►
From YouTube: CDS Jewel -- RADOS multi-object transaction support
B
Originally,
for
it
divides
its
printed
by
search
and
Samuel,
so
this
is
for
multiple
module.
Chicken
transaction
support
so
also
recently
to
potentially
very
useful
in
many
many
cases,
such
as
foot
and
if
we
can
implement
in
a
multiobjective
I
section,
so
we
can
greatly
simplify
the
design
of
the
client
for
internal
clients,
I'm,
seeing
the
zip
lines
such
as
the
CFS
and
the
article
programmable
interface.
This
is
indeed
own.
If
we
don't
have
such
modification
suppose
they
determine
tender.
B
Our
journal
here
since
there
are
many
operations,
refer
to
different
few
people,
multi
politics
and
deleted
vitaly,
no
transaction,
for
example,
phone
call
for
simple
example,
a
cuddle
and
like
the
big
they
are
and
the
create
operation
for
the
great
operation.
You
need
to
create
a
new
object
and
you
need
either
entry
in
the
parradile,
but
so
this
is
typically
with
people
to
put
the
operations
on
to
object
and
the
latest
amber
must
be
done,
automaton
and
also
some
other.
Like
the
we
live.
B
Unlike
the
move,
the
bull
situation,
you
move,
you
move
some
files
from
my
favorite
one
directory
to
another
directory
to
this
also
be
spittin
and
the
transaction
and
then
prefer
to
at
least
to
another
object
out
operations
at
the
party
w
and
other
email
list,
and
also
here
the
Ojeda
has
reported
many.
The
use
cases
two
ways
into
each
potentially
very
useful
for
two
to
implement
in
the
market
for
tickets.
B
I
section
for
the
implementation,
so
here's
our
algorithm,
it's
a
kind
of
like
the
two-phase,
commit
a
two
phase
commit
protocol
so
follow
the
yellow
for
the
other
interface
will
allow
clients
to
define
the
forest
subject.
You
can
refer
to
the
blueprint
of
the
ethnic.
Our
blueprint
indiscretion
to
the
client
can
can
t
find
a
list
of
objects,
rattle
operations
on
different
objects
and
the
client
couldn't
specify
them
the
master,
a
math
object.
The
math
object
will
will,
as
the
modulated
opulent
rejection
the
base
of
this
divine.
B
B
It
will
extract
to
the
object
to
write
operations,
I,
pg's
and
sender
them
to
come
corresponding
pages,
so
each
PG
will
receive
a
part
of
the
transaction
and
only
refers
to
the
operations
under
oxidative
and
in
in
that
PG
so
causes
those
pages,
the
columns
lane
so
for
a
service
step,
the
slave
received
from
master
and
part
of
the
transaction
and
the
usual
there.
They
will
do
a
check
if
they
are
pending
conventional
single
object.
Single
object,
institutions
going
up
and
with
the
operation
is
under
same
object.
B
A
B
Sent
to
the
email
list,
so
we
cannot
wait
in
that
case,
we
must
an
attorney
again
otherwise,
and
the
slave
will
construct
to
the
transaction
in
Atlantic
conventional
way
now,
with
her
master
prepare
a
ticket.
So
if
error
occurred,
for
example
or
regions
in
comparison
operation
field
of
wielded,
the
slim
will
return
master
error,
so
evil
master
collect
all
prepares,
prepare
in
the
case
of
fungus
lane,
then
you
too
will
send
the
slaves
to
prepare
commit.
B
Otherwise,
if
you
master
receivable
every
floor
slave
weed,
so
we'll
send
to
go
back
to
O'lakes,
let
them
cancel
the
transaction
and
the
will
return
the
collider
error.
So
you
fool
all
the
prepared
all
the
prepares
at
the
Seder.
On
the
slim
side,
the
Master
will
send
the
slaves
prepare
commit
and
the
slave
will
and
a
pound
slim
receive
the
prefect
committee
flowmaster
and
they
will
write
their
pending
transaction
for
the
PG
metadata
here
at
the
Messiah
la-la-la-la
deck
directed
aldol
object
generated
side
into
the
PG
metadata
res
returing
master,
prepared
committee
ck.
B
The
women
must
collect
all
prepare
comida
ck.
That
means
all
claims
has
persisted
in
the
transaction,
then
the
master
could
construct
the
transaction,
including
a
right
to
PG
metadata,
to
indicate
the
transaction
in
committee
and
reserved
rights
operations
and
its
own
data
object
and
construct
such
object
and
transaction
in
pure
objects.
Though,
then
veteran
client
basically
enable
clients
to
return
from
a
write
operation.
The
Zen
master
will
send
the
slaves
commit
when
can
win
slave,
listen
the
same
commit
to
they
will
submit
their
pending
transaction
to
object,
store
or
PG
melody.
B
Networking
scope,
the
other
transaction
finished
so
either
has
been
writin
to
the
ultimate
location,
deletes
the
transaction
from
the
PG
metadata
return,
the
master
committee
seeking,
which
means
those
data
a
new
transaction,
has
been
applied.
The
market
collected
our
community
can
then
return
client
to
commit
to
indicated
the
transaction
has
really
finished,
to
enable
clients
to
the
creek
to
read
operations
around
those
who
object
to
the
transaction
referred
to
and
the
deleted
of
education
for
the
PG
metadata.
So
that's
a
home
full
name
horses.
B
B
There
are
two
possibilities,
then,
for
the
first
part
ability
and
if
the
master
is
still
not
in
committing
state,
the
Master
will
recent.
That
means
the
slim
highlands
persisted
each
transaction
at
all,
so
in
this
case
the
Master
will
send
us
leo
recent,
the
slave,
the
transaction.
Let
us
leave
this
path
across
step
3,
as
described
above,
the
evil
master
is
already
in
committing
that
the
implant
will
actually
has
finished.
Almost
everything
this
is
has
already
removed
the
transaction
from
its
PG
metadata.
That
means
it's
almost
on
the
same
side,
it's
almost
as
our
transition.
B
After
rather
the
sling
is
tough.
It's
just
don't
get
a
chance
to
send
to
the
master.
Is
the
committee
is
a
cream
message,
so
in
that
case
massingill
to
nashik
muffin,
it
allows
it
and
the
for
the
second
essay
duration,
evil.
There
is
transaction
founder
in
slings,
Fiji
metadata.
Then
then
that
means
the
slave
has
finished
a
napper
listing
of
affection,
but
jajaja
Alan
to
commit
in
that
case
Master
will
will
struct.
Will
you
struggle
to
the
sling
to
commit?
Let's
leave?
They
start
from
step
8
to
finish
another
transaction.
B
To
our
heart
other
hand,
the
waist
length
recover
from
down
you
to
give
you
two
found
the
transaction.
It's
PG
metadata.
It
will
also
start
preparing
to
ask
a
master
state
and
the
process
according
to
the
14
different
situations,
get
kind
of
tricky,
so
you've
mastered
own
action
about
the
transaction,
which
implies
that
the
master
also
has
just
done
recover
from
that.
So
you
just
had
lost
two
already
memories.
Already
memory
transaction
informations
legislature
get
a
nothing
useful
information
from
aster,
then
sling
just
to
go
back
and
you've
a
master
role
is
to
a
section.
B
The
Master
will
be
back
to
the
slave
to
finish
the
transaction
as
described
above
so
on
the
other
side,
you
will
master
done
master
Dunham,
then
sleep
slave
could
be
aware
of
this,
but
also
by
our
ski
map
and
also
will
start
as
you
prefer
me
to
ask.
The
master
state
after
master
PG
have
returned
to
active
and
clean
by
the
matter,
PG
puri
and
the
process
according
to
reporting
situations
to,
if
master,
no
matter
what
the
transaction
implements
has
lost.
All
its
in
memory,
transaction
information
slave
just
go
back
and
you
master
in
committee.
B
That
means
master
has
already
produced
in
this
transaction
and
also
which
implies
all
the
slave
size
of
also
in
black
and
crispy
the
transaction.
In
that
case
today,
we
just
restarted
floss
step
into
the
tool
panel
and
to
do
a
final
committee
here
from
the
PG
metadata
for
automated
location,
so
I
one
master
recover
from
down
and
you
need
to
found
a
very,
very
start.
Sectioning
competing
in
yeah
in
objects
told
during
the
local
journal
replayed.
So
it
will
give
me
to
found
a
pending
transaction.
B
Then
it
will
also
started
super
cheering
to
all
the
slaves
after
your
state
and
the
inflow
transaction
from
the
in
slaves.
Pg
metadata,
which
implies,
as
slim
as
I
hope,
has
some
everything,
because
the
master
found
the
it
seems
committing,
which
implies
that
the
master
has
already
tender
transaction
to
other
slaves,
and
it
always
length
has
already
produced
Pedro
transaction
in
Berlin
police
units
attention.
Only
in
that
case
the
matter
will
be
in
committing
state.
So
if
no
transaction
for
the
in
slaves
PG
metadata
Leslie,
you
must
have
done
everything.
B
So
in
that
case
master
need
plastic,
so
you've
transaction
from
also
pumping
slaves.
Pg
metadata
just
send
the
sling
lets
them
commit.
Oh
yeah,
the
aberration
is
indeed
bitten,
yet
tricky,
so
something
to
to
discuss
so
and
as
we
can
see,
we
can
introduce
a
plan
to
decide
where
we
leaders
the
dash
of
prepared
her
mittens
step
and
the
step
3
to
this.
This
step
is
meant
to
do
a
fast
deadlock
and
the
Riddick
operation
check.
So
you
for
this
is
not
de
nerval,
then
the
step
3
and
the
6
could
be
coalesced.
B
Also
respectful,
507
could
be
collector.
Nevertheless
has
no
impact
on
the
arrow
process.
Sweetie
scattered
about
a
lot
of
sinful
to
discuss
is
the
first
step
8.
We
could
make
a
use
of
the
metadata.
Only
the
jump,
almeda
dinner
only
journal
mode
yeah.
We
just
took
the
adjust
from
talked
and
to
speed
up
the
writer
from
the
PG
metadata
to
ultimate
location.
B
A
I
beg,
but
I
think
it's
it's
super
hard
to
write.
Anything
non-trivial
against
lipid
liberate
us
right
now,
because
you
need
to
build
some
kind
of
multi-object
commit
operation
for
pretty
much
anything
non
non
trivial
and
everyone
has
to
do
it
and
it's
tedious
and
it
would
be
nice
if
ratos
did
it
for
you.
A
B
A
The
only
other
option
option
is
to
have
some
kind
of
heavy-handed
requirement
that
the
operations
can't
fail,
and
you
could
do
that
two
ways
by
partitioning
the
set
of
available
ratos
operations
into
those
that
could
fail
and
those
that
can't
or
by
just
like
printing
something
to
the
log
saying
the
user
did
something
naughty
which
doesn't
seem
right,
but
as
far
as
the
deadlock
part
goes,
we
could
allow
people
to
do
sort
of
non-trivial
operations
as
long
as
we
require
them
to
partition
their
objects
into
a
deadlock
classes
themselves
such
that
you
can't
send
basically
to
do
a
lock
ordering
when
they
specify
the
object
ops.
B
B
You
know
master
property.
In
that
case
we
can.
We
don't
have
an
easy
way
to
avoid
the
the
deadlock.
Even
a
simple
transaction
just
refers
to
two
objects,
then
let
us
think
just
two
transactions
and
they
both
refer
to
objects
a
and
the
B,
so
you
for
the
client
is
specified
yet
the
first
transaction
I.
A
Other
words,
the
coordinator
could
treat
itself
as
as
a
slave
and
lock
or
and
do
the
prepares
on
the
slaves
in
order.
So
my
argument
is
that
in
a
lot
of
cases
in
raid
OCW,
for
example,
where
you're
creating
the
bucket
index
and
also
atomically
creating
the
object,
you
know
the
object
doesn't
exist.
You
know
that
because
you're
generating
an
increasing
sequence
number-
and
it
couldn't
possibly
exist-
if
it
did
there'd-
have
to
be
a
bug.
A
So
in
that
case
it
would
be
nice
if
there
were
a
way
to
assure
liber8
owes
that
there
cannot
be
a
conflicting
transaction
on
the
second
object.
That
is,
it
would
be
nice
if
you
could
designate
that
as
a
leaf
object
in
the
lock
dependency
graph
with
the
other
object
d
bucket
index.
That
is
being
the
top
level
object,
in
which
case
the
coordinator
could
choose
to
do
what
would
have
to
choose
to
do
to
lock
the
thing
at
the
top
of
block
hierarchy,
first,
the
bucket
index
and
then
lock
the
leaf,
node
and
I.
A
A
Is
in
that
case,
you'd
say
these
two:
are
these
two
things
are
at
the
same
level
of
the
law
hierarchy
because
they
cannot
possibly
have
have
conflicting
trend
transactions,
and
that
would
enable
the
coordinator
to
do
them
both
at
the
same
time.
But
if
you
had
a
case
where
you
had
objects,
a
and
B
that
genuinely
had
different
requirements,
you
could
specify
them
in
a
list
that
says
first
lock
a
then
lock
be,
or
that
is
first
prepare
on
a
then
print
them
prepare
on
be.
B
A
I
don't
know
like
I
said,
though
it
seems
like
it's:
it's
not
so
heavier
requirement
that
the
clients
prove
that
deadlock
won't
won't
happen,
it'll
in
a
lot
of
use
cases
and
data
structures.
That
will
just
work
that
that
so,
although
I
suppose
you
just
never
get
the
rejection
message,
so
maybe
it
doesn't
matter
it
may
not
matter
you.
You
may
be
right.
The
light
detection
may
be
sufficient.
B
B
A
B
A
If
you
have
a
github
ranch,
you
probably
want
to
point
or
email
to
the
list
with
that
sooner
rather
than
later.
A
A
B
A
Think
so
I
mean
this
is
this
is
what
sage
I
wind,
I
I
guess
I
haven't
thought
about
that
much
since
last,
CD
else
I
think
we're
going
to
discover
some
problems
with
this,
as
we
do
the
implementation
and
testing
just
because
that's
the
nature
of
the
beast,
but
I
think
is
a
first
start.
This
is
a
natural
approach.
A
B
A
Well,
to
be
to
be
clear
this
actually,
this
super
peering
won't
actually
have
really
much
in
common
at
all,
with
regular
appearing
it'll,
just
be
some
some
additional
things
that
some
additional
messages
the
primary
sends
after
it's
already
completed
normal
peering,
to
kick
off
them
the
next
part
of
the
process.
This
won't
actually
be
part
of
caring.
It's
just
going
to
be
it'll
during
peering.
A
It
will
discover
some
in
progress
operations
that
it
now
apparently
knows
about,
and
then
it
will
send
appropriate
messages
to
the
slave
primaries
to
find
out
what
their
current
status
is,
but
it'll
be
after
appearing
as
completed
its
not
going
to,
for
example,
block
other
I.
Oh,
that
would
be
bad
it'll
black
on
the
Rio
in
that
object,
of
course,
but
not
on
all
of
the
objects.
B
B
A
Be
honest,
I
think
that
can
wait
until
later
in
the
process.
I
think
for
at
least
some
users
they'll
want
to
be
able
to
abort
Trent
Trent
transactions.
It's
just
really
useful,
so
we'll
want
that
that
option
and
later
on,
we
can
add
an
optimization,
that's
what
I
would
do
anyway.
I
would
implement
the
slightly
more
complicated
version
and
then
optimize
it
later.