►
From YouTube: Greater Cambridge Local Plan Webinar on Spatial Strategy
Description
Our third webinar looks at the spatial strategy used in the Greater Cambridge Local Plan, which you can comment on until 13 December https://www.greatercambridgeplanning.org/localplan
A
Welcome
to
you
all,
and
thanks
for
coming
along,
it's
really
good
to
have
you
here,
welcome
back
to
those
who
have
already
been
to
one
of
the
two
of
the
sessions
before
or
had
some
of
these
previously
with
other
other
plans
and
welcome
to
all
of
the
people
who
are
new
and
we
hope
to
run
a
good
session
for
you
today.
We've
got
a
good
panel
here
to
discuss
some
of
the
issues.
A
What
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
introduce
them
and
I'm
going
to
go
to
each
one
of
them
one
by
one
and
let
them
introduce
themselves
and
then
we'll
have
a
quick
catch
up
on
the
session
and
then
we'll
head
straight
into
the
slides.
We've
got
a
couple
of
interactive
slides
as
well,
for
you
all,
there's
a
q,
a
chat
which
you
can
which
you
can
use.
There
isn't
a
chat
function.
It's
just
q
and
a's
and
you'll
have
a
chance
to
engage
in
some
of
the
interactive
sessions
too.
B
A
Good
morning,
stuart
or
good
afternoon,
should
I
say
nice
to
have
you
here
too,
and
we've
got.
We've
got,
will
smeaton
and
tim
cliff,
who
are
running
all
of
our
technical
zoom
pieces
in
the
background,
so
thanks
to
them
for
being
here
this
morning,
my
name's
paul
branham
and
I'm
the
assistant
director
for
strategy
and
economy
in
the
planning
service.
A
It
might
be
just
my
spelling
is
bad
and
and
then
we'll
have
one
of
the
interactive
sessions
and
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
strategy
overview
and
go
through
the
sites
and
then
we'll
have
a
little
wrap
up
in
interactive
session.
And
then
there
will
be
15
minutes
around
50
minutes
at
the
end
for
a
focused
panel
q
a
but
I
would
say
to
you
all.
A
B
So
if
you
came
to
our
session
yesterday
about
jobs
and
homes,
you
would
have
heard
us
talk
through
how
we
got
to
these
numbers
and
that
webinar
will
be
up
on
our
website
for
anyone.
That's
particularly
interested
in
in
that
aspect
of
our
our
first
proposals,
but
our
evidence
shows
that
we
need
to
plan
for
maybe
44
and
a
half
thousand
homes
and
58
and
a
half
thousand
new
jobs.
B
B
B
B
So
in
developing
the
strategy
we
published
some
evidence
in
the
autumn
last
year,
which
some
of
you
may
have
seen
where
we
were
looking
at
a
number
of
strategic
spatial
options,
so
not
site
specific.
At
this
point,
but
in
broad
terms,
where
could
we
focus
development
to
meet
those
those
needs
that
we've
identified
and
we
looked
at
eight
different
spatial
options,
ranging
from
densification
of
of
cambridge
to
using
land
on
the
edge
of
cambridge,
but
not
in
the
green
belt,
which
is
primarily
cambridge
airport
edge
of
cambridge
in
the
green
belt?
Greenbelt?
B
Obviously,
a
really
important
national
planning
policy,
but
it
also
requires
us
to,
as
we
prepare
our
plans
to
look
at
the
sustainability
impact
of
our
greenbelt.
We
looked
at
the
role
of
new
settlements
might
play.
We
looked
at
the
role
of
disbursing
development
to
villages
and
then
some
blended
strategies
that
would
focus
on
putting
development
on
public
transport
corridors.
B
Should
we
look
at
focusing
in
the
southern
area
where
there
are
a
particular
number
of
jobs
already,
and
what
about
a
western
cluster?
Recognising
that
east
west
rail
is
proposed
to
come
with
a
new
station
and
really
make
a
big
difference
in
the
quality
of
public
transport
in
in
that
part
of
the
area,
so.
B
B
The
critical
findings
from
our
evidence,
related
to
choosing
related
to
choosing
our
strategy
were
that
location
is
the
single
biggest
factor
in
impacts
on
our
climate
emissions.
So
we
can
do
a
certain
amount
through
the
way
we
design
and
build
our
homes
and
community
facilities
and
employment
and
so
on,
but
where
we
locate
sites
and
minimising
use
as
a
car.
B
B
B
Those
sites
were
were
assessed
against
our
aims
and
the
emerging
preferred
strategy
following
that
initial
assessment
and
that
narrowed
down
the
numbers
to
around
107
173
sites
that
we
tested
through
our
sustainability
appraisal
process,
and
that
told
us
how
sites
perform
against
the
three
aspects
of
sustainability.
So
the
environmental,
economic
and
social
aspects
of
sustainability.
A
D
A
It
does
come
up
on
the
next
side,
so
there
is
a
number
that
you
need
to
put
in
when
you
get
to
mendy
and
you
can
you
can
get
to
the
question
so
we'll
run
it
now
I'll
go
to
the
next
slide
because
it
actually
should
have
the
number
on
there
is.
Is
that
number
coming
up?
Sorry,
it's
from
up
in
the
panel
is
that
the
number
coming
up
got
a
nod
from
stuart.
A
So
that's
great,
so
I
think
you
can
put
up
to
sort
of
five
five
five
words
in
here,
but
what
we'd
really
like
to
ask
you,
I
suppose,
is
what
factors
you
feel
we
should
choose
to
take
into
account
when
we're
when
we're
trying
to
select
those
those
sites
that
are
to
be
developed-
and
I
didn't
say
that
very
well
didn't
say
as
well
as
the
question
came
across
and
you
should
be
able
to
see
when
you
go
to
the
mentee
board.
You
should
actually
have
to
see
that
picture
in
full.
A
I
didn't
realize
this
until
yesterday.
It's
quite
good
when
you
look
at
it
on
your
phone
and
where
you
look
at
it
on
the
laptop
and
you
can.
You
know,
give
us
some
of
your
thoughts
about
the
factors
that
you
think
are
really
important.
When
choosing
you
know
the
sites,
because
this
is
obviously
the
underpinning
part
of
our
plan,
and
so
I'm
not
seeing
any
come
through
yeah,
I'm
hoping
that
people
can
get
through.
A
Oh
look,
yeah
we've
got
something
to
start
to
come
through
now,
a
big
one
is
definitely
transport
and
obviously,
as
you'll
know,
that
if
you've
seen
that
the
our
our
greater
cambridge
local
plan
infographic
tree,
you
can
see
the
four
themes
that
are
really
underpinned
by.
You
know
the
houses,
the
jobs
and
the
infrastructure
and
transport
such
a
critical
part
of
that.
That
piece
is
not
the
only
part
of
infrastructure,
but
certainly
it
is
definitely
something
that
you
know.
A
C
A
Okay,
my
apologies.
Yes,
so
if
the
the
numbers
showing
now
and
just
use
the
website
and
the
number
and
apologies
if
that
was
the
wrong
code
and
bear
with
us
with
the
new,
the
new
tech
that
we're
using,
we
are
trying
to
mix
it
up
a
little
bit.
This
is
still
a
little
bit
new
to
us,
so
lots
coming
through
now,
which
is
great
yeah,
lowe's
flood
devices
and
obviously
yeah
I
mentioned
you
know
I
think
a
couple
of
previous
slides
ago.
You
know
a
lot
of
our
strategy.
A
You
know
all
of
our
strategy
will
need
to
be
tested
against
in
the
sustainability
appraisal,
against
those
environmental,
economic
and
social
factors
that
make
up
the
sustainability
appraisals.
So,
yes,
all
of
these
things
are
hugely
important
and
something
around
wild
space.
Here
you
know,
and
we
have
got
a
reasonably
comprehensive.
I
said
recently,
I'm
doing
it
in
justice,
comprehensive
green
infrastructure
study
and
actually
the
session.
I
think
in
two
weeks
time
the
last
about
our
webinar
sessions
goes
into
quite
a
lot
of
detail
around
the
green
infrastructure
and
we've
got
stuart
here.
D
Well,
I
just
I
guess,
a
taste
of
one
of
the
next
slides
but
yeah.
It's
been
a
key
component
of
considering
both
where
development
should
go,
but
also
where
new,
green
infrastructure
and
nature
sites
might
go,
and
so
that's
been
entirely
developed
in
parallel,
alongside
considering
sites
of
development,
you
might
remember
we
did
a
call
for
green
space
sites,
so
it
definitely
is
a
priority
and
for
this
lifetime
we'll
show
you
the
kind
of
overview
of
where
we've
got
to
with
that
work.
A
So
it's
a
quite
detailed
and
in-depth
process,
and
but
you
know
we
have
committed
to
build
on
the
themes
that
we
started
to
plan
with,
and
you
know
you're
picking
up
on
quite
a
lot
of
those
things
as
it
is,
and
so
we
are
taking
a
lot
of
this
away
as
well
feeding
it
into
the
consultation.
But
obviously
you
know
part
of
these
webinars
is
really
to
get.
A
You
know
to
give
you
a
feel
for
how
we
put
the
plan
together,
but
allow
you
to
you
know
to
understand
how
best
to
comment
and
how
best
to
get
involved
and
put
those
detailed
comments
into
the
consultation,
and
you
know
we'll
you
know
remind
you
how
to
get
involved
and
participate
in
either
either
the
short
survey.
We've
got
a
very
short
survey
that
you
can
get
involved
in
and
do
anonymously
or
actually
you
know
if
you
want
to
put
in
longer
comments
and
much
more
detailed
comments.
A
You
know
there
is
capacity
for
that
and
we
do
welcome
those.
You
know
with
good
rationale
about
some
of
these
things.
We
have
got
another
quick
mentee
to
do.
I
think,
just
just
before
we
go
the
next
session.
Stuart
was
talking
about
and
you've
seen
this
slide.
Previously,
caroline
mentioned
it,
and
this
is,
you
know
this
is
the
science
that
we
were
looking
at.
A
This
is
these
are
the
eight
sites
that
we,
the
eight
types
of
strategies
that
we
looked
at
and
what
we
want
to
do
now
really
quickly
is
from
our
own
perspective,
is
rank
your
own
preferences
on
those
sites
and
just
to
for
us
to
get
a
feel
how
you
all
see
this.
I
know
we've
only
got
40
people
here
today,
I'm
hoping
that
we
will
share
this
webinar
much
more
widely
and
maybe
get
some
other
views
back
and
so
it'd
be
good
to
see.
A
Actually,
we've
taken
over
on
public
transport
quality
corridors
now,
so
you
know
that
focus
on
densification
and
public
transport
is
is
obviously
very
important
because
of
the
sustainability
piece.
Any
thoughts
on
that
from
the
panel
starting
to
see
those
changes.
I
do
like
these.
Actually
it's
interesting
to
see
people's
views.
D
I
guess
one
thought
is,
I
think
one
of
the
points
caroline
raised
was
that
one
of
the
critical
evidence
findings
was
that
it
wasn't
deliverable
to
put
all
the
development
in
any
one
of
these
places,
which
is
where
we've
ended
up
with
the
blended
strategy
and
in
terms
of
sustainability.
Certainly
identification
and
focusing
on
the
cambridge
urban
area
came
out
top,
particularly
in
terms
of
transport.
D
So
if
there
was
all
the
space
in
the
world
that
probably
be
where
you
would
end
up,
but
noting
that
you
can
straighten
up
well,
there
isn't
clearly
there
isn't
enough
land
there
to
do
that.
That's
that's
where
you
end
up
looking
to
other
places.
Another
point
interesting,
actually
green
belt
down
the
bottom.
I
remember
from
the
first
conversation
that
was
a
controversial
one.
A
Yeah
absolutely
stuart.
It's
really
there's
interesting
of
polarizing
conversations
within
planning,
but
that
is
absolutely
one
of
them
and
the
other
thing
that
I
would
note
around
certainly
around
that
densification,
which
is
from
a
trend
their
transport
pieces.
But
you
know
from
some
of
the
climate
work
we're
doing
around
reaching
zero
carbon,
which
we
have
got
another
session
on
that
next
week,
a
full
session
on
that
that
piece.
A
You
know
again
those
those
two
are
coming
out
much
much
more
strongly
in
terms
of
the
strategy,
and
you
know,
underpins
our
our
commitment
really
to
ensuring
that
this
is
a
sustainable
plan
and
delivers
on
their
zero
aspirations
as
well.
Is
there
any
other
thoughts
before
we
move
on
to
the
rest
of
the
slides
from
the
panel.
B
Yeah,
the
other
thing
I
was
going
to
just
highlight
is
that
our
transport
evidence
said
that
most
of
these
options-
you
you
could
deliver
in
in
some
shape
or
form,
but
they
have
very
different
performances
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
trips
that
would
be
made
by
by
non-car
modes.
But
the
one
option
they
said
was
wouldn't
be
possible
to
deliver.
All
our
needs
would
be
dispersal
to
villages
because
it
just
really
wouldn't
work
in
transport
terms,
so
that
was
quite
interesting.
B
So
we,
you
know
we
have
looked
carefully
at
where
villages
may
be
able
to
play
a
role
where
they
have
that
very
good
public
transport,
which
is
the
one
that's
come
up
ranked
first
on
on
on
the
list
here,
but
generally
dispersabilities
isn't
an
option
for
all
our
development
and
really
isn't.
You
know,
isn't
a
sustainable
way
to
meet
needs.
A
Absolutely
caroline
thanks
for
that.
Okay,
that's
really
useful!
It's
really
nice
to
see
some
of
these
thoughts
coming
through
from
you
as
well
and
break
it
up
a
bit.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
so
moving
on
now.
I
think
I
think
I'm
handing
over
to
stuart
is
that
correct
he's
going
to
do
the
strategy
overview,
fantastic,
stuart
I'll
hand
over
to
you.
D
Thanks
paul,
so
caroline's
talked
about
how
we
developed
this
strategy,
and
this
just
provide
an
overview
of
the
strategy
before
moving
to
the
sites,
so
some
kind
of
key
points
to
bear
in
mind.
So
drawing
on
what
caroline
said
about
the
strategic
options,
the
new
sites
we've
selected
in
line
with
the
aim
of
locating
sites
where
they've
minimized
strips
by
car
and
thereby
carbon
emissions.
D
So
that's
one
to
bear
in
mind.
We
did
also
allocated
sites,
for
particular
employment
needs
in
the
locations
that
met
those
specific
specific
needs
and
we'll
touch
on
those.
When
we
get
to
the
science
point
drawing
on
the
carbon,
only
four
percent
of
homes,
it
says
there
will
be
in
the
villages,
and
so
that
is
quite
a
small
percentage.
I
think
it's
around
three
or
four
hundred
homes
in
total
over
the
planned
period.
D
So
this
is
a
very
small
percentage
of
the
overall
distribution
of
development
and
that
again
kind
of
flows
from
what
caroline
was
saying
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
carbon
terms.
Locating
homes
and
villages
is
the
least
sustainable
thing
that
we
could
be
doing
so
we
have
earned
away
from
that
in
this
plan.
D
One
of
the
questions
people
have
put
in
the
chat
I
can
see
is
well
what
about
that
water
constraint.
It's
very
been
a
big
issue
in
the
news
and
the
first
proposals
plan
puts
it
front
and
center
we're
not
hiding
this
fact
at
all.
It's
really
very
clear
in
the
plan
that
the
delivery
of
the
sites
and
proposals
that
we've
put
forward
are
entirely
contingent
on
that
water
supply
being
adequate
without
causing
further
environmental
harm,
and
we
had
a
whole
slide
on
this
in
the
last
webinar.
D
Measures
are
being
explored
and
a
significant
amount
of
work
by
the
water
companies,
along
with
environment
agency
and
partners,
to
look
at
what
can
be
done
and
to
do
that
as
fast
as
possible.
But
if
we
don't
have
enough
certainty
about
what
supply
we're
willing
to
do
something
about
that
and
review
what
our
proposals
are
in
terms
of
the
phasing
of
sites.
D
D
So
this
diagram
particularly
shows
you
in
terms
of
housing,
the
distribution
of
sites
proposed,
starting
with
the
red
blobs.
You
recognize
northern
water
beach
and
those
are
our
housing.
Delivery.
Studies
suggest
that
more
homes
could
be
delivered
there
faster.
So
there's
not
new
new
sites.
It's
not
any
additional
homes.
It's
just
homes
coming
faster.
Our
evidence
shows
that
they
can
be
delivered
fast
by
2041
and
that
can
make
some
of
the
gap
needed
to
fill
from
our
objectively
assessed
need
for
homes
that
carolina
identified.
D
Secondly,
the
turquoise
blob
at
eddington,
so
the
developers
and
we've
reviewed
this.
We
think
there
could
be
space
for
additional
homes
on
the
addition
on
the
existing
allocated
site
there.
So
there's
no
expansion
of
the
built
footprint,
but
that
more
homes
could
be
delivered
about
a
thousand
homes,
perhaps
by
the
end
of
the
planned
period.
D
You
can
also
be
orange,
see
the
orange
blobs
there's
clearly
a
lot
of
sites
continuing
to
be
built
out
which
were
identified
in
previous
plans,
particularly
on
the
edge
of
cambridge
and
then
campbell
west
and
born
airfield
and
then
in
terms
of
the
purple.
The
proposed
new
site
allocations
to
meet
our
need,
the
key
big
sites
really
in
northeast
cambridge.
You
can
see
there
so
3
900
homes
by
the
end
of
the
planned
period.
D
On
the
edge
of
cambridge,
it
came
with
biomedical
campus
to
support
continued
development
growth
there
of
the
campus
and
then
the
other
big
location
you
may
be
aware
of.
Is
that
kanbon,
which
would
just
identify
as
a
broad
location
for
growth
in
those
specific
sites
right
now,
but
we
see
that
perhaps
2000
homes
might
be
delivered
there
and
jobs
too.
We're
still
working
on
firm
plans
for
what
that
might
look
like
in
the
longer
term,
thanks
paul.
D
D
In
the
first
column,
you
can
see
that
current
survivor
is
very
significant
in
terms
of
the
homes
we've
already
got:
plans
about
37
000
homes
that
faster
build
out
that
north
stone
and
water
beach
gets
you
about
1500
homes
and
a
thousand
at
eddington,
which
then
results
in
about
nine
thousand
homes
that
were
identifying
through
new
allocations,
and
you
can
see
that
split
there
between
the
different
broad
locations.
So
four
thousand
around
cambridge
urban
area
about
three
thousand
or
the
edge
of
cambridge
about
two
thousand
new
segments.
D
That's
for
camborne
and
then
there's
three
to
four
hundreds
in
the
villages.
So
really
small
number
and
you
can
see
at
the
bottom.
There
said
so
having
sifted
through
all
the
sites
in
the
housing
and
employment,
land
availability
assessment
and
considered
the
right
strategy.
We've
identified
only
19
sites
out
of
about
900,
first
identified
through
the
cork
sites
and
other
sources
of
supply
export.
D
So
I've
trailed
agreement
infrastructure
about
three
times
already.
Here's
the
plan
of
what
we're
proposing
and
we
did
a
detailed
evidence
base
working
with
our
consultants
and
various
partners
and
local
groups
to
identify
what's
already
there
in
terms
of
green
and
blue
infrastructure
in
the
water
environment
and
we've
come
up
with
these
areas,
which
so
site
specific
or
area
specific
ones.
So
the
ones
that
you
can
see
there
on
the
map
and
then
a
further
five
of
kind
of
dispersed
initiatives
and
these
the
areas
of
the
area.
D
Specific
ones
tie
in
with
the
proposals
by
wilder
trust.
Cambridge
past
president
future.
In
terms
of
the
cambridge
nature
network,
they
also
tie
in
with
the
local
nature
partnerships
areas,
but
we've
also
particularly
had
an
eye
to
where
new
development
might
go
and
how
does
that
tie
in
so,
for
example,
you
can
see
at
number
six.
D
A
C
So
yeah,
do
you
start
us
off,
so
we're
not
going
to
talk
through
every
single
slide,
but
just
so
that
people
have
an
overview
by
area
of
which
sites
we're
looking
at
in
first
proposals
and
what
the
kind
of
overall
vision
is
and
how
they
fit
into
some
of
those
strategic
questions
that
spirit
and
caroline
have
touched
on.
I'm
going
to
focus
here
on
the
proposed
new
site
allocations,
but
all
of
these
maps
are
on
our
website.
C
You
can
also
go
on
to
the
interactive
map
as
well,
which
is
really
really
useful,
brings
up
lots
of
different
information
about
both
the
proposed
news
sites
and
the
existing
site
allocations
that
we're
carrying
forward
from
previous
plans.
So
if
I'm
not
going
through
every
site
in
detail-
and
you
want
to
know
more-
please
please
do
go
on
there
and
see
so.
The
cambridge
urban
area,
already,
as
you
can
see,
has
quite
a
lot
of
orange
sites.
C
Those
are
the
ones
that
we
are
carrying
forward
from
the
previous
plans
and
there
are
a
range
of
scales
from
the
kind
of
finishing
of
orchard
park
as
a
project.
That
was
a
kind
of
really
significant
extension
to
the
city
in
previous
plans
through
to
smaller
sides.
This
time
around,
we've
got
the
major
urban
sizes,
of
course,
northeast
cambridge,
which
many
of
you
will
know
a
lot
about
already,
because
we've
been
developing
an
area
action
plan
for
that
for
some
time
now.
C
That's
obviously,
a
key
brownfield
site
has
a
really
great
public
transport
connection,
so
it
really
takes
a
lot
of
those
boxes
around
minimizing
car
use,
really
lowering
our
carbon
emissions
and
and
making
best
use
of
previously
developed
man
brownfield
land
rather
than
having
to
send
development
kind
of
sprawling
out
into
the
rural
areas
or
the
green
belt.
So
that's
it
that's
a
key
one.
Then
there's
also
a
couple
of
smaller
sites.
There's
some
landslide
problems
lanes.
C
So
we
already
identified
an
area
of
major
change
around
this
area
and
there's
now
a
specific
site
allocation
that
we're
proposing
in
there
and
then
there's
a
very
small
site,
almost
impossible
to
pick
out
on
this
map.
But
it
is
the
garages
between
samathi
street
and
the
blue
moon
pub
in
cambridge
and
that's
a
small
housing
site
there,
but
I
think
it
is
worth
pointing
out
on
this
map
that
there
are
these
other
opportunity
areas,
because,
of
course,
the
city
is
a
place
of
regeneration
and
reuseless
land
as
well.
C
So
the
opportunity
areas
in
the
areas
of
major
change
really
are
us
saying
here
are
some
locations
where
we
see
different
forces
at
play
over
the
next
20
years,
20
30
years
and
the
opportunity
for
redevelopment
in
a
coordinated,
comprehensive
fashion,
to
come
forward
here,
and
we
think
we
should
put
some
policy
guidance
in
place
so
that
when
those
owners
on
those
sites
and
those
those
developers
look
at
them,
they're
not
just
doing
piecemeal
development,
they're,
actually
adding
up
something.
That's
really
significant.
C
That
makes
a
big
difference
to
how
those
sites
work,
so,
whether
it's
along
the
road,
whether
it's
down
one
near
the
station,
whether
it's
you
know
some
of
the
the
retail
parks
and
so
forth,
where
we
know
that
retail
habits
are
going
to
be
changing
a
lot.
We
want
to
see
those
when
they
do
come
forward
developed
in
line
with
a
vision
that
we
are
setting
with
some
aspirations
that
we
are
setting
here.
C
What
we're
looking
at
so
the
edge
of
cambridge
again
really
interesting
here,
and
how
do
we
create
development
that
is
of
a
significant
enough
kind
of
density
and
scale
to
create
real
new
neighborhoods
here,
but
also
mediates
that
junction
to
the
countryside
provides
a
really
good
edge
to
the
green
space
and
greenbelt
beyond
and
make
the
most
of
those
links
that
stuart
was
talking
about.
How
do
we
actually
link
out
to
the
countryside
to
our
amazing
natural
spaces
and
make
them
part
of
the
pacemaking
vision?
C
So
if
I
could
have
the
next
one
clearly,
the
really
big
one
here
as
most
people
are
aware,
is
of
course
cambridge
east.
So
there's
been
some
development
on
the
fringes
of
the
marshals,
airport
site
mali
and
down
north
of
cherry
hinton.
That
was
already
identified,
but
cambridge
east
is
somewhere
where
we
now
have
confidence
that
that
will
come
forward
in
the
planned
period
and
we
can
start
really
putting
in
place
a
robust
policy
framework
for
what
kind
of
new
neighborhoods
that's
going
to
create
over
this
20
to
30-year
time
horizon.
C
So
the
numbers
that
you
may
see
in
the
policies
because
we
have
to
show
the
numbers
from
2020
to
2041
are
potentially
just
some
of
the
total
amount
of
development
that
could
come
forward
because
they
take
a
really
long
time.
If
you
look
at
nordstrom
and
water
beach
newtown
as
examples
from
previous
plans,
you
know
they're
still
building
out
through
this
plan
period,
probably
even
slightly
beyond
this
period.
C
In
some
cases,
the
other
significant
site
on
the
edge
of
cambridge-
that's
new
is
looking
at
the
biomedical
campus
area,
so
you
can
see
a
kind
of
small
purple
polygon
there.
Next
to
the
existing
site,
allocations
that
were
identified
in
the
adopted
plans,
and
then
you
can
also
see
a
black
line
around
that,
which
is
us
saying.
We
think
that
we
need
a
wider
policy
framework
to
ensure
that
we
protect
and
enhance
the
landscape
around
biomedical
campuses.
C
Next
one
please,
in
terms
of
our
new
towns,
we've
got
three
of
them:
we've
got
north
stone,
water,
beach
and,
of
course,
camborne.
So
those
are
again
sort
of
starting
to
grow
up
into
real
places.
Campbell's
obviously
been
around
for
a
while,
and
that's
really
the
focus
this
time
around
north
stonewater
beach.
You
think
everybody's
quite
aware
of
what's
going
on.
But
how
do
we
look
at
camborne
now
that
east-west
rail
is
coming
along?
C
It
is
simply
about
trying
to
speed
up
delivery
there,
so
they
really
do
reach
a
kind
of
critical
mass
and
a
really
vibrant
community,
slightly
quicker,
but
at
camborne
as
you
can
see,
we
have
a
mysterious
circle
at
campbell
because
we
haven't
identified
any
specific
sites,
but
we're
really
aware
that
with
east
west
rail
coming
along,
it
will
suddenly
become
one
of
the
best
best
connected
places
in
the
area
relatively
late
in
the
planned
period,
but
definitely
in
the
planned
period.
We
think
so
again.
C
We
would
really
love
to
hear
what
you
think
about
how
cambod
could
grow
from
a
village
into
a
town
as
it
is
now
and
into
a
really
vibrant
community
going
forward.
What
are
the
ingredients
that
would
make
that
really
tick
and
any
thoughts
about
where
geographically
you're
in
and
around
cambodia
that
should
be
focused
next
one,
so
in
sovereign
rural
cluster.
C
This
is
a
really
interesting
one,
which
we
decided
to
separate
out
into
its
own
kind
of
subsection
in
the
plan
really
because
of
this
co-location
that
stuart
and
caroline
mentioned
between
jobs
and
homes.
We
know
there
are
these
really
important
jobs,
clusters
of
abraham
and
so
forth
in
this
area,
and
also
pretty
good
public
transport
links
in
terms
of
the
train
line
coming
down
to
the
south,
which
stops
at
some
of
the
villages
there.
C
So
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
one,
so
there
are
a
few
proposals
here
that
you
can
see
outlined.
There's
the
potential
land
between.
Oh
actually,
I
just
noticed
that
should
be
purple
and
it's
not
as
orange
on
that
map.
So
apologies
we'll
get
that
corrected,
there's
a
land
between
hinton,
where
middle
lane
and
great
shelter.
So
that
is
a
relatively
small
site
and
it's
relatively
very
close
in
fact
to
the
station,
as
you
can
see
there.
C
So
we
feel
that
there's
a
case
to
be
made
for
using
that
side,
that's
being
proposed
and
and
bringing
that
forward,
and
then
you
can
also
see
that
there's
some
other
existing
sites
that
would
be
carried
forward
and
so
forth.
But
then
I
think,
I'm
afraid
I
think
some
of
these
colors
have
gone
slightly
off.
Haven't
they
stuart
because
I'm
pretty
sure
that
the
duxford
site
is
a
new
one
and
also
the
cafe
one
is
a
new
one.
Isn't
it
or
have?
C
I
got
that
one,
no
good,
I'm
remembering
it's
quite
hard
to
remember
all
the
sites
in
detail.
You
can
also
there's
those
are
two
small
sites.
As
you
can
see,
you
can
also
see
that
we've
decided
to
suggest
a
policy
area
at
the
genome
campus,
and
that
is
quite
significant
because,
as
many
of
you
will
know,
there's
a
site
there
that
now
actually
has
permission
for
new
homes,
actually
quite
a
substantial
number
of
new
homes
there
and
that's
come
forward
outside
of
the
it
wasn't
an
allocation
in
the
previous
local
plan.
C
Not
very
again
not
very
much
development
proposed
if
all
of
the
reasons
that
stewart
and
caroline
set
out
from
a
transport
and
a
carbon
perspective,
it
was
really
clear
from
our
evidence,
work
that
most
rural
sites
performed
poorly.
They
were
going
to
really
contribute
to
increased
carbon
emissions,
increased
congestion
on
our
roads
and
and
there
weren't
another
other
factors
that
would
mitigate
or
balance
out
against
that.
C
So
we've
got
a
couple
of
a
few
very
few
sites
if
you
could
go
to
the
next
slide
here,
but
these
are
really
about
focusing
on
the
most
sustainable
locations
a
little
bit
of
rural
employment
land,
because
that
is
really
important
and
things
like
that,
so
I'll
just
run
through
them
quickly.
Firstly,
there's
a
couple
of
small
sites
in
melbourne.
Melbourne,
of
course,
is
one
of
those
villages
that
has
good
public
transport
connections
and
that's
absolutely
key.
C
So
we
feel
it's
worth
supporting
the
sustainability
of
melbourne
as
a
community
with
those
two
small
sites,
there's
a
site
at
highfield's
quarter.
Court
now
that's
sort
of
interesting
one,
because
that's
essentially
part
of
a
larger
site
that
came
through.
In
fact,
it's
a
five-year
hazard
supply
side,
so
we
had
that
site
came
along
and
it
and
it
felt
to
us
that
actually
now
that
was
on
the
table
and
was
coming
forward,
that
kind
of
completing
that
made
sense
in
terms
of
its
its
overall
sustainability.
C
C
As
well
and
again,
as
I
said,
all
of
these
sites
are
on
our
interactive
map.
So
you
can
very
much
have
a
look
and
see
what's
going
on
there,
but
you
can
see
how
few
sites
are
now
being
suggested
in
the
rural
area
and
and
that
really
is
that
focus
on
transport
sustainability
and
really
making
the
best
use
of
land
compact
development.
Where
possible
thanks
paul.
A
A
So
just
we'd
like
to
think
what
you
think
of
it-
and
I
mean
you've
heard
from
you've
heard
of
the
team
from
the
panel
and
even
for
those
of
you
who
haven't
had
a
chance
to
have
a
look
at
it
yet
and
it's
the
same
menu
that
you
can
use
the
same
code
for
this,
but
you
know
we,
we
do
welcome
your
views
and
we
have
tried
to
kind
of
every
time
we've
gone
out
to
consult
with
every
time
that
we've
taken.
You
know
a
new
step
in
this
this
journey.
A
You
know,
we've
tried
to
kind
of
reiterate
and
take
years
into
consideration.
You
know
when
that's
that's
possible
and
we
do
really
value
what
people
think
and-
and
I
think
you
know-
we'd
like
to
you
know,
see
what
you
think
about
strategy.
I
mean
a
lot
of
work
has
gone
into
it.
This
is
a
really
significant
area
to
be
doing
plan
making
in,
and
it's
also
a
really
significant
time
to
be
making
plans
in
you
know
we
have
all
of
us.
You
know
pretty
much
been
through.
A
You
know
a
you
know
a
once
in
a
you
know,
once
in
a
century
kind
of
you
know
issue
in
terms
of
coding,
but
at
the
same
time
we're
struggling
with
some
of
the
you
know
the
most
complicated
kind
of
challenges
you
know.
Most
people
have
faced
around
climate
change,
lots
of
issues
around
social
inequality,
so
we've
tried
to
really
think
about
how
we
set
out
a
framework
and
a
strategy
that
can
help
us.
A
You
know
start
solving
some
of
those
problems
or
start
moving
towards
solutions
of
some
of
those
problems
and
in
the
next
15
to
20
years.
We
know
that
plan
making
is
incredibly
uncertain,
everything's
uncertain,
but
we
have
to.
We
have
to
do
this.
This
is
you
know
it's
incumbent
upon
us
to
at
least
you
know,
use
the
best
information
we
currently
have
to
set
out.
You
know
how
we
feel
we
can
achieve
some
of
the
things
that
we're
looking
to
achieve
and
yeah.
A
I
think
that
you
know
there's
going
to
be
lots
of
there's
lots
of
lots
of
comments
going
through
it's
disproportionate.
I
mean
I'm
interested
to
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
that.
I
mean,
I
feel,
like
we've,
probably
made
quite
a
proportionate
strategy
really
because
we
have
balanced
it
off
against
all
the
strategy
options
we
looked
at.
We
did
take
quite
a
lot
of
those
too,
and
you
know
I'm
glad
that
people
are
thinking.
It's
interesting,
a
real
concern
on
what
could
be
lost
and
I
think
that's
interesting.
I
mean
you
know.
A
Everybody
knows
that
planning's
a
lot
about
trade-offs,
and
you
know
they
are
one
time
making
is
underpinned
by
you
know
those
sustainability
place
or
management
mentioned
earlier
in
the
session,
as
we've
said
before,
there's
another
session,
specifically
on
some
of
the
environmental
issues
which
is
next
week,
but
what
we
have
really
tried
to
do
is
we've
tried
to
ensure
that
actually
this
plan
embeds,
you
know
positive.
You
know
environmental
improvement
to
every
opportunity
as
wherever
possible.
Really-
and
you
know
we
do-
you
know-
I
think,
without
a
plan.
A
You
know
we
are
a
plan
led
society.
You
know
in
the
uk.
We
are
plan
lead,
that's
the
way
we
do
development
and
without
it
you
know,
development
jobs
claims
will
happen
with
it
with
or
without
us,
and
what
we
try
and
do
is
really
try
and
put
a
framework
around
that,
so
it
is
sustainable.
Are
there
any
things
standing
out
for
you
guys
on
the
panel
here?
Some
of
the
comments
you
know
you've
had
such
a
lot
of
involvement
in
developing
the
strategy.
There's
some
nice
comments.
There,
too.
C
I
think
it's
interesting
to
see
sort
of
that
about
that
a
split
between
kind
of
people
liking,
the
idea
of
like
things
like
faster,
build
out
and
attracting
people
to
come
here
and
also
worrying
about
the
commuting
patterns
and
so
forth.
Interesting
questions
around
the
north
of
the
city
as
well
and-
and
I
think
you
know
the
aap-
that
the
northeast
cambridge
area
action
plan
obviously
gives
a
lot
more
detail
on
kind
of
what
the
vision
is
for
that
site
and
how
we
hope
to
achieve
that.
C
C
But
you
know
it's
ambitious
and
I
think
I
see
some
ambitious
interesting
there
as
well
and
we're
at
a
really
early
stage
here.
So
this
sort
of
feedback
is
really
fantastic,
because
what
we're
hoping
you'll
tell
us
is:
where
should
we
kind
of
go
next
with
some
of
this
stuff?
How
can
we
deliver
on
some
of
those
interesting
or
ambitious
things,
and
maybe
you
know
avoid
some
of
the
fears
and
the
the
worries
about
development
that
are
also
being
expressed.
C
A
Yeah,
absolutely
and
and
yeah,
and
I
think
that
the
one
thing
to
point
out
on
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
move
to
the
next
mentee
session,
and
so
people
can
start
feeding
into
that
and
then
I'll
start
pulling
off
the
questions
too.
So
we
can
actually
double
up
a
little
bit
here.
So
yeah
really
good
to
see
some
of
those
thoughts
coming
through
the
next
one.
The
next
system,
I
think
we've
got
some
people
in
there
already.
A
What
would
make
these
sites
into
great
places
basis
again,
and
so
you
know,
please
put
your
your
thoughts
into
this
and
this
board
as
well,
because
as
hannah's
mentioned,
it's
really
important
that
you
know
we
gather
them
at
this
stage
of
plan
making,
and
you
know
some
of
the
things
around
population
and
growth.
It's
a
really,
it's
a
really
difficult
one
and
we
do
understand
how
divisive
it
can
be,
but
a
local
plan
isn't
looking
at
just
today.
It's
looking
at
the
future
and
not
just
the
people
who
live
here
today.
They
are
very
important.
A
A
You
know
a
view
that
actually
that's
not
regularly
enough
in
you
know
very
swift,
moving
and
accelerated
and
21st
century,
but
it's
it's
certainly
something.
You
know
there
are
challenges
and
we
know
that,
but
there's
lots
of
good
stuff
coming
through,
and
I
think
you
know
please
shout
out
panelists
on
some
of
those
comments.
But
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
answer
a
few
questions
off
now.
A
There's
a
couple
of
questions
on
sewage
and
water
supply,
and
I
know
that
stuart's
already
mentioned
them
quickly,
but
we
will
touch
upon
them
because
they
are
a
core
theme
and
there
is
a
session
next
week
which
goes
into
more
detail.
But
you
want
to
pick
up
those
questions
quickly:
caroline
or
stuart,
one
of
the
two
of
you
quite
close
and
close
to
that
issue.
D
D
Yeah,
I
guess
it
was
just
the
broader
note
that
so
the
intricate
water
assessment
does
identify
with
the
current
research
plan
at
in
north
east.
Cambridge
does
need
improving
to
address
plan
and
future
growth.
So
it's
just
the
point.
I
guess
that
doing
nothing
is
not
an
option
at
that
site.
I
don't
know
if
caroline
wanted
to
talk
more
specifically
about
the
the
angle
and
watch
relocation
at
all,
but
that's
a
broader
point.
A
Yeah
absolutely
and
I'm
trying
to
try
out
some
of
these
questions
with
some
of
the
stuff
that's
coming
through
again
and
yeah,
I
mean
there's
a
there's,
a
lot
of
stuff
around
commuting
patterns,
and
you
know
I
think
that
nobody
really
has
the
true
answer.
This
we've
got
some
interesting
conversations
coming
through
yesterday
around
clovid
and
the
impacts
of
covert
on
you
know,
movement
and
people's
movement
promote
working,
but
we're
only
what
18
months
into
that.
So
you
know
we
have
to
keep
an
eye
on
it.
A
We
will
be
doing
some
further
economic
work
next
over
the
next
few
months
to
inform
the
next
stage
of
the
plan,
but
we
have
to
work
on
trends
that
may
stick
or
may
not
stick,
and
there
may
well
be
future
things
that
will
really
change
the
way
that
people
move.
We
need
to
be
really
cognizant
of
that,
and
you
know
flexible
policies
in
some
ways
are
a
really.
You
know
really
great
thing
and
we'd
love
to
be
able
to
do
more
around
that,
and
you
know
some
of
the
work
that
we
have
to
do.
A
Let
me
see,
let's
have
a
look,
should
the
plan
clarify,
there
is
also
an
important
existing
employment
cluster
at
north
east
cambridge,
not
relying
on
the
aap.
I
don't
know
if
you
you're
very
excited
on
the
aap
or
caroline
actually,
because
yeah
you're
quite
excited
from
the
age.
You
might
be
able
to
talk
to
that
question.
B
A
Thanks,
caroline
I've
got
a
question
around
cambodia
here
and
I'm
going
to
come
to
hannah
for
that
one.
I
think
cambodia
looks
like
a
massive
housing
estate
now,
apart
from
potential
transplants
with
eastwood
rail.
Just
can't
see,
leisure
facilities
meeting
needs
in
future,
as
cambridge
is
supposed
to
go
for
this,
who
will
want
to
live
there
apart
from
cheaper
housing
costs
compared
to
cambridge.
C
Yes,
super
interesting
about
camborne
and
actually
somewhere
where
we,
we
have
been
focusing
some
of
our
engagement
activities
to
try
and
understand
more
about
community
who
already
live
in
canberra
and
what
their
aspirations
are
for.
The
future
and
we've
been
doing
some
workshops
with
young
people
in
in
cambodia,
and
it's
really
interesting
how
much
demand
you
know
they
have
for
for
better
facilities
than
campbell
and
a
few
really
lovely
kind
of
sound
bites
and
things
that
came
out.
Of
that
I
mean
people
say
well.
Actually
why
isn't
cambodia?
C
So
there's
a
lot
of
really
interesting
things
coming
out
there
and
also
what
people
value
about
campbell
as
a
location
that
it
has
got
a
slightly
slower
pace
of
life.
People
really
value
the
links
into
the
countryside,
and
so
some
things
there
that
we're
going
to
have
to
be
careful
not
to
lose
alongside
all
the
games
that
could
come.
A
Thanks
hannah,
I'm
going
to
come
to
another
question
here
about
employment
science,
and
I
wonder
if
caroline
or
potentially
stuart
can
talk
to
this.
Are
our
employment
sites
focused
in
the
north,
like
the
homes
christian?
What
I'm
going
to
do,
whilst
that's
being
answered,
I'm
going
to
move
my
screen
on
from
the
menu
now
to
bring
up
the
rest
of
the
sessions
and
the
the
links
to
how
you
can
get
involved
more
fully
and
get
your
thoughts
in
so
picking
up
this
employment
question.
Please.
B
So
you
know,
but
we
we
have
look
carefully
to
try
and
make
sure
that
we
are
only
putting
development
in
locations
where
people
don't
need
to
use
their
car
every
day
for
movement,
because
that
is
such
a
significant
part
of
you
know
need
for
to
be
a
focus
of
our
strategy.
Given
that
real
focus
on
on
climate
change,
which
is
you
know,
an
ever-increasing
issue
for
us,
you
know
we've
always
aimed
to
reduce
travel,
but
it's
now
you
know
it's
now
crucial
for
the
planet,
let
alone
for
us.
B
It
looked
at
the
the
way
that
we
might
choose
to
travel
in
those
different
locations,
so
you
know
the
percentage
of
trips
that
would
be
by
car
the
percentage
of
trips
by
public
transport
and
by
active
means
by
you,
know
on
your
foot
on
on
foot
or
or
using
a
cycle
and
and-
and
it
really
did
point
us
very
clearly
to
the
you
know
the
most
sustainable
locations
being
in
and
on
the
edge
of
cambridge
and
and
and
campbell
came.
You
know
very,
very
close
behind
behind
that.
B
So
when
you
bring
that
all
together
that
that
has
very
much
informed
the
strategy
that
we
we
put
together
here,
but
obviously
interested
to
hear
your
views,
that's
what
this
is
all
about.
I
think
it's
important
perhaps
to
say
that
this
is
an
extra
stage
in
plan
making.
This
time
we
haven't
gone
straight
from
that
early
consultation
through
to
a
draft
plan.
We
we're
having
this
conversation
with
you
now
around
the
preferred
option.
B
So
we've
got
the
opportunity
to
hear
views
and
to
if
we
need
to
we,
we've
still
got
the
opportunity
to
adapt
our
strategy
and
our
policies
before
we
actually
write
up
that
full
draft
plan.
So
we
you
know
we
are
genuinely
keen
to
hear
from
as
many
people
as
possible
as
we
go
through
this
consultation.
A
Thanks
very
much
caroline
and-
and
you
know,
I'm
aware
there
are
a
couple
of
minutes
over
time.
Pandas
do
want
to
pick
up
any
questions,
while
I
just
talk
through
this
last
little
bit,
I'm
absolutely
happy
to,
but,
as
you
can
see
in
my
screen
now
we
are,
you
know
this
is
one
of
the
series
of
webinars
we've
we've
had
five
we've
had
two
already
one
is
around
how
to
engage
with
the
plan,
but
but
substantive
ones,
around
development
numbers.
A
This
is
around
the
start,
science
and
spatial
strategy,
and
you
know
the
theme
is-
and
we
understand
the
theme
that
you
know
we
we've
been
here
working
on
this
plan,
a
few
minutes
as
part
of
two
years.
We
understand
that
there's,
you
know
there
are
concerns
around
the
environmental
issues
around
climate
and
around
biodiversity
around
the
water,
and
that's
why
we've?
A
You
know:
we've
got
two
specific
sessions
on
those
coming
up,
so
you
know
we
will
be
able
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
those,
and
we
have
got
some
of
our
consultants
joining
us.
So
you'll
be
able
to
ask
some
of
those
questions.
You
know
we
haven't
hidden
away
from
anything
really.
We
have
been
very,
very
open
in
how
we
go
about.
A
You
know
bringing
this
to
the
forefront,
because
we
are
you,
we
want
to
solve
these
problems
or
work
towards
solving
these
problems
as
well,
as
part
of
you
know,
we're
a
team
of
planners.
You
know
that
our
world
is
really
trying
to
make
places
better
in
all
aspects,
and
so
please
do
join
us
for
those.
I
expect
to
see
them
as
being
really
really
busy
sessions
and
I
might
even
grow
my
beer
back.
B
A
Little
bit
by
the
time
we
get
to
the
end
of
the
month,
and
we
do
have
one
specifically
on
northeast
cambridge
and
the
local
plan,
the
air
action
plan.
I
know
there's
a
few
questions
coming
through
on
that
too,
and
and
a
lot
of
those
questions.
I
think
we
have
already
answered
in
previous
sessions
so
happy
to
point
in
the
direction
of
sonny
faqs,
which
gives
him
you
know
a
lot
more
detail
than
I
could
potentially
give
you
verbally
on
over
a
screen.
A
So
we
can
point
you
in
those
directions
too,
and
but
other
than
that,
I
think
we're
going
to
close
the
session
off.
Now
anything
we
haven't
answered,
that's
not
already
on
faqs.
We
will
be
recording
this.
The
sessions
recorded
we'll
pick
them
up,
we'll
put
them
on
their
faqs,
don't
feel
like
you're
being
ignored.
Absolutely
not.
We
want
people
to
get
involved
spread.
The
word
please
do
please
to
get
people
to
attend
consultations
open
till
december.
A
Please
get
involved
through
those
routes.
I
think
that's
pretty
much
it.
I
think
that
there
is
a
little
hopefully
that
that
qr
code
will
work
and,
as
per
my
other
one
didn't-
and
I
do
get
involved-
and
I'd
really
just
really
like
to
thank
the
panelists
today
for
their
their
contributions
and
I'd
like
to
thank
you
all
for
coming
along
and
for
some
really
helpful
feedback.
Some
really
helpful
questions,
and
it's
really
good
to
be
talking
to
you
about
this
now
and
other
than
that.
A
The
next
week
there
are
a
lot
of
other
sessions.
There
are
some
zoom
sessions
for
specific
forums
and
also
some
in
real
life
sessions
that
we're
going
to
be
going
to
as
well,
and
a
lot
of
the
team
are
trying
to
get
to
some
sessions
we'll
be
at
some
youth
clubs
we'll
be
at
some
schools,
we'll
be
in
some
places.
So
you
can
come
and
say
hello
and
say
you
know,
welcome
back
outside
of
outside
of
being
locked
up
in
offices
and
rooms
for
the
last
18
months,
but
other
than
that
have
a
lovely
week.