►
From YouTube: 2019-06-12:: Ceph DocUBetter meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
Okay,
so
the
idea
is
to
improve
the
onboarding
experience
kind
of
in
line
with
what
we
were
discussing
and
I.
Think
Lynne's
put
together
this
etherpad
kind
of
trying
to
integrate
or
like
put
down
in
one
place.
What
all
we
have
currently
and
some
of
it
may
or
may
not
make
sense
anymore
and
some
might
need
updation,
but
there's
definitely
things
that
need
to
be
grouped
together
in
the
right
places
for
people
to
be
able
to
access
it
and
I
was
thinking,
maybe
of
we
could
identify.
A
Okay,
cool
yeah,
I
think
so
the
resources
you're
costly,
are
as
a
website
and
currently,
if
you
look
at
the
website,
lot
of
information
here
is
there,
but
probably
not
in
the
right
order
or
in
a
more
you
know
a
human
easily
readable
way.
I
would
say,
like
it
says,
get
involved,
and
then
you
have
this,
but
I
mean
we
could
definitely
add
stuff
here,
which
could
just
have
like
this.
A
The
video
that
we
were
talking
about
what
is
safe
and
like
why
you
would
want
to
get
involved
in
it,
and
what
does
it
actually
could
probably
be
something
that
we
could
have
here
and
then
based
on
those
lights
or
the
the
stuff
that
we
discuss
in
that
video?
We
could
have
these
sections
like
if
you,
oh,
you
can
get
become
a
part
of
the
community
if
you
want
to
like
go
and
participate
in
the
developer,
monthly
and
stuff
like
that,
could
then
make
more
sense
instead
of
just
like
rather
than
having
it.
A
Saying
that
before
you
say
get
involved
and
like
I'm
just
saying
I
have
that
one
small
video
that
talks
about
or,
like
you
know,
the
maybe
like
a
five
minute
thing
that
talks
about
what?
What
does
it
mean
to
even
get
involved
right
and
what
are
the
avenues
in
which
you
can
you
can
become
a
developer?
You
can
become
a
dock
writer,
you
can
just
become
a
community
member
and
you
just
become
like
a
silent
listener
or
you
can
just
come
and
come
and
give
your
ideas
and
you
don't
need
to
quote
so.
A
B
B
A
Alright
I
mean
like
just
five
minutes
explaining
okay,
this
is
what
we
do.
This
is
how
we
do
it.
We
write
code
and
if
you
want
to
contribute-
and
then
you
know
the
person
who's
actually
doing
the
video
like
it
could
just
be
like
not
even
a
person
talking,
it
could
just
be
like
some
slides
and
some
voiceover
for
those
slides
and
then
it
might
just
become
easier
to
relate
and
identify
easily.
This
is
what
what
I
felt
is
lacking
in
this,
at
least
getting
involved.
Yeah
I
think.
B
That's
I
think
that's
a
pretty
good
idea,
yeah,
because
yeah
you're
you're
right!
It's
like
it's,
not
very
obvious
on
the
website
that
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
that
you
can
do.
A
A
A
A
I
think
it's
going
to
be
this
one
is
going
to
be
probably
a
little
more
detailed,
because
the
website,
the
way
you
have
to
really
you
know
the
layout
is
and
stuff
you
might
not
be
able
to
stuff
in
a
lot
of
information
there,
but
all
the
technically.
This
should
be
a
super
certain
that
should
be
a
subset
of
of
all
the
information
the
having
like.
So
this
one.
If
you
look
at
it,
it
just
starts
with
contributing
to
self,
and
then
there
are
a
bunch
of
things
here.
Mm-Hmm.
B
B
A
B
If
you're
like
I,
wanted
to
change
something
in
blue
store,
it
you're
right,
you
know
and
yeah
it
seems
like
we
might
be
able
to
have
like
kind
of
a
choose-your-own-adventure
page
for
getting
involved.
Yeah
I
think
I
mean
it
may
be
like.
Maybe
90%
of
the
data
is
already
agent.
We
just
need
to
like
maybe
like
reorganize
it
or
something.
A
A
Like
it's
as
simple
as
saying
that
you
have
you
have
this
links
which
says
getting
involved,
and
then
you
have
these
subsections
say
getting
involved
in
the
dashboard
or
getting
involved
at
the
in
like
the
OST
code
or
in
rtw.
So
these
these
directories
or
these
documentation
z',
are
already
there
well
structured
in
in
our
Doc's
directory
right.
If
we
could
just
find
a
way
to
like
have
this
link,
which
could
say,
okay
below
getting
involved
and
getting
involved
in.
B
Was
just
reading
it
yeah
yeah?
That
makes
sense.
B
A
A
Yeah
I
think
these
all
makes
sense
and
there
should
probably
be
a
if
there
isn't
a
an
existing
one.
There
should
be
a
rock
star
chef,
calm,
slash
contributing
to
safe,
and
all
these
readme
should
actually
go
there,
so
that
you
can
redirect
like
this.
One
I
can
clearly
see
that
it
talks
about
the
dashboard.
So
if
you
want
to
get
involved
in
the
starter
dashboard,
there
isn't
much.
A
A
B
A
A
B
Yeah
they're
definitely
definitely
link
them
the
website.
So
much.
A
Okay,
so
the
CDM
also
uses
tracker,
but
it
has
individual
recordings,
it
doesn't
have
the
entire
YouTube
channel
or
something
so
that's
what
I
said:
I
mean
like
people
who
want
to
use
it
use
the
wiki
page
for
planning
or
like
Syrians
or
adding
code
walkthroughs,
that's
fine,
but
we
have
the
getting
involved.
Page.
Just
directly
read
read
to
this
guy.
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
The
edit
on
github
link
mm-hmm,
there's
a
there
is
a
software
that
can
record
your
actions,
your
keyboard
actions
right,
so
we
can
probably
create
a
small
recording
of
using
that
edit
on
github
link
to
fix
a
documentation,
puck
and
add
it
directly
to
like
getting
involved
in
documentation.
This
is
the
easiest
way
to
go
about
it.
They
say.
B
B
One
thing
I
think
that
we
could
work
on
that
is
legitimately
very
annoying
with
documentation
and
Saif
is
the
build
process
yeah
like
because
it
goes
and
builds
like
the
Rados
Python
bindings
like
too
exciting
and
I.
Don't
know
what
all
it's
doing
is
a
bunch
of
automated
API,
Docs
I
think
it
takes
like
15
minutes
to
build
the
dogs
or
something
ridiculous
like
that,
and
that's
a
major
roadblock
even
like
I
said
it's
it's
it's
a
serious
roadblock,
so
I
think
I.
B
A
Yeah
yeah:
that's
why
I'm
just
writing
it
down.
That's
the
whole
point
that
I'm
gonna
after
we
finish
this
I'm
going
to
add
this
to
this
document
this
thing
and
we
can
figure
out
how
we
want
or
how
we
can
divide
work
or
who
can
work
on
what.
But
the
thing
is
that
this
anyways
this
this
is
etherpad
kind
of
shows
that
we
are
all
over
the
place.
You
know
we
don't
want
to
be
there.
The
we
should
start
start
streamlining
things.
A
B
A
A
B
A
No
I
mean
I,
don't
see,
I
mean
okay.
I
agree
that
there
has
to
be
strict
review
as
to
as
to
if
that
change
also
makes
sense
in
master,
then
probably
we
should
just
stay
okay.
This
change
actually
also
makes
sense
in
master,
so
I
mean
it's
not
like
you're
saying
close
this
PR,
it's
like
saying
you
have
this
PR
well
and
good.
Why
don't
you
also
create
another
PR
against
monster
right?
It's
not
like
we're
rejecting
things.
It's
like
we
asking
for
more
contributions.
That
song
is
a
plus.
B
B
B
B
A
B
B
A
The
person
reviewing
those
PRS
can
can
judge
whether
that
proposal
makes
sense
or
not,
accept
or
not
accept,
but
I
think
yeah.
That's
that's
definitely
a
second-level
thing,
but
but
we
first
need
to
everybody
needs
to
be
on
the
same
page.
That
can
we
actually
say
that
it's
okay
to
not
pack
boat
dock
fixes.
Can
we
just
target
it
directly
through
named
ranch's
if
there
isn't
isn't
a
way
for
us
to
change
the
target,
the
version
against
which
the
PR
has
been
created:
yeah,
okay,
okay,.
A
B
B
Think
we
can
just
I
mean
I,
think
we
can
ignore
it.
I
mean
we
should
not
be
it's
like
who
someone
should
just
be
like
making
a
decision
on
the
PR.
You
know
like
people
can
chime
in
all.
They
want
on
reviews
if
they
feel
like
it,
I
guess,
but
who
should
just
maybe
like
hat?
We
can
like
make
it
a
sort
of
goal
to
like,
maybe
not,
but
maybe
not
be
like
super
strict
with
things
and
documentation
or
something
I,
don't
know.
Yeah.
A
A
A
A
And
that
has
been
challenged
soil.
It
keeps
coming
back
every
time,
but
we
also
want
a
signed
off
by
how
what
is
the
most
intuitive
way
or
like.
Maybe
we
should
have
something
again
there
for
people
to
easily
understand
our
getting
started
should
actually
show
what
a
signed
off
by
is
doing
like.
Okay
come
with
mission
sign
off
whatever,
but
it's.
A
Yeah,
it's
not
done
it.
You
can
just
do
the
the
end
and
add
like
a
signed
off
by
manually
and
that
will
still
pass
the
check.
B
Yeah
I
mean
we
should
definitely
make.
We
should
definitely
make
sure
the
instructions
for
doing
that
are
the
first
time
user
friendly
for
sure
yeah.
It's
I
think
that,
like
having
the
signed
off
by
the
in
the
commit
is
probably
important
to
people
feel
like
yeah
it
is,
it
is
they're
like
not
having
it
versus
like
having
it
past
the
check.
Just
if
it's
in
the
comment
is
probably
not
sufficient.
I.
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
B
B
But
maybe
there's
some
tricks
and
certainly
not
compiling
Rados
or
whatever
it
does
when
it
tries
to
build
those
Python
bindings,
would
help
so
I
think
there
yeah
I
mean.
Maybe
we
can
split
this
a
little
bit
where
we've
got
like
a
fast,
build
in
a
full,
build
thing
and
maybe
like
a
docker
image,
that
cache
is
a
bunch
of
stuff.