►
From YouTube: Weekly Collab Call: Process Ideas for Challenge Teams, Proposals & Future Audit Teams, April 29, '22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Little
more
developed
than
some
of
the
other
ones,
and
so
then
you
have
the
question
of
representation
of
of
opinion
within
that.
So
I
think
that's
a
it's
a
complex,
it's
a
complex
thing,
but
you
know
I
guess
at
this
point
just
making
the
invitation
open
and
trying
to
trying
to
take
what
you
know
and
put
it
in
the
place
where
it's
most
useful
is
maybe
the
best
thing
that
you
can
do.
It
would
be
nice
it'd,
be
nice
from
a
tool.
A
Just
like,
I
think,
the
vca
process,
the
resolution
process
might
be
fantastic,
having
something
similar
put
in
place
for
proposers.
After
after
they
are
able
to
see
their
assessments
right
or
or
whatever
point
whatever
point.
We
have
these
like
groups
that
tend
to
have
clumps
or
issues
and
want
response
on
them
specifically.
B
C
B
D
A
G
Because
me
and
vladimir,
we
have
a
very
tiny
challenge,
so
they,
I
think
two
is
drop
out
and
one
is,
you
know
hiccup
another
one.
Have
too
many
proposals
can't
keep
up
with
the
you
know,
workload
so
yeah
we
got
two
more
fortnight
and
then
we
finished
the
challenge.
Seven
and
I
just
get
the
feedback.
It's
a
little
bit
annoying
at
the
challenge
team.
G
So
at
the
moment-
as
I
I
just
mentioned
to
my
to
one
of
my
team-
that
we
are
just
a
jason,
we
chase
them
and
we
keep
jason
jason
jason
chase.
And
then
I
I
suggestion
that
we
should.
We
should
put
the
heart
switch
so
after
the
onboard
release
fund
stop
there
unless
they
provide
the
first
report.
No
report
no
release
the
fund,
because
at
the
moment,
as
I
aware
of
that,
we
release
the
iog
release
up
to
three
or
four
three
over
four
funded.
G
If
they
report
some
kind
of
report
question
here
who
read
the
report
and
who
input
for
the
report
on
time
before
the
fund
release,
so
example,
if
me
and
me
and
simwe,
got
a
hundred
thousand
funded
so
25
000
like
what
then
you
just
mentioned
this
on
the
16
and
23
your
fundraiser.
So
by
the
end
of
may
they
have
25
000.
It
means
sim,
go
for
the
proposal
funded
and
then
basically
me
and
him
we
share.
You
know
twelve
thousand,
twelve
thousand.
We
go
into
you
know.
G
You
know
in
some
way
in
indian
and
we
have
a
good,
you
know
holiday
there.
We
come
back
rather
rubbish
and
we
got
another.
You
know
twenty
five
thousand
each
I
mean
twenty
five
thousand
fifty
thousand
gone
in
first
month,
the
second
month
you
tell
me
you
see
that
at
the
moment
I
see
some
report.
You
can
see
some
report
up
to
front
three
still
still
dangling
on
the
tree,
so
it's
not
even
closed
down
yet
so
it's
just
too
much
it.
I
don't
know.
G
I
know
it's
experiment,
but
I
think
we
we
find
the
way
that
the
where
the
very
less
noise
at
the
moment
is
proposal
report
and
the
money
keeps
flowing
out.
I
know
I
mean,
if
you
put
in
some
conservative
view
that,
oh
because
iog
released
the
money
and
advertising
cardano,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
everyone
worked
together
and
ca
worked
really
well.
Vca
worked
really
well
and
proposal
work
very
well,
but
control
the
funded
proposal.
At
the
end,
the
impact
is
really
really
tiny.
G
Clear
method
before,
if
you
don't
do
report,
don't
have
the
input
from
community
based
on
your
commitment
which,
in
your
audibility
then
stop
until
you
comply
to
that,
because
to
do
with
money,
so
centralized
is
iog.
Decentralized
should
be,
should
be
the
challenge
team
and
whoever,
whoever
want
to
input
that
report
before
that.
Some
kind
of
you
know
metric
or
trigger,
although
whether
just
gets
me
and
me
and
look
example
in
that
case,
we
have
75
000,
which
we
do
almost
nothing,
because
evidence
is
not
mandatory
it.
G
Why
don't
I
do
my
job
now?
I
just
work
so
hard
to
market
simon,
I'm
not
mark
anything
to
do
with
vca.
I
deal
with
my
own
assessment
because
I
keep
marketing
marketing
every
day
on
that
assignment.
I
said
why
can't
I
just
pull
myself
into
catholic
and
get
all
this
low
power
and
rise.
I'm
I'm
good
at
writing.
G
That's
my
education
backgrounds.
I
just
write
all
of
this
kind
of
fun.
Why
not?
I
team
a
couple.
You
know
high
impact
family
member.
There
we
go
game
on
we
on
the
caravan,
just
travel
and
then
ryan
travel
and
grinding
with
accepted
line
you
know
from
from.
Where
is
that
the
new,
the
new
owner
of
twitter?
So
we
have
that
set
the
line
which
is
right.
G
A
G
Is
a
recruitment
that
anyone
can
join
right
so
the
first?
If
if,
if,
if
joey,
writes
a
proposal
in
challenge
team
and
then
he's
the
the
one
in
charge,
he
will
let
pool
if
he
take
on
with
that
and
then
he
left
any
of
us
put
the
name
there
join
his
team.
If
not,
he
can
run
his
own
if
it
can
manage
it,
but
normally
it's
not
the
recommended
up
to
seven
seven
member
at
the
moment
from
infinite,
so
they
have
the.
G
Basically
we
have
the
onboard
meeting
for
the
challenge
team
and
everyone
explained
that
on
board
on
on
youtube,
I
mean
on
the
tail,
that's
pretty
much
and
then
the
challenge
team
take
care.
You
know
either
in
for
three
months.
At
the
moment
we
like
in
china
night,
we
are
doing,
we
don't
do
much.
We
don't
do
much
at
all.
So
when
the
fun
went
on
board,
we
start
kicking.
G
So
basically,
this
is
the
first
three
months
of
of
the
fun
is
not
much
work,
but
after
after
the
on
board
kicking
then
like
this
month,
right
we're
going
to
charge
so
challenging
start
to
going
so
we
set
up
all
the
communication.
We
gather
and
all
that
that
you
know
whatever
nsync
communication.
If
they
can't
be
on
you
on
zoom,
whatever
that
life,
that's
pretty
much
so
every
fortnight
they
come
on
the
meeting,
but
mostly
they
can't.
F
G
B
B
Six
of
us
now
there's
just
two
of
us,
everybody
else
bailed
when
once
they
got
funded
in
their
own
projects,
it
was
like
we
don't
have
time
to
do
this,
but
it
changed
a
little
bit
because
the
previous
fund
that
they
needed
to
report
bi-weekly
and
then
monthly
and
they
needed
to
report
some
kpis.
But
this
one
there's
like
six
questions.
They
have
to
answer
report
and
it
goes
out
to
iog.
B
It's
hard
hard
to
hear
from
them
anymore.
It's
like
it's
like
they
disappear,
it's
like
they.
They
like
to
disappear,
because
if
you
don't
know
what's
going
on
then
hey,
I
could
just
keep
filling
out
those
six
things
and
keep
collecting
money.
Even
if
I
have
a
show
stopper
like
I
can't
hire
a
code
or
a
programmer
or
for
whatever
I
need
I'm
going
to
put
it
on.
You
know
if
I
was
the
proposer
and
which
is
what's
happening,
they're
just
going
to
put
them
there
and
whatever
they
need
to
to
keep
getting
the
funding.
B
So
that's
why
I've
I've
had
this
debate
already,
because
I
see
there's
been
about
less
than
a
million
dollars
worth
of
funded
programs
and
there's
millions
and
millions
of
dollars
that's
gone
out
and
what
are
where
are
all
those
other
projects
they're
all
out
there?
It's
a
mystery
of
where
they're
at
along
the
path
of
completion
and
they're
all
kind
of
like
disappeared.
B
Incentivized,
oh
see
when
you,
okay,
when
you
take
on
the
challenge,
you're
required
to
do
one
meeting
with
people,
so
it's
a
proof
of
life
right
and
even
getting
people
to
come.
There
has
been
a
challenge
I
mean
we
we
got.
Maybe
eight
out
of
ten
people
actually
showed
up
and
I
I
think
danny
reaches
out
to
him
later,
to
try
to
get
him
to
prove
that
there
are
real
people
in
our
life
and
then
you
got
a
couple
other
requirements
that
you
have
to
do
as
far
as
meeting
with
him.
B
Then
I
mean
that's
it
I
mean
you,
don't
really
have
to
reach
down
into
the
project.
I
mean
I'd
like
to
reach
down
into
the
project,
but
they
they
say
well.
We
can't
give
you
their
email
addresses,
I'm
like
why
not
these
people
have
to
be
anonymous,
you're,
giving
them
money
and
they
got
to
be
anonymous.
F
B
G
G
G
G
F
B
But
no,
but
it's
fun.
I
think
it
fun
nine.
Where
I
got
him
to
d5,
though
it
was.
I
think
you
just
just
submitted
your
name
or
something
at
that
point,
because
they
randomly
hooked
me
and
june
into
the
same
there's
just
two
of
us
on
the
team.
Other
teams
had
different
number
of
people
on
it
and,
but
I
think.
J
D
B
Time
me
and
on
oscar
from
turkey-
and
you
know
I
when
there
were
proposers-
I
tried
to-
I
tried
to
give
them
all
the
information
they
needed
to
understand
how
to
write
a
proposal.
You
know
we
had
this
channel
and
we
just
fed
them
all
the
information
they
could
possibly
ever
need.
As
far
as
trying
to
write
a
good
proposal
but-
and
you
go
out-
and
you
try
to
comment
on
their
proposals
as
much
as
you
can,
but
once
they
get
funded,
they
disappear,
become
invisible.
G
Yeah,
I'm
thinking
ilg
should
considering
infant
9
in
front
8
in
front.
I
mean
fun
8
that,
after
release,
right
after
release
the
onboard
meeting,
I
mean
onboard
fund
that
the
next
release
will
be.
Yes,
keep
the
same
procedure
submit
direct
to
iog,
whatever
form
there.
If
they
don't
have
workload,
that's
fine,
I
mean.
Then
the
workloads
up
to
their
neck
is
no
problem
with
that.
G
C
G
Right
keep
the
same
thing
for
the
subsequence
release.
It's
no
point
that
they
release
three
or
three
over
four
fun
and
then
sit
there
while
foreclosing,
and
then
we,
if
I
have
100
100
000
likes,
seems
that
I
may
and
see
him,
and
then
we
have
75
000
without
just
right
on
the
rubbish.
We
can
good
at
writing.
G
G
D
B
B
F
F
B
J
E
B
Anyway,
we've
gone
through
this
with
the
circle
already
with
harrison
them
about.
You
know
not
in
those
we
did
the.
I
did
the
whole
handshake
metaphor.
The
whole
work,
the
handoff
of
the
baton
with
the
relay
race.
You
know
and
that's
all
they
all
just
do
the
same
thing
to
do
the
letter.
It's
going
to
be
like
thank
you
for
your
input
and.
B
K
B
And
you
know
harris
is
a
nice
guy
and
I
believe
he
went
out
to
colorado
and
they
had
their
meetings,
but
he's
only
allowed
to
say
certain
things
you
know
he
worked.
He
worked
for
a
living
he's
got
bosses
too,
so
he's
only
allowed
to
share
what
he's
allowed
to
share
and
that's
it
and
so
there's
a
whole.
B
G
Yeah,
it's
really
good.
Vc
are
really
good
challenge
team,
their
decentralization
they're,
very
good
minded,
but
don't
use
them,
don't
use
the
lighting.
It's
like
the
water
going
to
the
ocean
from
the
river
go
to
the
ocean.
It's
just
spread
everywhere.
It's
not
a
cancer
at
the
state,
full
bang!
That's
it
it's
everywhere
in
your
blood!
That's
how
it's
after.
F
D
E
F
F
It
just
needs
to
be
they
need
to
end.
They
need
to
end
the
damn
experiments
every
quarter.
If
there's
an
issue
with
it,
every
funding
round
change
it
like
take
the
legitimate
feedback
and
change
it
don't
keep
running
with
the
same
processes
that
don't
work
and
that's
all
they're
doing
because
they're,
either
lazy,
they're,
understaffed
or
they're,
just
basically
just
passing
time
until
they
come
in
and
change
the
entire
system
to
what
they
want
it
to
be.
F
F
A
Well,
it
doesn't
how
you
guys
talking
about
that
lin.
Are
you
guys
within
the
challenge
teams,
people
going?
Why
are
we?
Why
are
you
continuing
to
to
do
it?
It
just
seems
really,
if,
if
you
don't
have
ability,
if
you
wrote
the
challenge
enough,
that
you
care
about
the
challenge
and
you're
spending
the
time
on
it
and
it's
not
effective
at
all,
why
are
you
continuing
to
do
it
and
and
are
the
challenge
teams
coming
back
with
that
feedback
and
saying
we
don't
really
think
this
is
going
to
be
valuable
unless.
G
I
don't
know
if
they
don't
say
anything.
The
proposal
don't
say
anything
to
us.
We
we're
here
to
chase
them,
then
we
make
them
busy.
I
mean
if
we
care,
I
mean
if
any
talented
member
care
about
their
challenge,
because
we
have
we
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
write
a
report
to
iog
that
you
know
we
document
that
one
say
we
are
just
a
recorder,
the
video
recorder
and
then
whatever
you
know,
reception
is
here
at
that
point
and
then
we
collect
the
data
I
give
and
whoever
digests
our
data.
G
B
But
it's
two
different
perspectives
from
where
we're
at
we
okay.
Well,
I'm
the
b2b
challenge
team
right,
so
you
and
I
are
looking
at
hey.
How
can
we
make
these
successful
these
projects
that
are
funded
and
actually
the
proposers
in
the
beginning?
How
can
you
make
them
successful
now
iog
is
looking
at
okay.
Are
they?
Are
they
organizing
these
people
and
bringing
them
to
the
table,
giving
them
the
information
they
need
the
right
proposals?
B
Are
they
bringing
them
to
the
meeting
to
do
proof
of
life?
You
meet
those
few
little
parameters
with
iog.
Then
they're
happy,
you
know
they're
they're,
not
they
don't
have
any
other
parameters.
On
top
of
that,
we're
looking
to
try
to
make
the
projects
successful.
The
proposed
are
successful
and
the
project's
successful.
B
B
B
F
D
F
Goes
back
to
iog,
I
mean:
does
iog
really
want
them
to
be
successful?
If
they
do,
then
they
need
to
learn
accountability
and
responsibility,
because
you
get
out
there
in
the
real
world
and
you're
not
accountable
to
your
customers
or
you're,
not
accountable
to
your
vcs
or
your
backers.
Your
is
gone.
You
are
out
of
business
or
you're
getting
bought
out.
D
Longitudinal
accountability
like
you
consider
accountability
on
one
issue,
cool
like
you
got
you
did,
did
or
didn't
and
then,
but
that
same
person
team,
whatever
is
also
putting
in
multiple
on
all
kinds
of
fronts,
and
it's
like
dude.
If
you,
if,
if
you
didn't
finish
my
kitchen,
I'm
not
gonna
hire
you
for
my
bathroom,
like
it's
not
gonna
happen.
B
B
Well,
so
the
one
guy
got
15
grand
and
he
disappeared.
The
other
guy
was,
I
noticed,
another
guy
got
funded
over
two
funds.
You've
got
almost
like
125
000
over
two
funds
and
didn't
disappear,
but
he
never
finished
to
either
so
I'm
like,
if
you
could
have
paid
me,
a
hundred
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
I'll
I'll
sit
there
too.
B
D
Lydo
has
some
some
kind
of
I've
seen
recently
some
bar
charts,
where
it
shows
completion
and
not
completion.
He,
I
think,
is
it
it's
nascent
that
dude
is
building
out
some
really
it's
gonna
be
good.
It's
gonna
be
good,
but
like
right
now
and
he's
even
working
on
what
I
was
talking
about
that
longitudinal,
like
team
pages
like
people
that
have
multiple
proposals
in
he's
working
on
a
lot
of
stuff,
I
don't
know
exactly
what
he
has,
but
I
am
excited
I'm
excited
about
it.
F
A
A
A
J
G
Sorry,
can
you
take
the
lead
on
this?
Can
you
take
create
the
proposal
say
50
000
and
we
recruit
anyone
that
submits
the
report
and
any
forensics
data
and
it's
analytic
any
comparison
on
whatever
proposal
that
have
not
up
to
this
point
I
mean
just
collecting
everything
data
and
properly,
and
you
may
set
up
two
phases
so
phase
one.
You
set
up
the
website,
cfa2
the
upload
the
data
and
then
someone
will
rectify
that
and
that
rectifier
would
be
from
a
proposal
so
because
something
tip
on
their
tone.
G
G
F
A
A
They
only
make
it
very
complicated
it
should
it
should
it's
like
it's
like
just
bringing
public
research
to
the
forefront.
I'm
not
saying
we
do
some.
All
I'm
saying
is
there's
a
list
of
funded
proposer
projects,
so
we
started
talking
about
this
because
we're
looking
at
challenge
teams
being
a
being
ineffective.
A
Funding
for
and
I'm
saying,
fund
seven
or
before,
I'm
not
saying
eight,
I'm
saying
like
you
in
the
historical
past
have
received
funds
and
you
haven't
completed
the
project.
We
simply
as
a
comment
in
in
the
in
their
proposal
process
could
say
something
like
hey.
We
noticed
that
you
didn't
complete
your
funded
proposal
in
fund
five.
A
Can
you
explain
because
we
see
you're
back
for
more
having
not
completed
it
and
that's
just
a
matter
of
observing
I'm
I'm
offering
alternatives
in
the
fate,
so
that
could
be
part
of
of
a
fight
sharing
process
and
give
proposals
also
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
that,
because
that
gets
pointed
out
a
lot.
So
if
there's
a
legitimate
reason,
then
they
can
say
yeah.
It
was
because
this
happened.
This
happened.
This
happened.
I
learned
this
and
so
now
I'm
back
for
this.
A
That's
it
and
I'm
not
suggesting
that
it's
that
it's
out
of
bounds,
I'm
not
suggesting
in
any
way
that
we're
doing
anything
that
is
antagonistic.
I'm
simply
saying
that
we
present
there's
not
a
way
for
idea
scale
to
do
that.
Yet
I
think
it's
part
of
the
maybe
could
be
part
of
the
process.
Maybe
it's
an
overstep,
I'm
just
sharing
it
as
an
idea
and
maybe
a
prompter
of
ideas
that
could
think
in
that
same
vein,
that
allow
us
that
allow
us
to
do
some
kind
of
effort
towards
the
evaluating.
A
F
A
I'm
kidding,
they
didn't
complain.
Reason
that's
okay,
but
then
you
say
like
I
didn't
complete
it
because
of
this,
and
I
dropped
two
team
members
and
blah
blah,
or
I
learned
this
and
I
did
this
and
that's
okay.
You
can
explain
yourself,
but
it
adds
that
level
of
like
you
know.
I
think
it's
really
cool.
What's
going
on
right
now
in
this
vca
petition
process,
where
people
are
saying
hey,
what
is
this?
Can
you
explain
yourself
and
people
are
like
yeah?
I
can
here's
my
explanation,
we're
like
okay.
A
G
I
think
for
the
next
one,
but
I
really
want
to
see
some
kind
of
you
know
the
heart
trigger.
If
they
don't
do
nothing
from
second
report,
stop
the
free
laser
fund.
They
should
have
that
they
should
have
that.
Now
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know,
because
I
don't
have
problem
with
because
on
our
proposal
in
our
team
here
we
don't
have
problem
because
we
do
right.
We
do.
We
don't
do
our
job.
We
do
do
our
job.
If
we
promise
we
delivery
with
delivery,
even
some
team
is
leaving
yeah.
G
We
understand
that
family
issue
covering
all
the
impact,
but
you
can't
just
take
the
money
and
write
nothing
about
it.
Do
nothing
about
that
no
development
whatsoever
and
then
ioj
keep
spawning
them
that
just
get
the
money
and
without
just
a
tiny
information,
then
just
get
on
with
the
van
oh
gee.
I
don't
know
just
just
make
sure
the
point.
F
F
A
I
mean
I,
I
think
I
think
the
ability
to
do
that
as
a
community.
Is
there,
maybe
not
in
the
current,
in
the
current
way,
to
stop
the
process,
but
at
least
to
at
least
to
put
another
layer
of
transparency
there
and
we're
not
adding
transparency
that
doesn't
already
exist.
It's
just.
How
could
you
possibly
do
that
for
a
thousand
proposals?
A
Well,
you
don't
only
need
to
worry
for
the
for
the
proposers
right
and
you
only
really
need
to
do
it.
We
could
also
say:
okay,
everyone
who-
and
this
would
create
its
own
thing,
but
anyone
25
000
or
more
for
the
first
fund.
You
know
because
same
thing
with
assessments
like,
depending
on
how
much
you
spend
against
something,
that's
not
receiving
or
not
asking
for
a
whole
lot
so
or
it
could
be
50
000
or
more.
A
That
kind
of
a
thing.
Anyone
asking
for
that.
We
just
are
we,
you
know
wanting
to
steward
them
the
money
correctly
and
for
you
to
also
take
that
seriously,
because
and
and
if
that
process
is
taken
seriously,
then
we
used
to
do
foundation
grants
for
a
lot
of
the
charities
that
I
work
for.
Oh
my
god
I
mean
we
got
one
from
jacob's
ones,
the
sandals
for
a
thousand
dollars.
It
was
like
someone
nominated
us
and
we
just
got
chosen
and
we
had
to
submit
like
monthly
reports
over
three
months.
A
A
D
C
D
Stop
get
like
people.
What
I
see
is
people
jumping
into
the
gap.
I
see
you
lido
like.
I
see
people
jumping
into
the
gap
because
there's
a
complete
vacuum
of
structure
to
really
control
the
amount
of
money
that's
getting
thrown
at
the
internet
right
now,
like
it's
a
total,
it's
a
total
stopgap
venture,
it's
a
band-aid
like
it's,
it's
a
it's
wonderful
and
it
needs
to
be
done
because
the
correct
people
that
can
do
anything
are
not
doing
anything
everything,
but
it
just
it
saddens
me
yeah.
It
saddens
me.
D
The
the
lack
of
movement
on
the
people
that
are
in
control.
Have
the
authority
have
the
power
to
do
something
about
the
bleed
of
the
treasury
in
this
direction
are
not
doing
anything
it.
It
really
saddens
me.
It's
like
one
of
the
first
times
like
I
see
iog
they're
great
at
coding,
great
it
graded,
like
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
but
we're
talking
social
infrastructure
here
and
like
people,
and
that
is
not
a
coding.
D
You
can
just
click
on
some
keys
and
fix,
and
it's
this
is
a
a
huge
issue
that
is
going
to
just
compound
if
it
doesn't
get
solved,
and
I
see
a
lot
of
good
people
trying
to
jump
in
the
gaps
and
trying
to
fix
things
but
like
as
a
as
a
like.
Where
do
we
want
to
be
in
five
years?
Do
we
do?
We
still
want
to
be
this
band-aid
thing
like
it?
Just
it
there's
things
missing,
and
it
just
saddens
me.
D
Like
lynn,
told
me
about
that
one
that
first
couple
weeks
ago
dude,
I
still
had
nightmares
about
this,
that
25
grand
that
someone
walked
away
with
nothing
for
like
one
proposal
and
walked
away
with
nothing
like
it.
Just
it.
It
saddens
me
to
see
the
treasury
and
my
money
getting
treated
like
that
like
when
we're
supposed
to
be
building
something
here
and
we're
just
giving
it
away
to
grifters.
It
blows
my
mind.
A
A
That's
that's
the
mindset,
that's
that,
because
it
takes
time
and
it
takes
repetition
to
accomplish
things,
especially
in
an
environment
like
this.
It
takes
it
takes
the
if,
if
there
was
an
organized
organized
like
cohesive,
like
if
all
of
you
challenge
team
members
came
together
and
wrote
a
one-page
suggestion
like
here's,
what
we
think
should
be
not
this
isn't
for
future
challenge
teams.
This
is
on
the
process
of
challenge
teams.
Here's
how
it
would
work.
Here's
how
iog
would
communicate
like
this.
A
A
And
yes,
would
it
be
a
lot
easier
if
and
is
it
ridiculous
how
it
is
right
now
I
get
it
arguing
that
I
am
in
agreement,
I'm
not
in
disagreement,
for
that
is
it
do
I
wish
that
that
were
going
in
other
directions?
Yes,
do
I
wish
that
people
weren't
gaming
stuff
all
the
time
totally?
Are
there
lots
of
issues
I
was
talking
to
joe
earlier,
and
I
was
saying
it's
sort
of
like
we're,
building
a
house
and
there's
valuable
stuff
in
the
house
and
we're
standing
outside
in
the
yard
and
we're
like.
A
So
until
we
get
our
security
system
invented
and
built.
Could
you
please
not
climb
in
the
hole
in
the
window
that
we
know
is
there
and
then
people
are
like
yeah
sure
sure
we'll
do
that
and
most
people
are
like.
I
would
never
climb
in
that
window
in
the
house,
and
some
people
are
like
going
to
figure
out
how
to
climb
in
that
window
in
the
house
and,
unfortunately,
that's
that's
part
of
of
the
process
of
building
the
thing
for
it's
vulnerable
across
a
period
of
time.
So
what
do
we
have?
A
I
think
that
we
have
a
lot
of
things
right
now
that
we
could
utilize
and
it's
going
to
be
band-aid
utilization
sometimes,
but
if
you
prevent
30
people
from
walking
away
with
25
grand
or
5,
is
that
not
worth
the
work
of
commenting
on
proposals
and
not
saying
that's
the
way?
I'm
just
saying
we
could
find
some
stop
gap
things
that
would
prevent
that
from
happening
and
move
us
in
that
direction
enough
that
more
people
start
going.
A
A
I'm
not
apologizing
for
the
way
that
it
is.
I'm
simply
saying
that
all
of
us
sit
here
on
friday
nights
and
talk
about
it,
saturdays
for
for
lynn
and
joe
and
we're
sitting
here
and
talking
about
it.
We
might
as
well
come
away
with
some
stuff
and
like
throw
some
things
out
there
and
make
attempts,
because
it
gives
us
a
place
to
direct
this,
and
it
will
prompt
the
next
kind
of
thinking.
That's
going
to
be
exciting
for
us
to
have
momentum
behind,
rather
than
feeling
stuck
about
it.
M
I
didn't
hear
the
first
part
of
the
conversation,
so
I'm
remiss
because
I
don't
know
what
the
stop
gaps
are
necessarily
talked
about,
but
you
know
when
I
hear
about
the
the
issue
of
essentially
auditing,
you
know
how
do
we
get
good
auditing
done
on
these
proposals
so
that
when
ca-
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
just
about
ca
work?
But
when
cas
are
reviewing
these
proposals
and
when
voters
are
voting
on
these
proposals,
they
can
know
that
aspect
of
of
feasibility
for
lack
of
a
better
category
for
it.
M
M
I
I
think
to
myself
about
the
fault-tolerant
nature
that
the
treasury
will
eventually
have,
and
it
doesn't
have
it
yet,
because
the
numbers
aren't
high
enough
there's
not
enough
proposers
and
there's
not
enough
cas
and
there's
not
enough
vcas
to
get
true
fault
tolerance
in
the
system,
but
we
still
have
faults
and
with
fault
tolerance,
you're,
asking
yourself
how
many
good
proposals
offset
a
bad
one,
because
we
can't
get
into
the
mindset
where
we
start
saying.
How
do
we
prevent
bad
proposals
and
bad
proposals?
That's
not
the
point.
M
Good
proposal
is
and
there's
good
proposals.
They
sound
good
that
are
going
to
be
bad
there,
something
about
them
can't
be
pulled
off
or
whatever
there's
just
so
much.
We
don't
know
right.
That's
that's
kind
of
the
idea.
There's
there's
a
lot
of
information
that
not
only
do
we
not
have,
but
we
really
can't
have
so
fault.
Tolerance
is
just
the
idea
that
you
will
offset
misbehaving
actors
and
bad
results
and
that
at
a
certain
optimization
you
will
override
them
or
overwhelm
them
so
that
so
that
it's
just
not
a
problem.
M
M
Just
goes
off
the
charts,
so
you
know
they're
going
to
roll
out
the
d-reps
and
they're
going
to
do
these
workshops
and
stuff,
and
the
real
question
really
does
come
about
like
what
is
the
expected
level
of
of
what
they
call
rational
actors
versus
misbehaving
actors,
because
if
you
ex,
if
you
have
any
expectation
that
you
do
not
have
your
threshold
right,
that's
not
an
experiment.
You
should
do
it
ends
quickly.
It's
basically
endorsing
a
civil
attack.
A
That's
an
interesting
comparison
too,
because
if
you're
feeling
lit
so
the
conversation
started
because
lynn
was
talking
about
being
a
challenge
being
on
a
challenge
and
how
no
one
none
of
the
proposers
that
are
within
their
challenge
and
joey
was
echoing
the
same
experience
in
a
different
challenge
over
multiple
funds,
they're
not
being
accountable,
but
the
things
that
they're
supposed
to
do
with
the
challenge
theme
and
then
there's
not
a
real
solid.
Well,
we
all
know,
I
guess
you
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question
right.
A
F
G
No,
it
does
but
it's
available
in
excel
files.
That's
everyone
can
see
them,
and
that
means
the
fund
already
been
released
to
them
and
and
as
I
say,
one
person
or
a
small
team
to
look
after
a
few
hundreds
per
fund-
and
there
is
some
fun
some
proposal.
Some
projects
still
in
front
two,
not
just
close
now
we're
in
front
nine.
G
See
one
person
can't
do
it.
One
person
can't
do
that
much
so
they
must
have
some
kind
of
timeline
and
assume,
as
as
james
say,
the
threshold,
but
we
have
some
kind
of
you
know
cut
off
somehow
that
they
people
need
to
move
on,
say.
Okay,
your
project
is
dying
after
front
three
up
to
now.
You're
not
yet
finished
because-
and
you
asked
only
for
three
months
now-
we
up
to
fun
nights
already.
G
So
that's
what
is
three
four
times
you
know
more
than
a
year
already
and
if
you're
not,
then
we
just
cut
off
the
project.
That's
once
that's
one
of
the
threshold
you
may
measure,
as
led
and
in
term
of
report
and
impact,
and
if
you
don't
provide
a
certain
report
and
the
threshold
will
be
a
community
or
who
see
a
vca
input
into
that
report
before
the
money
release.
G
If
your
proposal
is
more
than
50
000,
for
example,
that's
another
threshold
you
may
encounter
because
at
the
moment
like
like
open
source,
there's
a
million
dollar
there,
some
proposal
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
two
hundred
three
hundred
thousand
and
what
are
the
threshold
for
them
first
fund.
If
there
is
300,
they
got
75,
000
dollar
easy
and
then
they
just
that's
for.
D
D
G
A
So
jeremy,
we
started
the
conversation
talking
about
the
challenge
team
process
and
just
listening
to
lynn
and
joey
talk
about
their
experiences
and
then
sort
of
picking
it
apart.
But
then
it
came
to
okay.
Well,
if
it
comes
to
if
it
comes
to
a
need
for
extra
support,
with
an
actual
like
looking
at
looking
at
people
who
are
not
performing
over
time
like
what
are
some,
what
are
some
things
that
we
could
do?
That
would
be
helpful
to
prevent
that
from
happening
question
for
you.
My
question,
for
you
is:
is
the.
A
Is
accomplishing
this
threshold
when
it
is
it?
Is
it
a
natural
process
that
happens
if
something
grows
and
you
and
you
reinforce
the
things
that
are
the
the
good
actors
right
and
or
the
where
you
reinforce
the
successful
behaviors
and
outcomes
in
people
when
you
reinforce
whatever
is
leading
to
that,
and
you
don't
spend
as
much
time
trying
to
prevent
it,
because
naturally
it
will
decreases
the
opposite
increases
or
what
is
the?
What
make
sure
that
your
process
doesn't
have
both
rise
at
the
same
time
and
end
up
canceling
itself
out.
M
Yeah,
I
would
say,
risk
analysis.
You
really
need
a
risk
assessment,
because
what
lynn
was
saying
with
the
the
amounts
is
pretty
relevant
because
we're
not
even
talking
on
a
proposal
by
proposal
basis,
it's
about
the
amount
by
amount
basis
like
how
much
goes
out
every
month
to
certain
things,
because
it
goes
out
and
chunks
in
bigger
chunks
to
some
people
smaller
chunks
to
others.
M
So
you
could,
you
could
do
like
a
mix
because
I
do
think
it's
a
natural
process.
I
think
the
filling
of
the
gap
like
iog
could
fill
the
gap,
but
now
we're
leaning
on
iog
again
and
we're
missing
data.
It's
a
question
of
where
do
we
get
that
data?
Because
we
really
need
the
retrospective?
I
mean
you
could
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
lido's
tool
and
just
get
a
feel
for
the
landscape,
and
you
realize
gosh.
We
haven't
had
a
good
look
at
this
landscape
at
all.
M
That's
one
thing:
I've
been
saying
for
a
while
is
auditing
will
improve
significantly
when
the
community
takes
it
over,
and
it
really
feels
like
it's
going
to
be
kind
of
a
hostile
takeover
where
people
just
demand
the
information
from
whatever
sources
they
can
get
it
one
just
real
quickly.
One
tool
you
could
create
would
be
a
way
for
proposers
to
pass
through
something
that
that
scrapes,
the
data
for
you
before
they
get
into
idea
scale
and
before
they
get
in
and
the
challenge
teams
could
be
a
way
to
do
that.
Challenge.
M
M
So
so
one
way
would
be
to
collect
the
data
on
the
way
in
the
the
stop
gaps
will
build
out
and
they
will
improve
and
they'll.
Add
more
team
members
and
they'll
do
things
like
that,
but
you
certainly
could
ask
for
something
stricter
at
the
highest
risk
levels.
Like
a
million
dollar
ask
that's
a
really
high
threshold
and
as
a
ca,
when
I'm
assessing
a
million
dollar
proposal,
I'm
really
super
strict,
especially
on
the
budget
like
where's
it
going.
How
are
they
spending
it?
M
You
know
that's
a
three
hour
assessment
right
there
and
that's
you
know
some
some
will
do
that
some
won't,
hopefully
enough
will,
but
you
could
certainly
man
make
mandatory
some
way
of
making
sure
you
get
that
oversight.
The
bonus
system
is
supposed
to
give
us
that
oversight.
A
lot
of
people
don't
understand
the
bonus
system.
M
I
would
say
the
rewards
that
I
earned
on
bonuses
in
this
fund.
If
I
remember
I
were
probably
30
33
from
bonuses,
and
that's
so
you
know-
that's
not
bad
if
cas
understood
that
they
would
go
looking
for
those
high
dollar
proposals
first
and
start
getting
those
numbers
up,
because
even
on
a
lottery
ticket
you're
making
good
money
to
go,
assess
those.
M
So
you
know
I
think
you
can
mix
it
up
a
little
bit
with.
You
know:
decentralized,
diffuse
web
of
trust,
where
you
just
trust
the
things
will
work
out,
but
also
when
that
risk
is
really
high.
Get
pretty
strict
with
something
you
know
impose
something
have
some
kind
of
a
a
strict
filter
that
has
to
be
passed
through.
M
M
I
can't
think
of
a
decent
example
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
but
it
would
just
be
some
kind
of
a
a
gate
for
the
really
high
dollar
proposals
and
to
the
point
of
getting
them
funded,
so
they
get
funded,
everything's
good.
You
can
put
another
gate
there
too.
If
you're
getting
over,
I
don't
know
10
000
per
distribution,
then
maybe
that
comes
with
something
beyond
the
frankly.
Quite
pitiful
audit
template
from
iog.
D
I,
like
the
idea
of
of
gating
or
like
a
threshold
for
more
scrutiny.
I
love
that
idea.
I
think
it's
great.
It's
the
the
the
individual
dollar
value
for
a
proposal,
though
I
think,
should
be
extended
to
all
the
proposals
that
those
that
or
those
individuals
have
within
a
fund
sure
the
multiple
of
these.
M
D
Because
of
all
these
micro
fracturing
of,
I
want
to
do
something
cool,
but
I'm
going
to
fracture
the
proposal
out
over
30
40
40
different
proposals
like
if,
if
all
that
was
considered
as
a
group
and
your
risk,
your
the
the
the
threat
index
would
keep
going
up
kind
of
like
you're
talking
about
like
yeah
yeah.
I,
like.
M
That
they're
taking
a
very
natural
you
know
splitting
a
proposal,
that's
a
very
natural
risk
mitigation
factor
that
comes
from
proposers
right
there.
They
don't
want
to
risk
not
being
able
to
move
forward
at
all,
so
they
split
it
up.
Something
might
move
forward.
But
from
what
I
mean,
you
really
need
almost
like
dedicated
cas
who
study
this
issue.
Specifically
this
multi-fund
or
multi-proposal
in
one
fund
phenomenon,
because
there's
just
from
a
game
theory
perspective
it
breaks
constantly,
and
then
you
get
all
the
feedback,
the
fallout
from
that
from
people
complaining
about.
M
Like
you
know,
I
can't
I
got
a
bad
grade
because
they
didn't
like
that.
My
proposals
didn't
fit
together
well
enough,
but
I
didn't
even
want
to
break
them
apart
in
the
first
place.
You
know
it
starts
like
the
actor
incentive
mechanism
starts
to
break
down
and
if
cas
were
trained
a
little
bit
better
to
assess
that
to
understand
how
those
pieces
fit
together
and,
more
importantly,
to
work
with
the
proposers.
D
F
A
G
Let's
start
with
this
right,
if
possible,
we
can
lobby
somehow
that
the
proposal
guy
in
fun
night
that
had
some
kind
of
threshold
like
like
you
know,
jeremy
mentioned
that
start
from
up
to
ten
thousand
here
that
what
you
gotta
do
number
of
report
number
of
engagement
number
of
orders,
any
indication
that
in
first
month,
from
twenty
thousand
from
ten
thousand
to
twenty
thousand,
this
is
threshold.
So
whoever
divide
their
proposal
because,
like
myself,
I
am
a
help
proposal.
Okay,
I
say
they
give
me
that
idea
to
give
me
that
problem.
G
I
said:
okay,
they
asked
me:
where
do
what
do
you
think
the
best
challenge
that
I
can
throw
them
in
then
I
advise
okay.
What
are
you?
What
are
you
doing
now
because
some
of
them
have
part-time
job,
full-time
job?
There's
a
million
reason
behind
that.
So
I
advise
them.
Okay,
you
should
go
there,
you
should
break
it
out
or
you
should
keep
the
same
fun
whatever
reason.
So
if
they
break
it
out,
I'm
not
breaking
that.
We
put
it
in
the
proposal
guy.
Clearly,
one
dollar
from
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars.
G
This
is
what
you
got
to
report.
This
is
what
you
gotta
engage.
This
is
what
you
got
to
provide
every
month
for
three
months.
If
you
are
for
six
months,
here's
what
six
months,
if
you
are
for
one
year.
This
is
one
year,
just
multiplying
that
kind
of
report.
That
kind
of
evident
upfront
in
the
proposal
guide
then
up
to
50
000,
here's
what
you
need
up
to
from
50
000
to
100
000
what
this
is,
what
you
need.
G
So
at
least
the
proposal
have
in
mind.
Okay,
if
I
don't
do
that,
I
got
no
fund.
We
get
that
mindset
up
front,
give
that
thinking
and
and
the
gate
up
front
so
before
they
do
anything.
Then,
oh
okay,
I
got
to
do
that
much.
If
I
don't.
I
don't
have
money
if
my
teammate
leaving
so
they
have
to
set
their
team
right
at
beginning,
at
least
somehow
they
have
to
do
their
homework
first.
They
can't
just
throw
anyone.
Oh
I
got
a
coder.
I
have
this.
I
put
them
together.
G
I
rather
propose
I
get
fun.
Oh,
oh,
my
god.
They
leaving
because
I
don't
find
enough
for
them.
So
what
do
I
do
now
I
sit
here:
do
nothing
just
get
a
fun,
so
that's
what
something
that
I
think
and
if
we
can
do
that
in
fun
night
then
question
here
who
will
endorse
the
metric?
Who
will
endorse
those
criteria.
D
M
F
A
Okay,
but
here's
the
thing,
so
I
get
that
mindset,
I'm
I'm
with
it.
Okay,
so
I
take
I
I
absorb
and
I
and
coppers
and
eclipse.
Okay,
I
understand
on
on
the
other
side
of
this,
though,
is
if,
if
what
what
are
the
things
that
we
can
put
in
right
now?
So
if
you
have,
if
you
add
those
in
there,
the
mindset
itself
is
the
beginning
of
that
and
then
ultimately,
if
there's
a
criteria
that
they
don't
complete
it
as
a
result,
they
don't
complete
the
thing
and
we
have
on
the
other
side
what?
A
A
So
you
have
something
in
the
beginning.
You
have
something
way
at
the
other
end
of
the
thing
as
a
beginning,
so
that,
at
the
very
least,
there's
more
transparency
around
what
the
expectation
is
and
whether
or
not
they
fulfilled
the
expectation
in
a
way
that
can
be
considered
and
evaluated
when
someone's
deciding.
If
this
person's
feasibly
going
to
create
this
project,.
F
A
F
He
said
lynn
said:
ask
merrick
to
put
that
in
the
form
I
was
going
to
say
and
then
that
would
also
you
know
granted
they
can
create
a
new
id,
but
that
would
also
go
towards
a
reputation
if
they
happen
to
lie.
But
then
you
got
to
have
somebody
that
actually
goes
back
through
and
validates
each
proposer
and
sees
if
they
actually
are
telling
the
truth,
because
you
got
to
have
a
team
to
do
that
or
else.
What's
the
you
know,
I
understand
the
reason
for
the
question,
but.
E
A
So
it's
probably
a
small
poll
and
if
we,
if
we
solve
for
it
at
least
enough,
that
someone
needs
to
represent
honestly
whether
they've
done
that
or
not
and
then
maybe
there's
a
repercussion
like
if
you're
someone
who
have
you
have
you
or
me
that
you're
on
received
funding
previously
under
any
of
yours
or
any
other
audio
skill.
We
can
write
a
paragraph
right.
F
A
With
you,
I
agree
with
you
totally
I'm
just
saying
that
if
you
put
a
speed
limit
side
in
the
side
of
the
road
and
once
in
a
while,
a
cop
is
sitting
there
way
less
people
speed
than
if
you
don't
have
one
there's
no
cop
ever
and
I
don't-
and
I-
and
this
is
like
to
john
w
made
this
comment
a
while
back
about
how
like
we
don't
need
to
make
rules
for
everything.
It's
it
and
I
totally
got.
A
I
didn't
mean
to
insinuate
that
you're,
like
whip,
cracking
people
about
it
or
like
making
it
hard.
I
just
think
that
should
be
part
of
the
of
the
of
their
feasibility
as
much
as
the
fact
that
they've
done
this
for
20
years
right.
So
if
you
were
you,
if
you're
experientially
involved
in
this
community
and
have
received
funding
part
of
the
accountability
for
you
submitting,
a
new
proposal
is
that
you
report
on
those,
because
it's
the
right
of
the
of
the
group
who's
evaluating
your
feasibility
to
know
whether
or
not
you're
going
to
complete
stuff.
A
M
Go
ahead.
Sorry,
it
really
is.
It
really
is
a
dialogue
right.
It's
a
conversation
because
there's
a
there
was
at
least
one
proposer
that
I
assessed.
Who
is
a
multi-fund,
multi-proposal
proposer,
and
I
thought
he
did
a
great
job
of
spelling
it
out
right
in
in
the
section
in
the
proposal
now.
I
think
it
asks
if
you've
ever
had
another
proposal
funded
or
something
I'm
not
sure
how
this
question.
I
don't
remember
exactly
how
the
question
is
worded.
We
could
look
at
formatting
that
section
like
turning
it
into
a
couple
different
entries.
D
M
They
always
know
exactly
what
you
should
include,
so
that's
one
area
where
you
could
actually
expand
quite
a
bit
with
trying
to
make
more
of
a
conversation,
knowing
that
this
is
all
done,
asynchronous
asynchronously
with
these
deadlines
that
stop
conversation
in
its
tracks.
My
point
I
was
going
to
make
was,
I
left
my
feedback
heal
off.
He
left
his
feedback
as
a
proposer
and
then
the
vcas
left
feedback
off
of
that.
That
was
a
conversation
that
happened.
Who
knows
about
it,
just
the
three
or
four
of
us
that
participated
in
it.
M
I
wish
everybody,
because
I'm
they're
telling
me
valuable
information
about
how
they
approach
multiple
proposals
and
how
they
decided
to
break
it
up,
and
things
like
that,
like
you,
just
need
more
conversation
around
these
things
in
order
to
figure
out
who
is,
I
wouldn't
even
call
it
bad,
acting
or
misbehaving?
Well,
maybe
misbehaving
on
the
grounds
that
they're
approaching
it
in
kind
of
an
ad
hoc
way,
and
after
a
while
that
gets
messy
even
for
them.
M
He's
still
working
in
other
places
to
get
funds,
and
so
it's
not
all
about
getting
around
this
block,
which,
if
that's
the
only
way
he
could
be
funded.
You'd
know
he
have
to
figure
the
block
out,
but
because
he
can
continue
to
work
and
just
figure
this
out
on
the
side.
Then
it
becomes
like
it
gets
messy
and
so
the
conversation
really
if
you
can
just
find
more
ways
to
have
it.
M
So
possibly
we
can't
have
the
conversation
like
in
real
time,
not
with
the
systems
we
have
in
place,
but
making
that
question
in
the
existing
proposal
guide.
Making
that
question
more
explicit,
like
dividing
it
up
to
how
many
proposals
you
have
in
this
fund,
how
many
proposals
have
you
had
in
the
past?
M
Do
you
have
any
completed
proposals?
You
know
you
can
come
at
it
from
a
couple
different
angles.
You
can
ask
them
like?
Are
you
have
you
failed
at
all,
which
isn't
probably
very
handy,
but
you
could
ask
what
have
you
been
successful
with
so
far
and
if
they
can't
really
say
they
have
well,
that's
that's
an
implicit
answer
as
well.
D
And
the
whole
goal
really
should
be
to
push
these
guys
across
the
finish
line
like
it's
more
of
a
it
should
be
a
collab
like
conversational
collaborative
like
we're
here
we're
here
to
help
you
succeed.
We
want
you
to
do
good
things
for
the
for
the
chain.
We
want
to
grow
the
ecosystem
or
whatever,
like
it's,
not
like
the
cop.
That's
just
like!
Oh
bad,
guys
back
it's
more
like.
We
really
want
this
stuff
to
work.
We
want.
F
Maybe
maybe
maybe
the
challenge
teams?
For
those
say
there
are
those
proposals
proposers
who
say
you
know
yeah
I
haven't
completed.
You
know
this
project
or
whatever
have
you?
Maybe
the
challenge
teams
can,
because
that
is
the
goal.
The
goal
is
success
of
the
projects.
So
maybe
the
challenge
team
can
hop
in
if
they
see
something.
F
Maybe
they
can
monitor
that
to
hop
in
if
they
see
something
and
try
to
assist
the
team
as
far
as
hey
you
know,
is
there
something
that
you
need,
or
but
obviously
incentivize,
that
challenge
team
more
than
what
they're
getting
now
but
yeah?
It's
kind
of
put
that
kind
of
put
that
whatever
you
would
call
it
burden
or
whatever
on
the
challenge
team.
As
far
as
hey
you
know,
that's
their
job
is
to
see
it
through
success.
F
A
That's
really
cool
and
it's
and
it's
much
it's
like
from
the
proposer
out,
rather
than
incoming
accusatory
towards
the
proposer.
A
lot.
A
lot
of
this
dissent
that's
happening
is
because
people
are
seeing
things
and
naming
it
something,
and
it's
distasteful
to
hear
that
thing,
and
so
you're
now
defending
yourself
and
now
we're
in
a
conflict.
The
conversation
piece
that
you
said
jeremy
is
like
is
so
central
to
this.
What
is
happening
in
that
in
the
vca
issue
that
navid
raised
is
so
interesting.
A
So
interesting,
it's
interesting
to
I'm,
I'm
learning
I
so
I'm
I'm
the
what
naveed
produced
in
the
document
I
said
today
I
was
like
I
don't.
Even
I
was
I
wrote:
are
you
having
fun
still
with
this,
or
is
this
work?
It's
fun
like?
I
don't
understand,
but
it's
it's
fun
for
him
to
look
at
that
and
process
and
think
about
and
ask
the
questions
how
the
questions
are
being
asked
are
so
respectful
compared
to
how
they
have
been
asked,
because
we're
looking
at.
A
A
A
Is
there
any
specific
kind
of
feedback
you
would
like
in
the
insight
sharing
process
from
the
community
just
for
them
to
think
about
it
right,
I
love
to
hear
what
people
think
about
ding
ding
ding,
not
making
it
too
complicated.
It
doesn't
have
to
be
mandatory,
but
maybe
someone
says
like
I'd
love,
to
hear
from
someone
who
doesn't
agree
with
this
on.
Why
that's
a
very
helpful
thing
to
understand
before
and
it
it
encourages
that
that
discussion
about
the
idea
versus
evaluation
of
the
proposal
that
comes
later
people
can
talk
about
like.
A
Does
anyone
think
this
will
work
or
won't
work?
It's
also
a
hard
thing
to
ask
when
you
think
that
you
know
and
you're
presenting
yourself
as
the
one
who's
going
to
do
it,
but
it
makes
it
a
lot
stronger
or
some
questions
like
that.
Where
questions
that
are
there
to
to
inspire
conversation
during
that
time
and
would
give
people
who
are
going
into
comment
or
to
think
about
it
await
a
place
to
start.
That
would
be
really
helpful
to
the
person
who's
wanting
to
do
the
project.
D
I,
like
the
whole
thing
about
reframing
the
whole
deal
to
be
success
based
and
like
we're
all
here
to
win.
I
love
that
I
think
that's
valuable
and
anywhere
you
can
shove
that
ethos
into
the
whole
system
from
challenge
team
to
all
the
way
through
to
finish
product.
I
think
that's
a
good
thing
to
to
do.
F
Did
well
I'm
not
just
that,
I'm
talking
about
verify
information
and
everything
else,
because
there's
a
lot
of
that
and
I've
been
been
harping
on
that.
This
is
a
this
for
all
this
money
floating
around.
There
is
so
much
trust,
and
so
little
eyeballs
on
on
everything
and
the
questions
are
good
that
were
just
discussed,
they're
great,
but
again
there
still
needs
to
be
those
people
that
will
look
at
that,
be
it
the
cas,
vcas
community
members,
a
team
that
looks
at
the
responses
and
the
replies
and
like
the
challenge
team,
can
do
that.
F
But
and
like
I
think,
a
challenge
team
is,
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
cap
on
it,
but
I
think
it's
like
10
people,
something
like
that.
I
don't
know
if
they
put
a
cap
on
it
or
not
seven
people,
but
you
know
we-
you
can
provide
it,
but
you'll
still-
and
I
know
what
jeremy's
saying
about
the
threshold
as
far
as
or
like
offsetting,
the
good
will
offset
the
bad
whatever.
However,
it
was
phrased,
but
you
still
got
it,
you
still
have
to
do
your
verify
in
there.
M
M
I
I
mean
I
know
like
they
have
that
qualitative
audit
pilot
that
wada
and
vanessa
want
to
run,
and
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
because
you
get
projects
that
are
so
emergent
that
what
they
turn
out
just
isn't
on
the
list
like
they're
successful
but
they're,
not
like
even
their
failure,
was
a
success
right
right
because
they
learned
something
important.
It
informs
everybody
else,
and
so
that
ends
up
in
the
soft
qualitative
metric
kind
of
place.
M
I
don't
know
what
percentage
you're
talking
about,
but
I
think
just
based
on
what
I
saw
in
this
fund,
which
was
right
around
200,
assess
or
200
proposals
like
deep
into
them
was
that
they
can
be
measured
right.
They
they
got
kpis.
These
things
can
be
turned
out.
We
can
measure
these
things
so
where,
if
that's
the
verify
right,
that's
the
proof
that
those
things
happen
and
that
you
can
show
they
happened.
M
M
Yeah,
it's
just
a
little
questionnaire
that
says:
do
you
want
more
money?
You
still
want
money
right,
you're,
not
you
know,
you're,
not
hanging
out
right
now.
Are
you
so
you
know,
and
and
there's
positives
to
that
you
know,
but
most
of
those
positives
come
from
the
fact
that
it's
just
iog
doing
the
work
and
if
they
actually
had
to
audit
it,
everything
would
grind
to
a
halt.
M
This
mood
occur
in
people
that
I
know
like
put
in
proposals
every
fund
where
they're
saying
god
I'm
in
the
proposal
phase
and-
and
I
just
it
wears
me
out
to
put
in
all
these
proposals-
they're
trapped
by
it
in
a
way
because
they
have
to
keep
these
proposals
coming-
that
doesn't
speak
to
how
well
they
do
them
or
how
how
well
they
do
their
auditing.
But
the
proposals
are
a
burden.
You
know
they
do
require
you
to
follow
through
and
follow
up
and
do
all
those
little
things.
M
M
You
know
it's
good
to
see
community
members
with
the
bee
and
they're
bonded
about
it,
but
that's
not
sustainable
for
them
right
and
we
can
back
them
up.
We
can
support
them
a
little
bit,
but
it's
still
not
sustainable
that
sustainable
participation
is
so
key
to
this
auditing
and
we
don't
have
that
model.
Yet
cas
can
do
what
they
do.
I
don't
consider
myself
an
audit
or
anything
else.
M
I
just
consider
myself
a
ca
so,
like
I
help
in
the
conversation
part
at
the
beginning,
I
can
help
voters
and
proposers
kind
of
respond
after
the
proposal
is
in,
but
once
it
comes
to
the
auditing
part,
I
can
just
look,
I
mean,
that's
all
I
feel
qualified
well,
I
wouldn't
say
qualified,
but
that's
what
I
feel
like
doing.
That's
all
I
care
about.
D
So
if
we
had,
let's
say
a
thousand
proposals
that
were
funded,
let's
just
shoot
a
round
number
out
there
any
and
there
was
just
let's
say:
10
full-time
jobs
that
were
funded
to
do
this
kind
of
work.
So
each
of
those
had
a
hundred
clients,
a
hundred
proposals
that
were
under
their
belt
and
their
whole
job
was
to
audit
to
provide
transparency
to
the
community
and,
moreover,
to
provide
success
to
the
proposer
to
get
them
across
the
finish
line
like
it
seems
like
if
you
had
the
right
resources
and
the
right
structure
in
place.
D
D
M
Proposals,
I
think
joey
had
a
proposal
along
those
lines.
I'll
have
to
dig
back
into
it
again,
but
it
was
for
he
was
calling
him
project
managers
and
it
would
be
a
team
that
helped-
and
I
don't
know
if
it
was
by
challenge
that
doesn't
quite
sound
right.
I
think
it
was
just
a
general
catalyst
team.
I
don't
know
if
they
were
meant
to
cover
the
warp
and
wolf
of
catalyst.
I
don't
know
if
they
were
going
to
go
that
far,
but
the
idea
was
trained.
M
People
like
and
that's
another
thing
that
comes
into
like
auditing
a
metric.
You
really
need
accreditation
because
some
things
matter,
some
things,
don't
as
a
ca.
I
can
totally
screw
up
my
assessment,
really
good
research
into
something
right.
I
can
still
get
it
wrong
if
it's
not
my
area
of
skill
or
expertise
or
if
I'm
just
not
thinking
well,
so
you
would
want
some
kind
of
trust
assurance
behind
any
kind
of
auditing
that
went
along.
That's
an
interesting
conversation
actually
about.
M
D
So
you
need
a
domain
expert
in
that,
let's
just
say
it
was
a
challenge.
We're
gonna
stick
with
this
challenge,
setting
motif
that
we
got
going
on
if
there
was
a
domain
expert
that
could
serve
that
role
as
auditor
cheerleader
like
like
getting
them
across
the
finish
line
like,
but
they
had
the
domain
expertise.
D
So
if
you're
talking
open
source
developer-
or
you
know
dapps
or
whatever
that
they
would
actually
know
that
stuff,
but
it's
it's,
it
seems
to
me
it's
it's,
not
it's
not
out
of
the
ballpark
to
suggest
that
this
could
totally
be
done.
It's
just
a
matter
of
resource
and
authority
to
implement
it.
Well,.
M
Do
and
you
can
do
that
with
accreditation
protocols,
they
certainly
exist.
I
mean
there's
licenses,
people
get,
you
know
you
could
try
and
model
something
like
that.
I
don't
think
that's
wise,
but
you
could
do
it.
It
could
be.
It
could
be
one
of
those
stop
gap
things
until
you
backfilled
enough
education
and
knowledge
just
into
the
general
community.
M
M
Looking
in
a
challenge
where
there's
just
not
really
any
problems,
you
know
it's
good
to
know
and
the
data's
really
handy
to
have
you'd
love
that
data
to
accrue
naturally-
or
I
shouldn't
say
naturally,
but
automatically
somehow
you
know
to
populate
something
without
somebody
riding
hurt
on
it.
Yeah
that
plays
into
the
idea
of
an
auditor
could
be
something
that's
handed
off
from
the
challenge
team
to
the
auditor
at
a
certain
point
for
a
challenge
setting.
If
you
were
still
using
that
model
after
funding,
I
would
think
right
right,
yeah,.
M
M
Post-Proposal
challenge
team
metamorphosis,
this
auditor,
you
know
the
sort
of
community
auditor
and
have
the
community
sign
off
on
it
in
order
to
even
submit
it
to
iog
what
you're
doing
in
a
lot
of
ways,
there
is
you're
getting
validation
to
something
before
it
goes
to
the
authorization
stage
right,
so
iog
authorizes
the
funds
to
be
dispersed,
but
they're
not
really
validating
it.
So
if
we
could
add
a
validity
metric
somewhere
in
the
system,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
official
right.
M
D
M
Maybe
you
want
that
endorsement,
like
you,
you're,
basically
going
out
and
asking
to
be
audited
and
hoping
that
they've
got
time
for
your
project
so
that
they
can
tag
that
in
the
in
the
the
iog
process
of
authorizing
you
to
get
your
funds,
because,
wouldn't
you
like
to
be
the
proposer
who
can
state
in
your
proposal
for
the
next
fund?
Yeah
I've
got.
You
know,
audit,
dow
or
whatever,
issuing
their
certification
report
on
my
stuff,
giving
me
high
grades
every
time
you
know.
That's!
M
D
L
A
D
A
That
you
could
have
like
an
audit
token
or
something
like
that.
You
could
have
like
a
something
like
there's
a
group
that
you
can.
You
can
go
through.
They
will
scrutinize
scrutinize,
so
you're,
inviting
them
to
really
look
at
and
evaluate
it.
If
you
have
the
same
way
that
you
just
wrote
for
the
treasury
jeremy,
if
there's
an
like
an
audit
framework
that
they
have
to
follow
in-
and
I
don't
know
how
you
do
that,
but
there's
that
so
that
people
can
be
bribed.
A
You
know
you
have
to
demonstrate
based
on
the
criteria
that
you
had,
that
you
had
scrutinized
this
to
because
of
its
maybe
the
maybe
they
pay
for
it
right.
Maybe
it's
a
paid
incentivized
thing
and
as
a
result
they
get
the
tote.
They
get
the
token.
Maybe
they
don't
pay
for
it
and
it's
it.
I
don't
know.
I
don't
know
what
those
factors.
A
A
But
when
you
have
that
it's
like
the
gold
star,
you
have
that
that
it's
a
it's
a
lot
of
hoops
to
jump
through
to
be
a
b
corp.
You
have
to
like
be
evaluated
and
all
that
stuff,
but
when
you
have
that
it
says
so
much
about
how
you
conduct
yourself
that
it's
the
value
is
there
and
when
you
don't
bother
to
go
through
that,
it's
okay.
But
this
is
a
good
thing
to
put
in
place
of
it,
not
to
reduce
the
the
needed
volume
and
to
let
people
really
choose
to
go
through
that
process.
D
It's
like
the
certification
in
the
dapp
store
right.
You've
been
talking
about
this,
like
the
certification
you've
walked
through
that
process.
It's
arduous,
it's
a
lot
more
extra
work,
but
you
get
that
little
green
check
or
whatever
badge
token.
Whatever
we
want
to
you
would
want
to
do.
One
would
want
to
do
that
makes
it
so
much
worth
it
to
do
it.
F
F
D
And
I've
heard
that
complaint
popping
up
a
lot
from
some
of
these
guys
in
these
spaces
that
are
that
are
like
doing
all
this.
Even
even
the
check
boxes
we're
talking
about
now,
they're
complaining
about
those
like
it's
too
much
so
my
whole
kick
back
to
that
is
dude
you're
taking
treasury
funds
like
come
on.
G
I
believe
that
from
now
now,
if
we
in
fun
night,
can
we
set
up
some
kind
of
working
body
somehow
done
by
fun,
15
iog,
only
receivable
payable
account
full
stock.
Iog
got
nothing
to
do
with
the
rest,
so
we
got
to
work
down
somehow
that
by
a
number
of
funds
from
now
on,
iog
only
received
the
received
the
receipt,
the
tick
box,
okay,
pay
or
not
pay.
G
G
So
if
we
want
to
go
go
ahead,
if
we
want
to
go
that
part,
if
we're
going
to
go
that
module
and
of
course
it's
like
all
other
decentralization
that
at
the
end
of
the
day,
community
control
community,
all
this
community
validation
community
valid
and
that's
benefit
back
to
the
community.
So
if
that's
the
case,
we
have
to
follow
up
some
kind
of
criteria,
the
metric,
the
working
phase,
and
then
we
get
that.
If
we
keep,
you
know
we
could
do
what
we're
doing
now.
G
G
G
A
A
Well,
but
I
think
also
like
to
jeremy's
point
about
proposals
should
be
like
we
nee.
We
need
a
little
bit.
These
great
conversations
are
happening.
I
think
vanessa's
having
conversations
with
proposers
and
they're
looking
at
the
proposer
guide,
but
I
think
that
should
come
together
and
it
should
have
mark
in
there
and
so
that
we
can
think
about
the
idea,
scale,
additions
and
danny
for
the
point
of
having
everything
you
know.
A
I
don't
know
as
far
as
as
early
as
the
conversation
happens,
maybe
it's
two
or
three
conversations
where
we
think
it's
not
just.
I
updates
idea
scale.
It's
like
you
know
it's
process,
process,
stuff
too.
If
we
add
these
questions,
it's
little
change
for
ideas
as
far
as
fields,
but
it's
it's
process
stuff,
but
I'd
love
to
just
get
feedback
from
you
guys
on
how
to
organize
this
other
than
like
hurting
people
around
or
trying
to.
We
can
do
that.
But
what?
What
do
you
think?
What
are
some?
A
G
F
F
But
there's
more
to
it
than
that
too.
You're
also
talking
about
the
like
the
check
box,
that
this
proposal
is
finished,
like
all
those
things
that
we
talked
about
as
far
as
idea
scale
to
to
make
the
changes
to
where
it's
easier
to
filter
things
out
and
to
also
what
was
discussed
today
as
far
as
and
then
also
lynn's
idea.
F
As
far
as
his
idea
about
I
mean
something
to
do
with
budget
or
like
how
many
months
or
something
of
that
nature
that
he
had
lined
up
so
there's
more
there's
more
to
discuss
about
idea
scale
than
just
that
than
just
what
was
here
today.
So
maybe
put
all
those
ideas
in
there.
That's
something
maybe
they'll
accept
something.
D
G
D
D
There's
a
hundred
conversations
going
on
other
other
places
that
are
doing
similar
things,
but
there's
no
structural
way
to
change
catalysts.
Let's
just
leave
it
at
catalyst
and
not
governance.
There's
no
structural
way
to
change
catalyst
other
than
iog.
Can
I
please
has
like?
Can
we
do
this?
Like
can
and
the
the
whole
asking
for
permission
thing
at
this
point
is
driving
me
flipping
insane
because
there's
so
many
brilliant
people
and
hardworking
people
doing
stuff,
but
that,
but
it's
as
you're
putting
something
in
the
suggestion
box
at
the
end
of
the
day
and
it's
it.
D
Or
or
sorry
or
put
in
a
proposal,
ask
for
money
for
something
if
you-
and
this
is
our
governance
system-
and
this
is
this-
is
our
system
at
this
time
ask
for
money
for
something
that
provides
legitimacy
to
go?
Do
something
and
then
maybe
we'll
use
it
or
not
like
there's
two
ways:
iog
can
I
please
has
or
give
me
money
for
this
and
I'll
go
build
it
maybe
won't
use
it,
but
I'll
go
build
it
and
it
just
it's
driving
me
nuts.
A
A
Brother
yeah,
I'm
gonna
shut
up.
No,
it's
it's
relevant,
it's
a
totally
relevant
thing,
but
I
think
for
right
now,
in
terms
of
like
the
button
on
this
is
it's
already.
This
idea,
scale
issues
needing
update
exists
as
a
community
suggestion
and
it's
got
votes
on
it,
so
we
can
go
through
their
our
process,
of
adding
it
to
the
adding
to
the
board
and
having
the
thread
live
in
there
and
talking
about
it
and
inviting
people
to
it.
A
So
that's
what
I'm
asking
I
guess
we
could
just
invite
people
in
to
that
conversation,
but
I
think
the
idea
scale
issues
are
are
start
to
finish
process
wise
and
not
really
that
specific
to
us.
Even
though,
when
I
say
us,
I
mean
cabca
as
far
as
people
perceive
it
when
I
bring
it
up,
so
maybe
I
maybe
I
maybe
I'll
go
back
to
mercy.
Maybe
I'll
go
back
to
mercy
and
vanessa
and
I'll
say
you
know
I'll
sort
of
I'll,
bring
it
to
them
and
say
how
can
we?
A
How
can
we
talk
about
it
more
and
we'll
make
it
we'll
update
this
in
our
own
dework
and
we'll
put
it
in
as
a
thread
that
we
can
talk
about
and
we
can
invite
mark
to
it,
and
at
least
that
async
conversation
will
happen.
We
can
put
those
ideas
in
there
and
start
to
talk
about
it
and
really
reflect
on
it.
Go
ahead.
Lin.
G
The
deny
the
proposal
kicking
we're
not
going
to
do
anything,
because
we
need
to
update
the
proposal
guy,
I'm
not
sure
who
each
other
now
is
nothing.
I
can
do
about
that.
No
nothing
we
can
do
about
that,
but
if
we
we
engage
with
mark,
we
have
to
do
before
the
night,
because
I
need
to
do
a
testing.
I
need
to
rewrite
coding,
rewrite
add
just
one
or
two
button,
so
we
need
to
understand
their
shoe
as
well.
I
mean
we've
got
to
put.
G
We
stand
on
their
shoe
as
well
that
the
knight
kicking
to
open
for
proposal.
Now
it's
the
30.
I
mean
the
29
year
time.
It's
not
much
the
weekend,
it's
over,
so
it's
pretty
much
another
five
working
day
for
for
iog.
You
know
95
stuff,
so
we
have
to
put
somehow
very
simple,
okay.
We.
This
is
what
we
need
and
then
I
don't
know
how
you
could
ask
from
community
for
return
for
next
seven
two
hour.
So
I'm
saying
okay,
we
got
to
do
this
in
fun
night.
G
The
box,
at
the
end
of
that
we
asked
okay,
here's
the
question:
what
we
don't
audit
anything
we
ask
them
to
fill
the
information
in
full,
stop
that
for
fun.
Nine,
because
only
five
days,
I'm
sure,
merrick
and
mark
can
create
two
box.
Have
you
done
the
puzzle?
If,
yes,
they
put
another
view
on
okay,
put
all
the
proposal
write
everything
there.
The
point
of
that
is
for
c
a
to
read
nothing
else
for
now,
because
we
don't
have
time
the
nines
have
to
be
finished.
G
A
From
this
conversation
tomorrow,
god
I
will
escalate
one
of
the
if
it's
okay
with
everyone
here
that
sounds
like
there's
consensus
and
a
group
that
is
talking
about
it
and
we
can
move
it
up.
So
we'll
we'll
escalate
or
what's
the
word
you
jeremy,
integrate
we'll
integrate
it
into
the
maybe
the
maybe
operations
working
group,
we'll
put
it
in
operations
working
group
and
then
we'll
have
that?
F
D
A
Let
the
thread
that's
created
as
a
result,
become
an
active
thread
and
invite
mark
to
it
and
we'll
put
in
the
different
things.
We're
talking
about
we'll
put
those
same
suggestion,
we'll
frame
the
thing
a
little
bit
and
put
the
same
suggestions
in
there.
I'm
sorry
not
suggestions
the
same
subtasks
in
there.
Whatever
is
a
recommendation,
we'll
make
a
subtask
with
a
little
bit
of
details
about
it.
One
add
the
month
to
month
budget
it
with
related
field,
two
check
box.
If
it's
finished
three,
the
self
audit
questions
toward
the
end.
A
I
think
that's
it.
Maybe
your
request
for
feedback
kind
of
requests
for
for
insight,
sharing
feedback
as
an
idea
just
to
log
it,
and
then
I
will
just
I'll
go
to
vanessa
and
mercy
and
see
how
they
want
to
collaborate
on
it,
so
that
we
get
full
input
and
that
input
is
in
one
place
and
we
can
have
sort
of
the
idea,
scale
updates
for
this
fund
and
try
to
get
that
quickly.
A
G
M
Yeah,
I
mean
any
kind
of
any
kind
of
linking
that
they
can
do
so.
You
can
do
your
own
research
right
because
it
is
about
first
ta
for
a
ca,
it's
about
verifying
proving
so
they
can
give
you
their
narrative
on
their
multi-proposals
or
whatever,
and
this
is
just
from
this
issue,
I'm
sure
if
I
thought
about
for
a
while,
I
could
find
a
bunch
of
other
data
points
that
need
to
go
in,
but
but
for
me
the
hardest
part
is
okay,
so
you've
told
me
this,
but
I
still
have
to
go.
M
Look
how
easy
or
hard
is
that
so
any
way
we
can
format
it
so
that
they
can.
You
know-
and
it's
tricky.
Sometimes
you
ask
for
the
link
and
they
give
you
their
youtube
channel
or
something
like
that
and
that's
not
where
you
want
it
to
go,
but
but
any
help
you
can
give
them.
So
they
can
give
you.
The
right
information
is
definitely
helpful.
M
F
G
F
A
A
F
F
A
That's
that's
what
we'll
do,
because
not
everyone
needs
to
needs
to
be
in
the
conversation
if
they
don't
need
to
be
right
at
the
point
of
having
like
a
sub
circle
with
tennis
people
in
it,
so
we
can
invite.
We
can
invite
everyone
as
in
hey.
Anyone
who
wants
to
come
come
talk
about
it,
but
I
don't
think
we
need.
A
You
know.
We
don't
correct
me
if
you
think
that
this
is
incorrect,
but
I
don't
think
we
need
to
have
if
we
give
everyone
the
opportunity
we
make
it
clear
and
available
and
there's
a
time
frame
by
which
they
can
do
that
and
they've
already
been
invited
to
contribute
to
it.
Anyway,
then,
I
think
we
can
go
forward
for
as
far
as
the
decision
making
for
these
specific
things,
since
they
are
not
major
process
changes.
F
E
A
G
Okay,
before
you
send
out
the
announcement,
can
you
formulate
the
question
for
the
time
restriction
whatever
that
for
fun?
9
the
following
area?
Requests
your
community,
your
input
from
community.
How
can
we
improve?
Please
provide
the
question
or
whatever
that
the
way
you
working
right
provide
your
input
related
to
improve
the
audibility
and
the
audibility
for
proposal
in
front
9
so
provide
your
question
that
we
can
embed
or
plan
it
into
id
scale
for
from
9
proposal,
and
then
that's
it.
G
F
F
A
A
We
reviewed
that
we
put
the
problems
into
the
work
we
asked
for
vote
on
those.
We
got
that
feedback
in
a
vote,
and
then
we
formed
a
group
around
it
discussing
it
coming
up
with
those
suggestions
that
are
an
aggregate
and
an
evolution
of
that
discussion
and
now
we're
at
the
point
of
talking
to
america.
We
don't
have
a
lot
of
time
left.
A
So
I
like
the
idea,
maybe
of
put
well
how
about
we
do
this
scott.
I
don't
know
here's
what
I
think.
What
feels
natural
to
me
is
we
start
that
thread.
We
populate
that
thread
with
the
suggestions
that
have
come
out
of
these
conversations
and
anything
else.
That's
dramatically
needed,
like
a
technical
fix
that
they
should
at
least
be
aware
that
was
sent
and
we
invite
mark
into
it
and
we
see
about
getting
those
changes
accomplished.
A
I
don't
think
we
should
allow
anything
new.
So
if
the
question
is,
are
we
asking
for
like
yes
or
no?
Do
you
think
this
is
important
on
a
poll
for
the
existing
things
we
came
up
with?
I
think
that
makes
sense,
but
I
don't
think
the
polls
should
request
new
information,
because
we
have
already
gone
through
a
very
sort
of
arduous
process
of
collecting
that.
F
A
F
F
G
Great,
and
can
I
add
one
at
the
end
of
the
poll
you
right,
you
run,
you
might
write
a
a
little
bit
political
kickball
around
that
for
fontaine
for
fontaine.
Input
will
be
over
the
next
link
in
after
the
propulsion
fin
final
line.
So
if
they
have
any
idea,
you
know
everyone
have
an
idea,
everyone,
they
all
have
an
idea.
Believe
me,
you
know,
I
might
say
I
have
a
million
ideas.
There's
no
point:
I'm
going
to
do
it,
I'm
not
going
to
do
it
so
far
for
fun
10.
G
G
F
They
could
also
leave
feedback,
so
they
can
use
the
feedback
bot
to
leave
feedback,
just
put
fun,
tin
or
fun.
10
suggestions
title
it
fun,
10.,
that's
what
bots
are
for
it
might
be
lazy,
but
that's
what
the
hell
these
bots
are
for.
It's
not
for
me
to
do
more
work.
It's
for
me
to
do
less
work
and
for
any
other
admin
on
here
to
do
less
work.
A
F
F
Want
to
put
mark
there's
already
a
thread
there
for
discussion
so
moving
it
to
to
do
I
mean
that
just
shows
that
it's
to
do
and
if
there's
already
a
thread
there,
you
can
just
highlight
that
thread.
You
put
an
announcement
out
and
the
link,
if
you
can
put
that
that
thread,
link
in
the
announcement
and
says
hey
we're
going
to
be
launching
a
poll
at
this
time
in
regards
to
this
community
suggestion
poll
will
be
here.
F
F
Well,
just
tag
everyone,
if
that's
what
we
need
the
answers
from
you
tag,
everyone
on
everything
tag.
Everyone
in
the
original
thread
tell
them
to
talk
about
it,
to
read
it
to
look
at
it
and
then
say
in
that
message
say
we're
going
to
have
a
poll
on
sunday
at
such
and
such
a
time
or
saturday
or
whatever.
That
poll
will
go
on
until
wednesday
at
such
and
such
a
time.