►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Common.May.30.2019
Description
CHAOSS.Common.May.30.2019
B
C
A
B
A
A
Because
this
is
oh
no,
this
does
have
the
same
list.
Okay,
sorry
I
was
looking
down
at
the
version.
History
was
what
I
was
looking
at:
okay,
yeah,
yeah,
okay,
that
makes
more
sense.
So
that's
kind
of
a
bigger
action
item,
probably
for
somebody
to
take
across
all
of
the
repositories
to
submit
that
change
and
what
what
becomes
the?
What
becomes
the
canonical
source
that
we
linked
to?
Is
there
a
code
of
conduct
in
the
governance
repo
that
we
linked
to,
or
is
it
should
we
be
linking
to
the
one
on
the
website?
I.
B
One
thing
we
should
just
check
is
github
scans
or
repositories
to
see
if
there
is
a
code
of
conduct
document,
so
we
probably
need
a
markdown.
That's
got
that
title
and
it
probably
is
okay
that
we
link
the
only
reason
that
matters
is
because
github
will
sort
of
not
promote
your
project
as
much.
If
I
don't
have
all
the
right
pieces
in
place.
Nope.
A
E
B
A
D
E
B
A
F
E
A
E
E
A
B
E
A
A
D
A
A
E
B
C
B
E
Okay,
I'm.
Okay,
with
that
I've
thought
a
little
I've
thought
a
bit
about
the
fact
that
there
are
two
different
templates:
mm-hmm,
yeah,
yeah
and
I'm
actually
come
down
on
the
side
that
I'm
okay
with
that,
because
really
what
the
goal
is
to
provide
detail
behind
the
metric
and
I.
Just
don't
think
that
what
the
metrics
that,
for
example,
DNI
puts
forward
and
is
really
mapped
to
the
same
style
of
templates,
I'm.
B
E
B
B
A
A
E
E
A
B
E
B
A
B
D
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
C
D
D
E
B
A
A
D
A
B
C
B
A
B
A
D
A
B
A
D
D
D
G
A
G
A
G
E
G
Right
and
some
of
that's
gonna
be
easy,
like
you
know,
domain
names
and
but
you
know,
federated
identity
problems
when
one
person
moves
to
another
job
or
something
like
that,
you
know,
or
in
the
case
of
Red
Hat,
where
we
don't
require
work
emails
to
contribute.
So
that
goes
off
our
stats,
enormous
Lee,
of
course,
so.
B
In
the
discussions
that
I've
been
on
on
the
call
that
that's
what
I
was
thinking,
so
this
was
kind
of
ask.
This
was
created
I
think
on
the
day
of
a
collar
around
the
name
of
a
call
related
to
a
pretty
deep
discussion
that
I
think
Brian
I
think
you
were
in
it
and
I
think
there
were
a
few
others
in
it
where
no.
B
Yeah
I
was
absolutely
thinking
about
a
broader
and
I
think
thinking
about
what
ends
up
being
a
discussion
point
in
this
group
I.
Think
a
media
central
discussion
point
in
this
group
has
been
the
resolution
of
affiliations
and
mapping
of
emails
to
the
same
person.
Yeah
like
that's
that's,
been
a
discussion
in
this
group,
so
I
think
that's
why
this
was
moved
over
and
I
certainly
had
a
big.
You
know:
how
do
we
do
this
as
a
community
perspective
in
my
mind,
right
now,
I
think
we
can
provide
tools.
Grimore
lab
has
sorting
hat.
B
Would
you
some
things
augur?
There
are
tools
that
we
can
use
to
map
email,
addresses
and
affiliations.
I
think
the
question
becomes.
Do
we
want
to
have
or
don't
want
to
think
about
something
that
is
shared
and
trusted?
And
if
and
maybe
that's
a
separate
issue,
but
briefly
I
think
we
might
want
to
explore
the
hyper
ledger
indie
project,
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
potential
there
for
people
to
be
able
to
by
choice,
share
information
across
projects
on
us.
A
A
E
My
thought
is
that
something
like
in
de
doing
identity
management
in
the
watch
and
pushing
that
management
out
to
people
is
clearly
the
the
positive
way
to
go
and
if
we
I
think
this
addresses,
perhaps
a
bit
of
the
issues
open
here
and
I
think
it
would
actually
also
be
to
help
on
the
DNI
site
of
thank
those.
People
cannot
manage
their
own
identity
information.
However,
that
I
think
that
that's
a
long
way
away.
Mm-Hmm
yeah-
it's
not
gonna
happen
this
week.
No.
H
E
I,
don't
think
that
precludes
any
any
of
us
from
looking
at
it
and
trying
to
make
it
to
connections
with
chaos.
However,
so
then
that's
point
one
point
two
is
having
chaos
managed
I.
Think
as
you
called
it
a
honeypot
or
this
list
of
organizational
affiliations,
just
sounds
like
an
absolute
nightmare.
I,
don't
think
we
want
to.
B
E
Think
the
way
that
Brian
and
you
were
talking
about
it
to
Sean
was
trying
to
think
about
what
are
the
current
set
of
tools
we
can
have
without
them
doing
block
chain
or
a
curated
list
that
can
provide
more
transparency
on
organizational
affiliation
under
the
current
model.
It's
not
perfect,
no
I,
don't
think
anybody
would
claim.
B
It
is
well
yeah,
it's
essentially
I
think
we
have
the
tooling
and
it's
up
to
each
in
each
deployment
of
a
tool
to
have
someone
who
updates
that
list
of
affiliations
and
aliases
periodically
I
think
for
most
long-running
projects.
You
could
probably
take
a
run
through
that
effort
hire
an
intern
to
spend
a
summer
or
a
year,
getting
it
curated
and
and
have
something
that
would
be
pretty
robust
and
useful
for
a
period
of
a
couple
of
years
before
it
had
to
be
significantly
updated.
E
B
B
B
E
A
B
The
answers
for
me
is
yes,
yes,
yeah
and
I
was
I
was
trying
not
to
just
carry
the
last
discussion
over
but
I.
In
my
mind,
I
was
thinking
that
the
this
organizational
affiliation,
an
email
alias
in
question,
is
it's
been
the
topic
of
a
lot
of
discussion
in
this
group
and
I
think
this
group
seems
like
the
most
advanced
in
its
conversation
to
address
that,
and
it
is
an
important
point
for
the
community,
but
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
take
it
on
and
define
common
that
way.
A
So
what
what
if
we
did,
what,
if
we
submitted
a
talk,
that's
basically
kind
of
kind
of
two
things.
So
one
is
what
is
what
is
the
common
metrics
working
group?
What
do
we
do
and
then
have
a
big
part
of
that
be
kind
of
a
deep
dive
into
the
organizational
affiliation
metrics?
So
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
look
like
all
we
do
is
organizational
affiliation.
Metrics
is
a
working
group,
but
it
does
make
it
clear
that
that
that
is.
That
is
a
big
focus
for
us
right
now,
and
it's
certainly
something
we
could
talk
about.
A
A
D
A
But
so,
let's,
let's
talk
a
little
bit
more,
because
I
know
that,
for
example,
Brian
and
Toby
have
put
in
a
ton
of
work
on
the
organizational
affiliation
metrics.
So
if
we're
gonna
do
a
deep
dive
on
that,
we
probably
I
just
wanna,
make
sure
that
we
submit
it
with
the
right
person
leading
the
discussion
or
maybe
it's
a
joint
talk
between
like
Garriga
Brian,
also
make
sure
that
we
we
talk
about.
Who
should
do
this
a
little
bit
more
yeah.
B
H
A
G
I
was
gonna,
do
something
I
was
gonna.
Do
something
along
these
lines
anyway,
because
of
the
work
that
I've
been
working
on
the
Sun
this
spring.
You
know
it's
gonna,
be
a
tail
painters
and
woe
and
hospital
visits
and
things
like
that.
It
was
gonna,
be
awesome,
everybody
was
gonna,
be
riveted,
maybe
I'll
make
it
more
professional.
H
A
A
G
A
A
A
E
20
minutes
it's
not
hard
for,
and
you
there's
been
so
much
work
done
in
each
one
of
these
working
groups.
It
even
just
updates
and
even
just
kind
of
this
model
of
updates
and
then
deep
dives
and
you
you
know
the
evolved
innate
chaos
have
a
lot
of
these
are
more
facilitating
discussion,
necessarily
presenting
so
yeah.
D
E
E
E
A
It
works
particularly
well
I
think
for
the
diversity
and
inclusion
working
group,
because
the
metrics
definitions
are
a
bit
less
technical,
so
it's
a
bit
harder
for
some
of
the
other
other
metrics
to
get
people
involved.
But
you
know
anybody
can
be
involved
when
you're
talking
about
like
communication
inclusivity,
that's
something
that
everybody
deals
with
and
open-source
projects
so
that
worked
particularly
well.
I
thought.
A
D
B
B
D
E
A
D
A
D
A
So
here's
here's
what
I
would
suggest-
let's,
let's
take
a
page
out
of
the
kubernetes
community
since
that's
the
community
I
work
in.
Does
someone
want
to
volunteer
to
be
the
release
team
lead
for
this
working
group
to
help
us
sort
of
get
our
act
together
and
and
pull
this
stuff
together,
because
we
can't
we
can't
just
do
it
in
these
meetings,
because
there's
just
not
enough
time
if
we're
gonna
hit
the
feature
freeze.
A
Does
somebody
have
time
to
be
sort
of
a
release,
lead
and
kind
of
talk
to
the
people
who
are
working
in
all
three
of
these
categories
and
see
which
metrics
we
want
to
focus
on
then
maybe
bring
it
into
the
next
meeting,
it's
sort
of
a
proposal
for
for
what
we
want
to
do
and
then
help
us
manage
actually
getting
that
out.
The
door
do.
E
A
A
A
So
we
have.
We
have
it
in
the
issues,
I
think
for
each
of
these
each
of
these
metrics.
So
we
have
issues
for
Geographic,
responsiveness
and
organizational
affiliation.
We
just
really
haven't
sort
of
pulled
together
and
kind
of
focused
and
then-
and
it
would
just
be
nice
to
have
somebody
sort
of
managing
kind
of
following
up
with
people
and
making
sure
that
we
get
something
in
the
release.
A
E
I'm,
already
kind
of
in
the
mode
of
range
frankly
people
anyway,
whether
that's
on
the
board
or
you
name
it
so
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
do
that.
I,
don't
mind
at
all
any
other
things
we
should
also
think
about
is.
We
had
obviously
have
the
metrics
list,
which
can
potentially
serve
as
a
source
of
inspiration,
yeah.
A
A
Would
say
they
probably
only
need
to
articulate
one
to
two
metrics,
perfect,
perfect
Assyria,
because
this
is
this
is
part
of
the
problem
and
we
need
to
find
the
focus
areas
and
then
we've
just
gone
really
deep
in
each
of
those
areas
and
we've
sort
of
identified
a
million
metrics,
but
not
actually
I.
Guess:
we've
gone
wide.
We've
identified
a
million
metrics
but
I've
actually
gone
deep
on
any
of
them.
Yeah.