►
From YouTube: Greater Cambridge Local Plan webinar on North East Cambridge: the Area Action Plan & the Local Plan
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
our
sixth
webinar
for
the
great
cambridge
local
plan,
consultation
stage,
proposals
for
our
preferred
options
or
the
first
proposals
as
we're
calling
it
and
we've
had
five
sessions
already
and
all
of
those
were
themed
sessions
around
the
themes
of
the
local
plan
and
this
session
today
is
around
north
east
cambridge
and
the
local
players
specifically
this
site
because,
as
you
may
or
may
not
know,
and
we
have
a
separate
aap
process
or
an
area
action
plan
process
that
has
been
going
on
kind
of
simultaneously.
A
The
local
plan
and
it's
one
of
the
sciences
proposed,
and
we
thought
it
would
be
helpful
to
really
have
a
bit
of
an
explainer
around
that,
whether
that
process,
the
relationship
with
the
local
plan
and
etc,
etc.
So
thank
you
for
all
of
the
people
joining
us
and
welcome
this
morning
and
welcome
back
to
people
who've
been
before
and
welcome
to
you
who
haven't
managed
to
come
to
these
sessions
before
we've
got
a
good
panel
this
morning
of.
C
A
Song
afternoon
should
I
say,
and
a
few
slides
and
taking
you
through
some
of
the
updates
and
we'll
run
a
little
interactive
session
in
the
middle
and
there'll,
be
chances
for
questions
all
the
way
through
the
presentations
as
well,
which
we'll
endeavor
to
answer,
and
so
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
take
myself
a
screenshot,
I'm
going
to
introduce
you
to
our
super
panel
this
morning.
So
I'll
ask
them
to
all
put
their
video
cameras
on
so.
C
Hi
everyone,
I'm
matthew
pedersen,
so
I'm
one
of
the
project
leads
delivering
the
nec
aap
on
behalf
of
the
shared
planning
service
for
greater
cambridge,
hey.
B
Good
morning,
I'm
caroline
hunt,
I'm
strategy
and
economy
manager
in
the
greater
cambridge
chair
planning
service
and
overseeing
both
the
local
plan
and
the
area
action
plan.
D
Good
afternoon,
everyone
yeah
I'm
terry
de
souza,
so
I'm
a
principal
planning
policy
officer
for
the
shared
planning
service
and
I
work
with
caroline
and
matt
and
others
in
helping
to
bring
together
the
area
action
plan
and
the
evidence.
Studies
that
underpin
underpin
it.
A
Thanks
terry,
it's
good
to
have
you
here
as
well
this
morning
and
behind
the
scenes
I
keep
saying
this
morning.
It
feels
like
this
morning
and
behind
the
scenes
we've
got,
will
smeaton
and
tim
cliff
and
obviously
not
got
their
cameras
on,
but
without
them
we
wouldn't
be
running
this
they're
doing
all
the
logistics
and
technical
stuff.
So
hopefully
it
all
goes
relatively
smoothly
this
morning.
A
For
those
of
you
who
don't
know
me,
my
name
is
paul
from
I'm
the
assistant
director
for
strategy
and
economy,
so
part
of
the
team,
that's
bringing
the
aap
and
also
the
local
plan
together
and
just
a
quick
outline
I'll
share.
My
screen
again
give
you
a
bit
of
an
outline
of
what
the
session
is
going
to
look
like
so
and
how
we're
going
to
run
it
and
you
can
post
in
the
chat
anonymously
at
any
time.
We'll
answer
the
questions.
A
The
panelists
will
try
and
answer
questions
as
we
go
along,
but
there
will
be
some
time
at
the
end
as
well.
For,
for
you
know
some
more
panel
questions
you
can
post
anonymously
or
leave
your
name.
It's
up
to
you.
It's
an
hours.
Long,
if
we're
over
on
a
little
bit,
I'm
not
too
fussed.
A
If
there's
plenty
of
questions,
if
we
don't
get
to
all
the
questions,
some
of
them
might
have
been
answered
in
previous
sessions
already,
and
then
I
can
highlight
to
where
you
need
to
go
to
get
to
those
questions
and
those
answers.
And
if
we
don't
manage
to
get
to
any
questions,
we
will
try
and
pick
them
up
and
put
them
into
our
faq
section
on
the
website
which
I'll
point
you
in
the
right
direction.
A
We're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
relationship
of
northeast
cambridge
with
the
local
plan
or
the
emerging
local
plan,
that's
in
consultation
at
the
moment
and
try
and
demystify
a
little
bit
of
the
process
around
the
aap
and
the
relationship
with
the
local
plan,
because
we
appreciate
it's
quite
a
complicated
planning
piece
and
the
two
processes
working
through
and
we're
also
going
to
give
you
a
bit
of
an
update
on
the
aap
and
what's
changed
and
we'll
get
some
views
about
what
you
think
about
that
during
an
interactive
session
and
then
pick
up
some
of
the
benefits
and
some
of
the
challenges
at
the
end.
A
B
Okay,
thank
you
paul.
So
I'm
gonna
run
you
through
some
of
the
overarching
issues
around
northeast
cambridge
and,
as
paul
said,
we're
preparing
two
plans
at
the
moment
that
both
deal
with
northeast
cambridge.
So
that
would
be
helpful
just
to
explain
how
they
relate
to
each
other
and
their
process
and
timetable
for
moving
forwards.
B
So
some
of
you
will
know,
we've
been
preparing
an
area
action
plan
for
northeast
cambridge
for
some
years
now
and
that
reflects
policies
in
our
current
adopted
2018
local
plans
that
identify
potential
for
this
area
for
redevelopment.
B
But
we
have
also
looked
in
preparing
our
new,
greater
cambridge
local
plan
and
our
first
proposals
that
are
out
for
consultation
at
the
moment
and
that
work
has
confirmed
north
east
cambridge
as
part
of
the
strategy
for
the
new
local
plan
and
we'll
run
through
a
little
bit
of
both
of
those
plans
and
on
what
they
do
and
how
they
work
and
northeast
cambridge
provides.
B
Then
a
more
detailed
planning
framework
for
the
northeast
cambridge
area
specifically
and
the
timetable
for
the
area
action
plan
is
that
we
are
having
undertaken
several
rounds
of
consultation.
Taking
a
report
through
our
member
processes
having
just
published
the
report
this
week
and
terry
will
talk
you
through
that
in
more
detail
shortly
and
in
terms
of
the
local
plan
we're
out
for
consultation
on
those
first
proposals.
B
It
identified
a
vision
very
much
to
focus
development
in
locations
where
use
of
the
car
was
minimized
because
our
evidence
showed
that
was
how
you
made
the
biggest
impact
on
carbon
emissions
as
part
of
our
move
towards
a
net
zero
carbon
strategy
and
northeast
cambridge
actually
came
out
as
the
most
sustainable
location
for
development
in
greater
cambridge,
reflecting
the
it's
it's
in
cambridge,
it
has
the
cambridge
north
station.
It
has
the
bus
way
out
from
huntington,
and
it
has
proposals
from
great
the
great
cambridge
partnership
for
links
up
to
water.
Beach.
B
Next
slide,
please
paul.
So
having
identified
this
as
a
really
sustainable
location
for
development,
we
have
looked
at
through
the
local
plan,
drawing
on
the
findings
of
the
area
action
plan
that
we
consulted
on
last
year.
B
So
we
we're
envisaging
this
as
a
new
city
district
for
cambridge,
it's
a
it's
a
really
sizable
site
and
it
has
really
strong
potential
for
development.
B
But
of
course,
at
the
moment
it
is
home
to
the
chemicals
wastewater,
treatment
works
and
that's
been
a
barrier
for
development
in
this
area
for
many
years,
but
we
know
that
there
is
now
proposals
from
anglian
water,
in
particular.
Looking
at
relocation
of
the
wastewater
treatment
works
and
to
a
new
site
at
honey
hill
is
their
preferred
location
as
they
are
going
through
their
separate
process,
and
I
think
it's
important
to
emphasize
that
it's
a
separate
process,
not
part
of
the
the
area,
action
plan
or
the
local
plan.
B
I'll
say
a
bit
more
about
that
in
a
moment
and,
as
I
said,
we
published
papers
now
for
the
area
action
plan
to
go
through
its
committee
process,
starting
with
the
first
meeting
at
the
joint
local
planning
advisory
group
next
week
on
the
22nd
next
slide.
Please
paul
so
looking
at
what
we
the
potential
thing.
B
We
think
that
northeast
cambridge
has
we
think
that
has
potential
for
over
8
000
new
homes
and
15
000
additional
jobs,
recognizing
it's
already
a
successful
area
with
the
cambridge
science
park
and
saint
john's
innovation
centre,
and
so
on
and
but
important
also,
particularly
given
congestion
and
also
as
part
of
meeting
our
housing
needs
to
bring
some
housing
development
into
that
area
as
well.
B
But
it's
not
just
about
homes
and
jobs.
It's
also
about
the
supporting
infrastructure
that
makes
it
a
really
good
place
to
live,
to
have
all
those
services
and
facilities
on
your
on
your
doorstep,
so
schools,
community
and
cultural
facilities,
open
space
and
links
also
out
into
the
wider
countryside,
and
we'll
say
more
about
that,
because
our
strategy
in
our
new
local
plan
isn't
just
about
homes
and
jobs.
B
It's
also
about
the
green
infrastructure
that
is
really
important
as
part
of
our
quality
of
life
every
day,
and
if
you
know,
that's
something,
that's
been
really
highlighted,
hasn't
it
through
the
pandemic,
the
importance
of
having
access
to
informal
green
space-
and
there
are
initiatives
identified
through
the
local
plan
that
come
very
close
to
northeast
cambridge
and
provide
real
opportunities
to
provide
that
accessibility
to
the
wider
area.
B
Next
slide,
please
paul!
So
before
we
move
into
well,
I
think
you
might
have
missed
the
slide.
B
Thank
you
before
we
move
into
the
more
detail
around
the
proposals
for
the
site.
I
think
it
is
important
that
we
we
do
discuss
the
relationship
with
water
treatment
plant
process.
B
So,
as
I
said,
both
the
local
plan
and
the
air
action
plan
are
predicated
on
the
treatment
plant
having
relocated
so
that
separate
dco
process
is
is,
is
absolutely
key
to
this
site
being
able
to
come
forward.
B
B
We
can
progress
forward
to
the
draft
plan
stage,
which
would
be
the
next
stage,
but
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
progress
the
local
plan
forward
to
the
formal
proposed
submission
stage
until
we
know
the
outcome
of
the
dco,
because
part
of
that
formal
stage
and
submitting
a
plan
for
examination,
you
need
to
be
able
to
demonstrate
that
your
proposals
are
deliverable
and
until
we
know
if
and
when
the
dco
the
water
treatment
works
would
would
relocate.
B
So
the
decision
that
members
are
being
art
will
be
asked
to
make
is
is
around
the
proposed
submission
plan
to
be
ready
for
consultation,
but
it
will
be
paused
and
that
consultation
would
not
take
place
until
such
time
as
the
dco
is
determined
and
if
it
is
approved,
we
do
expect
that
the
development
control
consent
order
examination
process
will
will
look
to
these
plans,
our
plans,
you
know
they
will
look
to
showing
how
sustainable
the
site
is
and
the
merits
of
development
in
in
this
area,
but
they
are
two
separate
processes.
B
So
if
the
dco
is
approved
on
its
current
timetable,
we
envisaged
that
we
would
be
able
to
take
both
plans
forward
for
their
formal
publication
for
representations
to
be
made
ahead
of
examination
around
2024.
B
Obviously,
we
need
to
keep
that
under
review
and
we
certainly
need
to
make
a
health
check
of
the
area
action
plan
to
see
whether
any
changes
in
circumstances
meant
we
needed
to
update
the
evidence
or
change
the
aap
at
that.
At
that
point,
I'm
just
talking
still
around
the
relationship
between
our
plans
and
the
water
treatment
works
relocation.
B
So
I
appreciate
it's
quite
a
technical
process
and
it
probably
doesn't
always
feel
logical
when
you're
looking
from
from
outside,
but
that's
the
way
that
the
the
system
will
will
work
next
slide.
Please
paul.
I
think
there
were
two
other
issues
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
at
the
outset.
B
B
B
We
also
know
that
the
ap
will
not
actually
go
forward
to
its
formal
examination
stages
until
water
resources,
east
have
prepared
a
new
water
management
plan,
and
that
should
give
us
the
clarity
we
need
and
hopefully
the
confidence
that
we
need,
that
there
will
be
an
adequate
water
supply.
B
B
Because
this
is
a
you
know,
this
is
an
important
issue
locally
and
particularly
for
communities
living
in
fenn,
road
and
affected
by
traffic
waiting
to
cross
across
the
crossing
into
finn
road.
B
The
councils
have
been
pushing
quite
hard
for
this
to
be
an
issue
that
network
rails
should
should
be
looking
at,
because
the
downtime
at
the
crossing
now
is
really
significant.
It's
over
half
an
hour
in
every
hour.
The
gates
are
down,
so
we
think
it
is
a
really
important
issue
should
be
being
looked
at.
B
Network
rail
is
currently
consulting
on
an
elia
area
capacity
studies,
the
name
of
their
project,
which
is
looking
at
level
crossings
between
ely
and
cambridge
and,
unfortunately,
they've
concluded
in
their
current
consultation
that
they
don't
think
any
further
intervention
is
needed.
Now
we
are
currently
preparing
to
make
our
formal
response
to
emphasize
very
strongly
that
we
consider
that
an
important
issue
network
rail
came
to
the
north
area
committee
last
week
and
indicated
they'd
welcome
further
engagement
with
the
council.
B
So
we
will
very
much
be
holding
to
them
to
that
and
wanting
to
have
that
those
further
discussions
and
that
we
will
do
alongside
work
on
the
new
local
plan.
But
we
say
that's
a
separate
issue
from
the
area
action
plan
itself.
So
that's
it
from
me.
I
know
there's
quite
a
lot
of
technical
stuff
in
there,
but
I
hope
it's
helpful
just
to
set
that
context
before
we
look
in
more
detail
at
the
air
action
plan
and
I'm
now
going
to
hand
over
to
terry
to
take
you
through
information
on
that.
D
Thank
you,
caroline,
so
so
yeah.
So
just
a
quick
recap,
I
suppose,
of
where
we
are
with
the
aap
process
and
where
we've
come
from,
I
suppose
so
for
those
of
you
that
may
remember,
we
didn't
issues
an
options:
consultation
back
in
2014,
so
at
that
time
the
site
was
known
as
cambridge
northern
fringe
east
and
that
basically
just
included
the
land
that
was
kind
of
the
eastern
side
of
milton
road,
where
the
wastewater
treatment
plant
is
at
the
moment
and
some
of
the
land
around
it.
D
It
was
a
much
smaller
kind
of
area
than
what
is
currently
proposed
and
then
in
2019
we
did
another
round
of
issues
and
options.
Consultation.
So
there's
about
80,
odd
questions
that
we
asked
for
comments
on
and
we
actually
amended
the
site
boundary
at
that
stage
to
include
cambridge
science
park
because,
obviously
the
science
park
is
a
really
important
local,
local,
regional
employer
in
the
area
and
actually
they're
a
really
big
part
of
northeast
cambridge.
So
it
kind
of
made
sense
to
include
them
as
part
of
the
proposals.
D
That
was
a
really
positive
consultation
and
we
received
a
number
of
responses
to
that.
That
then
helped
us
to
draft
the
the
area
action
plan
which
went
up
for
consultation
last
year,
so
that
was
kind
of
july
to
october,
and
it
was
at
that
stage
where
we
moved
away
from
here.
A
D
Some
questions
tell
us
what
you
think
too.
Here
is
a
proposed
vision.
Here
are
some
objectives,
policies
and
a
spatial
framework
which
is
essentially
like
a
a
diagram
as
to
show
how
the
area
could
be
laid
out
spatially,
and
we
asked
for
for
comments
on
on
those
on
those
things,
and
that
was
a
really
again
a
really
positive
consultation.
D
We
had
over
4
000
individual
representations
from
that
consultation
from
a
wide
range
of
backgrounds
which,
which
was
really
good,
and
as
part
of
that
consultation,
we
again,
we
amended
the
boundary
of
the
site,
so
it
included
cambridge
regional
college
again,
a
really
important
local
site
in
the
local
area
over
thousand
students.
So
it
was
important.
D
They
were
part
of
the
area
and
it
it
was
kind
of
seem
to
sort
of
embed
it
within
northeast
cambridge,
rather
than
it
just
being
on
the
fringes,
but
it
also
excluded
the
bramble
fields,
the
local
nature
reserve
and
enough
of
road
allotments,
because
we
weren't
actually
proposing
anything
for
those
areas
given
given
their
kind
of
uses
and
sensitivities.
So
we
thought
it
was
prudent
to
exclude
them
paul.
Can
we
go
into
the
next
slide,
please?
D
So,
on
the
consultation
from
last
year,
there
were
a
number
of
kind
of
key
issues
that
came
out
of
it.
Just
very
broadly
one
was
the
open
space
provision
on
site.
So
at
that
time
the
aap
was
proposing
around
10
and
a
half
hectares
of
additional
open
space
on
site,
and
people
thought
that
that
wasn't
enough
wasn't
sufficient
for
the
number
of
homes
that
we
were
proposing.
D
People
were
concerned
around
building
heights
and
densities.
So
thinking
about
you
know
some
of
the
it
didn't
necessarily
reflect
the
something
you
know:
the
character,
kind
of
existing
and
some
of
the
emerging
character
of
the
city
and
also
the
wider
impacts
that
would
have
on
the
sort
of
fen
landscape
and
also
the
densities
as
well.
People
were
concerned
that
the
site
was
was
too
dense
and
in
combination
with
the
open
space
provision,
it
was
kind
of
claustrophobic.
D
In
some
ways,
people
were
also
worried
about
employment
numbers
that
the
site
was
was
was
promoting
too
much
employment
floor
space
and
therefore
there
was
an
imbalance
between
not
only
homes
and
jobs,
but
also
the
fact
that
it
would
then
result
in
more
in
commuting
into
northeast
cambridge
and
therefore,
you
know
kind
of
going
against
the
kind
of
sustainable
vision
that
we
had
for
the
site.
D
People
were
concerned
that
the
community
facilities
weren't
adequate
enough
and
they
thought
that
we
needed
to
do
more
work
on
that
which
we,
which
we
have
done
and
then,
as
I
mentioned
before,
managing
traffic
traffic
levels.
You
know
thinking
about
the
amount
of
development
that
we're
proposing
for
norfolk's.
Cambridge
people
were
obviously
concerned
that
you
know
this
would
just
result
in
tailbacks.
D
You
know
all
the
way
up
the
a-10
and
all
the
way
along
the
a14,
so
those
were
the
kind
of
key
key
issues
that
came
out
so
in
terms
of
the
vision
for
northeast
cambridge.
We
it's
still
largely
the
same,
although
we
have
made
some
some
amendments
to
it.
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
emphasized
that
the
kind
of
healthy
and
inclusive
place
that
we
want.
We
wanted
northeast.
D
We
want
office,
cambridge
to
be,
and
particularly
thinking
about
kind
of
its
walkability
and
I'll,
come
on
to
that
in
a
moment,
and
also
just
and
also
thinking
about
how
it
would
be
about
high
quality
as
well,
because
you
know
with
high
density
development.
Well,
we've
all
developed
be
perfectly
honest,
but
with
high
density
development.
There
is
a
concern
that,
if
it's
not
done
well,
then
actually
you
could
end
up
with
a
really
poor
place.
So
it's
about
making
sure
that
you
know
we.
We.
D
We
have
really
good
strong
kind
of
principles
and
foundations
for
development
in
northeast
cambridge.
To
make
sure
that
you
you
you
get
the
the
right
type
of
development.
That's
gonna
leave
a
you
know
a
positive,
lasting
legacy.
D
So
looking
at
the
kind
of
proposed
changes,
this
is
just
a
very
brief
summary
of
the
changes
that
we've
made,
but
so
coming
on
to
the
open
space
provision
we've
we
took
it,
took
it
right
back
basically
and
looked
at
you
know
how
much
you
know,
what
what
does
the
existing
local
plan
standards
require,
and
how
can
we?
D
So
we've
amended
the
spatial
frame
right
now,
which
is
this
diagram
here
on
the
left
and
the
site
now,
based
on
the
new
diagram,
the
new
policies,
it
meets,
the
informal
open
space
and
the
children's
play
space
in
full
on
site.
So
that's
not
us
relying
on
other
sites
like
milton
county
park
to
meet
to
meet
those
standards.
It
means
that
people,
everyone
every
single
home
at
northeast
cambridge
will
be
within
a
five
minute,
walk
from
their
doorstep
to
an
open
space.
D
So
that's
something
that
we
really
wanted
to
make
sure
we
we
not
only
provided
the
open
spaces
but
actually
distributed
them
around
the
site
in
a
way
that
was
easily
accessible
to
everyone.
D
D
D
The
densities
have
also
been
reduced.
So
previously
they
went
up
to
kind
of
385
dwellings
per
hectare.
Now
the
densities
are
between
70,
along
kind
of
nutfield
road
and
backing
onto
the
existing
residential
houses,
and
then
they
peak
at
300
dwellings
per
hectare
in
the
center.
So
to
give
that
some
sort
of
context,
70
to
70
dph,
is
around
kind
of
like
what
you
have
around
the
romsey
mill
road
area
of
cambridge.
D
At
the
moment,
whereas
300
dwellings
per
hectare
is
kind
of
what
you
get
at
around
the
sort
of
cb1
area
around
cambridge
station,
and
that
is
only
one
block
at
the
district
center,
that
is
at
300
buildings
per
hectare.
Everything
else
is,
broadly
speaking,
around
180
to
240.,
so
it's
it
significantly
reduced
at
that
top
end
in
terms
of
densities.
D
The
important
thing
about
densities,
though,
is
that
you
still
it's
still
important,
that
you
kind
of
get
the
critical
mass
of
people
to
to
make
this
a
new
city
district
with
densities.
If
you
go,
there's
there's
there's
always
the
risk
that
if
you
go
potentially
too
low,
then
you
don't
necessarily
get
all
of
the
infrastructure
and
facilities
that
you
need
to
make
it
a
self-sustaining
place.
So
you
know
the
schools,
the
the
healthcare,
the
cultural
facilities
community
facilities.
You
know
they
all
need
a
critical
mass.
D
Even
you
know
the
bus,
the
bus
routes
and
everything
else.
They
all
need
a
critical
mass
in
order
to
make
sure
that
they're
deliverable
we've
reduced
the
number
of
jobs
on
site,
so
we've
gone
down
from
20
000
to
15,
000,
new
jobs
and
that's
still
a
significant
number
of
jobs.
But
actually
you
know
it's.
D
It's
helped
us
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
we
can
manage
the
number
of
vehicles
coming
into
northeast
cambridge
a
lot
better,
and
it
also
makes
sure
that
we
don't
have
a
negative
impact
on
some
of
the
other
employment
sites
that
are
in
the
other
parts
of
greater
gaming
bridge.
So
in
water
preacher
in
camborne
or
in
in
other
areas.
D
We're
still
making
sure
that
we
re-provide
the
same
amount
of
industrial
floor
space
in
northeast
cambridge.
So
we're
still
proposing
to
move
the
industrial
uses
from
the
norfield
road
industrial
estate
to
cowley
road
industrial
state
and
around
the
aggregate
rail
heads
to
sort
of
act
as
a
buffer
to
to
those
uses,
but
we're
we're
making
sure
that
we're
protecting
those
floor
spaces
because
they're
really
a
really
important
employee
employment
area
for
for
local,
for
local
people,
but
also
cities
need
you
know
those
types
of
uses
to
function.
D
We've
clarified
our
infrastructure
requirements
for
our
infrastructure
studies
and
there's
more
information
in
the
plan
about
that
from
kind
of
schools,
health
hubs
and
those
types
of
uses,
and
we've
now
got
an
agreed
transport
strategy
which
helps
to
make
sure
that
we
can
deliver
our
transport
policies
and
work
within
the
trip
budget
from
northeast
cambridge
and
then
paul.
If
you've
just
gone
to
the
last
slide
from
me.
D
It
just
sets
out
the
change
between
the
draft
spatial
framework
on
the
left
and
the
proposed
spatial
framework
on
the
right
and
essentially,
you've
got
a
really
kind
of
clear,
green
network
now,
which
runs
both
sides
of
milton
road
really
linking
in
as
well
to
the
wider
area,
so
into
kind
of
north
chesterton
into
king's
edges,
but
also
over
towards
the
river
to
make
sure
people
have
access
to
the
wider
countryside,
as
I
mentioned
before,
every
home
will
be
within
five
minute:
walk
off
a
little
off
of
an
open
space
and
also
every
home
will
be
within
a
five-minute
walk
of
a
local
center
or
district
center
which
will
meet
their
day-to-day
needs.
D
So
it's
really
focusing
on
that
kind
of
you
know:
walkability
easy
access
to
facilities,
and
I
think
that
kind
of
emphasizes
the
point
that
caroline
was
saying
earlier
about.
You
know
most
sustainable
location
of
all
of
the
sites
in
in
greater
cambridge.
A
D
A
You
very
much
and
caroline
as
well.
I
think
that
that
was
yeah
really
helpful.
I
mean
I
know
that
there
was
some
detail
in
there
and,
but
I
think
it's
really
helpful
to
give
you
a
clear
picture
of
some
of
the
technical
stuff
that
we've
had
to
kind
of
navigate
as
well
as
also
certainly
the
updates
from
where
we've
gone
from
the
previous
round
of
consultation
and
some
of
the
work
that
terry
matt
and
the
team
have
been
doing.
A
It's
really
fantastic
piece
of
work,
that's
been
happening,
and
so
what
we'd
like
to
do,
and
just
just
a
quick
reminder
that
obviously
all
of
the
sessions
all
of
the
webinar
sessions
are
up
online
at
the
moment
or
the
previous
ones.
This
session
will
be
exactly
the
same.
A
It
will
go
up
online,
probably
by
the
end
of
play
this
week
and
so
you'll
be
able
to
access
it
access
all
the
slides
as
well,
and
just
for
that
and
and
you
know
and
then
and
revisit
some
of
the
things
that
you've
been
we've
been
talking
about.
What
I'd
like
to
do
now
is,
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
have
had
some
of
these
sessions
before
we'd
like
to
ask
you
a
couple
of
questions
yourselves
get
you
a
bit
involved.
A
You'll
see
some
questions
coming
through
in
the
chat
and
we'll
pick
them
up
as
we
go
through.
Those
of
you
who
haven't
used
mentored
before
mention
meter
is
a
interactive
kind
of
session
and
piece.
You
can
scan
the
qr
code
or
you
can
visit
mentee.com
and
stick
that
code
in
there
voting
code,
95228
and
we'll
answer
some
questions
and
get
you
involved
and
my
panel
as
well.
Can
you
put
your
cameras
back
on
as
well?
Please?
A
So
people
can
see
you
so
we
can
actually
get
back
involved
in
the
conversation
as
some
of
the
questions
and
thoughts
come
through
to
everyone,
and
so,
firstly,
you
know
you've
heard
a
little
bit
from
terry
now
about
you
know
what
the
vision
is,
how
it's
changed
and
those
of
you
who
have
been
involved
and
not
know
about
the
plan,
and
you
know
previously,
you
know
you
would
have
seen
its
evolution
right
back
from
kind
of
2014
really.
So
I
think
we'd
like
to
really
ask
you.
A
You
know
what
parts
of
this
vision
that
you
feel
particularly
excited
about,
or
parts
of
the
vision
that
you
feel
are
you
know,
are
really
good
opportunities
for
not
just
the
city
of
cambridge,
but
also
for
the
wider
area
for
the
people
who
live
here
for
the
people
living
now
the
people
who
live
here
in
the
future.
So,
as
I
said,
if
you
go
to
that
meeting
code,
you
should
be
able
to
stick
in
some
some
thoughts.
A
That's
I
think
I've
allowed
a
word
count
of
five,
but
you
can
put
in
as
many
as
you
want
really
and
and
while
we're
waiting
for
some
of
your
thoughts
to
come
through
these
people
and
they're
all
waiting
for
some
of
your
thoughts
to
come
through.
I'm
going
to
ask
I'm
going
to
ask
the
panel
what
you
they
think
and
matt
I'm
going
to
come
to
you,
because
you've
had
some
serious
involvement
in
this
project
for
quite
some
time
really
and
other
projects
as
well.
C
I
mean
cambridge
has
a
long
and
and
very
successful
history
of
cycle
use
in
the
area
that
that's
the
envy
of
everywhere
else
nationally,
and
we
can
build
on
that
as
well
through
the
proposals
for
nec
and
really
drive
a
new
sort
of
place,
that
that
is
really
connected,
really
usable
in
terms
of
walking,
cycling
and
all
the
facilities
in
the
area
that
provides
everyone
with
fantastic
opportunities.
To
live
to
for
employment
and
for
connectivity
to
other
facilities
that
we
have
across
cambridge
as
well
so
yeah.
A
Now
I
mean
walkability
obviously
comes
up
really
strongly
in
there,
but
I
mean
terry
talked
quite
a
lot
about
you
know
the
re,
the
review
of
the
green
spaces
as
well
and-
and
you
know
don't
forget
nature
yet
of
course-
and
then
you
know,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
on,
underpinning
not
just
nec,
but
our
entire
strategy
for
the
local
plan
is
both
kind
of,
and
you
know,
biodiversity
and
green
spaces,
and
I
think
the
changes
that
we've
made
have
reflected
that,
and
you
know
I
think,
what's
the
what
are
the
distances
from
green
open
spaces?
D
Yeah,
so
every
home
will
be
within
a
five
five-minute
walk
of
an
open
space,
so
that
will
include
you
know,
kind
of
sort
of
kick
around
sort
of
spaces,
there's
a
sort
of
a
larger
green
space
where
we
propose
now
in
the
center.
So
in
addition
to
the
kind
of
the
linear
park
that
we've
we've
got
along
the
first
reign,
but
also
a
lot
more
kind
of
local
parks
as
well.
D
So
you
know
various
size,
sizes
and
shapes,
but
you
know
those
sorts
of
things
that
you
could
sort
of
just
just
go
to
as
an
easy
stroll,
rather
than
it
being
a
an
event
having
to
you
know,
make
the
effort
to
go
and
visit
something.
B
Yeah
and
paul,
perhaps
just
picking
up
on
that,
because
I've
seen
there's
a
question
from
in
in
the
chat
from
cppf
about
the
potential
impact
that
northeast
cambridge
might
have
on
the
wider
area,
and
you
know,
would
it
impact
on
places
like
wick
and
fenn.
For
example.
I
think
it's
really
important
to
stress
that.
B
So
our
revisions
to
the
air
action
plan
meet
our
informal
open
space
standards
in
full
on
site,
so
we're
not
relying
on
off-site
provision,
but
I
think
it's
also
important
to
recognize
that
we
are
providing
connections
over
torque
over
the
railway
so
that
people
can
connect
into
the
wider
footpath
network
so
along
the
cam
and
so
on,
but
also
there
are
going
to
be
three
ways
of
connecting
north
overall
under
the
a14,
and
that's
that
that's
really
important
in
terms
of
the
wider
green
infrastructure
strategy
that
we
have.
B
We,
we
didn't
specifically
have
a
map
on
that
in
in
the
slideshow,
but
there's
an
area
to
the
north
of
cambridge,
the
area
between
milton
and
histon
and
wrapping
right
up
to
water,
beaching
and
cotton
that
are
green
infrastructure
strategy.
Work
identified
as
a
north.
Cambridge
green
space
to
provide
enhanced
recreation
facilities.
B
So,
whilst
that's
a
local
plan
proposal,
you
know
the
northeast
cambridge
area
and
with
that
connectivity
will
will
have
on
the
back
of
that
wider
infrastructure
provision,
real
opportunities
for
access
into
the
wider
countryside
and,
and
should
that
you
know,
should
really
help
reduce
pressures
on
some
of
these
more
sensitive
spaces.
B
That
are,
you
know,
still
some
way
away
from
the
area,
and
that
has
been
looked
at
carefully
through
our
sustainability
appraisal
and
our
habitat
regulation
assessment,
and
I'm
I'm
sure
some
of
you
will
want
to
look
at
those
and
see
you
know
what
they've
concluded,
but
we
we
think
that
wider
green
infrastructure
strategy
is
really
important,
there's
also
a
another
enhanced
area
to
to
the
east
as
well
over
into
the
eastern
fence.
So
this
isn't
just
about
development.
D
Yeah
and
sorry
on
on
that
point,
sorry
just
to
come
in
on
the
chest
and
then
point
so
so
yeah
the
the
the
area
that
we
call
chest
and
fence
isn't
within
the
area
action
plan
boundary
it's
the
land
kind
of
between
the
railway
and
the
river.
Now
there
is
potential
for
that
area
to
be
used
for
kind
of
biodiversity,
enhancements
and
informal
immunity
space,
but
because
it
is
within
the
flood
zone,
it's
not
something
that
we
can
necessarily
you
know
define.
D
As
you
know,
this
is
informal
public
open
spaces
at
children's
play
spaces.
These
are
football
pictures
because
you
know
they
potentially
can't
be
used
all
year
round.
So
the
kind
of
aspiration
is
that
that
will
become
a
kind
of
a
biodiversity
and
informal
amenity
space
that
would
link
up
the
river
and
the
northeast
cambridge
site.
D
Now
you
know
that
footbridge,
therefore,
to
go
over
from
northeast
cambridge
into
that
area
is
really
really
important
for
that
and,
as
caroline
was
saying
in
terms
of
general
kind
of
movement
into
the
wider
countryside,
you
know,
if
you
lived
in
northeast
cambridge,
to
get
onto
the
river
towpath
without
that
bridge
would
actually
be
quite
a
cumbersome
route.
You'd
have
to
come
all
the
way
down
to
moss
bank
or
you'd
have
to
go
through
milton
county
park
and
work
your
way
up.
So
actually
it's
a
really
important
piece
of
infrastructure.
A
Yeah
thanks
terry
caroline
and
others
I
mean
you
know
I'm
going
to
move
over
to
the
second
question,
which
is
kind
of
the
reverse
of
this
question
now,
and
I
just
sort
of
mentioned
you
know.
Obviously
one
of
the
things
that
hasn't
come
up
in
some
of
this
is
around
the
climate
issues
and,
as
you
know,
you
know
we'll
have
a
whole
session.
A
You
can
refer
back
to
the
green
green
spaces
and
biodiversity
webinar
for
what
caroline
and
terry
been
talking
about,
but
obviously
climate
and
you
know
the
absolute
requirement
for
us
to
to
get
to
zero
carbon
and
within
the
green
timeline
set
in
the
sixth
carbon
budget.
You
know
it
does
have
an
implication
on
where
we
put
things-
and
you
know
the
strategy
is
reflected
on
that,
and
you
know
north
east
cambridge
is
a
very,
very
sustainable
location
as
well
and
so
moving
on.
A
So,
conversely,
and
you
know
again
same
mentee
code,
you
should
be
able
to
answer
this
one
straight
away
as
well
and
before
we
go
over
to
do
a
bit
more,
do
a
few
more
slides.
Is
you
know
what
parts
of
that
vision
for
northeast
cambridge?
Are
you
worried
about?
I
did
notice
some
of
the
comments
coming
through
and
you
know.
Obviously
we
do
understand
the
concerns
around
the
relocation
of
the
water
treatment
works.
A
A
I
know
that
we
mentioned
some
of
the
issues
that
have
cropped
up
recently
in
terms
of
the
fen
road
issue,
and
some
of
the
issues
that
we
kind
of
come
across
are
that
quite
a
lot
of
the
way
that
we
work
in
planning,
especially
in
the
uk,
is
quite
dependent
on
other
organizations.
You
know
there's
certain
things
within
our
gift,
but
we
have
to
work
together.
You
know
with
both
central
government
and
other
partners
to
deliver
things,
and-
and
you
know,
that's
that
is
complicated
and
so
yeah
water
supply.
A
I
mean
water
supply
is
one
of
the
things.
That's
that's.
I
think
it's
front
and
center,
our
entire
local
plan,
and-
and
you
know,
our
whole
strategy
is
is-
is
only
deliverable
on
the
fact
that
if
water
can
be
the
issues
with
water
can
be
mitigated-
and
you
know,
new
regional
scale.
Infrastructure
can
be
in
place
to
deliver
during
that
planned
period
where
we
know
that
we've
got
no
more
head
from
within
within
the
within
the
water
companies.
E
Oh,
can
I
just
can
I
just
comment
on
like
the
concerns
that
people
are
highlighting,
which
I
think
are
you
know
very
real
concerns,
one
of
the
interesting
areas
that's
being
discussed,
not
just
in
relation
to
this
side,
but
but
actually
across
the
kind
of
planning
landscape.
At
the
moment,
picking
up
on
all
of
the
issues
that
people
are
we
can
see
on
the
menu
plan
is
effectively.
How
do
you
make
good
places?
How
do
you
make
inclusive
places?
E
How
do
you
make
places
that
are
not
either
mono
tenure
that,
or
indeed
are
so
dispersed
that
there
is
no
economic
driver
for
the
kind
of
amenities
and
the
important
places
where
people
can
interact
and
where
families
can
mix
with
with
other
parts
of
the
community
and
one
of
the
issues
that
is
emerging
and
it's
a
reflection
in
some
respects
of
why
northeast
cambridge
could
be
a
very
positive
space?
E
Is
this
dynamic
about
a
population
densities?
Now
we
can
talk
about
heights
of
buildings
and
densities
of
buildings
and
so
on,
but
actually
increasingly
elements
of
population
density
and
also
workplace
and
population
density,
and
the
relationship
of
them
have
been
really
central
to
some
of
the
thinking
around
northeast
cambridge.
So
sites
like
camborne,
for
example,
are
very
relatively
low
density
locations
where,
because
of
that,
people
are
quite
remote
from
any
form
of
center,
people,
don't
walk
into
the
center
or
don't
encounter
one
another,
and
I'm
not
using
london
as
a
reference
point.
E
But
a
few
years
ago
there
was
a
lot
of
work
done
by
the
gla
around
london's
high
streets
and
why
they
were
so
exciting
and
dynamic
and
vibrant
places
and
what
they
found
effectively
when
they
mapped
all
of
the
different
land
uses
and
all
of
the
different
activities,
and
importantly,
all
of
the
different
people
that
were
using
that
space.
That
street
each
day.
E
That
became
part
of
the
that
understanding
that
having
school
children
and
parents,
and
working
and
retail
and
cafes
and
barbers
and
all
of
those
kind
of
things,
as
well
as
workspaces
right
on
top
of
each
other,
created
much
more
interaction
created.
Much
more
comfortable,
but
importantly,
much
more
economically
successful
and
sustainable
localities,
and
for
all
of
the
concerns
that
people
are
highlighting
in
northeast
cambridge.
E
I
think
one
of
the
issues
around
density
of
population
is,
you
know
some
of
these
issues
are
addressed
because
we
don't
see
them,
perhaps
in
cambridge's
growth
in
relatively
low
density,
suburban
forms
of
development.
One
of
the
things
that's
different
about
northeast
cambridge
is
its
potential
to
address
some
of
those
matters
in
a
different
way.
E
So
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of,
as
I
say,
put
a
bit
of
a
counterpoint
to
some
of
these
things
require
things
like
density
of
population,
and
how
do
you
think
and
your
comments
on
this
as
we
go
forwards?
But
how
do
you
think
we
can
achieve
that
in
an
appropriate
form
and
terry's
talked
about
some
of
the
changes
that
we
that
we've
made
but
it?
But
what
you
want
to
achieve
in
terms
of
those
concerns
in
part
or
a
function
of
population
densities
in
in
locations
going
forward.
A
Thanks
steven
and
what
we've
I
didn't
introduce
you
the
bidding
kicking
because
I
knew
you
were
joining
late,
so
this
is
steven
he's
he's
director
of
plum
economic
development
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
him
as
well,
so
he'll
be
joining
the
panel.
So
seeing
questions
come
through
now.
Thank
you
for
engaging
with
this.
It's
been.
A
C
Yeah,
thank
you
paul
yeah,
so
hopefully
everyone's
aware
that
both
of
the
local
authorities
have
declared
climate
change
emergencies
and
the
sustainability
agenda
has
grown
massively
in
the
last
10
years
or
more
and
is
at
the
forefront,
and
that
certainly
comes
through
in
the
consultation
responses
that
we've
had
to
both
issues
and
options
and
to
the
draft
plan
about
the
priority
that
we
should
be
placing
in
the
plan
on
addressing
sustainability
generally
and
therefore,
we've
proposed
very
ambitious
targets
within
the
plan
stretch
targets
beyond
national
standards,
in
particular
we're
promoting,
obviously,
net
zero
carbon
development,
but
we're
also
trying
to
drive
down
water
consumption
from
we're.
C
Currently
across
cambridge
we've
got
a
a
per
person
use
of
around
about
133
liters.
The
government's
target
is
110
liters
per
person,
and
we
are
proposing
80
liters
per
person.
So
we're
really
stretching
these
targets.
C
We
are
not
promoting
any
fossil
fuels,
so
no
gas
boilers
or
anything
else,
recognizing
the
direction
of
travel
that
needs
to
be
taken
there,
but
likewise
driving
down
energy
consumption
through
well
with
we'd
like
to
have
promoted
a
sort
of
district-wide
hidden
energy
network.
Actually,
the
work
that
we
did
identified
that
actually
we
were
better
off
looking
at
smaller
scale,
decarbonised
energy
networks
across
the
area,
so
that's
what's
being
promoted
that
will
help
reduce
the
the
draw
on
the
national
grid.
C
We
think
that's
the
right
thing
to
do
in
terms
of
making
everyone
try
to
at
least
achieve
the
targets
on
site
where
they
can,
and
that
should
be.
The
aspiration
here
is
to
really
challenge
the
development
industry
to
deliver
on
our
our
expectations.
I
think
it's
local
authorities,
but
as
community
for
them
to
do
as
much
as
possible
that
they
can
on
site.
C
We
are
promoting
100
ev
charging
as
well,
recognizing
again
the
direction
of
travel
towards
electric
vehicles
being
the
dominant
form
in
the
future
and
then
looking
at
how
we
manage
traffic
generally,
even
with
evs,
they
will
drive
improved
air
quality
across
the
area,
but
that
doesn't
reduce
traffic.
C
Really
so
again
through
the
aap
we're
promoting
a
trip
budget
that
trip
budget
has
other
elements
to
it
as
well,
we're
looking
at
car
barns,
so
people
don't
have
ready
access
to
their
their
vehicles,
we're
promoting
delivery
hubs
for
to
do
the
last
green
mile
journeys
across
the
area
to
ensure
that
we
intercept
those
trips
before
they
enter
into
the
area.
C
So
looking
further
afield,
looking
at
milton
park
and
riders,
potentially
some
of
those
locations
where
we
can
intercept
vehicles
before
they
come
in,
there
was
a
question
I
think
in
the
chat
about
air
quality.
The
air
quality
of
the
area
is
not
fantastic
in
terms
of
it's
mainly
affected
by
the
existing
traffic
air
quality
of
the
a14,
but
obviously,
with
the
further
greening
of
the
area
that
we're
seeking
to
do
the
move
to
ev
chargings
ev
vehicles,
we
hopefully
will
see
a
significant
reduction
in
or
improvement
in
air
quality
across
the
piece.
C
C
Do
you
want
to
move
on
and
now
other
key
benefits
to
the
site,
obviously
with
the
number
of
housing
that
we're
promoting
we're,
also
promoting
a
significant
amount
of
those
to
be
affordable
housing?
C
Recognizing
that
we
have
significant
needs
right
across
cambridge
because
of
our
high
house
prices
that
there
is
those
that
are
on
low
wages,
that
that
need
support,
as
well
as
those
in
the
middle
income
bands
as
well,
that
are
struggling
to
get
onto
the
housing
ladder
or
find
suitable
accommodation
as
well.
So
we
have
the
ability,
through
the
aap,
to
provide
for
a
wide
range
of
different
types
of
housing
types
and
and
tenures
to
help
people
that
are
finding
themselves
in
in
housing
constraint
in
particular,
again
we're
just
back
on
that
slide.
C
Sorry,
there
are.
We
are
looking
towards
things
like
custom
and
self-built
housing.
We
still
see
that
there
to
be
a
role
here,
in
particular,
providing
custom
housing
where
people
buy
a
shell
and
core
effectively
and
then
fit
it
out
as
their
as
they
move
in,
and
they
can
then
fit
it
out
in
their
own
time,
but
at
least
allows
them
to
get
onto
the
housing
ladder
and
then
we're
also
ramping
up
the
standards
in
terms
of
accessibility,
so
wheelchair
housing
provision,
as
well
as
the
enhanced
part
l
standards
of
the
building
regulations
thanks.
C
Lastly,
for
me,
is
around
some
of
the
key
wider
benefits
of
here,
of
what
the
aap6
to
do,
obviously,
overall,
we're
seeking
to
substantially
enhance
the
built
and
environmental
quality
of
the
place
that
we're
looking
for
a
very
integrated
community
as
well
we're
looking
to
target
the
widest
range
of
of
residents
from
those
more
seniors
as
well
looking
to
downsize
looking
for
a
place
where
it's
easily
accessible.
C
C
We
hope
that
they
will
be
of
benefit
as
well
to
the
wider
area
and
those
strategic
connections
will
allow
people
to
within
the
surrounding
communities
to
access
those
facilities,
as
well
as
improvements
offsite,
that
the
nec
can
provide
and
again
provide
connections
from
from
this
part
of
nec2
to
other
parts
within
the
white
area
and
a
key
one
for
us,
I
think
terry's
already
touched
on,
is
looking
at
the
range
of
employment
offer
here
at
the
moment,
we
have
very
much
a
focus
on
the
science
life
sciences
and
high
tech
office
provision
as
well,
but
then
we
have
the
industrial
floor,
space
which
is
really
key
to
a
sustainable
local
economy
and
through
the
aap,
we're
kind
of
promoting
to
bridge
those
gaps
as
well
through
more
makerspace
space,
more
affordable
workspace,
small
medium
entry
price
spaces
as
well,
move
on
spaces
too.
C
So
significant
employment
opportunity,
both
construction
and
post
construction
as
well,
that
we
need
to
maximize
the
benefits
of
to
the
local
community
as
well
and
and
really
make
most
of
the
new
facilities
that
will
be
provided
here.
Thanks.
A
So
you
can
see
them
we'll
actually
come
to
some
of
these
questions
here
and
there's
a
couple
of
questions
on
plan
b.
So
I'm
going
to
come
to
caroline,
potentially
for
that
in
terms
of
strategy
and
if
the
water
treatment
work
class
doesn't
go
ahead.
Caroline
you
happy
to
answer
that.
One.
B
Yeah
I
mean
we.
We
are
clear
that
if
the
water
treatment
works
doesn't
get
approved,
then
then
we
would
need
to
find
alternative
locations
for
those
3
000.
B
And
b,
at
this
stage,
we
still
think
there's
a
reasonable
prospect
of
that
coming
forward,
and
and
but
it
but
clearly,
if
it
if
that
changes,
then
we
would
need
to
look
again
and
our
what
our
evidence
does
is
look
at
a
whole
range
of
different
strategic
spatial
options
and
we've
also
looked
at
a
significant
number
of
of
site
options.
So
we
would
have
to
look
and
see
well
if
our
most
sustainable
location
is
not
available
for
this
plan.
B
Where
is
the
next
most
sustainable
location,
and
we
would
need
to
look
really
long
and
hard
at
that
honestly,
because
that's
quite
a
significant
number
of
homes
to
find
we
would
have
to
look
at
those
other
locations
like
around
the
edge
of
cambridge.
That
would
involve
looking
at
greenbelt.
We
need
to
look
at
are
the
locations
that
are
well
served
on
public
transport
routes.
Do
we
look
at
another
new
settlement?
B
Do
we
look
at
expanding
others
further
and
we
we
would
have
to
refresh
our
our
strategy,
but
at
this
stage
we
haven't
done
that,
and
I
don't
think
that's
the
right
thing
for
us
to
do
at
this
point
in
time.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Caroline
okay,
I've
got
another
question
here
and
I
think
there's
some
of
these.
I
can
point
direction
in
in
the
chat
afterwards
to
where
some
of
these
have
already
been
picked
up
in
our
faqs
and,
I
think,
does
the
assessment
of
northeast
cambridge's,
sustainable
location
include
the
consideration
of
the
carbon
or
environmental
costs
of
decommissioning
and
moving
the
sewage
works
and,
of
course,
I
think
that
we've
answered
this
previously,
but
just
to
iterate.
A
Obviously,
any
development
that
took
place
on
nec
would
obviously
be
subject
to
our
policy
planning
policy
framework
in
place
at
that
stage,
and
hopefully
we
would
have
our
our
carbon
policies
in
place
by
that
stage.
A
So
actually
it
would
be
subject
to
the
planning
policies
in
place
at
that
time,
and,
as
caroline's
mentioned
before,
is
one
of
the
most
sustainable
locations
for
growth,
as
shown
in
our
own
sustainability,
appraising,
I
think,
there's
a
question
around
numbers
and
I'll
just
touch
on
this
again
I
mean
there's
a
question
saying:
why
are
you
so
persistent
in
exceeding
the
government
supplies
numbers
for
developments
and,
of
course,
we're
not
persistent?
A
We
have
to
do
a
job,
and
we
have
explained-
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
is-
was
very
clear
in
the
jobs
and
homes
webinar,
which
was
actually,
I
think
our
second
session,
and
it
really
went
into
detail
about
why
we
felt
the
need
that
locally.
We
needed
to
really
look
at
those
figures
properly
and
because
obviously
local
leaders
is
the
most
important
thing
is
whether
you
think
government
has
a
clear
view
on
what
is
needed
locally
or
not.
A
But
certainly
we
feel
and
what's
incumbent
upon
us
as
as
planners
and
people
who
are
preparing
plan
is
to
prepare
a
sound
plan
that
meets
its
objectively
assessed
needs
and
actually
a
lot
of
work
went
into
that.
I
don't
know
if
any
others
want
to
say
anything
to
that
stephen
or
caroline,
and
but
some
you
know
you
know,
please
do
come
in.
E
Well,
I
mean,
I
think,
I
think
what
we
would.
What
we
would
argue
is
that
what
we're
doing
on
behalf
of
the
communities
is
identifying
the
need
that
we
believe
will
arise
and
planning
for
it,
not
necessarily
following
the
government's
housing
figure.
But
that's
because
we
from
the
work
we've
done.
E
We
sincerely
believe
that
the
need
that
the
area
will
experience
for
new
homes
and
jobs
is
different,
and
if
we
don't
plan
for
that,
we
do
you
all
a
huge
disservice
in
greater
cambridge,
because
it
means
that
there
aren't
enough
homes
for
the
population
that
want
to
live
here,
and
there
are.
That
has
only
one
impact,
which
is
to
increase
the
price
of
property
as
those
who
are
more
able
to
purchase.
E
It
are
able
to
outbid
the
people
who
may
already
be
here
or
the
families
of
people
who
may
well
already
be
here,
and
it
also
means
that
local
businesses
face
the
same
challenge
when
they're
looking
for
premises
or
they
want
to
expand
or
many
long
standing.
Businesses
may
well
wish
to
expand
and
the
price
of
business
accommodation
excludes
them,
and
second
thing,
probably
there's
only
one.
But
there's
two.
E
The
second
thing
is
that
actually
all
of
those
people
end
up
coming
to
greater
cambridge,
they
just
drive
and
use
public
transport
and
so
on.
So
I
don't
think
we're
abandoning
it.
What
we
think
we've
done
is
identify
what
we
think
we
need
to
plan
for
to
meet
the
needs
that
the
area
is
going
to
experience
and
just
paul.
I
don't
think
you
fully
covered
off
the
point
that
was
raised
about
the
carbon
footprint
of
relocation.
E
I
think
the
question
related
to
whether
or
not
the
the
net
effect
of
redeveloping
northeast
cambridge
and
the
water
stream
works
had
been
considered,
and
I
think
caroline
just
to
highlight,
I
think,
caroline
highlighted
that
the
sustainability
appraisal,
that's
associated
with
the
local
plan,
is
one
of
those
areas
in
which
the
consideration
of
the
cumulative
effects
of
the
local
plan
will
will
be
considered.
A
Thank
you
steven
thanks
for
that
clarification
as
well.
So
just
a
couple
more
questions
here,
and
I
think
I
could
see
terry
is
just
typing
an
answer,
but
there's
some
questions
around
green
walls
and
pieces
like
that
which
are
some
design
pieces,
just
know
that
you'd
be
interested
in.
Do
you
want?
Do
you
want
to
do
you
want
to
answer
that?
One
live
terry
and
stay
tuned.
Save
your
fingers
from
typing.
D
D
You
know
there's
a
lot
you
can
do
you
know,
particularly
for
the
smaller
species
and
things
around
green,
green
roofs
and
walls,
but
also
in
terms
of
the
kind
of
the
thermal
properties
of
buildings
and
how
they
work
so
thinking
about
the
kind
of
heat
island
effect
and
how
you
can
use
green
walls
and
that
to
actually
help
to
you
know,
maintain
sort
of
building
temperatures
and
heat
loss
and
things
so
yeah,
there's
kind
of
there's
a
double-sided
coin
on
that
one
thanks.
A
Terry,
I
know
we're
a
little
bit
over.
We've
only
got
a
couple
of
questions
left,
so
I'm
going
to
spin
through
them.
There's
a
question
here:
around
parking
provision
will
that
be
for
people
who
are
not
qualifying
for
blue
badge
have
great
difficulty
and
perhaps
only
temporary
in
walking
more
than
a
very
short
distance
matt.
C
I
can
see
you're
off
and
ready
to
go
with
this
one
yeah
yeah.
So
we
are
we've
made
provision.
Obviously
I
think,
and
obviously
blue
badge
parking
will
be
outside
of
the
residential
dwellings
and
as
close
as
possible
to
those
as
well.
There's
parking
will
be
for
servicing
as
well
for
service
vehicles
and
things
like
that
in
terms
of
people
with
mobility
issues,
we're
making
provision
for
mobility,
scooters,
electric
mobility
scooters
in
particular
to
facilitate
those
as
well.
C
We
recognize
that
there
will
be
a
wide
range
of
different
types
of
beyond
just
bikes,
different
types
of
ways
and
means
of
getting
around
and
other
than
that
we're
looking
at
internal
trips
through
sort
of
localized
shuttle
services
and
things
like
that
to
move
people
internally
around
the
place
as
well,
so
they
will
connect
up
with
the
local
bus
networks
too.
So
there'll
be
a
wide
range
of
different
sustainable
modes
of
travel
within
the
area,
not
just
walking
the
cycle.
A
Thanks
matt
question
here
on
the
emerging
policy,
isn't
written,
which
reads,
leaves
a
policy
vacuum
in
terms
of
being
more
than
a
dco.
C
Yeah,
do
you
want
me
to
do
that?
One
as
well?
Yeah
I
mean
we've
got
both
local
plans
were
adopted,
2018.
They
are
the
extent
planning
policies
they
account
for
their
current
circumstances
on
site
and
therefore
any
development
comes
forward
ahead
of
either
the
emerging
local
plan
or
the
aap
will
need
to
be
dealt
with
in
terms
of
the
extent
existing
planning
policies
that
are
there.
C
B
And
I
think
just
to
add
to
that
it
under
circumstances
that
the
water
treatment
works
didn't
relocate,
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
that
might
have
also
been
part
of
the
question.
We
would
obviously
need
to
look
afresh
whether
we
needed
additional
policies
to
cover
places
like
the
science
park
and
the
area
around
the
station
and
so
on.
So
we
would.
We
would
reflect
on
whether
we
needed
anything.
A
Thanks
carolina,
and
actually
just
one
with
this
last
question,
I
think
just
to
clarify
again
so
there's
a
question
around
the
sustainability
appraisal
in
terms
of
the
embodied
carbon
and,
obviously
the
contamination
of
the
existing
waterworks.
Will
the
soil
of
the
old
works
be
taken
away,
as
it
has
high
metallus
content
from
sewage?
Do
you
want
just
explain
the
sustainability
appraisal
piece
that
stephen
touched
on
in
relation
to
the
in
the
movement
of
the
water
treatment
works,
caroline,
just
just
to
touch
on
them.
B
So
the
air
reaction
plan
clearly
needs
to
understand
the
risk
of
contamination,
and
there
is
a
contamination
study
as
part
of
the
evidence
supporting
the
area
action
plan
which
has
looked
at
what
conditions
their
ground
conditions
they
might
be
and
how
they
might
need
to
be
addressed,
and
the
sustainability
appraisal
also
looks
at
and
understands
what
risks
there
may
be
to
soil
and
so
on
as
part
of
that
sustainability
process.
B
C
C
Now
the
environmental
regulations
pretty
much
require
nearly
all
of
the
contaminants
to
be
treated
are
outside
onsite
on
source,
which
limits
the
amount
of
excavation
that's
required,
and
then
it's
remediated
on
site
as
well
to
make
it
fit
for
purpose.
It's
only
really
where
you've
got
some
very
noxious
stuff
that
has
to
be
taken
off
and
it
has
to
be
treated
in
a
proper,
proper
processing
plan
to
to
deal
with
those
very
noxious
chemicals
which
we're
not
anticipating.
Here
sorry,
yeah.
D
A
Up
now,
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everybody
for
for
coming
along
and
not
just
the
panel
who've
been
great,
but
also
all
of
you
for
coming
in
and
joining
in
and
getting
involved
in
discussion,
giving
us
your
thoughts
and
questions.
As
I
said
at
the
beginning,
there
will
be
this
will
go
up,
live
including
the
slide
deck
and
on
to
our
website.
I
think
it
probably
will
be
by
the
end
of
the
week.
A
Usually
it's
pretty
quick,
we'll
deal
with
those
things
pretty
quickly
and
but
other
than
that
we
have
got
no
more
webinar
sessions.
So
this
was
the
last
one.
You'll
be
quite
glad
to
know
those
of
you
been
to
every
single
one.
You
don't
have
to
look
at
my
face
anymore
and
but
you
might
be
able
to
look
at
it
in
recording
if
you
really
wanted
to
have
a
lovely
week.
All
of
you
and
thank
you
for
attending
and
thanks
to
the
panel
and
I'll
see
you
all
soon.