►
A
There
you
go
welcome
everyone.
I
am
Tamara
Blake,
Wallace,
Planning,
Commission
administrator.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
as
a
hybrid
meeting,
allowing
for
both
virtual
and
in-person
participation
serving
as
moderator
tonight
is
Christine
Goldsmith,
our
Planning
Commission
development
review
coordinator,
who
will
now
go
over
the
rules
in
etiquette
for
this
meeting.
Chris
team
good.
B
B
If
asked
to
speak
and
you're
attending
on
your
phone,
you
can
mute
and
unmute
yourself
by
using
the
phone's
designated
mute
button
or
by
pressing
star
6..
If
you're
on
a
computer,
you
can
mute
and
unmute
Yourself
by
clicking
on
the
microphone
or
mute
button
on
the
toolbar
in
the
bottom
left
of
your
screen.
You
can
also
mute
and
unmute
by
using
keyboard
shortcuts
that
would
be
press
alt,
a
on
a
Windows
computer
or
for
a
Mac.
You
would
use
command
shift
a
when
questions
or
comments
are
requested
to
the
public.
B
Those
attending
in
person
will
be
asked
to
speak
first
and
those
virtually
will
speak
after
if
you're,
attended
via
phone
and
would
like
to
ask
a
question
or
make
a
comment
when
asked.
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
star
nine
and
you
will
be
called
upon
in
turn
to
identify
yourself
for
the
record
and
speak
if
you're
attending
virtually
and
would
like
to
ask
a
question
or
make
comment.
Please
go
to
the
chat
icon
on
your
Zoom
page
and
type
your
comment
into
that
section.
C
The
meeting
to
order
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
thank
you
for
joining
us
for
the
Calvert
County
Planning
commission's
October
19
2022
regular
meeting.
My
name
is
Maria
Bueller
and,
as
chair
of
this
board,
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
we'll
begin
with
roll
call.
Vice,
chair,
Kernan
here,
commissioner
Freeland
here,
commissioner
Tui.
C
A
A
Madam,
chair
I,
do
have
one
change
I
just
for
clarification
item
8D.
It
should
be
the
Fox
Run
Boulevard
Prince
Frederick,
request
from
the
requirement
for
site
plan
approval
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
grading
permit,
as
provided
by
the
Prince
Frederick
zoning
ordinance
in
chapter
12.,
I
mean
I'm,
sorry
chapter
one
I'm,
sorry,.
C
A
E
D
C
A
Next
item
on
the
agenda
is
item
five
recognitions
of
persons
attending
the
meeting
tonight
from
Planning
and
Zoning.
We
have
Mary
Beth
cook
director,
virtually
we
have
Judy
Michael
deputy
director
of
zoning.
We
have
Carolyn
Sunderland
deputy
director
of
planning,
Jenny
Plummer,
Walker
long
range,
planner
cat,
Lockwood
planner,
one
Rachel
O'shea
zoning
planner,
Christine
Fenimore
principal
planner,
Colleen,
Anglin,
environmental
planner,
2
from
park
and
rec.
We
have
Shannon
nazal
director
for
Public
Works.
We
have
Carrie
dull
director.
A
We
have
J.R
Cosgrove
deputy
director
of
capital
projects,
we
have
Jason
leave
it
project,
engineer,
Public,
Safety
fire
and
rescue
EMS.
We
have
James
Richardson
division
Chief
and
we
have
Stanley
Harris
emergency
communications.
Chief
from
the
sheriff's
office.
We
have
Captain
Brent
Parrott,
also
in
attendance.
We
have
our
legal
counsel,
John
Mattingly
in
our
recording
clerk,
Becky
Parkinson.
A
F
Thank
you
Tamara
evening
Commissioners.
My
name
is
Christine
Fenimore
principal
planner,
with
planning
and
zoning
and
I'll
be
presenting
the
site
plan
for
project
cspr,
138320
Calvert
Gateway
lot,
11
Business
Center.
If
you
can
advance
the
next
slide.
Thank
you
lot.
11
is
located
on
Town
Center
Boulevard
off
Ward
Road
in
Dunkirk
Town
Center.
Here
you
see
a
portion
of
the
tax
map,
of
course,
with
the
site
highlighted
next
slide.
F
F
F
F
Sitex
the
site
has
Frontage
on
Town
Center
Boulevard
and
Ward
Road,
as
I
just
said,
both
of
which
are
public
rights
away.
The
vehicular
access
is
proposed
via
one
access
point
off
of
Town
Center
Boulevard
sidewalk
is
proposed
along
the
property
Frontage
of
Ward
Road
and
Town
Center
Boulevard,
as
well,
within
the
site
along
the
front
side
and
rear
of
the
building
to
accommodate
building
access
from
the
parking
lot.
43
parking
spaces
are
required
and
45
are
being
provided.
That
includes
two
handicap
accessible
spaces.
F
F
F
Adequate
public
facilities,
a
certified
traffic
impact
analysis,
also
known
as
a
TIA,
is
required
prior
to
final
detailed
site
development
plan.
Approval
the
property
has
access
to
private,
Water
and
Sewer
as
part
of
the
Calvert
Gateway
Center.
The
project
is
non-residential
in
use.
Therefore,
APF
for
schools
does
not
apply
environmental
I'll
cover
briefly
as
well.
There
are
no
Wetlands
streams
or
buffers
within
the
limits
of
disturbance,
as
proposed.
There
are
non-title
wetlands
and
Associated
Wetland
buffer
on
the
lot
and
within
close
proximity
to
the
proposed
development.
F
F
Forest
conservation
requirements
of
the
zoning
ordinance
section
8-3
were
previously
addressed
at
the
time
of
subdivision
approval
for
Calvert
Gateway.
There's
on-site
Forest
retention
recorded
within
that
subdivision.
Not
just
on
this
lot.
There's
there's
a
tiny
bit
on
this
lot.
Most
of
it
is
adjacent
on
the
parcel
to
the
east.
F
F
F
So
the
conceptual
site
plan
has
been
reviewed
by
teg
agencies.
The
latest
comments
are
included
in
your
package.
Those
were
on
plan
two
at
this
time.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
I
also
want
to
mention
that
the
project
engineer
Nelson
arocha
with
Bay
engineering,
is
present
to
answer
any
questions
on
either
his
behalf
or
the
applicant's
behalf.
F
There-
and
that
is
mentioned
in
the
staff
report
and
Nelson-
you
may
be
the
the
better
person
to
answer
this.
We
did
receive
information
from
the
applicant
dated
September
15th
and
is
correspondence
from
mde
regarding
a
settlement
agreement
between
them
and
Dunkirk
Gateway
Business,
Park,
Association
Inc,
with
regards
to
the
private
septic.
I
My
name
is
Nelson
Rocha
I'm
with
Bay
engineering
and
to
answer
your
question:
Mr
Freeland,
the
the
site
was
required
to
do
mitigation
and
some
correction
corrective
measures
for
the
private
system.
They
went
through
that
repaired.
It
was
reviewed
by
mde
and
then
the
work
was
released
or
approved
and
then
now
it's
been
settled.
H
F
H
H
H
C
C
A
K
Good
evening
this
is
a
very
short
update,
I've
given
presentations
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
August,
September
and
now
October.
This
is
on
the
County's
proposed
comprehensive
plan
amendments
and
the
proposed
elimination
or
reduction
of
the
expansions
for
four
of
the
Town
centers.
As
I've
previously
mentioned,
the
board
of
County
Commissioners
met
with
staff
twice
in
June
in
work
sessions
and
directed
staff
to
start
the
process
for
doing
the
proposed
amendments.
At
your
August
meeting,
you
direct
its
staff
to
send
out
the
Amendments
for
agency
review
and
giving
the
agencies
at
least
60
days.
K
Advance
notice
of
the
public
hearing
staff
sent
the
the
request
out
for
comments
to
the
state
Clearinghouse.
The
Maryland
Department
of
planning
State
Clearinghouse
is
responsible
for
Distributing
those
to
the
state
agencies,
and
then
we
sent
them
to
our
adjoining
jurisdictions
and
then
our
regular
list
of
agency
local
agencies
and
then
posted
it
on
the
website
for
the
public
to
be
aware
of
the
planning.
Commission's
public
hearing
is
scheduled
for
November
2nd
here
at
Harriet
Elizabeth
Brown
at
seven
o'clock.
K
Since
the
memo
has
been
written,
in
addition
to
staff
presenting
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
economic
development
advisory
commission
and
the
Solomon's
Architectural
Review
Committee,
we
have
also
presented
to
the
Huntingtown
architecture,
Review
Committee,
Lusby
and
Prince
Frederick
architectural
committees,
and
sent
the
presentation
slides
to
both
St
Leonard
and
Owings.
For
their
review.
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
four
Town
centers
that
are
proposed
to
change
in
the
adopted
2019
County
comprehensive
plan,
our
Huntingtown,
where
the
proposal
is
to
eliminate
the
expansion
for
Solomons.
K
It
would
eliminate
the
expansion
in
its
entirety
and
then
for
Prince
Frederick.
It
would
reduce
the
expansion
significantly
to
basically
the
phase
one
with
a
sliver
here
and
a
sliver
there
for
snapping
boundaries
and
including
the
parcel
of
the
piece
of
the
parcel.
That's
on
the
east
side
of
Stafford
Road
and
Prince
Frederick
Boulevard,
and
then
for
Lusby
it.
K
It
retains
the
expansion
to
the
northeast
of
the
town,
but
eliminates
that
potential
future
expansion
between
Lusby
and
Solomons
and
your
packet
for
the
public
hearing
I
will
be
including
the
comments
we've
received
from
agencies
and
then
also
the
public
through
October
14th,
and
then
we'll
provide
you
with
the
comments
that
we
see
between
now
between
then
and
November
1st.
Anyone
that
wishes
to
provide
comments.
After
close
a
business
of
November
1st
needs
to
bring
them
to
the
public
hearing
to
hand
deliver
them.
L
Yeah
I
think
for
clarity,
since
this
is
a
issue
that
the
Public's
going
to
comment
on
the
labeling
that
we're
currently
using
says,
Town,
Center,
expansions
and
I
think
I.
Think
that
your
your
presentation
clearly
says:
that's
not
the
case.
We
are
we're,
not
expanding,
we're,
reducing
them
and
I.
Think
before
that
is
used
with
the
public
for
the
advertisement
of
the
of
the
meeting
and
that
sort
of
thing
I
think
some
other
title
that
more
nearly
reflects
what's
happening
ought
to
be
chosen
good
point.
We.
K
Can
certainly
make
that
change
to
what
we're
going
forward.
The
legal
ad
has
already
been
published
so
anything
what
we
can
put
up
on
the
website
to
clarify
that
it
is
the
reduction
or
elimination
of
the
expansions
for
for
the
town
centers,
the
ones
that
are
not
there's
no
changes
proposed
are
Dunkirk
Owings
and
St
Leonard.
A
M
M
An
application
was
received
by
Planning
and
Zoning
from
the
Chesapeake
Memorial
Gardens,
requesting
that
crematoriums
and
funeral
homes
be
permitted
as
accessory
uses
to
existing
cemeteries.
The
applicant
reasons
that
funeral
homes
and
crematoriums
are
related
uses
to
cemeteries
and
are
businesses
that
are
low
intensity
and
have
minimal
impact
to
surrounding
properties.
M
And
this
slide
is
showing
the
existing
zoning
in
the
use,
charts
for
crematoriums
funeral
homes
and
cemeteries
or
Memorial
Gardens
and
then
in
red.
This
is
the
proposed
text
amendment
to
add
an
sc
for
special
exception
for
the
farm
and
forest
district
with
the
conditions
for
crematorium.
Then
this
is
already
existing.
The
crematorium
crematorium
shall
be
accessory
to
funeral
home
and
then
adding
the
condition
for
funeral
homes
that
the
funeral
home
shall
be
accessory
to
an
existing
public
Cemetery.
As
the
adoption
of
the
ordinance.
M
M
Staff
did
go
ahead
and
draft
a
definition
to
be
added.
As
part
of
the
text
amendment
to
article
12
definitions,
a
public
cemetery
is
one
used
by
the
general
Community,
a
neighborhood
or
a
church,
while
private
cemetery
is
one
used
only
by
a
family
or
a
small
portion
of
the
community.
However,
actual
public
use,
rather
than
ownership,
determines
whether
a
cemetery
is
public.
M
A
M
M
This
slide
is
showing
the
existing
Lusby
Town
Center
use.
Chart
you'll,
see
down
at
the
bottom
of
the
chart.
Use
number
22
is
the
tavern
nightclub,
lounge
and
dance
hall
with
or
without
outdoor
facilities.
So
the
proposed
text
amendment
is
to
add
a
p
for
permitted
to
that
category.
That
would
include
Lounge
for
the
Cigar
Lounge
under
neighborhood
commercial
sub-district.
M
So
agency
comments
received
as
discussed
at
the
the
last
Planning
Commission
meeting.
There
was
concern
about
smoke
affecting
the
other
businesses,
since
this
would
be
located
within
a
building.
A
shared
building
and
I
did
contact
the
health
department
and
asked
if
they
could
please
submit
comments,
and
they
did
the
division
of
environmental
health,
sent
an
email
stating
that
the
the
Calvert
County
Health
Department
in
cooperation
with
the
Maryland
Department
of
Health,
enforces
the
Clean
Indoor
Air
Act.
M
D
Do
we
have
a
definition
of
how
the
primary
activity
is
used?
There
was
some
discussion
at
last
month's
meeting
that
food
and
alcohol
would
be
served
at
this
establishment
and
and
in
my
experience,
tobacco
sales
in
a
food
and
alcohol
establishment
are
a
very
minor
part
of
it.
Not
primary
business
when
I
had
a
bar
I
had
a
cigarette
machine
and
it
accounted
for
less
than
one
percent
of
my
gross
revenue,
and
it
was
very,
very
small,
I
they're
going
to
be
able
to
drink
and
eat
there
also
and
smoke.
The.
M
Applicant
is
proposing
snacks
as
well
as
Beverages
and
I
think
they
are
going
to
pursue
the
sale
of
alcohol
as
well.
For
the
for
this
definition,
it
would
be
more
than
50
percent
of
their
sales
would
have
to
be
from
the
cigar
tobacco
related
products
and
that
the
other
sales
would
not
be.
You
know
the
majority,
but
we
don't
necessarily
be
on
that
point.
Regulate
that.
M
No
I
mean
it.
That's
part
of
the
reason
why
we're
we're
doing
this
text
amendment
is
that
it
it
to
be
considered
a
lounge
in
that
category
is,
is
alcohol
sales
and
if
they
were
just
doing
the
sale
of
tobacco,
that
would
just
go
under
retail
and
would
be
fine,
but
since
they're
linking
the
two
together-
and
it
goes
under
the
category
definition
for
lounge.
That's
why
we're
requiring
the
text
Amendment
and.
D
G
J
Rachel,
we
spent
some
time
with
this
last
month
at
what
point-
and
you
said,
snacks
at
what
point
do
the
snacks
move
into
an
area
where
it's
an
actual
meal
and
it's
then
it's
an
actual
restaurant
and
then
something
else
falls
into
place.
That's
a
question!
I
have
so,
but
you
don't
have
the
answer.
I
know
so
do.
N
Mary
Beth
cook,
director
of
Planning
and
Zoning,
the
environmental
health
department,
has
a
Environmental
health
department
worker
that
does
food
service,
so
they
have
very
strict
regulations.
So
if
they
just
want
to
serve
snacks,
they
would
fall
under
one
category.
If
they
want
to
be
a
restaurant,
they
would
follow
under
another
category.
So
what
Rachel
presented
tonight
would
all
be
regulated
by
the
health
department.
O
Sir
good
afternoon,
Commissioners
and
staff,
my
name
is
Joseph
Cormier
from
Owings
Maryland
I
am
concerned
about
this
type
of
business,
being
the
zoning
being
changed
to
allow
for
this,
and
not
just
the
sale
of
alcohol
and
food
in
the
same
establishment,
but
in
many
neighboring
counties
that
have
smoking
lounges,
they
have
a
BYOB
policy,
so
I
don't
know.
What's
going
to
stop
people
from
going
to
Mike,
Hart's
liquor
store,
picking
up
a
handle
of
something
and
then
going
and
smoking
a
cigar
and
drinking
their
fill
with
no
one
to
cut
them
off.
O
C
P
Q
J
L
C
H
H
A
N
Good
evening
planning,
Commissioners
Mary
Beth
cook,
director
of
Planning
and
Zoning
I,
have
several
representatives
from
various
departments
here
this
evening
to
talk
about
their
section
and
sitting
with
me.
Right
now
is
director
Dahl
from
Public
Works
we're
going
to
begin
with
a
discussion
on
the
current
adequate
public
facilities
they're
currently
housed
in
the
Calvert
County
zoning
ordinance
in
Section,
1
7-105.
N
N
The
adequate
public
facilities
regulations
were
adopted
in
the
county
in
1988
and
from
1988
to
2002.
They
were
in
the
subdivision
regulations,
which
was
a
separate
document.
They
were
adopted
into
the
zoning
ordinance
in
2003
and
that's
where
they
are
contained
today.
The
Amendments
for
adequate
public
facilities
for
schools
were
done
in
2003,
2008
and
2018.
minor
edits
have
also
been
made
for
roads
So.
N
N
We
met
with
the
board
of
County
Commissioners.
Several
times
most
recently
in
June
and
October
of
2002
and
are
working
through
work
sessions
to
get
a
good,
solid
draft.
So
this
evening
we'll
be
presenting
to
you
some
of
those
regulations
as
they
currently
stand
and
if
once
adopted,
if
any
of
one
of
these
categories
existing
or
proposed
is
found
to
be
inadequate,
the
development
cannot
start
construction
until
capacity
becomes
adequate.
N
So
the
adequate
public
facilities
for
schools
are
not
proposed
to
be
changed,
we're
leaving
them
as
they
currently
are,
or
just
moving
them
out
of
the
Calvert
County
zoning
ordinance
into
the
county
code,
because
there's
going
to
be
such
an
expansion
and
any
changes
that
would
have
to
be
made
would
be
made
as
amendments
to
the
county
code.
Instead
of
the
Calvert
County
zoning
ordinance,
foreign.
R
Good
evening
everybody
Carrie
Dahl
director
of
Public
Works,
so
the
existing
current
adequate
public
facility
for
roads
is
actually
a
level
C
outside
of
the
Town
centers
and
it's
D
within
the
town
centers.
That
has
not
changed
much
if
I
would
go
to
the
next
Slide.
The
inaccuracy
piece
of
this
I'd
like
to
bounce
around
this,
so
we
can
understand
what
we're
talking
about
and
we'll
talk
about
the
other
things
that
we're
actually
doing
to
mitigate
some
of
these
things.
So
we
set
the
conditions
for
actual
actual
traffic
flow
within
the
county.
R
R
Deep,
before
impacts
from
the
proposed
development
should
have
been
no
worse
as
a
result
of
the
impact
from
the
development.
Otherwise,
if
you're
coming
in
and
what
you're
going
to
put
in
is
going
to
make
it
an
e,
you
have
to
mitigate
it
down
to
a
d
okay,
so
it
stays
where
it's
supposedly,
where
it
initially
started.
So
you
can't
make
it
worse.
You
can
only
make
it
where
it
was
when
you
first
started.
R
So
the
other
thing
that
we're
going
to
do
is
the
impact
studies.
The
impact
studies
we're
currently
right
now
covered
in
appendix
20-1
traffic
impact
out
analysis
is
currently
basically
trips
when
a
traffic
study
is
required
is
on
400,
basically
registered
trips
in
that
movements
within
that
area
of
time.
Okay,
we're
going
to
take
that
and
knock
it
down
to
250
and
that
way,
what
we're
going
to
do
is
we're
actually
going
to
re,
require
more
traffic
studies
to
actually
measure
what
the
impacts
would
be
on
that
area.
R
Sometimes
you
know
if
it's
only
going
to
be
400
you'll
have
to
do
them
at
400,
but
you'll
never
notice.
If
it's
going
to
be
250
and
there's
a
numerous
smaller
developments
that
he's
225
there
he's
200
here,
but
it's
all
in
the
same
area.
You
could
be
over
400
and
not
necessarily
get
a
good
analysis
on
that.
So
that's
why
we're
ratcheting
it
down
the
250
to
trip
that
scale
is
what
I'm
getting
at
okay,
so
moving
along
public
sewer,
we're
all
very
familiar
with
this
one.
We
discussed
this
earlier
in
the
year.
R
I
will
tell
you
that
the
90
percent
that
we
are
saying
as
proposed
inadequacy
is
probably
better
than
most
counties
that
are
out
there
in
the
state
of
Maryland
I've,
seen
them
as
high
as
95
and
some
of
them
like
High.
When
the
I'll
tell
you
the
truth,
most
counties
don't
enumerate
this
number.
They
don't
they
just
talk
about
flows
and
things
of
that
nature.
It's
almost
like
they
talk
around
it,
we're
actually
going
to
enumerate
it
call
it
90.
we
actually
have
to
be
in.
R
R
Okay!
Next,
so
water
we're
using
the
same
Theory.
Okay
90
is
the
threshold
that
we're
going
to
use
is
being
approaching.
Actually
we
have
19
Water
Systems,
and
all
of
them
are
in
pretty
good
shape
when
it
comes
to
supplying
the
water.
So
90
is
a
is
a
good
act.
It's
a
good
accuracy.
I
think
I
just
took
a
measurement
of
Prince
Frederick
before
I
came
here.
R
Just
to
give
you
an
example,
it's
at
like
60,
some
percent,
it's
just
like
it's
low
60s
when
I
looked
at
it,
okay,
so
it's
nowhere
close
to
being
at
90
percent
any
questions
there:
okay,
moving
along
so
attic
public
cities
for
Stormwind
water
drainage.
If
I
had
to
summize
this,
it's
as
simple
as
this
when
you
start
the
development,
okay,
there's
a
condition
that
it's
currently
in.
R
If
it's
green
grass
trees
and
everything
like
that,
when
you
actually
come
in
and
develop
the
area,
it
basically
has
to
convey
water
at
the
same
rate
of
wood.
If
there
is
water
that
needs
to
be
conveyed,
if
it
had
green
grass,
trees
and
everything.
So,
if
you're
putting
in
impervious
Services
of
that
nature
storm
drains,
then
it
basically
has
to
handle
the
water
okay
at
a
rate
of
the
same
or
lower
than
what
you
currently
started
with,
and
that's
essentially
what
all
that
language
there
says
we're
actually
developing
additional
language
to
this.
R
R
Questions,
okay
and
then
for
solid
waste.
This
is
all
based
on
the
transfer
station.
That's
at
appeal!
Okay,
right
now
we
say
that
it
would
be
inadequate
if
our
transfer
stations
started
exceeding
70
percent.
We
have
number
of
customers
that
actually,
you
know,
use
and
operate
out
of
the
transfer
station,
whether
it
be
commercial,
whether
it
be
residential,
you
name
it
and
we
actually
transfer
our
stations,
our
our
solid
waste
from
appeal
and
take
it
to
the
King
George
super
landfill
at
this
present
time.
S
Our
primary
goal
for
fire
rescue
EMS
would
be
the
provision
of
high
quality
fire.
An
EMS
citizen
to
the
service
to
the
citizens,
adequacy
of
the
fire
and
EMS
service
would
be
determined
by
using
response
time.
Statistics
which
measure
the
time
between
the
resource
being
dispatched
and
their
arrival
at
the
scene
of
an
incident.
That's
typically
in
direct
relation
to
the
distance
from
a
fire
engine
EMS
station.
S
Given
the
rural
demographics
of
Calvert
County
response
time
can
also
be
affected
by
the
availability
of
resources,
particularly
when
times
with
EMS,
when
service
demand
is
excessive,
or
we
have
significant
wait
times
to
transfer
patients
at
the
hospital
additional
service
response
criteria
could
be
considered.
Adequate
would
be
considered
adequate
if
the
standards
were
being
met,
each
fire
and
EMS
response
area.
S
There
are
six
main
response
areas
in
Calvert:
County
are
sectioned
off
into
sub
areas
known
as
boxes,
these
boxes
of
which
there
are
92
throughout
Calvert
County
are
in
direct
relation
to
the
distance
and
emergency
response
travel
from
each
of
the
six
primary
service
areas,
the
criteria
to
be
applied
to
the
development
of
commercial,
institutional
and
Industrial
and
major
subdivisions.
If
the
criteria
were
not
to
be
met,
a
project
could
be
delayed
up
to
six
years.
Additional
consideration
could
be
made
if
to
if
development
were
to
provide
EMS
service.
D
T
S
S
The
meeting
of
the
90
time
threshold
came
from
GIS
mappings
from
each
fire
department,
almost
within
from
each
fire
department
to
their
individual.
First,
two
areas
can
reach
within
10
minutes
almost
to
the
X,
the
almost
to
the
complete
perimeter
of
their
areas
and
exceed
sometimes
within
the
posted
speed
limit
plus
10
miles
per
hour.
S
Note
that
the
majority
of
the
population
densities
are
near
where
the
fire
stations
are
located
now,
population
density
is
as
well
as
the
call
volumes
are
our
highest
where
the
the
the
stations
are
currently
located
for
fire.
The
response
criteria
is
essentially
the
same,
except
it
would
be
instead
of
obviously
an
ALS
or
BLS
response.
U
Good
evening,
Stanley
Harris
chief
of
emergency
communications,
so
there's
no
industry
standard
for
to
take
the
number
of
citizens
and
tell
you
how
many
number
one
dispatchers
and
call
takers
you
need
so.
But
there
are
agencies
that
have
Staffing
models
that
look
at
call
volume
and
other
things
that
are
going
on
in
your
area
to
make
a
recommendation
for
what
you
need,
and
one
of
those
agencies
is
the
national
emergency
number,
Association
or
Nina.
So
we're
recommending
that
it'll
be
included
that
approved
full-time
equivalence
assigned
to
take
nylon.
U
U
D
V
Good
evening
Commissioners
Captain
Brent
Parrott,
with
the
Sheriff's
Office
after
review
of
our
current
residential
development
applications
and
Census
Data,
the
Sheriff's
Office
law
enforcement
services
are
deemed
adequate
at
the
projected
ratio
of
sworn
Law.
Enforcement
Officers
to
population
is
1.5
deputies
per
1000
residents.
At
this
time.
There's
no
identified
commercial
growth
data
to
assist
with
this
recommendation,
as
Calvert
County
government
continues
to
receive
residential
or
commercial
development
applications.
V
Data
used
to
determine
whether
the
above
law
enforcement
ratio
to
population
can
only
be
gathered
upon
completion
of
the
projects
and
its
occupancy.
The
growth
generated
by
any
proposed
residential
subdivision
or
Commercial
Business
may
not
exceed
the
service
capacity
of
existing
law
enforcement
officers.
Just
a
little
background.
V
The
Sheriff's
Office
responded
to
approximately
74
000
calls
for
service.
Last
year
we
have
approximately
168
sworn
Deputy
sheriffs,
where
the
uniform
was
I
needed
this
evening,
and
the
census
in
Calvert
county
is
approximately
92
000.,
so
we're
right
at
about
1.82
sworn
Law
Enforcement
Officers
to
that
thousand.
So
we
are
adequate
at
this
time,
and
that
includes
our
Court
deputies
in
the
courthouse.
V
V
So
we
use
those
and
that
will
that
will
will
get
you
that
ratio
that
1.5
or
2.0,
but
it
does
vary
across
the
country,
for
example,
City
type
like
DC
Baltimore,
where
you
have
a
small
geographical
area,
but
you
have
a
high
population
that
may
push
that
ratio
up
to
as
much
as
3
3.5
per
thousand
residents,
because
the
it's
so
tight-knit
we're
a
more
war
on
spread
out,
but
some
things
that
the
sheriff's
office
has
done
to
to.
We
talked
about
response
times
with
the
fire
department.
V
It's
hard
to
get
a
response
time
for
law
enforcement
because
we
run
so
many
calls
for
service.
But
what
we
did
in
the
last
assessment
a
few
years
ago
is
we
actually
Shrunk
the
patrol
beats.
So,
for
example,
when
I
came
on
25
years
ago,
I
mean
it
would
be
nothing
to
have
three
of
us
work
in
the
whole
County
back
then,
but
now
what
we
did
was,
as
population
grew
and
cost
of
service
increased
We
Shrunk.
Those
Patrol
beats.
So
instead
of
having
three
to
five,
we
now
have
eight.
H
N
Next
is
part
facilities,
so
we've
been
working
very
closely
with
the
county
attorney's
office
and
after
Consulting,
with
the
county
attorney,
we've
decided
to
defer
the
park
facilities
continue
working
on
it,
it's
a
little
bit
unique
because
there
aren't
as
many
examples
throughout
the
state
and
the
country.
So
we're
going
to
continue
tweaking
this,
but
we'd
like
to
move
forward
with
the
rest
of
the
adequate
public
facilities
regulations
at
this
time
and
continue
working
on
the
park
facilities,
but
Shannon
menzal,
director
of
Parks
and
Recreation,
is
here.
H
Q
So
at
this
time,
Shannon
is
all
director
of
Parks
and
Recreation.
So
with
fees
in
lieu
it
would
be
based.
If
this
were
going
to
be
part
of
the
apfo,
it
would
be
based
on
potentially
a
per
dwelling
unit
cost
which
at
this
time
has
really
not
been
hasn't
been
dove
into.
Yet
at
this
point,
and
as
we
continue
research
on
what
might
be
the
most
appropriate
for
adequate
public
facilities
for
Park
facilities,
we'll
be
able
to
look
further
into
that.
Thank.
H
Q
L
H
S
Basically,
can
you
hear
me
basically
pretty
much
with
the
exception
of
I
would
say
the
most
their
busiest
areas
and
the
busiest
population
densities
are
closest
to
where
the
six
primary
areas
are
currently
with
the
exception
of
Solomons.
Theirs
is
a
much
larger
area,
in
fact,
Solomon's.
First,
two
area,
probably
attributes
to
about
30
percent
of
the
County's
entire
call
volume.
S
H
S
I
I
believe
that
they've
been
they
are
looking
at
that
they're
looking
at
a
potential
move
north
that
would
allow
them
to
be
closer
to
the
center
of
that
first
do
area.
It
would
provide
a
quicker
response
time
to
probably
their
busier
area,
which
would
be
the
Chesapeake
Ranch
Estates,
as
well
as
still
provide
adequate
service
to
the
Solomons
area.
Would.
S
Currently,
the
annex
is
in
place
to
allow
for
ISO
ratings
for
insurance
companies.
You
have
to
be
within
five
miles
of
a
fire
department
to
be
considered
covered
if
your
insurance
company
uses
ISO
rating
there's
a
significant
portion
of
the
northern
area,
but
from
Solomon's,
Northern,
Lusby
I,
would
say,
and
before
you
get
into
actually
way
before
you
get
to
see
letters
obviously,
but
where
you're
beyond
five
miles
and
actually
parts
of
the
ranch
club
that
or
the
Ranch
Estates
that
have
hydrants
that
are
still
wouldn't
be
considered
protected.
S
D
S
I
don't
know
the
population.
I
can
tell
you
that,
like
I
said
probably
80
to
85
percent
of
our
call
volume
is
EMS
we're
finding
that
we're
spending
a
significant
amount
of
time.
You
know
a
single
call
for
the
Solomon's
area
probably
takes
two
hours
by
the
time
you
responded.
A
scene
is
the
short
part,
wrap
up
the
patient,
go
to
the
hospital
and
Prince
Frederick
turn
around
and
come
back.
You've
that's
two
hours
for
one
call.
I've
jokingly
said
if
I
leave
Prince,
Frederick
and
heading
south.
W
W
Yeah,
my
name
is
Bob
Estes
and
I'm.
Speaking
for
myself,
I
guess
the
some
of
the
adequate
public
facilities
have
a
kind
of
what
I
call
easily
the
six-year
rule.
Do
all
of
them
have
that
you
know
schools.
You
have
to
remediate
after
six
years
and
then,
if
you
don't
they
get
to
go
ahead.
Is
that
true
for
all
of
them.
W
W
If
I
I
have
a
problem
with
it's
good
that
we're
reducing
the
number
of
units
to
require
a
traffic
study,
but
I
worry
that
if
you
have
one,
that's
200
another
one,
that's
200
another,
that's
200
you're,
not
requiring
a
traffic
study,
but
now
you're
up
to
600.
So
that's
a
comment
did
better
that
time
and
I'm
also
worried
that
in
engineering
I'm,
an
engineer
retired,
but
we
never
designed
things
like
aircraft
to
average.
W
We
always
went
to
maximum
and
I
note
that
the
sewer
capacity
is
always
stated
as
90
percent
of
average
and
I
worry
that
the
maximum
could
cause
problems.
I'm,
not
a
you
know,
a
sewer
guy
but
I'm
worried
about
not
considering
maximum
stormwater
management.
I'm
always
worried
that
we're
not
designing
to
the
actual
current
conditions
in
the
county
in
those
County
conditions
are
actually
part
of
the
NOAA
database
local
database.
B
C
A
Y
Dpw
is
requesting
an
exception
to
allow
for
the
removal
of
excess
filter
within
and
adjacent
to
the
unbuilt
section
of
the
right-of-way.
This
project
would
expedite
the
future
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard,
as
well
as
enable
DPW
to
utilize,
fill
dirt
on
other
ongoing
County
construction
projects,
which
will
provide
significant
cost
savings.
Y
There
are
four
Provisions
under
this
section
of
the
Prince
Frederick
zoning
ordinance
that
allow
for
an
exception.
The
second
provision
states
that
the
issues
related
to
the
protection
of
natural
features
are
deemed
by
the
Planning
Commission
to
have
been
satisfactorily
satisfactorily
addressed
in
a
pending
subdivision
plot
or
site
plan.
I
want
to
point
out
that
the
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
will
require
an
approved.
Road
plan
may
not
necessarily
require
a
full
site
plan,
but
both
of
these
documents
are
very
detailed
engineering
drawings,
the
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard.
Y
Y
This
is
a
portion
of
the
project
in
question
that
includes
the
Fox
Run
Boulevard
right-of-way
and
then
three
affected
Parcels,
one
is
owned
by
the
board
of
County
Commissioners.
One
is
owned
by
the
Board
of
Education
and
one
is
owned
by
Bargo
LLC.
The
board
of
County
Commissioners
has
already
gotten
the
necessary
permissions
from
the
other
two
land
owners
to
grade
on
their
property.
Y
Y
There
are
slopes
greater
than
25
percent
within
proximity
to
the
proposed
grading.
Those
would
be
the
areas
that
are
dark
gray
that
you
see
on
the
plan.
None
of
these
steep
slopes
would
be
impacted
with
the
proposed
grading
permit
application,
except
for
a
small
portion
of
slopes
that
were
created
during
the
construction
of
the
existing
intersection
between
Fox
Run,
Boulevard
and
Chesapeake
Boulevard.
Y
There
are
no
Wetland
streams
or
Associated
buffers
within
the
proposed
limits
of
work.
There
are,
however,
some
Wetland
and
stream
buffers
in
proximity
to
the
project,
mainly
to
the
north
of
the
LOD
that
you
see
in
yellow,
sediment
and
erosion.
Control
measures
to
protect
water
quality
are
required
to
be
in
place
to
pass
inspection.
Y
Y
There
are
both
specimen
and
Monument
trees
within
proximity
to
the
proposed
grading
specimen
trees,
anything
that
is
30
inches
in
diameter,
measured,
four
and
a
half
feet
off
the
ground.
A
monument
tree
is
something
that's
regulated
within
the
Prince
Frederick
Town
Center
and
those
are
24
inches
and
greater
measured
at
that
same
height
from
the
ground.
Y
Dpw
has
applied
for
two
variances
from
the
board
of
appeals
to
remove
any
affected
specimen
or
monument
trees,
and
that
was
heard
at
this
morning's
board
of
appeals.
Hearing
the
Calvert
County
zoning
ordinance
allows
for
Forest
conservation
requirements
to
be
phased
and
addressed
on
a
lot
by
lot
basis
or
for
the
property
as
a
whole.
Y
Forest
conservation
plans
for
both
this
portion
of
the
Fox
Run
Boulevard
right-of-way
and
for
Magnolia
Ridge,
would
have
to
be
approved
prior
to
final
Road
plan
and
final
site
plan
approval,
and
then
this
is
kind
of
the
other
half
of
the
project
area
that
wouldn't
fit
on
the
first
sheet,
and
it
shows
you
a
little
bit
more
of
the
piece
that
Bargo
owns.
Which
is
the
piece
kind
of
below
the
road
and
then
the
the
water
tower
parcel
that
has
already
met
its
Forest
conservation
requirements
based
upon
review.
Y
The
staff
has
determined
the
proposed
grading
activity
will
have
no
direct
adverse
impacts
on
the
protection
of
adjacent
natural
features.
As
long
as
the
submitted
grading
plan
is
followed,
there
appear
to
be
no
outstanding
environmental
issues
associated
with
this
proposal.
That
would
require
additional
analysis.
Prior
to
Road
plan
approval,
the
staff
recommended
the
Planning
Commission
Grant,
the
applicant's
request,
for
an
exception
allowed
under
the
Prince
Frederick
zoning
ordinance
chapter
1,
section
A
for
the
issuance
of
a
grading
permit
prior
to
the
conditions
whoa
prior
prior
to
site
plan
approval.
Y
C
H
X
Good
evening
planning
Commissioners,
my
name
is
Jason
Levitt
I'm,
a
project
engineer
with
Department
of
Public
Works
capital
projects.
That's
a
good
question:
Mr
Freeland!
There
are
actually
a
few
projects
that
are
currently
underway
that
require
fill
dirt.
One
example
is
the
Ravine
that
was
fixed
over
at
Simmons
Ridge.
There
was
approximately
250
yards
or
250
cubic
yards
of
fill
that
was
required
for
that.
X
X
That's
a
difficult
question
to
answer
at
this
point.
According
to
the
preliminary
analysis
that
I
did
there's
a
in
the
neighborhood
of
like
35
000
cubic
yards
that
need
to
be
removed
for
the
grading
to
be
done
on
this
project,
but
that's
dependent
on
the
quality
of
the
dirt,
also
and
the
quality
of
the
dirt
required
for
each
of
the
particular
activities
that
it's
you
know
earmarked
for,
because
there's
select
fill
required
for
certain
activities.
X
And,
honestly
we
don't
know
yet
what
the
quality
of
this
dirt
is
or
whether
it
can
be
used
for
all
of
the
activities.
But
35
000
is
the
cut
number.
There's
approximately
I
think
19
000
cubic
yards
of
fill
required
for
this
plan,
but,
like
I
said,
until
we
determine
the
Quantic
the
quality
of
the
fill,
we
won't
know
whether
we
can
actually
apply
it
to
the
project
or
not.
X
To
simply
using
AutoCAD
to
generate
the
numbers
for
the
volumes,
so
we
have
not
done
any
Geotech.
Yet
it's
my
understanding
that
that's
done
a
little
bit
further
down
the
line
once
we
actually
get
Machinery
in
the
dirt
and
we
can
kind
of
see
and
get
an
idea
and
we
have
geotex
on
calls.
You
know
that
are
that's
their
purpose.
To
perform,
that
soil
testing,
to
determine
the
suitability.
H
So
so
one
one
of
the
problems
that
I
have
this
evening
on
the
capital
project
worksheet.
The
last
sentence
is
the
REM
the
remaining
section
of
of
this
road
that
we're
talking
about
this
evening.
The
remaining
section
is
dependent
on
the
prince
charity,
Town,
Center,
Master,
Plan
update
and
unless
I
slept
through
it,
we
haven't
updated
that
printerick
town
center
master
plan
so.
X
H
T
Multiple
projects,
He,
is,
as
Jason
stated,
that
we
can
use
the
excess
filter
on
one
cover
pies
now
the
workshop
behind
cover
Pine
requires
certain
dirt
in
certain
locations
and
then
you
can
use
bad
dirt
in
other
locations
and
when
we
say
bad
Dart,
it's
not
necessarily
bad.
It
could
be
a
clay
material
that
you
can't
necessarily
want
to
use
under
building
a
road.
So
when
Jason
referenced,
you
know,
there's
19
000
yards
of
fill
that
needed
it
for
let's
say
to
build
Fox
Run
Boulevard.
T
If
the
soul
doesn't
meet
the
qualifications
for
compaction
rates
underneath
the
road,
we
can't
use
it
for
that,
but
we
can
use
it
outside
of
the
the
road
beds,
such
as
the
shoulder
on
filth,
slopes
and
so
forth,
and
we
come
believe
it
or
not.
We
come
across
a
lot
of
those
throughout
the
county
with
erosion
jobs.
We
got
to
fix
it
in
the
culverts,
the
one
he
mentioned,
local,
where
he
talked
I,
think
it's
like
250
yards
is
actually
250
truckloads
and
each
truckload
holds
20
yards.
T
So
we
have
a
lot
of
large
erosion
projects
that
keep
appearing
that
we
have
to
maintain
or
fix
throughout
the
county.
So
we
need
a
more
or
less
a
stockpile
location
where
you
can
find
dirt,
whether
it's
good
or
bad,
that
meets
all
our
needs
twofold.
We
can
excavate
it
out
of
here
and
haul
it
to
the
site
cheaper
than
we
can
pay
somebody
to
bring
the
soil
in,
because
if
we
pay
them
to
bring
it
in,
not
only
are
you
paying
for
Trucking
we're
also
paying
for
the
material
on
the
truck.
T
D
D
Z
Very
Breezy,
Point
speaking
for
myself,
I
think
there
may
be
an
embedded
assumption
here
that
this
Fox
Road
connector
is
actually
going
to
get
built.
Otherwise,
why
grade
yeah
I
get
that
it
would
be
a
good,
less
expensive
source
for
for
Phil
Dirt,
but
in
your
next
agenda
item
you're
going
to
be
looking
at
the
whole
Eastern
Loop
Road,
and
whether
that
should
still
be
built
with
extended
extended,
extensive
taxpayer
expense.
And
if
phase
two
expansion
goes
away,
do
we
still
need
that
entire
Loop
Road?
Z
If
it
turns
out
that
we
don't,
then
why
are
we
building
this
extension?
The
sole
function
of
that
extension
then
becomes
enabling
the
development
of
of
the
residential
development
that's
proposed
right
adjacent
and
it
puts
the
county
in
the
position
of
taxpayer
funding.
What's
essentially
a
road
servicing,
a
new
residential
development.
Z
So
that's
an
awkward
political
situation
that
I'd
like
you
to
consider,
and
so
the
question
really
is:
would
it
make
sense
to
defer
a
decision
on
this
project
until
the
county
and
you
figure
out
what
you're
going
to
do
with
the
entire
Loop
Road?
If
you're
going
to
go
ahead
with
the
entire
Loop
Road,
then
this
makes
sense
otherwise,
I'm
not
sure
it
does.
Thank.
C
T
T
To
kind
of
segue
off
of
what
the
previous
speaker
was
saying,
everybody
can
look
at
this
and
assume
that
foxford
Boulevard
is
going
to
be
built.
We're
just
trying
to
go,
get
the
dirt
in
grade
it
sooner.
So
we
can
use
a
different
projects.
Is
that
a
false
assumption?
Not
necessarily?
This
is
a
capital
project?
That's
been
in
the
books.
For
over
a
decade
it's
been
listed
with
the
Army
Road
there's
Beach
Bridge
running
Loop
Road
Fox,
Run
Boulevard,
it's
been
in
the
budget's
book
since
2011.
T
as
a
capital
project
was
it
benefit.
Was
this
road
benefit
the
land
adjacent
to
it
for
development?
We
all
can
certainly
say.
Yes,
however,
if
you
look
at
it
as
a
whole,
You've
Got,
the
capital
Middle
School
site
at
the
Calvert
High
School
site,
write
your
Jace
one
another.
You
follow
the
transportation
for
the
school
buses.
They
leave.
The
Middle
School
site
go
through
Fox
Run
jam
up
the
entire
Center.
When
buses
come
in
buses,
go
out,
turn
South
head
into
there's
Beach
Road
and
go
to
the
high
school.
T
Why
are
we
sending
our
kids
out
on
the
Route
4
through
all
that
traffic,
if
all
they
have
to
do?
Is
travel
2500
feet
on
a
back
road
to
the
high
school?
That's
the
ultimate
goal
for
divide
developing
Fox
from
Boulevard
and
building
that
extension.
It
gives
a
safer
path
for
his
kids
to
get
from
school
to
school
or
public
transportation
that
we
provide
them
and
it
alleviates
traffic
at
the
intersections
that
we
already
know
have
issues.
So,
if
you're
coming
out,
there's
Beach
Road,
you
can
swing
it
right
on
the
Fox.
H
AA
Rodney
Garcia
claudible
homes,
so
the
the
entirety
of
Bargo,
which
is
basically
and
this
started
even
when
it
was
Magnolia
Landing
well
before
we
even
got
involved
or
Randy
got
involved
and
and
basically
an
agreement
that
was
made
with
the
county
was
that
this
this
was
a
portion
that
should
be
built.
This
was
the
connection
date
with
the
connection.
AA
The
next
one
we
talked
about
was
Chesapeake
Bowl
of
art
extension,
which
kind
of
connected
from
where
Chesapeake
Boulevard
comes
out
from
the
middle
school
and
then
runs
over
to
the
circle
on
Darris,
Beach
Road,
and
it
was
kind
of
a
a
weird
connection.
It
also
went
across
two
severe
Wetlands
right
through
them,
not
around
them,
not
beside
them,
but
but
through
them.
So
this
was
much
less
environmentally
impactful,
so
we
got
involved
and
probably
even
Randy.
AA
Before
myself
got
involved
in
the
project,
it
was
said
that
they
would
give
property,
so
property
was
given.
This
property
was
originally
part
of
the
of
the
Bardo
property
now,
but
it
was
Magnolia
landing
at
the
time
and
they
gave
that
property
to
the
county.
We've
given
right
away
and
all
to
make.
What
is
probably
one
of
the
most
important
in
my
mind
if
I'm
I'm
living
eat
and
breathe
here
and
basically
I
think
the
the
connectivity
within
Prince
Frederick?
AA
This
is
one
of
the
the
most
important
pieces
of
love
between
those
two
schools
as
Jared,
clear,
to
explain
we're
putting
kids
on
Route
four
we're
jamming
up
that
intersection
as
traffic
is
coming
through
an
afternoon,
we're
putting
buses
out
there
and
trying
to
bring
them
out
on
the
highway
and
then
take
them
to
intersection.
So
if
you
look
at
as
a
as
a
community
good
for
the
entire
Community,
this
is
by
far
one
of
the
most
important
pieces
left.
It's
actually
from
budgets.
AA
I've
seen
this
night,
it's
a
much
less
costly
environment
of
the
engineering
we've
actually
paid
for
all
the
engineering
on
the
road
we
actually
are,
are
and
and
working
with
the
county
on
on
a
portion
that
we
would
even
pay
for
this
as
a
product.
So
we're
not
we're
not
trying
to
get
a
free
ride,
we're
not
trying
to
sneak
by
anybody.
Anybody
that
knows
me
within
the
county
knows
that
and
and
but
it's
it's
I,
think
it's
a
vital
piece.
AA
I
think
when
we
talk
about
things
within
the
the
comprehensive
plan
or
the
zoning
ordinance,
it's
about
trying
to
do
things
that
make
sense.
You
know
I
think
one
of
the
key
words
when
you
when
you
look
at
this,
even
when
you
read
you
know
things
that
talk
about
the
the
ordinance,
and
this
was
a
map
that
was
drawn
years
ago
that
had
pencil
sticks.
That
said,
here's
where
road
goes
and
here's
where
road
goes
and
the
next
one's
over
behind
the
Safeway
or
the
giant.
AA
You
know
that's
all
through
Wetlands,
all
it's
never
going
to
happen.
We
can
start
down
by
the
bowling
alley
and
come
out
by
the
pool.
That's
never
going
to
happen,
that's
good!
That's
that's
why
the
expansion
can
happen
quite
honestly,
because
the
roads
that
follow
that
can't
be
done
without
absorbitant
cost.
This
is
a
fairly
I
know.
It
sounds
like
a
lot
but
inexpensive.
AA
Two
and
a
half
three
million
dollar
road
to
meet
a
very,
very
high,
have
a
very,
very
high
impact
on
relieving
traffic
congestion
within
this,
this
area,
which
is
the
center
of
Prince
Frederick,
which
is
one
of
the
most
important
areas
in
the
in
the
county.
Obviously,
so
with
all
that,
like
things
Wars
that
are
in
here,
you
know,
this
plan
represents
a
general
concept.
So
when
this
pencil
drawing
was
done,
it
was
a
general
concept.
AA
So
tonight,
probably
between
both
of
these
things,
I
would
just
say
that
it's
really
just
a
combination
of
doing
something.
It
makes
a
lot
more
sense
for
every
side
involved
the
county,
it's
a
cheaper,
less
expensive
project,
it's
environmentally
more
sound!
It's
going
beside
Wetlands,
not
through
Wetlands,
the
other
one
is
going
not
even
directly
across
vertically
across
Wetland.
AA
It's
running
kind
of
you
know,
kind
of
semi
on
a
45
degree
angle
through
Wetlands,
which
is
which
is
is
very
impactful
so
so
overall
and
then,
and
then
it
creates,
and
even
within
the
the
comprehensive
plan
it
says,
you're
trying
with
your
road
system
without
a
crate.
What
makes
sense
for
the
development
that
will
be?
You
know
around
that.
AA
You
know
you're
trying
this
this
kind
of
checks,
all
those
boxes
off
so
I
think
in
working
with
you
know:
Mary
Beth
and
staff
and
everybody
that
we've
worked
with
carry
you
know:
DPW,
Jr
and
and
Jason
Levitt
extensively,
the
the
the
it's.
It
really
makes
a
lot
of
sense
for
everybody
involved
and
and
the
dirt,
as
you
said,
I
can
tell
you
from
from
the
developer
Builder
standpoint.
You
can
never
have
enough
dirt
because
it
does
get
very
expensive.
AA
We
we
go
to
sites
and
for
decent
dirt
John
you
might
be
dealing
with.
You
know,
150
200
load
now
for
something
even
looks
like
sand.
You
know
much
less
Bank,
Run
and,
and
you
start
adding
those
up
when
you
have
250
loads
or
whatever,
is
it
it
all
of
a
sudden?
You
spend
you
know
a
couple
hundred
thousand
dollars
just
like
that,
so
it's
it's
always
a
nightmare
for
us
when
we
run
out
of
dirt
on
our
sites.
We
like
to
have
plenty
right
there,
and
this
is
kind
of
that.
AA
H
AA
The
only
thing
that
this
is
getting
tonight
is
on
the
on
the
portion
of
Argo
or
Chesapeake
Boulevard
Boulevard
was
drawn
on
the
previous
Transportation
plan.
It's
no
longer
on
the
2040
Transportation
plan.
It
was
on
the
2020
Transportation
plan
on
that
Council
drawing
it
showed
a
line
going
through
more
with
the
Chesapeake
Boulevard
extension
would
have
gone
straight
through
the
barber
property
and
and
into
the
circle,
and
in
that
the
planning
had
asked
us
to
come
to.
AA
You
know
talk
to
you
guys
and
to
say
so:
she's
understood
that
process
and
give
us
your
blessing
that
that
we
can
it's
kind
of
like
the
fox
front.
Boulevard
is
taking
the
responsibility
of
what
Chesapeake,
Bowl
extension
extension
would
have
been.
It
was
kind
of
a
connection
kind
of
more
self-connection,
but
not
on
Route
4
that
they
try
to
achieve
on
both
sides
of
RAV4,
so
that
people
can
once
they
get
on.
They
want
to
go
to
Giant
and
they
live
downstairs
Beach.
AA
They
can
work
their
way
back
through
go
down
through
this
working
one
deer
beach
and
never
really
be
congesting
around
four.
So
it
did
these
little
connectors
like
this
are
just
invaluable
I
mean
even
though
it
went
behind
Walmart.
You
know
years,
what's
behind
there,
like
that,
they'd
give
that
last
piece
of
connectivity
that
lets
people
really
stay
on
that
side
of
the
road
and
not
reinvade
a
re-come
out
on
Route,
four,
so
definitely
I
think
it's
a
very
important
piece.
T
So
the
conceptual
Road
plans
have
been
approved
conceptually
for
storm
water
management,
we're
working
through
the
site,
development
phase
now,
but
it's
kind
of
tied
to
the
whole
Magnolia
land
or
Magnolia
Ridge
subdivision
community.
So
when
they
get
that
work
down
the
entrance
to
it,
we
should
be
seeing
the
road
plants
come
back
in
with
full
design.
F
Go
ahead:
yes,
so
just
Chris
Fenimore,
a
principal
planner
with
Planning
and
Zoning
to
speak
to
that
right
now,
the
item:
that's
before
you
is
coming
from
the
Prince
Frederick
Town
Center
zoning
ordinance,
and
it
basically
says
you
can't
get
a
grading
permit
before
you
have
site
planner,
subdivision
approval,
and
so
the
request
is
to
get
dirt
good,
bad
or
otherwise.
Before
in
this
case,
it's
Road
plan
approval.
There
is
no
site
plan
to
build
a
road,
and
that's
really
the
only
thing
that
this
line
item
on
the
agenda
is
requesting.
I.
F
AB
H
F
F
As
J.R
noted
before,
there
are
conceptual
Road
plans
that,
with
stormwater
management,
it
has
to
be
done
in
three
steps,
whether
it's
Road
plans
or
site
development,
and
so
formal
Road
plans
have
not
been
submitted.
That
I'm,
aware
of
Colleen
would
be
a
reviewer
on
those
as
the
environmental,
planner
and
development
review.
F
So
to
answer
your
question:
I've
not
seen
a
formal
Road
plan
design
at
this
point,
they're
simply
asking
to
be
able
to
retrieve
dirt
before
that
road
design
is
approved.
That's
not
saying
that
that
site,
plan
subdivision
or
Road
plans
don't
have
to
be
done.
It's
simply
saying
if
you
meet
certain
criteria
in
the
Town,
Center
ordinance
and
John
spoke
to
the
one
that
they're
requesting
and
that
we've
put
in
the
the
memo
that
they
can
move
forward
with
a
permit
before
they
have
Road
plan
approval.
They
still
need
to
get
Road
plan
approval.
M
D
F
No
one
can
remove
any
dirt
of
this
size
without
a
grading
permit
anytime
you're
moving.
Is
it
100
cubic
yards
or
500
5
000
square
feet
of
dirt?
You
have
to
get
a
grading
permit,
that's
required
by
the
state
of
Maryland
sediment
range
control,
all
that
good
stuff
they're,
simply
asking
to
be
able
to
do
that
before
they
have.
In
this
case,
Road
plan
engineering,
approval,
Road
engineering
plan
approval
and
that's
not
just
by
engineering.
There
are
several
agencies
that
review
Road
engineering
plans,
similar
to
a
site
plan
that
comes
before
you.
F
It's
engineering
plans
for
that
road.
It
includes
storm
water
set,
emerge
controls
they
have
to
address
environmental
features.
Of
course
you
know
transportation,
and
should
the
road
go
there
in
the
first
place
comes
up
before
you
know
we're
looking
at
that
level
of
detail,
but
they're
just
simply
asking
to
be
able
to
get
that
grading.
Permit
application
submitted
before
final
Road
plan
engineering
plan
approval
does.
D
G
D
T
T
T
Yeah,
it's
not
going
to
be
you're,
not
going
to
see
a
big
hole.
Okay
and
like
they
said.
The
point
of
this
is
it's
kind
of
an
odd
situation,
and
you
all
probably
don't
see
this
much
because
it's
a
road
right
that
needs
a
grading
permit
for
us
to
go
in
and
grade
before
any
subdivision
approval,
because
this
kind
of
isn't
tied
to
a
subdivision
right
now
it
was
tied
to
a
subdivision
what
was
Magnolia
Landing,
but
that's
been
since
I
believe
abandoned.
T
So
at
that
point
in
time,
when
that
writer
was
created,
it
was
tied
to
a
subdivision
and
it
had
approval,
but
that
approval
was
no
more
so
now
we
have
it
right
away
that
the
county
owns
and
we
would
like
to
go
in
and
remove
soil
from
it.
So
we
can
use
for
other
projects,
but
the
Town
Center
ordinance
says
we
can't
do
that
without
your
permission,
because
we
don't
have
an
approved
site
plan
or
subdivision
here
we
are.
Y
Sure
to
what
J.R
said.
Sorry,
there
is
a
storm
water
management
feature
at
the
top
of
the
plan.
That's
on
the
screen,
so
it's
not
like
they're
going
to
leave
a
big
pit.
That's
going
to
be
mud!
It,
like
he
said,
will
be
it's
almost
like
the
the
first
step.
They
would
do
to
build
the
road
anyway.
It's
just
we're
going
to
take
the
dirt,
we'll
come
back
to
building
the
road
when
they
get
me
the
plans
to
review
and
we
come
back
to
building
the
road.
Well,.
F
J
F
F
A
AB
P
A
J
G
A
A
little
bit
of
background,
the
county
is
currently
reviewing
plans
for
two
proposed
residential
development
projects
to
be
located
on
the
south
side
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
between
dares
Beach
Road
and
existing
Chesapeake
Boulevard.
This
section
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
is
currently
unbuilt,
except
for
a
small
segment
that
extends
off
of
there's
Beach
Road
that
serves
as
an
interest
to
Calvert
High
School.
The
proposed
residential
development
projects
are
known
as
Magnolia
Ridge.
A
A
Both
projects
are
under
the
same
ownership
and
being
designed
by
Barrett
and
Associates
LLC.
The
adopted
Prince
Frederick
zoning
ordinance
chapter
2,
travel
ways.
Zoning
zoning
ordinance,
3
section
3,
includes
an
illustration
with
the
subcaption
approved
Road
system
map,
as
amended
by
Saj,
to
include
future
overpasses.
If
you
see
the
attached
page
to
the
memo
based
upon
the
layout
one
option
for
the
Loop
Road
alignment
includes
extending
Chesapeake
Boulevard
South
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
to
dares
Beach
Road.
The
design
and
construction
of
Chesapeake
Boulevard
South,
however,
would
be
difficult
says.
A
Another
option
for
the
Loop
Road
alignment
would
be
the
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
to
dares
Beach
Road
as
currently
platted.
This
option
would
bring
Fox
Run
Boulevard
in
alignment
with
the
intersection
of
dare's
Beach
Road
at
Fairground
Road
on
behalf
of
their
client,
Barrett
and
Associates
is
Seeking
a
determination
from
the
Planning
Commission
that
the
second
option,
the
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
to
dares
be
trade
at
the
intersection
with
Fairground
Road
best
realizes
the
intent
and
goals
as
set
forth
in
the
County's
comprehensive
plan.
A
Prince
Frederick
master
plan
and
Zoning
coordinates
and
the
2040
Transportation
plan
staff
recommendations
and
outlined
in
this
under
discussions
are
the
actual
requirements
and
that
are
stated
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
Prince
Frederick
master
plan
and
zoning
ordinance
and
the
transportation
plan,
so
staff
recommendations
on
this
would
be.
Staff
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
review
and
consider
the
proposed
requests
for
intent
and
consistency
with
the
2019
comprehensive
plan,
Prince
Frederick
master
plan
and
zoning
ordinance
and
the
2040
Transportation
plan.
AC
Thank
you,
Miss
Wallace
good
evening,
commissioner
staff
I
can't
figure
out
whether
or
not
I
got
a
good
setup
with
the
last
one
or
all.
The
Thunder
was
stolen
out
from
underneath
me,
but
you
know
we're
here
to
discuss
what
is
the
Eastern
Loop
Road
through
Prince
Frederick
and
its
consistency
with
the
zoning
orange
master
plan
and
transportation
plans?
A
AC
So
we
are
here
to
solicit
the
planning
commission's.
You
know,
interpretation
of
whether
or
not
this
proposal
of
completing
Fox
Run
Boulevard
is
consistent
with
the
Loop
Road
expansion
on
the
east
side
of
Prince
Frederick,
everyone's
familiar
with
Prince
Rudder,
Boulevard,
being
the
West
Loop
Road,
and
its
intention.
There
is
to
basically
alleviate
traffic
off
of
two
and
four
and
provide
ways
for
people
to
get
around
town
without
having
to
use
the
main
thoroughfares.
AC
So
the
bullets
that
you're
seeing
on
this
slot
are
actually
direct
quotes
from
the
master
plan
and
zoning
ordinance,
and
it
basically
is
the
goals
and
what
it
is
intended
to
be:
the
Eastern
Loop
Road
here
and
and
actually
both
Loop
roads,
but
particularly
the
Eastern
leap
Road
with
the
master
plan.
It
was
actually
I,
guess
envisioned
at
one
time,
but
that
extension
would
actually
be
Armory
Road,
extending
All
the
Way
North
and
providing
access
to
the
hospital.
AC
Some
of
the
key
points
here
is
that
you
know
the
idea
of
that
you're
protecting
environmentally
sensitive
areas,
in
that
it
was
a
general
concept
right
is
that
there
wasn't
detailed
engineering
plans
that
went
along
with
it
and
that
it
really
needed
to
be
consistent
with
right.
It
didn't
spell
out
this
has
to
be
the
alignment
it
just
wanted
it
to
be
consistent
with
the
intent
of
of
the
alignment.
AC
So
each
of
the
individual
sides
that
go
on
from
there
we
kind
of
looked
at
those
main
points
and
whether
or
not
the
proposals
that
were
within
the
master
plan
or
within
the
transportation
plans
met
those.
So
the
first
is
yes,
it's
absolutely
extending
Armory
road.
All
the
way
through
the
shopping
center
would
provide
access
to
the
hospital
kind
of
takes
me
back
to
we
presented
Lusby
Parkway,
commissioner
Tui,
and
you
said
that
it
went
right
through
the
middle
of
the
produce
section.
AC
I,
don't
think
it
really
makes
sense
to
go
through
the
middle
of
a
shopping
center
to
provide
that
access.
So
it
does
retains
trees
and
stream
valleys
and
sensitive
steep
slopes,
because
you're
going
over
existing
paved
areas,
but
it
doesn't
really
kind
of
align
with
what
you
would
think.
A
detailed
engineering
or
detailed
traffic
study
would
say
as
far
as
it
providing
some
relief
without
creating
more
congestion
in
another
place
of
town.
AC
I
I
believe,
is
when
the
master
plan
and
zoning
ordinance
were
adopted,
as
Calvert
Middle
School
was
still
there
on
the
corner
is
that
the
Town
Center
has
kind
of
changed,
shape
and
Direction
over
that
time,
including
moving
the
middle
school
back
closer
to
the
high
school,
which
was
touched
on
in
the
last
presentation
of
why
the
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard
makes
so
much
sense.
So
you
know
I,
don't
see
this
being
consistent
with
future
development,
it's
actually
taking
it
through
existing
development.
AC
The
2010
Transportation
plan,
which
I
believe
was
adopted
in
1997,
gets
into
these
bullet
points
of
of
what
the
idea
was,
and
it
included
this
map
here,
which
showed
kind
of
an
extension
it's
hard
to
read
but
showed
the
extension
from
the
roundabout,
which
is
at
dares
Beach,
Road
and
Armory
road
now,
through
the
Bargo
property
through
where
the
middle
school
would
be
today
and
then
looping
around
the
hospital
and
connecting
back
to
it.
You
know
the
idea
here
is
that
it,
you
know,
provides
efficient
circulation.
It
protects
the
environment.
AC
AC
We
talked
about
the
new
developments
being
consistent
with
this
I
think
that's
changed
over
time.
I,
don't
think
this
alignment
is
still
consistent
with
that
and
I.
Don't
think
that
this
really
is
the
most
efficient
circulation.
When
you
take
into
account
the
large
nodes
of
traffic
they're
coming
out
of
the
two
schools
themselves,.
AC
AC
This
is
a
overlay
of
the
proposed
alignment
coming
from
the
roundabout
connecting
to
where
Chesapeake
Boulevard
terminates
today
it
goes
right
over
our
stream
and
what
is
also
Wetlands
that
are
there,
there's
also
an
elevation
difference
about
30
or
40
feet
that
you'd
have
to
do
so
when
the
last
presentation
talked
about
the
amount
of
fill
dirt
that
you
would
need
in
order
to
make
this
happen.
That
is
a
very
realistic
thing
for
this
project.
AC
You
would
have
to
generate
so
much
dirt
on
the
order
of
magnitude
of
50
or
60
000
cubic
yards
of
dirt
that
you'd
be
trucking
and
bringing
in
here
to
fill
in
a
wetland
in
a
stream
and
I.
Don't
really
think
that
that
makes
sense
with
this
alignment,
obviously
that
cost
to
bring
in
all
that
dirt
make
that
connection
go
through
environmentally
sensitive
land
is,
is
very
costly,
both
social
and
you
know,
and
economically.
AC
Kind
of
touched
on
all
of
these
again,
you
know
this
is
a
map
that
overlays
the
road
alignment
with
steep
slopes.
It's
going
through,
probably
one
of
the
most
sensitive
areas
through
the
side
of
Prince
Frederick.
As
far
as
the
slopes
and
the
and
the
natural
wetlands
in
stream
that
are
there
and
I,
don't
really
believe
at
any
point.
This
is
really
looked
at
from
an
engineering
study.
AC
As
far
as
the
alignment
that
we
talked
about,
the
vertical
elevation
difference
that
you
have
to
make
up
and
the
quantity
of
dirt
that
it
would
take,
is
just
something
that
you
would
normally
stay
away
from
with
an
engineering
study,
so
the
2020
Transportation
plan
I'd.
You
know
that
that's
actually
incorrect.
It's
the
2040,
it's
the
projection
out
through
2040
that
they're
working
on
right
now
or
that
was
actually
adopted.
Is
that
correct
Miss?
Wallace?
Yes,
thank
you.
So
you
know
again.
AC
AC
So
you
know
trying
to
make
this
connection
as
soon
as
possible
to
provide
that
benefit
between
traveling,
between
schools
and
taking
off
pressure
off
the
dares
Beach
intersection
there
I
think
is,
is
pretty
important
and
that
was
noted
in
the
transportation
plan
and
really
got
into.
You
know
why
this
should
be
done
is
as
part
of
this
project
it
does.
AC
You
know
the
proposal
that
is
in
the
2040
Transportation
plan
does
extend
the
the
Loop
Road
along,
as
the
alignment
is
that
you're,
seeing
here
that
provides
the
connectivity
from
the
heart
of
Prince
Frederick
here
up
to
the
hospital.
At
some
point
it
it
does,
retain
those
trees
and
those
steep
slopes.
Those
events
that
have
been
you
know
the
environmentally
sensitive
areas
that
are
there
on
the
Bargo
property,
and
it
is
consistent
with
the
development
that's
been
going
on
in
Prince
Frederick,
both
already
that's
been
completed
and
what
is
also
proposed.
AC
AC
This
is
the
actual
comes
from
the
transfer,
2040
Transportation
plan
or
the
Master
Plan
update
the
draft
master
plan.
Okay.
So
this
already
shows
what
the
vision
is
with
the
next
Amendment
of
the
master
plan.
So
there
are
proposals
you
know
we
believe
is
consistent
with
the
key
points
of
the
current
master
plan
and
the
transportation
plan,
as
well
as
the
upcoming
Master
Plan
update,
we're
just
out
in
front
of
the
ball
a
little
bit
here
with
the
request
to
to
complete
this
connection,
and
that
is
it.
H
AC
AC
C
W
W
There's
a
lot
of
elevation
change
in
there
I,
don't
know
how
you
do
that
without
affecting
that
Headwater
to
Hunting
Creek
and
two
segment.
Two
there
also
crosses
a
fairly
significant
ravine.
I
tried
it
once
I,
don't
recommend
it.
It's
difficult,
I,
don't
know
that
you
would
fill
it
in
with
dirt
or
have
a
bridge
or
what
you
would
have,
but
it's
not
not
as
simple
as
it
looks.
I
just
want
you
all
to
consider
that
thank.
AA
So
this
is
just
basically
we're
just
dealing
with
four
here
on
this
screen,
so
it's
got
nothing
to
do
with
three
or
two
I
understand
Bob's
comments
and
surely
agree
with
him.
100,
that's!
Actually
the
road
if
it
ever
is
built,
is,
is
much
more
environmentally
sensitive.
This
this
portion,
even
building
the
section
we're
talking
about
still
alleviates
a
great
amount
of
traffic
off
of
the
mid
Prince
Frederick
Terrace
Beach,
intersection,
Route
4
light
school
bus
is
not
entering
Route
40
back
on
so
they're,
just
you're
completely
separate
I
agree.
AA
There's
other
pieces
that,
just
because
they're
drawn
on
a
map,
that's
kind
of
what
happened.
That's
why
we're
here?
It
was
a
pencil
sketch
from
1997
that
showed
roads
going
anywhere
and
took
none
of
that
into
consideration,
including
the
environment
and
and
there's
someone
one
that
absolutely
should
never
get
billed
just
for
environmental
reasons.
If
nothing
else
so
yeah
I
agree
with
him
on
on
three
and
two.
Z
That
is
I'm
sorry,
David,
Berry,
Breezy
Point
speaking
for
myself,
I
get
the
school
bus
argument
and
it's
a
powerful
one
to
try
and
keep
those
maximum
extent
possible
route
2-4
as
far
as
overall
traffic
abatement.
The
issue,
then,
is
once
these
large
residential
developments
go
in
with
the
amount
of
additional
traffic
that
they
generate.
Is
there
a
net
increase
or
decrease?
Even
if
this
extension
is
is
built?
Z
AA
Yeah,
the
traffic
impact
Studies
have
been
done
and
and
have
been
reviewed
by
DPW.
The
project
shows
you
know
no
issues.
Even
before
we
put
route
the
number
four
in
we
would
be
okay
to
move
forward.
We
could
have
designed
our
project
with
two
alternative
accesses.
I
could
have
gone
routes,
Army
Road
and
not
done
anything.
We're
doing
this
for
what
we
think
is
the
overall
betterment
for
the
community
as
a
whole
that
we
have
a
better
location
for
this.
Connecting
Road
we're,
building
a
peace,
deck
Road,
we're
paying.
AA
And
actually
we're
working
out
another
you
know
agreement
with
the
county
that
will
be
paying
per
portion
of
the
vote
as
well.
So
so
we
could
have
gone
a
different
route,
not
even
gotten
this
deep
into
the
process.
So
we've
it's
not
we're
coming
here,
as
we've
been
working
with
staff
and
county
for
two
years
on
this.
It's
it's.
This
isn't
because
that
old
stick
drawing
was
in
was
in
the
current
zoning
orange
circumference
plan,
zoning
ordinance
that
stick
drop
from
the
from
the
old
Transportation
plan.
That's
no
longer
the
current
Transportation
plan.
AA
That's
why
we
had
to
get
your
blessing
to
move
forward
with
you
know.
Mary
Beth
wanted
that
that
blessing
from
you
to
move
forward
the
in
the
new
Transportation
plan,
it
doesn't
even
show
the
Chesapeake
Boulevard
extension
anymore.
It
shows
the
fact
from
the
board.
I
think
everybody's
come
to
consensus
with
all
of
Staff
DPW,
Planning
and
Zoning
everywhere
within
the
county,
that
it
makes
much
more
economical
sense
for
everybody
involved,
but
definitely
the
county
to
make
that
connection
and
I
think
I
would
add
the
school
bus.
I
would
add
anybody
lives
on
daresby's
road.
AA
AA
Traffic
sellers
are
done.
That's
that
that's
not
required
and
you're
going
to
get
you're
going
to
get
traffic
now
going
both
ways:
you're
going
to
get
you're
going
to
get
a
distribution
of
traffic
that
you're
not
going
to
get
if
they.
If
we
did
go
to
Army
road,
which
we
could
and
could
have
gone
out
by
the
high
school,
we
could
have
had
those
two
accesses
and
that
would
have
met
well,
then
you
have
a
lot
more.
You
know
funneling
into
less
area.
AA
You
know
everybody's,
you
know
with
people
going
out
and
making
that
left
on
Fox
Run
Boulevard
with
the
driver
studies
it
actually
helps
improve
the
entire
situation.
Even
the
high
school
area
will
improve
because
not
everybody's
coming
from
dares
Beach.
Some
people
are
coming
from
Fox
from
Boulevard,
so
you
know
just
from
my
experience
as
a
citizen,
not
as
a
developer.
You
know
that
it
is
going
to
be
a
very
beneficial
piece
of
road
for
the
county,
as
we
saw
some
of
the
other
little
pieces
that
got
added
on
the
on
the
west
side.
C
AD
I
would
I'm
Leonard
Souza
I'm
a
director
with
Calvert
Citizens,
United
and
I'd
like
to
make
a
comment
about
the
statement
that
was
just
made
that
a
traffic
study
was
done
between
2016
and
2020.
Calvert
County
grew
by
a
large
number
of
residences
in
the
county.
There
was
a
real
surge
of
residential
growth.
During
that
point,
the
last
study
that
was
done
on
the
highways
was
done
in
2017,
as
the
consultant
testified
several
weeks
ago.
I
don't
know
whether
he
became
whether
he
came
before
you
all,
but
he
certainly
came
before
the
boccc.
AD
So
any
study
that
is
relying
on
previous
studies
is
going
to
be
flawed
simply
because
there
was
population
growth
in
the
county
that
is
resulting
in
an
increased
level
of
Highway
congestion.
I
suggest
that
that
be
kept
in
mind
and
that
we
can't
rely
on
previously
done
studies
until
a
new
one
is
done
to
see
what
the
latest
level
of
congestion
is.
AD
D
D
AD
Sir,
you
can
you
can
you
can
rely
on
the
U.S
census
numbers
if
you
want,
or
you
can
rely
on
the
county
data
as
to
the
number
of
residences
approved,
I'm
I've
got
is
I,
don't
have
it
with
me,
but
I
can
come
up
with
the
proof
to
show
you
what
the
number
of
new
residences
approved
in
the
county
between
2016
and
2020
was,
and
that's
at
a
much
higher
rate
than
what
your
annual
plan
projected.
This
body
has
not
been
observing
your
own
plan.
AD
I
have
never
heard
anybody
during
any
of
these
hearings
say:
oh,
these
are
the.
These.
Are
the
developments
that
we're
looking
to?
How
does
that
comply
with
what
the
County's
plan
was
when
it
was
set
in
2014
you're,
going
to
be
reaching
the
number
of
residences
in
the
county
in
the
next
year
or
two
that
you
were?
You
would
set
initially
to
be
reached
in
2040.,
so
that
is
the
rate
of
growth
that
I'm
looking
at
and
that's
based
on
County
data.
AC
AC
Well
we're
here
today
to
ask
is:
is
basically
is
the
completion
of
Fox
Run
Boulevard,
and
this
easterly
Loop
Road
the
mo
the
the
best
way
to
realize
the
goals
of
the
transportation
plan,
as
well
as
the
the
comprehensive
plan
and
the
master
plan,
and
we
believe
it
does
I
mean
it.
It
makes
a
connection
that
alleviates
traffic
off
of
two
and
four
protects
environmentally
sensitive
areas
and
all
the
other
bullet
points
that
we
went
through
with
development
of
the
projects,
which
is
will
be
brought
back
to
you
at
some
point
here
as
well.
C
O
Hi
good
evening
again,
Commissioners
my
name
is
Joseph
Cormier
I
do
want
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
fox
run
extension.
It
is
going
to
help
alleviate
traffic,
not
just
on
a
normal
bus
day,
but
anybody
who
was
trying
to
get
into
Calvert
middle
school
during
the
bus
strike
and
I
hope
we
never
have
one
of
those
again.
It
was
absolutely
a
nightmare
twice
a
day
and
it's
also
going
to
help
alleviate
traffic
coming
out
of
Calvert
High
School
after
the
football
games,
another
large
sporting
events
that
they
have
up
there.
O
C
H
C
C
A
There
is
a
memo
from
Becky
Parkinson
the
background
Planning
Commission.
Regular
meetings
are
primarily
held
on
the
third
Wednesday
of
each
month.
If
a
holiday
falls
within
a
close
or
close
to
the
third
Wednesday
meeting
week,
the
meeting
may
be
rescheduled
accordingly
for
the
year
2023.
Regular
meetings
in
January
through
November
are
proposed
to
be
held
on
the
third
Wednesday
of
each
month.
Staff
recommends
December's
meeting
be
scheduled
on
the
second
Wednesday
due
to
the
holiday
season.
A
If
you
see
the
attached
proposed
list.
As
of
this
writing,
meetings
will
be
held
hybrid
unless
otherwise
designated
in
person
at
901
dares
Beach,
Road,
Prince
Frederick
via
Zoom.
If
participating
see
individual
agenda,
the
live
stream
viewing
will
be
held
via
the
County
website
on
meetings
on
demand.
C
A
A
Next
on
the
agenda
is
item
10,
which
is
public
comment.
At
this
time
we
will
open
the
meeting
up
for
public
comment.
According
to
the
Calvert
County
ordinance
number
5121,
the
Planning
Commission
chair
will
first
request
comments
from
the
attending
in
person
and
then
from
those
attending
virtually
speakers,
whether
in
person
or
participating
by
phone
or
virtually
will
be
limited
to
two
minutes
as
individuals
and
five
minutes.
If
they
rep
are
designated
to
represent
a
group
or
organization.
C
O
Good
evening,
one
more
time,
Commissioners
and
staff
I
just
want
to
thank
all
the
staff
that
worked
on
these
presentations
this
evening.
We
really
do
have
the
best
staff
here
in
Calvert,
County
I
appreciate
everyone
being
available
for
questions
through
social
media
and
when
I
call
up
there.
It
really
is
a
great
democracy
and
action
to
to
have
this
work.
O
I
just
want
to
remember,
remind
everyone
to
register,
to
vote
and
get
your
vote
in
and
Friday
at
the
Harry
Elizabeth
Brown
Center
we're
going
to
be
having
a
community
resource
fair
for
special
education,
and
we
hope
everybody
stops
by
10
a.m,
to
2
p.m.
Thank
you
so
much
and
have
a
good
evening.
Thank.