►
From YouTube: Board of Commissioners' Briefing (September 1, 2020)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
First
buncombe
county
briefing
meeting
to
order.
Thank
you
all
for
being
with
us
commissioners.
Are
there
any
questions
about
the
items
on
the
agenda?
We're
going
to
talk
about
the
cares,
act,
funding
and
some
uses
of
those
funds
for
individual
assistance
in
child
care,
we're
going
to
discuss
high
performance
building
and
efficient
fleet
policies
and
get
an
update
on
coven
19.
A
A
Okay,
thanks
for
the
reminder,
commissioner,
so
that's
in
reference
to
discussion
about
the
process
to
use
for
us
to
appoint
members
to
the
early
childhood
education
committee,
which
obviously
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
this
last
meeting,
we're
kind
of
in
transition
from
the
way
we
did
it
before
to
the
new
way.
So
I
think
we
just
want
to
check
in
on
that
one
to
maybe
make
a
decision
about
how
we're
handling
the
transition.
A
B
A
B
The
individual
assistance
program
again
will
be
four
hundred
thousand
dollars,
we're
hoping
that
will
last
through
december.
The
focus
will
be
housing,
assistance
and
eviction.
Legal
services
and
funds
can
also
be
used
for
other
life,
essential
needs.
It
will
be
modeled
after
the
one
buncombe
fund
program.
As
you'll
recall,
most
of
those
funds
were
spent
on
housing,
we'll
also
be
working
with
pisgah
legal
services
to
provide
legal
assistance
for
those
who
are
facing
evictions
and
we'll
be
working
with
hhs
as
well.
Just
like
we
did
with
one
buncombe
the
child
care
program.
C
C
B
Yes,
so
there
is
a
proactive
piece
and
then
to
to
make
sure.
Hopefully
people
will
not
be
involved
in
the
court
system,
and
so
they
can
go
directly
to
hhs,
just
like
they
did
when
one
buncombe
was
functioning,
but
you
know
there
may
be
times
when
some
people
you
know
are
not
aware
of
that,
and
so,
if
they
are,
if
they
do
enter
the
court
system,
that's
when
pisgah
legal
will
be
made
aware
of
them
and
be
in
contact
with
hhs.
B
C
B
C
B
C
Have
the
answer,
but
so
when
we're
talking
about
400
000
on
each
of
these,
do
you
have
an
idea?
How
much
goes
to
the
end
user?
I
mean
how
much
of
that
400
they're
going
to
get.
I
mean
it's
50
000,
going
to
an
administrative
cost
etc.
Do
we
have
an
idea
of
how
much
of
that
will
drop
will
go
straight
to
the
community?
The.
B
B
I
think
we
were
done
with
that
one.
Yes,
so
again,
we're
working
with
hhs
staff
to
get
ready,
also
working
on
the
contracts
and
working
with
communications
on
outreach
and
we're
hoping
to
begin
by
mid-september.
E
B
Yep,
so
philip,
you
might
have
to
help
me
with
this
one,
but
we
have
very
limited
funds
in
the
existing
program.
So
that's
why
we're
wanting
to
really
increase
that
amount,
because
we
anticipate
a
high
level
of
need
so
so.
F
I'll
jump
in
here
real,
quick
before
philip
says
to
your
point:
if
we
could
save
money
on
this,
the
programs
that
we
currently
have
these
are
the
providers
of
those
programs
to
increase
that
level.
They're,
anticipating
that
that
level
of
increase.
This
is
the
cost
that
they
will
have
to
administer.
That.
A
F
A
E
A
A
A
H
Yeah,
I
attempt
to
answer
that
from
a
housing
perspective.
Yes,
we
will
be
modeling
one
bunk
them
and
actually
using
the
same
eligibility
criteria.
H
So
it's
really
no
different
to
some
extent
from
one
bunkaman
how
people
apply
it's
just
that
we
want
to
scoop
up
some
of
those
folks
through
the
courts
that
are
already
sitting
in
the
court
system
now
who
face
eviction
and
homelessness,
and
that's
where
pisgah
comes
in,
because
they're
already
working
with
those
families
to
try
to
prevent
that
homelessness,
but
that
wouldn't
be
the
entire
funds,
as
was
mentioned
earlier,
I
mean
we
want
to
work
on
prevention
also
and
from
a
child
care
perspective.
H
What
we
really
hoped
to
accomplish
with
those
funds
is
that
for
school-aged
children,
the
income
limit
for
subsidy
is
133
of
poverty,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
families
who
who
may
be
eligible
for
younger
children,
but
not
school-aged
children,
and
you
know,
with
the
school
situation
right
now,
there's
a
lot
of
need
out
there
for
school-aged
children,
so
moving
that
to
300
percent
will
hopefully
help
we.
We
really
feel
like
that.
H
H
E
A
So
it's
not
just
administration
of
the
funds
it's
actually
doing.
In
addition
to
maybe
helping
administer
some
funds
actually
doing
some
legal
advocacy
for
folks
who
are
already
in
a
foreclosure
process
to
hopefully
keep
them
in
their
house,
so
it's
400
000
for
direct
assistance
and
it's
basically
75
000
for
some
legal
advocacy
work
to
help
people
stay
in
their
homes.
Is
that
the
right
way
to
think
about
it?
Okay,
thank
you
for
talking
us
through
that.
C
F
But
there
might
be
new
cases
that
come
before
the
courts,
that
fisca
is
going
through
the
dockets
every
day
to
see
who
else
is
getting
filed.
So
there
might
not
just
be
a
list
of
existing
clients.
There'll
be
a
list
of
people
that
go
to
the
courts
and
get
filed
against
and
the
men
physicals.
They
have
a
person
that
goes
through
the
dockets
on
a
daily
basis
and
that's
how
they
also
find
clients
that
have
just
been
sued
or
charged
with
eviction
papers.
C
I
C
That
they're
going
to
be
on
immediately
and
then
they'll,
be
you
know
at
some
point
in
time.
We'll
want
want
that
information
back,
because
what
I'm
picturing
is
that
we're
sitting
75
000
over
here,
that's
in
the
pisgah
legal
eviction
fund
eviction
prevention
fund.
You
know
for
those
that
are
already
in
the
legal
battle.
That's.
C
And
either
way
we're
going
to
want
to
know,
I
mean
the
other
day
we
had
the
buncombe
county
job
recovery
act
where
they
came
in
and
they
said.
Okay,
this
was
the
number
of
businesses.
This
was
the
number
of
jobs
that
were
affected
and
we're
going
to
want
the
same.
We're
going
to
want
the
same
thing
from
this.
C
You
know,
okay,.
C
But
but
there
is
a
component
in
in
this,
where
they'll
be
able
to
receive
funds
to
to
pay
their
landlord.
Now
so,
and-
and
I
guess
eventually,
I
mean
when
they're
in
the
legal
situation-
they're
also
going
to
be
paying
past
part
of
that
legal
help
is
going
to
be
figuring
out
how
to
way
to
to
pay
back
x
and
help
them
through
that
process.
I
guess.
H
Yes,
that
would
be
correct.
I
mean
we
hope
we
try
to
do
some
data
analysis
about
where
the
need
may
lie
out
there
sure
and
you're
you're
probably
correct.
I
mean
we
took
a
guess
at
probably
a
million
dollars
somewhere
around
eviction
issues
and
those
kinds
of
things,
but.
A
H
A
F
A
Okay
and
just
to
just
to
make
sure
I'm
clear
on
that
kind
of
process,
this
doesn't
require
commission
approval
because
of
discretion
we
gave
within
administration
of
cares
funding
earlier.
Is
that
correct?
Okay,
all
right?
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
updates.
We
really
appreciate
it.
This
is
important.
I'm
glad
to
see
this
going
ahead.
A
J
Policy
good
afternoon,
commissioners,
good
afternoon,
my
monitor
is
not
on,
so
I
can't
see
the
display
so,
as
chairman
newman
said,
we're
here
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
high
performance
building
policy
and
potential
efficient
fleet
policy.
Again,
we
just
wanted
the
opportunity
to
kind
of
bring
this
before
you
have
a
chance
to
get
some
feedback
on
it.
J
High
performance
building
policies
are
really
a
best
practice
for
local
governments,
we're
one
of
the
few
that
don't
have
this
local
governments
of
our
size
that
don't
have
one
in
writing,
and
so
we
really
wanted
to
to
bring
this
to
you
today
to
get
some
some
feedback.
Obviously
there's
a
number
of
reasons
that
we
would
adopt
a
policy
or
resolution
on
high
performance
buildings,
obviously
to
reduce
operational
costs
to
optimize
the
life
cycle.
Economic
performance-
I
like
that
one
in
particular,
when
we
focus
on
new
construction
in
particular.
J
One
of
the
things
we
need
to
think
about
is
not
just
what's
the
upfront
cost,
but
what
is
the
long-term
cost
of
these
facilities?
They're
intended
to
be
here
for
30
40
50
years,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
we
make
good
decisions,
conserve
natural
resources,
reduced
waste
streams
and
improve
water
and
air
quality
as
a
part
of
these
new
building
processes.
J
So
the
county
created
a
vehicle
evaluation
team
fairly
recently
and
that's
its
various
departments,
performance
management,
general
services,
fleet
permits,
sustainability,
etc,
and
the
goal
there
is
to
to
really
look
at
how
and
when
and
why
we
make
these
purchases
and
to
sort
of
implement
a
new
evaluation
process
through
which
we
ensure
the
purchase
of
the
most
efficient
vehicles
possible
to
try
and
increase
fuel
efficiency,
reduce
fuel
costs
and
ultimately
meet
our
goal
of
reducing
greenhouse
gas
emissions
from
our
fleet
as
well.
So
really
what
we're
looking
at
here
is.
J
So
when
it
comes
to
building
policy,
there
were
a
handful
of
models
out
there.
Some
of
you
probably
already
heard
of
leed
leed
is
pretty
well
known.
Leed
is
leadership
in
energy
and
environmental
design.
It's
one
of
the
most
common
out.
There
there's
also
the
living
building
challenge,
which
is
a
newcomer
to
this
space
in
the
built
environment,
but
something
we
wanted
to
look
at
as
well,
and
we
also
sort
of
kicked
around
the
idea
of
a
custom
policy,
something
sort
of
a
hybrid.
J
Can
we
sort
of
cherry
pick
the
best
of
each
and
and
make
our
own
policy
and
really
where
we
ended
up,
was
with
coming
back
to
lead.
I
can
certainly
get
into
the
details
of
why
we
made
that
decision,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
lead
is
really
just
the
most
well
recognized
and
established
high
performance
policy
in
the
world,
and
it
it
is
available
for
virtually
all
different
building
types.
It's
research-backed
standards.
J
One
of
the
things
that's
really
critical
for
us,
too,
is
that
it's
very
well
known
in
in
the
built
environment,
space,
architects
and
engineers
are
very,
very
familiar
with
it,
so
that
professional
community
is
is
has
that
you
know,
has
the
knowledge
and
skills
to
help
us
go
through
that
process.
J
So
the
staff
recommendation
is
to
adopt
a
lead
policy
requiring
lead
gold
for
our
any
new
construction
and
facilities
over
10
000
square
feet
for
major
renovations
and
we're
defining
that
as
anything
that
is
50
percent
or
more
of
the
aggregate
square
footage
of
a
facility
and
anything
that
doesn't
sort
of
fall
into
the
those
two
categories,
wouldn't
necessarily
need
to
be
leed
certified,
but
could
still
essentially
use
that
same
lead
checklist
and
employ
as
many
cost
effective
measures
as
possible.
J
So
we
really
wanted.
This
is
the
point
at
which
I'm
really
hoping
to
get
some
some
feedback
from
the
commission
to
really
determine
how
we
move
forward.
We
have
some
additional
decision
points
in
terms
of
will.
We
want
to
move
forward
with
this
policy
and
if
we
do
do,
we
want
to
include
the
new
fleet
facility,
that
is
in
the
design
process,
as
we
speak,
we're
not
sort
of
so
far
down
the
road
that
we
couldn't
include
the
new
fleet
facility.
J
But
there
are
some
challenges
to
that,
since
we
didn't
include
it
up
front
and
then
we
have
to
look
at
you
know.
Do
we
want
to
potentially
include
other
buildings
that
we
don't,
that
may
not
be
counting
on
buildings,
but
that
we
do
have
sort
of
some
control
over
in
terms
of
school
capital,
fund,
commission
and
those
types
of
things?
So
do
we
want
to
include
those
types
of
educational
institutions
in
these
requirements,
just
some
food
for
thought,
as
we
as
we
kick
around
this
decision
process.
J
C
Back
right
right
there,
that
was
where
my
first
question
was
yes,
sir.
So
there's
no
question
lead
is
a
is
a
standard
that
is
used
in
construction
across
you
know.
You
know
major
business
and
in
government,
but
what
is
the
difference
between
lead
and
lead?
Gold.
J
So
lead
is
lead,
has
multiple
levels
right,
so
you
can
be
lead,
certified,
lead,
silver,
lead,
gold
or
lead
platinum
and
basically,
lead
is
what
it
is.
It's
a
checklist
and
it's
based
on
a
point
system.
So
the
number
of
points
you
get
is,
then
is
the
level
of
certification
you
get
so,
for
example,
and
I
have
a
lead
checklist
in
front
of
me,
because
I
was
sure
that
I
was
going
to
get
that
question.
J
J
It
takes
up
to
50
points
to
be
silver,
60
points
to
be
gold
and
80
points
to
be
platinum,
so
essentially
one
of
the
flaws
of
lead,
in
my
opinion,
and
although
it
is
certainly
a
good
standard,
one
of
the
flaws
is
this:
this
it's
not
weighted
right.
So
a
point
is
a
point,
regardless
of
which
category
it
comes
from.
J
We
decided
that
gold
was
a
high
enough
standard
for
us,
and
that
was
one
that,
after
some
discussion
with
general
services,
they
felt
like
was
reasonable
and
they
could
be
met
in
terms
of
the
construction
process
for
most
of
our
facilities.
So.
C
C
One
of
the
things
I've
never
really
understood-
and
I
remember
you
know
a
previous
commissioner
that
was
here
that
you
know
didn't
understand
it,
maybe
for
different
reasons,
sure
how
I
can
look
at
the
buncombe
county
courthouse
with
all
those
windows,
yes
and
think
in
any
way
in
this
world
it
could
be
energy
efficient,
sure
with
all
those
windows.
Sure
I
mean
it's
a
legitimate
question
and
to
be
leed
certified.
C
You
know,
let's
see
what
I'm
looking
for
that,
just
because
it's
leed
certified,
I
don't
wanna
automatically
think
well,
it
is
the
most
energy
efficient
building
in
the
county,
because
that
is
not
the
case
that.
C
C
Second,
is
that
we're
reducing
the
pollution
carbon
footprint
you
know
of
you
know
during
the
construction
process
and
over
time
in
that
building.
You
know
those
are
those
are
two
things,
but
that
the
first
one
I
mean
we
can.
C
I
think
this
requires
more
more
conversation,
more
information,
more
numbers.
You
know
that
we
could
build
it
because
you
said
accustom
sure
and
I'll
go
back
to
my
previous
life
when
I
was
with
clayton
sure
that's
what
we
did.
C
C
You
know
the
highest
quality
for
that
of
that
affordability,
for
that
customer
and
can
and
and
came
up
with
what
we
called
it.
She
branded
it
and
I
don't
know
why
the
county
can't
can't
can't
do
that,
because
I
you
know
and
I'm
more
hush.
But
I
don't
want
us
to
be
misled
that
just
because
we're
investing
millions
in
in
lead
construction
that
it's
going
to
be
the
most
efficient
building,
sure
that
we
could
have
built.
J
J
We
certainly
would
be
willing
to
discuss
even
you
know,
adding
potential
language
for
net
zero
energy
if,
if
that
is
something
that
the
board
would
be
interested
in,
so
you
know
at
this
point,
we
simply
wanted
to
recommend
you
know
a
sort
of
an
out
of
the
box
standard
that
we
can
use
and
that
everyone
was
comfortable
with,
but
we
are
very
open
to
crafting
that
language
to
meet
the
board's
needs.
J
A
J
Essentially,
that
means
it
was.
They
used
the
checklist
to
build
to
lead
silver.
I
believe,
okay,
but
they
did
not
pay
for
the
certification.
Okay,.
A
So
I
know
this
is
this
is
kind
of
a
big
generalization.
I
mean
every
project
is
its
own
unique
project.
But
what
do
you
see
in
terms
of
you
know?
Let's
just
for
a
moment,
I
mean
there's,
there's
all
these
sustainability
and
energy
goals
that
we
have
that
are
important
just
from
a
kind
of
purely
kind
of
financial
standpoint.
A
What
what
are
the
generalizations
that
that
you
see
when
you
when
organizations
choose
to
go
for
leed
certification,
especially
a
fairly
high
standard
like
gold
sure
in
terms
of
is
there
a
premium
construction
costs
generally
compared
to
not
having
that
and
then
the
operating
cost
for
the
facility,
like
utility
costs,
other
things
you
know,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
just
going
to
think
this
sounds
great
from
an
environmental
standpoint,
but
you
know
how
much
is
it
going
to
increase
construction
costs
if
any
and
then
what
does
it
do
usually
pay
for
themselves
through
lower
operating
costs?.
J
That's
absolutely
correct,
so
it
does
kind
of
run
the
gamut,
because
you're
talking
about
lead
can
be
used
for
any
type
of
facility,
so
obviously
a
50
000
square
foot
office
facility,
like
the
one
we're
in
very
different
animal
than
a
20
000
square
foot
library.
J
That
said,
it
can
range
anywhere
from
as
low
as
seven
or
eight
percent
that
we've
seen
to
as
high
as
12
to
15
percent.
J
In
terms
of
that
premium
that
you
pay
for
the
construction
costs,
so
I
think
that's
kind
of
a
safe
range,
but
to
nail
that
number
down
specifically,
it
really
is
kind
of
on
a
project-by-project
basis,
but
for
the
most
part,
if
you
focus
on
you
know
the
energy
side
of
it,
which
is
I
mean,
that's
where
we
tend
to
spend
a
lot
of
our
our
time
and
energy,
because
I
think
that's
that
helps
us
meet
our
internal
goals
for
reducing
carbon
emissions
and
of
course
we
haven't
built
a
lot
of
new
facilities.
J
Recently,
I
mean
we're
still
in
the
process
with
the
library,
but
most
of
these
things
are
done
with
the
idea
that
you're
trying
to
make
good
decisions.
That
will
inform
long-term
cost
savings
right
that
that
that
lower
operational
cost
will
pay
for
itself,
but
to
put
a
time
frame
on
it
again,
it's
it's
really
a
function
of
what
type
of
facility
is
it
and
and
what
measures
are
you
choosing
to
implement?
C
So
I
was
trying
to
remember
what
the
what
we
had
developed
the
energy
star
was
the
was,
what
was
utilizing
house
and
how
we
came
up
with
energy
smart,
which
met
the
needs
of
the
of
the
customers,
and
the
only
concern
that
I
have
with
this
is
that
I
I'm
not
against
lead
building
at
all.
I
think
it's
a
good
standard.
C
I
think
we
have
to
be
very
careful
with
with
the
points
sure
and
that
we
have
to
make
sure,
because
we
are
a
government
that
we're
spending
somebody
else's
money.
It's
not
like
we're
in.
You
know
that
that
we
are.
C
You
know
that
achieves
and
meets
our
goals,
because
I
mean
we
just
you
know
we
just
all
agreed
to
invest
a
lot
of
money
in
solar
sure
and
we
got
to
have.
This
has
got
a
all.
This
has
got
to
roll
in
together,
you
know
and
because
you
know
I
don't
want
us
to
see
automatically
okay,
we're
going
to
lead
silver,
and
then
you
know
we
come
in
here
and
the
building
costs
52
million
when
it
could
have
cost
35
million.
I
C
This
helped
me
a
lot.
I
had
no
idea
that
location
transportation
that
there
was
point
that
that
type
of
point
system
was
applied
to
lead
building.
J
Okay,
absolutely-
and
I
do
think
that
is-
is
you
know
it
can
become
and
should
probably
be
a
common
practice
for
us
to
bring
these
issues
to
you
as
we're
making
these
decisions
so,
and
I
think
that
again
we
can
certainly
craft
this
language
and
build
this
into
how
we
inform
those
decisions
moving
forward.
J
So,
for
example,
if
there
is
a
decision
to
be
made,
one
system
versus
another
system-
and
we
can
certainly
part
of
this
process-
will
be
the
commissioning
agents
for
any
of
these
facilities
will
be
able
to
run
life
cycle
costs
analysis
for
these
decisions
as
you
make
them,
and
then
we
can
certainly
bring
those
to
the
board
at
any
time
to
get
feedback
in
terms
of
how
we
move
forward.
You
know
again,
we
don't
build
a
lot
of
buildings,
so
I
hope
that
I'm
not
here
every
year
you
know
you
know.
J
A
C
C
I
I
believe
it
was
that
it
was
a
very
wise
investment
for
the
for
the
community,
and
so
I
think
you
know
I
don't
want
to
belabor
belabor
this
point,
but
I
don't
want
to
think
that
just
because
we
think
leed
certified
is
good,
that
all
of
a
sudden
that
the
commissioners
are
okay
with
that
and
we're
gonna.
You
know
rubber
stamp
the
money,
because
if
it
comes
back
and
it's
too
expensive,
it's
it's
our
job
to
say.
Well,
why
is
it
so
much?
A
A
F
And
that's
the
common
practice
and
I
think
what
what
jeremiah
was
also
saying
is
every
project
we
have.
We
would
also
look
at
the
payback
as
well
yeah,
so
we'll
do
that
cost
by
that
cost
analysis
for
everyone.
You
will
see
that
before
we
award
any
contract.
I
think
what
we're
asking
is
when
we
put
a
bid
out,
we
would
put
into
that
bid.
We
want
these
standards,
and
so
you
can
bring
to
us
both
options
right
now.
There's
no
standards
out
there
that
we
are
using
so
we're
asking
for
that
guidance.
F
C
Do
we
have
any
idea
on
a
hybrid
I
mean
you
mentioned?
Hybrid
has
general
services,
and
you
know
your
department
have
had
any
discussion
about.
Well.
If
we
could,
you
know
if
we
can
do
it
ourselves,
here's
what
we
would
want.
We
have
these
eight
components.
We'd
want
to
make
sure
that
this
yeah.
This
is
our
lead.
J
Absolutely
we've
had
pretty
extensive
discussions
about
it
honestly
and
I
think
that's
the
way
we
leaned
initially
and
as
we
began
to
build
it
out
more
and
more
it.
First
of
all,
it
ended
up
kind
of
looking
like
a
lead
policy
anyway,
but
it
also
it
really.
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
drove
home
to
us
was
if
we
do
have
a
custom
policy.
J
For
us,
you
know
the
the
united
states,
green
building,
council
revamps
lead
every
couple
of
years,
and
so
it's
sort
of
letting
somebody
else
do
all
of
that
work
for
you
in
terms
of
incorporating
new
technologies
and
and
that
sort
of
thing,
so
that's
where
we
sort
of
fell
back
to
you
know,
an
out-of-the-box
solution
worked
a
little
better.
I
think
for
us,
but
you
know
again
we
serve
the
board,
so
we're
certainly
willing
to
continue
to
have
this
conversation.
A
I
bet
they're
at
least
certified,
if
not
some
higher
standard
with
my
is
my
hunch.
So
one
other
question
I
have
is
you
know
at
the
last.
You
know
one
of
recent
meetings.
We
voted
to
put
10
million
dollars
toward
solar
on
more
than
40
public
buildings
and
the
financial
analysis
on
that
looked
really
attractive
and
compelling.
A
Absolutely,
and
so
you
know
if
we
build
new
buildings
and
that
individual
building
is,
you
know,
is
similarly
financially
attractive
to
do
solar
compared
to
what
we
just
looked
at
for
for
40
different
buildings
in
a
way
just
kind
of
having
a
well-designed
well-constructed
building,
that's
run
by
solar
power.
I
mean
like
five
or
ten
years
ago
that
would
have
been
like.
A
Oh
my
gosh,
that's
the
most
green
building
anyone's
ever
built,
but
so
it
seems
to
me
like
that,
should
almost
kind
of
become
fairly
routine
new
construction
and
I'm
sure
leed
certification
would
encourage
that
kind
of
design.
It
does.
K
A
A
That
kind
of
putting
a
lot
of
thought
into.
How
do
we
build
that
out
is
a
great
opportunity
and
you
know
how
much
attention
does
do
we
draw
away
towards
like
kind
of
making
sure
we're
going
after
all
these
points
to
get
a
lead
certification
when
there's
this
huge
opportunity,
that's
just
right
in
front
of
us
and
kind
of
fully
developing
that
that
opportunity.
A
So
I
would,
I
would
just
say,
for
my
two
cents,
you
know
in
addition
to
whatever
kind
of
lead
policy
we
make.
I
think
we
should
have
a
policy
specifically
on
new
construction,
that
unless
it's
a
site
where
it's
just
clearly
there's
reasons
solar
is
not
going
to
be
good
there
due
to
you
know,
mature,
immature
trees
or
just
whatever
factor.
A
Do
we'll
do
one
of
those
things
so,
and
I
don't
see
that
as
necessarily
inconsistent
with
lee,
but
maybe
in
addition
to
that
and
it's
because
in
some
cases
we
might
say
you
know
lee
doesn't
really
make
sense
here,
but
let's
definitely
install
solar
as
part
of
the
project.
C
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
some
incorporations
and
it's
a
good
discussion.
I
know
it's
going
to
probably
go
a
little
bit
longer
than
what
people
think
it
should,
but
I
know
when
ink
intermediate
was
was
done
in
probably
other
schools,
because
they
have
the
solar
shades
on
where
they
actually
change,
based
on
the
sun
and
and
that
reduces
the
the
the
heat
inside
the
building
all
kinds
of
different
things.
C
But
I
think
one
of
the
for
me
a
part
of
lead
that
I
that
I,
like
that's
not
necessarily
as
much
energy
related,
is
that
you
know
people
are
in
these
buildings.
We
got
to
remember
these
are
not
just
brick
and
mortar
as
we
call
them.
You
know.
The
air
quality
in
these
buildings
are
critical
even
more
today
and
then
in
the
past,
and
you
know,
though
it
may
be
solar
that
we
use
it
may
be.
C
You
know
we
cannot
over
emphasize
yeah,
I
mean
you
could
you
could
put
and
and
I'm
not
against
the
chairman's
you
know,
thoughts
as
far
as
solar.
I
think
solar
should
be
part
of
you
know
one
piece
of
the
puzzle,
but
you
know
you
could
put
you
know
and
I'm
not
being,
but
you
could
put
that
on
a
building
leave
all
the
windows
open,
you're
still
going
to
have
a
ridiculous
energy
bill,
and
so
so
you've
got
to
make
sure
that
you
know
the
windows
are
proper.
C
C
C
You
know
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
like
that,
but
as
we're
looking
at
increasing
the
efficiency
of
these
buildings
that
we're
putting
solar
on,
then
we
need
to
look
at
the
efficiency
inside
of
that
building
for
the
people
that
are
in
there
that
have
to
breathe
that
air
and
that
just
because
we're
putting
solar
on
it,
that
we
don't.
We
need
to
make
sure
we're.
C
Looking
at
the
the
coolers
and
the
hvac
units
and
and
some
of
those
that
they
get
neglected
a
lot
I
mean
you
can
drive
around
the
buildings
and
look
at
them
and
see
the
age
of
them
and
they
get
they.
They
go
get
neglected
and
I
just
don't
want
us
to
do
that.
Just
because
you
know
some
of
these
new
energy
options
that
can
help
us
and
save
us
money,
it's
gonna,
you
know,
I
don't
want
it
to
be
the
whole
conversation,
but
good
comments.
A
J
Honestly,
probably
in
the
next
couple
of
months
that
one
wasn't
necessarily
one
that
now
we
certainly
can
update
you,
but
it
doesn't
require,
like
a
board
resolution
of
any
kind
to
do
that,
but
we
can
certainly
update
you
and
give
you
a
heads
up
as
to
what
those
what
that
policy
will
potentially
look
like
and
get
your
feedback
on
it.
But
it's.
The
simple
version
is
basically
requiring
the
most
efficient
vehicle
possible
in
its
class
as
vehicle
requests
are
made,
and
then,
if
that,
for
example,
isn't
is
an
electric
vehicle?
J
That's
great
if
the
market
may
not
be
mature
enough
for
an
electric
truck,
for
example,
if
that's
the
request,
then
we
go
with
the
most
efficient
in
its
class
and
and
then
sort
of
work
our
way
down
from
there
I
mean
that's
the
general
concept
with
that
potential
policy,
but
we're
we're
happy
to
bring
that
before
the
board.
A
A
Not
but
it's
I
mean
the
basic
concept
you
just
summarized,
but
it's
still
still
a
work
in
progress.
J
It's
still
a
work
in
progress.
Yeah
we've
got
multiple
departments
sort
of
talking
through
you
know.
How
do
we
go
through
the
evaluation
process?
Who
has
what
say,
and
what
and
obviously
general
services
in
fleet
has
a
has
a
big
role
in
sort
of
you
know
that
decision-making
process
as
well.
Do
we
have
the
infrastructure
necessary
to
even
support
electric
vehicles?
If
we
start
adopting
them,
do
we
have
the
the
technicians
with
the
experience
to
work
on
electric
vehicles?
J
A
J
Don't
really
have
a
black
and
white
policy
in
terms
of
how
we
request
vehicles,
we
have
a
process
that
we've
used
and
it's
been
pretty
consistent,
at
least
recently
that
those
requests
go
to
general
services
and
his
team
mike's
team,
essentially
you
know,
works
with
fleet
and
then
makes
those
determinations.
Do
you
need
this
vehicle?
Let
me
look
at
your
other
vehicles.
What's
the
mileage
on
them?
Do
we
need
to
even
fulfill
these
requests
and
if
so,
you
know
determining
what
vehicles
are
available?
A
We
don't
have
any
county
policy
in
terms
of
saying,
hey.
There's
such
a
such
department
use
new
vehicle.
Here's
a
model
now
here's
another
model,
maybe
it
costs
more,
but
it's
it's.
You
know
a
lot
less
on
gas,
so
right
how
the
decision
is
made
to
do
this
versus
this.
That's
kind
of
just
that
sort
of
at
the
discretion
of
it
is
the
staff
level
to
make
those
kind
of
decisions
we.
J
A
Something
formal
well
just
thank
you
for
all
that.
I
really
look
forward
to
it.
I
think
it's
an
important
part
of
the
discussions
in
terms
of
how
we
get
to
our
our
policy
goals,
our
higher
you
know
our
our
energy
goals,
because
it's
a
big
part
of
the
footprint
right.
It's
completely.
A
When
we
buy
new
vehicles,
we're
going
to
have
them
for
a
long
time.
So,
if
you're
going
to
try
to
make
changes
over
10
years,
buying
new
vehicles
today
that
that
are
not
as
efficient
as
it
could
be,
or
electric
or
whatever
you're
locking
in
a
lot
of
you
know,
status
quo.
Every
time
you
buy
one
of
those
absolutely.
J
A
To
discussing
it,
absolutely
any
other
questions,
commissioners,
I.
C
Just
got
a
comment,
so
one
is
general
services.
You
showed
a
buncombe
county,
jeff
yeah,
you
showed
the
sheriff's
car.
So
then
we're
talking
about
general
service
general
services
does
an
amazing
job
in
taking
care
of
the
the
vehicles.
I
most
confident
in
that
I
just
you
know.
C
When
people
ask
questions
about
money,
they
ask
us
sure.
So
I
mean
if
we're
buying
a
sixty
thousand
dollar
car.
Well,
that's
a
problem.
I
mean
it'd
be
good
to
know
how
much
his
car
I
bet
I
better
blow
my
mind
how
much
these
vehicles
are
costing
now?
Oh
yeah
and
some
of
them
it
doesn't
matter
what
you
do.
You're
gonna
get
eight
miles
a
gallon.
I
C
Sure
I
mean,
if
you're
pulling
it
around
so
then
it
might
be
the
missions
and
things
so
I
mean
I
just
it'd,
be
good
to
get
more
information,
good
discussion
on
it,
and
you
know,
I
think,
if
we
say
we're
going
to
have
a
policy
that,
as
a
commissioner
we're
always
going
to
have
to
that
ordinance
is
going
to
show
up
on
our
agenda
and
we're
going
to
be
the
ones
that
have
to
prove
it.
So
that's
why
we
asked
the
question.
So
thanks
for
all
the
information
that
was
great.
A
So
one
last
thing
you
did
ask
us
about
schools
and
other
like
not
county
but
buildings,
but
county
partnered
buildings,
correct
yeah.
I
mean,
I
think
these
are
all
things
we
want
to
encourage,
but
I
guess
just
from
a
decision-making
standpoint.
A
You
know
we're
not
always
the
driver
on
the
development
and
design
of
those
facilities,
so
would
it
be
more
of
a
the
county?
Here's
what
the
county
is
doing.
We
encourage
our
partners
to
consider
this
and
we'll
we'll
help
you
where
we
can,
but
it's
I'm
not
even
sure
we
could
require
it.
But
what
are
your
thoughts
on
how
we
would
if
we
said
we
want
to
promote
this?
How
would
we
do
that.
J
Well,
we
we've
we're
actually
still
waiting
on
that
that
decision-making
process
to
determine
whether
or
not
we
even
have
that
authority
right.
So
we're
we're
asking
that
exact
same
question
and
hopefully
we'll
find
out
relatively
soon
whether
or
not
we
could.
We
could
even
do
it
if
we
wanted.
A
I
think
they've
been
doing
a
great
job
already,
as
commissioner
beltran
said,
I
think
they've
probably
done
more
than
we
have
in
some
ways,
so
all
right.
Well,
thank
you,
gentlemen.
Very
much
look
forward
to
talking
about
this
further
at
the
formal
meeting,
no
problem.
Okay,
all
right
last
up
well
actually
almost
last
step,
but
the
kova
19
update
and
stacy
saunders
and
fletcher
tove
are
here
to
talk
to.
L
L
L
L
Our
first
slide
is
what
you've
come
to
know
as
the
epi
curve,
and
this
is
showing
us
our
confirmed
cases
by
date
and
then
the
seven
day
average,
which
helps
us
sort
of
actually
see
that
that
curve,
and
as
I
mentioned
the
last
time
I
came
before
you-
we
saw
the
low
and
slow
curve
early
in
the
spring
when
we
had
the
stay-at-home
order.
In
effect
for
this
state
and
then
saw
that
slight
bump.
L
During
the
incubation
period,
following
the
phase
two
implementation
and
the
lifting
of
some
of
our
restrictions
in
the
state
and
which
also
coincided
with
one
of
our
major
holidays
being
memorial
day,
and
so
you
see
that
slight
increase
there
and
then
that
leveled
out
and
then
there
was
a
steady
increase
in
cases
as
we
moved
further
into
phase
two
and
we
began
to
interact
with
each
other
more
and
more
movement
in
general
of
people
and
which
also
had
another
major
holiday
within
that
time
period,
which
was
july
4th-
and
you
saw
that
a
little
bit
more
steep
of
an
increase.
L
Recently,
we've
been
seeing
a
slight
decrease
in
our
new
cases
per
day.
That's
that
very
for
you
all
the
very
far
right
pieces,
that
about
a
month
ago,
we
were
seeing
close
to
about
40
new
cases
on
average
per
day
in
our
most
recent
weeks,
we're
actually
seeing
more,
like
20
cases
per
day
this
with
a
steady
community
testing
strategy
and
our
decreasing
percent
positivity
rate,
which
I'll
share
with
you
shortly
and
mass
mandate
going
into
effect,
statewide.
L
L
This
indicator
is
defined
as
the
percent
of
tests
that
are
administered
that
come
back
to
us
as
positive,
and
so
in
buncombe
county.
We
had
five
percent
of
the
tests
coming
back
positive
throughout
july,
and
we've
seen
that
percent
positivity
decreased
slightly
in
the
past
few
weeks
to
about
3.7,
so
we're
hitting
just
below
four
percent.
L
L
There
are
several
access
points
for
testing
in
the
county
and
there
are
three
community
testing
sites
that
are
supported
by
buncombe
county,
which
are
at
a
b
tech,
the
ingles
and
swananoa,
and
then
the
buncombe
county
sports
park.
We
do
have
a
new
registration
process
in
place
that
I
mentioned
the
last
time.
L
I
was
here
that
does
have
folks
going
to
our
symptom
checker
to
see
if
they
meet
the
criteria
for
testing
and
then
completing
registration
ahead
of
time-
and
we
have
dr
mullendore
here
with
us
today
as
our
operational
lead
for
the
community
testing
site.
So
if
you
have
specific
questions
at
the
end,
she'll
be
glad
to
answer
those
as
well.
L
C
So,
can
you
tell
me
what
suspected
patience
admitted
means
is
in
the
bottom
bar
really
have
to
blow
it
up
to
see
it.
L
L
So
the
suspected
would
be
folks
who
are
coming
into
the
hospital
system
that
do
not
have
a
laboratory
confirmed
case,
a
laboratory,
confirmed
diagnosis.
Yet
so
they
have
covet-like
symptoms
that
are
that
they
have
symptoms
that
are
consistent
with
covid,
but
may
not
have
a
laboratory
confirmed
test,
yet
it
could
be
pending
and
then
the
confirmed
one
would
be.
Your
laboratory
confirmed.
L
L
C
Well,
they
what
it's!
What
what
I
heard
is
that
these
folks
have
coveted
like
symptoms,
maybe
and
they're
tested
and
they're
they're
suspected
that
they
could
be
admitted
they
haven't
been
admitted.
The
35
at
the
top
is
what's
in
the
hospital
right
now.
Is
that
right
is
that
a
mission
currently
hospitalized.
C
So
they
haven't
confirmed
them
yet
they're
there,
but
they
haven't
confirmed
yet
they're
correct,
okay,
but
35
is
is,
I
know,
we've
asked
this
question
a
hundred
times:
that's
buncombe
county!
No,
I
see
it's
not
is.
D
C
And
it's
it's
still
hospital
capacity,
so
I
get
that
correct.
A
L
I
A
Maybe
is
there
a
way
to
just
show
the
mission
numbers,
the
paper
usually
reports
this
and
then
they
say
and
here's
how
many
are
admission,
which
I
mean.
L
L
Each
hospital
is
going
to
run
their
own
data
reports
if
you're
interested
in
that
I'd,
be
glad
to
reach
out
to
mission
and
see
if
they
would
share
that
with
us
to
be
able
to
share
it
with
you.
So
you
can
see
what
missions
population
looks
like
again
that
may
not
all
be
buncombe
county
residents.
C
But
that
is
a
question
we
get
asked.
Okay,
when
we're
out
you
know
how
many
you
know
they
want
to
know
how
many
is
in
the
hospital
and
they
want
to
know
accuracy
they
want
to
know.
Should
I
be
afraid,
should
I
not
be
afraid
you
know,
and
it's
not
that
they,
you
know
want
to
walk,
walk
around
without
a
mask
they
want
to.
They
want
to
walk
around
and
not
be.
L
Yeah
so
you're
you're
essentially
saying
the
last
part
of
my
presentation,
which
is.
L
No,
that's
great,
absolutely
that's
going
to
be
my
sentiment
exactly
that
we
are
seeing
our
trends
go
in
a
really
great
direction,
but
that
doesn't
mean
this
is
the
time
to
let
up.
That
means
that
what
we've
been
doing
is
working
and
we
have
to
keep
doing
it.
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
with
you.
L
You
know
I
get
to
talk
about
the
data
and
I
get
to
talk
about
what
we're
doing,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
people
behind
the
scenes
who
are
doing
that
work
that
this
isn't
just
about
numbers
that
we
have
health
and
human
services
staff
and
county
staff
and
community
partners
who
make
this
happen.
So
all
the
strategies
that
we
put
in
place.
L
We
continue
to
remind
our
community
of
the
three
ws
that
wear
weight
and
wash
that
it's
important
for
all
of
us
to
follow
the
precautions
and
when
we
protect
ourselves
we're
protecting
each
other
and
the
more
that
we
commit
to
those
three
w's.
The
more
likely
we're
to
continue
to
see
our
trends
go
in
the
right
direction,
and
so
right
now
the
3ws
are
our
best
prevention
mechanism
and,
to
your
point,
we're
seeing
really
good
progress
in
our
trends.
L
L
A
Questions
is
it,
is
it
possible
to
just
I
realize
it
just
got
announced,
but
and
or
maybe
maybe
fletcher
is
going
to
talk
about.
L
L
I
can
give
you
the
the
brief
synopsis
and
then
fletch
can
chime
in
with
anything
else
so
phase
2.5
means
the
following:
mass
gathering
limits
will
increase
to
25
people
indoors
and
50
people
outdoors,
which
is
different
than
our
current,
which
was
10
and
25
respectively
playgrounds
may
open
museums
and
aquariums
may
open
at
50
capacity.
F
So,
commissioner,
fletch
is
here
and
in
the
past
we
have
stayed
aligned
with
the
governor.
I
don't
see
anything
here.
We
can
think
about
that
some
more
and
if
there's
anything,
we
see
differently
for
our
county.
We
can
bring
that
back
to
you,
but
right
now
we're
assuming
that
we
will
stay
aligned
with
the
governor's
orders.
C
I
C
That
mean
we
can
that
we
can
make
the
decision
to
to
do
that
or.
A
Do
we
just
remind
me,
do
we
actually
have
like
our
local
order
doesn't
does
it,
it
does
not
actually
speak
to
gems
or
the
size
of
a
community
gathering
being
at
10
or
20.
Does
it
speak
to
those
details?
It
just
aligns
with
the
governor's
order.
Okay,
so
ours
will
automatically
adjust
once
the
governor
adjusts
his
order.
G
K
A
Okay,
well,
I'm
you
know,
I
mean
we've
just
heard
this
information.
I
think
it
sounds
positive.
I
mean
one
of
the
things
I've
heard,
particularly
in
some
ways
related
to
the
gyms,
because
I
feel
like
there's,
been
a
lot
of
ambiguity
about
the
policy
on
gyms
they're,
technically,
not
open,
but
there's
this
sort
of
exception
or
loophole
which
is
impossible
to
document.
C
And
I
you
know
and
to
speak
to
the
county
and
you
know
the
job
they're
doing.
I
visited
the
gym
yesterday
and
I
mean
it
was
clear
on
the
front
of
that,
what
you
did
or
you
didn't
go
in
I
mean
it
was
they
were
very
I
mean
they
were
by
the
book
and
and
people
spread
out
and
should
have
went
and
worked
out,
but
it
didn't.
But
I
just
went
by
to
say
hey,
but
is
there,
should
we
be
putting
this
on
the
agenda
tonight
to
to
go
on
and
do
it.
F
F
C
Let
me
tell
you
why
I
like
being
able
to
do
it
as
quick
as
possible.
You
know
what
no
fault
of
any
any
anybody
here,
but
we
run
into
a
situation
last
time
where
we
had
discussions
on
what
we
might
do,
then
the
media
goes
out
and
puts
out
that
that's
what
we're
gonna
do
you
know
and
then
we
gotta
deal
then
we're
dealing
with
with
that.
You
know
it'd
be
good.
If
we're
able
to
have
recommendations
here
and
then
we
all
agree
on
what
we're
gonna
do
and
then
move
forward.
G
C
G
L
I
think
upon
first
hearing
staff
was
talking
more
about
the
mass
gathering
limitation
pieces
so
we'll,
if
you
have
feedback
and
at
the
you
know,
at
the
leisure
of
the
board,
if
you
all
are
looking
toward
wanting
to
align,
then
that
is
absolutely
in
your
authority
to
do
so.
If
you'd
like
for
us
to
go
back
and
think
about
or
give
have
your
feedback
in
for
us
to
talk
with
both
our
planning
and
command
pieces
of
it
and
come
back
to
you,
then
we
can
do
that
as
well.
A
I
would
I
would,
I
would
prefer,
for
the
staff
to
have
time
to
reflect
on
this
yeah.
I
think
that
jim's
policy
is
a
is
a
seems
like
a
nice
clarification
for
what
the
rules
really
are.
Instead
of
you're
supposed
to
be
shut
down
and
no
one's
supposed
to
be
in
there.
A
Oh,
except
you
can
have
an
unlimited
number
of
people
in
there
if
they
say
that
there's
some
reason
they
have
to
do
it,
but
in
terms
of
the
changes
in
terms
of
just
indoor
gatherings
and
things
like
that,
I
would
like
our
health
staff
to
have
a
chance
to
kind
of
carefully
reflect
on
it,
because
that's
how
this
thing,
that's
how
this
thing
spreads
right.
So
you
know
we're
seeing
some
positive
numbers
in
terms
of
just
a
number
of
cases,
but
you
know
one
place
that
we
just
need
to
be
honest
about.
A
The
seriousness
is
that
buncombe
county's
rate
of
actual
deaths
per
capita
is
is
is,
is
is
not
a
lot
lower
than
the
state
and
we've
had.
We've
had
a
lot
of
fatalities
here,
relative
to
population,
just
like
the
state
as
a
whole.
So
and
I'm
not
saying
I
wouldn't
be
open
to
the
change,
but
I
would
want
our
staff
to
have
a
chance
to
carefully
reflect
on
it
rather
than
doing
something
hasty,
so
in
the
governor's
policy
goes
into
effect.
On
the
you
said,
the.
F
We
can
bring
that
back
to
you,
but,
as
I
understand
it,
we
actually
have
a
contract
with
local
providers
and
they're
the
ones
that
would
allow
the
softball
tournaments
or
not.
So
we
actually
leased
or
have
a
contract
with
the
different
providers
or
recreation
providers
in
our
county.
But
josh
isn't
here
and
I
can
make
sure
josh
gets
an
answer
and
email
that
out
to
the
board.
So.
F
I
believe
that
was
the
last
ask
that
we
had
of
josh
and
he
said
that
we
have
a
contract
with
those
providers
and
what
they
do,
but
we
just
provide
a
facility,
but
I'll
make
sure
I
get
that
answer
for
you.
E
And
the
reason
I
brought
that
up
is,
I
got
a
phone
call
on
sunday
of
a
buncombe
county
resident
who
does
softball
tournaments
but
they're
having
to
go
to
hendersonville
to
do
the
tournaments
because
they
can't
do
them
in
our
county
parks
and
they
were
being
told
they
couldn't
do
them
here
and
I
was
just
wondering
why
they
couldn't
be
doing
do
them
here.
It's.
G
Just
that
that's
a
function
of
the
organization,
who's
running
the
tournament
and
not
buncombe
county
parks
and
rec
and
there's
some
josh
can
speak
greater
depth
to
that.
E
D
C
Yeah
I
mean
thanks
for
saying
that
fletch
I
mean.
I
think
that
you
know
where
I
go.
You
know,
they're.
I've
been
a
lot
of
places
more
than
25
people
in
there,
but
they're
spread
out.
You
know
when
you
talk
about
a
gathering
you're
talking
and
I'm
not
talking
about
an
event
I'm
talking
about
in
general
businesses,
but
if
you
you're
talking
about
a
gathering,
it's
like
a
event
or
something
right
is
that
right,
fletch
like
if
I'm
gonna
have
a
birthday
party
or
I'm
gonna,
have
something
like
that.
C
M
I've
just
got
yeah
a
question,
make
sure
so
come
friday.
Is
the
governor's
order
to
go
2.5
correct,
so
staff
will
talk
about
this
up
till
friday
right
and
get
tomorrow.
So
when
I
mean
I
think
as
commit
your
commissioner
belcher
said,
do
we
need
to
say?
Okay,
if
you
do
not
see
any
changes,
we
do
agree
to
go
into
2.5
friday,
instead
of
you
coming
to
us
thursday
evening
and
us
needing
48
hours
to
come
back
and
have
a
meeting
to
say:
okay,
we're
not
going
in
line
with
2.5.
M
A
C
A
C
L
We
did,
quite
literally,
we
were
in
the
hallway.
Listening
to
the
briefing
before
we
came
in.
C
I
mean
I
don't
care
to
come
back,
but
it'd
be
nice
if
we
could,
if
there
was
a
way
to
do
it,
based
on
an
assumption
that
they're
they're
going
to
be
okay
with
it.
And
if,
if
there's
an
issue
that
you
you
go
back
and
you
see,
there's
a
there's
an.
I
C
F
So
I'll
ask
commission
free
to
tell
me
for
what
we've
done
in
the
past
is
we
can
draft
an
ordinance
after
we
discuss
tomorrow
we
have
our
command
meeting
at
10.
We
can
discuss
with
the
governor
come
out
and
after
we
decide
and
get
a
recommendation,
we
can
float
a
resolution
to
you
guys
and
you
can
you
can't
respond
because
it
will
be
a
public
meeting.
But
if
you
see
anything
wrong
with
that,
then
you
can
individually
call
through
or
myself,
but
the
chairman
has
the
has
the
authority
to
sign
that
order.
F
If
you
see
anything,
you
don't
like,
you
can
call
through
individually
call
myself
and
we
can
make
those
changes
and
send
a
different
resolution
out,
but
the
intent
would
be
to
have
that
signed
by
thursday,
so
that
can
go
into
effect
along
with
the
governor.
If
we
see
anything
that
we
don't
like,
we
will
let
you
know
that,
but
you
won't
have
to
have
another
meeting.
C
A
But
the
problem
is,
I
just
don't
think
we're
going
to
give
our
if
we,
if
we
do
it
tonight,
we're
just
not
giving
the
staff
time
to
not
in
a
political
pressure
moment
come
up
with
an
answer,
but
just
you
know,
I
think
they
need
to
digest
this.
They
need
to
look
at
data
and
I
think
they
need
a
couple
days
to
do
that.
So,
for
those
reasons,
I'm
not
comfortable
scheduling
a
vote
on
these
questions
tonight.
A
A
C
A
Commissioners,
we
do
have
a
couple
other,
hopefully
quick
things.
We
can
have
a
little
break
between
meetings.
Commissioner
whitesides
ask
that
we
confer
on
a
process,
question
related
to
appointments
to
a
committee.
A
So
let
me
see
if
I
can
summarize
and
tell
me
if
I
get
this
wrong
so
at
the
at
the
last
meeting,
we
of
course
decided
which
committees
will
those
committees
can
have
interviews
and
make
recommendations
to
the
board
and
which
ones
the
commission
would
fully
own
that
whole
process
ourselves.
A
I
I
A
Is
is,
do
we
do
we
go
with
the
recommendations
in
the
future?
They
would
do
what
were
we
decided
or
do
we
want
to
go
ahead
and
interview
for
those
two,
so.
C
Who's
on
the
committee
now
alan
jasmine
and
robert
and
robert
I
mean
I
would
I
would
support
whatever
that
they
want
to
do.
M
I
mean
a
lot
of
good
qualified
people
and.
D
I'm
happy
with
that,
and
it
was.
It
was
three
of
us
on
the
subcommittee.
I
was
one
of
them
and
we
had.
It
was
excellent
people
and
the
two
names
were
burning.
It's
one
from
the
community
and
one
a
retiree
as
a
matter
of
fact.
All
of
them
were
phd's
or
doctors,
except
one
and
she's
starting
to
work
on
a
phd
at
the
four
we
had
nine
applicants
and
I
think
we
prepared
it
down
before
the
interview
and
they
were
excellent.
I
C
A
Job
by
consent
by
consensus,
we'll
add
that
to
the
agenda
and
and
also
just
to
clarify,
we
will
also
add
to
the
agenda
votes
on
the
civic
center
and
tda
position
tonight
as
well.
I'll
ask
for
agreement
to
add
that
okay,
commissioners,
that's
all
we
had
so
we've
got
a
we'll
adjourn.
This
meeting
and
we'll
reconvene
to
adjourn
for
the
five
o'clock
regular
meeting.