►
From YouTube: 2019-06-19 :: Ceph Orchestration meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
I
don't
know
I
can
ask
him
all
that
could
be
I.
Think
that
well
this
morning,
I
think
maybe
it's
a
little
bit
late
for
for
him,
but
I
can
ask
him.
Usually
if
we
had
any
kind
of
meeting
we
had
the
meeting
at
8
8
a.m.
in
the
morning,
though-
and
this
is
like
a
little
bit
late
for
for
him,
so
I
didn't
in
any
case
I
would
ask.
A
B
B
The
other
thing
is
that
Joshua
is
I,
wants
to
look
into
a
thing
called
safe
demon.
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
We
have
a
unhappy
endpoint,
that
is
the
four
key
state
or
rtw
update
name
styles,
and
you
cannot
cost
okay
in
this
case.
What
the
first
time
that
you
are
going
to
use
this
command
is
I.
Think
that
the
it
could
be
good.
But
what
happened
they?
If
you
want
to
use
the
command
more
times,
for
example,
you
want
a
system
with
three
rtw
service
and
you
can
use
this
this
comma,
the
fist
time,
okay
and
then
you
want
to,
for
example,
to
add
one
more.
B
B
B
A
Yes,
this
is
mm.
Yes,
we
are
agree.
Impart
okay,
because
here
I
think
that
the
other
program
that
we
have
is
that
we
are
mixing
host
and
servers
management
with
ton,
some
group
or
so
on.
Some
group,
real
management
I,
think
that,
well,
probably,
we
have
to
to
audience
I
think
that
it
could
be
good
the
15
to
separate
both
different
things.
A
A
I
think
that
my
my
vision
is
that
it
is
very
easy
to
do
this
directly
with
a
dradis
back
with
a
admin
command,
so
it
could
be
easy
for
any
kind
of
tool
to
make
this
disguise
this
kind
of
management,
because
you
with
with
simple
commands,
you
have
the
the
actions
and
the
results,
and
you
can
analyze
a
everything.
Okay
and
I
think
that
today,
the
interface
that
we
have
is
is
good
enough.
A
They
are
the
only
thing
that
we
need
is
really
to
to
manage
service,
to
work
or
to
remove
service,
but
all
the
service
with
this
dire
mode,
III
think
that
it's
not
it's
not
okay,
to
to
mix
to
put,
for
example,
the
song
in
the
in
the
service
in
a
play
in
the
command
that
would
enough
to
work.
People
knew
that
money
really.
A
Yes,
because
and
I
think
that
there
are
different
things
in
any
case.
What
we
can
do
is,
for
example,
to
provide
a
new
happy
end
point,
for
example,
to
create
a
new
song,
a
new
configuration
new
structure
with
three
on
some
group,
with
all
the
other
items
that
we
need
in
a
rtw
structure.
Maybe
it
could
be
useful
to
to
to
have
only
one
command
to
do
this
kind
of
thing,
but
to
manage
tones
or
to
mix,
for
example,
in
this
command,
where
we
are
doing.
A
The
update
the
forecast
8
update
with
a
name
of
the
song
what
we
are
doing,
creating
a
new
song
creating
a
new
secondary
zone.
What
are
the
settings
of
for
a
40
song
I?
Think
that
is
not
clear.
A
Ok,
ok,
I
can
I
can
I
I
like
your
proposal
about
the
the
coma?
Ok,
but
removing
the
part
of
soul
I'm
in
any
case,
I
will
add
orchestrators
commands
in
order
to
manage
RDW
structure
if
it
is
needed,
because
I
think
that
it
could
be
I
think
that
this
is
enough.
They
interface
that
we
have
with
a
girl
rather
big
with
admin,
Commons
yeah.
B
B
C
A
A
I
have
asked
the
solution
architecture
here
in
Spain,
okay,
with
contact
with
clients,
and
usually
they
want
only
two
songs.
Okay,
in
order
to
replicate
that
this
is
the
the
more
neutral
configuration
two
songs,
one,
the
primary
and
the
secondary,
and
this
is
down
for
the
skate-a-thon
to
about
half
losses
of
to
have
a
high
our
availability.
So,
but
in
any
case
but
I
have
freed
okay
I,
have
it
a
distillation?
The
comments?
A
B
A
A
A
B
Yeah
I
don't
know
nothing.
A
B
B
C
B
Yeah
I've
already
tested
think
is
it
so
it
that
worked
at
least
for
my
test,
yep.