►
From YouTube: PV:vPA Solutions Brainstorm for F9 06152022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
here,
we
are
welcome
to
this
after
town
hall.
This
is
a
discussion
about
for
the
proposal
assessors
and
veteran
proposal
assessors
until
we
get
that
naming
figured
out,
and
our
goal
here
is
to
brainstorm,
look
at
some
of
the
sense
solution
or
sense
issues
from
fund
8
that
we
have
compiled
and
have
a
good
uploaded
list
of
here
and
think
about
our
approach
to
solving
them
for
fund
nine.
A
And
then
we
also
have
two
groups
here
present
and
maybe
others
will
join,
who
are
actively
working
on
things
that
are
related
to
this
group
and
we're
going
to
just
give
them
some
space
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what's
going
on
both
in
an
informational
way
and
then
in
an
engagement
way.
Maybe
you'll
find
some
some
additional
support
or
cross-collaborative
opportunities,
and
then
hopefully,
by
the
end
of
this,
we
have
some
some
marching
orders
and
some
things
that
we
can.
We
can
take
further
and
then.
A
Finally,
if
there's
anything
that
isn't
on
our
list,
that
we
think
should
be.
We
can
also
consider
that
okay
sound
good,
so
I'm
gonna
kick
it
with
that
over
to
zoe
and
zoe
you're
working
on
the
renaming
initiative
fantastically
so
I
I
pass
to
you
and
maybe
we
can
give
ourselves
like
up
to,
however
long
it
takes
we'll
try
to
go
to
like
15-20
minutes.
Maybe
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
stuff
today,
so
we'll
try
to
be
as
distinct
as
we
can,
but
also
as
comprehensive
as
possible.
Thanks
go
ahead.
Zoe.
B
Awesome,
thank
you.
So
I've
been
organizing
the
renaming
initiative
because
there
was
always
much
discussion
around
the
term,
especially
the
term
community
advisor
now
that
got
changed
and
with
the
same
breath
we
just
also
changed
vca
to
vpa.
B
Now
I
was
I
had
this
idea
of
changing
from
roles
to
stages
and
gathered
some
people
invited
some
I'll
also
invite
you
I'll
send
a
telegram
link
and
if
you
are
watching
this
without
access
to
the
zoom
chat,
it's
it's.
The
link
is
just
t
for
telegram
that
me
slash
renaming
initiative
without
special
characters
or
anything
with
that.
You
can
just
join
the
telegram
announcement
channel.
There's
also
a
discussion
group
and
the
next
step
I'll
be
doing.
Is
I
made
a
introduction
and
summary
video?
B
I
still
need
to
edit
that
and
as
soon
as
it
is
ready
I'll
send
it
into
into
this
announcement
channel
yeah,
and
then
we
proceed
the
status
as
it
is
now
we
just
brainstormed.
I
introduced
some
folks
to
the
stages.
Instead
of
rose
staff,
we
discussed
first
problems,
we
see
and
yeah
the
next
things
will
be
to
to
get
the
detailed
process.
Look
at
how
we
could
group
it
into
meaningful
stages,
what
roles
we
would
like
to
keep
and
how
we
could
name
everything.
B
B
Expect
the
unexpected
always
yeah.
No
it's
it's
it's!
It's
absolutely
amazing!
Really
I
sometimes
it's
very
humbling.
It's
really
really
really
humbling
to
to
just
see
how
many
people
have
ideas
and
and
how
you
can,
just
if
you,
if
you
give
somebody
a
space
they
can
where
they
can
grow,
they
will
grow
in
and
it's
it's
actually
amazing,
and
what
I
learned
about
the
names
is
that
naming
is
yeah
important
and,
and
it
makes
great
sense
to
have
clarity
and
stuff,
but
yeah
about
working
with
people.
It's
just
it's.
B
It's
amazing,
yeah
and
about
at
the
question
in
in
the
chat.
Is
this
thing?
Is
this
conveying
discord,
unfortunately,
not.
B
No
sorry-
and
I
I
can't
just
take
a
place
where
this
will
be
where
this
could
work
just
on
top
from
top
of
my
head.
I
don't
know
if
you,
if
you
got
an
idea
where
such
a
channel
would
be
nice.
Just
let
me
know
square
circle,
catalyst,
united.
C
B
A
Yeah,
I'm
sure,
if
there's,
if
there's
need
for
okay,
if
there's
need
for
it
cool,
I
I
think
that
so
are
you
you're
recording
the
discussions
too.
Is
that
right.
A
B
I'm
excited
I'm
working
on
on
those
at
the
moment,
and
the
video
I
will
share
is
is
a
summary
and
not
the
whole
discussions.
Yeah.
I
don't
know
you
know
I
I
just
I
don't.
I
don't
like
this
approach
of
throwing
several
hours,
videos
on
people
kind
of-
maybe
maybe
everybody
likes
them,
but.
A
Yeah,
I
think
some
people,
I
think
some
people
do
and
some
don't.
I
guess
it's
just
especially
for
people
who
are
newer.
Some
some
people
are
really
familiar
with
this
process
and
some
are-
and
some
are
newer.
So
that's
like
really
part
of
the
organizing
of
it.
Isn't
it
it's
like.
How
do
you?
How
do
you
really
keep
everyone
a
bridge
than
not
like
you
know,
have
us
watch
marathons
of
meetings
like
this
one,
so
so
yeah?
I
totally
agree
so
good
on
you
for
doing
this.
A
Any
any
questions
on
this
or
comments
on
the
changing
of
the
name
overall
and
or
any
any
stuff
for
zoe
that
you
wanna.
That
should
be
raised
here
in
reference
to
this.
D
I
think
that
we're
a
worldwide
community-
and
we
have
to
be
explicit
about
the
naming-
we
have
to
use
words
that
relate
exactly
to
what
we're
doing,
and
we
should
strive
for
that
in
every
area
of
of
endeavor.
D
Here,
I'm
doing
some
writing
some
articles
and
things
about
catalysts
about
cardano
and
I'm
finding
myself
trying
to
be
very
careful
with
my
phrasing
turns
of
phrase
slang
things
like
this,
so
that
when
it
goes
through
the
you
know,
the
quickest
translation
possible
is
to
maybe
go
through
like
a
google
translate
or
something
like
that,
and
then
edit
that,
on
the
other
end,
for
somebody
is,
is
what
some
people
are
doing
and
then
there's
other
methods
that
are
using
other
approaches,
and
these
do
not
benefit
well
from
using
turns
of
phrase
or
slang
or
even
just
inaccurate
names
that
maybe
are
there
just
for
legacy's
sake
or
some
sort
of
you
know.
D
People
are
used
to
it
or
it's
a
tradition
or
so
you
know
I
mean
it's
embedded
in
the
culture
or
something.
So
we
have
to
be
explicit
about
making
sure
we
don't
adhere
only
to
like
some
sort
of
tradition
or
a
culture,
but
also
maybe
make
the
culture
that
we're
always
looking
to
simplify
things
for
a
worldwide
community
and
and
looking
at
it
from
that
angle
is
maybe
part
of
the
culture
that
we
want
to
adopt.
B
Thank
you.
That's
that's
a
also
great
part
of
the
goal
that
it's
clari
clarified,
everything
and,
and
you
you
don't
have
to
second
guess,
or
I
mean
many
people
when
when
ca
was
still
a
thing
many
people
came
in
and
you
know
you
could
explain
it
to
them
and
stuff,
but
you
you
have
you
had
to
always
explain
it
and
yeah.
I
totally
agree
with
you
thanks
very
much
for
the
input.
Can
I.
D
Share
one
more
thing
sure
I
actually
didn't
become
a
ca
right
away,
because
I
was
like
what
do
I
have
any
business
becoming
a
community
advisor
and
everybody
day
one
was
like
you
could
be
a
ca
right
now.
You
can
do
that
and
I
was
like
that
makes
no
sense,
because
I
didn't-
and
I
didn't
even
look
into
it
enough
to
know
that
it
did
make
sense,
but
it
was
like.
Oh
a
proposal.
Assessor.
Oh
that's
attainable,
that's
something
I
could
achieve.
D
D
B
Awesome
yeah
awesome,
it's
also.
If
we
got
if
we
have
this
term
free
from
from
this
bamboozling
usage,
you
can
actually
implement
the
role
community
advisor
and
really
have
them
as
community
advisors.
That's
also
part
of
this
part
of
this
whole
naming
thing
awesome.
B
E
Hey
folks,
I
guess
my
question
is
just
really
simple:
what
was
the
impetus
and
also
what's
up
to
cardona,
benjamin
and
jonathan?
E
You
guys
were
part
of
the
last
week
that
the
discussion
was
cardona
benjamin,
I
would
say,
don't
shortchange
yourself,
because
you
might
have
a
world
of
experience
over
someone
who's
coming
in.
You
know
today
as
day
one.
So
you
never
know
it's
all
relative,
but
yeah,
I'm
just
curious
what
the
impetus
was
for,
I
kind
of
get
it.
I
guess
it
seems
like
for
clarification
purposes.
These
are
different
words
advisor.
You
know
et
cetera,
community
advisor
versus
proposal,
assessor.
E
If
I
got
that
right,
but
yeah,
I'm
just
curious.
If
there
was
like
a
lot
of
confusion
or
you
know
how
it
came
about
to
start
this
initiative.
B
Yeah
kind
of
all
the
time
when,
when
I
when
I
came
in,
I
I
joined
catalyst
in
fund
seven
and
I
kinda
right
away
addressed
that,
and
many
people
told
me
hey.
This
is
this
is
normal
that
you
get
confused
about
that
yeah.
We
understand
and
we
had
to
learn
it
too
and
stuff,
and
everybody
got
into
this
explaining
explaining
mode
and
stuff,
and
I
understood
and
yeah
started
using
myself
and
stuff,
but
I
I'm
not
the
only
one
that
talks
about
it.
B
Yeah.
Oh
it's
also
crazer.
He
when
I,
when
I
talked
to
him
about
it.
He
said
that
he's
talking
about
it's
in
several
funds
and
stuff
and
then
iot
just
you
know
in
constant
communication
with
circle
and
circle
being
in
constant
conversation
with
the
community
decided
to
yeah
just
change
that
as
a
first
step
and
yeah
just
to
to
look
what
what
happens
and
that
this
first
thingy
is
kinda
out
of
the
way
yeah.
B
So
that
wasn't
that
that
wasn't
my
achievement
or
something
or
the
achievement
of
this
initiative.
That
was
just
the
first
step
as
a
result,
from
an
ongoing
conversation.
A
C
F
I
really
like
what
zoe
presented
in
discord-
and
I
think
many
people
talked
about
that,
and
I
really
like
that
conversation
in
discord,
because
it's
so
supportive,
unlike
in
some
telegram
groups,
but
the
point
was
that
let's
focus
on
what
needs
to
be
done,
let's
focus
on
the
tasks
and
then,
let's
focus
on
what
kind
of
people
are
needed
to
do
those
tasks
and
who
is
okay
to
do
at
what
stage
and
blah
blah.
F
So
for
me,
this
pa
vpa
thing
is
just
like
a
intermediate
intermediary
step
on
our
way
to
coming
to
understanding
like
what
the
process
is,
what
the
stages
in
the
process
are,
what
the
different
tasks
are,
that
people
can
take
up
what
is
required
from
them.
Is
it
the
bronze
level
or
silver
level
or
gold
level
person?
That
is
able
to
do
this,
that
and
that
task,
and
that's
going
to
be
so
much
easier
for
people
to
understand,
especially
when
we
have
these
reputation,
systems
and
whatnot
in
place.
E
Would
would
this
be
in
any
way
connected
to
the
project
in
the
discussion
that
I
was
in
last
week
that
that
was
I'm
fearing
the
name
of
the
platform
that
I'm
sorry,
jonathan,
our
cardano
benjamin,
you
guys
remember
the
name
of
that
platform
that
we
were
on
it
was.
F
E
Is
this
connected
to
that
because
it
seems
like
this
is
all
about
sort
of.
You
know,
as
I
just
heard
reputation
again,
and
that
word
came
up
as
well
last
week
and
it
seems
like
there
is
a
common
honest
you
know,
goal
or
or
something
to
sort
of
have
people
you
know,
have
the
ability
to
acknowledge
people.
You
know
folks
contribution
and
have
some
consistent
reference.
D
That
conversation,
oh,
can
I
mention
something
just
to
kind
of
share
what
you
were
mentioning
there
yeah
last
week's
conversation
was
about
the
use
of
d-work
as
a
platform
to
kind
of
recognize
the
work
of
people
that
people
were
doing
and
sharing
some
tokens
to
them
for
doing
work
for
the
catalyst
circle
in
specific
talking
about
catalyst,
swarm
bounty
board.
I
I
think
it's
not
the
same
thing
but
yeah.
D
I
think
we're
talking
about
from
my
understanding,
just
like
simplifying
and
renaming
in
in
this
in
this
sense
to
maybe
maybe
from
that
point
zoe
could
maybe
respond
now,
but
yeah.
We
were
just
talking
about
something
regarding
catalyst
circle
last
time
and
the
bounties
and
whatnot.
H
G
I
seems
quite
relevant.
Some
of
these
questions
are
quite
relevant
to
what
we're
talking
about.
A
G
So
we
had
a
fund,
a
proposal
to
do
a
needs
assessment
and
then
a
needs
assessment
as
in
what
do
people
need
to
know
how
to
do
if
they're
going
to
be
community
advisors-
and
you
know-
that's
changed
to
proposal
advisor
so
I
started.
I
started
on
that
with
a
google
doc
and
there's
information
about
that.
So
what
I
have
to
show
is
there's
an
overview
on
our
website.
I
have
a
curriculum
piece
that
I've
I've
got
I'll,
show
you
all
these
momentarily.
G
I've
come
up
with
an
assessor's
template
and
also
we
have
a
a
build
out
in
discord
for
getting
feedback,
so
it's
kind
of
a
full
meal
deal,
and
this
is
a
full
meal
deal,
because
this
is
our
fundy
proposal.
This
is
what
we
asked
about
doing
and
we
got
some
funding
to
do
this.
So
this
is
why
it's
fairly
well
built
out
at
this
point.
G
G
G
One
thing
that
came
out
of
that
is:
how
do
you
acknowledge
people-
and
I
don't
have
a
good
answer
for
that
really,
but
anyway,
we're
going
with
our
second
part
of
this,
which
actually
synthesizes
some
of
the
input
from
that
first,
google
doc
and
we've
now
continuing
with
the
competencies
approach.
G
This
version
of
what
that
could
look
like
as
far
as
what
someone
learning
about
being
a
ca
or
pa
could
look
like-
and
this
was
I
didn't
know
about
zoe's
work
at
the
time,
and
it
was
interesting
to
see
that
apparently
that
idea
of
doing
things
by
phases
sort
of
coalesced
at
the
same
time
as
we
were
working
on
our
proposal-
and
we
didn't
hear
about
this
till
after
the
proposal
was
already
funded.
So
I'd
already
committed
to
doing
all
this
before
I
heard
of
the
work.
G
G
So,
as
you
can
see,
it's
divided
into
these
four
phases,
and
the
idea
here
is
that
each
of
these
things
people
are
kind
of
on
their
own,
to
learn
to
go
to
learn
how
to
do
each
of
these
things,
but
that
it
gives
a
map
of
everything
that
you
would
need
to
know
how
to
do
and
then
within
each
of
these
example
one
example
two
example:
three
that
would
be
linked
specifically
to
the
correct
or
useful
resources
to
meet
that
goal,
and
I
have
elsewhere
on
the
blog
here,
there's,
for
example,
with
the
ca
guide
like
so
you
arrive,
you
respond
to
an
email
and
you
create
your
account.
G
Then
you
submit
a
receive
address.
Then
you
look
at
the
dates
and
you
get
yourselves
organized,
so
you
do
all
those
four
things
in
the
arrive
phase
and
then,
as
you're
getting
more
ready
to
actually
reports.
You
read
the
ca
guide
and
I
do
actually
have
a
time
stamped,
annotated
version
of
that
one
of
the
recent
catalyst
school
videos.
So
I
linked
a
whole
bunch
of
topics
but
they're,
not
they're,
not
linked
here
yet
but
anyway.
This
because
this
is
still
actually
tentative
and
we're
still
looking
for
community
input
on
this.
G
So
you
would
read
the
guide
and
then
you
would
read
about
the
challenge
and
then
you
would
assess
yourself
and
then
you
would
select
the
challenges
and
so
on
and
so
on.
Then
you
would
engage
and
you
would
assess
okay
and
as
far
as
the
assessment
go,
that's
really
the
key
part.
This
is
the
current
stream
and
then
I've
come
up
with
a
proposed
stream
and
I'll
just
show
you
the
further
proposed
stream.
G
I
would
propose
this
template
and
I
used
to
be
an
english
teacher,
so
I
kind
of
think
content.
I
know,
americans
call
it
a
template,
so
I
can
do
that
too
or
rubric.
It's
kind
of
a
marking,
it's
kind
of
a
marking
guide.
So
with
the
criteria
or
the
the
components
of
a
proposal
on
this
axis,
the
deliverables,
the
rule
about
the
team
in
the
budget
seems
to
be
those
things
we
want
to
know
how
to
assess
and
then
what
does
this
mean
well?
Did
they
define
their
terms?
Did
they
explain
stuff?
G
Did
they
give
evidence
and
then
for
the
three
criteria
for
the
challenge,
and
this
matrix
shows
how
you
know
different
things?
You
would
look.
You
know,
for
example,
on
the
deliberate
rules.
Does
the
proposal
specify
what's
going
to
be
created
or
implemented
sort
of
a
yes
or
no,
or
it
could
be
a
one
out
of
ten?
G
So
I
haven't,
quite
you
know,
finalized
how
this
could
work,
but
this
this
would
be
the
idea
that
assessors
could
use
something
like
this
also
to
prepare
themselves,
and
you
could
also
use
this
to
evaluate
either
your
own
skill,
your
own
competency
in
this
area,
or
to
evaluate
someone
else's
competency,
okay,
any
questions
or
comments
so
far,
otherwise
I'll
go
to
the
discord
part.
I
guess
I'll
go
to
the
discord
part
and.
G
Dev
discord
channel
our
server,
this
channel
improvements,
a
processes-
we've
added
this,
so
that
this
with
this
we've
actually
got
built
out
so
that
people
you,
for
example,
in
this
meeting
or
in
other
places
where
I've
committed
to
going
like
cadena
forum
in
telegram
other
places
on
discord,
inviting
people
to
come
here
to
talk
specifically
about
those
things
so
in
in
these,
for
example,
in
these
areas,
so
that
these
would
be,
I
think,
they're
called
threads,
I'm
not
sure
the
terminology
and
discord,
but
these
threads.
G
You
know
talking
about
this
first
one
talking
about
this
one
talking
about
this
one.
So
the
idea
is,
for
example,
assess
the
budget
that
you
look
at
what
I
just
showed
you
like
the
big
template,
the
big
the
big
overview,
the
curriculum
document.
Do
you
agree?
That's
you
know
a
priority
competency
to
assess
the
budget.
Do
you
agree
on
the
wording?
Do
you
agree
on
the
resources?
G
Do
you
agree
with
that's
what
it
means?
You
know
the
whole
thing.
So
all
the
conversation
on
that
topic
would
be
here
in
the
in
our
server
here.
Also
I'm
very
willing
to
take
a
conversation
in
the
channel
if
people
are
not
in
discord
can
certainly
email
me
and
we
can
find
another
way
to.
We
could
put
that
on
our
moding
website.
Actually,
so
that's
what
we've
got
going
here
and
we're
certainly
looking
for
feedback
on
what
I
just
showed
you
and
that's.
Why
I'm
here
today
also
to
connect
with
everybody
here.
I
Sorry
but
yeah
great
yeah-
this
is
very
nice
michael
and
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
with
that.
So,
as
fund
8
was
getting
started,
I
learned
about
the
work
that
michael
was
doing
with
his
business
partner.
Paul
and
we've
had
some
really
good
discussions
and,
in
my
own
ca,
improving
integrity
of
ca
processes.
I
Proposal
for
this
round
I
had
put,
I
had
reserved
funds
for
someone
in
the
ca
community
who,
who
was
you
know
putting
forward
a
good
initiative
like
this,
and
so
I'm
fo-tech
is
providing
some
sponsorship
for
their
work
as
well,
and
in
addition
to
that,
it's
it's
still
in
the
planning
stages.
I
But
I'm
in
discussions
with
the
snap
gorilla
team-
and
I
have
a
meeting
with
them
tomorrow
to
see
if
we
can
kind
of
finalize
the
first
steps
of
a
plan
where,
as
michael
is
saying,
he
wants
to
have
feedback
from
the
community
and
snapgrilla
has
tools
to
formalize.
That
feedback,
where
part
of
what
I
proposed,
is
evaluating
the
possibility
of
using
the
quadratic
funding
within
the
ca
assessment
process
and
michael
had
a
really
nice
idea
that
he
actually
wants
like
an
assessment
of
his
competency
tools,
and
this
actually
makes
it
real.
I
Rather
than
setting
up
like
a
dummy
test
of
using
the
quadratic
voting.
We're
going
to
try
to
set
up
a
possibility
of
cas
using
both
the
dids
tools
that
snaprela
is
setting
up
and
their
quadratic
voting
capability.
I
And
I
don't
think
anyone
from
snap
gorilla
is
here
today,
but
just
to
kind
of
give
a
little
background
their.
They
had
some
independent
funding,
independent
of
the
catalyst
they
had
their
own
funding
and
have
already
developed
a
pretty
sophisticated
platform
that
is
ultimately
for
facilitating,
diverse
recruiting
in
high
tech
and
but
as
part
of
that
they
they
have
built
the
they.
They
are
in
the
process
of
building
the
equivalent
to
what's
called
git
coin
on
the
ethereum
side
and
making
that
available
for
the
cardinal
community.
I
G
I
Very
exciting
and
are
you
guessing
and
in
coming
weeks,
I'll
have
more
to
share.
A
So
for
each
of
your
initiatives,
what
are
some
things
that
you
that
you
need
immediately
if
it
are
the
things
that
the
community
can
support
on,
are
the
things
that
you
need:
feedback
or
involvement
on
what
are
some
ways
that
that
people
could
engage
from
here
on
or
is
it
more
just
staying
informed
and
and
providing
feedback?
How
should
people
do
that.
I
What
what
we'll
need
in
particular,
is
people
in
the
community
to
review
this
and
I'm
hoping
to
set
up
like
a
bounty
process
where
those
reviewers
will
get
a
small
reward
for
participating
in
the
review
and
and
the
and
the
bounty
process
will
also
be
part
of
the
quadratic
voting
within
using
the
snaprela
website.
G
G
The
bounties
are
probably
going
to
be
necessary
to
ensure
that
we
get
some
the
right
kind
of
input
and
another
thing,
interestingly,
came
up
in
in
the
phase
one
of
this
project,
which
was
just
in
a
google
doc,
and
only
four
people
came
in,
but
still
it
was
very
rich
input
and
one
person
was
really
commenting
on
the
use
of
you
know
sort
of
open
source
contributions,
and
how
does
that?
You
know
how
do
people
really
get?
G
You
know
like,
if
not
like,
rewarded
in
some
way
anyway,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
at
least
start
to
be
capturing
this
in
terms
of
reputational
points.
Somehow
and
that's
been
talked
about,
whether
it's
not
a
payment
or
not
per
se,
but
at
least
some
kind
of
reputation
points,
and
that's
all
very
much,
I
guess
early
days
to
say
exactly
how
that
should
work,
but
we're
very
interested
in
that,
because
you
know
that
kind
of
input
is
really
the
gas
for
all
these
things
to
be
working
on.
So.
G
I
think
that's
about
all.
I
have
to
say
except
please
I
I'll
put
that
in
the
chat.
If
I
haven't
already
and
that's
what
we're
doing
and
we
need,
we
need
input
and
we're
gonna
be
going
to
be
going
out
with
this
information
to
a
bunch
of
different
sources,
two
more
times
after
this.
E
Sure
why
not
call
me
a
crazy
but
like,
and
I'm
not
trying
to
sort
of
shoehorn
last
week's
discussion
into
this,
but
I'm
just
listening
and
it
seems
like
there
is
power.
You
know,
there's
some
crossover
and
what's
with
that
discussion,
what
that
discussion
was
and
what
we're
talking
about
right
now
same
words
are
being
used,
reputation,
etc,
and
it
seems
like
there
is
in
outreach.
As
felix
was
having
last
week,
he
was
looking
for
input,
I'm
wondering
michael,
have
you
touched
base
with
felix
on
his
project?
E
What
he's
got
going
on
because
it
seems
like
that
should
probably
happen?
Maybe
you
guys
are
asking
a
lot
of
the
same
stuff
and
it
seems
like
there
should
be
some.
You
know
synergy
going
on
between
you
guys.
It's
it's
just
obvious.
So
that's
why
I
want
to
say
that
and
if
I'm
very
wrong,
I
apologize,
but
I
just
want
to
put.
G
Yeah
indeed,
there's
all
kinds
of
possible
synergies,
and-
and
it's
great
that
that
ken
rick
and
kendrick's
group
and
our
group
can
argue,
are
getting
once
one
of
those
synergies
going.
That's
great.
I
haven't
heard
of
felix's,
I
I
know
also
len
len.
I
forget
his
last
name
also
has
a
a
relevant
project,
so
I
haven't-
and
maybe
I
can
maybe
nadia
can
help
me-
connect
those
dots
right.
E
Felix's
was
about
creating,
you
know,
a
a
a
token
that
is
not
necessarily
monetary.
It's
just
for
reputation
and
he
was
trying
to
you
know,
get
some
input
as
to
how
it
could
be
utilized.
E
I
guess
most
readily
and
and
also
looking
for
any
feedback,
and
you
know
he
was
kind
of
just
feeling
out.
I
guess
kind
of
just
cold
response
to
see
what
we
had
to
say
about
it
and
I
felt
like
it
was
pretty
good
discussion
and.
G
E
A
Okay,
what
do
you,
what
are
you
thinking,
michael
about
and
then
ellen
I'll,
come
right
to
you
about
the
beginnings
of
the
application
for
this
coming
fund?
Are
you
feeling
like,
because
we
don't
have
long
until
we
do
that
on
board?
I
think
this
is
a
fun
10
thing
for
them
for
the
entirety
of
it
or
they're
you're,
going
to
try
to
get
something
in
place
for.
G
G
G
Okay,
yeah,
I
don't
know
the
process
yeah,
I
don't
know
the
post
is
one
one
thing
you
know
I
noticed
clearly
in
fund
nine.
Was
that
the
there
are
no
there's
almost
no
funding
for
educational
stuff
in
fund
nine,
unlike
fund
date,
there
was
all
kinds
of
funding
right,
so
I'm
not
exactly
sure
where
things
are
gonna
go
in
the
immediate
future
and
actually
maybe
I'm
not
sure.
I
think
that
will
emerge
and
see
how
far
we
get
this
summer
too
right
like
camera
can,
maybe
you
could
even.
I
Yeah,
the
only
thing
I
would
say
is
I
I
experienced
something
similar
with
last
year's
work,
that
voter
did,
and
so
I've
tended
to
now
propose
longer
projects
and
not
try
to
do
it
all
in
a
hurry.
Just
because
you
don't
know
exactly
cycle
to
cycle
what
funding
you're
going
to
have
available
for
projects.
G
I,
I
guess
just
to
say
on
nadia
I
don't
really
know,
and
I'm
certainly
we're
certainly
open
to
suggestions
about
a
good
way
to
to
do
it.
It
seems
to
me
that
you
know
like
a
lot
of
the
fun
date
conversation
let's
face.
It
was
about
people
gaming,
the
system
that
was
a
big
large
part
of
the
conversation
telegram
as
the
voting
started
and
around
that
whole
phase,
and
it
seems
to
us
that
having
a
competency-based
thing
and
just
shining
light
on
that,
it's
one
way
to
shine
light
on
that
whole
process.
G
Even
though
the
incentives
are
really
much
more
important
than
incompetence,
but
but
it's
still
one
way
to
shine
light
on
the
whole
process.
So
we're
open
suggestions
about
how
we
can
move
the
whole
thing
forward.
Past
fund,
eight
and
in
fund
nine,
actually
we're
thinking
of
proposing
for
fun
nine
along
the
lines
of
dao,
but
that's
kind
of
a
different,
a
different
topic
as
well.
So
I
don't
know
but
we're
open.
A
It
seems
it
might
lend
itself
in
in
very
specific
phases,
like
this
phase
works
for
this.
This
phase,
with
a
portion
of
it
works
for
this
fun.
We
can
try
this
out.
We
can
see
how
it
adopts.
We
can,
you
know,
then
sort
of
establish
what
works
and
what
doesn't
and
the
the
more
complex
to
build
stuff.
The
more
integrated
stuff
might
be
longer,
but
maybe
you
tested
competencies
early
and
just
get
feedback
on
it.
A
G
Yeah
and-
and
it
seems
like
if
we
can
get
especially
if
we
get
some
bounties
and
get
some-
you
know
dedicated
participation
in
getting
the
feedback,
then
they're
actually
looking
at
really
quite
robust
data
to
build
decisions
on
you
know
if
there's
x,
number
of
people
saying
they
agree
this
or
they
agree
to
some
extent
or
whatever
I
don't
know
the
process,
but
it
seems
to
me
you
can
go
back
to
higher
up
in
the
food
chain
and
say
here's
here's
actual
data
about
what
we
could
be
doing
as
far
as
competencies
go.
I
I
I
G
C
A
You're
trying
to
mute
okay,
we
can
come
back
to
you
just
chime
in
when
you're,
when
you're
unmuted,
here
not
sure.
Sometimes
it's
and
open
the
camera
cool.
A
E
I
definitely
want
to
throw
out
the
idea.
I
like
the
the
aspect
of
competency,
because
I'm
kind
of
big
on
education.
I
mean
that's
what
I'm
spending
a
lot
of
my
time
with
in
general
and
learning
about
blockchain,
d5
and
learn,
and
I
mean
the
most
complicated
thing.
I'm
learning
about
right
now
is
how
to
navigate
the
cardinal
community.
So
you
know
that's
why
I'm
coming
to
these
meetings
and
trying
to
you
know
soak
up
as
much
as
I
can.
E
I'm
just
a
big
sponge
right
now,
so
I
would
definitely
if
I,
if
I
had
you
know
if
I
had
a
wand,
I
would
keep
that
there
and
and
maybe
keep
it
as
a
point
of
emphasis,
because
you
know
like
in
a
in
a
broader
sense.
You
know
this
is
blockchain
technology,
etc.
I
think
it's.
E
It
would
be
unfortunate,
an
unfortunate
sort
of
a
missed
opportunity
to
not
get
everybody
on
a
certain
level
to
start
with,
so
that
they
don't
feel
like
overwhelmed
or
that
maybe
this
is
not
for
me.
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
traditional
finance,
stuff
or
whatever,
even
though
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
finance
per
se.
I
like
the
idea
of
getting
people
familiar
and
giving
them
some
sort
of
direction.
E
That's
why
I
really
liked
your
the
sort
of
visual
grid
that
you
had
setting
up
people,
giving
them
a
map
to
follow
or
some
sort
of
some
sort
of
direction,
because
otherwise
it's
just
jumping
into
the
amazon
and
saying
I'm
gonna.
E
And
people
are
doing
well,
I
could
see,
but
I
mean
I'm
struggling
a
bit.
You
know,
but
I
you
know,
I
appreciate
you
guys
and
people
that
are
doing
things
like
this.
I'm
trying
to
get
to
you
guys
level
as
far
as
contributions.
So
again
I
couldn't
couldn't
you
know,
support
that
more,
the
educating
and,
and
you
know,
assessing
people's
competency
and
what
they
have
to
contribute
not
to
go
on
too
long.
But
you
know
another,
an
idea
that
I
have
of
my
own.
E
That's
that's
kind
of
you
know
in
the
same
ballpark
is
you
know
I
like
the
idea
of,
like
you
know
not
per
se
myers-briggs
assessment
but
like
when
you
come
into
the
cardano
community,
and
you
know
in
a
sense
that
you
can
take
a
sort
of
personality,
assessment
or
skills
or
interest
assessment
and
say
you
know.
This
is
where
I
stand.
This
is
my
map
of
my
interests,
my
skills
and
you
kind
of
plug
it
into
something
or
some
sort
of
module
or
some
sort
of
website
or
some
sort
of
reference
point
and
say.
E
G
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much
for
that,
and
and
actually
we
are
doing
that
in
fact
earlier
this
morning
I
did
a
session
with
a
colleague
of
mine
through
modigdev
of
actually
getting
people
up
and
running
with
a
wallet
and
an
exchange.
G
You
know
that
that
very
first
thing
and
it's
it's
really
exactly
the
same
idea
where
you've
got
a
map
of
the
of
the
steps
like
you
have
to
you
know
deal
with
your
financial
institution.
Then
you
have
to
have
a
mechanism
to
get
the
fiat
and
then
you
have,
you
know,
a
wallet,
an
exchange,
and
then
you
can
do
something
with
it.
So
it's
also
divided
into
steps
and
then
but
that's
a
map,
because
it's
going
to
vary
for
individuals,
but
also
with
our
study
buddy
the
larger
model.
G
The
study
buddy
thing
is
we.
We
set
you
up
with
partners
like
two
partners
so
that
you
three
people
who
are
all
working
at
that
more
or
less
at
that
level.
You
know
you
can
all
go
forward
and
compare
notes
about
what
you're
learning
about
wallets
or
exchanges
or
wherever
you
are.
It
could
be,
you
know,
staking
or
investing
or
whatever
so
we're
this.
This
kind
of
approach
we're
going
to
be
building
sort
of
like
they're
super
pared
down
courses,
it's
more
like
a
map
and
some
companions.
G
Yeah
so
please
check
out
our
website
and
and
go
in
there,
and
actually
there
is
the
the
the
form
and
there's
an
intake
form
on
there
and
you
can
register
and
then
we'll
set
you
up
with
some
people
who
are
also
at
the
same
level
wherever
your
level
is
so
it
this
morning.
One
person,
for
example,
wants
to
get
accept
payments
on
his
website
to
sell
his
book.
So
that's
a
learning
goal
for
that
person
and
the
other
person
wants
to
get
into
trading
with
bots.
G
So
those
two
guys
can
be
set
up,
and
you
know
two
different
groups
once
they've
given
us
their
their
interests,
then
we
can
set
them
up
with
other
people
who
have
the
same
interest
and
then
there's
actually
an
agreement
that
you're
going
to
check
in
all
together
three
times
with
those
same
people
and
and
compare
notes
and
we're
we're
looking
at
eventually
that
be
a
a
actually
a
smart
learning
contract.
It
would
actually
be
like
a
trustless
contract
where
you,
you
know
you
to
really
encourage
people
to
follow
through
on
their
learning
intention.
G
G
E
E
A
C
A
Michael's
saying
maybe
choose
a
different
input
under
your
mute
button
there.
If
you
click
on
the
arrow
that
points
up,
maybe
choose
a
different
mic.
If
you
have
one
available,
oh
yeah,
next,
to
mute.
Thank
you
michael
there's,
a
little
arrow
at
the
three
buttons
there.
A
A
So
I
want
to
give
this
the
group
the
sentiment
following
this.
If
there's
anything
else
on
this
one,
I'm
thinking
we'll
go
back,
we
lost
it
again.
Maybe
we'll
pull
up
the
prioritized
problems
board
here
and
go
to
that
next.
Does
that
feel?
Okay
for
everyone,
any
other
things
we
want
to
add
for
this
conversation.
A
Okay,
so
sorry,
I
have
a
very
loud
person
mowing
the
lawn
outside
my
window
and
I
can't
do
anything
about
it
more
everything's
shut.
So
hopefully
it
doesn't
come
over
too
strong.
So
I
will
share
my
screen
here
and
I'll
just
give
this.
I
think
everyone
in
this
group
is
pretty
familiar.
A
A
Before
I
put
it
up
once,
I
put
it
up,
it's
like
you,
know,
glitter
and
and
aluminum
foil.
So
it's
madness.
Thank
you,
michael.
So
there's
a
list
of
there's
a
list
of
issues
large
and
small,
and
then
we
asked
the
pa
community
and
the
broader
community
over
this
time
to
come
in
and
upvote
the
things
that
they
felt
were
most
important.
So
that's
what
I'm
going
to
pull
up
here!
A
A
Collaborative
interests
together
so
other
people
who
would
be
able
to
work
on
work
on
certain
issues
together,
those
could
end
up
as
proposals.
They
could
end
up
as
hey.
We
can
do
this
right
now,
let's
try
to
fix
it
and
that
then
they
could
work
onto
working
group
boards.
These
community
suggestions,
once
people
wanted
to
adopt
them,
they
could
come
become
onto
the
working
group
boards,
there's
one
for
pas
and
there's
one
for
vpas
and
that
they
would
then
become
workflow
problems
that
we
would
work
to
solve
and
then
archive.
A
So
that
was
the
purpose
of
this
process.
A
lot
of
work
went
into
building
this.
I
want
to
just
give
scott
a
shout
out
for
pretty
much
the
whole
dwork
build
and
a
lot
of
work
on
the
server
for
doing
that
this
fund,
and
to
jeremy
and
tommy
and
everyone
for
giving
a
lot
of
feedback.
There's
been
a
lot
of
good
work
here
done
on
this,
to
bring
it
to
this
point,
so
we're
at
the
point
of
using
the
tools
and
allowing
them
to
be
adopted
and
moved
forward
based
on
what's
there.
A
So
the
tools
are
there
now
and
we're
gonna
start
really
using
them
for
for
this
fund
and
we'll
probably
find
stuff,
we
need
to
change,
but
hopefully
not
too
much
stuff
that
it
slows
us
down.
So
I'm
about
to
show
you
this
dework
board,
so
this
dwork
board
is
the
community
suggestions
board
and
this
community
suggestions
board
is
a
compilation
of
all
of
these
issues
raised
in
channels
and
across
the
across
the
time
here.
So
you'll
see
that
the
top
ones
here
are
the
most
upvoted.
A
So
19
people
voted
for
this
17
people
voted
for
this
16
for
this,
and
so
on
I'll
just
scroll
it
for
us
quickly
to
see
the
scope
there's
quite
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
some
of
these
ones
down
here
were
less
supportive.
So
what
should
become
of
unused
and
deliverable
project
funds
may
be
an
important
thing
within
catalyst,
but
perhaps
not
as
much
of
a
priority
for
the
pas
to
think
about
together,
where
some
of
the
top
ones
are
more
related
to
us.
Overall
there's
some
stuff
here
that
doesn't
have
much
to
do
with
us.
A
That
was
just
raised
so
yeah.
So
that's
the
scope.
So
what
I'm?
What
I'm
thinking
about
is
having
this
initial
discussion
with
everyone
to
say
what
what's
here
that
are
the
top
issues?
A
How
can
we
prepare
ourselves
to
make
sure
that
these
are
resolved
so
that
they
don't
show
up
and
rear
their
heads
here
in
fun,
nine,
and
is
there
anyone
who
is
interested
in
either
working
on
them
or
championing
them?
What
will
happen
for
these
from
here
is
when
we
decide
or
maybe
automatically.
A
Maybe
we
decide
as
a
group
that
the
reality
is
that,
if
something,
if
something
ends
up
in
the
top
five
or
ten
community
suggestions,
it
automatically
becomes
a
suggestion
for
the
board
and
I'll
show
you
the
board
itself
here
as
well,
just
to
help
give
that
visual.
So
the
community
suggestions
is
in
shared
ideas.
This
is
what's
called
a
board
here,
we're
calling
a
board
and
then
we
have
these
working
groups.
A
So
I
would
go
into
the
proposal
assessor
working
group
just
to
show
you
that
once
something
is
chosen
and
selected,
it
becomes
a
live,
active
problem,
that's
being
solved
and
someone
has
picked
it
up.
So
we
have
this.
Actually,
I
don't
know
why
this
is
assigned
to
you,
jeremy,
but
this
was
allison's,
sia
onboarding
course
development.
So
she
has
this
on
here
with
subtasks
attached
to
it
and
maybe
you're
both
working
on
it
together,
I
didn't
mean
to
I
just
remember
that
she
started
it.
A
So
we
have
this
goal
here,
of
creating
content
for
onboarding
and
as
a
response
to
one
of
these
issues
and
there's
lots
of
other
things.
A
So
that
is
that
is
that
I'm?
I
know
it
might
be
new
for
some
of
you
to
look
at,
but
ultimately
what
we
want
is
to
organize
our
work
together
and
chronicle.
What
we've
done?
That's
the
purpose
and
to
be
able
to
respond
to
issues
that
we're
finding
that's
why
we
have
this
here.
So
I'm
going
to
come
back
to
the
shared
ideas
board,
here's
the
community
suggestions
and
all
of
this
lives
in
the
discord
server,
so
these
create
threads
in
a
discord
server
that
can
be
talked
about.
A
A
So
I'm
just
going
to
pause
there
having
having
run
through
that,
I
see
you
have
your
hand
up
kendrick
to
just
take.
I
Yeah,
I
have
lots
of
questions
I'm
new
to
d-work.
It
does
look
really
interesting,
and
so
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
the
environment
a
little
bit
more
you're.
This
is
a
d-work
view.
Is
that
correct?
But,
and
but
it's
also,
as
I
understand
it
like
the
layout
looks
a
lot
like
discord,
and
is
it
like
already
integrated?
Is
what
you're
seeing
sort
of
integrated
with
discord
too
and
then.
My
second
question
is:
when
you
go
to
the
project
boards,
those
project
boards,
the
layout
looks
a
lot
like
github.
I
A
A
So
once
we
created
these
threads
each
of
each
of
these
each
of
these
issues
here,
so
you
can
see
it
when
you
click
on
it.
These
are
just
some
of
the
things
that
similarity
of
proposals,
for
example,
create
similarity
of
assessment
issues.
So
clear
guidance
is
needed.
That's
something
that
happened
a
lot.
We
had
a
lot
of
proposals
that
were
either
copy,
pasted
or
similar,
so
we
want
when
people
want
to
assess
them,
the
assessment
would
be
naturally
reasonably
similar.
It
would
be
a
lot
very
time
consuming
to
write
just
change
wording
around.
A
So
some
of
these
requests
were
like
clarity
on
whether
the
assessments
could
avoid
filtering
the
similarity
assessment.
Filtering
people
didn't
want
their
assessments
filtered
out
because
they
were
similar,
because
the
proposals
were
similar:
clarity
of
ethics
on
discussing
red
flags
and
then
max
parameters
for
proposals,
and
so
some
of
that
some
of
that
was
addressed
lightly
with
the
additional
proposal
questions
as
to
feasibility
and
scope
of
proposals
in
the
proposing
process.
So
hopefully
there'll
be
more
clarity
from
that,
but
also
we
need
to
address
this
here.
A
So
I
I
point
that
out
just
to
give
people
a
view
of
the
actual
problems
as
it's
been
raised.
So
when
this
was
created
also
a
disk,
a
discord
channel
was
created
for
it
within
the
discord
server,
and
then
people
can
talk
about
it.
Conversations
happen
around
it
and
those
things
are
linked
to
each
other.
A
When
this
is
created,
it
also
creates
a
github
that
will
be
the
archiving
piece,
so
this
so
dwork
here
is
serving
the
purpose
of
automating
and
creating
hooks
between
those
places
and
also
creating
the
opportunity
for
us
to
be
able
to
work
together
and
communicate
about
it
as
it
as
it
progresses.
A
A
So,
let's
say
you're
working
with
a
group
like
we
we're
using
this
for
the
gps
as
well
and
within
there
we
as
a
team.
We
work
together
on
things
and
think
about
it.
You
can
estimate
the
amount
of
time
that
someone's
going
to
spend
on
it,
and
you
can
also
update
that
afterwards,
it
doesn't
it's
not
going
to
like
sit
at
your
computer
and
count
your
22
minutes,
but
it
will
give
you
this
that'd,
be
nice.
E
If
it
can
reach
an
email
service,
that
might
be
a
start
because
then
you
can,
you
know
if
you
have
outlook
which
has
a
calendar
embedded
in
it.
You
can
then
say:
okay,
I
just
kind
of
link
this
to
my
calendar
outlook,
if
it,
if
it
doesn't
already
have
this
sort
of
feature.
J
There
will
be
if
you
have
a
discord
account,
because
you
can
log
into
d-work
with
either
discord
or
github.
We
have
it
set
up
to
where
it's
discord.
If
you
have
a
task
that
is
coming
due
or
you
assigned
a
task,
it
will
ping
you
in
the
thread
that
was
created
for
the
work
issue,
it'll
open.
If
you
are,
if
you
are
assigned
to
it,
yeah.
E
It'll
ping,
you
in
discord,
yes,
it
will
yes
in
discord.
I
know
discord
sends
me
emails,
so
maybe
I
mean
that
that's
still
some
some,
you
know
you
know
some
sort
of
connection.
A
So
I
thought
maybe
an
open
discussion
here
among
this
group
having
looked
at
these
and
certainly
we'll
need
more
discussion,
because
there's
lots
of
people
involved
who
are
not
here
but
as
an
initial
discussion.
One
of
the
things
that
I
can
definitely
put
forth
is
that
we
need
to
update
the
ca
guide,
pa
guide
and
the
guide
needs
to
have
the
in
the
insights.
Also,
I
think
from
to
make
sure
that
we
address
what
was
newly
put
in
the
proposal
guide.
A
We
need
the
input
of
that
community
also
in
thinking
about
the
assessments
piece,
so
there
is
continuity
and
understanding
across
the
across
the
process
and
so
that
we're
updated
for
this
fund
based
on
things
we
learned
last
fund,
so
some
of
these
things
actually
will
feed
into
that,
but
that
makes
some
of
them
urgent,
meaning
like
we
need
to
update
the
guide
based
on
the
fact
that
similar
proposals
are
creating
the
similarity
issues.
So
what
should
a
ca
do
if
they
put
sorry
guys?
A
What
should
a
pa
do
if
they
come
across
that
circumstance,
we
maybe
could
save
ourselves
and
them
a
lot
of
time
and
and
help
them
to
prepare.
If
we
have
that
kind
of
outlined
as
far
as
expectations,
I
don't
know
how
far
we'll
get
on
the
reputation
model,
although
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
influence
there,
so
our
interest
there.
So
then
there's
a
lot
for
the
vca
process
and
then
there's
a
lot
for
some
of
the
suggestions
regarding
how
to
make
it
more
aligned
between
the
proposing
and
the
assessing
process.
A
So
I
want
to
open
it
to
the
group
to
hear
what,
if
there's
interest
in
anyone
wanting
to
take
a
little
bit
of
a
lead
on
these,
we
can
help
them
get
set
up
and
we
can
start
to
talk
about
more
broadly,
how
we're
going
to
do
it
together.
How
should
how
should
we
do
it?
How
should
we
approach
it
and
what
things
might
not
be
on
here?
K
Yeah,
can
you
hear
me
yeah?
Yes,
yeah,
I'm
sorry
it's
I
yeah.
It
was
a
problem
in
my
computer
and
configurations
and
etc
yeah.
So
I
don't
know
if
I'm
going
to
be
a
bit
general
on
this.
My
the
comment,
I'd
like
to
to
say
first,
is
I'd
like
to
thank
you,
nadia
and
michael
and
scott
and
the
people
that
I
talked
in
the
last
days
and
I'm
sorry.
I
could
not
follow
up
much
because
these
the
amount
of
information
is
always
overwhelming
and
competing
with
a
lot
of
other
staff.
K
One
thing
that
it's
not
totally
clear
to
me
from
my
experience
last
I
was
talking
to
captain
dan
about,
for
example,
I
think
you
would
idea
you
already
said
you
were
going
to
to
have
a
guidelines
with
more
specific
examples,
because
one
thing
that
could
not
happen
and
the
and
might
happen
in
the
last
fund
is
like
vcas
expecting
some
specific
approach,
that's
not
written
on
the
guidelines.
K
So,
for
example,
it
was
written
in
the
guidelines.
Things
like
you
know.
You
need
to
give
qualitative
response.
Not
that
shows
you
read
the
project
and
not
say
just
is
great.
It's
good,
I
love
it
or
things
like
that
that
it
was
clear,
but
it
was
not
clear,
some
other
specific
issues,
so
this
is
another
things
that
you
know
from
from.
K
The
question
I
I
put
before
is
like:
if
it's
not
clear
in
in
the
in
the
guidelines,
so
they
the
the
proposer
assessors,
cannot
ask
you
know
what
is
not.
You
know
explained
well
in
all
the
guides.
K
Another
thing
is,
I
shared
with
you,
this
inspirational
video
from
a
social
epidemiologist,
because
what
I
loved
about
this
video-
I
don't
know
if
you
had
a
chance
to
see,
I
highly
recommend,
because
we
are
talking
about
inequality
and
all
the
the
problems
in
equality
generate
and
it's
not
about
wealth,
because
the
most
wealthy
countries
have
with
high
inequality,
have
a
lot
of
big
problems
related
to
well-being,
health,
mental
issue
and
etc.
K
So
what
I
think,
what
we
want
here,
at
least
what
I
we
would
locate
our
ways
for
is
like
to
use
the
technologies,
for
you
know
to
really
construct
a
better
world,
so
we
need
to
have
some
value.
So
one
thing
that
this
guy
says
is
like
one
of
the
devices
used
in
this
system
is,
like
people
feel
currently
undervaluated,
and
usually
people
feeling
correct.
K
Currently
currently
recurrently
undervaluated
are
the
people
target
for
some
reasons
or
the
people
you
know,
because
if
someone
is
unemployed,
though
he's
not
with
the
the
the
opportunities
it,
there
is
some
issue
around
it.
Maybe
you
know
some
different
issues
that
the
person
is
being
undervaluated.
So
these
this
is
a
recurrent
thing.
So
I
think
we
should,
in
our
communication
and
make
sure
when
we
are
talking
about
things,
because
I
mean
it's
like
pas-
are
not
experts
either?
K
And
you
know
all
the
proposals
and
everything
pas
have
experience
in
the
catalyst
system,
and
that's
it
you
know.
So
this
is
important,
but
it's
it's
like
it's
not
to
put,
and
the
fact
that
pas
vcas
did
not
need
to
have
accountability
like
to
show
all
these
have
to
be
filtered
out
because
of
these,
and
that
this
also
makes
like
a
kind
of
abuse
of
power,
and
so
I
think
what
I
would
like
to
bring
is
discussion
with
my
project
that
I
will
present
in
some
time.
K
It's
how
we
we
make
sure
the
values
that
is
necessary
are
embedded
in
our
projects
and
the
way
we
are
conducting
things
because
otherwise,
if
we
replicate
like
a
type
of
power
dynamics
where
you
know
someone
has
power,
does
not
need
to
have
accountability
and
just
say:
oh,
you
did
you
put
people
against
the
wall
individually.
You
did
this
wrong.
K
You
did
this
wrong
and
you
don't
see
what
comes
up
as
a
as
as
a
phenomenon
and
with
what
happened
and,
of
course,
if
some
people
are,
you
know
vibrating
to
this
greed,
of
making
money,
making
more
and
more
more
more
as
I
could
and
not
taking
care
about
the
others,
then
it's
also
another.
You
know,
addiction
that
makes
people
to
reinforce
these
power
dynamics
and
evaluate
some
people
for
them
to
kind
of
shut
up
and
don't
say
anything
and
etc.
K
So
I'm
just
pointing
out
those
things
because
I'd
like
to
explain
you
know
my
position
when
I
I
was
criticizing
things
and
not
not
escaping
from
acknowledging
that
you
know
in
one
proposal
or
another
I
met
I
I
might
you
know
be
too
concise
or
something
it's
something
that
I
need
to
go
back
and
analyze.
K
You
know
point
by
point
with
the
guidelines
and
etc
to
see
what
happened.
So
I
hope
these
will
improve.
You
know
with
the
pas
giving
giving
explanations,
and
I
don't
know
how
far
you
went
in
this
proposal
like
if
there
is
going
to
have
a
limit
of
proposals
like
people
can
assess
and
things
like
that
so
yeah.
I
hope
I
hope
I
what
I
said
could
be
understood
a
little
bit
and
thank
you
very
much.
E
Is
there
is,
I
believe
she
was
taught?
I
believe
ellen
was,
and
alan
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
speaking
around
sort
of
the
notion
of
this
human
behavior,
where,
when
you
have
an
incentive
for
people
to,
I
guess,
work
through
proposals
they
may
be.
They
may
you
know,
get
so
focused
on
getting
some
proposals.
You
know
the
throughput
whether
or
not
you
know
you
may
sort
of
sideline.
E
E
And
I
think
that's
sort
of
what
I
gathered
at
least
that
much
which
I
think
is
all
you
know
everything
I
heard
that
I
understood
was
definitely
you
know
great
ideas.
E
D
Yeah
I've
been
working
on
something
recently,
just
like
an
article
that
I'm
right
working
on
with
some
of
the
information
that
came
out
in
some
different
spreadsheets
trying
to
trying
to
try
to
like
focus
the
reader's
attention
on
like
how
do
we
create
more?
D
How
do
we
create
this
sort
of
cultural
mindset
that
we're
all
really
aiming
for
excellent
assessments?
All
the
time?
That's
the
only
assessment
worth
writing
right
like
like
there
were
only
because,
as
we
do,
that
some
of
those
are
going
to
get
filtered
out
to
only
good
and
even
thrown
out,
because
there's
just
going
to
be.
If
we
raise
the
bar
to
a
certain
level,
then
you
have
like
a
lot
of
what
you
have.
Is
you
have
much
more
useful
information
for
voters?
That's
what
it
comes
down
to
right!
D
It's
like
that's
the
only
reason
that
we're
here
we're
we're
doing
this
for
the
voters
we're
trying
to
help
the
voters
also,
I
guess,
secondly,
we're
trying
to
help
the
proposers
to
be
able
to
read
the
assessments
and
then
reevaluate
next
time
if
they
have
to
rewrite
and
even
in
the
future
in
posterity
like
we
look
back
and
we
can
go.
Oh
look
at
these
assessments.
This
is
how
you
write
a
good
proposal
and
then
even
the
assessments
are
helping
to
refine
it
even
further,
so
that
now
I'm
writing
my
own
proposal.
D
I
can
use
this
as
sort
of
a
template,
not
a
template,
but
you
know
just
a
basis
to
learn
from
so
in
any
case,
yeah,
I'm
trying
to
speak
to
that
in
this
article-
and
I
guess
I
haven't-
I
haven't
heard
anybody
talking
about
this
topic
very
much
just
like
how
do
we
help
the
community
focus
on
excellent
assessments
and
monetarily
speaking,
it
looks
like
people
that
I
mean
there's
people
that
were
writing
very
few
assessments,
but
all
excellent
and
then
other
people
throwing
stuff
at
the
wall.
D
I
mean
you're,
seeing
like
200
assessments
and
like
maybe
three
of
them
went
through
and
were
even
good
and
they
got
paid
very
little
and
it's
like
how
much
time
did
they
spend
versus
the
person
that
spent
time
writing
excellent
and
good
proposals
that
only
wrote,
maybe
five
or
ten
or
three
or
whatever,
and
got
paid
a
lot
actually
and
anyway,
I'm
trying
to
make
these
correlations.
D
It's
not
always
clear
in
the
data
like
how
many
of
them
got
how
many
of
them
made
an
assessment
that
there
was
only
one
assessment,
so
they
kind
of
got
a
lot
of
the
whole
pool
of
money.
I
think
that's
how
it
works.
I'm
not
quite
sure-
and
I
don't
even
know
where
to
go
to
necessarily
for
these
to
get
these
questions
answered,
and
maybe
that's
how
somebody
could
reply
to
what
I'm
saying
is.
D
Where
do
I
go
to
ask
these
questions
and
then
also
in
terms
of
looking
at
that
data,
I'm
trying
to
understand
just
for
the
benefit
of
this
article
so
that
we
can
learn
from
this
is
how
do
I
determine
which
ones
of
these
ended
up
in
a
lottery
system?
Because
some
of
the
people
that
receive
quite
a
bit,
maybe
they
won
a
lot
of
the
lottery
or
something
like
that,
because
a
lot
of
the
assessments
or
proposals
were
assessed
far
more
than
five
times.
You
know.
D
So
then
that
means
there
was
a
lottery
implemented
and
I
don't
know
where
the
details
of
that
are:
it's
a
lot
of
data
to
go
through
and
everything,
but
I'm
trying
to
maybe
use
the
current
assessment
or
the
current
incentives
to
help
the
reader
to
realize
like.
Oh,
actually,
writing
excellent
and
good
proposals
is
and
and
is
primarily
excellent.
Proposals
is
really
worth
shooting
for.
I
don't
know
so.
Where
would
I
go
to
to
maybe
ask
somebody
more
refined
information
on
that
topic,
or
is
that
even
available
now.
E
I
could
be
wrong,
but
and
I'm
very
new
still,
but
I
know
that
you
know
sort
of
signing
up
the
the
whole
signing
into
and
signing
up
for
the
idea,
skill-
I
do
recall
I
mean
there's
there
is
there-
is
a
guy.
There
is
a
guide
for
community
or
proposal
assessment.
It
was
community
advisors,
so
I
suppose
that
document
would
be
updated.
You
know
what
let
me
actually
look
for
that
I
have
it.
I
have
a
bookmark,
so
I
can
just
kind
of
put
that
in
the
chat
for
you.
D
Yeah,
I'm
actually
looking
for
an
individual
to
speak
to
because
this
information
isn't
documented
that
I
understand
yet,
unless
you
actually,
unless
you're
saying
that
it
is
documented
in
there.
I
just
didn't
see
it.
I've
read
that
yeah
there's
there's
all
the
times,
so
I
don't
think
that
it's
in
there
I'm
sorry.
I
I
need
the
breakdown
of
like
of
like
okay.
This
proposal
in
fund
8
received
this
many
assessments
and
if
it
was
11
assessments,
then
that
means
there
was
definitely
a
lottery
system
put
in
place.
Who
won
the
lottery?
D
E
Yeah,
I
don't
I
don't
know
I
would.
I
wouldn't
know
the
access
to
the
results.
As
far
as
you
know,
you
know
how
the
how
that
went.
I'm
sorry.
L
D
Yeah
I
mean
I'm,
I'm
yeah,
I
guess
I'm
looking
for
information.
There
was
about
like
if
an
assessment
110
or
had
sorry
it's
an
assessment.
If
a
proposal
received
10
assessments,
let's
just
say
those
10
assessed
and
though
they
were
all
good
and
excellent
and
there
must
have
been
a
lottery
system
taken.
You
know
the
lottery
would
have
had
to
happen.
So
what
is
the
breakdown?
D
Who
won
the
lottery
and
whatever
so
that
when
I'm
reading
the
so
that
when
I'm
reading
the
facts
and
figures
of
who
received
what
compensation
I'm
understanding
like?
Oh
they
got
this
much
more
because
they
won
a
lottery
versus.
Oh,
they
got
this
much
over
here
because
they
were
one
of
four
assessments
or
something
I
I
don't
know.
Where
is
there
any
of
that
information?
Is
that
available
publicly
or.
L
I
don't
think
that's
available
publicly
in
a
very
uniform
and
easy
way
to
access.
I
think
we
tried
to
come
forward
this
time
around
with
a
very
transparent
document,
which
was
a
little
bit
too
transparent
for
this
round,
and
we
had
to
actually
pull
it
back
because
of
the
issue
of
anonymity.
L
In
some
of
these
cases,
we're
going
to
be
addressing
it
coming
forward
with
a
dual
submission
of
different
addresses
for
pas
and
vpas,
so
that
we
can
actually
come
back
in
the
next
round
and
really
do
very
detailed
analysis
of
that,
and
I
would
imagine
we
can
use
the
one
which
was
published
and
then
pulled
back
as
a
basis,
and
perhaps
we
can
include
also
like
another
document
which
could
be
pulled
together
with
like
how
many
active
how
many
active
reviews
were
on
any
given
proposal
and
which
one
would
have
triggered
what
kind
of
like
lottery.
L
But
I
don't
think
we're
there
yet
in
terms
of
like
that
level
of
detail
just
yet,
but
it
may
be
something
we
can
strive
for
for
the
next
one.
Granted
we
fixed
that
anonymity
issue.
That
happened
this
time
around.
Because
of
that
transparency
drive
for,
but
then
we've
you
know
not.
Everything
was
as
it
should
be.
L
So
it's
something
to
definitely
look
at
it,
but
it's
a
mountain
of
data
and
I
think
all
of
that
is
up
and
available
in
a
sense
that
what
actually
feeds
the
voting
app
itself
that
spreadsheet
is
available.
D
Yeah,
so
if,
if
I
wanted
to
just
for
instance,
find
out
where
how
how
I
was
paid
personally
like
I
can
look
at
my
assessments
on
there
and
everything
I've
on
that
document,
and
I
could
see
like
oh
I
I
rated
this
one
as
all
right
I
mean
I
got
an
excellent
rating
on
this
assessment.
That's
great
and
then
I
got
paid
a
certain
amount,
but
that
breakdown
isn't
there
and
I'm
wondering
if,
if
that's
that
information,
I
could
see
anywhere
you're
saying
no
right,
not
not
yet.
L
D
L
D
E
Benjamin
you
know
I
I
know
like
in
one
of
the
project:
catalyst
youtubes
it's
for
onboarding.
You
know
new
cas
and
people
coming
in
in
one
of
the
youtubes
I
watched
some
time
ago.
I
think
I
don't.
I
remember
that
that
I
remember
the
the
gentleman
who
owned
the
dog,
but
I
think
I
think
felix
was
one
of
the
people
in
the
video.
E
In
any
case,
they
did
have
somewhat
what
you're
speaking
to
where
they
on
on
a
sort
of
like
it
looked
kind
of
like
a
spreadsheet,
but
it
was
definitely
some
it
wasn't
like
excel,
but
it
did
it.
They
were
speaking
somewhat
to
how
things
are
rewarded,
although
I
don't
think
that
information
was
put
into
some
sort
of
formal
document
for
consumption
like
on
idea
scale
or
anything.
I
think
that
was
just
in
that
video.
E
E
E
A
Sorry,
I
was
just
talking
and
you
were
not
hearing
me.
I
was
saying
this:
is
the
document
danny's
just
like
there's
a
lot
there
as
far
as
the
rewards
overview
that
came
out
last
fund,
okay,
so
a
little
bit
back
here,
I
guess
I
guess.
A
The
question
for
me
is
having
really
sort
of
observed
this
and
put
it
up
and
watch
the
votes
happen
and
been
in
these
conversations
for
a
while
is,
should
we
should
it
become
that
there
is
a
that
we
look
as
a
community
at
ca
ideas
here,
god
at
pa
ideas
here
and
think
about
okay,
there's
three
or
four
of
them,
and
we
need
to
do
them,
and
these
are
the
most
urgent
should
we
thank
you,
michael
pa,
should
we
should
it
be
pas
and
vpas
and
we
have
like
kind
of
a
team
around
each
that
certain
people
work
on
the
original
thinking
was
that
the
those
who
raised
these
issues
might
be
interested
in
spearheading
them
a
little
bit
or
at
least
being
involved
in
the
solution.
A
Like
ellen
to
your
point,
you
have
you,
maybe
you're,
not
the
general,
but
perhaps
you'd
like
to
really
have
influence
on
it,
based
on
what
your
experience
is,
so
that
your
perspective
is
represented
and
other
perspectives
are
represented
in
the
solving.
So
I'm
I
put
this
question
to
the
group
to
say
how
do
we
want
to
self-organize
around
these
and
when,
once
we
do
that,
should
we
should
we?
How
should
we
meet
and
talk
about
it?
She
would
do
it
ace,
mcmanus
synchronously.
A
What
we've
historically
done
is
we
find
a
problem,
we
sort
of
know
what
needs
to
happen.
Certain
amount
of
people
get
together
on
it.
Maybe
maybe
we
like,
for
example,
we
created
a
doc.
We
have
a
thread
in
discord.
We
talk
about
it.
We
invite
people
to
that
thread.
We
also
have
it
going
on
in
telegram,
and
then
here
maybe
that
maybe
we
could
do
it
that
same
way
and
which
is
we
end
up
updating
this
here
with
subtasks
and
we
are
a
little
bit
more
organized.
A
A
G
Yeah,
I
I
can't
really
answer
the
question.
I
I
just
really
noticed
that
I
don't
have
enough
understanding
about
the
whole
process.
G
It's
a
it's
a
bit
of
a
black
box.
I
I
you
know,
I'm
not
very
familiar
with
the
vcas
and
less
familiar
with
the
circle
and
then
even
less
familiar
with
how
the
circle
relates
to
cardano
as
an
entity
and
then
how
that
relates
to
iohk,
and
it
seems
to
me
that
you
know
it's
decentralized
at
this
level,
but
it's
it's
not
decentralized,
all
the
way
to
the
top
right,
all
the
way
to
the
iohk
shareholders
so
and
somewhere,
some
decisions
are
getting
made
somewhere.
G
E
I
feel
like
I'm
some
I'm
someone
in
the
same
thinking
as
michael
and
my
and
just
you
know
to
you
know
just
a
little
bit
of
full
disclosure.
My
background
is,
in
you
know,
grant
administration,
so
I've
been
reading
proposals
for
a
living
for
a
while,
and
so
you
know
I'm
I'm
used
to
a
little
bit
of
you
know.
E
I
understand
it's
decentralized
and
the
nature
of
this
and
everything,
but
I
think
it's
I
think
in
trying
to
we
want
to
get
your
answers
not
even
help,
but
myself,
I'm
still
trying
to
sort
of
even
learn.
You
know
how
to
walk
and
and
like
how
to
navigate
these.
This,
like
we're,
introduced
to
like
three
different
platforms
at
once.
You
know
and
that
they're
proprietary
one
of
them
is,
I
think,
proprietary
brand
new.
E
So
I
think
it's
a
bit
overwhelming
because
we
can
probably
give
you
some
ins
answers,
maybe
not
great
insight,
but
at
least
give
you
answers,
but
I
feel
like
to
truly
contribute
on
the
ground.
You
know
in
a
real
way.
We
have
to
figure
out
how
to
even
use
these
tools,
as
you
mentioned
tools
earlier
earlier.
I'm
still
learning
how
to
use
the
tools
in
a
sense,
although
I
am
obviously
willing
to
help
at
the
core
of
the
matter.
So
I
think
maybe
that's
probably
an
impediment
to
furthering.
A
Very
helpful,
thank
you,
vlad
I'll
go
to
you
and
then
I'll
maybe
respond
to
all
of
it
at
once,
where
it
makes
sense
for
me
to
respond
to
it.
H
Hi
hi
everyone.
Can
you
hear
me
yeah?
I
was
thinking,
maybe
when
we
have
a
list
on
the
work
of
these
prioritized
issues.
H
Well,
we
do
have
a
budget
for
ca
rewards,
maybe
a
small
percentage
of
that.
Like
one
two
three,
I
don't
know
five
percent
of
that
could
be
allocated
to
resolve
the
top
three
issues
or
we
have
catalyst
as
a
funding
mechanism.
So
maybe,
let's
say
the
top
two
issues
for
proposers
or
top
two
issues
or
top
three
issues
for
cas
could
automatically
be
included
as
a
as
a
proposal
that
would
that
would
that
would
invite
as
a
project
that
would
invite
proposers
to
try
to
resolve
them.
H
So
maybe
there
are
some
other
ways
of
using
existing
allocations
or
existing
funding
mechanisms
to
to
address
the
top-ranked
proposed
issues
that
we
see
in
d-work.
So
I
think
it
will
also
then
result
in
more
cas
participating
in
the
dework
voting,
because
these
issues
will
be
resolved
will
be,
will
attract
the
possibility
of
being
financed
to
to
find
a
solution.
F
Yeah,
that's
a
good
idea
and,
like
jeremy
is
saying
in
the
chat
that
there
is
a
treasury
money
already
from
the
proposal
made
in
the
previous
fund,
but
that
part
that
jeremy
is
saying
that
streamlines
some
of
the
governance
of
that.
I
think
that's
a
really
good
idea.
F
If
we
force
whoever
wants
to
get
some
of
the
treasury
money
or
this
common
rapid
funding
money
that
they
should
go
through
the
process
of
submitting
it
to
the
board
and
then
getting
the
votes
from
the
people
and
if
they
make
it
to
the
top
three,
then
they
can
get
the
money
or
something
like
that.
F
But
to
get
to
that
point
we
need
to
publicize
this
more
because
people
don't
know
it
exists,
so
it
has
to
be
in
a
recurring
cadence
that
we
show
that
okay,
these
are
the
top
three.
Currently
these
are
bubbling
under
go
votes.
Then
we're
gonna
choose
we're
gonna
work
on
one.
Then
these
are
the
results
from
the
previous
one.
It
has
to
be
like
a
train
that
goes
on
and
you
keep
documenting
and
telling
about
what's
happening
in
the
train.
A
I,
like
that,
a
lot.
So
what
is
your?
What
are
you
thinking
about?
How
that
would
happen?
It
would
come
into
the
channels
on
a
weekly
basis.
These
are
new
ones.
Are
there
other
times
to
add,
and
then
the
decisions
is
made
and
then
new
ones
start
do
things
live
there
long
term
if
they
don't
get
adopted?
What
are
some
thoughts
on
that.
F
H
A
A
I
guess
my
question
is
about
then:
how
do
you
keep
it
from
being
groundhog
day
of
saying
the
same
thing
over
again
functionally
for
the
problems
that
are
listed
there
for
those
for
the
things
that
end
up
on
the
community
suggestions
board
for
us
to
do
what
criteria
is
it?
Is
it
the
top
three,
if
it's
the
top
three,
it
gets
incentivized
someone
gets
incentivized
to
go
through
the
process,
which
could
also
be
its
own
framework
of
adding
it
to
the
board
and
spearheading
its
resolution.
A
B
B
If
you
always
have
a
different
audience
for
for
them
is
really
the
first
time,
and
I
mean
today
it
was
awesome
to
really
get
to
really
see
the
whole
thing
guided
through
and
stuff.
That
was
very
helpful
and
I
kind
of
miss
that
in
the
server,
because
I
feel
like
if
or
if
I,
if
I
when
I
go
into
the
server,
I
I
feel
overwhelmed
and
I
can't
really
orient
myself
and
I
then
feel
like
okay,
when
I
want
to
contribute.
I
first
have
to
read.
B
I
don't
know
many
many
many
many
letters
and
that's
that
I
yeah.
I
think
that
would
be
very
greatly
appreciated
if
you
invite
every
now
and
then
and
and
really
yeah
make
it
make
it
a
bit
clear
what
what
what
one
can
do
and
and
stuff
just
so.
The
just
just
the
yeah
first
overwhelm
meant
just
vanishes
and
stuff.
A
A
It
is
sort
of
how
it
used
to
be
before
we
put
something
like
this
together
was
we
come
in
rooms
where
we
talk
like
this
and
we'd
sort
of
try
to
figure
out
how
to
get
things
together,
and
we
would
have
conversations
some
places
and
things
would
get
done,
but
it
also
was
like
then,
like
rocky
you're
saying
having
come
here
and
when
you're
new
orienting
yourself
mid-stream,
while
so
much
as
in
motion
without
the
historical
information
and
the
wisdom
there
and
trying
to
come
up
to
speed
is
so
complicated.
A
It's
overwhelming
yes
and
orienting.
What
those
things
are
that
could
be
very
specific
in
the
greater
context
is
a
complicated
thing
as
well.
So
I
totally
appreciate
this,
and
this
is
very
much
a
work
in
progress.
It's
not
a
finished
thing,
so
it
is
the
outcome
of
having
tried
to
solve
for
that
across
fund
eight.
A
So
we
have
a
lot
more
to
do
and
your
comments
are
very
helpful
in
that
we
still
need
to
also
say,
but
let's
sort
of
put
this
in
an
instructional
place,
so
scott's
done
like
really
comprehensive
tutorials.
I
think
he
just
posted
that,
and
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
now
is
phil.
Has
this
great
opportunity
for
for
a
wiki
for
a
catalyst
wiki
that
we
can
all
use
and
perhaps
having
it
in
one
place
where
people
can
say?
Okay,
I
have
an
issue:
here's
where
this
should
go.
A
We
do
I'm
going
to
put
in
the
chat
and
then
I'll
go
to
ellen
and
tommy.
This
is
a
link
to
what
what
was
the
original
guide
for
this
and
it's
pretty
straightforward.
It's
very
visual.
Hopefully
it's
not
too
much
but
I'll
just
pop
this
up
here,
real
fast,
which
was
that
the
original
thinking
was
that
we
would
have
sort
of
a
process
by
which
an
issue
came
up
and
then
a
group
would
form
around
it.
And
then
someone
in
that
group
would
want
to
take
more
of
a
more
of
a
leadership
role.
A
Then
eventually
it
would
come
to
resolution.
So,
like
the
the
dework
part
from
the
issues,
right
now
are
sort
of
what's
on
the
community's
suggestions
board,
and
then
a
group
forms
around
it
and
they
work
on
it.
That's
kind
of
like
dework
and
discord
the
work,
conversation
and
discord
ends
up
on
the
community
suggestions
board.
Then
the
working
groups
board
and
d
work
where
we're
actually
moving
it
across
and
it's
adopted.
It
comes
to
a
resolution
and
then
we
archive
it-
and
that
was
really.
A
A
So
I'll
put
this
I'll
put
this
in
here,
for
you
guys
to
take
a
look
at
those
of
you
who
are
who
are
newer
to
it
and-
and
I
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
it's
this
is
like
the
very
birth
of
it,
so
we're
trying
to
use
it
in
this
fun
newly
and
those
of
you
who
are
brand
new
to
it.
Your
confusion
and
overwhelm
will
be
very
helpful
and
that
we
will
get
to.
A
K
I
was
expecting,
I
don't
know
if
nadia
could
answer
the
question.
Maybe.
K
You
couldn't
because
of
the
relations
because,
michael
and
benjamin
first
they
were
saying
something
about
it's,
it's
something
centralized
somewhere
so,
and
I
I
I
don't
know
if
you
imagine,
as
a
person
in
the
community
engaged
if
you
would
be
able
to
answer
this
question,
but
this
made
me
think
first,
it
made
me
think
that
this
governance
model,
which,
for
example,
I
think
I
I
comment
here
somewhere
sometime
about
you-
know
some
stuff
I
saw
in
algorand
and
it's
like
they
have
the
foundation
working
together
with
the
community
as
a
dao,
and
then
the
foundation
can
design
the
the
some
ideas
with
very
experienced
experts,
professionals
and
etc,
and
then
but
it's
not
so
then
it's
there
is
a
transparency
where
you
have
some
experts
and
some
professionals
designing.
K
K
K
I
o
h,
you
know,
decide
to
push
something,
then
you
can
kind
of
made
people
to
start
to
manipulate
to
you
know
to
don't
have
the
discussions,
certain
discussions
and
etc.
K
So
I'm
just
raising
these
questions
because
I
think
it's
it's
possible
to
be
transparent
and
decentralized
and
to
have
experts
at
the
same
time
or
not
just
experts,
but
also
like
you
know,
professionals,
you
know
proposing
things
and
explaining
things,
but
then
it's
possible
to
have
these
another
thing
that
I
was
surprised
when
beijing
said
is
surprised
because
I
I
would
never
thought
about
that.
It's
like.
K
Is
it
some
extra
bonus
going
to
the
people
who
assess
more
more
proposals
or
for
the
vcas
who
assessed
more
proposals,
so
they
have
extra
bonus.
So
this
is
also
something
that's
not
clear
to
me,
but
I
I
just
would
like
to
comment
beijing
inside
these
and
is
something
to
to
to
be
clear
to
everyone
how
this,
because
I
think
this
is
another
instant
incentive
to
gamify
the
system
and
what
I
proposed
in
the
last
days.
K
For
example,
oh
let's
say
nobody
should
have
more
than
50
percent
of
of
proposal
or
assessments
filtered
out
unless
the
the
vcao
pa,
whatever,
unless
that
they
can
prove
they
didn't
follow
up
the
guidelines,
because
these
things
is
also
about.
It's
also
about
to
prevent
the
gamification
to
prevent
the
greed
and
also
to
acknowledge
the
people
who
are
you
know,
spending
a
lot
of
time
and
and
and
doing
their
contributions
and
it's
an
and
some
evaluations
can
be
subjective.
K
For
example,
if
a
proposal
come
to
to
this
is
another
thing,
that's
not
clear
for
me,
for
example,
a
proposal
made
a
comment
in
one
of
my
assessments,
and
it's
is
because
this
proposal
made
a
comment
on
or
one
or
two
proposals.
I
mean
some
proposer
made
a
comment
like
thanks.
So
thank
you
for
your
evaluation,
blah
blah
blah,
but
there
is
one
who
one
or
two
they
were
not
happy
at
all,
but
who
were
then?
Maybe
they
they
were,
like.
You
know
very
well
known
in
the
community
and
etc.
K
So
did
these
influence
the
the
the
thing
to
be
all
filtered
out,
and
it's
not
clear
from
me
how
all
this
information
go
to
a
spreadsheet.
There
is
an
automated
system
that
transfer
these
all
this
information
to
a
spreadsheet.
K
So
there
are
some
some
things
that
are
not
clear
to
me
and
I,
since
I
come
in
this
conversation,
I
I
was
a
bit
late,
so
I
saw
that
you
discussed
some
stuff
already
so
yeah,
so
I
just
would
like
to
to
raise
these
points.
A
So
good
any
any
response
to
to
ellen's
there.
I
can
also
tell
you
ellen
just
having
been
in
the
in
the
session
with
you
on
friday
and
having
talked
through
this,
I
think
perhaps
it's
hard
to
make
broad
generalizations
about
what
happened
in
one
circumstance
and
and
say
that
that
is
the
case
across
the
board.
So
perhaps
what
might
be
very
helpful
to
you
is.
A
I
do
think
it's
important
that
we
don't
solve
for
assumptions,
but
that
we
solve
for
actual
things
that
can
be
can
be
tied
to
data.
That's
an
important
thing
here,
because
it's
easy
to
to
come
to
conclusions,
especially
with
so
much
information
to
process,
and,
like
has
been
said
here
that
there's
there's
so
much
to
come
to
so
this
is.
A
The
community
is
broad,
in
particular,
the
pa
community
and
the
bpa
community
very
focused
on
looking
at
data
and
addressing
things
and
helping
to
to
help
each
individual
person
come
to
conclusions
about
what
their
experience
was.
So
I
think
maybe
I
would
encourage
that.
I
think
there's
there's
no
shortage
of
understanding
that
that
these
that
things
need
fixing
here
for
the
for
the
pas.
I
say
this
a
lot
for
each
of
those
systems.
We
have
a
lot
to
do
here.
A
It's
part
of
why
these
these
issues
are
are
raised,
and
we
need
to
also
make
sure
that
we
do
that,
because
what
to
make
a
small
change
sometimes
has
a
major
impact,
and
that
can
be
a
good
thing
and
that
can
be
a
troublesome
thing.
So
I
need
to
make
sure
that
we
actually
at
the
bottom
of
what's
what
the
cause
has
been
and
that
we
can.
A
We
can
address
that
specifically
and
that
there's
a
and
also
that
there's
a
real
need
for
that
or
that
it's
not
a
circumstance
that
arose
for
some
situational
issue.
A
K
Yes,
no
problem,
it's
just
I
I
I
did
not
have
the
time
to
go
back
to
everything.
Again,
you
know
to
provide
the
captain
dang,
you
know
or
more
and
actually
to
give
him
the
the
more
information.
K
I
would
also
need
to
be
available
to
to
further
discussions
with
him
which
it's
it
can
be
overwhelming
for
me
in
these
days,
but
but
I
I
yeah
I'm
I
understand
this
specifically
and
what
I've
been
more
while
I
don't
have
the
time
to
to
you,
know,
to
put
the
magnifying
glass
on
these
I'd
like
to
to
point
out
some
doubts
about
those
questions
that
may
make
you
that
might
make
you
think
about.
K
K
I
was
kind
of
highlighting
the
fact-
let's
understand
these
in
abroad,
to
to
see
if
there
is
some
addictive
behavior
that
made
these,
for
example,
if
if
you,
if
you
filter
out
more
people,
so
these
funds
will
become
what
a
bonus
for
the
for
the
people
who
filtered
out
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
is-
is
things
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
not
very
clear
and
so
and
the
other
question
I
we
are
commenting.
K
A
D
I
was
talking
about
like
there's
so
many
so
much
money
allotted
for
for
five
assessments,
on
a
proposal
and
and
and
when
there's
only
when
it
turns
out
that
a
bunch
are
filtered
out
or
you
know,
thrown
out
or
whatever
and
there's
only
one
or
two
assessments
that
actually
made
it
through.
It's
my
understanding
that
those
two
receive
the
full
allotment
of
five
or
it's
divided
up.
At
least
that's
what
it
looks
like
on
the
sheet
that
I
found
with
all
this
data
on
it
in
terms
of
payment.
D
I
had
found
on
that
that
there
was
some
people
getting
paid
quite
a
bit,
even
though
they
only
made,
but
it
was
like
oh
they're
getting
quite
a
bit
because
they
were
making
it's
like
what
I'm
saying
is
not
a
gamification
issue,
because
they
couldn't
even
know
that
all
of
them
would
be
thrown
out
until
after
the
vcas
do
their
work,
so
it'd
be
kind
of
impossible
for
them
to
know
that
they
would
be
the
one
of
the
only
people
that
made
an
assessment
that
actually
was
worth
its
salt
to
stay
in
the
running
or
whatever.
D
H
All
right,
I'll
I'll
have.
A
H
I
think
this
is
a
very
useful
debate,
especially
this
issue.
We
we
ranked
a
lot
of
proposals
up
by
and
by
importance
on
the
work
and
they're
just
staying
there,
and
I
think
that
many
of
them
have
a
very
material
impact
on.
H
I
think
that
probably
more
than
five
percent
of
the
pa
reward
part-
probably
more
a
lot
more,
is-
is
lost
to
many
attempts
to
gain
the
system
in
the
pa
or
vpa
stage
and
by
not
addressing
the
the
top
issues
on
the
work
doesn't
mean
these
right
now,
but
anyway,
if
we
don't
address
them,
much
more
will
be
lost.
H
I
think
it's
a
pretty
urgent
thing
and
I
think
it
not
addressing
these
issues
just
attracts
more
and
more
people
to
to
try
to
abuse
the
system.
So,
even
if
it
is
at
a
price
of
setting
aside
five
percent
three
percent-
I
don't
know
one
percent
of
the
pa
reward
paul.
H
I
think
reducing
any
attempt
to
game
the
system
by
resolving
the
dework
issues
will
in
fact
not
reduce
the
rewards
to
pas
and
vpas
who
are
dedicated
to
pushing
catalyst
forward,
because
a
fairer.
C
H
E
I'll
try
to
be
really
quick.
I
just
think.
Actually
I
I
don't
think
gamification
is
a
bad
thing.
Is
that
me
alone?
I
think
maybe
cheating
the
system
is
bad
for
sure.
Right
gamification
for
me
just
means
sort
of
making
something
competitive
for
oneself.
So
if,
however,
it
is,
it
works
for
you
as
a
device
mentally
go
for
it
and
you
can
call
again.
I
call
it
for
me,
but
then
there's
cheating,
which
is
like
just
you
know:
dishonest
habits
or
behaviors.
E
That's
all
I
had
to
say
on
that,
and
then
I
thought
I
had
on
this
is
just
I'm
trying
to
give
something
tangible
that
you
can
take
for
the
actual
questions
you
had
nadia
regarding
the
ideas,
I
wonder
and
forgive
my
ignorance,
but
I'm
still
new
to
even
looking
at
it
so
visually,
I'm
kind
of
still
new
at
fresh.
Looking
at
the
d
work
platform
like
kendrick,
I
think
his
name
kendrick
said
earlier.
It
does
remind
me
of
a
few
things.
E
Other
platforms,
I
wonder
because
it
it's
it's
overwhelming
at
all.
This
is,
but
if
one
were
to
make
them
their
way
to
dework
and
say
no,
I'm
like
I'm
like
myself
like
I
I
was,
I
thought
I
was
ready
to
help,
but
then
I
realized
okay,
I
can't
even
figure
out
what
what
I
need
to
do
or
how
to
do
it.
I
wonder
if
there's
a
way
of
simplifying
the
visual
format
to
say:
are
you
here
to
do
this
here
is
where
you
go.
E
You
know
and
like
here's,
what
we
need
you
to
do
or
what
you
can
do
like
very
simple,
very
simple.
You
know,
and
it's
like
okay,
I
can
do
that.
You
know
versus
I
don't
know
figuring
out
whether
I'm
on
the
right
page
or
not,
you
know,
am
I
supposed
to
click
this.
You
know,
like
I,
don't
know
just
some
raw
thoughts.
I
had
I
apologize
if
they're
not
terribly
constructive,
but
I
want
to
give
a
little
bit
more
feedback
that
you
could
actually
use
for
the
questions
you
had.
A
Yeah,
I
I
totally
appreciate
that
so
I'll
just
say
that
these
are
like
our
collective
community
problems.
This
is
not
like
a
single
person
deciding,
and
this
is
like
us
working
together
to
try
to
try
to
figure
this
out.
A
So
I-
and
it's
also
not
the
intention
that
someone-
the
attention
for
me
and
bringing
this
up
and
showing
it
visually
is
so
we
can
understand
what
has
been
prioritized
and
think
about
the
problems
that
we
like
vlad
was
saying
need
attention.
A
A
The
the
proposal
there's
additional
questions
in
the
proposal
guide
that
they
need
to
address
in
their
submission
of
their
proposals
that
affect
the
assessment
and
so
mercy,
and
I
tried
to
do
a
good
amount
of
work
of
looking
through
the
lens
of
both
proposers
and
and
assessors,
and
trying
to
make
sure
that
there's
continuity.
A
So
I'm
giving
that
example
to
say
there
are
things
that
we
need
to
be
urgent
on
addressing
and
then
there's
also.
We
need
to
continue,
simplifying
and
and
making
more
clear
the
process
by
which
we
work
together,
which
are
these
tools,
so
these
tools
are
but
these
tools
right
now
are
like
someone
came
over
and
was
like.
Why
are
you
using
that
screwdriver?
I
have
this
power
tool.
Do
you
want
to
use
it
and
you're
like
yeah?
A
You
have
some
guides
for
it
and
they're
like
no
have
fun
like
that's
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
so.
We
need
the
the
easy
how
to
press
this
button.
Do
this
thing
that
still
so
it's
totally
expected
that
people
have
that
feeling
of
overwhelm
it's
because
we're
in
between.
We
have
things
we
need
to
do
right
now.
The
sensing
in
the
is
the
issues
that
happen.
We're
learning
tools.
A
At
the
same
time,
and
also
we
have
to
do
this
stuff,
so
I
I
would
appreciate
if
you
are
interested-
and
I
would
appreciate
just
the
fresh
eyes
to
say-
okay
when
I
look
at
this,
I
need
to
know
these
things,
because
what
we
probably
need
next
simultaneous
to
solving
these
prioritized
issues
is
the
wiki
or
the
straightforward
one
shooter
that
says:
here's
how
here's,
how
you
go
about
this
point,
a
to
point,
z
or
point
a
to
point
c
or
yeah,
and
that's,
and
so
it's
really
really
simple,
because
the
tools
themselves
do
need
just
like
zoom
and
everything
else.
A
We
use
in
here
there's
a
certain
amount
of
coming
up
to
speed
with
the
tools
themselves
and
the
culture
of
how
catalyst
works
together.
That
is
to
be
honest,
different
in
every
in
every
circle
somewhat,
but
there's
some
standards
to
it
and
we
want
to
help
people
come
up
this
view
with
those
standards
quickly,
so
that
when
we
have
to
solve
things
together,
we
are
all
comfortable
with
what
we're
with
what
we're
using
to
do
that.
So
I'm
just
giving
you
that
for
some
context-
and
I
appreciate
the
question
and
you're-
it's
totally
valid.
E
Thank
you
nadia,
and
one
last
thing.
One
real
quick
idea
is,
I
just
thought
like
well:
while
there
are
people
that
are
experienced
out
there,
I
wonder
if,
if
anybody
would
care
to
just
sort
of
maybe
even
record
themselves
using
these
tools
and
then
posting
it
somewhere
like
here's,
how
you
do
this?
If
you
have
to
do
x
or
y,
very
simple.
A
A
M
Hey
guys,
sorry
I
joined
in
late.
I
have
to
hop
also
in
a
couple
minutes,
but
I
want
to
just
bring
up
a
couple
things
right.
I
don't
know
if
this
was
already
brought
up,
but
the
dapps
challenge
is
a
huge
challenge.
It's
like
60
or
75
percent
of
the
total
funding.
Don't
know
exactly
right
now,
but
because
of
that,
most
of
the
proposals
will
go
in
there
right
and
then
because
I'm
one
of
the
purposes
in
it,
I
won't
be
able
to
see
a
other
proposals.
M
In
the
same
challenge,
question
that
I
did
have
that's
that's
the
issue,
because
now
we
have
to
onboard
just
prcas
who
are
not
proposals
who
can
assess
dabs
question
I
had.
Is
I
heard
about
dwork
earlier
right,
something
about
ca,
doing
some
work
on
dwork?
Why
are
we?
Why
did
we
choose
the
cas
to
be
anonymous.
M
A
Those
things
should
be
mutually
exclusive
to
each
other,
because
dework
is
in
place
here
for
just
people
to
work
together
on
stuff,
in
the
same
way
that
you
would
talk
in
any
channel.
So
it's
not
related
to
actually
doing
the
assessments.
But
if
you
want
to
answer
about
the
anonymity
decision,
I
can
kick
that
okay
I'll,
throw
you
a
hot
potato
danny.
If
you
want
it's,
not
a
hot
potato,
but
do
you
want
to
do
you
want
to
speak
to
the
decision
on
anonymity
of
pas.
L
It
follows
the
logic
of
what's
commonly
coming
out
of
the
peer
review
process
in
general
traditions
and
so
for
the
environment.
L
However,
we
do
have
some
oddities,
which
are
specific
to
our
environment,
that
we
also
need
to
overcome,
and
one
of
them
is,
namely
identity,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
solutions
coming
down
the
road
with
the
decentralized
identity
solutions
will
help
us
address
that
yesterday,
that
account
creation
and
everything
is
a
little
bit
convoluted
and
it's
it's
not
as
bulletproof
as
it
could
be
and
where
it
should
be
so,
whereas
in
the
real
world,
when
you
are
in
the
peer
review
of
the
scientific
papers,
you
are
probably
part
of
a
chapter
somewhere
and
people
know
that
you
are
actually
a
capacity
behind
a
certain
domain,
expertise
and
whatnot,
and
but
it
allows
you
to
actually
provide
feedback
which
is
not
ideally
not
biased,
just
or
like
it
protects
you
from
the
fallback
that
you're
actually
giving
somebody
brutally
honest
feedback
on
something
if
you're
like
in
that
field
of
sorts.
L
So
it
follows
the
peer
review,
scientific
research
methods
in
in
the
real
world
as
such,
but
in
catalyst
environment.
I
think
where
this
needs
to
evolve
over
time
is
through
the
decentralized
id
so
that
we
can
start
bolting
down
like
yes,
this
is
a
one
account,
and
it's
not
you
know,
accompanied
by
another
five
or
ten.
L
M
My
second
question
was:
how
does
ssi
can
play
so
you
already
answered
that
I
talked
to
kendrick
actually,
the
other
day.
He
joins
our
because
he's
our
advisor
right
from
fun8
and
because
we
are
building
the
bounties
on
ssi,
whatever
you
can
just
create
a
bounty,
hey
generate
your
ssi
wallet
or
did
to
become
a
ca,
and,
just
like
you
would
have
an
idea
scale
like
a
box
to
import
your
your
cardano
wallet
address.
M
You
can
input
your
your
did
that
you
guys
can
read
and
verify
and
all
that
good
stuff.
I
can
offer
that
as
a
solution.
I
know
allison
and
proof
space
guys
got
funded
for
that
in
fun,
eight
as
well,
but
that's
this
could
be
an
alternative
if
it's
needed.
We
can
deliver
we're
gonna
launch
this,
sometimes
in
july.
M
L
I
think
the
come
on
yeah
there's
a
lot
of
goodness
coming
out
of
the
ca
challenge,
which
had
a
lot
of
projects.
I
think
building
underneath
and
I
think
alison
is
working
with
prism
roots
team
is
doing
a
lot
of
ground
work
as
well.
So
I
think
we
are
converging
towards
like
a
situation
where
we
can
truly
be
living
up
to
the
potential
of
anonymity,
but
without
that
fear
of
like
are
we
being
played
on
the
other
side
of
the
equation.
L
You
know
we're
still
we're
able
to
identify
some
of
these,
but
I
think
we
are
under
no
illusion
that
certain
things
are
coming
out
of
under
the
radar,
which
is
which
are
not
possible
to
be
to
be
picked
upon,
and
it
takes
a
lot
of
creative
effort
and
work
to
uncover
these
things.
But
those
decentralized
ids
are
definitely
something
I
have
a
high
hopes
for
and
it's
exactly
it
should
be.
The
part
of
the
the
the
designing
solution
down
down
the
line.
A
So,
recognizing
that
we
are
like
two
hours-
and
you
guys
are
all
rock
stars
for
being
in
this
conversation,
this
long
and
much
appreciated.
A
I
want
to
just
take
a
little
tiny
intermission
here
to
say
what
I
think
would
be
helpful
if
you're
not
in
the
the
server,
yet
I'm
going
to
put
the
link
and
if
you
want
to
come
in
here
and
as
a
beginning,
maybe
this
is
a
place
where,
if
you
can
come
in
and
just
like
post,
hey
I'd
like
to
be
involved
in
some
way.
The
intention
is
not
that
you
come
in
with
full
knowledge
of
how
to
use
these
tools.
A
A
So
if
you
can,
if
you
want
to
pop
in
and
do
that,
I
certainly
we'll
keep
our
eye
out
for
that,
and
then
we
can
maybe
add
people
to
the
initiatives
that
they're
most
interested
in
and
that's
a
really
nice
way,
especially
if
you're
new
to
meet
people
and
get
involved
in
some
way.
That's
meaningful
and
also
sometimes
the
ideas
for
proposals
or
collaborations
come
as
a
result
of
that.
So
I
want
to
just
request
that
there's
an
introductions
and
then
ask
a
question
section
in
there.
A
So
if
you
want
to
just
post
neither
of
those-
and
you
can
tag
me
if
you
want
it's
just
nadia
hopkins
in
there
and
then
I
will
try
to
help
us
get
in
directions
that
are
meaningful
to
you
and
also
to
the
to
the
ecosystem,
so
that
this
conversation
continues
itself
forward
and
helps
people
to
get
involved
in
ways
that
make
sense.
A
So
I
also
probably
what
we'll
do
is
try
to
get
a
group
together
to
look
at
the
pa
assessment.
So
that's
that's
coming
up
here
real
fast,
because
we
need
to
have
it
done.
Probably
the
next
10
days,
maybe
the
two
weeks
and
that's
going
to
take
some
thoughtful
consideration.
So
if
you
have
space
to
do
that
and
it's
important
to
you,
then
please,
let
me
know
you
can
just
tag
me
as
well.
I'll
give
you
my
I'll,
give
you
my
dm
here
or
my.
A
Reaching
the
time
where
I
start
to
sound
dumb,
so
that's
there,
you
can
dm
me
or
you
can
just
come
into
the
server
and
ask
around
there's
a
lot
of
people.
There
who'll
help
you
get
to
the
right
place.
A
Okay,
so
then
we
can
just
keep
talking
here,
we'll
let
it
sort
of
naturally
wind
down,
but
ideally
we
can
get
together
on
some
of
these
prioritized
things
and
we'll
continue
the
discussion
there
so
that
everyone
doesn't
have
to
hang
on
if
you've
got
other
things
to
do.
Go
ahead.
Ben.
D
I
was
just
off
of
ben,
was
it
men
that
was
talking
earlier
yeah?
I
was
just
thinking
about
how
actually,
during
one
fund,
I
actually
decided
not
to
do
a
proposal
because
I
realized
like
if
I
just
stayed,
did
the
assessments
there,
because
I
knew
that
category
so
well.
I
was
like
oh,
I
can
totally
make
more
than
I
would
on
the
proposal
and
that
will
fund
my
project,
which
totally
did
no
problem,
and
then
it
was
all
good.
But
it's
like
a
weird
kind
of
question.
D
We
have
to
ask
ourselves
as
experts
in
a
certain
field,
because
some
people,
like
myself,
I'm
a
writer
I
you
know
I
come
into
a
tech,
heavy
space
and
it's
like
there's
only
so
many
assessments
I
can
do
right.
I
have
some
expertise
in
other
areas.
It's
not
just
quite
only
writing,
but
you
know
it's.
He
just
had
such
a
great
point.
It's
like,
if
he's
gonna,
be
a
developer.
D
Now
he's
like,
he
can't
assess
on
anything
there
and
it's
like
a
conflict
of
interest,
which
it
totally
makes
sense,
but
like
it
is
a
problem
when
a
lot
of
developers
go
into
that
space
and
they're
proposing,
and
then
it's
like.
Oh
you
know
now:
we've
lost
our
pool
of
people
that
really
know
what
to
you
know
how
to
assess
these.
You
know
so
it
is
like
a.
D
It
is
an
interesting
thing
and
it
brings
me
to
a
different
point
which
is
like
I
I've
been
thinking
for
a
while,
as
I
I've
done,
assessments,
I've
thought
boy.
This
really
could
be
structured
in
a
more
a
more
community-oriented
way
where
it's
like
you
are
only
allowed
to
I'm.
This
is
just
an
idea.
It's
like
what,
if
we
were
only
allowed
to
assess
proposals
that
we
were
we've
been
commenting
on
during
the
process
of
uploading
proposals.
D
Having
comments
being
said,
if,
if
it's
like,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
making
comments
on
these,
of
course,
that
would
need
to
be
incentivized
and
that's
a
whole
different
thing
and
it's
a
big
ball.
It's
like
a
whole
new
way
of
of
incentivizing
things,
but
it
would
all
what
it
would
allow
for
not
to
worry
about
being
anonymous.
D
Perhaps
because
this
is
this
person
making
this
assessment
is
somebody
who's,
an
expert
in
the
field
or
has
some
expertise,
that's
worth
mentioning
and
has
also
been
with
you
since
you
uploaded
your
proposal
and
has
been
making
comments,
so
you
can
adjust
things
before
the
final
day
there
and
and
is
kind
of
maybe
look
looked
at
as
maybe
a
mentor
or
something
like
this
and
a
friend
as
opposed
to
an
anonymous
person
making
crazy.
D
You
know,
suggestions
that
might
make
somebody
so
angry
that
they
need
to
be
anonymous
or
something
you
know
it's
just
it's
just
like
a
weird
psychology
that
we're
supposing
it's
like.
We
have
to
anonymize
these
people,
because
then
somebody
could
be
maliciously
attacking
them
for
making
such
assessments
it's
like.
Well,
maybe
we
need
to
be
creating
friendships
or
some
sort
of
I
don't
know
if
it's
really
okay
to
use
such
a
normal
word.
It's
not
so
you
know,
friendships
is
a
word.
D
That's
not
so
corporate
and
we're
not
being
so
professional
anymore,
because
I'm
using
this
word
or
something,
but
it's
a
decentralized
space
and
we're
trying
to
create
kind
of
a
new
world
here.
So
maybe
it's
okay
to
use
it.
I
don't
know,
but
yeah,
it's
just
a
topic
that
I
was
thinking
about
that
I
don't
know
if
anybody's
talking
about
that
anywhere
in
the
catalyst
united
or
if
there's
like
a
particular
server
to
talk
about
that
in
or
whatever,
but
I
just
thought
I'd
throw
it
out
there
to
see.
A
It's
also
a
very
welcome
conversation
because
for
for
me,
like
my
experience,
I
know
anyone
who
came
in
like
I
probably
got.
I
came
in
and
found
six,
but
I
got
probably
involved
in
fun
seven.
It
was
a
very
tumultuous
time
and
it
was
not
like
a
nice
time
necessarily
certain
for
a
certain
part
for
for
this
part,
because
it
was
there
were
a
lot
of
challenges
and
it
was
very
strenuous.
A
So
it
wasn't
like
this
kind
of
idyllic
experience
that
some
people
had
who
came
in
at
different
times.
It
was
very
like
we
had
a
lot
of
work
to
do
so.
A
The
language
around
that
becomes
a
lot
more
like
worker
bee
kind
of
language
and
a
lot
less
relational
and
a
lot
less
collaborative,
and
I
think
that
that's
a
really
important
point
that
you're
making-
and
I
know
jeremy
said
to
me
once
a
while
back
that
you
know
some
of
it
too
is
volume
like
when,
when
you
don't
have
you
don't
have
a
when
you
don't
have
a
lot
of
of
participants,
you
suffer
more,
I'm
going
to
totally
I'm
not
saying
this
exactly
as
he
said
it,
but
the
when,
when
you
don't
have
we
don't
have
the
scale
that
we'll
have
the
things
that
go
wrong
are
very,
very
impactful.
A
A
It
can
be
intense
and
so
that
keeping
that
mindset
of
expecting
that
people
are
here
for
the
reasons
that
we're
here
that
that's
brought
us
here
to
make
something
really
cool
and
creative
and
interesting
and
to
do
a
good
job
with
what
we're
doing
and
that
mistakes
can
be
made
and
that
we're
not
going
to
necessarily
find
the
same
stuff
that
we
found
other
places
and
that
everything's
in
motion.
All
those
things
are
really
fundamental
to
what
we're
doing
here
and
should
be
a
big
part
of
the
conversation.
A
So
we
don't
over
emphasize
preventing
things,
but
we,
this
is
really
the
thing
that
made
me
think
about
jeremy's
comments.
We
don't
over
emphasize
preventing
that
we
we
acknowledge
that
that's
going
to
happen,
but
that
we're
really
considering
all
the
opportunity
that's
there
and
and
the
great
majority
of
the
good
work,
that's
being
done-
gets
a
lot
of
attention
as
well
so
yeah.
A
So
what
I,
what
I
will
commit
to
is
I'm
gonna
come
out
of
this
meeting.
I'll,
put
the
recording
up
so
and
I'll
put
it
on
I'll,
give
it
to
swarm
and
also
put
it
on
the
it'll,
be
in
the
video
drops
in
the
server
there
and
maybe
we'll
start
to
have
a
conversation
around.
Maybe
in
the
general
space
we'll
have
to
start
to
have
a
conversation
around
okay.
We
need
to
really
get
at
this
a
little
bit
more.
A
Perhaps
we
can
really
start
with
making
the
whole
process
and
the
tools
a
lot
more
accessible.
So
we
have
some
like
easy
one,
two
three
and
we
can
look
at
the
at
the
guide
because
I'm
it's
my
sort
of
intuitive
sense
that
the
guide
is
going
to
flush
out
a
lot
of
these
issues
that
need
to
be
talked
about.
A
Is
there
other
I'm
missing
a
lot
of
what's
going
on
in
the
chat,
but
please
speak
up.
If
you
put
something
there
that
I'm
not
acknowledging
that
you
want
to
have
heard
solution
of
de-work
issuance
and
emotion,
yeah
good,
and
what
will
really
help.
That
is
like
a
couple
people
willing
to
go
like
the
process.
Right
now
is
some
things:
your
community
driven
efforts
and
some
end
up
being
proposals
that
are
longer
term
things,
but
the
things
that
we
can
solve
now,
if
they're
straightforward,
we
try
to
solve
now.
D
M
I
think
that
we
do
have
that.
Can
you
put
that
in
there
scott.
D
D
A
Starting
a
point
of
distribution
of
bpa
workload,
see
if
anyone
beats
me
to
it.
That's
awesome:
okay,
thanks
danny,
okay,
great
so
we'll
we'll
start
on
that
and
we
need
to
have.
We
need
to
have
a
good
influence
of
proposers.
Maybe
some
from
the
funders
funded
proposers
group.
We
need
to
have
a
full
perspective
on
this,
so
that
we
really
see
see
it
from
all
sides.
That's
going
to
help
us
all
understand!
A
A
D
A
C
A
A
A
No
one
gets
excited
about
updating
the
guide,
so
it
doesn't
have
as
many
votes
but
at
the
bottom
here
any
of
these
you
find
that
you
want
to
be
involved
in.
If
you
go
to
the
bottom,
you
can
click
discuss
here.
This
takes
you
to
the
discord
for
it
and
it's
going
to
launch
it
in
my
app,
which
probably
won't
show
on
my
screen,
but
that
should
take
us
to
the
app
over
here.
A
A
D
A
So
this
is
good,
and
this
is
exactly
why
we
need
this
yeah
there
you
go
guys,
so
I
scrolled
down,
if
you
just,
if
you
go
to
that
link,
if
you
scroll
down
here
it's
and
again,
this
will
not
be
the
intention
for
the
future
that
someone
has
to
go
through
it
like
this,
but
right
now,
that's
where
we're
at
so.
C
A
D
A
A
So
if
you
click
on
this
here,
there's
a
bunch
of
different
comments.
So
as
a
group,
we
would
kind
of
look
at
these
comments.
These
are
all
the
things
that
were
related
to
the
guy
that
were
raised
so
clarity
on
evaluating
the
idea
versus
the
proposal,
details
on
similarity
and
auto
filtering.
So
these
are
just
things
that
were
raised
during
that
time
that
we
logged
and
then.
A
A
So
when
you
come
when
you
come
here,
it's
not
launching
for
me
right
now,
and
I
don't
know
why
that
is,
but
we
can
get
that
together
here
see
how
it
has
this
discuss
here
with
to
figure
out
why
that
is
scott.
It
might
be
because
it's
been
up
here
for
a
little
bit,
but
you
should
it
should
launch
to
the
discord
app
and
then
maybe
we
can
find
the
thread
for
this
scott
and
put
it
in
there
somehow,
because
it
should
launch
the
see
if
I
can
accept
it.
A
D
My
same
issue
is
that
there
is
a
whole
dework
tutorial
channel
in
the
catalyst
united,
so
that's
cool.
I'm
gonna
have
to
go
through
that.
A
So
when,
when
you
come
in
when
you
come
into
the
server
here,
see
how
down
here,
this
is
catalyst
suggestions.
These
are
suggestions
that
people
have
made
and
now
because
I've
launched
it.
It's
given
me
this
thread
again,
so
it'll
launch
a
thread
for
you
and
I'm
going
to
give
you
guys
this
exact
thread.
So
we
can
talk
about
it
and
as
a
group
in
there
okay,
but
you
have
to
you-
have
to
join
the
server
first.
A
A
That's
the
that's,
really
what
it
should
be.
So,
ultimately,
the
point
is
that
we
we
would
get
together.
You'd
get
people
here,
you'd
share
the
thread
with
someone,
so
they
could
join
the
conversation,
not
that
they'd
have
to
go
through
that
process
that
we
just
went
through.
So
I
understand
that
that
was
a
complex
process,
so
people
would
join
here.
They
get
to
talk
about
it
and
then
there'd
be
someone
who,
maybe
is
the
champion
or
the
leader
of
the
group,
and
that
person
can
update
the
work
board.
A
But
a
lot
of
the
conversation
can
happen
here,
danny
we
can
post
the
we
can
post
the
draft
in
here
and
then
we
can
invite
people
into
this
space
too,
who
want
to
participate
in
like
ellen,
for
example,
and
people
who
want
to
participate
in
it
and
then,
ultimately,
you
would
have
that
same
functionality
for
other
things
that
need
to
be
addressed
as
well.
So
this
will
be
the
initial
conversation.
A
So
thank
you.
For
there
we
go
all
right,
very
good
guys,
thank
you
for
bearing
with
us
on
that
one
all
right
and
then
simultaneously
we'll
get
those
we'll
get
the
updates
for
the
tools
together
so
that
you
can
know
how
to
use
them
and
jeremy.
We
can
do
the
same
thing
for
you
with
the
vpa
stuff,
with
the
work
distribution.
A
The
the
for
a
while
in
the
beginning,
when
I
first
was
in
catalyst
I
had
like
collections
of
tabs
that
were
open
and
then
my
computer
was
so
slow.
I
couldn't
do
anything
and
I
had
to
really
make
a
whole
big
bookmark
thing.
It's
pretty
amazing
how
many
bookmarks
you
get
in
catalyst,
so
a
mountainous,
pile
of
them
a
buffet
of
bookmarks.
A
All
right
anything
I
missed
in
the
chat.
A
E
I
mean
if
we're
tackling
a
bunch
of
things.
You
mentioned
black
and
white,
so
let's
just
tackle
race
right
now,
joke
that's!
That's
humor!
Right!
There,
guys,
okay,
okay,
trying
to
levitate
on.
A
The
way
out,
you
can't
laugh
too
soon
at
that
one:
that's
not
the
right
thing:
okay,
okay,
really
good
guys.
Any
any
other
comments,
we're
doing
pretty
good.