►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - December 6, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Me
loving
Heavenly
Father.
We
come
to
you
this
hour,
asking
for
your
blessings
and
help
as
we
are
gathered
together,
bless
each
person
present.
We
pray
for
guidance
in
the
matters
at
hand
and
ask
that
you
would
clearly
show
us
how
to
conduct
our
work
with
a
spirit
of
joy
and
enthusiasm.
We
pray
that
this
meeting
is
successful,
productive
and
blessed
give
us
the
desire
to
find
ways
to
excel
in
our
work.
Give
us
wisdom
concerning
the
issues
that
we
face.
Help
us
to
work
together,
encourage
each
other
to
Excellence.
B
D
E
E
That's
a
carousel
replica
of
one
of
our
horses
on
on
our
Carousel
that
soon
to
be
open
later
this
month
we
hope
and
it's
a
collector's
item
and
also
a
child's
toy,
so
we're
we're
trying
this
to
see
if
it
has
any
popularity
and
if
it
does
we'll
we'll,
probably
make
some
other
replicas
of
some
other
animals
on
the
on
the
carousel.
So
you
have
the
first
ones.
That's
a
it's.
An
original
Harold
seems
like
it.
Yeah
I
need
two
more
I,
don't
understand
we
we
got
them
for
you
anyway.
E
It's
a
pleasure
and
honor
to
recognize
a
new
lease
Society
tonight.
The
new
Leaf
Society
started
in
2007,
so
15
years,
they've
been
beautified
in
our
city
and
also
other
municipalities
and
parts
of
Alamance
County
and
we're
very
proud
of
all
the
work
and
projects
they've
done
in
Burlington
on
our
streets
and
thoroughfares
in
our
Parks
and
their
their
work
is
very
visible.
They
have
a
new
Leaf
Circle
at
Alamance
Crossing.
E
That's
really
outstanding
got
a
tricycle
on
top
and
a
bunch
of
nice
flowers
and
grass
around
it
and
I
I
love
every
time,
I
go
by
there
and
see
that
and
they've
done
a
lot
of
other
projects
down:
Main
Street
and
South
Church
Street
in
front
of
city
park,
University,
Drive,
Rockwood
O'neill.
E
All
that
is
evidence
of
what
new
Leaf
has
done
for
the
beauty
of
our
city
and
and
we're
very
proud
of
that,
and
we're
very
proud
that
we
have
a
partnership
with
with
new
leaf
and
I
want
to
mention
the
Willowbrook
Park
Arboretum,
primarily
paid
for
by
New
Leaf
society
and
their
donors,
and
and
it's
turned
into
a
real
gym
for
our
city,
a
piece
of
land
that
was
a
flood
plain
that
wasn't
used
for
much
other
than
a
park.
E
That
was
a
long
leisurely,
narrow
park
for
many
years,
and
now
it's
it's
a
very
well
used
and
lots
of
of
people
using
that
park.
That's
been
turned
into
an
arboretum
that
has
about
six
or
seven
Gardens
in
it
right
now.
Some
unique
features
like
the
veterans
overlooked
that
recognizes
all
the
people
that
served
and
a
lot
that
made
sacrifices
for
our
country
on
the
side
of
the
old
American,
Legion
building,
and
also
a
new
Children's
Garden.
E
That's
unique
and
educational
and
a
play
space
for
a
lot
of
kids
and
then
a
tree
house
and
a
lot
of
good
things
that
are
in
that
Arboretum.
And
it's
just
going
to
get
better
and
better,
so
I
wanted
to
recognize
New
Leaf
and
let
our
mayor
read
the
proclamation,
and
we
also
will
be
installing
a
plaque
permanent
plaque
on
the
commons
building.
It's
on
the
screen
there.
If
you
can
see
it
that
will
recognize
what
new
Leaf
has
done
for
our
city
and
we'll
be
there
in
perpetuity.
So
we
have
some
members.
E
We
need
some
help:
Kelly
May
she's
our
current
president
of
new
league
and
been
with
him
a
long
time
right
behind
hers,
Rhett
Davis,
a
former
president
and
now
Legacy
member
of
the
new
leaf
and
certainly
helps
wonderfully
and
he's.
Also
the
chairman
of
our
Arboretum
advisory
committee
appointed
by
city
council.
So
we're
happy
to
have
him
and
do
a
role
in
Mrs.
Davis
is
right
next
to
him
and
Jim
Larson
is
over.
There
he's
former
city
engineer
for
some
of
you
all
might
remember.
E
E
E
Oh
Marcy,
green,
yes,
Marcy,
sorry,
Marcy's
with
impact
Alamance
and
a
big
donor
to
New
Leaf,
and
certainly
the
the
main
donor
for
the
Children's
Garden
and
the
Arboretum
so
Marcy
glad
to
have
you
here
is
that
everybody,
okay,
the
mayor's
going
to
read
the
Proclamation,
then
we'd
like
you
all
to
come
up
and
get
a
picture
and
think,
okay
and
I'm
sure
he'll
ask
one
of
you
to
say
a
few
remarks.
Yep.
D
And
whereas
one
of
the
new
Leaf
society's
largest
projects
to
date
is
the
Burlington
Arboretum
at
Willowbrook
Park
and
has
become
one
of
the
city
of
Burlington's
crown
jewels.
This
multi-million
dollar
Endeavor
is
an
extremely
Popular
Community
Asset
and
will
continue
to
evolve
over
the
years
and
whereas
the
Burlington
arborium
at
Willowbrook,
Park
open
year
round
from
sunrise
to
sunset,
features
a
wide
paved
walking
path
that
meanders
the
length
of
this
17-acre
park.
D
The
veterans
Overlook
site
sits
high
on
the
banks
of
the
creek
across
from
the
commons
building,
offering
a
lovely
view
into
the
Arboretum.
Other
stunning
features
include
a
Children's
Garden
educational
play
area,
Tree
House
constructed
from
Locust
wood
and
a
variety
of
plant
collections
restored,
natural
spring
benches,
picnic
tables,
sculptures,
attractive
signage
and
a
Monumental
investment.
That
is
a
dream
come
true.
Now,
therefore,
I'm
mayor
Jim
Butler
in
the
Burlington
City
Council,
do
dinner
honor
and
a
pleasure
to
extend
this
proclamation
in
recognition
of
the
new
Leaf
Society.
D
F
F
F
G
Mayor,
thank
you.
So
much
and
Tony
appreciate
all
of
your
words.
We
couldn't
have
done
this
project
without
you
leading
the
way
and
a
collaborative
effort
with
the
city
there's
so
many
familiar
folks
and
folks
that
worked
on
this
project
in
this
room.
So
we
say
thank
you.
Rhett
and
Janice.
Burgess
get
all
the
credit
for
the
hard
work.
Gade
is
going
to
pay
the
path
forward
as
she
carries
on
The
Advisory
Group,
that's
going
to
have
oversight
over
the
park
with
the
collaboration
of
the
city.
We
thank
you.
G
We,
as
as
Ronnie's
prayer
alluded
to
it,
has
been
a
joy.
It
has
been
more
of
a
joy
to
see
how
the
citizens
of
Burlington
have
treasured
the
park.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you,
Brett!
Thank
you!
Janice
and
Gabe,
and
Tracy
and
IL
impact
elements
for
all
of
the
work
and
the
investors
and
our
funders.
We
couldn't
have
done
it
without
you
and
you
know
we
are
now
75
projects
for
New,
Leaf
and
4.4
million
dollars
in
15
years.
So
I
think
we're
here
to
stay.
G
D
F
D
D
Our
next
item
is
out
flag,
outstanding
flag
display
certificate
presented
to
the
City
of
Burlington
I'd
like
to
recognize
Sam
Powell
past
president
of
Alamance
Battleground
chapter
of
the
sons
of
the
American
Revolution.
H
H
Our
duties
to
monitor
the
use
and
display
of
the
United
States
flag
here
in
the
community,
and
so
we
travel
around
and
remind
people
when
they're
getting
old,
worn
and
torn
and
encouraging
their
replacement.
But
we
are
here
tonight
to
provide
the
city
with
a
a
certificate
of
accommodation
for
properly
displaying
the
American
flag.
According
to
the
U.S
flag
code,
the
City
of
Burlington
displays
the
flag
here
at
the
municipal
building
at
fire
department,
City
at
the
police
department
and
cemeteries,
and
it.
F
H
H
I
A
H
Well,
we
just
like
to
go
out
to
area
classes
with
students
and
and
talk
about
the
American
Revolution
and
having
a
uniform
and
flags
creates
an
interest.
That's
why
we
do
that.
D
F
F
Oh
okay,
you
want
a
minute
this
thing
here.
My
name
was
Buddy
Brubaker
back
when
I
was
in
Williams
High
School
and
LG
Guthrie
I
got
to
go
up
and
talked
to
him:
Robert
anymore,
who's,
the
council,
member
and
Jim
Butler
and
Carl
who's,
that,
fellow
by
the
horn,
that's
Alan
Baker!
So
that's
right.
He
sent
out
off
to
Alaska
to
come
back
and
tell
us
42
years
worth
of
History.
F
Well,
Mr
Ward
done
a
good
job.
Ronnie
Wall's
done
a
good
job.
Harold
has
Jim.
You
did
a
good
job.
The
other
day,
well,
sitting
there
having
breakfast
talking
to
my
friend
from
Alaska
and
I,
have
a
little
buddy
right.
There
he's
52
years
old
and
I'm
gonna.
Let
him
come
up
here
and
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
the
cheap
pulleys.
F
It
really
but
yeah
I,
guess
I
thought
she
done
a
great
job
would.
D
Our
next
item
is
the
additions
to
the
consent
agenda
item
G,
to
set
a
date
of
public
hearing
to
adopt
a
resolution:
2444
Maple,
Avenue
development
item,
H,
paralegal,
reclassification
and
item
I
assistant,
City
attorney
reclassification.
Is
there
a
motion
on
the
additions
to
the
consent
agenda?
So
I
have
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second
second:
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
I
I
any
post.
D
D
He
posed.
Our
next
item
is
the
consent
agenda.
These
items
are
typically
non-controversial
if
anyone
has
any
questions
about
the
following
items.
Please
let
us
know
item
a
to
approve
the
2022
North
Carolina,
firefighters,
association,
annual
roster
certification
pursuant
to
North
Carolina
General
statute,
58-86-25
Item
B
to
approve
proposed
fees
and
charges.
Schedule
changes
to
be
effective.
January
1st
2023.
D
Approval
this
time
we'll
entertain
a
motion
on
the
consent
agenda
motion
to
approve
with
the
add-ons
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
as
their
second.
Second,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
I
any
post.
Thank
you.
Our
next
item
is
public
hearings.
We
do
have
several
public
hearings
on
the
agenda
tonight.
If
you're,
if
you
are
wishing
to
speak,
you
will
everyone
will
have
an
opportunity
to
speak
when
your
item
is
called
item
number
one.
D
K
Good
evening,
mayor
and
Council
John
Ando
interim
Transit
manager
link
Transit
today
we're
here
to
hold
a
public
hearing
on
the
title
VI
program.
The
title
VI
is
a
civil
rights
act
for
1964,
which
projects
people
from
discrimination
based
on
race,
color
natural
origin
based
on
federal
programs
that
are
received
are
based
on
services
and
programs
receiving
federal
assistance.
We've
prepared
a
title,
VI
program
that
has
been
placed
on
the
link
transits
website
for
30
days.
We've
had
the
plan
available
at
the
link
transit
offices.
K
D
D
Hearing
9
will
entertain
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing.
We
have
emotions
their
second.
Second,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
eye,
and
you
pose
this
time
we'll
entertain
a
motion
concerning
the
resolution
for
link
Transit,
title
VI.
M
D
You
we
have
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second?
Second,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
aye
aye
any
opposed.
That
concludes
item.
One
item.
Two:
a
public
hearing
has
been
scheduled
to
consider
amendments
to
the
city
of
Burlington's,
unified
development,
ordinance,
udota
5-22.
At
this
time,
we'll
recognize
our
planning
director,
Jamie
Lawson
good
evening,
Jamie.
N
Good
evening,
everyone
mayor
and
then
remembers
of
the
council
I'm
here
tonight,
there's
a
public
hearing
on
the
unified
development
ordinance
amendments,
it's
udlta
5-22.
N
Just
in
brief.
As
you
know,
the
unified
development
ordinance
is
a
living
document,
so
we've
come
here
to
present
additional
amendments.
This
is
the
10th
round
of
amendments.
The
updates
and
Chad
Meadows
is
here
he's
going
to
be
going
through
a
a
quick
presentation,
but
the
updates
include
creation
of
a
zoning
permit,
updates
to
The
Limited
use,
zoning
standards,
tiny
home
Provisions,
electric
vehicle
charging,
station
additions
and
other
technical
related
changes.
These
changes
are
consistent
with
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
we're
recommended
unanimously
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
on
October
24th.
N
There
was
one
ad
which
we'll
talk
about
in
terms
of
flag
Heights.
This
this
item
was
also
briefed
to
you
at
your
work
session
on
November
14th.
So
staff
is
recommending
all
of
the
the
recommendations
and
changes,
but
I'll
introduce
Chad
Chad.
N
D
F
O
Chad
welcome.
Thank
you,
sir
Mr
mayor
council
members,
I'm
Chad
Meadows,
with
code
right
planners,
my
pleasure
to
be
here
with
you
tonight.
We
are
old
hands
at
this
and
I'll
move
through
this
material
very,
very
quickly.
As
Jamie
mentioned.
This
is
the
10th
Amendment
that
we
made
to
the
Udo
since
adoption.
So
we've
been
at
this
for
about
three
years
now.
O
As
always,
we
organize
our
amendments
into
one
of
three
groups:
either
those
that
are
Prosperity
related
things
that
are
necessary
or
helpful
to
the
business
Community
here
in
Burlington,
those
that
are
Precision
related,
where
we've
revised
the
language
to
make
things
easier,
to
understand,
more
clear,
easier
to
follow,
Etc
and
then
finally,
those
that
are
legal,
related
or
those
things
that
we
need
to
change
based
on
actions
from
the
general
assembly.
Thank
you.
O
O
We
have
about
18
areas
of
revision
tonight
and
I
will
go
through
this
very,
very
quickly.
We've
added
a
new
zoning
compliance
permit
for
very,
very
simple
kinds
of
review.
Things
like
accessory
structures,
murals
public
art
Etc.
O
So
nothing
substantive,
just
some
clarifications
to
the
applicant
about
how
many
uses
we've
had
several.
This
is
a
very
successful
change
that
we've
made
most
of
the
rezoning
seem
to
be
coming
through
in
a
limited
use
sort
of
process,
but
we're
getting
numerous
numerous
uses
and
I
think
the
intent
was
to
to
more
closely
Fetter
or
or
streamline
a
number
of
allowable
uses.
So
we're
encouraging
applicants
to
do
that.
As
Jamie
mentioned,
we've
added
some
options
for
electrical
vehicle
charging
stations,
some
very
basic
Provisions
for
three
top
three
types
of
tiny
house.
O
We
softened
some
of
the
parking
standards
for
multi-family,
specifically
the
guest
parking
requirements
and
we've
softened
the
standards
for
the
farmers
market.
We've
added
some
additional
flexibility
for
metal,
siding
on
non-residential
building
sides.
Another
adjustment
is
flag,
Heights
and
sizes.
This
was
something
that
came
up
during
planning
and
zoning's
consideration
in
October
and
something
we
talked
about
again
during
the
work
session
last
month.
O
Essentially,
the
current
Udo
sets
a
limit
on
flag
height
or
basically
flag,
pole
height
size
of
about
25
feet
after
lots
of
discussion
with
applicants,
lots
of
discussion
with
Planning
and
Zoning.
The
suggestion
is
that
we
go
from
25
feet
in
height
to
40
feet
in
height,
okay.
So
that's
one
of
the
key
changes
that
we
would
suggest
being
made
one
more
flag,
height
or
flag
size
change,
which
is
the
current
Udo
caps
individual
flag
sizes
at
24
square
feet.
Okay,
so,
basically,
that's
you
know
might
be.
O
It
could
be
a
variety
of
different
ways
that
you
measure
that,
but
ultimately
it's
24
square
feet.
After
discussion
with
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
members,
there
was
concern
that
that
24
square
feet
might
not
be
enough
for
some
kinds
of
military
flags
and
that
we
needed
to
increase
that
number
to
60
square
feet,
which
is
what
has
been
suggested
before
you
tonight.
We
believe
that
that's
an
adequate
number
that
will
cover
most
kinds
of
flags
that
are
in
commercial
production
today
and
we
shouldn't
have
any
problems.
O
Meeting
those
standards,
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
supported
that
change
and
we're
we're
here
to
suggest
to
you
that
that
be
incorporated
into
the
new
Udo
couple.
Other
changes
related
to
Precision,
just
some
clarification
about
the
planning
department
names
clarification
about
some
zero
lot
line.
Setbacks
for
townhouses
single-family
attached
units
clarified
that
there's
some
Maximum
building
length
or
standards
that
are
not
applied
to
multi-family
buildings
that
have
Central.
You
know
dining
or
Recreation
facilities.
O
We
didn't
want
to
penalize
those
those
buildings
for
having
those
kinds
of
central
features:
some
additional
Clarity
on
the
rules
for
fences
when
they're
located
within
a
required
Landscaping
buffer,
we've
added
some
additional
buffering
requirements
for
lots
that
border
interstates
and
railroad
rights.
O
Of
way,
we've
tried
to
make
the
banner
rules
a
little
bit
easier
to
administer
by
dropping
the
the
ratio
that
ties
them
to
the
width
of
the
building
in
favor
of
just
a
basic
maximum
10
foot
length
we're
clarifying
that
street
setbacks
still
apply
when
open
space
is
located
between
a
building
and
the
street.
So
those
are
the
the
basics
of
these
kinds
of
precision.
Amendments,
no
real
substantive
change,
just
additional
clarity.
O
The
last
set,
the
last
single
change
that
we're
suggesting
is
part
of
Udo
522,
is
are
legal
related.
There
was
a
set
of
session
laws
that
came
out
from
the
general
assembly
last
year,
20
well
earlier
this
year,
2022-62,
which
changed
the
appeal
body
for
subdivision
applications
that
are
decided
by
staff.
It
used
to
be
the
superior
court,
and
now
that
has
been
sent
back
to
the
board
of
adjustment,
not
a
big
deal.
O
It's
just
a
basic
kind
of
legal
change
that
we
needed
to
incorporate
in
the
Udo,
and
that
concludes
the
the
changes
that
we're
suggesting.
With
this
round.
As
I
mentioned,
you
know
we
we
talked
with
Planning
and
Zoning.
They
had
some
flag
recommendations,
we've
made
those
changes
and
suggest
you
consider
them
tonight
and
finally,
the
additional
clarification
about
our
desire
for
applicants
to
limit
the
range
of
uses
associated
with
their
limited
use.
Rezoning
application,
okay
and
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
guys
have
any
questions.
A
D
D
M
There
I'll
make
a
motion
I,
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
to
amend
the
City
of
Burlington
unified
development
ordinance
with
the
proposed
Tech
Amendment.
The
motion
is
based
upon
the
consistency
of
the
proposed
tax
amendment
with
the
comprehensive
plan
in
that
second
floor
land
use
gold.
One
recommendation:
five
of
the
comprehensive
plan
call
for
an
update
of
the
unified
development
ordinance
section
four
land
use
goal.
One
recommendation:
five
of
the
comprehensive
plan
call
for
insuring
Sound
Land
planning
decisions
that
are
consistent
with
the
vision
of
the
plan.
M
The
action
is
reasonable
and
in
the
public
interest
in
that
section,
four
land
use
gold.
Two
recommendation
for
of
the
comprehensive
plan
addresses
confusion,
conflicts
and
obsolescence
of
the
zoning
code
through
a
new
unified
development
ordinance.
Second
floor
land
use
gold,
two
recommendation,
four
of
the
comprehensive
plan
and
you
Udo
will
be
modern,
graphically
intensive
and
user
friendly
from
both
the
public
petitioner
and
administrative
perspective.
D
A
N
Evening
again,
so
I
pulled
up
on
this
map,
all
of
the
properties
that
you
called
out
and
they're
all
highlighted
in
the
teal
shade.
This
is
a
request
for
the
properties
to
be
rezoned,
medium
density,
residential.
N
This
was
originally
45
uses
and
it
was
reduced
down
staff
fields
and
fines
that
this
request
is
consistent
with
the
big
Alamance
Creek
area
study
and
there's
portions
of
the
comprehensive
plan
that
it
is
inconsistent
with.
As
the
portions
of
the
area
are
rural
residential
AG,
however,
we
are
recommending
approval
as
per
option
two
in
your
packet
provided
in
the
consistency
statement
sheet.
The
applicant
is
here.
If
you
have
any
questions
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have
too.
P
Good
evening
Mr
Mayor
members
of
the
council,
I'm
Paul,
Koontz
and
I
represent
the
applicant
tonight.
We
have
a
team
here,
including
Ryan
Fraser
and
Amber
Hamad
from
Vision
real
estate
partners
and
Charlie
Yao
and
Oliver
Kaja
from
bowler
engineering.
So
as
we
go
through
this,
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
will
certainly
be
able
to
address
them.
Okay,
I'd
like
to
start
by
giving
Ryan
a
few
minutes
just
to
make
a
brief
presentation
about
about
his
company.
P
Q
Q
You
know
really
we
want
to
talk
through.
We
understand
that
we
want
to
spend
the
bulk
of
the
time
talking
through
the
rezoning.
Q
Q
We
are
an
owner
operator,
developer
of
commercial
real
estate
assets,
we're
based
in
Mountain
Lakes
New
Jersey,
which
is
about
20
miles
west
of
New
York
City,
and
we
have
a
fully
vertically
integrated
commercial,
real
estate
platform
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is
we
operate
in
the
company
with
all
services
in-house
all
the
services
of
a
development
company
operating
under
kind
of
a
single
single
platform.
So,
as
I
said,
I
run
our
investments
team.
We
have
in-house
development
capabilities,
in-house
construction,
Leasing,
Property,
Management,
asset
management,
accounting.
So
really
what
that
creates?
Q
Is
a
great
communication
internally
in
terms
of
execution
of
projects
and
getting
work
done
because
we're
not
third
partying
out
work
from
an
external
perspective.
It
really
creates
a
lot
of
efficiency
of
execution
for
the
tenants
that
we
work
on
behalf
all
of
our
partners,
our
financial
partners
and
the
host
municipalities,
in
which
we
work
so
discussing
partners
and
tenants
that
we've
worked
with
in
the
past
I.
Think
it's
important
to
point
out.
We
are
a
family-owned
business,
so
very
entrepreneurial
mindset.
Q
You
know
tenants
that
we
land
at
this
portfolio,
but
we
would
expect
an
investment.
You
know
call
it
close
to
100
million
dollars
on
this
project.
So
it's
it's
a
very
significant
investment
for
our
company
for
us
we're
excited
about
it.
We're
excited
to
do
business
in
Burlington
and
we
look
forward
to
discussing
the
project
further.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Mr
Frazier.
P
And
and
thank
you
Jamie
for
the
presentation
to
start
with
the
the
initial
application
had
45
uses
on
it.
When
we
first
came
to
pnz
in
these
zones
there
would
be
53,
so
we
had
already
cut
it
down
to
45
on
when
we
came
in
the
door
and
apparently
we
were
a
little
ahead
of
the
curve
because
we
actually
did
list
the
uses
that
could
be
used,
not
the
ones
that
were
excluded
so
and
I
think
that's
the
right
way
to
do
it.
P
We
had
our
initial
Planning
and
Zoning
meeting
September,
26th
and
and
then
we
scheduled
a
meeting
with
the
public.
There
was
not.
There
was
not
a
vote
taken
on
the
26th.
We
scheduled
a
neighborhood
meeting,
but
the
the
neighborhood
is
really
Keck
road
that
runs
along
the
side.
That's
the
residential
neighbors.
P
Everything
else
on
Anthony
court
is
already
industrial,
Light
industrial
and
there's
Baptist
Temple
Church
over
on
the
right
hand,
side
if
you're
standing
out
at
Anthony
Road,
and
so
the
notice
requirements
actually
only
required
us
to
notify
the
residents
along
Keck
that
bordered
the
property.
But
we
took
the
next
step
with
the
help
of
some
of
the
residents
out
there,
and
we
noticed
everybody
on
Keck
Road.
Both
sides
and
Baptist
Temple
was
nice
enough
to
host
us
there.
It's
also
where
that
Community
votes.
So
it
was
an
easy
place
to
find.
P
We
just
had
to
schedule
it
until
they
let
daycare
out.
It's
always
a
fun
thing
to
work
around
right.
So
so
we
had
a
meeting,
we
had
something
like
45
people
show
up
and
we
were
out
there
hour
and
a
half
two
hours.
We
did
a
brief
presentation
and
then
made
all
of
our
team
available
to
everybody
in
the
community,
because
there's
just
so
many
questions
when
there's
a
development
next
door,
you
don't
know
what's
coming
in,
you,
don't
know
who
the
developer
is
and
and
through
that
process
we
were
able
to
really
identify.
P
P
No
one
spoke
against
it
that
time
first
time
through
there
was
a
few
people
with
comments
and
and
I
hope
that
we
have
taken
a
lot
of
steps
to
satisfy
the
neighborhood
out
there
and-
and
we
really
think
and
and
I
think
this
limited
use
process
is
ideal
for
this
type
of
development.
You
know
this
there's
going
to
be
multiple
buildings
with
a
lot
of
square
footage
with
unknown
end
users.
At
this
point,
so
obviously
it's
a
project
that
is
is
being
developed.
P
So
so
we
can
cut
down
the
uses
and
take
out
those
things.
That
would
be
not
the
right
uses
for
that
space,
but
also
that
the
community
would
be
most
concerned
about,
but
still
leave
flexibility
to
the
developer
when
they
don't
have
an
identified,
end
user
in
place
or
if
you
don't,
if
you
have
buildings
that
could
be
used
in
a
lot
of
different
ways,
and
that's
why
we
have
35
uses
left
on
here.
P
Some
of
them
are
are
less
likely
than
others,
but
I
also
don't
want
ever
want
to
put
a
client
in
a
situation
where
they
come
in
and
say
and
to
get
a
permit
and
then
planning
staff
or
or
development
staff
in
Burlington
would
say.
Well
you
can't
you
know
you
can't
put
solar
panels
on
the
roof,
because
you
took
solar
farm
off
of
there
and
I
know
that
would
be
an
ancillary
use
and
those
are
things
that
lawyers
worry
about
a
lot
more
than
maybe
clients
and
staff.
P
D
This
is
a
public
hearing,
so
at
this
time,
we'll
open
the
floor
for
public
comments
on
item
number
three
request:
anyone
from
this
side
of
the
room
that
would
like
to
speak
on
item
number
three
concerning
this
rezoning
is
for
anyone
on
this
side
who
would
like
to
speak
on
item
number.
Three
hearing
now
will
entertain
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing.
D
I
Samira
I
make
a
motion.
Please
I
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
to
rezone
property
from
medium
density,
residential
MDR
and
medium
industrial
Mi
to
medium
Industrial,
Limited
use
milu.
I
I
I
The
council
finds
that
the
request
is
compatible
with
the
existing
industrial
sites
in
the
area
and
the
action
is
reasonable
and
the
public
interest
in
that
the
comprehensive
plan
encourages
a
sustainable,
a
sustainable
balance
of
land
uses.
The
request
is
compatible
with
existing
zoning
and
land
use
areas
in
the
study
and
the
request
is
supported
by
the
19
by
the
2018
big
Alamance
Creek
Pac
area
study.
D
Have
a
motion,
and
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
eye
any
opposed.
Thank
you.
That
concludes
item
number
three.
Thank
you,
gentlemen,
and
really
want
to
say
how
much
we
appreciate
the
time
you
spent
with
the
property
owners
out
there.
It's
always
comforting
to
know
that
that
much
effort
went
into
a
project.
We
really
do
appreciate
it.
D
Our
next
item
item
four,
a
public
hearing
has
been
scheduled
to
consider
a
requests
to
rezone
properties
zoned
as
medium
density,
residential
MDR
light,
industrial
Li
and
office
institutional
oi
to
office.
Institutional
limited
use
o.
I
l.
U
rezoning
22-01a.
The
properties
are
located
on
the
north
side
of
West
Front
Street
between
Paris
Street
and
Saddle
Club
Road
addressed
as
2635
West,
Front
Street
and
consisting
of
Alamance
County
tax
identification
numbers.
D
N
Good
evening
again,
so
yes,
this,
this
is
a
rezoning
request.
A
limited
use,
rezoning
request
for
the
properties
that
are
highlighted
here
on
the
map
shown
in
teal.
The
request
is
for
office,
institutional
limited
use
specifically
to
allow
college
or
university
uses
only
this
request,
I'm
just
going
to
pull
up
the
future
land
use
designation.
N
So
this
is
inconsistent
with
the
future
land
use
designation,
as
this
area
is
rural,
residential
AG,
but
staff
does
recommend
the
approval,
as
it
is,
a
continuation
of
the
continuation
and
expansion
of
the
uses
that
are
already
occurring
on
the
property.
The
Planning
and
Zoning
commission
recommended
a
unanimous
approval
at
their
October
24th
meeting,
and
this
item
was
briefed
to
you.
Let
your
work
session
on
November
14th
as
well.
We
haven't
received
any
comments.
The
applicant
Brad
Moore
is
here
in
case.
R
Thank
you
mayor
and
members
of
council.
My
name
is
Brad
Moore
I'm,
the
university
architect,
director
of
plane,
design
and
construction
at
Elon,
University,
I'm
joined
by
Dr
Jeff
Stein,
our
vice
president
for
strategic
initiatives
and
Partnerships
Jimmy
did
a
great
job
of
explaining
what
we're
trying
to
do.
But,
as
you
know,
94
of
our
college
campus
falls
into
the
jurisdiction
of
the
town
of
Elon.
There's
these
three
Parcels
that
fall
into
the
jurisdiction
of
the
City
of
Burlington.
R
These
Parcels
are
currently
zoned
medium
density,
residential
and
light
industrial,
but
this
is
the
land
that
we
currently
use
for
our
sustainable
agriculture,
research
and
teaching
Farm
we're
going
to
continue
to
use
that,
but
the
current
zoning
doesn't
really
apply
for
that.
So
we're
asking
for
this
to
be
rezoned
for
o
and
I
limited
use,
and
it's
consistent
with
the
09
zoning.
That's
to
the
west
of
us,
which
is
in
the
town
of
Elon
and
the
Owen
District,
that's
to
the
east
of
us.
It
is
in
Burlington
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
D
D
D
This
time
we'll
entertain
a
motion
to
concerning
the
rezoning
of
item
number
four
orange
sheet.
As
indicated.
L
Press
to
rezone
properties
from
medium
density,
residential
MDR,
light
industrial,
Li
and
office
institutional
alive
to
office.
Institutional
limited
use,
oilu
the
properties
are
located
on
the
north
side
of
West
Front
Street
between
Paris
Street
and
Saddle
Club
Road
addressed
as
2635
West,
Front
Street
and
consisting
of
Alamance
County
tax
identification
numbers.
L
115754-115864
and
115865,
while
the
request
is
inconsistent
with
the
future
land
use
map
in
section
4
land
use
of
a
comprehensive
plan,
in
that
it
calls
for
this
area
to
have
rural
residential
agricultural
uses.
The
request
is
compatible
with
the
existing
institutional
uses
occurring
on
the
property.
L
D
D
N
N
N
Again,
this
was
heard
by
the
Planning
and
Zoning
Commission
on
October
24th,
where
they
recommended
a
unanimous
approval
and
was
brief
to
you
at
your
work
session
on
November
14th
staff
is
recommending
the
request
as
it's
consistent
with
option
one
in
your
consistency
statement
sheet,
the
applicant
choice.
I
must
say
that
she
is
is
here
in
case
you
have
any
questions
for
her
and
I'm,
certainly
able
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
J
Thank
you
so
much
for
allowing
me
to
today
to
present
project
I've
been
at
the
name,
is
Joyce
Patton
I've
been
in
business.
My
business
is
Panama's
accounting
service
for
about
18
years
now,
here
in
Alamance,
County
I've
been
renting
an
office
for
many
years
and
have
outgrown
it,
and
it's
just
not
working
for
me
and
I
decided
to
try
and
find
my
own
place
since
the
rents
are
so
ridiculous.
J
Now,
so
I
did
find
this
piece
of
prop
I
couldn't
go
into
the
bidding
wars
of
buying
existing
homes,
so
I
bought
a
piece
of
property
and
actually
moved
a
house
that
was
scheduled
for
a
demolition
on
the
property.
Next
to
me,
so
we
moved
this
nice
little
1950s
Bungalow
and
we've
been
renovating
it
since,
and
it's
going
to
be,
hopefully
the
perfect
use
for
my
office
and
I'm
requesting
that
we
get
approved
for
that.
We've
had
very
good
feedback
from
our
neighbors.
They
like
what
we're
doing
with
the
property.
J
We
did
do
a
lot
of
cleaning
up
of
the
area.
There
have
been
a
lot
of
Transit
activity
there
and
a
fire
on
the
property
with
a
little
burnt
wood
and
whatnot,
and
we've
had
very,
very
positive
feedback
from
our
neighbors.
We're
asking
for
light
industrial,
because
that's
what's
around
us
mostly
and
also
the
family
next
door
to
us,
has
shown
interests
since
I'm
a
little
bit
on
the
older
side,
I'm
not
going
to
be
there
forever
working.
So
they
have
also
suggested
that
I
go
for
the
light
and
duster.
D
D
A
M
There
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
of
these
owned
property
from
medium
density,
residential
MDR
to
light
industrial
Li.
The
property
is
located
on
the
south
side
of
Anthony
Road
South
from
the
intersection
of
Hanford
Road
and
Anthony
Road
addressed
as
1208
Anthony
Road
in
consistent
of
Alamance
County
tax
identification
number
132180.
M
The
motion
is
based
upon
the
consistency
of
the
proposeries
only
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
that
the
future
land
use
map
in
section
4
land
use
of
the
comprehensive
Plan
cost
for
this
area
to
have
General
industrial
uses.
The
request
is
compatible
with
the
adjacent
industrial
use.
The
action
is
reasonable
and
in
the
public
interest,
and
that
the
comprehensive
plan
costs
are
Industrial
muces
in
the
area.
Research
is
compatible
with
existing
zones
and
land
uses
in
the
area.
D
N
He's
owning
request
for
tonight,
so
this
is
a
request
for
rezoning.
The
properties
are
shown
here
in
teal
on
the
map.
This
is
a
request
for
a
conventional
rezoning
where
the
property
is
splits
zones,
o
and
I
office
of
institutional
and
medium
density,
residential
and
the
applicant
is
seeking
high
density
residential.
N
This
would
allow
for
all
of
the
uses
within
the
zoning
designation.
If
approved,
then
they
would
follow
the
technical,
Review
Committee
for
site
plan
application.
This
area
is
not
consistent
with
the
future
land
use
designation,
as
shown
here.
This
is
a
general
industrial,
so
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
your
request
with
option
number
two.
In
your
consistency
statement
sheet,
the
applicant
Mr
Moffett
is
present
in
case
you
have
any
questions
for
him
and
I'm
here
in
case
you
have
any
questions
for
me
just.
D
N
I
You
want
a
point:
can
we
point
those
two
feet
properties
out
on
the
map
there?
Can
you.
I
One
that's
already
rezone
High,
residential
or
okay.
N
So
the
mouse,
so
these
two
properties,
one
one,
two,
nine
three
one
that
I'm
circling
around
here.
Can
you
see
that
and
then
that's
in
blue,
that's
the
office
and
institutional
and
then
just
east
of
that
this
other
property
here
113189
is
in
the
medium
density,
residential
zoning,
District,
that's
yellow
in
total,
that's
about
12,
acres
together
and
then
across
on
the
north
side
of
Grand
Oaks
Boulevard
highlighted
where
them
circling
around
it.
In
this
orange
Shade,
that's
high
density
residential
there.
Let.
N
I
wasn't
prepared
to
I
would
say
just
guessing,
probably.
K
B
A
S
Welcome
thank
you,
mayor
Butler,
thank
you,
Miss
Lawson
members
and
Council
pleasure
to
be
with
you
this
evening.
I
appreciate
you
all
bearing
through
this
agenda
and
working
through
it.
My
name
is
Ryan
Moffett
I'm,
a
lawyer
at
the
Vernon
Law
Firm
across
the
street.
We
are
located
at
522,
South,
Lexington,
Avenue
and
I'm
happy
to
be
carrying
this
request
to
you
on
behalf
of
Grand
Oaks
East
LLC.
S
That
entity
is
headed
by
Dennis
Euless
who's.
Here
he
is
a
native
of
this
area.
A
local
Builder
and
Aiden
stoltzfus
is
an
engineer
who
is
has
worked
on
this
property
on
this
request
and
and
what
it
may
become.
He
and
Mr
Euless
have
worked
together
for
a
very
long
time
on
a
number
of
different
projects
throughout
Alamance
County,
from
residential
to
commercial,
single
family
to
multi-family
and
they've.
All
done
it
very
well
at
a
high
level
at
a
high
quality.
S
S
That's
about
11
and
a
half
acres,
Mr,
Euless
and
Mr
stoltzfus
came
to
what
was
then
a
pre-application
conference
with
just
that
track
and
had
an
idea
or
a
concept
for
a
multi-family
development
had
a
great
meeting
with
staff
at
that
time.
Looked
at
what
would
work,
what
some
of
the
drawbacks
were
in
particular
that
corner
parcel
was
not
part
of
the
initial
plan
and
that
presented
somewhat
of
a
conundrum
from
an
access
point.
That
is
a
major
intersection
and
there's
not
a
whole
lot.
S
You
can
do
with
that
corner
parcel
and,
if
you've
got
a
residential
use
on
the
11
and
a
half
acres,
it's
consistent
with
the
residential
uses.
All
the
way
around
it
makes
it
difficult
to
do
anything.
So
the
big
takeaway
from
that
initial
meeting
over
a
year
ago
was
to
try
to
find
a
way
to
incorporate
that
corner
lot.
S
Today,
the
entity
has
purchased
both
tracks.
They
went
back
to
the
to
the
owner
of
the
course
corner
lot
and
and
got
a
contract,
and
so
they
do
own
that
property
and
and
are
ready
to
move
forward
with
the
12.7
acres
for
this
high
density,
residential
request.
S
When
you
look
at
the
evolution
of
this
area
of
the
city,
particularly
between
University
Drive,
or
between
Huffman
Mill
and
Highway,
62
Alamance
Road
over
the
last
15
years,
and
particularly
the
organization
of
the
land
uses
in
that
area,
this
request
naturally
fits
that
growth
and
that
progression
it's
become
a
very
active
area
and
a
very
functional
and
efficient
area.
S
Closer
to
the
interstate
you've
got
commercial
uses,
General
business
uses
and
then,
as
you,
progress
East,
you
have
a
really
a
a
good
mix
of
residential
options
and
the
way
that
it
has
has
come
together
with
your
higher
density
uses,
concentrated
closer
to
those
employment
areas
closer
to
those
institutional
areas
closer
to
the
major
intersections,
so
that
the
higher
density
those
intersections
can
absorb
the
higher
density
and
then,
as
you
move,
East,
the
density
from
the
residential
uses
falls
off
some
more,
and
so
it
really
naturally
works
well
together,
and
this
request
Falls
right
in
line
with
that
progression.
S
With
the
high
density
residential
use
here,
what
you're
going
to
see
is
a
living
option.
That's
conducive
to
the
Employers
in
this
area,
you're,
going
to
see
a
living
option,
that's
conducive
to
commuters,
with
the
access
to
the
interstate,
and
so
notwithstanding
what
Miss
Lawson
said
about
the
the
land
use
plan.
It's
really
come
together
in
a
functional
and
an
efficient
way
for
for
a
higher
density.
Residential
use.
I
think
it's
helpful
to
have
that
intersection
there
on
a
thoroughfare
like
Grand,
Oaks
Boulevard
that
feeds
into
University
Drive.
S
It
relieves
any
traffic
pressure
that
may
be
created
by
the
the
higher
density
residential
uses
at
the
intersection
and
and
to
feed
out
from
the
employment
centers,
and
so
from
a
consistency
and
a
compatibility
standpoint
from
a
reasonable
reasonableness
standpoint.
It
really
does
present
the
highest
and
best
use
for
this
particular
parcel,
and
on
that,
on
that
basis,
it's
it's.
S
It's
not
surprising
that
that
it's
got
staff's
recommendation.
It's
not
surprising
that
it
has
Planning
and
Zoning
commissions
recommendation
on
a
six
to
one
basis
and
it
it
really
presents
with
the
most
reasonable
and
the
most
efficient
continuation
of
the
growth
and
the
functional
growth
in
that
area.
S
B
About
the
the
traffic,
what
this
development
creates
for
that
Community
going
the
other
way
mayor,
Butler
handed
me
sort
of
a
a
traffic
study
before
our
meeting
tonight.
So
if
you
could
summarize
this
document-
and
that
would
help
me
yes.
S
What
we've
looked
at
is
a
multi-family
use
now
we're
requesting
high
density
residential
there's
a
there's,
a
menu
of
higher
density
uses
that
could
work
there.
What
you
see
with
all
the
multi-family
is
that
multi-family
is
probably
the
best
and
from
a
density
standpoint
we're
looking
at
what
what
the
Udo
permits
is.
30
units
an
acre,
that's
up
to
350
units.
S
This
has
been
planned
out
for
multi-family
use
at
200
units,
that's
less
than
16
units,
an
acre,
that's
almost
half
the
allowable
density
and
and
an
apartment
product
200
units
is
expected
to
generate
about
80
peak
hour
trips,
so
80
80
additional
trips
onto
either
Grand
Oaks,
Boulevard
or
Kirkpatrick
road,
because
the
way
the
property's
been
planned,
it
has
points
of
Ingress
and
egress
on
both
roads
on
a
daily
basis.
The
projection
is
about
900
additional
trips.
S
S
Then
you
have
to
consider
Grand
Oaks
Boulevard
in
and
of
itself
that
road
has
a
long
history,
as
you
all
I,
think
know
well
and
and
I
think
it's
important
for
the
record
and
for
the
public
to
understand
that
when
it
was
extended
from
the
the
t
Road
the
road
that
terminated
that
simply
fed
into
the
residential
area.
S
It
was
done-
and
this
was
there's
a
feasibility
study
from
the
Department
of
Transportation
done
in
1995
that
looked
at
extending
Grand,
Oaks
Boulevard
from
that
Terminus
all
the
way
to
Kirkpatrick
Road,
and
that
was
done
for
the
purpose
of
eventually
connecting
with
what
was
the
southern
or
what
was
going
to
be.
The
southern
Loop
Expressway
and
an
expressway
is
a
huge
Road.
It's
like
a
belt
line.
If
you
can
imagine
Alamance
County
having
a
belt
line,
Grand
Oaks
Boulevard
was
supposed
to
be
a
part
of
that.
S
S
That,
notwithstanding
you
know,
the
extension
was
was
put
in
it's
it's
a
multi-lane
divided
road
and
it
can
hold
up
to
or
over
30
000
trips
a
day
we're
at
4,
300.
and
so
traffic.
The
short
answer
is
traffic
is,
is
a
non-issue
statistically
speaking,
but
I
think
it's
200
trips
sounds
like
a
lot
or
80
trip
sounds
like
a
lot
or
900
additional
trips
a
day
sounds
like
a
lot
on
top
of
4
300,
but
when
you've
got
a
road
that'll
accommodate.
S
Six
seven
eight
times
that
it's
you've
got
a
pretty
comfortable
road
to
live
on
for
quite
a
while.
Just
anecdotally
I
would
I
I
have
to
say
this
I
dropped.
S
My
my
youngest
son
goes
to
preschool
at
the
cone
Health
daycare
center
on
Kirkpatrick
Road
I
dropped
him
off
this
morning
and
I
came
to
work
down
Kirkpatrick
through
Grand
Oaks
and
up
Alamance
road
to
Mebane
Street
and
as
as
true
as
I'm
standing
before
you
today,
I
was
the
Lone
car
at
7
50
this
morning
to
make
a
left
turn
off
of
Kirkpatrick
Road
and
I
had
both
West
eastbound
Lanes
to
myself
from
the
time
I
turned
onto
Grand
Oaks
to
the
time
I
turned
off
of
Grand
Oaks
onto
Alamance
Road.
S
It
was
a
serendipitous
that
our
hearing
is
this
evening,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
yes,
any
high
density
residential
development
at
that
at
that
property
is
going
to
add
traffic.
Any
development
at
that
property
is
going
to
add
traffic.
It's
it's
helpful
that
it's
right
there
at
the
intersection
to
relieve
any
pressure
that
would
come,
but
you
may
have
folks
Head
East
down
Grand
Oaks,
but
you're
going
to
get
where
you're
trying
to
go
a
lot
quicker,
going
west
or
going
north
up
Kirkpatrick.
So
that's
a
long-winded
answer.
Your
question:
Mr
wall,
I.
B
B
Let
me
read
you
some
facts
right,
quick
just
because
some
of
the
neighbors
have
addressed
this
with
me
and
I
wanted
to
be
fair
with
them.
There's
16
residential
driveways
with
direct
access
to
Grand,
dugs,
five
intersecting
neighborhood
city
streets,
I
won't
bother
to
read
the
streets,
an
active
Community
Church,
two
existing
large
apartment,
complex
complexes
that
already
exist
an
assisted
living
facility
and
now
we're
talking
about
expanding
this.
B
What
you're
talking
about
tonight?
So
that
was
the
point
of
asking
about
the
traffic
study.
What
would
it
create
with
this
new
development?
Plus?
What's
already
there?
The
larger
point
is
I
think
I
remember
many
years
ago
that
we
talked
about
it
being
a
thoroughfare
through
there,
and
it
was
part
of
the
loop
that
you
discussed
as
well.
B
D
The
reality
of
it
is
I
mean
this
was
part
of
the
Southern
Loop.
It
was
designed
to
be
a
thoroughfare
and
handle
significant
amount
of
traffic,
but
200
trips
a
day
is
not
really
net
200,
because
whatever's
going
there
is
going
to
net
something.
So
maybe
it's
80
trips
more
a
day,
maybe
it's
100
more
a
day,
but
whatever's
going
whatever
could
go
in
there
by
udl
standards
currently
is
going
to
generate
some
trips.
I
I
not
coming
down
what
we're
talking
about
now.
So
honestly
and-
and
we
should
all
realize
this
in
this
room
with
the
development-
that's
occurred
there
across
in
the
hospital
beyond
the
south
of
the
hospital
that
remains
to
be
one
of
the
sites
that
would
certainly
in
terms
of
of
not
commercial
but
office.
Institutional
would
be
a
great
area
for
continued
development,
possible
yeah
across
my
hospital,
so
I.
I
D
Well,
it
also
will
be
very
diverse.
The
development
of
along
Grand,
Oaks
and
University
will
be
very
diverse
and
not
just
one
dimensional
and
I
think
that's
what
that's.
What
makes
it
all
work,
but
you
know
the
Triad
Business
Journal
has
an
interest
interesting
article
to
doubt
enough.
Anyone
saw
it
on
housing
in
Alamance,
County
and
certainly
in
Burlington-
and
you
know,
high
density
residential
is
a
real
thing.
D
It's
a
real
need,
so
how
we
plan
for
that
and
where
we
place
it,
and
certainly
on
a
on
the
thoroughfare,
as
opposed
to
you
know,
being
adjacent
to
what
would
be
fully
residential
is
much
more
digestible,
but
I
have
a
feeling
we're
going
to
see
a
lot
more
of
these
coming,
certainly
based
on
the
article
in
in
the
journal
today.
So
I
think
everybody
should
read
that
it's
very
eye-opening,
but
any
other
questions
from
Mr
Martin
I.
L
D
S
D
D
Hear
anyone
on
this
side
of
the
room
that
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item
on
the
agenda.
Hearing
no
will
entertain
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing.
We
have
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second?
Second,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
I
I.
Any
opposed
this
time
we'll
entertain
a
motion
concerning
item
number:
six,
the
rezoning
from
MDR
to
hdr
on
these
two
Parcels,
as
spelled
out
in
the
agenda.
I
I
Thank
Mr
wall
for
the
comments
he
made
in
reference
to
the
concerns
or
the
questions
about
some
of
the
residential
communities
to
the
east.
There
that
that
maybe
or
some
of
the
owners
of
the
property
may
feel
likely
impacted
by
this
I
think
the
other
coffee
was
Miss.
Hikes
asked
about
what
piece
of
property
was
not
in
the
city
and
we
got
to
understand
as
we
go
east
on
the
south
side
of
of
that
thoroughfare,
that
most
of
that
property
is
not
right.
Now
in
the
city.
I
The
north
side
is
what's
been
annexed,
so
I
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
to
rezone
properties
from
Office
institutional
overnight
to
medium
density,
residential
MDR
to
high
density
residential
HDR.
The
properties
are
located
in
the
Southeast
Corner,
the
intersection
of
Grand
Oaks
Boulevard
and
Kirkpatrick
Road
addressed
to
zero
Kirkpatrick
road
to
zero,
Grand
Oaks
Boulevard,
inconsistent
of
Alamance
County
tax
identification,
numbers
112931
and
113189.
I
While
the
request
is
inconsistent
with
the
pooch's
land
use
map
in
section
4
land
use
of
the
comprehensive
planning
that
it
calls
for
this
area
to
have
General
industrial
uses,
the
request
is
compatible
with
the
existing
residential
uses
in
the
area.
The
accident
is
reasonable
in
the
public
interest,
in
that
the
comprehensive
plan
encourages
a
substantial
balance
of
land
uses
and
the
request
is
compatible
with
the
existing
Zone
Indian
languages
in
the
area.
D
So
the
motion
acknowledges
that
it's
inconsistent
with
the
land
use
plan
and
states
that
we
amend
the
land
use
plan.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct.
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
eye
any
opposed.
D
I
Mr
Mayor
comments
you
made
about
the
article
on
the
day's
Journal
sort
of
goes
back
to
what
we
just
did
that
The
Changing
Times
fall
for
some
changes
to
make
the
need.
D
Well,
with
all
of
the
Omega
side,
developments
specifically
is
what
this
was
alluding
to
and
it
is
becoming
very
apparent.
The
the
area
of
choice
to
reside
is
going
to
be
broken,
so
Brooks
of
this
article,
which
is
going
to
have
its
challenges
very
good,
very
positive,
but
it's
going
to
have
its
challenges.
D
Item
seven.
On
our
agenda.
A
public
hearing
has
been
scheduled
to
consider
a
voluntary
annexation
petition
to
Annex
into
the
City
of
Burlington,
one
parcel,
which
is
contiguous
to
the
current
city
limit
the
property,
zero
Hallie
long
Lane
is
approximately
17
acres
in
size
and
is
located
at
the
end
of
Holly
long
Lane
and
consists
of
Alamance
County
tax
identification.
Number
140996.
Once
again,
we'll
recognize
planning
director,
Jamie
Lawson.
N
N
It's
it's
roughly
17
acres
in
size
located
in
the
medium
density,
residential
zoning
District,
the
applicant
was
seeking
or
seeking
Water
and
Sewer
associated
with
the
property.
Hence
the
request
for
the
annexation,
as
it
is
contiguous
to
the
existing
City
Limits.
So
you
see
that
boundary
in
the
orange-ish
shade.
This
request
was
presented
to
you
at
your
work
session
on
November
14th,
where
resolution
was
set
to
for
the
public
hearing
for
tonight.
The
matter
has
been
properly
advertised
and
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
request
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
D
Okay,
any
questions
for
Jamie
on
this
side.
It's
applicant
here,
just
yes,
any
any
comments
on
your
bathroom,
we're
all
good.
Okay,
just
want
to
be
sure.
Thank
you
item.
Seven
is
a
public
hearing
at
this
time,
we'll
open
the
floor
for
public
comments.
Anyone
on
this
other
room
like
to
speak
on
item
number,
seven,
we're
running
out
of
items.
D
Anyone
on
this
side
of
the
room
like
to
speak
on
item
number,
seven
hearing
them
will
entertain
a
motion
to
close
the
public
hearing,
the
move
we
have
the
motion:
is
there
a
second?
Second,
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
eye
to
eye
any
opposed,
but
this
time
we'll
entertain
a
motion
on
annexation.
Request
for
item
number,
seven.
D
We
have
the
motion.
Is
there
a
second?
So
after
we
have
a
motion,
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
I
in
your
post?
That
concludes
item
number.
Seven,
and
this
concludes
all
items
on
our
agenda.
At
this
time.
We'll
move
into
public
comment
period.
We
have
one
that
is
signed
up,
Greg
Wilder,
it's
Mr
Wilder.
D
C
D
I
thought
y'all
knew
something:
I
did
I
was
looking
on
the
agenda.
I
was
too
okay
all
right
this
time,
we'll
move
into
city
council
comments,
but
before
we
do
there
was
a
there
was
an
economic
development
project
announced
by
the
state
this
earlier
today.
Peter
you
want
to
come
forward
just
sort
of
set
set
director
straight.
T
Yes,
sir
good
evening,
thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
members
of
council,
I'm,
Peter
Bishop,
your
director
of
Economic
Development,
and
it's
my
pleasure
to
inform
you
and
repeat
from
some
news
articles
earlier
today
that
Alamance
Foods
has
received
a
job
development
investment
Grant
from
the
state
of
North
Carolina,
to
move
forward
with
an
expansion
project
in
Burlington.
Unfortunately,
some
of
those
press
releases
had
a
mistaken
City
listed.
The
mailing
address
for
the
plant
is
Graham
North
Carolina,
but
it
is
in
the
taxing
jurisdiction
and
physically
in
the
City
of
Burlington.
T
So
an
understandable
mistake,
but
a
pretty
big
mistake,
so
certainly
nothing
against
our
friends
and
Neighbors
in
Graham,
but
Burlington
was
very
happy
to
work
with
the
company
and
win
this
project
and
very
excited
to
be
a
part
of
all
the
other
Economic
Development
rezonings.
You
know
we
had
a
small
business
rezoning,
some
housing
as
well,
so
lots
of
growth
tonight.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
votes
and
support.
Yeah.
D
D
It
really
yeah
so
yeah.
Well,
that's
wonderful!
A
couple
of
other
items,
one
I'm,
not
sure.
If
everyone's
aware
I
think
everyone
should
have
received
an
email,
but
the
Times
News
was
purchased
by
Paxton
Media
Group
and
we
were
contacted
so
we're
going
to
have
a
reporter
for
the
Times
news
now,
I
think
Paul
Johnson,
so
I
don't
miss
Paul.
D
C
D
And
and
then
we
have
Carousel
Christmas
in
the
Park
December
22nd,
no
one's
guaranteed
us.
D
Is
our
last
meeting
for
for
2022
at
least
last
one
I'm
coming
to
if
y'all
have
another
one?
I
won't
be
be
here,
but
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
recap.
Some
things:
I
I
want
to
tell
everyone
how
proud
I
am
of
City
staff
and
really
how
proud
I
am
of
my
colleagues
up
here
and
how
much
respect
and
admiration
I
have
for
each
and
every
one
of
you
I
started
jotting
some
things
down
and
just
briefly,
you
know
this
year
as
we
reflect
back.
D
We
had
the
transition
of
a
city
manager
in
that
position.
Then
we
worked
through
an
interim
to
now
having
Craig
Honeycutt
on
board.
We've
had
many
economic
development
projects,
many
successes,
steritech
the
84
acre
Life
Sciences,
Industrial
Park,
the
spec
building
with
Bobbitt
I,
know
Pickett
Hosiery.
There
were
two
or
three
others.
Pending
you
heard
of
one
tonight,
we've
got
the
Paramount
Theater
expansion,
the
entertainment
venue
at
Burlington,
athletic
Stadium
synthetic
soccer
fields,
the
upgrades
there
pickleball
courts
who,
by
the
way,
every
time
I
go
somewhere.
People
are
asking
me
about.
D
When
are
we
going
to
do
the
pickleball
courts?
Now,
completion
of
the
Carousel
and
the
subsequent
guarantee
from
Nolan
that
12
22
22,
it
will
be
open
a
lot
of
activity
for
Western
Electric
and
the
the
Tamp
facility,
cleanup
I,
know.
We've
we've
been
working
on
this
for
a
long
long
time
this
year,
I've
said
it
on
18
meetings
concerning
that
and
we
we've
got
some
recent
updates
on
one
final
piece
and
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
compile
kind
of
a
recap.
D
Pretty
soon
we
we're
in
the
process
of
a
transition
to
a
new
housing,
Consortium
Consortium
working
on
that
HPC,
revamped
and
restructure
of
the
process.
Our
city
park
cleanup,
which
is
ongoing,
downtown
lighting
upgrades
with
Duke
Energy,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
the
things
that
we've
done:
downtown
policing,
it's
much
more
safe
environment,
more
visually,
appealing
to
those
that
are
visiting
downtown.
We
have
a
permanent
city
clerk,
Beverly
Smith,
it's
no
longer
interim
assistant.
A
D
Manager
returning
Rachel
Kelly,
so
that's
that's,
been
pretty
awesome
benefits
upgrade
for
City
staff.
D
We've
been
planning
and
working
hard
on
the
implementation
of
the
infrastructure,
improvements
in
downtown
really
working
through
the
grant
that
we've
seen
from
the
state
of
North
Carolina.
We
brought
in
Aaron
Nettles
to
come
on
board
and
Lead
our
many
downtown
BDC
initiatives
and
we've
cleaned
up
a
lot
of
structures
going
back
to
the
ones
on
North
Main
Street.
D
So
if
you
look
back
and
think
it's
been
a
pretty
busy
year
and
that's
just
a
testament
to
a
group
of
people
that
work
hard
on
what
matters
and
we
have
extreme
communication
and
dialogue
and
a
lot
of
dedicated
people
so
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
my
colleagues
up
here
and
really
thank
you
to
City
staff
for
and
I'm
sure,
there's
15
things
we
left
out.
That's
just
jotting
down
in
10
minutes,
so
I
thought
that
was
worth
worth
recapping
any
other
Council.
D
M
Actually,
I
really
appreciate
you
doing
that,
because
sometimes
you
know
we
fail
to
remember
over
the
course
of
the
year
what
we've
done,
or
you
know
the
things
we've
addressed,
but
we
have.
We
have
I
believe
you
know,
I'm,
really
very
proud
and
honored
to
work
with
this
group
and
I.
Think
we've
accomplished
a
lot
through
your
leadership
and
and
we
really
appreciate
what
you've
done
and
just
look
forward
to
the
next
year
and
maybe
we'll
accomplish
more.
We've
got.
I
Just
knock
it
out
one
to
ten.
You
know
it's
a
good
night
when
you've
got
seven
public
hearings
for
growth.
In
your.
I
So
you
know
that's
something
we
don't
need
to
take
for
granted
and
to
all,
but
but
the
leadership
that
this
Lawson
has
given
us
in
D
and
z
is
been
wonderful,
Force
and
I
hear
from
the
developers
yeah
I
heard
from
all
parties.
I
think
it's
fair,
obviously
Mr
kirkman's
involvement
is
it's
been.
It's
been
big
in
that
I.
Think
Mr
Huffman's
involvement
is
well.
That's
that's
part
of
the
process.
Mr
Lambert,
but
you
know
it
appears.
We've
got
a.
I
I
A
C
A
D
Is
that
motion?
Oh
sure,
all
right?
We
have
a
motion.
Is
there
a
second?
Second,
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all
in
favor
signify
by
I.
This
time
we'll
enter
into
closed
sessions.