►
From YouTube: 2017 09 27 Cedar City Council Action Meeting
Description
Weekly scheduled public City Council meetings for Cedar City, UT
A
March
13th
of
2015
at
that
time,
mr.
Cluett
was
notified
by
Miss
Savage
that
he
was
fine
in
that
location
and
it
was
able
to
sell
vape
in
that
location
until
the
gross
sales
went
over
35%.
So
that
point
in
time
he
was
put
on
notice
of
that
requirement.
Now
from
that
year
till
last
year,
the
only
thing
that
changed
was
the
law
requiring
who
has
had
the
burden
to
prove
you're
over
35%.
A
The
old
law
stated
that
it
was
up
to
the
business
that
is
up
to
the
city
to
prove
that
the
new
law
changed
that
and
made
it.
So
the
business
was
required
to
do
so.
So
once
that
law
changed
and
we
approached
big
hit
vapor
to
ask
for
that
proof
of
documentation,
there
hasn't
been
any
denial
that
they've
been
able
to
stay
under
that
35%.
A
Therefore
they'd
be
in
violation
of
the
city
ordinance.
So
the
council
essentially
has
a
few
options.
Tonight
one
will
be
to
deny
the
appeal
and
we
move
forward
with
the
ordinance
as
written.
The
next
would
be
to
deny
the
appeal
and
throw
the
agriculture
language
back
in
which
is
stated
in
state
law.
The
next
recommendation
that
came
from
council
neroli
would
be
to
still
deny
the
appeal,
but
then
we
could
add
additional
language.
Changing
the
measuring
requirements.
Instead
up
from
front
door
to
property
line,
it
would
go
from
front
door
to
front
door.
C
D
A
Law
or
property
yeah,
and
then
the
fourth
option
would
be
to
to
grant
the
appeal
he
would
remain.
Where
is
that?
That
would
be
in
violation
of
city
workers
and
state
law?
We
had
a
little
discussion
last
week
of
what
the
city's
required
to
do
when
it
comes
to
state
law
required
to
hold
true
to
it,
the
entire
way
or
if
we
have
a
very
wiggle
game.
So
it's
really
not
a
lot
of
case
law
on
point,
but
I
did
find
a
statute.
A
That
said,
the
city
has
a
right
to
pass
our
ordinances,
how
we
feel
as
long
as
they're
done
properly,
but
the
language
of
the
ordinance
can't
be
clearly
contrary
to
state
law,
so
that
there
is
some
wiggle
room
in
there.
My
legal
advice
is
always
going
to
be
on
the
side
where
we
decide
with
the
state.
I
just
think
that's
a
little
safer
gram
for
the
city.
C
A
E
A
C
A
C
This
body
perhaps
consider
something
like
indicating
mr.
Cook,
we
do
mean
business,
you,
you
are
being
shut
down,
but
we'll
give
you
one
more
month
to
find
something
or
one
one
small
grace
period
of
some
sort
or
do
you
think
we
ought
to
just
do
it
now,
and
so
he
would
be
out
of
business
in
the
morning
right.
D
F
Based
on
what
you've
done,
I'll
make
a
stab
of
the
motion
that
that
we
denied
the
appeal,
but
we
give
him
30
days
to
find
a
new
location
and
I
would
recommend
that
we
leave
the
agricultural
in
I.
Think
it's
not
I
think
it
could
be
shown
that
it's
not
really
contrary
to
the
state
law
intentions
when
we're
in
a
rural
area,
and
hopefully
we
don't
have
someone
that
gets
caught
in
that
little.
If
they
want
us
to
change
it.
A
A
G
C
B
H
B
E
D
D
B
E
G
G
E
G
G
H
G
D
J
G
I
don't
know
if
I
don't
know
that
the
city's
really
actively
monitoring
these
things.
It's
more
like
kids,
that
if
they
go
to
reapply
to
the
State
Health
Department
I
did
talk
to
one
of
the
owners
this
afternoon
and
he
mentioned
that.
He
would
like
the
agreement
modified
to
stay,
to
say
that
that
to
add
that
language,
that,
if
the
septic
system
fails,
then
they
would
be
required.
So
I
just
found
this
relying
what's
what.