►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Common Working Group 7-22-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
hi
everybody.
Today's
june
22nd
welcome
to
the
chaos
common
working
group
meeting
a
light
group
today.
The
minutes
are
in
the
chat,
if
you
could
add
yourself,
that
would
be
great.
A
B
It's
my
birthday
tomorrow
is
your
birthday.
Did
you
just
say
that
happy
birthday.
A
B
A
E
It's
isn't
50
the
one
that's
usually
decorated,
with
like
headstones
and
yeah,
it
could
be,
and
black
balloons
and.
D
I
don't
know
40..
I
think
it
used
to
be
considered
like
the
the
top
of
the
the
hill
of
age.
Yes,
after
that
you're
you're
in
decline,
I
don't
know
amusingly
on
our
work
calendar.
They
accidentally
put
my
birthday
down
as
friday
when
my
birthday
is
the
23rd
of
june,
and
so
I'm
going
to
go
into
chat
tomorrow
and
and
celebrate
my
553rd
month
birthday
like
you,
do
when
you're
you're
a
little
kid
and
you're
like
oh
he's,
11
months
old,
nice,
that's
gonna,.
A
A
We
can
take
a
look
at
the
prs
language
distribution
metric
draft
by
sean
a
couple
weeks.
A
E
A
E
The
what's
yorg's
comment
there
is
that
what
we're
waiting
on
could
you
link
the
metric
from
the
focus
areas?
Read
me.
E
No,
I
can,
I
can
take
it
so
I'm
I'm
trying
to
catch
up
on
metrics
release
stuff
anyway,
so
I'm
going
through
each
working
group
and
figuring
out
what,
where
we're
at
as
far
as
the
metrics
release,
goes
so
I'll.
Take
this
one
and
create
the
issue
and
okay,
add
the
link
in
and
I'll
just
merge
the
pull
request
and
we'll
just
move
it
into
the
review
process.
B
E
Or
I
shouldn't
say
usually
about
maybe
fifty
percent
of
the
time
it
gets
overlooked.
So
we
should
probably
add
that,
as
part
of
the,
we
should
add
that
to
the
release
handbook
as
the
two
things.
D
E
F
I
think
it
is
written
in
the
document,
and
even
that
is
also
written,
that
once
it
is
done,
then
send
an
email
to
the
list
for
release
so
that
people
can
review
it
right.
A
A
E
Yeah
so
I
went
to
merge
this
today
and
there
is
a
merge
conflict
on
it.
So
I'm
asking
ritik
to.
F
E
A
Just
redo
it
yeah
or
have
written
redo
it
he'll
respond.
I
suspect.
Okay-
and
this
is
just
this-
is
the.
E
Who?
What
when,
where
thing
right
we're
renaming
it
to
people,
places
something
something
else:
okay,
gotcha.
A
E
When
we
merge
it,
it'll
break
the
website,
but
so
I'll
I'll
just
have
to
spend
some
time
fixing
it
real
quick
so
that
that's
why
it
was
like
holding
up
on.
A
Thank
you
kevin
all
right.
So
here
are
the
issues.
A
Okay,
new
metric
drive
through
contributors.
E
E
Okay,
maybe
it
might
be
in
the
it's
here:
what's
that
no,
it
might
be
in
the
spreadsheet.
F
Can
you
anyone
assign
this
clone
metric
in
progress
level,
because
we
have
20
say
that
again,
it
was
really.
F
E
I
take
that
back.
Episodic
contributors
has
not
been
added
to
the
spreadsheet
okay.
A
Aligned
here
let
me
stop
my
share
for
a
second.
A
A
A
E
Yeah,
if
you
add
it,
I've
got
the
link
to
the
the
google
doc.
So
if
you,
if
you
add
a
line
in
people,
I
will
go
ahead
and
add.
A
E
What
could
be
contribution
in
contribution,
so
the
current
question
is
how
many
contributors
only
contribute
a
little
for
a
short
amount
of
time.
That
is
the
question,
so
it
is
about
the
contributors
and
not
about
the
contributions.
A
All
right
event,
locations
place
of
event,
locations,
we're
good
there
time,
waiting
for
reviewer
action
and
time
waiting
for
submitter.
A
F
E
So
we
do
have
so
I
will
say
this:
we
have,
I
don't
know
if
it's
on
here.
It's
no
well,
it's
not
it's
not
in
the
issues.
Yet,
however,
we
are,
we
are
releasing
the
contribution
platform
metric
and
that's
just
waiting
on
me
I'll,
put
in
the
I'll
put
in
the
pull
request
for
that
today
and
create
the
issue.
E
It
is
in
place,
yeah,
okay,
and
so
this
one's
that
one
should
be
ready
for
release.
I
I
need
to
convert
the
google
doc
into
a
pull
request,
create
the
issue
and
add
it
to
the.
E
A
D
A
That's
normally
how
we
do
it
all
right
cool.
Thank
you
all
right,
let's
take
a
look
at
anything
else.
We
might
have
had
from
last
time
looks
like
we
had
a
review
of.
It
looks
like
we
did.
The
review.
A
E
So
I
that
is
in
a
very
basic
stage.
I
am
working
on
that
in
parallel
to
the
event
location,
inclusivity
metric
that
I
am
bringing
forward
for
the
dei
working
for.
D
E
So
I
figured
it
just
makes
sense
that
I'd
do.
Are
they
two
different
metrics?
They
are
two
different
metrics.
However,
the
event
location
needs
to
be
defined
before
event.
Location
inclusivity
can
be
defined.
You
know
what
I
mean.
I
do.
Okay,
okay,.
A
All
right,
cool
and
then
collaboration
platforms.
You
just
commented
on
that.
C
C
C
A
A
Yeah,
just
second,
you
always
seem
to
have
it
very
handy.
E
E
A
E
C
That
which
one
in
the
matrix
template
sport
activity?
No,
no!
No
looking
for
that
disclaimer!
Oh
okay,.
D
E
Well,
I
just
I'd
linked
to
the
one
in
metrics
and
I
didn't
wasn't
there
so
on
the
on
the.
E
I
think
I
think
the
plan
was
to
move
that
template
from
the
metrics
repo
into
the
governance,
repo.
G
A
E
We
could
you
know
we
could
store
our
our
metrics
releases
in
there.
We
can
move
that
stuff
in
okay,
move
the
move,
the
metrics
pdfs.
In
there
yeah
I
mean
we
could
we
could
merge
the
the
mars
project.
We
could
put
the
mars
project
into
that
metrics,
repo
yeah.
A
It
makes
me
feel
better,
it's
nothing
to
do
with
anything,
but
all
right,
cool
all
right.
I
got
that
in
there
so
I'll
fix
that.
Okay,
so
back
to
your
clones
of
anon,
I'm
going
to
open
this
up.
Yes,.
D
F
I've
defined
it
like
what
how
many
clones
is
the
main
question
that
we
are
going
to
have
made
it
a
differentiation
between
technical
force
and
the
clone,
because
that
has
always
been
interchangeably
used.
I
put
it
in
a
note
over
here.
A
F
E
A
A
E
F
So
the
question
is:
do
we
need
to
keep
a
note
here
and
should
we
keep
the
same
note
in
the
technical
too
or
because
they
too
are
so
interchangeably
used?
I
want
to
have
a
clear
distinction
in
both
the
areas.
E
You
know
I
I
do
think
that's.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
idea
to
add
it
to
the
technical
fork
metric
as
well.
Yes,
so
for
this
note,
though
you
should
that
so
technical
fork
is
a
is
a
metric,
that's
defined,
so
we
should
link
directly
to
it.
F
F
E
E
So
and
then
in
the
in
the
objective
section
you
could
probably
you
could
probably
add
a
little
bit
about
the
the
use
cases
around
clones
and
technical
forks
and
the
there
is
a
motivation
difference
if
I
remember
correctly
so
a
a
technical
fork
generally.
The
the
motivation
for
a
technical
fork
is
to
possibly
contribute
back
to
the
project.
E
A
E
Tech,
a
technical
fork
as
part
of
a
the
implication
for
a
technical
fork
is
that
you're
gonna
put
in
a
pull
request
to
make
some
change
to
the
projects.
Yeah.
E
To
contribute
back
to
the
original
project
right,
so
in
the
objective
section
we
have
a
little
bit
of
that's.
This
is
the
area
where
we
could
provide
example
use
cases,
and
we
could
also
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
the
motivations
for
looking
at
a
clone
versus
a
technical
fork
would
be
right.
So
why
would
we?
Why
would
why
would
counting
clones
be
relevant
rather
than
counting
technical,
forks.
F
E
For
usage,
yes,
whereas
a
technical
fork
is
part,
is,
is
more
connected
to
the
development
process.
F
So
if
you,
if
you
look
at
the
like
git
flow,
we
have
a
server
like
up,
is
upper
stream
repository
or
project,
and
then
we
have
a
platform
for
like
a
copy
on
the
platform
and
copy
on
the
local
machine.
If
you
look
at
this
visualization,
which
I'm
selecting
so
so,
a
clone
can
be
added
to
the
fork
and
contributed
back
to
the
main
project
or
it
can
just
be
and
just
live
on.
Your
local.
A
E
A
C
H
So
I
just
think
we
need
to
how
many
copies
of
a
project
are
downloaded.
I
think,
will
be
confusing
for
people,
I'm
also
not
coming
up
with
an
alternative.
So
I
don't
know.
E
H
H
No,
I
would
say
I
would
say
how
many
copies
of
the.
F
H
E
Said
save
to
save
to
a
local
machine.
A
A
A
E
H
I
wonder
instead
of
sorry
instead
of
source
code.
I
wonder
if
we
want
to
say
repository
because
you
don't
actually
clone
the
whole
project.
You
clone
a
repository
within
a
project.
H
F
E
H
H
H
H
C
A
Yes,
okay,
so
working
on
the
clones
metric
to
make
similar
like
language,
language
edits,
right,
vanad,
yes,
that
ai.
A
Okay,
there,
okay
good
what
else
in
the
clones
metric.
F
A
F
E
F
E
F
I'm
saying
like
I'm
not
sure
whether
augur
or
lab
are
providing
the
tools
to
display
these.
This
metric
I've
just
added
these
tools,
but
I'm
not
sure
so
I
have
to
check
from
over
on
the
more
lab
on
this
yeah.
I
know
they
both
they
both
they
both
count.
E
F
F
F
If
they
are
providing
like,
for
example,
our
clones
by
week
or
month,
will
be
helpful
because
we
are
adding
them
as
a
filter,
so
I
don't
know
who
copied
these
images
from
where
I
I
don't
know
the
source
code.
I
copied
them
from
our
weekly
meeting
notes,
so
yeah
notes
on
these
yeah.
Those
are
not
the
visuals
we
would
need
so,
but
they
help
to
clarify
their
technical
folks
and
clones
too.
F
You
don't
know
where
that
came
from
no
somebody
pasted
them
in
the
last
weekly
meeting,
so
I
was
not
sure
of
the
source.
It
is
from
the
give
up
somewhere.
But
I
don't
know
the
exact
link
of
the
image.
E
F
F
F
How
about
you're,
adding
the
disclaimer
I'll
add
that
I'll
find
the
exact
source
and
add
the
disclaimer
to
this?
Oh.
A
F
E
D
E
A
D
F
To
the
api
is,
if
api
can
be
used
in
any
of
the
programs
like
it
can
be
graphical
or
it
can
be
our
python
or
whatever,
but.
E
So
for
me
the
the
data
collection
strategies-
and
maybe
I
mean-
maybe
I
understand
it
in
a
different
way
from
other
people,
but
the
data
collection
strategies
section-
is
there
for
situations
where
we
don't
have
defined
tools
or
pieces
of
software
to
collect
that.
I
collect
the
information
so
in
that
so
in
in
some
of
the
metrics
will,
for
example,
create
surveys
or
like
this
is
one
way
that
you
could
grab
the
data.
E
Would
also
be
a
section
where
we
could
add
any
sort
of
kind
of
relevant
guidance
for
for
collecting
the
the
information
disclaimers
and
things
of
that
nature.
If
we're
using
a
github
api
link,
it
probably
belongs
in
the
tools
section,
but
even
then
I
don't
know
that
I
would
just
use
it
by
itself.
A
F
F
There
was
one
more
thing
I
found,
which
was
a
new
concept
for
me.
Maybe
people
are
familiar,
which
is
partial
clones
like
people
don't
copy
the
entire
repository.
Sometimes
the
repositories
are
so
big
and
they
do
a
partial
portion
of
a
repository
as
a
clone.
So
that
was
a
new
concept
to
me
and
yeah.
I
put
it
in
the
filter,
so
is
it
a
right
face
or
like
guidance,
or
can
we
measure
that
person
clone
was
the
question.
F
Yeah
I
have
provided
a
github
lab
git
lab
link
to
that.
They
have
clearly
defined
a
partial
clone
and
steps
for
doing
it
or
something
along
that
line,
and
I
was
working
off
of
this.
E
I
do
I
I
am
thinking
that
maybe
you
should
add
the
some
sort
of
reference
to
a
tool
to
access
the
api
in
the
tools
providing
the
metric
section,
though.
E
G
E
A
Thank
you,
everybody
for
being
here
and
your
contributions
don
just
so
you
know
we
basically,
in
the
first
part,
got
a
lot
of
the
metrics
kind
of
finalized
to
kind
of
start
heading
out
for
community
review.
So
well,
that's
awesome,
yep
and
just
kind
of
talked
about
now
that
the
website
migration
has
happened,
that
the
prs
for
the
focus
area
naming
can
kind
of
start
occurring
as
well.
Just
all
right.
Well,.