►
Description
There is no agenda associated with this meeting, but to see future Regular Meeting Agendas, please visit buncombecounty.org/commissioners.
A
B
C
C
C
Today
we
will
cover
a
quick
review
of
the
remainder
of
the
proposed
budget
calendar.
We
will
review
again
the
fiscal
year
21
estimated
revenue
budget,
as
well
as
updated
expenditure
budgets,
focusing
on
some
items
that
were
still
under
review
or
continue
to
be
placeholders
pending
a
final
recommendation
from
the
board.
We
would
like
to
review
the
list
of
items
where
we've
asked
for
Commissioner
guidance
and
finalized
recommendations
for
those
items.
C
C
June,
2nd
is
scheduled
to
be
the
county
managers
recommended
fiscal
year
21
budget.
We
will
deliver
and
make
available
to
the
public
the
budget
message
and
recommended
budget
no
later
than
June.
1St
June
16th
is
the
scheduled
public
hearing
on
the
recommended
budget,
and
we
are
requesting
a
specially
called
meeting
to
be
held
on
or
before
June
23rd
for
fiscal
year
21
budget
adoption,
as
there
is
new
statutory
guidance
that
the
public
comment
period
needs
to
be
open
for
24
hours
beyond
the
public
hearing
date
before
action
is
taken.
E
Yeah,
if
there's
a
virtual
meeting,
if
if,
if,
for
instance,
Commissioner
Whiteside
just
has
a
cold
and
can't
come,
that
would
be
different,
but
if
he's
participating
even
if
he
has
a
cold
or
is
healthy
remotely,
then
there's
a
new
set
of
rules
that
would
apply
and
the
virtual
meeting
of
a
public
hearing
would
require
in
additional
24
hours
after
the
public
hearing
was
held
for
the
public
to
send
in
written
comment.
So
you'd
have
to
come
back
and
have
a
separate
vote.
It
could
be
two
days
25
hours
or
one
week.
C
So
we'll
begin
with
reviewing
revenues,
a
reminder
that
the
fiscal
year
20
amended
budget
is
comprised
of
three
hundred
and
twenty
four
point:
five
million
in
budgeted
revenues
with
an
appropriation
of
fourteen
point,
eight
million
of
fund
balance
for
a
total
revenue
budget
of
three
hundred
and
thirty
nine
point.
Three
million
moving
on
to
second
pass.
C
Between
these
two
revenues,
we
estimate
six
point:
three
million
of
growth,
which
offsets
are
projected
six
point:
six
lower
revenues
for
the
other
categories;
five
point:
nine
million
more
in
ad
valorem
with
the
HCA
and
the
natural
growth
for
real
and
personal
property
sales
and
services
had
some
areas
of
projected
decline.
However,
overall
it
is
slightly
up
based
on
anticipated
revenue
from
Medicaid
cost
settlement
for
public
health.
C
We
are
estimating
that
local
option
sales
tax
will
be
approximately
3.5
million
below
the
fiscal
year.
20
amended
budget,
however,
essentially
flat
to
our
fiscal
year,
20
projection
your
end,
restricted
intergovernmental
is
lower
in
comparison
as
the
fiscal
year.
20
budget
includes
nine
hundred
and
twenty
nine
thousand
of
1nc
revenue
that
was
paid
back
out
to
GE
Aviation.
That
would
not
be
in
your
fiscal
year.
Twenty
one
budget,
Health
and
Human
Services,
is
expecting
a
net
reduction
in
DSS
revenues,
as
it
relates
to
lower
expenditure.
C
C
Other
taxes
and
licenses
permits
and
fees
are
lower,
based
on
projected
trends
grant
funds
in
fiscal
year.
Twenty
included
one
hundred
and
sixty
one
thousand
from
NC
state
opioid
response
through
via
to
the
sheriff
detention
for
medication,
assisted
treatment
and
eighteen
thousand
from
dogwood
trust
for
Owen
Park
playground.
These
were
one-time
revenue
or
authorized
for
one
year.
Other
grants
continue
to
support
medication,
assisted
treatment
and
are
part
of
the
multi-year
grant
funds.
C
A
A
C
So
for
other
revenue,
so
interfund
transfer
revenue
as
I
had
stated
grows
as
amendments
are
made
throughout
the
fiscal
year
fiscal
year,
20
adopted
budget
started
at
7.1
million
in
comparison,
the
fiscal
year
20
amended
budget
includes
a
1.3
million
dollar
transfer
back
to
the
general
fund
from
the
east
asheville
library
project.
I
don't
know
if
you
remember
that
we
brought
before
the
board
and
had
a
discussion
that
we
would
debt-financed
that
project
1.3
million
had
previously
been
applied
to
it
from
the
general
fund.
C
Fiscal
year
20
adopted
did
not
or
the
adopted
now
the
amended
miscellaneous
revenue
in
fiscal
year.
Twenty
included
350,000
from
economic
development
for
the
NCDOT
inca
Commerce
Park
Road
project.
That
is
not
revenue.
That's
budgeted
for
fiscal
year
21.
So
that
would
be
the
comparison
for
miscellaneous
bond
proceeds
is
the
anticipated
financing
for
fiscal
year.
21
recommended
fleet
purchases.
C
We'll
revisit
Advil
arm
here,
so
just
a
reminder
that
ad
valorem
makes
up
sixty
five
point.
Four
percent
of
revenue
for
the
general
fund
outlined
on
this
slide
are
the
property
valuations
by
property
type
beginning
with
fiscal
year.
Nineteen
and
twenty
budgeted
and
then
the
fiscal
year.
Twenty
one
estimates
for
each
year,
you
can
see
the
total
valuation
in
the
top
table.
The
bottom
table
reflects
the
calculation
that
yields
total
revenue,
total
valuation
growth
from
fiscal
year
twenty
to
fiscal
year.
C
F
F
C
F
A
E
G
C
So
as
a
reminder
about,
though,
we
have
a
significant
lag
in
terms
of
our
ability
to
know
what
those
final
numbers
are,
so
our
March
numbers
we
won't
know
until
June
1,
so
we
experienced
a
3
month
lag.
So
we
are
well
into
our
next
fiscal
year
before
we
know
April,
May
and
June
I'm.
So,
yes,
we
have
projected
just
a
small
decline
for
the
March
number
at
about
4
percent
and
then
for
April
May
into
June.
C
C
Don't
did
not
have
those
slides
in
today,
but
we
previously
had
those
trended
slides
where
we
kind
of
gradually
demonstrate
an
increase
in
that
sales
tax,
leading
up
to
the
month
of
January,
and
so
overall
for
the
entire
year
we
are
estimating
about
a
10,
a
10
percent
reduction
in
comparison.
Does
that
help.
C
C
When
we
started
the
budget
planning
cycle
and
receive
requests
from
departments,
we
started
having
received
all
of
those
requests
with
an
expenditure
budget
of
360
point
nine
million
dollars.
Obviously
this
was
pre-pandemic,
and
this
was
our
departments.
You
know
really
engaging
around
what
kind
of
new
opportunities
or
needs
that
they
may
have.
C
We
fast
forward
to
the
current
period
with
recognition
that
a
tremendous
amount
of
work,
collaboration
and
input
from
departments,
committees,
leadership
in
the
board
have
occurred
and
the
second
pass
total
expenditure
amount
is
proposed
at
three
hundred
and
thirty
five
point:
seven
million
depicted
here
by
function
as
this
is
the
categories
in
which
we
adopt
the
general
fund
expenditure
budget.
The
top
three
areas
of
spending
are
education
at
27.3%,
Human
Services
at
twenty
five
point:
nine
percent
and
public
safety.
At
twenty
point,
two
percent
of
the
total
expenditure
budget.
C
Comparing
the
budgets
for
fiscal
year
2002
fiscal
year,
21
second
pass.
The
overall
reduction
in
comparison
is
1.1
percent,
less
for
an
overall
3.7
million
net
reduction
in
expenditures.
The
areas
of
cultural
and
recreation,
economic
and
physical
development,
human
services,
debt
and
other
financing
sources
and
uses
are
decreased
budgets
from
fiscal
year.
2010
reductions
are
a
result
of
refunding
and
fewer
projects
scheduled
for
debt
issuance
next
year.
C
Economic
development
is
based
on
scheduled
economic
incentive
payments.
If
companies
reach
their
targets,
there
are
dollars
that
had
to
be
carried
forward
about
1.4
million
from
the
19
budget
to
fiscal
year.
20
budget,
based
on
the
timing
of
incentive
payments
that
are
not
in
the
fiscal
year,
21
amount.
In
comparison,
there
was
another
1
million
in
expenditures
in
fiscal
year.
2014
cacao
spark
access
road
again
that
wouldn't
be
in
fiscal
year
21.
So
that's
the
information
on
the
variance
there.
C
Other
financing
sources
and
uses
includes
interfund
transfer
expense,
so
funds
that
are
paid
from
the
general
fund
in
support
of
programs
that
reside
in
a
specialized
fund
net
reductions
in
comparison
are
a
result
of
a
lower
subsidy
for
a
mountain
mobility.
Transportation,
based
on
the
new
contract
rate,
in
addition
to
some
Kerr's
funding
that
can
be
utilized
for
that
program.
We
are
not
authorizing
Pago
capital
projects
at
the
current
time
and
have
fewer
budgeted
Greenway
payments
in
comparison
to
fiscal
year.
20.
C
Following
the
presentation
on
Tuesday
from
education
systems,
the
total
requested
increase
across
all
systems,
and
this
is
focusing
on
their
Tier
one,
so
their
top
their
top
priority
amounts.
Those
increases
translate
to
2.8
percent
over
fiscal
year
20
a
BTech
was
a
zero
percent
requested
increase,
Asheville
City
Schools
requested
is
7.8
percent
over
fiscal
year.
Twenty
and
Buncombe
County
Schools
is
a
2.2
percent
growth
request
over
fiscal
year
20
the
amount
included
in
the
second
pass
version
of
the
budget
is
a
BTech
flat
to
their
fiscal
year.
C
20
amended
amount,
which
totals
7
million
75
thousand
six
hundred
dollars.
Buncombe
County
Schools
is
in
50%
of
their
requested
increase.
The
amount
is
seven
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
three
hundred
and
thirty
eight
dollars
a
1.1
percent
growth
for
Asheville
City
Schools,
the
average
daily
membership,
shared
estimate
of
bunkum
County's
increase
is
one
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
and
ninety
three
dollars
also
a
1.1
percent
increase.
C
F
H
A
A
B
F
Yeah
well,
I
want
to
make
sure
I
get
this
comment
on
the
record.
I
just
want
to
say
and
that
I'm
hoping
they
continue.
The
same
thing
I
want
to
thank
the
the
City
Schools
for
their
commitment
to
the
teacher
assistants
and
and
their
pay
and
and
I
hope
they
I'm
sure.
They'll
continue
doing
that
and
I
just
wanted
to
say,
based
on
on
what
they
presented
last
time,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I
didn't
say
it
forward.
I
said
it
again,
so.
C
To
provide
you
with
information,
more
information
on
public
safety
and
general
government,
we
would
like
to
review
expenditures
by
ledger
account
type.
To
reiterate
the
overall
expenditure
budget
is
1.1
percent
decrease,
so
3.7
million
less
than
the
fiscal
year
20
amended
budget
program,
support,
operating
debt
service
and
transfers
are
all
lower
in
comparison
program.
Support
and
operating
are
lower,
based
as
a
result
of
departments
working
to
identify
reductions
related
to
expected
reduced
revenues.
This
is
largely
driven
by
travel
and
training,
reductions,
debt
and
transfers.
C
We
reviewed
earlier
capital
outlay
is
the
net
increase
for
the
purchase
of
recommended
fleet.
So
earlier
you
may
have
seen
that
net
increase
in
general
government.
While
we
are
recommending
fleet
that
are
all
public
safety,
our
general
services
manages
the
fleet.
Therefore,
the
budget
is
reflected
in
general
services
budget,
which
is
general
government
function,
so
know
that
those
are
fleet
that
are
public
safety,
but
the
budget
resides
with
general
services.
C
C
This
is
the
detail
for
salary
and
benefits,
salary
and
benefits.
Make
up
forty
four
point:
four
percent
of
our
total
general
fund
expenditure
budget,
a
two
million
dollar
net
increase
for
salary-
is
the
net
of
including
the
April
1st
2020
cost-of-living,
that
becomes
part
of
the
fiscal
year.
21
budget,
reducing
an
estimate
for
fiscal
year,
21
cost-of-living,
accounting
for
personnel
additions
and
adjustments
will
also
go,
will
go
a
little
further
into
some
salary
areas.
C
Momentarily
health
insurance
reflects
an
increase
of
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
accounts
for
adding
new
positions,
as
this
is
the
employer
contribution
share
of
health
insurance
costs,
and
we
also
realized
a
net
reduction
to
retiree
obligation
for
health
insurance.
So
we
had
some
fall-off
of
health
insurance
who
may
have
become
eligible
for
Medicare
and.
C
So
we
we
are
definitely
working
in
the
health
insurance
fund
to
again
try
to
make
those
efforts
to
realize
cost
savings
as
it
relates
and
can
come
back
to
you
with
some
more
detail.
Information
at
a
later
date
into
the
fiscal
year
and
retirement
is
the
net
increase
to
the
state
required
employer
contribution
and
is
accounting
for
new
personnel
added
similar
to
the
school
systems
you
heard
from
them
that
they
received
rate
increases
passed
along
from
the
state.
C
Payroll
taxes
in
401k
are
accounting
for
a
net
change
associated
with
salary
personnel,
changes
or
additions.
Our
longevity
obligation
has
decreased
and
the
remaining
category
includes
a
net
increase
for
our
per
FTE
or
a
per
position
costs
for
items
such
as
workmen's
comp,
unemployment
and
general
liability
premiums
and
claims
estimates.
C
Is
correct
so
what
we
did
for
the
estimate
of
removal
was.
We
took
the
amount
that
was
the
fiscal
year,
20
cost-of-living
net
increase,
so
six
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand.
We
made
an
assumption
that
if
it
were
the
same
and
we
removed
that
from
the
salary
budget
for
fiscal
year,
twenty
one,
since
that's
an
amount
we've
been
able
to
cover
with
with
lapse
salary.
We
then
adjusted
it
down
reduced
it
off
the
salary
budget.
C
So
want
to
review
with
you
personnel
adjustments
that
are
included
in
the
second
pass
budget.
It
includes
a
total
of
ten
full-time
and
one
part-time
general
fund
positions,
one
grant
fund
position
and
five
solid
waste
enterprise
fund
positions.
So
a
total
of
seventeen
across
all
funds,
solid
waste
positions
are
planned
with
a
July
first,
twenty
twenty
begin
date.
The
time
limited
grant
funded
position
would
also
begin
July
one,
the
one
part-time
EMS
medical
director
would
begin
July
one
due
to
the
nature
of
what's
required
and
we'll
talk
through
that.
C
In
a
minute,
the
ten
full-time
general
fund
positions
are
proposed
to
begin
effective,
January,
1st
of
2021,
so
a
six-month
delay
on
the
remainder
of
those
positions.
In
addition
to
new
personnel
requests,
there
are
36
reclassification
requests
that
have
been
reviewed
and
recommended
by
HR
as
additional
work
towards
aligning
work,
duties
and
equitable
classification
and
compensation.
C
C
C
C
Ems
has
an
additional
request
to
add
three
full-time
telecommunicator
positions
for
the
9-1-1
call
center.
You
heard
recently
from
Brooke
Haslett
around
the
work
to
identify
the
9-1-1
call
center,
as
consolidated
under
state
guidelines
to
maintain
eligibility
for
state
9-1-1
funding.
The
consolidation
of
county
functions
for
the
call
center
until
moving
the
sheriff
dispatch,
an
Emergency,
Operations
Center
personnel
under
one
organizational
structure
in
fiscal
year
2019
it
remained
that
these
personnel
adhered
to
different
work
schedules,
so
twelve
versus
eight
hour
shifts
by
adding
these
positions.
C
C
Previously
Mission
Hospital
subsidized
this
service
by
allowing
personnel
to
provide
the
medical
oversight.
No
formalized
relationship
exists
for
the
medical
oversight
of
Buncombe
County
EMS.
This
oversight
is
required
by
North
Carolina
Administrative
Code.
This
individual
will
provide
the
medical
oversight
for
both
EMS
and
all
Fire
District
ambulance
services.
So.
F
F
B
E
F
I
B
C
C
Public
health
is
requesting,
and
at
one
additional
nurse,
as
they
have
seen
increased
volume
for
immunization
clinic
visits
and
the
wise
woman
program
who
provides
cardiovascular
screening
prevention
and
intervention
for
women.
This
position
is
anticipated
to
lower
wait
times
and
improve
client
services.
C
C
C
You
can
see
the
comparison
of
July
to
April
last
fiscal
year
and
the
green
columns
compared
to
the
fiscal
year
the
current
fiscal
year
in
the
green
trend
line
that
the
overall
monthly
tonnage
far
exceeds
the
prior
year
tonnage.
It
is
projected
that
revenues
would
be
sufficient
to
cover
the
increased
cost
of
these
requested
positions
and
the
total
fiscal
year.
21
impact
is
four
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
one
hundred
and
seventeen
dollars.
C
So
just
wanted
to
provide
you
with
a
reminder
that
ii
passed
budget
maintains
26,
total
fleet
replacement
vehicles,
its
24
sheriff
so
replacement
vehicles
and
two
ems,
so
one
truck
and
one
replacement
ambulance
the
estimated
cost
for
fleet
in
fiscal
year.
Twenty
one
is
one
hundred
and
fifty
two
thousand
dollars
and
that's
as
we
are
estimating
only
one-half
of
an
annual
payment
for
the
debt
financing
on
those.
The
remainder
would
be
debt
payments
for
no
more
than
a
total
of
fifty
nine
months.
C
We
heard
from
General
Services
on
Tuesday
of
this
week
that
they
have
work
to
obtain
a
design
estimate
for
the
fleet
services
complex
and
would
like
to
bring
this
project
forward
on
june,
2nd
for
consideration
in
advance
of
budget
adoption
due
to
the
nature
of
the
location
and
the
size
so
they're
at
max
capacity
in
this
facility.
We
are
requesting
this
to
be
considered
earlier
than
fiscal
year
21
budget.
C
There
would
be
no
additional
impact
for
cost
if
you
were
to
approve
and
establish
the
project
earlier
for
the
Leicester
Crossing
build
out
a
plan
for
space
needs
and/or
design.
Once
a
plan
for
space
Naser
design
has
been
established,
we
will
bring
back
to
you
information
on
costs
and
request
to
repurpose
debt
savings
from
a
prior
issuance
for
this
project.
I
B
B
I
C
So
these
are
our
debt
finance
projects.
What
did
you
just
review
with
you
again?
Any
pay-as-you-go
items
that
remain
in
a
second
pass
of
the
budget
currently
in
is
that
their
one
hundred
and
thirty
four
thousand
dollar
commitment
to
the
Black
Mountain
Greenway,
it's
a
final
of
three
payments
and
a
$200,000
$200,000
towards
Inka
Heritage
Greenway
construction,
which
contributes
towards
the
county
match
to
the
TVA
funding.
C
The
second
pass
budget
does
not
include
funding
towards
the
woodland
Greenway
design
for
projects
that
were
reviewed
and
recommended
by
our
information
technology.
Governance
team
remain
included
to
information
technology
tools
that
support
additional
cybersecurity.
The
GRC
tool
and
the
security
rating
tool
totaling
$34,500
remaining
also
is
the
on
board
replacement
cameras
on
mountain
mobility
vehicles.
A
county
match
of
sixteen
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
is
needed.
Federal
funding
covers
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
of
the
remainder,
and
then
just
a
praise.
C
C
So
those
are
a
county
general
fund
capital,
but
why
don't
you
just
bring
back
before
you?
The
recommended
solid
waste
capital
projects?
There
are
six
projects,
totaling,
nine
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars,
and
again
all
of
these
purchases
are
anticipated
to
be
able
to
be
covered
through
revenues
generated
as
a
result
of
operations.
C
Earlier
in
the
expenditure
comparison
for
a
budgetary
contingency,
there
is
one
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
the
fiscal
year
twenty
budgets
set
aside
as
contingency
for
fiscal
year,
twenty
one
we
have
included
in
second
pass.
A
total
amount
of
1
million
in
budgetary
contingency
potential
uses
are
for
contingency,
are
for
any
unanticipated
pandemic,
related
expenditures,
and
it
establishes
available
funding
to
be
able
to
continue
work
towards
addressing
salary
disparities,
as
HR
continues
to
work
through
the
pay
and
compensation
plan.
C
So
this
brings
us
to
one
final
review
of
items
that
we've
previously
requested
guidance
from
you
all
on
for
prioritization
and/or
inclusion
in
the
budget
for
the
first
item
subsidized
ad,
a
complementary,
complementary
paratransit,
the
RFP
and
selection
of
a
contract
provider
for
transportation
services
has
concluded,
and
there
is
no
recommended
increase
to
the
amount
of
the
cost
to
city
of
Asheville
for
complementary
paratransit.
You
heard
from
Matt
Cable
on
Tuesday
that
we
anticipate
cost
reductions
to
be
able
to
be
shared
with
the
city.
C
The
second
pass
budget
includes
$65,000
for
elementary
and
intermediate
playgrounds
for
solar.
Our
recommendation
is
that
this
item
not
be
included
in
the
fiscal
year
21
budget
and
that,
following
the
conclusion
of
consideration
of
responses
to
the
solar
RFP
that
be
brought
back
as
a
separate
item
for
review
and
consideration
by
the
board
likely
in
July.
C
So
these
are
the
three
items
the
first
one.
Now
we
know,
there's
there's
no,
no
new
cost
in
fact
savings
there
for
the
city.
So
the
two
that
we
would
like
to
seek
guidance
from
you
on
today
are
the
elementary
school
playgrounds
and
then
is
there
agreement
to
have
the
solar
as
a
separate
item
following
budget
adoption.
A
My
suggestion
on
the
solar
RFP,
you
know
it's
challenging
to
any
budget,
it's
kind
of
a
planning
document
right.
We
don't
really
know
how
things
are
going
to
happen
until
we
get
further
out
on
this
RFP.
We
don't
know
what
the
numbers
will
be,
because
we
haven't
gotten
the
RFP
back
yet
on
either
the
cost
or
the
savings
right.
A
My
suggestion
would
be
I,
believe
I'd
be
fine,
but
not
including
a
dollar
amount
in
the
budget,
but
I
do
think.
This
is
an
important
initiative
and
the
you
know,
people
in
the
community
do
read
our
budget,
the
budget
kind
of
talks
about
what
are
you
hoping
to
get
done
this
year?
So
perhaps
there's
another
way
to
simply
reference.
The
solar
RFP
in
the
budget,
like
perhaps
in
the
managers
statement
about
you,
know,
there's
an
RFP
underway.
We're
expecting
results
on
this
timeframe.
A
Both
the
costs
and
savings
on
utilities
will
be
analyzed
by
the
Commission
in
a
decision.
One
being
I
think
it
should
be
acknowledged
in
some
way
in
the
budget.
I.
Don't
particularly
have
a
strong
view
about
where
that
is,
but
I
think
not
referencing
it
at
all
in
the
budget
would
maybe
not
send
the
right
message
and
one
other
thing
is
I
do
think.
I
do
think
it's
important
to
note
that
there'll
be
savings.
A
C
So
so
what
I'll
say
is
that
the
recommended
budget
and
brief
which
well
it's
the
the
intro
part,
is
the
county
managers
budget
message
there's
narrative
there,
but
then
the
following
pieces
of
that
are
the
executive
summary
and
some
of
the
technical
language
around
the
actual
budget
for
the
funds.
There
is
a
section
that
references
the
capital,
so
you
know,
if
that's
the
board's
desire
that
that's
information
that
we
you
know
include
and
provide
narrative
around.
We
could
certainly
include
that
in
there,
as
it
relates
to
capital
I,
just.
A
A
H
G
A
question
on
the
playgrounds
project,
which
seems
great
on
its
on
its
face,
given
that
the
recommended
amount
of
funding
for
both
school
systems
is
below
what
they
came
forward
on
with
in
terms
of
request.
But
might
we
get
some
input
from
them
on
if
an
additional
$65,000
is
going
into
schools?
Is
this
the
project
that
they
would
elevate
or
given
the
circumstances
we're
all
operating
under?
What
would
that
be
allocated
in
a
different
way?
For
me,
at
least,
that
would
be
sort
of
helpful
information
to
inform
the
final
stage
of
decision-making
around
this.
G
F
I
can
commissioner
I
could
probably
shed
a
little
bit
of
light
on
on
this.
Ask
I
have
personally
spoken
to
every
principal
at
these
schools,
and
this
is
we
also
chairman,
York
you'll.
Remember
we
brought
it
up
in
the
school
capital
fund,
but
in
school
capitals,
a
hundred
thousand-
and
you
can't
do
that-
and
this
if
it
ends
up
on
a
list,
did
you
it
ends
up
all
the
way
down
here
on
a
priority
list.
F
So
it's
one
of
those
things
you
you
never
you
never
ever
get
to
and
the
way
they
raised
their
money
is
through
through
the
the
PTO
and
in
what
an
aspect
of
this
is
that
these
that
are
receiving
this
funding.
They
have
raised
over
half
or
over.
So
this
is
basically
a
match.
Is
what
we're
doing
I
I
strongly
support
it.
F
They
I
think
in
light
of,
in
light
in
our
in
our
intermediate,
schools
have
been
left
out
in
the
playground
planning,
and
so
it's
one
of
those
things
they
have
to
go
to
their
PTO,
to
try
to
raise
the
money
and
given
the
give
the
financial
condition
of
parents
and
now
in
what
they
could
be
soon
I
think
it
I
think
it's
a
very,
very
wise
investment.
Probably
if
you
pick
the
phone
up
and
you
went
to
the
top
of
the
school
system
and
ask
them
where
does
this
rank?
F
You
know
what
I've
been
told
us
number
27
and
so
in
number
27
means
you
never
get
to
number
27
so,
but
as
far
as
the
schools
and
the
parents
and
the
you
know
the
principal's,
they
it's
been
a
long
and
a
labor
of
love
for
at
least
a
you
know
to
two
or
three
years
for
a
lot
of
these
schools.
So
I
wanted
to
come
in
on
that
and
the
other
thing
I
want
to
come
in
on
the
Chairman
I
I
agree
with
with
the
chairman
on
on
on
the
solar.
F
My
question
is
this:
on
the
fifty
thousand
dollar
debt
issuance
we're
not
going
to
have
that
because
we
don't
have
the
RFP,
so
there's
not
going
to
be
any
any
money.
But
this
is
an
ongoing
discussion.
It'll
be
a
discussion.
You
know
next
year
and
but
it
is,
it
is
something
that
we
have
committed
to
us.
You
know
I,
think
at
some
level
and
to
let
the
public
know
that
we
have
not
backed
away
from
a
commitment
to
looking
at
you
know,
so
we're
on
the
buildings
and
the
savings
and
balancing
all
that.
F
It's
probably
not
a
bad
idea.
Don't
really
know
how
you
do
it,
but
again
it's
not
affecting
any
money
in
the
budget,
but
you
know
we
have
certain.
You
have
certain
goals
and
we
have
certain
things
we
want
to
try
to
achieve,
and
certainly
you
know
maybe
next
year
you
know
the
technology's
gonna
be
less
and
the
savings
gonna
be
more.
We
don't.
We
don't
really
know
I'm
hopeful
that
it'll
be
it'll,
be
both
of
those
that's
kind
of
my
position
on
the
prioritization,
so
I
would
love
to
see
us
do
both
of
those.
So.
J
J
F
F
F
What
they
told
me
was
that
so
many
children
end
on
the
basketball
court
sitting
on
their
backpacks.
Having
discussions
about
you
know
how
good
or
bad
it
is
at
home,
and
so
by
creating
this
this
space
for
them
it
allows
them
to
go
out
and
get
that
energy
out,
and
it's
very
important
to
them.
And
it's
very
important
to
me
but
and
I've
heard
from
people
in
the
community
and
I
mean
it's
an
ongoing.
It's
an
ongoing
issue.
It
started
at
one
school
and
actually
the
the
call
came
from
a
which
is
really
interesting.
F
The
first
call
that
I
got
on
this
came
from
a
city.
Council
woman
had
called
me,
and
there
was
a
particular
school
that
was
concerned,
and
they
were
then
it
created
this
conversations
that
well
we've
left
out
the
intermediate
schools.
You
know
we
go
to
high
school
when
we
build
the
the
fields
and
we
invest.
You
know
millions
of
dollars
in
turf
and
and
and
they
felt
very
strongly
about
it
and
I'm
I-
think
it's
a
great
thing
to
do,
and
them
I.
J
Don't
not
much
at
all
I,
don't
disagree,
Commissioner,
Belcher
I,
where
I'm
landing
on
this,
though,
is
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around
it
in
some
ways
it
feels
like
it's
bypassed
the
budgeting
process
that
goes
through
central
office
and
in
some
ways
it
feels
that
if
schools
can
get
individual
schools
can
get
directly
to
us,
then
they
can
advocate
for
their
individual
needs.
Yet
again,
bypassing
the
central
office
and
school
board,
budgeting
process
and
also
the
school
improvement
capital
process.
I
mean
I.
J
J
The
optics
of
how
this
looks
to
me
isn't
sitting
quite
right.
I
think
we
could
be
opening
Pandora's
box
of
individual
schools
reaching
out
saying.
Oh,
you
know,
chairman
Belcher
I've
really
got
this
need
this
year.
You
know
Commissioner
Belcher,
chairman
you,
man,
I
did
I,
don't
know
it's
just
feels
like
they're,
not
playing
with
well.
F
I'll
tell
you
very
clearly
that
the
school
system,
the
principal's
the
parents,
students
all
that
are
involved
in
this-
are
playing
by
the
rules
as
an
elected
official,
I'm
elected
to
be
the
years
of
the
community
and
when
the
community
contacts
me
or
whether
they
contact
chairman,
Newman
or
whoever
it
might
be
here,
and
they
express
a
need
for
their
tax
dollars.
It
is
not
a
pet
project
from
the
principles.
That's
what
you
actually.
Actually
that's.
Why
that's
worded
differently
and
Commissioner
I'm?
F
J
It's
not
a
need,
I,
think
again,
it
doesn't
feel
like
it
fits
within
the
proper
budgeting
process
and
in
the
grand
scheme.
Maybe
somebody
could
say:
well,
it's
only
sixty
five
thousand
dollars,
but
we're
also
not
fully
allocating
the
requests
that
came
forward
to
us
from
both
school
systems
on
Tuesday
because
of
the
budget
situation
that
we're
currently
in
and
this
this
is
questionable
to
me.
So
I
haven't
made
my
mind
up
either
way,
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
situation
a
bit
better
and
also
understanding
how
this
could
be
addressed
in
a
different.
H
F
F
Taxpayers
sometimes
are
very
clear
what
they
would
like
to
have
their
dollars
invested
in,
and
this
came
from
them.
That
is
my
duty
to
respond
to
that.
It's
not
going
around
anything
I'm
on
the
school
capital
fund.
You
know,
Commission
fire
brought
this
up
at
the
meeting
that
they
had
been
left
out
of
the
building
process
of
the
intermediate
schools
can.
B
C
I
F
There's
not
a
foundation,
you
know
for
this
I
wish
it
was
here's
the
thing.
We
need
to
understand
that
there's
one.
This
is
a
one-time
cost,
they
have
half
the
money
and
it
is
a
match,
and
they
it's
a
need
that
that
I
think
should
be
met
and
I,
don't
think
it's
a
unwise
use
of
tax
dollars
at
all.
So.
E
F
F
And
you
don't
even
want
to
get
me
talking
about
Johnson
elementary
and
their
ability
to
their
PTO
to
raise
money.
Johnson
elementary
is
one.
Is
it
one
of
the
ports,
if
not
the
poorest,
probably
the
school
in
the
system?
Yes,
there
are.
There
are
no
sidewalks
leading
to
that
school.
My
daughter
was
an
assistant
teacher
there
for
ten
years.
I
know
that
school
I
know
these
these
principals.
F
This
is
not
this
is
these
are
legitimate
needs
for
these
for
these
schools,
if
they
I
can't
help
it
that
they
may
not
fall
in
the
perfect
mold
of
how
the
the
school
system
works,
but
I
don't
think
it's
fair
to
these
children.
Are
there
these
parents
to
not
deal
with
this
question?
The
fact
is
is
that
elementary
schools
are
provided
for
in
the
capital
budget.
F
High
schools
are
provided
at
a
at
a
greater
level
in
in
in
and
needful
for
sports
and
for
activities
and
exterior
activities,
but
the
intermediate
schools,
those
children
are
in
the
middle
and
they
they
they
so
their
playground.
Equipment
is
different
than
what
you
would
see
at
an
elementary
school,
and
but
if
you
look
at
the
intermediate
schools,
you
will
see
a
ball
field
and
you
will
see
a
basketball
court
in
their
design
and
if
you
go
to
six
and
seventh
graders,
you
go
to
the
sixth
graders
and
you
go
to
the
intermediate
school.
F
Then
what
you're
going
to
see
is
that
they
use
the
basketball
court
for
it
to
play.
Foursquare
is
what
they
use
it
for.
If
you
go
to
the
intermediate
schools,
that's
what
you'll,
see
and
you'll
see
them
sitting
on
their
coats
in
the
corners,
you'll
and
you'll,
see
some
basketball,
but
you'll
see
them
trying
to
make
the
most
attempt
that
they
can
to
be
able
to
do
this
over
anyhow.
A
A
A
If
we
were
in
a
look,
it's
a
hard
budget
year
right
so
so
I
mean
if
we
were,
if
we
were
funding
their
full
requests
and
we
said
hey,
you
know,
I
know
it's
not
in
your
budget
that
we'd
like
to
allocate
some
additional
funds
for
this.
It
probably
it
would.
It
would
be
an
easier
conversation
to
have.
Then
you
know
we're
gonna
make
you
make
some
cuts
to
things
you've
identified
as
priorities,
but
we
want
you
to
do
this
thing
instead,
so
it's
and.
A
J
Standing
that
process
a
little
different
I
mean
this,
is
you
know,
I'm
still,
learning
I.
Think
you're,
you
don't
learn
a
lot,
but
I
mean
I've
said
it
once
I'll
say
it
again.
You'll
probably
hear
me
say
it
again.
At
least
three
more
times
I
mean
these
are
gonna,
be
really
challenging
decisions
to
make
and
challenging
time.
So
I
think
we
have
to
look
at
all
aspects
and
I
appreciate
the
conversation
and
learning
more
and.
A
I
think
it's
a
fair,
you
know,
I
mean
the
only
thing
I
would
say
to
add.
Is
you
know
they're
I,
don't
I
think
there
are.
This
would
be
great
thing
to
do
it's,
but
it's
not
necessarily
just
a
one-time
thing.
I
mean
this.
Is
this?
You
know
in
five
years,
from
now
ten
years
now
next
year,
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
a
fair
conversation
is
about
to
talk
about.
What
is
the
process
for
funding
them?
A
I
agree
with
what
Commissioner
White's
I
said:
there's
the
processes
is
kind
of
have
it
had
to
have
been
privately
fundraise?
Basically,
in
the
past
and
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
I.
Think
it's
a
fair
question
is
that
is
that
the
should
there
should
there
be
some
more
kind
of
clear
public
investment
in
this
to
supplement
that
over
time,
because
it
is
a
great
value
to
have
good
playgrounds
for
kids,
so
I
think,
let's
I
think
we've
had
a
good
discussion.
A
I
think
we'll
probably
have
some
more
as
we
go
through
this
to
think
this
budget,
and
maybe
maybe
longer-term
policies
to
around.
How
can
we
get
something
in
something
in
from
one
of
the
different
pots
of
funding
to
maybe
help
out
with
this
over
time,
because
I
think
a
little
bit
goes
along
goes
a
long
way,
but
any
other
comments
on
this
point.
K
Yeah
I'd
like
to
ask
about
the
60.
If
we
said
earlier
that
we
cannot
advise
where
that
money
goes.
If
we
were
to
vote
for
the
65,000
could
could
we
tell
the
school
that
it
has
to
go
to
that,
even
though,
even
though
we
would
roll
this
up
in
there
because
here's
here's,
the
thing
is
I
want
to
make
sure
schools
are
more
I'm
concerned
about
our
children.
So
I'm
concerned
the
fact
that
they've
missed
the
last
nine
weeks.
K
I,
don't
know
what
the
Falls
going
to
look
like
for
it
for
those
those
students
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
try
everything.
We
can
to
make
sure
that
our
students
have
the
positive
learning
experience
that
I
had
growing
up
in
a
buckin
County
school,
having
a
playground,
letting
kids
out
and
and
releasing
some
tension
that
helps,
and
if
you
don't
think
it
helps,
and
you
know
it
helps
those
teachers
to
be
able
to
let
those
kids
go
out
there
and
release
some
of
that
that
tension.
K
A
B
We're
asking
two
things:
Wanda
fee
fund
it
separately,
it
would
be
separate,
would
not
be
rolled
up
okay.
So
if
the
conversation
is
not
to
fund
schools,
then
that
money
could
be
rolled
and
then
we
wouldn't
it
would
lose
its
identity
and
they
would
spend
it
on
whatever
need
they
have.
So
so
there's
two
conversations:
one
leave
it
as
is,
and
it'll
be
earmarked
for
these
playgrounds
for
these
specific
schools.
But
if
you
don't
fund
this
and
you
want
to
roll
it
up,
then
it
becomes
part
of
the
allocation
to
the
schools
and.
A
So
those
in
that
case,
you
know
it
might
be
sort
of
the
nature
of
look
the
board's
allocated
this
additional
funding.
We
think
this
is
a
great
idea.
It's
kind
of
more
of
an
ask,
but
it's
it
is.
It
is
a
in
that
scenario.
It
is
ultimately
the
School
Board's
decision
on
how
to
allocate
the
funds,
so
it's
sort
of
a
request,
but
not
a
directive.
B
K
My
got
one
more
thing
about
the
the
solar
panel,
so
if
I
agree
with
putting
something
in
the
budget
saying
because
that
is
one
of
our
strategic
goals,
but
the
question
the
$50,000
for
if
it
were
to
come
about,
that's
just
the
issue
dead,
correct.
That's
that's
not
a
debt
payment,
so
we
won't
see
a
debt
payment
to
fiscal.
K
K
Service,
okay,
but
but
putting
that
thing
in
that
explanation
doesn't
bind
us
to
because
if
at
our
F
P
comes
back
I'm
hoping
I
was
that
very
favorable.
Those
preliminary
numbers
work.
They
were
very
scary,
but
but
we
know
so
I
just
want
make
sure
we
have
a
chance
to
look
at
those
and
we're
not
binding
ourselves
to
say.
Okay,
we
put
that
in
there,
so
we
got
a
budget
for
it.
So
I.
A
That's
right
and
again,
my
only
other
point
was:
let's
don't
forget
to
when
it
does
come
back
out
to
look
at
the
savings
because,
even
though
I
think
the
costs
are
likely
coming
lower
than
the
conservative
estimates
that
were
given
to
us,
I
think,
even
in
that
scenario
the
annual
savings
offset
the
annual
debt
payment.
So
even
then
it
was
it
wasn't.
You
know
it
was
kind
of
revenue
neutral
for
the
county.
So
but
ya
know
we're
not
committed
we're.
Just
acknowledging
a
process
is
being
carried
out.
Okay,.
M
Is
you
know,
I
wish
that
y'all
would
come
up
with
some
priorities
and
I
said
you
know,
my
priority
is
taking
care
of
the
citizens
of
Buncombe.
County
is
what
it's
not
built
in
a
ball
field
or
a
racetrack
or
anything
like
that.
It
is
less
than
what
the
paper
saying
this
ball
field
is
what
we
heard:
Commissioner
Belcher
and
myself
around,
for
a
playground
that
they
need
it,
and
we
talk
about
mental
health,
playgrounds
mentally
and
physically.
Any
way
you
want
look
at.
We
had
that
argument
about
the
srl
officers.
M
We
didn't
want
to
use
the
money
for
SLR,
but
that
was
what
the
grant
and
he
was
for.
Yes,
we
need
the
mental
health
in
the
schools,
but
$50,000
120
thousand
something
taxpayers
I,
believe
that's
almost
half
a
pinata,
each
person,
I,
don't
think
nobody's
gonna
complain,
but
that's
where
I
stand.
We
have
got
to
take
care
of
our
kids
and
that's
education
mentally
physically
everything
cuz.
They
are
the
future
when
we're
not
here.
A
F
J
F
J
A
F
C
C
So
before
we
come
to
the
conclusion
where
we
are
able
to
discuss
the
budget
adoption
date,
I
was
able
to
receive
some
information.
Well,
we've
been
in
the
meeting
today
just
around
the
prior
collection
rates,
so
the
question
was
asked
from
Commissioner
Belcher
around
pre
recession
or
recession
level,
so
dating
back
to
fiscal
year.
Oh
8,
the
collection
rate
that
was
budgeted
at
that
time
was
99.1
zero.
C
Just
one
other
piece
of
information
just
wanted
to
offer
as
clarification
around
the
placeholder
amounts
for
for
the
elementary
and
the
intermediate
schools.
So
it
is
for
intermediate.
Schools
with
proposed
amounts
at
fifteen
thousand
each
Inka
Koontz
Evelyn
North
Windy
Ridge.
It's
two
elementary
schools
with
placeholder
amounts
of
twenty
five
hundred
per
elementary,
which
was
Pisgah
and
Johnston.
B
C
Right
so
that
brings
us
back
to
a
discussion
around
the
remainder
of
the
budget
calendar.
So
we
have
currently
proposed
that
Tuesday
June
the
23rd
at
your
regular
board,
meeting
time
of
5:00
p.m.
that
we
would
hear
and
request
approval
or
here
budget
adoption
from
you
want
to
seek
information
from
you
on
whether
or
whether
or
not
you
that
would
work
for
you
as
a
board
or
is
there
another
date
that
we
would
need
to
look
at.
I
B
A
H
So
typically
the
way
that
that
works
is
those
projects
are
passed
through
funds
through
and
C
D
ot
that
we
are
then
reimbursed
for,
but
because
the
lack
of
funding
and
NCDOT
S
cash
balance
issues,
a
lot
of
which
relate
to
lower
driving
lower
gas
tax
revenues
at
the
moment,
they're
unable
to
reimburse
us
for
those
projects
at
this
time,
so
they
suspended
those
indefinitely.
At
this
point,
ongoing
work
may
continue,
but
the
mass
of
the
vast
majority
of
the
MPO
is
locally
administered.
Projects
will
be
impacted
at
the
moment.
H
That's
all
of
our
projects
and
I'll
go
over
that
and
a
little
bit
more
detail
on
the
next
slide,
but
all
of
our
projects
were
kind
of
in
between
phases
where
we
were
waiting
for
approvals,
I'm,
an
administrative,
administrative,
Lisu
NCDOT,
and
we
were
unable
to
gain
those
before
this
happened.
We
don't
have
a
timeline
or
a
method
of
correction.
That's
been
introduced.
H
There
are
many
ways
that
that
could
happen,
most
of
which
are
going
to
require
action
by
the
General
Assembly
and
that
the
projects
may
have
to
be
really
prioritized
as
fundings
released.
So
since
we
don't
have
an
idea
of
how
that
fundings
going
to
come
back
at
this
time
or
how
big
that
bottleneck
is
going
to
be,
we
may
have
to
reprioritize
projects
as
to
which
projects
are
most
urgent
within
the
mpos
allocations.
H
Our
local
impacts,
the
Inka
Heritage
Trail,
is
one
of
the
projects
where
we
have
now
delayed
in
the
engineering
and
design
phase.
There
was
four
point:
eight
million
dollars
of
a
total
twelve
million
dollar
budget
for
the
Inka
recreation
destination.
Four
point:
eight
million
dollars
was
our
allocation
to
FHWA
Surface
Transportation
block
program,
and
we
were
using
that
to
match
tourism
product
development
funds
through
the
TDA.
We
have
made
the
TDA
aware
of
this.
They
understand
that
it's
an
ongoing
situation
we'll
continue
to
update
them,
as
we
understand
how
these
delays
will
play
out.
H
Similarly,
the
Woodfin
Greenway
project
has
also
been
delayed
in
the
engineering
and
design
phase.
This
is
a
project
that
we've
had
before
you
quite
a
few
times,
we're
still
continuing
to
seek
additional
monies
through
the
NPO
toward
that
project,
which
we
can
have
allocated
at
this
time.
We
just
don't
have
access
to
spend
it.
The
total
amount
of
project
money
delayed
at
this
point
is
six
point:
five
million
dollars
of
a
total
fourteen
million
dollar
budget
for
the
the
project
all
tolled,
and
then
we
have
the
reams,
Creek,
Greenway
engineering
and
design
delay.
H
On
our
long
term,
funding
impacts,
FHWA
is
made
tentative
indication
that
they
are
not
willing
to
extend
projects.
They
are
willing
to
look
at
it
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
but
we
are
under
a
timeline
as
soon
as
we
start
expending
those
funds
we
have
ten
years
from
the
time
we
first
expend
funds
under
an
NCDOT
contract
to
get
that
project
constructed.
So
this
is
something
that
we're
trying
to
make
FHWA
FHWA
aware
of
that
we're
seeing
impacts
because
of
the
way
that
NCDOT
is
allocating
those
funds.
H
We
have
no
indication
whether
NCDOT
is
going
to
get
these
fixed
within
months
or,
if
it's
going
to
be
within
the
longer
term,
and
what
we
anticipate
is
an
infusion
of
stimulus
funding
or
action
by
the
General
Assembly
could
allow
the
projects
to
move
forward
in
a
more
short-term
time
frame,
we're
asking
NCDOT
to
continue
administrative
approvals
of
our
project.
So
what
we're
hoping
is
that
once
funding
is
reallocated
and
we
can
begin
spending
we'll
have
all
those
contract
approvals
done,
we
won't
have
any
more
delays
than
we
need
to.
A
H
A
The
d-o-t
funds,
in
this
case
those
d-o-t
funds,
is
NCDOT.
Funds
are
really
the
federal
highway
administration
funds,
as
federal
funds
brought
down
to
do
te
correct,
that's
correct,
so
we
have
ten
years
to
spin
the
funds.
So
you
know
I
know
these
projects
are
complicated
and
take
a
long
time
they
that
does
seem
like
a
long
time.
So,
even
though
there's
this
problem
right
now
with
dat
cash
flow
because
of
a
variety
of
reasons,
how
concerned?
Are
you
about
the
potential
inability
to
expend
the
funds
for
each
of
these
projects
in
that
time
frame?
A
H
Now
we're
not
concerned,
but
I
would
say
that's
something
that
we
need
to
triage
and
reevaluate,
particularly
as
as
we
depending
on
how
long
we
see
these
allocation
issues
go
on.
It
is
a
relatively
long
time
frame
in
all
these
projects,
we're
in
a
comfortable
spot
within
that
time
frame.
It
just
really
depends
on
how
long
the
project
or
the
delays
continue.
A
And
is
there
on
the
Inca
and
the
woodland
project
in
particular,
there
are,
you
know,
there's
a
variety
of
different
funding
sources
for
those
projects.
Is
there?
Is
there
any
potential
to
use
some
of
the
other
funds
to
keep
the
design
and
engineering
moving
ahead
and
then
potentially
use
the
the
d-o-t
funds
that
are
now
on
hold
for
construction?
Is
there
any
ability
to
look
at
those
kind
of
options,
or
is
it
already
kind
of
locked
in
to
the
use
it
would
have
to
be
spent
on
it's.
H
A
federalized
project,
so
it's
never
recommended
that
you
do
anything
outside
of
that
federalized
funding
stream
and
without
an
agreement
in
place
because
you
do
have
to
follow
all
of
both
FTA
FHWA
and
NCA
do
tease
guidelines,
and
a
lot
of
that
is
the
way
that
you
track
the
project
along
its
course
I've
not
seen
information.
That
NCDOT
would
allow
us
to
do
that
and.
A
I'm
not
suggesting
that
we
don't
plan
to
adhere
to
federal.
You
know
federal
construction
standards
and
basically
assume
that
we're
going
to
work
under
all
this
federal
guidelines,
but
just
like,
for
example,
on
the
Woodfin
project.
Woodfin
has
a
lot
of
money
allocated
for
this
right.
I
think
there's
some
concern.
I've
heard
from
people
in
the
community
that
the
project
is
delayed
too
much
that
their
bond
money
might
also
be.
You
know
there
might
be
risks
around
other
funding,
not
being
there
indefinitely
so
like
on
that
project.
A
H
A
H
Of
the
bond
expenditures
are
spent
outside
of
our
Greenway
portion
of
the
project.
I
know
that
that's
something
that
the
Woodfin
Board
of
Aldermen
is
actually
actively
managing
and
communicating
with
their
citizens
about.
They
do
have
several
components
of
that
project
out
for
bid
in
with
in
construction
timelines.
So
from
my
conversations
with
the
aldermen
and
Mayor
bihaan,
I,
don't
understand
that
that's
a
concern
for
the
town
yet,
but
they
are
aware
of
those
concerns.
F
F
B
A
G
Sorry
I
had
one
more
budget
question,
which
is
just
maybe
team
standard.
Can
you
kind
of
just
talk
us
through
at
a
high
level?
How
you're
envisioning
ongoing
budgeting
for
Cova
19
related
needs
that
we
would
do
it
sort
of
on
a
as
needed
basis
moving
forward
or
that
the
cares
funding
will
kind
of
help
propel
that
or
just
wondered
would
like
to
hear
your
thinking
on
that.
B
Plan
right
now
is
to
work
on
we're
working
on
our
plan.
That
is
due
to
the
state
on
June
1st
and
that's
what
we
would
use
the
Cure's
money.
First,
you
want
to
spend
that
we
did
already
spend
a
1st
5
under
that
account.
He
gave
us
and
we
actually
spent
a
hundred
thousand
at
the
second
500,
so
we're
about
six
hundred
thousand
spent.
We
are
looking
to
spend
our
three
million
dollar
workers
fund
in
first
before
you
will
spend
any
County
money,
and
that
is
the
reason
why
it's
a
contingency.
G
I
B
B
B
I
F
B
N
Good
afternoon
so
I
have
to
go
ahead
and
have
max
kicked
his
slides
on,
for
you
guys,
but
put
together
some
slides.
What
did
was
pulled
out
the
salient
points
from
the
executive
order
number
141
to
walk
through
what
the
big
changes
are
from
phase
1
to
phase
2
I
put
a
slide
in
with
some
points
for
further
discussion
where
we
have
concerns
and
then
the
end,
as
you
remember,
going
into
phase
1
I
had
the
columns
that
we
can
compare
like
side
by
side.
N
What
looks
different
so
we'll
walk
through
those
line
by
line
again
at
the
end,
but
just
to
go
through
the
the
salient
differences
as
we
going
forward
in
the
new
order.
High-Risk
individuals
are
still
encouraged
to
stay
at
home.
This
is
the
state
order
again
just
to
be
clear.
This
governor
Cooper's
order,
the
stay-at-home
order
is
lifted.
There
is
a
safer
at
home
recommendation,
so
it
changes
from
a
stay
at
home
order
to
a
recommendation
to
still
stay
home
as
much
as
possible:
their
exemptions
for
worship,
religious
services
and
First
Amendment
rights.
N
So
none
of
the
mass
gathering,
guidance
or
constraints
apply
to
those
services.
There's
new
phrases
you'll
see
throughout
the
document,
a
new
clause
which
is
course
signage,
screening
and
sanitation,
and
what
that
encompasses
a
couple
things
we've
already
been
doing,
but
it
says
that
you
know
businesses
have
to
have
a
posted
emergency
maximum
occupancy.
They
have
to
post
signage
for
best
practices
for
employees
and
staff
as
they
walk
in.
They
need
to
conduct
daily
symptoms
of
workers
and
isolate
and
remove
sick
workers.
N
So
you
see
that
you'll
see
that
phrase
throughout
the
order,
often
but
its
core
signage
screening
and
sanitation
clause.
Mass
gathering
guidance
has
changed.
It's
still
ten
people
indoors,
but
now
outdoors
it's
been
expanded
to
twenty
five
and
I.
This
is
we
get
into
some
specifics
just
generally
at
this
point,
but
restaurants
are
now
open
as
a
Friday
for
dining
services
at
50%
capacity,
and
there
are
some
other
restrictions
in
the
or,
but
that's
the
general
idea
is
that
restaurants
can
serve
50%
or,
with
other
capacity
depend
on
square
footage.
N
Personal
care
grooming
in
tattoo
parlors
to
include
you,
know,
beauty,
salons,
hair
salons
nail
parlors
can
also
operate
at
50%
capacity,
with
other
restrictions
in
place.
Indoor
and
outdoor
pools
can
be
open
at
50%
capacity
with
other
restrictions,
day
camps
and
overnight.
Camps
are
also
allowed
with
restrictions,
parks,
trails
and
beaches
are
opened
with
regulations,
public
playgrounds
remain
closed
and
that's
a
different
from
what
their
governor
originally
proposed
for
Phase
two,
so
that
that's,
he
encouraged
those
to
remain
closed
or
ordered
those
to
remain
closed.
M
N
So
I
know
we've
seen
people
want
to
do.
I'm
community
driving
theaters
previously
had
been
really
focused
on
our
religious
services,
but
those
are
exempt
from
any
of
this
now.
But
we
look
as
we
look
at
people
trying
to
plan
graduations
or
end
of
year
ceremonies
for
schools
and
that
kind
of
covers
that
they
could
drive
in
stay
in
their
cars,
and
we've
been
working
with
schools
to
a
lot
in
the
new
parking
lot
kind
of
services
for
graduation
or
one
by
one.
N
N
N
So
if
there
was
some
kind
of
entertainment
venue
like
a
movie
theater,
that
was
showing
outdoor
movies
you
could
drive
in,
but
this
this
clause,
the
entertainment
venue
here-
is
really
talking
specifically
about
like
music
venues
like
the
orange
peel.
Yes,.
F
N
N
Yes,
entertainment,
it
would
not
it's
not
a
facility,
so
it
would
apply
to
the
vehicle
clause.
So
that's
fine
as
long
as
people
stay
in
their
vehicles,
yeah
yeah,
if
you,
if
you
look
at
that
clause
and
the
order
itself
in
Section
eight,
you
know
it's
talking
specifically
about
venues.
You
know
like
bowling
alleys,
music
venues,
amusement
parks,
dance
halls,
things
like
that
facilities.
N
Entertainment
and
sporting
events
and
large
venues
are
allowed
kind
of
what
this
is
talking
in
general.
If
you
have
a
venue
that
could
has
you
know
over
500
people,
you
can
allow
sporting
events
that
happen
to
be
televised
or
recorded,
but
they're
still
mass
gathering
guidance
for
spectators.
So,
potentially
you
could
have
you
know
a
collegiate
basketball
game
and
have
the
staff
and
teams
playing
in
a
large
venue,
but
spectators
would
still
be
limited
to
twenty
five
people,
but
that
way
they
could
broadcast
the
events.
N
N
We
are
recommending
aligning
with
the
state
on
this,
but
it
does
give
Public
Health
some
serious
concerns.
We
know.
Even
on
a
good
year,
we
have
severe
problems,
keeping
norovirus
out
of
day
and
overnight
camps
on
a
good
year
and
that's
the
same
fundamentals
of
hand,
hand
hygiene,
we
see
so
there's
gonna,
be
extra
complexity
involved
in
extra
strain
on
our
communicable
disease
nurses,
who
have
to
respond
to
that
who
are
now
at
full
capacity
just
dealing
with
covin
19.
So
what
we're
asking
for?
N
Is
these
camp
administrators
there's
specific
guidance
for
day
and
overnight
camps
from
north
client,
Department
of
Health
and
Human
Services?
They
need
to
take
a
really
strong
assessment
of
that
and
determine
whether
they
can
truly
meet
those
requirements
or
not,
and
if
they
can't
we're
really
asking
them
to
make
the
judgment
to
not
open
if
they
can't
meet
those
requirements,
because
the
burden,
the
potential
consequences
for
their
children
and
the
facilities
along
with
the
burden
on
public
health,
it
can
be
quite
severe,
and
this
is
just
a.
N
H
So
at
this
time,
we'd
recommend
that
at
least
four
county
facilities
that
we
not
return
youth
sports.
There
is
a
mixture
of
guidance
out
there
that
varies
from
sport
to
sport.
There's
nothing
Universal
that
allows
for
protection
of
players,
particularly
when
it
comes
to
sports,
where
players
have
to
get
into
each
other's
personal
space,
which
is
most
youth,
sports
and
adult
sports.
H
And
given
that
lack
of
guidance
and
basic
protections
that
we
as
a
county
understand
that
there
is
liability
protections
in
place
by
the
governing
bodies,
because
we've
not
seen
information
that
the
governing
bodies
have
even
cleared
those
sports
to
return
to
play
and
just
the
amount
of
varied
recommendations
in
the
field.
At
this
time
that
we
wait
until
there's
more
universal
guidance.
We
have
been
working
with
the
Sports
Commission
and
a
number
of
partners
around
the
country
to
try
to
understand
what
those
recommission
recommendations
would
be.
H
H
So
at
this
point
our
recommendation
would
be
to
step
it
back
and
wait
until
we
received
more
clear
guidance
from
the
state
in
communicating
with
the
National
or
the
North
Carolina
Parks
and
Rec
Association.
This
morning
there
was
still
not
clear
understanding
of
what
the
governor's
guidance
that
was
put
out
yesterday
means
as
it
applies
to
use
sports
so
again,
and
so
we
have
that
clear
guidance
that
we
can
universally
communicate
to
all
our
partners,
we'd
like
to
hold
at
this
point
so
that
we
can
do
so
in
an
organized
manner.
A
H
F
H
And
we
also
don't
have
it
from
the
governing
bodies
of
those
sports,
so
we
have
like
Babe,
Ruth
baseball
and
North
Carroll
use
North
kind
of
Youth
League
Soccer,
the
adult
soccer
league,
all
of
whom
are
at
this
point
a
little
bit
divergent.
So
with
that
kind
of
plethora
of
divergent
guidance
out
there,
it's
really
hard
to
communicate
to
all
of
our
partners.
H
F
F
B
So
our
recommendation
will
be
not
to
align
on
County
facilities
for
organized
sports,
but
we
can
come
back
and
change
that
once
we
have
guidance
and
once
we
have
the
staff
Josh
mentioned
that
he
doesn't
have
the
staff
either
to
open
the
facilities
at
the
level
of
cleaning
that
some
people
want
to
do
as
well,
because
staff
is
deployed
and
stretched.
Then,
at
this
point,
so
our
ask
is
on
County
facilities
and
anyone
using
county
facilities
for
organized
sports
so
that
we
do
not
align.
At
this
point.
N
We
would
recommend,
though,
maintaining
a
50%
capacity
for
hotels,
but
breaking
that
out,
specifically
from
the
hotel
industry
to
be
and
bees
to
homestays
and
having
clear
separate
guidance
for
each
of
those
in
regards
to
capacity
and
room
turnover
as
far
as
happening.
You
know,
24
hours
between
our
room
bookings
so.
N
The
speaker,
restaurants,
we've
seen
a
document
coming
out
from
a
combination
of
Department,
Health
and
Human
Services
of
the
state
in
the
North
Carolina
Restaurant
Association,
very
clear
guidance
on
how
to
operate.
It's
also
kind
of
expounded
upon
in
the
order
itself
and
the
accompanying
FAQ
document.
One
point
where
we
Public
Health
recommends
being
more
strict.
N
Is
that
the
guidance
we've
seen
kind
of
allows
for
self-service
buffets
with
certain
practices
put
in
place,
we
would
like
to
just
say
for
the
vendor
face
to
no
self
service,
no
buffets
at
restaurant,
so
aligned
with
the
state
for
restaurant
guidance,
with
the
exception
of
self-service
buffet
options.
So.
F
F
N
N
N
N
Real
quick
bars
means
establishments
that
are
not
eating
establishments
or
restaurants,
as
the
find
in
North
Clara
a
general
statute
there
that
we
have
a
permit
to
have
a
permit
to
sell
alcoholic
beverages
for
on-site
consumption
under
North,
Carolina,
General
statute,
18,
B,
1001
and
that
are
principally
engaged
in
the
business
of
selling
alcoholic
beverages
for
on-site
consumption.
So
I
know
we've
been
getting
questions
and
I.
This
may
be
a
question
for
Michael
FRU,
but
we
get
a
lot
of
questions
about
the
brewery.
K
Excuse
me,
sir:
if
those
brewery
tap
rooms
provide
meals,
that's
an
eating
establishment.
Then,
at
that
point,.
N
Correct
so
there
are
establishments
in
town
that
have
a
restaurant
and
brewery,
so
they
would
clearly
be
able
to
operate
under
the
restaurant
clause,
but
there
are
some
who
are
primarily
distribution
sites,
Brewin
sites
to
have
tap
rooms.
They
have
food
on
site
such
as
food
trucks,
they
have
large
outdoor
spaces,
I
think
from
local
attorneys
and
communications
I've
seen
around
the
state,
people
are
looking
at
the
the
final
clause
there
and
that
are
principally
engaged
in
the
business
of
selling
alcoholic
beverages.
There's
some
debate
on
that
I
know.
N
I
think
that's
understanding
that
restaurants
have
a
variety
of
roles
from
front
of
house
to
back
of
house
and
making
accommodations
for
that
and
then
in
the
state's
order.
It's
just
recommended
for
all
public
settings.
So,
but
what
we're
recommending
from
public
health
is
to
make
for
businesses
with
public
facing
employees
to
make
that
use
of
masks
mandatory
as
we
see
with
close
contact
services
and
then
again
have
a
strong
and
strong
encouragement
for
greater
masks.
Use
in
the
community
is
our
current
recommendation.
F
F
H
N
F
N
So
I
think
I
think
the
difference.
What
we
see
here
is
that
it's
already
mandated
by
the
state
for
those
close
contact
services
previously
we've
seen
grocery
stores
and
other
retail
language
from
the
state
and
ours
as
strongly
recommended.
So
we're
thinking
about
you
know,
including
that
to
all
retail
all
groceries.
That's
mandated
if
you're
a
public
employer
and
those
public
facing
employees
need
to
wear
a
mask
and
then
strongly
encouraging
it
for
the
public.
So.
A
L
K
We're
gonna,
try
it
we're
gonna
say
require
okay
I'm
asking
Kent.
Can
we
can
we
say
those
words,
I
mean
if
if
the
state
is
saying,
if
the
governor
saying
we
strongly
encourage
workers
at
restaurants
to
wear
face
coverings,
our
difference
is
we're
saying
you
have
to
what
can
we
make
that
can
we
make?
Can
we
say
that
is
that
legally
for
us
to
say
that
you
have
to
put
to
have
an
employee?
They
have
to
put
a
face
cover
now.
I
think.
N
Think
I
think
about
how
you
know.
Restaurants,
we
ask
people
to
wear
hair
nets
to
keep
the
hair
out
of
food,
or
we
ask
assume
that
people
wash
their
hands
after
they
use
the
bathroom
I.
Think
when
I
think
about
this
I
think
about
it's
another
public
health
measure
to
enforce
general
public
health
safety.
So
that's
the
point
of
view
I
think
we're
coming
at
it
from
public
health.
It's
another
step
to
protect
general
public
health,
I'm!
N
K
N
Can
I'll
get
with
Michael
and
whoa?
That's
that.
K
Cuz
to
me,
I
mean
I
mean
the
governor
has
his
his
orders
and
and-
and
you
can
see
some
of
the
stories
across
the
country
where
the
governor's
orders
have
been
tested,
yes
and
and
to
me
and
I
know
we
have
that
we
have
the
freedom
to
go
more
restrictive,
but
but
do
we
step
over
the
line
by
going
more
restrictive
and
risk
these
things
coming
back
to
the
county
that
the
governor
is
trying
to
fend
off
when
he's
saying
strongly
encouraged
to
wear,
face
coverings
and
we're
saying
required,
please
I,
just
and
I
know
it's
word
semantics
all
that
stuff.
L
N
A
M
Think
putting
retail
business
and
restaurants
all
together
with
me
having
a
restaurant
I
think
it
ought
to
be
totally
separate,
because
what
is
not
in
that
retail
business
restaurant?
What
are
we
not
saying?
You
gotta,
wear
a
mask
you
because
that's
hitting
every
business,
every
retail.
So
what
that
says
is
we're
mandate
meant
for
everyone
anywhere.
You
go
except
your
house
or
car
correct.
N
E
N
M
M
I
think
you've
got
separate
restaurants
from
that
I
think
I,
just
don't
know
how
you
can
tell
everyone
they've
got
to
understand
the
health
on
the
restaurant
end
of
it
is
you're
messing
with
people's
food
hair
nets,
gloves
off,
but
I
think
putting
all
three
of
them
together.
You
are.
We
are
opening
a
can
of
worms
right
here.
N
I
would
think
from
the
town
halls
we've
had
several
with
the
restaurant
industry.
We've
been
in
constant
commerce
and
conversations
with
the
air
group
allowed
them
intent
on
duty
enforcing
this
already
themselves
for
their
for
their
servers
and
for
the
hosts
so
and
it's
they've
been
asking
us
to
go
further
than
that
and
mandate.
You
know
the
public
to
have
made
it
for
public.
There
were
face
masks
and
we
understand
there
there's
this
very
complex
issue.
A
G
The
primary
reason
I
want
to
introduce.
That
is
because
I'm
just
really
concerned
about
what
the
numbers
are
telling
us
in
Buncombe
County
right
now,
as
we've
talked
about
so
many
times,
the
governor's
office
is
making
decisions
on
the
basis
of
100
counties.
Some
of
those
counties
have
a
thousand
cases.
Some
of
them
have
one
and
part
of
our
work
is
how
do
we
really
localize
this
process
and
I?
G
Just
in
brief
and
the
numbers
will
come
up
in
a
second
but
as
we
think
about
the
local
trends,
we're
seeing
a
fairly
steep
rise
in
cases
we're
seeing
just
say
some
cases
have
more
than
doubled
in
the
last
week
last
Thursday
morning
they
were
102
another
216
cases,
so
they
more
than
doubled.
Deaths
were
I,
think
for
last
Thursday,
their
house,
seven,
so
they've
increased
seems
for
a
75%
increase
there.
G
The
rate
of
positivity
based
on
these
numbers
is
up
to
5.0,
which
is
a
significant
increase
from
the
three
whatever
it
was
at
the
States
at
seven
point
three
I
think
so
we're
not
at
that
which
is
really
good
news,
and
yesterday
the
the
Citizen
Times
published
information
around
missions,
current
caseload
I
think
they
have
seven
or
eight
patients.
As
of
yesterday,
who
had
tested
positive
compared
to
for
the
week
prior,
they
have
56
patients
with
suspected
covered
19
compared
to
13
the
week
prior.
G
So
more
than
quadrupling,
if
I'm
doing
math
on
the
spot,
which
I
can't
necessarily
be
relied
on
so
anyway,
in
short,
we're
seeing
house
Colon's
case
numbers
deaths,
positivity
rate,
all
increase
in
the
good
news
Department,
the
testing
numbers
are
going
ever
increasing,
which
is
really
great
but
I.
Just
I
have,
like
all
of
us.
I've
been
wrestling
with
this
and
up
late
at
night.
Thinking
about
it
and
I
the
the
big
picture,
good
news
and
all
this
is
our
numbers
are
still
a
lot
lower
than
so
many
other
places,
but
they're
increasing.
G
I,
don't
think.
There's
necessarily
the
will
to
do
that.
So
so
I
would
like
to
explore
if
we
are
going
to
move
into
phase
2
doing
so
with
a
requirement
that
folks
wear
face
masks
when
they
are
out
in
public
to
protect
themselves
to
protect
other
people,
we'd
be
following
suit,
with
what
Durham
County
has
done.
If
we
were
to
take
that
step,
so
I'll
Paul,
is
there
and
and
and
kind
of
look
forward
to
hearing
other
people's
thoughts,
I.
A
I've
also
been
thinking
about
this
question
quite
a
bit
and
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
it's
a
difficult
decision
from
the
standpoint
of
you
know
all
of
us.
We
all
have
different
kind
of
views
on
public
policy
role
of
government
things
like
that,
the
regardless
of
where
you
come
down
on
those
you
know
nobody
wants
to
see
the
government
issuing
these
kind
of
directives
that
are
very
personal
right,
how
people
attire
themselves,
but
well,
that's
true
and
I
certainly
share
that.
A
A
Participation
rate
in
wearing
masks
is
one
of
the
most
powerful
predictors
in
the
spread
of
Kovan
19
right.
This
is
a
highly
contagious,
primarily
airborne
transmitted
disease
right
so
and-
and
you
know
and
I
think
our
understanding
around
this
issue
has
changed
a
lot
from
where
we
were
a
couple
of
months
ago
to
where
we
are
today,
because
it's
been
getting
attention.
You
know
all
around
the
country
all
around
all
around
the
world
and
but,
as
I've
tried
to
sort
of
study
it.
A
You
know,
what's
the
big
takeaways
to
me
or
that
you
know,
I,
think
kind
of
intuitively
people
might
have
started
when
this
thing
began.
Like
let's
wear
masks
us,
it
protects.
You
I
think
what
we've
kind
of
realized
more
and
more
as
it's
been
researched,
is
that
it's
not
really
a
major
protection
for
the
person
wearing
it
from
like.
A
You
know
being
transmitted
the
disease,
but
it
is
a
very
powerful
have
a
powerful
effect
on
reducing
and
suppressing
the
spread
of
kuben
19
from
when
you
know
we
exhale,
we
all
were
breathing
and
we're
breathing
out,
and
so
when
people
wear
masks,
it
significantly
reduces
the
amount
of
transmission
for
people
who
are
positive.
Many
of
whom
don't
know
it.
You
know
many
people
were
positive,
don't
know
it
and
when
you're
in
an
indoor
environment,
I
think
it's,
you
know
much
more
important
for
an
indoor
environment
than
an
outdoor
environment.
A
You
know
the
if
a
high
percentage
or
universal
you
know,
group
of
people
are
wearing
masks
compared
to
not
the
way
that
this
virus
will
be
transmitted
through
the
air
that
we're
all
kind
of
breathing
together
right,
so
I
am
and
I
share.
Commissioner
Jasmine,
Beach
Ferrara's
concerns
about
the
the
growth
in
numbers
we've
seen.
We
are
still
lower
than
most
places
across
the
state,
but
I
just
think.
A
A
little
differently
is
a
fairly
small
decision
and
the
totality
of
you
know,
restaurants,
reopening
things
like
that
to
me,
I
keep
coming
back
to.
This
is
probably
one
of
the
most
effective
tools
that
we
have
that
we
could
use
to
suppress
the
transmission
of
this
disease
as
more
parts
of
the
economy
are
opening
up.
If
we,
if
we
do
do
this,
you
know
I
would
say
I,
certainly
don't
think
that
this
is
something
that
we
should
be
doing
on.
A
Any
kind
of
you
know
long-term
basis,
I
see
this
as
kind
of
a
tool
that
we
might
want
to
use
during
phase
two.
None
of
us
have
ever
been
through
this
before
right.
We
had
just
kind
of
put
the
economy
on
ice,
and
now
it's
coming
back
online
and-
and
we
don't
know
how
that's
gonna
look,
but
this
is
a
tool
that
we
know
can
make
it
safer.
A
We
know
that
the
the
places
in
the
world
that
had
high
real
high
participation
rates
in
masks-
many
of
them
were
mandated,
have
have
gotten
through
this
with
a
lot
lower
rates
of
illness
than
than
others.
The
other
reason
that
I
have
kind
of
come
around
to
this
idea
is
that
you
know
Western
North
Carolina
is
a
place
that
a
lot
of
people
travel
to
and
through
from
around
the
country.
You
know
if
we
were,
we
were,
you
know
a
rural
County,
and
mostly
just
the
people
who
were
there
are
the
people
who
were
there.
A
You
know
I'd,
probably
think
about
it
really
differently.
If
it
was
just
our
resident
population
that
we
were
thinking
about,
I
have
I
think
the
people
of
Buncombe
County
have
done
a
terrific
job
in
terms
of
doing
the
right
thing
to
stay.
Safe,
we've
seen
that
over
the
last
month
and
a
half,
but
if
restaurants
are
reopened,
you
know,
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
more
people,
as
they
have
been
for
decades,
and
especially
in
the
last
few
years
are
gonna,
are
gonna
be
coming
to
our
community.
A
I
saw
a
survey
that
someone
put
online
and
it
was
it
was
a
young
person
and
a
college
student
together.
They
worked
on
this
kind
of
survey,
I'm
going
out
and
just
kind
of
interviewing
people
on
the
streets
like
hey,
where
you
from
they
kind
of
made
notes
of
who's
wearing
masks
who's.
Not
what
were
they
here
for
and
it
was
real
friendly.
A
You
know
it's
important
to
our
economic
to
our
economy
going
forward,
but
as
these
people
are
going
in
our
businesses,
then
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
protecting
the
the
people
who
work
there,
not
just
protecting
them
from
the
from
the
from
the
employees
who
work
there,
but
I
want
to
protect
our
workers
from
folks
who
mean
no
harm,
but
but
many
of
whom
will
have
this
illness
and
and
not
know
it.
So
those
are
a
few
my
thoughts
on
it.
Mr.
A
K
I
may,
if,
if
I
go
to
a
business
and
that
business
is
saying,
I
have
to
have
a
shoes
and
a
shirt
on
and
they
wear
down,
masks
I
can
understand
that
I'll
put
a
mask
on.
But
what's
that
going
to
look
like
if
you're
saying
we're
gonna
require
everybody,
everybody
to
have
a
mask
that
mean
we're
gonna,
if
you
don't
have
a
mask
going
get
arrested,
is
I
mean
I'd
like
to
know
what
that
look
like?
We,
we
decided
a
restaurant.
They
didn't
want
to
go
against
an
order.
K
We
cited
a
restaurant
because
those
people
have
no
money.
So
now
I'm
going
to
ask
you,
as
a
citizen
of
this
county,
if
I
leave
my
house
to
go
on
a
walk
somewhere
and
I,
don't
have
a
mask.
Is
a
law
enforcement
officer
going
to
arrest
me
or
cite
me
what's
that
gonna
look
like
because
I
have
the
freedom
in
this
county
in
this
country
to
make
a
decision?
That's
gonna
that
now
now
I
understand.
K
Please,
please
I
understand
that
I
risk
taking
getting
this
thing
from
somebody
else
and
taking
it
to
someone
I
understand
that.
But
the
thing
is,
though,
is
some
folks
aren't
gonna
like
what
are
you
gonna
do
am
I
gonna
be
arrested,
I'm
asking
you
am,
I'm
gonna
be
arrested
for
wearing
a
mask
for
not
wearing
a
mask
yeah.
A
It's
a
great
question,
so,
first
of
all,
I
would
say-
and
again
this
is
just
you
know.
This
is
my
thoughts
on
it.
I'm
not
trying
to
speak
for
anyone
else,
but
just
based
on
kind
of
what
I've
tried
to
learn
about
about
this
I
would
say
you
know
this
is
a
policy
that
should
be
considered
for
indoor
commercial
facilities.
If
you're
outdoors
I
mean
everything
about
I.
A
Think
what
we've
been
learning
about
this
is
that
if
you're
outdoors,
the
risk
level
is
just
a
thousand
times
less
right,
so
I
don't
think
this
is
something
that
I
mean
if
someone
wants
to
wear
a
mask
outside
when
they're
doing
something
great,
but
it's
not
something
that
would
be.
You
know,
I,
think.
The
question
is
whether,
for
commercial
indoor
environments,
where
people
have
to
go
work,
the
cost
they
do
have
to
feed
their
family.
It's
not
really
a
choice.
Are
we
gonna
protect
those
people
from
people
who
are
coming
in
that
store?
A
Who
don't
don't?
No,
nobody
wants
to
do
anything
wrong,
but
a
lot
of
people
have
this
disease.
Just
don't
know
it
and
they're
gonna
be
interacting
there
and
if
most
of
them
are
all
of
them
have
masks
I
think
the
data
is
pretty
clear.
The
chance
of
that
worker
or
a
bunch
of
workers
getting
sick
is
much
lower.
So
it's
it's
for
indoor
commercial
environments,
not
what
people
do
in
their
homes,
not
people
people
doing
stuff
outside.
In
terms
of
the
question
about
enforcement,
it's
a
really
legitimate
question,
I!
A
Think
from
what
I've
researched,
because
a
lot
of
different
states
around
the
country,
whole
states
are
doing.
This
Colorado
has
been
doing
it
for
a
while
New
Mexico
is
doing
a
bunch
of
states
are
doing
this
statewide
and
then
a
bunch
of
cities
and
counties
are
doing
it
individually
and
I.
Think
the
the
general
consensus
is
that
no
nobody's
going
to
get
arrested
for
not
wearing
a
mask
right.
A
The
police,
Asheville
police
department,
Buncombe
County,
Sheriff's
Department
they've,
got
bigger
challenges
that
they
need
to
be
focused
on
than
whether
somebody's
not
following
the
mask
policy
right.
So
I
think
we
should
acknowledge
if
we,
if
we
do
this,
that
it's
not
going
to
be
for
for
individuals.
This
is
not
going
to
be
a
police,
enforced
policy,
so
I
would
say
that's
my
answer.
K
Okay,
then,
so
then
I'll
go
back
to
my
original
thing,
about
businesses,
putting
the
business
being
the
one
that
puts
the
requirement
well,
I.
Think
when
government
puts
requirement
on
the
people,
then
we
overstep
we
over
I
mean
we
do.
What
I'm
saying
is
is
if
I
will
support
businesses,
making
the
decision
and
now
that's
where
I
want
to
go
back
to
the
legal
aspect
can
force?
Can
we
or
can
through
public
health
can
through
this
there's
some
law
out
there?
K
F
And
I
go
back
to
the
state.
You
know
the
state
mandated
your
requirements
are
not
are
not
bad
they're
there,
they're,
safe,
they're,
probably
not
as
safe
for
some
people
and
they're,
probably
too
strict.
You
know
for
others,
and
you
know
it's
amazing
to
me
how
I
mean
I
think
for
of
ask
I
wear
this
when
I
go
out
and
and
I
use
it
not
for
myself,
but
I
use
for
others.
F
F
Don't
you
know
I'm
a
thought
came
to
me
is
you
know
somebody
gets
in
there
and
this
is
just
what
popped
in
my
head.
Somebody
gets
in
there
in
there
in
there,
in
their
truck
from
from
Haywood
County
and
they're,
bringing
their
lawn
mower
over
to
get
it
fixed
at
the
place
that
I
taken.
They
they
go
in
there
and
and
then
they
can't
go
in
the
place
and
because
they
have
to
have
a
they
have
to
have
a
mask.
F
Now,
if
that's
required
by
that
that
owner
still
gonna
be
it's
still
gonna
be
very
difficult,
but
I'm
just
not
ready
to
tell
you
know
the
general
public,
that
I
mean
I,
just
it
just
doesn't,
and
we
need
to
do
this
fair.
This
is
something
that
I
mean
we
can
kind
of
get
in
into
it.
On
some
things
you
know,
and
but
this
is
this
needs
to
be.
This
is
very
personal.
Very
respectful
people
have
to
make
some
of
those
decisions
and
I.
F
You
know
I'm
not
I'm,
not
a
hundred
percent
sure
how
comfortable
people
are
going
to
be
going
into
somewhere,
where
I'm
at
I
mean
I
got
two
four
year
old,
grandkids
and
I.
Think
about
them.
You
know,
masks
are
very
traumatic
for
particularly
one
of
them.
You
know,
masks
or
are
very
scary.
You
know-
and
now
you
know-
and
people
are
you
know
they
get
masked
and
they
get.
You
know
different
designs
on
them
and
they're
very
I
mean
they're.
They
are
they're,
they're
kind
of
traumatic
for
some
kids
I.
Think.
N
That's
a
matter
of
messaging
and
that's
what
I
see
part
of
our
role
as
Public
Health
and
something
I've
taken
as
a
personal
crusade
over
the
last
couple
weeks
is
to
get
rid
of
that
stigma
that
fear
of
mass.
That's
not
because
you're
afraid
it's
because
you
care
about
others.
You
realize
that
wearing
a
mask
you're
worried
about
somebody
else's
grandmother
who
maybe
you
never
met
and
teaching
children
that
mask
is
an
assignment,
fear
or
threats.
It's
a
sign
of
protection
Aaron.
So
those
are
my
thoughts
on
masks.
I.
N
Think
we've
looked
at
this
very
hard
for
a
month
about
Matt
the
mask
question,
the
complexities
and
we've
seen
from
the
country
and
internationally
and
mandating
it.
There's
extremely
complex,
I,
so
I
think
we're.
We
arrived
at
our
recommendation
where
I
thought
was
a
middle
ground
where
we
can
require
through
public
health
code.
Basically,
businesses
was
front
forward
facing
public
facing
employees
to
wear
and
then
have
the
public
a
strong
recommendation
for
them
to
increase
our
numbers
of
compliance.
A
I
Coming
from,
let
me
sense
this:
the
governor's
telecast
last
night,
five
o'clock,
I,
talked
to
small
business
owners,
call
me
at
home,
one
around
7:30
and
another
one.
Maybe
around
8:30
I
talked
to
three
this
morning,
three
of
them
in
the
downtown
in
the
area
and
three
and
not
mean
to
or
not,
but
the
gist
of
the
conversation
was
this.
I
They
are
saying
that
they
are
going
to
require
their
in
to
were
restaurants,
free
or
not
they're
going
to
require
their
employees
to
wear
a
mask,
but
they
said
they
want
to
require
the
customers
to
to
wear
masks,
but
it
would
help
if
they
had.
They
could
say
that
in
Buncombe
County
we're
requiring
mess.
This
was
coming
from
then
and
sure
I
mean
it
might
be
mixed.
Maybe
I
talked
to
just
five
people:
it's
25,
not
five,
but
you
know
everything
that
I
read
and
talking
about
the
safety
and
nobody
hates
windlass
more
than
that.
I
But
what
we
look
at
for
the
safety
of
the
people
in
Baucom
care,
I.
Think
to
me:
it's
no-brainer,
you
know,
I
think
that's
what
comes
first,
the
safety
of
the
people
in
the
county
and
when
I
see
we
have
seven
deaths
to
me.
I
feel
bad
when
I
see
one
death,
but
if
that
goes
up,
I
think
is
the
elected
officials?
It's
our
job.
To
do
all
we
can
to
help
save
the
drives
and
to
make
sure
that
sure
we
operate
as
we
can.
J
Sides
you
and
I
may
have
them
talked
to
some
of
the
same
folks,
I'm
hearing
some
similar
conversations
from
business
and
restaurant
owners
as
well
and
their
employees
want
to
go
back
to
work.
They
need
the
money
and
what
I'm
hearing
is,
and
yet
they're
scared
to
go
back
to
work
that
they're
more
than
willing
to
wear
the
face
coverings,
but
the
conversations
I've
had
is:
please
protect
my
employees
so
that
they
will
come
back
to
work
and
that
I'm
not
having
to
hire
and
train
new
people.
J
Please
give
the
appearance
that
you
care
about
the
folks
that
are
working
in
my
business
and
that
really
gave
me
pause
that
I
think
this
is
the
elephant
in
the
room
that
we
haven't
said
and
I
may
be
opening
a
hole,
conversation
that
love
it
or
hate
it
and
we're
not
gonna
debate
that
we're
our
economy
is
driven
by
tourism
and
we
talk
about
opening
our
occupancy
to
50
percent.
We
talk
about
doing
that
in
order.
I
can't
talk
with
this
on
at
the
same
time,
which
is
a
real
problem.
J
I'm
sorry,
we
know
that
in
order
to
move
our
economy
forward,
we
have
to
do
these
things
and
we
are
going
to
rely
on
people
from
outside
of
Buncombe
County
in
North
Carolina
to
come
visit
Asheville.
We
have
an
opportunity,
as
Buncombe
County
leaders,
to
say
we
want
not
only
the
tourists
who
are
coming
to
propel
our
economy
forward
to
be
safe,
but
we
recognize
how
important
these
employees
in
the
tourism
driven
economy
are
to
Buncombe
County,
and
we
want
to
protect
you.
We
talk
over
and
over
that
the
tourism
industry
pays
low.
J
We
can
debate
that
we
can
talk
about
how
those
employees
are
treated
in
that
industry.
We
have
again
the
chance
to
be
leaders,
true
leaders
and
say
we
care
about
you
and
we're
going
to
make
Buncombe
County
in
Asheville
a
safe
place
for
everyone
who
live
here.
The
people
who
are
coming
to
visit
and
I
think
down
the
road.
We
could
look
back
on
this
and
say:
Asheville
and
Buncombe
County
were
leaders
in
reopening
the
tourism
economy
in
a
really
safe
way
that
was
safe
for
everyone.
J
We
talked
about
fear
of
masks.
The
fear
for
those
folks
putting
them
on
is
a
very
real
fear,
and
we
can't
ignore
that
as
part
of
our
conversation
in
dr.
Malinda
or
in
Fletch
again,
I
cannot
say
it
enough.
Thank
you
for
the
work
that
you're
doing
you're
approaching
this
from
such
a
science
and
data-driven
perspective,
and
that
makes
making
decisions
from
where
I
sit
so
much
easier.
So
I
commend
you
for
what
you're
providing
us.
M
Finish
upon
that
is
I
still
want
to
say.
The
restaurant
should
be
separate
from
that
of
anybody
in
the
restaurant.
That's
working
I
think
they
should
have
a
mask
if
that's
it,
but
the
people
coming
in
should
have.
If
they
walk
in
and
see
they
hang
out
masks.
They
can
very
willingly
turn
around
and
walk
out
of
restaurants
business
off
now.
One
thing
I
just
want
to
bring
up
al
and
Amanda
to
require
the
people
coming
into
a
restaurant
to
eat
with
a
mask
Amanda.
N
D
So
that's
what
I
want
to
bring
us
back
to
so
we
we
talked
about
like
equity,
being
very
important
in
this
community,
but
if
you
think
about
who
are
the
employees
right
like,
we
need
to
protect
the
employees
too,
so
I
I
get
the
whole
like
freedom,
but
I.
Look
at
it
as
freedom
from
disease
like
the
freedom
of
this
community
from
kovat
right
that
that's
my
public
health
frame,
and
so
it
comes
kind
of
from
a
point
of
privilege
to
be
able
to
not
have
to
wear
a
mask
when
we're
telling
our
essential
workers.
D
Who
often
are
you
know,
people
of
color
or
you
know,
come
from
a
lower-income
like
you
need
to
wear
a
mask,
and
then
anybody
walking
in
the
store
so
I
just
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
just
got
to
get
that
off.
My
chest
and
I
also
just
want
us
to
recognize
like
it
is
really
hard
like
I've
been
in
this
since
January
and
I
haven't
had
a
lot
of
time
to
stop
and
like
think
my
kids
start
in
kindergarten,
this
fall
I
haven't
had
time
to
stop
and
really
think
what
that's
gonna.
D
D
So
we
are,
this
will
be
a
new
normal
like
this
is
real
right
like
we
have
we
can.
We
are
not
ready.
We
can't
return
to
that
and
so
like.
This
is
a
whole
new
world,
and
we
have
to
understand
that
this
is
gonna.
Take
sacrifice
right.
This
is
gonna.
We
are
gonna
have
to
give
up
a
little
bit
of
what
we
once
knew
and
it's
I'm
not
happy
about
it.
I
mean
I'm,
we're
going
through
the
stages
of
grief
right,
but
I.
Think
like
we
need
like
the
this
virus
is
our
enemy.
D
It
is
about
me
it's
about
my
sons,
about
my
husband,
but
it's
about
all
of
us
and
who
is
the
most
vulnerable
in
our
community
and
I.
This
is
an
opportunity,
I
think
for
our
community
to
step
up
and
like
really
do
what's
right
and
I,
get
it
I.
It's
the
same
thing:
I
struggle
against
with
immunizations
right,
mandating,
immunizations
and
having
people.
D
F
F
It's
like
I
said
before
I
said
we
can.
We
can
we
can
go
at
it
on
some
other
things
you
know,
but
on
this
one
right
here
we
just
need
to
have
a
good
discussion
and
what
we
have
to
do
is
to
be
able
to
bring
to
light
the
concerns
that
that
we
hear
throughout
the
communities-
and
you
know
that
we
hear
I,
don't
think
requiring
mass
for
for
customers
is,
is
very
realistic.
You
know
I,
don't
I,
don't
I.
Just
don't
see
that
being
very
realistic,
given.
F
As
you
see
it,
I
think
it'd
be
very
very
difficult
least,
and-
and
there
is
I
mean
most
things-
I
come
in
I
come
in
from
a
pop
holes
perspective
and
it's
just
the
way.
I
am
you
know
and
I.
You
know,
and,
and
you
know
we
may
say
well
to
teach
someone
that
a
mask
is
okay,
that's
tough,
sometimes,
and
so
what
happens?
Is
you
just
kind
of
keep
them
away
from
it
until
you
might
be
able
to
to
to
get
them
to
be
more
comfortable?
Something
like
that.
F
K
D
K
K
Pender
and
I
said
we
got
to
make
sure
we
take
care
of
because
it
was,
it
was
a
burden
and-
and
it
is
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
both
y'all
are
taken
care
of
and
in
any
any
way
that
we
that
we
can
help,
because
it
has
been
you've
been
dealing
with
this
way
before
and
and
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
understand
that
Commissioner,
it's
not
I,
don't
care
about
the
employees,
that's
that's
not
it.
It
never
has
been
and
I
don't
know.
K
If
that
was
directed
and
my
fault,
my
thought
is
it's
not
about
masks.
It's
not
about
masks.
It's
about
government
mandating
mask
and
having
a
business
owner
saying
that
you're
required
to
wear
it
as
an
employee
and
you're
required
to
wear
it.
As
my
customer,
that's
a
support
wearing
mask
if
I
can
get
a
haircut
this
in
the
next
two
or
three
days,
I'll
wear
three
masks.
K
The
issue
is:
is
government
mandating
citizens
to
do
something,
whereas
the
business
owner
could
go
ahead
and
say
all
my
employees
are
gonna
have
to
wear
them,
and
anyone
who
comes
in
here
will
have
to
wear
them.
That
is
that
that's
my
I
guess
my
issue
with
the
whole
thing
about
the
mask
is
whether
it's
government
mandate
or
business
saying
that
you're
gonna
have
to
do
it.
So
my.
G
To
first
of
all,
thank
you,
dr.
mellendorf,
for
sharing
those
perspectives
and
I.
Think
it's
so
important
that
every
step
of
the
way
we
are
keeping
front
and
center
the
experiences
of
those
in
our
community
who
are
most
vulnerable
for
a
wide
range
of
factors,
including
race,
including
income,
including
age,
including
having
pre-existing
conditions.
G
You
know,
I
Fletcher,
you
said
the
other
night
and
I
thought
you
said
it
as
well
as
I'd
heard
anyone
say
it
is.
As
we
open
our
commune
back
up,
we
were
going
to
see
more
cases
and
more
deaths
and
that's
what
we
have
to
sit
with.
That's
just
real
and
then
the
question
becomes.
What
steps
can
we
take
to
do
everything
in
our
power
to
reduce
the
number
of
cases
and
reduce
the
number
of
deaths?
G
I've
heard
a
lot
of
conversation
about
people
saying:
well,
it's
not
that
bad
really
and
there
are
examples
of
pieces
they're
a
fairly
mild.
My
best
friend
is
an
infectious
disease
doctor
in
North
Carolina
and
is
treating
people
with
coca
right
now
cover
19,
and
we
were
in
touch
this
week
and
she
said
the
thing
that
is
most
terrifying
about
this
as
a
medical
professional
is
that
we
cannot
medically
predict
who
is
going
to
survive
and
who's
going
to
die.
It
doesn't
make
sense.
G
She
talked
about
treating
a
family
where
they
were
they're,
seeing
lots
of
family
clusters,
as
you
alluded
to
here,
so
they
had
siblings
in
their
30s
admitted
one
was
going
home,
the
other
died
and
they
didn't
know
why.
We
have
to
understand
the
gravity
of
that
and
I'll
be
honest
if
we
should
all
be
wearing
masks
in
here
right
now,
I,
don't
know
why
we're
not.
This
is
probably
the
sixth
hour
we've
spent
together
this
week.
I
love
all
of
you.
I,
truly
love
you,
whatever
you
think
about
me,
I
love!
G
You
I
can't
help
it
that
don't
know
why
we're
not
wearing
masks
ever
chronic
condition.
I
would
rather
not
wear
a
mask.
I've
got
to
my
family
can't
afford
for
me
to
get
sick
for
every
one
of
us.
There's
a
story
like
that:
it's
really
really
deeply
personal,
we're
all
scared
and
there
will
be
people
for
whom.
If
we
do
decide
to
move
forward
with
requiring
mass
in
our
community,
there
will
be
people
who
are
very
upset
about
that
and
I
get
that
anytime
government
a
new
step
into
personal
freedom.
G
This
is
what
I'm
going
to
keep
talking
about,
because
if
we
are
determined
to
move
into
Phase,
two
and
again,
I
really
wish
we'd
pump
the
brakes
on
that
Durham
County
is
doing
that
they
have
the
highest
case
accountant
in
the
state,
so
they're
in
a
different
situation,
but
they
are
implementing
a
much
more
restrictive
version
of
Phase
two
I
wish.
We
would
take
the
time
to
take
a
closer
look
on
that
because
of
what
our
dad
is
doing
right
now.
G
I,
don't
know
if
that's
gonna
happen,
but
if
we're
gonna
move
forward
in
the
ways
we're
discussing,
it
feels
not
just
like
the
most
responsible
thing,
not
just
like
the
most
compassionate
and
this
everything,
but
it's
the
way
to
save
lives.
Moving
forward,
Commissioner
Pentland,
you
raised
a
question
about
the
legality
of
this
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
get
a
clear
opinion
on
that.
Just
in
a
little
bit
of
research,
as
commissioner
manoomin
alluded
to,
we
do
see
other
states
doing
this.
G
Durham
County
has
had
an
order
like
this,
in
effect
for
several
weeks,
I
believe
I'm
not
aware
of
any
legal
challenges
in
Oklahoma,
there's
a
city
that
rescinded
theirs,
but
that
was
because
people
were
threatening
employees
who
were
enforcing
it.
It
wasn't
a
question
of
the
legality
of
it.
It
was
because
community
members
were
being
asked
to
put
masks
on
and
were
actually
physically
threatening
people.
So
to
me,
what
that
speaks
to
is
if
our
community
gets
on
board.
G
With
this
embraces
this,
it
becomes
them
the
new
normal
that
we're
all
wear
masks
instead
of
you're
in
an
environment,
and
a
lot
of
people
aren't
wearing
masks
in
this
room.
So
that's
we're
not
modeling
how
to
move
through
this
in
a
healthy
way,
and
it's
a
personal
choice
right
now.
It's
one
that
perplexes
me,
but
that's
a
different
story,
but
you
know
I'm
not
aware
of
any
legal
guidance
suggesting
that
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
this,
but
I'd
certainly
you're
right.
E
Can
offer
a
couple
thoughts?
The
new
executive
order
does
retain
elements
of
executive
order,
138
regarding
the
autonomy
of
local
governments,
counties
and
cities,
so
counties
and
cities
here
are
still
allowed
to
make
restrictions
greater
restrictions
than
the
state
order
has
in
place,
except
for
the
only
exception
is
retail
occupancy.
E
There
can't
be
greater
restriction
for
retail
occupancy
locally.
In
turn,
I've
heard
a
number
of
mentions
about
what
retail
owners
may
do.
Retail
owners
may
require
everyone
who
comes
in
to
wear
masks
just
like
no
shirts
no
service.
If
they
don't
do
so,
it
would
be
a
trespass,
so
they
do
have
that
power
and
the
county
has
that
power
as
well.
The
county
can
require
that
people
going
into
businesses
can
also
wear
that
that
would
be
more
restrictive
than
the
state
I
think
would
also
be
allowed.
E
As
to
the
other
questions
that
we're
talking
about
just
as
a
reminder
for
everybody,
any
restrictions
that
are
imposed
must
be
founded
in
fact,
and
reasonably
tailored
to
limit
the
threat
presented
and
they
were
applied
to
municipalities
in
Buncombe
County.
Only
if,
if
they
consented
to
and
asked
for
that,
to
be
the
case
and
I'd
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
other
questions,
you
might
have.
E
A
Me
ask
a
question:
are
there
any
other
I
kind
of
feel
like
we
should
make?
Are
there
any
other
things
we
need
to
give
feedback
on,
I
mean
the
mask
issues,
getting
a
lot
of
attention
anything
else.
We
want
to
what's
custody,
there's
any
less.
We
want
to
give
guidance
on
and
then
let's
come
back
to
you
and
kind
of
try
to
bring
that
issue
to
closure.
I
only.
N
N
N
N
N
Restaurants,
you
know,
on
dining,
with
restrictions,
barbers
and
salons
open
with
restrictions.
Those
entertainment
venues
remain
closed,
still
long
term
care
has
strict
restrictions
on
visitors,
worship
is
now
worship
and
religious
ceremonies
are
now
exempt
from
the
order,
but
we
still
recommend
the
three
W's.
N
Leisure
tourism
bookings
will
would
be
allowed.
We've
allowed
them
to
make
those
bookings
but
recommendations
allow
them
to
proceed
with
those
bookings
again
allowance
for
reservations
with
restrictions
that
we've
discussed
outdoor
sporting
events.
You
know
we
read
that
recommendation
from
Parks
and
Rec
to
delay
county
run,
organized
events
and
then,
while
the
other
stuff
follows
the
new
mass
gathering,
guidance
or
specifically
outlined
state
protocols
such
as
for
day
camps,
overnight
camps
or
new
restaurants,
and
things
like
that.
That
was
the
entirety
of
my
presentation.
K
A
It's
a
hard
it's
a
hard
one.
If
someone
had
asked
me
where
was
where
I
was
at
on
this
even
honestly
week
ago,
I
would
I
would
have
been
in
a
different
place
that
we're
all
just
living
into
this
trying
to
learn
as
we
go,
some
of
the
other
decisions
that
have
been
made
and
there's
some
things
that
are
in
our
control
and
then
other
things
are
just
you
know,
courts
make
certain
decisions
on
different
issues.
Things
change
some
protections
we
had
a
week
ago.
We
don't
have
anymore
and
they
greatly
concern
me.
A
This
is
this
is
a
tool.
That's
in
the
toolbox
and
I.
Think
that
are
we
ever
gonna
get
you
know
kind
of
universal
wearing
of
masks
in
them
or
not.
That's
not.
It's
not
gonna
happen.
There's
some
people
who
are
never
gonna,
put
on
a
mask
and
that's
just
a
way
the
world
works
and
but
I
do
believe.
If
we
adopt
a
policy
that
in
commercial
settings
you
know
public
facing
commercial
settings,
we
we
have
a
policy
that
people
people
need
to
wear
masks.
A
I
do
believe
the
rate
of
people
wearing
these
will
be
higher
than
if
we
go
and
and
I
think
that
that
will
make
a
difference
in
how
this
plays
out
in
our
community.
So
for
those
reasons
you
know
I'm
supportive
of
it
I'm
hearing
that
there
was
a
majority
of
the
Commission
that
would
like
to
like
to
give
that
direction
in
terms
of
what
we
wear
we
go
on
this
next,
so
I
guess
my
question
may
be
to
the
county
manager
is:
do
we
need
to
vote
on
that?
We
could?
A
We
could
vote
on
that
if
we're
gonna
vote
on
that,
we
actually
would
need
to
talk
about
the
process
for
doing
that,
because
this
is
a
work
session,
but
but
just
I
guess
just
that's
one
question
is
the
staff
feel
like
we
have
guidance
or
should
we
should?
We
just
make
sure
this
is
really
clear
and
and
take.
E
This
is
a
call
for
work
session,
so
by
policy
and
practice.
The
board
doesn't
typically
vote
during
such
work
session.
However,
all
board
members
are
present.
If
the
board
wanted
to
vote
on
this,
we're
right
smack
dab
in
the
middle
of
emergency.
You
could
adjourn
the
special
meeting,
call
an
emergency
meeting
now
and
vote
on
it.
Okay,.
A
F
F
I
think
it
should
be
left
to
the
to
the
businesses
to
make
that
decision,
because
they
know
their
team
members
and
their
employees
and
other
customers
best
and
I
think
they
all
be
looking
out
for
for
their
best
interest
in
balancing
their
ability
to
to
earn
that
income
and
see,
if
they're,
going
to
be
able
to
keep
that
business
going
and
I
think
that
they'll
compassionately
do
that.
I
have
a
I,
have
a
tremendous
amount
of
confidence
in
the
in
the
the
community
and
those
business
owners
and
I.
F
Think
it's
been
reflective
in
the
town
halls.
How
how
I
mean
I'm
just
very,
very
proud
of
the
the
the
people
of
Buncombe
County
and
you
know
I,
believe
they'll
I
believe
they'll.
Do
the
right
thing:
I
believe
as
we
move
into
this,
that
they'll
they'll
be
respectful
and
in
protective
and
I.
Think
they'll
do
the
right
thing.
K
One
of
the
things
that
I
would
like
to
make
sure
every
how
this
goes
is
that
we
give
guidance
on
the
proper
way
of
taking
these
masks
off
because
I
wearing
the
mask.
Yes,
but
if
something
gets
on
the
mask,
can
you
reach
up
there
and
you
grab
it
with
your
hands?
Those
are
things
that's
going
to
have
to
be
looked
at
to
let
the
citizens
know
the
proper
way
of
taking
these
masks
off
is
not
just
grabbing
it
with
your
hand
and
then
not
one
in
washing
your
hands.
M
Well
great
first
I
want
to
thank
everyone
for
what
they're
doing
and
please
don't
mean
I
know
we
all
get
up
here,
sometimes
and
say
things,
but
we
never
leave
without
telling
each
other
be
safe,
have
a
good
weekend
as
a
family,
so
I
don't
want.
Anyone
think
this
is
this.
Is
our
opinions
is
what
we're
doing
on
issues
but
I
I'm,
okay,
yep.
If
our
county
manager
of
us
says
we
all
need
to
wear
masks
here,
I
am
for
it.
M
I'm
six
foot,
eight
I've
had
emails,
does
Jasmine
not
like
you
or
something
because
she's
so
far
away
from
you.
Well,
that
is
being
said.
So
I
am
county
manager
and
every
one
I
will
wear
a
mask
if
it
says
if
it
makes
everyone
feel
good,
I
mean
I
will
be
more
I.
Keep
going
back
to
this
restaurant
thing
of
being
an
owner.
Our
health
department
has
the
authority
to
say
they
tell
us
to
wear
nets.
They
tell
us
what
our
temperature
of
our
food
is.
They
tell
us
everything
they
should
go
ahead.
M
We
need
to
get
this
going
and
I'll
be
more
than
glad
to
stop
my
page
today.
If
we're
not
going
into
Phase
two
to
let
these
things
start
and
I'll
challenge
everyone
else,
stop
there
pay
I,
don't
think
a
lot
of
us
can
make
it
ten
weeks
like
some
of
the
other
ones.
Have
so
that's
where
I'm
at
and
thank
you
and.
A
I
A
H
A
The
topic
is
a
discussion
about
the
county's
local
policy,
going
forward
related
to
Cobie
19
responds
in
Phase
two,
and
we
just
we've
just
had
a
discussion
about
in
a
work
session
format.
There
was
one
item
we
felt
like
the
Commission
should
vote
on.
So
that's
the
purpose
of
the
emergency
meeting
I'll
make
a
I'll
make
a
motion
for
consideration.
A
The
motion
would
be
to
give
direction
that
the
county
would
support,
having
a
policy
that,
in
commercial
public
based
in
commercial
facilities
masks
will
be
worn
in
Phase
two
of
the
co19
response
in
Buncombe
County
for
four
employees
and
customers
who
are
in
those
public
facing
commercial
facilities.
There
needs
to
be
language
in
our
directive
that
talks
about
that.
This
can
be
done
where
it's
practical,
when
people
are
eating
food
they're
gonna
have
to
take
a
mask
off,
so
this
cannot
be
done.
A
You
know
every
moment
that
you're
in
a
facility,
but
we're
practical,
that's
the
policy
that
we
would
like
to
have
in
place.
It's
not
going
to
be
a
permanent
policy.
We'd
like
for
this,
to
go
back
to
being
a
recommended
policy
at
some
time
in
the
near
future,
either
when
phase
3
starts
or
at
an
earlier
time,
as
recommended
by
staff.
A
This
is
not
a
permanent
policy
of
the
county,
but
it's
something
that
we
want
to
maximize
participation
in
wearing
masks
and
commercial
facilities,
as
we
are
starting
this
new
phase
2
process
in
Buncombe
County
and
in
the
state
of
North
Carolina.
This
applies
only
to
indoor
settings.
No
outdoor
settings
would
be
no
requirement
for
wearing
masks
and
any
outdoor
settings
or
people's
personal
residences.
This
isn't
only
applying
to
public
facing
commercial
facilities
where
employees
and
customers
are
having
that
kind
of
interaction
in
a
public
commercial
setting.
That's
the
motion.
N
L
A
G
Itself,
yes,
I
wondered
if
we
could
just
say
if
we
could
include
public
facilities
that
may
not
be
commercial
in
nature,
for
instance
a
public
library
or
so,
if
so
wordsmith
it
in
such
a
way
that
it
would
encompass
settings
like
that
and
also
make
sure
that
we're
providing
very
clear
guidance,
I
think
to
address-
and
this
might
be
at
the
messaging
level.
But
the
concerns
come
share.
G
Other
words
raised
around
some
of
the
specific
concerns
that
folks
of
color
might
have
around
this
and
then
finally,
I
think
is
important
that
we
just
are
very
clear
about
enforcement,
and
the
way
this
seems
to
play
out
in
other
communities
is
that
this
provides
a
way
for
say
someone
working
at
a
grocery
store
to
say
to
a
customer.
You
need
to
put
a
mask
on.
G
L
M
G
A
I'm
an
agreement
with
the
content
that
was
just
here
by
commissioner
jasmine
beach
for
our
I'd.
Like
that
to
be
part
of
the
motion,
including
the
that
in
the
counties
policy,
there
will
be
language
making
it
clear
that
individuals
are
not
going
to
be
prosecuted
by
law
enforcement
over
this,
but
that
we
do
feel
strongly
that
businesses
who
take
this
order
seriously
and
require
everyone
coming
into
their
businesses,
that
we
do
strongly
support
them
and
we
will
support
those
businesses
in
their
decision
to
to
enforce
this
on
their
properties.
A
A
We
need
we
need.
People
have
a
little
time
to
prepare
for
this.
So
I
would
like
to
ask
for
the
staff
to
make
a
recommendation
on
exactly
when
this
piece
of
our
local
order.
We
go
into
effect.
I
think
we
should
give
some
additional
time,
so
it
doesn't
go
into
effect
immediately
on
five
o'clock
on
Friday,
so
people
just
have
a
time
to
plan.
Do
some
planning
around
this
all
right?
That's
the
motion.
Is
there
a
second.
I
F
F
G
Federal
court
ruling
that
came
down
last
Saturday
sort
of
made
clear
that
that
churches
are
exempt
from
any
restrictions
that
question
I
put
to
staff
using
their
public
health
lens
would
be
to
think
about
what
are
the
non-commercial
public
spaces?
People
might
be
in
under
the
new
guidelines
and
the
only
example
I
can
think
of
right.
Now
is
a
library,
I'm
sure,
I'm
sure
there
are
others,
but
but
the
intent
is
just
to
keep
people
employees
safe
in
those
settings.
So
so.
A
So
it's
a
good
question
and
I
think
it's
on
these
matters
I
think
it's
very
important
for
us
to
be
as
clear
as
possible
and
it's
it's
it's
hard
to
contemplate
every
situation
in
society
in
the
economy.
But
at
this
point
I
believe
the
motion
is
for
business.
Commercial
facilities
of
public
facing
libraries
are
specifically
mentioned,
but
that's
still
that's
the
limit
of
it.
If
the
staff
come
up
with
other
ideas
they
want
to
talk
about,
then
we
could
talk
about
that,
but
that's
not
included
in
the
motion
at
this
time.
K
K
A
M
A
A
M
I'm
telling
you
what
I
want
you
to
understand,
Asheville,
City
and
Buncombe
County
is
different.
It
is
I,
am
scared
for
my
employees
absolutely
that
this
big
burly
guy
comes
in
and
says
he
is
not
gonna
wear
a
mask
in
there
and
I
won't
service
you're,
putting
my
employees
in
danger
and
I'm
a
small
and
I'm
talking
about
all
these
I
mean
I.
Don't
want
a
friendly
amendment.
Please
make
it
mandatory
for
the
businesses
to
have
that
because
don't
put
my
people
in
danger,
please
please
don't.
A
M
About
this,
and
we
can
change
something-
let's
see
how
this
phase
goes
of,
making
the
employees
do
it
first,
and
then
we
can
look
at
it
in
a
week
or
two
I
tell
you
get
out
in
Leicester,
San
Dimas
out
in
these
rural
areas.
At
these
feeding
seeds,
I'm
telling
you
we're
asking
the
dangers,
not
gonna,
be
arresting
someone
for
not
having
it.
It's
gonna
be
for
someone
getting
something
out
of
their
car
or
someone
coming
in
and
taking
retaliation.
I
am
asking,
let's
think
about
this.
A
M
A
A
Me
finish:
sorry,
many
of
them
have
expressed
to
me
that
they
believe
they
will
be
in
a
much
better
position
to
enforce
this
policy.
If
the
position
of
Buncombe
County
supporting
it
and
requiring
it
versus
it's
hey,
my
business
has
decided
we
don't
like
people
like
you.
You
know
that's
kind
of
how
they
feel
like
they
have
to
express
it
right
now,
it's
just
each
business
having
to
make
this
difficult.
A
Look
at
the
difficulty
we're
having
here
we're
making
every
business
go
through
that
exact
same
process
and
and
they
feel
like
they
will,
they
will
be
able
to
better
protect
their
employees
and
their
customers
by
having
the
county
adopt
this
position,
but
I
acknowledge
it.
Will
it
I
acknowledge
what
you're
saying
I
share
the
concern?
I
just
I
think
the
other
side
of
it
is
mr.
K
Chairman,
please
can
may
I
ask
what
is
what
is
the
difference
with
a
business
owner
who
who
says
that
I
will
I
will
make
my
employees
do
it?
I
will
make
my
customers
do
it,
but
it's
better.
If
you
make
me
do
it,
knowing
knowing
that
we
just
said
we
wouldn't
enforce
it,
but
the
business
owner
can
enforce
it.
Do
a
trespass:
I,
don't
understand
the
business
owner
aspect
telling
us
we
want
you
to
make
us
do
it
when
they
already
have.
They
already
have.
A
A
G
All
say
absolutely
here:
you
can
be
sure
president,
it's
a
that
part
of.
It
is
very
very.
Concerning
mahir,
you
I
hear
you
it's
very
concerning,
and
we
have
more
than
a
month
two
months
now
of
seeing
what
happens
when
people
are
not
required
to
Merrimack
mass
but
strongly
encouraged,
which
is
that
very
few
people
wear
masks.
I
mean
when
you
go
out
to
Ingles
when
you
go
around
town
when
you
go
around
the
county,
you
see
very,
very,
very
few
masks
and
I.
L
G
G
This
is
not
a
tool
or
decision
to
take
lightly
and
at
the
same
time,
we
know
that
when
people
don't
wear
mass,
it
significantly
increases
the
risks
to
people
on
both
sides
of
that
interaction.
It
so
that
that
risk
is
present
and
ubiquitous.
There's
also
many
scenarios
of
businesses
that
might
not
pass
this
policy
on
their
own
and
the
employees
of
those
businesses
that
we
have
to
think
about.
G
M
M
F
M
Hope
something
happened,
but
we
talk
about
deaths.
We
could
have
fatalities,
guys
of
someone
going
believe
everybody's
already
mentally
drained
right
now,
don't
shake
your
head.
I
mean
they
are
people
ill
right
now,
they're
losing
their
life
savings
they're
losing
their
cars,
their
kids
are
going
hungry,
I
mean,
let's,
let's
give
them
the
choice.
I,
just
you
know,
I,
don't
know
if
I'll
stay
open.
If
I
have
to
do
that,
because
I'm
not
putting
my
employees
in
danger.
F
Yeah
and
I
want
to
respond.
You
know,
I
know,
I,
know
Commissioner
of
Presley
very
well
in
his
relationship
with
his
family
and
and-
and
he
is
I
believe
he
is
very
serious
and
in
his
statement
and
that
he
is,
would
be
concerned
for
his
implementing
members.
You
know
one
or
more
of
which
you
know
his
family
and
you
know
I
think
that
we
can
move
into.
F
F
A
The
county
adopts
this
policy.
Each
jurisdictions
in
the
counties
can
have
to
decide
if
they
want
to
do
this.
My
expectation
is
that
some
of
them
won't
made
just
be
Asheville
and
become
County.
I,
don't
know
we'll
see.
I
believed
Asheville
will
also
will
also
be
on
the
same
page.
It's
the
other
jurisdictions
decide
not
to
do
it.
That
is,
each
jurisdiction
is
going
to
have
to
make
a
decision
on
whether
they
want
to
opt
into
this
or
not
and
I
respect
where
any
of
them
come
down
on
it.
A
K
Right
Massa
question
Fisher
mr.
fruit,
the
the
shoes
and
shirt
no
service,
ordinates
rule.
What
does
that
come
from?
Can
this
be
put
into
that
same
thing
and
it's
the
business
owner
I
just
think
we're
overstepping
government
government
is
overstepping
here.
If
we,
if
we
could
say
to
the
business
owner
that
rule
is
in
place
under
this
ordinance,
then
we
don't
have
to
require
anything.
It
could
be
up
to
the
business
owner.
E
That
is
an
option.
I
would
call
it
in
common
law.
It's
a
control
over
the
premises
you
owned
or
managed
under
lease
or
or
just
as
a
manager
same
thing
if
you've
you've
seen
a
kid's
skateboard
out
in
front
of
grocery
stores
before
and
the
manager
says,
get
off
the
property.
So
if
they
come
back,
it's
a
second-degree
trespass.
So
the
same
thing
would
apply.
Any
business
owner
can
set
conditions,
reasonable
conditions
for
people
to
enter
accepting
medical
or
disability
situations.
K
A
K
A
K
Chair
believes
I'd,
say:
let's,
let's,
let's,
let's
understand
we're
going
to
be
doing
the
same
thing
if
I
put
it
into
the,
if
I
put
it
into
Commissioner
Presley's
hands
that
says:
hey
I'm
gonna
we're
require
this
and
we
put
it
into
all
the
other
business
owners.
If
we're
doing
the
same
thing,
they'd.
F
E
A
A
A
A
E
A
I
A
B
So
we
would
work
on
that
language
and
get
it
back
out
to
you
tomorrow,
we'll
also
reach
out
to
all
the
different
mints
Bally's
to
see
how
be
aligned
and
we'll
have
that
ready
for
tomorrow.
I
believe
her
is
that
three
o'clock
13:33
that's
so
tomorrow
through
o'clock,
we'll
have
a
media
briefing
so
we'll
have
this
ready
and
circulated
to
you
all,
okay,
so
that
we
can
have
that
order
signed
tomorrow.