►
From YouTube: 2019-06-05 :: Ceph Developer Monthly part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
But
I
guess
in
general,
we
have
to
be
having
these
kinds
of
feature
flags,
but
for
upgrades
and
downgrades
more
introducing
new
methods.
I
know
everybody
has
like
the
RVD
features
for
scrolling.
What
the
client
site
is
using
on
the
OSDs
I'm,
not
sure
if
every,
if
rgw
and
the
fest
of
the
similar
facilities
they
wear
or
if
those
needs
to
be
be
billed
out.
A
B
C
A
A
C
B
D
D
B
I
I
have
to
assume
I
I
bet
we'll
do
that
at
least
once
even
after
we
do
commit
to
not
to
allowing
down
grades
but
like
even
with
the
major
releases.
We
have
a
lot
of
problems
with
people
who
don't
read
the
big
important
text
at
the
top
of
the
upgrade
notes
and
at
least
announced
that
we
allow
down
grades
on
minor
releases,
I
think
they're
gonna
be
a
lot
of
people
who've.
Never
ever
looked
at
that
stuff.
F
A
F
F
G
A
F
D
B
I
mean
that's
the
thing,
I
think
it
does
have
to
be
about
making
rules,
because
it's
not
something
that
we
have
rules
strong
enough
that
people
can
rely
on
then
they
can't
rely
on
it.
So
there's
not
any
points
like
no
process
is
ever
gonna.
Be
perfect.
There's
only
three
something
like
I
I
agree
with
that,
but
I
mean
like
people
are
gonna
write
contracts
around
this
that
you
know
some
of
us
are
gonna
have
to
support,
and
that
scares
me
so.
D
My
context,
if
there
is
a
problem
in
food
store,
that
is
a
data
loss
corrupting
issue
and
the
way
to
fix
it.
It's
not
allow
you
to
downgrade
back
to
the
thing
that
was
broken
then
like
you're
deciding
well
do.
I
want
to
allow
people
to
downgrade
to
the
dot
ones,
release
that
is
like
broken
and
they
should
never
run
or
do
am
I
just
gonna
say
we're
not
allowing
it
down
grades
and
you
can
decide
you
can.
F
D
D
G
It
also
eliminates
having
to
look
at
release
notes,
if
that's
like
a
blanket
policy,
it
gives
us
that
one
shot
too
if
something
went
wrong
with
the
zero
release,
which
is
maybe,
where
there's
more
likely
going
to
be
a
problem
less
every
few.
Just
if
that's
known,
then
you
don't
have
to
worry
about
release,
notes
and
yeah
I
mean.
G
A
D
A
That's
why
I
went
to
I
was
going
for
here.
You
know
what
we
can
do
next
to
create
this
actually
and
bring
so
many
other
other
areas
that
we
may
need
you
in
mind
for
future
backwards.
A
E
A
E
D
D
D
D
D
But
you
want
to
get
you
want
the
new
coptic
corpus,
but
the
old
code
can
be
running
this
in
a
pull
request
that
is
generating
or
in
$2.
You
maybe,
but
yeah
anyway,
it'll
be
little
bit
awkward
to
write
it's
good
once
we
have.
If
we
have
an
automated
tool
to
generate
more
representative
core
subjects,
then
what
it
conceivably
doing
doing
check.