►
From YouTube: 2019-07-24:: Ceph DocUBetter Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
So
on
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
say:
I've
been
watching
your
doc.
You
better
meeting
and
I've
been
actively
kind
of
participating
in
the
stuff
community
for
documentation
for
a
little
while
and
yeah
I'd
love
stuff,
I've
used
it
in
a
lot
of
capacities
and
if
anything
I
can
do
to
help
with
the
documentation.
I'm
open.
A
That's
that
we
are
both
in
Pacific
time,
so
it's
not
that
late
for
us,
yet
all
right,
so
I
think
that
there's
bad
the
chat,
I
think
I
started
out,
adding
a
few
things
in
it.
Well
last
week,
I
think
we
made
to
pull
requests,
one
I,
think
I,
think
yeah
I
think
I
added
the
youtube
links
to
the
getting
started.
Page
yes,
and
then
there
was
Gabriella
intern
with
Fred
who
actually
was
supposed
to
be
in
this
meeting
today
as
well,
but
I
don't
see
her.
A
I
wasn't
the
email
thread
so
I
think
you
mentioned
something
like
removing
some
repeated
rules
and
I
think
we
do
have
some
repeated
rows
in
the
release
Eddie
or
something
where
we
have
the
same
month
listed
multiple
times,
then
each
row
kind
of
adds
a
particular
latest
release
for
a
version
like.
Is
that
what
you
meant
yeah.
B
Yeah,
okay,
so
I
guess
I
can't
actually
link
directly
to
it.
But
if
you
look
at
the
schedule,
the
SEC
release,
yeah
I
think
this
is
what
you
were
saying.
So
basically,
if
you
look
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
timeline
you'll
see
like
March
2019
and
right
March,
2019,
yeah,
okay,
so
yeah
we're
talking.
A
B
Not
you
know,
I
should
I
thought
I
thought
my
description
was
obvious,
so
I
didn't
reread
the
email,
but
I'll
go
back
and
like
I
can
respond
to
it
directly.
Also
is
the
I
mean
this
is
a
this
is
definitely.
This
is
like
a
programming
problem
like
it's,
not
a
documentation
problem,
so
just
to
make
sure
we
have
like
somebody
working
on
it.
That
can.
A
Be
yeah
when
she
is
she's
a
safe
and
dawn
I,
think
she's
working
on
some
ansible
stuff
or
something
so
I
think
that
shouldn't
be
a
problem.
Okay,
but
we
can.
We
can
help
her
through
it
if
required.
Okay,.
A
Okay
and
those
are
a
few
things
and
there's
one
more
thing,
so
this
happened
to
actually
her
and
she
ended
up
creating
a
poor
request
using
the
edit
on
github
link
and
I.
Think
there
is
a
place
to
sign
off
your
commit
when
you
create
that
pull
request,
but
maybe
she
missed
that
or
you
did
not
find
it
or
whatever.
Then
later
it
becomes
very
difficult
to
add
that
signed
off
by
antlerless
you
have,
you
have
to
just
go
to
a
force,
push
or
something.
A
So
it's
just
wondering
how
can
we
make
it
more
obvious
to
people
who
are
creating
for
requests
just
using
the
web
UI
that
you
need
to
just
this
is
the
time
you
should
be
signing
off
your
commission
I
know.
Even
even
adding
Greg
had
the
same
problem
once
well.
You
try
to
edit
something
directly
using
the
editor
and
then
it
crossed
a
lot
of
problems.
I.
A
B
B
B
A
A
Are
the
other
thing
in
general?
Also,
the
signed
off
by
is
a
big
problem,
a
lot
of
Nukem,
even
people
who
are
not
using
the
editor
on
github,
it's
very
difficult
to
just
make
them,
because
sometimes
people
just
go
and
edit
their
comment
which
comes
up
with
the
PR,
and
they
think
that
the
test
is
whether
the
signed
off
by
check
is
going
to
pass.
But
it
doesn't
so
I
think
I,
don't
know,
I've
been
thinking
about
it,
maybe
loosening
some
of
those
requirements
or
doc,
PRS
and
or
something
it's.
This
I
mean.
A
B
B
A
People
who
could
have
just
made
one
line,
changes
and
God
not
committing
to
SEF
might
not
have
been
able
to
do
that
because
there
is
this
thing:
I
understand
that
signing
with
them.
It
is
important.
We've
done
everything
like
you
know.
When
you
even
create
a
pull
request.
It
says
a
bunch
of
things,
but
I
think
it's
still
not
obviously
I.
B
B
A
Kind
of
what
I
was
thinking
or
maybe
just
have
an
override
for
the
sign
of
check
that
if
we
think
that
that's
the
hurdle
for
that
person
to
contribute,
we
can
maybe
override
it
for
the
first
time,
if
somebody's
contributing
for
the
first
time.
But
let
us
say,
we're
your
season
contributor,
you're,
just
missing
a
sign
of
pie
that
doesn't
qualify
for
that
role.
B
A
A
B
A
D
B
Wonder
what
other
projects
do
like?
So,
if
you
think
about
like
I,
mean
def
has
a
lot
of
contributors,
but
stuff
has
a
small
number
of
contributors
compared
to
some
of
these
projects
that
are
like
really
huge
and
like
they
must
handle
this
somehow,
maybe
they,
maybe
they
just
don't
require
signed
off
by
fend
off
guy,
seems
to
be
some
sort
of
kernel
holdover
from
the
kernel
I.
B
A
C
Yeah
good
question
when
I'll
be
honest,
I'm
still
very
much
beginner
in
programming
in
general,
I
guess,
but
when
I
started,
when
I
committed
my
first
PR
to
SEF
I
I
was
you
know,
I
was
lost
to
when
I
did
the
signed
off
well,
I
remember
when
I
was
first
reviewed.
You
know
just
the
whole
idea
get
in
general
to
me
was
a
mystery
so
signing
off
my
commits
and
everything
I
definitely
had
to
learn
that
and
kind
of
read
the
documentation
too.
So
I
could
see
where
it's
kind
of
it
may
be.
C
For
the
first
time,
contributors
like
you
were
saying
a
problem:
I
mean
I,
guess
you
know,
and
I
go
back
and
forth
between
using
the
you
know.
If
I
want
to
use
the
UI
for
github,
I
can
use
that
or
I
can
go
on
the
command
line
and
do
it
that
way,
but
I
kind
of
see
where,
where
that
might
be
a
you
know,
for
a
first-time
contributor
that
you
know
how
that
could
be
a
an
obstacle.
Yeah.
B
A
Plus,
plus,
you
have
to
pull
request
and
you
can
always
go
and
edit
the
first
comment
that
most
people
usually
tend
to
do
when
we
ask
them
to
add
up
signed
off
by
so
every
time
there
is
a
commit.
There
is
a
pull
request
associated,
so
you
can
go
and
figure
out
who
the
person
was.
You
know,
I
mean
two
things:
one,
we
the
relax
it
completely
and
we
say
it's:
okay,
not
to
have
a
sign
of
buying
a
dock
PR
or
we
have
a
proper.
D
A
A
Once
you
missed
it,
you
would
you
had
a
hard
time
adding
that
yeah,
you
can't
discuss
two
things:
either
we
relaxed
the
sign
off
by
requirement
for
dog
Pierre's
completely,
where
we
say
it's:
okay,
not
to
sign
off
a
dog
peer
or
of
this
relax
it
for
new
new
contributors
who
are
just
trying
to
get
acquainted
with
safe
or
trying
to
make
the
first
contribution,
or
we
have
like
a
very
structured
way
of
explaining
to
the
new
user.
How
commit
needs
to
be
signed
and
whatever
possible
ways
either.
A
A
B
Deciding
if
we
can
relax
the
requirements
seems
like
the
first
steps
so
like
basically
somebody's
like
we
just
don't
want
to
make
exceptions
for
like
this
very,
like
Pacific
edge
case,
then
we
can
go
ahead
and
make
the
video
sounds.
A
Good
yeah
I
think
yeah.
We
can
take
that
question
to
Sage
and
other
people
who
can
make
that
decision.
I'm
sure
stages,
sage
is
going
to
be
fine
with
like
having
more
people,
contribute
to
Saif.
If
that
helps,
but
he'll
get
bias
from
other
people
as
well,
so
I
can
I
can
have
that
discussed
and
I
can
get
back
by
the
next
meeting.
I.
D
Can
give
some
input
I
think
both
are
really
good
options
personally,
so,
as
me
had
mentioned,
I
did
struggle
a
lot
with
adding
the
signature,
but
with
her
guidance,
it
didn't
seem
as
complicated
as
I
thought.
D
It
was
so
I
think
a
video
could
be
really
helpful
or
like
a
sort
of
documentation
providing
like
the
step
by
step
procedure
for
that,
especially
if
adding
the
signatures
is
a
typical
convention
for
like
across
all
all
stuff
repositories,
but
if,
if
you
feel
that
you
will
get
more
contributions
from
people
outside
of
the
team,
if
you
are
more
lenient
with
that,
then
that's
also
I,
guess
my
god.
Yeah.
A
D
B
Yeah,
sorry
for
not
responding,
just
been
swamped
but
yeah,
so
yeah.
If
my
email
wasn't
clear,
it
was
just
like
there
would
be
March
like
two
or
three
marches,
but
then
just
one
entry
in
each
row
it'd
be
nice
to
have
like
one
row
with
all
three
entries.
Yeah.
B
D
B
Well,
you
don't
really
have
to
ask
if
it,
if
you
don't
want
to,
but
like
I'm
just
curious,
if
signed
off
by
is
like
required
anymore
at
all
or
if
it's
just
something
that
people
just
have
muscle
memory
for
you
know
like
like
I,
don't
like
I
just
have
get
set
up
so
I,
don't
even
have
to
do
yes,
like
you,
just
ads
signed
off
to
everything
I
commit
without
like
so
it's
almost
as
if
it
doesn't
have
any
meaning
anymore,
and
you
know
like
huge
projects
like
don't
use
that
stuff,
so
I
get
I.
B
A
A
As
a
must
must
have
to
March
a
PR
earlier
must
have
so
that's.
Maybe
there
were
reasons
then
to
do
that
as
well.
So
maybe
it's
a
good
time
to
release
revisit
and
see
if
those
still
stand,
yeah
yeah
there
we
go
okay,
now
I
get
your
point
no,
but
is
it
really
required,
at
least
for
doc?
Be
ours
is
really
required
and
if
not,
then
why
won't
we
waste
the
effort
of
creating
a
video
or,
like
you
know
that
okay
I
think
that's
something
I
can
take
and
report
by
the
next
meeting.
Oh.
A
Gabriela
thanks
for
looking
through
that
contributing
to
safe
document
and
I'm
sure
if
we
can
get
both
the
ideas
that
you
had
it's
going
to
be
better
than
what
we
had
so
thanks
again,
all
right
I
also
don't
have
anything
else.
If
you
don't
think
we
can
call
it
a
meeting
have
a
good
evening.
Everybody
do
you
guys
there
thanks
bye-bye.