of
an
affordable
housing
crisis
Crunch
and
a
rent
crunch.
It's
on
it's
just
ridiculous
to
have
something
like
this.
B
H
H
H
Especially
since
we're
since
we're
just
a
couple
other
items
before
we
get
to
the
workshop
discussion,
which
is
we
had
a
discussion
at
the
committee
meeting
about
the
April
meeting
date,
we
have
no
public
hearing
items
for
that
meeting.
Generally
the
council
reviews
and
approves
the
the
next
fiscal
year
budget
at
that
meeting,
but
that's
really
just
taking
the
core
budget
and
we
package
it.
It's
like
an
annual
report
that
we
present
to
the
council.
H
So
there
was
no
objection
to
the
planning
Council
staff
filing
that
by
the
deadline,
the
end
of
April
with
the
Office
of
Management
and
budget
and
then
putting
that
on
your
May
agenda
for
your
consideration,
just
really
about
of
the
annual
report
and
information.
So
if
there's
no
objection
to
proceeding
in
that
manner,
then
I
would
say
that
you
can
cancel
your
April
meeting
without
objection.
C
H
H
The
the
item
that
you
have
before
you
item
R3
that
you
have
the
memo,
that's
related
to
the
workshop
that
we
had
discussed
at
the
January
meeting.
So
I
prepared
this
memo
just
to
put
in
front
of
the
Committees
and
get
some
feedback,
and
so
what
I'd
like
to
report
is
the
feedback
that
I
received
and
then
kind
of
what
our
plan
is
to
actually
set
up
a
workshop.
H
So
there
were
no
additions
to
the
topics
that
are
that
are
listed
in
this
memo
and
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
send
out
a
survey
so
that
we
can
rank
the
topics.
The
Committees
have
recommended
a
half
day
format,
so
I
would
send
out
the
the
topics
so
that
I
would
know
what
your
greatest
interest
is
and
then
organize
any
staff
or
anyone
that
we
need
to
invite
separately,
find
a
location,
maybe
at
a
county
park.
Maybe
a
meeting
room
there
set
up
for
half
day.
They
also
preferred
timing
right
now.
H
As
of
this
discussion
was
the
July
May
eating
date
because,
generally,
that
meeting
is
canceled
and
most
people
do
set
aside
the
fourth
Thursday
of
the
month
for
the
planning
Council.
If
they're.
If,
if
I
get
feedback
that
there's
not
enough
people,
then
we
would
have
to
move
forward
from
that
to
to
find
the
identify
a
meeting
date.
H
H
There's
no
additional
correspondence.
I
do
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
there
are
four
public
hearing
agenda
items
today.
Three
of
those
are
recertifications
of
local
plans.
Planning,
Council
staff
recommends
approval
of
all
four
items
that
are
in
agenda,
including
item
page
four,
which
is
a
land
use
plan
amendment
in
the
city
of
Fort
Lauderdale
there
is
the
quasi-proceding
quasi-dishield
proceeding
is
waived
by
the
city
for
item
ph1
and
I
would
just
say
about
item
page
four.
The
land
use
Point
amendment
in
the
city
of
Fort
Lauderdale.
H
It's
only
people
are
only
here
for
questions
only
and
also
there
is
an
affordable
housing
set
aside
that
came
in
and
was
filed
with
the
land
use
plan
Amendment,
it's
located
off
of
Cypress
Creek,
generally
located
off
Cypress,
Creek,
Road
and
I-95.
If
you
want
any
additional
information
or
discussion,
otherwise,
staff
is
recommended
approval
of
items
Peach
one
two
and
three
and
four,
with
the
condition
of
the
affordable
housing
and
the
development
limitation.
Mr.
B
C
K
The
period
that
I
had
resigned
from
this
Commission
was
only
because
I
got
elected.
You
got
elected
and,
as
we
can
only
have
one
elected
official
and
our
mayor
decided
to
stay
on
the
council
for
a
while,
when
he
resigned
to
move
over
to
the
mpo
board.
I
was
reinstated,
and
happily
so,
by
Mark
Bogan,
our
County
Commissioner
that
I
serve,
so
it
it's
with
a
heavy
heart
that
I
leave
because
I
I've
come
to,
like
all
of
you
and
your
opinions
and
your
dedication
to
the
county
and
with
that
I.
Thank
you
again.