►
From YouTube: CDS Jewel -- Messenger, Priorities for Client
A
C
B
Might
have
a
kill
or
simple
model
about
varieties
of
grunt
and
crashing,
so
it
is
a
little
like
the
yesterday's
topic
of
food
Josh
and
this
topic,
or
only
addressed
this
problem
of
garam
ho
different
Walker
closer
I
mean
that
if
we
should
especially
wait
with
IBD
for
the
sim
crust
cluster
and
we
need
to
get
the
different
choice,
example,
I
really
need
it
more
LPS
and
last
better
way.
Pero,
it's
fair
wages
and
I'll
double
you'll
need
middle-class
iops
and
can
can
be
a
full
high
latency.
B
B
B
And
we
want
to
implement
a
simple
/,
proud
model
to
address
these
problems
at
first,
though,
we
needed
to
add
a
product,
a
tool,
connection
hazarika
session.
So
if
you
can't,
we
have
a
relative
and
it
will
send
an
OST.
Will
you
still
this
mess
reviews
and
queen
a
messenger
to
less
passive,
especially
the
right,
hey,
Quinn
per
gallon
hope
we
will
have
messages,
Michelle
of
thyroid
Queen
and
always
the
open,
prairie
and
Fagin
okung.
B
If
we'll
party
lucky
then
63,
we
only
use
the
product
Lisa
McCune
and
it
will
much
like
fi
fi
fo
and
if
we,
if
we
party
less
than
this
rate
and
actually
we
use
or
we'll
talk,
investor
and
conveys
the
message,
Europe
and
distribution,
so
I
think
if
we
want
to
make
a
practical
work
battered
and
now
we
needed
to
enable
the
lake
later
lady,
it
a
method
and
we
needed
to
about
the
performance
problem.
I
think
I'm
not
sure
why
why
we
disable
this,
but
I
I
think
it
is
performance
for
one.
B
A
D
Ok,
so
it's
so
the
purpose
of
the
tokens
is
actually
to
prioritize
quiet,
io
as
a
whole
against
non-client
I.
Oh,
it
actually
isn't
intended
to
prioritize
clients
against
each
other,
because
at
the
moment
all
clients
are
priority.
63
yeah,
you're
correct.
This
is
a
big
fat
opportunity
for
improvement.
Oh
yes,
yeah.
B
Oh
so
I
think
maybe
we
needed
to
do
implement
or
improve
this
protocol
to
about
the
botanique
for
performance,
for
example,
women
needed
to
riff
on
to
linux,
TC
algorithms,
for
example,
essay
as
FK,
0,
0,
simple,
now
predict
algorithm
and
standard.
Maybe
we
needed
to
do
some
control
for
priotiy
with
performance
relationship
after
example,
if
one
cran
can
get
rid
of
forecast
province,
capsule
and
the
caustic
total
IPS
is
30
solids,
LPS
and
the
way
if
one
can
is
100
priority
and
another
is
verdicts
we
want
to.
B
B
B
The
exhaust
we
we
have
a
dedicated,
sound,
odd
for
YouTube
very
thoroughly
clean
and
different
under
each
Australia
will
process
the
high
priority
crashing
at
first.
For
example,
if
we
have,
many
connections
connects
to
the
OSD
and
each
connection
will
have
different.
The
party
and
the
weather
will
only
process
the
higher
party
connection
and
the
threads
will
share.
The
product
state
follow
the
band.
For
example,
the
higher
party
maybe
should
be
distributed
at
a
will
among
the
distress.
B
D
D
B
And
the
second
that
we
will
implement
April
the
existing
PD
cream
and
I
think
love.
The
big
step
problem
is
the
performance
I
think
we
needed
to
do
some,
but
I
don't
have
to
do
idea
for
this,
but
I
think
we
need
a
twin
a
gas
stop
performance,
the
problem
so
based
on
the
existing
party
model,
we
needed
to
do
some
change.
For
example,
now
we
have
a
necessary
party
from
the
other
2
211
teen
file
and
the
way
may
use
the
middle
range.
You
follow
contraction
for
a
range
sorry.
This
is
law.
B
And
the
connection
in
poverty
will
be
excited
was
the
ultimate
priority
to
the
actual
character
inflammation
in
front
of
me.
Implementation
and,
for
example,
acabo
okie
and
the
scram
okie
is
lower
than
53,
and
we
needed
to
make
this
party
worker
l
before
and
the
secondary
disorder
is
FL
journal
queen,
and
we
want
to
make
it
a
like
Oakland,
like
a
political
and,
for
example,
we
need
to
do
some
heuristics
algorithm
to
controvert
her
alo
by
PI
party.
Maybe
we
need
a
tool.
Spelter
I
always
buy
party.
D
D
It's
unlikely
that
we
want
to
perform
fair
queuing
in
the
file
journal
because
will
already
have
done
the
queuing
one
layer
up
and
presumably
we'd
have
throttled
in
such
a
way
that
the
file
journal
in
the
file
store
have
exactly
enough.
I
owe
to
work
with
to
fully
saturate
their
queue,
but
not
so
much
that
they
have
extra
queuing
to
work
with.
If
that
makes
sense
now.
D
Another
challenge
is
that
the
best
you
could
possibly
do
with
the
file
store
level
is
prioritized
between
what
are
they
called
off
sequencers
because
you
can't
do
out
of
order,
writes
on
a
particular
off
sequencer,
because
then
that
would
be
an
OP
done
sequencer
in
particular,
if
you,
if
a
PG
processes
to
ops
at
different
priorities,
it
doesn't
matter
they
went
into
the
file
there.
They
went
into
the
PG
log
in
that
order
and
they
must
be
completed
in
that
order.
So
you
have
limited
reordering
opportunities
in
the
file
journal
anyway,
yeah.
B
D
E
B
Yeah,
so
maybe
this
there
is
only
is
a
simple
algorithms.
For
example,
it
will
only
according
the
outside
or
the
transaction
side
or
the
authority
and
gather
the
orange
you
original
original
implementation
work
at,
for
example,
if
we
meet
a
very
large
I,
all
sides
transgressions,
and
this
is
a
low
priority,
and
the
next
is
a
high
point-
a
we
made
in
the
to
spell
better
tool,
translation
input,
yal
structure,
and
maybe
some
slack.
It
is
some
more
simple
something
for
her
to
stay
Corelli.
That's.
D
The
problem,
if
the
file
journal
queue,
has
a
high
priority
item,
followed
by
a
low
priority
item
or
a
low
priority.
Sorry,
if
it
has
a
low
priority
item,
followed
by
a
high
priority
item,
you
still
must
complete
the
low
priority
item
first,
unless
we
attach
some
metadata
that
says
that
they're
in
different
pools,
oh
okay,
I.
B
The
result
we
expect
is
bad.
At
least
we
can
make
high
particle
and
how
bad
proposed
their
low
part
a
grant.
Maybe
we
don't
help
the
detail,
formal
control
battery.
We
want
to
at
least
get
to
the
bank
vamos.
Maybe
this
is
not
a
very
good
enough
and
the
same
frantic
planet
could
get
to
the
balance,
the
performance
and
the
list,
the
second
disorder,
maybe
we
can
get
a
most
relation
for
between
the
two
different,
the
father
hunter,
like
I,
said
on
this
to
the
crashes.
C
B
D
Oh,
it's
enough
well
yeah,
so
on
in
a
particular
OST,
that's
kind
of
true.
The
problem
is
that
you
don't
know
whether
the
client
has
done
a
bunch
of
I/o
elsewhere,
yeah
yeah,
don't
get
me
wrong.
This
is
all
very
good
and
I'm.
Some
saying
that
the
other
work
is
also
in
the
priority
queue
area
and
you
guys
might
benefit
from
communicating
that's
just
just
now,
starting
though
so
you
might
catch
them
on
stuff,
develop.
Let's
see
if
I
can
introduce
you
next
time.
F
F
And
another
question
is
that
I
remember
such
one
years
before
or
some
years
before,
we
reduce
the
file
store
journal
queue
length
of
our
store
q
lens.
To
do
something
small.
The
main
idea
is
that
we
don't.
We
want
to
keep
the
any
Q
of
below
the
probably
killed
to
be
relative
shorter,
so
that
we
could.
F
B
Yeah,
maybe
maybe
yeah,
maybe
it
is
useless
I,
maybe
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
I
simply
talking
about
just
like.
Maybe
your
problem
slow
and
not
our
future
yeah.
I
synchro
ET,
and
I
think
this
is
maybe
either
problem.
Example.
We
can't
get
her
the
banister
foremost
among
the
clowns
and
and
we
needed
to
make
it
work
and
better.
F
D
B
D
B
Yeah
yeah
I
just
think
to
make
it
I
want
to
get
some
ideas
from
Neos.
The
pc
okonoboh
do
and
I
want.
Maybe
we
can
do
some
work
space
to
only
jesting
lips
come
implement
such
a
cool,
but
I
think,
is
absolutely
not
a
good
enough
for
our
this
module
yeah.
We
needed
to
do
some
changes.
What
do
we
want
to
get
some
ideas
for
them?
Yeah.
D
The
only
ones
I
was
able
to
find
were
token-based
because
the
the
real
purpose
of
that
q
isn't
fairness
among
clients.
I,
don't
I
mean
that's
important,
but
at
the
moment
every
all
client
to
send
with
the
same
priority,
and
we
don't
have
any
kind
of
global
information
anyway,
so
it
seemed
futile.
What
I
really
care
about
the
problem
that
Q
is
currently
solving
is
scheduling,
recovery,
snap
trimming
and
scrub
work
against
client
work,
though
yeah
whatever
we
replace
it
with,
will
need
to
be
able
to
do
that
as
well.
Yeah.
G
Hey
how
my
super
a
couple
of
observation?
Actually
in
the
same
point,
so
we
also
observed
that,
okay
to
clients
who
are
not
getting
the
similar
priority,
so
we
did
some
debugging
here.
So
what
we
saw
is
that
these
shards
actually
are
not
equally
distributed,
that
one
of
the
reason
means
all
the
iOS
on
that
different
shards
are
actually
some
of
the
shots
are
heavily
loaded.
Some
of
the
shots
are
not
properly
loaded,
so
you
may
want
to
look
at
that
sharding
scheme,
which
is
very
knave
right
now.
G
D
C
G
D
The
way,
if
you're,
if
you're,
finding
that
the
threads
are
imbalanced,
there
are
only
two
ways
that
can
happen.
One
is
that
you
don't
have
enough
placement
groups
on
the
PG
or
on
the
OSD,
and
the
other
is
that
the
placement
group
seeds
that
are
assigned
to
the
OSD
are
in
fact
not
uniform
over
the.
However
many
bits
we're
using
to
do
the
mod
for
the
thread,
so
you
might
consider
hashing
them
again
as.
D
C
D
Distribution
must
be
bad,
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
could
happen,
although
I
guess
there's
nothing
in
cross.
That
makes
me
really
confident
that
it
would
preserve
a
good
distribution
and
just
kind
of
assumed
it
would
okay,
so
yeah
that
should
go
away
if
you
use
a
good
hash
function
on
the
input
PG
seats,
yeah.
G
So
yeah
we
didn't
dig
down
on
that,
so
we
found
these
things,
so
we
saw
that
jml,
okie,
solving
and
TC
may
look
bigger
threat.
Cash
value
is
also
solving
that
issue.
So
we
kind
of
move
away
from
that.
So
but
I
think
that
probably
kind
of
one
of
the
root
cause
of
the
of
the
imbalanced
performance
between
the
clients,
yeah.
D
Well,
different
threats
keep
in
mind
you're,
pulling
with
at
least
with
the
standard.
Messenger
are
pulling
information
off
of
the
connections.
So
it's
not
super
surprising
that
there
could
be
a
bug
in
TC
Malik,
where
memory
allocated
and
one
thread
turned
out
to
be
much
less
effectively
utilized
in
a
different
thread
if
it
was
failing
to
pull
from
the
thread,
local
cache
or
something
like
that,
I
got.
E
C
C
E
E
So
another
aspect
of
this
that
we
don't
really
talk
too
much
about
in
either
the
qos
session
or
the
session.
Yet
it's
kind
of
the
admission
control
portion
where
you
may
want
to
if
you're,
getting
if
you're,
trying
to
guarantee
that
clients
receive
fair
shares,
you
may
want
to
press
for
AB
measure
the
enema,
the
ABS,
that
your
OCS
can
do
and
prevent
you
from
yourself
view
from
over
subscribing
by
having
too
many
clients
connected
or
more
than
the
requester
good
handle.
C
D
E
E
So
I
quit
with
the
ps4
what
other
statistics
the
aziz
could
be
reporting
there
there
I
a
spare
capacity
to
the
monitors
and
a
large
cut,
can
the
drag
of
how
many
clients
are
and
are
connected,
potentially
and
then
the
night
new
clients.
If
there
are
already
as
many
as
that,
the
cluster
can
handle
with
the
given
reservations.
D
It's
also
weird
because
if
you're
even
remotely
conservative
about
it,
you'll
reserved
toom
way
below
the
clusters
actual
throughput,
because
flatter
thoughts
are
going
to
happen.
So
if
you
want
to
have
a
high
probability
of
an
OSD
not
being
overloaded,
which
is
what
you're
really
trying
to
avoid
you'd
have
to
weigh
over
a
way
under
subscribe.
E
C
E
E
E
E
E
D
It'sit's
fairness
in
the
the
simplest
dunce
I
mean
it's
valuable.
It's
just.
It
also
doesn't
guarantee
wait?
No,
it
does
right,
okay,
so
okay,
so
just
for
the
record.
How
am
I,
if
you
were
looking
for
someone
to
fit
somewhere
to
fit
that
into
the
prioritized
q
it
would
fit
in
under
the
token
bucket,
but
above
where
I
do
a
round
robin
thing
on
the
clients?
You'd
replace
the
client,
the
in
the
per
entity,
Anstey
cues
with
a
SF
q
scheduler
that.