►
From YouTube: Ceph Performance meeting 2019-01-17
Description
A
B
By
I
mean
it
seems
to
be
stable,
it's
let's
see
it
was
marked,
not
experimental
and
mimic,
so
we
haven't
heard
a
lot
of
feedback.
Hopefully
that
means
no
bugs
there's
a
lot
of
follow-up
work
to
actually
take
advantage
of
the
asynchrony
and
rgw
that
work
is
progressing
but
kind
of
slowly
but
I'm,
hoping
that
we
can
get
kind
of
the
important
pieces
and
for
Nautilus
is.
B
A
Well,
I
was
thinking
I
should
I
should
probably
try
to
start
moving
over
to
that
for
any
I.
Don't
do
rgw
testing
that
often
but
I've
been
doing
some
for
the
memory
auto-tuning
work
as
just
kind
of
like
another
another
aspect
of
it,
since
that
great
sharing
tends
to
create
much
heavier
OMAP
workloads,
though
maybe
I
should
switch
over
to
beast
for
that
now.
C
A
All
right,
not
too
much
new
stuff
for
pull
requests
this
week
eager
had
modification
for
the
auto
tuning
stuff,
I,
think
he's
just
specific
to
on
startup,
making
it
a
little
bit
more
aggressive
about
tuning
immediately.
I
need
to
look
at
that.
It
also
changes
the
frequency
of
of
tuning,
which
may
be
a
good
idea,
but
it
may
have
effects
as
well.
That
aren't
good.
D
A
D
D
D
D
A
A
D
A
D
D
F
D
A
You
in
in
Radek,
so
what's
what's
next,
like
how
close
are
we
to
having
like
a
store
thing
in
there,
that
we
can
test.
F
E
E
G
E
E
G
E
G
G
Yeah
so
I'm
actually
trying
to
redo
the
the
blue
store
back
in,
but
you
know
that
be
half
or
India
and
I
chatted
with
Kapoor
just
a
little
bit
about
that,
but
I'm
trying
to
redo.
That
would
be
there
right
now.
So
I
can
actually,
you
know,
send
you
that
that
edge
or
ideas,
the
reviewer,
just
just
what
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
G
But
but
it's
essentially
it's
a
it's
a
you
know
it
is
it
blocked
abstraction
which,
which
basically
hides
like
implementation
of
whether
it's
an
off
the
device
it's
over
there,
it's
a
network
device
or
a
local
device
or
a
or
a
logical
volume
kind
of
implementation.
Actually,
we
are
actually
even
building
of,
like
you
know.
Caching,
like
with
cash
kind
of
a
block
device
as
well
so
yeah
I
mean
a
whole
bunch
of
things
are
can
be,
can
be
abstracted
out
would
be
do
with
minimal
overhead,
but.
F
D
D
G
D
G
E
G
Fact,
open-source
now
we,
the
actual
quince,
was
just
last
month
and
I
mean
again.
This
was
kind
of
fun
on
the
side,
but
just
because
I
portrayed
the
world
Cass
I
just
wanted
to
put
it
out
there
that
it's,
it's
actually
open
source
and
we
can
use
it
like
if
you
need
to
in
some
shape
or
form.
Oh
cool
yeah,
okay,.
G
G
E
G
D
I
had
a
question
my
my
intuition
was
that,
if
the
most
the
way
that
you
would
ideally
want
to
structure,
your
hardware
is
that
if
you
have
to
nuuma
nodes,
you
would
have
like
two
in
VMI's
on
each
Numa
node
and
then
one
Nick
on
each
node,
and
you
would
ideally
have
the
OSD
on
Numan
of
zero
use.
The
Nick
attached
to
new
node
zero
and
the
ones
on
one
user
Nick
on
one.
Is
that
actually
the
case
is
that
how
it
works
so
far
like
all
my
boxes
have
like
the
Indy.
G
You
know
that's
how
it
should
work,
but
but
actually
all
the
Dell-
and
you
know,
HP
boxes
that
specifically
there
they're
not
built
for
you,
know
these
high-density
storage
kind
of
application,
so
they
always
so
to
save
and
also
to
save
cost.
You
know
they
always
end
up
putting
a
by
16
expander
and
get
four
enemies
that
way
on
on
one
one
side.
G
So
so
they
just
don't
bring
out
it
in
a
PCIe
out
of
the
out
of
the
process
or
even
if
it's
available
like,
for
example,
the
skylake
processors
have
48
PCI
lanes
each
they.
You
have
96
lanes,
but
if
you
look
at
CP
0,
typically,
nobody
brings
out
more
than
and
maybe
half
the
lanes.
So
so
the
only
only
box,
that's
out
there
actually
I
worked.
I
was
working
with
quanta
to
fix
this
problem,
and
I
did
a
toggle
also
at
a
set
day
on
this.
G
So
so
for
now
we'll
we'll
see.
If
again,
we
can
help
you
know,
but
in
the
past.
Actually
there
are
two
data
points.
I
can
actually
share.
So
in
the
past
like
when
we
had
done
some
testing
with
pre,
luminous,
I,
remember
and
Orlando
can
keep
me
honest
here,
but
but
I
think
the
the
benefit
to
going
to
fill.
The
new
balance
was
about.
You
know
10
to
15
percent,
but
then
we
did
some
recent
analysis
where
we
saw
going
from
singles
pocket
to
dual
socket.
I
mean
again,
you
know
called
of
newer
balance.
G
D
E
D
G
D
C
E
E
G
D
A
E
D
Well
then,
when
it
searches
the
local
machine
for
which
IP
to
bind
to
for
the
network,
it'll
try
to
choose
an
IP,
that's
on
a
NIC!
That's
on
the
same
note
as
the
storage
and
the
my
expectation
was
that
then,
when
you
have
a
Nick
on
both
Numa
nodes,
you
could
configure
them
with
different
IPS
but
on
the
same
network
and
then
the
Oh
Steve's
would
bind
to
the
one
whichever
one
was
on
the
right,
humanoid
and
so
they'd
end
up
on
the
right
on
the
right.
Nick
I,
don't
know
how!
D
Again,
since
these
systems,
there
aren't
really
any
mail
systems
out
there,
many
of
them
just
a
Kelowna
one
and
I
guess
that
doesn't
really
gonna
help
anyone
I'm
yet
but
I'm,
hoping
that
eventually,
it
will
and
I
think
that
what
I'm
I
have
a
feeling.
What
we
should
do
is
basically
sort
of
get
rid
of
all
the
old
guidance
around
creating
a
frontside
Network
in
the
backside,
Network
roll
that
out
and
instead
suggest
that
people
have
all
their
nicks
on
the
same
network
and
hopefully,
eventually
then
Beth
will
be
as
smart
as
possible.
D
Don't
know
probably
not
what
people
do
is
they
would
they
would
bond
them
I
think
so.
The
old
guidance
was
have
one
NIC
on
the
front
side
network,
one
NIC
on
the
back
side
network
and
then
sort
of
the
newer
guidance
is
more.
Although
that
documentation
doesn't
say
this,
but
the
newer
guidance
is
really
to
bond
them,
and
so
you
have
some
redundancy.
D
If
one
NIC
fails,
then
it'll
use
the
other
one
and
use
whatever
some
bonding
protocol
to
Nick,
but
I
have
a
feeling
that
for
high
performance
situations
the
bonding
isn't
really
going
to
help,
because
it's
basically,
especially
if
the
nicks
are
on
Turpin,
then
you're
like
I'm,
assuming
that
it's
not
going
to
be
smart,
it's
just
going
to
slow
it
down.
Instead
of
speeding
it
up
and
so
I'm.
A
G
Challenged
with
the
network
config,
usually
the
IP
address
belongs
to
so
usually
it
doesn't
allow
same
subnet
to
type
it
to
mix
on
the
same.
Subnet
may
not
work
because
their
routing,
you
know
the
way
the
current
without
being
set
up.
You
know
you
will
like
all
your
packets
will
be
forwarded
to
essentially
the
first.
You
know
the
interface
that
appears
in
the
first
routing
entry.
So
that's.
D
G
G
H
H
It's
something
we
before
there's
a
way
to
fix
it,
which
is
to
set
our
filter
to
one,
though
that
it
will
actually
go
to
the
interfaces
that
you
wanted
to
go
to
I'll
try
to
send
a
link
about
this,
but
it's
a
I
think
it's
a
fairly
well
there's
anybody
else
heard
of
this
I
mean
I've.
It's
been
around
here,
hear
yours,
yeah,.
G
Yeah
there
are
out
there
and
the
choices
are
you
know,
so
those
two
settings
need
to
need
to
play
with
and
and
at
four
l3
actually
I
was
describing
the
more
of
the
challenge
with
layer
three,
because
when
the
packet
is
received
for
the
subnet,
you
know
it's.
The
route
lookup
is
only
going
to
happen
on
the
subnet
address
right.
G
It's
not
the
specific
IP
address,
so
it
may
not
be
delivered
to
the
to
the
right
interface,
because
the
kernel
routing
entry
tells
it
to
go
to
let's
say
zero,
but
the
IP
address
actually
belongs
to
each
one
right.
So
there
may
be
some
something
on
there,
but
but
with
IP
policy
routing
you
can
actually
set
some
rules
and
I
can
I
can
actually
try
some
examples
and
sends
in
the
cross.
But
if
you
can
share
that
link
that
you're
talking
about
that
would
be
great
as
well.
Yeah.
A
G
D
G
Kind
of
what
you've
seen
and
you
know
so
so
like
we
just
didn't
being
exercised
with
OVH
and
it's
likely
that
they,
you
know
we
did
some
TCO
analysis.
Basically
on
these
nodes,
so
I
would
say
the
NIC
cost
is
probably
you
know,
ten
five
percent,
two
or
three
percent
of
the
total
cost.
Oh
yeah
only
made
me
okay,
I,
think
yeah
cool.
D
I
wondered
to
Sheriff
separately
we're
talking
about
the
insert
a
refresh.
If,
if
this
quantity
of
machines
might
be
a
possibility,
it
could
be
possible
to
get
a
balanced
set
of
boxes.
G
Yeah
so
I
I'm
trying
to
see
if
we
can,
if
we
can
get
yeah
get
kit.
You
know
basically
the
latest
system
that
that
held
the
right
expanders.
So
for
the
skylake
systems,
the
white
boxes,
saintil
white
boxes,
they
they
come
with
different
expander
options,
so
we
have
figured
out
how
to
how
to
actually
configure
those
new
balanced.
We
may
not
be
able
to
get
like
everything
you
about
where
it
means
the
nvme
we
can
get
knew
about
so
I'll
say
I
will
try
to
make
it.
G
You
know
as
close
to
yeah,
don't
think
as
possible
and
if,
like
I'm,
also
trying
to
get
some
quotes
from
quanta
to
see,
if
they
can,
they
can
give
us
systems
with
good
dental.
If
you
can
get
those
qct
systems,
they're
one
you
and
perfectly
balanced
I
mean
that
that
would
be
actually
the
ideal
ideal
case.
I'll
I'll
see
what
I
can
do.