►
Description
Burbank Infrastructure Oversight Board Meeting - December 8, 2022
A
A
A
A
C
A
D
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
opportunity
to
address
the
infrastructure
oversight
board.
I
was
here.
The
last
meeting
and
I
want
to
be
able
to
again
address
on
behalf
of
the
vision,
Burbank
board
of
directors
I'm.
Currently
the
elected
vice
president,
and
we
are
opposed
to
the
Metro's
plan
of
taking
away
two
lanes
from
Olive.
D
Avenue
I
think
that
the
letter
that
the
city
council
issued
two
Metro
is
I
think
the
great
start
get
your
numbers
up,
and
then
you
used
mixed
flow
until
you
get
your
numbers
up
and
then
let's
read
taking
away
the
two
full
Lanes
of
Olive
Avenue
between
Buena,
Vista
and
first
I,
believe
it
is
so
this
happens
to
be
your
future
items.
Item,
B
and
vision.
Burbank
is
looking
forward
to
supporting
the
city
in
that
matter.
Thank
you.
A
All
right,
thank
you
for
those
comments.
We
were
supposed
to
hear
that
item
this
evening,
but
for
some
reason,
unbeknownst
to
me
at
least
it
was
put
off
to
a
future
date.
Do
we
have
any
comments
we'd
like
to
comment
on
this
Mr
Berkman?
Maybe
you
could
give
us
some
idea
where
we're
not
going
on
this?
Yes,.
E
Honorable,
chair
and
board
members
Mr
Christie,
our
assistant
director
of
Community
Development
over
Transportation,
told
us
that
there's
more
research
and
time
needed
to
bring
the
item
to
the
board,
but
it
will
be
forthcoming.
We
will
keep
you
posted
on
the
date.
I,
don't
know.
If
you
had
anything
else,
they
had
Mr
Han.
A
H
I
A
A
E
E
So
you
know
I
wanted
to
emphasize
this.
This
agenda
item
builds
upon
our
previous
improvements
to
the
capital
Improvement
project
program
after
after
that
coveted
year
when
I,
when
I
first
started.
After
that
we
created
a
prioritization
methodology
and
we
produced
two
prioritized
CIP
programs
based
on
that
methodology.
So
that
was
very
good
work
by
by
the
board
with
us
last
year.
During
the
process,
the
board
asked
us
to
to
be
able
to
review
the
unfunded
needs
list
and
we
went
through
a
high
level.
E
Prioritization
exercise
and
that's
what
produced
the
list
that
is
before
us
tonight
and
tonight
we
we
take
another
step
with
the
goal
of
continuous
Improvement
in
mind.
Staff
always
wants
to
do
that
with
you
to
review
the
list
and
provide
input
on
which
projects
the
board
would
like
staff
to
consider
carefully
when
preparing
their
departments
propose
cips
to
be
considered
by
the
board
and
Council
coming
forward
for
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
E
So
the
unfunded
needs
list.
This
list
is
a
very
high
level
document.
It's
a
planning
document,
it's
a
living
document
and
it's
modified
on
an
as
needed
basis,
primarily
during
our
CIP
development
process.
It
is
not
a
document
that
staff
prepared
with
thoroughly
vetted
Scopes
and
budgets
and
schedules.
You
know
high
level
planning
document
so
consequently
really
to
to
set
contacts.
E
You
know
running
around
in
that
you
know
running
around
in
that
Maze
of
so
many
different
things,
so
my
goal
with
Mr
Han
is
to
make
sure
we
can
properly
convey
to
the
Departments
what
this
board
feels
those
number
ones,
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is:
what's
the
top
number
ones
that
they
really?
You
know
we
really
should
consider
making
sure
this
is
in
your
in
your
eyes
when
you're
preparing
your
individual
Capital
programs,
so
I
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
make
that
introduction,
and
we
look
forward
to
having
this
discussion.
E
F
The
only
comment
I
have
is
the
that
we
are
actually
we're
in
the
process
of
developing
our
CIP
budget
right
now.
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
time
to
introduce
this
to
the
board
and
have
a
discussion,
and
we
could
take
this
to
the
Departments
and
they
could
start
looking
at
it
and
seeing
if
that's
something
that
they
could
actually
deliver
and
also
fund
within
the
program
that
they
have.
A
A
List
but
to
go
Page
by
Page,
and
we
can
say
if
there's
an
item
which
we
really
have
great
interest
in
or
if
there's
time
we
have
some
questions
on
so
the
first
page
of
of
the
unfended
needs
is
dealing
with
streets.
Colleagues,
do
you
have
any
questions
or
any
projects
you
think
should
be
given
High
priorities
on
on
this
list?.
L
K
General
question
I
know
we
have
money
coming
from
the
federal
government
from
the
chips
act,
the
inflation
reduction
act
and
then
the
the
main
infrastructure,
Bill
I,
know
at
Rail
and
bridges
and
ports-
and
you
know
includes-
includes
a
lot
of
things
just
wondering
I
know.
Our
city
is
all
over
applying
for
some
of
the
grants,
just
wondering
how
that
might
affect
some
of
these
projects.
Considering
the
Metro,
that's
rail
right,
so
going
forward
that
might
help
fund.
Our
unfunded
situation
here
wanted
to
bring
that
out.
Yes,.
E
Through
the
chair
board
member
Coronado,
very
astute,
accurate
point,
we
might
remember
that
I
believe
there's
a
category
within
our
prior
to
prioritization
list,
which
comes
with
fiscal
points.
I
think
you
know
a
funding
supports
the
points
of
bringing
a
project
forward,
so
that
is
one
of
the
things
that
would
really
bring
a
project-
let's
say
from
a
medium
prior
to
a
high
priority
when
we
actively
get
funds.
E
But
the
thing
to
recognize
is
that
we,
as
staff,
will
likely
bring
only
apply
for
grants
that
we
have
high
priority
projects,
for
there
are
times
where
money
is
provided
to
us.
It
based
you
know,
based
on
population,
let's
say
so.
That
is
something
that
we
consider
but
to
make
sure
grants
Grant
applications
and
and
administration
and
processing.
They
take
up
a
lot
of
time.
E
F
And
also,
if
I
may
add,
all
the
grants
that
you're
talking
about
whenever
federal
funds
or
state
funds
there's
also
a
local
match
that
the
city
would
have
to
put
local
funds
into
the
project.
So
it's
never
a
hundred
percent
Grant
from
federal.
So
usually
it's
about
25
match.
So
if
it's
a
10
million
dollar
project,
we
still
have
to
come
up
with
quite
a
bit
of
money
to
match
and,
and
you
have
to
move
forward
with
the
project.
G
E
One
thing
I
wanted
to
let
the
board
know
and
the
public
know.
That's
that's
listening.
The
Chandler
Bikeway
is
an
active
project
and
that
is
definitely
moving
forward
through
Mr
Christie's
Transportation
division
in
CDD
and
Community
Development,
and
this
is
one
of
those
high-level
things
that
needs
to
happen
in
order
for
that
Bikeway
project
to
be
designed
and
constructed.
E
F
So
this
project,
it's
a
separate
project
outside
of
the
existing
Chandler
project
that
the
city
is
working
on,
so
that's
funded
and
we're
in
the
process
of
design
or
procuring
a
consultant
to
help
us
with
the
design
process.
So
this
is
the
that's
why
the
the
importance
is
at
three,
because
the
primary
objective
is
to
make
that
trail.
Connection
finish
that
out,
and
then
this
is
is
a
I.
Don't
know
the
full
detail
scope
of
this,
but
it's
not
it's
outside
the
original
scope
of
that
project.
E
J
F
C
Thank
you
just
going
through
this
list,
I
see
a
lot
of
these
projects
that
are
eligible
for,
let's
say,
major
m.
A
major
R
applications
I5
on
Madness
is
a
very
good
candidate
for
the
next
phase
of
clean
for
California
grants,
which
is
capped
at
five
million
dollar.
Are
you
going
to
apply
for
some
of
these
funds
for
this
project,
even
though,
let's
say
if
it's
not,
if
it's
not
a
priority,
one,
and
they
are
pretty
I-
would
say
nice
cookie
cutter
project
for
this
grant.
E
Right
to
address
in
the
same
manner
as
Miss,
Coronado's
question
I
think
it
was
every
project
that
we
have
that
can
be
eligible
for
the
measure
M's
or
the
measure
P's
or
any
other
Grant
sources.
That
is
our
primary
directive.
We
always
we
love
using
other
people's
money
so
as
opposed
to
general
fund
or
even
measure
P.
So
we
definitely
want
to
do
that.
We
will
again
chat
with
Mr
Christie
and
his
team
about
the
unfunded.
The
unmet
needs
for
the
I5,
because
that
is
a
product
that
is
ongoing
right
now.
F
I
Lucky
for
me,
Mr,
chair
I.
My
colleagues
have
already
asked
the
critical
question,
which
is
the
issue
of
the
Chandler
bike
path
extension,
which
is
apparently
not
at
all,
related
to
a
priority.
Prioritization
number
three
for
the
victory
Chandler
rail
Crossing.
So
that's
very
clear
to
me.
I
would
like
to
express
a
concern
that
we
move
on
the
Olive
and
Magnolia
Bridge
Improvement
project
staff
has
set
us
a
number
one.
F
Thank
you,
Mr
burchman,
so
we've
recently
released
an
RFP
for
the
rail
design
and
doing
some
Rehab
on
the
bridge
deck.
So
we
are
expecting
the
proposals
to
come
back
by
December
14th,
and
so
this
is
just
addressing
the
rail
issue
as
far
as
the
bridge
that
the
construction
for
the
24
million,
that
dollar
was
originally
associated
with
the
bridge
expansion.
So
this
is
a
a
different
item.
The
reason
it's
still
on
here
is
because
this
is
for
bridge
expansion
or
possibly
a
new
construction,
The
Rail
Project
for
the
The
Olive
and
mag.
F
E
A
couple
years
yeah
but
appreciate
the
question,
because
this
this
kind
of
example
Blends
into
everything
we've
been
talking
about.
So
there
exists
a
current
project
sheet
that
we've
looked
at
for
the
Olive
and
Magnolia
Bridge
railings,
and
that
was
a
couple
years
ago
when
the
infrastructure
investment
jobs
act
came
out.
We
worked
to
try
and
get
funds
from
that
and
other
monies,
but
we
were
unsuccessful.
It
was
a
I
believe
the
total
budget
for
both
was
2.4
million.
The
match,
for
example,
that
we
talked
about
going
after
that.
E
Grant
was
20,
so
we
had
a
400
000
commitment
that
the
board
that
we
all
put
forward
to
council
to
pursue
this
grant
in
anticipation
of
hopefully
getting
this
going
forward.
So
we
had
the
design
money
with
our
with
our
with
our
current
project
and
we
will
seek.
We
will
be
coming
back
to
you,
probably
with
requests
for
construction
dollars,
given
how
much
costs
have
increased
just
in
the
past
couple
of
years.
I'd
imagine
this
project
once
we
get
the
cost
estimate
from
the
designer
we'll
come
back
and
say
all
right.
E
Well,
here's
here's
the
reality,
but
the
good
thing
is:
when
you
have
a
design
complete,
it
makes
the
application
for
a
grant
that
much
stronger,
so
hopefully
we'll
have
the
opportunity
to
to
get
that.
Otherwise,
we'll
be
coming
to
you
with
a
prioritization,
probably
to
see
if
we
want
to
use
measure
P
or
we'll
talk
to
other
folks
about
other
funding
sources.
And
lastly,
we
can
revise
this
write-up
because
we
are
actually
pursuing
the
the
railing,
so
we
can
modify
that
I
made
a
note
of
that.
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
Mr,
chairman
I-
this
is
my
last
year
here
on
the
board.
So
I
just
want
to
remind
my
colleagues
that
for
me
this
is
a
something
or
not
for
me,
but
all
the
people
who
use
the
the
train
and
who
walk
up
the
or
forget
the
elevator
walk
up
the
stairs
use
that
bridge
all
the
time,
and
it
really
is
a
priority
that
we
need
to
hopefully
find
dollars
within
measure
P
funds.
This
would
be
a
great
opportunity.
I
So
if
I'm
not
here,
hopefully
a
little
voice
will
remind
you
that
someone
here
uses
it
and
and
wanted
your
support
for
that
and
then
I
Echo.
What
our
new
newly
elected
council
member
mentioned
about
the
issue
of
traffic
mitigation,
so
that
and
that's
a
number
one
here
so
I'll-
make
a
quick
observation.
I
noticed
that
in
big
numbers,
the
streets
total
87
million,
or
so
it's
the
same,
87
million
as
it
has
been
in
the
past.
I
The
park
and
rec
folks,
on
the
other
hand,
have
really
upped
their
game
and
up
to
another
50
million
or
so
into
the
into
the
pot,
give
or
take
I,
don't
know
if
that
needs
to
be
reminded
of
staff
for
the
next
presentation
of
this
year.
For
now
to
make
the
numbers,
perhaps
a
little
more
realistic,
based
on
just
all
the
inflation
and
increases
in
costs
for
purposes
of
the
streets,
at
least.
Thank
you,
Mr
chair
thank.
E
You,
yes
remember
vanderboard,
thank
you
for
that
comment.
That
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
ask
of
the
department
staff
when
Mr
Han
and
his
team
go
to
them
to
say
it's
Scopes
budgets
and
schedules,
so
I
mean
not
so
much
schedules,
because
these
are
the
high
level
needs,
but
we
definitely
want
to
have
accurate
numbers.
So
it's
a
good
point.
We
will
make
sure
to
ask
them
that.
A
All
right,
so
thank
you.
It's
going
to
be
my
policy.
Usually
as
chair.
Do
you
speak
last
and
one
of
the
advantages
that
everything
I
wanted
to
say
has
already
been
said.
So
you
don't
have
to
hear
me,
but
I
I
would
point
out
two
items
to
me:
leaped
out,
one
was
the
intersection
traffic
mitigation
issues
and
we're
experiencing
a
lot
of
development.
A
A
lot
of
it
brought
forth
by
by
changes
in
state
law
which,
however,
didn't
consider
the
full
picture
and
there's
unfunded
mandates
that
come
along
with
that
and
Street
improvements.
I
think
are
are
very
important
that
we
need
to
be
ahead
of
the
curve
or
before
it.
You
know
we're
gridlock,
and
the
second
is
the
Olive
Magnolia
Bridge,
which
you
know
when
I
see
words,
functional,
Obsolete
and
structurally
deficient.
That
you
know
causes
me
some
concern
and
I've
noticed
driving
to
the
bridges.
Recently,
several
sections
of
the
railing
has
been
taken
out.
A
G
I
mentioned
that,
with
the
new
developments
that
are
coming
in
that
it's
an
unfunded
mandate
from
the
state
and
I'm
wondering
part
of
the
developments
is
diff
is
diff
fees
or
diff.
So
it's
called
diff
right
development
impact
fees.
Right
so
does
do
diffs
go
into
part
of
this
process,
or
are
they
a
separate
funding
for
the
the
improvements
around
the
around
the
developments?
That
would
then
affect
like
traffic
mitigation
and
things
like
that
around
the
development.
So
is
that
included
in
in
our
process?
Here
too,.
E
So
our
our
impact
fees
that
our
city
and
other
cities
collect
they
are
basically
pooled
and
and
used
as
we
need
to
within
our
program
because
they're
kind
of
available
to
us,
the
diffs
themselves,
I
think,
are
under
the
purview
of
Community
Development
I
would
have
to
maybe
during
the
capital
Improvement
program
meetings
that
we
have
asked
Mr
chrisier's
team
to
kind
of
elaborate
on
how
they
are
and
plan
on
using
them
going
forward.
I.
G
F
F
As
far
as
the
development
impact
feed,
so
there's
different
impact,
you
have
the
library
impact
fee,
Parks
impact
fee,
so
whatever,
when
they
pay
for
parks
and
pack
fee,
you
can
only
use
it
for
Parks
development
and
if
it's
Library
impact
fee,
then
they
have
to.
You
could
only
use
it
for
library,
library
improvements
as
far
as
Transportation
related.
A
A
I
I
am
extremely
concerned
that
this
has
moved
to
a
two
priority
because
in
my
opinion,
it
should
lay
somewhere
in
the
three
perhaps
four
or
five
priority,
primarily
for
two
reasons:
number
one:
it's
not
used
enough
and
I
can
guarantee
you
neighbors.
The
chair
included,
would
be
up
in
arms
and
more
than
arms
and
legs,
and
everything
else
complaining
if
hip
and
the
pitchforks.
I
If
this
was
suddenly
to
become
more
used
and
the
obvious
investment
of
75
million
dollars
means
you
would
want
to
get
your
money
back
in
terms
of
value
to
the
community
and
primarily
that
would
be
to
increase
use.
So,
in
my
opinion,
this
is
something
that
yes,
there
may
be
a
dozen
projects
that
need
to
be
done
to
improve
handicap
access.
Etc
I
mean
we
all
go
up
there
from
time
to
time,
and
it's
magnificent.
I
H
I
know
we're
undergoing
a
drought
right
now,
however,
the
rders-
and
this
is
going
to
be
one
of
those
years
and
for
those
of
you
who
never
took
a
world
geography,
class
or
geology
class
of
anything
from
time
to
time
when
volcanoes
go
off
in
Indonesia
or
in
the
Philippines
or
in
Siberia
Southern
California
experiences
unusual
rains.
This
is
going
to
be
one
of
those
years
and
why
there's
a
constant
volcano
going
up
the
same
thing
in
Indonesia
so
and
just
recently,
we've
experienced
a
little
bit
of
rain.
H
That
really
wasn't
anticipated,
so
I
would
I
would
like
to
see
the
storm
drains
improve.
So
maybe
that
should
be
for
this
year
anyway,
moved
up
to
number
one,
just
because
every
now
and
again
we
get
those
unusual
years,
and
this
is
one.
This
is
going
to
be
one
of
those
unusual
years
where
every
couple
weeks,
I
can
sit
down
and
it
ran
in
two
weeks
and
sure
enough.
H
E
That's
why
that's
on
here
I
can
tell
the
board
and
the
public
in
my
few
years,
granted
we're
in
the
drought,
but
when
we
have
had
heavy
rains
and
in
heavy
rains,
our
crews
are
out
there
very
quickly.
Looking
at
you
know
the
canyons
and
sunset
making
sure
everything's
clear
our
storm
drain
systems,
which
I
think
is
about
a
third
account
I,
don't
know
which
way
it
is
either
the
third
the
county
or
two-thirds,
the
county
and
the
rest
city.
E
They
function
really
well
and
our
assistant
director
over
waste
water
and
storm
water
services,
Mr
Steve
Walker.
They
are
always
working
with
our
field
Crews
to
make
sure
if
there
are
any
issues
that
we
see
out
there,
that
we
do
plan
for
those
and
they
would
come
to
this
body
as
an
individual
project
in
an
area.
A
E
A
E
Sir,
our
field
Crews
as
when
I
talk
about
the
field
Crews
our
Public
Works
crews
in
in
streets
and
as
we
need.
If
we
need
resources,
Wastewater
Crews,
they
always
go
out
before
major
storms-
are
forecasted
making
sure
all
the
inlets
are
cleared
and
all
the
drains
are
ready.
We
do
that
city-wide
in
August
and
September
to
make
sure
everything
is
clear,
but
as
fall
comes
and
leaves
drop,
they
go
through
make
sure
everything
is
is,
is
cleared
out
to
the
best
that
we
can
when
storm
heavy
rains
are
expected.
E
G
G
E
I
would
answer
that
by
saying
our
again:
our
our
crews
are,
they
are
on
top
of
all
of
our
infrastructure
and
from
above
ground.
You
know
our
street
crews
are
out
there
looking
at
all
the
streets
in
their
daily
process
of
going
around
their
business
and
sinkholes.
Usually,
while
there
are
sudden
failures,
we
do
know
the
history
and
the
age
of
all
I
want
to
say
it's
250
miles
or
so
of
of
both
sewer
and
storm
drain,
pipe,
that's
all
around
the
city
that
it
would
present
itself
as
a
depressional.
E
You
would
see
similar
to
I
think
a
water
main
if
it's
leaking.
If
it
starts
eroding
the
subgrade
and
the
soils
typically
it'll
be
a
little
dip,
and
it's
when
you
have
the
the
water
main
rupture
or
a
heavy
storm
right.
If
there's
a
lot
of
volume
of
water
in
a
storm
drain
pipe
and
it
ruptures
and
really
quickly
or
that's
when
they
drop
so
I,
it's
I
can
say
with
confidence.
E
G
Think
too,
that
that
is
also
being
discussed
in
the
community
as
there's
interest
in
using
it
more
as
a
space
for
performance,
because
we
don't
have
a
large
performance
space
in
the
city,
otherwise
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
an
opportunity
here
for
because
there's
so
much
interest
in
the
in
the
Arts
Community,
for
that
space,
There's
an
opportunity
for
partnership
or
for
some
sort
of
collaboration,
but
also
with
recognizing
the
impact
on
the
community
right.
So
I
think
that's
a
that.
G
A
I'll
I'll
take
the
liberty
of
saying
folks
who
lived
down
stream
from
the
theater.
Don't
want
to
see
more
traffic,
that
was
on
Walnut
and
Harvard
and
the
other
streets,
and
we
can
endure
a
certain
amount,
but
not
a
year-round
operation.
At
least
that's
my
opinion.
All
right.
Do
we
have
more
comments?
I
have
a
couple
questions.
A
A
E
Okay,
well,
the
good
news
is
in
real
time
right
now
and
for
the
past
year,
Public,
Works
and
Parks
have
been
analyzing.
What
improvements
are
needed
both
to
the
pool
and
importantly,
I'd,
say,
more
importantly,
to
the
equipment,
room
and
I'm,
not
exactly
sure
of
a
time
frame.
But
that
is
something
that
we
have
a
consultant
on
board:
an
Aquatics
expert.
A
Okay,
thank
you
that
just
stood
also
Verdugo
Aquatic
Facility
says
the
slide
was
installed
in
2013
and
it
needs
to
be
replaced.
You
know
a
nine-year
lifespan
for
this
stuff.
That
seems,
you
know
short.
That's
just
my
thoughts
on
the
matter.
I.
Don't
we
don't
have
anyone
from
the
park
apartment
here
this
evening?
Do
we
no.
A
A
G
F
G
If
I
recall,
Miss
Garcia
said
that
the
reason
why
she
did
not
include
it
and
the
suggested
funding
was
because
it
was
going
to
be
funded
by
the
Arts
and
public
places,
so
I'm
wondering
if
that's
either.
Just
not
yet
been
you
know
started,
but
that's
the
intention
or
if
I'm
curious,
it'd,
be
curious
to
see
where
that's
at
yeah.
F
So
we're
expecting
the
the
seat,
the
2324
project
sheets,
from
all
the
Departments
tomorrow,
so
we'll
see,
if
that's
included.
If
not,
then
we
could
talk
to
them
about
them
and
when
we're
presenting
all
the
projects
to
the
board
in
February,
they
could
explain
why
or
why
not
that
be
included
or
Not
Included
right.
G
A
F
E
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
capturing
this,
because
I
think
at
the
end,
we're
going
to
want
to
have
a
decision.
I
think
there
were
three
projects
now,
including
the
one
board
member
talk
how
she
just
mentioned
the
passport
acceptance,
I
believe
Mr
van
bort
mentioned
Starlight
Bowl,
going
from
two
to
three
Miss
Takahashi
mentioned
now
passport,
going
from
three
to
something
of
a
higher
priority,
possibly
and
I.
E
I
Vandenberg
Mr
chair,
thank
you
very
much.
I
just
wanted
to
take
advantage
as
we're
on
page
two
specifically
to
comment
on
something
that
I
feel
strongly
about,
and
we've
been
through
this
before,
but
the
the
Bell
Golf
Course
improvements,
2.25
million
dollars.
I
know,
we've
already
spent
hundreds
of
thousands
from
measure,
P
funds
and
the
last
couple
of
fiscal
years
and
I
think
we're
currently
spending
money
for
that
all
good
money.
I
This
is
not
about
any
misuse
of
funds,
but
this
is
a
reminder
that
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
had
asked
a
year
and
a
half
ago
or
two
years
ago
that
we've
discussed
what
the
responsibilities
or
efforts
of
this
board
should
be
I'm.
Trying
to
remind
myself
that
we're
here
as
as
Watchdogs
right,
our
our
task
is
to
be
an
oversight
board
based
on
those
measure,
P
funds,
where
we
ask
the
public
to
cough
up
money
out
of
their
wallets
at
this
point.
That
money
by
the
way
is
growing
nicely.
I
I
watched
from
a
distance
your
meeting
last
last
month-
and
you
know
the
millions
keep
adding
up.
The
city
continues
to
only
cuff
up
four
four
million,
which,
in
my
opinion,
is
another
effort.
That
is
not
the
good
faith
effort
that
we
sold
to
the
public.
That's
just
my
opinion,
so
with
the
gulf.
The
the
Bell
golf
course
I
feel
is
important
and
I
know
Parks
and
Rec
has
said
as
a
one
and
I'm
Not
For
a
Moment
suggesting
that
I
know
what
it
is
they
want
to
move
forward
with.
I
I
know:
there's
an
enormous
demand
for
a
general
fund,
I
mean
every
penny
is,
is
accounted
for.
Everybody
scratches
what
they
can
to
make
the
general
fund
dollars
go
as
far
as
possible,
but
I
believe
that
this
is
not
what
we
voted
for
as
members
of
the
public,
and
that
is,
we
were
told
that
these
funds
from
measure
P
would
be
for
projects
that
otherwise
never
get
done
and
that
are
over
and
above
the
dollars
that
the
city
would
always
spend
so
I
get
off
my
high
horse
and
and
I
know,
we've
been
there.
I
We
sent
a
letter
to
the
council.
The
council
responded
by
saying
we're
going
to
keep
it
at
4
million.
Of
course,
one
day
we
may
spend
more,
but
I
just
don't
think
that
that's
the
the
right
response
to
the
general
public
at
large
I
think
that's
a
bit
of
the
problem.
We
all
have
with
tax
dollars.
You
know
it's,
the
money
is
fungible
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
have
no
way
of
of
really
controlling
things,
but
I
think
this
board.
H
E
B
E
The
thing
that
we
for
the
board
brought
to
council
was
the
minimum
measure,
P
expenditure
being
set
at
4
million,
the
actual
expenditure
of
measure
P
within
our
Capital
programs
for
the
past
few
years,
I
think
outside
of
cobit
I,
think
it's
been
about
13
million
of
measure
P
dollars,
so
that
4
million
is,
is
the
the
law.
The
propositions
law
guideline
of
a
minimum
investment,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
was
clear
for
everybody.
L
F
Yeah
find
me
yes,
so
the
the
project
estimate
we
haven't
identified
the
funding
source
so
we're
going
to
always
seek
other
funds
or
it
doesn't
just
because
the
dollar
amount
the
2.5
is
here
doesn't
mean
it's
measure,
P
funds
either.
So
absolutely
so,
those
are
I
think
when
we
present
the
projects.
Those
are
the
discussions
we
could
have
in
more
detail
at
that
time
and.
G
Yeah
you
bring
up
a
good
point:
Mr,
Brown,
important
and
the
rest
I
think
that
when
we
talked
about
the
develop
Golf
Course
improvements
in
the
last
round,
one
of
the
comments
that
we
made
was
that
one
of
the
items
was
like
this
similar
it
was.
This
is
debel
Golf,
Course
improvements.
It
listed
a
lot
of
different
improvements,
and
so
in
the
second
presentation
that
Miss
Garcia
gave
to
us,
she
she
pulled
out
a
number
of
the
improvements
separately
or
rearranged
them.
G
That
way,
too,
with
with
the
parks
and
rec
there's
so
much
to
cover
that
it
allows
the
board
as
well
I
think
to
then
kind
of
pick
a
little
bit
more
granularity
of
which
parts
of
the
the
debelle
golf
course
we
think
are
valuable
to
invest
in
this
time
around
versus
the
other
Park
Park
Investments.
So
I
think
that
would
that
be
helpful.
Mr
vanderboard,
if
that
were
presented
in
as
well
as
potentially
considering
the
level
of
priority.
I
Mr,
chairman
Boardman,
absolutely
that's
why
I
preface
by
saying
I
didn't
know
what
the
components
were
to
for
me
to
be
able
to
say,
I
want
to
bring
this
down
to
a
level
three.
You
know
both.
You
know
the
vice
chair
and
I
have
an
opinion
about
funding,
but
I
mean
it's
very
clear.
This
is
not
the
discussion
of
funding.
Of
course
we're
not
funding.
You
know
500
million
dollars
worth
of
Master
P
tomorrow.
It's
just
simply
a
matter
of
observing
this
is
the
opportunity
to
say.
I
Should
we
be
as
a
board
prioritizing
this
as
a
number
three
and
let
staff
work
their
way
in
back
to
us,
as
you
suggest,
with
smaller
bytes
that
tell
us
why
it
needs
to
be
paid
but
yeah,
and
so
maybe
this
is
one.
That
is
simply.
It
requires
more
clarification
from
staff
before
we
knock
it
down
to
a
three
and
and
create
a
a
bit
of
a
of
a
headache
for
staff
right,
yeah,
yeah,.
E
A
All
right
that
said
for
the
record,
I
agree
with
both
you
and
Mr
Brennan
and
I
think
those
should
be
trees
and
taken
from
other
funding
sources
and
I
believe
it
was
a
million
dollars
in
the
black
over
the
last
fiscal
year,
all
right.
Moving
on
we're
dealing
with
facilities,
which
is
the
bottom
of
page
three
and
Page
four
of
of
our
list.
Do
you
have
any
comments
or
questions
on
those
items.
I
Mr
chair,
yes,
just
a
point
of
clarification.
From
staff's
perspective
that
88
million
dollar
number
again
has
been
a
placeholder
for
a
while
about
the
library
should
that
remain
there
in
that
fashion,
should
it
be
increased?
How
should
we
be
dealing
with
it
in
this
unfunded?
You
know
future
projects
or
or
assets
whatever
we
we're
going
to
call
just
because
I'm
not
sure
that
88
million
should
be
in
this
list
anymore.
I
A
Foreign
no
more
comments
or
questions.
My
only
comment
would
be
on
the
kitchen
at
the
police,
fire
building
I'm,
you
know
sure
it
needs
rehab,
but
I
think
other
funding
sources.
Then
measure
P
are
really
what
the
voters
expressed.
So
I
would
give
it
a
lower
rating
than
the
one
on
the
page
five
which
is
streets.
A
F
A
So
yeah
glad
I
asked
well
not
hearing
any
of
my
colleagues
I'm
just
going
to
comment
that
two
items
leaped
out
in
my
eyes:
the
San
Fernando
Boulevard
Street
ballards,
which
is
a
relatively
small
item
at
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
removable
safety
barriers,
which
seems
you're
talking
about
the
same
item,
that's
much
higher
1.5,
but
I
I
think
those
should
be
given.
You
know
serious
consideration
if
they
haven't
I
mean
I,
think
we're
we're
taking
safety
measures
already.
So
you
know
this
may
be
a
moot
issue
that
I'm
bringing
up
yes.
E
E
Things
from
Angelino
right
to
is
the
whole,
no
I
think
that's
just
Olive
from
Olive
to
Magnolia
a
one-way
circulation
and
also
a
full
closure.
So
staff
and
Consultants
are
looking
at
that
right
now
and
I
believe
we're
looking
to
go
to
council
to
provide
a
report
in
I
think
we're
looking
at
February.
E
G
So,
although
this
isn't
a
change,
I,
just
I
just
wanted
to
first
of
all
I'm
pleased
to
see
several
projects
specifically
focusing
on
bike
and
pedestrian
safety
and
access.
I.
Think
that's
that's
huge!
It's
it's!
It's
going
to
be
a
big
part
of
our
future
Street
improvements,
so
I
I'm
pleased
to
see
that
and
I'm
really
glad
to
see.
G
I
want
to
put
a
lot
of
emphasis
on
the
safety
measures
around
the
north
side
of
the
Burbank
bridge
in
that
area,
on
San
Fernando,
between
San,
Fernando
and
Burbank
that
that
intersection
there
is
so
dangerous
for
bicycles
and
also
sometimes
for
pedestrians,
but
the
new
bridge
too,
as
well
so
I
just
really
am
glad
to
see
that
that's
on
the
list.
So
that's
in
North,
San,
Fernando,
Boulevard,
streetscape
and
Safety
project
I'm.
Assuming
that's
the
part.
That's
on.
G
That's
the
it's
that's
the
part
it's
above
Burbank
Bridge,
right
yeah,
so
that
I
know
it's
been
in
the
works
and
I
know
that
there's
been
quite
a
bit
of
drama
around
the
new
bridge
and
bike
safety
and
pedestrian
safety
and
I'm
pleased
to
see
it's
there
and
I'm
glad
to
see
it's
one.
If
I
can
make
it
one
and
bold
I
would
and
then
just
in
general,
just
the
concept
of
keeping
bikes
in
pedestrian,
especially
downtown
focus
on
the
safety.
I
Just
an
observation
there
rightfully
so
there
are
a
lot
of
ones
here
and
meaning
you
know.
What's
how
does
that
saying
goes
when
everything
is
a
priority?
Nothing
is
a
priority
or
maybe
I
have
a
reverse.
You
know
what
nothing
is
a
priority
whatever
it
is,
if
there's
so
many
ones,
are
we
really
getting
ourselves
to
a
point
and
we'll
never
be
able
to
really
focus
on
anything
in
particular
I
I?
I
Don't-
and
this
is
for
staff
more
than
anything
else
and
I
know
that's
Mr
Christie's
Department
to
a
large
extent,
but
maybe
we
can
just
ask
him
to
maybe
he
can
put
1.1
1.2
1.5.
However,
he
he
makes
it
easier
for
us
to
kind
of
grasp
what
it
is.
He
sees
us
a
potential
future
for
for
a
number
of
these
projects.
I
G
Follow
up
on
that,
if
you
look
at
the
existing
assets,
most
of
those
are
twos
and
threes.
So
I'm
wondering
I,
don't
know
if
David
Christie's
not
here
to
to
answer
to
this,
but
maybe
there's
more
going
to
be
more
of
a
focus
on
the
new
assets
and
less
on
the
existing
I.
Don't
know,
but
that's
something
to
consider
too
is
that
these
these
other
assets
are
twos
and
threes.
So
I,
don't
know
what
do
you
think
Mr
Brickman
yeah.
E
So
we
need
to
remember
that
this
again
is
a
high
level
review,
so
we're
not
scoring
on
one
to
ten
we're
not
scoring
them
out
of.
What's
our
score
50.,
you
know
it's
not
a
prioritization
score.
This
is
something
that
allows
staff
to
see
what
the
iob
believes
are:
categories
of
high
and
medium
and
low,
and
it's
up
to
staff
to
go
through
each
one
of
these
and
bring
the
most
important
ones
at
a
critical
time
forward
into
consideration
for
measure
P
funding
in
the
capital
program
each
and
every
year.
E
I
A
E
H
A
E
So
in
all
likelihood
this
we
would
talk
to
Miss,
Garcia
and
her
team
about
this
along
with
probably
PD
and
it
and
our
facilities.
Folks
to
say
what
do
we
want
to
have
here
if
anything
at
this
time,
but
there
is
definitely
a
study
going
on
to
make
sure
we
have
a
report
of
what
we
should
be
doing
to
enhance
security
properly
Citywide
at
our
facilities.
G
What
most
cities
do
have
some
sort
of
like
welcome?
You
know.
Big
Burbank,
like
Glendale,
has
one
when
you
go
in
the
Glendale.
Does
the
Glendale
thing
and
I'm
just
curious
about
that,
but
thoughts
about
that
from
having
been
around
for
a
while,
or
maybe
there
is
one
I
just
don't
know
where
it
is
because
I
haven't
seen
it,
but.
E
Board
member
Takashi
the
project,
the
consideration
of
a
project
itself,
the
latest
that
I've
heard
was
to
have
not
necessarily
service
clubs
signs.
But
an
actual,
like
you
said,
a
welcome
to
Burbank
type
of
sign
and
I
believe
it
was
considered.
The
location
to
be
considered
was
the
off-ramp
of
the
134
on
Alameda
by
Whole
Foods.
Is
it
by
the
oh?
That's
Hilaria
am.
E
I,
get
that
name
right,
I'm,
sorry,
I'm
still
a
little
new,
but
that's
it
that's
one
location,
but
we
haven't
obviously
with
a
prioritization
of
three.
We
haven't
pursued
it
in
depth,
so
we'll
take
a
look
at
it
and
talk
about
it
with
with
that's,
probably
something
we
would
talk
about
with
the
city
manager,
Department,
I,
think
office.
G
It
seems
like
a
small
project
that
would
have
kind
of
a
high
impact
of
a
community.
You
know
pride
and
and
recognition,
and
especially
in
the
media
District,
making
that
transition
from
from
North
Hollywood
or
the
other
areas
of
town
into
Burbank
I
think
that's
kind
of
a
that's.
You
know
it's
kind
of
exciting.
To
say
this
is
our
city
and
we
haven't
had
it
so
have
we
had
one
before
Mr
randburg
that
you're
aware
of.
I
I
I'm
gonna,
just
remember,
remember
that
we
had
him
from
the
media
District
the
problem
with
these
signs
is
they
become
old
after
a
while
and
they
become
dated,
and
unless
you
really
are,
we
know
the
biggest
little
city
in
the
world.
You
know
Burbank
putting
a
you
know,
welcome
to
the
media
center
or
welcome
to
Burbank.
I
You
have
to
really
be
good
at
doing
something
that
will
last
for
20
years,
50
years
as
opposed
to
after
a
few
years,
the
wood
starts
looking
decrepit
and
it's
falling
apart,
but
I
know
this
was
has
been
I.
Remember
when
we're
in
the
planning
board.
For
us
this
is
Jackson
Remember.
There
were
some
signs
that
were
proposed
or
when
it's
just
it's
come
and
gone
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
that's
the
challenge.
I
E
If
I
may,
if
I
may
have
a
a
moment
of
Candor-
and
this
is
the
right
board
to
do
with
these
types
of
projects-
take
up
an
inordinate
amount
of
staff
time,
because
obviously
Burbank
is
a
community
that
takes
a
lot
of
pride
in
living
and
working
and
having
fun
here
and
the
ideas
of
what
a
monument
sign
should
look
like
I
I.
It's.
G
H
Quick
got
unfunded,
but
we're
sort
of
priority,
two
new
soccer
fields,
which
would
be
a
great
idea.
Where
do
you
plan
to
build
them,
considering
that
it's
a
very
popular
sports
amongst
Young,
Folks
anyway,
as
well
as
internationally
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
happen?
But
where
do
you
plan
on
building
them
seriously?.
I
I
And
and
Burbank
High,
but
yeah
we
never
are
willing
to
really
bite
the
bullet
and
buy
land
like
we
were
talking
about
buying
it
at
the
airport.
I
remember
our
councilman
Campbell
back
then
was
adamant
that
we
shouldn't
do
that
because
of
health
issues
with
the
airport
pollution
Etc.
There
was
something
about
doing
where
the
Home
Depot
is
now
and
that
went
down
the
terrain
because
of
the
pollution
from
the
freeway.
I
A
D
G
F
G
E
And
if
I
may
Mr
chair,
we
should
remember
that
Parks
just
took
over
the
animal
shelter
from
the
police
department
last
year,
and
there
are
two
projects:
I
think
that
were
moved
forward,
wanted
us
to
do
the
kennel
flooring
and
I
think
they're
pursuing
a
shade
structure
right.
So
those
two
are
ongoing.
Now
and
I've
made
a
note
to
tell
Parks
folks,
the
the
mister
system
is
something
that
the
board
would
like.
E
A
G
There's
three
items
that
were
not
on
the
list
that
maybe
I
misremembering
that
they
were
funded
from
last
time,
but
I,
don't
recall
that
they
were
the
first
one.
Is
the
Oliver
Diego
Sparks
intersection
I
thought
it
was
on
the
unfunded
list
last
time
it
didn't
get
funded
yet
and
then
it
was
pushed
forward.
But
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
that
one.
That.
E
G
E
B
E
An
active
study
that
you
as
a
council
member
will
be
seeing
in
the
coming
months.
That's
the
one-way
and
Council.
In
my
budget
presentation,
they
requested
a
consideration
for
our
staff
and
Consultants
to
look
at
a
full
closure
also,
so
those
two
options
are
something
we'll
we'll
be
bringing
to
council
great.
A
E
Please
Mr,
chair
and
board
members
I
think
it
would
be
worth
going
through
the
list
just
once
more
to
the
most
specific
thing
we
need,
because
we
took
notes
on
which
projects
we
want
to
go
to
the
Departments
make
sure
they
are
accurate
if
they
should
be
removed,
like
the
best
example.
Is
the
library
in
the
Civic
Center
costs
accurately
updated,
but
for
this
group,
if
there
are
any
priorities
to
change,
we
definitely
would
like
to
hear
those
and
have
consensus,
because
there
are
several
individual
ideas.
E
E
L
E
L
Because
we
described
this
as
giving
input
to
staff
I,
don't
think
we
have
to
go
to
the
formality
of
a
formal
motion
for
each
item.
You
want
to
upgrade
or
decrease
in
priority
I
think
as
long
as
there
is
a
sense
from
staff
that
they
understand
what
the
consensus
of
the
board
is.
I
think
that's
fine
that
satisfies
you
know
how
we
have
it
listed
on
the
agenda.
C
F
E
F
E
I
think
I
would
like
to
go
through
and
just
make
sure
I
would
just
say:
I
understand
this,
and
if
people
say
if
folks
say
no
I,
don't
want
to
come
back
and
have
the
wrong
information
for
them.
Yeah.
So
I'll
briefly
go
one
page
by
one
page
to
Mr,
vanderboard's,
Point,
page
two,
the
DeBell
Clubhouse
expansion
and
the
bell
Golf
Course
improvements.
I
F
I
L
I
I
E
When
we
talked
from
a
from
a
staff
perspective,
it's
a
it's
a
medium
priority,
because
it's
always
something
that
we
are
considering
as
our
field
Crews
and
every
rainy
season.
If
we
see
issues
typically,
issues
are
reported
by
the
public
to
us.
I
was
traveling.
This
is
flooded
in
front
of
my
home.
This
is
flooded,
so
we
get
those
reports.
In
addition
to
our
team's
observations,
it
does
not
mean
that
the
public
health
and
safety
consideration
is
not
100
top
priority.
It's
just
that
the
condition
of
our
storm
drain
system.
E
E
E
A
For
clarification,
really
for
me,
is
as
we're
going
on.
I
mean
this
list.
The
Departments
do
look
at
it
when
you're
going
into
the
budget
season
and
decide.
Yes,
we
you
may
plunk
this
item
out
and
give
it
priorities
in
one
of
the
17
items
for
funding.
Or
is
this
just
something
that's
been
in
existence
and
like
an
appendix
you
know
we
have
it,
but
you
know
we
may
not
really
need
it
to
Mr.
E
Chair
I
would
say
it
has
been
kind
of
sitting
there
since
measure
P
was
created,
but
we
properly
took
a
priority
to
take
a
look
at
it
and
every
year
since
Mr
Han
has
been
here
just
before
me,
we've
made
sure
it
is
part
of
each
department
staff
to
look
at
this
really
before
you
say.
I
want
to
do
this
new
thing
or
I.
Have
this
existing
asset
I
have
to
take
care
of
well.
E
We
have
this
so
make
sure
you
look
at
these
and
carefully
consider
and
that's
why
it's
so
beneficial
for
us
to
hear
from
you,
so
we
can
tell
them
of
this
list.
These
are
your
highest
priorities
that
the
board
really
wants
you
to
look
at
and
from
my
perspective,
when
you
attend
this
meeting
in
February,
March
just
be
ready
to
explain,
what's
going
on
why
maybe
this
isn't
going
forward
whatever
this
is
for
the
board
compared
to
what
you're
proposing?
Is
that
get
that
right.
A
I
I
E
E
J
G
To
put
on
so
I
mean
I
from
an
infrastructure
funding
perspective
I,
it's
it's
could
be
a
three
but
from
a
community
interest
perspective
I
think
it
is
more
of
a
two,
maybe
even
a
1.5.
So
from
our
perspective
of
looking
at
how
much
of
the
city's
infrastructure
money
we'd
like
to
put
into
improving
it
just
per
se,
without
consideration
of
perhaps
like
what
the
demand
is
just
oh,
it
needs
Improvement
put
more
money
in
yeah.
Okay,
I
could
see
a
three,
but
looking
ahead
for
how
the
community
might
be
interested.
G
That
I
want
to
still
have
it.
I
want
well
I
guess
if
it's
a
three
but
stays
on
the
list,
solid
that
it's
there
so
when
the
community
does
start
to
look
into
it
and
wanting
to
work
together
with
parts
that
it
is
on
the
list,
at
least
so,
maybe
maybe
by
the
time
things
get
going
then
next
year
maybe
I'll
move
up
too.
So
I've
talked
myself
into
being
okay
with
the
three
yeah
nice
for
now.
Okay,.
E
E
E
A
G
Wanted
to
revisit
the
previous
comment
or
the
previous
discussion
earlier
about
an
update
on
all
of
Sparks
Verdugo,
just
just
officially
request
that
be
presented
again.
It's
it's
been
a
while,
since
we've
had
an
update
and
I
think
it'd
be
good
to
for
the
board
to
see
what's
going
on
there,
especially
considering
the
previous
public
comment
about
the
brt.
E
A
The
communication
with
the
traffic
committee
and
we
created
a
list
of
Liaisons
I,
felt
guilty
about
the
fact
that
I
missed
the
October
meeting
and
and
I
don't
like
feeling
guilty
so
are.
Are
we
going
to
do
this
next
year?
If
so,
then
the
roster
needs
to
be
updated.
So
maybe
we
should
discuss
in
January
if
we
want
to
continue
our
liaison
or
non
liaison
with
with
the
traffic
committee
and.