►
B
Welcome
everyone.
I
am
tamara
blake,
wallace
planning,
commission
administrator.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
as
a
hybrid
meeting,
allowing
for
both
virtual
and
in-person
participation
serving
as
moderator
tonight
is
chris
goldsmith
development
review
coordinator.
Who
will
now
go
over
the
rules
of
etiquette
for
this
meeting?
Chris.
C
Good
evening,
I'm
chris
goldsmith
the
development
review
coordinator
for
calvin
county
planning
and
zoning,
and
I
will
be
moderating
this
evening.
This
meeting
is
being
recorded
on
both
video
and
audio
for
record
keeping
purposes
for
those
attending
virtually
or
on
a
phone.
Please
keep
yourself
muted
to
ensure
no
interruptions
to
the
evening.
C
If
you
were
asked
to
speak
and
you
are
attending
on
your
phone,
you
can
mute
or
unmute
yourself
by
using
the
phone's
designated
mute
button
or
by
pressing
star
six.
If
you're
on
a
computer,
you
can
mute
and
unmute
yourself
by
clicking
on
the
microphone
slash
mute
button
on
the
toolbar
in
the
bottom
left
of
your
screen.
You
can
also
mute
and
unmute
by
using
keyboard
shortcuts
window
users
can
press
alt
a
mac
users,
can
press
command
shift
a
when
questions
or
comments
are
requested
of
the
public?
C
Those
attending
in
person
will
be
asked
to
speak
first
and
those
attending
virtually
will
speak
after
if
you
are
attending
via
phone
and
would
like
to
ask
a
question
or
make
a
comment
when
asked.
Please
use
the
raise
hand
function
by
pressing
star
9
and
you
will
be
called
upon
in
turn
to
identify
yourself
for
the
record
and
speak
if
you
are
attending
virtually
and
like
to
ask
a
question
or
make
comment.
Please
go
to
the
chat
icon
on
your
zoom
page
and
type
your
comment
into
that
section.
A
To
order
good
evening,
everyone
thank
you
for
joining
us
for
the
calvert
county
planning
commission's
august
24th
2022
regular
meeting.
My
name
is
maria
buehler
and,
as
chair
of
the
board,
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
We
will
begin
with
item
one
on
the
proposed
agenda.
Roll
call
vice
chair,
kernan.
D
A
A
F
A
F
A
B
Okay,
next
on
the
agenda
is
recognition
of
persons
attending
the
meeting
tonight
from
the
department
of
planning
and
zoning.
We
have
an
attendance
mary
beth
cook
director.
We
have
virtually
judy
makel
deputy
director
of
zoning.
We
have
jenny,
plummer
welker
long
range
planning.
We
have
olivia
vedado
planner
three,
we
have
jessica,
catano,
planner,
two
virtually
and
kathleen
lockwood
planner
1..
B
Also
in
attendance
with
us
tonight
is
our
associate
county
attorney.
Pam
lucas
she'll
be
providing
legal
counsel
for
us
tonight
and
then
we
have
becky
parkinson
our
recording
clerk
next
on
the
agenda
item.
Six
is
major
subdivisions
for
preliminary
review
and
action.
We
have
one
item:
item,
6a,
sd-13820,
wyatt's
ridge,
lots,
1-24
tax
map,
11
parcel
123
and
it's
zoned
rcd.
G
G
G
The
ariel,
which
also
shows
some
of
your
adjacent
subdivisions,
it
shows
the
fields
and
the
woods
and
the
very
dark
little
area
on
the
west
side
is
a
pond,
and
then
this
is
the
site.
The
preliminary
plan
that
is
before
you
tonight,
the
lots
are
outlined
in
red.
You
have
the
green
areas,
which
are
your
wooded
area,
and
a
lot
of
that
is
also
forest
retention
area
and
then
also
open
space.
G
G
I
met
with
them
on
august,
8th
and
I'd
like
to
read
just
a
summary
of
that
meeting
into
the
record.
That
way,
we
have
it
on
record,
but
also
anybody
that
was
not
able
to
attend
that
meeting.
That
night
that
might
be
listening
in
can
hear
again
what
was
discussed.
G
Their
concerns
had
to
do
with
the
following
items:
property
values-
I
explained
the
cost
and
the
purchase
of
land,
the
engineering
work
and
construction.
What
goes
into
the
value
of
lots
and
the
price
point
for
a
house
also
pointed
out
that
currently
in
a
vacant
lot
within
the
adjacent
subdivision
of
danbridge,
there
is
a
house
that
is
under
construction
and
the
contract
on
that
right
now
is
850
000,
so
lots
going
into
the
subdivision
would
be
comparable.
G
Adding
traffic
onto
skinner's
turn
road.
A
traffic
impact
analysis
form
is
submitted
with
the
preliminary
plan
submittal
or
at
the
concept
plan
level.
As
a
general
rule,
each
residential
lot
is
designated
10
average
daily
trips
per
lot
per
the
coward
county
traffic
impact
analysis.
Ordinance
subdivisions
are
developments
that
generate
less
than
400
average
daily
trips
do
not
need
to
prepare
a
full-fledged
traffic
study,
and
I
explained
that
you
know
the
traffic
studies
are
required.
If
you
go
above
that
number.
G
In
this
case,
we
were
at
240.,
the
subdivision
proposes
and
is
required
to
have
an
xld
cell
lane.
Those
lanes
will
help
the
flow
of
traffic
to
continue
in
that
area
with
minimal
impacts
and
will
keep
the
traffic.
Turning
into
the
subdivisions
safe.
There
was
a
question
about
the
sight
distance
coming
out
of
the
subdivision.
Part
of
the
road
planned
submittal,
a
sight
distance
analysis
plan
is
prepared
for
review.
That
demonstrates
the
site
distance
for
the
road.
Intersecting
skinner's
turn
road
and
that
has
to
meet
all
of
the
road
ordinance
standards
as
well.
G
As
of
the
last
review
of
the
road
plans
which
have
been
submitted,
the
site
distance
is
adequate,
getting
on
to
maryland
route,
2
and
or
maryland
route.
4
because
skinner's
turn
road
connects
to
both
the
concerns
are
the
access.
It's
dangerous.
There's
currently
no
signal
light,
there's
a
flashing
light
on
the
route
4
side.
G
We
had
a
lot
of
discussion
of
how
both
areas
had
issues
for
decades,
and
I
did
forward
them
contact
information
for
jonathan
meckloff
through
the
state
highway
administration
to
get
more
information
if
there
were
any
planned
improvements
for
either
maryland
route,
2
or
route
4
in
the
future,
they
had
questions
about.
The
noise
during
construction.
G
Calver
county
does
not
have
regulations
regarding
noise.
This
is
handled
by
the
sheriff's
department,
so
I
did
speak
with
a
deputy
who
stated
that
the
regulations
for
construction
or
noise
are
from
seven
a.m
in
the
morning
till
10
pm
at
night,
and
that
is
for
any
day
of
the
week.
He
also
said:
if
there
are
ever
any
issues,
please
don't
hesitate
to
call
them,
and
I
did
pass
that
on
as
well.
G
If
the
schools
are
closed
and
all
three
schools
have
to
be
open
that
serve
that
subdivision,
so
elementary
middle
and
high
school
have
to
be
open,
this
subdivision
could
actually
be
on
hold
once
it
gets
preliminary
approval
and
not
be
able
to
record
for
up
to
six
years,
so
the
traffic
that
we
currently
have
and
issues
that's
more
than
likely
going
to
be
extremely
different.
There
may
be
some
improvements
that
are
done
in
the
meantime
before
this
gets
recorded,
but
they
were
unaware
of
that.
G
So
I
think
that
helped
appease
a
little
bit,
so
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
read
through
the
staff
report
just
pointing
out
any
items
that
are
not
the
normal
conditions
that
we
have.
I
did
give
everybody.
I
have
a
few
typos
which
I'll
read
those
into
the
record
just
so
that
you
can
follow
along
on
that.
G
G
G
So
when
you
add
all
of
those
together
or
for
receiving
areas
that
are
more
than
one
mile
from
a
town
center,
the
maximum
density
is
one
lot
per
four
acres.
When
you
add
all
of
those,
you
have
three
tdr
lots
and
15
receiving
area
lots
that
will
require
the
use
of
five
tdrs
per
lot
for
a
total
of
24
lots
in
the
subdivision.
G
The
subdivision
has
been
reviewed
by
staff.
It
finds
that
it
is
consistent
with
the
calvert
county,
comprehensive
plan
and
in
compliance
with
the
calvary
county,
zoning
ordinance,
subdivision
regulations,
as
well
as
other
applicable
county
ordinances
and
design
standard
standards.
Therefore,
staff
recommends
approval
of
sd-138200
wyatt's
ridge
lots,
one
through
24,
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
condition
number
four:
I
just
want
to
point
out
there
down
near
the
bottom.
It
should
be
17
lots,
it's
17.5,
rounded
down
to
17.
G
G
G
The
focal
point
requirement
is
being
met
with
a
monumental
sign
and
landscaping
at
the
entrance.
That
will
also
be
shown
on
the
improvement
plan.
Item
number
13.
If
that
could
be
corrected
to
wyatt's
lane,
that
is
the
street
tree
provision
number
14,
the
first
three
lots
to
be
created
for
residential
purposes
are
exempt
from
the
adequate
public
facility
ordinance.
G
I
can't
speak
in
this
situation,
but
a
lot
of
times
they
don't
they
forego
that,
because
once
you
get
in
there
and
start
working
on
putting
in
a
road
and
driveways,
you
really
want
to
be
doing
all
of
it.
At
one
time,
item
number
16
for
article
5-201
d6
fencing,
is
required
along
any
parcels
that
have
agricultural
uses
or
agricultural
preservation.
Districts,
parcels,
124
and
191
are
properties
that
join
the
proposed
parcel
and
they
are
assessed
as
with
agricultural
uses.
G
G
Item
number
32.
I
don't
usually
point
this
out
at
standard,
but
I
wanted
to
in
this
case
because
of
the
concerns
on
the
road.
A
winding
strip
of
sufficient
width
along
the
entire
frontage
of
skinner's
turn
road
to
provide
an
ultimate
60
foot
right
away
shall
be
deeded
to
calvary
county.
This
deed
comes
in
with
the
final
plot
and
is
recorded.
G
G
H
G
H
I
It
there's
a
concern
that
people
on
zoom
cannot
hear
commissioners
asking
questions
so
I'll.
Ask
that
you
all
speak
directly
into
your
microphones,
please
thank
you.
D
Olivia,
the
existing
fence
is
that
fence
connected
to
this
property,
or
is
it
a
fence
of
the
adjoining
property
and
what
type
of
fence
is
it.
G
K
My
name
is
jeff
mardis
from
coa.
I
believe
the
fencing
is
posed
with
barbed
wire
and.
K
To
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
it
is
the
the
little
fencing
I
saw.
I
I
haven't
gone
around
the
full
boundary
of
the
site.
Our
survey
crew
did
at
one
point
when
they
were
out
there
surveying
everything,
but
I
personally
have
only
saw
a
little
area
of
the
fencing.
L
G
M
Good
afternoon
or
evening,
joe
kojeski,
with
carlson
olfa
associates
the
pond.
I
believe
right
now
is
not
a
stormwater
management
pond
that
is
inspected
by
the
county
as
it
wasn't
designated,
as
you
know,
under
their
inspection
criteria,
not
sure
how
the
pond
was
constructed,
probably
an
older
farm
pond,
and
I
think
the
idea
at
this
point
is
to
maintain
the
pond
and
put
in
the
covenants
that
it's
going
to
be
a
responsibility
of
the
lot
owner
that
purchases
that
lot.
M
K
G
N
Thank
you,
I'm
sarah
vance
from
7414
danbridge
lane.
If
this
is
approved,
I
will
gain
not
one
but
two
neighbors
to
my
immediate
backyard
and
I
just
like
to
personally
say
I'm
sad
to
lose
my
undisturbed
meadow
view:
the
wildlife
there
and
the
winter
blanket
of
snow.
But
on
a
more
serious
note,
I
would
like
to
reiterate
my
concerns
about
the
traffic
impacts
to
skinner's
turn
road.
N
I'm
a
little
bit
disappointed
or
frustrated,
I
guess
being
new
to
the
process
here.
It
seems
like
the
public
comment.
Phase
comes
a
little
bit
late,
that
once
everything's
been
perked
planned
and
parceled.
Now
is
the
time
for
public
comments
and
it
just
feels
kind
of
like
a
check.
The
box
requirement
is
being
checked
off
here.
N
A
G
So
I
would
just
like
to
point
out
one
thing,
and
I
believe
I
mentioned
that
the
night
of
the
meeting-
this
is
a
tier
three
that
required
a
public
hearing
and
required
notification
to
the
adjacent
property
owners.
For
that
reason,
state
regulations
if
this
development
was
not
in
a
tier
three
and
required
that
there
would
be
no
notification
at
all,
so
just
wanted
to
put
that
out.
There.
A
H
D
B
O
Good
evening
commissioners,
jenny,
plummer
welker
long-range
planner,
I'm
joined
this
evening
by
kathleen
katt
lockwood
planner
one
who's
at
present
with
us
and
then
jessica,
gatano
planner,
two
who's
joined
us.
Virtually
I'd
like
to
recognize
the
gis
staff
from
the
technology
service
department.
They
have
assisted
us
in
preparing
the
maps
for
this
evening.
O
Comprehensive
plan
recognizes
nine
town
centers.
Two
of
those
are
the
municipalities
of
north
beach
and
chesapeake
beach,
which
have
their
own
planning
and
zoning
authority.
The
other
seven
town
centers
come
under
the
county
commissioner's
authority,
and
so
those
seven
are
indicated
on
the
map
and
the
ones
that
we'll
be
looking
at
this
evening
are
highlighted
in
red.
So
there
are
no
changes
requested
for
the
town,
centers
of
dunkirk,
owings
and
st
leonard.
O
The
first
town
center
that
I'd
like
to
take
us
through
is
huntingtown
on
the
left
is
the
a
close-up
view
of
the
county,
comprehensive
plan's
future
land
use
map
and
on
the
right
is
the
as
a
map
showing
the
proposed
change
to
the
huntingtown
town
center
expansion.
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
expansions
with
the
comprehensive
plan
adoption
don't
happen
automatically.
O
O
Moving
further
south
to
prince
frederick
on
the
left
is
a
close-up
from
the
adopted
county,
comprehensive
plan
map
showing
the
future
land
use
categories,
and
the
map
on
the
right
is
also
from
the
adopted
comprehensive
plan,
and
it
shows
two
phases
of
prince
frederick
expansion.
It
shows
in
the
dark
purple
the
current
town
center
boundary
plus
the
areas
that
would
be
included
in
the
first
expansion
and
then
the
light
purple
is
the
phase
two
expansion
which
includes
areas
to
the
west
and
then
also
sliver
to
the
southeast
between
maryland
2-4
and
maryland.
765.
O
O
O
The
areas
previously
identified
for
the
phase
ii
expansion
are
proposed
to
be
future
land
use
categories
of
either
residential
or
industrial.
The
map,
on
the
right
hand,
side
shows,
on
the
west
side
the
light
blue
color
that
would
be
identified
in
the
comprehensive
plan
as
industrial.
It's
a
comparable
category
to
the
employment
center.
O
O
O
The
comprehensive
plan
adoption
would
included
that
as
a
future
expansion
area
that
that
portion
of
dow
remain
out
and
no
expansion
for
the
solomon's
town
center,
the
area
that's
hatched
in
green
between
solomon's
town
center
and
lesbian
was
it
is
identified
in
the
adopted
plan
as
a
potential
future
expansion
area
and
the
commissioners
have
asked
that
to
be
removed
as
an
expansion
area.
O
This
is
a
map
of
the
proposed
new
future
land
use
map,
so
it
takes
away
those
expansion
areas
that
we've
just
discussed
and
then
identifies
the
future
land
use
categories
for
the
areas
that
no
longer
would
be
expansion
areas
so,
for
example,
in
the
prince
frederick
area,
the
area
that
had
been
proposed
in
that
phase
two
area
would
be
residential,
that
orange
color
for
huntingtown.
It
would
be
the
rural
residential
and
in
the
lesbian
area
it
would
either
be
residential
or
industrial
for
the
land.
That's
currently
zoned
employment
center
on
the
southeast
of
town.
O
One
of
the
staff
looked
through
all
the
maps.
This
is
one
map
that
needs
to
be
changed.
The
road
classification
map
showed
the
expansion
areas
in
their
entirety,
so
this
map
reduces
them
back
to
what's
being
proposed,
and
then
this
table
shows
the
comprehensive
plan
sections
that
have
proposed
amendments.
O
It
includes
the
executive
summary
which
includes
one
map,
the
future
land
use
map.
It
includes
the
table
of
contents,
which
specifically
identified
the
prince
frederick
phasing,
and
so
that
title
is
proposed
to
change
to
prince
frederick
expansion.
O
O
The
changes,
the
amendments
that
you
received,
each
of
these
sections
of
the
plan
and
the
changes
are
noted
in
red,
either
the
additions
or
the
with
the
strikethroughs.
J
I
I
have
one
question:
I'm
a
little
puzzled.
All
of
the
comprehensive
plans,
since
the
pleasant
peninsula
has
anticipated
that
we
would
direct
growth
wherever
possible.
The
town
centers
we're
apparently
we're
changing
that
now.
We're
not
gonna
do
that
anymore.
We're
we're
trying
to
make
the
town
center
smaller
did.
Did
anybody
explain
why
we're
doing
this?
I
mean
what
was
the
specific
trigger
thing
that
caused
us?
Okay,
let's
make
all
these
smaller
and
let's
not
worry
about
the
future
growth
going
into
the
countryside.
O
With
the
adoption
of
the
2000
the
comprehensive
plan
in
2019,
the
the
plan
did
not
reduce
the
size
of
any
of
the
town
centers
that
had
been
adopted
in
the
2010
comprehensive
plan.
So
there
was
no
re
with
with
this
proposal,
there's
no
reduction
smaller
than
the
existing
town
center
boundaries
as
they
stood
with
the
2010
plan.
There
was
a
much
discussion
on
directing
growth.
O
The
idea
was
to
change
the
boundaries
one
for
the
town
center
to
accommodate
more
growth,
but
we
do
have
an
agricultural
preservation
program
that
relies
on
the
transfer
of
development
rights
and
the
idea
was
to
accommodate
transferal
development
rights
and
direct
that
away
from
the
countryside.
So
that's
sure
I
haven't
answered
your
question
fully.
O
Welcome,
I
would
like
to
point
out
that,
with
the
adoption
of
the
20,
the
2019
excuse
me
comprehensive
plan.
The
one
mile
radius
around
the
ten
town,
centers
with
water
and
sewer
is,
was
changed
to
do
the
residential
areas,
those
orange
areas
on
the
map
versus
just
arbitrary
one-mile
perimeters
around
them.
So
that's
why
you
see
the
orange
areas
and
then
also
some
of
the
residential
development
in
the
vicinity
of
solomon's
and
lesbian,
which
is
the
high
density.
Around
chesapeake
ranch
estates
in
white's
chesapeake
ranch
estates
was
identified
also
as
residential.
F
O
The
commissioners
did
discuss
that
at
the
workshop
work
session.
I
don't
recall
if
it
was
the
first
or
second
one,
but
the
discussion
with
huntingtown
was
that
the
state
does
allow
for
waivers
for
construction
projects
for
priority
for
areas
that
are
not
priority
funded
designated.
O
So
the
commissioners
believe
that
we
did
not
need
the
priority
funding
designation
to
do
any
future
type
of
projects
with
huntingtown
high
school.
O
H
O
Was
changes
and
I
recall
that
the
planning
commission
there
was
option
a
and
option
b
and
the
planning
commission
had
recommended
for
one
option
and
that
was
the
high
school.
Only.
O
D
O
Yes,
there
are
st
leonard
elementary
school
being
one
that
is
adjacent
to,
but
not
inside
the
town
center.
I
recall
that
the
county
had
to
ask
these
or
pointed
out
to
the
state
that
it
was
adjacent
to
a
party
funded
area,
the
saint
leonard
town
center
and
yeah
there's
so
the
town
centers
that
have
schools
are
prince,
frederick
and
prince
frederick
and
lesbian.
O
Welcome,
oh
and,
of
course,
chesapeake
beach.
O
Commissioners
believe
that
it's
possible,
through
the
waiver
system,
to
seek
any
future
funding
that
may
be
needed,
the
state
for
construction
projects
and
for
so
example,
building
a
new
school
and
a
new
location
or
putting
on
an
addition
that
the
state
does
look.
Whether
property
is
inside
or
outside
a
priority
funding
area.
But
there
is
the
waiver
process.
L
O
O
O
O
Describing
the
town
centers
that's
in
chapter
three,
starting
on
page
3-2,
there's
a
there
was
a
slight
change
on
that.
That
was
just
a
correction
in
the
third
paragraph,
about
adding
a
space
but
then
moving
on
to
where
the
town
centers
are
described.
There
are,
for
example,
for
huntingtown
about
deleting
the
description
of
the
expansion
area
same
for
prince
frederick
solomon's
and
lesbian.
O
O
O
And,
as
I
mentioned
for
chapter
7
for
the
functional
road
classification,
the
map
which
is
on
page
7-9
would
be
replaced
with
the
map.
That's
on
the
following
page
and
it
would
show
the
reduced
areas
for
the
town
centers
for
huntingtown,
prince
frederick,
lesbian
solomon's,.
H
So,
just
to
get
back
to
this,
the
only
thing
I'm
I'm
trying
to
understand-
and
I
know
you
might
not
have
the
answer
to
this
jenny,
but
we're
we're
going
through
with
the
school
they're
going
to
have
to
go
through
a
waiver
process,
and
I
guess
one
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
originally
was
that
my
memory
serves
me
right
was
if
it
was
in
the
town
center.
H
J
Well,
she
we
all
know
this-
that
the
state
has
been
encouraging
new
facilities,
that
they
contribute
any
of
the
cost
to
be
in
priority
funding
areas
and
priority
funding
areas
are
those
areas
that
have
water,
public,
water
and
sewer
or
are
scheduled?
I
think
to
have
it
very
shortly
so
that
that
this
would
then
this
is
not
a
priority
funding
area.
If
we
take
it
out,
if
we
leave
it
in
the
town
center,
it
will
be
a
priority
funding
area.
Am
I
right
one.
O
Clarification
one
clarification
putting
it
into
the
town
center
does
not
automatically
make
it
a
priority
funding
area.
We
would
need
to
ask
the
maryland
department
of
planning
and
put
forth
reasonings
why
to
expand
the
current
huntingtown
town
center
priority
funding
area
to
include
the
high
school.
O
No,
we
haven't
because
the
town
center
has
not
expanded,
yet
we
would
need
to
wait
until
the
huntingtown
town
centers
actually
officially
expanded.
The
2019
plan
said
that
in
the
future
we
will
expand.
Honeytown
huntingtown
town
center
has
not
been
officially
expanded
through
the
zoning
map
process.
J
Okay,
that's
my
error.
Then
I
thought
the
high
school
same
as
mr
jones
was
speaking.
I
thought
the
high
school
was
included
in
huntingtown
in
the
last
plan
and
you're
saying.
That's
not
true,
though,.
O
O
O
To
mr
jones
comment,
I
don't
know
how
arduous
the
waiver
process
is
for
the
board
of
education
to
go
through,
but
they
have
done
so
for
prior
school
construction
projects
that
are
outside
party
funding
areas.
For
example,
northern
middle
and
northern
high
school
are
both
outside
priority
funding
areas
and
have
recently
been
gone
through
replacement.
H
O
Just
I
cannot
speak
for
the
board
of
county
commissioners.
One
concern
that
has
been
expressed
is
for
not
just
huntingtown,
but
for
expansions
of
town
centers
across
maryland.
2-4
is
the
concern
for
potential
weather.
O
So
it
includes
areas
to
the
northeast
and
the
west,
both
north
and
south,
of
maryland
231
and
some
minor
refinements
to
the
boundaries
to
include
entire
parcels
rather
than
splitting
parcels.
F
And
jen
the
two
sections
to
the
north,
the
one
with
the
medical
arts
building
right.
Yes,.
O
F
O
So
they
were
originally
part
of
the
phase,
one
expansion
so
effectively.
There's
no
change
for
for
these.
It's
just
a
different
for
the
map
on
the
left.
It
showed
the
dark
purple
showed
the
phase,
one
expansion
as
if
it
had
already
happened
right.
O
I
will
add
to
that
that
tiny
little
sliver
that
is
shows
up
on
the
south
of
stokely
road
and
east
of
prince
frederick
boulevard.
O
L
O
F
O
So
the
current
zoning
for
the
light
purple
area
and
that
there's
like
a
little
sliver
on
the
east
side,
that's
the
board
of
education's
property
for
calvert
middle
school.
So
it's
cleaning
up
some
boundary
there.
So
it's
mainly
the
portion,
that's
north
of
the
hospital,
so
that
is
currently
zoned
employment
center,
which
allows
for
a
quite
of
like
allows
for
medical
uses,
because
that
zone
existed
there
prior
to
the
construction
of
the
medical
arts.
Building
the
medical
arts
building
was
constructed
in
the
employment
center
zone.
H
We
changed
yesterday
the
text
amendment
that
we
made.
O
F
Okay,
in
the
center
of
the
map
and
at
the
top
of
the
map,
the
the
highest
portion
of
purple.
What
is
that
piece
that.
O
Pieces
that
equates
to
the
one
on
the
right
hand,
side
that's
in
the
hatched
purple
right,
which
is
the
patuxent
business
park
on
the
west
side
of
of
h.d
truman,
road
and
the
area.
That's
north
of
the
patuxent
business
park,
which
includes
the
state
highway
park
and
ride
and
then
also
the
self-storage
area.
O
And,
as
I
previously
mentioned,
the
section
of
dow
that
was
adopted
to
eventually
come
into
the
solomons
town
center,
the
commissioners
would
like
to
not
have
that
happen.
So
the
solomon's
town
center
keeps
its
current
town
center
boundaries.
L
Again,
my
name
is
bob
estes
and
I
had
a
couple
of
questions
about
that
kind
of
goldish
area
and
then
specifically,
I'd
like
to
ask
about
an
area
that
is
west
of
prince
frederick
boulevard
and
just
west
of
calvert
hills
apartments.
Are
you
familiar
with
that
area?
Yes,
that
area
currently
is
farmland,
as
witnessed
by.
I
think
it's
sorghum
or
it
might
be
a
corn
growing
on
it.
Currently
is.
So
what
is
the
the
current?
I
guess
zoning
for
that.
I
would
assume
it's
agricultural.
L
L
L
Okay,
I
get
it
okay,
now
the
rest
of
the
gold
area
in
there
is
it
currently
zoned
all
of
it
zoned
for
residential,
or
would
that
have
to
be
a
change
in
zoning
to
get
it
to
be
residential?
So.
O
O
So
I
will
move
on
to
slide
nine
from
last
month's
meeting
so
slide.
Nine
shows
the
proposed
ex
phase,
one
phase,
two
expansion
areas
with
the
zoning
underlaid
and
it
I
know
it's
a
bit
difficult
to
see,
but
the
area
that
is
the
yellow
that
is
located,
lovely
daryl.
Thank
you
there
on
the
south
side
and
if
you
could
go
to
the
north
side
in
the
yellow
kind
of
green
hatch,
so
that
land
is
zoned.
O
O
So
we
have
three
different
zones
that
are
in
the
current
phase.
Two,
we
have
the
residential
that
light,
yellow
with
the
green
hatch.
We
have
the
gray
with
the
green
hatch,
which
is
employment
center,
and
then
we
have
just
the
green
hatch,
which
is
south
of
stokely
road,
which
is
the
rural
residential.
L
What's
the
what's
the
current
maximum
density
allowed
there.
A
L
Purposes:
well,
I'm
trying
to
lead
the
commissioners
down
a
a
road
to
maybe
explain,
maybe
to
dr
haller,
why
you
know
a
lot
of
the
residents
and
citizens
did
not
want
it
to
be
town
center.
We
were
worried
about
density,
but
I
understand.
I
Good
evening,
commissioners
and
staff,
my
name
is
joseph
cormier
and
I'm
from
owings
maryland,
I'm
just
confused
about
this
huntingtown
expansion.
If
we
have
the
opportunity
to
include
the
high
school
and
avoid
a
waiver
waivers
can
be
denied,
and
if
we
have
an
opportunity
to
get
rid
of
red
tape,
we
should
take
it
and
include
any
school
property
that
can
be
involved
in
these
town
centers.
And
as
we
talk
about
these
expansions,
I
haven't
heard
a
lot
spoken
about
capacities.
I
As
far
as
sewage
and
aquifers
we
can
keep
building
pipes
but
we're
pulling
from
the
same
water
and
we're
going
to
expand
down
231,
there's
barely
any
cell
phone
coverage
down
there.
Now
we
want
to
add
more
people
to
it
and
are
we
just
going
to
have
to
shovel
more
money
into
comcast
to
add
more
services
when
we're
already
paying
them
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars
to
get
that
last
mile?
What
plan
are
we
doing
to
put
that
in
place
before
we
expand
our
town
centers?
I
And
we
you
talk
briefly
about
the
tdrs
I'd
love
to
see
a
map
showing
the
current
tdrs
that
are
in
that
program
and
which
properties
that
could
be
part
of
this
town
center
expansion.
That
could
be
part
of
that
tdr
program
that
could
be
put
toward
a
land
trust.
Instead,
we
need
to
be
smart
with
our
growth
and
we
need
to
take
care
of
our
waterways
and
the
more
expansion
we
do,
the
less
we're
going
to
be
able
to
protect
our
waterways.
Thank
you.
So
much.
P
One
more
question:
yes:
ma'am
in
regards
to
solomon,
the
lesbian
expansion,
the
removal
of
the
expansion
in
lesbian.
Would
there
be
any
impact
on
the
proposed
apartments
that
are
going
into
lesbian.
O
The
proposed
departments
that
are
working
their
way
through
the
planning
process
are
within
the
lesbian
town
center,
so
the
the
proposed
removal
of
the
potential
future
expansion
area
would
not
impact
those
okay.
Thank.
P
F
F
O
B
C
Q
Okay,
128
32
rio
grande
trail
and
I'm
on
the
lake
preservation
committee
of
chesapeake
ranch
estates
about
the
I'm
glad
that
glad
that
you
removed
the
expansion
of
lesbian.
Q
The
area
south
of
lo
lesbi
town
center
is
industrial.
That
is
the
the
last
remaining
forest
in
in
lesbi
that
forest
should
be
preserved
as
a
forest.
It's
close
to
the
wetlands.
Q
Q
Q
A
B
Okay,
commissioners,
moving
on
item
eight
items
of
interest.
We
have
the
site
plan
a
subdivision
application
list.
Is
there
any
discussion
or
questions.
B
Do
we
have
anybody
airline
to
speak.
I
Good
evening,
commissioners
and
staff,
my
name
is
joseph
cormier
in
owings
maryland
again,
I
want
to
thank
you
guys
for
all
the
hard
work
that
you
do
for
these
commissions
and
these
planning
meetings.
As
we
continue
to
talk
about
the
the
build
out,
I
also
want
staff
to
take
into
account
the
need
for
more
emergency
services
and
first
responders.
I
I
We
need
to
be
cognizant
of
the
load
that
goes
into
those
and,
of
course,
the
the
school
system,
as
we
balance
out,
we're
going
to
have
to
you
know,
start
talking
about
redistricting
schools
at
some
point
and
that's
going
to
be
another
thing:
that's
going
to
take
a
lot
of
public
input
and
transparency
for
so
please
take
all
of
that
into
account
as
we
keep
moving
forward
with
these
meetings.
Thank
you.
So
much.