►
From YouTube: Ceph User Survey Working Group 2020-11-25
A
A
B
C
C
C
B
We
have
yeah,
considering
we
have
a
half
an
hour
previously.
I
was
telling
the
group
in
our
last
session
that
we
should,
you
know,
split
up
the
different
pages
and
then,
if
there
are
particular
changes
that
we
want
to
make
to
the
existing
survey,
then
we
should
raise
those
in
the
in
today's
meeting.
B
But
otherwise,
though
I,
if
anything,
is
kept
the
same
from
the
previous
survey,
then
we
shouldn't
be
going
over
those.
I
think.
D
Suggest
you
know
I
made
a
pass
through
the
whole
thing
I
suggest
for
expedience
that
we
just
raise
up
anything.
We
have
issues
with.
A
E
Yeah,
the
red,
the
gateway,
someone
responded
to
your
family
stuff
and
one
person
asked
if
we
could
put
the
ranked
questions
back
and
raise
answers
back
in
which
actually
got
me
thinking.
I
I
don't
know
if
the
survey
thing
can
do
this,
because
I
didn't
poke
too
much,
but
the
preference
is
like
zero.
I
don't
use
this
one.
I
never
use
it
up.
If
I
know
about
it
up
to
five,
which
is
this
is
my
first
choice,
the
one
through
five
or
zero
through
five
kind
of
ranking.
Instead
of
this
is
number
one.
D
D
B
D
E
B
Yeah,
if
you
think
I
think
it's
you
evolve,
yeah
yeah.
So
if,
if
you,
I
sent
the
email
to
the
stuff
users
list
about
our
planning,
because
I
didn't
feel
like
that
the
information
was
really
getting
out
there
of
what
we're
working
on,
and
so
there
were
instances
of
bucket
notifications
as
well
as
us
thinking
modules
as
well
as
multi-site
that
were
raised.
A
A
B
I
think
we
were
saying
we
wanted
to
take
out
ranking
questions
right.
E
B
D
D
B
E
D
Yeah,
I'm
reopening
here:
oh
yeah,
that's
perfect!
Yeah.
A
E
D
C
E
C
E
E
New
features
is
not
actually
in
there.
Thank
you
for.
C
C
Yeah,
if
you
give
new
features,
then
we
also
have
to
give
a
comment
box
right
that
could
fall
into
any
of
these
categories.
D
Yeah,
that's
why
I
think
I
think
the
category
is
you
know.
Are
you
know
it's
like
new
features,
okay,
that
that,
without
any
context,
that's
useless
sure
and
you
know,
and
the
categories
of
what
new
features
would
be
just
some
things
that
we
have
there.
So
I
think
yeah,
I
think
you
know
the
you
know
the
choices
as
presented
in
that
respect
are.
A
C
Could
there
be
one
other
option
for
other
product
integration,
apis.
C
E
D
A
E
D
A
D
E
D
I
have
dozens
of
easter
eggs
in
in
the
book.
Nope
people
only
mention
two
of
them
to
me,
so
I
don't
know
if
people
aren't
reading
the
book
or
if
they
just
don't
pick
up
on
them.
C
D
C
D
Oh
there's
a
question
in
there,
but
raising
the
question
of
of
is
this
useful.
E
A
C
E
D
E
D
B
Hold
on,
let
me
because
another
question
was
asked
to
me
and
I
haven't
answered
it
yet
it
was
brought
up
about.
Why
do
you
use
stuff
that
question
missing
in
page
one,
but
it
I
do
see
it
in
page
one.
D
Yeah,
asking
of
the
messenger
type
you
know,
v1
v2,
is
that
you
is
that
information
useful
to
anybody.
E
Not
even
the
v1v2
I'm
talking
about
the
rdma
versus
tcp
versus,
I
have
no
idea
what
dpdk
is.
E
E
A
D
A
A
A
C
A
E
I'm
having
issues
finding
links
that
actually
don't
require
a
large
amount
of
reading
to
actually
absorb,
what's
trying
to
be
said,
which
actually
I'm
thinking
that
leaving
the
question
as
it
sits
with
the
hint
of
hey.
This
is
the
default,
because,
if
you're
not
going
off
the
default,
if
you
set
up
rdma,
you
know
you've
set
up
our
dma.
It
doesn't
accidentally.
A
B
Yeah,
I
actually,
I
don't
even
see
this
question
in
2018
user
survey,
so
I'm
assuming
because
I
don't
have
any.
D
D
B
Right
right,
so
I
I'm
assuming
that
this
question
actually
came
from
page,
maybe
that
who
added
it
just
because
I
I
don't
have
anything
on
the
mailing
list
or
other
email
emails
about
this
particular
question
from
anyone
in
the
public.
B
Yeah,
as
I
assumed
tcp
posik,
the
default
outweighs
rdma
we're
looking
at
about
11
votes
for
everything
else.
Aside
from
the
default,
I
am
not
really
sure
this
question
is
really
worth
it.
B
D
E
E
A
A
A
E
D
A
No,
it's
not
luminous
luminous.
I
believe
right.
A
B
So
if
we
take
a
look,
if
we
take
a
look
at
what
people
marked
for
the
releases
that
they
are
running
luminous
is
the,
I
think,
one
of
the
top
choices
yeah
at
155
for
the
2019
user
survey
and
then
the
rest.
It
kind
of
drops
off
to
two
digits
aside
from
mimic
so.
D
A
B
Right
so,
but
that's
why
I
was
bringing
up
like
what
releases
are
people
running
so
so
yeah
I'd
be
in
favor
of
not
requiring
the
question
removed,
not
applicable.
B
D
D
D
D
A
D
Well,
I
I
added
quant
to
end
for
people
who
didn't
know
who
qct
was
I
for
the
first,
the
chassis.
I
think
I
had
a
server.
They
rephrased
it
a
little.
I
added
soft
iron
in
there
as
well
and
that
we
build
our
own.
D
D
Yeah
that
was
part
of
why
I
put
soft
iron
in
there.
You
know-
and
I
was
like
I've
heard
of
quantum,
but
I
see
qct
mentions
remember
at
first
who
the
hell
was
qct.
Until
I
realized
it
was
quanta
the
architectures
I
split
out
aimed
amd
epic
and
aim
the
other,
maybe
because
maybe
if
they're
people
using
desktop
cpus
same
with
intel
other,
you
know
if
they're
people
using
atoms
or
celerons
or
something
yeah.
E
E
E
Not
arm
code,
that's
running
on
it
yeah
I'll,
delete
that,
because
I'm
the
one
who's
babbling
about
it.
E
D
Under
the
type
of
storage
devices
used,
I
thought
I'd
put
an
entry
in
there
percent
is
confederate
flash
or
other
all-flash
arrays.
Is
that
somewhere
else.
D
Aren't
going
to
be
very
many
of
those,
but
let's
not
worry
about
it.
I
added
dm
crypt
to
the
osd
layout
strategies.
D
C
C
D
D
I
I
enhanced
the
wording
for
a
dedicated
cluster
private
network.
The
network
technologies
in
use-
I
think,
was
not
there
in
night
2019.
I
added
it
back
in.
D
I
mean
I
mean
I
mean
heck,
you
know,
look
look
at
the
people
adding
direct
lib
late
radios
for
dovecot.
I
mean
who
would
have
predicted
that,
but
you
know
I
was
right
when
I
was
writing
the
book.
I
really
really,
you
know
was
searching
for
an
example
of
liberators
clients
and
that
they
could
had
a
hard
time
finding
any
I'd
be
addressed.
Families
I'm
not.
I
don't
remember
if
that
was
there
before,
but
it's
there
now,
oh
ssd
form
factor
I'm
going
to
edit
those
descriptions.
A
little.
C
In
the
previous
question,
which
usd
layout
is
a
liam
lvm
cash
still
a
separate
option.
I
thought
dm
cash
is
part
of
lvm
cash
now
or
lvm.
Rather
there
or
they're
called
the
same
dm
cash
and
lvm
cash
have
one.
D
C
A
E
A
B
I
think
when
we
get
the
results
right,
my
plan
is,
you
know,
of
course,
to
make
the
results
available
to
you
all,
but
yeah
we
will
have
to
go
through
all
these
comment
boxes
and
try
to
pick
out
and
highlight
the
stuff.
That's
not
trolling.
That
is
relevant,
so
it
will
take
some
time.
E
D
D
E
True
because
if
I
had
to
pick
for
mine,
I've
got
12
and
1
and
36
in
the
other,
yeah
and
10
in
another
one.
So
it's.
D
I
expanded
the
the
the
replication
ec
thing.
I
I
rephrased
it
a
little.
C
D
A
C
E
C
A
A
Okay,
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
how
you
guys
think
about
it,
but
it's
like
this
new
thing
with
the
step
atom,
so
yeah
might
be
useful
to
see
if
or
if
people
are
using,
the
default
set
of
users
like
which
would
be
portman
or
doing
dockers
or
whatever.
I
think
that's
really
interesting,
because
yeah
just
want
to
see
how
many
people
just
keep
installing
packages
and
how
many
make
this
shift
to
the
new
cool.
A
D
A
D
A
B
On
page
four,
with
which
platforms
do
you
use
stuff
with?
Can
we
agree
to
drop
eucalyptus.
E
C
One
is
already
covered
in
the
osd.
What
was
it
that
engine.
D
C
I
see
it's
redundant
from
that.
All
of
those
options
are
covered
in
there,
but
it's
not
directly
checking
for
caching
but.
E
D
Rbd
cache
has
been
default
for
several
releases,
so
yeah,
I
I
I
would
vote
then
to
just
remove.
Do
you
see
any
caching
benefit.
C
E
D
C
C
With
the
dm
cache
right,
recash.
D
C
E
A
E
D
Oh,
the
the
way
rbd
and
mirrored
docs
were
originally
written.
One
could
not
unreasonably
assume
that
they
required
one
to
have
custom
cluster
names.
D
B
Yeah,
so
do
we
see
anything.
A
B
A
E
A
D
A
B
Okay,
so
let's
review
brian,
the
stuff
user
spelling
list
the
feedback
that
we
got
in
terms
of
rgw
use
cases.
B
B
B
E
D
A
B
You
bought
it
paul
would
you
you
were
assigned
to
this
page
right.
A
No,
it
doesn't
mean
michael,
oh,
okay,
sorry
mike
yeah.
You
should
be
doing.
B
Did
I
do
it
yeah?
Maybe
we
should
then
reach
out
respond
back
to
the
mailing
list
of
what
exactly
numbers
that
we
could
put
in
there.
That
makes
sense
good
night
for
unsure,
as
a
group.
C
B
E
B
Yeah,
so
I
don't,
I
don't
think
it
I'm
gonna
change
my
mind
and
say:
maybe
it
doesn't
make
sense
for
us
to
go
through
this
email
until
one
of
one
of
us
from
the
group
responds
back
and
gets
more
information,
and
then
we
can
report
back
in
the
next
meeting.
B
A
C
B
So
page
two
is
cluster
questions
and
page
two
assumes
that
this
survey
is
reporting
for
x
amount
of
clusters
that
you
specify
right.
So
I
would
actually
say
that
maybe
this
belongs
in
page
two.
Instead,
if
we
keep
it.
B
D
E
Different,
I
read
this
question:
how
it's
repeated
in
each
module
group,
whatever
it's,
how
we?
How
are
you
provisioning,
rbds?
All
right,
I'm
do
well.
My
rbds
are
production,
so
I
check
production.
If
I
scroll
down,
it's
like
okay,
well,
with
meadows
gateway.
Well,
my
rbd
is
we're
doing
proof
of
concept.
Development
testing
check
those.
E
If
it
was
phrased
instead
of
ceph
cluster
roles
phrased,
as
you
know,
reno's
gateway
production
level
or
something
I
don't
know.
D
B
A
B
It
might
end
up
that
at
the
beginning,
before
the
people
take
the
survey,
unfortunately
just
based
on
the
platform
we're
using
and
what
we're
working
with
that.
We
just
explained
up
front
that
you
can
either
report
for
multiple
clusters.
But
if
you
have
multiple
clusters
with
different
components
in
different
states,
then
you're
going
to
have
to
take
the
survey
for
those
different
times.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
wonder
if
they
will
they
do
that,
but
yeah
it
doesn't
matter.
A
B
A
B
All
right
well,
based
on
what
paul
was
saying
my
my
vote,
then,
would
be
to
have
it
on
a
per
component
basis,
with
the
idea
that
we
will
have
instructions
of
how
to
fill
out
the
survey
based
on.
D
B
Yeah,
we
can
certainly
add
a
description
at
the
very
top,
but
we
also
do
have
a
you
know:
user
survey
landing
page
as
well
that
I
will
be
using
to
promote
the
survey
and
social
media
and
whatnot,
but
definitely
having
it
in
both
places.
When
I
heard.
C
So
if
we
have
to
make
on
a
component
basis,
then
we
should
have
a
separate
page
for
rbd.
No,
no,
no
well.
B
We
already
do
have
that.
What.
B
What
I'm
saying
is
on
page
five
page,
six
and
page
seven,
I
guess
also
potentially
page
eight.
I
don't
know
this
stuff
cluster
role.
Question
gets
duplicated
on
those
pages
at
the
very
top
for
each
one,
and
instead
we
say
something
like
what
is
the
state
of
this
component
in
your
cluster
or
clusters.
B
After
we
look
at
this
we're
at
time,
I
gotta
actually
get
to
another
meeting
as
well.
So,
but
I
think
this
is
good
and
all
at
some
point
at
the
end
of
the
day,
trying
to
generate
another
pdf
and
give
it
to
the
mailing
list
for
feedback
but
yeah.
If
we
could
get
those
rgw
questions
answered
of
what
we're
gonna
do
and
how
we
could
better
freeze
those
questions
and
answers.
That
would
be
good.
B
And
fan,
if
you
could
give
me
an
another
email
address
and
we
could
try
that
and
get
you.
A
B
I'm
so
sorry
yeah.
B
A
A
B
I
mean
if
it
isn't
too
much
trouble
if
there's
like
a
support
contact
on
that,
just
tell
them
that
I
gave
you
access
and
you're
not
getting
access.
Oh.
B
B
I'm
so
sorry
about
that.
Okay,
great,
are
you
all
take
care,
and
thank
you
all
for
your
time
and
finding
this.
Thank
you.
I'm
gonna
do
this
on
my
own,
so.