►
From YouTube: 2023-04-13 Committee of Adjustment - Central Frontenac
Description
2023-04-13 Committee of Adjustment - Central Frontenac
A
A
I
can
be
replaced
all
right
now,
just
some
opening
remarks.
We
are
doing
a
hybrid,
which
is
in
person
and
virtual
for
the
committee
of
adjustment
today,
just
so
everyone's
aware,
members
of
the
public
may
join
in
person
or
virtually
on
that
screen
for
those
of
you
who
may
be
new
to
the
committee
of
adjustment.
My
name
is
Francis
Smith
and
I'm.
The
chair
of
the
committee
for
this
meeting
and
we'll
have
counselors
introduce
themselves
starting
over
here
with
Lynn.
B
A
And
I
guess:
I
should
say
that
in
the
council
life
I'm
the
mayor
since
it
didn't
say
that
all
right,
Cindy
Dickman,
will
be
assisting
us
with
the
meeting
she's
our
host
and
Chris
beside
her
will
make
sure
that
our
technology
works.
The
way
it's
supposed
to
the
format
of
the
meeting
will
be
to
follow
the
agenda.
That's
posted
online
staff
have
also
prepared
presentations
to
everyone
to
follow
along
with
during
the
meeting,
and
this
will
be
shown
on
that
screen
for
each
application.
A
With
the
public
hearing,
we
will
have
a
a
format
that
is
I
will
introduce
the
file
so
that
everyone
knows
where
it
is
on
the
agenda.
The
planner
will
provide
an
overview
of
the
application.
We'll
then
ask
if
there's
any
comments
from
the
applicant
or
their
agent,
and
then
committee
members
may
ask
questions
of
the
applicant
or
the
agent.
The
public
will
then
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions
or
provide
comments
and
I
encourage
the
public
to
ask
questions.
A
If
there's
any
doubt
in
your
mind
about
an
application,
the
committee
will
then
deliberate
and
vote
on
the
application
voting
will
take
place
by
members
of
the
committee
raising
their
hands
or
verbal
confirmation.
If
attending
online,
we
don't
have
any
Committee
Member
online.
Okay,
all
members
of
the
public
will
have
an
opportunity
to
provide
comments
on
the
new
applications.
A
If
a
person
or
public
body
does
not
make
an
oral
submission
at
the
meeting
or
make
a
written
submission
to
the
township
before
a
decision
is
made,
the
person
or
public
body
is
not
entitled
to
appeal.
The
decision.
Please
note
that,
as
of
January
1st
2023,
only
persons
specified
in
the
ACT
are
permitted
to
appeal
consent
and
minor
variance
applications.
A
C
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Once
the
meeting
is
open
to
the
public.
The
chair
will
ask
if
anyone
has
questions
or
comments.
Members
of
the
public
who
are
attending
virtually
will
be
asked
to
use
the
raise
hand
feature
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen.
This
alerts,
us
that
you
would
like
to
speak
staff
will
then
notify
the
chair
that
someone
would
like
to
speak
and
we
will
proceed
to
unmute
your
microphone.
Sometimes
this
takes
a
few
seconds
to
take
effect.
You
will
receive
a
notification
that
your
microphone
has
been
unmuted.
C
Please
wait
a
second
after
unmuting
your
microphone
before
speaking,
we
are
having
some
issues
with
their
sound
system.
It's
working
right
now,
but
in
the
event
that
our
sound
system
does
not
function
properly,
please
use
the
chat,
feature
I'm
going
to
leave
it
open.
If
there's
anyone
who
needs
to
speak-
and
we
can't
hear
you
then
we'll
we'll,
please
use
the
chat
feeder
feature
to.
C
Let
me
know
if
there's
anyone
calling
in
by
phone
I
don't
believe
that
there
is,
but
if
anyone
is
calling
in
by
phone,
you
use
the
star
9
feature
when
you
would
like
to
raise
your
hand,
this
will
prompt
give
you
a
prompt
on
the
phone
that
you've
raised
your
hand
and
you'll
be
notified
when
the
microphone
has
been
unmuted.
This
afternoon
we
have
one
member
of
the
public
participating.
A
Thank
you
Cindy,
in
the
unlikely
account
that
our
connection
goes
down
and
we
cannot
restore
it
within
15
minutes.
The
meeting
will
be
postponed
and
staff
will
be
in
touch
with
each
applicant
and
notice
will
also
be
posted
on
the
township
social
media,
letting
everyone
know.
So
those
are
sort
of
the
housekeeping
things
any
questions
or
comments
from
anyone
on
those,
if
not
we'll,
move
on
to
a
motion
by
Bill
Everett
and
second
by
Dan,
Meeks
that
the
agenda
be
adopted,
as
are
there
any
amendments
as
presented
all
those
in
favor
carried.
A
Is
there
any
disclosure
pecuniary
interest
in
general
nature
thereof
of
any
item
on
tonight's
agenda
by
any
member
of
the
committee?
None
noted
we'll
put
that
in
the
minutes.
Motion
moved
by
Bill
Everett
second
by
Dan,
Meeks,
that
the
minutes
of
the
March
9th
2023
minutes
be
adopted
any
discussion
or
corrections
to
the
minutes,
seeing
no
hands
all
those
in
favor
carried.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
This
is
an
application
to
be
submitted
for
the
construction
of
a
new
garage
with
a
footprint
of
93
square
meters
to
be
located.
Approximately
45
meters
from
the
high
water
mark
of
sherbet
Lake.
The
existing
accessory
structures,
which
is
a
detached
garage,
has
a
footprint
of
35.6
square
meters
or
about
383
square
feet.
The
variance
for
this
application
was
to
permit
a
total
accessory
structure
footprint
for
greater
than
93
square
meters,
as
per
the
bylaw,
so
on
the
screen.
D
Right
now
is
the
sketch
that
was
submitted
by
the
applicant.
So
you
can
see
the
lake
is,
to
the
right
hand,
side
of
this
image.
The
red
outline
box
here
is
the
garage
proposed
location
and
noted
with
the
dash
green
line
is
a
a
rock
cliff
or
ledge
that
is
present
on
the
property.
So
this
application
was
circulated
for
review
by
the
conservation
Authority
as
it
is
on
the
waterfront,
and
one
of
the
concerns
expressed
by
the
conservation
Authority
was
the
setback
of
the
proposed
garage
to
this
rock
cliff.
D
They
had
some
concerns
with
regards
to
slope
stability,
which
is
always
a
concern
when
looking
at
new
construction
to
ensure
that
new
construction
doesn't
impact
either
water
body
or
any
existing
Construction.
In
this
case,
I
believe
the
concern
is
that
it
would
destabilize
and
perhaps
fall
down
impact
on
the
other
existing
structures
on
the
property.
This
property
also
has
an
existing
septic
system.
The
application
was
not
circulated
for
review
to
the
septic
approval
Authority,
as
there's
no
Plumbing
proposed
in
the
garage
and
the
location
for
the
garage
is
not
near
the
septic
system.
D
So,
as
I
noted,
Mississippi,
Valley
conservation
Authority
did
review
this
and
noted
that
the
location
is
within
the
erosion
Hazard
area
due
to
the
location
at
the
top
of
the
slope
on
the
property.
The
conservation
Authority
proposed
two
options
to
address
this
situation,
either
requiring
a
relocation
of
the
proposed
location
to
a
minimum
setback
of
11.6
meters
from
the
top
of
slope
that
may
be
challenging
on
this
property,
going
to
that's
almost
the
distance
from
the
top
of
the
slope
to
the
rear
lot
line.
D
Alternatively,
the
applicant
could
prepare
a
slope
stability
analysis
to
determine
if
reducing
the
setback
to
that
which
is
proposed
in
the
original
application
is
possible
and
safe
on
the
property
that
usually
involves
looking
at.
Is
it
a
granite
crop
or
Bud
Rock
of
some
sort
and
that
type
of
things?
So
those
are
the
two
options
that
the
conservation
Authority
gave
to
address
that
hazardous
situation?
D
These
comments
were
provided
to
the
applicant
who,
at
this
point,
is
not
looking
at
doing
that
stability
analysis
and
also
asked
for
a
deferral
to
reevaluate
options
and
potential
proposals
that
could
come
in.
So
the
recommendation
is
that
a
committee
hear
any
comments
from
the
public
today.
If
there
are
any
and
different
this
application
until
an
alternative
can
be
determined
on
the
property.
A
E
D
E
C
A
Members
of
the
committee
with
questions
comments:
okay,
seeing
none
I'll
read
the
motion
move
by
Dan
and
seconded
by
Bill
and
making
the
decision
upon
this
application.
The
committee
considered
whether
or
not
the
variance
and
permission
requested
was
minor
and
desirable
for
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
the
land
building
or
structure,
and
that
the
general
intent
purpose
of
the
zoning
bylaw
and
the
official
plan
will
be
maintained
or
in
the
case
of
a
change
in
the
use
of
property
which
is
lawfully
not
conforming
under
the
bottle.
A
As
to
whether
or
not
this
application
has
met
the
requirements
of
subsection,
45
2
of
the
planning
act
concurring
the
following
decision
and
reasons
for
decision
that
minor
variance
application,
ao2
23
Olson
for
the
property
located
part
of
lot
11
concession
10
in
the
geographic
Township
of
Olden
be
deferred
until
the
concerns
expressed
by
Mississippi
Valley
conservation,
Authority
have
been
addressed
any
further
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
Garrett
all
right.
Good
luck,
hopefully
we'll
see
you
back
next
month,
we'd
like
to
get
buildings
started
quickly.
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
so
this
is
also
an
application
for
the
construction
of
a
new
garage
on
a
waterfront
property.
This
property
is
on
big
Clear
Lake
and
is
accessed
by
Willett
Lane.
The
proposal
for
this
garage
is
to
have
a
footprint
of
63
square
meters
or
approximately
690
square
feet,
and
its
proposed
location
is
approximately
73
meters
from
the
high
water
mark
of
big
Clear
Lake.
D
As
you
can
see
on
the
image
on
the
screen,
the
location
proposed
for
the
garage
is
shown
in
yellow
and
will
be
on
the
north
side
of
Willett
lane
from
the
existing
development
and
the
shoreline.
There's
an
existing
accessory
structure,
another
hobby
Workshop
garage
type,
building,
I'm
located
closer,
approximately
30
meters
from
Big
Clear
Lake
has
a
footprint
of
88.5
square
meters,
so
is
the
maximum
permitted
footprint
on
a
property
for
accessory
structures
is
93
square
meters.
The
addition
of
the
garage
north
of
Willett
Lane
would
put
this
total
over
that
93
square
meters.
D
Planning
staff
would
like
to
note
that
the
law
coverage
would
is
a
permitted
five
percent
maximum
for
the
entire
property.
The
addition
of
this
proposed
garage
to
the
existing
accessory
structures
or
bring
the
total
lock
coverage
for
accessory
structures
to
3.3
percent,
so
they
are
under
the
percentage
of
lot
coverage,
but
they
are
over.
D
The
permitted
maximum
footprint
planning
staff
would
also
like
to
note
that
the
one
meter
side
yard
shown
for
this
accessory
structure
does
meet
the
minimum
requirements
for
side
yard
setback
and
the
five
meters
north
of
the
Willett
Lane.
Again,
these
are
approximate
to
ensure
that
they
can.
The
applicant
can
locate
the
garage
in
an
area
that
is
more
level
as
the
property
slopes
more
steeply
down
towards
the
lake
on
the
south
side
of
Willett
Lane.
D
This
application
was
circulated
for
review
to
Quinte
conservation
Authority.
They
have
no
objections
to
the
application
as
submitted.
They
have
no
concerns
with
regards
to
Natural
hazards.
They
noted
there
are
slopes
on
the
property,
but
the
location
proposed
is
not
within
any
identified
slope
or
erosion,
Hazard
area
and
as
the
pro
the
proposed
garage
is
located
greater
than
45
meters
from
the
high
water
mark
of
big
Clear
Lake,
it's
outside
the
regulated
area
for
quinty
conservation,
and
so
no
conservation,
Authority
permit
will
be
needed
prior
to
any
building
permit.
D
Issuance
again,
this
one
was
also
not
circulated
for
a
review
for
septic
approval,
as
there's
no
Plumbing
in
the
garage
proposed
and
the
location
for
the
garage
is
nowhere
near
the
existing
septic
system,
which
is
located
south
of
the
lane
in
proximity
to
the
dwelling.
There
is
no
formal
public
comments
received.
A
A
A
690
square
feet
be
approved,
subject
to
conditions
and
reasons
noted
in
the
planning
report
and
that
the
secretary
treasurer
shall
issue
the
notice
of
decision
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
planning
act,
including
providing
the
notice
of
decision
to
the
applicant
any
person
or
public
body
that
made
a
written
request
to
be
notified
and
any
other
person
or
public
body
prescribed
any
further
questions
or
comments.
All
those
in
favor
Gary.
A
D
B
D
F
D
D
B
E
B
B
B
B
B
D
B
D
You
can
see
on
the
Sleek
habits
being
worked,
as
shown
in
the
red
circle
on
this
property
has
some
decent
books
for
the
driveway
and
parking
area
near
the
lane
at
the
it's
kind
of
a
sideways
closest
to
the
lane,
and
then
there's
stairs
that
lead
him
to
the
college.
You
can
obviously,
we
have
an
area
on
the
existing
footprint
of
the
Sleep
cotton
in
order
square
meters,
so
we'll
be
square
to
be
not
a
huge
one.
D
The
Proposal
is
to
demolish
reconstructed
in
a
large
ostein
pattern
for
a
total
reconstructed
footprint
of
34.5
square
meters
about
323
square
feet.
There's
a
maximum
of
400
square
feet
permitted
in
the
zoning
final
for
a
sleep
pattern.
So
there
the
proposal
is
still
under
the
maximum
footprint
permitted.
First
property.
D
D
D
Similar
to
the
current
situation,
there
were
no
comments
received
from
the
public
regarding
this
application
planning
staff
recommendation.
You
hear
any
comments
from
the
public
if
there
are
any
today
and
approve
the
application
as
submitted
subject
to
the
conditions
in
the
planning
report,
which
is
very
similar
as
the
previous
construction.
That's
proposed
in
the
drawings,
no
adverse
impacts,
no
alterations
to
Natural
Bridge
patterns.
B
B
By
Susan,
it
may
be
the
decision
upon
this
application.
The
committee
considers
whether
or
not
the
variance
requested
with
light
and
desirable
the
appropriate
development
or
use
of
land,
building
or
structure
another
given
attended
purpose
of
the
Sony
biology,
official
family
maintained
or
in
the
basis
of
a
change
in
the
use
of
property,
which
is
lovely
not
conforming
under
the
bylaw
as
to
whether
or
not
this
application
has
been
requirements
and
stuff.
There
is
45
too,
of
the
planet
have
incur
in
the
following
decision
with
humans
for
decision.
B
The
prediction:
application
80623
North
for
the
property
located
at
part
of
lot
7575
in
Geographic,
Channel,
10
back
1097,
approximately
betrayal,
to
allow
for
the
Reconstruction
and
enlargement
from
the
Sleep
cap
and
located
approximately
10
meters
332.8
feet
from
the
high
water
marker
crotch
Lake.
The
existing
safe
cabin
has
a
footprint
of
4.5
square
meters
or
48
square
feet.