►
Description
Regular Meeting of the Black Mountain Board of Alderman from August 12, 2019. For more information about the meeting you can visit townofblackmountain.org
A
B
A
Right
the
Anastos
I
have
are,
please
make
sure
your
cell
phones
are
turned
off
and
if
you
will
keep
your
minding,
everybody
remain
quiet
during
the
meeting
whenever
you're
speaking
there,
it
your
it
bothers.
Your
neighbors
bothers
the
people
on
the
board
and
it's
just
it's
just
not
conducive
to
us
having
a
big
meeting.
So
all
the
meetings
going
on,
please
remain
quiet,
proclamations,
awards
and
recognition.
We
have
none.
A
C
Noticed
that
you
have
a
thing,
a
resolution
tonight
could
do
the
Cherry
Street
one-way
resolution,
I'm,
sorry,
Lisa,
Miller,
406,
West,
8th
Street,
I,
forgotten
and
I
wanted
to
speak
on
the
Cherry
Street
one-way
resolution.
In
reading
the
information
the
the
traffic
numbers
were
taken
and
they
were
taken
with
regards
to
an
early
morning
reading
and
in
late
afternoon.
Reading
in
a
midday
reading,
the
early
morning
reading
didn't
take
into
account
the
the
stores
being
open
on
Cherry
Street
the
late
afternoon
meeting.
C
E
E
Recently
we
have
in
this
last
year
we've
been
working
really
hard
to
create
an
online
permitting
platform
for
all
of
our
various
permits
and
applications
that
we
do
in
our
department,
and
it's
been
no
small
undertaking
we're
getting
close
to
be
able
to
launch
so
stay
tuned.
For
that,
then,
working
on
the
downtown
parking
and
circulation
study,
we
also
completed
an
engineering
study
for
some
River
registration
work
at
Veterans,
Park,
we'll
Swannanoa
River,
and
now
that
project
is
shovel
ready,
which
is
really
exciting.
For
that
stretch
of
river.
E
E
Unfortunately,
in
some
of
the
hot
waters
we
had
last
year,
we
completed
the
Blue
Ridge
Road
small
area
plan
planning
process,
and
you
will
be
seeing
a
draft
document
for
adoption
and
presentation
next
month
from
our
consulting
team
and
we
created
a
viable
project
for
a
large-scale
River
restoration
of
floodplain
buyout
program
through
the
USDA,
which
is
not
the
typical
federal
agency.
You
see
involved
in
that
work,
but
they
have
been
blessed
with
that
effort
and
that
money,
and
so
we
have
to
jump
through
the
first
two
hoops.
E
We
submitted
a
package
to
the
state
with
a
proposed
idea
and
they
came
in,
did
a
site
visit
and
I
put
them
on
foot
for
three
and
a
half
hours
through
town,
and
we
were
all
overheated
at
the
end
of
it.
But
we
made
a
good
impression
and
we
have
we
were
standing
by
for
marching
orders
for
the
next
step.
E
E
We've
also
been
really
working
with
shoestring
amount
of
time
and
money
to
increase
our
community
engagement
efforts.
As
always
a
good
planning
practice
and
I've
always
preached
a
participatory
of
planning
perspective.
We've
had
our
meetings
for
the
foot,
the
public,
all
the
planning
projects
we've
had
going
on.
We've
also
launched
a
stormwater
web
page
recently
with
education
and
resources
to
improve
our
stormwater
conditions
and
town
help
empower
everybody
to
to
know
how
they
can
improve
their
own
property.
E
We
are
working
with
River
link
to
hold
a
rain
garden,
installation
and
certification
workshop
in
September,
and
we
are
excited
to
have
some
folks
from
Public
Works
join
us,
so
they
can
get
certified
in
that
process,
and
hopefully
some
of
the
local
landscape
professionals
in
town
will
join
us
too.
But
anybody
can
come
and
learn
how
to
do
that
on
their
own
property
and
now
be
in
September
in
October.
E
Some
of
the
goals
that
we
have
in
this
new
year
are
rolling
out
our
new
online
platform,
which
is
going
to
include
some
the
ability
to
see
real-time
inspection
updates.
That's
going
to
be
a
huge
shift
in
our
workload
in
the
department,
and
it's
also
going
to
take
some
time
to
work
out
the
kinks.
So
even
once
it's
live,
I
know
that
everybody
will
bear
with
us
as
we
get
it
sorted
out.
E
We
look
forward
having
at
least
four
community
outreach
events
that
are
not
included
in
a
specific
planning
process.
This
would
be
in
addition
to
we
updating
the
comprehensive
plan
in
the
future.
Land
use
map
will
be
hiring
that
part-time
building
inspector
we've
been
advertising
and
we're
trying
to
expand
our
reach
to
get
some
applications.
We
look
forward
to
implementing
some
additional
stormwater
regulations
and
programs
to
continue
making
progress
on
that
front
and
we're
going
to
partner
with
regional
organizations
to
support
housing,
stabilization
and
affordability
efforts.
E
E
We
have
four
active
grants
right
now
and
hopefully
this
list
will
grow
a
little
bit.
Over
the
year
we
had
the
Riverwalk
Greenway
tomahawk
face
to
the
parking
and
circulation
study,
and
this
one
a
NOAA,
revert
engineering
I
mentioned.
We
completed
the
engineering,
but
we
still
have
money
in
that
fund
for
permitting
and
construction
oversight
once
it
goes
to
construction
and
then
the
numbers
which
are
small
and
hard
to
read
and
I'm.
E
Sorry,
if
you
look
at
some
trends
and
land
use,
we
always
look
to
look
at
the
rate
of
minor
and
major
subdivision
applications
that
have
been
made
in
our
department
and
you
can
see
we
have
a
significant
number
of
minor
applications,
as
opposed
to
minor
from
this
that
you
can
see.
This
represents
more
than
135
and
Counting.
We
do
have
2019
up
there
just
so
you
can
see
a
trend
line
that
we
are
already
well
halfway
at
this
point
in
the
year.
E
E
E
E
E
E
Number
of
building
inspections:
this
is
why
you
can
never
find
Dan
and
we
say
he's
always
out
in
the
field.
Dan
did
over
three
thousand
inspections
last
year
and
as
we
continue
to
ramp
up
additional
stormwater
requirements,
it's
going
to
be
imperative
to
have
that
part-time
person
in
place
to
help
manage
these
inspections
to
help
balance
the
Dan's
workload
associated
with
stormwater
code
enforcement.
This
is
a
little
bit
funny
compared
to
other
years.
Last
year,
we
heard
feedback
that
citizens
wanted
us
to
take
a
more
proactive
response
to
zoning
and
code
enforcement.
E
So
we
created
a
spreadsheet
with
all
the
roads
in
town
and
you
could
pull
out
so
it
could
randomly
pull
two
of
those
streets
out
a
hat
essentially,
and
we
did
inspections
twice
a
week
which
greatly
increased
our
numbers.
We
also
had
the
part-time
inspector
from
mark
who
helped
us
through
this
spring,
which
was
a
big
help,
but
what
we
noticed
was
despite
the
fact
that
we
did
a
tremendous
number
of
total
inspections.
E
We
did
not
have
a
significant
increase
in
found
violations,
so
we
have
continued
to
do
complaint
driven,
but
we
also
were
proactive
and
so
right
now
we're
evaluating
how
frequently
we
want
to
perform
the
random
inspections.
So
we
are
being
respectful
and
cognizant
of
how
much
time
we
actually
have
in
our
department
to
do
that
for
how
much
it
actually
yields
so
that
that's
an
ongoing
conversation.
We're
going
to
hold
trial
and
error
to
fine-tune
that
number.
E
E
The
group
also
had
some
Street
closure
recommendations
for
our
Honeycutt
Harbor
Avenue
first
Street
in
Campbell
Street.
There
were
eight
text,
amendments
and
I'm
sure
you'll
be
excited
to
know.
There
are
many
more
to
come.
They're
all
coming
down
the
pipes
made
the
Padgett
Allen
Road
subdivision
was
40
Lots
and
also
reviewed
the
Chapmans
Cove
subdivision.
With
ten.
They
recommended
the
Greenway
master
plan
and
they
heard
the
rezoning
in
June.
E
The
Zoning
Board
of
Adjustment
I
know
you,
you
get
updates
from
them,
so
I'm
just
going
to
summarize
these.
They
granted
the
variance
at
5800
Lafayette
and
the
one
from
Allen,
Mountain,
Drive
and
one
all
sixth
Street.
There
was
one
variance
denied
on
Oakland,
and
then
they
attended
the
UNC
School
governor,
its
quasi-judicial
training.
E
The
historic
Commission
summary
they
referred
there,
it's
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
127,
Cherry,
Street
and
Seven
Sisters
new
gallery
I
also
heard
the
mural
for
the
public
restrooms
on
Cherry
Street.
They
approved
of
you
signs
and
town,
and
the
attempt
also
attended
the
quasi-judicial
training
at
the
UNC
School
of
Government
and
they're
also
doing
another
workshop
coming
up
soon
in
Waynesville.
E
E
There
was
a
grant
funded
installation,
the
third
piece
of
public
art
and
Veterans
Park,
and
there
you
can
see
the
the
art
was
recently
installed
and
they'll
be
holding
a
dedication
of
that
are
in
a
chalk,
sidewalk,
chalk
event
in
September.
So
we'll
be
getting
all
that
information
to
you
soon,
and
this
is
just
a
short
list
of
some
of
the
agencies.
E
We
work
with
I
know
I'm
omitting
some
unintentionally,
but
we
couldn't
do
what
we
do
without
working
with
every
everybody
in
Asheville
and
in
Buncombe
County
and
at
the
state
and
all
the
way
up
to
DC
the
biologists
who
came
to
visit
for
USDA.
You
know
flew
in
from
DC
just
to
see
us
so
we're
small,
but
we
are
well
integrated
into
all
of
these
groups.
B
B
B
B
E
Does
not
require
it.
We
were
able
to
include
the
money
that
the
town
provided
to
the
Pigeon
River
grant
and
also
include
the
pigeon
river
money
as
cash
dedicated
to
that
project.
Already,
the
total
construction
for
the
project
came
in
156,000.
We
were
expecting
over
200,
so
we're
really
encouraged
by
those
numbers
and.
B
E
Or
completed
federal
programs,
it,
it
being
so
USDA
typically
does
River
restoration
to
its
natural
state
for
the
purposes
of
mitigating
flooding
and
improving
water
quality,
all
those
things
they
are
also
doing
contiguous,
floodplain,
buyout
programs
to
create
easements
to
do
the
restoration
in
and
also
in
that
process.
Looking
at
properties
that
may
qualify
for
the
traditional
floodplain
buyout
program
to
relocate
anybody
whose
entire
structure
would
be
impacted
by
such
a
program,
we
are
very
preliminary
stages.
E
G
Yeah
item
a
is
adoption
of
minutes.
This
would
be
the
minutes
of
July
8
2019
agenda
session,
July
8
2009
teen
regular
session
item.
B
is
a
call
for
public
hearing,
protects
amendments
to
amend
the
duplex
definition
in
the
land-use
code.
This
would
be
to,
for
the
most
part,
tighten
that
definition
up
it's
relatively
loose
as
it's
written
today,
item
C
is
a
call
for
public
hearing
for
text
amendments
to
amend
the
time
frame
for
non-conformities.
G
Item
D
is
a
call
for
public
hearing
for
text
amendments
to
amend
the
historic
district
and
historic
Conservation
District
overlay.
This
is
to
clean
up
some
confusing
language
that
is
written
in
both
those
sections
and
to
put
some
more
processes
in
place
for
the
for
the
reviews
of
those
applications
that
come
through
item
E
is
a
budget
amendment
transferring
funds
to
the
golf
phone,
so
this
would
be
to
transfer
125
thousand
dollars
from
our
general
fund
to
our
golf
fund
for
our
financial
statements
we
can't
record
negative
cash.
So
that's
what
this
is
for.
G
125
thousand
item
F
is
a
budget
amendment
for
the
governor's
crime
commission
grant
for
the
police
department.
This
is
totally
grant
funded.
This
is
for
laptops
and
associated
equipment
for
patrol
vehicles,
so
this
will
be
for
$25,000
for
two
and
stuff
get
this
installed
and
to
purchase
those
and
that'll
be
your
consent
agenda.
B
Question
right
or
just
make
sure
I
understand
on
the
on
the
budget
amendment
to
transfer
funds
general
funds
to
the
golf
course
there
you're
looking
for
Dean,
just
I
want
to
make
sure
I
have
this
court
I'm
saying
this
correctly,
but
to
remind
the
public
that
that
that
would
include
July
1
through
you
know
the
golf
playing
months,
the
heavier
golf
playing
months
generally
up
through
October
31
until
the
time
changes
and
it
gets
starts
getting
dark
and
cold
and
2:18.
Those
were
extremely
wet
months.
B
I
mean
the
play,
was
extremely
low
and
we're
not
always
aiming
to
be
able
to
break
even
and
with
the
golf
course
it's
just
weather
and
play
dependent,
but
2018
as
far
as
the
weather
was
was
pretty
tough
and
July
went
on
was
I.
Don't
know
there
was
any
wetter
than
before.
July
1,
but
it
was
wet
well.
Saturday
is
miss
for
I
mean
almost
every
Saturday.
It
rained
in
2018
I.
Think.
B
B
B
J
D
Hi
I'm
will
Chapman
I
live
on
104
4th
Street
and
due
to
my
lack
in
public
speaking
I'm
going
to
read
with
you,
this
is
our
fourth
year
living
on
4th
Street
and
it's
a
very
short
residential
street
I.
Think
it's
well.
According
to
the
study
a
couple
years
ago,
575
feet
long
home
1
in
its
Mon
Street
and
on
the
other,
it's
a
stop
sign,
and
then
it
turns
into
Portland
Villa.
D
D
D
If
so,
we
would
like
the
speed
limit
to
be
lowered
to
10
or
12
and
a
half
miles
an
hour,
despite
being
very
small
Road,
the
residential
Road.
We
have
a
large
amount
of
traffic.
You
guys
did
a
traffic
study
a
couple
of
years
ago
and
with
the
speed
limit
being
20
miles
an
hour
stuff
like
this
was
too
fast
for
the
street.
D
Considering
the
how
close
the
houses
are
to
the
road
and
how
there
are
no
residential,
sidewalks
or
easements
in
that
study,
that
was
done
a
couple
years
ago,
865
cars
used
4th
Street.
In
a
13
hour
day,
592
were
going,
West
273
were
going
east,
the
average
speed
limit
was
27
miles
an
hour
and
the
top
15
percent
of
everyone's
speed
in
that
study
was
thrown
out.
D
So
even
the
top
15
surround
the
study
concluded
that
it
was
above
generally
expected
threshold
of
5
miles
an
hour
above
posted
speed,
limit,
there's
a
lot
of
pedestrian
traffic
as
well.
People
walking
their
dogs
and
people
out
and
about
and
I
do
think
that
this
residential
road
was
in
the
speed
limit
was
established
long
before
the
amount
of
houses
and
traffic
that
there
are
now
in
town.
D
The
speed
limit
is
20
miles,
an
hour's
and
there
are
sidewalks
and
we
don't
have
sidewalks
or
even
an
easement,
so
it
makes
sense
for
our
speed
limit
to
be
much
lower.
My
main
concern
is
that
one
of
the
kids
would
get
hurt
one
day.
In
addition
to
lowering
the
speed
limit,
we
would
ask
for
traffic
calming
measures.
The
street
is
short,
but
it's
wide
and
straight,
and
it's
just
too
easy
to
speed
on
measures
that
may
naturally
slow
the
street
by
changing
it
to
one
lane
or
narrowed
street
I.
D
A
F
I
was
on
the
Planning
Board
when
the
last
big
rezoning
issue
came
up.
We
did
the
major
rezoning
several
years
back
and
one
of
the
issues,
of
course
was
spot
zoning,
and
the
other
issue
was
some
of
the
urban
zoning
issues
and
whether
it
should
be
rural
or
town.
I
live
on
three
thirteen
flat
Creek
Road.
There
is
a
hearing
coming
up
about
one
parcel
of
305
Creek
Road,
which
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
rezoning
of
that
property.
F
F
I,
don't
like
spot
zoning
I,
don't
think
it's
the
right
thing
to
do,
but
then
again,
you're
the
guys
that
have
to
decide
that
I
would
love
to
see
it
go
through
on
a
wider
range.
But
if
these
people
get
there
has
been
and
then
that's
considered
doing
it
for
the
whole
community,
it's
the
right
thing!
Thank
you.
C
Lisa
Milton
406
West
State
Street
I
served
on
the
Planning
Board
at
the
June
meeting,
where
this
application
that's
coming
before
you
came
before
us,
and
the
vote
ended
up
three
to
three
tie.
I
was
in
the
three
that
voted
against
their
application,
but
it
wasn't
that
we
voted
against
the
rezoning
of
the
of
the
area.
It
was
looking
only
at
taking
one
parcel.
C
We
felt
that
the
whole
area
should
be
looked
at
and
resumed
it's
an
area
with
lots
that
are
large
enough
to
accommodate
adding
additional
structures
in
it's
a
way
of
essentially
reducing
the
cost
of
the
dirt
and
making
more
affordable
housing
for
people
I.
Think
if
you
look
at
this
application,
you
have
a
parcel
that
is
surrounded
totally
by
sr2
properties.
C
If
you
take
that
one
parcel
and
you
zone
at
tr4
or
I
believe,
is
what
they
were
asking
for,
then
at
that
point
it
doesn't
affect
that
neighborhoods
ability
to
ask,
but
what
it
maybe
opens
up
is
the
ability
for
other
people
who
live
in
other
neighborhoods
and
want
their
parcel
Ruiz
owned.
It
kind
of
opens
the
door
where
it's
hard
to
say.
You've
said
it:
you've
allowed
one
parcel
to
be
resumed
in
another
district.
How
do
you
turn
that
parcel
down
and
I
think
that
that
is
definitely
a
neighborhood
that
is
mixed?
C
A
A
G
Maybe
Ron
and
I
can
tag-team
this
one
though
we
did
get
two
offers
on
the
Public
Works
building
the
former
Public
Works
building.
Excuse
me
at
29
92
u.s.
highway
70,
one
of
those
being
350,000,
one
of
those
being
400,000.
We
did
get
an
appraisal
done.
We
had
President
performed,
came
back
at
585
thousand
I.
Think
at
this
point
it
seems
to
be
that
we
would
want
to
wait
until
we
got
something
closer
than
closer
to
five
hundred.
G
A
A
You
may
never
get
585
and
six-hundred
next
week,
but
if
you
get
an
offer,
that's
acceptable
under
the
statutes,
then
you
have
to
advertise
that
you
receive
that
offer
and
from
10
days
in
the
time
that
is
published,
other
people
can
come
in
and
bid
and
raise
the
offer
and
the
statute
sets
out
how
much
they
have
to
raise
the
bid
by
and
the
deposit
that
to
me.
If
you
do
get
another
bid
advertised
that
again
that
and
keep
since
there's
a
higher
bid.
B
A
K
A
A
Do
you
want
to
raise
your
bid
if
the
town
is
ultimately
interested
in
getting
rid
of
the
building
which
I
think
you
are,
then
you
probably
want
to
do
that
if
you're
just
entertaining
these
offers,
because
it's
entertaining
and
you
don't
not
me,
but
though
you
would
agree
the
building
or
not
that's
up
to
you
but
I
think
the
building
now
truly
is
a
surplus
property,
and
you
know
you
got
folks
carrying
cash.
Give
the
opportunity.
B
But
but
we
know
accident
they'll
actually
take
outside
of
just
which
they
would
know
by
content
of
our
meeting
that
we're
open
to
hearing
from
folks.
So
so
be
it
I
mean
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
ask
Josh
to
go
to
anybody
in
particular
any
more
than
if
you
solve
them
tomorrow
on
the
street.
You
could
ask
him
about
it.
I
mean.
Did
that
fair
to
say,
Ron
yeah.
A
B
A
G
Right
I
brought
this
de
last
month
and
since
then,
we've
mm-hmm.
We
went
back
and
got
some
pros
and
cons
from
from
the
greenways
Commission,
as
well
as
the
consultant
who's
working
on
this
project
currently
for
us
I
think
you've
got
at
least
some
of
this
in
your
packet
missing
a
one
piece:
I'm,
not
sure
if
you've
got
the
information
from
the
greenways
Commission,
but
what
they
have
recommended,
as
their
first
choice
would
be
to
use
an
escape
yeah
dissing
in
front
of
you.
G
You
know
that
I
think
the
salt
man
building
in
the
back
and
then
taking
kind
of
off-road
them
through
and
hitting
dealing
Avenue,
which
is
the
way
we've
always
kind
of
thought.
We
would
go
once
we
got
past
our
building
there,
that
one
was
the
most
preferable
for
the
greenways
Commission.
That
was
their
first
choice.
Now
that
does
have
some
pros
and
some
cons
pros
are
you're
close
to
the
river,
so
it
has
more
of
a
Riverwalk
feel
cons.
Are
you
run
into
issues
with
potential
maintenance?
G
If
you
have
flooding
issues
anytime,
you're
close
to
the
river,
the
Greenway
there's
always
going
to
be
issues
with
flooding
and
having
to
fix
that
now
that
their
second
option
was
to
use
the
Public
Works
a
lot
as
well,
but
to
go
on
the
north
side
of
the
building
kind
of
using
Terry
estates
and
income
and
past
just
to
the
edge
of
our
lot
pretty
much
and
then
coming
back
down
just
as
option.
The
first
option
did
I
just
mentioned
to
you
that
has
pros
in
that
there's
for
your
property
owners.
G
It
does
not
run
into
the
risk
of
having
to
deal
with
the
river
if
you
have
flooding
issues
because
you're
not
on
the
riverbank
at
that
point.
So
that
could
be
that's.
That's
definitely
seen
as
a
pro
and
not
having
to
deal
with
maintenance
on
on
erosion,
and
then
the
third
option
was
the
option
C,
which
really
was
not
a
favorable
option,
but
that
was
using
alterius,
strict
area
States,
pretty
much
all
the
way
down
and
hitting
fence
Avenue.
We
would
have
to
do
some
treatments
to
Terry
estates.
G
Maybe
you
have
to
do
one
way
or
something
on
that
row,
so
it
would
be
quite
a
bit
of
disruption
for
for
traffic.
Ontario,
States
and
I
did
talk
to
you
last
month
about
some
of
the
pricing
options
on
those
the
first
choice
jacent
to
the
river
and
the
Public
Works
lot
was
five
hundred
and
seventy
nine
thousand
their
second
choice
was
also
using
the
Public
Works
lot
north
of
the
building.
That
was
six
hundred
and
forty
two
thousand
for
that
option.
B
G
B
G
G
B
First
choice:
the
first
choice
right,
but
but
as
far
as
you
know,
I
mean
for
to
me
the
decision
that
we
have
to
make
this
to
me.
The
to
me,
the
big
factors
are
the
maintenance
along
the
river
and
again
exposure
to
you
know
catastrophic
events,
whereas
if
you
lessen
that
even
though
it's
more
expensive,
it
seems
like
that
might
be
the
better
long-term
decision
to
make.
G
I'll
say
yeah,
we,
you
know
this
is
kind
of
what
we're
waiting
on
to
give
our
consultants
to
go
ahead
to
start
doing
the
design
for
the
whole
project
we're
starting
to
meet
now
pretty
much
monthly
to
have
conversations
with
the
consultant.
Deity
was
involved.
They're
gonna
come
every
month
for
every
other
month,
so
we're
starting
to
get
some
momentum
on
this.
So.
B
A
G
G
Have
a
resolution
for
that
changing
Cherry
Street
to
one-way
I
know.
This
is
something
that
you've
been
talking
about
for
quite
some
time
and
we
did
do
a
and
we're
still
working
on
a
parking
and
circulation
study.
But
we
did
have
the
consultants
look
specifically
at
Cherry
Street
first,
so
we
get
these
recommendations
to
the
board
and
sorry.
G
The
consultants
encouraged
us
to
do
for
handicapped
spots
on
along
Cherry
Street,
so
two
on
each
side
for
accessibility,
a
minimum
of
of
one
on
each
side,
but
they
prefer
two
on
each
side
and
then,
as
you
get
to
the
top
or
the
north
side
of
Cherry
Street,
this
would
be
one
way
from
Sutton
to
State
Street.
You
would
have
I
think
now.
You're
not
supposed
to
do
left-hand
turns,
but
I
think
people
do
it
from
time
to
time.
G
But
what
this
does
show
is
some
curb
extensions
or
some
bump
outs
to
make
that
left
turn
much
harder,
also
to
reduce
the
travel
lane
for
pedestrians,
crossing
Cherry,
Street
and
I
know.
There
were
a
handful
of
meetings
with
the
steering
committee
they've.
This
I
think
we
got
our
recommendations
last
week
from
from
the
consulting
firm.
B
And
it's
by
the
other
study
that
we
did
and
we
decided
to
hold
off
on
making
a
decision
until
we
got
this
study.
Did
it
have
a
recommendation
to
it
or
did
we
just
it
just
sort
of
I
think
you
just
said
you
can
go
this
way.
You
can
go
that
way.
I
don't
know
that
they
I
don't
know
that
they
made
a
firm
recommendation,
but
I,
that's
the
reason
I
was
asking
I
tended
to
think
that
they
actually
made
the
same
recommendation
without
the
parking
without
the
parking
being
parallel
on
both
sides.
B
B
So
if
we,
if
the
board,
approve
this,
what's
the
what's,
the
timeframe,
I
understand,
Lisa's,
comment
about
and
I
think
it's
a
valid
point
about
the
traffic,
the
the
folks
doing
the
study
and
Jessica.
You
have
to
help
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
they
you
know
they
do
the
best
that
they
can
they
they.
You
know
they
tried
to
assess
that
impact.
It's
pretty
difficult
to
do,
but
you
know
it's
it's
sort
of
like
what
what
are
you
gonna
do
with
that?
B
You
really
can't
you
know:
you're
not
gonna,
be
able
to
go
to
the
other
direction
because
it
just
can't
it's
just.
No.
That
would
never
work.
You
know,
but
the
road
configured
the
way
it
is
so
you're
really
the
north
going
north
is
the
only
way
I
think
the
only
viable
option
and
I
don't
see.
I
understand
your
point,
but
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know,
I,
don't
have
any
issues
what's
going
ahead
and
doing
it.
H
G
B
H
G
E
Oh
I
will
answer
your
questions
in
if
I
can't
our
consultants
are
here
they
came,
but
in
this
configuration
we
retain
enough
width
so
that
if
a
delivery
truck
needs
to
double
Park,
there
is
enough
within
the
travel
lane
for
for
cars
to
go
around
it
safely,
whereas
now
with
two
lanes
of
traffic,
it's
about
any
point.
Work
as
I.
B
E
E
G
I
G
Utility
pair
reimbursed
my
agreement
with
NCDOT,
they
were
doing
some
work
on
Blue
Ridge
Road
some
time
ago.
It
did
hit
one
of
our
water
lines
which
hasn't
affected
anybody,
but
we
didn't
want
to
get
it
fixed.
We
did
go
ahead
and
make
that
repair.
The
total
was
twenty,
eight
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars
DoD
has
agreed
to
reimburse
us
for
that
full
amount
and
the
agreement
is
in
your
packet
for
us
to
sign
to
get
back
to
them.
So
we
can
take
care
of
that.
H
G
Josh,
this
is
item
8b
as
a
resolution
prescribing
procedures
for
disposal
of
surplus
personal
property.
This
the
majority,
this
information
comes
directly
out
of
the
General
Statutes.
This
is
stuff
we
currently
do
now,
however,
we're
unable
to
get
a
when
you
wanted
to
get
an
updated
copy
of
this
on
file.
So
what
you
have
before
you
is
the
resolution
that
just
allows
staff
to
do.
You
know
to
do
gov
deals
or
to
sell
surplus
property
as
long
as
it's
below
the
30,000
dollar
value,
personal
property,
not
not
real
estate
but
personal
property.
Any.
G
G
I
A
G
After
our
we
at
our
last
meeting,
I
did
give
you
some
options
on
4th.
Street
I
did
meet
with
wills,
wife
and
she'll
a
few
weeks
ago
and
just
went
over
some
of
those
options.
I
think
by
the
end
of
the
meeting
she
was
asking.
Well,
can
we
at
least
for
the
time
being
try
to
lower
the
speed
limit
and
see
what
that
does
for
us?
B
B
G
Right
so
this,
what
what
you've
got
in
your
packet
is
some
information
that
was
done
a
few
years
ago
and
I
think
as
I
noticed,
we
were
going
through
budget
this
year,
we've
been
putting
some
money
aside
in
a
capital
reserve
for
the
fire
department
to
do
some
renovations
on
the
interior
of
the
fire
department.
They
must,
notably
the
kind
of
the
north
side
of
the
back
side
of
the
building
were
the
restrooms
and
living
quarters
are
currently.
We
currently
have
a
$275,000
in
the
capital
reserve
for
those
interior
renovations.
G
Speaking
with
our
new
chief
Scotty,
it
just
made
sense
to
come
to
the
board
and
at
least
make
you
aware
that
we
wanted
to
take
a
look
at
this
study
that
was
done
a
few
years
ago
before
we
move
forward
with
doing
any
interior
renovations.
It
just
made
sense
that
we
want
to
take
a
look
at
the
structural
integrity
of
the
building
and
make
sure
everything
was
okay
before
we
move
forward
with
with
doing
interior
renovations.
G
So
it
wouldn't
be
something
that
we
come
back
later
and
say
well,
I
wish
we
would
have
done
this
first.
So
what
you
have
like
I
said
is
a
number
a
number
of
years
old.
It
may
be
worth
us
having
someone
else.
Take
a
look
at
this
just
due
to
the
fact
that
it
is
seven
years
old
and
some
of
these
numbers
could
be
more
and
luckily
they're,
probably
more.
G
G
A
G
G
It's
kind
of
foreign
to
me:
it's
the
language
that
spoke
over
here,
but
yeah.
It's
definitely
getting
in
there
kind
of
going
in
and
see
in
the
condition
underground.
I
know,
there's
everyone's
always
said:
there's
a
creek
that
runs
underneath
the
building,
they're
kind
of
like
the
post
office,
but
definitely
it's
I
think
it's
worth
examining
that
with
some
of
these
recommendations
that
they've
got
in
here.
So
then,
what's
not
going
on
it
well.
B
B
Okay,
so
it's
scheduled,
but
before
we
do
you're,
just
asking
for
our
direction
to
hold
off
on
any
of
those
renovations.
Until
we
get
this
structural
engineering
report
either
revised
or
a
new
one
and
understand
what
kind
of
structural
issues
we
have
to
deal
with,
yes,
yeah
so
I,
don't
think
requires
emotion
involved.
But
it
certainly
sounds
like
a
wise
thing
to
do.
To
me.
G
I
G
A
Free
library
agreement-
yes,
that's
mine,
Elmer's
approached
but
I'm,
throwing
really
crazy
library,
because
that
seems
to
be
the
common
term
use
nationwide.
But
you're
talking
about
these
freestanding
boxes,
they're
just
containers
that
people
build
books
in
you
could
take
a
book
out
for
free
using
the
condition.
Is
you
leave
one
in
this
place
and
it's
just
not
maintained
with
the
taxpayer
and
not
supplied
by
the
taxpayer?
A
I've
drafted
an
agreement
proposed
agreement
that
basically
allows
the
placement
of
a
little
free
library
at
the
south
end
of
the
flat
Creek
Greenway
Charlotte
Street
you
ride
away
so
both
of
those
areas
control
over
the
town,
you'll
be
the
ones
that
have
to
say
can't
go
there
or
not,
but
I
put
in
there,
and
there
were
concerns
and
I
haven't
spoken
to
everybody
back.
There
is
concerned
about
what
it's
going
to
be
used
for.
Is
it
going
to
be
safe,
Tizen
to
be
kept
up
and
I
hope
in
the
giraffe?
A
A
If
we
find
it's
being
used
from
the
illegal
purpose
and
the
improper
purpose,
the
agreement
you
have
allows
the
town
to
say
just
take
it
out,
but
this
purple
lady
long
had
mated
the
board
I
want
before,
but
where
Josh
signs
that
the
thing
allows
it
to
happen.
Who
wanted
to
know
if
the
board
was
interested
in
doing
this
at
all?
And
if
so,
if
the
terms
of
agreement
is
drafted
sufficient
for
Phil's,
it's
satisfactory,
protect
the
town
centers.
It.
B
H
M
E
The
subject
parcel
is
a
little
over
eight
tenths
of
an
acre
and
is
currently
contains
a
single-family
dwelling
and
its
own
sr
to
the
owners
are
requests
saying
that
the
property
be
rezone
to
TR,
for
in
close
proximity
to
the
parcel.
There
are
other
zoning
districts,
including
TR,
for,
and
you
are,
eight.
The
character
of
the
neighborhood
is
primarily
single-family
residential
with
low
and
moderate
densities.
E
The
request
for
OTR
for
zoning
will
allow
for
similar
type
and
scale
of
development
that
is
entirely
characteristic
of
area.
The
most
significant
difference
between
the
existing
and
proposed
districts
is
lot
size
which
has
reduced
from
one
half
of
an
acre
to
one
quarter
of
an
acre
at
this
density.
The
parcel
could
be
subdivided
to
create
one
additional
parcel.
The
area
served
with
all
utilities
in
Road
access
is
necessary
and
the
parcel
is
not
encumbered
by
utility,
easement,
steep,
steep
slope,
floodplain,
floodway
or
stream
buffer
requirements.
E
Property
owners
also
attended
and
voice
their
support
of
the
application,
but
also
expressed
interest
in
having
their
own
properties
also
reserved
to
TR.
For,
during
the
noticing
process,
we
haven't
received
no
phone
calls
or
complaints
against
the
application.
If
resumed
and
potentially
subdivided,
the
parcel
would
create
one
new
light,
as
I
mentioned,
which
does
support
the
residential
character
of
the
area
of
the
closest
SR,
2
properties
to
the
north
and
south
of
subject
parcel.
E
It's
can
be
referred
to
as
spot
zoning,
Culebra,
North
Carolina
case
law,
also
provided
by
the
school
of
government
in
Childress
V
Atkins.
It
is
not
a
spot
zone
where
the
difference
in
zoning
districts
is
modest.
In
that
particular
case,
the
court
have
held
that
a
restricted
residential
zone
and
rural
agricultural
districts
were
not
were
sufficiently
similar
to
not
be
designated
as
spot
zone
spot.
E
Zoning
is
not
illegal
in
North
Carolina,
however,
it
is
subject
to
a
greater
level
of
scrutiny,
meaning
the
validity
of
the
request
is
not
assumed,
as
it
would
be
in
a
traditional
rezoning
application
in
2005.
The
requirements
for
spot
zoning
were
formalized
by
adding
a
requirement
for
a
statement
of
why
the
reason
the
request
is
found
to
be
reasonable,
a
spot
zone
request,
is
also
required
to
be
compatible
with
the
town's
Comprehensive
Plan.
This
is
one
of
the
rare
instances
in
your
comprehensive
plan.
Is
policymaking
versus
a
guidance
document.
E
The
concept
of
validity
to
the
request
can
be
made
considering
a
variety
of
questions,
and
some
of
the
standards
that
are
issued
by
the
School
of
Government
include.
Does
the
property
have
different
physical
characteristics
that
make
it
especially
suitable
for
the
proposed
rezoning,
such
as
peculiar
topography
or
unique
access
to
roads
or
utilities?
E
The
only
unique
aspect
of
this
lot
is
that
is
particularly
large
in
the
given
context
of
the
area.
Are
there
land
uses
on
or
in
proximity
to
the
site
that
are
different
from
the
uses
that
make
most
of
the
surrounding
property
in
the
comment
is
know
that
the
use
the
property
those
proposed
is
harmonious
with
those
and
consistent
with
what
is
already
there.
E
Considering
the
majority
of
the
SR
2
Lots
are
already
legally
non-conforming
being
smaller
than
than
necessary,
and
the
uses
are
very
similar.
There
are
no
additional
safeguards
necessary
to
consider
this
application.
The
applicant
has
volunteered
that
they
SiC
seek
to
resign
their
property
in
order
to
create
one
additional
single-family
dwelling
a
lot
of
language
on
that
topic,
but
I
felt
it
would
be
good
for
you
to
hear
that
before
you
consider
this
application.
E
B
Still
I'm
not
I,
think
I
mean
the
whole
thing
with
spot
zoning.
It's
relative
to
everything,
but
you
know
this
article
from
David
Owens
at
the
at
the
school
government.
You
know
attorney
Owens
that
was
distributed
and
it's
available
to
the
public.
They
want
it
from
Josh
or
maybe
it's
in
the
minute
end.
I,
don't
I
mean
D
agenda
packet,
I,
don't
know,
but
nonetheless
it.
It
does
say
much
that
maybe
it.
B
Certainly
be
contested
and
that
the
fact
that
I
think
I
gather
the
neighboring
all
the
neighbors
are
open
to
zoning.
The
neighborhood
I
do
think.
That's
the
better
way
to
go
so
I'm,
not
in
favor
of
doing
this
tonight,
I'm
in
favor
of
being
a
little
bit
broader
and
our
planning
and
just
doing
the
neighborhood,
and
that
takes
all
the
not
only
takes
all
the
guesswork
out
of
it,
we're
not
doing
back
or
not
in
risk
of
doing
spot
zoning.
A
Thinking,
if,
if
anybody
in
just
a
moment
and
what
this
board
has
fine
and
I
know
you're,
you
rather
take
the
policy
approach.
Let's
just
take
the
neighborhood,
but
you've
got
a
petition
before
you
and
the
things
you
have
to
look
at
is
one:
is
it
spot,
zoning
or
not,
and
that
could
go
either
way?
It's
not
necessarily
spot.
Zoning
took
because
it's
an
isolated
piece.
It
has
to
be
an
isolated
piece.
A
That
is
either
we
added
restrictions
to
it
or
restrictions
removed
compared
to
its
neighbors,
and
if
it
is
spot
zoning,
it's
not
necessarily
illegal
and
the
sport
has
to
determine
okay.
If
you
reach
the
conclusion,
it's
bought
something
he's
apparently
yeah.
The
second
question
is:
is
this
something
rezoning
reasonable
and
there
is
a
little
bit
stronger
burden
that
you
have
the
applicant
has
to
me.
You
have
to
find
if
I'm,
if
I'm
asked,
if
I
have
a
lot,
it's
on
the
edge
of
tr4
and
I
has
to
be
resolved.
A
I'm
just
asking
to
be
incorporated,
that's
almost
to
give
them
you.
You
know
it
doesn't
make
sense.
Fine
you're
done
here
if
you've
determined
it
spots
on
it
again.
That's
that's
one
decision
to
make.
The
second
is.
If
it
is
spots
awning
you
look
at
it
in
C
and
the
facts
that
are
provided
to
you.
Is
it
really
reasonable
that
this
piece
of
property
be
treated
like
its
neighbors
and
be
allowed
to
be
subdivided
so
that
it's
like
the
Lots
around
it,
which
were
less
than
half
acre
lots?
A
At
the
reasonable
is
that
you've
got
is
I,
can't
think
of
a
good
example.
My
bedrooms
have
to
probably,
but
if,
if
I,
had
a
presidential
law
in
the
middle
of
agricultural
property
and
I
lent
it
just
a
small
lot
and
I
wanted
it
resolved,
I
could
build
houses
on
it
which
aren't
allowed.
This.
Is
that
reasonable
that
suddenly
I
get
to
start
residential
structures
in
the
middle
of
a
farm?
That's
stretch,
however,
if
this
farm
has
already
developed
into
residential,
it's
become
more
farmers
houses
than
garden.
A
A
Then
it
is
that
reasonable?
Is
that
a
high
degree
of
reasonable
distance
there'd
be
a
lot
tree
like
they're
close
mate?
If
this
not
we're
sitting
in
the
middle
of
some
topic
or
tracks
and
I
wanted
to
cut
my
Africa
laugh
lot
in
2/4
echelons,
probably
be
less
reasonable,
again,
I'm
just
toasting
examples.
I
can't
find
it
for
you
right.
B
Well,
this
you
know
this
article
from
omens.
You
know
he
also
uses
it
some
court
cases
referring
to,
but
you
know
that
it
just
is
also
a
factor
of
whether
it's
part
of
a
comprehensive
plan
at
all.
You
know
that
you,
you
know,
can
does
it
fit,
does
it
have?
Does
it
fit
with
any
comprehensive
plan
at
all?
For
that
particular
area
and.
I
B
B
Right,
it
just
seems
to
me
that
there's
not
just
the
reasonableness
factor
which
I
get
what
you're
saying
but
there's
you
know
the
whole
thing
is
relatively
subjective.
Basically,
and
then
you
can
still
take
the
risk
and
spawn
zone
and
just
know
that
you've
got
a
risk
of
being
sued
and
it
doesn't
work
which
I
don't
think
we're
interested
in
that.
But
you
know
it's
still
just
the
best
decision
the
board
can
make
as
to
whether
it's
a
prudent,
you
know
the
directions
prudent
on
it,
and
it's
not
that
not
that
we're
dismissing
the
applicants.
B
A
A
Yeah,
you
said
you'd
conclude
your
socks
on
me
and
are
we
making
a
reasonableness,
giving
it
a
reasonableness
test?
I
think
you
can
put
that
to
work,
then
you're
good
to
go
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
trying
to
talk
you
out
of
it
right.
I
just
like
to
see
that
analysis
in
there,
because
if
there's
a
lawsuit
to
see
you
because
you
shouldn't
read
something
I
get
to
defend
that
right.
If
there's
a
lawsuit
to
see
you,
because
you
did
resolve
I,
get
to
defend
that
I
just.
B
B
A
A
I
E
Come
out
of
your
deliberations,
it's
not
something
I
draft
that
I
can't
address
the
comprehensive
plan.
Briefly
that
and
the
town's
comprehensive
plan.
There
is
language
about
supporting
the
character
of
existing
neighborhoods
with
infill
development
that
utilizes
existing
infrastructure
in
order
to
maximize
public
investment
and
breathable
revitalized
and
supported
existing
neighborhoods
and
I.
Think
the
concept
if
I
made
of
reasonableness
is
largely
noted
on
the
on
the
validity.
I
think
that
those
questions
that
are
it
from
that
same
article
for
mr.
E
A
A
A
I
A
A
E
L
E
I
L
E
But
remember
a
lot
of
these
lots
are
already
too
small,
so
a
lot
of
them
could
not
be
subdivided.
Some
of
them
could
and
create
a
couple
of
Lots,
but
many
of
them
are
already
at
to
the
tr4
size
of
and
about
a
third
of
them,
and
the
potential
study
area
would
be
too
small
to
be
subdivided
even
at
the
airport.
They
would
remain
legally
non-conforming
and
be
closer
to
a
ur8
because
they
are
so
small.
It
is
quite
a
grab
bag
over
there
block
sizes
for
sure.
So.
B
E
E
Think
it
like
I,
think
Lisa's
spoke
eloquently
to
that
and
effectively
it
was.
There
were
concerns
about
spot
zoning,
but
if
there's
a
greater
request
to
look
at
the
area,
but
they
might,
as
Ron
said,
the
requests.
Look
at
the
greater
area
is
appreciated
and
a
valid
thing
to
do.
But
it
cannot
stop
you
from
examining
that
the
individuals
right
to
petition
for
such
a
rezoning.
A
B
I
A
I
A
Can't
think
of
it
truly
unreasonable
my
it's
truly
unreasonable
other
than
you
ours
on
this
way,
your
neighbors
ours.
On
this
way,
it
is
a
few
feet
to
the
neck
signing
district.
You
would
take
a
lot
of
lots
being
resolved
to
make
you
a
jacent.
Is
it
unreasonable
to
pull
this
piece
out
and
after
no
greater
benefit
than
this
individual
being
able
to
create
a
new
loss?
B
It
does
I
tell
you
what
I'm
wrestling
with
and
I
think
it's
worth
articulating
and
that
is
I
want
us
and
I
think
we're
doing
so,
but
to
to
have
a
discussion
and
a
decision
that
would
be
suitable
for
the
next
time.
It
comes
up.
You
know
that
that
that
we
say
you
know
we
have
these
criteria
and
we
can
apply
them
and-
and
that's
that's
kind
of
really
what
I'm,
what
I'm
shooting
for
is
to
is
to
is
to
be
able
to
connect
those
dots
which.
A
You
know
you
want
to
put
some
limits
on
it
say:
okay,
you
can
be
sr2
instead
of
tr4,
but
with
conditional
zoning
you
can
put
further
limitations
on
and
this
situation
having
free
money
you
can
furies
on
TR,
for
there
just
result
here
are
four
and
this
one.
A
lot
of
communities
have
done.
They've
got
so
many
of
the
simpler.
E
B
E
L
That
was
gonna,
be
my
question
too,
because
if
you
look
at
it
says
public
hearing
tonight
at
six
o'clock-
and
this
was
posted
in
a
town
bulletin
board
on
seven,
nine
was
posting
in
the
back
nine
7:18
725,
with
the
exception
of
bus.
Is
there
anybody
else
here
tonight
that
lives
in
this
area
on
flat,
Creek
Road.
E
L
I
H
M
They
don't
have
to
the
people
that
want
to
if
they're
locked
conforms
to
that
they
could.
So
the
object
is
not
to
do
this
tonight,
but
to
do
a
larger
portion
and
a
little
bit
later
time
and
if
she'd
follow
through
on
that
from
June
we'd
be
having
an
earring
in
the
next
month
or
two
that
would
be
considering.
F
We're
drinking
a
pre-30
and
Clary
fruit,
not
discussion
about
the
reasonable
and
unreasonable
of
the
proposal.
I
would
find
it
very
unreasonable
to
turn
this
request
down.
It's
people
have
taken
a
terrible
piece
of
property.
You
all
probably
seen
that
house
awful
disrepair.
They
were
turning
it
into
a
really
nice
house
and
they
want
to
set
up
that
and
say
pretty
much
of
a
low
income
or
moderate
income
house
and
build
another
one,
probably
just
like
it
next
to
it,
which
would
vastly
improve
that
neighborhood.
F
So
I
would
ask
that
the
board
go
ahead
and
approve
this
tonight.
For
these
people
to
go
ahead.
They've
got
a
lot
of
money
invested
in
this
and
penalizing
them
making
them
wait
for
rezoning
of
the
whole
neighborhood
I
think
would
be
detrimental
to
their
project
and
to
the
town
as
a
whole.
They
could
abandon
it
and
just
leave
it
like
it
is
if
they
wanted
to
I.
F
F
I
was
at
the
time
the
Planning
Board
was
looking
at
trying
to
preserve
open
space.
There
was
not
the
residential
pressure.
This
is
what
six
seven
years
ago.
I
guess
I
got
it
old
your
mind
slips,
but
yeah.
The
whole
idea
was
to
try
and
keep
things
open
and
rural
and
now,
like
Mountain,
has
progressed,
we're
becoming
very
urban,
and
we
have
to
embrace
that
because
there
are
more
people
wanting
to
live
here.
There's
a
need.
You
talk
about
dollars,
you
take
the
one
lot
turn
it
into
to
your
tax
revenue
for
the
town.
A
K
Name
is
Thomas
Wright
I
leave.
It
live
at
three
five
one
Avena
Road
I
am
the
general
contractor,
slash
partner
in
the
house,
300
flat
Creek.
The
only
thing
that
separates
us
between
the
tr4
and
the
SR
two
is
the
eighth
acre
piece,
a
lot
on
Padgett
Town
Road
we're
the
very
next
person
on
Black
Creek
Road.
This
is
where
the
only
property
right
this
next
to
the
actual
zoning.
So
it's
not
like
we're
out
in
the
middle
of
nowhere
we're
actually
right
next
door.
K
Besides
188
they
core
a
lot
that
cannot
be
rezone,
Denny
Way,
so
I
was
just
asking.
If
you
would.
Please
consider
the
fact
that
we're
where
the
we're
planning
on
building
the
house
right
next
to
where
it
was
that
the
old
used
to
be
a
barn
there
used
to
be
a
some
kind
of
establishment
there.
We
want
to
build
it
right
on
the
same
property
that
was
there
on
the
Roseland
garden
property.
So
we'll
do
that
be
bigger
than
even
the
eighth
acre.
They
be
quarter
acre
and
more
so
we're
not
like.
A
B
Would
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
rezoning,
its
spot
zoning
but
I?
Think
in
the
discussion
with
town
attorney
it
meets
the
reasonableness
standard
and
I
would
like
to
ask
Josh
if
you
would
just
get
things
underway
to
move
forward
with
rezoning
the
rest
of
the
rest
of
the
adjoining
properties.
There.
I
A
Opposed
passes
for
all
right
communication
from
staff,
mr.
ron
smith
down
front
just
a
quick
with
a
not
an
oddity
in
the
law.
The
recent
Court
decision
and
pretty
this
plays
in
as
we're
always
doing,
this
staff
is
making
decisions
and
the
staff
can
make
a
decision
that
the
property
owner
doesn't
like,
and
the
property
owner
has
a
right
to
appeal.
They
have
30
days
to
appeal
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
A
Another
thing
is
staff
can
make
a
mistake,
and
staff
can
come
back
and
correct
that
mistake
so
subject
to
some
limitations
and
that's
steps
that
law.
What
is
new,
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
it's
new,
but
at
least
the
courts
are
now
open.
Their
mouths
I
said
it
out
loud
is:
if
staff
makes
a
decision
that
you,
as
the
representative
town,
think
it's
an
incorrect
decision,
you
think
they
made
a
mistake.
This
board
can
actually
appeal
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment.
There
was
a
case
that
came
up
or
the
court
of
appeals.
A
I
can't
remember
what
the
facts
were
now
where
a
decision
was
made,
but
the
staff
a
months
later.
Somebody
discovered
that
and
the
administration
discovered.
You
know
we
don't
like
that
decision.
We
think
it
was
an
error.
Now
the
staff
doesn't
think
they
were
an
error.
The
board
did
and
they
tried
to
set
that
action
aside.
A
Go
the
homeowner
and
say
staff
made
a
mistake
and
homeowner
challenged
that
and
the
court
said
if
the
Board
of
Aldermen
wanted
to
challenge
that
decision
by
the
staff
they
needed
to
appeal
to
the
board
of
judgment
within
30
days.
Don't
know
exactly
what
that
means
to
you.
You
can't
put
an
oversight
process
in,
but
it
might
be
worth
note
to
pay
a
little
more
closer
attention
to
your
board
minutes
in
case
you
think,
there's
been
a
decision,
it's
the
only
way,
I
know
to
Margaret.
A
It
is
get
your
Planning
Board
minutes
your
Board
of
Adjustment
minutes
your
staff
reports
and
look
at
what
they've
done.
So
if
a
decision
is
made,
you
have
that
opportunity
as
a
board
just
say,
I
think
they
made
a
mistake
with
the
town.
Let's
take
this,
the
Board
of
Adjustment
was
going
to
happen
once
in
a
lifetime,
but
the
courts
have
said:
that's
how
you
got
to
do
it.
If
the
town
has
a
body
determined
for
the
staffs
made
a
decision,
do
you
feel
there's
an
improper
interpretation?
A
B
A
A
A
G
I
G
Our
plan-
everybody
is
okay,
with
that
that'd
be
a
Thursday
and
just
to
give
everyone
a
heads
up.
That's
watching
or
listening
we'll
be
watching
or
listening
we're,
starting
our
preparations
and
maybe
should
have
already.
But
we've
got
a
group
together
for
our
upcoming
2020
census,
so
starting
to
get
some
information
about
that
out,
we
put
some
stuff
on
our
website.
The
county
has
done
the
same
thing,
so
we're
hoping
to
get
to
get
folks.
G
Make
folks
aware
of
that
and
get
folks
prepared
to
you
know
to
report
to
the
census,
if
you
in
fact
get
a
questionnaire,
because
it
means
a
lot
on
funding
for
towns
and
counties.
Those
of
you
that
travel
I-26
that
construction
will
be
starting
in
September
for
an
into
lasts
for
five
years
and
they
say
so
be
prepared
for
that.
It's
supposed
to
be
much
better
once
they
get
done.
G
I
think
it'll
be
four
lanes
on
each
side,
heading
from
Asheville
Hendersonville
and
then
to
get
back
to
you
on
our
test
of
Lake
tomahawk
that
took
a
while
to
get
back.
Finally
to
get
those
back
for
those
water
tests.
I'll
say
that,
in
order
to
be
over
the
limit,
you
have
to
have
235
fecal
coliform
colonies
in
100
milliliters
of
water
to
be
over.
The
safe
limit.
Irish
came
back
August
a
second
at
11
colonies,
so
it
is.
L
Of
things
mr.
mayor
so
Sharon
here
earlier,
where
she
is
our
new
chamber
president
and
want
to
commend
she
and
her
staff
on
solid
wood
Festool
this
past
weekend,
I
was
out
there
from
9:00
to
12:00
on
Saturday,
and
we
had
a
really
good
crowd.
Come
through
dodging
raindrops
I'm,
not
sure
how
it
did
after
arrested
today.
L
K
A
A
garbage
system
and
people
that
pick
up
our
garbage
and
you
have
some
outside
folks
that
don't
live
in
town.
They
don't
pay
for
those
garbage
pickups
and
the
brush
pickups
that
are
abusing
our
town.
Taxpayers
happens
all
the
time
and
I.
Just
if
you
see
that
or
have
a
a
sense
of
something
like
that,
be
maybe
going
on
get
in
touch
with
Town
Manager,
because
that's
number
one:
it's
against
our
ordinances
number
two,
it's
cheating
and
number
three.
A
It
just
adds
to
the
cost
of
when
we
have
to
read
regroup
and
do
our
garbage
contracts
and
future
it's
based
on
what
the
tonnage
volume
is
is
coming
out
of
this
town
and
some
of
it
I'm
not
gonna
I'm,
not
gonna
make
a
percentage,
but
some
of
it
I
know
here's
not
ours.
That's
it
with
that
meeting
adjourned.