►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
B
B
All
right,
it
is
friday,
the
third
of
june
2022-
and
this
is
a
conversation
about
all
important
things.
That's
all
we
talk
about
is
important
stuff
anyway,
so
jeremy,
I
guess
we'll
start
with
the
treasury.
We
we
got
the.
We
got
the
slide
the
slide
done
in
town
hall
this
week,
so
we
invited
just
people
to
understand
the
beginnings
of
the
process.
You
got
the
posts
out
in
the
channels.
B
B
E
F
Documentation
is
up
in
the
channels
that
it's
not
really
an
onboarding
event,
because
that
would
scare
anybody
away,
I
think,
yeah,
because
it's
quite
a
math
pile
of
documentation.
I
shared
a
link
in
the
hub
chat
to
some
documentation
that
ca
member
newman
shared
with
me
to
organizing
documentation.
It's
worth
a
look
for
any
documentation.
F
F
It's
and
so
much
has
to
be
created
to
pull
it
off.
So
okay
actually
reached
out
to
me.
I
think
now
you
turned
him
onto
the
rap
funny
treasury.
He
said
that
he's
ready
when
we
are
essentially,
I
didn't
get
an
elevator
pitch
for
his
idea
or
anything,
but
I
didn't
have
to
take
it.
I
just
thought
of
this
today,
but
what
if
we
ran.
F
A
smoke
test
on
the
treasury,
where
everybody
has
a
role
and
we're
not
trying
to
populate
these
roles
to
the
full
extent
that
they
need
to
be
populated
to
run
it
with
some
somebody
like
phil,
okay
and
a
proposal
from
him,
and
we
would
be
able
to
show
it
working
and
announce
the
it'd
be
pretty
emerging.
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
you
present
it.
F
G
B
We
just
ended
up
in
the
breakout
room
for
the
coordinator,
call
because
we're
both
in
the
same
challenge
obviously-
and
we
just
hadn't-
talked
for
a
while,
so
it
was
just
me
him
and
kendrick.
So
we
started
talking
about
the
treasury
and
he
was
talking
about.
He
was
actually
really
impressed
with
the
d
work
set
up
and
sort
of
was
trying
to
understand
all
that
it
was
accomplishing
and
afterwards
he
said
you
know,
let's
chat
a
little
bit.
B
So
we
talked
about
that
and
he
was
thinking
about
testing,
that
out
and
thinking
of
a
beginning
process
for
being
able
to
incorporate
that
and
then
ultimately,
if
it
made
sense
to
god-
and
I
were
talking
about
this
earlier
today-
if
it
made
sense
to
that,
he
could
build
out
a
lot
of
that
integration
and
have
that
had
create
a
tool
that
could
be
truly
open,
source
and
community
owned.
That
would
do
a
lot
of
the
things
for
what
we've
created
here
this
process.
B
It
would
take
a
couple
funds,
probably
to
really
get
that
whole
scope,
but
he
could
actually
use
the
process
now
to
create
to
create
a
project
under
the
working
group
board
run
through
that
whole
process.
So
it
understands
it.
We
could
do
some
minimal
claims
against
the
treasury,
feasibly
for
people
to
actually.
B
Be
incentivized
to
work
on
the
wiki,
so
you
start
to
have
like
user
cases
for
people
using
the
wiki
to
actually
produce
updates
on
on
that
site,
and
it
would
be
a
test
of
the
treasury,
so
I
think
it
that
would
serve
a
lot
of
purposes.
It
sounds
like
we
have
a
lot
of
components
that
would
serve
each
other
and
the
opportunity
to
engage
people
in
these
different
processes
in
a
way.
That's
both
meaningful
and
give
us
learning
knowledge.
B
I
love
the
walkthrough
idea.
How
are
you
thinking
and
I'd
love
to
hear
what
other
people
think
about
it
too?
That's
just
my
first
impression,
I
think
for
me:
there's
like
a
foggy
sort
of
sense
that
everything
fits
together
and
in
the
doing
of
it.
Maybe
that
will
really
that
the
edges
will
present
themselves
and
we'll
be
able
to
see
the
picture
of
the
whole
thing.
G
B
F
C
F
And
we
have
a
way
of
making
decisions
and
distributing
that
to
people
who
can
do
it
and
when
they
have
power
making
those
decisions
they
can
then
redistribute
power
back
into
the
community.
So
it's
this
reciprocal
kind
of
a
thing
going
there
that's
all
background
it
does
nobody
any
good,
except
that
maybe
they
have
a
little
more
confidence
or
trust
in
it,
but
to
get
somebody
funded,
you
just
got
to
get
in
there
and
start
trying
it
trying
to
get
rapid
funding.
F
There's
there's
there's
benefits
to
just
jumping
in
and
funding
somebody,
but
that
always
ends
up
in
the
same
place,
which
is
a
completely
trustful
network
that
is
completely
reliant
on
usually
one
or
two
people.
So
that's
what
we're
moving
away
from
I
love.
The
idea,
like
ework,
is
kind
of
hanging
around
in
the
background,
as
this
like
almost
like
a
dow
government
structure,
just
waiting
for
us
to
figure
out
how
to
implement
it,
and
it's
it's
a
really,
I
think,
a
really
wonderful
integration
into
the
treasury.
F
It's
an
end
around
around
a
lot
of
the
convenient
votes
and
things
like
that,
because
that
all
happens
asynchronously
within
it,
which
is
a
nice
tool
to
have
for
that,
and
it's
also
you
know
every
once
in
a
while
people
talk
about.
If
the
ability
to
create
proposals
that
then
people
stepped
up
and
adopted
and
dework
allows
is
essentially
that
it
allows
people
to
create
the
work
and
the
idea,
and
then
somebody
comes
in
and
picks
it
up
for
the
incentivization
and
competition
handy,
handy
tools.
F
F
It's
going
to
be
anybody
interested
in
doing
like
we
have
to
create
the
advisory
group,
the
treasury
advisory
group,
so
much
as
we
need
people
to
go
and
get
their
hands
on
it
and
start
playing
with
the
review
criteria
and
start
playing
with
the
idea
of
making
a
template
for
a
proposal,
and
things
like
that.
So
so
I
really
feel
like
if
we
were
to
bring
in
a
proposer
and
just
start
walking
them
through
the
process
where
you're
playing
the
role
of
trustee.
D
F
Discussing
the
proposal
and
figuring
out
its
merits
and
deciding
if
it's
a
value
and
deciding
if
it's
not
and
that
could
involve
dework
and
putting
it
in
there
and
just
seeing
how
that
works
and
just
figuring
out
in
real
time,
which
would
probably
be
better
than
planning
anything
out
with
d-work
just
to
play
with
it,
put
something
in
oops
that
didn't
work.
Take
it
back
out,
put
it
back
in
again.
Maybe
it
works
that
way.
We
already
know
we're.
F
D
Is
I
mean
it's
not
my
it's
not
my
treasury.
It's
not
my
proposal,
but
like
the
treasury's,
not
my
proposal,
it's
not
my
and
it's
not
my
budget
in
there,
but
how
much
of
that
proposal
cuts
into
the
budget
as
far
as
if
that
proposal
was
actually
funded
by
the
treasury,
and
would
that
limit
the
amount
of
participation
that
you
get.
I
D
F
Means
we
really
can't
drain
it
very
fast,
so
we'll
take
advantage
of
that,
and
that
gives
us
hard
sealing
like
if
it
works
out
too
it's
gonna
be
four
thousand.
Something
is
my
guess,
and
that
could
be
your
hard
limit.
Just
like
okay
in
this
first
month
of
fun
thing,
we
can't
take
a
proposal
more
than
four
thousand
so
fit
it
in
that
in
that
group,
I
also
feel
like
if
we
had
participants
that
were
actually
active
in
the
treasury,
like
once
we
get
it
going.
F
F
F
As
far
as
as
like,
okay,
we're
open
for
proposals
go
ahead
and
put
your
stuff
in
what
kind
of
budgets
can
you
ask
for
again?
It's
a
discussion
for
the
treasury
community
itself,
like
a
really
good
idea,
that's
going
to
have
impact
right
now
that
could
be
implemented
quickly.
That's
worth
more,
but
you've
got
a.
You
know.
You've
got
to.
F
Make
a
case
for
it
and
there's
one
of
the
things
that
you'd
like
to
see
in
catalyst,
is
to
have
a
lot
of
that
discussion
about
the
value
of
a
proposal
happen
before
you're,
committing
to
or
to
proposer
flags
get
that
conversation
early.
This
treasury
has
the
ability
to
do
that.
We
should
be
having
that
conversation
so
that
by
the
time
we
get
to
a
vote,
it's
a
better
culture
for
the
vote.
F
It's
really
about
logistics
more
than
it's
about
quality
of
the
proposal,
because
it's
complete
should
be
the
first
goal,
and
we've
already
had
a
huge
discussion
about
the
value
of
it
and
at
most
you're
using
a
vote
to
settle
disagreement.
You
know
to
figure
out,
if
there's
some
kind
of
balance,
you're
missing,
like
a
a
fund
asking
for
a
specific
amount
that
just
isn't
what
the
community
sees.
So
we
need
to
vote
on
it
and
see
if
we
can
come
to
an
agreement
on
something
like
that.
F
B
It
seems
to
me
also
like
we
could
take
multi-month
things,
so
you
might
need
3
000
of
it,
but
you
could
take
it
over
three
months
term
right.
So
I
think
those
kind
of
things
will
be
interesting
to
build
into
that
way.
You
wouldn't
be
taking
such
a
significant
part
of
the
pot
for
that
particular
period
of
time.
F
Chances
are
you
should
make
it
worth
your
while
that
should
be
a
larger
proposal
that
should
be
asking
for
a
little
bit
more.
If
it's
easy
to
audit,
probably
keep
it
small
fast,
you
know
there's.
I
would
like
to
see
24-hour
turnaround
on
small
rapid
funding.
You
know
it
shouldn't
take
that
long
for
small
amounts
and
have
just
it's
like
I
say
it's
contextual
we
should
always
be
able
to
if
we
need
more
information,
get
more
information.
If
we
need
more
communication,
we
should
have
more
time
for
communication.
F
We
should
be
under
pressure
to
to
push
when
things
need
pulled,
and
things
like
that.
So
it's
really
it's.
If
I
could
give
it
one
characteristic,
it
would
be
communication
figuring
out
how
to
make
sure
that
people
who
are
working
together
to
collaborate
on
the
goals
of
the
treasury,
which
are
to
continue
to
foster
the
role
of
hesitate
to
call
it
anything
right
now.
Proposal
assessor.
But
it's
the
overall
environment
of
proposal
assessing
to
keep
cold,
making
it
a
place
where
people
develop.
F
And
it's
not
so
much
about
developing
proposers
as
it
is
about
developing
the
community
of
auditors
and
and
assessors
who
are
helping
the
process
along
and
helping
them
grow
into
these
jobs.
To
develop
professionalism,
to
have
better
tools.
All
the
little
things
you're
looking
forward
to
to
accelerate.
B
Correct
yeah,
so
in
in
the
fund,
seven
or
five
day,
sorry,
there
was
a
a
challenge
which
was
ca
improvements,
and
so
we
proposed
a
that.
We
started
rapid
funding,
treasury
that
belongs
to
the
community
that
took
a
portion
of
that.
So
that
proposal
was
funded,
and
this
is
now
an
experiment
both
in
having
like
a
side,
treasury
and
actually
now
creating
the
framework
for
it
and
deploying
and
implementing
that.
So.
B
It's
for
anything
there
are.
There
are
specific,
like
themes
or
topics
that
it
can
be
used
for
within
within
the
treasury,
so
things
like
tools
or
work
done
or
marketing,
or
things
like
that.
There's
categories
within
the
within
the
treasury
for
the
kinds
of
things
it
should
be
used
for,
but
ultimately
it
should
it
should
benefit
and
make
improvements
to
the
the
assessing
process
within
catalyst.
Okay,
thank
you
for
the.
D
D
F
F
The
treasury
admin
group,
which
needs
to
be
formed
has
some
responsibility.
At
least
one
of
them
is
to
have
minimal
template
like
at
least
have
to
do
this
and
there's
review
criteria
that
I've
included.
The
implication
is
not
that
it's
correct,
but
we
got
to
start
somewhere
and
the
review
criteria
is
very
much
about
just
having
a
complete
proposal
actionable
proposal
that
fits
in
a
specific
time
frame.
That
has
the
little
thing
like
a
start
and
end
date.
You
know
just
very
controlled:
it's
not
qualitative
at
all,
not
meant
to
be
a
judgment
on
value.
F
That's
meant
to
be
left
up
to
the
community,
merely
making
sure
it's
something
complete
and
actionable
that
can
be
got
it.
That
could
be
anything
I
mean
somebody
could
submit
anything
and,
like
I
said,
contextual,
if
it's
a
small
proposal,
there's
a
lot
less.
You
need
for
something
like
that.
If
it's
a
big
proposal,
there's
gonna
be
a
lot
more,
that
you
need
for
that.
The
resources
that
you
dedicate
to
something
like
that
should
be
efficient.
F
Request
that
you
would
have
for
a
58
request,
which
is
where
dwork
comes
in,
because
it
automates
so
many
things
like
we
shouldn't
even
have
to
vote
on
a
58
request.
It's
a
way
everybody's
time,
but
at
the
same
time,
if
you
don't
have
something
in
place
eventually,
whoever
is
discharging
those
funds
is
going
to
get
attacked
and
their
role
is
going
to
get
attacked
and
before
you
won't
be
able
to
discharge
58,
even
though
it's
like
where's
the
risk
where's
the
damage.
F
So
you
know
it's
it's
a
way
to
let
nature
sort
itself
out
the
bigger
puzzle
will
carry
their
own
weight.
The
little
proposals
will
carry
their
way
as
far
as
what
like
like,
we
started,
go
going
through
a
walk
through.
What
would
that
look
like
I?
I
honestly
don't
know
it
would
start
with
what
kind
of
proposal
is
it
then
community
would
digest
it
and
say
what
should
a
mission
like
look
like,
like
I
say,
for
a
small
one,
that
should
be
a
fast
process.
F
D
Yes,
I
would
see
that
on,
like,
for
instance,
if
phil
has
phil's
got
his
wikipedia,
I
haven't
seen
it,
but
supposedly
has
his
wikipedia
up
like
for
people
to
participate
in,
creating
that
wiki
or
updating
that
wiki
or
something
like
that.
Like
I
don't
know,
I
mean
that's
what
came
to
mind
with
that.
As
far
as
like
a
thousand
I
could
see,
I
could
see
him
writing
a
proposal
for
a
thousand
dollars
to
incentivize
people
to
work
on
the
wiki
yeah,
something
like
that
and
that
can
be
that
can
be
somewhat
monitored.
D
A
B
A
J
A
It
might
be
worth
some
thought
to
think
about
what
that
dollar
value
would
be,
or
what
the
trigger
would
be
to
validates
like
a
more
like
we're,
gonna
look
at
scrutinize
it
a
little
bit
more
than
a
bounty,
but
I
like
the
idea
of
starting
with
something
that's
on
the
lower
end
for
a
test
pilot.
I
I
do
like
that
idea.
D
F
Would
certainly
administer
the
the
threshold
as
far
as
determining
it.
My
guess
is
they're
like
what,
if
you
were
tagged,
what
would
your
approach
be?
Mine
would
be
to
start
a
discussion
on
it
and
see
what
kind
of
data
could
drive
that
decision.
One
major
piece
of
that
is
what
size
is
the
treasury,
like
it's
full
size,
it's
30k
and
it's
monthly
size,
it's
less
than
five.
F
F
F
Better,
like
an
interactive
algorithm
for
the
like
iog
as
their
algorithm,
for
how
a
ca
should
assess
proposals
right.
It's
go.
Look
for
low
assessments,
look
for
high
dollar
or
popular,
you
know,
that's
their
algorithm
and
the
rewards
are
tied
to
that.
So
maybe
what
would
somebody
would
that
be
like
that
out
there?
I
don't
know,
but
I
don't
think
a
whole
lot.
F
So
it's
really
what
kind
of
things
people
want
to
create
and
get
done
and
there's
also
a
limit
at
a
certain
size.
You
really
need
to
go
right
back
to
catalyst
and
ask
them,
because
if
somebody
came
in
a
ten
thousand
dollar
proposal
like
I
don't
see
that
falling
under
rapid
funding,
it's
just
it's
too
big
and
catalysts
could
do
a
lot
better
job
of
it
and
probably
distribute
it
faster,
even
rapid
funding
treasury,
because
how
do
we
get
through
all
that
conversation?
F
How
do
we
get
through
that
discussion?
Now,
there's
so
much
so
it
goes
into
the
professionalism
of
it,
the
auditing
of
it
yeah
the
the
governance
framework,
its
role
in
that
is
just
that.
It's
got
guardrails
in
place
for
how
the
roles
interact
and
for
how
the
tools,
once
we
get
them,
stacked
up
how
the
tools
interact,
but
the
goal
all
along
is
gonna,
be
how
do
we
help
people,
collaborate.
B
Cases
where
you
have
something
like
a
reimbursement,
for
example
like
scott,
for
like
the
server
costs
like
90
bucks,
or
something
right
where
you
just
have
a
straight
receipt
and
you're
like
here's
my
receipt,
we
agreed,
I
was
gonna.
Do
this
thing
like
that,
doesn't
require
a
lot
of
you
know
a
lot
as
well
so,
and
some
of
those
might
be
higher
price
tags.
Who
knows
as
we
go
forward,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
just
have
like
circumstantial
type
of
type
of
claim
that.
D
D
D
K
E
E
What,
if
you,
instead
of
looking
at
a
dollar
value,
you're
locked
you
divided,
the
treasury
into
three
units
did
one
just
a
flat
bounty
or
or
proposals
that
went
under
508
or
less
a
thousand,
eight
or
less,
and
then
two
thousand
or
less
or
some
something
you
know
with
parameters
and
as
far
as
the
deliverable,
the
proposal
it
doesn't
matter.
If
it's
a
success
or
not
it's
a
true
fault,
it's
something
that
can
be
clearly
say.
E
Yes,
that
was
done
like
it
was,
regardless
of
the
result,
as
you
know,
was
there
a
person
in
the
discord
for
one
hour?
Yes,
you
know
what
was
that?
What
were
they
doing?
We
don't
have,
but
can
we
limit
all
you
know
as
much
as
possible
to
make
it
easy
that
way,
it's
not
doesn't
require
adjudication
or
arbitrage,
or
anything
like
that,
plus
I'm
working
with
eight
hours
on
a
like
a
a
statement
of
work
like
a
contract
statement
of
work,
but
you
know
very
simple
where
it's
you
know
deliverable.
E
You
know
one
two,
three
or
four
and
it's
based
on
a
time.
You
know
you're
going
to
do
this
for
this
amount
of
time.
What
the
outcome
is,
is
it's
not
it
doesn't
matter
it's
just
you
know.
Can
we
see
that
an
event
occurred
and
you
know
the
treasury?
You
know
how
hard
cords
and
to
decentralization
do
you
want
to
do
and
and
get
into
the
governance
type
discussions.
B
No
yeah,
I
think
so.
I
guess
it.
I
guess
to
sort
of
these
question
marks
are
to
be-
are
to
be
completed
by
tag
right.
That's
the
that's
the
purpose
of
this
sort
of
next
part
of
the
process,
so
I
really
love
the
idea.
I
like
your
idea,
scott
too,
of
having
the
wiki
like
engagement
and
the
wiki,
be
the
thing
it
will
engage,
people
it
will
develop
the
wiki.
It
will
create
involvement.
B
We
certainly
have
the
need
so
be
a
great
like
the
next
thing.
As
far
as
the
the
process
for
the
workflow
is
concerned,
is
we
have
these
fantastic
tutorials
and
we
have
the
pdf,
but
as
we
were
talking
about
originally,
it
was
the
plan
to
have
like
a
gift
book.
That
said,
hey
friendly
person,
you
are
new
here
and
you
want
to
raise
something
and
you
want
to
maybe
work
on
something:
here's
how
this
works,
and
then
it
has
sort
of
the
flow
of
how
you
would
engage
with
that
process.
B
This
concept
of
the
subcircle,
the
emerging
and
then
disbanding
around
the
work
examples
to
the
tools,
people
you
can
ask
for
help
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
it
would
be
actually
a
great
service
to
have
that
developed,
maybe
on
the
wiki,
for
a
lack
of
for
a
lack
like
just
as
an
example
of
something
that
would
actually
be
extremely
productive.
B
Having
that
having
that
be
one
of
the
first
things
that
gets
put
on
there,
I
think
that
is
broadly
applicable
because,
as
the
server
expands
and
other
people
come
in,
it
will
be
very
much
built
into
something
that
will
be
easy
for
them
to
understand,
rather
than
us
explaining
a
lot
here.
It
is
a
digestible
composed
piece.
B
B
F
F
We
just
want
people
commenting
and
asking
questions
and
and
picking
up
the
tools
and
checking
them
out
and
putting
them
back
down
and
and
making
criticisms
of
it
and
things
like
that.
That's
what
we're
really
looking
for
right
now
is
feedback
loops
to
start
picking
up.
So
I
would
say
that,
if
there's
an
initiative
going
on,
it
should
be
a
walk
through
an
actual
funding
walkthrough
to
get
somebody
funded,
that's
going
to
get
people
engaged
because
it's
this
is
something
that
that
occurred
to
me
this
morning.
F
I've
been
thinking
of
this
as
a
rapid
funding
treasury
with
a
self-governance
experiment
attached
to
it,
but
that's
not
where
the
idea
came
from.
The
idea
came
from
having
the
need
to
be
able
to
distribute
funding
from
community
held
fund,
and
this
was
swarm
that
was
asking
for
this
and
because
they
wanted
to
be
able
to
distribute
funding
from
catalyst
as
needed
right,
and
it
was
clear
from
some
of
the
things
they
wanted
to
do
with
the
funds
that
there
was
going
to
be
an
attack
now
right
now,
they're
relying
completely
on
trust.
F
F
We
need
to
find
that
link
in
there
and
we
can
only
find
that
by
playing
with
the
tools,
it's
the
proposers,
we're
gonna,
do
the
work,
it's
the
proposer,
so
we're
gonna
get
the
funds
it's
the
tooling.
They
build
is
so
that
proposers
can
build
build
better
tooling,
so
that
they
can
get
better
projects
off
the
ground.
It's
not
about
tag.
H
F
One
of
the
things
I
love
about
d-work
it
kind
of-
is
a
workaround
tag.
Even
however,
there's
like
right
off
the
top
nadia
is
responsible
for
reporting
back
to
iog
in
order
to
keep
the
treasury's
funding
coming
in.
So
somebody
needs
to
create
audit
reports
to
submit
to
iog
that's
an
administrative
task.
It's
not
the
job
of
the
trustees
in
the
system
to
do
that.
Work,
they're
responsible
for
it,
but
they
distribute
that
responsibility
as
much
as
they
can
to
the
community
and
that's
where
tag
picks
up
some
of
that
slack.
F
They
will
audit
the
results.
They
will
present
that
information.
They
will
make
recommendations.
Does
that
have
to
be
a
working
group,
it's
organized
as
a
working
group,
but
it
doesn't
have
to
be.
It
could
just
be
the
community
speaking
up
when
it's
their
turn,
but
for
now
it's
organized
as
a
as
a
as
a
working
group,
a
little
governing
body.
F
F
I
like
the
idea
of
a
new
person,
a
new
ca
to
the
ecosystem,
picking
it
up
just
to
see
what
it
looks
like
in
new
eyes,
whereas
I
like
the
idea
of
a
proposer
being
more
of
a
veteran
in
the
system,
but
that's
my
personal
opinion.
I
mean
whatever
we
end
up,
but
I
feel
like
we
move
forward
on
the
treasury
itself.
F
F
What
are
our
trenches
for
58
to
500,
even
going
to
measure
it
in
it
like?
In
my
opinion,
we
should
be
measuring
ecosystem
and
ada,
but
it's
understandable
that
it's
measuring
dollars,
however,
because
this
is
all
infrastructure
related,
there's
no
reason
we
shouldn't
be
able
to
just
call
it
to
finish.
There's
no
need
to
translate
the
doll,
so
so
all
those
little
decisions.
We
really
want
those
to
be
data-driven
and
that's
actually
a
principle
in
the
government.
F
K
I
think
when
people
become
interested
and
come
as
part
of
the
part
of
the
treasury
community
or
pay
more
attention
to
it,
and
when
you
start
getting
the
tag
members,
then
I
think
things
will
start
to
team
together
and
we
won't
have
to
ask
jeremy
hey.
How
do
you
do
this
or
you
know?
How
are
you
maybe
for
guidance
to
blame,
complete
direction.
A
F
Yeah,
there's
there's
an
aspect
of
this
to
think
about
too,
where,
if
you
had
a
failure
for
your
first
funded
project,
you
know
whether
it
was
a
failure
to
to
discuss
it
well
or
a
failure
to
administer
it
well
or
anything
like
that.
That's
enter,
that's
an
energizing
force
too.
That's
a
form
of
energy
effort.
Attention.
F
Relative
immunity
can
support
things
so
when
like,
if
we
don't
create
tag
right,
then
you
fund
a
proposal
without
that
accountability
for
auditing
okay.
Now
you
kind
of
screwed
yourself
a
little
bit.
Well,
it
turns
out.
We
have
this
thing
called
tag
we
could
create
if
we
wanted
to
it's
waiting
to
be
built.
Well,
maybe
people
excited
about
it
because
they
see
the
risk
there's
opportunities
here
to
to
let
I
mean
it's
about
so
it's
communication
is
at
that
top
level,
but
learning
is
underneath
that
and
growth
is
going
to
come
from
that
learning.
F
So
it
doesn't
really
do
us
any
good
to
tell
a
community
member
how
to
participate
in
this
if
that
community
member
can
find
their
own
way
through
it
find
their
own
questions
find
their
own
way
of
of
challenging
it
and
pushing
it
and
evolving
it.
That's
where
that
evolution
is
even
gonna
come
from
is
the
attention
that
those
community
members
bring.
F
So
it's
okay,
it's
it's!
It's
a
good
idea
to
break
it
and
not
have
everything
in
place
from
the
very
beginning,
so
these
trial
balloons
send
them
up
and
when
it
goes
off,
hopefully
it
works,
but
when
it
goes
off,
you
can
step
back
okay.
This
would
have
been
different
if
tag
is
present
right
now
like
if
we
form
tag.
This
is
how
that
would
have
went.
B
J
B
B
And
also
we
sort
of
are
feeling
out
that
we
might
need
a
steward
role
for
these
working
groups
to
maintain
the
order
within
the
projects.
Could
we
start
with
like
very
simple
bounties
for
those
like?
Could
we
could
the
community
suggest
those
things
and
have
them
be
picked
up
out
of
the
treasury
so
that
we
can
try
moving
some
of
those
things
forward?
B
Maybe
by
having
like
a
champion
of
these
subcircles,
I
know
that
we've
talked
about
having
it
be
volunteer.
I
think
we've
accomplished
that
a
few
times
could
it
be.
Could
it
be
that
we
that
we
incentivize
a
steward
for
a
month
or
three
months
at
some
nominal
amount
for
that
period
of
time
to
practice
having
someone
in
there?
J
G
B
K
K
Did
it
she
put
them
straight
up
into
two,
so
I
mean
that's
more
for,
like
you
know,
for
sure
that
that's
if
you're,
not
looking
for
community
votes
on
it,
because
you
can
do
community
votes
in
discord,
yeah,
you
can
just
use
emojis
for
community
votes
or
a
poll.
Even
so
it's
I
mean
emojis
will
be
the
easiest.
The
poll
would
be
the
second
easiest,
and
then
everything
can
go
straight
to
to
do
the
to
do
column
on
the
board
and
then
that'll.
B
I
guess
it
does
make
sense
that
we
might
put
suggested
bounties
in
as
community
suggestions
and
let
them
be
voted
on
and
that
they
would
need
to
get
a
certain
amount
of
consensus
or,
if
they're
small
budget
things.
I
think
it's
kind
of
the
same
thing
right
if
it's
a
small
budget
thing
and
you're
asking
for
a
hundred
dollars
for
something
simple,
then
so
these
are.
B
Maybe
it
just
needs
to
be
like
claimed,
then,
and
and
responded
to
sort
of
the
reverse
of
someone
saying
I
have
an
idea.
I
would
like
money
for
it's
the
opposite,
which
is
like
we
have
this
thing,
we'd
like
to
be
accomplished
and
then
there's
funding
attached
to
it.
Who
wants
to
do
it?
Does
that
make
sense.
K
K
C
K
And
just
use
d
work
whenever
it
comes
time
to
actually
do
the
task
or
once
a
task
is
accepted
or
say
approved
by
the
community.
Once
there's
right,
you
can
put
it.
It
can
be
in
a
specific
channel
for
suggested
proposals,
and
then
the
community
would
have
a
threshold
of
time
or
whatever,
like
I
don't
know,
but
just
making
something
up.
There
could
be
a
threshold
of
time
for
the
community
to
react
to
that
particular
suggested
proposal
after
that
period
of
time.
If
it
doesn't
reach
a
threshold,
it
stays
where
it
is.
J
K
B
Yeah,
I
think
it
actually
makes
chronologically
for
those
particular
things
now,
I'm
outside
the
process,
thinking
part,
which
I
have
chosen
to
illustrate
by
doing
that
for
some
reason
I'm
outside
of
the
process
thing
and
I'm
thinking,
though,
I
think
those
three
things
are
all
interrelated.
In
that
sense,
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
have
phil
come
first.
If
he's
going
to
do
some
kind
of
like
wiki
explanation
of
because
then
the
other
things
are
determined
necessary
by
that,
and
if
that's
been
the
case,
then
you
can
ask
them
a
lot
easier.
B
K
F
F
Yeah
that
initial,
that
initial
walkthrough
is
guided,
I
feel
like
nadia's
the
trustee.
So
that's
there's
no
question
there.
We
don't
have
anybody
representing
administrative
capability,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
if
we
need
that,
but
we
volunteer
to
to
say
yeah,
no
I'll
I'll
read
a
little
bit
of
documentation
just
enough
to
pull
off
the
pull
off
the
job.
F
To
make
it
look
right,
I
would
the
way
I
want
to
participate
going
forward
in
the
entire
treasury
is
just
as
a
community,
because
discussion
is
the
root
of
what
happens
with
the
participation
in
this.
It's
you
know
it's
just
people
adding
input
until
a
proposer's
got
something
he
can
do.
They've
got
some
something
they
can
work
on.
F
So
I
just
want
to
be
part
of
the
discussion
at
that
level.
So,
if
you've
got
and
as
part
of
that
discussion,
I
would
be
able
to
point
to
places
in
the
governance
document
the
same
way
that
the
ca
in
a
discussion
on
telegram
can
point
to
the
guide.
Okay
point
to
the
pca,
aggregated
spreadsheet,
complete
the
tools
that
are
out
there.
F
I
can't
I
can't
it
would
be
really
improper
for
me
to
participate
at
any
other
level
having
one
that
designed
it
because
conflicts
of
interest
for
me
all
over,
so
the
the
farthest
away
I
can
get,
is
just
talking
about
it,
just
discussing
it
and
that's
all
I
really
want
to
do
anyway.
So
if
so,
if
you
ask,
where
does
the
process
come
from
it's
coming
from
me,
but
I'm
acting
as
just
somebody
talking
about
it,
so
I
tell
somebody
they
tell
somebody
eventually
enough.
F
So
and
that's
her
role
as
trustee
in
this
is
that
she,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
has
the
wallet
and
she's
accountable
for
where
that
those
funds
go,
we
would
like
to
see
more
trustees
appointed
as
participation
grows,
so
once
tag
is
formed,
that's
two
more
trustees
automatically.
They
have
to
be
appointed
to
like
a
board.
I
hate
using
board
of
trustees.
It's
so
freaking
corporate,
but
but
that
would
be
a
group
of
trustees
and
they
all
make
that
decision
to
control
the
wallet.
F
So
you
have
a
multi-sig
wallet
for
that
and
that's
they're,
not
judging
anything
trustees.
Don't
do
that.
They
just
protect
the
proposal
right.
The
proposal
says:
hey:
we've
got
fund
from
catalyst.
These
funds
are
for
growing
infrastructure
and
catalyst
that
helps
proposal
assessment,
be
done
in
a
healthy
way
in
a
way
that's
conducive
to
an
environment.
That's
working
for
everybody,
that's
participating
they're,
protecting
that
that's
their
only
job
of
the
trustees
and
that's
the
funds
going
out
to
do
that
job.
F
F
B
B
Yeah,
just
out
of
finishing
that
conversation
up,
I'm
glad
that
I'm
glad
that
there's
real
interest
there
and
maybe
we'll
just
tell
them
you
know,
start
to
start
to
come
start
to
come
forward
with
some
idea
of
it
and
we
get
that
conversation
going
and
we
say
okay
well.
We
should
probably
also
know
this
and
have
you
thought
about
that,
and
what
are
you
going
to
do
here
so
that
that
conversation
produces
some
form
of
a
template
and
then
exactly
we'll
have
a
template.
B
So,
okay,
so
that's
great,
that's
good!
So
we'll
give
that
as
a
beginning
and
then
maybe
we
can
see
we'll
see
where
that
goes,
and
if
we
have
once
we
have
that
conversation
sort
of
logged
as
a
template,
then
there's
something
else
to
organize
around
a
little
bit.
So
it
sounds
like
we
have
a
good,
a
good
sort
of
natural
way
for
it
to
begin.
B
B
I
say
that
to
say
it
really
was
a
learning
process
for
someone
interested,
because
it
is
so
thorough
and
in
depth
and
anticipates
so
much
into
the
future
without
being
prescriptive
about
that
like
it
anticipates,
what
needs
will
be
without
us
being
even
remotely
there.
Yet
it's
like
really
people
could
learn
a
lot
from
from
from
reading
and
getting
involved
too,
which
was
what's.
That
was
a
big
part
of
the
desire
to
do
it.
B
Okay,
so
any
any
top
any
just
while
we
are
have
a
break
in
topics
anything
people
want
to
bring
up
to
chat
about.
I
got
a
couple
other
things,
but
let's
see
if
we
just
something
natural
comes
out
here,
that
anything
that's
people
have
been
thinking
about
or
wanting
to
communicate
about,
or
anything
like
that.
B
E
K
E
E
And
a
lot
of
the
conversation
that
I've
heard
here
is
some
that
we've
been
having
over
it
at
adol.
You
know
they've
divided
up
into
working
groups.
They
do
have
the
multi-sig
treasury
wallet
we'll
probably
be
having
a
meeting
tonight,
oh
in
the
catalyst
working
group.
If
anybody
wants
to
kind
of
come
and
look
at
a
far
less
experienced
group
trying
to
do
this,
it's
a
good!
It's
a
it's!
Probably
a
good
resource
to
see
like.
F
It's
definitely
if
anybody's,
not
following
their
discord.
It's
wreck
amended
for
sure,
there's
that,
like
I
said,
multisig
wallet
for
the
trustees
roundtable,
I
was
thinking
of
and
there's
all
sorts
of
floating
of
responsibility
that
can
be
done
through
dow
tooling
it.
I
described
this
framework
to
some
people
as
an
analog
dao.
F
It's
it's!
It's
not
digital.
It's
it's!
It's
in
the
realm
of
intent
as
opposed
to
contract
and
that's
an
interesting
dynamic.
It's
worth
playing
with.
If
that
doesn't
mean
we
shouldn't
be
taking
advantage
of
contracts
where
we
can
and
and
securing
some
things
when
they
can
be
secured,
so
yeah,
leaning
into
eight
house
work
is
something
we
should
definitely
think
about.
F
B
I
think
one
of
the
one
of
the
initial
roles
considered
was
or
the
applications
was
proof
of
life,
so
the
proof
the
ability
to,
rather
than
go
through
this
process,
to
have
proof
of
life
credentialing
that
you
could
then
carry
across,
and
it
was
one
of
the
most
sort
of
like
basic
ones
that
could
be
done.
It
didn't
require
as
much
preparation
as
some
of
the
other
ones
did.
It
didn't
require
as
much
experience
it
just
was
simply
you
exist.
B
Although
there's
quite
a
lot
attached
to
existing
a
lot
of
times
too,
so
I
think
that
would
be
really
interesting
to
to
add
all
these
different,
all
these
different
colors
to
this
there's
it's
it's
ripe
for
that.
So
I'm
hoping
that
this
group
really
does
that.
I
hope
we
continue
to
just
throw
these
ideas
in
here
and
try
them
out.
G
Could
we
entertain
a
brief
discussion
about
proof
of
life
and
any
of
the
trust
issues
that
are
generated
and
how
to
choose
individuals
that
are
exercising
that
that
discretion
of
verifying
truth
or
proof
of
life,
because
I
it's
come
up
in
several
conversations?
I've
had
recently
about
maintaining
anonymity
while
still
having
you
know
some
form
of
digital
identity,
and
I
don't
know
how
you
folks
feel.
If
it's
not
a
fruitful
endeavor,
then
I'm
not
trying
to
push
it
on
the
group.
D
B
J
C
A
C
B
That
is
the
purpose
of
these
of
these
times.
That's
this
like
this.
Why
we
have
just
this.
Is
a
group
discussion
time?
That's
what
it's
for,
but
sometimes
we
actually
sometimes
we're
actually
doing
stuff,
no,
I'm
kidding,
but
sometimes
like
right
now,
there's
a
lot,
that's
just
happened,
and
so
there's
actually
like
agenda
stuff,
which
sometimes
we
get
together.
We
I
like
talk
about
different
themes
or
we
have
different
philosophical
conversations
about.
E
Yeah
yeah,
it's
a
great
question
and
one
that
I
think
we
would
benefit
greatly
from
if
we
address
from
maybe
not
going
straight
to
proof
of
life
or
anything.
But
what's
the
minimum
thing
that
you
know
we
could
verify
as
far
like
a
credential
or
what
have
you
a
working
group
lead
that
could
be
a
credential
like
where
we
don't
have
to
go.
Look
for
a
a
first
world.
You
know
company
to
to
verify
credentials
we're
not
doing
vcs.
These
are
community
credentials
or
even
you
know,
self-assigned
to
a
controlled
group.
E
G
C
G
H
C
E
Protocol
near
somebody
they
did
like
just
you
know,
500
of
their
tokens
for
the
best
meme
of
the
week.
You
know
like
it's
just
a
meme
contest,
really
you're,
communicating
whether
it
be
in
in
the
group
or
to
the
to
the
community
or
beyond,
sending
out
signals
is
a
good
thing
but
yeah.
I
like
the
canon
solution,
popeye
quasar.
E
B
B
In
the
context
of
how
long
it's
been
being
talked
about
by
certain
of
us
here
and
less
about
others,
but
it
came
that
came
quickly
the
offer
to
do
that,
and
so
I
think
it's
on
the
heels
of
a
lot
of
the
community
just
already
sort
of
naturally
doing
it.
So
we
have
to
change
name
within
the
space
as
well.
I
think
for
those
who
have
the
who
have
this
roles
within
the
server
already,
it
might
not
be
visually
a
very
big
change
unless
they
choose
to
adopt
additional
roles.
J
E
B
D
A
D
D
C
B
All
right,
okay,
I
think
we're
I
think,
we're
in
position
to
do
that
and
then
it
did
seem
like
there
was
some.
There
was
some
continuity
as
far
as
times
to
get
together
on
the
thank
you,
scott
for
making
that
win
to
meet.
It
seemed
like
there's
some
continuity
on
there
between
people,
so
we
could
make
it
an
aftertown
hall.
D
My
I
I
want
to
just
voice
and
concern
about
the
aftertown
halls.
You're
gonna
have
people
commenting
on
it
that
have
no
intention
of
even
using
it
yeah
yeah,
similar
to
the
last
time
when
I
made
a
suggestion
that
create
or
have
a
meeting
in
the
server
for
ideation
and
everybody
was
against
it,
but
nothing
ever
happened
afterwards.
K
D
B
D
A
If
you
added
things
outside
of
circle
because
sub
you
sub
circle
like
that's,
where
the
whole
thing
came
from,
so
if
there's
a
d
rep
channel,
where
does
that
go
like
I
was
just?
I
was
just
thinking
on
broadening
more
generic
than
the
concept
of
a
sub-circle,
more
of
a
catalyst
get
stuff
done
area
like
there's
a
lot
of
words
you
can
come
with
come
up
with,
but
that
was
my
only
thought
was
that
the
sub
comes
from
subcircle
and
there
might
be
not
exactly
directly
under
circle
kind
of
things
that.
H
A
E
D
E
B
A
B
H
I
feel
I'll
be
honest.
I
feel
like
catalyst
hub
makes
sense,
because
it
is
like
a
little
boring
yes,
but
you
capture,
kind
of
everything
you
want
out
of
it.
You've
got
the
cut
like
the
cabca
stuff.
All
the
working
groups
you've
got
potentially
d
reps
in
the
future,
other
things
like
it's
all
kind
of
like
catalyst
hub,
because
that
doesn't
really
exist.
Yet
I
mean
you've
got
the
main
cardano
project,
catalyst
server,
but
that's
not
like
a
hub
hub.
It's
kind
of
just
a
mess
of
other
things.
B
K
D
B
The
purpose
of
this
space
is
not
to
is
not
really
to
like
educate
it's
not
for
people
to
come.
Ask
it's
for
it's
eventually
for
people
to
it's
for
all
those
things,
but
it's
for
people
who
come
the
thing
that
this
server
has,
that
other
servers
don't
have
is
this
collection
of
tools
that
allows
you
to
to
get
together
collaborate
on
something
well,
it
could
be
like
catalyst
collabs
or
something
like
that.
It
lets
people
come
together,
collaborate
and
get
work
done
and
archive
it.
B
That's
like
the
main
thing,
and
then
it
allows
us
like
like
dang,
like
you
guys,
so
it
was
absolutely
stunning
to
me
when
you
guys
stunning,
in
like
a
beautiful
way
to
watch
is
how
I
mean
that
when
you
guys
put
together
all
of
those
petition
channels
and
just
like
how
that
worked
was
such
an
execution
of
of
the
server.
It
was
so
fantastic
to
see
that
happen.
So
it's
just
natural
that
there's
there's
a
sense
of
we're.
Gonna
we're
gonna
use
this
to
to
serve
our
purposes
of
it's.
C
I
F
I
I
You
come
up
with,
I
think,
if
I
were
you
in
charge
you
whatever
that
proposal,
I
would
come
up
with
a
plan
because
I'm
a
bit
more
into
practical
gathering
at
the
governing
high
end,
I'm
down
to
the
earth
guy,
so
I
would
come
up
with
a
flow
charge.
Okay,
if
you
want
to
get
this
fun,
here's
follow
if
that
first
month
and
you
get
it's
tired
by
smells
the
fishy
smelling,
it's
not
working,
and
then
you
come
up
with
your
backup
plan.
I
Well,
you
got
six
months
right
come
on.
I
just
said
the
fact
like,
like
jamie
already
explained
so
far,
it's
pretty
good
idea,
but
now
you
know
the
ball
is
on
your
hand
at
the
end
of
the
day,
and
then
you
got
to
do
the
report
every
month
and
you're
going
to
do
that
six
months,
so
now
you're
going
to
come
up
with
a
flowchart
using
draw.io.
I
Okay,
if
you
want
to
get
this
fun
and
here's
a
criteria
for
your
entry
and
how
to
use
this
first
click
on
this
video
two
minutes
use
the
dework
or
you
the
just
a
video
only
and
that
video
you
do.
Every
fortnight
I
mean
again
two
weeks
and
then
and
then
that
video
and
then
don't
make
more
than
three
minutes
people
we
would
back
out
and
run
it's
like
my
student.
I
just
don't
care
about
anything
more
than
five
minutes,
not
give
them
any.
I
You
know
exam,
you
know
question
and
answer,
so
we
give
them
a
very
short
video
at
the
end.
Okay,
how
are
you
going
to
create
whatever
the
task
and
who
got
to
monitor
them?
Who
are
going
to
vote
them
and
how
you
get
a
fund
and
where
your
wallet
and
then,
when
you
do
it
and
here's
what
the
outcome?
So
you
give
them
a
kind
of
fate,
phase
sequence,
and
if
that
would
say
two
months
you
said.
Oh,
my
god.
This
is
plenty
disaster
and
you
tell
them
okay.
I
This
is
my
backup
plan,
so
that
would
be
will
be
deal
with
and
the
community
we
will
be.
You
know,
input
and
what
about
they
do
a
youtube
will
be
archiving
the
in.
In
the
you
know,
the
server
at
the
moment.
So
that's
very
simple
way.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
you
know
that's,
cadance
rigs
and
family
can
be
optional.
I
H
I
H
I
You
do
every
every
two
weeks
do
a
very
short
video.
You
know
what
I
don't
know
how
to
use
it.
I
forgot
because
what
I'm
fear
that
I
do
something
wrong,
you
see
what
I'm
saying
and
I
feel
a
bit
embarrassed,
even
though
I
I
can
do
this.
I
can
do
that,
but
something
that
top
of
my
head
example,
I'm
just
new
guy.
I
just
want
to
create
something
on
the
link
between
your
your
github
and
d
work
and
then
well
I'll.
Do
something
wrong.
I
The
gun
might
maybe
some
guys
say:
hey
this
guy
is
a
disaster.
So
can
you
do
something
very
short,
video
every
two
weeks
and
post
it
again?
Oh
here's
the
example
how
to
do
that?
That's
it
and
then
we
will
use
I'm
telling
you
at
the
challenge
team.
Now
I'm
stuck
to
be
you
know,
I'm
stuck.
I
can't
even
manage
my
team.
Now
I
have
I'm
not
even
finished
front.
I
Seven
challenge
team
right
now,
fun
I
am
working
on
and
for
night
I
mean
a
team
lead
again,
so
I
just
I
think
I
got
three
jungle
in
my
head.
Even
on
top
of
my
john
on
team,
I'm
dead,
you
see
what
I'm
saying.
I
really
need
something
to
put
it
on,
so
the
team
can
follow
the
proposal
I
can
put
it
in.
I
can't
sleep
my
head,
you
see
when
I
do
it
on
the
paper.
This
is
disaster.
You
see
that
I
haven't
listened
to
it
every
week.
That's
not
annoying.
H
D
I
D
The
video
there's
no
need
to
do
to
continue
to
do
a
three
minute,
video
you
just
do
one
video
and
put
put
it
on
the
server
and
people
can
just
go
to
the
server
you
forget
where
that's
at
then
I
mean
you
can
always
ping
somebody
in
the
general
chat,
but
going
back
to
the
video,
I
think
there
is
a
video
on
dwork.
It's
not
two
minutes.
D
It's
not
three
minutes
it's
longer
than
that,
because,
like
you're
gonna
have
to
like
I
go
literally,
you
have
to
tell
people
how
to
log
in
you
know
I
mean
I
can
make
a
video.
That's
just
that's
just
like
here's
how
you
log
in
in
the
video
next
video
is
like
here's,
how
you
create
here's,
how
you
create
a
a.
D
Suggestion
or
post
a
post
an
issue
I
mean
the
video
is
going
to
be
longer
than
that,
because
there
are
areas
that
it
needs
to
be
like.
I
don't
know
like
you're
the
educator
I'm
not,
but
for
me
it's
like
video
needs
to
be
detailed,
and
it's
like
a
reference
video
to
where
you
can
always
go
back
to
it,
and
you
don't
have
any
questions
when
you're
done.
E
D
Another
thing
is
doing
the
the
meetings
or
whatever
sessions
educational
sessions
in
discord
like
coordinate
a
time
like
I've
done
in
the
past,
for
discord
like
discord,
learning
and
dework
learning,
and
that
can
also
be
done
every
two
weeks
where
people
just
come
in
and
you
know
if
there's
no
questions
and
like
it's
just
straight
up.
This
is
how
you
use
it
and
they
just
listen.
No
questions,
you're,
talking,
30
minutes
and
that'll
run
through
everything.
B
I
think
scott,
beginning,
though
you
also
could
just
if
you're
talking
about
something
basic
like
raising
a
community
suggestion.
You
have
that
list
there
in
the
beginning
of
the
shared
work
you
could
just.
We
could
just
do
like
super
like
super
simple
put
it
on
a
powerpoint
slot
thumbnail
slide
step.
H
B
Didn't
it
didn't
the
music's
gonna
play
behind
it?
Someone
has
enough
time
to
read
it.
Then
just
do
the
click
of
that
exact
thing.
Then
it
goes
number
two
music
is
playing
behind
it.
There's
like
a
firework.
Maybe
then
you're
like
showing
the
thing
you
click
on
it.
Next
one
you
get
the
picture,
so
you
don't
even
have
to
talk
over
or
show
anything
just
give
the
slides
and
then
at
the
end
we
can
have
the
quasar
popeye
meme
and
that
will
really
drive
the
whole
thing,
but
I
think
we
can.
B
I
think
we
can
just
like
don't
even
sometimes
even
talking
talking's
too
much
you're,
so
succinct
in
how
you
put
those
steps
together
and
you're
so
you're
so
particular
about
making
their
exact
see
how
nicely
I
just
said
that
you
can.
You
can
actually
just
take
those
and
put
them
right
into
the
video
and
then
demonstrate
this
by
really
chopping
it
up.
I
can
help
you
with
this
too.
B
If
you
want,
I
can
just
stick
it
in
imovie
or
something
like
that
and
make
it
real
real
like
because
that
we're
gonna
have
to
have
that
people
can't
we.
If
it's
accessible
for
people
of
all
types
and
kinds,
even
like
us,
non-techie
peeps,
we
can't
be
like
okay,
I'm
ready
to
submit
my
very
simple
issue
and
then
it's
like
42
minutes.
B
There's
no,
no
doubt
and
the
the
thoroughness
of
which
you
provided,
that
is
fantastic.
It's
it's
comparable
actually
to
the
thoroughness
of
jeremy's
governance
documents
and
also
sometimes
you
need
like
ping
ping
ping,
especially
if
you're
not
really
that
deep
into
it
right.
If
you
just
want
to
just
want
to
kind
of
know
and
get
involved,
and
you
want
to
put
a
question
up
there
on
the
board-
it
can't
seem
more,
it
can't
take
longer
to
learn
how
to
do
it
than
it
takes
to
do
it.
B
D
B
F
F
There's
no
emergence
and
then
kind
of
just
above
that
your
how-to
guide
is
where
they're
bringing
a
question
and-
and
it
looks
very
similar
like
if
people
get
tutorials-
are
two
guides
confused,
but
the
difference
is
that
maybe
it's
not
a
really
specific
set
of
steps.
The
documentation
is
way
better.
I
didn't
get
into
my
personal
reading.
Anything
like
that
and
then
beyond
that
you've
got
reference,
which
is
a
third
quadrant
and
then
your
final
one
is
like
explanation.
Reference
is
going
to
be
your
drop.
F
I
like
what
I
created
for
the
government
documentation.
Oh
that's
mostly
reference
it's
for
going
to
when
you
have
a
very
specific
question,
but
then
there's
explanations
like
that
distributed
leadership
document.
That's
it
explanation.
That's
the
high
level
answer.
I
think
you
don't
need
to
know
those
things
they're
just
kind
of
helpful
in
an
approach.
It's
not
even
you!
You
have
a
specific,
great
question.
Maybe
something
like
that!
Just
kind
of
come
away
from
it
saying
yeah
I
might
be
able
to
play.
K
F
B
B
For
the
first
three
months
I
was
like
I
just
figured
out
telegram
and
now
there's
discord
and
I
just
figured
out
the
mirror
board
and
now
there's
like
google
docs
ever
there
was
just
so
so
many
different
things
and
places
to
check
stuff,
and
I
got
one
server
now.
There's
10
servers.
You
know,
and
just
yesterday
scott
told
me
about
the
red
dots
I'm
kidding,
but
it
was
a
while
back.
B
You
know
you
sort
of
understand
how
everything
you
don't
even
know
you
don't
know,
so
it
needs
to
be,
and
now
it
needs
to
be
enough
for
this
process
because
it
should
be.
It
should
be
like
very
beginners
level,
and
then
obviously
people
are
gonna.
People
are
gonna,
go
a
lot
further
in
and
some
people
need
that
immediately
and
sometimes
people
aren't
gonna.
Look
at
that
for
four
months,
but
whatever.