►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Common Working Group March 16 2023
Description
Meeting minutes can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xsii5tfmmDwWpuhrFcBJMeYeT3RipJdiCdHrbi0NalQ/edit
E
A
A
Yeah
well,
and
to
be
clear:
the
complexity
as
I
see
it
isn't
a
isn't
a
bad
thing.
I
think
it's
actually
a
good
thing
like
the
project
is
evolving
and
we're
getting
more
groups
involved,
we're
getting
more
people
involved
and
I
think
this
is.
This
is
a
natural
evolution
of
the
growth
of
an
open
source
project
they
get,
they
get
more
complex,
but
it's
it's
a
good
thing.
I
think
we're
doing
it
in
a
way
that
makes
it
a
good
thing
and
not
a
just
complexity
for
complexity.
Right.
E
E
E
A
A
A
E
E
B
A
D
D
A
C
E
E
B
B
D
E
B
E
D
C
A
B
E
So
the
discussion
that
came
up
yesterday
was
about
kind
of
really
thinking
through
what
these
four
metrics
should
be,
with
respect
to
kind
of
that
bronze
level
and
then
subsequently,
through
silver,
through
gold
and
through
Platinum.
What
those
four
original
metrics
should
be
and
the
the
the
two
that
came
up
as
maybe
something
later
down
the
road
that
we
would
ask
for
our
project
burnout.
For
example,
how
does
a
project
address
project
burnout
within
their
their
work?
And
then
how
does
that
project
recognize
contributors
in
their
work?
E
E
Project
accessibility,
which
is
a
metric
that
we
have
a
event,
location,
accessibility,
so
I
think
it
would
be
moderately
related
to
that,
and
then
communication
transparency
so
like
ensuring
that
the
community
is,
you
know,
has
open
in
public
documents
that
the
repositories
are
open
in
public,
that
all
meetings
are
open,
public,
transparent,
accessible
transcriptions
are
providing.
You
know
the
kind
of
things
like
this.
How
do
you?
How
does
your
community
work
to
to
be
open
and
and
transparent
in
your
work?
E
D
D
A
D
Did
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
yesterday?
This
is
more
kind
of
about
General
accessibility
and
it
doesn't
really
get
into
the
specific
accessibility
of
the
the
software
or
the
kind
of
the
that
Nielsen
Norman
accessibility
like
colorblindness
and
things
of
that
nature.
So
it's
more
about
kind
of
General
project,
accessibility,
okay,.
D
It's
on
an
on
an
open
platform:
I
suppose
you
have
access,
you
have
access
to
the
code.
I
mean
it's
kind
of
that
that
General
the
general
openness
of
the
project
right,
so
the
that,
at
a
base
level,
open
source
allows
you
to
do
these
things
and,
and
the
project
is
allowing
you
to
do
these
things
as
well.
Right,
okay,.
A
E
D
And
I
do
want
to
reiterate
that
so
when
I,
when
I,
when
I
thought
of
these
two,
that
was
just
I
kind
of
thought
of
them
pretty
quickly
when
when
we
dropped
them
in
so
maybe
the
maybe
the
four
that
we're
choosing
aren't
don't
include
these
two,
but
my
my
inspiration
for
having
this
conversation
is
around
the
the
the
model
that
Dawn
had
proposed.
So
what
are
those?
What
are
those
four
starter
metrics
that
we
would
look
at
for
for
this?
D
B
C
B
F
F
Publish
and
I
mean
it's
I
agree
with
you,
it's
something
that
is
very
common
within
the
open
source
war,
and
one
good
aspect
that
we
can
look
at
documentation
is
to
copy
the
model
from
openstack.
They
treat
documentation
the
same
way
they
treat
code,
so
they
try
to
bring
in
contributions
in
that
space
and
give
credit
for
people
the
same
way.
F
Pull
requests
in
developing
complex
algorithm
is
done
so
in
that
way,
people
with
without
technical
background
have
grid
visibility
when
they're
rewarding
contributors
in
the
community
that
has
really
improved
their
documentation
tremendously
one
other
way.
We
could
also
improve
documentation.
I
mean
it's
still
new,
but
it's
working
for
the
trial
versions
is
using
a
kind
of
language
model.
To
explain
I
mean
those
are
things
we
can
discuss
later,
but
for
now
we
could
really
improve
copy
the
model
from
openstack.
It
works
very
well
and
I've
been
in
that
Community
I
see
yeah,
okay,.
D
I
was
just
gonna
say:
maybe
we
can
add.
Maybe
we
can
add
documentation
quality
as
a
as
a
metric
to
look
at
in
the
future
and
I
would
say
if,
if
we're
quality
metrics,
if
we're
adding
them
to
project
badging,
those
probably
are
down
down
the
line
in
gold
or
Platinum.
If
we're
starting
to
measure
quality,
I
think
early
on
in
early
on
in
bronze,
it's
more
about.
Do
these
things
exist
and
then
I.
Think
as
you
go,
you
go
down
through
the
that
the
badging
it
it
becomes.
F
B
C
C
F
F
A
lot
of
API
calls
have
changed.
The
documentation
is
not
reflecting
the
new
version.
There
was
a
space
where
you
need
to
do
a
CD
into
a
folder
that
folder
has
been
removed,
and
things
like
that,
so
people
keep
on
in
the
loop
of
the
oral
project.
It's
not
just
working,
so
they
cannot
even
understand
what
is
happening
foreign
at
times
like
the
openstack
model.
They
make
sure
that
documentation
and
code
goes
hand
in
hand.
Any
change
in
the
source
code
reflects
immediately
in
the
document
before
it
is
released.
C
B
E
E
D
F
D
D
F
C
D
Georg
had
access
to
that
all
along.
He
had
access
to
it,
but
I
think
he
had
stepped
away
from
the
project
for
kind
of
personal
reasons,
for
it's
a
short
period
of
time,
so
he
wasn't
around
during
that
that
conversation,
but
I
believe
him
and
Elizabeth
had
gotten
together
and
access
may
have
been
shared
okay,
so
it
sounds
good.
That's
awesome!
Okay,.